NRC-89-0069, Annual Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept 1988
| ML20245F343 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1988 |
| From: | Sylvia B DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-89-0069, CON-NRC-89-69 NUDOCS 8905020348 | |
| Download: ML20245F343 (86) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:m, n i; .
., g
((y;f;;y 8@ p . T
~
Y _ l__ l x 1AXXUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MOXITORING REPORT 1988 /~ I j , n g
!jp,5**8o8 -
R-Prepared by Radiological Effluents Group IN w a
[f r,: ., . TABLE OF CONTENTS
-Page Section
[. i 1- 1.0 Introduction 2- 7.0 Rt.diological Environmental Monitoring Program
. .. 2. 2.1' Regulations l 2 2.2 Preoperational Program
.2 2.3 ' Operational Program 2- '2.4 - Quality Control 3 -- 3.0 Terrestrial Monitoring Program 3 3.1 - Introduction
'3 . 3.2 - Direct Radiation 3 3.3 - Atmospheric Monitoring 4 3.4 Milk Sampling ,
- 4. 3.5 . Garden Sampling 5 4.0 Aquatic Monitoring 5 4.1- introduction 5 4.2 - Drinking Water
- 5 4.3 , Surface Water 6 4.4 ' Ground Water 6- 4.5 Sediment Samples
- 6. 4.6 - Fish Samples 7- 5.0 Land Use Census 7 5.1 1988 Land Use Census 7- 5.2 Results 11 6.0 Program Execution 11 6.1 - Thermoluminescent Dosirretry 11 6.2 Lower Limit of Detection 11 6.3 Food Product Sampling -
12 7.0 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Summary 18 8.0 Description of Fermi 2 Sampling Lecations 31 9.0 Complete Data Tables 78 Appendix A Interlaboratory Comparison Results
Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report was prepared by the Detroit Edison Company in compliance with the requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This report describes the 1988 radiological monitoring and sampling activities conoucted by Detroit Edison as part of the Fermi 2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). The Fermi 2 REMP was established by Detroit Edison in 1978. Up until the time that Fermi 2 was started up by Detroit Edison in 1985, the Program provided for acquiring environmental data in order to establish a preoperational baseline. Now that Fermi 2 is in operation, the REMP has been modified to focus on acquiring environmental data from monitoring and sampling locations. These locations would be most likely to indicate if there were any measurable effects in the environment from the operation of Fermi 2. These monitoring and sampling locations are called " indicator" locations. Detroit Edison also collects data from environmental monitoring and sampling locations which , are distant from Fermi 2. These locations are considered to be outside the area which might be affected by Fermi 2 operation. These distant monitoring and sampling locations are called
" control" locations.
In 1988, Detroit Edison collected over 750 environmental indicator and control samples and performed more than 1,000 analyses as part of the REMP. .his report contains the tabulated summarias of the campling and analysis results for 1988. Throughout the year, the Detroit Edison Radiation Effluents staff at Fermi 2 collects and compares the environmental indicator data with the control data. This data is used to determine if there have been any measurable effects in the environment which are telated to the operation of Fermi 2. Any significant differences between the indicator data and the control data are required to be reported to the NRC. In 1988 there were no significant differences found between indicator and control environmental monitoring data related to the operation of Fermi 2. The levels of radioactive. material which were detected in samples have been attributed to naturally-occurring radioactivity, fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing. Therefore, Detroit Edison has concluded that there were no discernable effects upon the environment related to the operation of Fermi 2 in 1988. L___ _-___
9 Annual Radiological 7 Enylronmental Monitoring l Report 1988 Page 2 i 2.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM l 1 l 2.1 REGULATIONS I Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 50 Appendix 1, Section 4.B requires that Detroit Edison establish an appropriate surveillance and monitoring program to assure that radioactive products released to the environment are kept at extremely low levels. Section 20.201 of 10 CFR Part 20 further requires that a licensee conduct surveys of levels of radiation or concentrations of radioactive products as necessary to show comp!iance with Commission regulations. 2.2 PRECPERATIONAL PROGRAM l The preoperational enuronmental monitoring program was established seven years prior to the ; operation of the Fermi 2 reactor. This preoperational program determined the existing levels of radiation and radioactive products occurring naturally and from man-made sources in the environment around the Fermi-2 site. The program included continuous monitoring of direct radiation, radioactivity in air, lake sands and waters, drinking wat6c, cow's and goat's milk, and local garden variety vegetables. l 2.3 OPERATIONAL PROGRAM i The elements that made up the preoperational monitoring program are still in effect today. The preoperational progrem became the operational program it! June of 1985 when initial criticality was achieved for the Fermi 2 reactor. Th9 sampling and analysis program in the operational phase still continuously monitors direct radiation, radioactivity in air, lake cands and water, drinking water, cow's and goat's milk, and local garden variety vegetables. T he Radiological Environmental Monitoring program continuously samples and analyzes the food chain to man for radioactive nutorial. 2.4 QUALITY CONTROL Detroit Edison participates in an NRC approved interlaboratcry comparison program. In this program, simu'ated environmental samples are prepared by the Quality Assurance Branch of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and sent to the Fermi-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) laboratory. The laboratory performs the required analysis and returns the results to the EPA. The EPA performs a statistical @nalysis and comparison to known values and returns the results to the laboratory. If the results do not fall witnin allowable limits, the laboratory's methods and techniques are re-evaluated. The results of this program are reviewed by Detroit Edison and are required to he reported to the NRC. The interlai> oratory comparison program results for 1938 are provided in Appendix (A). The analysis results for 1988 that were not within the allowaole limits as required by the EPA are listed in an addendum to Appendix (A).
Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 Page 3 3.0 TERRESTRIAL . MONITORING PROGRAM
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The terrestrial monitoring program provides continuous monitoring of the land environment pathways that may result in human consumption of radioactive products. The results of the trionitoring program provide tcr a direct comparison of the effects of Fermi 2 on a short term basis (i.e. weekly), and a review of long term trends over the course of operation for Fermi 2. The following sections discuss the type of sample, analysis performed, a review of short and long term trends, and comparison to preoperational samples. 3.2 DIRECT RADIATION The most widely used cont.inuous monitoring device in the environmental program is the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). The TLDs are subjected to strict testing requirements of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) before they are used in the field. The environmental TLDs are Incated around Fermi 2 to monitor gaseous radioactivity and direct radiation resulting from the operation of Fermi 2. In 1988, the TLD monitoring program included forty-six (46) TLDs located around Fermi 2. Each of the 46 TLD locations has two cards with 4 readout areas per card. The TLDs were collected once each calendar quarter and sent to the environmental laboratory for analysis. The results of the analysis were sent to Ferna 2 for comparison and trending. During 1988, three hundred and sixty-six (366) TLDs were analyzed for direct radiation exposure. The TLDs nearest the plant indicated a mean value of 16.3 millirem / quarter. The TLD considered not to be effected by the operation of Fermi 2, (i.e. control TLD) indicated a mean value of 17.0 millirem / quarter. In the period 1983 to 1988 (two years prior to the operation of Fermi 2 to four years after) the average annual radletion mean for all indicating TLDs was 17.7 millirem / quarter. The indicating TLDs ranged from 8.8 *o 23.4 millirem / quarter, showing variations from year to year. The control location covering the same time period had an annual average mean exposure of 18.4 millirem / quarter. The contal TLD varied from 14.5 to 21.8 millirem / quarter, which is equivalent to that of the TLD readings naar the plant. 3.3 ATMOSPHERIC MON 110 RING Detroit Edison continuously monitors the air near Fermi-2 for radioactivity. The atmospheric monitoring program developed for Fermi 2 has continuously sampled the air since 1979. Four of the five (5) air sampling sites selected for monitoring were based on the eveluation of l predominant wind directions. A fifth location was selected approximately 14 miles west of the l plant and is considered to be unaffected by the operation of Fermi 2. During 1988, two hundred and sixty (260) air samples were collected and counted for gross beta radioactivity. The average gross beta radioactivity level was 0.0185 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled for all indicating air sample locations. The average gross beta radioactivity level { for the controlling location in 1988 was 0.0178 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled. The range of the indicating locations in 1988 was from 0.0047 to 0.0592 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled. The range of the controlling location was from 0.0045 to 0.0497 per cubic meter of air sampled which is equivalent to the range of the indicating locations. j l
- Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 Page 4 From 1983, (two years prior to the operation of Fermi 2) through 1988, the armual average gross beta radioactivity level for indicating locations near the plant was 0.0230 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled. The annual mean gross beta radioactivity for the control location for the same five (5) year period was 0.0230 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled. The range of the annual average gross beta radioactivity for sample locations near the plant was from 0.0047 to 0.0592 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled. The annual average gross beta radioactivity for the control location ranged from 0.0021 to 0.0497 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled.
During 1988, two hundred and sixty (260) charcoal containers were counted to determine the presence of radioiodine in the atmosphere. None of the containers showed detectable levels of radiciodine levels, (i.e. above 0.07 pCl per cubic meter air sampled). Twenty (20) composite samples for each individual atmospheric sampling station were counted. No gamma or beta emitting radioactivity attributed to the operation of Fermi 2 was detected in any of the composite samples. All gamma or beta emitting radioactivity that was detected was naturally occurring. 3.4 MILK SAMPLING PROGRAM l During 1988, fifty-five (55) milk samples were collected from farms participating in the Fermi 2 environmental program. None of these samples showed any radioactivity that is attributed to the operation of Fermi 2. The only radioactivity detected in the samples was naturally occurring potassium-40. The annual average potassium-40 level at the indicating locations was 1495 pCl per liter of milk. The annual average potassium-40 level at the c-ontrol location was 1338 pCi per liter of milk. From 1983 through 1988, the annual average potassium-40 level for the Fermi-2 sample focations was 1344 pCi per liter of milk. The range of the reported values for these samples was from a low of 1090 to a high of 1660 pCi per liter of milk. The average annual value for l the control location during the same time period was 1145 pCi per liter of milk. The range of the reported values was from a low of 1170 to a high of 1430 pCi per liter of milk. Thus, the control location reported values equivalent to the Fermi-2 sample locations. 3.5 GARD ~N SAMPLING PROGRAM During 1988, thirteen (13) vegetables samples were collected and analyzed. No radioisotopes that can be attributed to the operation of Fermi-2 were detected. The only radioactivity detected was naturally occurring potassium-40 and Beryllium-7. The indicating stations annual mean average was 3508 pCi of potassium-40 and 300 pCi of Beryllium-7 per kilogram of vegetable. The range of the reported values was from a low of 2170 pCi of potassium-40 per kilogram to a high of 5990 pCi of potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetable and from a low of 190 pCi of Beryllium-7 per kilogram to a high of 410 pCl of Beryllium-7 per kilogram of vegetable. The controlling location's annual mean average was 2243 pCl of potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetable and < LLD for Beryllium-7. The range of the reported values was 1820 to 2970 pCi of potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetables sampled. In the sampling years 1983 through 1988, the annual mean average of indicating locations was 3568 pCi of potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetables sampled. The range of the indicating locations for these years was a low of 2170 to a high of 5990 pCi of potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetables sampled. The controlling location had an annual mean average of 3701 pCi of potasslum-40 per kilogram of vegetables sampicd. The range of the controlling location for these years was a low of 1820 to a high of 5660 pCi of potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetables sample 1
- - _ _ - _ - I
Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 Page 5 4.0 AQUATIC MONITORING PROGRAM
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The aquatic monitoring program provides continuous monitoring of the aquatic environment of Fermi 2. At Fermi-2, the dominant feature of the aquatic environment is Lake Erie, on which the plant site borders. The aquatic environment also includes other surface waters, such as the Detroit River, groundwater (i.e. wells) near the plant, fish, and lake sediments 4.2 DRINKING WATER Ouring 1988 twenty-four (24) drinking water samples were collected from the drinking water supplies of Detroit and Monroe. Water samples obtained at the Monroe water intake are considered to be influenced by Fermi-2. The Detroit city water intake located in Allen Park, Michigan is considered not to be influenced by liquid discharges from Fermi 2. Therefore, Detroit Edison considers the Detroit city water intake to be the " control" location for the aquatic monitoring program. In all the samples examined by the gamma spectrometer no radioactivity was found that could be attributed to the operation of Fermi 2. The gross beta radioactivity analysis performed on these same samples indicated a mean concentration of 2.8 pCi per liter of water sampled for the Monroe water intake. The gross beta ranged from a low of 2.2 to a high of 4.0 pCi per liter of water sampled. The samples collected at the control station (the Detroit water intake) indicated a mean of 2.3 pCi per liter of water sampled. The gross beta radioactivity levels in the control station samples ranged from a low of 1.8 to a high of 2.7 pCi per liter of water sampled. Sampling data for 1983 through 1988 show an annual mean gross beta radioactivity of 2.9 pCi > per liter for the indicating location. The gross beta radioactivity measured in these years ranges from a low of 2.2 to a high of 4.0 pCi per liter of water sempled. The annual mean gross beta radioactivity for the control station for the same period is 2.4 pCi per liter of water sampled. The gross beta radioactivity range for these years is a low of 1.8 to a high of 3.0 pCi per liter of water sampled. Those samples analyzed in 1988 were well within the ranges of the previous years. In 1988 tritium activity was detected in the indicating and control location samples. The average tritium concentrationof the indicator and control locations were 390 and 338 pCl per liter of water respectively. In samples collected at these same locations prior to the operation of Fermi 2, levels of tritium had also been detected. The average tritium concentration of the indicator and control locations were 300 and 340 pCi per liter of water respectively. 4.3 SURFACE WATER MONITORING During 1988 twenty-four (24) surface water samples were collected at the Fermi 1 intake and Trenton Channel Power Plant. In all of the samples examined by the gamma spectrometer, no radioactivity attributed to the operation of Fermi 2 was detected. In 1988 low level tritium activity was detected at the Indicating surface water loactions. l
,\.
Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 Page 6
~
In previous sampling years 1983 to 1985 and again 1988 tritium was detected at the indicating location. At the indicating location, the mean concentration ranged from a low of 160 pCl/ liter of tritium in 1985 to a high of 390 pCi of tritium per liter in 1983. For the controlling location at Trenton Channel, the mean concentration ranged from a low of 230 pCl of tritium per liter in 1983 and a high of 290 pCi of tritium per liter sampled in 1984. No tritium was detected at the control location in 1985. In 1985 tritium was detected in the first calendar quarter (January-March). The Fermi 2 reactor did not achieve operation until late in the second quarter (April-June) of 1985. The detected tritium in the first quarter of 1985 is not the result of the operation of Fermi-2. The levels of tritium detected at the Fermi 2 discharge is 1988 are consistent with the levels detected in years prior to the operation of Fermi 2. No effect from plant operation is detected.' 4.4 GROUND WATER MONITORING Based on monitoring well data, in 1988 at no time did the aquifer indicate any flow inland. Samples were collected once each calendar quarter 'of 1988 from the four (4) monitoring wells on the Fermi-2 site. These samples will provide a baseline for future monitoring.
.The samples were collected and placed on the gamma spectrometer and showed no detectable gamma radioactivity. When analyzed for tritium (hydrogen-3) no radioactivity was detected.
4.5 SEDIMENT SAMPLING In 1988, ten (10) lake sediment samples were obtained from five (5) separate locations. Four (4) . samples were taken, one South Southeast at 0.9 miles, one 3.0 miles West Southwest and two (2) samples 13 miles North Northeast of Fermi 2 show detectable levels of Cesium-137. The two sediment samples taken at North Northeast of Fermi 2 indicated an average level of 122 pCl of Cesium-137. This average level is about 1.5 times lower than the lower limit of detection (LLD) of 180 pCi of sediment required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. In samples collected at the Fermi 2 discharge the presence of Cesium-137 was not detected in any of the samples. 4.6 FISHING SAMPLING A total of fourteen (14) fishing samples from three (3) sample locations (two indicating and a control location) were collected in 1988. From these fishing samples, representative edible portions (fillet) of each fish species were processed and analyzed. Of these fourteen (14) samples, threa (3) samples showed detectable levels of cesium-137. The control location showed two samples with levels of ceslum-137 of 120.7 pCl per kilogram and 74 pCi per kilogram. The indicating location showed levels of cesium-137 of 65.7 pCi per kilogram. The highest level of ceslum-137 (120.7) was 1.2 times lower than the lower limit of detection (LLD) ) of 150 pCi required by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Samples collected in the ! second half of 1988 indicated no cesium-137 to be present. j l l
' o Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 l
Page 7 In years 1983 through 1988, various concentrations of cesium-137 have been detected in fish at both the indicating and control locations. At the indicating locations, the levels of cesium-137 ranged from a low of 25 pCi to a high of 68 pCi per kilogram of fish fillet. The control location during the same period showed radioactivity from a low of 24.4 pCi to a high of 120.7 pCi per kilogram of fish fillet. The values for the 1988 sampling year are consistent with previous sampling years including preoperational data. Therefore, it is concluded by Detroit Edison that the detected levels of cesium-137 are attributable to the residual fallout of the nuclear weapons tests. 5.0 LAND USE CENSUS 5.1 1988 LAND USE CENSUS As required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Detroit Edison performs an Annual Land Use Census. The annual land use census is a formal, documented evaluation of the changes in the location of the nearest resident, dairy animals (goats and cows), and gardens. Locations were identified through several means. One of the most common was Detroit Edison's continuing contact with neighbors of the Fermi-2 plant as Company personnel performed routine environmental sampling. Other census methods included door-to-door contacts and questionnaires. Using cartography, meteorology and aerial photography, each l Identified location was evaluated. Based on the results of this evaluation, one new location was added to the sampling program, and one location was dropped. 5.2 RESULTS To document the Land Use Census for 1988 Figures and Tables are provided for comparison to the 1987 Land Use Census. One new residence was identified Northwest of Fermi 2 at approximately 1.1 miles (See Table 1). The nearest milk locations identified in 1988 changed slightly from those identified in 1987. Milk cows were located west of Fermi 2 at 4262 Post Road and will be added to the program when the animals start producing milk in the spring. A milk goat located to the west of Fermi 2 was added to the sampling program 5/24/88, but was dropped 7/12/88 because samples could no longer be obtained due to sale of milk animals. Eight (8) of the eleven (11) closest gardens identified during the 1987 Land Use Census changed during the 1988 Census (see Table 2). The changes in garden locations did not affect the sampling program. The most significant change in the Environmental Program was dropping the garden control location to the west of Fermi 2 due to decreased size and content. A new control location was added west northwest of the plant.
. . Annual Radiological
" " #" " "O NEAREST RESIDENT Rsport 1988 Page 8 1
nar tor aMrmee/Itemident e Distance (MD cime (MD { 1988- NE 6760 Lakeshore 1.2 mi E 1987 NE ~ 6760 Lakeshore 1.2 mi 1988 NNE 6441 Brancheau 1.1 mi E 1987 NNE 6441'Brancheau 1.1 mi 1988 N 6200 Blanchett 1.1 mi E 1987 N 6200 Blanchett 1.1 mi
/ 1988 M 5701 Post 1.1 mi NC 1987 M 5701 Post 1.1 mi 1988 m 6577 Ieroux 1.1 mi -0.1 mi 1987 NW 6511 Ieroux 1.2 mi 1988 WNW 6200 Langton 0.8 al 1C
.1987 .M 6200 Langton 0.8 mi 1988 W 6001 Toll 1.2 mi 2C 1987 W 6001 Toll 1.2 mi 1988 WSW 4981 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.4 mi IC 1987 WSW 4961 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.4 mi 1988 SW 5194 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.2 mi E 1987 SW 5194 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.2 mi 1988- SSW 5820 Pte. Aux Peaux -
1.1 mi IC 1987 SSW 5820 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.1 mi 1988 S 4834 Long 0.9 mi IC . 1987 S- 4834 Iong 0.9 mi !
- END-SSE Iake Erie i
0 l e t o-___--------------_---- - - - - - - - _ - l
'. == Annust Radiological Environmental Monitoring NEAREST GARDENS Report 1988 Page 9 he tor MArmem/t:medan Distarce (MI) s'hanae Mi) 1988 NE 7477 Gladys 2.0 mi E 1987 NE 7477 Gladys 2.0 mi 1988 lelE 6441 Brancheau 1.1 mi E 1987 NNE 6441 Brancheau 1.1 mi 1988 N 6366 Troubly 2.0 mi + 0.1 mi 1987 N 6380 Troubly 1.9 mi 1988 M 4956 Anteau 2.9 mi + 0.4 mi 1987 teH 8503 Dixie Bay. 2.5 mi 1988 NR 7680 Dixie Bry. 2.2 mi + 0.8 mi 1987 NW 7104 Miller 1.4 mi 1988- WNR 6834 Dixie Bry. 1.8 mi + 0.5 mi 1987 WIM 6170 Ieroux 1.3 mi
. 1988= W 6170 Leroux 1.3 mi - 0.3 mi 1987 W 5681 'ib11 1.6 mi {
l 1988 WSW 4280 Pte. Aux Peaux 2.1 mi IC ) 1987 'WSW 4280 Pte. Aux Peaux 2.1 mi j l 1988 SW 4971 Elm 1.5 mi + 0.1 mi l 1987 SW 4983 Elm 1.4 mi 1988 SSW 4375 5th 1.4 mi - 0.2 mi 1987 SSW 5887 Lakeview 1.6 mi , 1988 S 5991 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.1 mi - 0.3 mi 1987 S 6233 Highland 1.2 mi !
