ML20246L436
| ML20246L436 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/16/1989 |
| From: | Blaha J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| WIR-890310, NUDOCS 8903240177 | |
| Download: ML20246L436 (36) | |
Text
_ - _ _ _ _ _ .
Q '
k( $
March 16, 1989 For: The Commissioners From: James L. Blaha, Assistant for Operations, Office of the EDO
Subject:
WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT - WEEK ENDING MARCH 10, 1989 A sumary of e N events is included as a convenience to those Commissioners who may prefer a condensed version of this report.
Contents Enclosure Nuclear Reactor Regulation A Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards B Nuclear Regulatory Research C Analysis ana Evaluation of Operational Data D Governmental & Public Affairs E General Counsel F*
.. Administration G Information Resources Management H Controller I l Personnel. J Small & Disadvantaged Business Utilization & Civil Rights K*
Enforcement L Consolidation M Regional Offices N Executive Director for Operations 0*
Items Addressed by the Comission P Meeting Notices Q Proprietary or Other Sensitive Information (Not for R externaldistribution)
- No input this week.
,. ~@ !
l gg32cokk MOS" J nes L. Blaha, Assistant for Operations WEEKLYINFOREPT PNU , fice of the Executive Director for Operations
Contact:
1 James L. Blaha, OED0 492-17 kr) o
y a HIGHLIGHTS OF WEEKLY INFORMATION REPORT WEEK ENDING MARCH 10, 1989 Plutonium Air Transport On February 28 - March 3,1989, staff from SGTR and Lawrence Livennore National Laboratory met with representatives of the Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Devel-opmentCorporation(PNC)todiscussshipmentaircraft,shipmentconfiguration and package design in connection with the testing and administrative program for certifying p'utonium air transport packages to satisfy the Murkowski ,
Amendment. SGTR staff also met with representatives of the Japanese Science and Technology Agency concerning implementation of the Murkowski Amendment which places additional requirements on the shipment of plutonium by air through U.S. air space from one foreign country to another. Draft drop test criteria and crash test requirements are to be developed by July 15, 1989.
Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Plan On December 28, 1988 theU.S.DepartmentofEnergy(DOE)transmittedtothe NRCtheSiteCharacterizationPlan(SCP)fortheYuccaMountain,Nevadasite.
The staff completed its acceptance review of the SCP and has concluded that the SCP is acceptable for further examination. This review will culminate in issuance of the Site Characterization Analysis (SCA)., currently scheduled for July 28,1989.
Petition for Reconsideration and for Rehearing En Banc on Industrial Challenge to NRC Regulations for Uranium Mill Tailings in 10 CE,R Part 40-Update The U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, upheld NRC's regulations in 10 CFR Part 40, Appendix A in decisions filed on January 27, 1989. Basis of the petitioner's' case is that the cost-benefit analysis in the Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement was inadequate to sustain the criteria in the NRC's regulations. However, in a petition filed March 1, 1989, attorneys filed a request for reconsideration of the January 27, 1989 decision, and in the event the panel declines, that the court examine the case en banc. ;
1 Houston Lighting & Power Company HoustonLighting&PowerCompany(HL&P)enteredMode2(startup)for I South Texas Project (STP), Unit 2, at approximately 11 p.m. on March 9.
HL&P will commence a controlled approach to initial criticality by boron dilution and anticipates achieving initial criticality for Unit 2 late Friday morning, March 10, 1989. STP, Unit 2 received a fuel load / low power license on December 16, 1988. STP, Unit 1, began commerical operations en August 25, 1988.
1
1 4 l
)
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 q PILGRIM 1
The Region I Acting Regional Administrator, Mr. James Allan, signed a letter onMarch3whichapprovedreactorpoweroperationuptotwenty-five(25) percent of full power for the Pilgrim site. The approval was in accordance with the Boston Edison Company's (BECo) Power Ascension Test Program and )
.NRC Confirmatory Action Letter 86-10 and its supplements. !
The staff provided the Comission information regarding the contemplated approval to increase power on February 27, in accordance with SECY-88-346. l The information included the plant status, adequacy of licensee's activities ;
during the initial phase of operation, and the status of offsite emergency )
preparedness and progress being made.
The licensee and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts were notified by telephone of the approval letter by the Acting Regional Administrator. The NRC Restart staff at Pilgrim resumed around-the-clock inspection coverage on February 27.
