NL-17-018, Consistency Certification for Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2 and Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3 License Renewal Application

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Consistency Certification for Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2 and Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3 License Renewal Application
ML17060A614
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/31/2017
From: Dacimo F
Entergy Nuclear Northeast
To: Rosado R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, State of NY, Dept of State
Burton W, 415-6332
References
NL-17-018
Download: ML17060A614 (33)
v • d • e


Text

  • Entergx

-cw Entergy Nuclear Northeast Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249 Tel (914) 254-2055 Fred Dacimo Vice President Operations icense Renewal NL-17-018 January 31, 2017 BY HAND DELIVERY New York State Department of State Office of Planning and Development Attn: Consistency Review Unit 1 Commerce Plaza 99 Washington Avenue-Suite 1010 Albany, New York 12231 Re: Consistency Certification for Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2 and Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3 License Renewal Application

Dear Secretary Rosado:

Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (collectively, "Entergy"}have submitted a license renewal application ("LRA") to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") requesting renewal of the Operating Licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 ("IP2" and "IP3," collectively, **1PEC"). On December 17, 2012, Entergy filed with the New York State Department of State ("NYSDOS"},

pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act ("CZMA"}, a certification stating that renewal of the IPEC operating licenses was consistent with the New York State Coastal Management Program

("NYSCMP"}. On November 5, 2014, Entergy withdrew that consistency certification. NYSDOS objected to Entergy's certification on November 6, 2015, and challenged Entergy's withdrawal.

Pursuant to an agreement between Entergy and NYSDOS, among other parties, dated January 9, 2017, NYSDOS withdrew its challenge to Entergy's November 5, 2014 withdrawal of its consistency certification, and agreed to proceed as if the withdrawal became effective on November 5, 2014, thereby (l} rendering NYSDOS's November 6, 2015 objection moot and of no effect and (2} requiring Entergy to submit a new certification. Pursuant to that same agreement, Entergy hereby submits the attached consistency certification for renewal of the IP2 and IP3 operating licenses.

This submission certifies that the proposed activity (renewal of the IPEC operating licenses) is consistent with all applicable and enforceable policies of the NYSCMP 1 pursuant to the CZMA, 16 U.S.C. § 1451 et seq. Accordingly, Entergy requests your concurrence with the enclosed Consistency Certification.

New York State, Department of State, "New York State Coastal Management Program and Final Environmental Impact Statement,"(incorporating approved changes from 1982 to 2006), available at http://www.dos.ny.gov/opd/programs/pdfs/NY CMP.pdf.

NL-17-018 Page 2 of 3 As specified in the NYSCMP and the regulations of the Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration at 10 C.F.R. Part 930, Subpart D, the following documents are attached for your review:

  • Entergy's Consistency Certification;
  • Entergy's written analysis of the IPEC license renewal consistency with the policies of the NYSCMP;
  • Entergy's Federal Consistency Assessment Form and signed consistency certification;
  • IPEC site diagram and maps (6-mile and 50-mile radius) showing the geographic location of IPEC;
  • Tables showing the environmental permits applicable to current IPEC operations, and the consultations related to IPEC license renewal; and
  • List of owners of property abutting IPEC.

Additionally, the following necessary data and information are enclosed via electronic media:

  • Entergy's LRA submitted to the NRC requesting renewal of the IPEC operating licenses,2 and the eighteen amendments to the LRA since its original submission in 2007;3
  • the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants, Supplement 38 Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (Volumes 1-4, plus Draft Volume 5); and
  • the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's ("NYSDEC") final State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES") Permit and accompanying Fact Sheet, and final Water Quality Certification ("WQC"), authorizing continued operation of the Indian Point nuclear facility (Units 2 and 3), with the proposed Supplemental Final Environmental Impact Statement ("FSEIS") and State Environmental Quality Review Act C'SEQRA") documents, including the NYSDEC State Coastal Assessment Form.

2 The IPEC Environmental Report, submitted as Appendix E to the LRA, includes a description of the proposed activity, its associated facilities, and an analysis of coastal effects, alternatives, and mitigating actions, as well as a statement of the purpose and need for the activity.

3 Additional correspondence between Entergy and the N RC regarding the IPEC license renewal proceeding can be accessed via the NRC's official recordkeeping system, known as ADAMS-- http:f/adams.nrc.gov/wba (under the "Content Search" tab, add the document property "Docket Number" and value "05000247" (for IP2) or "05000286" (for IP3)).

NL-17-018 Page 3 of 3 Enclosures as stated cc: Mr. Daniel Donnan, Regional Administrator, Region I, NRC Ms. Jeffrey J. Rikhoff, Acting Branch Chief, RERP/DLR/NRR , NRC Mr. William Burton, Sr. Project Manager, RSRG/DLR/NRR, NRC Mr. Douglas Pickett, Sr. Project Manager, LPLl-1/DORUNRR, NRC Mr. Sherwin E. Turk, Special Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, NRC NRC Resident Inspector's Office, Indian Point Ms. Bridget Frymire, New York State Department of Public Service Mr. John B. Rhodes, President and CEO, NYSERDA Ms. Rossana Rosado, Secretary of State, NYSDOS

ENTERGY CERTIFICATION THAT IPEC LICENSE RENEWAL IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC; Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC; and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (collectively, "Entergy") hereby provide to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") the below certification, pursuant to the requirements of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 as amended ("CZMA") (16 U.S.C. §§ 1451-1465) and regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

("NOAA") ( 15 C.F.R. Part 930, Subpart D), in support of Entergy' s license renewal application

("LRA") for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1 & 2 ("IP2" and "IP3," collectively, "IPEC").

CONSISTENCY CERTIFICATION Entergy certifies to the NRC and the New York Department of State ("NYSDOS") that the proposed renewal of the IP2 and IP3 Operating Licenses complies with the enforceable policies of the New York State Coastal Management Program ("NYSCMP") and that continued operation of IPEC will be conducted in a manner consistent with the NYSCMP. Entergy expects IP2 and IP3 operations during the period of extended operation ("PEO") to be a continuation of current operations as described below, with no physical or operational station alterations that would affect New York State's coastal zone.

NECESSARY DATA AND INFORMATION Federal Statutory and Regulatory Background The CZMA imposes requirements on an applicant for a Federal license to conduct a review of an activity that could affect a state's coastal zone. The Act requires an applicant to certify to the Federal licensing agency that the proposed action would be consistent with the state's federally approved coastal zone management program. The Act also requires the applicant to provide to the state a copy of the certification statement and requires the state, at the earliest practicable time, to notify the Federal agency and the applicant whether the state concurs with, or objects to, the consistency certification. See 16 U.S.C. § 1456(c)(3)(A).

NOAA promulgated implementing regulations making the certification requirement applicable to renewal of Federal licenses for activities not previously reviewed by the state. See 15 C.F.R. § 930.51(b)( l). NOAA approved the NYSCMP in 1982.

New York State Coastal Management Program The NYSCMP is administered by the Office of Planning and Development in the NYSDOS. For Federal agency activities, NYSDOS reviews projects to ensure adherence to the State program or an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program. Applicants for Federal agency approvals or authorizations are required to submit copies of Federal applications to NYSDOS, together with a Federal Consistency Assessment Form and the consistency certification. The Department reviews the consistency certification and proposal for consistency with the NYSCMP as l

documented in 44 specific policies established in the Department's 1982 Final Environmental Impact Statement. The policies articulate the State's vision for its coast by addressing the following areas:

  • Development
  • Fish and Wildlife
  • Flooding and Erosion Hazards
  • General
  • Public Access
  • Recreation
  • Historic and Scenic Resources
  • Agricultural Lands
  • Energy and Ice Management
  • Water and Air Resources Appendix A to this Determination identifies the 44 NYSCMP policies and Entergy's justification for certifying compliance.