*ENE-SSE Lake Erie e
l _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ a
-* . ' Annual Radiological
- ALL PROBABLE MILK ANIMALS Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 Page 10 s
stme+ne Distane o naaw rintIcm ,
' Fird ina/ Result's NNS 4.3 al 7806 Labo ' Goats 4.9 mi 10327 US Rtrnpike No milk animals 4.5 mi' 9501 US ' turnpike No milk animals ;
-N 6339 Troubly No milk animals let
- 4.5 mi 3?39 Stewport M. Cows 3.0 mi 8288 Swan Creek Cows Wet 2.1 mi 4262 Post M. Cows 3674 Post M. No allk animals W 4.2 mi 5904 Nantel Goats 4.2 mi 1972 Nm5 eau Goats MSW . 3020 Mantel No milk animals 2.9 mi 3979 Dixie Ihry. Cows W
- 14.2 mi 7512 N. Custer Cows lef
- 5.7 mi 2705 E. Labo Cows l l
- Participating in Fermi 2 REMP 0
e e , + l
Annual Radiological. Environmental Monitoring I Report 1988 Page 11 m 6.0 PROGRAM EXECUTION
.' All phases of the terrestrial and aquatic monitoring were conducted in accordance with the Technical Specifications as implemented in the sampling schedule. If samples could not be '
obtained from a specific locatien, other samples were substituted where appropriate. The following includes the details of deviations from the normal sampling schedule for 1988. 6.1 THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY (TLD) No TLD was available for location T-1 for the first-quarter of 1988. The TLD was determined to be missing on 03-30-88 and was subsequently replaced. Vandalism is assumed by Detroit Edison to be the cause of the missing TLD. The TLD is a monitoring device located on a telephone or power pole in the vicinity of Fermi 2, and is therefore, susceptible to vandalism. Detroit Edison has determined that it is more ; cost-effective to replace a TLD at specific locations rather than to design a device that would prevent vandalism. 6.2 LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION For all samples collected and analyzed in 1988, the required ' Lower Limit of Detection was not met on the following samples. 3 One result (< 0.08 pCl/m3) for lodine-131 in charcoal and gross beta (<0.0122 pCl/m ) for sample location API 4 on 06/07/88 did not meet the lower limit of detection due to a low
~
volume caused by a pump malfunction. lodine-131 was not reached in milk samples collected on 05/24/88 at locations M-2 (< 1.1), M-3 (< 1.1) and M-6 (<2.0) pCl/ liter due to the relocation of the Analytical Laboratory and r,ubsequent delays in counting the lower limit of detection. 6.3 FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLING Although a garden was identified in the Land Usu Census, food samples were not sufficient for sampling for location FP-3. Garden location FP-2 was not sampled because samples were not available because of drought conditions. A new control replaced FP-2 and is identified as FP-6. l J
.., Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring
- g. ,
Report 1988 .
~~
Page 12 , I ( t 4 1 1 l l
)
l l SECTION 7 l 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
i l 1 y i s 1 i l
0 0 0 0 0 ers _ e 8 8 tR :n
- uo '
9 NN 1 r e ) ) b s 2 - ) 2) m n 5) )1 34 e loone /7 4 . / . c riag 2 /8 20 e tt en 59 47 32 D naMa (4 ( - ( - oc R - 2 D D D D D' D 5 D D D
- L L L Co 85 1 L L L L L L y L 6 L L L L L L 0. 4 L L L
" r 74 54 71 a
1( 6( < < < < < < 1 ( < < < u n a J
) ) )
p 2 7 d i
- 5) ) )
o h . t n e /4 45 81 i s s a g 2 / 0 / . r n e e n 53 41 8 2 e w h M a (5 ( - - - - - - - (2 - - - P o g R - 8 - g T n 77 3 3 iHa 7. 1 i n n e 84 46 08 w hM 1( 8( 2 1 t o t ' r t i l 4 o h wa p c e n u ) ) R e nn y .y on r r n r iA d a a o 3 F t n d d 1 e ( a o n n e ,f vW c t uW uW l
.oiS a
n o t oN oN o rW g .L a B B P dSD c . i i- - - - - - .. R i - - - i o 3em 3em , sim h L - t - t 5 l em 1 c ' Ii 6 Ii 6 2 l l r4
. 4 i PS PS - ooe y 3 M A(0 A(0 T TPF1 r -
a 0 , m 5 t m i -
) )
u . or rs 8 4 S . on 0 )) 3 o t t o C 2 68 3 _+ N m e ain e /) 1 / ) a D ct a g 82 / 9 4 4 t r i ae n 0 61 3 g e f dcM a 29 1 1 3 3 o k o no R (5 ( - (2 r c I L - D D D D D D - D D D P o t 57 O. L L L L L L 3 8 L L L D s 9. 7 L L L L L L L L L g e 84 05 6 8 n w 1 ( 8( < < < < < < 1 ( < < < i h r t o u t o i 2 S 9 n f o t s 7 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 M i e b O. 0 d n l D 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 1 5 0 5 l U i L 1 1 5 6 2 2 0 1 3 1 a t m L c m 0 ig r 3 o e 6 l F 6 o o s 3 i c .fa a 5 d i y do s 5 0 m 6 e 4 a r n e 6 2 m 2 s 2 R n i t arey s 2 a o E l G D l ebl 4 7 a i pma 3 3 r 9 0 1 a 4 9 8 t y c yun 7 1 1 e 8 9 3 m 5 5 5 n a TNA - - - h - - 1 m - - - e t F . 8 S e s s t r r - a S n e o i m "s f G . G B C C O S S I .G GM F C n t o 4 o c . r i F a n v o e n i s c E f t e) a o a . g d f c ) n r 1 e o e s lam / ) u ) u)
* - m L l et eu1 e 3 o r S1 0 N a ppi myn ncC nem r) t gsQ
/
rip rn/ .t 7 aTU ot oi1 akD/ rC S - ( bg bdC mcLR ep e - r a~ rop mat m t( a iP0 i I( aB(( lb A 1 A G W a ( T l i
ul 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O00O0000000 0 rou - 8 ers 8 b- e 9 mnR 1 uo -- NN - r : e I b m e s ) c l n . 2 e oone ) 1) ) ) D riag 4 / 7 4 4 t t en / 2 / /
- naMa 1 1 2 1 1
- (
oc R D D D D D D D ( D ( - D ODDODDDDDD( y Co L L L L L L L L 8 L LLLLLLLLLL r L L L L L L L L 9 L L LLLLLLLLLL8 8
^^
a 3.1 3 u < < < < < < < 0 < 2( < < <<<<<<<<<0 3 n a J
)
d p ) ) ) o i . 4 4 2 i h t n e / / 1) ) ) r s s a g - 1 1 /0 ~ 4 4 e n e e n 0 0 0 0 O O - ( ( 2 - - - U - - - - - - / / P h M a 1 4 1 1 w - ' o g R 9 3 ( - ( ( g T i n 1 2 n Ha 0 3 2 0 i n e 8. 2 9 t w hM 2( 1 3 r o t - o t il p h wa e c u h R n nn C
) e en 3 d r iA d n 1 i l i i e
u F t n o m em o em o em o ( a o t 0 n c n r2 r2 r2 i i o t 0 0 0 0 0 O - e k2 e 0 4.0 n - - - - - - - - - - - n n t n L a r a 1 9o1 -
.o1 o1 n a c T t E(5M 0 M 0 M-o 1 g o nN 1 r9 r 9 r9 c 4 i L 1 iN1 1 e6 1 e61 e6
( 3 h - E t 1 t t
- c W PiWSWa Wa 1 Wa 1 y 0 i S PmSSDWS DW SDWS r 5 M - .
a ' m . m t u . i rs S o o on ) N r t o C m - t ain e 2 a t e ct a g ) 1 ) ) r e D i ae n 4 /) 4 4 g k dcM a / 20 / / o c f no R 1 1 1 1 r o o IL D D D D D O D D ( (4 D O DDDDDDODD( ( P D L L L L L L L L - L L LLLLLLLLL t L L L L L L L L 3 82 L L LLLLLLLLL2 0 g s 1 9 n e - < < < < < < < < 3 22 < < < < < < <<<<<1 3 i w r h o t t u i 2 o n S - o 't 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000000
- M i s b 0 0 n e D 5 0 5 5 8 5 1 4 5 05505585 1 l
U l L 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 31 1 31 1 1 1 3 a i L - c i m i m g r 0 o e 3 l F o . i o fa 8 8 8 88 8 d c do s 4 4 a i y n e 0 2 2 0 R r t ar s 5 4 5 4 n i e y 9 1 m 9 1 m ' l E l eb l - 4 7 - u u a i pm a 0 5 b 3 3 a 9 0 i 4 9805b33a90 i t c yun 6 6 N 1 1 L 8 9 t 55566N1 1 L89 t n y s TNA - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - i e t F o n r s s a r r r B S neoonrssarr r m i C Z Z C C 8 S S T G G MFCCZZCC8SS T n l f I ' ' o i o r c i a n g v F o e n n i c ) i E f t a d k o a f) e n) c ) rI u i1 1 e o e s u/n r/
- m L et S1 i D1 0 a lppi N myn .Ct pn .Cp 7 aTU r( o r(
e S ( e c e t ( t l a a b W W a T l l
ul 0 w ' rou 8 ers 8 b- e 9 mnR 1 uo-NN _ r e 1 b . m .
)
s e 7) ) )) c l n- 1 0 6 40 - e oone / 3 1) /4 D riag 74 /8 45 tt en 1 1 6 (3 - - naMa oc R D D D D ( - 0 D 1 1 ( - D L D D D L L L 80 y Co L L L L 87 L 0 L L L L 1 2 - r a
' l L L L L 31 31 L
4.1 < < < < 92 2( _ u 1( 1( n a I J _ )
)
p 7) ) - d )0 1 0 o i t' i h ne /6 )) )) 69
' r s s ag .
76 46 . 60 / 9 - e n e en - - - - 1 1 - / '- - - /1 65 _ P w h Ma ( - 43 . 24 ( - _ o g .R 0 ( - ( - 0 g T i n 59 4 0 27 n Ha 92 09 01 i n e 41 0. 2 01 92 t w hM 1( 3( 3( 3( r o t o t il li p h wa E e c u m E R n nn r N N
) e on m a N N r F d t t r iA d
_ e F t n a ni ni u ( a- o F r am ame n c i W e l l i n o t - - - - sN - tW - - - e0 e0 t a L a a r o o n g c oi ai R4 R4 o 1 i o Vm Cm c 4 h L 1 m 1 m ( 3 c 35 62 - r r _ - i - - P a Pa y 0 M M4 M4 FF FF r 5 a . m * - t m u '. i o rs S o r on ) - ) N t t o c 8) ) 0) m e aine 30 5 1 0 a t D ct ag /6 3) )) / 9 r e i aen 86 /6 60 09 g k f dcMa 31 5 / 1 1 5 o c o no R ( - 33 24 ( - r o IL 'D D D D 0 D ( - D D D ( - 0 P D t ' L L L L 09 L 0 L L L 0 82 g s L L L L 80 L
- 9. 1 L L L 09 01 08 51 e 31 n w < < < < 1 ( < 1 ( < < < 3( 3(
i h " r t o u t 2 o i S n t h 1 1 0 0 0 o s 0 0 0 0 . . M in e b 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 U l D 1 5 8 5 0 6 6 8 5 0 l i L 1 1 1 0 2 5 a t m L 5 c m i r 0 g e 3 o F l - o o i c f* 1 1 3 3 d i dos 5 5 5 5 1 1 a r y n e 5 5 0 R n t arsey 4 E i 1 l l ebl 4 7 - 4 7 a i pma 1 3 3 a 9 0 1 3 3 t c yun 3 1 1 L 0 8 9 3 1 1 7 0 n y a TNA 1 - - - 4 1 - - - 4 e t F - S s s a - r r - S s s e - m i I G C C B M S S I G C C B K
, n l f '
o i o - r c i v a n F o n i s) E f t t t o a ce
. c ) uw 1
e o e s d
- m L l et ) og 0 a ppi 1 rk N myn / P/
, 7 aTU 1 1 S ( kC dC e l p op l i( o( b M F a I1lI T
,)j jlj j!]i ,i ,' l Ji ' il I!
,jl]j.
~
o
*. - )3. m D3*gOom&sa 3 - - ;.. h -
1 m3[033'y** gos_ O 5O mDj3 ( e 7#C $ n' fis y ott ul 000000 b 0 OO0O00 0 0 0. O rou 8 ers _ 8 b- e
. 9 mnR 1 uo NN r
e b ) - m e s ) 0) c n 0) 1 0 D e loone riag 1 7
/ .
/5 03 tten 20 1 5
- naMa (2 ( -
e e e oc R DDDDDD 1 0 eeeeee a n n y Co LLLLLL - 26 nnnnnn n n o o o r L' LLLLLL 4. 4 14 oooooo o a 77 02 NNNNNN N N N N u n _<<<<<< 9( 3( a ! ' J
)
)
0 d ) ) )5 p 25 o 0' )0 i i h t ne 1) 75 ) /7 r s s ag /0 /3 2) 21 ( - e n e- en .- - - - - - 20 75 - - - - /6 0 p h Ma (2 ( - 25 . w 0 (1 03 o
- g R 1 43 g .
i n - 04 - n T Ha 4. 4 21 28 92 . i e 77 02 28 41 - t n hM 9( 3( 1( 1( r w t o o i l I 1 p h t wa h e c u R nn C
) n on . i y d e iA d nm a 0 ni e r t n o B 8 om nh u (
F a o r5 3 t acW n -c i '
- e. t 2 n3 i aS i
n o t - - - - - l 9 a - - - - e1 dew- - t a L a - e e W r
- nB n g c Cd ras Te0 I i o 1 o n Bn ,k2 im c 4 i
.L .a i i a .t
( 3 h 1 l 3rm 5tE 4a0 c sW - a - nN - r y 0 i FIS FM5 SIN ST3~ r 5 M a . m t m u . i o rs ) S o r on )
)
0 0) 1 0 N t t o C
/5 m aine ) )0 1 a t e ct ag 4 44 / 05 r e D iaen / /3 4) 1 7 g k d cM a 1 1 3 (6 (1 o c f no R ( ( - 5 .-
r o o IL DDDDD _ 0 DDDDDD 81 90 D D P D LLLLLL 7 82 LLLLLL - 60 L L t 83 LLLLLL 00 67 L L s LLLLLL g 5 82 1 6 18 n e <<<<<< 6 2( <<<<<< 1( 1( < < i w r h o t u t 2 i o n t S o 000000 0 0 0 0 0 M i n s b 363363 5 0 AAAAA5 8 0 U e D 1 21 1 21 1 5 NNNNN1 1 0 4 3 l l L 1 6 2 a t i L c m m i i r 0 g e o F 3 l o o 4 i c fa 1 0 t d i dos 1 5 5 a r y n e R n t ars ey 5 9 E i l ebl 4 7 4 7 a l i pma 498053 3 4805b3 3 9 0 t yun 555661 1 0 5566N1 1 0 8 9 n y c TNA - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - 4 - - e t a S neoons s - S noonrs s - r r m t F G MFCCZC C K G MCCZZC C K S S n i f ir o t o r c i a n v F o n ) ) E f i t y o t a e r
) m d 1
e c e s s
- m
- o. l et g t g 0 a L ppi k nk N myn / e/
7 aTU 1 m1 S ( hC iC e sp dp i( e( lb F S a T 1 1Ij
' tll! ll Itil! ,
} .' rou f ' . - ' - '
s 8 ers l b e 8 b- e - 9 mnR a e r e - 1 uo -_ l h h ~ NN s i T D T
.r n a L -
o v ' e L b m i t .a s d k y e s a rs e e i c l n c oi t t l e oene o t a a m.
;.- D riag l ce l v tt en - au u e n
- naMa .
d el c l i oc R eeeeeeeeee e ra i e
~ y Co 1 nnnnnnnnnn i 2 v.tr
.e 1
3 r ' L oooooooooo f
.nne a -
NNNNNNNNNN i h 1 u - - ' . c i oop T - n ' e mii I a l p rtt r
. r J s eaai
' Ft ca l o t so a f
._- ) a e .l n o c D
,9 _
i d o i h p t ne t s hl t o e' i rha a r L L
. r s s ag -
' - - n mtt t h e on e c p
e n w h e g en Ma
- - - ------. m rorb
. e fco n f
o o R er ~ f s n
. g T in 1 n Ha lps u no s ~. o i n e oneo 1 i t u hM ma i ur 3 t a
r c t ae tfl g 1 o t it sm cI a - n _" p h ws e . vr I i e c u de r o m -. R n nn nl i .l f r r .
" o e y
) e on ub dea d r iA d oa unD f t r e F t n rt dl oL e o u ( a o gc nail D d t n c i '
k e avt L a o af e r i t
'n a L t
a '
~ --.-
c2 ae enro.L coe h o t b n g c bd nf nipnwo a o 1 i o c 4 h L rf at ooo m l ( 3 c - oo t aeidn o
- i f st rtk o rf y 0 M n i spaai f o r 5 ro d net a . oi l eira dn m t rt .ohmbn eo m rc nrt r i di i
epm _ S u o r
. o rs on ea ot r i nst mr luta N t o C t oeeue cc oF t
m e aine pcmdpt x o a , t D ct ag g i i e el r e iaen _ i . ret eyd e g k f dcMa sy ch hb nr o c o no R 1 l st nt e e r .o IL DDDDDDDDDD 6n e e dh eo R
,, P D t s
; ' LLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLL
- 6. o , dst em ose t_ n bt g e -
ds nmsrumoee 7 i n w <<<<<<<<<< - nn
.t _oidf it e aoivu crt ad h .
oe t ed f ch r t
, o -
u m ance) cexg du) e n s t 2 o de i S er ot eumef1dl s/ n o t 000000000' 0 su as l l c7 uail y s i n e b 5055055851 ba eix4l nCae pn w M U D 1 31 1 31 1 1 1 3 e 'e.d e t e1 c l nm ( x p a
~ ~j 1 i L .
dcf
; e L o oxi n c
i m m i e ce t1 em em0.n eeunp2i u i r 0 g e 3 - c4 ?hnbl e o F ne< ' ci oey< y
.j att .iit svbb a
, o o cec) mhua dl i
c ' fa 6 6 sdeF rwohwsdne d i dos 1 1 t( e r oaead a r y n e 0 af e Fen)l hs sg R n t ars 5 4 mods u1 m
- E i ~ ey 9 - 1 m m eyonmm) a . o u at nsbh / g c1 r c l l ebl td1 rm a i pma 49805b33ai gioe mphd f
t c yun 55566N1 1 Lt eCf/) < g n e t y F a TNA - - - - - - - - - i
. S neoonrssar
= lI ut nire eerp dCm.de m i GMFCCZZCCBT S def ad2ep 1 t
' n l f 1 Greri i2t 7 .l o i o 841 u wapet s i
r c a n : obesacss1 pl nlu o 0. 0. s (1 <e v F o al nsuc0e0 ( r n i t ei s r m E f t d el g ees< <uss o a n bandrri(D( l tD c ) u naea L ol L 1 e o e s o sirt ettLt vuL
- m L et r) sm asnl l l s 0 a lppi 1 oodcniuuduwed N myn G. / rnniot ssesore g
7 aTU r1 adiueet el t S ( eC .= nt orrar ea e t p = niar v mev a( Da cneeeeore lb W BL esoohnl nrhl a ' GLMiLNtOeOfT e T i abC d* # 9 h
/
p ' f[ f 4 Annual Radiological . ! o w ' Environmental Monitoring [ f' _ Report 1988 - Page 18
- l. ' '1.:.