SH0REHAM On March 3,1989, the Comission voted four to zero (Commissioner Curtiss did not participate in this matter) to dismiss Suffolk County, the State of New York ar.d the Town of Southampton as parties from all proceedings pending before the Commission or any of its subordinate adjudicatory Boards. The Comission further charged the Director of NRR to evaluate each outstanding contention that remains as a result of this dismissal and in a public meeting explain the resolution of each to the Comission.
The remaining NRC work activities prior to issuance of the full power license include:
a) An evaluation of each pending contention to determine whether and how each is resolved; b Development of findings relative to 10 CFR 50.57; c Completion of an operational readiness team inspection; d Completion of the Technical Specifications certification process; e Briefing for the Comission regarding the full power license.
McGUIRE, UNIT 1 At 11:45 pm on 3/7/89, McGuire Unit I was manually tripped from 100 percent power when a drop in the pressurizer level, increase in main steam line radiation, and increased charging flow revealed a primary to secondary leak of 100 to 150 gpm from the "B" steam generator. An alert was declared by the '
licensee at 11:45 pm. The licensee activated its onsite emergency response facilities and the NRC partially manned the Region II and Headquarters j MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE A
i- i Incident Response Centers. Radioactivity was released to the atmosphere from the steam jet air ejector and from three main steam power operated relief valves which opened for about three minutes. The licensee isolated the "B" '
steam generator and began cooldown and depressurization of the reactor coolant' sy stem. The maximum accumulated dose at the site boundary, calculated by the i licensee, was less than 0.001 mren. l The licensee began cooling down the plant using auxiliary feedwater and steeming to the condenser through the enaffected steam generators. As of 3:00 PM on 3/8/89, the primary system was at 330*F and 336 lbs, while the good steam generators were at 80 lbs; the "B" SG was at 289 lbs. The licensee expected to initiate RHR cooling momentarily, but pending the switch to RHR cooling, the Alert status was still in effect.
Preliminary post-trip review by the licensee indicates the pre-trip leakage may have exceeded 550 gpm which could be indicative of a tube rupture.
An AIT was dispatched to the site on 3/8/89 to address the licensee's actions ,
to secure the system.
SEABROOK UNIT 1 On March 8, 1989, Judd Gregg, Governor of New Hampshire, issued a news release stating his position that Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSNH) management not perform low power testing at the Seabrook plant unless it has obtained authorization for full power operation. Governor Gregg feels that ;
PSNH management would not be exercising sound business judginent to' do low power :
testing without such authorization. Governor Gregg intends to petition the l U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Hampshire to prevent Seabrook from performing such tests.
In considering other actions, Governor Gregg noted that his legal counsel advised against withdrawing New Hampshire's evacuation plans since such plans, which have been approved, "cannot effectively be withdrawn". 1 The applicants consider the Governor's action to be a request to delay low power testing and not an auion that indicates any opposition to the eventual operation of Seabrook Station.
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE A
i.
'd t
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 1 i
SAFEGUARDS Domestic j Conference on Structures for Enhanced Safety and Physical Security l A member of SGTR attended a three day conference in Arlington, Virginia, hosted by the American Society of Civil Engineers regarding the design and fabrication of structures of enhanced safety and physical security. Papers presented by U.S. D00 personnel, civilian engineering firms, and representatives of foreign organizations covered such subjects as aggression threats and tactics, the ;
security engineering design process, and observed effects of terrorist attacks !
on real structures. l Transportation l
Plutonium Air Transport l
On February 28 - March 3,1989, staff from SGTR and Lawrence Livermore National i Laboratory met with representatives of the Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Devel- !
opment Corporation (PNC) to discuss shipment aircraft, shipment configuration .
and package design in connection with the testing and administrative program i for certifying plutonium air transport packages to satisfy the Murkowski 1 Amendment. SGTR staff also met with representatives of the Japanese Science ,
and Technology Agency concerning implementation.of the Murkowski Amendment }
which places additional requirements on the shipment of plutonium by air 1 through U.S. air space from one foreign country to another. Draft drop test j criteria and crash test requirements are to be developed by July 15, 1989. 1 Application for TRUPACT II Shipping Package OnMarch3,1989,NuclearPackaging(NUPAC).submittedapartialapplication for certification of the TRUPACT II shipping package. To expedite the review process, the application for the TRUPACT II shipping package is being submitted in two phases. Phase 1 (the March 3 application) addresses only the proposed ,
package contents. Phase 2 will address the structural integrity of the package, and will incorporate the results of full-scale testing on prototype !