Proposed Action Entergy operates IPEC pursuant to NRC Operating Licenses DPR-26 (Unit 2) and DPR-64 (Unit 3). Entergy submitted a license renewal application ("LRA") to the NRC requesting renewal of these operating licenses for an additional 20 years beyond the current expiration dates (the period of extended operation, or "PEO"). The Unit 2 and Unit 3 licenses were set to expire September 28, 2013, and December 12, 2015, respectively, but continue in force under the NRC's "timely renewal" provision (10 C.F.R. § 2.109(b)) until the NRC makes a final determination on the LRA. Entergy expects IPEC operations during the PEO to be a continuation of current operations as described below, with no physical or operational changes that would affect the New York State coastal zone. License renewal would give Entergy the option of relying on IPEC to meet a portion of New York State's future needs for electric generation.

Table 1 lists consultations related to IPEC license renewal, Table 2 lists environmental permits applicable to current IPEC operations, and Table 3 lists owners of properties abutting IPEC.

On January 13, 2017, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

("NYSDEC") submitted to the Administrative Law Judges C'AUs") the final State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES") Permit4 and a final Water Quality Certification

("WQC") for the continued operation of IPEC, pursuant to a stipulation that includes Entergy's commitment that IP2 shall permanently cease operations no later than April 30, 2020, and IP3 shall permanently cease operations no later than April 30, 2021; provided, however, the operation of either IP2, IP3, or both units, may be extended upon the mutual agreement of NYS and Entergy, which shall take account of, and be made in accordance with, applicable law and regulatory requirements. On January 27, 2017, the AUs and NYSEC Commissioner issued their respective Order and Decision concluding the proceeding and directing NYSDEC Staff to The cover page of the final SPDES Permit was subsequently replaced by NYSDEC to correct a stenographic error. The corrected page is included in the enclosed final SPDES Permit.

2

complete the requisite public notice of the final SPDES Permit and WQC, as well as the associated State Environmental Quality Review Act process. Copies of the final SPDES Permit and WQC are included with this Certification. Entergy intends to comply fully with the commitments, conditions and requirements of the SPDES Permit and WQC for continued operations through retirement.

IPEC Description IPEC is located on approximately 239 acres of land on the east bank of the Hudson River at Indian Point, Village of Buchanan in upper Westchester County, New York. The site is about 24 miles north of the New York City boundary line. The nearest city is Peekskill, 2.5 miles northeast of Indian Point. See Figs . 2 & 3.

The layout of IPEC is shown in Figure 1. The plant consists of two pressurized water reactors with steam generators that produce steam which then turns turbines to generate electricity. Unit 2 is capable of an output of 3,216 megawatts (thermal) [MW(t)], with a corresponding net electrical output of approximately 1,078 megawatts (electric) [MW(e)]. Unit 3 is capable of an output of 3,216 MW(t), with a corresponding net electrical output of approximately 1,080 MW(e).

The circulating water systems for IP2 and IP3 include shoreline-situated intake structures along the Hudson River consisting of seven bays (six for circulating water and one for service water) for each unit. The circulating water intake bays have state-of-the-art, optimized, vertical Ristroph-type traveling water screens, developed and tested in concert with fisheries experts, including from the Hudson River Fisherman's Association, to minimize (impingement) impacts to fish. These screens have become the model for the United States Environmental Protection Agency's national rule on circulating water systems, and continued operation of these systems during the license renewal period was authorized in 2013 by the National Marine Fisheries Services as protective of federally listed sturgeon. Then, the water from each individual screenwell flows to a motor-driven, vertical, mixed flow condenser circulating water pump.

After moving through the condensers, cooling water from IP2 and IP3 flows downward from the discharge water boxes via six 96-inch diameter down pipes and exits beneath the water surface in a 40-foot wide discharge canal. The cooling water from the canal is released into the Hudson River through an outfall structure located south of IP3, which was designed to and has been demonstrated to the satisfaction of NYSDEC to enhance mixing of cooling water and River water to minimize potential thermal impacts to the River in compliance with all applicable New York water quality standards.

Sanitary wastewater is transferred to the Village of Buchanan publicly owned treatment works system where it is managed appropriately, except for a few isolated areas which have their own septic tanks which are pumped out by a septic company, as needed, and taken to an offsite facility for appropriate management. Although the sanitary wastewaters are nonradioactive, a continuous radiation monitoring system is provided.

Entergy employs a permanent workforce of approximately 1,100 employees at IPEC. The majority of the IPEC workforce lives in Dutchess, Orange, and Westchester Counties. The site 3

workforce increases by approximately 950 workers for temporary (approximately 30 days) duty during staggered refueling outages that occur about every 24 months for each unit.

In compliance with the NRC regulations, Entergy has analyzed the effects of plant aging and identified activities needed for IPEC to operate for an additional 20 years. IPEC license renewal would involve no major plant refurbishment.

Power is delivered to the ConEdison transmission grid via two double-circuit 345-kV lines that connect the IP2 and IP3 main transformers to the Buchanan substation located across Broadway near the main entrance to IPEC. Except for the point where they cross over Broadway, the lines are located within the site boundary, are approximately 2,000 feet in length, and were constructed using tubular-steel transmission poles. ConEdison addresses impacts to the transmission line corridors in accordance with its vegetative management plan.

In 2010, IPEC generation represented approximately IO percent of the total electricity consumption in New York State, 17 percent of the total electricity consumption in the Southeastern New York area, and up to 30 percent of the New York City area's base-load electricity. IPEC generates more electrical energy than any other facility in the Empire State.

Environmental Impacts The NRC's Generic Environmemal Impact Statement for license Renewal of Nuclear Plams

("License Renewal GEIS") analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the renewal of nuclear power plant operating licenses. The NRC codified its findings regarding these impacts at I 0 C.F.R. Part 51, Subpart A, Appendix B, Table B-1. The codified findings (applicable as of the date the LRA was submitted to the NRC5 ) identify 92 potential environmental issues. The NRC's Generic Environmental Impact Statememfor license Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants, Supplement 38 Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 ("IPEC SEIS")

documents the NRC's consideration of these topics as they pertain to IPEC license renewal.

Category 1 Issues (Generically Applicable) 6 The NRC generically identified 69 "Category 1" issues as having SMALL impacts. A SMALL significance level is defined by the NRC as follows:

For the issue, environmental effects are not detectable or are so minor that they will neither destabilize nor noticeably alter any important attribute of the resource. For the purpose of assessing radiological impacts, the Commission has concluded that those impacts that do not exceed permissible levels in the Commission's regulations are s The NRC updated the License Renewal GEIS and corresponding table in 10 C.F.R. Part 51 following submission or the IPEC LRA. Revisions to Environmental Review for Renewal or Nuclear Power Plant Operating Licenses, 78 Fed. Reg. 37,282 (June 20, 2013). The update resulted in consolidation and reclassification or certain issues such that the updated table now identifies 78 issues, rather than 92. Id.

6 The revised License Renewal GEIS and table in 10 C.F.R. Part 51 now identiry 59 "Category 2" issues, rather than 69.

4

considered small as the term is used in this table. ( l 0 C.F.R. Part 51, Subpart A, Appendix B, Table B-1) l0 C.F.R. Part 51, Subpart A, Appendix B, Table B-1 and the License Renewal GEIS discuss the following types of Category 1 environmental issues:

  • Surface water quality, hydrology, and use;
  • Aquatic ecology;
  • Groundwater use and quality;
  • Terrestrial resources;
  • Air quality;
  • Land use;
  • Human health;
  • Socioeconomics;
  • Uranium fuel cycle and waste management; and
  • Decommissioning.

