SVP-17-022, Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 25

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Core Operating Limits Report Cycle 25
ML17096A427
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/06/2017
From: Darin S
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SVP-17-022
Download: ML17096A427 (81)


Text

SVP-17-022 10 CFR 50 April 6, 2017 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-29 NRC Docket No. 50-254

Subject:

Core Operating Limits Report for Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 25 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 was shutdown for Refuel Outage 24 (Q1 R24) on March 27, 2017. In accordance with Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5.d, enclosed is the Core Operating Limits Report (COLR) for Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 25.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Wally J. Beck at (309) 227-2800.

Respectfully, Sc::ir:! 5)~

Site Vice President Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

Enclosure:

Core Operating Limits Report for Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 25 cc: Regional Administrator - NRC Region Ill NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station

Enclosure Core Operating Limits Report for Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 25

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Core Operating Limits Report For Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 25 Revision 0 Page 1of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table of Contents Page Record of Quad Cities 1 Cycle 25 COLR Revisions ........................................................ 3

1. Terms and Definitions ................................................................................................. 6
2. General Information ..................................................................................................... 7
3. Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate ............................................................. 8
4. Operating Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio .......................................................... 48 4.1. Manual Flow Control MCPR Limits ...................................................................... 48 4.1.1. Power-Dependent MCPR .............................................................................. 48 4.1.2. Flow-Dependent MCPR ................................................................................ 48 4.2. Scram Time ......................................................................................................... 49 4.3. Exposure Dependent MCPR Limits ..................................................................... 50 4.4. Recirculation Pump ASD Settings ....................................................................... 50
5. Linear Heat Generation Rate .................................................................................... 64
6. Control Rod Block Setpoints ..................................................................................... 72
7. Stability Protection Setpoints ..................................................................................... 73
8. Modes of Operation ................................................................................................... 74
9. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 77
10. References .............................................................................................................. 79 Page 2 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Record of Quad Cities 1 Cycle 25 COLR Revisions Revision Description 0 Initial issuance for Q1 C25 Page 3 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 List of Tables Page Table 3-1: MAPLHGR Multipliers .................................................................................................................. 8 Table 3-2: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattices 101 and 108 .......................................................................... 8 Table 3-3: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 152 .......................................................................................... 9 Table 3-4: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 153 ........................................................................................ 10 Table 3-5: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 154 ........................................................................................ 11 Table 3-6: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 155 ........................................................................................ 12 Table 3-7: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 156 ........................................................................................ 13 Table 3-8: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 157 ........................................................................................ 14 Table 3-9: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 158 ........................................................................................ 15 Table 3-10: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 159 ...................................................................................... 16 Table 3-11: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 160 ...................................................................................... 17 Table 3-12: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 161 ...................................................................................... 18 Table 3-13: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 162 ...................................................................................... 19 Table 3-14: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 163 ...................................................................................... 20 Table 3-15: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 164 ...................................................................................... 21 Table 3-16: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 165 ...................................................................................... 22 Table 3-17: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 166 ...................................................................................... 23 Table 3-18: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 167 ...................................................................................... 24 Table 3-19: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 168 ...................................................................................... 25 Table 3-20: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 169 ...................................................................................... 26 Table 3-21: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 170 ...................................................................................... 27 Table 3-22: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 171 ...................................................................................... 28 Table 3-23: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 172 ...................................................................................... 29 Table 3-24: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 173 ...................................................................................... 30 Table 3-25: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 174 ...................................................................................... 31 Table 3-26: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 175 ...................................................................................... 32 Table 3-27: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 176 ...................................................................................... 33 Table 3-28: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 177 ...................................................................................... 34 Table 3-29: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 178 ...................................................................................... 35 Table 3-30: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 179 ...................................................................................... 36 Table 3-31: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 180 ...................................................................................... 37 Table 3-32: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 181 ...................................................................................... 38 Table 3-33: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 182 ...................................................................................... 39 Table 3-34: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 183 ...................................................................................... 40 Table 3-35: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 184 ...................................................................................... 41 Table 3-36: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 185 ...................................................................................... 42 Table 3-37: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 186 ......................................................................................43 Table 3-38: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 187 ...................................................................................... 44 Table 3-39: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 188 ...................................................................................... 45 Table 3-40: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 189 ...................................................................................... 46 Table 3-41: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 10XM Bottom Lattices ....................................................................... 47 Table 3-42: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 1OXM Top Lattices ............................................................................ 47 Tab re* 4~ 1: s*cram Times .............................................................................................................................. 49*

Table 4-2: Exposure Basis for Transient Analysis ...................................................................................... 50 Table 4-3: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 51 Table 4-4: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX) .......................................................................................................................................... 51 Table 4-5: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits forTSSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 52 Table 4-6: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 52 Page 4 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-7: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 53 Table 4-8: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 53 Table 4-9: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 54 Table 4-10: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 54 Table 4-11: ATRIUM 1OXM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 55 Table 4-12: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX) .......................................................................................................................................... 55 Table 4-13: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX) .......................................................................................................................................... 56 Table 4-14: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX) .......................................................................................................................................... 56 Table 4-15: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 57 Table 4-16: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX) .......................................................................................................................................... 57 Table 4-17: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 58 Table 4-18: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 58 Table 4-19: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 59 Table 4-20: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX) ........................................................................................................................ 59 Table 4-21: ATRIUM 1OXM SLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, All Exposures ......................... 60 Table 4-22: ATRIUM 1OXM SLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, All Exposures ........................... 60 Table 4-23: ATRIUM 1OXM SLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, All Exposures ....................... 61 Table 4-24: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, All Exposures .................................. 61 Table 4-25: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, All Exposures ................................... 62 Table 4-26: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, All Exposures ................................ 62 Table 4-27: ATRIUM 1OXM and OPTIMA2 MCPRf Limits .......................................................................... 63 Table 5-1: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 101 and 108 ...................................................................... 65 Table 5-2: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 152, 153, 154, 155, 163, 164, and 165 ............................. 65 Table 5-3: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 156, 157 and 158 .............................................................. 65 Table 5-4: LHGR LimitsforOPTIMA2 Lattices 159, 160, 161, and 162 ..................................................... 66 Table 5-5: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 166, 167, 168, 169, and 170 ............................................. 66 Table 5-6: LHGR Limits forOPTIMA2 Lattices 181, 185, 186, 187, and 189 ............................................. 66 Table 5-7: LHGR LimitsforOPTIMA2Lattices171, 172, 173, 174, 178, 179, 180, 183, and 188 ............ 67 Table 5-8: LHGR LimitsforOPTIMA2Lattices176, 177, and 184 ............................................................. 67 Table 5-9: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 175 and 182 ...................................................................... 68 Table 5-10: LHGR Limits for ATRIUM 10XM .............................................................................................. 68 Table 5-11: ATRIUM 10XM LHGRFACp Multipliers .................................................................................... 69 Table 5-12: OPTIMA2 LHGRFACp Multipliers ............................................................................................ 70 Table 5-13: ATRIUM 10XM LHGRFACr Multipliers .................................................................................... 71 Table 5-14: OPTIMA2 LHGRFACr Multipliers ............................................................................................. 71 Table 6-1: RBM Allowable Values .............................................................................................................. 72 Table 7-1: OPRM PBDA Trip Settings ........................................................................................................ 73 Table 8-1: Modes of Operation ................................................................................................................... 74 Table 8-2: Core Operational Restrictions for EOOS Conditions ................................................................. 76 Page 5 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

