Text

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML15141A195
Person / Time
Site:	LaSalle
Issue date:	05/13/2015
From:	Karaba P; Exelon Generation Co
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML15141A347	List: ML15141A219; RA15-024, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report;
References
	RA15-024
	Download: ML15141A195 (91)
	v • d • e

_________

LaSalle Sation Exelon Generation 815 415 2000 www.exeloncorp.com 10 CFR 50 Appendix I RA1 5-024 May 13, 2015 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-1 1 and NPF-1 8 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374

Subject:

2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Enclosed is the Exelon Generation Company, LLC, LaSalle County Station 2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, submitted in accordance with Technical Specification 5.6.2, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. This report contains the results of the Radiological Environmental and Meteorological Monitoring Programs. This report is enclosed as an attachment.

In addition, this attachment contains the results of groundwater monitoring conducted in accordance with Exelons Radiological Groundwater Protection Program, which is a voluntary program implemented in 2006. This information is being reported in accordance with a nuclear industry initiative.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Mr. Guy V. Ford, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (815) 415-2800.

Respectfully, PeterJ. Karaba Site Vice President LaSalle County Station Attachment cc: Regional Administrator NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector LaSalle County Station

Docket No: 50-373 50-374 LASALLE COUNTY STATION UNITS I and 2 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December2014 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental $ enices I

ExetonGeneratiori, LaSalle County Station Marseilles, IL 61341 May 2015 Page 1 of 178

Table Of Contents I. Summary and Conclusions 1 II. Introduction 2 A. Objectives of the REMP 2 B. Implementation of the Objectives 2 Ill. Program Description 2 A. Sample Collection 2 B. Sample Analysis 5 C. Data Interpretation 5 D. Program Exceptions 6 E. Program Changes 9 IV. Results and Discussion 9 A. Aquatic Environment 9

1. Surface Water 9

2. Ground/Well Water 10

3. Fish 10

4. Sediment 11 B. Atmospheric Environment 11

1. Airborne 11

a. Air Particulates 11

b. Airborne Iodine 12

2. Terrestrial 12

a. Milk 12

b. Food Products 13 C. Ambient Gamma Radiation 13 D. Land UseSurvey 13 E. Errata Data 14 F. Summary of Results Inter-laboratory Comparison Program 14 Page 2 of 17$

Appendices Appendix A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Annual Summary Tables Table A-I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for the LaSalle County Station, 2014 Appendix B Location Designation, Distance & Direction, and Sample Collection Analytical Methods Tables ons, Table B-I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sampling Locati Distance and Direction, LaSalle County Station , 2014 e

Table B-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary of Sampl Collection and Analytical Methods, LaSalle County Station, 2014 Figures Figure B-I Inner Ring OSLD Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2014 Figure B-2 Outer Ring OSLD Locations and Fixed Air Sampling Locations of the LaSaHe County Station, 2014 the Figure B-3 Ingestion and Waterborne Exposure Pathway Sample Locations of LaSalle County Station, 2014 Appendix C Data Tables and Figures Primary Laboratory Tables in Table C-il Concentrations of Gross Beta in Surface Water Samples Collected the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

in the Table C-l.2 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-l.3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

ted in Table C-ll.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Ground/Well Water Samples Collec the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014 es Table C-ll.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Ground/Well Water Sampl Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Page 3 of 178

Table C-lll.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fish Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-V.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-V.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-V.3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-Vl.1 Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-Vll.1 Concentrations of 1-131 in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-Vll.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-Vlll.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Food Product Samples Collected in the Vicinity of LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-IX.1 Quarterly OSLD Results for LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-lX.2 Mean Quarterly OSLD Results for the Inner Ring, Outer Ring, Other and Control Locations for LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Table C-IX.3 Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for LaSalle County Station, 2014.

Figures Figure C-I Surface Water Gross Beta Stations L-21 (C) and L-40 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014.

Figure C-2 Surface Water Tritium Stations L-21 (C) and L-40 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014.

Figure C-3 Air Particulate Gross Beta Stations L-01 and L-03 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014.

Figure C-4 Air Particulate Gross Beta Stations L-05 and L-06 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014.

Figure C-5 Air Particulate Gross Beta

- Station L-10 (C) Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014.-

Figure C-6 Air Particulate Gross Beta Station L-04 and L-07 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014.

III Page 4 of 178

Figure C-7 Air Particulate Gross Beta Station L-08 and L-1 1 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014.

Appendix D Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Tables Table D-1 Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table D-2 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table D-3 DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2014 Table D-4 ERA Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2014 Table D-5 DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Environmental, Inc., 2014 Appendix E Effluent Data Appendix F Meteorological Data Appendix G Errata Data Appendix H Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report (ARGPPR) iv Page 5 of 178

Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted for the LaSalle County Station (LSCS) by Exelon covers the period 1 January 2014 through 31 December 2014. During that time period, 1,407 analyses were performed on 1,393 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with preoperational data, it was concluded that the operation of LSCS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment.

Surface water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. Ground/well water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected. Gross beta and tritium activities detected were consistent with those detected in previous years.

Fish (commercially and recreationally important species) and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected in fish. Cs-137 was detected in both samples at control location L-21. Occasionally Cs-i 37 is detected at very low levels (just above LLD) and is not distinguishable from background levels.

Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta and gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected.

High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on weekly air samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable activity for 1-131.

Cow milk samples were not analyzed in 2014 for concentrations of 1-131 and gamma emitting nuclides as this dairy herd was sold prior to the first sample in 2014.

Food product samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected.

Environmental gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLD). Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, Exelon changed the type of dosimetry used for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimetry were deployed and Thermo-luminescent Dosimetry (TLD) were discontinued. OSLD technology is different than that used in a TLD but has the same purpose (to measure direct radiation).

1 Page 6 of 178

Introduction The LaSalle County Station (LSCS), consists of two boiling water reactors, each rated for 3,546 MWt. Both units are owned and operated by Exelon Corporation and are located in LaSalle County, Illinois. Unit I went critical on 16 March 1982. Unit 2 went critical on 02 December 1983. The site is located in northern Illinois, approximately 75 miles southwest of Chicago, Illinois.

A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for LSCS was initiated in 1982 (the preoperational period for most media covers the periods 1 January 1979 through 26 December 1981 and was summarized in a separate report.). This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) and Landauer on samples collected during the period I January 2014 through 31 December 2014.

A. Objectives of the REMP The objectives of the REMP are to:

1. Provide data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive materials in the site environs.

2. Evaluate the relationship between quantities of radioactive material released from the plant and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure.

B. Implementation of the Objectives The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:

1. Identifying significant exposure pathways.

2. Establishing baseline radiological data of media within those pathways.

3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station radiological effects (ii any) on man and the environment.

Ill. Program Description A. Sample Collection Samples for the LSCS REMP were collected for Exelon Nuclear by Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs). This section describes the general Page 7 of 178

collection methods used by Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to obtain environmental samples for the LSCS REMP in 2014. Sample locations and descriptions can be found in Tables BI and B2, and Figures Bi through B4, Appendix B.

Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, ground/well water, fish, and sediment. Two gallon water samples were collected weekly from two surface water locations (L-21 and L-40) and composited for monthly and quarterly required analyses. Control location was L-21. Two ground/well water locations (L-27 and L-28) were also grab sampled quarterly. All samples were collected via grab sample. The samples were then transferred to new unused plastic containers. Both the grab container and the sample containers were rinsed with source water prior to actual sample collection. Fish samples were collected semiannually at three locations, L-34, L-35 and L-36 (Control). Sediment samples composed of recently deposited substrate were collected at three locations semiannually, L-21 (Control), L-40 and L-41.

Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of airborne particulate and iodine. Airborne particulate and iodine samples were collected and analyzed weekly at nine locations (L-01, L-03, L-04, L-05, L-06, L-07, L-08, L-i0 and L-1 1).

The control location was L-10. Airborne particulate and iodine samples were obtained at each location, using a vacuum pump to pull air through a glass fiber particulate filter and iodine cartridge. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute. The particulate filters and iodine cartridges were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

Terrestrial Environment The terrestrial environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of milk and food product. Samples are typically collected biweekly at one milk location (L-42) from May through October, and monthly from November through April. The control location was L-42.

All samples, when available, were collected in new unused two gallon plastic bottles from the bulk tank at each location, preserved with sodium bisulfite, and shipped promptly to the laboratory.

Food products were collected annually in September at five locations fL-Quad C, L-Quad I, L-Quad 2, L-Quad 3 and L-Quad 4). The control Page 8 of 178

location was L-Quad C. Various types of samples were collected and placed in new unused plastic bags, and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

Ambient Gamma Radiation Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, Exelon changed the type of dosimetry used for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimetry (OSLD) were deployed and Thermo-luminescent Dosimetry (TLD) were discontinued.

This change may cause step changes in readings, up or down, depending on site characteristics. However, the relative comparison to control locations remains valid. OSLD technology is different than that used in a TLD but has the same purpose (to measure direct radiation).

Each location consisted of 2 OSLD sets. The OSLDs were exchanged quarterly and sent to Landauer for analysis. The OSLD locations were placed on and around the LSCS site as follows:

An inner ring consisting of 16 locations (L-J01, L-102, L-103, L-104, L-105, L-106, L-107, L-108, L-109, L-110, L-111B, L-112, L-113A, L-114, L-1 15 and L-1 16) near and within the site perimeter representing fence post doses (i.e., at locations where the doses will be potentially greater than maximum annual offsite doses) from LSCS release.

An outer ring consisting of 16 locations (L-201, L-202, L-203, L-204, L-205, L-206, L-207, L-208, L-209, L-210, L-21 1, L-212, L-213, L-214, L-215 and L-216) extending to approximately 5 miles from the site designed to measure possible exposures to nearby population.

An other set consisting of eight locations (L-01, L-03, L-04, L-05, L-06, L-07, L-08 and L-1 1).

The balance of one location (L-10) representing the control area.

The specific OSLD locations were determined by the following criteria:

1. The presence of relatively dense population;

2. Site meteorological data taking into account distance and elevation for each of the sixteen 22 1/2 degree sectors around the site, where estimated annual dose from LSCS, if any, would be most sign ifi cant;

3. On hills free from local obstructions and within sight of the vents (where practical);

Page 9 of 178

4. And near the closest dwelling to the vents in the prevailing downwind direction.

(Two OSLDs were placed at each location approximately six feet above ground level.)

B. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TEE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the LSCS REMP in 2014. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table E-2.

In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:

1. Concentrations of beta emitters in surface water and air particulates.

2. Concentrations of gamma emitters in ground/well and surface water, air particulates, milk, fish, sediment and vegetation.

3. Concentrations of tritium in ground/well and surface water.

4. Concentrations of 1-131 in air and milk.

5. Ambient gamma radiation levels at various site environs.

C. Data Interpretation The radiological and direct radiation data collected prior to LaSalle County Station becoming operational were used as a baseline with which these operational data were compared. For the purpose of this report, LaSalle County Station was considered operational at initial criticality. In addition, data were compared to previous years operational data for consistency and trending. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:

1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal. The LLD is intended as a before the fact (a priori) estimate of a system (including instrumentation, Page 10 of 178

procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact (a posteriori) criteria for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required LSCS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.

The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity.

2. Net Activity Calculation and Reporting of Results Net activity for a sample was calculated by subtracting background activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity effecting a negative number. An MDC was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected.

Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows:

For surface water and food product 12 nuclides, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, I-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140 and La-140 were reported.

For ground/well water, fish, sediment, air particulate and milk II nuclides, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, Cs-i 34, Cs-I 37, Ba-140 and La-i 40 were reported.

Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than single analysis uncertainty.

D. Program Exceptions For 2014, the LSCS REMP had a sample recovery rate of 97.8%. Sample anomalies and missed samples are listed in the tables below:

Page 11 of 17$

Table D-1 LISTING OF SAMPLE ANOMALIES Sample Location Collection Reason Type Code Date NI L-03 01/30/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 161.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months . Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-03 02/19/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 142.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months . Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-03 02/27/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 176.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months (eight-day run time). Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-08 02/27/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 188.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months (eight-day run time). Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-05 06/05/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 90.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months . Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-03 06/19/14 Low reading of 70.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months due to power outage at sampler; Station notified.

Flowrate estimated at 6OCFH for the particulate sample only. The iodine sample did not meet the required lower limit of detection due to low run time from the power outage.

NI L-05 06/25/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 139.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months . Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-10 07/03/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 112.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

Page 12 of 17$

Table D-1 LISTING OF SAMPLE ANOMALIES Sam pie Location Collection Reason Type Code Date Ni L-11 07/03/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 178.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months (eight-day run time). Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-04 08/07/1 4 No apparent reason for low reading of 155.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months . Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-04 10/16/14 No apparent reason for low reading of 165.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months . Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

NI L-07 12/18/7 4 No apparent reason for low reading of 159.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months . Low timer readings of this nature are consistent with weather related power interruptions.

Table D-2 LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Sample Location Collection Reason Type Code Date M L-42 01 /01/14 - No samples; farmer sold dairy herd.

12/31/14 SW L-21 02/06/14 No sample; water frozen SW L-40 02/06/14 No sample; water frozen NI L-03 06/19/14 No iodine sample due to low run time from power outage. Iodine sample did not meet the required lower limit of detection.

NI L-03 06/25/7 4 No power to sampler.

NI L-03 07/03/14 Power restored to sampler. No sample due to recent power restoration.

Page 13 of 178

Table D-2 LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Sam pie Location Collection Reason Type Code Date OSLD L-208-1, 10/01/14 OSLDs found missing during quarterly L-208-2, exchange; collector placed new 4th quarter L-209-2, OSLDs.

L-210-1 OSLD L-216-4 01/07/15 OSLD found missing during quarterly exchange due to utility pole replacement; collector placed new I quarter OSLD.

Each program exception was reviewed to understand the causes of the program exception. Occasional equipment breakdowns and power outages were unavoidable.

The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable program implementation.

E. Program Changes A new air monitoring location, L-1 IA, was installed in mid-December of 2014 and is currently collecting preliminary data, but is not operational at this time.

IV. Results and Discussion A. Aquatic Environment

1. Surface Water Samples were taken weekly and composited monthly at two locations (L-21 and L-40). Of these locations only L-40 located downstream, could be affected by LaSalles effluent releases. The following analyses were performed:

Gross Beta Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta (Table Cl.1, Appendix C). Gross beta was detected in all 24 samples with a range of 4.2 to 11.1 pCi/I. Concentrations detected were consistent with those detected in previous years Page 14 of 178

(Figure Ci, Appendix C). The required LLD was met.

Tritium Quarterly composites of weekly collections were analyzed for tritium activity (Table Cl.2, Appendix C). Tritium was detected in four of eight samples. The concentrations ranged from 327 to 470 pCi/I. Concentrations detected were consistent with those detected in previous years (Figure C2, Appendix C). The 2000 pCi/L OCDM and contractually requited 200 pCiIL LLDs were met.

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from both locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table Cl.3, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected, and all requited LLDs were met.

2. Ground/Well Water Quarterly grab samples were collected at two locations (L-27 and L-28). Wells 4, 5 and 6 are associated with L-28. L-27 and L-28 well 6 could be affected by LaSalles effluent releases. The following analyses were performed:

Tritiu m Quarterly grab samples from the locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table Cll.1, Appendix C). No tritium was detected and the 2000 pCi/L OCDM and contractually required 200 pCi/L LLDs were met.

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table Cll.2, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected, and all required LLDs were met.

3. Fish Fish samples were collected at three locations (L-34, L-35 and L-36) semiannually. Locations L-34 and L-35 could be affected by LaSalles effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry The edible portion of fish samples from both locations was analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table Clll.1, Appendix C).

Page 15 of 178

Naturally occurring K-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 2,096 to 4,664 pCi/kg wet. No fission or activation products were found.