TRUPACT II packages. The second phase of the application will be submitted ,
after the test program is completed.
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE B
_ __ i
r __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
E l
Meeting on Model No. CNS 10-160B Transport Cask On March 1,1989, the Transportation Branch met with Chem-Nuclear Systems Inc.,
to discuss the Model No. 10-1608 shipping cask. The Model No. CNS 10-160B is a cylindrical steel and lead cask with foam-filled impact limiters on each end.
l The cask is being developed to transport various solid or dewatered radioactive materials and activated reactor components. The application is being reviewed by the Transportation Branch. Chem-Nuclear plans to provide the supplemental information.
LOW-LEVEL WASTE MANAGEMENT Petition for Reconsideration and for Rehearing En Banc on Industrial Challenge to NRC Regulations for Uranium Mill Tailings in 10 CFR-Part 40-Update l The U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, upheld NRC's regulations in 10 CFR ,
Part 40, Appendix A in decisions filed on January 27, 1989. Basis of the petitioner's case is that the cost-benefit analysis in the Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement was inadequate to sustain the criteria in the NRC's regulations. However, in a petition filed March 1, 1989, attorneys filed a request for reconsideration of the January 27, 1989 decision, and in the event the panel declines, that the court examine the case en banc.
INDUSTRIAL AND MEDICAL-NUCLEAR SAFETY Fuel Cycle Safety Nuclear Fuel Services (NFS) Inc., Erwin Tenn.
On March 1-2, 1989, NMSS and Region II staff met with an NFS representative to discuss nuc~1 ear criticality safety criteria for the NFS license renewal application. NFS will revise the criteria section of the proposed license conditions and modify the safety demonstration portion of the renewal application. Because of administrative problems, the schedule for revising ;
the renewal application has been extended by NFS to May 1989.
B&W Fuel Company (BWFC) - Commercial Nuclear Fuel Plant On March 6-7, 1989, representatives from IMNS and Region II met with BWFC '
representatives to discuss their pending license renewal. Topics of discussion included management controls, nuclear safety criteria, and environmental protection criteria. As a result of the meeting, 411 reassess established criteria ar.d submit a revision to the , application.
i 1
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE B
, r i
HIGH-LEVEL WASTE MANAGEMENT ,
Yucca Mountain Site Characterization Plan On December 28, 1988 the U.S. Department of Energy (D0E) transmitted to the NRC the Site Characterization Plan (SCP) for the Yucca Mountain, Nevada site.
The staff completed its acceptance review of the SCP and has concluded that the SCP is acceptable for further examination. This review will culminate in issuance of the Site Characterization Analysis (SCA), currently scheduled for July 28,1989.
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE B
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 Interagency Radiation Research and Policy Coordination Science Sub-Panel on Occupational Radiation Protection ,
The Science Panel of the Comittee on Interagency Radiation Research and Policy l Coordination (CIRRPC) recently approved the formation of a Science Sub-Panel on Occupational Radi6 tion Protection. The formation of this Sub-Panel has been actively supported by the NRC's representatives to the CIRRPC Science Panel and was recomended to the Science Panel by an ad hoc group including NRC representatives from RES and NRR. The Sub-Panel will provide a mechanism for member agency coordination in the occupational radiation protection research area and thereby. improve the effectiveness of such research.
This will be the sixth Science Sub-Panel. Previously established Sub-Panels ;
have responsibilities in the areas of radioepidemiology, high LET radiation, the scientific basis for radiation protection standards, human health effects, research plannirg for anticipated disasters, and ionizing radiation risk '
assessment.
Past cooperative efforts by Federal agencies have lacked the focus and level of attention that will be provided by the new Sub-Panel in exchanging information, identifying problems of mutual concern, prioritizing research to resolve such problems, identifying basic research results applicable to such problems, and preparing reports on its findings. This effort is expected to be of particular benefit to the NRC in that it will provide a forum to ,
influence the research conducted by agencies with somewhat 16rger radiation i protection research budgets; and may also lead to increased joint funding opportunities.,
The CIRRPC was< formed in 1984 by the Federal Coordinating Council for Science, Engineering and Technology under the chairmanship of the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy to coordinate Federal research and i '
policy. There are eighteen member agencies, including the NRC.