1. Terms and Definitions AOO Anticipated operational occurrence APLHGR Average planar linear heat generation rate ASD Adjustable Speed Drive CAVEX Core average exposure CPR Critical power ratio CRWE Control rod withdrawal error EFPD Effective full power day EFPH Effective full power hour EOC End of cycle EOCLB End of cycle licensing basis EOFPL End of full power life EOFPLB End of full power licensing basis EOOS Equipment out of service FWT Feedwater temperature FHOOS Feedwater heater out of service GWd/MTU Gigawatt days per metric ton Uranium ICF Increased core flow ISS Intermediate scram speed LHGR Linear heat generation rate LHGRFACt Flow dependent LHGR multiplier LHGRFACp Power dependent LHGR multiplier LPRM Local power range monitor MAPLHGR Maximum average planar linear heat generation rate MCPR Minimum critical power ratio MCPR1 Flow dependent MCPR MCPRµ Power dependent MCPR MELLLA Maximum extended load line limit analysis MSIV Main steam isolation valve MWd/MTU Megawatt days per metric ton Uranium NEOC Near end of cycle NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NSS Nominal scram speed OLMCPR Operating limit minimum critical power ratio oos Out of service OPRM Oscillation power range monitor PBDA Period based detection algorithm PLUOOS Power load unbalance out of service PCOOS Pressure controller out of service SLMCPR Safety limit minimum critical power ratio SLO Single loop operation TBV Turbine bypass valve 1ev lurbinecontrolvalve TIP Traversing incore probe TLO Two loop operation TMOL Thermal mechanical operating limit TRM Technical Requirements Manual TSSS Technical Specification scram speed TSV Turbine stop valve Page 6 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

2. General Information This report is prepared in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.5. The Q1 C25 reload is licensed by AREVA. However, some legacy analyses by Westinghouse are still applicable for OPTIMA2 fuel as described in Reference 2.

Licensed rated thermal power is 2957 MWth. Rated core flow is 98 Mlb/hr. Operation up to 108% rated core flow is licensed for this cycle. For allowed operating regions, see applicable power/flow map.

The licensing analysis supports full power operation to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX). Note that this value includes coastdown, where full power operation is not expected. The transient analysis limits are provided for operation up to specific CAVEX exposures as defined in Section 4.3.

Coastdown is defined as operation beyond EOFPL with the plant power gradually reducing as available core reactivity diminishes. The 01 C25 reload analyses do not credit this reduced power during coastdown and the EOCLB limits remain valid for operation up to rated power.

Power and flow dependent limits are listed for various power and flow levels. Linear interpolation on power or flow (as applicable) is to be used to find intermediate values.

Only MCPRp varies with scram speed. All other thermal limits are analyzed to remain valid with NSS, ISS, and TSSS.

LHGRFAC1 is independent of feedwater temperature and EOOS conditions.

For thermal limit monitoring above 100% rated core flow, the 100% core flow values can be used unless otherwise indicated in the applicable table.

For thermal limit monitoring above 100% rated power or 108% rated core flow, the 100% rated power and the 108% core flow thermal limit values, respectively, shall be used. Steady state operation is not allowed in this region. Limits are provided for transient conditions only.

Page 7 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

3. Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate Technical Specification Sections 3.2.1 and 3.4.1 For OPTIMA2 natural uranium lattices, TLO and SLO MAPLHGR values are provided in Table 3-2. For all other OPTIMA2 lattices, lattice-specific MAPLHGR values for TLO are provided in Tables 3-3 through 3-40.

For ATRIUM 10XM fuel, the lattice-specific MAPLHGR values can be found in Tables 3-41 through 3-42.

As shown in Table 3-1, there is a 2% penalty on the MAPLHGR TLO values for OPTIMA2 fuel loaded in Cycle 23. Therefore, in accordance with Reference 8, a 0.98 multiplier has been implemented for additional core spray leakage contingency. This penalty does not apply to OPTIMA2 fuel that was loaded in Cycle 24.

During SLO, these limits are multiplied by the fuel-specific EOOS multiplier listed in Table 3-1. The ATRIUM 10XM multiplier may be applied to all OPTIMA2 for SLO conditions, as the ATRIUM 10XM multiplier is more limiting. Note that, per Reference 8, the SLO multiplier for OPTIMA2 fuel loaded in Cycle 23 is 0.84 to account for the additional core spray leakage contingency.

Table 3-1: MAPLHGR Multipliers (References 2, 5, and 8)

Fuel Type Condition Multiplier ATRIUM 10XM SLO 0.80 OPTIMA2 loaded in SLO 0.86 Cycle 24 OPTIMA2 loaded in SLO 0.84 Cycle 23 OPTIMA2 loaded in TLO 0.98 Cycle 23 Table 3-2: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattices 101and108 (References 4, 5, 7, and 8)

All OPTIMA2 Bundles Lattices 101: Opt2-BO. 71 108: Opt2-T0.71 Avg. Planar Exposure '

TLOMAPLHGR (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0 7.50

  • 75.0 7.50 *
  • All OPTIMA2 bundles in the core contain natural uranium lattice types 101 and 108. The MAPLHGR limits for those lattice types have been set equal to their most conservative value of 7.50 kW/ft.

Page 8 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-3: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 152 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QJ23)

Lattice 152: Opt2-B4.29-18G8.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLC (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/

0.0 8.91 2.5 9.19 5.0 9.22 7.5 9.37 10.0 9.67 12.0 9.78 15.0 10.00 17.0 10.04 20.0 9.97 22.0 9.87 24.0 9.87 30.0 9.76 36.0 9.63 42.0 9.52 50.0 9.42 60.0 9.57 72.0 9.76 75.0 9.57 Page 9 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-4: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 153 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QJ23)

Lattice 153: Opt2-84.47-18G8.00 I Avg. Planar Expos::r:;;: TLO (GWd/MTU) *.PLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 8.82 2.5 9.10 5.0 9.06 7.5 9.01 10.0 9.12 12.0 9.15 15.0 9.26 17.0 9.34 20.0 9.49 22.0 9.60 24.0 9.65 30.0 9.56 36.0 9.52 42.0 9.48 50.0 9.52 60.0 9.67 72.0 9.77 75.0 9.67 Page 10 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-5: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 154 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QJ23)

Lattice 154: Opt2-BE4.57-18G8.00 Avg. Planar Expos~ TLO (GWd/MTU) APLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 8.95 2.5 9.28 5.0 9.23 7.5 9.03 10.0 9.17 12.0 9.22 15.0 9.36 17.0 9.44 20.0 9.61 22.0 9.72 24.0 9.73 30.0 9.65 36.0 9.62 42.0 9.55 50.0 9.59 60.0 9.64 72.0 9.91 75.0 9.64 Page 11of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-6: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 155 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QJ23)

Lattice 155: Opt2-M4.57 -18G8.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 8.93 2.5 9.28 5.0 9.24 7.5 9.06 10.0 9.19 12.0 9.23 15.0 9.36 17.0 9.46 20.0 9.63 22.0 9.74 24.0 9.73 30.0 9.64 36.0 9.61 42.0 9.56 50.0 9.58 60.0 9.60 72.0 9.87 75.0 9.60 Page 12 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-7: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 156 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QJ23)

Lattice 156: Opt2-ME4.54-18G8.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.06 2.5 9.39 5.0 9.34 7.5 9.17 10.0 9.32 12.0 9.38 15.0 9.53 17.0 9.63 20.0 9.92 22.0 9.96 24.0 9.89 30.0 9.84 36.0 9.77 42.0 9.73 50.0 9.68 60.0 9.66 72.0 10.24 75.0 9.66 Page 13 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-8: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 157 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QJ23)

Lattice 157: Oot2-T4.54-18G8.00 Avg. Planar Exposure i TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.10 2.5 9.42 5.0 9.31 7.5 9.14 10.0 9.30 12.0 9.34 15.0 9.48 17.0 9.58 20.0 9.92 22.0 9.96 24.0 9.90 30.0 9.84 36.0 9.78 42.0 9.70 50.0 9.66 60.0 9.66 72.0 10.16 75.0 9.66 Page 14 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-9: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 158 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QJ23)