Absent findings of new and significant information, the NRC will rely on its codified findings, as amplified by supporting information in the License Renewal GEIS, for its assessment of environmental impacts associated with license renewal. Entergy has not identified any new and significant information, and has adopted by reference the License Renewal GEIS analysis for all Category 1 issues.7 Category 2 Issues (Plant-Specific)

The NRC also identified 21 issues as "Cateory 2," for which license renewal applicants must 9

submit additional, site-specific information. Summaries of the conclusions for each subcategory of applicable 10 issues are as follows:

7 This includes the nine new or amended Category I issues in the revised License Renewal GEIS and table in JO C.F.R. Part 51. See NL-15-028, Letter from F. Dacimo, Entergy, to NRC, Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Renewal Application Environmental Review (TAC Nos. MD541 I and MD54 I 2), Attachment at 3-29 (Mar. 10, 2015). See also IPEC SEIS (documenti ng the NRC's consideration or these topics; Volume 5 considers the new or amended Category I issues).

8 The revised License Renewal GEIS and table in JO C.F.R. Part 51 now identify 17 "Category 2" issues, rather than 21 .

9 As to the new or amended Category 2 issues in the revised License Renewal GEIS and table in 10 C.F.R. Part 51, Entergy concluded that: the potential environmental impacts would be SMALL for Terrestrial Resources and Groundwater Resources; the NRC' s SMALL Environmental Justice conclusion in the Indian Point License Renewal GEIS remains valid; and cumulative impacts on the listed resource areas would be SMALL, but, if climate change is considered a cumulative impact contributor, then the cumulative impact on Water Resources could range from SMALL to MODERATE. See NL-15-028 at 30-39. Although the NRC has proposed, in a draft supplement to the IPEC SEIS, to conclude that impacts to on-site Groundwater Resources may be MODERATE at present (but acknowledging they may move to SMALL due to natural attenuation), see IPEC SEIS, Draft Vol. 5, Entergy has submitted additional information rebutting the NRC's conclusion and showing the impacts to on-site groundwater resources arc SMALL. See NL-16-021, Letter from F. Daci mo, Entergy, to C. Bladey, NRC, Comments on Second Draft Supplement to Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Indian Point License Renewal (Mar.

4, 2016); NL-16-044, Letter from F. Dacimo, Entergy, to C. Bladcy, NRC, Entcrgy's Corrections and Clarifications in Response to Third-Party Comments on the NRC's Second Draft Supplement to the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 License Renewal (Apr. 25, 2016).

5

Aquatic ecology: Historic and current studies have shown no negative trend in overall aquatic River species populations related to plant operations. The final SPDES permit will ensure impacts remain SMALL. 11 Threatened and endangered species: Entergy has no plans to perform major refurbishment activities; therefore, impacts due to refurbishment are not expected. The final SPDES permit will ensure impacts to these species through license renewal would be SMALL.

Human Health: IPEC transmission lines meet the National Electric Safety Code recommendations for preventing electric shock from induced currents; therefore, the impact related to license renewal would be SMALL.

Socioeconomics: Entergy has no plans for refurbishment activities and does not anticipate increasing its workforce during the period of extended operation. Therefore, any impacts on local transportation, available housi ng, and local water systems would be SMALL.

Offsite land use: Entergy has no plans to perform major refurbishment activities; therefore, any impacts due to license renewal would be SMALL.

Historic and archeological resources: Entergy has no plans to perform major refurbishment activities; therefore, impacts due to license renewal would be SMALL.

12 Severe accident mitigation alternatives (..SAMA"l: Entergy identified certain potentially cost-beneficial modifications that may have the potential to reduce the impacts of a severe accident. However, none relate to adequately managing the effects of aging during the period of extended operation. Thus, any impacts related to license renewal would be SMALL.

10 Some Category 2 issues are applicable to plants having features that are not present at IPEC, or apply only to activities that are not proposed as part of the IPEC license renewal.

11 Although the NRC has proposed, in a draft supplement to the IPEC SEIS, to conclude that impacts to Aquatic Ecology would be SMALL to MODERATE, see IPEC SEIS, Draft Vol. 5, Entergy has submitted additional information rebutting some of the NRC's species-specific conclusions. See NL-16-021; NL-16-044.

12 On September 12, 2016, the NRC issued requests for additional information to Entergy regarding the IPEC SAMA analyses; Entergy's answers are due by January 10, 2017. The NRC may present its evaluation of this information in a further volume of the IPEC SEIS, if warranted.

6

Category N I A Issues <Not Categorized)

The NRC identified two issues as "Category N I A," for which the 10 C.F.R. Part 51 categorization and impact findings do not apply.13 Summaries of the conclusions for these two issues are as follows:

Environmental Justice: Entergy has no plans to perform major refurbishment activities; therefore there would be no adverse impacts to minority and low income populations from such activities in the vicinity of IP2 and IP3. Environmental Justice impacts of continued plant operation during the license renewal period would be SMALL.

Electromagnetic Fields: The NRC staff has determined that appropriate Federal health agencies have not reached a consensus on the existence of chronic adverse effects from 14 electromagnetic fields. Therefore, no further evaluation of this issue is required.

Findings I. The NRC has determined that the significance of Category 1 issue impacts is SMALL.

Entergy has adopted by reference the NRC findings for Category Iissues.

2. For applicable Category 2 issues, Entergy has determined that the environmental impacts are SMALL15 as that term is defined by the NRC. Impact to the coastal zone, therefore, would also be SMALL.
3. To the best of its knowledge, Entergy is in compliance with New York licenses, permits, approvals, and other requirements as they apply to IPEC impacts on the New York coastal zone.
4. IPEC license renewal and continued operation of IPEC facilities, and their effects, are all consistent with the enforceable policies of the New York Coastal Management Program.

State Notification By this Certification, the State of New York is notified that the IPEC license renewal is consistent with the New York State Coastal Management Program. Attached to this Certification is a completed New York State Department of State Federal Consistency Assessment Form. The 13 Environmen1al jus1ice was nol evalualed on a generic basis and must be addressed in a plant specific supplement to the GEIS. Information on the chronic effects or electromagnetic fields was not conclusive at the ti me the GEIS was prepared.

I The revised License Renewal GEIS and table in to C.F.R. Part 51 continue to identify the chronic effects or electromagnetic fields as N/A.

15 As noted above, Entergy has submitted information rebutting the NRC's draft proposed conclusions regarding Groundwater Resources, and some species-specific findings regarding Aquatic Ecology. See supra notes 9, 12. Cumulative impacts on the listed resource areas will be SMALL unless climate change is considered a cumulative impact contributor, in which case the cumulative impact could range from SMALL to MODERATE.

7

State's concurrence, objections, or notification of review status shall be sent to the following contacts:

Entergy's counsel for this matter: The NRC project manager for this matter:

William B. Glew, Jr., Esq. Mr. William Burton Entergy Services, Inc. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 440 Hamilton Avenue Washington, DC 20555-0001 White Plains, NY 10601 Telephone: +1 301.415.6332 Telephone: (914) 272-3360 Email: william.burton @nrc.gov E-mail: wglew @entergy.com Kathryn Sutton Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: +1 202.739.5738 Email: kathryn.sutton @morganlewis.com 8

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Federal Consistency Assessment Form An applicant, seeking a permit,license, waiver, certification or similar type of approval from a federal agency which is subject to the New York State Coastal Management Program (CMP), shall complete this assessment form for any proposed activity that will occur within and/or directly affect the State's Coastal Area. This form is intended to assist an applicant in certifying that the proposed activity is consistent with New York State's CMP as required by U.S. Department of Commerce regulations (IS CFR 930.57). It should be completed at the time when the federal application is prepared. The Department of State will use the completed form and accompanying information in its review of the applicant's certification of consistency.