4. Sediment Aquatic sediment samples were collected at three locations (L-21, L-40 and L-41) semiannually. Locations L-40 and L-41, located downstream, could be affected by LaSalles effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometrv Sediment samples from both locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table ClV.1, Appendix C). Nuclides detected were naturally occurring K-40. Potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 13,040 to 19,110 pCi/kg dry. Cesium-137 was detected in two samples. The concentration ranged from 146 to 166 pCi/L. No LaSalle fission or activation products were found.

B. Atmospheric Environment Airborne

a. Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples were collected from nine locations on a weekly basis. The nine locations were separated into four groups: Group I (onsite) represents locations within the LSCS site boundary (L-03 and L-05),

Group II (near site) represents the locations near the LSCS site (L-01 and L-06), Group Ill (far field) represents the control location at an intermediate distance from LSCS (L-04, L-07, L-08 and L-1 1) and Group IV (Control) represents the control location at a remote distance (L-10).

The following analyses were performed:

Gross Beta Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table CV.1 and CV.2, Appendix C).

Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.

Comparison of results among the four groups aid in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of LSCS. The results from the OnSite locations (Group I) ranged from 3 to 33 E3 pCi/rn3 with a mean of 18 E3 pCi/rn3. The results from the near site location (Group II) 11 Page 16 of 178

ranged from 5 to 32 E3 pCi/rn3 with a mean of 19 E3 pCi/rn3. The results from the far field locations (Group Ill) ranged from 6 to 31 E-3 pCi/rn3 with a mean of 18 E3 pci/rn3. The results from the Control location (Group IV) ranged from 6 to 29 E3 pCi/rn3 with a mean of 18 E3 pCi/rn3. Comparison of the 2014 air particulate data with previous years data indicate no effects from the operation of LSCS (Figures C3 through C-7, Appendix C). In addition, comparisons of the weekly mean values for 2014 indicate no notable differences among the four groups.

Gamma Spectrometry Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table CV.3, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity was detected in 34 of 36 samples. These values ranged from 66 to 155 E3 pCi/rn3. Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in two samples. The concentration ranged from 28 to 31 E3 pCi/rn3. All other nuclides were less than the MDC.

b. Airborne Iodine Continuous air samples were collected from nine locations (L-01, L-03, L-04, L-05, L-06, L-07, L-08, L-1 0 and L-1 1) and analyzed weekly for 1-131 (Table CVl.1, Appendix C). No 1-131 was detected. All required LLDs were met.

2. Terrestrial

a. Milk Samples are typically collected from one location (L-42) biweekly May through October and monthly November through April. The following analyses are typically performed:

Iodine-I 31 Milk samples from the location are typically analyzed for concentrations of 1-131 (Table CVII.1, Appendix C). 1-131 was not analyzed in 2014.

Gamma Spectrometry Milk samples are typically analyzed for concentrations of Page l7of 178

gamma emitting nuclides (Table CVll.2, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring K-40 activity is typically found in all samples. Gamma emitting nuclides were not analyzed in 2014.

b. Food Products Food product samples were collected at five locations (L-Quad C, L-Quad 1, L-Quad 2, L-Quad 3 and L-Quad 4) when available. Four locations, (L-Quad 1, L-Quad 2, L-Quad 3 and L-Quad 4) could be affected by LaSalles effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table CVlll.1, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected, and all required LLDs were met.

C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeters (OSLD). Forty-one OSLD locations were established around the site. Results of OSLD measurements are listed in Tables ClX.1 to CIX.3, Appendix C.

All OSLD measurements were at or below 30 mrem/quarter, with a range of 16.2 to 30.0 mrem/quarter. A comparison of the Inner Ring, Outer Ring, and Other data to the Control Location data, indicate that the ambient gamma radiation levels from the Control Location L-J0 were corn parable.

D. Land Use Survey A Land Use Survey conducted during the August 2014 growing season around the LaSalle County Station (LSCS) was performed by Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) for Exelon Nuclear to comply with Radiological Effluent Control 12.5.2 of the LaSalles Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The purpose of the survey was to document the nearest resident, milk producing animal and garden of greater than 500 ft2 in each of the sixteen 22 % degree sectors around the site. The distance and direction of all locations from the LSCS reactor buildings were positioned using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. There were no changes required to the LSCS REMP as a result of this survey.

The results of this survey are summarized below:

Page 18 of 178

Distance in Miles from the LSCS Reactor Buildings Sector Residence Livestock Milk Farm Miles Miles Miles AN 3.9 4.0 -

BNNE 1.6 1.7 -

CNE 2.1 3.5 -

D ENE 3.3 3.8 -

EE 3.2 - -

FESE 1.4 - -

GSE 1.7 4.7 -

HSSE 1.8 4.7 -

JS 1.5 4.7 -

KSSW 0.7 - -

LSW 1.0 5.8 -

MWSW 1.5 - -

NW 1.5 3.0 -

P WNW 0.9 3.0 -

QNW 1.8 4.0 -

RNNW 1.7 4.6 -

E. Errata Data There is no errata data for 2014.

F. Summary of Results Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program The primary and secondary laboratories analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices (Appendix D). The PE samples, supplied by Analytics Inc., Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following pre-set acceptance criteria:

1. Analytics Evaluation Criteria Analytics evaluation report provides a ratio of laboratory results and Analytics known value. Since flag values are not assigned by Analytics, TBE-ES evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

2. ERA Evaluation Criteria ERAs evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERAs acceptance limits are established per the USEPA, NELAC, state specific PT Page l9of 178

program requirements or ERAs SOP for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.

3. DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEPs evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values.

The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = A), Acceptable with Warning (flag = W), and Not Acceptable (flag = N). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/- 20% to +/- 30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% <bias <30%). lIthe bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

In reviewing our environmental inter-laboratory crosscheck programs, we identified 1) duplication of efforts on some matrices and isotopes and 2) that we are performing crosscheck samples on some matrices and isotopes that we do not perform for clients. Since the DOE MAPEP is designed to evaluate the ability of analytical facilities to correctly analyze for radiological constituents representative of those at DOE sites, the needed changes were made to the MAPEP program. Therefore, the following isotopes were removed from the MAPEP program:

Soil gamma will be provided by Analytics twice per year, starting in 2015. For 2014, one soil gamma is provided by MAPEP, the 2 soil gamma is provided by Analytics.

AP gamma is currently provided by Analytics.

Water gamma, H-3, Sr-90, uranium, gross alpha and gross beta currently provided by ERA.

MAPEP evaluates non-reported (NR) analyses as failed if they were reported in the previous series.

For the TBE laboratory, 163 out of 169 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (Ni-63, K-40 and 1-131 in water, and two Sr-90s and one Gross Alpha in AP samples) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1. Teledyne Brown Engineerings MAPEP March 2014 Ni-63 in water result of 32.7 +/- 1.69 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data Page 20 of 17$

but would have passed the acceptance range of 23.9 44.2 Bq/L.

No client samples were affected by this failure. NCR 14-04

2. Teledyne Brown Engineerings MAPEP March 2014 K-40 in water result of 1.63 +/- 2.49 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data but would have passed the false positive test. No client samples were affected by this failure. NCR 14-04

3. Teledyne Brown Engineerings ERA November2014 1-131 in water result of 15.8 pCi/L was lower than the known value of 20.3 pCi/L, failing below the lower acceptance limit of 16.8. The result was evaluated as failed with a found to known ratio of 0.778. No cause could be found for the slightly low result. All ERA 1-131 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable. No client samples were affected by this failure. NCR 14-08

4. Teledyne Brown Engineerings MAPEP March 2014 Sr-gO in AP result of 0.822 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 1.18 Bq/sample, falling below the lower acceptance limit of 0.83 Eq/sample. The rerun result was still low, but fell within the lower acceptance range of 0.836. The rerun result was statistically the same number as the original result. No cause could be found for the slightly low results. No client samples were affected by this failure. NCR 14-04

5. Teledyne Brown Engineerings MAPEP September 2014 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.310 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0.703 Sq/sample. The gravimetric yield of 117% was very high (we normally see yields of 60% to 70%) and could account for the low activity. No client samples were affected by this failure. NCR 14-09

6. Teledyne Brown Engineerings MAPEP September 2014 Gr-Alpha in AP result of 0.153 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0.53 Eq/sample. The AP sample was counted on the wrong side.

The AP was flipped over and recounted with acceptable results.

No client samples were affected by this failure. NCR 14-09 For the EIML laboratory, 85 of 90 analyses met the specified acceptance criteria. Five analyses (Water Pu-238, Pu-239, Fe-55; AP Co-57; Soil Cs134) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratorys MAPEP February 2014 water Pu-238 result of 1.28 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 0.83 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 1.08 Bq/L. The high bias on the plutonium was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard. The result of the reanalysis with the Page 21 of 178

new tracer was 0.68 Bq/L, which fell within the acceptance criteria.

Client samples for the associated time period were evaluated, and no client samples were affected by the issue.

2. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratorys MAPEP February 2014 water Pu-2391240 result of 0.91 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 0.68 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 0.88 Bq/L.

The high bias on the plutonium was traced to contamination from a newly purchased standard. The result of reanalysis with the new tracer was 0.66 Bq/L, which fell within the acceptance criteria.

Client samples for the associated time period were evaluated, and no client samples were affected by the issue.

3. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratorys MAPEP February 2014 AP Co-57 result of 1.60 +/- 0.05 Eq/total sample failed the false positive test. Interference from the Eu-i 52 resulted in the misidentification of Co-57. The failure was specific to the MAPEP sample. Therefore, there was no impact to client samples as a result of this issue.

4. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratorys MAPEP February 2014 soil Cs-i 34 result of 6.10 +/- 1.80 Eq/kg failed the false positive test.

Long sample counting time lead to interference from naturally occurring Bi-214 in the sample matrix with a close spectral energy.

The failure was specific to the MAPEP sample. Therefore, there was no impact to client samples as a result of this issue.

5. Environmental Inc., Midwest Laboratorys MAPEP August 2014 water Fe-55 result of 55.10 +/- 14.80 Bq/L was higher than the known value of 31.50 Bq/L, exceeding the upper control limit of 41.00 BqIL. The result of the reanalysis of Fe-55 was 32.63 +/-

16.30 BqIL, which fell within the acceptance criteria. Client samples for the associated time period were evaluated, and no client samples were affected by the issue.

The Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program provides evidence of in control counting systems and methods, and that the laboratories are producing accurate and reliable data.

Page 22 of 178

APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Page 23 of 178

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES Of NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIIvIIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER GR-B 24 4 8.1 7.0 8.1 L-40 INDICATOR 0 (PCI/LITER) (12/12) (12/12) (12/12) ILLINOISR1VER-DOWNSTREAM (5.2/11.1) (4.2/10.8) (5.2/11.1) 5.2 MILES NNW OF SiTE H-3 8 200 430 360 430 L-40 INDICATOR 0 (2/4) (2/4) (2/4) -

ILLINOIS RiVER DOWNSTREAM (3 89/470) (327/3 93) (3 89/470) 5.2 MILES NNW Of SITE GAMMA 24 MN-54 15 <LLD <LLD - 0 15 <LLD <LLD - 0 CO-5$

30 <LLD <LLD - 0 FE-59 15 <LLD <LLD - 0 CO-60 30 <LLD <LLD - 0 ZN-65 15 <LLD <LLD - 0 NB-95 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOMTORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR TilE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORTII4G PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH ifiGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UN1T OF PERFORMED PERFORMED Of DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS 30 <LLD <LLD - 0 SURFACE WATER ZR-95 (PCI/LITER) 15 <LLD <LLD - 0 1-131 CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD 0 15 <LLD <LLD - 0 LA-140 200 <LLD <LLD - 0 GROUND WATER H-3 12 (PCI/LITER)

GAMMA 12 15 <LLD <LLD - 0 MN-54 0

00 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOMTORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR TUE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECT[ON RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMEND GROUND WATER CO-58 15 <LLD <LLD -

0 (PCLLTTER)

FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD -

0 CO-60 15 <LLD <LLD -

0 ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD -

0 NB-95 15 <LLD <LLD -

0 ZR-95 30 <LLD <LLD -

0 CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD -

0 CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD -

0 0

0 BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD -

0 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

SUMMARY

FOR TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 NAME OF FACILITY:

REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL LOCATION Of FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMiT RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION MEASUREMENTS MEASUREMENT) (LLD)

<LID <LLD -

0 GROUND WATER LA-140 15 (PCI/LITER)

FISH GAMMA 12

<LU) <LID -

0 (PCIJKG WET) MN-54 ]30

<LLD -

0 CO-58 130 <LLD

<LLD -

0 FE-59 260 <LU)

<LID <LLD -

0 CO-60 130

<LLD -

0 ZN-65 260 <LID

<LID -

0 NB-95 NA <LID CD CD

<LLD -

0 ZR-95 NA <LID 0

-a 00

VALUES THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE PARENTHESES (F)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOMTORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR ThE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION Of FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION NUMBER Of REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR TYPES Of ANALYSIS LOWER LIMiT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED (UNIT Of PERFORMED (LLD) MEASUREMENTI MEASUREMENT) 130 <LU) <LLD -

0 FISH CS-134 (PCFKG WET) 150 <LLD <LLD -

0 CS-t37 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 LA-140 SEDIMENT GAMMA 6 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 (PCIIKG DRY) MN-54 NA <LU) <LLD -

0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 FE-59 0

CD 0

<LLD -

CO-60 NA <LLD 0

00 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME Of FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUI4BER Of REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION NUMBER Of PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT Of PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT ZN-65 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 (PCI/KG DRY)

NB-95 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 ZR-95 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 C

CS-134 150 <LCD <LCD -

0 CS-137 180 <LLD 156 156 L-21 CONTROL 0 (2/2) (2/2) ILLINOIS RWER AT SENECA UPSTREAM (146/166) (146/166) 4.OMILESNEOF SITE BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 LA-140 NA <LCD <LCD -

0 AIR PARTICULATE GR-B 466 10 18 18 19 L-07 INDICATOR 0 (E-3 PCIICU.MEUR) (412/414) (52/52) (52/52) SENECA o (3/33) (6/29) (6/3 1) 5.2 MILES NNE Of SITE 00 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-f RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOMTORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNiT Of PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS AIR PARTICUlATE GAMMA 36 (1-3 PCIICU.METER) ?vlN-54 NA <LU) <LU) -

0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 FE-59 NA <LID <LLD -

0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 ZN-65 NA <LLD <LLD -

0 NB-95 NA <LID <LLD -

0 ZR-95 NA <LU) <LU) -

0 CD CS-134 50 <LU) <LID -

0 C

Go THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOMTORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORT]NG PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION if NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED Of DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS AIR PARTICULATE CS-137 60 <LLD <LLD (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)

BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 00 AIR IODINE GAMMA 466 (E-3 PCJJCU.METER) 1-13 1 70 <LLD <LLD 0 VEGETATION GAMMA 10 (PCI/KG WET) MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 NA <LLD <LLD - 0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD - 0 00 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOMTORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME OF FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH RIGIWST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER Of REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMiT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UMT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENT VEGETATION ZN-65 NA <LID <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET)

NB-95 NA <LLD <LLD - 0 ZR-95 NA <LID <LID - 0 1-13 1 60 <LID <LID - 0 CS-134 60 <LID <LID - 0 CS-137 $0 <LLD <LLD -

0 BA-140 NA <LID <LCD - 0 LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD - 0 C

-.1 00 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES f F)

TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOMTORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 NAME Of FACILITY: LASALLE DOCKET NUMBER: 50-373 & 50-374 2014 LOCATION OF FACILITY: MARSEILLES IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS DECT RADIATION OSLD-QUARTERLY 331 NA 23.5 21.5 26.4 L-102-l INDICATOR 0 (MWIJ3.EMJQTR) (323/323) (8/8) (4/4)

(16.2/30.0) (17.9/25.2) (20.9/30) 0.6 MILES NNE C

00 C

00 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

APPENDIX B LOCATION DESIGNATION, DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND SAMPLE COLLECTION & ANALYTICAL METHODS Page 34 of 178