Lattice 158: Opt2-T4.55-16G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.51 2.5 9.81 5.0 9.72 7.5 9.58 10.0 9.67 12.0 9.62 15.0 9.79 17.0 10.01 20.0 10.05 22.0 10.04 24.0 9.99 30.0 9.93 36.0 9.87 42.0 9.81 50.0 9.71 60.0 9.71 72.0 10.22 75.0 9.71 Page 15 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-10: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 159 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.08-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QK23)

Lattice 159: Oot2-B4.36-18G8.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.77 2.5 9.98 5.0 9.86 7.5 9.77 10.0 9.91 12.0 9.93 15.0 9.95 17.0 9.92 20.0 10.09 22.0 10.01 24.0 10.00 30.0 9.84 36.0 9.69 42.0 9.57 50.0 9.46 60.0 9.59 72.0 9.81 75.0 9.59 Page 16 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-11: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 160 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.08-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QK23)

Lattice 160: 0pt2-B4.54-18G8.00 Avg. Planar Exposur TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.82 2.5 10.04 5.0 9.91 7.5 9.75 10.0 9.86 12.0 9.80 15.0 9.60 17.0 9.48 20.0 9.46 22.0 9.45 24.0 9.50 30.0 9.66 36.0 9.65 42.0 9.59 50.0 9.60 60.0 9.70 72.0 9.85 75.0 9.70 Page 17 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-12: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 161 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.08-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QK23)

Lattice 161: 0pt2-BE4.63-18G8.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.88 2.5 10.23 5.0 10.08 7.5 9.79 10.0 9.93 12.0 9.94 15.0 9.64 17.0 9.52 20.0 9.53 22.0 9.54 24.0 9.62 30.0 9.78 36.0 9.72 42.0 9.67 50.0 9.65 60.0 9.66 72.0 9.99 75.0 9.66 Page 18 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-13: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 162 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.08-1 BGZ8.00/6.00 (QK23)

Lattice 162: Opt2-M4.63-18GB.OO Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.85 2.5 10.21 5.0 10.01 7.5 9.75 10.0 9.91 12.0 9.94 15.0 9.63 17.0 9.52 20.0 9.55 22.0 9.55 24.0 9.63 30.0 9.78 36.0 9.75 42.0 9.66 50.0 9.61 60.0 9.58 72.0 9.91 75.0 9.58 Page 19 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-14: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 163 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.08-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QK23)

Lattice 163: 0pt2-ME4.60-18G8.00 lanar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) I 0.0 10.02 2.5 10.35 5.0 10.23 7.5 9.95 10.0 10.09 12.0 10.06 15.0 9.86 17.0 9.73 20.0 9.80 22.0 9.83 24.0 9.95 30.0 9.99 36.0 9.95 42.0 9.89 50.0 9.73 60.0 9.69 72.0 10.23 75.0 9.69 Page 20 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-15: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 164 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.08-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QK23)

Lattice 164: Oot2-T4.60-18G8.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 10.09 2.5 10.40 5.0 10.33 7.5 10.04 10.0 10.16 12.0 10.05 15.0 9.83 17.0 9.72 20.0 9.73 22.0 9.90 24.0 9.98 30.0 10.01 36.0 9.95 42.0 9.88 50.0 9.70 60.0 9.58 72.0 9.93 75.0 9.58 Page 21 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-16: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 165 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.08-18GZ8.00/6.00 (QK23)

Lattice 165: 0pt2-T4.60-14G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 10.48 2.5 10.72 5.0 10.59 7.5 10.37 10.0 10.43 12.0 10.30 15.0 10.07 17.0 10.01 20.0 10.01 22.0 10.02 24.0 10.02 30.0 i0.02 36.0 9.98 42.0 9.92 50.0 9.86 60.0 9.82 72.0 10.27 75.0 9.82 Page 22 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-17: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 166 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.17-2GZ6.00-1 OG6.00 (QL23)

Lattice 166: Opt2-B4.59-12G6.00

. Planar Exposu TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.32 2.5 9.49 5.0 9.39 7.5 9.36 10.0 9.36 12.0 9.38 15.0 9.41 17.0 9.45 20.0 9.52 22.0 9.59 24.0 9.60 30.0 9.62 36.0 9.62 42.0 9.62 50.0 9.62 60.0 9.67 72.0 9.91 75.0 9.67 Page 23 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-18: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 167 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.17-2GZ6.00-1 OG6.00 (QL23)

Lattice 167: Opt2-BE4.67-12G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.37 2.5 9.58 5.0 9.44 7.5 9.47 10.0 9.58 12.0 9.46 15.0 9.50 17.0 9.56 20.0 9.63 22.0 9.70 24.0 9.71 30.0 9.76 36.0 9.77 42.0 9.70 50.0 9.68 60.0 9.65 72.0 9.99 75.0 9.65 Page 24 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-19: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 168 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.17-2GZ6.00-1 OG6.00 (QL23)

Lattice 168: Opt2-M4.67-12G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure I TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.36 2.5 9.60 5.0 9.42 7.5 9.52 10.0 9.59 12.0 9.48 15.0 9.51 17.0 9.57 20.0 9.70 22.0 9.70 24.0 9.72 30.0 9.76 36.0 9.79 42.0 9.69 50.0 9.66 60.0 9.62 72.0 9.99 75.0 9.62 Page 25 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-20: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 169 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.17-2GZ6.00-1 OG6.00 (QL23)

Lattice 169: 0pt2-ME4.65-12G6.00 Avg. Planar E TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.57 2.5 9.81 5.0 9.65 7.5 9.67 10.0 9.72 12.0 9.66 15.0 9.73 17.0 9.82 20.0 9.93 22.0 9.98 24.0 9.98 30.0 10.00 36.0 10.00 42.0 9.94 50.0 9.81 60.0 9.77 72.0 10.21 75.0 9.77 Page 26 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-21: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 170 (References 4 and 8)

Bundle Opt2-4.17-2GZ6.00-1 OG6.00 (QL23)

Lattice 170: 0pt2-T4.64-10G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 10.01 2.5 10.19 5.0 9.98 7.5 10.07 10.0 9.84 12.0 9.82 15.0 9.82 17.0 9.85 20.0 9.94 22.0 9.97 24.0 9.97 30.0 9.99 36.0 9.99 42.0 9.93 50.0 9.81 60.0 9.77 72.0 10.21 75.0 9.77 Page 27 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-22: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 171 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)

Lattice 171: Opt2-B4.33-16G8.00-2G5.50 A *:;;. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.08 2.5 9.42 5.0 9.34 7.5 9.51 10.0 9.72 12.0 9.86 15.0 10.08 17.0 10.19 20.0 10.38 22.0 10.39 24.0 10.39 30.0 10.19 36.0 10.05 42.0 9.93 50.0 9.83 75.0 9.83 Page 28 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-23: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 172 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)

Lattice 172: Opt2-B4.47-16G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposur1 TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.01 2.5 9.35 5.0 9.26 7.5 9.23 10.0 9.38 12.0 9.46 15.0 9.60 17.0 9.66 20.0 9.79 22.0 9.90 24.0 10.02 30.0 10.02 36.0 9.98 42.0 9.94 50.0 9.95 75.0 9.95 Page 29 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-24: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 173 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)

Lattice 173: 0pt2-BE4.56-16G8.00-2G5.50

.Planar Ex~ TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.04 2.5 9.36 5.0 9.26 7.5 9.25 10.0 9.44 12.0 9.53 15.0 9.68 17.0 9.75 20.0 9.90 22.0 10.01 24.0 10.15 30.0 10.11 36.0 10.08 42.0 10.02 50.0 9.98 75.0 9.98 Page 30 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-25: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 174 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)