A. APPLICANT (please print)

Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC; Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC; and I. Name: Entergy Nuclear Operations , Inc. (collectively, "Entergy")

2. Address: Indian Point Energy Center,450 Broadway, Buchanan, NY 10511
3. Telephone: Area Code ( 914)=2= 5.4...-. 2.0::;..5=5:;...._ _
8. PROPOSED ACTIVITY:

I. Brief description of activity:

Entergy is applying to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") to renew the operating licenses of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 (collectively, "IPEC"). No change of existing coastal facilities, activities, or effects is proposed.

2. Purpose of activity:

To continue producing up to 2158 MW of baseload electrical power for the energy consumers of New York State.

3. Location of activity:

Westchester Buchanan 450 Buchanan County City, Town, or Village Street or Site Description

4. Type of federal permit/license required: Renewal of NRC Operating Licenses
5. Federal application number,if known: Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR -------
6. lf a state permit/license was issued or is required for the proposed activity, identify the state agency and provide the application or pennit number, if known:

§ A SPOES Permit & Water Quality Certificate from the Oep't of Environmental Conservation.

§ These are provided inthe January 13, 2017 NYSDEC ResoluUon Noticeattached to this consistency certification.

C. COASTAL ASSESSMENT Check either "YES" or "NO" for each of these questions. The numbers following each question refer to the policies described in the CMP document (see footnote on page 2) which may be affected by the proposed activity.

I. Will the proposed activity result in any of the following: YES/NO

a. Large physical change to a site within the coastal area which will require the preparation of an environmental impact statement? (1 1, 22, 25, 32, 37, 38, 41, 43) ./
b. Physical alteration of more than two acres of land along the shoreI ine, land under water or coastal waters? (2, 11, 12, 20, 28, 35, 44) ./
c. Revitalization /redevelopment of a deteriorated or underutilized waterfront site? ( I ) ./
d. Red uction of existing or potential public access to or along coastal waters? ( 19, 20) ./
e. Adverse effect upon the commercial or recreational use of coastal fish resources? (9, I 0) ./
f. Siting of a facility essential to the exploration, development and production of energy resources in coastal waters or on the Outer Continental Shelf? (29) ./
g. Siting of a facility essential to the generation or transmission of energy? (27) ./
h. Mining, excavation, or dredging activities, or the placement of dredged or fill material in coastal waters? ( 15, 35)
i. Discharge of toxics, hazardous substances or other pollutants into coastal waters? (8, 15, 35)
j. Draining of stormwater runoff or sewer overflows into coastal waters? (33)
k. Transport, storage, treatment, or disposal of solid wastes or hazardous materials? (36, 39)
t. Adverse effect upon land or water uses within the State's small harbors? (4)
2. Will the proposed activity affect or be located in, on, or adjacent to any of the following: YES/NO
a. State designated freshwater or tidal wetland? (44) ./t
b. Federally designated flood and/or state designated erosion hazard area? ( 1 1, 12, 17) ./t
c. State designated significant fish and/or wildlife habitat? (7) (_

d.

e.

f.

State designated significant scenic resource or area? (24)

State designated important agricultural lands? (26)

Beach, dune or Barrier Island? ( 12)

'* ./

./_

g. Major ports of Albany, Buffalo, Ogdensburg, Oswego or New York? (3) ./
h. State, county, or local park? (19, 20) 7
1. Historic resource listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places? (23) 7
3. Will the proposed activity require any of the following: YES/NO
a. Waterfront site? (2, 21, 22)
b. Provision of new public services or infrastructure in undeveloped or sparsely populated sections of the coastal area? (5)

'* ./

c. Construction or reconstruction of a flood or erosion control structure? (13, 14, 16) ./
d. State water quality permit or certification? (30, 38, 40) ./§
e. State air quality permit or certification? (41, 43) ./
4. Will the proposed activity occur within and/or affect an area covered by a State-approved local waterfront revitalization program, or Stale-approved regional coastal management program?

(see pol icies in program document*)

t No change of existing activities or facilities isproposed.

§ These are provided in the January 13, 2017 NYSDEC Resolution Notice attached to lhis consistency certilicabon

D. ADDITIONAL STEPS I. Ifall of the questions in Section C are answered "NO", then the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F.

2. If any of the questions in Section C are answered "YES", then the applicant or agent is advised to consult the CMP, or where appropriate, the local waterfront revital ization program document*. The proposed activity must be analyzed in more detail with respect to the applicable state or local coastal policies. On a separate page(s), the applicant or agent shall: (a) identify, by their policy numbers, which coastal policies are affected by the activity, (b) brielly assess the effects of the activity upon the policy; and, (c) state how the activity is consistent with each policy.

Following the completion of this written assessment, the applicant or agency shall complete Section E and submit the documentation required by Section F.

E. CERTIFICATION The applicant or agent must certify that the proposed activity is consistent with the State's CMP or the approved local waterfront revitalization program, as appropriate. If this certification cannot be made, the proposed activity shall not be undertaken. If this certification can be made, complete this Section.

"The proposed activity complies with New York State's approved Coastal Management Program, or with the applicable approved local waterfront revitalization program, and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. "

Applicant/Agent's Name: Fr= ed Da=c=im=

o---

--

--

Address: Indian Point Energv Center. 450 Broadway, Buchanan . NY 10511 Telephone' A<ea Code ( 914 ) 2 Applicant/Agent' s Signature: Date: _1.(.._

3 1/._2_

'tJ l]_

F. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. The applicant or agent shall submit the following documents to the New York State Department of State, Office of Planning and Development, Attn: Consistency Review Unit, One Commerce Plaza-Suite 1010, 99 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12231.

a. Copy of original signed fonn.
b. Copy of the completed federal agency application.
c. Other available information which would support the certification of consistency.
2. The applicant or agent shall also submit a copy of this completed form along with his/her application to the federal agency.
3. If there are any questions regarding the submission of this form, contact the Department of State at (518) 474-6000.
  • These state and local documents arc available for inspection at the offices of many federal agencies, Department of environmental Conservation and Department of State regional offices, and lhc appropriate regional nnd county planning agencies.

Local program documcnls arc ulso uvailnblc for inspection 11t lhe offices of the appropriate local government .

FIGURE 1 - Indian Point Energy Center

\

--*

\\

\*.

'*

'\

'-

- cu

.§ cCD 0:

D.. -a .

c > ep

- -1::

"

C' 1c11 (/)

-w 0

  • D 0

,

.i 9

FIGURE 2 -50 Mile Radius N o r t h A ti a n t i c Oco an

    • LJeoin.,  :)XIO -- Uft9'111Ml 7,g..,,,oaa14111
  • ,DOU!0* 1.:0UU l.Sll- f1:

10

FIGURE 3 -6 Mile Radius DII.O C :.5:]l*1==2---Milici 11

TABLE l -Consultations Agency'" Authority Activity Covered U.S.Fish and Wildlife Endangered Species Act Requires federal agency Service and Na1ional Section 7 ( 16 USC 1636) issuing a license 10 Marine Fisheries Service consuh with USFWS and NMFS.

New York Natural Herilage Endangered Species Acl Requires federal agency Program Seclion 7 issuing a license 10 (16 USC 1636) consul! wi1h 1he fish and wildlife agency al 1he slale level.

New York Stale Nalional His1oric Preservation Act Requires federal agency Office of Parks, Section 106 issuing a license to Recreation, and Hisloric consider cuhural impacts Preservation and consul! wi1h SHPO New York S1a1e Federal Coas1al Zone Management Act Requires an applicant to Department of State (16 USC 1451 ct seq.) provide certification to the federal agency issuing the license and to the designa1ed state agency 1hat license renewal would be consistent with the federally-approved state coastal zone management program.