TABLE B-I: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, LaSalle County Station, 2014 Location Location Description Distance & Direction From Site A. Surface Water L-21 Illinois River at Seneca, Upstream (control) 4.0 miles NE L-40 Illinois River, Downstream (indicator) 5.2 miles NNW GmundIWeII W2tRr L-27 LSCS Onsite Well (indicator) 0 miles at station L-28-W4 Marseilles Well (control) 7.0 miles NNW L-28-W5 Marseilles Well (control) 6.7 miles NNW L-28-W6 Marseilles Well (indicator) 4.1 miles N C. Milk bi-weekly I monthly L-42 Biros Farm (control) 14.2 miles E D. Air Particulates / Air Iodine L-O1 Nearsite 1 (indicator) 1.5 miles NNW L-03 Onsite 3 (indicator) 1.0 miles ENE L-04 Rte. 170 (indicator) 3.2 miles E L-05 Onsite 5 (indicator) 0.3 miles ESE L-06 Nearsite 6 (indicator) 0.4 miles W L-07 Seneca (indicator) 5.2 miles NNE L-08 Marseilles (indicator) 6.0 miles NNW L-1 0 Streator (control) 13.5 miles SW L-1 1 Ransom (indicator) 6.0 miles S E. Fish L-34 LaSalle Cooling Lake (indicator) 2.0 miles E L-35 Marseilles Pool of Illinois River, Downstream (indicator) 6.5 miles NNW L-36 Illinois River, Upstream of Discharge (control) 4.3 miles NE F. Sediment L-21 Illinois River at Seneca, Upstream (control) 4.0 miles NE L-40 Illinois River, Downstream (indicator) 5.2 miles NNW L41 Illinois River, Downstream (indicator) 4.6 miles N G. Food Products Quadrant 1 Diane Partridge 4.5 miles NE Quadrant 2 Mike and Gina Welboume 3.8 miles ESE Quadrant 3 Michael Olson 1.5 miles WSW Quadrant 4 Robert Eisers 4.5 miles NW Control Eugene Clements 10.0 miles NW B-I Page 35 of 178

TABLE B-I: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, LaSalle County Station, 2014 Location Location Description Distance & Direction From Site H. Environmental Dosimetry OSLO Inner Ring L-101-1 and-2 0.5 miles N L-102-1 and -2 0.6 miles NNE L-103-I and -2 0.7 miles NE L-104-I and -2 0.8 miles ENE L-105-I and-2 0.7 miles E L-106-1 and -2 1.4 miles ESE L-107-1 and -2 0.8 miles SE L-108-1 and -2 0.5 miles SSE L-109-1 and -2 0.6 miles S L-110-I and -2 0.6 miles SSW L-lIIb-1 and-2 0.8 miles SW L-112-I and-2 0.9 miles WSW L-113a-I and-2 0.8 miles W L-114-I and-2 0.9 miles WNW L-115-I and-2 0.7 mites NW L-116-I and -2 0.6 miles NNW Outer Ring L-201-3 and -4 4.0 miles N L-202-3 and -4 3.6 miles NNE L-203-I and -2 4.0 miles NE L-204-I and -2 3.2 miles ENE L-205-1 and -2 3.2 miles ESE L-205-3 and 4 5.1 miles E L-206-1 and -2 4.3 miles SE L-207-1 and -2 4.5 miles SSE L-208-1 and -2 4.5 miles S L-209-I and -2 4.0 miles SSW L-210-1 and-2 3.3 miles SW L-211-1 and-2 4.5 miles WSW L-212-1 and -2 4.0 miles W L-21 3-3 and -4 4.9 miles W L-214-3 and 4 5.1 miles WNW L-2I5-3 and -4 5.0 miles NW L-216-3 and -4 5.0 miles NNW Other L-01-1 and -2 Nearsite 1 (indicator) 1.5 miles NNW L-03-1 and -2 Onsite 3 (indicator) 1.0 miles ENE L-04-1 and -2 Rte. 170 (indicator) 3.2 miles E L-05-1 and -2 Onsite 5 (indicator) 0.3 miles ESE L-06-1 and -2 Nearsite 6 (indicator) 0.4 miles W L-07-1 and -2 Seneca (indicator) 5.2 miles NNE L-08-1 and -2 Marseilles (indicator) 6.0 miles NNW L-1J-1 and-2 Ransom (indicator) 6.0 miles S Control and Special Interest L-J0-1 and -2 Streator 13.5 miles SW B-2 Page 36 of 178

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, LaSalle County Station, 2014 Sample Medium Analysis Sampling Method Analytical Procedure Number Surface Water Gamma Monthly composite TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Spectroscopy from weekly grab samples. Env. Inc., GS-O1 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Surface Water Gross Beta Monthly composite TEE, TBE-2008 Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity in from weekly grab various matrices samples.

Env. Inc., W(DS)-01 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in water (dissolved solids or total residue)

Surface Water Tritium Quarterly composite TBE, TBE-201 I Tritium analysis in drinking water by liquid from weekly grab scintillation samples.

Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)

Ground/Well Water Gamma Quarterly grab TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Spectroscopy samples.

Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Ground/Well Water Tritium Quarterly grab TBE, TBE-2011 Tritium analysis in drinking water by liquid samples. scintillation Env. Inc., 1-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)

Fish Gamma Semi-annual samples TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Spectroscopy collected via electroshocking or Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by other techniques gamma spectroscopy Sediment Gamma Semi-annual grab TEE, TEE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Spectroscopy samples Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Air Particulates Gross Beta One-week composite TBE, TBE-2008 Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity in of continuous air various matrices sampling through glass fiber filter paper Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in air particulate filters Air Particulates Gamma Quarterly composite of TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Spectroscopy each station Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Air Iodine Gamma Bi-weekly composite of TEE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Spectroscopy continuous air sampling through Env. Inc., -131-02 Determination of 1-131 in charcoal charcoal filter canisters by gamma spectroscopy (batch method)

Milk 1-131 El-weekly grab sample TEE, TBE-2012 Radioiodine in various matrices when cows are on pasture. Monthly all Env. Inc., -131-01 Determination of 1-131 in milk by an other times ion exchange Milk Gamma Bi-weekly grab sample TEE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Spectroscopy when cows are on pasture. Monthly all Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by other times gamma spectroscopy Food Products Gamma Annual grab samples. TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Spectroscopy Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy OSLD Optically Stimulated Quarterly OSLDs Landauer Incorporated Luminescence comprised of two Dosimetry A12O3:C Landauer Incorporated elements.

B-3 Page 37 of 178

Figure B-i Inner Ring OSLD Locations of the LaSalie County Station, 2014

Figure B-2 Outer Ring OSLD Locations and Fixed Air Sampling Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2014 B-S Page 39 of 17$

Figure B-3 Ingestion and Waterborne Exposure Pathway Sample Locations of the LaSalle County Station, 2014 B-6 Page 40 of 178

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES AND FIGURES -

PRIMARY LABORATORY Page 41 of 178

Table C-il CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION L-21 L-40 PERIOD 01/02/14 - 01/30/14 10.8 +/- 3.1 11.1 +/- 3.1 02/13/14 - 02/27/14 10.0 +/- 2.4 (1) 10.7 +/- 2.5 (1) 03/06/14 - 03/26/14 7.2 +/- 2.2 6.0 +/- 2.1 04/03/14 - 04/24/14 4.3 +/- 2.2 7.9 +/- 2.6 05/01/14 - 05/29/14 7.5 +/- 2.6 9.2 +/- 2.9 06/05/14 - 06/25/14 4.3 +/- 2.3 6.9 +/- 2.7 07/03/14 - 07/31/14 4.8 +/- 2.1 5.7 +/- 2.3 08/07/14 - 08/27/14 4.2 +/- 2.2 5.2 +/- 2.3 09/03/14 - 09/25/14 9.4 +/- 2.8 10.6 +/- 3.1 10/07/14 - 10/30/14 5.0 +/- 2.2 7.8 +/- 2.6 11/06/14 - 11/26/14 8.5 +/- 2.5 7.7 +/- 2.4 12/04/14 - 12/31/14 7.8 +/- 2.3 8.0 +/- 2.4 MEAN 7.0 +/- 4.8 8.1 +/- 4.0 Table C-12 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION L-21 L-40 PERIOD 01/02/14 - 03/26/14 327 +/- 136 (1) 470 +/- 146 (1) 04/03/14 - 06/25/14 393 +/- 142 389 +/- 139 07103/14 - 09/25/14 < 171 < 175 10/01114 - 12/31/14 < 188 < 187 MEAN 360 +/- 93 430 +/- 115 THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-I Page 42 of 178

Table C-l.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD L-21 01/02/14 - 01/30/14 < I < I <3 <1 <3 <1 <3 <10 <1 <1 <16 <5 02113/14 - 02/27/14 (1) < 2 < 2 <6 <2 <5 <3 <11

<4 <2 <2 <22 <8 03/06/14 - 03/26/14 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <14 <2 <2 <21 <7 04/03/14 - 04/24/14 < I < 2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <11 <1 <1 <16 <5 05)01/14 - 05/29/14 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <9 <2 <2 <16 <5 06/05/14 - 06/25/14 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <5 <1 <1 <10 <3 07)03/14 - 07/31/14 < 1 < I <2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <7 <1 <1 <9 <3 08/07/14 - 08/27/14 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <4 <13 <2 <2 <21 <6 09/03/14 - 09/25/14 < I < I <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <11 <1 <1 <17 <5 10/01/14 - 10/30/14 < 1 < I <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <12 <1 <1 <18 <5 11/06/14 - 11/26/14 < 1 < 2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <14 <1 <1 <21 <5 12)04/14 - 12/31/14 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <12 <2 <2 <19 <7 MEAN L-40 01/02/14 - 01/30/14 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <10 <1 <1 <16 <5 02/13/14 - 02/27/14 (1) < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 <18 <6 03/06/14 - 03/26/14 < 1 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <10 <1 <1 <16 <6 04/03/14 - 04/24/14 <2 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <12 <2 <2 <20 <6 05/01/14 - 05/29/14 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 <2 <20 <7 06)05/14 - 06/25/14 < I < 2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <2 <13 <3 07/03/14 - 07/31/14 < 1 < 1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <11 <1 <1 <15 <3 08/07/14 - 08/27/14 < 2 < 2 <7 <3 <5 <3 <5 <14 <2 <2 <25 <8 09/03/14 - 09/25/14 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <2 <4 <13 <2 <2 <22 <7 10/01/14 - 10130114 < 2 < 2 <5 <2 <3 <2 <14

<3 <2 <2 <21 <7 11/06/14 - 11/26/14 < 1 < 1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <10 <1 <1 <14 <4 12/04/14 - 12131/14 < 2 < 2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <11 <1 <2 <17 <6 MEAN - -

CD CD C (I) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION 00

Table C-ll.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDIWELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION L-27 L-28-W4 L-28-W5 L-28-W6 PERIOD 01109114 - 01/09/14 < 172 < 172 - < 174 04/10/14 - 04/10/14 < 157 - < 161 < 161 07/10/14 - 07/10/14 < 175 < 174 - < 177 10/09/14 - 10/09/14 < 188 - < 194 < 190 MEAN - - - -

C-3 Page44ofl78

Table C-1L2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUND/WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD

< < < 11 < 5 < 9 < 4 < 5 < 32 < 12 L-27 01/09/14 - 01/09/14 < 5 < 4 10 4 04/10/14 - 04/10/14 <3 <3 <8 <3 <7 <3 <6 <3 <3 <24 <7 07/10/14 - 07/10/14 < 4 < 5 < 9 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 9 < 4 < 5 < 21 <5

< 10 < 11 < 6 < 7 < 36 < 10 10/09/14 10/09/14 < 5 < 6 < 71 < 6 < 6 MEAN L-28-W4 01/09/14 - 01/09/14 <4 <4 <10 <5 <9 <5 <8 <4 <5 <32 <9 07/10/14 - 07/10/14 <4 <4 <8 <4 <7 <5 <8 <5 <5 <24 <6 MEAN L-28-W5 04/10/14 - 04/10/14 <5 <5 <11 <5 <9 <5 <9 <5 <5 <34 <9 70/09/14 - 10/09/14 <5 <4 <12 <6 <11 <6 <9 <6 <6 <38 <11 MEAN L-28-W6 01/09/14 - 01/09/14 <5 <6 <8 <6 <9 <5 <8 <4 <5 <33 <9 04/10/14 - 04/10/14 <4 <5 <10 <5 <9 <4 <8 <4 <5 <31 <9 07/10/14 - 07/10/14 <4 <4 <9 <3 <7 <4 <7 <3 <4 <20 <6

<11 <8 <4 <5 <25 < 11 10/09/14 10/09/14 <5 <6 <10 <6 <5 MEAN

.1.

0 Go

Table C-Ill I CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FISH SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PC/KG WET +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD L-34 05/06/14 < 60 < 68 < 171 < 65 < 117 < 68 < 116 < 57 <46 < 926 < 334 Channel Catfish 05/06/14 < 49 < 65 < 130 < 52 < 109 < 65 < 105 < 50 <43 < 856 < 250 Common Carp

< 18 < 19 < 47 < 17 < 37 < 21 < 37 < 18 < 19 < 169 < 44 Channel Catfish 10/08/14 10/08/14 < 24 < 27 < 59 < 22 < 49 < 31 < 49 < 26 < 26 < 243 < 57 Common Carp MEAN -

L-35 05/06/14 < 59 < 71 < 151 < 48 < 104 < 64 < 121 < 60 < 50 < 862 < 243 Quillback 05/06/14 < 39 < 36 < 106 < 54 < 75 <40 < 80 < 35 < 36 < 565 < 203 Smallmouth Buffalo 10/08/14 < 21 < 22 < 47 < 19 < 45 < 26 < 39 < 22 < 22 < 186 < 52 Freshwater Drum Smallmouth Buffalo 10/08/14 <27 <24 <56 < 30 <45 <28 <48 <21 <24 <231 <62 MEAN - - -

L-36 05/06/14 <62 <76 < 168 <64 < 137 <84 < 150 <60 <61 < 1197 <297 Largemouth Bass

< 66 < 93 < 206 < 65 < 156 < 92 < 133 < 76 < 75 < 1336 < 290 Smallmouth Buffalo 05/06/14 10/08/14 < 24 < 26 < 56 < 21 < 51 < 29 < 49 < 26 < 25 < 239 < 59 Freshwater Drum Smallmouth Buffalo 10/08/14 <22 < 22 <58 <26 <44 <23 <47 <20 <24 <222 <70 MEAN 0*

C 00

Table C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PC/KG DRY +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD

< < 223 < 102 < 173 < 95 < 157 < 68 146 +/- 85 < 696 < 195 L-21 05/01/14 < 92 90

< < 313 < 127 < 214 < 140 < 204 < 108 166 +/- 95 < 1115 < 328 10/01/14 < 113 127

- - - - 156+/-29 MEAN - -

< < 138 < 91 < 137 < 69 < 105 < 53 < 88 < 290 < 91 L-40 06/05/14 < 52 62

< 219 < 79 < 231 < 108 < 183 < 85 < 111 < 859 < 238 10/01/14 < 82 < 89 MEAN - -

< 52 < 139 < 42 < 92 < 51 < 84 < 38 <48 < 396 < 124 L-41 05/01/14 < 43

<49 < 125 <34 < 91 <54 <83 <35 <52 <417 < 113 10/01/14 <43 MEAN (p

0 00

Table C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP I GROUP II PERIOD L-03 L-05 L-01 L-06 01/02/14 -01/09/14 24+/-5 23+/-5 21+/-5 27+/-5 01/09/14 01/16/14

- 23 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 19 +/- 4 01/16/14 -01/23/14 14+/-4 12+/-4 20+/-5 18+/-5 01/23/14 - 01/30/14 17 +/- 4 (1) 16 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 01/30/14 - 02/06/14 22 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 32 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 02/06/14 02/13/14