Lattice 174: 0pt2-M4.56-16G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposur TLO (GWd/MTU) *** '"'LHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.02 2.5 9.36 5.0 9.25 7.5 9.26 10.0 9.44 12.0 9.54 15.0 9.69 17.0 9.76 20.0 9.92 22.0 10.02 24.0 10.16 30.0 10.10 36.0 10.07 42.0 10.01 50.0 9.94 75.0 9.94 Page 31 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-26: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 175 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)

Lattice 175: Opt2-ME4.52-16G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.15 2.5 9.50 5.0 9.39 7.5 9.41 10.0 9.59 12.0 9.70 15.0 9.86 17.0 9.96 20.0 10.21 22.0 10.38 24.0 10.35 30.0 10.31 36.0 10.25 42.0 10.19 50.0 10.06 75.0 10.06 Page 32 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-27: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 176 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)

Lattice 176: 0pt2-T4.52-16G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.20 2.5 9.53 5.0 9.42 7.5 9.40 10.0 9.56 12.0 9.66 15.0 9.80 17.0 9.88 20.0 10.20 22.0 10.39 24.0 10.34 30.0 10.31 36.0 10.24 42.0 10.13 50.0 10.03 75.0 10.03 Page 33 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-28: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 177 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-16GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QM24)

Lattice 177: Opt2-T4.53-16G5.50 Avg.~anarExposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.63 2.5 9.98 5.0 9.93 7.5 9.71 10.0 9.82 12.0 9.92 15.0 10.19 17.0 10.39 20.0 10.45 22.0 10.44 24.0 10.40 30.0 i0.35 36.0 10.28 42.0 10.23 50.0 10.11 75.0 10.11 Page 34 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-29: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 178 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)

Lattice 178: 0pt2-B4.33-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) I 0.0 9.36 2.5 9.68 5.0 9.56 7.5 9.64 10.0 9.77 12.0 9.94 15.0 10.13 17.0 10.22 20.0 10.34 22.0 10.36 24.0 10.38 30.0 10.18 36.0 10.03 42.0 9.90 50.0 9.80 75.0 9.80 Page 35 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-30: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 179 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)

Lattice 179: 0pt2-B4.46-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposu TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.29 2.5 9.59 5.0 9.49 7.5 9.38 10.0 9.46 12.0 9.54 15.0 9.66 17.0 9.70 20.0 9.76 22.0 9.87 24.0 9.98 30.0 10.02 36.0 9.98 42.0 9.93 50.0 9.90 75.0 9.90 Page 36 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-31: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 180 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)

Lattice 180: 0pt2-BE4.55-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.32 2.5 9.62 5.0 9.48 7.5 9.43 10.0 9.56 12.0 9.61 15.0 9.74 17.0 9.79 20.0 9.86 22.0 9.98 24.0 10.11 30.0 10.11 36.0 10.08 42.0 10.00 50.0 9.91 75.0 9.91 Page 37 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-32: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 181 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)

Lattice 181: 0pt2-M4.55-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.31 2.5 9.62 5.0 9.53 7.5 9.47 10.0 9.57 12.0 9.63 15.0 9.75 17.0 9.80 20.0 9.87 22.0 10.00 24.0 10.12 30.0 10.10 36.0 10.07 42.0 10.00 50.0 9.84 75.0 9.84 Page 38 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-33: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 182 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)

Lattice 182: Opt2-ME4.51-14G8.00-2G5.50 1 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.46 2.5 9.78 5.0 9.66 7.5 9.61 10.0 9.73 12.0 9.80 15.0 9.93 17.0 9.98 20.0 10.14 22.0 10.32 24.0 10.36 30.0 10.31 36.0 10.27 42.0 10.16 50.0 10.06 75.0 10.06 Page 39 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-34: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 183 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)

Lattice 183: Opt2-T 4.51-14G8.00-2G5.50 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.51 2.5 9.82 5.0 9.69 7.5 9.59 10.0 9.71 12.0 9.77 15.0 9.89 17.0 9.94 20.0 10.17 22.0 10.36 24.0 10.34 30.0 10.32 36.0 10.24 42.0 10.12 50.0 9.96 75.0 9.96 Page 40 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-35: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 184 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.03-14GZ8.00/5.50-2GZ5.50 (QN24)

Lattice 184: Opt2-T4.52-14G5.50 r=;;g. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW -*

0.0 9.98 2.5 10.25 5.0 10.18 7.5 9.89 10.0 9.90 12.0 10.01 15.0 10.18 17.0 10.36 20.0 10.45 22.0 10.46 24.0 10.42 30.0 10.37 36.0 10.30 42.0 10.22 50.0 10.04 75.0 10.04 Page 41 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-36: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 185 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)

Lattice 185: Oot2-84.58-14G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO

{GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.31 2.5 9.51 5.0 9.45 7.5 9.46 10.0 9.50 12.0 9.56 15.0 9.67 17.0 9.75 20.0 9.87 22.0 9.97 24.0 9.99 30.0 10.01 36.0 10.03 42.0 10.01 50.0 9.99 75.0 9.99 Page 42 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-37: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 186 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)

Lattice 186: Opt2-BE4.67-14G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.34 2.5 9.56 5.0 9.49 7.5 9.52 10.0 9.67 12.0 9.65 15.0 9.75 17.0 9.85 20.0 9.99 22.0 10.08 24.0 10.11 30.0 10.15 36.0 10.14 42.0 10.09 50.0 10.02 75.0 10.02 Page 43 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-38: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 187 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)

Lattice 187: Opt2-M4.67-14G6.00 Avg. Planar Exposure ~ TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.32 2.5 9.57 5.0 9.47 7.5 9.51 10.0 9.70 12.0 9.66 15.0 9.76 17.0 9.86 20.0 10.05 22.0 10.09 24.0 10.11 30.0 10.17 36.0 10.13 42.0 10.08 50.0 9.99 75.0 9.99 Page 44 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-39: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 188 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)

Lattice 188: Opt2-ME4.64-14G6.00 vg. Planar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.51 2.5 9.75 5.0 9.67 7.5 9.71 10.0 9.80 12.0 9.84 15.0 9.98 17.0 10.13 20.0 10.31 22.0 10.37 24.0 10.38 30.0 10.41 36.0 10.37 42.0 10.32 50.0 10.16 75.0 10.16 Page 45 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-40: MAPLHGR for OPTIMA2 Lattice 189 (References 5 and 7)

Bundle Opt2-4.16-12G6.00-2GZ6.00 (Q024)

Lattice 189: Opt2-T4.64-12G6.00 nar Exposure TLO (GWd/MTU) MAPLHGR (kW/ft) 0.0 9.91 2.5 10.14 5.0 9.98 7.5 10.01 10.0 9.98 12.0 9.96 15.0 10.07 17.0 10.16 20.0 10.31 22.0 10.37 24.0 10.37 30.0 10.37 36.0 10.38 42.0 10.31 50.0 10.13 75.0 10.13 Page 46 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 3-41: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 10XM Bottom Lattices (Reference 2)

All ATRIUM 10XM Bundles Lattices XM LCP-0720L-OGO XM LCB-0720L-OGO XMLCB-4475L-16GV80 XMLCB-4487L-14GV80 XMLCB-4487L-14G80 XMLCB-4499L-12GV80 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO MAPLHGR (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.0 11.70 20.0 11.70 67.0 6.60 Table 3-42: MAPLHGR for ATRIUM 10XM Top Lattices (Reference 2)

All ATRIUM 10XM Bundles Lattices XM LCT-0720L-OGOd XMLCT-0720L-OGO XMLCT-4355L-12G30 XMLCT -4523L-14G80 XMLCTP-4523L-14G80 XMLCT -4530L-12GV80 XMLCTP-4530L-12GV80 Avg. Planar Exposure TLO MAPLHGR (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.0 11.70 15.0 11.60 20.0 11.21 67.0 6.60 Page 47 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

4. Operating Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio Technical Specification Sections 3.2.2, 3.4.1, and 3.7.7 The OLMCPRs for 01 C25 are established so that less than 0.1 % of the fuel rods in the core are expected to experience boiling transition during an AOO initiated from rated or off-rated conditions and are based on the Technical Specifications SLMCPR values (Reference 2).