New York State Clean Water Act Requires New York Department of Section 401 State cer1ification that Environmental (33 USC 1341) discharge would comply Conservation with state water qual ity standards 16 Consultations with additional non-federal and non -NYS entities are included in the IPEC SEIS, Volume 3, Appendix E.

12

TABLE 2 -Environmental Permits A2ency Authority Description Number Expiration Date USNRC Atomic Energy Act, IPI License to DPR-5 September 28, 2013 IO CFR 50 Possess USNRC Atomic Energy Act, IP2 License to DPR-26 September 28, 2013' IO CFR 50 Ooerate USNRC Atomic Energy Act, IP3 License to DPR-64 December 12, 2015' IO CFR 50 Operate USDOT 49 CFR 107, Subpart G IP2 DOT Hazardous 060415600002XZ June 30, 2018 Materials Certificate of Registration USDOT 49 CFR 107, Subpart G IP3 DOT Hazardous 060415600003XZ June 30, 2018 Materials Certificate of Registration TDEC Tenn. Comp. R. & IP I & IP2 T-NYO I O-Ll7 December 31, 2017 Regs. 0400-20-10-.32 Radioactive Waste License-for-Delivery TDEC Tenn. Comp. R. & IP3 T-NY-005-L17 December 31, 2017 Regs. 0400 J0-.32 Radioactive Waste License-for-Delivery NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 325 IP2 Pesticide 12696 April 30, 2018 Application Business Registration NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 325 IP3 Pesticide 13163 April 30, 20 18 Application Busi ness Registration NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Parts 704 IP I , 2, and 3 SPDES NY 000 4472 October I, 1992*

and 750 Permit NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 704 SimulalOr NY 025 0414 March 31, 2018 Transformer Vault SPDES Permit NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 704 Buchanan Gas NY 022 4826 February 28, 2018 Turbine SPDES Permit NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Parts 200 IP2 & IP3 Air 3-5522- November 20, 2024 and 201 Permit 000 I 1/00026 WCDOH Chapter 873, Article IP2 Gas Turbine I #00021 December 31, 2018 XIII, Section Air Permit 873.1306.1 of the Laws of Westchester County

[3

TABLE 2 -Environmental Permits (Cont.)

Aency Authority Description Number Expiration Date WCDOH Chapter 873, Article IP2GasTurbine 3 #00023 December 31, 2018 XIII, Section Air Permit 873.1306.1 of the Laws of Westchester Countv WCDOH Chapter 873, Article IP2 Boiler Permit 52-4493 Not Applicable XIII, Section 873.1306.I of the Laws of Westchester County WCDOH Chapter 873, Article IP2VaporExtractor 52-5682 December 31, 2018 XIII, Section Air Permit 873.1306.1 of the Laws of Westchester County WCDOH Chapter 873, Article IP3Boiler Permit 52-6497 No Expiration Date XIII, Section 873.1306.1 of the Laws of Westchester County WCDOH Chapter 873, Article IP3Training Center 52-6498 No Expiration Date XIII, Section Boiler Permit 873.1306.J of the Laws of Westchester County WCDOH Chapter 873, Article IP3VaporExtractor --.. --I XIII, Section Air Permit 873.1306.I of the Laws of Wcstchestcr County J

NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 610 IP2 Major Oil 3-2140 Slorat.?c Facility WCDOH Westchestcr County IP3 Petroleum Bulk 3-166367 September 7, 2020 Sanitary Code, Article Storage Registration xxv Certificate NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 372 IP2 Hazardous NYD99 I 30441 I No Expiration Dale Waste Generator ldcnti fication 14

TABLE 2 -Environmental Permits (Cont.)

Ae.encv Authority Description Number Expiration Date NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 372 IP3 Hazardous NYD085503746 No Expiration Date Waste Generator Identification NYSDEC 6 NYCRR Part 373 IP2 Hazardous NYD99 I 3044I I February 28, 2007J Waste Part 373 Permit USEPA 40CFR 264 IP2Hazardous Solid NYD9913044 I I October 14, 2002' Waste Amendment Permit USEPA 40 CFR 264 IP3 Hazardous Solid NYD085503746 October 17, 2001)

Waste Amendment Permit Notes:

Current as of January 2017.

( I ) Timely renewal application was submitted; having met the requirements in 10CFR 2.109, Entergy is allowed to continue to operate IP2 and IP3 under the existi ng l icenses until the NRC reaches a final decision on the license renewal request.

(2) The expiration date of the new SPDES Permit will be determined in accordance with the January 13, 2017 NYSDEC Resolution Notice auachcd to this consistency certification.

1\3) Timely renewal application was submiued; therefore, permit is administratively continued under New York State Administrative Procedures Act.

(4) Application has been submitted to WCDOH, but a permit has not yet been issued .

(5) Permit has been administratively continued based on conditional mixed waste exemption.

CFR = Code of Federal Regulations USDOT = U.S. Department of Transportation TDEC = Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation USEPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency IPI = Indian Point, Unit I IP2 = Indian Point, Unit 2 IP3 = Indian Point, Unit 3 15

TABLE 3 -Owners of Properties Abutting IPEC Name & Current Address of Tax Assessor Map Parcel Owner (us provided in Tax Property Address (as Provided in lclentlrication Number Assessors Database) Tax Assessors Database)

Abutters to Entere.v's License Renewal related orooerties. asidentilied above 43.6-1-2 NEW YORK STATE ATOMIC & HUDSONRIVER SPACEAUTHORITY EMPIRESTATE PLAZA NEW YORK STATE DEA BUILDING 4 ALBANY NY 12223 43 .7-1-1 VILLAGEOF BUCHANAN PARK BROADWA Y TATE AVE BUCHANAN NY 1051I

43. 10-1-2 Continental Buchanan 350 BROADWAY 350 BROADWAY BUCHANAN NY 10511 43.1 1*1 1 CREX DIMARBLLC BLEAKLEY AVE& BROADWAY CID GLENNGRIFFEN 1234LINCOLNTERRACE PEEKSKILLNY 10566 43.11-2-1 RITORNATO SANDRA L 300BLEAKLEY AVE 14COACHLIGHTSQ MONTROSENY 10548 43.1 1-2-31 CON EDISON CO OF NY BROADWA Y TAX DEPARTMENT CIO: STEPHANIEJ. MERRIT 4 IRVING PL RM 74 NEW YORK NY 10003 43.11*2 33 CON EDISON COOF NY BROADWAY TAX DEPARTMENT C/O: STEPHANIEJ. MERRIT 4 IRVING PL RM 74 NEW YORK NY 10003 43.11-2-34 MANNFOLK MARY 461 BROADWAY M 461 BROADWAY BUCHANAN NY I0511 43 .14-2-1 CON EDISON CO OF NY 375 BROADWAY TAX DEPARTMENT C/0:STEPHANIEJ. MERRIT A 4 IRVING PL RM 74 NEW YORK NY 10003 43.14-2-2 ST MARYS ROMAN CEMETERY 345 BROADWAY CEMETERY PO BOX 609 VERPLANCK NY 10596 16

TABLE 3 - OwnersofPropertiesAbutting IPEC (Cont.)

