ML22215A236

Comment (037) from Peter Gebhardt on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning

ML22215A236
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	07/28/2022
From:	Gebhardt P - No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC/SECY
SECY/RAS
References
87FR12254 00037, NRC-2015-0070, PR-140, PR-20, PR-26, PR-50, PR-51, PR-52, PR-72, PR-73
Download: ML22215A236 (1)

Text

8/3/22, 10:13 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/3a123732-0af5-49df-ae4a-c6338bc53461 As of: 8/3/22 10:13 AM Received: July 28, 2022 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. l65-6auo-tscz Comments Due: August 30, 2022 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2015-0070 Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning Comment On: NRC-2015-0070-0229 Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning Document: NRC-2015-0070-DRAFT-0292 Comment on FR Doc # 2022-03131 Submitter Information Name: Peter Gebhardt Address:

Carmel, NY, 10512 Email: p.gebhardt@verizon.net Phone: 845-225-4076 General Comment I was never in favor of decommissioning the Indian Point power plant. This plant has provided safe and efficient power to the downstate area for many decades.

I spoke with assemblywoman Sandra Galef and told her that I was opposed to any waste from Indian Point being dumped into the Hudson River. General Electric dumped material from their plant into the Hudson and it has taken many years to clean up. I believe the clean up is still ongoing. No waste from Indian Point should enter the Hudson River.

Oversight should not be decreased by the NRC. It is important to have accurate tracking data for the spent fuel and where it will ultimately be stored.

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/3a123732-0af5-49df-ae4a-c6338bc53461 1/1