Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Start dateReporting criterionTitleEvent descriptionSystemLER
ENS 5220125 August 2016 20:23:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
Unanalyzed Condition Involving Potential Tornado Missile DamageOn August 25, 2016, Engineering staff were reviewing a proposed modification to install additional internal flooding protection for the Intake Building staircase down to the Raw Water Pump vault. Fort Calhoun Station determined that the existing Intake Building internal flooding and tornado-borne missile analyses did not sufficiently account for the potential of tornado-borne missiles striking Fire Protection piping in the Intake Building. A tornado-borne missile strike could potentially cause a double-ended rupture of Fire Protection piping in the vicinity of the stairwell down to the Raw Water Pump vault, which could cause flooding and subsequent failure of all four Raw Water Pump motors more quickly than bounded by the Engineering Analysis. The Engineering Analysis uses a postulated crack from a Moderate Energy Line Break per USNRC Branch Technical Position MEB 3-1, vice postulating a double ended pipe rupture. The resulting flow rate from this postulated crack is less than that possible from a tornado-borne missile strike. This condition creates a potential loss of safety function from the Fort Calhoun Station Raw Water System (ultimate heat sink). All four Raw Water Pump motors could potentially become inoperable from flooding caused by a tornado-borne missile impacting the Fire Protection System Piping near the Raw Water vault stairwell prior to operator action to secure both Fire Pumps. This condition is reportable per 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) for any event or condition that results in the nuclear power plant being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety, and per 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D) for any event or condition that at the time of discovery could have prevented the fulfillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to mitigate the consequences of an accident. Interim compensatory measures are to isolate the Fire Protection piping in the vicinity of the Raw Water Pump vault stairwell when severe weather is forecast. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified.
ENS 5191710 May 2016 16:38:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
Containment Cooling Water System Inoperable Due to Unanalyzed Condition

During scheduled maintenance, at 1138 CDT, the Fort Calhoun Station Shift Manager was notified via phone call and condition report of an unanalyzed condition which was the result of the maintenance on Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger valves. This condition could have led to the inability of the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system to perform its design function of providing a cooling medium for the Containment atmosphere under Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) conditions. This was identified by OPPD (Omaha Public Power District) staff engaged in Design Basis Reconstitution. As part of the maintenance, HCV-484, Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger AC-4A CCW Outlet Valve, and HCV-481, Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger AC-4B CCW Inlet Valve, were opened. Under these conditions, with the assumed single failure loss of DC control power and accident conditions of a LOCA, CCW would be allowed to flow through both shutdown cooling heat exchangers, effectively bypassing flow to the Containment Cooling Units. These conditions are not assumed under plant design basis calculations, and therefore placed the plant in an unanalyzed condition. Following clearance removal at 1535 CDT, both HCV-484 and HCV-481 were returned to service and the condition described above no longer exists. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * UPDATE ON 6/15/16 AT 1836 EDT FROM JOHN BLALOCK TO DONG PARK * * *

Discovered 6/15/2016 at 1330 CDT: During the extent of condition review for the above ENS notification, it was discovered that the unanalyzed condition that occurred on 5/10/2016 also occurred five other times during the past 3 years. Details for these additional occurrences will be included in the 60-day Licensee Event Report associated with the original 5/10/2016 ENS notification. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Taylor).

Shutdown Cooling
ENS 5148721 October 2015 18:50:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition Due to Pressurizer Heater Bank Potential Circuit Failure VulnerabilityThe isolation function when transferring control from the Main Control Room to the Alternate Shutdown Panel (AI-185) for Pressurizer Heater Bank No. 4 (including Groups No. 10, No. 11, and No. 12) has been identified as a potential circuit failure. Identification of the potential circuit failure vulnerability is for Pressurizer Heater Bank No. 4 when isolated from Alternate Shutdown Panel (AI-185) and operated locally from Motor Control Center (MCC-4C1) for Alternate Shutdown Fire Areas 41 (Cable Spreading Room) and 42 (Main Control Room). The vulnerability involves an external hot short affecting the conductor connecting to the control room switch which may keep the 94/10 relay energized and defeat MCC control of the heaters. In a postulated event, a fire in the control room could prevent the heaters from energizing when demanded, or cause the heaters to unintentionally energize. This condition is being reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) as an unanalyzed condition. Per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 805, fire watch is an adequate compensatory measure. Therefore, this vulnerability has been added to the existing NFPA 805 Fire Protection compensatory measure for Fire Area 41. For Fire Area 42, the Main Control Room is continuously staffed, which has been credited as the compensatory measure. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified.05000285/LER-2015-006
ENS 508009 February 2015 23:30:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionSafety Injection Tank Level Results in an Unanalyzed Condition