Name & Current Address oC Tax Assessor Map Parcel Owner (as provided In Tax Property Address(as Provided in ldenttncation Number AssessorsDatabase) Tax Assessors Database) 43.14-3-1 Town of Conandt BROADWAY IHeady Street Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567 43.14-3-2 HICKEY JOSEPH W &JULIA 320 BROADWAY 320 BROADWAY PO BOX 701 VERPLANCK NY 10596 43.15-1-13 DECRENZA JOHN 142WESTCHESTER AVE 142WESTCHESTER AVE BUCHANAN NY 10511 43.15-1-14 Mary Quinn 148WESTCHESTER AVE 148 WESTCHESTER A VE BUCHANAN NY 10511 43.15-1-16 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 3 WESTCHESTER A VE TROLLEY RD MONTROSE NY 10548

43. 15-1-21 CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 3 WESTCHESTER AVE TROLLEY RD MONTROSENY 10548 43.18-1-1 MCGUIGANJOSEPH & 303 BROADWAY ELIZABETH PO BOX 273 303 BROADWA Y VERPLANCK NY 10596 43.18-1-2 KEESLER FREDERICK F& 38 MANOR LN MARGARET PO BOX 136 VERPLANCK NY 10596 43.18-1-5.1 COUGHLANEILEEN 33 MANOR LN PO BOX 746 33 MANOR LN VERPLANCK NY 10596 43.18-2-1 KERTELITS THOMAS J & KELLY 3 PHEASANTS RUN H

3 PHEASANTS RUN BUCHANAN NY 105 1 1 43.18-2-14 SCHNEIDER ROBERT L & RENEE 5 PHEASANTS RUN 5 PHEASANTS RUN BUCHANANNY 10511 17

APPENDIX A ENTERGY ANALYSIS OF IPEC LICENSE RENEWAL CONSISTENCY WITH THE POLICIES OF THE NEW YORK STATE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM POLICY .lliSTI F!C:\TION CUNSIS I LNCY DEVELOPMENT 1: Waterfront Policy 1 is inapplicable. IPEC already exists Redevelopment Restore, revitalize, and redevelop deteriorated as a highly productive well maintained and underutilized waterfront areas for waterfront facility within Buchanan. Ifand to commercial, industrial, cultural, recreational, the extent Policy 1 is deemed applicable to and other compatible uses. License Renewal, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 1.

2: Water-dependent Uses Policy 2 is inapplicable. License Renewal Facilitate the siting of water dependent uses does not involve the siting of new facilities and facilities on or adjacent to coastal waters. within the coastal zone. IPEC is an existing water-dependent use located within the coastal zone. Ifand to the extent Policy 2 is deemed applicable to License Renewal, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 2.

3: Development of New York's Major Ports Policy 3 is inapplicable to IPEC License Further develop the state's major ports of Renewal. IPEC is not within and will not Albany, Buffalo, New York, Ogdensburg, and affect any of the ports identified in Policy 3.

Oswego as centers of commerce and industry, and encourage the siting, in these port areas, including those under the jurisdiction of state public authorities, of land use and development which is essential to, or in support of, the waterborne transportation of cargo and people.

4: Encouraging Development of Small Harbors Policy 4 is not applicable to IPEC License Strengthen the economic base of smaller Renewal. Buchanan does not have a "small harbor areas by encouraging the development harbor." License Renewal will not affect any and enhancement of those traditional uses and small harbors.

activities which have provided such areas with their unique maritime identity.

5: Development in Areas with Adequate IPEC License Renewal will not entail new Essential Services and Facilities development, but rather continued generation Encourage the location of development in areas of reliable, virtually emission-free energy for where public services and facilities essential to New York State consumers at an existing such development are adequate. industrial center that has adequate infrastructure to support both current and future operations under License Renewal.

JPEC License Renewal will not trigger the need for additional infrastructure, such as roads, water or sewer services, schools or other social services, or additional transmission facilities. Ifand to the extent Policy 5 is deemed applicable to License Renewal, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 18

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

5.

6: Exgedited Permitting Policy 6 is inapplicable to IPEC License for Development Renewal. License Renewal does not entail the Activities siting of new development activity within the Expedite permit procedures in order to coastal zone or state and local permitting for facilitate the siting of development activities at the same.

FISH AND WILDLIFE 7: Significant Coastal Fish No new construction or activities are proposed and Wildlife Habitats ("SCFWH"} as part of IPEC License Renewal that Significant coastal fish and wildlife habitats reasonably could be expected to raise Policy 7

. will be protected. preserved. and where concerns, even for nearby SCFWHs.

practical. restored so as to maintain their Extensive data collected under the oversight viability as habitats. and direction of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

("NYSDEC..) regarding the effects of IPEC operations on aquatic organisms. populations.

and communities over a 35-year period indicate that IPEC cannot reasonably be considered to have caused an adverse impact on habitats within the 7Hudson River, let alone in a nearby SCFWH, 1 including Hudson Highlands. and no destruction or significant impairment of such habitat can reasonably be expected from continued operations during the License Renewal period. Moreover. adequate assurances of protection exist under applicable New York law. including the State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("SPDES..)

program, pursuant to which NYSDEC assures IPEC's compliance with applicable Federal and State law. Therefore, if and to the extent Policy 7 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 7.

8: Hazardous Wastes and Pollutants that IPEC License Renewal will result in the Bioaccumulate or Cause continuation of existing operations. Based on Lethal or Sub-lethal Effects over 40 years of operation, historic discharges Protect fish and wildlife resources in the by IPEC of pollutants or hazardous substances coastal area from the introduction of hazardous have not caused sub-lethal or lethal effects on wastes and other pollutants which bio- the Hudson River's aquatic biota and have not accumulate in the food chain or which cause bioaccumulated in aquatic food chains. IPEC significant sub-lethal or lethal effects on those is and will continue to be extensively regulated 17 Note that the August 15, 2012 revisions to SCFWH definitions in the NYCMP, including Hudson Highlands, are not applicable to the IPEC license renewal application. In its approval of those revisions, NOAA explained that "new and revised enforceable policies shall only be applied to applications for federal authorization filed after [NOAA]'s approval." Letter from J. Gore, NOAA, to G. Stafford, NYSDOS at I (Nov. 30, 2012)

(emphasis added).

19

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

resources. by NYSDEC. If and to the extent Policy 8 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is consistent with Policy 8.

9: Recreational Use of Fish No new construction or operational changes and Wildlife Resources are proposed as part of IPEC License Renewal.

Expand recreational use of fish and wildlife Data from recent creel surveys, data collected resources in coastal areas by increasing access through the Hudson River Biological to existing resources, supplementing existing Monitoring Program C'HRBMP") for over 35 stocks, and developing new resources. years, and analysis of IPEC's operations indicate that IPEC has not impeded existing use or development of the recreational fisheries. Policy 9 is inapplicable to IPEC License Renewal. However, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 9 if and to the extent it is deemed applicable.

10:Commercial Fishing No new construction or operational changes Further develop commercial finfish, shellfish, are proposed as part of IPEC License Renewal.

and crustacean resources in the coastal area by Data collected through the HRBMP for over 35 encouraging the construction of new, or years, and analysis of IPEC's operations, improvement of existing on-shore commercial indicate that IPEC has not impeded existing fishing facilities, increasing marketing of the development of commercial fisheries.

State's seafood products, maintaining adequate Therefore, if and to the extent that Policy 10 is stocks, and expanding aquaculture facilities. deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 10.