- 23 +/- 5 27 +/- 5 23 +/- 4 24 +/- 5 02/13/14 - 02/19/14 23 +/- 5 (1) 23 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 19 +/- 5 02/19/14 - 02/27/14 30 +/- 5 (1) 27 +/- 5 25 +/- 4 27 +/- 5 02/27/14 - 03/06/14 23 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 03/06/14 - 03/13/14 21 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 25 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 03/13/14 - 03/20/14 16 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 03/20/14 - 03/26/14 17 +/- 5 13 +/- 4 18 +/- 5 12 +/- 4 03/26/14 - 04/03/14 16 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 04/03/14 -04/10/14 15+/-4 15+/-4 16+/-4 13+/-4 04/10/14 - 04/17/14 14 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 04/17/14 - 04/24/14 20 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 04/24/14 - 05/01/14 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 4 6 +/- 3 11 +/- 4 05/01/14 -05/08/14 13+/-3 13+/-3 13+/-3 16+/-4 05/08/14 - 05/15/14 10 +/- 4 3 +/- 2 12 +/- 4 9 +/- 4 05/15/14 - 05/22/14 13 +/- 4 < 5 17 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 05/22/14 - 05/29/14 12 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 05/29/14 - 06/05/14 9 +/- 4 18 +/- 7 (1) 5 +/- 2 14 +/- 4 06/05/14 - 06/12/14 10 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 06/12/14 - 06/19/14 10 +/- 5 (1) 15 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 06/19/14 - 06/25/14 (1) 16 +/- 5 (1) 13 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 06/25/14 - 07/03/14 (1) 8 +/- 4 <5 8 +/- 4 07/03/14 - 07/10/14 14 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 07/10/14 - 07/17/14 17 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 07/17/14 - 07/24/14 22 +/- 5 19 +/- 4 25 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 07/24/14 - 07/31/14 17 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 07/31/14 - 08/07/14 27 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 08/07/14 - 08/14/14 14 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 17 +/- 5 15 +/- 5 08/14/14 -08/21/14 22+/-5 18+/-4 26+/-5 23+/-5 08/21/14 - 08/27/14 16 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 15 +/- 5 15 +/- 5 08/27/14 -09/03/14 20+/-5 17+/-4 20+/-5 17+/-4 09/03/14 - 09/10/14 13 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 17 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 09/10/14 - 09/18/14 14 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 09/18/14 - 09/25/14 23 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 09/25/14 - 10/01/14 21 +/- 5 28 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 10/01/14 - 10/09/14 15 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 10/09/14 - 10/16/14 9 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 9 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 10/16/14 - 10/23/14 17 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 10/23/14 -10/30/14 21+/-5 25+/-5 20+/-4 25+/-5 10/30/14 - 11/06/14 16 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 11/06/14 - 11/13/14 17 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 11/13/14 - 11/20/14 16 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 22 +/- 5 11/20/14 - 11/26/14 19 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 11/26/14 - 12/04/14 24 +/- 4 28 +/- 5 22 +/- 4 28 +/- 5 12/04/14 - 12/11/14 33 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 31 +/- 5 30 +/- 5 12/11/14 -12/18/14 23+/-5 26+/-5 24+/-5 30+/-5 12/18/14 - 12/24/14 22 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 12/24/14 - 12/31/14 20+/-4 23+/-4 24+/-4 23+/-4 MEAN 18+/-11 18+/-12 19+/-11 19+/-11 THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-7 Page48 of 178

Table C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP III GROUP IV PERIOD L-04 L-07 L-08 L-l1 L-10 01/02/14 - 01/09/14 18 +/- 4 24 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 01/09/14 - 01/16/14 20 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 19 +/- 5 16 +/- 4 01/16/14 - 01/23/14 17 +/- 4 21 +/- 5 17 +/- 5 16 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 01/23/14 - 01/30/14 17 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 01/30/14 - 02/06/14 24 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 02/06/14 02/13/14 30 +/- 5 27 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 27 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 02/13/14 - 02/19/14 23 +/- 5 29 +/- 6 22 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 02119/14 - 02/27/14 24 +/- 4 27 +/- 4 26 +/- 4 (1) 31 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 02/27/14 - 03/06/14 20 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 03/06/14 - 03/13/14 25 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 16 +/- 4 22 +/- 5 03/13/14 - 03/20/14 11 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 03/20/14 - 03/26/14 18 +/- 5 16 +/- 5 17 +/- 5 17 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 03/26/14 - 04/03/14 14 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 20 +/- 5 18 +/- 4 04/03/14 - 04/10/14 13 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 04/10/14 - 04/17/14 13 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 04/17/14 - 04/24/14 11 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 04/24/14 - 05/01/14 9 +/- 4 6 +/- 3 10 +/- 4 8 +/- 4 6 +/- 3 05/01/14 - 05/08/14 16 +/- 4 11 +/- 3 16 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 05/08/14 - 05/15/14 10 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 05/15/14 - 05/22/14 14 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 05/22/14 - 05/29/14 12 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 05/29/14 - 06/05/14 11 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 06/05/14 - 06/12/14 16 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 06/12/14 - 06/19/14 17 +/- 4 19 +/- 5 12 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 06/19/14 - 06/25/14 13 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 06/25/14 - 07/03/14 9 +/- 4 7 +/- 4 7 +/- 4 7 +/- 4 (1) 9 +/- 6 (1) 07/03/14 - 07/10/14 16 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 07/10/14 - 07/17/14 16 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 07/17/14 - 07/24/14 27 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 07/24/14 - 07/31/14 20 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 07/31/14 - 08/07/14 26 +/- 6 (1) 21 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 21 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 08/07/14 - 08/14/14 18 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 17 +/- 5 14 +/- 4 15 +/- 5 08/14/14 - 08/21/14 23 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 20 +/- 4 23 +/- 5 21 +/- 4 08/21/14 - 08/27/14 13 +/- 4 16 +/- 5 12 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 16 +/- 5 08/27/14 - 09/03/14 22 +/- 5 20 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 26 +/- 5 09/03/14 - 09/10/14 18 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 14 +/- 5 13 +/- 4 15 +/- 5 09/10/14 - 09/18/14 14 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 09/18/14 - 09/25/14 20 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 18 +/- 4 23 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 09/25/14 - 10/01/14 22 +/- 5 27 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 10/01/14 - 10/09/14 15 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 10)09/14 - 10)16/14 12 +/- 4 (1) 16 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 10/16/14 - 10/23/14 22 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 10/23/14 - 10/30/14 20 +/- 4 23 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 10/30/14 - 11/06/14 16 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 11/06/14 - 11/13114 17 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 16 4+/-

11/13/14 - 11/20/14 18 +/- 4 23 +/- 5 20 +/- 4 26 +/- 5 20 +/- 4 11/20/14 - 11/26/14 22 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 11/26/14 - 12104/14 27 +/- 5 26 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 26 +/- 5 22 +/- 4 12/04/14 - 12/11/14 30 +/- 5 31 +/- 5 30 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 12/11/14 - 12/18/14 26 +/- 5 28 +/- 5 (1) 25 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 12/18/14 - 12/24/14 28 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 12/24/14 - 12/31/14 25 +/- 5 22 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 MEAN 18+/-11 19+/-12 18+/-10 18+/-11 18+/-11 THE MEAN AND TWO STANDARD DEVIATION ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-8 Page 49 of 17$

Table C-V.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCIICU METER +/-2 SIGMA GROUP I -

NEAR-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II FAR-FIELD LOCATIONS -

GROUP III FAR-FIELD LOCATIONS GROUP IV CONTROL LOCATION COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN +/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN +/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN +/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN +/-

PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD 01/02/14 - 01/30/14 -

12 25 19 +/- 10 01/02/14 01/30/14 14 27 19 +/- 7 01/02/14 - 01/30(14 -

12 24 19 +/- 7 01/02/14 01130114 12 26 18 +/- 12 01/30114 - 02/27/14 -

22 30 25 +/- 6 01/30/14 02/27/14 19 32 24 +/- 8 01/30/14 - 02/27/14 -

21 31 25 +/- 6 01/30/14 02/27/14 21 29 25 +/- 8 02/27/14 - 04103/14 -

10 23 18 +/- 9 02127114 04103114 12 25 19 +/- 9 02127114 - 04103114 -

11 26 18 +/- 9 02/27/14 04/03/14 14 22 18 +/- 6 04/03/14 - 05/01/14 -

8 20 14 +/- 7 04/03/14 05/01/14 6 20 14 +/- 9 04/03/14 - 05/01/14 -

6 17 13 +/- 6 04/03/14 05/01/14 6 18 14 +/- 11 05/01/14 - 05/29/14 -

3 16 11 +/- 8 05/01/14 05/29/14 9 18 14 +/- 6 05/01/14 - 05/29/14 -

10 16 13 +/- 4 05/01/14 05/29/14 10 17 14 +/- 7 05/29/14 - 07/03/14 -

8 18 13 +/- 8 05/29/14 07/03/14 5 17 12 +/- 8 05/29/14 - 07/03/14 -

7 19 12 +/- 7 05/29/14 07/03/14 9 14 12 +/- 4 07/03/14 - 07/31/14 -

14 22 17 +/- 5 07/03/14 07/31114 13 25 19 +/- 9 07/03114 - 07/31/14 -

11 27 18 +/- 9 07/03/14 07/31/14 14 23 18 +/- 7 07/31/14 - 09/03/14 -

12 27 19 +/- 10 07/31/14 09/03/14 15 26 19 +/- 9 07/31/14 - 09/03/14 12 26 -

18 +/- 8 07/31/14 09/03/14 15 26 21 +/- 10 09/03/14 - 10/01/14 -

13 28 18 +/- 11 09/03/14 10/01/14 14 26 20 +/- 9 09I03/14 - 10/01/14 -

13 27 19 +/- 9 09/03/14 10/01/14 15 29 20 +/- 14 10/01/14 - 10/30/14 -

9 25 16 +/- 10 10/01/14 10/30/14 9 25 17 +/- 10 10/01/14 - 10/30/14 -

11 23 17 +/- 8 10/01/14 10/30/14 15 24 17 +/- 9 10/30/14 - 12104114 -

16 28 20 +/- 9 10/30/14 12/04)14 14 28 19 +/- 8 10/30/14 - 12/04/14 -

13 27 21 +/- 9 10/30/14 12/04/14 16 24 20 +/- 6 12/04/14 - 12/31/14 -

20 33 24 +/- 8 12/04/14 12/31/14 22 31 26 +/- 8 12/04/14 - 12/31/14 -

19 31 25 +/- 8 12/04/14 12/31/14 19 29 25 +/- 8 01/02/14 12/31/14 3 33 18 +/- 11 01/02/14 - 12/31/14 -

5 32 19 +/- 11 01/02/14 12/31/14 6 31 18 +/- 11 01/02/14 - 12/31/14 6 29 18 +/- 11 pz (1

0 00

Table C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD

<3 <6 <2 <1 <288 < 106 L-01 01/02114 04/03/14 <1 <4 <9 <2 <4

<8 <16 <3 <3 <3258 < 1283 04/03/7 4 07/03/14 <4 <8 <30 <3 <8 07/03/74 - 10/07/14 <4 <8 <28 <3 <11 <11 <17 <4 <2 <1988 <670

- 12/31/14 <4 <7 <23 <4 <10 <8 <14 <4 <3 <841 < 329 10/01/14 MEAN

<4 <8 <2 <2 <445 < 175 L-03 01/02/14 04/03(14 <2 <4 <14 <2 <8

<7 <10 <4 <3 <1406 < 538 04/03/7 4 07/03/14 <4 <6 <25 <4 <10

<6 <10 <2 <3 <1369 < 822 07/03/14 10/01/14 <3 <7 <21 <2 <8

- 12/31/14 <3 <8 <19 <4 <11 <7 <15 <4 <4 <873 < 377 10/01/14 MEAN

<5 <6 <2 <2 <503 < 154 L-04 01/02/14 04/03/14 <2 <3 <11 <2 <6

<6 <9 <3 <3 <930 < 319 04/03/14 07/03/14 <2 <5 <18 <3 <5

- 10/01/14 <4 <8 <20 <4 <10 <10 <16 <4 <4 <2236 < 517 07/03/14

<5 <9 <2 <2 <671 < 119 10/01/14 12/31/14 <3 <3 <9 <3 <5 MEAN

<3 <5 <9 <2 <2 <468 < 189 L-05 01/02/14 04/03/14 <2 <4 <15 <2

<8 <7 <17 <3 <4 <1389 < 674 04/03/14 07103/14 <3 <7 <21 <5

<6 <9 <2 <2 <872 < 438 07/03/14 10/01/14 <3 <4 <8 <3 <8 10/01/14 - 12137/14 <4 <7 <24 <3 <8 <7 <14 <4 <3 <947 <249 MEAN

<5 <8 <2 <3 <508 < 192 L-06 01/02/14 04/03/14 <2 <3 <16 <3 <6

<7 <6 <12 <3 <2 <973 < 433 04/03/14 07/03/14 <3 <7 <24 <3

<6 <5 <7 <2 <2 <801 < 385 07/03/14 10/01/14 <2 <5 <15 <2 10/01/14 - 12/31/14 <2 <2 <7 <2 <3 <3 <5 <1 <1 <279 <79 CD U. MEAN C

00

Table C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD L-07 01/02/14 - 04/03/14 <3 <5 <16 <1 <7 <6 <12 <3 <3 <593 < 194 04/03/14 07/03/14 <4 <5 <15 <3 <7 <6 <12 <4 <3 <1242 <545 07/03/14 10/01/14 <3 <3 <27 <2 <7 <6 <12 <3 <2 <1514 <487 10/01/14 12/31/14 <2 <3 <10 <3 <3 <3 <4 <1 <1 <332 < 122 MEAN L-08 01/02/14 - 04/03/14 <3 <5 <17 <3 <8 <7 <13 <4 <3 <559 < 259 04/03/14 - 07/03/14 <3 <7 <24 <3 <10 <7 <12 <3 <3 <1575 < 356 07/03/14 - 10/01/14 <3 <5 <19 <3 <7 <6 <9 <3 <2 <1101 < 350 10/01/14 - 12/31/14 <2 <2 <14 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <1 <570 < 197 MEAN L-10 01/02/14 - 04/03/14 <3 <6 < 19 <3 <7 <6 < 11 <3 <3 <527 < 180 04/03/14 - 07/03/14 <2 <5 <20 <2 <6 <5 <8 <2 <2 <1022 <342 07/03/14 10/01/14 <5 <11 <27 <4 <11 < 11 < 17 <4 <4 <1915 < 834 10/01/14 12/31/14 <3 <5 < 16 <2 <6 <5 <7 <2 <2 <594 < 124 MEAN L-11 01/02114 04/03/14 <2 <3 <15 <3 <5 <5 <6 <2 <2 <446 <87 04/03/14 07/03/14 <2 <4 <14 <2 <5 <5 <9 <2 <2 <664 < 111 07/03/14 10/01/14 <3 <4 <15 <2 <5 <5 <8 <2 <2 <1203 <451 10/01/14 - 12/31/14 <2 <3 <14 <2 <5 <4 <7 <2 <2 <489 < 189 MEAN C