\l ' i
'1
, , j i
s , l f..fw i J W f r SECTION 8
- c. ,
DESCRIPTION OF FERMI 2 SAMPLING LOCATIONS { r t s I e d
- q ' e - r F n n n n n n n n n n n n e o o n n o n o o o o o o o o o i t e o i i i t i t i i t t t i ' i t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t e e e a e e e e a e a e e a a a t t i t l l l t l t t l t i i d e d ld d d d d d d d s d d d d d e t e a a e a e a e a e e a e a e W d R R R R R R R R R R R R .R R R o d M t t t t t t c t e t e t c t c c e t t t c t c t c e c c c e c t e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e r r r r r r r r r r r r i r i r t r t i i t i i t t i i i t c D iD D O D D O O D D D O D D O e e s f A f o
. d o e d a . n w c n n de e W t n i a Rt e n S e e a td s l e s b e st f o e o) t i l f n r kS o o l Py - r n e A o o a r n W o r D o t t e o gi w P t a d) r r p f r t n wn( - d R y t D F e o e a ri s 2 - n u sa r er L 5
n c d el s e w t t rt o e t rk l e m mo ud e m s d om L r d aer o l u uS en F r a n e Ce p r wt o P v a e eu f o E a l o n e e u Sw k e ee Po F k l s L H n r 8 r P Pt B o d k P r . p d oe a i s f n e ae m R d d t - P n sS ue S c a e t Pd a n n nna u u( at r i S n t a a eoW d) t e A A i s S n e C e eS) a o s ri/ Ra ep e eS e
- 2 n i o u t 1 t e e ) e t( l s l r t yN e e t P a e $cw mr t e t tt n o e l e u r( r t t p e t el } mA re n) nF ie P l i t t a A e t i d d n t srk e er i y i ot o M r O M r a r n e c a o mrOr re a l l eA or ot Pa G
3 P M c m o 5
.t e
e t N M t a P Pa Pn e g 1 .t F d s k ii d d 6 tSt e e r rr r F nc c f e f n fv nf - r r f S c m
. W D W
e ea e nP n f ot eP twep ine at ot a ou o o o l oo d d
. e) na n r e o ( ee op a t r r of ra eS el eS et aw R R re or o o e rrS en( ._. r g e c f oe o ot t td( du d p
d et CA C t o o Cm C E n5 t i e t t t t t ew) o r o ee rE g Sy So P St Sr t s o ao o o t t El
) S) u r r i E EH E w i Et l P D S W N l ndn SH N( NS 5n GP T T Ne So Eo Cde e orRi ( t r r nv g . .l . Po l .e .h . . n t e . . .c .t .t .ai n e ei e ck r et ec eg eo mc e e ee en en e R i l l b l t re t e l a l n l r rn l l l p l o l o l m r o oo o oEat al oe oo ou oe o o oS oC oC oI o PFt o P PM P t NPS PO PB PL PH FF P P P( P( P(
t t n o M ) n t e mo or t rp n f p i l i t t l l l t t t l t t t e A m e mm m e m e m m a m m m e
" n e( 2 2 4 6 3 8 n c 8 2 8 0 6 7 1 1 O.
e nr . . T r eo 4 5 4 5 2 2 4 t t 1 T 0 1 0 1 t tt w ec n in E De l W a i c g l h s at
' ' 8 cun 8 t
e ime 2 '5 '3 7 '3 '9 8 ' 7 'T t gil 8 8 4 '4 M 3 8 9 '2 4 5 '3 7 3 4 2 ezt 2 3 2 3 2 2 8 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 d 2 / / 2 2 / / e t Ac / 7 / 2 / w
/
w 6 / w / W w / / w w R o/e w 2 w / 1 S S rrr N / S w S S / $ w S S w w ooi W w W S W W S $ S Ww S S w w etD t c ee WS n or 9 O t e 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 s t b 1 1 t t 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 S
. em T T T T T T T T T T 7 T T T T t u SN
) l
~ q e .
r F n n n n n n n n n n on on on e oi i o n o n o o o o o o o o i i t i i i i t . i i i i t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t e e a a a e e a a a e a s a e l e t t t t t t i t t t t t t t t d e d d d d o d d d d d d d d d d e t e e e a o e a e e e e e e R e R a W d R R R R R R R R R R R R R, e t t t t d W t t t t t t e c t t t c e c e e c t t e e e c c e C c e t a e e 4 e e e e e e e e e e a r r r r r t r r i t r r r r r r t i t t i t r t r t t f t t i c O O O O D O D O O D O O D O O e e s A s m s - d o s o e n r d r a " d f R c r tR s F e e e e f s I ( A t n Pr d o s I P t e
- e R o t r o G t f 5 r h e ) - B t ns t o c o t F s
a ou e e a C t e P A t u c tC z N l t a A e. l n o r d r ( t iN i e P D n b w M F l a i . e F d e - o 1 r G y c d A n e l e d P e r w n l P e c p ve n , w e d H e e n m iv a 1 k t t n F i - t e a rr e R t a e h l F S n De k .n e e l a S t e P o s e do r n r s a e l W A n 2 n 1 ee e Ri C o) m i r F d e P e e t cR r t ra tb a D A A n W d t t p n C nc t ue G d P a l - - e t t al oe r Hr A) . d d e r a r ra y t s o A f e N e - A l t r p e t c t n n f r P 5 o f n t O e h o f F d s no o ae t oi 4 c A O i S o 1 e e Ei t rt f d f s r r 9 e 9 h D F 5
. N D t S Gn oR oi e ra 5 t 0 n S n A m f a I c n eM 6 o e e F P e a t oe r e en ee r n r g e g e S g r o rg - n w n ow S r g ec r e dn do dp P -
Wce) n i o t t iS C ou o t t O e o r r St Si S( Cb e r t e l e r B r i eRt o f r E m c e s b a b e e P D l o C Wa Ee St M 5u n nr y y y y t n e onr r ,C e t r d g Pot ,
.G - .S . .H d o a a a aw s o i n sn e e/ et ee e eml o s i C w w d
w dF o C p S i t no l l h l I l c id id E r suC o os ot oa to or e E iA p E t o 1 W( P PA Pw PP P Pf R S M iM M MP o N N i n e A
? )
n l mo a or rp t n f p t t t i t t t l e A m a m m m e m as t 5 5 4 4 8 m e( 0 2 9 7 7 1 t 1 1 1 t 1 2
, n c 9 3 3 7 o nr . .
0 O O O
. 0
. . +
O 0 O r eo 8 0 9 1 9 7 9 9 f i t t v ec n ia E De d l a c i g l h o et o 8 t cun ' 4 8 6 8 '9 8 9 7 4 ' e l mo1 3 0 8 '3 8 4 '9 '3 '5 t ' 1 t gI 5 9 8 ort 2 2 1 3 0 0 2 2 1 3 3 2 t 1 8 7 d / 3 / 6 6 / / / 1 1 1 t 0 4 / e l At / 3 E W E / / / E 1 8 E R o/e w w / W 3 rrr S N w N / / t N $ E E E S / / N W N M N N # W $ S S S E t E E oo4 W # et0 t c
' ee WS n
or _ t e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 S 6 - t h 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 _ auu T T T T T T T T T T T T T t T T _ t e _ SN
i)il!I$ D
,. . )33c "* mmbO_OO_O<~ .
S. m3<W an3U~ EO3XO232E mat 3O O o 7tOO U y c A A 4 A A A n 4 A e 5 S S S 5 S S S u t a e r F a ' i d
- e t t t t t m n n n n e e n
e e e d e m mm mm h h h e l i i d d t i i d d s s s t d d e e a o e e e i i i t W S s 5 S S F F F c e e e s o A r d e ) - n e e a s e e e r e r fk k o s D- o oa a h s n e td h s .L t n f - t f n f ed i f t a f rn o - e 0L- o oa t n c 0 h a t f a 5o t t f sk f e l ) L P 0 o f e 0 l o e t y 0 or h l l 0 C c r 2 r p et 2 t e e 1 t m nc f n e w n o e a B o m - e t m o 0w P ) o C S n l r y r ( e r 0S l . t ei o p 2 l rd p 2 t t n t o p e i e r p a - t e p hg o mr n n t a e - m m i Sn oe u n n ( r r i c i , e pw rh m a o e A o de e .t m h C t eh g p o C ( g o F S e ug r oe C r n
. D ai a n n d a i m d es h ,t s ot n h a c e r
a n P c hl l ' r a er s cear l n l s m g nre l o e s l y o h uow O eot r r) I O r o Aho Bhe T Tl o P l sT 2 se o n 2 B _ g F ef tf r t t eh m ne nr *t o r t t n noe er rt e t on e mr se i i t t ri d Co l r ooa e sor n Ec e o r - o Ptw F ENE I D( C F O t i n - B e - I ) - n l a eo or t rp l l l fp l n mmm i l i e e( A m e m m t a m 5 4 0 n c 9 2 1 0 o nr . 3 9 0 5 i r ee tt O 0 1 3 1 v ee n l s E Ca R l a i c - g lh e at csn - l e a ae '4 8 '0 8 ' l d i gtl ozt 6 t 7 ' 6 7 2 4 '02 0 3 8 8 3 -_ e l Ac t / 3 / / / 5 2 t o/e E E / w E E 8 / I rrr 5 N E 5 M N / w ooi 5 E N WN N E S - etD tc - ee _ WS S T n N . or E 2 3 4 5 1 2 3
. t e W l
- - - - H - - -
tb s l - 5 5 S F F F
. an D 5 5 5 I
t u E F SM S l f!l ~
-. a u Annual Radiological ]
Environmental Monitoring j Repon 1988 1
., f. h h Page 22 .l z a a j i *
~
e l *
- 1; I I .
i e ee
~. E Ti i i
I 1 s i e i .c ! 3 g 2 i .
~ - 8 : ;
- E" .P E ti e i 2e #~ R o,
.; 2n~
, ga e n E e g
i t: : ?
* :,r*
r I .
- t. B a .: >:
M i. Niii - l b
. .O w og tio T, Sil ..
f;; *., S : I 12 X 2 1 0e II 3'.52 s.1 s. e -s T ?? a a m l i i
-m. q r
s e . F
.s s s .s s 3 e
ee ee eent ee nt ee nt e nt nt ie i a i e ia l l ia
. d d dl dt dl dt dl i
e e ou g l c ou oul cou l ou c l c
- W ~
oi t c oi oi oi oi l t l t t t d l t it e dr dr dr dr dr t ea aa eaRPea RP oa RP e RP RP l c e s s A f o y y d l a b b e n 5 e s ~ a e e R d s c c R e e n n r n l e e e m e o F F t u t P s e t e e u e e 8 t t C P c 1 t i S . s f
- e. . N u e n n A e r o o 2 l o) 1 e p e hy , ,
5 t e e ni st ei d a d a 7 i n S de n k n o o - o e au R R P 2 f t Lm m t l l r d t r p no m l l o n m i l oC o o F a r A r T T o c et y t F e s l s t e d t S t e oe n e n o
. a D Pr a D e y m l a t a
r c u he cN r y y r d n E r g I a( d d i o t e n n h) f r ra Bw u u et o P e o o bo P l i B B r r g ev ,t e n r re e e en n i l th t 4 t 5 l o r r A t - i - oC o o s s_ El $T ST P( C t i n o m ) n l mo a or rp t n f p i l e A i t l m m m e( m m m 2 0 n c o nr 4 6 6 r eo 4 1 i lt t O 0 1 v ec n ia E De R l a c i g lh e at l cun ' 0 0 0 e ime 8 9 gt t 4 1
'8 l
d ert 3 2 9 9 e tac 3 / 3 6 t W 2 i R s/e / / w rrr E N W / eof N N N W S etO t c ee SS n or l 2 3 4 5 t e - - - I eseI P t I I I P P P P t u A A A A A SM
u
, q .
e r F r r e e r r . t t e e a r a t t r r r e a W w a a e e e e l i d g g w w t a t a t a t a d e e n n e e w w w w . W d i i i c c d d d d k k a a n n n n d n n f f u u u u e i i r r o o o o t r r u uS r r r G r a D D S G G G t c e s s t A n e I d r n u g a s t e n ey u c k i ce e A u at k nn eo n r r e e t s n) e Ft t t I t P S t n o d f e i n e t r 1 Rr c c o o k nt - e
- o. P i a an F ) v M f 1 t t l o E Po o f a n PC A t e o t I ( . Ps f E l d S r e ( e p eR r e) t s 2 t a o g r e w3 r ms 6 f e t e) t o4 E uo S n Sn tl a P# er . 8 o o ao w e ec e 2 i ML wr l e k s P t .
t t e es ar P a d l p nf ) n k nu Le nA e G R i oo k o a no k uPk m r t rC L ah f a A oep er eD a i d n o F e re c s tW e P a( w Ce hn t t e tk . a e W t en P g a D Sc nd R nr d nhr A n m w o eR oc t e i we P ee a rl l t tS f r o t e Lc r eB l n n( i Pf s f c n g t A e t e 0f oe on f e o a2 ( r i re 0 f w e oF r w/1 o n T r 1 s oW wF P tM u u mg a s Sd e t st 5t' td R g om o0 l
- c o ft fR t i
n ru na r0 t7 a r ouCr rr pa t f7i n 3P fi t r oe e4 e Et pe 2o 4A 2o o MP D1 F DS A n 44P 1 P 4T t t n e o l ) s ' l a mo or t rp n f p l e l l t l e A m l m i e m m a m e( m m l n c 2 4 4 0 0 o nr 0 3 t. O r eo t 2 O 1 0 t 1 i tt v ec n ia E De R l e c I - _ g l h e at l cun '9 7 '9 e imo
'5 l gt i 5 '0 8 0 8 d ort '9 0 1
/ /
2 4 7 2
/
2 2 2
/
l Ac 8 S te o/e 1 8 E E 1 W / W rrr / / 5 M / 5 w M ooi $ N $ M S 5 S f t etD t c R se E R _ eS t T E A T - w A S _ W L _ G L n N E E _ er I 1 2 C I 2 W t 2 3 4 K - A - - t e - - - - t b N W W F w WS E w w w W G _ em I D D R s T G G G _ t u R U I _ SN D $ S
. s wl wt w1 wl wi e ( a ( e ( e ( a ( e r v v v v v F Wa Me Wa We Ma
- s s s s s t t t t t '
e e c c c c c l t u u u u u d d d d d d d e o o o o o o W M r r r r r . P P P P P d d d e d d d t o o o o o a o o o o o i F F F F F c o s s A d n a e n t e t y e a c w
- e. h i g i
e iH e k W n o nr ip
)
2 i s t u t t t p T o r e r cu i r 1 t c 0 n F e d s 5 o o e 9 C
. r D u (
m P - a a e n r d m h e
! g o
oo r a c n t o e r r F F a s b t P r o o e t B P L G g n n a 1 2 6 0 i l 4 6 0 0 r o 4 2 8 2 o R 6 4 7 8 t i n o M ) m l mo a or rp t n f p e A m e(
- n c o nr t r ao l t l e i tt m a m t v ac m s.
n l a 0 1 1 4 _ E Be . . 3 t S 4 t 2 . 3 l e c l e l h e et t cun 8 0 9 e l eo 8 2 0 8 l ed i t 2 d ert 2 t 2
/
e t Ac / / ts
/
t
/
E w R e/e E # rrr M N N eol M g e # t N W stO t c ee BS o or t e 1 t - 3 4 5 8
.' e P - - - -
p P P P MMF F F F F
r s.' e P .
/
s u s n e , C e e t d s e U B d
- d n e a t L e t t
c n e e e c s e r A t d s n o a m e e n h o t t t n e i c e s L e c e n l e . g d i e s S n e e r 2 s t t m w m u p u u u t l s a a a s a r n e i r e e e e s c P P P F e C s o s n s l e e u u u c s D e us t A A A m a U r o e e t n e
% r h h h n o e et e t h ~. g dn s c c e n n u
o t g t ni i n n g t o t t n s r o. k a a s or e en o o o t i o oP a P l a r l P p L L B B P L L T g d 0 0 7 0 1 1 4 0 4 e n 1 1 0 0 8 9 2 3 i . i 6 4 0 0 7 f e r 7 4 2 7 5 2 0 9 1 8 8 i l e 6 6 6 5 6 6 6 4 5 5 4 tb t s na n ec o dt it m ) p s np t mo or eo e rp e t be n f p r
, l t e A t l t t t l ea m m e a m m m m m a m l l t m e( v n c 2 9 at o nr 1 1 4 2 1 7 8 2 1 ha r eo .
1 t t 1 0 0 1 t 1 0 h i tt 1 st v sc n n ie or E De t o W tt l ec a ce c oS i t g l h t e at cun w w w w ee l e i me E NW N s w 5 sc f gt l N M N N w w w S 5 3 et hn d ort l Ac / / 8 N N / / / / 0
/ 0
/ /8
/8 /8 0 To e 0 0 "5 7 3 8 4 1 '7 9 t R o/e 8 2 2 9 7 r rrr 6 7 6 3
3 3 1 3 0 3 7 2 2 2 1 1 :o ooi 3 1 Ee etD Tt t c Oe ee S e I t t I S
Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring
- Report 1988 Page 27 .. D .
1 -
,e I -
I 4 s .
~-
". E
- \
1 s [ i E k lr l l _ I
" .i ,
, ' s v,
g i ._ 8 [~
~ p 3
a
\
~ * /
g n [ .4 e k' - x-
,-w w(
c .
==. 9 = .v
, L m
r $ s 6,'t t - s,,# gn
# 5
%, M M
? m m
l T esos>>oo Yh NI i i! !, i a :=
!;n ; l
,i l
!gs- =_i5 !
I 8 l!
.,s E ..
Annual Radiological Environinental Monitoring
' Report 1988 Paae 2R
!L 1
~
I - nka .
' W_ \f -- -
N
! b[ t i l
- I
~
=
~2 M
* - I '
\_
s g,
- eq ;
4 1
'~
ts , N i
/
- l .",f
.x
^1 ) X, s .
4' ,l
=l '
( w
. 3.
~
=-;: sg-rn , ,- ..t
< z'
'8
(# p Jtts '\ n i
*Ja(3
, . ','a<>.,t,, g
,, s 350 >>00
- In n : .
515 its ig P s, s
~
l [j{l iis g:.! !
= .
l=! 5 t5 5 i
Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring (- Report 1988 l :- l- oace 29 E m o 1 L Ir ^ c
. n . /..
l - r l e p~ , h"- . [f_
' g- I! a l
i /
/ s. :
+
1 is y n i- p i iy J=
- s a
. n s g x ;
,- s._ s . , ~ l 7 o i P: gg m -
e i~' gl!
~
)' L z-
,g , [ .
3 1 'L 5e ,-,' yS
~~_~.-
' ~I y
sies l ,# 6 IT'####. - E[ Im 888 5 L. ___- . ll5!E5ll! ll l ss ll m m = _ c=o I "E l,.e _F.F ' !. n l E*a lj e m WJtrW m E
, a: ', n m g
a ls l y;;,o nt- 'l l,"E ll '
!.! [F !,
L._:::::_ l 380 DOS I CD *
!! ' I!! -x IIl 8
l l!E ~ ! 8 : y5~g 1
. ~a g
eI iI g
* * )
gg E
m.y n - 1
. j i14. - Q l
5
. \ Annual Radiological 1 Environmental Monitoring R: pod 1988 H" g- Page 30 l
_ _ _ _ E 7 - w z
, 1 r\, w n- .
N
',r .
. y -
l w x -
,,a i U
t. 1
'c ^
F '
> i e G .*
+- ,
p 'd, k a .
.~
. .vx z -
i 5 wg , 1 l -0*;, -
* * '% y w @
J l " ~ m - L/r ks
%, \ ,
w = '
/m r~a g i I
, m m / I w z m
T
..o. o. 1 unem.
e* '?'**'2' 0,EnTM'E ggk
,c g a t, Eg;["='maa EE'a r-as- a use, m .-
o
;gr k finasez10 8s M l p, [t*s - ; ". "O o 5 EE i
mm
$=gs B, J m aE o E: t,,
*S R,
I 05 5 4 l 1
r. l
*
- Annual Radiological i Environm:ntal Monitoring )
Repod 1988 i Page 31 )l 1 l a l 1 i SECTION 9 ; a l k' DATA TABLES I I i f ! I i l I l
.~.
