ML050250306

Comment (86) Submitted by Dot Sulock on Petition for Rulemaking PRM 73-12, Upgrade the Design Basis Threat Regulations

ML050250306
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	01/19/2005
From:	Sulock D - No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC/SECY/RAS
Ngbea E S
References
+adjud/ruledam200505, 69FR64690 00086, PRM 73-12
Download: ML050250306 (2)

Text

DOCKET NUMBER ( (3 PETITION RULE PRIMT4DCEE From: Dot Sulock <dsulock@ unca.edu>

at- - _ _

19/7 C~ 4s 4 10am) m y DOCKETED USNRC To: <SEt;Y nrc.gov>

Date: Wed, Jan 19, 2005 3:25 PM January 21, 2005 (10:35 am)

Subject:

nuclear reactor safety from terrorists OFFICE OF SECRETARY Hi NRC, RULEMAKINGS AND As you know, our nuclear reactors are vulnerable to determined attack ADJUDICATIONS STAFF from land using short range missiles and from the air. Since you have the responsibility of ensuring the safety of the population, you need to do something about this. Spent fuel ponds, in particular, need to be protected from terrorist attack. The financial consequences of an attack on a spent fuel facility at Indian Point or one of the reactors near Charlotte would be incomprehensible. The exclusion zone at Chernobyl is about 1200 square miles. What is the value of Charlotte, NC or NYC if it had to be permanently evacuated? How would the govt pay for relocation? Dot Sulock, University of North Carolina at Asheville

5ECA1-0a-

i . I VI9 Mail Envelope Properties (41EEC24D.425: 3:13349)

Subject:

nuclear reactor safety from terrorists Creation Date: Wed, Jan 19, 2005 3:25 PM From: Dot Sulock <dsulock@unca.edu>

Created By: dsulock@unca.edu Recipients nrc.gov owf5_po.OWFNDO SECY (SECY)

Post Office Route owf5_po.OWFNDO nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 734 Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:25 PM Mime.822 1606 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard