ML22215A065

Comment (030) from Evie Horton on PR-20, 26, 50, 51, 52, 72, 73 and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning

ML22215A065
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	07/26/2022
From:	Horton E - No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC/SECY
SECY/RAS
References
87FR12254 00030, NRC-2015-0070, PR-140, PR-20, PR-26, PR-50, PR-51, PR-52, PR-72, PR-73
Download: ML22215A065 (1)

Text

8/2/22, 9:44 AM blob:https://www.fdms.gov/87c337e3-da33-4c6a-9319-2f43be696fbc As of: 8/2/22 9:44 AM Received: July 26, 2022 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. l62-injc-k6tn Comments Due: August 30, 2022 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2015-0070 Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning Comment On: NRC-2015-0070-0229 Regulatory Improvements for Production and Utilization Facilities Transitioning to Decommissioning Document: NRC-2015-0070-DRAFT-0285 Comment on FR Doc # 2022-03131 Submitter Information Name: Evie Horton Address:

Brooklyn, NY, 11205 Email: eviekhorton@gmail.com General Comment I find any sort of loosening of regulations that would allow dumping waste into waterways deeply troubling and the criteria for safety of such an act alarmingly narrow. In the case of Indian Point, as another commenter stated, the Hudson is a tidal river that flows both ways. So this decision seems reckless even if lower elevation communities don't rely on water from the Hudson directly. De-regulation efforts like this seem extremely short sited and narrow in scope. Purposefully contaminating a waterway and citing the lack of communities' reliance on it seems, to me, to ignore the other possible negative environmental impacts. I believe it's in the best interest of all of us to rethink this section of the proposal.

Thank you.

blob:https://www.fdms.gov/87c337e3-da33-4c6a-9319-2f43be696fbc 1/1