FLOODING AND EROSION HAZARDS 11 through 14-Siting Structures to Polices 11 through 14 are inapplicable to Mini mize Flooding and Erosion License Renewal. The IPEC site is not in a 11: Buildings and other structures will be sited NYSDEC -designated coastal erosion hazard in the coastal area so as to minimize damage to area, and only those facilities located property and the endangering of human lives immediately adjacent to the shoreline are caused b floodin g and erosion. within the 100-year floodplain. The remaining 12: Activities or development in the coastal portions of the site are outside the 500-year area will be undertaken so as to minimize floodplain. No new erosion control structures damage to natural resources and property from are proposed as part of License Renewal. If flooding and erosion by protecting natural and to the extent Policies 11 through 14 are protective features including beaches, dunes, deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is barrier islands, and bluffs. fully consistent with any relevant aspects of 13: The construction or reconstruction of Policies 11 through 14.

erosion protection structures shall be undertaken only if they have a reasonable probability of controlling erosion for at least thirty years as demonstrated in design and construction standards and/or assured maintenance or replacement programs.

14: Activities and development, including the 2

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

construction or reconstruction of erosion protection structures, shall be undertaken so that there will be no measurable increase in erosion or flooding at the site of such activities or development, or at other locations.

15: Mining2 Excavating 2 or Dredging Policy 15 is inapplicable to License Renewal.

Mining, excavation or dredging in coastal No maintenance dredging is proposed as part waters shall not significantly interfere with the of IPEC License Renewal. Any future natural coastal processes which supply beach dredging that may be required would be materials to land adjacent to such waters and implemented pursuant to applicable federal shall be undertaken in a manner which will not and/or State permits which would ensure that cause an increase in erosion of such land. any dredging would not cause coastal erosion or flooding.

16: Public Funding for Erosion Protection IPEC License Renewal would not use public Public funds shall only be used for erosion funds for erosion protective structures. Thus, protective structures where necessary to protect Policy 16 is not applicable to IPEC License human life, and new development which Renewal.

requires a location within or adjacent to an erosion hazard area to be able to function, or existing development; and only where the public benefits outweigh the long term monetary and other costs including the potential for increasing erosion and adverse effects on natural protective features.

17: Non-Structural Measures for Policy 17 is not applicable to License Renewal.

Flood and Erosion Control IPEC does not and will not require non-Non-structural measures to minimize damage structural measures to minimize damage to to natural resources and property from flooding natural resources and property from flooding and erosion shall be used whenever possible. and erosion. Ifand to the extent Policy 17 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 17.

GENERAL 18: Safeguarding the State's Vital Economic 1 IPEC License Renewal will protect the welfare Social and Environmental Interests of New York's citizenry by preserving and To safeguard the vital economic, social, and maintaining a virtually emission-free, reliable, environmental interests of the state and of its lower cost energy resource; important citizens, proposed major actions in the coastal employment opportunities; and financial area must give full consideration to those support to local communities.

interests, and to the safeguards which the state IPEC License Renewal will safeguard the has established to protect valuable coastal environment. IPEC License Renewal allows resource areas. New York State to address air quality standards, to address global warming, and to minimize the precursors to acid rain, while at the same time adequately safeguarding its environmental interests in the coastal zone. If 2

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

and to the extent that Policy 18 may be deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 18.

PUBLIC ACCESS 19 and 20 - Public Access Policies 19 and 20 do not apply to IPEC 19: Protect, maintain, and increase the level License Renewal. IPEC is an existing facility and types of access to water-related recreation and no new facilities or operations are resources and facilities. proposed that could interfere with public 20: Access to the publicly-owned foreshore access to publically-owned foreshore or and to lands immediately adjacent to the recreational resources.

foreshore or the water's edge that are publicly IPEC License Renewal will not reduce access owned shall be provided and it shall be to water-related recreational resources or the provided in a manner compatible with publicly-owned foreshore or recreational adjoining uses. resources. The only publicly-owned lands near IPEC are Lents Cove Village Parle and the Westchester RiverWalk. Lents Cove Village Park already has water access and the purpose of the Westchester RiverWalk is to link existing water-related recreational resources, such as Lents Cove and Steamboat.

If and to the extent Policies 19 and 20 are deemed applicable to IPEC, continued operation under IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policies 19 and 20. In fact, the many publicly-owned and publically-funded recreational areas in the vicinity of IPEC have been constructed or improved during the past 15 years with the indirect financial support of IPEC's payments-in-lieu-of-taxes .

RECREATION 21 and 22 -Water-Related Policies 21 and 22 are inapplicable to License Recreational Opportunities Renewal. If and to the extent deemed 21: Water-dependent and water-enhanced applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully recreation will be encouraged and facilitated, consistent with Policies 21 and 22. IPEC's and will be given priority over non-water- presence has not and will not impede continued related uses along the coast. development of water-related recreational 22: Development, when located adjacent to the opportunities, including boating access to the shore, will provide for water-related recreation, Hudson River from a variety of marinas in the whenever such is compatible with reasonably vicinity of IPEC, and numerous waterfront anticipated demand for activities, and is parks and trails.

compatible with the primary purpose of the development.

2

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

IDSTORIC AND SCENIC RESOURCES 23: Man-Made Historic, Archaeological and License Renewal will not result in any land Cultural Resources disturbance. Therefore, Policy 23 is Protect, enhance, and restore structures, inapplicable to License Renewal. The closest districts, areas, or sites that are of significance properties listed on the National or New York in the history, architecture, archaeology, or Registers of Historic Places are more than a culture of the state, its communities, or the mile from the perimeter of the IPEC site. Any nation. future on-site land disturbance at IPEC would adhere to procedures that assure the protection, enhancement, and restoration of the State's historic and culturally significant resources.

License Renewal is therefore fully consistent with Policy 23 if and to the extent Policy 23 is deemed applicable.

24 and 25 -Scenic. Natural and Policies 24 and 25 are not applicable to Manmade Resources existing facilities. IPEC License Renewal 24: Prevent impairment of scenic resources of includes no change of the aesthetic statewide significance. environment that would impair or lead to the 25: Protect, restore, or enhance natural and degradation of scenic resources. If and to the man-made resources which are not identified extent Policies 24 and 25 are deemed as being of statewide significance, but which applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully contribute to the overall scenic quality of the consistent with Policies 24 and 25.

coastal area.

AGRICULTURAL LANDS 26: Agricultural Lands Policy 26 does not apply to IPEC License Conserve and protect agricultural lands in the Renewal. IPEC is and will remain an state's coastal area. industrial site. The New York State Department of State has decided to exclude highly developed areas of the state, such as Westchester County, from its effort to map important farmlands in the coastal area of New York State.

ENERGY AND ICE MANAGEMENT 27: Siting and Construction of Policy 27 does not apply to IPEC License Major Energy Facilities Renewal since IPEC License Renewal does not Encourage energy conservation and the use of involve the siting or construction of a major alternative sources such as solar and wind new energy facility; IPEC is already sited and power in order to assist in meeting the energy constructed. IPEC supplies energy in an area of needs of the State. high demand and at a location on the transmission grid that relies on IPEC to supply the high voltage necessary to maintain grid stability The production of electricity at IPEC does not result in emissions of criteria air pollutants, GHG, or acid rain precursors. IPEC requires a shorefront location to withdraw the necessary water for cooling pu rposes and to 2

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

receive barge shipments of large equipment necessary for the production and transmission of electricity. If and to the extent Policy 27 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with this policy because continued operation of IPEC can serve as a reliable energy bridge to alternative energy I

sources.

28: Ice Management Policy 28 is inapplicable to License Renewal.

. Ice management practices shall not interfere IPEC has not experienced any issues

. with the production of hydroelectric power, associated with blockage of the intakes due to damage significant fish and wildlife and their ice. The use of ice curtain walls will not habitats, or increase shoreline erosion or interfere with the production of hydroelectric flooding. power, damage significant fish and wildlife and their habitats, or increase shoreline erosion or flooding. Ifand to the extent Policy 28 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 28.