On October 14, 2013 a calculation for the containment internal structural analysis was revised and accepted by the station. This calculation limited the Safety injection tank level to 74%. On October 16, 2013 Safety injection tank level was raised to 100% for approximately 13 hours in preparations for plant start-up. While the plant was safely in a cold shutdown condition, this represents a reportable unanalyzed condition. This issue is of a historical nature and does not question the current operability of any plant systems or structures. This was self identified during a Fort Calhoun calculation review. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM MICHAEL PEAK TO DANIEL MILLS AT 2335 EDT ON 3/12/15 * * *

Following review of the reported event, attendant calculations and associated documentation, engineering personnel determined that the condition described in event notification EN50800 did not place the plant in an unanalyzed condition. Revision 1 of a calculation for the containment internal structural analysis demonstrated that when the safety injection tanks 'B' and 'D' are 100% filled in an outage condition, approximately a 10% safety margin is maintained. This revision was the calculation of record at the time the safety injection tank levels were raised above 74%, in October, 2013. Revision 2 of the calculation was completed to remove excess conservatism and to provide a closer representation of available margin. In addition, margin was also improved by limiting tank level to 74%. However, improving margin by limiting tank level to 74% does not result in an unanalyzed condition when tank level is 100%, as adequate margin remains. Therefore this event is being retracted. The licensee will notify the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified the R4DO (Okeefe).

ENS 4947828 October 2013 17:30:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionPostulated Event Could Result in a Hot Short That Could Adversely Impact Safe Shutdown EquipmentA review of industry operating experience regarding the impact of unfused direct current (DC) ammeter circuits in the control room has determined that the condition described below applies to Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station. This could result in an unanalyzed condition with respect to 10 CFR 50 Appendix R analysis requirements. The control room ampere indications for the Class 1E batteries and their chargers do not include over-current protection to limit fault current. In a postulated event, a fire in the control room could cause one of the ammeter wires to hot-short to the ground plane. Simultaneously, the event could cause another DC wire from the opposite polarity on the same battery to hot-short to the ground plane. This would cause a ground-loop through unprotected ammeter wiring. Since this circuit is not protected (not fused), this event could result in excessive current flow in the ammeter wiring to the point of causing a secondary fire in the associated raceway system. This could potentially cause the loss of the ability to conduct a safe shutdown as required by 10CFR50 Appendix R. This condition is being reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) as an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety. Compensatory measures (fire watches) have been implemented for affected areas of the plant. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified.
ENS 4937823 September 2013 18:40:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition - Epoxy Floor Coatings Do Not Meet Design Basis Requirements in Two RoomsAt 1340 CDT, on 09/23/2013, as part of a vendor analysis for the high energy line break reconstitution project, it was determined that Room 81 and 82 epoxy floor coatings do not meet the design basis requirements for a high energy line break barrier. This is an unanalyzed condition based on 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3) as loss of the floor coating could affect multiple redundant trains of safety-related equipment during a design basis event. The plant is currently in a cold shutdown condition. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.
ENS 493245 September 2013 13:31:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionPotential Low Pressure Safety Injection Pump Run Out Condition

Current design basis calculations indicate the Low Pressure Safety Injection (LPSI) pumps could potentially operate in a run-out condition under certain worst case design basis conditions. The LPSI pumps could operate in a run-out condition beyond the analyzed time by 20 minutes. Current design basis calculation assumes LPSI Pump would be shutdown by (the) RAS (Recirculation Actuation Signal) in less than one hour, however due to past changes to Containment Spray Pump Start Logic, the time was lengthened to 80 minutes which is beyond the one hour analyzed. This represents a reportable unanalyzed condition. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM LUKE JENSEN TO HOWIE CROUCH AT 1722 EDT ON 10/31/13 * * *

Fort Calhoun completed additional analysis which verified that the LPSI pumps will not go into run-out as previously reported. Therefore Fort Calhoun is withdrawing the event notification. The licensee will notify the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Drake).