f L 1 l l l (.. E
1 FERMI-2 Annual Radiological l Environment:1 Monitoring ' l TLD ANALYSIS Report 1988 Page 32 Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs. j Collection: 1st Quarter (January - March) l Units: mR/ standard quarter, net exposure Date Placed: 01-04-88 i Date Removed: 03-30-88 j Days in the Fleid: 86 ! Calculated Transit Dose: 5.4 + 0.6 Location mR/Std. Otr. Azimuth Distance Station () (miles) A B Mean + s.d. % s.d. T-1 38 1.4 MISSING T-2 21 1.1 17.5 + 1.0 19.4 + 1.7 15.8 + 2.4 15.2 T-3 4 1.1 14.7 I 0.9 14.1 I 0.7 14.4 I 0.4 2.9 T-4 340 0.6 16.4 I 1.2 16.8 I 1.1 16.6 I 0.3 1.7 T-5 321 0.6 18.4 I 1.0 17.6 I 0.9 18.0 I 0.6 3.1 T-6 296 0.6 16.370.7 17.6 I 0.9 17.070.9 5.4 ) T-7 269 14.2 18.3 I 1.2 19.071.2 18.6 I 0.5 2.7 T-8 304 1.9 19.471.2 19.371.1 19.4 I 0.1 0.4 T-9 333 1.5 16.? I 0.9 14.8 I 0.8 15.571.0 0.6 T-10 6 2.2 17.4 I 0.7 17.6 I 0.7 17.5 I 0.1 0.8 T-11 25 6.3 11.9 I 0.8 ' 13.7 I 1.3 12.8 I 1.3 9.9 l T-12 33 6.1 15.4 I 0.8 14.1 I 0.7 14.8 I 0.9 0.6 T-13 357 4.1 18.1 I 0.9 23.0 I 2.6 20.6 I 3.5 16.8 T-14 338 4.4 19.2 I 0.9 17.9 I 0.8 18.6 I 0.9 4.9 T-15 318 3.9 18.4 I 0.8 18.470.8 18.4 I 0.0 0.0 T-16 282 4.8 18.271.3 18.1 I 0.8 18.2 I 0.1 0.4 T-17 273 5.2 18.1 I 0.9 17.7 I 0.8 17.9 I 0.3 1.6 T-18 245 4.8 18.4 I 0.8 18.9 I 0.8 18.6 I 0.4 1.9 T-19 234 5.0 22.371.0 22.8 I 1.2 22.6 I 0.4 1.6 T-20 253 2.6 19.6 I 1.3 19.6 I 1.5 19.6 I 0.0 0.0 T-21 237 2.7 16.770.7 16.9 I 1.2 16.8 I 0.1 0.8 T-22 168 1.2 17.1 I 0.8 17.6 I 1.2 17.4 I 0.4 2.0 T-23 193 1.1 17.2 I 0.9 16.8 I 0.9 17.0 I 0.3 1.7 T-24 222 1.2 16.7 I 1.1 15.0 I 0.8 15.871.2 7.6 T-25 249 1.4 22.170.8 21.5 I 1.2 21.8 I 0.4 1.9 i T-26 258 1.1 21.3 I 0.8 22.471.3 21.8 I 0.8 3.6 T-27 223 7.0 15.370.7 15.6 I 0.9 15.4 I 0.2 1.4 T-28 227 10.6 17.4 + 1.1 17.5 I 1.0 17.470.1 0.4 T-29 237 10.3 20.4 I 1.5 18.6 I 1.0 19.5 I 1.3 6.5 T-30 247 7.8 15.3 I 0.7 16.4 I 1.3 15.8 I 0.8 4.9 f-31 254 8.9 19.6 I 1.6 20.2 I 1.9 19.9 I 0.4 2.1 T-32 296 10.3 19.1 I 1.2 18.6 I 0.6 18.8 I 0.4 1.9 T-33 318 9.3 15.5 I 1.4 13.871.5 14.7 I 1.2 8.2 T-34 339 9.7 16.6 I 0.8 16.272.5 16.4 I 0.3 1.7 T-35 360 7.0 10.770.7 10.5 I 0.7 10.6 I 0.1 1.3 T-36 360 9.2 21.8 I 0.8 18.8 I 0.7 20.3 I 2.1 10.4 T-37 23 9.9 18.171.4 18.1 I 0.8 18.1J 0.0 0.0 T-38 289 1.7 17.4 [ 0.8 16.8 { 1.0 17.1 } 0.4 2.5
~* -* Annual Radiological l FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring TLD ANALYSIS EE " '
age 33 Gamma Radiation, as_ measured by TLDs (continued) Collection: 1st Quarter (January - March) ! Units: mR/ standard quarter, net exposure ] i Date Placed: 01-04-88 ; Date Removed: 03-30-88 Days in the Fleid: 86 Calculated Transit Dose: 5.4 + 0.6 Location mR/Std. Otr. Azimuth DIEtance Station (*) (miles) A B Mean + s.d. % s.d. T-39 147 0.17- 15.5 + 1.3 15.5 + 1.3 15.5 + 0.0 0.0 T-40 139 0.16 15.571.0 14.9 I 2.5 15.270.4 2.8 T-41 133- 0.15 16.2 I 0.7 15.770.7 16.070.3 2.2 T-42 125 0.15 17.371.0 16.5 I 0.9 16.970.6 3.3
-T-43 114 0.14 17.471.0 17.9 I 0.9 17.6 I 0.3 2.0 T-44 101 0.14 16.9 I 1.5 16.571.1 16.7 I 0.3 1.7 T-45 84 0.16 15.8 I 0.9 15.270.7 15.5 I 0.4 2.7 T-46 71 0.2 - 16.9 { 0.8 18.1 { 1.3 17.5 j 0.8 4.8 l
l l 1 I l C_________ _ _
g FERMI-2 Annual Radiological . Environm::ntal Monitoring TLD ANALYSIS Rsport 1988
' Page 34 j
" Gamma'Rsdiation, as measured by TLDs.
l Collection: 2nd Quarter. (April - June) < t Units: mR/ standard quarter, net exposure .
- Date Placed: 03-30-88 '
! , Date Remo'ved: 06-29-88 l yg Days in the Field:' , 91
.i Calculated Transit Dose: - 2.4 + 0.2 ll Location mR/Std. Otr.
- Azimuth Distance -
- Station' ' (*)- (miles)' A B Mean + s.d. % 's.d.
T-1 .38- - 1.4 8.6 + 0.5 - 8.8 + 0.3 - 8.8 + 0.0 0.0 5 T 21 1.1 16.2 I 1.1 15.9 I 0.7 16.07 0.2 1.3 T-3 4- 1.1 12.6 I 0.2 '12.2 I 0.3 12.4 I 0.3 2.3
-T-4L 340 0.6 13.8 I 0.3 14.3 I 1.1. 14.0 I 0.4 2.5 T-5 -321 0.6 11.9 I 0.4 12.5 I 0.5' 12.2 I 0.4 ~3.5 T-6 296 0.6 11.6 I 0.6 -11.3 I 0.4 11.4 I 0.2 1.9 T l269 14.2 15.6 I 0.4 .15.7703 15.6 T. 0.1 0.4 T 304 1.9 19.8 I 0.8 19.8 I 0.8 19.8 I 0.8 0.0 T-9 333 1.5 14.6 I 0.4 13.8 T 0.4 14.2 I 0.6 4.0 T-10, 6 2.2 16.2 I 0.5 16.5 I 0.4- 14.4 I 0.2 1.3 T-11 25- 6.3 15.2 I 0.9 15.0 I 0.4 15.1 I 0.1 0.9
- T-12 . 33 6.1 ' 12.8 I 0.3 12.470.5 12.6 I 0.3 2.2 T-13. 337 4.1 16.3 I 0.4 16.5 I 0.2 16.4 I 0.1 0.9 I T-14 338 4.4 16.8 I 0.6 '16.6 I 0.6 16.7 I 0.1 0.8 i T-15 318 3.9 15.5 I 0.7 14.5 I 0.5 15.0 I 0.7 4.7
--T-16 '282 4.8 15.1 I 0.4 15.6 I 0.6 15.4 I 0.4 2.3 T-17' 273 5.2 15.170.6 15.170.5 15.1 I 0.0 0.0
.- T-18 245 4.8 14.8 I 0.7 14 9 I 0.4 14.8 I 0.1 0.5 T-19 234 5.0 17.5 I 0.3 18.1 I 0.9 17.8 I 0.4 2.4 T-20: 253 2.6 '18.5 I 0.5 18.5 I 0.8 18.5 I 0.0 0.0
-T-21 237- 2.7 14.170.3 13.8 I 0.4 14.0 I 0.2 1.5 g T-22 168 1.2 20.071.3 18.770.8 19.4 I 0.9 4.6 T 193 1.1 15.9 I 0.6 16.1 I 0.4 16.0 I 0.1 0.9
-T-24 222 1.2 13.5 I 0.4 13.770.4 13.6 I 0.1 1.0 T-25 249 1.4 18.3 I 0.5 19.070.6 18.6 I 0.5 2.7
-.T-26 258 1.1 17.5 I 0.5 18.2 I 0.4 17.8 I 0.5 2.8 T-27 223 7.0 12.2 I 0.2 12.2 I 0.3 12.2 I 0.0 0.0 T-28' 227 10.6 14.6 I 0.3 14.5 I 0.5 14.6 I 0.1 0.5 T-29' 237 10.3 15.571.0 15.0 I 0.6 15.2 I 0.4 2.3
-T-30f 247 7.8 12.1 I 0.5 12.570.6 12.3 I 0.3 2.3
'4 T 254 8.9 14.8 I 0.4 14.5 I 0.4 14.6 I 0.2 1.4 T-32 296 10.3 15.470.5 15.6 I 0.4 15.5 I 0.1 0.9 i T 318 9.3 13.4 I 0.3 13.4 I 0.5 13.4 I 0.0 0.0 !
'T-34 339 9.7 13.2 I 0.5 13.1 I 0.4 13.2 I 0.1 0.5 l T-35 360 7.0 10.7 I 0.9 10.7 I 0.4 10.7 I 0.0 0.0 ]
LT-36 360 9.2 14.4 I 0.C 14.5 I 0.3 14.4 I 0.9 0.5 ! T-37 23 9.9 14.3 I 0.6 12.4 I 1.0 13.4 I 1.3 10.0 l T-38' 289 1.7 15.7 { 0.6 14.6 { 0.3 15.2 { 0.8 5.1 l
-- _ _ . _ _ . _ i
FERMI-2 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring TLD ANALYSIS Report 1988 Page 35
' Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs (continued)
Collection: 2nd Quarter (April June) Units: mR/ standard quarter, net exposure Date Placed: C3-30-88 Date Removed: '06-29-88 Days in the Field: 91 Calculated Transit Dose: 2.4 + 0.2 Location mR/Std. Otr. Azimuth . Distance Station (*) (miles) A B Mean + s.d. % s.d. T-39 147 0.17 12.4 + 0.4 12.3 + 0.3 12.4 + 0.1 0.6 T-40 139 0.16 12.2 I 0.3 11.6 I 0.5 11.9 I 0.4 3.6 T-41 133 0.15 -13.7 I 0.3 13.1 I 0.4 13.4 I 0.4 3.2
-T-42 125 0.15 14.071.0 13.8 I 0.7 13.9 I 0.1 1.0 T-43 114 0.14 13.6 I 0.4 13.470.5 13.5 I 0.1 1.0 T-44 101 0.14 12.7 I 0.3 13.3 I 0.4 13.0 I 0.4 3.3 T-45 84 0.16 11.8 I 0.3 11.770.4 11.8 I 0.7 0.6 T-46 71 0.2 12.6 [ 0.7 12.2 [ 0.5 4.1 11.9 [ 0.3 1
j. l i 1 ~ - _ - _ _ _ _ ,
-s Annual Radiological
- FERMI-2 Environm:ntal Monitoring Report 1988 TLD ANALYSIS Page 36 Gammrs Radiation, as measured by TLDs.
Collection: 3rd Quarter (July - September)
; Units: mR/ Standard. Quarter, Net Exposure
. 1 Date Placed: 06-29-89 Date Removed: 09-29-88 Days in the Field: 92 Calculated Transit Dose: 1.7 + 0.7 Locati_o_n mR/Std. Otr.
Azimuth Distance Station (*) (miles) A B Mean + s.d. % s.d. r
-T-1 38 1.4 16.0 + 0.7 15.7 + 0.4 15.8 + 0.2 1.3
'T-2 21 1.1 17.9 I 0.8 18.7 I 1.6 18.3 I 0.6 3.1 T-3' 4 1.1 13.9 I 0.9 13.6 I 0.7 13.8 I 0.2 1.5 T-4 340 0.6 ' 16.9 I 1.0 17.8 I 1.3 17.4 I 0.6 3.7 T-5 321 0.6 19.371.2 19.171.1 19.2 I 0.1 0.7 T-6 296 0.6 16.9 I 0.8 17.871.6 17.4 I 0.6 3.7 T-7 ,269 14.2 16.9 [ 1.0 17.2 { 1.0 17.0 [ 0.2 1.2 T 304 1.9 18.1 + 0.7
~
17.7 + 0.8 17.9 + 0.3 1.6 T-9 333 1.5 15.1 0.7 14.6 [ 0.8 14.8 [ 0.4 2.4 T-10 6 2.2 18.7 + 0.7 18.9 +.1.6 18.8 + 0.1 0.8 T-11' 25 6.3 12.0 I 0.7 13.3 I 0.7 12.6 I 0.9 7.3
.T-12 .33 6.1. 14.0 I 0.8 14.5 I *i 3 14.2 I 0.4
~
2.5 J-13 357 4.1 ' 18.3 I 0.8 19.5 I 1.5 18.9 0.8 4.5
'T-14 338 4.4 18.8 I 1.0 17.5 I 1.0 18.2 ? 0.9 5.0 T-15 318 - 3.9 15.8 I 0.9 16.2 I 0.8 16.0 I 0.3 1.8
.T-16 '282 4.8 17.5 I 0.7 17.6 I 0.8 17.6 I 0.1 0.4 T 273 5.2 16.2 I 0.9 15.8 I 0.8 16.070.3 1.8 T-18 245 4.8 16.1 [ 0.8 16.7 [ 1.2 16.4 [ 0.4 2.6 T-19 234 5.0 20.1 + 0.7 21.0 + 1.3 20.6 + 0.6 3.1 T-20 253 2.6 20.671.0 19.9 I 1.0 20.2 I 0.5 2.4 >
T-21 237 2.7 15.770.8 15.7 I 0.8 15.7 I 0.0 0.0 T-22 .168 1.2 16.7 I 0.8 17.4 I 1.4 17.0 I 0.5 2.9 T-23 193 1.1 17.2 I 0.9 17.2 I 1.0 17.2 I 0.0 0.0
.T-24 15.2 I 0.7 222 1.2 15.7 I 0.8 14.7 I 0.7 4.6 T-25 249 -1.4 20.0 I 0.9 19.8 I 0.8 19.9 I 0.1 0.7 T-26 258 1.1 19.4 I 0.8 20.2 I 0.7 19.8 I 0.6 2.9
- 'T-27 223 7.0 13.4 I 0.8 14.171.1 13.8 I 0.5 3.6 T-28 '227 10.6 17.1 I 1.0 17.1 I 0.8 17.1 I 0.0 0.0 T-29 237 10.3 17.5 I 1.3 17.4 I 1.2 17.4 I 0.1 0.4 T-30 247 7.8 13.8 I 0.7 14.8 I 0.8 14.3 I 0.7 4.9 T-31 254 8.9 17.3 I 1.0 18.0 I 1.3 17.6 I 0.5 2.8 T-32 296 10.3 18.9 I 1.4 17.1 I 1.4 18.0 I 1.3 7.1 T-33 318 9.3 14.4 I 0.8 13.9 I 0.8 14.2 I 0.4 2.5 T-34 339 9.7 16.1 I 0.8 15. i I 1.2 15.6 I 0.7 4.5 T-35 360 7.0 15.9 I 0.9 16.470.9 16.2 I 0.4 2.2 T-36 360 9.2 19.9 I 0.9 18.5 I 1.0 19.2 I 1.0 5.2 T-37 23 9.9 17.2 { 0.8 17.9 [ 1.2 17.6 [ 0.5 2.8 I T-38 289 1.7 17.5 + 0.9 17.3 + 0.8 17.4 + 0.1 0.8
__ __- _ - . . b
o w ,
. Annual Radiological -
FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring TLD ANALYSIS Report 1988
< Page 37
. Gamma R' adiation, as measured by TLDs (continued)
Collection: -3rd Quarter (July - September) ~l ~ et Units: 'mR/ Standard Quarter, Net Exposure Date Placed: 06-29-88 bate Removed: 09-29-88 i Days in the Fleid: 92 Calculated Transit Dose: 1.7 + 0.7 Location mR/Std. Otr. Y Azimuth Distance -
, Station . (*) (miles) A B Mean + s.d. % s.d.
T-39 147 0.17 14.8 + 0.9 14.7 + 0.9 14.8 + 0.1 0.5 ; T-40 139 0.16 13.8 + 0.8 12.9 + 1.2 13.4 + 0.6 4.8 ! T-41 133 0.15 15.3 I 0.8 14.7 I 0.8 15.0 I 0.4 2.8 ! T-42 .125 . 0.15 . 16.9 I 1.3 16.0 I 1.0 16.4 I 0.6 3.9 T-43 '114 0.14 16.2 I 1.0 16.5 I 1.0 16.4 I 0.2 1.3 T-44 101 0.14 16.7 I 1.2 15.8 I 1.1
~
16.2 I 0.6 3.9 T-45 84 0.16 15.5 0.8 15.3 [ 0.3 1.8 15.1-{ 1.0 .; T-46 71 0.2 16.2 _+ 1.3 16.2 _+ 0.0 0.0 16.2 _+ 0.9 l
.s, i
l 1
. 1 1
Annual Radiological
~
FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring TLD ANALYSIS Report 1988 Page 38 Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs. Collection: 4th Quarter (September - December) l l Units: mR/ Standard Quarter, Net Exposure l: .
. Date Placed:. 09-29-88 '
Date Removed: 12-29-88 Days in the Field: 91 f Calculated Transit Dose: 2.3 _+ 0.6 l Location mR/Std. Otr. j Azimuth Distance ! Station- (*) (miles) A 8' Mean + s.d. % s.d. T-1 38 1.4 19.2 + 0.6 18.2 + 0.8 18.7 + 0.7 3.8 ! T-2 ' 21 ' 1.1 17.6 I 0.8 17.9 I 0.7 17.8 I 0.2 1.2 ! T-3 4 1.1 14.5 { 0.7 14.6 { 0.1 0.5 l 14.6 { 0.6 T-4 340 0.6 16.1 + 0.8 16.4 + 0.7 16.2 + 0.2 1.3 i T-5 321 0.6 14.1 I 0.8 14.7 I 0.6- 14.4 I 0.4 3.0 i T-6 296 0.6 14.1 I 0.7 13.8 I 1.0 14.0 I 0.2 1.5 l T-7 269 14.2 16.7 I 0.7 16.0 I 0.9 16.4 I 0.5 3.0 . T-8 304 1.9 15.8 I 0.9 16.0 I 0.9 15.9 I 0.1 0.9 T-9 333 1.5 16.6 I 0.8 15.8 I 0.8 16.2 I 0.6 3.5 ! 18.4 I 0.7 18.1 I 0.8 18.2 I 0.2 ' .2 ! T-10 6 2.2 T-11 25 6.3 10.8 I 0.8 10.270.6 10.5 I 0.4 4.0 ! T 33 6.1 14.0 [ 0.1 1.0 j 14.1 { 0.7 13.9 [ 0.8 T-13 357 4.1 19.9 + 0.6 19.1 + 0.6 195 + 0.6 2.9 l
~
T-14 338 4.4 17.9 + 0.7 17.8 + 0.8 17.8 + 0.1 0.4 T-15 318' 3.9 16.8 I 0.8 16.4 I 0.8 16.6 I 0.3 1.7 l T-16 282 4.8 16.3 I 0.7 16.8 I 0.6 16.6 I 0.4 2.1 4 T-17 273 5.2 16.2 I 0.9 16.4 I 0.9 16.3 I 0.1 0.9 { T-18 245 4.8 16.4 I 0.8 16.5 I 0.9 16.4 I 0.1 0.4 !
.T-19 234 5.0 18.6 I 1.1 18.2 I 0.9 18.4 I 0.3 1.5 !
T-20' 253 2.6 21.4 I 0.6 20.9 I 0.8 21.270.4 1.7 ! T-21 237 2.7 16.6 I 0.6 16.5 I 0.7 16.6 I 0.1 0.4 T-22 168 1.2 12.0 I 0.7 11.5 I 0.7 11.8 I 0.4 3.4 T-23 -193 1.1 18.4 I 1.0 18.1 I 0.8 18.2 I 0.2 1.2 T-24 222 1.2 15.7 I 0.7 15.9 I 0.7 15.8 I 0.1 0.9 T-25 249 1.4 21.1 I 0.8 20.970.7 21.0 I 0.1 0.7 T-26 258 1.1 19.8 I 0.8 20.3 I 1.1 20.0 I 0.4 2.0 T-27 223 7.0 14.1 I 0.7 14.1 I 0.8 14.1 I 0.0 0.0 T-28 227 10.6 17.0 I 0.8 16.6 I 1.0 16.8 I 0.3 1.7 T 237 10.3 17.8 I 0.9 17.6 I 1.0 17.7 I 0.1 0.8 T-30 247 7.8 14.4 I 0.7 14.3 I 0.7 14.4 I 0.1 0.5
.T-31 254 8.9 16.1 I 0.7 16.2 I 0.7 16.2 I 0.1 0.4 T-32 296 10.3 17.9 I 0.8 17.8 I 0.8 17.8 I 0.1 0.4 l
T-33 318 9.3 15.4 I 0.7 15.3 I 0.9 15.4 I 0.1 0.5 T-34 339 9.7 15.1 I 0.8 14.8 I 0.8 15.070.2 1.4 T-35 360 7.0 12.0 I 0.7 12.2 I 0.7 12.1 I 0.1 1.2 f ' T-36 360 9.2 16.4 I 0.8 16.8 I 0.6 16.6 I 0.3 1.7 T-37 23 9.9 15.6 I 0.7 14.6 I 1.1 15.1 I 0.7 4.7 T-38 289 1.7 17.1 { 0.7 17.6 { 0.6 3.6 18.0 { 0.7 l 1 I _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - l
Annual Radiol:gical-FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring R; port 1988 TLD ANALYSIS Page 39 l Gamma Radiation / as measured by TLDs (continued) l- Collection: 4th Quarter (September - December)
' Units: mR/ Standard Ouarter, Net Exposure Date Placed.' 09 29-88 Date Removed: 12-29-88 Days'in the Field: 91 Calculated Transit Dose: 2.3 + 0.6 Location mR/Std. Otr.
Azimuth Distance Station (*) (miles) A '. B Mean _+ s.d.
% s.d.