00

Table C-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP I GROUP II I GROUP III IGROUP IV PERIOD L-03 L-05 L-01 L06 L-04 L-07 L-08 L-1 1 L-1 0 01/02/14 - 01/09/14 < 27 < 27 <27 <32 <27 <32 <32 <13 <32 01/09/14 - 01/16/14 < 23 < 23 <23 <18 <23 <18 <11 <19 <19 01/16/14 - 01/23/14 < 27 < 27 <26 <16 <26 <49 <49 <49 <49 01/23/14 - 01/30/14 < 70 (1) < 65 <67 <69 <67 <69 <69 <69 <24 01/30/14 - 02/06/14 < 50 < 50 <50 <55 < 50 <56 <54 <22 <56 02/06/14 - 02/13/14 < 65 < 65 <37 <64 < 65 <61 <61 <25 <61 02/13/14 - 02/19/14 < 61 (1) < 52 <21 <51 <60 <66 <65 <55 <56 02/19/14 - 02/27/14 < 41 (1) < 43 <22 <43 <38 <49 <49 (1) <55 <55 02/27/14 - 03/06/14 < 30 <30 <18 <30 <30 <33 <33 <33 <33 03/06/14 - 03/13/14 < 25 <58 <59 <58 < 59 <49 <49 <48 <49 03/13/14 - 03/20/1 4 < 55 <55 <21 <54 <54 <64 <61 <63 <61 03/20/14 - 03/26/14 < 65 <55 <50 <55 < 38 <65 <67 <59 <57 03/26/14 - 04/03/14 < 25 <67 <25 <67 <59 <47 <47 <53 <54 04/03/14 - 04/10/14 < 64 <27 <64 <64 < 63 <66 <66 <65 <66 04/10/14 - 04/17/14 < 34 <34 <34 <37 < 35 <36 <38 <16 <38 04/17/14 - 04/24/14 < 67 <69 <69 <27 <69 <66 <65 <65 <65 04/24/14 - 05/01/14 < 34 <35 <34 <38 <34 <38 <38 <21 <38 05/01/14 - 05/08/14 < 54 <53 <53 <52 <53 <22 <53 <52 <52 05/08/14 - 05/15/14 < 32 <32 <32 <12 <32 <36 <36 <36 <36 05/15/14 - 05/22/14 < 67 <66 <66 <52 <66 <53 <32 <53 <53 05/22/14 - 05/29/14 < 68 <66 <35 <68 <68 <55 <55 <57 <57 05/29/14 - 06/05/14 < 36 <66 (1) <36 <41 < 36 <42 <41 <41 <17 06/05/14 - 06/12/14 < 35 <35 <15 <35 <35 <32 <32 <32 <32 06/12/14 - 06/19/14 (1) <56 <55 <34 <55 <35 <34 <14 <34 06/19/14 - 06/25/14 (1) <54 (1) <51 <51 <51 <58 <56 <55 <55 06/25/14 - 07/03/14 (1) <33 <13 <33 <32 < 39 < 39 < 41 (1) < 66 (1) 07/03/14 - 07/10/14 < 31 <31 <31 <25 <31 <26 <25 <11 <27 07/10/14 - 07/17/14 < 69 <69 <27 <69 <69 <70 <69 <69 <70 07/17/14 - 07/24/14 <44 <44 <44 <44 <44 <43 <43 <43 <43 07/24/14 - 07/31114 < 13 <34 <34 <34 <34 <37 <37 <36 <36 07/31/14 - 08/07/14 < 57 <58 <57 <22 <62 (1) <64 <63 <63 <63 08/07/14 - 08/14/14 < 21 <21 <21 <21 <9 <32 <32 <32 <32 08/14/14 - 08/21/14 < 55 <55 <21 <55 <55 <57 <57 <56 <56 08/21/14 - 08/27/14 < 24 <63 <63 <63 <63 <62 <62 <62 <62 08/27/14 - 09/03/14 < 66 <66 <66 <26 <66 <69 <69 <69 <69 09/03/14 - 09/10/14 < 66 <66 <66 <28 <66 <68 <67 <67 <67 09/10/14 - 09/18/14 < 50 <50 <21 <50 <50 <66 <66 <65 <66 09/18/14 - 09125/14 <49 <49 <48 <62 <48 <26 <62 <63 <62 09/25/14 - 10/01/14 < 50 <51 <21 <50 <50 <55 <53 <53 <53 10/01/14 - 10/09/14 < 36 <36 <36 <32 <36 <33 <18 <33 <33 10/09/14 - 10/16/14 < 67 <68 <26 <67 <68 (1) <69 <69 <70 <70 10/16/14 - 10/23/14 < 28 <28 <28 <43 <28 <44 <44 <44 <18 10/23/14 - 10/30/14 < 30 <30 <30 <23 <30 <24 <24 <9 <24 10/30/14 - 11/06/14 < 33 <33 <33 <32 <32 <33 <32 <18 <32 11/06/14 - 11/13/14 < 29 <29 <11 <29 <29 <32 <32 <32 <32 11/13/14 - 11/20/14 < 63 <61 <25 <63 <63 <67 <67 <67 <67 11/20/14 - 11/26/14 < 44 <44 <44 <18 <43 <43 <40 <43 <43 11/26/14 - 12104/14 < 17 <43 <43 <43 <43 <48 <49 <49 <49 12/04/14 - 12/11/14 < 55 <55 <28 <55 <55 <43 <43 <42 <42 12/11/14 - 12/18/14 < 62 <63 <62 <62 <24 <27 (1) <61 <61 <61 12/18/14 - 12/24/14 < 46 <46 <48 <21 <46 <15 <44 <42 <42 12/24/14 - 12/31/14 < 35 <15 <35 <35 <35 <15 <26 <27 <27 MEAN -

(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION c-i 2 Page 53 of 178

Table C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA CONTROL FARM COLLECTION L-42 PERIOD (1) Samples were not available in 2014 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-J3 Page54ofl78

Table C-VIL2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD (1) Samples were not available in 2014

çi (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

Table C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/-2 SIGMA SITE COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD L-CONTROL Beets/kohlrabi 09/17/14 < 11 < 11 < 33 < 11 < 27 < 13 < 21 < 34 < 9 < 12 < 76 < 21 Kohirabi leaves 09/17/14 <9 < 10 <22 <9 <21 < 11 < 18 <29 <9 < 9 <67 <20 MEAN - - - - - - - - - -

L-QUAD 1 Potatoes 09/17/14 < 12 < 13 < 31 < 14 < 26 < 14 < 26 < 43 < 12 < 14 < 93 < 18 Swiss chard 09/17/14 < 10 < 11 <29 < 11 <27 < 13 <22 <34 <9 < 12 <85 <26 MEAN - - - - - - - - - - -

L-QUAD 2 Beet greens 09/17/14 < 17 < 20 < 48 < 16 < 41 < 19 < 31 < 57 < 18 < 16 < 134 < 31 Beets 09/17/14 < 19 < 16 < 48 < 19 < 41 < 18 < 35 < 50 < 15 < 19 < 108 < 33 MEAN - - - - - - - - - - -

L-OUAD 3 Beets 09/17/14 < 12 < 11 < 25 < 12 < 22 < 12 < 20 < 36 < 9 < 11 < 78 < 20 Swiss chard 09/17/14 < 10 < 13 < 28 < 13 < 32 < 13 < 20 < 35 < 10 < 12 < 77 < 25 MEAN - - - - - - - - - - -

L-QUAD 4 Beets 09/17/14 < 11 < 11 < 29 < 11 < 28 < 11 < 23 < 32 < 10 < 11 < 68 < 16 Kale 09/17/14 < 14 < 14 < 35 < 14 < 38 < 14 < 27 < 41 < 13 < 12 < 91 < 28 MEAN CD C

0 00

Table C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/QUARTER +/-2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC CODE +/-2SD.

L-01-1 23.7 +/- 4.5 20.5 25.3 25.3 23.8 L-01-2 23.1 +/- 7.2 18.3 26.8 24.4 23.0 L-03-1 23.0 +/- 3.6 20.6 23.0 25.0 23.2 L-03-2 22.7 +/- 4.6 19.3 24.3 23.3 24.0 L-04-1 23.0 +/- 7.0 17.8 24.4 25.2 24.7 L-04-2 22,2 +/- 6.3 17.5 22.9 24.4 23.8 L-05-1 22.8 +/- 7.5 17.2 24.6 24.3 25.1 L-05-2 22.8 +/- 4.3 20.0 22.4 23.7 25.1 L-06-1 24.4 +/- 6.9 19.5 25.4 27.7 24.9 L-06-2 24.4 +/- 4.4 21.7 23.5 26.8 25.4 L-07-1 24.8 +/- 8.6 19.2 24.7 29.6 25.7 L-07-2 23.5 +/- 6.0 19.2 24.5 26.1 24.2 L-08-1 23.2 +/- 4.6 19.8 24.4 24.7 23.9 L-08-2 23.4 +/- 6.4 18.7 23.8 25.0 25.9 L-10-1 21.6 +/- 5.0 18.0 21.9 23.4 23.1 L-10-2 21.4 +/- 6.1 17.9 20.6 21.8 25.2 L-11-1 21.9 +/- 6.6 17.0 22.9 24.1 23.6 L-11-2 21.0 +/- 3.2 18.7 21.5 22.2 21.7 L-101-1 24.6 +/- 2.3 22.9 25.1 24.6 25.6 L-101-2 23.3 +/- 7.0 18.2 24.2 26.2 24.7 L-102-1 26.4 +/- 7.8 20.9 26.5 28.1 30.0 L-102-2 26,4 +/- 6.0 22.7 25.1 28.7 29.0 L-103-1 23.4 +/- 5.4 20.0 23.1 26.5 24.1 L-103-2 24.0 +/- 6.1 19.5 24.6 25.7 26.1 L-104-1 22.7 +/- 4.0 19.7 23.8 23.8 23.6 L-104-2 22.1 +/- 5.4 18.5 21.6 23.3 24.8 L-105-1 24.6 +/- 7.4 19.2 25.2 26.5 27.5 L-105-2 24.0 +/- 6.3 19.3 25.2 25.4 26.1 L-106-1 23.5 +/- 6.5 18.7 24.2 25.6 25.4 L-106-2 22.4 +/- 5.7 19.0 21.0 25.0 24.4 L-107-1 24.4 +/- 4.4 21.6 23.7 26.7 25.4 L-107-2 23.6 +/- 3.5 21.3 23.8 25.5 23.9 L-108-1 24.9 +/- 8.0 18.9 26.1 27.4 27.1 L-108-2 20.5 +/- 4.5 17.3 20.7 21.7 22.4 L-109-1 23.4 +/- 7.2 18.6 23.2 27.3 24.4 L-109-2 25.5 +/- 6.6 21.2 25.7 29.3 25.7 L-110-1 23.2 +/- 7.3 17.8 24.2 24.9 25.8 L-110-2 22.6 +/- 7.9 16.9 22.9 25.4 25.2 L-112-1 21.9 +/- 6.2 17.4 22.3 23.5 24.4 L-112-2 23.8 +/- 5.6 20.0 23.9 26.7 24.4 L-114-1 24.5 +/- 6.1 20.3 24.3 26.1 27.3 L-114-2 25.3 +/- 4.5 22.0 26.7 26.8 25.7 C-16 Page57ofl7$

Table C-IX.1 QUARTERLY OSLO RESULTS FOR LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/QUARTER +/-2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN JAN MAR

- APR JUN

- JUL SEP

- OCT DEC CODE +/-2 S.D.

L-115-1 22.7 +/- 6.5 18.3 22.5 23.8 26.0 L-115-2 21.3 +/- 5.7 17.2 23.3 21.4 23.1 L-116-1 21.7 +/- 2.5 20.2 21.2 22.6 22.8 L-116-2 23.2 +/- 4.7 19.8 24.1 24.0 25.0 L-201-3 21.0 +/- 4.4 17.8 22.5 21.6 22.2 L-201-4 24.3 +/- 7.2 19.0 25.7 27.0 25,5 L-202-3 21.9 +/- 7.8 16.7 23.0 26.1 21.9 L-202-4 20.5 +/- 5.2 17.2 20.0 23.4 21.3 L-203-1 23.6 +/- 4.8 20.1 25.3 25.0 23.8 L-203-2 24.0 +/- 6.1 19.8 23.7 26.7 25.8 L-204-1 24.3 +/- 8.0 18.7 24.3 27.6 26.6 L-204-2 24.5 +/- 7.2 19.1 26.2 26.1 26.5 L-205-1 23.7 +/- 4.7 20.2 24.3 25.3 24.9 L-205-2 23.9 +/- 6.3 20.4 22.1 27.0 26.1 L-205-3 25.1 +/- 6.5 21.3 23.9 28.9 26.4 L-205-4 23.5 +/- 5.4 19.7 25.4 23.4 25.4 L-206-1 24.6 +/- 6.9 20.1 23.8 27.7 26.9 L-206-2 23.2 +/- 9.4 16.2 24.7 25.9 25.9 L-207-1 22.0 +/- 6.5 17.3 23.2 22.8 24.7 L-207-2 23.3 +/- 7.5 18.8 22.9 23.4 28.0 L-208-1 22.6 +/- 8.3 18.4 22.6 (1) 26.7 L-208-2 23.9 +/- 8.7 19.4 24.1 (1) 28.1 L-209-1 23.0 +/- 6.1 18.6 23.5 25.6 24.4 L-209-2 21.9 +/- 6.6 18.3 22.8 (1) 24.7 L-210-1 24.0 +/- 6.1 20.5 25.6 (1) 25.9 L-210-2 24.7 +/- 7.5 19.1 27.0 26.7 26.0 L-211-1 25.3 +/- 7.0 20.3 25.4 28.0 27.5 L-211-2 24.7 +/- 8.4 18.7 25.0 26.8 28.2 L-212-1 24.7 +/- 4.6 21.7 24.0 26.8 26.1 L-272-2 24.4 +/- 4.3 23.3 23.1 27.6 23.6 L-213-3 22.8 +/- 5.3 19.0 24.2 24.9 22.9 L-213-4 23.0 +/- 9.0 17.3 23.3 28.3 23.1 L-214-3 23.0 +/- 6.7 18.0 24.1 24.9 24.9 L-214-4 22.5 +/- 7.5 17.3 24.6 25.7 22.2 L-215-3 24.6 +/- 7.8 18.8 26.9 27.0 25.5 L-215-4 25.2 +/- 4.8 21.8 25.2 27.3 26.4 L-216-3 24.4 +/- 7.1 19.1 25.3 26.5 26.6 L-216-4 23.9 +/- 8.8 18.9 25.7 27.1 (1)

L-1JIB-1 24.3 +/- 5.4 20.7 24.2 25.2 27.1 L-111B-2 23.2 +/- 5.1 19.6 23.7 25.6 23.8 L-113A-1 25.1 +/- 7.7 20.8 23.1 27.0 29.4 L-113A-2 23.9 +/- 5.8 19.8 24.2 25.4 26.3 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-17 PageS8ofl78

TABLE C-IX2 MEAN QUARTERLY OSLD RESULTS FOR THE INN ER RING, OUTER RING, OTHER AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREMIQUARTER +/-2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION INNER RING OUTER RING OTHER CONTROL PERIOD +/-2 S.D.

JAN-MAR 19.6 +/- 3.1 19.1 +/- 3.1 19.1 +/- 2.6 18.0 +/- 0.1 APR-JUN 23.9 +/- 3.0 24.2 +/- 2.9 24.0 +/- 2.6 21.3 +/- 1.8 JUL-SEP 25.5 +/- 3.7 26.0 +/- 3.5 25.1 +/- 3.6 22.6 +/- 2.3 OCT-DEC 25.5 +/- 3.6 25.3 +/- 3.7 24.3 +/- 2.2 24.2 +/- 3.0 TABLE C-IX.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR LASALLE COUNTY STATION, 2014 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIREM/QUARTER LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-2 S.D.