Containment Spray
ENS 4911914 June 2013 16:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionInvalid Conditions Discovered Due to Exclusion of Small Bore Piping from AnalysisWhile revising calculations for the station analyses for potential high-energy line breaks outside of containment, the station determined that the conditions required to validate the exclusion from analyzing for a break in some small-bore (1- to 4-inch diameter) piping could not be validated. The piping is contained within the station's auxiliary building. In the unlikely event of a break of one of these lines during power operations, the plant may not have been able to respond as expected. The plant is currently in cold shutdown, with the fuel removed from the core. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.
ENS 4911213 June 2013 13:05:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed ConditionThe station is reporting an unanalyzed condition involving the steam driven auxiliary feedwater pump. A postulated high energy line break in the room containing the pump could result in steam communicating with equipment in the safety related switchgear and battery rooms which are immediately above the room. The plant is currently in cold shutdown with the fuel removed from the core. The licensee stated that in the event of a postulated high energy line break, steam could possibly enter the switchgear and battery rooms via a stairwell and ventilation ductwork. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Auxiliary Feedwater
ENS 4905017 May 2013 05:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionEmbedment Depth for Seismic Anchors Inadequate

It has been determined that some instrument racks in the Containment and Auxiliary buildings do not meet their design basis capacity due to inadequate embedment depth of the seismic anchors. Assumptions made about embedment depth for a previous event were determined to be incorrect; therefore, the design basis capacity cannot be assured. This report is being made under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), 'Unanalyzed condition'. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION ON 6/10/2013 AT 1630 EDT FROM DAVID ORTIZ TO MARK ABRAMOVITZ * * *

Additional evaluation has determined that the instrument racks are adequately anchored. Therefore, this event is not reportable. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified the R4DO (Gepford).

ENS 488064 March 2013 20:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition Due to Mechanical Seal Material DesignIt has been determined that the mechanical seals used in two Low Pressure Safety Injection Pumps and three Containment Spray Pumps are made of a material that may not maintain the designed integrity of the systems under certain accident conditions. These seals have been installed since original plant construction. This issue was discovered by plant personnel while researching requirements for the replacement parts during scheduled outage activities. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Containment Spray
ENS 4878727 February 2013 02:12:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionRelay Backing Plate Fasteners Discovered to Be at Less than Specified TorqueDuring a follow-up review of off-site testing of a sample of General Electric model HFA relays, it was discovered that some of these relays did not pass testing for full qualification in their as-found condition. Additional torquing of the relay backing plate mounting screws was required to fully meet the required qualification. Further investigation into the as-found condition of these relays installed in the plant continues at this time. The relays in question are installed in Engineered Safeguards Features, Auxiliary Feed Water, and 4160 volt systems and are used in protective and actuation functions. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Auxiliary Feedwater
ENS 4878124 February 2013 23:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionInverters Potentially Inoperable During Emergency Diesel Generator OperationDuring a review of the plant inverters, it has been determined that the inverters may not have been operable. The inverters were replaced during the 2008 refueling outage. It appears that either the modification did not recognize that the diesel frequency range is wider than the new inverters, or did not recognize its consequence. Consequently, when the diesel is supplying power to the buses and loads are being sequenced onto the bus, the bus frequency exceeds the inverter frequency range. This causes inverter voltage transients. Operation of the inverters has been modified to improve plant reliability. This issue was discovered during scheduled plant testing of the electrical system. The licensee informed the NRC Resident Inspector.Emergency Diesel Generator
ENS 487307 February 2013 20:30:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition Due to Possible Run-Out of High Pressure Safety Injection PumpCurrent design basis calculations indicate the high pressure safety injection (HPSI) pumps could potentially operate in a run-out condition under certain worst case design basis conditions. The calculated flow is beyond the pump curves. The HPSI pumps could operate in a run-out condition for an extended period following a design basis accident. The pump vendor indicates that long term operation in this condition could not be supported due to accelerated wear of pump internal components. This represents a reportable unanalyzed condition. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified.05000285/LER-2013-003
ENS 4809411 July 2012 21:03:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionAnalysis of Internal Containment Support Beam Exceeds Load Combination LimitFort Calhoun Station is making an 8-hour verbal report per 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) Unanalyzed Condition. An internal containment support beam (B-22) has been identified by the station as not passing the required load combination as stated in the USAR for at power conditions. Beam B-22 is the designation for the two beams that directly support Safety Injection Tanks 6B and 6D. This beam was also identified as having potential loading conditions outside the allowable limits for the load combination for shutdown conditions. Specifically, it was determined that in order to bring the beam loading to within acceptable levels, the allowable floor live load would need to be reduced from the current designated load distribution of 200 pounds per square foot (psf) to 140 psf. A walkdown of the area by Design Engineering estimates the current floor live load is approximately 100 psf. Compensatory actions are being established to remove any equipment that is contributing to current live loading of the support beam and to isolate and post the affected area to ensure no equipment is stored without engineering analysis. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.
ENS 479924 June 2012 20:14:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionReactor Coolant System in a Degraded Condition Due to an Instrument Rack Seismic Design Issue