T-39 147- 0.17 18.4 + 0.8 18.6 + 0.9 18.5 + 0.1 0.8 . T-40 139 0.16 17.370.7 17.0 I 0.8 17,2 I 0.2 1.2 T-41 133 0.15 22.8 I 1.1 21.970.6 22.4 I 0.6 2.8 T-42. 125 0.15 22.470.8 22.270.7 22.370.1 0.6 T-43 114 0.14 23.4 I 0.7 23.170.8 23.270.2 0.9 T-44 101 0 14 20.2 I 0.6 21.570.6 20.8 I 0.9 4.4 T-45 84 0.16 17.570.6 17.470.8 17.4 T 0.1 0.4 T-46 71 0.2 15.9 { 0.7 15.7 [ 0.3 1.8 15.5 [ 0.7 i 1 l l 1
7 8 3 3 3 4
- - 3 3 T T - -
. . . T T
. . 2 7 1 9 .
p 3 2 4 2 22 2 . . u 1 1 - - - - 3 5 4 o - - T T TT - 1 1 r T T T - - G . , . . T T 6 . 5 1 9 4 061 . n 03 1 4 4 3 2 223 7 6 . . i 1 - 1 - - - - - - - 1 1 8 9 T - T T T T TTT - - - - s T T . T T T T D . . L 5 . 6 4 3 0 2 3 98 850 . . . T 33 2 1 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 2 1 23 7 6. 5 4 TT T T T T T T T T TT TTT T T T T n
~
a 4 7 1 4 7 9 2 0 9 3 4 4 6 1 0 e . M 1 0 5 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l
+_ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
a . u 0 0 4 3 8 1 2 2 2 4 6 3 6 3 0 g n . n 8 5 4 5 5 7 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 A 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 7 3 4 6 0 7 2 8 5 6 7 9 1
. 3 3 0 0 2 0 3 4 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 n r -
o t + + + + + + + + + + +- + +_ + + i Q 2 9 2 5 6 3 9 4 7 7
. 4 6 2 3 t 1 c h e t 5 4 8 5 9 2 0 5 8 6 7 5 6 5 6 r ) 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i .
S D I d. 2 S s s Y s
. ~
I L A a + 3 7 2 2 4 5 8 2 9 2 7 3. 2 6 M p G. R N . 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 2 2 0 0 2 1 A m . E o r rt + + + + F D C t 1 + + + + + + + + + +- L Q Q T y 4 7 8 . 2 8 0 9 5 8 7 7 5 6 8 5 b . d 6 d r 7 5 5 6 5 5 4 7 3 6 7 6 7 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 d t 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
'- e S .
p / u R o m r ( G 5 6 0 7 8 1 0 9 1 4 3 4 0 3 5 e . . n t . 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 2 0 2 3 1 o a r + + +, 1 i R t + + + + + + 1 + + + +- t Q a e 1 3 8 8 4 5 1 0 6 7 4 4 1 5 i r d . . 9 . d u n2 4 4 8 1 2 3 3 5 6 4 5 5 4 5 4 a8 s 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 R8 o ' 9 p a1 x m E m. ay 5 9 0 3 e 2 2 8 8 3 8 3 3 3 1 Gl g . r a . 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 0 O 2 1 ye r r g l t e t + 1 n + + + + + + + +- + +_ + +_ rr v Q i ea A 7 4 s 5 1 6 0 4 0 8 2 2 8 6 8 t u t s . rQ s 6 5 i 7 6 7 6 6 7 7 9 8 7 7 6 a 1 1 1 M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 u - Q: e er gu _ as ro ep vx AE n o si st E' E E E E E WW W WW W ac N N N N E S S S S S S W N N N pe N E E S S W W N mr oi CD r l
1
. . 3 8 -
4 - T
- T . . , . . . . .
1 61 4 481 725 , p 3244 1 1 2 1 33 9 u ' 82 - - - - - - - - - - 2 o 33- TTT TTT TTT - r - - T , -. T G TT . . . . . . . ' i 5036 360 2047 . n . 22444 1 1 2 1 333 8 i 262 - - - - - - - - - - - 2 s --- TTT T T T.T - TTT TTTT T D . , . , . . . . : L . . ,4925 059 1 736 . T 1 592344 1 1 1 1 233 7 TTTTTTT TTT TTTT T n n 5 2 1 6 e . W - 1 1 1 1 _ l + +- +- + - e 2 u 4 8 8 0
- n t n 6 7 4 7 m A 1 1 1 1 r
e F m o 0 6 8 7 r f . 3 1 1 0 r
) t + +- +- +
s Q e 7 9 3 8 l h t 7 7 4 t m ) 4 1 1 1 % ( . S - I e d. S s 2 Y c L n - I a + 8 8 9 3 A W R NA t s . . 1 1 1 0 _ E i r r F D D t t + +~ +- +_ L O Q y 7 0 3 3 T b . d : d r 6 8 5 7 1 d t 3 1 1 1 e S p / u R o m r ( . G 8 5 6 5 e n t . 2 1 1 0 o a rt i R + +- +- + t Q a e 2 1 5 0 i r d . d u n 4 6 3 5 a s 2 1 1 1 1 o R p a x m E m a e 9 7 8 1 G g . a . 1 1 2 1 y r r - l e t + +- +- + r v Q e A 1 0 0 8 t t . r s 7 9 6 8 a 1 1 1 1 1 u Q
'e g
a r e s v l A e- e do c)hr 2 5 nr nst o it ae * - - wn tl nc 5 po sioa 0 2 > UC i Mre D(fR
~
j
. , 4 FERMI-2 Annual Radiological y
Environmental Monitoring' ort 1988 [o AIR PARTICULATE ANAL
. age'42 -
l .g flocation ~= > Estral Beach, Lakeshore Drive 18 Poles' South'of Lakeview q API-1 (Indicator) Distance -= 1.4 Miles NE of Fermi 2
. Sample - = - Airborne Particulate 'and Airb'orne Iddine Analysis . = Gross Beta and Iodine - 131 a Sample
. Frequency -
= 610
= Coginuourf=eekly pCl/m (.001 pCi/m3) .
Units Date - Vogume a Date Vogume Collected (m )- Gross (pci/m p) Collected (m ) Gross (pCi/m g) eta 01-05-88 233 20.1 + 5.6 07-05-88 248 12.9 + 3.0 01-12-88 240 25.8 I 5.4 07-12-88 246 25.3 I 6.0 01-19-88' 230 7.1 7 5.1 07-19-88 220 21.5 I 4 1 01-27-88 267 19.4 I 5.5 07-26-88 277 24.3 I 3.2 02-02-88 201 9.2 76.0 08-02 -246 31,7 I 4.4 02-09-88' 236' 20.7 + 5.5 08-09-88 249 44.6 I 4.9 Li: '. 02-16-88 228 '10.9 I 5.5 .08-16-88 247 27.8 I 4.1 i : 02-23-88 238 10.0 I 5.1
~
08-23-88 248 21.1 I 3.8 l
' 03-01-88' '232' ' 8.6+ 4.9 08-30-88 244 22.5 I 4.2 ~
< ~ 03-08-88' 235' 10.0 + 5.2 09-06-88 246 22.3 ~ 3.8 03-15-88 236 < 7.9 09-13-88 245 23.5 + 5.0 _j
' 03-22-89 .234' < 8.3 09-20-88 244 19.6 + 4.2 03-29-88' '237 < 7. 5 09-27-88 241 21.8 I 4.7 1st Otr mean + s.d. 14.2 + 6.6 3rd Otr mean + s.d.
24.5 + 7.4 - 04-05-88 239- 6.4 + 5.4 10-04-88 246 25.0 + 4.9 04-12-88 230 6.3 I 5.1
~
10-11-88 237 29.3 I 4.6 04-19 248 < 7.8 18-88 241 24.5 I 3.9 04-27-88' 256.' < 7.1 10-25-88 239 17.1 I 4.0 05-03-88. 194 < 9.2 11-01-88 239 21.2 I 4.2
^05-10-88 219 9.2 + 5.2 ' 11-08-88 239 25.1 I 4.3,
~
05-17-88 221 < 6.3 11-15-88 235 18.9 I 3.9 05-24-88 211 < 8.6 11-22-88 240 22.6 I 4.0 05-31 245 11.4 + 5.0 11-29-88 239 27.5 I 4.4. 06-07-88 244 9.4 T 4.9
~
12-06-88 234- 38.6 I 4.9 06-14-88 243 < 9.9 12-13-88 236 29.2 I 4.4
. 06-21-88 245 11.2 + 4.7 12-20-88 231 25.2 I 4.4 06-28-88 246 < 7.1 12-27-88 238 26.3 I 4.4 D1-03-89 235 52.7 I 5.8 2nd Otr. mean + s.d. 9.0 + 2.2 4th Otr mean +_ s.d. 27.4 + 8.9 a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pct /m3 unless noted otherwise.
1 n: I
FERMI-2 Annual Radiological 7" Environmental Monitoring
- AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSWport 1988 Page 43
- Location = Site Boundary and Toll Rd on Site Fence North of Fermi Drive API-2 (Indicator)
Distance = . 0.6 Miles NNW of Fermi 2 Sample = Airborne Particulate and Airborne lodine Analysis = Gross Beta and lodine - 131 a Sample - Frequency = Coginuoup=eekly 10~ pCi/m (.001 pCl/m3) Units = Date Vogume Grossgeta Date Vogume Collected Collected (m ) Gross g) eta (pCl/m (m )- (pCl/m ) 01-05-88. 241 21.5 + 5.3 07-05-88 261 11.8 + 2.8 01-12 251- 22.8 I 5.4 07-12-88 284 24.5 I 5.2 01-19-88 241 11.2 I 5.1 07-19-88 259 20.7 I 3.7 01-27-88 275' 18.1 I 5.4 07-26-88 263 23.972.9 02-02-88 211 10.0 I 5.8 08-09-88 257 29.5 I 4.1 02-09-88 243 23.7 I 5.5 08-09-88 263 38.6 I 4.5 02-16-88 246 11.9 I 5.2 08-16-88 260 27.0 I 4.0 02-23-88 247 10.7 I 4.9 08-23-88 262 20.0 I 3.6 03-01-88 242 9.0 T 4.8 08-30-88 257 23.4 I 4.1 03-08-88 '244 6.9 I 4.9 09-06-88 259 24.2 I 3.8 03-15-88 245 < 16 09-13-88 260 26.074.8 03-22-88 243 < 8.0 09-20-88 255 23.5 I 4.2 03-29-88 248 6.6 + 4.7 09-27-8r 255 22.0 I 4.5 1st Otr mean + s.d. 13.8 + 6.4 3rd Otr mean + s.d. 24.2 + 6.0 04-05-88 252 8.8 + 5.3
~
10-04-88 261 26.2 + 4.8 04-12-88 245 < 7.5 10-11-88 253 27.8 I 4.3 04-19-88 .247 < 7.9 10-18-88 258 24.5 I 3.7 04-27-88 281 6.8 + 4.2
~
10-25-88 253 16.1 I 3.7 05-03-88 220 < 8.1 11-01-88 255 20.5 I 4.0 05-10-88 192 13.9 + 6.0 11-08-88 257 22.4 I 3.9 05-17-88 250 < 5.6 11-15-88 251 19.3 I 3.8 05-24-88 256 < 5.1 11-22-86 257 25.0 I 3.9 05-31-88 257 11.7 + 4.8 11-29-88 255 24.2 I 4.1 06-07-88 257 12.0 I 4.8 12-06-88 251 37.9 I 4.7 06-14-88 257 < 9.4 12-13-88 254 30.174.3 06-21-88 259 12.4 + 4.6 12-20-88 252 21.3 I 3.9 06-28-88 260 9.4 T 4.5 12-27-88 250 23.7 I 4.1 01-03-89 251 59.2 I 5.8 2nd Otr mean + s.d. 10.7 + 2.5 4th Otr mean + s.d. 27.0 + 10.6 a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCi/m3 unless noted otherwise. i E________ - . _ _ _
s y E :,- ' > Annual Radiolog'ical I' MRW-2 Environmental Monitoring t AIR PARTICULATE ANAL ,
= Site Boundary and Toll Rd North of Langton Road Location '
1
- API-3 (Indicator) j Distance ' = 0.6 Miles NW of Fermi 2 -
< : Sample.. = Airborne Particulate and lodine 131a F 4 - Analysis =- Gross Beta and lodine - 131 Sample !
& Frequency.
= Co_ginuoup=eekly !
Units - = 10 pCi/m (.001 pCl/m3) { l Date Vogume Date Vogume l Collected (m ) Gross (pCl/m g)ota
' Collected (m ) Gross (pCl/m g) eta 01-05-88 252 20.2 + 5.0 07-05-88 278 11.5 + 2.7 1 01-12-88 233 22.8 I 5.4 07-12-88 278 21.7 I 5.2 01-19-88 '252 ' 9.4 T 4.8 07-19-88 277 24.0 7. 3.7 !
01-27-88' 240 21.5 + 6.2 07-26-88 279 26.4 + 2.8 i 02-02-88' 222 14.8 I 5.7 .08-02-88 275 30.0 I 4.0 02-09-88 243 27.2 I 5.6 08-09-88 281 36.7 I 4.2 02-15-88 227 10.6 I 5.5 08-16-88 279 25.8 I 3.7 02-23 258' 11.5 I 4.8 08-23-88 278 19.0 I 3.4 03-01-88 '252 13.6 I 4.8 08-30-88 276 22.3 I 3.8 03-08-88 254 9.3 T 4.8
~
09-06-88 277 21.0 I 3.5 03-15-88 257. < 7.3 ~ 09-13-88 279 29.8 I 4.7 03-22-88 253 < 7.7 09-20-88 274 20.8 [ 3.9 03-29-88 258 6.1 + 4.5 09-27-88 158 23.3 + 6.7 l 1st Qtr mean + s.d. 15.2 + 6.7 3rd Otr mean + s.d. 24.0 + 6.1 04-05-88 262 0.8 + 5.1 10-04-88 244 23.9 + 4.9 04-12-88' 253 5.7 I 4.6
~
10-11-88 271 25.3 I 4.0 04-19-88' 258 < 7.5 10-18-83 275 21.5 I 3.4 04-27-88 293' 4.7 + 4.0
~
10-25-88 270 16.8 I 3.6 05-03-88 226 < 7.9 11-01-88 272 17.7 I 3.6 05-10-88 266 13.4 + 4.5 11-08-88 275 22.473.8 05-17-88 267 < 5.2 11-15-88 267 .17.4 I 3.5
'05-24-88 272 < 4.7 11-22-88 274 26.4 I 3.8 05-31-88 275 11.1 + 4.5 11-29-88 271 22.573.8 06-07-88 276 9.6 7 4.4 12-06-88 268 36.7 I 4.5 06-14-88 271
~
< 8.9 12-13-88 271 28.5 I 4,0 06-21-88 275 12.0 + 4.3 12-20-88 269 26.3 I 4.0 06-28-88 276 9.5 T 4.3 12-27-88 268 26.3 I 4.1 01-03-89 269 53.4 I 5.4 2nd Otr mean + s.d. 11.5 + 6.8 4th Otr mean + s.d. i 26.119.4 a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCl/m3unless noted otherwise.
L. }
e- + Annual Radiological FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring ort 1988 AIR PARTICULATE ANAL 45 Location = Doty Farm
' 7512 North Custer Road Monroe, Michigan API-4 (Control)
Distance = 14.2 Miles W of Fermi 2 Sample = Airborne Particulate and lodine-131 Analysis = Gross 8 eta and lodine - 131 a Sample Frequency = Coginuoup=eekly 10- pCi/m (.001 pCl/m3) Units = Date Vogume Date . Vogume Collected (m ) Gross (pCi/m g)eto CoCected (m ) Gross (pCl/m g) eta 01-05-88 233 15.0 + 5.2 07-05-88 240 14.1 + 3.1 01-12-88 258 23.4 I 5.3 07-12-88 247 26.6 I 6.0 01-19-88 232 13.1 I 5.3 07-19-88 252 22.5 I 3.8 01-27-88 266 17.0 I 5.5 07-26-88 243 27.4 I 2.8 02-02-88 203- 9.2 T 6.0 08-02-88 250 34.7 I 4.5 02-09-88 234 29.87 5.9 08-09-88 251 38.3 I 4.6 02-16-88 256 8.4 T 4.9 08-16-88 248 30.1 I 4.2 02-23-88 245 6.8 I 4.8 08-23-88 244 19.7 I 3.7 03-01-88' 232 .13.97 5.2 08-30-88 248 23.0 I 4.2 03-08-88 235 6.4 I 5.0 09-06-88 241 25.3 I 4.1 ~ 03-15-88 236 <~7.9 09-13-88 247 23.4 ~ 4.9 03-22-88 233 6.6 +~ 5.3 09-20-88 243 25.1 4.4 03-29-38 238 < 7.5 09-27-88 275 20.674.2
- 1st Otr mean + s.d. 13.6 + 7.5 3rd Qtr mean + s.d. 25.4 + 6.3 04-05-88 242 6.0 + 5.3 10-06-88 244 22.7 + 4.8 04-12-88 235 6.2 I 5.0 10-11-88 239 26.5 I 4.4 04-19-88 237 <~8.2 10-18-88 240 24.4 I 3.9 04-27-88 270 < 6.7 10-25-88 238 19.6 ~ 4.1 04-03-88 214 < 8.4 11-01-88 239 17 6 [ 4.0 Ob-10-88 234 8.6 + 4.8 11-08-88 241 23.2 + 4.2 00-17 243 4.5 I 3.6 11-15-88 238 20.8 I 4.0 05-24-88 244 <~5.4 11-22-88 238 24.1 I 4.0 05-31-88 228 9.3 + 5.2 11-29-88 236 25.5 I 4.3 b 36.7 I 4.9 06-07-88 147 < 12.2 12-06-88 233 06-14-88 218 6.8 + 2.4 c
~
12-13-88 232 33.6 I 4.7 06-21-88 214 7.0 5.2 12-20-88 227 26.0 I 4.5 06-28-88 247 8.7 I 4.7 12-27-88 266 24.6 I 4.0 01-03-88 232 49.7 I 5.7 l 2nd Qtr rnean + s.d. 7.2 r,1.8 4th Otr mean + s.d. 26.8 + 8.3 ! a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCl/m3unless noted otherwise. b 3 Low volumo due to pump breakdown. lodine-131 concentration is < 0.08 pCl/m due to low volume. C Sample was recounted and gross beta value is the value obtained from the second determination. 1 l
- n--a---
y< ,- Annual Radiological FERMl-2 ~ Environmental Monitoring Rs ort 1988 ~ AIR PARTICULATE ANALY$ e 46 I i l.ocation = Corner of Erie St. and Poln' te Aux Pea' ux Road API-5 (Indicator) . Distance =~ 1.0 Miles SW of Ferm? 2 Sample - = Airborne Particulate and lodine-131
- Analysis - = Gross Beta and lodine - 131a L >
. Sample.
Frequency '
= . 10~Coginuoup=eekly Units = pCi/m (.001 pCi/m3) l Date Vogume - Date Vogume Collected (m ) Gross (pCl/m g) eta Collected (m ) Gross g) eta (pCi/m 01-05-88 258 16.8 + 4.8
~
07-05-88 271 16.0 + 2.9 01-12-88 234 27.3 5.9 07-12-88 274 24.1 I 5.4 01-19-88 258 11.6 ~ 4.8 07-19-88 281 20.8 ~ 3.5 01-27-88 295 23.4 I 5.2 07-26-88 281- 23.472.6 02-02-88 -226 15.0 I 5.6 08402-88 259 30.5 I 4.2-102-09-88 260 24.1 I 5.2 08-09-88 270 42.6 I 4.6 02-16-88 L 236 ~ 10.4 I 5.3 '08-16-88 256 26.8 I 4.0
~
02-23-88 267 10.7 I 4.6 08-23-88 265 21.5 3.6 l 03-01-88 261 12.7 [ 4.6 - 08-30-88 269 22.1 [ 3.9 03-08-88 266' ~ 7.2~ + 4.5 09-06-88 268 21.0 + 3.5 03-15-88. 267 < 7.0 09-13-88 264 22.0 I 4.6 03-22-88: 262 - < 7.4 09-20-88 263 23.074.1 03-29-88 268 6.8 + 4.4 09-27-88 276 20.4 I 4.2
' Ist'Otr mean + s.d. 15.1 + 7.0 .
3rd Otr mean + s.d. 24.2 + 6.5 04-05-88 271 7.5 + 4.9 10-04-88 268 27.4 + 4.7 04-12-88 266 8.3 I 4.5 10-11-89 273 28.4 I 4.1
~
04-19-88 267 < 7.3 10-18-88 271 21.9 + 3.5 04-27-88 '305 < 5.9 10-25-88 270 14.8 + 3.5 05-03 243 < 7.4 11-01-88 '270 20.7 I 3.8 05-10-88 265 - 11.4 + 4.4 - 11-08-88 271 22.4 I 3.8 05-17-88 274' 4.9 T 3.2
~
11-15-88 269 21.6 I 3.7
~
05-24-88 277 < 4.6 11-22-88 270 29.3 ~ 4.0 05-31-88 277- 11.0 + 4.4 11-29-88 268 24.4 3.9 06-07-88 279 13.8 I 4.5
~
12-06-88 267 37.1 I 4.5 06-14-88 276 .' < 8.7 12-13-88 265 28.9 I 4.1 06-21-88 278 10.2 + 4.2 12-20-88 262 24.174.0 06-28-88 279 8.9 T 4.2 12-27-88 269 25.8 I 4.0 01-03-89 266 50.1 I 5.3 2nd Otr mean + s.d. _ 9.5 + 2.7 4th Otr mean + s.d. 26.9 + 8.4 l i a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCi/m3unless noted otherwise. 1 i l u__ _ - _ _ - - )
/* * < Annual Radiological ,
Endronm:ntal Monitoring j FERMI-2 Riport 1988 AIR PARTICULATE ANALygg 47 1 Airborne particulate- l Monthly gross beta averages of weekly sampling collections (a) Units = 10-3 pCl/m3 = (.001 pCl/m3) Collection Location Period - APl API-2 API-3 API-4 API-5 January 16.3' 16.7 175 '15.5 18.8 February 12.6 13.8 15.7 14.7 14.5 NIarch 10.0 6.8 7.7 6.5 7.0 April 6.4 7.8 6.7 6.1 7.9 May 10.3 12.8 12.2 7.5 9.1 ' June 10.3 11.3 14.8 7.5 11.0 July 23.2- 22.2 22.8 25.0 22.8
~ August' 29.0 27.2 26.0 27.8 28.2
- September 21.8 23.9 23.7 23.6 21.6 October 24.0 23.6 21.9 23.3 23.1 November 23.1 22.3 21.3 22.2 23.7 December 34.4 34.4 34.2 34.1 33.2
. Annual mean b 21.4 20.4 20.4 19.8 20.3 a Unless specified otherwise, data from samples collected on the first, second, or third day of a month are grouped with data from the previous month.