Tables 4-3 through 4-27 include MCPR limits for various specified EOOS conditions. The EOOS conditions separated by "/" in these tables represent single EOOS conditions and not combinations of conditions. Refer to Section 8 for a detailed explanation of allowable EOOS conditions.

4.1. Manual Flow Control MCPR Limits The OLMCPR is determined for a given power and flow condition by evaluating the power-dependent MCPR and the flow-dependent MCPR and selecting the greater of the two.

4.1.1. Power-Dependent MCPR The OLMCPR as a function of core thermal power (MCPRµ) is shown in Tables 4-3 through 4-26. MCPRp limits are dependent on scram times as described in Section 4.2, exposure as described in Section 4.3, fuel type, FWT, and whether the plant is in TLO or SLO. TLO limits for ATRIUM 10XM fuel are given in Tables 4-3 through 4-11 and SLO limits for ATRIUM 10XM fuel are given in Tables 4-21 through 4-23. TLO limits for OPTIMA2 fuel are given in Tables 4-12 through 4-20 and SLO limits for OPTIMA2 fuel are given in Tables 4-24 through 4-26.

4.1.2. Flow-Dependent MCPR Table 4-27 gives the OLMCPR limit as a function of the flow (MCPR1) based on the applicable plant condition. These values are applicable to both ATRIUM 10XM and 0 PTI MA2 fuel.

Page 48 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 4.2. Scram Time TSSS, ISS, and NSS refer to scram speeds. The scram time values associated with these speeds are shown in Table 4-1. The TSSS scram times shown in Table 4-1 are the same as those specified in the Technical Specifications (Reference 11 ).

To utilize the OLMCPR limits for NSS in Tables 4-3, 4-6, 4-9, 4-12, 4-15, 4-18, 4-21, and 4-24, the average control rod insertion time at each control rod insertion fraction must be equal to or less than the NSS time shown on Table 4-1 below.

To utilize the OLMCPR limits for ISS in Tables 4-4, 4-7, 4-10, 4-13, 4-16, 4-19, 4-22, and 4-25, the average control rod insertion time at each control rod insertion fraction must be equal to or less than the ISS time shown on Table 4-1 below.

The "Average Control Rod Insertion Time" is defined as the sum of the control rod insertion times of all operable control rods divided by the number of operable control rods. Conservative adjustments to the NSS and ISS scram speeds were made to the analysis inputs to appropriately account for the effects of 1 stuck control rod and one additional control rod that is assumed to fail to scram (Reference 2).

To utilize the OLMCPR limits for TSSS in Tables 4-5, 4-8, 4-11, 4-14, 4-17, 4-20, 4-23, and 4-26, the control rod insertion time of each operable control rod at each control rod insertion fraction must be less than equal to the TSSS time shown on Table 4-1. The Technical Specifications allow operation with up to 12 "slow" and 1 stuck control rod. One additional control rod is assumed to fail to scram for the system transient analyses performed to establish MCPRp limits (Reference 2). Conservative adjustments to the TSSS scram speeds were made to the analysis inputs to appropriately account for the effects of the slow and stuck rods on scram reactivity (Reference 2).

For cases below 38.5% power (Pbypass). the results are relatively insensitive to scram speed, and only TSSS analyses were performed (Reference 2).

Table 4-1: Scram Times (References 2 and 11)

Control Rod Insertion Fraction NSS (seconds) 155 (seconds) TSSS (seconds)

(%)

5 0.324 0.360 0.48 20 0.694 0.720 0.89 50 1.510 1.580 1.98 90 2.670 2.800 3.44 Page 49 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 4.3. Exposure Dependent MCPR Limits Exposure-dependent MCPRp limits were established to support operation for the entire cycle duration. Note that the thermal limits are based on CAVEX. The CAVEX values at which point the MCPRp limits are required to be changed are shown in Table 4-2 below. The limits at a later exposure range can be used earlier in the cycle as they are the same or more conservative.

Table 4-2: Exposure Basis for Transient Analysis (Reference 2)

Core Average Exposure Description (MWd/MTU)

Break point for exposure-dependent 34,737 MCPRp limits (NEOC)

Design basis rod patterns to EOFPL 37,019

+ 25 EFPD (EOFPLB)

EOCLB - Maximum licensing core 37,572 exposure, including coastdown 4.4. Recirculation Pump ASD Settings Technical Requirement Manual 2.1.a.1 Quad Cities 1 Cycle 25 was analyzed with a slow flow excursion event assuming a failure of the recirculation flow control system such that the core flow increases slowly to the maximum flow physically permitted by the equipment, assumed to be 110% of rated core flow (Reference 2);

therefore the recirculation pump ASD must be set to maintain core flow less than 110% (107.8 Mlb/hr) for all runout events.

Page 50 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-3: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Flow Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition

(%rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.93 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.41 3.41 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.48

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCVSlow Not supported at this time.

Closure FHOOS Core Flow Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition

(%rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck :560 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.05 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

560 3.52 3.52 2.70 TBVOOS 2.10 1.48

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Not supported at this time.

Closure Table 4-4: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.94 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

560 3.41 3.41 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.48

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.06 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.52 3.52 2.70 TBVOOS 2.11 1.48

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 51 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-5: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nominal FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25 :S 38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.95 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.41 3.41 2.61 TBVOOS 2.02 1.48

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power(% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25 :S 38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.10 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.52 3.52 2.70 TBVOOS 2.13 1.50

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-6: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nominal FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25 :S 38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.93 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

560 3.41 3.41 2.61 An TBVOOS 1.99 A 1.<+o

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core .... Core Power(% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25 :S 38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.05 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.52 3.52 2.70 TBVOOS 2.10 1.49

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 52 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-7: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.94 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.41 3.41 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.48

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power(% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.06 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.52 3.52 2.70 TBVOOS 2.11 1.49

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-8: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.95 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.41 3.41 2.61 TBVOOS 2.02 1.51

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25 S38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.10 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.52 3.52 2.70 TBVOOS 2.13 1.52

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 53 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-9: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.93 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.41 3.41 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.48

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.05 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.0L 3.52 2.70 TBVOOS 2.10 1.49

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-10: ATRIUM 10XM TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.94 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.41 3.41 2.61 TBVOOS 1.99 1.48

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::;6Q 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.06 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31

60 3.52 3.52 2.70 TBVOOS 2.11 1.49

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 54 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-11: ATRIUM 1OXM TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 2.52 2.52 2.17 1.95 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31 TBVOOS s 60 3.41 3.41 2.61 2.02 1.51

> 60 3.51 3.51 2.76 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 2.66 2.66 2.27 2.10 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.70 2.70 2.31 TBVOOS s 60 3.52 3.52 2.70 2.13 1.52

> 60 3.61 3.61 2.85 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-12: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.95 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35 TBVOOS s 60 3.20 3.20 2.50 2.03 1.47

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.74 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.10 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35 TBVOOS s 60 3.31 3.31 2.57 2.14 1.48

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 55 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-13: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 :s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.96 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.20 3.20 2.50 TBVOOS 2.04 1.47

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.74 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 :s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck :560 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.10 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.31 3.31 2.57 TBVOOS 2.15 1.48

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-14: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, BOC to NEOC (34,737 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nominal FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 :s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.97 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