During a review of plant installed instrumentation racks inside containment, two instrument racks were identified that were over the analyzed weight for the seismic analysis. The instruments on these racks are used for reactor coolant pressure transmitters that are part of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) pressure boundary, as they are connected via instrument lines to the RCS with no remote closure capabilities. A failure of these racks during a seismic event due to the excessive weight could result in an unisolable leak from the RCS within containment based on engineering judgment. This results in the RCS principal safety boundary being in a degraded nonconforming condition as the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR) specified Class 1 requirement is not being met for the current seismic design. Further engineering analysis is in progress to address the weight issue for these racks and mounting requirements. The plant is shutdown and in Mode 5 with the reactor vessel head removed, so RCS is not intact and not required to be for current plant conditions. This report is being made in accordance with 10CFR72(b)(3)(ii)(A) for a degraded condition. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * UPDATE ON 8/3/12 AT 1708 EDT FROM JULIE BISSEN TO DONG PARK * * *

On June 4, 2012, at 2059, Fort Calhoun Station made an 8-hour non-emergency notification for a degraded condition. Subsequent internal review has determined that the initial reporting criterion for degraded condition, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(A), was incorrect. The instrument racks were identified as being over the analyzed weight for the seismic analysis. This is an unanalyzed condition, not a degraded condition. The report made on June 4, 2012 should have been made under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), unanalyzed condition. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Werner).

Reactor Coolant System
ENS 479004 May 2012 15:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionContainment Equipment Not Analyzed for Environmental Conditions of RecordWhile evaluating the station environmental equipment qualification for equipment inside the containment it was determined that a number of different pieces of equipment were not analyzed for the environmental conditions associated with the current analysis of record. The equipment is subject to adverse conditions for a time frame longer than currently accounted for (220 verses 60 seconds). In addition, the equipment is subject to potentially different temperature effect than that to which it is currently analyzed. This affects a variety of equipment in containment. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.
ENS 478922 May 2012 16:55:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionPotential Unanalyzed Condition with Containment Pressure Instruments

While investigating operating experience from another station it was determined that Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) is subject to similar conditions. The operating experience involved setpoint drift of safety related pressure switches beyond what had been accounted for in the station's safety analyses. Following investigation and evaluation, it was determined that pressure switches that provide safety related signals for high containment pressure to the reactor protection system (RPS) and engineered safeguards actuation circuitry may be similarly affected at FCS. The impact of the potential drift was evaluated, and it was determined that neither RPS nor the engineered safeguard circuitry may actuate at the required containment pressure of 5 psig. An evaluation determined that the actuation may not occur until slightly higher than the required pressure. Other systems are currently being evaluated to see if this same condition applies. The station is in MODE 5, refueling shutdown condition, and there is no immediate safety concern. The pressure instruments are located in the penetration area which is subject to elevated temperatures. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION AT 1616 EDT ON 10/19/2012 FROM LUKE JENSEN TO MARK ABRAMOVITZ * * *

The condition was initially determined to be reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), plant in unanalyzed condition, based on a conservative assumption that the error introduced violated not only the Technical Specification limit (5.0 psig) but also the safety analysis limit of 5.4 psig, USAR Table 14.1-1. Subsequent evaluation of actual data concluded that the safety analysis limit was not exceeded and therefore not reportable under 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B). LER 2012-004-1 reported this condition under 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A), and 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(v)(A,B,C,D). Revision 2 of the LER will correct the reporting criteria. The NRC Resident Inspector was notified by the licensee. Notified the R4DO (Pick).

