PY-CEI-NRR-2373, Application for Amend to License NPF-58,correcting Typos Found in TS Table 3.3.6.1-1

Application for Amend to License NPF-58,correcting Typos Found in TS Table 3.3.6.1-1

ML20204E487
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	03/15/1999
From:	Myers L CENTERIOR ENERGY
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20204E491	List: ML20204E497 PY-CEI-NRR-2373, Application for Amend to License NPF-58,correcting Typos Found in TS Table 3.3.6.1-1
References
PY-CEI-NRR-2373, NUDOCS 9903250045
Download: ML20204E487 (5)

Text

,

~-

• gam ____ g Ferry Nuclear Pdwer Plant 10 Center Road y y M r=-

Perry. Chio 44081 Lew W. Myers . 440-280-59I5 Mce President Fax: 440-280-8029 March 15,1999 PY CEI/NRR-2373L United States Nuclear Regu;atory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 1

Perry Nuclear Power Plant i Jocket No. 50-440 l License Amendment Request Pursuant to 10CFR50.90: Revision of Technical i Specification Table 3.3.6.1 Typographical Errors Ladies and Gentlemen:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission review and npproval of a license aruendment for the Perry Nuclear Power Plant is requested. The proposed amendment corrects typographical errors found in Technical Specification Table 3.3.6.1-1.

Attachment 1 provides the Summary, Description of the Proposed Technical Specification Change, .

Safety Analysis, and Environmental Consideration. Attachment 2 provides the Significant Hazards l Consideration. Attachment 3 provides the annotated Technical Specification page reflecting ^the .

proposed change. )

If you have questions or require additional information, please contact Mr. Henry L. Hegrat, Manager - Regulatory Affairs, at (216) 280-5606.

Very truly yours, Attachments cc: NRC Project Manager NRC Resident Inspector NRC Region III 3 tate of Ohio

~

9903250045 990315 PDR ADOCK 05000440 P PDR

l  !

i I

1 l

i l

t l

I, Lew W. Myers, being duly sworn state that (1) I am Vice President - Perry, of the l FirstEargy Nuclear Operating Company, (2) I am duly authorized to execute and file l this certification as the duly authorized agent for The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Toledo Edison Company, Duquesne Light Company, Ohio Edison Company, l and Pennsylvania Power Company, and (3) the statements set forth herein are true and i

! correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. l l

A [0 M W Lew W. MS j l

l Swom to and subscrib. d before me, the /6 day of @l.4ad. , /9f') l i

bKl

• - Aen -

%swwm

' W.

• i l

Attachment 1 PY-CEI/NRR-2373L Page1of2

SUMMARY

The proposed change requests revision of the Perry Nu:: lear Power Plant (PNPP)

Technical Specification Table 3.3.6.1-1. The proposed change will correct typographical errors found in the table dealing with the surveillance numbers.

This is an administrative change to correct the typographical errors found on this table.

As such there is no safety significance to the proposed changes.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED TECHNICN SPECIFICATION CHANGE Technical Specification Table 3.3.6.1-1 Function 5.c, Surveillance Requirements SR 3.6.1.1.3,3.6.1.1.4 and 3.6.1.1.5 are being replaced by the proper surveillance numbers SR 3.3.6.1.3,3.3.6.1.4 and 3.3.6.1.5.

SAFETY ANALYSIS This proposed change corrects a typographical error that has existed in Technical Specification Table 3.3.6.1-1 since the conversion to the improved technical specification format. The surveillance numbers currently listed are not valid numbers, and therefore do j not coincide with a valid test requirement. Correcting a typographical error will avoid any confusion in the future for personnel reviewing this Table.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION The proposed Technical Specification change request was evaluated against the criteria of 10CFR51.22 for environmental considerations. The proposed change does not significantly increase individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposures, does not significantly increase the amounts of effluents that may be released off-site and, as

. discussed in Attachment 2, does not involve a significant hazards consideration. Based on the foregoing, it has been concluded that the proposed Technical Specification change meets the criteria given in 10CFR51.22(c)(9) for categorical exclusion from the requirement for an Environmental Impact Statement.

COMMITMENTS WITHIN THIS LETTER There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. Any actions discussed in this document represent intended or planned actions, are described for the NRC's information, and are not regulatory commitments. Please notify the Manager -

Attachment 1 PY-CEI/NRR-2373L 1 Page 2 0f 2 i Regulatory Affairs at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant of any questions regarding this document or any associated regulatory commitments. i l

!. i f

\

l l

l l

l i

p Attachment 2 PY-CEI/NRR-2373L Page1of1 The standards used to arrive at a determination that a request for amendment iuvolves no significant hazards considerations are included in the Commission's Regulations, 10CFR50.92, which states that the operation of the facility in accordance with the l

proposed amendment would not: (1) involve a significant increase in the probability or

- consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

The proposed amendment ins been reviewed with respect to these three factors and it has been determined that the proposed change does not involve a significant hazard because:

1. The proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

The proposed change involves a purely administrative change to correct typographical errors on a Technical Specification Table. Since this change is administrative it does not impact any initiators of accidents. Therefore, the probability of an accident previously evaluated has not changed.

Likewise, an administrative change correcting typographical errors can not impact the consequences of any previously evaluated accident.

Therefore, the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated have not significantly increased.

l

2. The proposed change would not create the possibility of a new or different kind of l accident from any' accident previously evaluated. I l

This proposed change does not physically alter the plant or systems or equipment in the plant, or the method for operation of the plant. Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.

l 3. The proposed change will not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety, The proposed change is an administrative change that has no impact on margin of safety considerations.

Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety.

L.. __