INNER RING 128 16.9 30.0 23.6 +/- 5.9 OUTER RING 131 16.2 28.9 23.6 +/- 6.3 OTHER 64 17.0 29.6 23.1 +/- 5.5 CONTROL 8 17.9 25.2 21.5 +/- 5.1 INNER RING STATIONS L-101-1, L-101-2, L-102-1, L-102-2, L-103-1, L-103-2, L-104-1, L-104-2, L-105-J, L-105-2, L-106-1, L-106-2, L-107-1, L-107-2, L-108-1, L-108-2, L-109-1, L-109-2, L-J10-1, L-110-2, L-J11B-1, L-11JB-2, L-112-1, L-112-2, L-113A-1, L-113A-2, L-114-1, L-114-2, L-115-1, L-115-2, L-116-1, L- 116-2 OUTER RING STATIONS - L-201-3, L-201-4, L-202-3, L-202-4, L-203-1 L-203-2, L-204-1, L-204-2, L-205-1, L-205-2, L-205-3, L-205-4, L-206-1, L-206-2, L-207-1, L-207-2, L-208-1, L-208-2, L-209-1, L-209-2, L-210-1, L-210-2, L-211-1, L-211-2, L-212-1, L-212-2, L-213-3, L-213-4, L-214-3, L-214-4, L-215-3, L-2154, L-216-3, L-21 6-4 OTHER STATIONS L-01-1, L-01-2, L-03-1, L-03-2, L-04-1, L-04-2, L-05-1, L-05-2, L-06-1, L-06-2, L-07-1, L-07-2, L-08-1, L-08-2, L-11-1, L-11-2 CONTROL STATIONS L-10-1, L-10-2 C-18 Page 59 of 178

FIGURE C-I Surface Water Gross Beta Stations L-21 (C) and L40 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014 -

L-21 (C) Illinois River at Seneca 14.0

I 01-27-05 01-22-07 01-16-09 01-11-11 01-05-13 12-31-14 L-40 Illinois Rivet Downstream 12.0 I

01-27-05 01-22-07 01-16-09 01-11-11 01-05-13 12-31-14 C-19 Page 60 of 178

FIGURE C-2 Surface Water Tritium Stations L-21 (C) and L-40 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014 -

L-21 Illinois River at Seneca 2000 03-31-05 03-14-07 02-24-09 02-07-11 01-20-13 01-03-15 L40 Illinois River Downstream 2000 03-31-05 03-14-07 02-24-09 02-07-1 1 01-20-13 01-03-15 C-20 Page 61 of 178

FIGURE C-3 Air Particulate Gross Beta Stations L-01 and L-03 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014 -

L-O1 Nearsite No. I 60.0 50.0 U

10.0 0.0 01-06-05 01-05-07 01-03-09 01-02-11 12-31-12 12-30-14 L-03 Onsite No. 3 60.0 50.0

c3 9

w 10.0 0.0 01-06-05 01-05-07 01-03-09 01-02-11 12-31-12 12-30-14 C-21 Page 62 of 178

FIGURE C4 Air Particulate Gross Beta Stations L-05 and L-06 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014 -

L-05 Onsite No. 5 60.0 50.0 40.0 5

300 0,

0 0 20.0 10.0 0.0 01-06-05 01-05-07 01-03-09 01-02-11 12-31-12 12-30-14 L-06 Nearsite No. 6 70.0 60.0 0,

50.0 S 40.0 0,

0 30.0 0

20.0 10.0 00 01-06-05 01-05-07 01-03-09 01-02-11 12-31-12 12-30-14 C-22 Page 63 of 178

FIGURE C-5 Air Particulate Gross Beta Station L-1O (C)

Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014 -

L-1O (C) Streator 60.0 50.0 i

20.0 10.0 0.0 01-06-05 01-05-07 01-03-09 01-02-11 12-31-12 12-30-14 C-23 Page 64 of 178

FIGURE C-6 Air Particulate Gross Beta Stations L-04 and L-07 Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014 -

L-04 Rte. 170 60.0 50.0 40.0

. 300 0,

0 uj 0 20.0 10.0 07-07-05 05-31-07 04-23-09 03-17-11 02-07-13 01-01-15 L-07 Seneca 60.0 50.0 40.0 (3

. 300 0,

9 20.0 10.0 0.0 07-07-05 05-31-07 04-23-09 03-17-11 02-07-13 01-01-15 C-24 Page 65 of 17$

FIGURE C-Z Air Particulate Gross Beta Stations L-08 and L-1 I Collected in the Vicinity of LSCS, 2005 2014 -

L-08 Marseilles 60.0 50.0 c4 9

LU 0

10.0 0.0 07-07-05 05-31-07 04-23-09 03-17-11 02-07-13 01-01-15 L-11 Ransom 60.0 50.0 9

0.

LU o

E 10.0 0.0 07-07-05 05-31-07 04-23-09 03-17-11 02-07-13 01-01-15 C-25 Page 66 of 178

APPENDIX D INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM Page 67 of 178

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

March 2014 E10854 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 95.1 91.7 1.04 A Sr-90 pCi/L 10.9 15.1 0.72 W El 0855 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 96.6 98.5 0.98 A Ce-141 pCi/L 112 119 0.94 A Cr-SI pCi/L 449 491 0.91 A Cs-134 pCIIL 186 210 0.89 A Cs-137 pCi!L 250 253 0.99 A Co-58 pCi/L 248 266 0.93 A Mn-54 pCi/L 292 297 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 230 219 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 312 323 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 321 337 0.95 A E10857 AP Ce-141 pCi 53.0 53.9 0.98 A Cr-SI pCi 232 223 1.04 A Cs-134 pCi 100 95.3 1.05 A Cs-137 pCi 122 115 1.06 A Co-58 pCi 122 121 1.01 A Mn-54 pCi 135 135 1.00 A Fe-59 pCi 111 99.3 1.12 A Zn-65 pCi 140 147 0.95 A Co-60 pCi 187 153 1.22 W E10856 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 74.1 76.4 0.97 A E10858 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2090 1760 1.19 A June 2014 E10913 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.9 91.3 0.94 A Sr-90 pCi/L 13.8 14.5 0.95 A E10914 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 86.5 90.9 0.95 A Ce-141 pCi/L 111 124 0.90 A Cr-51 pCi/L 255 253 1.01 A Cs-134 pCi/L 147 162 0.91 A Cs-137 pCi/L 123 120 1.03 A Co-58 pCi!L 105 112 0.94 A Mn-54 pCi/L 155 156 0.99 A Fe-59 pCi/L 106 102 1.04 A Zn-65 pCi/L 251 252 1.00 A Co-60 pCi/L 218 224 0.97 A E10916 AP Ce-141 pCi 95.1 92.6 1.03 A Cr-51 pCi 215 190 1.13 A Cs-134 pCi 122 122 1.00 A Cs-137 pCi 95.1 69.8 1.06 A Co-58 pCi 68.7 84.1 1.05 A Mn-54 pCi 115 116 0.99 A Fe-59 pCi 72.6 76.7 0.95 A Zn-65 pCi 193 189 1.02 A Co-60 pCi 179 168 1.07 A E10915 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 85.6 85.2 1.00 A E10917 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1680 1810 0.93 A D-1 Page68ofl78

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TEE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

September2014 E10946 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 90.7 96.9 0.94 A Sr-90 pCi/L 14.0 16.4 0.85 A E10947 Milk 1-131 pCIIL 92.0 97.6 0.94 A Ce-141 pCi/L 117 126 0.93 A Cr-51 pCi/L 281 288 0.98 A Cs-134 pCi/L 141 158 0.89 A Cs-137 pCiIL 186 193 096 A Co-58 pCi/L 137 143 0.96 A Mn-54 pCi/L 136 142 0.97 A Fe-59 pCiIL 162 158 1.03 A Zn-65 pCi/L 75.2 73.0 1.03 A Co-60 pCi/L 286 297 0.96 A E10949 AP Ce-141 pCi 97.8 82.1 1.19 A Cr-51 pCi 212 188 1.13 A Cs-134 pCi 106 103 1.03 A Cs-137 pCi 131 126 1.04 A Co-58 pCi 85.7 93.0 0.92 A Mn-54 pCi 92.8 92.3 1.01 A Fe-59 pCi 113 103 1.10 A Zn-65 pCi 53.2 47.5 1.12 A Co-60 pCi 202 193 1.05 A E10948 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 83.9 89.8 0.93 A E10950 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2010 1720 1.17 A E10951 Soil Ce-141 pCi/g 0.208 0.186 1.12 A Cr-51 pCi/g 0.398 0.425 0.94 A Cs-134 pCi/g 0.216 0.233 0.93 A Cs-137 pCi/g 0.398 0.365 1.09 A Co-58 pCi/g 0.197 0.211 0.93 A Mn-54 pCifg 0.242 0.209 1.16 A Fe-59 pCi/g 0.238 0.233 1.02 A Zn-65 pCi/g 0.117 0.108 1.08 A Co-60 pCi/g 0.447 0.438 1.02 A December2014 E11078 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.7 95.7 0.90 A Sr-90 pCi/L 12.9 15.6 0.83 A E11079 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 85.9 95.1 0.90 A Ce-141 pCi/L 205 219 0.94 A Cr-51 pCi/L 402 406 0.99 A Cs-i 34 pCi/L 156 164 0.95 A Cs-i37 pCi/L 194 198 0.98 A Co-58 pCi/L 122 130 0.94 A Mn-54 pCi/L 220 225 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 183 175 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 287 297 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 224 235 0.95 A D-2 Page 69 of 178

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

MonthlYear Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

E11081 AP Ce-141 pCi 96.4 102 0.95 A December2014 Cr-51 pCi 171 190 0.90 A Cs-134 pCi 73.1 76.9 0.95 A Cs-137 pCi 99.0 92.6 1.07 A Co-58 pCi 57.5 60.8 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi 107 105 1.02 A Fe-59 pCi 74.2 81.6 0.91 A Zn-65 pCi 144 139 1.04 A Co-60 pCi 114 110 1.04 A E11080 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 93.5 98.2 0.95 A E11082 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1760 1970 0.89 A (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

gravimetric and/or (b) The Analytics known value is equal to 700% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

limits of 0.80-1.20.

(d) Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratio W-Accepteble with warning, reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0.70 and> 7.30.

D-3 Page 70 of 178

TABLE D-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 1)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Limits Evaluation fc)

Month/Year Number Media RAD-97 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 38.25 36.7 27.5 43.6

- A May 2014 Sr-90 pCi/L 24.65 26.5 19.2 30.9

- A Ba-133 pCi/L 89.1 87.9 74.0-96.7 A Cs-134 pCi/L 45.55 44.3 35.5-48.7 A Cs-137 pCiIL 91.15 89.1 80.2-101 A Co-60 pCi/L 65.10 64.2 57.8-73.1 A Zn-65 pCi/L 244 235 212 -275 A Gr-A pCi/L 45.65 61.0 31.9-75.8 A Gr-B pCiJL 27.95 33.0 21.4-40.7 A 1-131 pCi/L 23.75 25.7 21,3-30.3 A U-Nat pCi/L 9.61 10.2 7.95- 11,8 A H-3 pCi/L 8435 8770 7610 -9650 A MRAD-20 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 28.0 46.0 15.4 71.4

- A RAD-99 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 30.4 31.4 22.8-38.1 A November2014 Sr-90 pCi/L 18.6 21.8 15.6-25.7 A Ba-133 pCi/L 46.8 49.1 40.3 54.5

- A Cs-134 pCi/L 88.0 89.8 73.7 98.8

- A Cs-137 pCi/L 99.0 98.8 88.9- 111 A Co-60 pCi/L 92.5 92.1 82.9 104

- A Zn-65 pCi/L 325 310 279 362

- A Gr-A pCi/L 29.9 37.6 19.4-48.1 A Gr-B pCi/L 27.5 27.4 17.3-35.3 A 1-131 pCi/L 15.8 20.3 16.8-24.4 N(1)

U-Nat pCi/L 5.74 5.80 4.34 6.96

- A H-3 pCi/L 6255 6880 5940 7570

- A MRAD-21 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 27.3 36.9 12.4-57.3 A low activity. TBE would evaluate this as (1) The lodlne-131 was evaluated as failed with a ratio of 0.778. No cause could be found for the slightly since 2004 have acceptable with warning. A rerun was not possible due to 1-73 7 decay. All other ERA lodine-737 evaluations been acceptable. NCR 74-08 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

gra vimattic and/or (b) The ERA known value is equal to 700% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

Reported result falls (c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable.

of the Warning Limit.

outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside D-4 Page 71 of 178

TABLE D-3 DOES MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 1 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

March 2014 14-MaW30 Water Am-241 Bq/L 0.764 0.720 0.504 0.936

- A Cs-134 Bq/L 20.7 23.1 16.2-300 A Cs-137 Bq/L 28.0 28.9 20.2-37.6 A Co-57 Bq/L 26.5 27.5 19.3-35.8 A Co-60 Bq/L 15.6 16.0 11.2-20.8 A H3** Bq/L NR 321 225-417 N(3)

Mn-54 Bq/L 13.5 13.9 9.7 18.1

- A Ni-63 Bq/L NR 34.0 23.8 44.2

- N (3)

Pu-238 Bq/L 0.911 0.828 0.560 1.076 Pu-239/240 BqIL 0.751 0.676 0.473 0.879 K-40 Bq/L NR (1) N (3)

Sr90** Bq/L NR 8.51 5.96 11.06

- N (3)

U234/233** Bq/L NR 0.225 0.158-0.293 N(3)

U238** Bq/L NR 1.45 1.02 1.89

- N (3)

Zn-65 Bq/L -0.201 (1) A 14-MaS30 Soil Cs-f 34 Sq/kg 2.02 (1) A Cs-137 Bq/kg 1300 1238 867-1609 A Co-57 Eq/kg 1069 966 676 1256

- A Co-60 Sq/kg 1.32 1.22 (2) A Mn-54 Sq/kg 1510 1430 1001 -1859 A K-40 Sq/kg 669 622 435 809

- A Sr-90 Bq/kg 4.14 (1) A Zn-65 Bq/kg 763 695 487 904

- A 14-RdF3O AP Cs134** Sq/sample NR 1.91 1.34-2.48 N(3)

Cs137** Eq/sample NR 1.76 1.23-2.29 N(3)

Co57** Eq/sample NR (1) N (3)

Co60** Bq/sample NR 1.39 0.97- 7.81 N (3)

Mn54** Bq/sample NR (1) N (3)

Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.8220 1.18 0.83-1.53 N (3)

Zn65** Bq/sample NR (1) N (3) 14-GrF3O AP Gr-A Sq/sample 0.606 1.77 0.53-3.01 A Gr-B Eq/sample 0.7507 0.77 0.39-1.16 A 14-RUV3O Vegetation Cs-134 Bq!sample 5.96 6.04 4.23-7.85 A Cs-f 37 Eq/sample 5.06 4.74 3.32 6.16

- A Co-57 Bq/sample 11.8 10.1 7.1 13.1

- A Co-60 Eq/sample 7.34 6.93 4.85 9.01

- A Mn-54 Eq/sample 8.95 8.62 6.03 11.21

- A Sr-90 Eq/sample 1.23 1.46 1.02 1.90

- A Zn-65 Eq/sample 8.91 7.86 5.50- 10.22 A D-5 Page 72 of 178

TABLE D-3 DOES MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2014 (PAGE 2 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

September2014 14-MaW3I Water Am-241 Bq/L 0.705 0.88 0.62-1.14 A Cs134*** Bq/L NR (1) N (4)

Cs137*** Eq/L NR 18.4 12.9-23.9 N(4)

Co57*** Bq/L NR 24.7 17.3-32.1 N(4)

Co60*** Bq/L NR 12.4 8.7 16.1

- N (4)

Mn54*** Bq/L NR 14.0 9.8 18.2

- N (4)

Ni-63 Bq/L 24.07 24.6 17.2-32.0 A Pu-238 Bq/L 0.591 0.618 0.433 0.803

- A Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.0153 0.0048 (2) A K40*** Bq/L NR 161 113-209 N(4)

Zn65*** Bq/L NR 10.9 7.6 14.2

- N (4) 14-MaS31 Soil Cs134*** Sq/kg NR 622 435 809

- N (4)

Cs137*** Sq/kg NR (1) N(4)

Co57*** Eq/kg NR 1116 781 - 1451 N (4)

Co60*** Eq/kg NR 779 545- 1013 N (4)

Mn54*** Sq/kg NR 1009 706 - 1312 N (4)

K40*** Sq/kg NR 824 577 - 1071 N (4)

Sr-90 Sq/kg 694 858 601 - 1115 A Zn65*** Sq/kg NR 541 379 - 703 N (4) 14-RUF3I AP Sr-90 Eq/sample 0.310 0.703 0.492 0.914

- N (4) 14-GrF31 AP Gr-A Eq/sample 0.153 0.53 0.16-0.90 N(4)

Gr-E Bq/sample 0.977 1.06 0.53 1.59

- A September 2014 14-RdV31 Vegetation Cs-134 Sq/sample 7.31 7.38 5.17 -9.59 A Cs-I 37 Eq/sample 8.93 8.14 5.70- 10.58 A Co-57 Eq/sample 10.8 9.2 6.4- 12.0 A Co-60 Bq/sample 6.31 6.11 4.28 7.94

- A Mn-54 Eq/sample 7.76 7.10 4.97 9.23

- A Sr-90 Eq/sample 0.738 0.85 0.60-1.11 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 7.16 6.42 4.49 8.35

- A The MAPEP cross check isotope list has been reduced due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients.