Reactor Protection System05000285/LER-2012-004
ENS 4786225 April 2012 14:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Conditions Resulting from a Non-Conservative Error in CalculationsA non-conservative error was identified in the Proto-Flo input calculation FC06644 for LPSI (Low Pressure Safety Injection) flow post-RAS (recirculation actuation signal). The calculation used an incorrect (non-conservative) input for LPSI pump performance. Also, the associated procedure (EOP/AOP Attachment 11) as written does not provide adequate direction during the Alternate Hot Leg Injection mode of operation. EOP/AOP Attachment 11 (Alternate Hot Leg Injection) used 140 psia as the entry point. The LPSI pumps may not be able to meet minimum flow requirements at this pressure, affecting core cooling and possibly resulting in pump damage. Also the EOP/AOP attachment directs the operator to verify that flow is approximately 400 gpm as indicated on FIC-326. If 400 gpm cannot be achieved the contingency is to open any LPSI loop injection isolation valve. This step would not depressurize the RCS low enough to allow the 400 gpm flow rate to be achieved which would cause insufficient flow. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that the referenced procedural guidance may not be able to complete the safety function of providing adequate core cooling during the Alternate Hot Leg Injection mode of operation under a worst case scenario. Therefore, this condition is an unanalyzed condition and reportable under 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B). The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.
ENS 478842 March 2012 13:41:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionPotential Degradation of Reactor Containment Electrical Penetration Seals

During a review of environmental qualification records for reactor containment building electrical penetrations, six penetrations were identified that may not provide an adequate seal during worst case (Design Basis Accident (DBA)) conditions as required. These penetrations are through wall from the containment into the auxiliary building. The conditions that could cause degradation of the electrical penetration seals are not applicable to this operating mode. The station is currently in a refueling mode. This event was identified on March 2, 2012. The reportability was confirmed on May 1, 2012 at 1502 CDT. The current penetration configuration has existed since the plant was built. The area of concern is that the Teflon connections may degrade under conditions of high radiation and high temperature during a DBA event. The licensee is investigating the extent of the condition and repair techniques. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

* * * UPDATE FROM ROBERT KROS TO PETE SNYDER AT 1523 ON 6/26/12 * * * 

On review of CR 2012-01947 by a new Project Manager, who was brought in as a subject matter expert on HELB/EEQ, and issue was identified with the 530 primary containment electrical penetration feed-throughs used for non-CQE devices. The CR (Condition Report) correctly notes that under the original accident testing, the Teflon seals failed, and water was noted leaking from these penetrations. On further review, the following was noted: Due to the design of the penetration feed-throughs, when the inboard Teflon seal fails (as it is expected to, due to high level of radioactivity in the primary containment, following a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)), the atmosphere of the primary containment will be introduced to the penetration assembly, first through the failed seal or seals, and then through the weep hole between the inboard and outboard seals of the feed-through. This will put the same high level of radioactivity in direct contact with the outboard seals, resulting in the failure of its Teflon Seal. This would result in approximately 530 breaches of the Primary Containment during post LOCA conditions. The existing vendor analysis does not assume any contribution to the outboard seal exposure from the mixing of containment atmosphere with the penetration air after the failure of the inboard seal. This is probable, as each feed-through has a weep hole. Once the inboard seal fails, the penetration will be filled with containment atmosphere to equalize the pressure, which will bring the associated noble gas and Iodine fraction in proportion, into the penetration. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Clark)

  • * * UPDATE AT 1748 EDT ON 7/17/12 FROM MOECK TO HUFFMAN * * *

During the extent of condition review for CR 2012-01655 and 2012-01947 additional penetration feed-through assemblies were identified that are subject to the same failure mechanism. These penetrations are associated with the containment sump recirculation isolation valves, and also associated with the personnel air lock. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Walker).