Annual mean is determined by averaging all individual results, not monthly means. I
Annual Radiological FE M -2 Environmental Monitoring - AIR PARTICULATE ANALY e 48 Quarterly Airborne Particulate Analysis Quarterly Composite of Weekly Samples by Location Gamma Units Isoppic
= 10- pCi/mAnglysis of Quartg)ly Composite
= (.001 pCl/m
~
8.ab Other Location 4.ade Voly) (m e Be-7 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gammas a Sr-89 Sr-90 1st Otr.,1988 API-1 FAP-933 3047 87.6 + 32.8 < 2.0 < 1.8 < 2.6 < 1.6 < 0.6 APl-2 934 3177 77.0723.0 <1.0 <1.0 < 1.8 < 1.7 < 0.6 API-3 935 3201 79.0 I 23.6 <1.4 < 1.7 < 2.2 < 1.6 < 0.5 API-4 936 3101 74.0 I 14.3
~
< 1.2 < 1.3 < 2.1 < 1.0 < 0.4 API-5 937 3358 109.3 + 24.9 < 1.0 < 1.7 < 2.3 < 1.7 <0.6 2nd Otr.,1988 API-1 FAP-1080 3041 72.8 + 12.9 < 1.5 < 1.5 < 1.6 < 1.3 < 0.5 API-2 1081 3233 119.8 + 35.0 < 2.0 < 2.2 < 2.8 < 1.2 < 0.5 API-3 1082 3470 105.7 I 19.3 < 1.2 < 1.7 < 1.6 < 1.1 < 0.5 API-4 1083 3470 62.0 + 9.8 < 1.2 < 1.4 < 1.4 < 1.7 < 0.6 API-5 1084 3557 < 1.7 < 1.5 < 2.0 < 1.0 < 0.4 j 66.4 { 12.9 !
3rd Otr.,1988 API-1 FAP-1172 3201 85.8 + 18.5 < 1.5 < 1.5 <3.3 < 1.3 < 0.5 API-2 1173 3395 57.0 { 14.9 <1.2 <1.2 < 2.2 < 1.0 < 0.4 , APl-3 1174 3489 92.1 + 31.8 < 2.2 < 2.3 < 5.3 < 1.1 < 0.4 API-4 1175 3229 78.1718.8 <2.0 < 1.9 < 2.0 < 1.2 <0.5 API-5 1176 3497 72.8 [ 15.6 < 1.5 < 1.5 < 2.8 < 0.6 < 0.2 4th Otr.,1988 APl-1 FAP-1289 3329 79.2 + 15.4 < 1.4 < 1.5 < 1.9 < 0.5 < 0.2 API-2 1290 3558 03.4 { 13.2 < 1.9 < 1.7 < 2.0 < 0.4 < 0.4 API-3 1291 3764 61.8 + 21.2 < 1.8 < 1.4 <3.2 < 0.5 < 0.6 API-4 1292 3343 46.2 + 11.1 < 1.4 < 1.4 < 1.8 < 0.6 < 0.6 API-5 1293 3759 66.0 + 11.9
< 1.0 < 1.4 <1.3 < 0.4 < 0.5 l - (a) For all gamma isotopic analyses, spectrum is computer scanned from 80 to 2048 kev.
Specifically included are Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95,1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, and Ba-La-140. N4.turally occurring gamma-emitters, such as Ra daughters are frequently detected but not listed here. Potassium-40 is listed only if detected. Data listed as "<" are at the 4.66 sigma level, others are 2 sigma. Unless noted otherwise, the less than value ("<") for air particulate listed under "Other Gammas' is for Nb-95 and may be higher or lower for other radionuclides. All concentrations, except gross beta, are decay corrected to the time of collection.
.o ,
Annual Radiological FERMl-2 Environmental Monitoring SURFACE WATER ANALY0ffort 1988 Page 49 Location = Fermi Unit 1 Raw Lake Water Intake Structure SW-1'(Indicator) Distance = 0.4 Miles SSE of Fermi 2 L Sample = Surface Water Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample Frequency = Monthly Units = pCl/ liter Location Sample Description and Concentration SW-1 Date Collected 01-25-88 02-25-88 03-23-88 04-29-88 Lab Code FSW-4774,5 FSW-5163 FSW-5524 FSW-6068 Mn-54 < 2.8 <3.3 <5.4 < 6.0 Fe-59 <5.8 <7.1 < 12.3 < 13.2 Co-58 <2.9 < 3.5 < 5.7 <6.6 Co-60 <3.0 <3.6 < 5.8 <7.8 Zn-65 <6.2 < 6.6 < 14.4 < 13.7 i Zr-Nb-95 < 2.8 < 2.4 <6.2 < 6.6 Cs-134 < 2.9 < 2.9 <5.8 < 6.0 Cs-137 < 3.0 < 3.5 < 5.9 < 6.6 Ba-La-140' < 3.7 <3.6 < 9.4 < 8.5 Date Collected 05-25-88 06-22-88 07-27-88 08-24-88 Lab Code FSW-6298 FSW-6634 FSW-7131 FSW-7543 Mn-54 < 3.6 < 5.2 < 3.2 < 5.6 l Fe-59 < 7.9 < 12.3 < 13.8 < 12.3 i Co-58 < 3.8 < 5.4 <5.5 < 5.6 Co-60 < 3.7 < 6.4 < 5.9 <5.6 Zn-65 < 7.6 < 13.0 <9.6 < 13.3 Zr-Nb-95 <5.0 < 5.9 < 5.3 < 5.6 Cs-134 < 3.8 < 5.8 <3.4 < 5.7 Cs-137 < 3.7 < 5.6 < 4.1 < 6.1 Ba-La-140 < 10.8 < 6.8 < 6.2 < 9.0 s Date Collected 09-28-88 10-27-88 11-23-88 12-28-88 Lab Code FSW-7994 FSW-8493 FSW-8845 FSW-9266
- Mn-54 < 5.1 < 5.5 < 5.3 < 5.9 Fe-59 < 9.1 < 13.3 < 12.5 < 15.1 Co-58 < 5.2 < 4.0 < 6.1 < 5.0 Co-60 < 5.2 < 5.0 < 5.7 < 6.7 Zn-65 < 8.5 < 8.4 < 11.2 < 12.3 Zr-Nb-95 < 4.8 < 5.1 <6.7 < 5.7 !
Cs-134 < 4.8 < 3.5 < 6.0 < 4.6 j Cs-137 < 4.8 < 5.4 <5.8 < 5.5 Ba-La-140 <7.7 < 8.0 < 10.4 < 5.0 I i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ]
Annual Radiological FERMI-2 Envircnm:ntal Monitoring SURFACE WATER ANALY e 50 l Location = Deco's Trenton Channel Power Plant intake Structure SW-2 (Control) Distance = 13 Miles NNE of Fermi 2 Sample = Surface Water Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample Frequency = Monthly Units = pCl/ liter Location Sample Description and Concentration SW-2 Date Collected 01-25-88 02-25-88 03-23-88 04-29-88 Lab Code FSW-4776 FSW-5164 FSW-5525 FSW-6069 Mn-54 < 5.8 <4.0 < 6.0 < 5.2 Fe-59 < 10.7 <8.1 < 14.2 < 10.4 Co-58 < 5.7 <3.5 <6.1 <5.6 Co-60 <6.4 <3.4 <6.1 <6.6 Zn-65 < 13.4 <8.8 <14.0 < 10.8 Zr-Nb-95 <6.3 <3.6 <Q.9 <6.9 l Cs-134 < 5.7 < 4.2 <5.5 < 5.5 Cs-137 < 5.9 < 4.2 <6.2 <6.1 Ba-La-140 < 6.4 <3.5 < 10.1 <9.6 Date Collected 05-25-88 06-22-88 07-27-88 08-24-88 Lab Code FSW-6299 FSW-6635 FSW-7132 FSW-7544 Mn-54 < 4.0 <4.1 < 4.3 < 5.7 Fe-59 < 1 i .3 < 9.3 < 12.2 < 14.2 Co-58 < 4.9 <3.7 <5.2 <6.1 Co-60 < 4.9 <4.0 < 4.5 < 7.2 Zn-65 < 8.8 <3.9 < 12.2 < 14.1 Zr-Nb-95 <6.3 < 4.8 <6.1 < 6.5 Cs-134 < 4.6 <3.2 <4.8 < 5.9 Cs-137 < 4.8 < 4.0 < 4.8 < 5.5 Ba-La-140 < 14.4 <5.9 < 13.9 < 12.3 Date Collected 09-28-88 10-27-88 11-23-88 12-28-88 Lab Code FSW-7995 FSW-8494,5 FSW-8846,7 FSW-9267,8 Mn-54 < 4.7 <4.7 < 3.5 <3.8 Fe-59 < 11.0 < 12.5 < 7.8 < 7.1 Co-58 <4.9 < 5.8 <3.9 < 3.9 Co-60 < 5.3 < 6.2 <3.8 < 4.2 Zn-65 <9.5 < 13.1 < 7.4 < 8.7 Zr-Nb-95 < 5.2 <7.0 < 5.0 <3.9 Cs-134 < 5.2 < 5.2 <3.7 <4.2 Cs-137 < 5.0 < 5.6 <4.0 < 3.7 Ba-La-140 < 6.7 < 10.7 <6.7 < 4.6
' 'e p ,- Annual Rt2diological FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 DRINKING WATER ANALYN$e 51 Monroe Water Station North Side of Pointe Aux Peaux Road Location =
West of Long Road DW-1 (Indicator) Distance = 1.2 Miles S of Fermi 2 Sample = Drinking Water Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and Gross Beta Sample Frequency = Monthly - Units = pCi/ liter Location - Sample Description and Concentration DW-1 Date Collected 01-25-88 02-25-88 03-23-88 04-29-88 Lab Code FPW-4777 FPW-5165 FPW-5525 FPW-6070 Gross beta 3.010.9 2.510.9 2.210.8 2.510.5 Mn-54 < 4.4 < 4.8 ' < 2.0 < 5.6 Fe-59 <7.9 < 11.2 < 3.8 < 10.5 l Co-58 < 4.7. <4.5 <2.0 < 6.4 Co-60 <4.6 <5.3 <2.0 <5.6 Zn-65 < 10.2 < 12.9 < 4.4 < 12.2 . Zr-Nb-95 <4.3 <5.4 < 2.0 <5.3 Cs-134 <4.8 <5.7 < 2.0 < 5.8 Cs-137 < 4.5 <5.6 <2.2 <5.6 Ba-La-140 < 4.4 <7.6 < 2.6 <7.6 Date Collected - 05-25-88 06-22-88 07-27-88 08-24-88 Lab Code FPW-6300 FPW-6636 FPW-7133 FPW-7546 Gross beta 2.7 1 0.6 2.7 1 0.5 2.2 1 0.5 3.510.3 M n-54 <4.4 <3.8 <5.4 <4.2 Fe-59 < 12.2 <9.8 < 12.0 <8.8 Co-58 < 4.7 <3.4 < 6.0 < 4.1 Co-60 < 4.9 <3.7 < 4.8 < 4.4 Zn-65 < 10.0 <9.4 < 13.3 < 11.0 Zr-Nb-95 <5.9 <6.0 <6.7 <5.1 Cs-134 <4.9 <4.4 < 5.5 <3.7 Cs-137 <4.3 < 4.1 <6.1 < 4.2 Ba-La-140 < 12.7 < 11.0 < 14.9 <5.6
~
C -' ' ~ Annual Radiological FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring Raport 1988 DRINKING WATER ANALYSlfJ e 52 Location = Monroe Water Station North Side of Pointe Aux Peaux Road West of Long Road '
- DW-1 (Indicator)
Distance = 1.2 Miles S of Fermi 2 Sample = Drinking Water
- Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and Gross Beta Sample -
+' Frequency = Monthly Units = pCi/ liter Locauon - Sample Description and Concentration (continued)'
Date Collected 09-28-88 10-27-88 11-23-88 12-28-88 Lab Code FPW-7996 ' FPW-8496 FPW-8848 FPW-9269 Gross beta 2.5 + 0.3 2.7 + 0.6 4.0 + 0.9 3.1 + 0.6 Mn-54 <3.5 < 4.9 <6.2 < 3.6 Fe-59 <7.S < 10.9 < 14.9 < 8.5 Co-58 <3.2 <6.0 < 7.4 < 4.6 Co-60 < 3.4 < 6.0 <6.4 <3.6 Zn-65 < 7.2 < 10.2 < 12.5 <9.7 Zr-Nb-95 < 3.5 < 5.8 < 8.2 < 4.1 0 Cs-134 <3.6 <5.7 <6.3 < 4.0 Cs-137 <3.6 <5.7 < 7.1 < 4.3 Ba-La-140 <4.7 <9.3 < 7.9 < 5.0 l J l 1 L_ : - _ _ _ _ __ _ _
90' ' FERMI-2 Annual Radiological DRINKING WATER ANALYgggironm@ntal f Monitoring , Report 1988 ] Page 53 i
' Location = . Detroit Water Station,14700 Moran Road, Allen Park, Michigan DW-2 (Control) f1 Distance = 20 Miles N of Fermi 2 Sample - = ' Drinking Water 1
- Analysis = Gamma Emitting isotopes and Gross Beta
. Sample -
Frequency = Monthly Units. =- pCi/ liter Location Sample Description and Concentration DW-2 Date Collected 01-25-88 02-25-88 03-23-88 04-29-88 Lab Code FPW-4778 FPW-5166 FPW-5316,7 FPW-6071 Gross beta 2.510.8 1.810.8 1.8 1 0.8 1.8 1 0.5 Mn-54 < 4.7 < 4.7 <2.9 < 7.2 F e-59 <9.8 < 11.7 <6.2 ' < 17.3 - Co-58 < 4.6 <7.0 < 3.0 < 6.0 Co-60 < 4.8 < 5.7 <3.4 < 4.4 Zn-65' < 9.1 < 13.4 < 6.4 < 13.2 Zr-Nb-95 < 4.4 <6.5 < 3.0 <7.5 Cs-134 <4.6 <6.3 < 2.9 < 5.6 Cs-137 < 4.9 <5.7 < 3.0 < 7.7 Ba-La-140 < 7.6 <7.0 <3.6 <6.8 Date Collected 05-25-88 06-22-88 07-27-88 08-24-88 Lab Sc.le FDW-6301 FDW-6637 FDW-7134 FDW-7547 - Gross beta 2.6 1 0.5 2.6 + 0.4 2.2 1 0.5 2.2 1 0.3 Mn-54 <4.7 <6.3 < 4.4 < 5.1 Fe-59 < 11.3 < 13.5 < 9.0 < 12.5 Co-58 <5.1 <6.0 < 5.0 <5.5 Co-60 < 4.3 <5.6 <4.8 < 5.4 Zn-65 < 10.5 < 14.2 < 10.7 < 10.7 Zr-N b-95 < 6.8 <6.7 < 6.3 < 6.1 Cs-134
<4.7 <5.2 <4.9 < 5.4 Cs-137 < 4.8 <5.5 <5.2 < 5.3 Ba-La-140 < 10.9 < 9.5 < 12.7 < 12.4 4
- I
0 .i ,, h, FERMI-2 ' Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring DRINKING WATER ANALY9 port 1988-Page 54 Location = Detroit Water Station, 14700 Moran Road, Allen Park, Michigan DW-2 (Control) Distance ~= 20 Miles N of Fermi 2 Sample = Drinking Water Analysis = Gamma Emitting isotopes and Gross Beta
. Sample Frequency - = Monthly H Units = pCl/ liter Location Sample Description and Concentration
,i, (continued)
Date Collected 09-28-88 10-27-88 11-23-88 12-28-89 Lab Code FDW-7997,8 FDW-8497. FDW-8849 FDW-9270 Gross beta- 2.2 1 0.3. 2.7 1 0.5 2.2 1 0.3 2.6 1 0.6 Mn-54 : < 4.5 < 5.0 < 5.2: < 2.8 Fe-59 <9.7 < 12.1 < 11.4 <8.6 Co-58 < 5.0 < 6.7 <5.9 < 3.2
.Co-60 " <4.4 <6.2 < 5.3 < 3.5 Zn-65 <9.0 < 13.4 < 13.1 <6.3 Zr-Nb-95 <4.8 < 6.7 <6.0 <4.1 Cs-134 < 4.6 <6.3 < 5.4 <2.8 Cs-137 <4.5 < 6.1 <6.1 . < 4.5 Ba-La-140 < 7.2 < 13.2 < 8.6 < 2.8 -
4 l 1 1 l l = = _ = _ _ - _ - . _ - _ . _ _ _ ._ _ ._ _________-_--___________________ _ ____ _ _ m
7., [ .' ; ' ' FERMI ,2 Annual Radiological ,g ' Environmental Monitoring [ SURFACE AND DRlhKING WATER N$8 l Quarterly Surface and Drinking Water Analysis n: y < Quarterly Composite of Monthly Samples by Location !) ; , ' Stronium 89/90 Analysis of Quarterly Composite h Units = pCi/ liter . 4 Concentration Date Collected Lab Code Sr-89 Sr-90 4 L Location SW-1 1st Qtr., 88 . FSW-9006,7. < 24.5 < 0.7 2nd Otr., 88 9011 <8.3 < 0.8 3rd Qtr., 88 - 9015 <4.7 < 1.3 4th Otr., 88. 9390,1, < 0.7 < 0.6 Location SW-2 1st Otr.,- 88. FSW-9008 < 23.9 < 0.8 1
- 2nd Otr., 88 :- 9012 <8.8 0.9 + 0.5 3rd Qtr., 88 9016 <2.2 <6.7 4th Qtr., 88 9392 <0.7 <0.6 Location DW-1 1st Otr., 88 FSW-9009 < 22.8 < 0.7 2nd Otr., 88 - 9013 <6.3 <0.6 3rd Qtr., 88 9018 <2.9 1.2 + 0.6 4th Qtr., 88 9303 < 0.6 < 6.9 Location DW-2 1st Otr., 88 FSW-9010 < 27.2 < 0.7 2nd Qtr., 88 9014 <7.8 0.8 + 0.4 )
*- <1.6 <6.5 Sid Otr., 88 9019 4th Qtr., 88 9394 <0.7 < 0.7 Note 1: LLD for Sr-89 for 1st,2nd and 3rd quarters are high due to the delay in analysis
= _ _ -
-C Annual Radiological FERMl-2 Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 SURFACE AND DRINKING WATEWANA59 SIS Quarterly Surface'and Drinking Water Analysis Quarterly Compcsite of Montihy Samples by Location Tritium Analysis of Quarterly Composite Units = pCl/ liter-Compositing Location Period Lab Code H-3 I Indicator SW-1, Surface 1st Qtr., 88 FSW -5526 <310 2nd Otr., 88 6638 <310 3rd Otr., 88 8506 313 + 103 4th Otr., 88 9390,1 <310 DW-1, Drinking . 1st Otr., 88 FPW-5528 < 310 2nd Otr., 88 6640 < 310 3rd Qtr., 88 8503 < 310 4th Otr., 87 9393 390 + 110 Control SW-2, Surface. 1st Otr., 88 FSW-5527 <310 2nd Qtr., 88 6639 <310 3rd Otr., 88 8507 < 310
-4th Otr., 88 9392 <310 DW-2, Drinking. 1st Qtr., 88 FPW-5529 338 + 106 2nd Otr., 88 6641,2 <310 ,
3rd Otr., 88 8504,5 < 310 4th Otr., 88 9394 < 310 e i 4 mm___m.___.__ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , = , _ _ _ _ _ _
- Annual Radiological F' Environmental Monitoring
.- FERMI-2
R: pod 1988 GROUND WATER ANALYgge 57 Location = GW 100 Ft. W. of Lake Erie, Fermi 1 Parking Lot near Gas Fired Peakers Distance = 0.4 Miles S of Fermi 2 Sample = Ground Water Analysis = Tritium and Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample -
Frequency = Quarterly Units = pCi/ liter Sample Description and Concentration Location GW-1 GW-1 GW-1 GW-1 Date Collected 03-17-88 06-23-88 09-23-88 12-16-88
' Lab Code FGW-5447 FGW-6662,3 FGW-7932,3 FGW-9144 H-3 < 310 <310 < 310 < 310 Mn < 1.5 < 5.9 < 4.8 < 2.7 Fe-59 < 3.4 < 12.9 < 12.6 < 7.1 Co-58 < 1.5 < 6.2 < 5.8 < 2.8
~Co-60 <1.6 <6.1 <5.7 <2.9 Zn-65 <3.1 < 11.8 < 13.5 <6.7
, Zr-Nb-95 .<1.5 <6.7 <6.4 < 4.1 Cs~-134 <1.3 <6.1 < 5.3 < 2.6 Cs-137 <1.7 < 6.0 < 6.7. <3.3 Ba-La-140 < 1.8 < 10.1 < 8.7 <4.6 I
l 1 l l p
l
- j. > .,
. g. ..