These nuclides are no longer part of the TBE cross check program due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients. MAPEP evaluates non-reported analyses as failed if they were reported in the previous series.

All future gamma cross check samples for these isotopes will be provided by Analytics.

(1) False positive test.

(2) Sensitivity evaluation.

(3) Water, Nl-63 overlooked when reporting, but the result of 32.7+- 1.69 would have passed the acceptance criteria. NCR 14-04 Water, the non-detected K-40 was overlooked when reporting, but would have passed the false positive test. NCR 1 4-04 AR, Sr-90 rerun was within the low range of the acceptqance criteria. The original and rerun results were statistically the same. No cause could be identified for the slightly low Sr-90 activity. NCR 74-04 For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reported in the previous series. NCR 14-04 (4) AR, Sr-90 gravimetdc yield was venj high at 717%. Could indicate larger than normal amounts of calcium in the AP. A second fuming HNO3 separation would be required to remove the excess calcium. NCR 14-09 AR, Gr-Alpha was counted on the wrong side. When flipped over and recounted the results were acceptable. NCR 14-09 For non reported (NR) analyses, MA PEP evaluates as failed if they were reported in the previous series. NCR 14-09 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The MA PEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) DOE/MAPEP evaluation: Aacceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

D-6 Page73 of 178

TABLE 0-6 ERA STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAMa ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page loll)

Concentration fpCi/L)

Lab Code Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control Result b Result c Limits Acceptance ERW-1384 4/7/2014 Sr-89 40.29 +/- 5.76 36.70 27.50 - 43.60 Pass ERW-1384 4/7/2014 Sr-90 24.08 +/- 2.35 26.50 19.20 - 30.90 Pass ERW-1385 4/7/2014 Ba-133 78.23 +/- 3.93 87.90 74.00 - 96.70 Pass ERW-1385 4/7/2014 Co-60 62.75 +/- 3.53 64.20 57.80 - 73.10 Pass ERW-1385 4/7/2014 Cs-134 44.97 +/- 3.99 44.30 35.50 - 48.70 Pass ERW-1385 4/7/2014 Cs-137 88.54 +/- 4.93 89.10 80.20 - 101.00 Pass ERW-1385 4/7/2014 Zn-65 249.1 +/- 10.44 235.0 212.0 - 275.0 Pass ERW-1388 4/7/2014 Gr. Alpha 56.70 +/- 2.47 61.00 31.90 - 75.80 Pass ERW-1388 4/7/2014 Gr. Beta 32.10 +/- 1.20 33.00 21.40 - 40.70 Pass ERW-1391 4/7/2014 1-131 25.52 +/- 1.12 25.70 21.30 - 30.30 Pass ERW-1394 4/7/2014 Uranium 10.76 +/- 0.74 10.20 7.95 - 11.80 Pass ERW-1397 4/7/2014 H-3 8982 +/- 279 8770 7610 - 9650 Pass ERW-5382 10/6/2014 Sr-89 29.40 +/- 5.32 31.40 22.80 - 38.10 Pass ERW-5382 10/6/2014 Sr-90 19.19 +/- 1.85 21.80 15.60 - 25.70 Pass ERW-5385 10/6/2014 Ba-133 43.54 +/- 4.54 49.10 40.30 - 54.50 Pass ERW-5385 10/6/2014 Cs-134 81.95 +/- 7.49 89.80 73.70 - 98.80 Pass ERW-5385 10/6/2014 Cs-137 95.76 +/- 5.50 98.80 88.90 - 111.00 Pass ERW-5385 10/6/2014 Co-SO 90.25 +/- 2.77 92.10 82.90 - 104.00 Pass ERW-5385 10/6/2014 Zn-65 327.4 +/- 23.3 310.00 279.0 - 362.0 Pass ERW-5388 10/6/2014 Gr. Alpha 30.88 +/- 8.05 37.60 19.40 - 46.10 Pass ERW-5388 10/6/2014 G. Beta 20.47 +/- 4.75 27.40 17.30 - 35.30 Pass ERW-5392 10/6/2014 1-131 19.58 +/- 2.35 20.30 16.80 - 24.40 Pass ERW-5394 10/6/2014 Uranium 5.51 +/- 0.37 5.80 4.34 - 6.96 Pass ERW-5397 10/6/2014 H-3 6876 +/- 383 6880 5940 - 7570 Pass a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency testing in drinking water conducted by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA).

b Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the mean +/- standard deviation for three determinations.

c Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, I determination) and control limits as provided by ERA.

D-7 Page 74 of 178

TABLE D-5 DOES MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page 1 of 2)

Concentration a Known Control Lab Code b Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c Acceptance MAW-1140 2/1/2014 Gr. Alpha 0.77 +/- 0.06 0.85 0.26 - 1.44 Pass MAW-i 140 2/1/2014 Gr. Beta 4.31 +/- 0.08 4.19 2.10 - 6.29 Pass MAW-ii84 2/1/2014 Fe-55 0.40 +/- 3.20 0.00 -0.01 - 2.00 Pass MAW-i 184 2/1/2014 H-3 345.10 +/- 10.60 321.00 225.00 - 417.00 Pass MAW-i 184 2/1/2014 Ni-63 32.40 +/- 3.20 34.00 23.80 - 44.20 Pass MAW-i184 2/1/2014 Pu-238 1.28 +/- 0.i2 0.83 0.58 - 1.08 Fail (1)

MAW-ii84 2/1/2014 Pu-239/240 0.91 +/- 0.iO 0.68 0.47 - 0.88 Fail f 1)

MAW-i 184 2/1/2014 Sr-90 7.00 +/- 0.70 8.51 5.96 - 11.06 Pass MAW-i 184 2/1/2014 U-233/234 0.20 +/- 0.07 0.23 0.16 - 0.29 Pass MAW-i 184 2/1/2014 U-238 1.25 +/- 0.i8 1.45 1.02 - 1.89 Pass MAW-i184 2/i/2014 Co-57 27.86 +/- 0.38 27.50 19.30 - 35.80 Pass MAW-1184 2/1/2014 Co-SO 15.99 +/- 0.27 16.00 11.20 - 20.80 Pass MAW-ii84 2/1/2014 Cs-i34 21.85 +/- 0.54 23.10 16.20 - 30.00 Pass MAW-i 184 2/1/2014 Cs-137 28.74 +/- 0.49 28.90 20.20 - 37.60 Pass MAW-i184 2/1/2014 K-40 i.80 +/- 2.00 0.00 0.00 - 10.00 Pass MAW-i184 2/1/2014 Mn-54 14.06 +/- 0.40 13.90 9.70 - 18.10 Pass MAW-1i84 2/1/2014 Zn-65 0.00 +/- 0.19 0.00 -0.01 - 0.00 Pass MAVE-1 148 2/1/2014 Co-57 11.63 +/- 0.i9 10.10 7.10 - 13.10 Pass MAVE-i 148 2/1/2014 Co-60 7.28 +/- O.i8 6.93 4.85 - 9.01 Pass MAVE-i 148 2/1/2014 Cs-i34 6.29 +/- 0.29 6.04 4.23 - 7.85 Pass MAVE-1 148 2/1/2014 Cs-137 5.18 +/- 0.20 4.74 3.32 - 6.16 Pass MAVE-i 148 2/1/2014 Mn-54 9.22 +/- 0.26 8.62 6.03 - 11.21 Pass MAVE-1 148 2/1/2014 Zn-65 8.59 +/- 0.40 7.86 5.50 - 10.22 Pass MAAP-i 151 2/i/20i4 Co-57 1.60 +/- 0.05 0.00 NA Fail (2)

MAAP-i 151 2/i/20i4 Co-60 1.38 +/- 0.06 1.39 0.97 1.81

- Pass MMP-i 151 2/1/2014 Cs-134 1.75 +/- 0.11 1.91 1.34 2.48

- Pass MMP-1 151 2/1/2014 Cs-i 37 1.81 +/- 0.10 1.76 1.23 2.29

- Pass MAAP-i 151 2/i/20i4 Mn-54 0.01 +/- 0.03 0.00 NA Pass MAAP-i 15i 2/1/2014 Zn-65 -0.24 +/- 0.09 0.00 -0.50 1.00

- Pass MAAP-i 151 2/1/2014 Sr-90 i.il +/- 0.14 1.18 0.83 i.53

- Pass MAAP-i 154 2/1/20 14 Gr. Alpha 0.56 +/- 0.06 1.77 0.53 - 3.01 Pass MAAP-i 154 2/1/2014 Gr. Beta 0.98 +/- 0.06 0.77 0.39 - 1.16 Pass MASO-i 146 2/1/2014 Ni-63 4.80 +/- 15.30 0.00 NA Pass MASO-1 146 2/1/2014 Co-57 1064.50 +/- 3.60 966.00 676.00 - 1256.00 Pass MASO-i i46 2/1/2014 Co-60 1.70 +/- 0.50 1.22 (3) Pass MASO-1 146 2/1/2014 Cs-i34 6.10 +/- 1.80 0.00 NA Fail (4)

MASO-1 146 2/1/2014 Cs-i 37 1364.30 +/- 5.30 1238.00 867.00 1609.00

- Pass MASO-1 146 2/1/2014 K-40 728.90 +/- 15.90 622.00 435.00 809.00

- Pass MASO-1 146 2/1/2014 Mn-54 1588.00 +/- 6.00 1430.00 1001.00 1859.00

- Pass MASO-i 146 2/1/2014 Zn-65 763.50 +/- 6.80 695.00 487.00 904.00

- Pass MASO-i 146 2/1/2014 Sr-90 i.23 +/- 1.37 0.00 NA Pass D-$ Page 75 of 178

TABLE D-5 DOES MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2014 (Page 2012)

Concentration a Known Control Lab Code b Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits c Acceptance MASO-4439 8/1/2014 Ni-63 771.62 +/- 23.29 980.00 686.00 - 1274.00 Pass MASO-4439 8/1/2014 Sr-90 778.34 +/- 17.82 858.00 601.00 - 1115.00 Pass MASO-4439 8/1/2014 Cs-134 520.60 +/- 7.09 622.00 435.00 - 809.00 Pass MASO-4439 8/1/2014 Co-57 1135.00 +/- 7.40 1116.00 781.00 - 1451.00 Pass MASO-4439 8/1/2014 Co-60 768.20 +/- 7.70 779.00 545.00 - 1013.00 Pass MASO-4439 8/1/2014 Mn-54 1050.70 +/- 12.60 1009.00 706.00 - 1312.00 Pass MASO-4439 8/1/2014 Zn-65 407.89 +/- 15.03 541.00 379.00 - 703.00 Pass MAW-4431 8/1/2014 Am-241 0.79 +/- 0.08 0.68 0.62 - 1.14 Pass MAW-4431 8/1/2014 Cs-137 18.62 +/- 0.54 18.40 12.90 - 23.90 Pass MAW-4431 8/1/2014 Co-57 24.85 +/- 0.42 24.70 17.30 - 32.10 Pass MAW-4431 8/1/2014 Co-60 12.27 +/- 0.38 12.40 8.70 - 16.10 Pass MAW-4431 8/1/2014 H-3 207.20 +/- 10.60 208.00 146.00 - 270.00 Pass MAW-4431 8/1/2014 Fe-55 55.10 +/- 14.80 31.50 22.10 - 41.00 Fail (5)

MAW-4431 8/112014 Mn-54 14.36 +/- 0.53 14.00 9.80 - 18.20 Pass MAW-4431 8/1/2014 Zn-65 11.46 +/- 0.78 10.90 7.60 - 14.20 Pass MAW-4493 8/1/2014 Gr.Alpha 0.93 +/- 0.07 1.40 0.42 - 2.38 Pass MAW-4493 8/1/2014 Gr. Beta 6.31 +/- 1.35 6.50 3.25 - 9.75 Pass MAAP-4433 8/1/2014 Sr-90 0.74 +/- 0.10 0.70 0.49 - 0.91 Pass MAAP-4444 8/1/2014 Sr-89 7.82 +/- 0.52 9.40 6.60 - 12.20 Pass MAAP-4444 8/1/2014 Sr-90 0.76 +/- 0.10 0.76 0.53 - 0.99 Pass MAVE-4436 8/1/2014 Cs-134 7.49 +/- 0.18 7.38 5.17 - 9.59 Pass MAVE-4436 8/1/2014 Co-57 11.20 +/- 0.19 9.20 6.40 - 12.00 Pass MAVE-4436 8/1/2014 Co-60 6.84 +/- 0.17 6.11 4.28 - 7.94 Pass MAVE-4436 8/1/2014 Mn-54 8.11 +/- 0.26 7.11 4.97 - 9.23 Pass MAVE-4436 8/1/2014 Zn-65 7.76 +/- 0.43 6.42 4.49 - 8.35 Pass 8

Results are reported in units of Sq/kg (soil), BqIL (water) or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation).

b Laboratory codes as follows: MAW (water), MAAP fair filter), MASO (soil), MAVE (vegetation).

n)

C MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determinatio and control limits as defined by the MAPEP. A known value of zero indicates an analysis was included in the testing series as a false positive. MAPEP does not provide control limits.

standard.

(1) The high bias on the plutonium crosscheck samples was traced to contamination from a newly purchased The results of reanalysis with replacement tracer purchased from NIST:

MAW-1184 Pu-238 0.68 +/- 0.10 Sq/C MAW-1184 Pu-239/240 0.66 +/- 0.10 Bq/L (2) Interference from Eu-152 resulted in misidentifica tion of Co-57.

(3) Provided in the series for sensitivity evaluation. MAPEP does not provide control limits.

matrix (4) False positive test. Long sample counting time lead to interference from naturally occuring Bi-214 in sample with a close spectral energy.

(5) Result of reanalysis Fe-55 32.63 +/- 16.30 Bq/L D-9 Page 76 of 178

APPENDIX E EFFLUENT DATA Page 77 of 178

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1

SUMMARY

2 1.0. EFFLUENTS 3 1.1. Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere 3 1 .2. Liquids Released to Illinois River 3 2.0. SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE 3 3.0. DOSETO MAN 3 3.1. Gaseous Effluent Pathways 3 3.1.1. Noble Gases 4 3.1.1.1. Gamma Dose Rates 4 3.1.1.2. Beta Air and Skin Dose Rates 4 3.1.2. Radioactive Iodine 5 3.1.2.1. DosetoThyroid 5 3.2. Liquid Effluent Pathways 5 3.3. Assessment of Dose to Member of Public 5 4.0. SITE METEOROLOGY 6 Page 78 of 178

Table of Contents (cont.)

APPENDIX E-1 DATA TABLES AND FIGURES E-1.1 Station Releases Table 1.1-1 Gaseous Effluents Summation of all Releases E-1 .2 Table 1.2-1 Summation of all Liquid Releases E-1.3 Table 2.1-1 Solid Radwaste Annual Report E-1 .4 Table 3.1-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Gaseous Releases and Compliance Status E-1 .5 Table 3.2-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Liquid Effluents and Compliance Status E-1 .6 Table 3.3-1 1 OCFR2O Compliance Assessment E-1 .7 Table 3.4-1 Maximum Doses Resulting from Airborne Releases Based On Concurrent Meteorological Data E-1 .8 Page 79 of 17$

INTRODUCTION LaSalle County Station, a two-unit BWR, is located near Marseilles, Illinois in LaSalle County, 3.5 miles south of the Illinois River. Both units are rated at 3546 MWt. Unit 1 loaded fuel in March 1982. Unit 2 loaded fuel in late December 1983. The Station is designed to keep releases to the environment at levels below those specified in the regulations.