Primary containment05000285/LER-2012-002
ENS 4765810 February 2012 06:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition - Guidance Not Adequate to Mitigate a Design Basis FloodDuring a review of the station's procedures for responding to external flooding conditions, it was determined that the guidance is not adequate to mitigate a design basis flood event (1014 feet mean sea level (msl)). Compensatory actions have been identified and are being implemented. Additional corrective actions are being evaluated. The plant is currently in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown, with a river level of 986 feet 2 inches msl with no predictions for river level to pose a threat to safety related components. NRC inspectors identified procedural inadequacies relating to the mitigation of flooding. The licensee is addressing the procedural inadequacies. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified.05000285/LER-2012-001
ENS 478486 October 2011 18:44:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionWaste Disposal System Class One Seismic Support Inoperable

The Waste Disposal System (WDS) Class 1 piping requires operable seismic supports downstream of the isolation valve class break. Currently, eight (8) INC (International Nuclear Safety, Corp.) snubbers have been degraded to (Non Nuclear System) NNS Class 4 ridged struts. The snubbers original design function was to allow thermal motion but restrain seismic motion. The snubbers have been identified as potential to create an unanalyzed condition that over stresses the safety class 1 drain pipe upstream of the isolation valve if the snubbers on the drain pipe downstream of the isolation valve were in a locked condition (acting as a strut). Per NRC bulletin 81-01, these snubbers are assumed to be frozen and do not allow movement of the pipe; thus, they have been degraded to rigid struts as they are not in the snubber program and are not tested. They still provide a seismic safety function for (class) II/I issues and act as a strut to provide horizontal restraint to the WDS piping.

The snubbers were removed from the piping system and tested to determine their performance and if they would have moved to allow thermal growth. Six snubbers failed the test and were either in a locked condition or their movement was dimensionally small relative to the required movement. The (Reactor Coolant System) RCS is within acceptable stress values with the snubbers removed. The 8-hour regulatory reporting time has been exceeded. An initial Reportability Evaluation was completed on March 26, 2012 and had determined the supports were operable. A second Reportability Evaluation later determined the supports have been inoperable since October 6, 2011. The WDS is used to drain the RCS. The licensee will notify the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION ON 9/26/12 AT 1949 EDT FROM ROBERT KROS TO DONG PARK * * *

Additional review and testing demonstrated that (there was) no degradation of the RCS from thermal fatigue. The analysis demonstrates adequate past performance of the snubbers with regard to thermal fatigue. The impact of the snubber has been analyzed and determined to have not resulted in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degraded plant safety. Therefore, this event is being retracted. The failure to retract this notification in a timely fashion has been entered into the corrective action system. The licensee will notify the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Werner).

ENS 4708822 July 2011 13:30:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionFire Supression Pumps Inoperable

Both Fire Suppression Pumps are not operable because the required monthly surveillance tests will not be completed for June and July. The surveillance tests will be completed when flood waters recede to below 1004 feet MSL. The current river level is 1006.3 feet. Both fire pumps, FP-1A and FP-1B, are available and lined up for use. Other options are also available to provide a means of backup fire water supply that include: - Water Plant Pumps DW-8A and DW-8B aligned to the Fire Protection (FP) system. - Temporary connection to the fire protection water distribution system by the Fort Calhoun Fire Truck that is staged on site or any other fire pumper truck via fire hydrant FP-3G. - Admin Building/Training Center fire hydrant via fire hoses or water truck. This supply is from Blair water system and FP storage tank west of Highway 75. - Drafting from the Missouri River via temporary pumps. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * UPDATE FROM ERICK MATZKE TO HOWIE CROUCH AT 1714 EDT ON 8/30/11 * * *

Further review of the plant design and licensing basis determined that the plant is adequately analyzed for the reported situation and that it does not constitute an unanalyzed condition significantly degrading plant safety as originally reported. Therefore, this event is being retracted. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Proulx).