560 3.20 3.20 2.50 TBVOOS 2.07 1.51

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.r4 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core eore Power(% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 :s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.13 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.31 3.31 2.57 TBVOOS 2.17 1.52

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 56 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-15: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::;;50 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.95 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.20 3.20 2.50 TBVOOS 2.03 1.50

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.74 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::;; 60 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.10 1.45 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.31 3.31 2.57 TBVOOS 2.14 1.51

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-16: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::;;50 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.96 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.20 3.20 2.50 TBVOOS 2.04 1.51

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.74 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated}

0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::;; 60 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.10 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

50 3.31 3.31 2.57 TBVOOS 2.15 1.51

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 57 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-17: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, NEOC to EOFPLB (37,019 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::;50 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.97 1.48 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.20 3.20 2.50 TBVOOS 2.07 1.53

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.74 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.13 1.48 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.31 3.31 2.57 TBVOOS 2.17 1.53

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-18: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::; 60 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.95 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

50 3.20 3.20 2.50 TBVOOS 2.03 1.50

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.74 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power(% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

rated) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 100 Base/TCV Stuck  ::;50 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.10 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.31 3.31 2.57 TBVOOS 2.14 1.51

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 58 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-19: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25  :$ 38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.96 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.20 3.20 2.50 TBVOOS 2.04 1.51

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.74 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25  :$ 38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.10 1.46 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.31 3.31 2.57 TBVOOS 2.15 1.51

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-20: OPTIMA2 TLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, EOFPLB to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX)

(Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25  :$ 38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck :560 2.43 2.43 2.12 1.97 1.48 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

60 3.20 3.20 2.50 TBVOOS 2.07 1.53

> 60 3.42 3.42 2.74 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

EOOS Condition Flow(%

0 25  :$ 38.5 > 38.5 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::; 60 2.56 2.56 2.15 2.13 1.48 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 2.71 2.71 2.35

560 3.31 3.31 2.57 TBVOOS 2.17 1.53

> 60 3.54 3.54 2.82 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 59 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-21: ATRIUM 10XM SLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)

Nominal FWT EOOS Condition (all Core Power (% rated) include SLO) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.55 2.55 2.20 2.06 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.44 3.44 2.64 2.06 2.06 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS EOOS Condition (all Core Power(% rated) include SLO) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.69 2.69 2.30 2.08 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.55 3.55 2.73 2.13 2.06 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-22: ATRIUM 10XM SLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition (all Core Power(% rated) include SLO) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.55 2.55 2.20 2.06 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.44 3.44 2.64 2.06 2.06 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS EOOS Condition (all Core Power (% rated) include SLO) 0 25  ::; 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.69 2.69 2.30 2.09 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.55 3.55 2.73 2.14 2.06 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 60 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-23: ATRIUM 10XM SLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition (all Core Power(% rated) include SLO) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.55 2.55 2.20 2.06 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.44 3.44 2.64 2.06 2.06 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS EOOS Condition (all Core Power(% rated) include SLO) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.69 2.69 2.30 2.13 2.06 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.55 3.55 2.73 2.16 2.06 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-24: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for NSS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition (all Core Power (% rated) include SLO) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.46 2.46 2.15 2.14 2.14 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.23 3.23 2.53 2.14 2.14 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS EOOS Condition (all Core Power(% rated) include SLO) 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.59 2.59 2.18 2.14 2.14 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.34 3.34 2.60 2.17 2.14 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 61of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-25: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for ISS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition (all Core Power (% rated) include SLO) 0 25 :S 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.46 2.46 2.15 2.14 2.14 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.23 3.23 2.53 2.14 2.14 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS EOOS Condition (all Core Power(% rated) include SLO) 0 25 :S 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.59 2.59 2.18 2.14 2.14 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.34 3.34 2.60 2.18 2.14 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Table 4-26: OPTIMA2 SLO MCPRp Limits for TSSS Insertion Times, All Exposures (Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT EOOS Condition (all Core Power (% rated) include SLO) 0 25 :S 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.46 2.46 2.15 2.14 2.14 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.23 3.23 2.53 2.14 2.14 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS EOOS Condition (all Core Power (% rated) include SLO) 0 25 :S 38.5 > 38.5 50 Base/TCV Stuck 2.59 2.59 2.18 2.16 2.14 Closed/MSIVOOS TBVOOS 3.34 3.34 2.60 2.20 2.14 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this lime.

Page 62 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 4-27: ATRIUM 10XM and OPTIMA2 MCPRt Limits (Reference 2)

EOOS Condition* Core Flow-(% rated\ MCPRtlimit Base Case and 0 1.70 FHOOS in TLC and 35 1.70 SLO 108 1.18 0 1.81 Any Scenario** 'with 35 1.81 One MSIVOOS 108 1.18 0 1.90 Any Scenario** with 35 1.90 TBVOOS 108 1.35 0 1.70 Any Scenario** with 1 35 1.70 Stuck Closed TCV/TSV 108 1.18

  • See Section 8 for further operating restrictions.
    • "Any Scenario" includes any other combination of allowable EOOS conditions that is not otherwise covered by this table.

Page 63 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

5. Linear Heat Generation Rate Technical Specification Sections 3.2.3 and 3.4.1 The TMOL at rated conditions for the OPTIMA2 and ATRIUM 10XM fuel is established in terms of the maximum LHGR as a function of rod nodal (peak pellet) exposure. The LHGR limits for OPTIMA2 fuel are presented in Tables 5-1 through 5-9. The limits in Table 5-1 apply to OPTIMA2 natural blanket lattices (lattice types 101 and 108). The limits in Tables 5-2 through 5-9 apply to non-natural blanket OPTIMA2 lattices that require Gadolinia set down penalties. The LHGR limits for ATRIUM 10XM fuel are presented in Table 5-10.

The power- and flow-dependent LHGR multipliers (LHGRFACp and LHGRFAC 1) are applied directly to the LHGR limits to protect against fuel melting and overstraining of the cladding during an AOO (Reference 2). In all conditions, the margin to the LHGR limits is determined by applying the lowest multiplier from the applicable LHGRFACp and LHGRFAC1 multipliers for the power/flow statepoint of interest to the steady state LHGR limit (Reference 2).

LHGRFACp and LHGRFAC1 multipliers were established to support base case and EOOS conditions for all Cycle 25 exposures and scram speeds. The LHGRFACp multipliers for ATRIUM 10XM and OPTIMA2 are presented in Table 5-11 and Table 5-12, respectively. The LHGRFAC 1 multipliers for ATRIUM 10XM and OPTIMA2 are presented in Table 5-13 and Table 5-14, respectively.

The EGOS conditions separated by "/" in these tables represent single EOOS conditions and not combinations of conditions.