Liquid effluents, although no longer released from LaSalle County Station, were designed to be released to the Illinois River in controlled batches after radioassay of each batch. Gaseous effluents are released to the atmosphere after delay allowing time for short-lived (noble) gases to decay. Releases to the atmosphere are sampled and analyzed on a routine basis. The gaseous effluent samples are analyzed for particulate, iodine, noble gas, and tritium activity. The particulate and iodine sample results are obtained from continuously collected composite samples. The noble gas and tritium sample results are obtained from routine grab samples. The results of effluent analyses are summarized on a monthly basis and reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as required per Technical Specifications. Airborne concentrations of noble gases, tritium, I-131, and particulate radioactivity in offsite areas are calculated using effluent and meteorological data.

Environmental monitoring is conducted by sampling at indicator and control (background) locations in the vicinity of LaSalle County Station to measure changes in radiation or radioactivity levels that may be attributable to station operations. If significant changes attributable to LaSalle County Station are measured, these changes are correlated with effluent releases. External gamma radiation exposure from noble gases and internal dose from 1-131 in milk are the critical pathways at this site; however, an environmental monitoring program is conducted which also includes these and many other pathways which are less significant in terms of radiation protection.

1 Page 80 of 178

SUMMARY

Gaseous effluents for the period contributed to only a small fraction of the LaSalle County Station Radiological Effluent Controls Limits. Liquid effluents had no contribution to offsite dose, as no liquid radioactive discharges were conducted. Calculations of environmental concentrations based on effluent, Illinois River flow, and meteorological data for the period indicate that consumption by the public of radionuclides attributable to LaSalle County Station does not exceed regulatory limits. Radiation exposure from radionuclides released to the atmosphere represented the critical pathway for the period with a maximum individual total dose estimated to be 1.67E+00 mrem for the year, where a shielding factor of 0.7 and an occupancy factor of 0.95 are assumed for the nearest resident. The assessment of radiation doses is performed in accordance with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM), specifically, a comparison of preoperational studies with operational controls or with previous environmental surveillance reports and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. Control locations are basis for preoperational data. The results of analysis confirm that the station is operating in compliance with JOCFR5O Appendix I, IOCFR2O and 4OCFR19O.

2 Page 81 of 178

1.0 EFFLUENTS 1.1 Gaseous Effluents to the Atmosphere Measured concentrations of noble gases, radioiodine, and particulate radioactivity released to the atmosphere during the year, are listed in Table 1.1-1. A total of 3.87E+03 curies of fission and activation gases were released with an average release rate of 1 .23E+02 pCi/sec.

A total of 1.87E-01 curies 011-131 were released during the year with an average release rate of 5.94E-03 pCi/sec.

A total of 3.59E-02 curies of beta-gamma emitters were released as airborne particulate matter with an average release rate of 1 .14E-03 pCi/sec. Alpha-emitting radionuclides were below the lower limit of detection (LLD). Carbon-14 released in 2014 was calculated separately with a total of 3.35E+01 curies released with an average release rate of I .06E÷00 pCi/sec.

A total of I .82E+01 curies of tritium were released with an average release rate of 5.76E-01 pCi/sec.

1.2 Liquids Released to Illinois River There were no liquid batch releases in 2014. Continuous release path activity was below applicable Lower Limits of Detection.

2.0 SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE Solid radioactive wastes were shipped by truck to a disposal facility or to a waste processor. For further detail, refer the LaSalle 2014 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR). This report was submitted 1st to the USNRC by the required date of May 2014.

3.0 DOSE TO MAN 3.1 Gaseous Effluent Pathways Table 3.1-1 summarizes the doses resulting from releases of airborne radioactivity via the different exposure pathways.

3 Page 82 of 178

3.1.1 Noble Gases 3.1.1.1 Gamma Dose Rates Unit I and Unit 2 gaseous releases at LaSalle County Station are reported as Unit I releases due to a single station vent stack (SVS) release point. Offsite Gamma air and whole body dose rates are shown in Table 3.1-1 and were calculated based on measured release rates, isotopic composition of the noble gases and average meteorological data for the period.

Doses based on concurrent meteorological data are shown in Table 3.4-1. Based on measured effluents and meteorological data, the maximum total body dose to an individual would be 3.19E-02 mrem (Table 3.1-1) for the year, with an occupancy factor of 0.95 and a shielding factor of 0.7 included. The maximum total body dose based on measured effluents and concurrent meteorological data would be 2.22E-02 mrem (Table 3.4-1).

The maximum gamma air dose was 4.78E-02 mrad from Table 3.1-1, and the maximum gamma air dose from concurrent meterorological data was 5.38E-03 mrad (Table 3.4-I).

3.1.1.2 Beta Air and Skin Dose Rates The range of beta particles in air is relatively small (on the order of a few meters or less);

consequently, plumes of gaseous effluents may be considered infinite for purpose of calculating the dose from beta radiation incident on the skin.

However, the actual dose to sensitive skin tissues is difficult to calculate due to the effect of the beta particle energies, thickness of inert skin and clothing covering sensitive tissues. For purposes of this report the skin is taken to have a thickness of 7.0 mg/cm2 and an occupancy factor of 1.0 is used. The skin dose (from beta and gamma radiation) for the year was 5.38E-02 mrem from Table 3.1-1, and the skin dose from concurrent meteorological data was 5.57E-03 mrem (Table 4

Page 83 of 178

3.4-1). The maximum offsite beta dose for the year was 2.22E-03 mrad from Table 3.1-1, and the maximum offsite beta dose from concurrent meteorological data was I .93E-03 mrad (Table 3.4-1).

3.1.2 Radioactive Iodine The human thyroid exhibits a significant capacity to concentrate ingested or inhaled iodine. The radioiodine, 1-131, released during routing operation of the plant, may be made available to man resulting in a dose to the thyroid.

The principal pathway of interest for this radionuclide is ingestion of radioiodine in milk.

3.1.2.1 Dose to Thyroid The hypothetical thyroid dose to a maximum exposed individual living near the station via ingestion of milk was calculated. The radionuclide considered was 1-131 and the source of milk was taken to be the nearest dairy farm with the cows pastured from May through October. The maximum thyroid does due to 1-131 was 9.13E-O1 mrem for the year.

3.2 Liquid Effluent Pathways The three principal pathways through the aquatic environment for potential doses to man from liquid waste are ingestion of potable water, eating aquatic foods, and exposure while on the shoreline.

Not all of these pathways are significant or applicable at a given time but a reasonable approximation of the dose can be made by adjusting the dose formula for season of the year or type and degree of use of the aquatic environment. NRC developed equations* were used to calculate the doses to the whole body, lower gastro-intestinal tracts, thyroid, bone and skin; specific parameters for use in the equations are given in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The maximum whole body dose was O.OOE+OO mrem and organ dose was O.OOE+OO for the year mrem (Table 3.2-1).

3.3 Assessment of Dose to Member of Public During the period January to December 2014, LaSalle County 5

Page 84 of 178

Station did not exceed these limits as shown in Table 3.1-1 and Table 3.2-1 (based on annual average meteorological data), and as shown in Table 3.3-1:

The Radiological Effluent Technical Standards fRETS) limits on dose or dose commitment to an individual due to radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each reactor unit (1.5 mrem to the whole body or 5 mrem to any organ during any calendar year; 3 mrem to the whole body or 10 mrem to any organ during the calendar year).

The RETS limits on air dose in noble gases released in gaseous effluents to a member of the public from each reactor unit (5 mrad for gamma radiation or 10 mrad for beta radiation during any calendar quarter; 10 mrads for gamma radiation or 20 mrad for beta radiation during a calendar year).

The RETS limits on dose to a member of the public due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than eight days in gaseous effluents released from each reactor unit (7.5 mrem to any organ during any calendar quarter; 15 mrem to any organ during any calendar year).

The 10CFR2O limit on Total Effective Dose Equivalent to individual members of the public (100 mrem).

4.0 SITE METEOROLOGY A summary of the site meteorological measurements taken during each calendar quarter of the year is given in Appendix F. The data are presented as cumulative joint frequency distributions of the wind direction for the 375 level and wind speed class by atmospheric stability class determined from the temperature difference between the 375 and 33 levels. Data recovery for these measurements was 99.9% during 2014.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Rev. 1) 6 Page $5 of 178

APPENDIX E-1 DATA TABLES AND FIGURES E-1.1 Page86ofl78

Table 1.1-1 LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT (2014)

GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ELEVATED RELEASE UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 Est Total A. Fission & Activation Gases Unit Quarter I Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter4

1. Total Release Ci 9.98E+02 7.88E+02 1.16E+03 9.23E+02 2.50E+O1

2. Average release rate for the period i.rCi/sec 1 .28E+02 1.006+02 1 .46E+02 1.162+02

3. Percent of ODCM limit %

B. Iodine 1 Total Iodine 131 Ci 6.41 2-02 5.01 2-02 3.28E-02 3.98E-02 1.502+01

2. Average release rate for the period giCi/sec 8.242-03 6.372-03 4.13E-03 5.002-03

3. Percent of ODCM limit %

C. Particulates

1. Particulates with half-lives > 8 days Ci 1.042-02 8.032-03 8.862-03 8.592-03 3.502+01

2. Average release rate for the period 1.tCi/sec 1 .33E-03 1.022-03 1 .12E-03 1.082-03

3. Percent of ODCM limit D. Tritium

1. Total Release Ci 4.482+00 2.406+00 5.046+00 6.256+00 1.50E+01

2. Average release rate for the period iCi/sec 5.76E-01 3.062-01 6.352-01 7.862-01

3. Percent of ODCM limit %

E. Gross Alpha

1. Total Release Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD N/A

2. Average release rate for the period iCiIsec <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD

3. Percent of ODCM limit %

F. Carbon-14

1. Total Release Ci 8.38E+00 8.38E+00 8.38E+00 8.372+00

2. Average release rate for the period tCi/sec 1 .08E+00 1 .06E+00 1 .05E+00 1 .05E+00

3. Percent of ODCM limit %

This information is contained in the Radiological Impact on Man section of the report.

Indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in pCi/mI E- 1.2 Page 87 of 178

Table 1.2-1 LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION EFFLUENT AJ1D WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT (2014)

SOLID WASTE AND IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS FOURTH QUARTER A. Fission & Activation Products

1. Total Release (not including tritium, gases

& alpha)

2. Average diluted concentration during period

3. Percent of applicable limit B. Tritium

1. Total Release Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD N/A

2. Average diluted concentration during Ci/mL <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD

3. Percent of applicable limit 3/4 C. Dissolved & Entrained Gases

1. Total Release Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD N/A

2. Average diluted concentration during .tCi/mL <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD

3. Percent of applicable limit %

D. Gross Alpha Activity

1. Total Release Ci <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD N/A

2. Average release rate for the period 1.Ci/mL <LLD <LLD <LLD <LLD

3. Percent of ODCM limit

[ E. Volume of Waste Released (prior to dilution)

Liters 0.OOE+00 0.OOE÷0O 0.OOE+00 0.OOE÷00 F. Volume of Dilution Water Used During Liters 0.OOE+00 0.OOE÷00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE÷00 Period This information is contained in the Radiological Impact on Man section of the report.

< Indicates activity of sample is less than LLD given in pCi/mI E- 1.3 Page 88 of 17$

Table 2.1-1 SOLID R&DWASTE ANNUAL REPORT LaSalle County Station Table 2.1-1 deliberately deleted. For solid waste disposal detail, refer to the LaSalle County Station 2014 Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report (ARERR).

E-1.4 Page89ofl7$

Table 3.1-1 LASALLE COUNTY NUCLEAR POWER STATION EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL ANNUAL REPORT (2014)

RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT ON MAN MAXIMUM DOSES RESULTING FROM GASEOUS RELEASES AND COMPLIANCE STATUS Quarterly 1st % of 3rd Unts 2nd % of % of 4th % of Annual % of Infant Receptor Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Limit Limit GammaAir 5.OOE÷OO mRad 1.20E-02 0.24 9.77E-03 0.20 1.41E-02 0.28 1.19E-02 0.24 1.OOE+01 0.48 Beta Air J.OOE+01 mRad 5.67E-04 0.006 4.41E-04 0.004 6.91E-04 0.007 5.24E-04 0.005 2.OOE+01 0.01 NC Total Body 2.50E+OO mRem 8.OOE-03 0.32 6.52E-03 0.26 9.42E-03 0.38 7.93E-03 0.32 5.OOE+00 0.64 NC Skin 7.50E+OO mRem 1.35E-02 0.18 1.1OE-02 0.75 1.59E-02 0.21 1.34E-02 0.18 1.50E+01 0.36 NNG Organ 7.50E+00 mRem 3.14E-01 4.18 2.43E-01 3.24 1.61E-01 2.15 1.95E-01 2.60 1.50E+01 6.08 Quarterly 1st 3rd U % of 2nd % of % of 4th % of Annual 3/4 of Child Receptor Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Limit Limit Gamma Air 5.OOE+00 mRad 1.20E-02 0.24 9.77E-03 0.20 1.41E-02 0.28 1.19E-02 0.24 1.OOE+01 0.48 Beta Air 1.OOE+01 mRad 5.67E-04 0.006 4.41E-04 0.004 6.91E-04 0.007 5.24E-04 0.005 2.OOE+01 0.01 NC Total Body 2.50E+00 mRem 8.OOE-03 0.32 6.52E-03 0.26 9.42E-03 0.38 7.93E-03 0.32 5.OOE+00 0.64 NC Skin 7.50E+00 mRem 1.35E-02 0.18 1.1OE-02 0.15 1.59E-02 0.21 1.34E-02 0.18 1.50E+01 0.36 NNG Organ 7.50E+00 mRem 1.29E-01 1.72 1.OOE-01 1.34 6.66E-02 0.89 8.05E-02 1.07 JI 1.50E+01 2.51 Teenager Quarterly 1st 3rd Units % of 2nd % of 3/4 of 4th % of Annual 3/4 of Receptor Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Limit Limit CammaAir 5.OOE+00 mRad 1.20E-02 0.24 9.77E-03 0.20 1.41E-02 0.28 1.19E-02 0.24 1.OOE+01 0.48 Beta Air 1.OOE+01 mRad 5.67E-04 0.006 4.41E-04 0.004 6.91E-04 0.007 5.24E-04 0.005 2.OOE+01 0.01 NG Total Body 2.50E+00 mRem 8.OOE-03 0.32 6.52E-03 0.26 9.42E-03 0.38 7.93E-03 0.32 5.OOE+00 0.64 NG Skin 7.50E÷00 mRem 1.35E-02 0.18 1.1OE-02 0.15 1.59E-02 0.21 1.34E-02 0.18 1.50E+01 0.36 NNG Organ 7.50E+00 mRem 6.54E-02 0.87 5.07E-02 0.68 3.36E-02 0.45 4.07E-02 0.54 J.50E+01 1.27 Quarterly 1st 3rd Units 3/4 of 2nd % of % of 4th % of Annual % of Adult Receptor Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Quarter Limit Limit Limit Gamma Air 5.OOE+00 mRad 1.20E-02 0.24 9.77E-03 0.20 1.41E-02 0.28 1.19E-02 0.24 1.OOE+01 0.48 Beta Air 1 .OOE+01 m Rad 5.67E-04 0.006 4.41E-04 0.004 6.91E-04 0.007 5.24E-04 0.005 2.OOE+01 0.01 NC Total Body 2.50E÷00 m Rem 8.OOE-03 0.32 6.52E-03 0.26 9.42E-03 0.38 7.93E-03 0.32 5.OOE+00 0.64 NC Skin 7.50E+00 m Rem 1.35E-02 0.18 1.1OE-02 0.15 1.59E-02 0.21 1.34E-02 0.18 1.50E+01 0.36 NNG Organ 7.50E+00 mRem 4.13E-02 0.55 3.20E-02 0.43 2.13E-02 0.28 2.57E-02 0.34 1.50E+01 0.80 The LaSate County Nuclear Power Station maximum expected annual dose from Carbon-14 has been calculated using the maximum gross thermal capacity at full power operation. The resultant bounding

°° doses are based upon site specific assumptions of source term.

RA15-024, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Text

Subject:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search