ENS 4696516 June 2011 17:30:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
Additional Penetration Identified for Mitigation During Walkdown

Operations identified a potential flooding issue in the Intake Structure 1007 ft. 6 in. level. The area of concern is a the hole in the floor at the 1007 ft. 6 in. level where the relief valve from FP-1A discharge pipe goes through the raw pump bay and discharges into the intake cell. There is one penetration of concern. Flooding through this penetration could have impacted the ability of the station's Raw Water (RW) pumps to perform their design accident mitigation functions. Efforts are in progress to seal the penetration. This eight-hour notification is being made pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72 (b)(3)(v). The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION ON 9/26/12 AT 1949 EDT FROM ROBERT KROS TO DONG PARK * * *

The penetration in question is not an external penetration and is not within the scope of the CLB (Current Licensing Basis) and therefore the condition is not reportable. The penetration is internal to the intake structure and does not affect internal flooding. The failure to retract this notification in a timely fashion was identified while reviewing flood related station notifications from 2011 and has been entered into the corrective action system. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Werner).

ENS 4629730 September 2010 21:16:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition Due to Potential Flooding Via Condensate Drain Lines

USAR Section 2.7.1.2, River Stage and Flow, states flooding protection against the 1,014 foot flood in the auxiliary building is provided by removable flood barriers and sandbagging. When required, these flood barriers are installed in openings leading to safety related equipment on the 1,007 foot and 1,011 foot floor elevations. It has been identified that the condensation drains from the switchgear room's air handling units VA-87 and VA-88 (located in the auxiliary building), and the upper electrical penetration room's air handling units VA-85 and VA-86 (located in the auxiliary building), have no isolation valves or check valves to prevent backflow from the drain line's discharge in the turbine building basement. This means that flooding of the turbine building above approximately the 1011 foot elevation (floor level of the switchgear rooms) would result in water back-flowing via the drain lines into the switchgear rooms. River level is currently at the 999' 6" elevation and stable. Procedure changes are currently being developed to block the affected drain lines. River level has never reached the 1011 foot elevation at the facility. The licensee has notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM ERICK MATZKE TO ERIC SIMPSON AT 1307 EST ON 11/30/10 * * *

A further evaluation of the reported flooding issue determined that the flow into the switchgear rooms would be insufficient to affect the operability of safety related equipment in the auxiliary building; therefore, the incident could not have prevented fulfillment of a safety function nor could it have caused the inoperability of independent trains of safety related equipment. The situation does not constitute an unanalyzed condition. Therefore, this event is being retracted. The NRC Resident Inspector has been notified. Notified R4DO (Powers).

ENS 458288 April 2010 21:22:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B), RPS System Actuation
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(i), Tech Spec Required Shutdown
Technical Specification Required Shutdown Due to Inoperable Steam Generator Inlet Isolation Valve

At 1622 hours CDT, an electrical ground on 480 Volt Bus 1B3A was determined to be from a supply cable to Motor Control Center (MCC)-3A1. Isolating loads on this MCC required securing power to HCV-1385, Steam Generator RC-2B Inlet Isolation Valve. This condition results in the valve being unable to close on a Steam Generator Isolation Signal (SGIS), which requires entry into Technical Specification 2.0.1(1). This Technical Specification requires the plant to be placed in a Hot Shutdown condition within 6 hours. A plant shutdown to Mode 3 was commenced at 1740 hours CDT. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * UPDATE FROM DAVID SPARGO TO DONALD NORWOOD AT 0036 EDT ON 4/9/2010 * * *

At 2123 hours CDT, the Reactor was manually tripped from 22% Reactor Power in order to meet the requirements of Technical Specification 2.0.1(1) and have the reactor in a hot shutdown condition. All systems functioned properly. At 2124 CDT, the plant entered Mode 3 Shutdown Condition. AT 2235 CDT, HCV-1385, Steam Generator RC-2B Inlet Isolation Valve has been manually closed. Technical Specification 2.0.1(1) has been exited. The licensee is reporting the manual scram under 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B). The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

Steam Generator
ENS 4546726 October 2009 15:50:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionPressurizer and Feedwater Storage Tank Level Indications Do Not Meet Appendix R Requirements

During a review in preparation for converting from 10 CFR 50 Appendix R to NFPA 805, it was discovered that all of the cables for pressurizer and emergency feedwater storage tank level indications did not meet Appendix R cable requirements. A fire in Corridor 4, Corridor 26, or in Room 6 could result in a failure of level indication for these critical components. Corridors 4 and 26 were adequately addressed by existing fire watches. A fire watch was established for Room 6 upon discovery of this condition. Pressurizer level and emergency feedwater storage tank level indicators currently meet their requirements, with the established fire watches. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION FROM ERICK MATZKE TO DONALD NORWOOD AT 1507 ON 11/18/2009 * * *

On October 26, 2009, Fort Calhoun reported the (above event). During the course of the subsequent evaluation it was determined that the pressurizer level indications do meet the 10 CFR 50 Appendix R separation requirements. There is sufficient redundancy of emergency feedwater storage tank level indications to allow proper operator response to potential plant fires. Therefore, this event is not reportable. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Proulx).