Page 64 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 5-1: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 101 and 108 (Reference 3)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 23.000 12.22 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-2: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 152, 153, 154, 155, 163, 164, and 165 (Reference 10)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 14.999 13.01 15.000 12.62 35.000 10.71 35.001 11.04 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-3: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 156, 157 and 158 (Reference 10)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 14.999 13.01 15.000 12.55 45.000 9.70 45.001 10.06 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Page 65 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 5-4: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 159, 160, 161, and 162 (Reference 10)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 17.999 12.71 18.000 12.52 32.000 11.17 32.001 11.34 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-5: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 166, 167, 168, 169, and 170 (Reference 10)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-6: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 181, 185, 186, 187, and 189 (Reference 3)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 23.000 12.22 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Page 66 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 5-7: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 171, 172, 173, 174, 178, 179, 180, 183, and 188 (Reference 3)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 19.500 12.56 19.501 12.44 23.000 12.09 34.000 11.01 34.001 11.13 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-8: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 176, 177, and 184 (Reference 3)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGRLimit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 14.000 13.11 18.500 12.66 18.501 12.41 23.000 11.97 41.000 10.23 41.001 10.44 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Page 67 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 5-9: LHGR Limits for OPTIMA2 Lattices 175 and 182 (Reference 3)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.000 13.72 13.999 13.11 14.000 12.71 23.000 11.85 36.000 10.60 36.001 10.93 57.000 8.87 62.000 8.38 75.000 3.43 Table 5-10: LHGR Limits for ATRIUM 10XM (Reference 2)

Peak Pellet Exposure LHGR Limit (GWd/MTU) (kW/ft) 0.0 14.i 18.9 14.1 74.4 7.4 Page 68 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 5-11: ATRIUM 10XM LHGRFACp Multipliers (Reference 2)

Nomina/FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

Flow EOOS Condition

(% 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 80 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::;; 60 0.51 0.51 0.59 0.67 0.70 0.93 1.00 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 0.51 0.51 0.59

50 0.41 0.41 0.56 TBVOOS 0.67 0.70 0.93 0.97

> 60 0.39 0.39 0.51 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power(% rated)

Flow EOOS Condition

(% 0 25 s 38.5 > 38.5 50 80 100 rated)

Base/TCV Stuck  :::;; 60 0.49 0.49 0.57 0.67 0.70 0.93 1.00 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 0.49 0.49 0.55

60 0.38 0.38 0.51 TBVOOS 0.67 0.70 0.93 0.97

> 60 0.36 0.36 0.48 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 69 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 5-12: OPTIMA2 LHGRFACp Multipliers (Reference 2)

Nominal FWT Core Core Power (% rated)

Flow EOOS Condition >

(% 0 25

5 50 60 80 100 rated) 38.5 38.5 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 0.60 0.60 0.66 0.72 0.79 0.83 0.86 1.00 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 0.55 0.55 0.62 TBVOOS s 60 0.44 0.44 0.53 0.69 0.72 0.74 0.78 1.00

> 60 0.43 0.43 0.51 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

FHOOS Core Core Power (% rated)

Flow EOOS Condition >

(% 0 25

5 50 60 80 100 rated) 38.5 38.5 Base/TCV Stuck s 60 0.54 0.54 0.62 0.66 0.73 0.78 0.86 1.00 Closed/MSIVOOS > 60 0.54 0.54 0.62 TBVOOS s 60 0.42 0.42 0.53 0.66 0.72 0.74 0.78 0.98

> 60 0.41 0.41 0.50 TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

Page 70 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 5-13: ATRIUM 10XM LHGRFACt Multipliers (Reference 2)

Core Flow (% rated) LHGRFACt 0.0 0.57 35.0 0.57 80.0 1.00 108.0 1.00 Table 5-14: OPTIMA2 LHGRFACt Multipliers (Reference 2)

Core Flow (% rated) LHGRFACr 0.0 0.27 20.0 0.43 40.0 0.60 80.0 1.00 100.0 1.00 108.0 1.00 Page 71 of79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

6. Control Rod Block Setpoints Technical Specification Sections 3.3.2.1 and 3.4.1 The Rod Block Monitor Upscale Instrumentation Setpoints are determined from the relationships shown in Table 6-1.

Table 6-1: RBM Allowable Values (Reference 6)

ROD BLOCK MONITOR PSCALE TRIP FUNCTION I ALLOWABLE VALUE Two Recirculation Loop Operation o.65 wd + 56.1%

Single Recirculation Loop Operation o.65 wd + 51.4%

Wd - percent of recirculation loop drive flow required to produce a rated core flow of 98.0 Mlb/hr.

The setpoint may be lower/higher and will still comply with the CRWE analysis because CRWE is analyzed unblocked (Reference 2).

Page 72 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

7. Stability Protection Setpoints Technical Specifications Section 3.3.1.3 The OPRM PBDA Trip Settings are provided in Table 7-1.

Table 7-1: OPRM PBDA Trip Settings (Reference 2)

Corresponding Maximum PBDA Trip Amplitude Setpoint (Sp)

Confirmation Count Setpoint (Np) 1.14 16 The PBDA is the only OPRM setting credited in the safety analysis as documented in the licensing basis for the OPRM system (Methodology 3).

The OPRM PBDA trip settings are based, in part, on the cycle specific OLMCPR and the powerlflow-dependent MCPR limits. Any change to the OLMCPR values and/or the power/flow-dependent MCPR limits should be evaluated for potential impact on the OPRM PBDA trip settings.

The OPRM PBDA trip settings are applicable when the OPRM system is declared operable, and the associated Technical Specifications are implemented.

Page 73 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

8. Modes of Operation The allowed modes of operation with combinations of equipment out-of-service are as described in Table 8-1. The EOOS conditions separated by"/" in these tables represent single EOOS conditions and not combinations of conditions.

Note that the following EOOS options have operational restrictions: all SLO, 1 TCV/TSV stuck closed, and MSIVOOS. See Table 8-2 for specific restrictions.

Table 8-1: Modes of Operation (Reference 2)

EOOS Option Thermal Limit Set Base Case Base Case > TLO or SLO

> Nominal FWT or FHOOS TBVOOS TBVOOS > TLO or SLO

> Nominal FWT or FHOOS Base Case 1 TCV/TSV Stuck Closed > TLO or SLO

> Nominal FWT or FHOOS MSIVOOS One MSIVOOS > TLO or SLO

> Nominal FWT or FHOOS PLUOOS Not supported at this time.

TCV Slow Closure Not supported at this time.

PCOOS Not supported at this time.

PLUOOS and 1 TCV/TSV Stuck Closed Not supported at this time.

PCOOS and PLUOOS Not supported at this time.

PCOOS and 1 TCV/TSV Stuck Closed Not supported at this time.

Page 74 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Common Notes:

1. All modes are allowed for operation at MELLLA, ICF (up to 108% rated core flow), and coastdown subject to the power restrictions in Table 8-2 (Reference 2). The licensing analysis supports full power operation to EOCLB (37,572 MWd/MTU CAVEX). Note that this value includes coastdown, where full power operation is not expected. Each OOS Option may be combined with each of the following conditions (Reference 2):
a. Up to 40% of the TIP channels OOS
b. Up to 50% of the LPRMs OOS
c. An LPRM calibration frequency of up to 2500 EFPH
2. Nominal FWT results are valid for application within a +10°F/-30°F temperature band around the nominal FWT curve (Reference 2). For operation outside of nominal FWT, a FWT reduction of up to 120°F is supported for all FHOOS conditions listed in Table 8-1 for cycle operation through EOCLB (Reference 2). At lower power levels, the feedwater temperature reduction is less (Reference 2). Per Reference 12, there is a restriction which requires that for a FWT reduction greater than 100°F, operation needs to be restricted to less than the 100% load line. For a feedwater temperature reduction of between 30°F and 120°F, the FHOOS limits should be applied.
3. The base case and EOOS limits and multipliers support operation with 8 of the 9 turbine bypass valves operational (i.e., one bypass valve out of service) with the exception of the TBVOOS condition in which all bypass valves are inoperable (Reference 2). Use of the response curve in TRM Appendix H supports operation with any single TBV OOS. TRM Appendix H facilitates analysis with one valve OOS in that the capacity at 0.45 seconds from start of TSV closure is equivalent to the total capacity with eight out of the nine valves in service (Reference 9). The analyses also support Turbine Bypass flow of 29.6% of vessel rated steam flow (Reference 9), equivalent to one TBV OOS (or partially closed TBVs equivalent to one closed TBV), if the assumed opening profile for the remaining TBVs is met. If the opening profile is NOT met, or if the TBV system CANNOT pass an equivalent of 29.6% of vessel rated steam flow, utilize the TBVOOS condition.
4. For the TBVOOS condition, analyses assume zero TBVs trip open and zero TBVs are available for pressure control during the slow portion of the transient analysis (Reference 9). Steam relief capacity is defined in Reference 9.