'----------------m;----7 Annual Radiological f.
..- , f- l< '
FERMl-2 . Environmental Monitoring Rzport 1988 GROUNDWATER ANALYgge 58
- Location = GW South of Pointe Aux Peaux Rd. By Stoney Point's Western Dike
, Distance =- 1.0 Miles SSW of Fermi 2 .,z.
ISample -= Ground Water
'F. '
Analysis = Tritium and Gamma Emitting Isotopes
* .,. Sample .
~ Frequency = - Quarterly a
- Units . > rCl/ liter Sample Description and Concentration Location . GW-2 GW-2 GW-2 GW-2 Date Collected 03-17-88 06-23-88 09-23-88 12-16-88
- Lab Code FGW-5448 FGW-6664 FGW-7934 FGW-9145 H-3 < 310 < 310 < 310 <310 Mn-54 ~ <2.1 < 5.6 < 6.4 <4.7 Fe-59~ < 3.8 < 10.9 < 12.4 < 10.4
_%. <4.7 N' Co-58 <2.1 < 7.1 <6.7
, Co-60 < 2.3 < 8.6 <6.2 <4.2 Zn-65 < 4.9 < 14.2 < 13.4 < 10.2
? ' Zr-Nb-95 < 2.1 - < 7.1 <6.2 <5.3 -
-a Cs-134 <2.3 <6.2 <6.5 < 4.4
.Cs-137 '
< 2.2 < 8.3 <6.6 <4.8 ,
Ba-La-140- <2.2 < 8.2 <8.4 <5.3
.~
.g
- i
-b i
-- - __ _ ___._.______.______________________Q
FERMI-2 Annual Radiological 3- Environmsnta! Monitoring GROUNDWATER ANALYSigport 1988 Page 59
~
Location = GW 143 Ft. W of Pointe Aux Peeux Rd.,62 Ft. N of Site Boundry Fence
-.s . ' Distance ,"' = 1.0 Miles' SW of Fermi 2 -
Sample ' a Ground Water Analysis = Tritium and Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample Frequency ' = - Quarterly Units ' = pCl/ liter Sample Description and Concentration Location GW-3 GW-3 GW-3 GW-3 Date Collected 03-17-88 06-23-88 09-23-88 12-16-88 Lab Code FGW-5449 FGW-6665 FGW-7935 FGW-9146,7 H-3 <310 < 310 < 310 <310 Mn-54 <1.9 < 3.8 <0.9 < 3.2 Fe-59 < 3.6 < 8.5 < 17.0 <7.0
'Co-58 < 1.9 < 4.2 <6.3 < 3.5 l Co-60 <1.9 <5.6 <7.0 < 3.2 l
h' ZN-65 < 4.8 < 8.5 < 12.7 < 6.6 Zij Nb-95 < 1.8 <4.9 < 4.7 < 4.0 Cs.-134 - < 2.5 < 3.8 < 6.5 <3.1 Cs 137. < 2.0 < 4.4 < fi8 < 3.7 ! Ba-La-140 <2.3 < 5.1 < 8.6 <4.7 r
-J-
, ; FERMI-2 Annual Radiological ;
hy
' Environmental Monitoring a' ' GROUNDWATER ANALYSISort 1988 li Page 60
+ .
' Location -
= GW 42 Ft. S of Langton Rd. 8 Ft. E of Toll Rd. Fence l
- Distance = ' O.6 Miles WNW of Fermi 2 l
. Sample .= Ground Water -
Analysis = . Tritium and Gamma Emitting Isotopes 4 Sample:
, Frequ ency - = Quarterly -
Units = - pCi/ liter Sample Description and Concentration ., 1 Location , GW-4 ~ GW-4 GW-4 GW-4 ; Date Collected' 03-17-88 06-23-88 09-23-88 12-16-88 Lab Code FGW-5450 FGW-6666 FGW-7936 FGW-9148 ; s
'H-3 <310 < 310 <310 < 310 Mn-54 < 2.8 <6.7 < 5.4 <1.2 Fe-59 <6.7- < 13.5 < 12.0 <3.2 Co-58 < 2.8 < 7.4 <6.2 ~ < 1.2 )
Co-60 < 2.9 < 4.2 <7.1 <1.2 ; 1 Zn-85 <6.7 - < 14.2 < 15.0 < 2.5 Zr-N b-95 < 1.6 < 7.5 . < 6.4 <1.5
-Cs-134 <2.9 < 6.5 <6.4. < 1.1 e Cs-137 Ba-La-140
<3.3
< 3.0
<7.2
< 12.1
< 6.2
<8.6
<1.2
< 1.9
. y.
e
--_----_m. . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -
Annual Radiological FERMI-2 ' : Environmental Monitoring LAKE ERIE SEDIMENTS AN Location - = S 100-300 Ft. Offshore in Line With Land Base Water Tower on Pointe Aux Peaux Rd. Distance ' = 0.9 Miles SSE/164 of Fermi 2 (Indicator).
+ Sample = Sediment L Analysis = Gamma Emitting isotopes / Strontium 89-90
. Sample .
Frequency- = Semi-Annual Units - = pCi/kg Dry Weight Location S-1 - Date Collected 05-11-88 10-04 Lab Code FBS-372 FBS-419, 20 K-40 8,700 + 550 11,250 + 435
~
! Mn <29- <20
'Co-58 < 47 < 23 lCo-60 < 30 <22 Zn <68 < 76 Zr-Nb-95 . < 57 < 33 Cs-134 <22 <30 Cs-137 < 27 60 + 41 Sr-89 ' < 27~
34 Sr-90 <7 Location = S Fermi-2 Discharge Approximately 200 ft. Offshore Distance = 0.2 Miles ENE/67 of Fermi 2 (Indicator)
, Sample ' = Sediment Analysis - = Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 Sample -
Frequency. = . Semi-Annual Units = pCl/kg Dry Weight Location S-2
. Date Collected 05-11-88 10-04-88 Lab Code FBS-373 FBS-421 K-40 9,520 + 640 11,740 + 530 Mn-54 <47) <30~
Co-58 < 74 <40
, Co <48 <30 Zn-65 < 124 < 108 Zr-Nb-95 < 80 <45 1 Cs-134 < 44 <38 i
~Cs-137 <34 <23 Sr-89 < 29 S r-90 ' <8
t 3 . .. Annual Radiological E FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring Raport 1988 LAKE ERlE SEDIMENTS AN44aW%2
. Location = S Estral Beach Approximately 200 Ft. Offshore of North Shoreline where Swan Creek and Lake Erie meet
- Distance =
1.1 Miles NE/37 of Fermi 2 (Indicator) Sample = Sediment Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 Sample Frequency = Semi-Annual Units - = pCl/kg Dry Weight Location
- S-3 Date Collected 05-11-88 09-28-88 Lab Code FBS-374 FBS-408 K-404 13,320 + 690 13,180 + 820 Mn-54 < 41 - < 30-Co < 73 <40 Co-60 <51 < 44 Zn-65 < 124 < 88
, Zr-Nb-95 <76 < 54
'Cs-134 <41 < 26 Cs-137 <33 <37 Sr-89 <28 Sr-90 <7 Location = ' S Indian Trails Community Beach
' Distance = 3.0 Miles WSW/240 of Fermi 2 (Indicator)
- Sample = Sediment Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 Sample Frequency =- Semi-Annual Units = pCl/kg Dry Weight Location S-4 Date Collected 05-16-88 09-08-88 Lab Code FBS-372 FBS-469 3
K-40 12,330 + 560 17,550 + 120 Mn-54 < 26~ < 50 Co-58 <37 <51 Co-60 <31 < 64 Zn-65 < 68 < 129 Zr-Nb-95 <44 < 71 Cs-134 <19 < 46 I Cs-137 < 24 139 + 52 Sr-89 <58 , Sr-90 <7
4:
.* . . Annual R:diological FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring C' 't - Re ort 1988 h LAKE ERIE SEDIMENTS Ay @y Location =
~.R DECO Trenton Channel Power Plant intake Area Distance ) = 13 Miles NNE/20 of formi 2 (Control)
Sample , = Sediment i Analysis = ' Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 Sample
. Frequency = Semi-Annual Units = pCi/kg Dry Weight Location S-5 .. Date Collected 05-11-88 10-06-88
! .# - Lab Code FBS-375 FBS-422 K-40 9,310 + 650 9,790 + 580
' Mn-54 <36" < 45 Co-58 < 58 <43 Co-60 <40 < 43 Zn-65 < 86 < 153 Zr-N b-95 <75 <69 Cs-134 < 32 <42 Cs-137 88 + 35 156 + 36 Sr-89 <64-Sr-90 < 23 i t
N-----_-:..__..___-____
Annual Radiological FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring P MILK SAMPLE ANALYS e Location = Doty Farm (M-1) (Control) 7512 N. Custer Rd. Monroe, Mich. Distence = 14.2 Miles W of Fermi 2 Sample = Milk Analysis = Gamma Emitting isotopes and lodine 131 Sample Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Seml-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCl/ liter Collection Lab Concentration Date Code 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 K-40 01-11-88 FMI-1535 < 0.2 <5.5 < 6.1 < 5.5 1410 + 140 02-16-83 1640 < 0.2 <6.2 < 7.0 < 6.4 1370[130 03-15-88 1712 < 0.2 < 6.0 <7.0 < 5.8 1280 + 150 04-12-88 1786 <0.2 < 5.3 <6.1 <7.0 1330 7 140 05-10-88 1871 < 0.3 <4.3 <4.2 <3.5 1230[120 05-24-88 1928 ' < 0. 9 < 1.8 <2.1 < 2.6 1170 + 60 06-14-88 2068 < 0.7 <7.2 < 11.2 < 10.4 1390 + 180 l 06-28-88 2151 < 0.4 <6.4 <8.6 <4.9 1380 7 180 ! 07-12-88 2204 < 0.4 < 6.9 < 7.6 < 9.9 1330 I160 07-26-88 2305,6 < 0.4 < 5.0 < 4.8 < 4.0 1280 I 160 08-10-88 2391 < 0.5 < 7.6 <8.3 <8.8 1330 7 140 08-24-88 2471,2 < 0.3 < 7.7 < 8.0 < 10.8 1410 I150 09-06-88 2592 < 0.2 <6.4 <7.8 < 10.7 1300 7 140 09-21-88 2620 < 0.1 < 5.9 <7.0 < 8.0 1410 I 130 10-11-88 2711 < 0.3 < 6.9 <7.3 < 8.2 1260 7 150 11-16-88 2869 < 0.2 < 6.2 < 7.0 < 7.8 1430 I 160 12-15-88 2948 < 0.2 < 6.8 < 6.7 < 8.7 1350{160
n _ Annual Radiological
' ~
Environmental Monitoring . P 1 y MILK SAMPLE ANALYSifa'ge"65 1 1
- Location . = Reaume Farm (M-2) (Indicator) j 2705 E. Labo Rd. Carleton, Mich. j Distance = 5.7 Miles NW of Fermi 2 !
Sample = . Milk l Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and lodine 131 Sample , Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season ! Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season l Units , = pCl/ liter I I Collection Lab Concentration- ' Date Code 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 K-40
)
01-11-88 FMI-1536 < 0.2 < 4.6 <6.0 < 3.8 1190 + 130 02-15-88 1641 < 0.2 < 6.3 <6.7 < 6.7 1330 + 160 1 03-14-88 1701 < 0.2 <6.4 < 6.6 < 11.1 1090I 120 04-12-88 1787,8 < 0.2 < 7.1 < 8.4 < 5.7 1370 I 160
.05-10-88 1872,3 < 0.3 <7.2 <8.5- < 11.2 1320 I 140 )
a 05-24-88 19296 < 1.1 < 5.5 <5.5 < 5.1 1340I120 1 06-14-88 2069 < 0.7 <7.4 < 8.7 < 12.7 1290I160 06-28-88' 2152 < 0.4 < 7.8 < 6.2 < 11.0 1250I140 07-12-88 2205 < 0.3 < 6.8 < 6.4 < 9.8 1260I140 07-26 '2307 < 0.2 < 6.6 < 7.0 < 8.5 1280 I150 08-09-88 2392 < 0.5 < 4.3 < 5.9 < 5.2 1300 I 160 08-24-88 2473 < 0.3 < 6.7 < 7.7 <8.0 1240I 160 l 09-06-88 2530 < 0.2 < 6.3 < 6.8 < 7.61 1210 I 140 l 09-20-88 12617 <0.2 < 10.3 < 10.1 < 7.1 1490[170 ) 10-11-88 2712- <0.3 <4.5 < 4.1 <3.7 1150 + 150 - ! 11-15-88 2870 < 0.2 < 6.0 < 8.1 <9.0 1290I130 12-15-88 2949 < 0.2 < 6.2 < 7.4 <6.5 1270[120
- a - LLD not reached due to relocation of laboratory and subsequent delays in counting.
l l 1
*- FERMI-2 Annual Radiological ronmsntal Monitonng MILK SAMPLES ANALY port 1988 Page 66 .3 Location = Yoas Farm (M-3) Indicator 3239 Newport Rd. Newport, Mich.
Distance = 4.5 Miles NW of Fermi 2 Sample = Milk Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and lodine 131
' Sample Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCi/ liter Collection Lab Concentration .
Date ' Code 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 K-40 I i 1 01-11-88 FMI-1537 <0.3 <5.6 <6.1 < 7.2 1340 + 130 02-15-88 1642,3 <0.3 <5.1 < 5.8 <6.1 1430 7 140 03-14-88 1702,3 < 0.4 <2.9 <3.1 < 12.6 1480I 80 04-12-88 1789 <0.2 <6.1 <6.5' < 7.7 1290 7 140
.05-10-88 1874 < 0.3 < 6.8 <6.3 < 7.6 1530 7 140 05-24-88 1930 < 1.1 a < 6.9 < 7.8 < 8.7 1520 I 170 ,
06-14-88 2070 <0.6 < 7.4 <8.4 < 12.1 1530 7 170 06-28-89 2153 < 0.3 <6.6 < 7.7 < 9.0 1640 [ 140 07-12-88. 2206 <0.3 < 2.3 <2.4 < 2.7 1560 + 70 07-26-88 2308 <0.2 <1.9 < 2.0 ' <1.7 1570 I 120 08-09 2393 < 0.2 <5.9 <6.4 < 7.2 1660[160 l 1360 + 140 08-24-88 2474 < 0.3 < 5.9 < 6.5 <6.5 09-06-88 2531 < 0.2 < 13.0 < 12.1 < 13.6 1510 [ 180
<6.2 < 6.4 1490 + 140 20-88 2618 < 0.2 < 7.0 10-11-88 2713 <0.3 < 4.9 - < 5.5 < 5.8 1430 7 120 i 11-15-88 2871 <0.4 < 4.6 < 5.5 <4.5 1480 7 150 12-15-88 2950 < 0.2 < 5.0 < 5.0 <4.3 1590 [ 120 a LLD not reached due to relocation of laboratory and subsequent delays in counting.
J f 1
-+ - . . FERMI-2 Annual Radiological MILK SAMPLES ANALY p t 8 Page 67 Location - = Carter Farm (M-6) Indicator 5904 Mentel Rd. Monroe, Mich.
Distance = 4.2 Miles W of Fermi 2 Sample = Milk Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and lodine 131 Sample
- Frequency. = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCl/ liter Collection Lab Concentration Date Code 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 K-40 05-24-88 FMI-1980 < 2.0a < 2.8 <2.9 <8.9 1100 + 70 06-14-88 2071 < 0.8 < 4.7 - <4.7 < 10.3 1410 7 160 06-28-88 2154 <0.4 < 6.2 <7.0 < 7.7 1450 7 160 07-12-88 2207 <0.5 < 5.4 <5.5 < 9.8 1390[130 b
NS a LLD not reached due to relocation of laboratory and subsequent delays in counting. b NS = No sample. Location M-6 dropped from program as of 08-09-88. t f I 1
- 3 3
J 1 1 l
Annual Radiological FERMI-2 : Environment:1 Monitoring Report 1988 MILK SAMPLE ANALYSIBage 68
" Location = Doty Farm (M-1) (Control) 7512 N. Custer Rd. Monroe, Mich.
Distance' = 14.2 Miles W of Fermi 2 Sample = Milk Analysis - = Strontium 89/90 Sample
- Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season
' Units = pCi/ liter Collection Lab Concentration Date Code Sr-89 Sr-90 01-11-88 FMI-1535 NAa 02-16-88 1640 < 1.9 1.3 + 0.4 03-15-88 1712 <1.2 1.2 I 0.3
'04-12-88 1786 < 1.3 1.4 I 0.5 .
05-10-88 1871 < 0.8 1.4 I 0.4 05-24-88 1928 < 0.7 1.4 I 0.5 06-14-88 2068 < 0.9 1.4 I G.5 06-28-88 2151 < 0.6 1.8[0.5 07-12-88 2204 <0.7 1.0 + 0.4 07-26-88 2305,6 <1.2 1.4 I 0.6 08-10-88 2391 < 0.7 1.7 7 0.5 08-24-88 2471,2 < 0.7 1.5 I 0.4 09-06-88 2592 < 0.5 1.6{0.3 09-21-88 2620 < 0.4 1.5 + 0.1 10-11-88 2711 < 0.6 1.5 + 0.5 11-16-88 2869 <0.6 1.1{0.4 12-15-88 2948 < 0.6 1.4 + 0.5 a NA = Not analyzed; insufficient sampic for analysis. i
I ' f Annual Radiological j FERMI-2 Environmental Monitoring . R:; port 1988 l MILK SAMPLE ANALYS$ ige 69 p- . Location - = Reaume Farm (M-2) Indicator ) ! 2705 E. Labo Rd. Carleton, Mich. ]j b .= 5.7 Miles NW of Fermi 2
' Distance Sample - = Milk j
- Analysis = Strontium 89/90 1 Sample Frequency - = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Seml-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCl/ liter Collection Lab Concentration
. Date Code Sr-89 Sr-90 i
01-11-88 FMI-1536 < 4.1 1.5 + 0.4 02-15-88 1641 <3.0 1.9 I 0.5 03-14-88 1701 < 1.7 3.0 I 0.6 04-12-88 1787,8 <1.6 2.0 7 0.6 05-10-88 NAa 05-24-88 1929 <0.7 1.'7 + 0.5 06-14 2069 < 2.7 2.1 I 1.1 06-28-88 2152 < 0.7 1.9 I 0.5
'07-12-88' 2205 < 0.5 1.4 I 0.4' 07-26-88 2307 < 0.6 2.4 I 0.5 08-09-88 2392 < 0.7 1.0 I 0.4 08-24-88 2473 < 0.8 1.3 I 0.5 09-06-88 2530 < 0.4 1.5 I 0.3
' 09-20-88 12617 < 0.6 1.7 I 0.4 10-11-86 2712 <0.6 1.7 I 0.4 11-15-88 2870 < 0. 7 1.8 I 0.4 12-15-88 2949 <0.5 1.2[0.4 a NA = Not Analyzed; Insufficient sample for analysis.
_m__---_-___--_----_ _ _ . _ . - - . . _ . . . _ . _ . _ _
Let .. FERM -2 Annual Radiological - MILK SAMPLES ANALYSligvironmantal Monitoring Repo_ rt 1988 Page 70 1
' Location - = Yoas Farm (M-3) Indicator 3239 Newport Rd. Newport, Mich.
}
- Distance = 4.5 Miles NW of Fermi 2 Sample = - Milk f Analysis = Strontium 89/90 1 Sample j Frequency _ = Monthly - Non Grazing Season J Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCi/ liter Collection Lab Concentration Date Code Sr-89 Sr-90 l
01-11-88 FMi-1537 NA a
'02-15-88 1642,3 < 0.9 1.6 + 0 4 l
03-14-88 1702,3 NA a ] 04-12-88 1789- < 1.2 1.9 + 0.4 j 05-10-88 1874 < 0.9 2.4 + 0.5 . 05-24-88 1930 < 0.7 2.2 + 0.5 l 06-04-88 1930 < 0.9 1.9 I 0.6 1
'06-14-88 2070 < 0.7 1.4 7 0.4 07-12-88 2203 < 0.6 1.6 I 0.5 07-26-88 2308 < 0.6 1.7{0.4 q 08-09-88 2393 < 0.7 1.8 + 0.3 1 08-24-88 2474 < 0.4 1.6{0.4 09-06-88 2531 <0.4 1.6 + 0.3
'09-20-88 2618 <0.6 2.0 7 0.4 l 10-11-88 2713 <0.5 1.5 I 0.4 l 11-15-88 2871 < 0.7 2.2[0.5 {
12-15-88 2950 < 0.7 1.7 + 0.5 a NA = Not Analyzed; insufficient sample for analysis. I 1 l i 1 i l
J'.- ,~ FERMI-2 Annual' Radiological MILK SAMPLES ANALYS
"*3" ' "' '"
p 988 Page 71 Location = Carter Farm (M-6) (Indicator) 5904 Mentel Rd. Monroe, Mich. Distance = 4.2 Miles W of Fermi 2 i Sample- = Milk Analysis = Gamma Emitting isotopes and lodine 131
' Sample
- Frequency - = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCi/ liter Collection Lab Concentration Date Code Sr-89 Sr-90 05-24-88 FMI-1980 < 1.4 3.2 + 0.8 06-14-88 2071 < 0.6 ' 2.4 I 0.4 06-28-88 2154 < 0.8 2.8 I 0.6 07-12-88 2207 < 1.2 3.6[1.0 I
l l
i!