29: Develonment of New IPEC already exists next to the Hudson River.

lndigenous Energy Resources Policy 29 applies to newly-proposed energy Encourage the development of energy facilities within coastal waters and is not resources on the outer continental shelf, in applicable to IPEC License Renewal.

Lake Erie and in other water bodies, and ensure the environmental safety of such activities.

WATER AND AIR RESOURCES 30: Industrial Discharge of Pollutants No change of existing operations is proposed Municipal, industrial, and commercial as part of IPEC License Renewal. IPEC's discharge of pollutants, including but not discharges are subject to the limits set by its limited to, toxic and hazardous substances, into SPDES permit; those limits are established to coastal waters will conform to state and ensure conformance with water quality national water quality standards. standards ("WQS"). If and to the extent Policy 30 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 30.

31: Triennial Reviews of WOS Policy 31 applies to NYSDEC's triennial State coastal area policies and management review of WQS and, therefore, is not objectives of approved local waterfront applicable to IPEC License Renwal. Policy revitalization programs will be considered 31 relates to NYSDEC's obligations to comply while reviewing coastal water classifications with the federal Clean Water Act ("CWA")

and while modifying water quality standards; and to consider Local Waterfront however those waters already overburdened Revitalization Programs and the New York with contaminants will be recognized as being State Coastal Management Program in doing 1

a development constraint. so.

32: Innovative Sanitary Waste Systems Policy 32 is directed toward municipalities Encourage the use of alternative or innovative and/or sewer districts. Entergy is not sanitary waste systems in small communities responsible for regulating the treatment and 2

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

where the costs of conventional facilities are disposal of sanitary wastes within Buchanan.

unreasonably high, given the size of the Therefore, Policy 32 does not apply to IPEC existing tax base of these communities. License Renewal.

33 and 37 - Best Management Practices No significant change of existing operations or

("BMP"} for Stormwater. Combined Sewer BMPs is proposed as part of IPEC License Overflows.and Non-Point Source Discharges Renewal. IPEC operates subject to applicable 33: Best management practices will be used to regulatory requirements pertaining to ensure the control of stormwater runoff and stormwater runoff and non-point discharge of combined sewer overflows draining into nutrients, organics, and eroded soils into coastal waters. coastal waters. If and to the extent Policies 33 37: Best management practices will be utilized and 37 are deemed applicable, IPEC License to minimize the non-point discharge of excess Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 33 and nutrients, organics, and eroded soils into Policy 37.

coastal waters.

34: Vessel Wastes No change in operations is proposed as part of Discharge of waste materials into coastal IPEC License Renewal. Entergy does not waters from vessels subject to state operate vessels at IPEC that discharge waste jurisdictions will be limited so as to protect materials into coastal waters. Therefore, significant fish and wildlife habitats, Policy 34 is not applicable to IPEC License recreational areas and water supply areas. Renewal.

35: Dredge and Fill Activities No dredging or filling is proposed as part of Dredging and filling coastal waters and License Renewal. Ifneeded, any additional disposal of dredged material will be undertaken dredging and filling during License Renewal in a manner that meets existing state permit would be undertaken pursuant to federal and requirements, and protects significant fish and State permits that impose the requisite wildlife habitats, scenic resources, natural conditions to ensure consistency with Policy protective features, important agricultural lands 35 and its objectives. Therefore, if and to the and wetlands. extent deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 35.

36: SQill Resgonse and Hazardous No change of existing activities at IPEC is Material Management proposed as part of License Renewal. The Activities related to the shipment and storage transportation and storage of petroleum of petroleum and other hazardous materials products and hazardous materials on-site at will be conducted in a manner that will prevent IPEC are subject to comprehensive federal and or at least minimize spills into coastal waters; State regulations. These laws and regulations all practicable efforts will be undertaken to were in the event a spill occurs, to mitigate its expedite the cleanup of such discharges; and effects in a timely and appropriate manner. If restitution for damages will be required when and to the extent Policy 36 is deemed these spills occur. applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 36.

38: Protection of Surface Water and No change of IPEC's operations is proposed as Groundwater Supplies part of License Renewal. The Hudson River The quality and quantity of surface water and and groundwater in the vicinity of IPEC are groundwater supplies will be conserved and not used as a source of drinking water. IPEC's protected particularly where such waters discharges to surface water are suject to 25

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

constitute the primary or sole source of water applicable State and federal requirements supply. which require compliance with WQS.

Therefore, if and to the extent Policy 38 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 38.

39: Solid Wastes and Hazardous Wastes No change in operations is proposed as part of The transport, storage, treatment, and disposal IPEC License Renewal. Entergy's solid waste of solid wastes, particularly hazardous wastes, management practices associated with the within coastal areas will be conducted in such a generation, transportation and storage of solid manner so as to protect groundwater and wastes, including hazardous and mixed wastes, surface water supplies, significant fish and are being and will continue to be conducted wildlife habitats, recreation areas, important pursuant to applicable federal and State agricultural land, and scenic resources. regulatory requirements, thereby ensuring the protection of the State's resources, including ground and surface waters, and fish and wildlife habitat. Therefore, if and to the extent Policy 39 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 39.

40:Steam Electric Generating Effluents in No change of IPEC's operations is proposed as Conformance with WQS part of License Renewal. Effluent discharges Effl uent discharged from major steam electric from IPEC are governed by a SPDES permit generating and industrial facilities into coastal issued by NYSDEC which requires that waters will not be unduly injurious to fish and discharges satisfy applicable water quality wildlife and shall conform to state water standards. If and to the extent Policy 40 is quality standards. deemed applicable to License Renewal, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 40.

41: Achieving National Ambient Air Quality IPEC's virtually emission-free energy Standards ("NAAQS"}and State Ambient Air production plays an important role in attaining Quality Standards (SAAQS"} NAAQS and SAAQS and thereby protects the Land use or development in the coastal area public health and environment. Without IPEC, will not cause national or state air quality other forms of electric generation would standards to be violated. increase, which would result in increased '

emissions. Therefore, IPEC License Renewal substantially advances the goals of Policy 41.

If and to the extent that Policy 41 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 41.

42: Reclassifying Prevention of Significant Policy 42 is directed at NYSDEC rulemakings Deterioration ("PSD"} Designations regarding air attainment classifications. IPEC Coastal management policies will be is not a "major source" and IPEC License

. considered if the state reclassifies land areas Renewal will not entail a "major modification pursuant to the prevention of significant at a major source" and does not trigger PSD deterioration regulations of the federal Clean requirements. Therefore, Policy 42 is Air Act. inapplicable to License Renewal.

26

APPENDIX A (Cont.)

43:Acid Rain IPEC plays a key role in meeting the power Land use or development in the coastal areas generation and energy needs of the State must not cause the generation of significant without contributing to the production of acid amounts of acid rain precursors: nitrates and rain precursors. Without IPEC, it would be sulfates. more difficult for New York to fulfill its commitment under Policy 43 to limit the causes of acid rain. If and to the extent that Policy 43 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 43.

WETLANDS 44: Tidal and Freshwater Wetlands Policy 44 is inapplicable to License Renewal.

Preserve and protect tidal and freshwater No filling or alteration of wetlands is proposed wetlands and preserve the benefits derived as part of IPEC License Renewal. Operation from these areas. of IPEC does not adversely affect NYSDEC-mapped tidal and freshwater wetlands or submerged aquatic vegetation beds within the i

Hudson River. No change to existing operations is proposed as part of IPEC License Renewal. Therefore, if and to the extent Policy 44 is deemed applicable, IPEC License Renewal is fully consistent with Policy 44.

27

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-17-018,_Consistency_Certification_for_Entergy_Nuclear_Indian_Point_2_and_Entergy_Nuclear_Indian_Point_3_License_Renewal_Application&oldid=2010460"