Page 75 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12 Table 8-2: Core Operational Restrictions for EOOS Conditions (Reference 2)

Core Flow (% of Core Thermal Power (%

EOOS Condition Rod Line(%)

Rated) of Rated Power) 1 TCV Stuck Closed* N/A < 75 < 80 One MSIVOOS N/A < 75 N/A SLO < 51 < 50 N/A

  • Also applicable to one TSV stuck closed.

All requirements for all applicable conditions listed in Table 8-2 MUST be met.

Page 76 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

9. Methodology The analytical methods used to determine the core operating limits shall be those previously reviewed and approved by the NRC, specifically those described in the following documents:
1. GE Topical Report NEDE-24011-P-A, Revision 14, "General Electric Standard Application for Reactor Fuel (GESTAR)," June 2000.
2. Removed.
3. GE Topical Report NED0-32465-A, Revision 0, "Reactor Stability Detect and Suppress Solutions Licensing Basis Methodology for Reload Applications," August 1996.
4. Westinghouse Topical Report CENPD-300-P-A, Revision 0, "Reference Safety Report for Boiling Water Reactor Reload Fuel," July 1996.
5. Westinghouse Report WCAP-16081-P-A, Revision 0, "10x10 SVEA Fuel Critical Power Experiments and CPR Correlation: SVEA-96 Optima2," March 2005.
6. Westinghouse Report WCAP-15682-P-A, Revision 0, "Westinghouse BWR ECCS Evaluation Model:

Supplement 2 to Code Description, Qualification and Application," April 2003.

7. Westinghouse Report WCAP-16078-P-A, Revision 0, "Westinghouse BWR ECCS Evaluation Model:

Supplement 3 to Code Description, Qualification and Application to SVEA-96 Optima2 Fuel,"

November 2004.

8. Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-15836-P-A, Revision 0, "Fuel Rod Design Methods for Boiling Water Reactors - Supplement 1," April 2006.
9. Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-15942-P-A, Revision 0, "Fuel Assembly Mechanical Design Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors Supplement 1 to CENP-287," March 2006.
10. Westinghouse Topical Report CENPD-390-P-A, Revision 0, "The Advanced PHOENIX and POLCA Codes for Nuclear Design of Boiling Water Reactors," December 2000.
11. Westinghouse Report WCAP-16865-P-A, "Westinghouse BWR ECCS Evaluation Model Updates:

Supplement 4 to Code Description, Qualification and Application," Revision 1, October 2011.

12. Exxon Nuclear Company Report XN-NF-81-58(P)(A), Revision 2 and Supplements 1 and 2, "RODEX2 Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Response Evaluation Model," March 1984.
13. Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation Report ANF-89-98(P)(A), Revision 1 and Supplement 1, "Generic Mechanical Design Criteria for BWR Fuel Designs," May 1995.
14. Siemens Power Corporation Report EMF-85-74(P), Revision 0 Supplement 1 (P)(A) and Supplement 2 (P)(A), "RODEX2A (BWR) Fuel Rod Thermal-Mechanical Evaluation Model," February 1998.
15. AREVA NP Topical Report BAW-10247PA, Revision 0, "Realistic Thermal-Mechanical Fuel Rod Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors," February 2008.
16. Exxon Nuclear Company Topical Report XN-NF-80-19(P)(A), Volume 1 Revision O and Supplements 1 and 2, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors - Neutronic Methods for Design and Analysis," March 1983.

Page 77 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

17. Exxon Nuclear Company Topical Report XN-NF-80-19(P)(A), Volume 4 Revision 1, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Application of the ENC Methodology for BWR Reloads,"

June 1986.

18. Exxon Nuclear Company Topical Report XN-NF-80-19(P)(A), Volume 3 Revision 2, "Exxon Nuclear Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors, THERMEX: Thermal Limits Methodology Summary Description," January 1987.
19. Siemens Power Corporation Topical Report EMF-2158(P)(A), Revision 0, "Siemens Power Corporation Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors: Evaluation and Validation of CASM0-4/MICROBURN-B2," October 1999.
20. Siemens Power Corporation Report EMF-2245(P)(A), Revision 0, "Application of Siemens Power Corporation's Critical Power Correlations to Co-Resident Fuel," August 2000.
21. AREVA NP Report EMF-2209(P)(A), Revision 3, "SPCB Critical Power Correlation," September 2009.
22. AREVA Topical Report ANP-10298P-A, Revision 1, "ACE/ATRIUM 10XM Critical Power Correlation,"

March 2014.

23. AREVA NP Topical Report ANP-10307PA, Revision 0, "AREVA MCPR Safety Limit Methodology for Boiling Water Reactors," June 2011.
24. Exxon Nuclear Company Report XN-NF-84-105(P)(A), Volume 1 Revision 0 and Volume 1 Supplements i and 2, "XCOBRA-T: A Computer Code for BWR Transient Thermal-Hydraulic Core Analysis," February 1987.
25. Advanced Nuclear Fuels Corporation Report ANF-913(P)(A), Volume 1 Revision 1 and Volume 1 Supplements 2, 3, and 4, "COTRANSA2: A Computer Program for Boiling Water Reactor Transient Analyses," August 1990.
26. Framatome ANP Report EMF-2361 (P)(A), Revision 0, "EXEM BWR-2000 ECCS Evaluation Model,"

May 2001.

27. Siemens Power Corporation Report EMF-2292 (P)(A), Revision 0, "ATRIUM'-10: Appendix K Spray Heat Transfer Coefficients," September 2000.
28. Framatome ANP Topical Report ANF-1358(P)(A), Revision 3, "The Loss of Feedwater Heating Transient in Boiling Water Reactors," September 2005.
29. Siemens Power Corporation Topical Report EMF-CC-074(P)(A), Volume 4 Revision 0, "BWR Stability Analysis: Assessment of STAIF with Input from MICROBURN-B2," August 2000.

Page 78 of 79

COLR Quad Cities 1 Revision 12

10. References
1. Exelon Generation Company, LLC and MidAmerican Energy Company, Docket No. 50-254, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Renewed Facility Operating License, License No. DPR-29.
2. AREVA Report ANP-3565P Revision 0, "Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 25 Reload Safety Analysis,"

February 2017.

3. Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-15-2 Revision 0, "Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 Cycle 24 Reload Licensing Report", January 2015.
4. Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-12-120 Revision 0, "Bundle Design Report for Quad Cities 1 Cycle 23," September 2012.
5. Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-14-135-NP Revision 1, "Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 Cycle 24 Supplemental MAPLHGR Report", October 2015.
6. GE Document, GE ORF C51-00217-01, "Instrument Setpoint Calculation Nuclear Instrumentation, Rod Block Monitor, Commonwealth Edison Company, Quad Cities 1 & 2,"

December 14, 1999. (Attachment A to Exelon Design Analysis, QOC-0700-1-1419, Revision 0).

7. Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-14-98 Revision 0, "Bundle Design Report for Quad Cities 1 Cycle 24," August 2014.
8. Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-12-188-NP Revision 0, "Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 Cycle 23 MAPLHGR Report", January 2013.
9. Exelon TOOi ES1600013 Revision 1, "Quad Cities Unit 1 Cycle 25 Plant Parameters Document,"

October 2016.

10. Westinghouse Report NF-BEX-13-2 Revision 0, "Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 Cycle 23 Reload Licensing Report," January 2013.
11. Exelon Technical Specifications for Quad Cities 1 and 2, Table 3.1.4-1, "Control Rod Scram Times."
12. Exelon Letter, NF-MW:02-0081, "Approval of GE Evaluation of Dresden and Quad Cities Extended Final Feedwater Temperature Reduction," Carlos de la Hoz to Doug Wise and Alex Misak, August 27, 2002.

Page 79 of 79