~
q :. : g -+ 3c9_ ymQ O_OC_o*-
@:<TO gesE EO3.O' '23O .
( [oOA .W$ [m8 9M
?
~ 000000 0000 81 1 550 8480 447333 > 1 133 5
+ +++++ 4 +~+ +- +~
0 0 4 000000 4 0000
- 289273 - 4922 K 9691 . 1 5 K ' . 4 3,2 335324 3322 0
0 3 . _ 5 1 1
+ -
1 7 32 7 29605 J50 e
- 00921 2 921 241 S e 0'421 6
< <<s S 1 < < < <
7 7 3 3 1 1
- 55241 8 - 46 s 1 23221 s 7421 C < < < < << C < <<<
n n o o _ i i t t a a S r r T t -- S t n 4 n 4 Y _ e3 e3 L c1 c 1 A 350707 n - 57 M n - o s 6421 o s 123221 CC <<<< 2 E C C <<<<( < l S
;l T e
R C E U " " F D 1 1 O 3 3 _ R 569419 1 0 1 7 - P 1
- 233321 - 1 631 I <<<<<< I < < <<
D O O 0 F n 9 o s 2, . - 2 a 1 389 . s e 234567 1 1 88 t e S 333888 4444 p 444444 m r o g e - n e - e n d e o d e F t o i o V s o V y- s w C F 2 a C F w f I o s e t e S H o r m p
- g G g r o mkc eh .Esn Nti g e t o i n
b r n b d r F e rii Nct s w a apM ut"- it a r a e w f I o L w sdi re L o i o Fn. r eom rE D uW i h l eC io ll . g G r el el t ut l g e og of .h Esn e gogf nTr iP mdc Nti g l acai a o M a ek l casdci n pe bcbl l 1 p1 dm c/ pe cbsrcl rRi Nct mp mp obiaou a' M ut it bobu e0w om ii re ay araa o5eP R9NF4FG Tp 0.oa wC ay ST rawhra BCSCBC Fo b , sdi eom uW ST CBCC - dat l rE D rLr iP g a o M a ek d d 888888 6 p5 dm c/ e 8888 . e l l 0 w om i1 t 8888 t 888888 3. o a wC c - - - - c - i8eP e 888999 W7NF4FG Tp e 6699 e1 222222 'el 1 1 22 tl - - - -
= === = = t1 ac 777888 ao 7788 DC 000000 = = == == DC 0000 y r y r -
o n e s c n o n e s c n o c i n o t o c i n o t nesee i a i nesee i a i al yl us t c t al yl us t c t a t pl pqt a i a t pl pqt a i c smamei c d c smamei c d o ianarn o n o ianarn o n DSASFU L I DSASFU L I L L ll l ll
p ii4il j' ,j' ' i ii F . ~
.* >oacm_ ' DeCL o_OU_O D. . .
' mn<T033e3.e e EO2.O23E l
( DD e2o 3."WCC mmx me3eu yw 000 656 323 11+ 0 4 000
- 427
, K 989 112
~
1 7 1 55
- 614 e 1 11 S <<< .
7 3 1
- , 460 s 21 2 C <<<
n o i t . a r t
$ n 4 I e3
$ c 1 Y -
n - 1 56 L o s 21 1 A CC <<< M t 2 A t S s T " e t C 1 s U 3 E D 1 562
. F O - 212 t
1 < << M y
-D l a
O O b
'F 1 23 s
- 999 e l
444
.n e b - a o d a t
s o 2 e _ a C g _ i s e S e m' e' p v _ r . o-Fe'.t g n y _ b f o i a f s w a e
- o I o L i l r
W g G l eb e ogr r
. Nsn g caa o mnh Wti . n l _
rac pe mp cbb obu f . ami sut ct - it . d FrM edi re ay rah _ i l om uW ST BCR e _ r ae . ire dGe d - e mP a'- Dek g d i u q c/ e 888 e u0 b0y- b 6 6. dom m ii t 888 a2aP4oa- wC c - - - r L8MF1 FG Tp. e 999 s el 222 i tl - - - ao 888 s y
=' = = =_ == DC 000 l a
n
. y- a f n' e s c' n o'
c i n o l 1 i nesee i o 3 t - al yl us t r 1 a- t pl pqt a t - c smamei c n I _. o- ianarn o o - L DSASFU L C a l:.. ll. Lilili! -
.. - ,o FERMI-2 Annual Radiological Environm ntal Monitoring FISH SAMPLES ANALYS@ port 1988 i Page 74 ,l Location = F Celeron Island Area
- Distance = 9.5 Miles NNE of Fermi 2 ' I I
Sample = Fish f Analysis = Gamma Emitting isotopes ! Sample
- . Frequency = Semi-Annual Units = pCi/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions)
L Location Sarn? Description and Concentration I Control Date Collected 11-88 10-05-88 10-05-88 Lab Code FF-416 FF-477 FF-478 Type Walleye Wa!! eye Sucker K-40 3340 + 410 3180 + 280 2460'29C Mn-54 < 27~ < 2I) < 22 Fe-59 <208 < 65 < 80 Co-58 < 58 < 25 < 29 Co-60 < 24 < 20 <23 Zn-65 - < 64 <48 < 78 Cs-134 <22 < 17 <32 Cs-137 120.7 + 29.9 74 + 16 <20 i i ! t
' ~
FERMI-2 Annual Radiological
- 1 Environm:ntal Monitoring Report 1988 FISH SAMPLES ANALYSf9ge 75 Location = F Fermi 2 Discharge Approximately 1200 Ft. Offshore Distance = 0.4 Miles E of Fermi 2 Sample a ' Fish Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample .
Frequency = Sem'-Annual Units = pCl/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions) Location Sample Description and Concentration Indicator Date Collected 05-11-88 10-04-88 10-04-88 10-04-88 Lab Code FF-414 FT-479 FF-480 FF-481 Type Walleye Walleye Perch Sucker K-40 2941 + 440 3340 + 200 2950 + 340 2320 + 250 Mn-54 <32 <25 < 23 <17 Fe <207 < 85 < 80 <41 Co-58 < 52 < 33 < 30 <18
'Co-60 < 27 < 23 < 22 < 18 Zn-05 < 67 < 60 <66 < 50 Cs-134 < 23 < 23 < 32 <21 Cs-137 65.7 + 29.4 <26 < 23 < 16 l
l l l 1 i
- r. ,
FERMI-2. Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring FISH SAMPLES ANALYSgport 1988 Page 76 i Location = ' F Brest Bay Marina I -. Distance = 5.0 Miles SW of Fermi 2 Sample = Fish .I Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes ; Sample Frequency = Semi-Annual Units ' = pCi/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions) Location Sample Description and Concentration
' Control Date Collected 05-11-88 09-30-88 09-30-88 09-30-88 Lab Code FF-415- FF-482 FF-483 FF-484,5,6 Type- Walleye Catfish Carp ND a K-40 , 3130 + 360 2150 + 200 2430 + 210 2140 + 420 ^
Mn-54 < 20~ < 18 < 24 <20 Fe-59 < 250 < 60 < 79 < 104 Co-58 <44 < 24 <30 <27 Co-60' < 19 < 16 <21 < 22 Zr. -65 <68 <49 <51 < 52 Cs-134 < 18 <22 <21 <18 Cs-137 < 24 < 16 <22 <24 a Due to small sample size, Perch, Walleye and Bass samples were combined for analysis. I 1 I l 1
.'" ~*
Annual Radiological l-2 Environmental Monitoring
)
MSH SAMPLES ANALYS P" ge 77
' Location ' = F Brest Bay Marina Area Distance - = 5.0 Miles SW of Fermi 2 1 Sample = Fish {
Analysis =~ Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample Frequency = Semi-Annual Units = pCl/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions) 4 Location Sample Description and Concentration Control Date Collected 09-14-88 09-15-88 09-30-88 Lab Code FF-475 FF-476 FF-479 Type Walleye Bass Crapple K-40 2780 + 330 3160 + 390 5350 + 420 Mn-54 < 14- <35 <35 Fe-59 < 70 < 192 < 162 Co-58 < 24 < 52 <57 Co <11 < 34 <36 Zn-65 <31 < 73 <111 Cs-134 < 14 < 27 <36 Cs-137 < 14 <33 <36 I
' " Annual Radiological Environm:ntal Monitoring R: port 1988 Page 78 l t
APPENDIX A l Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results i
.c 1
i l ) 5
. _______________ D
'" Annual Radiological Environmental Moritoring Report 1988 Page 79 -
Appendix A
-;o; interlab' oratory Comparison Program Results'
~
lTeledyne isotopes Midwest Laboratory (formerly Hazleton Environmental Sciences) he s participated lo interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of its quality control program in December.1971. These programs are operated by agencies which supply environmental-type samples (e.g., milk or water) containing concentrations of radionuclides known to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on the istoratory's analytical pro::edures and to alert it to any possible problems. Participant laboratories measure the concentrations of specified raalonuclides and report them to the issuing agency. Several months later, the agency reports the known values to the participant laboratories and specifies control limits. Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures used. The results in Table A-1 were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water, air filters, and food samples during the period January through December,1988. This program has been conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Intercomparison and Calibration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Las Vagas, Nevada. w __E._ ___._-~_.__.____.______.
t U. f ' M.. Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 .. . .j Table A-1. Page 80 c Concentration in pCl/1 b lc iLabs Date TIML Result EPA Result" Sample c
. Code; Type. . Collected Analysis +20 Is,N=1 Control Limits STW-521 Water ; Jan 1988 Sr-89 27.3 + 5.0 30.0 +5.0 21.3-38.7 Sr-90 15.3 { 1.2 15.0 { 1.5 12.4-17.6 STW-523 . Water. Jan 1988 Gr. alpha 2.3 + 1.2 4.0 + 5.0 0.0-12.7-g Gr. beta 7.7 + 1.2 8.6 3 5.0 0.0-16.7 L
' STF-524 Food- ' Jan 1988 Sr.89 44.0 + 4.0 46.0 + 5.0 - 37.3-54.7 Sr-90 53.0 I 2.0 .55.0 I 2.8 50.2-59.8 l-131 102.37 4.2' 102.0 7 10.2. 84.3-119.7 Cs-137 95.7 i 6.4
~
91.0 i 5.0 82.3-99.7-K 1010.7 + 158.5 1230.0 + 61.5 1123.5-1336.5
- STW-525 Water Feb 1988 ' Co 69.3 + 2.3
~ 69.0 +~ 5.0 60.3-77.7 Zn-65 99.0 3.4 94.0 ~ 9.4 77.7-110.3 Ru-106 '92.7714.4 105.0 10.5 86.8-123.2 i i
Cs-134 61.7 I 8.0 64.0 i 5.0 55.3-72.7 Cs-137 99.7 [ 53.0 94.0 { 5.0 85.3-102.7 STW-526 Water Feb 1988 H-3 3453 + 103 3327 + 362 2700-3954 STW-527 Water Feb 1988 Uranium 3.0 + 0.0 3.0 + 6.0 0.0-13.4 1
' STM-538: Milk Feb 1988 l-131 4.7 _+ 1.2 4.0 _+ 0.4 3.3-4.7 4
STW-529 - Water Mar 1988 Ra-226 7.1 + 0.6 7.6 +~ 1.1 5.6-9.6 l Ra 228 N A'~ 7.7 1.2 6.7-9.7 STW-530 '. Water Mar 1988 Gr. alpha 4.3 + 1.2 6.0 + 5.0 0.0-14.7 Gr. beta ~ 13.3 + 1.3 13.0 + 5.0 4.3-21.7
= STAF-531 Air - Mar 1988 Gr. alpha 21.0 + 2.0 20.0 + 5.0
~
11.3-28.7 Filter Gr, beta ' 48.0 I 0.0 50.0 5.0 41.3-58.7 I Sr-90 16.7 I 1.2 17.0 I, 1.5 14.4-19.6 ; I Cs-137 18.7 [ 1.3 16.0 [' 5.0 7.3-24.7 i S1W-532 Water Apr 1988' l-131 9.0 +_ 2.0 7.5 + 0.8 6.2-8.8 a i l 1 { l l
= _ _ _ -
Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1988 Table A-1 (continued) Page 81 Concentration in pCi/1 b , Lab Sample Date TIML Resu't EPA Result" Code Type Collected Analysis +20 c 1s,N=1 Control Limits STW-533 Water Apr 1988 534 (dlind) Sample A Gr. alpha ND I (6.0 + 11.0 27.0-65.0 Ra-226 ND I 6.4 i 1.0 4.7-8.1 Ra-228 ND I 5.6 I 0.8 4.2-7.0 Unranium 6.0 + 0.0 6.0 { 6.0 0.0-16.4 Sample B Gr. beta ND I 57.0 + 5.0 48.3-65.7 Sr-89 3.3 + 1.2 5.0 i 5.0 0.0-13.7 Sr-90 5.3 7 1.2 5.0 7 1.5 2.4-7.6 ; l Co-60 63.37 1.3 50.07 5.0 41.3-58.7 Cs-134 7.7 i 1.2 7.0 i 5.0 0.0-15.7 Cs-137 8.3 [ 1.2 7.0 [ 5.0 0.0-15.7 STU-535 Urine Apr 1988 H-3 6483 + 155 6202 + 620 5128-7276 STW-536 Water Apr 1988 Sr- 39 14.7 + 1.3 20.0 + 5.0 11.3-28.7 Sr-90 20.0 [ 2.0 20.0 [ 1.5 17.4-22.6 STW-538 Water Jun 1988 Cr-51 331.7 + 13.0 302.0 + 30.0 250.0-354.0 Co-60 16.0 i 2.0 15.0 i 5.0 6.3-23.7 Zn-65 107.7 7 11.4 101.0 7 10.0 83.7-118.3 Ru-106 191.3 7 11.0 195.0 7 20.0 160.4-229.6 Cs-134 18.3 i 4.6 20.0 i 5.0 11.3-28.7 Cs-137 26.3 { 1.2 25.0 { 5.0 16.3-33.7 STW-530 Water Jun 1988 H-3 5586 + 92 , 5565 + 557 4600-6530 STM-541 Milk Jun 1988 Sr-89 33.7 + 11.4 40.0 + 5.0 31.3-48.7 Sr-90 55.37 5.8 60.07 3.0 54.8-65.2 i 94.0 I 9.0 78.4-109.6 I 1-131 103.7 I 3.1 Cs-137 52.7 i 3.1 51.07 5.0 42.3-59.7 K 1586.7 + 23.1 1600.0 + 80.0 1461.4-1738.6 i STE-542 Water Jul 1988 Gr. alpha 8.7 + 4.2 15.0 + 5.0 6.3-23.7 Gr. beta 5.3{1.2 4.0[5.0 0.0-12.7 , STF-543 Food Jul 1988 Sr-89 ND I 33.0 + 5.0 24.3-41.7 Sr-90 ND I 34.0 I 2.0 30.5-37.5 l-131 115.0 + 5.3 107.0 7 11.0 88.0-126.0 Cs-137 52.7 i 6.4 49.0 i 5.0 40.3-57.7 K 1190.0 + 66.1, 1240.0 + 62.0 1132.6-1347.4 i l
Environmental Monitoring .
* < R!pon 1988 Page 82
. Table A-1. (continued) y m
Concentration in pCl/1D5 ,
& Lab Sample - Date TIML Result EPA Result" ~
Code. Type. Collected Analysis +2o c -1s,N=1 Control Limits STW-544 ' . Water Aug 1988 l-31 . 80.0 +_ _ 0.0 76.0 + 8.0 62.1 -C9.9 STW-545 ' Water; - Aug 1988 Pu-239- 11.0 + 0.2 ' 10.2 + 1.0 8.5-11.9 STW-546 Water Aug 1988 Uranium 6.01 0.0 6.0 + 6.0 0.0-16.4 Air Gr. alpha 8.0 + 0.0-16.7 STAF-547 _ Aug 1988 8.01 0.0 5.0 , Filter Gr. beta 26.3 + 1.2 29.0 + 5.0 20.3-37.7 l S r-90 8.0 T 2.0
~
8.0 i 1.5
~
5.4-10.6 Cs-137 13.0 + 2.0 12.0 + 5.0 3.3-20.7 STW-548 .Wator Sep 1988 Ra-226 9.3 +,, 0.5 8.4 + '2.6 6.2-10.6 Ra-228 5.8 +, 0.4 5.4 + 1.6 4.0-6.8
. L STW-549 ' : Water Sep 1988' Gr. e!pha 7.01 2.0 8.0 + 5.0 0.0-16.7 =
Gr beta 11.3 1 1.2 10.0 + 5.0 1.3-18.7 STW-550 -'^ Water - Oct 1988 Cr-51 252.0 + 14.0 251.0 + 25.0 207.7-294.3 Co-60 26.0 T 2.0
~
25.0 7 5.0 16.0-33.7 Zn-65 158.3 10.2 151.0 + 15.0' 125.0-177.0 , I Ru-106 153.0 + 9.2 152.0 + 15.0 126.0-178.0 Cs-134 28.7 i 5.0
~
25.0 i 5.0 16.3-33.7 Cs-137 16.3 1.2 15.0 [. 5.0 6.3-23.7 STW-551 . Water - Oct 1988 H-3 2333.3 + 127.0 2316.0 + 350.0 1709.8-2927.2
-STU-555. Urine - Nov 1988 H-3 3030.0 + 208.8 3025.0 + 359.0 2403.2-3646.8 STW-556 . . Water Nov 1988 G r. ' alpha 9.0 + 3.5 9.0 + : 5.0 0.3-17.7 Gr. alpha 9.7 { 1.2 C.0 [ 5.0 0.3-17.7 I
. 1 a Results obtained by Teledyne isotopes Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the environmental sample crosscheck program operated by the latercomparison and Calibration Section, Quality
' Assurance Brand, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agenr.y (EPA), Las . Vegas, Nevada.
b All results are in the pCi/1, except for elemental potassium (K) data in milk, which are in mg/1; air filter samples, which are in pCi/ filter; and food, which is in mg/kg. c Unless otherwise indicated, the TIML results are given as the mean +2 standard deviations for three I 'i _ determinations.
-d USEPA results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1s,1 determination) and control limits as defined by EPA.
'O - NA = Not analyzed.
'I ND = No data. Not analyzed due to relocation of the lab.
1 ll
- 1 Annual Radiological 4
Envhonmental Monitodng - Report 1988 Page 83 ADDENDUM TO APPENDIX A ; i
~
Lab EPA Control Code Analysis TIML Result Limit Explanation STM-504 Sr-89 57.0 +_ 4.3 60.3 - 77.7 Milk had high fat content Sr-90 32.0 + 1.0 32.4 - 37.6 which made analyses difficult. I Addition of errors to TIML result would put values within EPA control limits. EPA also had the same problem in analyzing its own sample. STW-511 Ra-228- 8.1 + 1.4 4.6 - 8.0 TIML results are usually within EPA control limits. Analysis of the next sample was within EPA control limits. No further action is planned. STW-516 Cr-51 80.3 + 17.5 61.3 - 78.8 Results in the past have been within EPA control limits and TIML will monitor the situation in the future. STF-524 K 1010.7 + 158.5 1123.5 - 1336.5 Error in tranferrance of data. Correct data was 1105 + 33. Results in the
~
past have been within tlie limits and TIML will monitor the situation in the future. STW-532 1-131 9.0 +, 2.0 6.2 - 8.8 Sample recounted after 12 days. The average result was 8.8 + 1.7 (within . EPA control limits). The sample was recounted in order to check the decay. Results in the past have been within the limits and TIML will continue to monitor the situation in the future. STW-534 Co-60 63.3 + 1.3 41.3 - 58.7 High leval of Co-60 was due to contamination of beaker. Beaker was discarded upon discovery of contamination and sample was recounted. Recount results were 53.2 + 3 6 and 50.9 + 2.4.
\
i l .l l' l , I l 1 i
-- o
3,
' h g,i ' )
u S. Rciph Sylvia M ' Gensor Vsce President
~
6400 f40rth Danse Heghway Edison ==- - April 30, 1989 NRC-89-0069 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission L 4 Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555
References:
(1) Fermi 2 NRC Docket No. 50-3 41 NRC License No. NPF-43 Sub'ect: j Annual Radioloolcal Environmental Operatino Report ! Attached is the 1988 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Fermi 2. This submittal is required by section.6.9.1.7 of the Technical Specifications. If you have any questions or comments about this report, please w--- ' contact Patricia Anthony at (313) 586-1617. Sincerely,
< cc: A. B. Davis R. C. Knop W. G. Rogers '
J.F. Stang i Region III m , i}}