Feedwater
ENS 4294328 October 2006 22:09:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionUnanalyzed Condition

An 8 hour notification per 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B) is being made due to discovery of a previously unanalyzed plant condition. The chemical volume control system (CVCS) charging line is a high energy line susceptible, within design space, to a rupture that could result in pipe whip and an impingement condition. The containment penetration (M-3) for the charging line is directly below the high-pressure safety injection (HPSI) header penetrations (M-5 & M-6). Due to this proximity, a failure of the charging line could impact the SI-1503 class HPSI line (M-6) causing damage to the header and rendering it incapable of fulfilling its design function. The two HPSI headers are different class piping with the M-5 penetration being a 2500 psig (SI - 2501 Class) line and the M-6 penetration being a 1500 psig (SI-1503 Class) line. The 2500 psig line is constructed of robust enough piping to not be susceptible to failure, however both HPSI headers are cross connected prior to location of concern. Although both HPSI and CVCS breaks are isolable, operator action would be required to identify and isolate the break location. The possible result of a high energy line break of charging piping could result in all three pipe headers being inoperable until manual action could be taken to isolate leakage on the 1500 psig HPSI line. Plant is currently shutdown for refueling outage with scheduled startup of November 21, 2006. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION PROVIDED BY ERICK MATZKE TO JEFF ROTTON AT 1119 EST ON 11/07/06 * * *

Additional review of the stations design and licensing basis has determined that the charging and high pressure safety injection systems are correctly designed to the stations high energy line break criteria for lines inside containment. This situation is not reportable and therefore event notification 42943 is being withdrawn. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector. Notified R4DO (Clark)

ENS 4290212 October 2006 22:30:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionSteam Generator Instrumentation Nonconformance

During a review of two nonconformances documented in the station's corrective action system, an unanalyzed condition which could significantly degrade plant safety was noted. The steam generator level instrumentation was not installed as documented in the UFSAR. Letdown valves and piping inside containment was not installed as described in the UFSAR. An unacceptable scenario is a postulated design basis accident in one of the steam generators and a single failure of the letdown piping in the vicinity of the instrumentation piping of the other steam generator, which could, produce conditions that would mislead the operator as to the condition of the plant during the accident. This condition was discovered during steam generator replacement when the old steam generators were removed and the instrumentation piping became visible. The replacement piping will be routed in accordance with approved drawings. This piping is not required in the current mode. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.

  • * * RETRACTION ON 11/07/06 AT 1152 EST FROM ERICK MATZKE TO MACKINNON * * *

Additional review of the situation previously reported has determined that there are no unanalyzed interactions between the SG level instrumentation tubing and the letdown system. The review determined that the previous determination was incorrectly postulating the occurrence of simultaneous accidents. This observation was not readily apparent during the initial review. Therefore this event is not reportable under 10CFR50.72. Event number 42902 is being withdrawn. However, the continuing review has identified a failure which will require reporting under part 50.73, but not 50.72. R4DO (Jeffrey Clark) notified. The NRC Resident Inspector was notified of the retraction of this event by the licensee.

Steam Generator
ENS 4289610 October 2006 20:00:0010 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed ConditionContainment Spray Valve MispositionedWhile performing maintenance on one of two installed Containment Spray Header valves, HCV-345, the System Engineer determined that the valve disk was installed backwards (ball valve). Actual valve positioning would be opposite of remote indication. The resulting affect would be that an accident signal to open HCV-345 would have closed the valve rendering one header inoperable. This condition is presumed to have existed, since the last maintenance activity on the valve during Refueling Outage May 2005, and through Cycle 23. This system is not required to be operable in the current mode. The licensee notified the NRC Resident Inspector.Containment Spray