ACRS Subcommittee Meeting on Additional Applications of Leak-Before-Break (LBB)
Technology q On March 7,1989, the RES staff presented its recommendations and justifications 4 for applying LBB to ECCS and EQ as expressed in SECY-88-325 to the ACRS sub-committee on Thermal Hydraulic Phenomena . The staff did not recomend rule-making at this time with respect to using LBB to modify ECCS or EQ performance {
requirements. Presentations concerning the LP3 application were also delivered by toryNSSS vendors, (consultant utility) to ACRS . representatives, owners' groups and a national labora-A i for March 10, 1989. j Individual Plant Examination Workshop The Individual Plant Examinations (IPE) are a key part of the implementation of the Comission's Severe Accident Policy Statement. This Policy Statement 1
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE C
Q l called for systematic examinations of all plants to discover plant-specific l vulnerabilities to severe accidents. The staff issued Generic Letter 88-20 in November 1988 requesting these examinations and issued NUREG-1335, " Individual Plant Examination: Submittal Guidance", as a Draft for Comment in January 1989.
The stuff indicated in the Generic Letter that a workshop would be held to l' receive questions and comments on the IPE process and the submittal guidance.
The IPE Workshop was held February 28 through March 2,1989 at the Worthington Hotel in Fort Worth, Texas. The Workshop was attended by an estimated 350 representatives from the utilities, vendors, industry groups, consulting firms and the NRC staff and contractors. Re (GreatBritain,FRG, Japan,andSpain)presentativesfromfourforeigncountries also attended. The meeting was reported l by local news organizations. In addition to the IPE process, the workshop also 1 included discussions of staff plans for Accident Management, Integrated Safety Assessment (ISA) program and the relationship of the IPE to other parts of severe accident issue closure, such as the Containment Performance Improvement Program.
A wide range of comments and questions were received, reflecting various degrees of understanding of the intent of the IPE process and a wida range of utility .
experience with probabilistic safety analyses. Overall, tne workshop was viewed f as a very successful and informative meeting for all involved. The staff received significant constructive coments and numerous attendees expressed the opinion that the meeting had been very useful in explaining the IPE process. A transcript {
of the meeting and presentation material will be available and placed in the t Public Document Room.
The staff intends to carefully review the Workshop transcript and written I comments and questions received (requested by March 17,1989) on this matter.
Questions and connents will be factored in the revision of NUREG-1335 and will be addressed directly in a written response to the industry. The current schedule calls for NUREG-1335 to be revised and reissued by the end of May 1989. This will formally start the IPE process with initial utility !
responses concerning schedules ano plans for the IPE to be submitted to the I staff within 60 days following issuance of NUREG-1335. The bulk of the IPEs (
are expected to be completed within three years. j MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT
_ NUCLEAR PLANT AGING RESEARCH (NPAR) PROGRAM RESEARCH REVIEW GROUP MEETING Dates: March 21, 22, 23, 1989 Place: Crowne Plaza Holiday Inn 1750 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD (301)-468-1100 BACKGROUND:
The NRC Nuclear Plant Aging Research (NPAR) program is directed toward gaining knowledge and understanding of degradation processes within nuclear power i plants. This hardware-oriented engineering program is a rigorous and systematic investigation into the potentially adverse effects of aging on plant MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE C l
components, systems, and structures during the period of normal licensed plant operation, as well as the period of extended plant life that may be requested :
tr, utility applications for license renewals.
At the request of Guy A. Arlotto, Director, Division of Engineering, RES, a review group for Nuclear Plant Aging Research has been established. Its membership includes staff representatives from NRR, AE00, RES, and each of the five Regions.
PURPOSE OF THE MEETING:
In depth review of the NPAR program including contractors performance and accomplishments; obtain directions for future research; discuss ways to improve inter-office communications, establish interactions with the Regions and field inspection teams and enhance utilization of research results in the regulatory process.
For further information contact J. Vora, RES (301) 492-3854.
l MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE C
.- e L !
> l l
Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 Director's Office On March 9, E. L. Jordan met with Ron Callen from the State of Michigan and RIII personnel to discuss the Performance Indicator program.
Division of Safety Programs On March 10, 1989, the Director of Division of Safety Programs and a NRR representative met with GA0 representatives who are initiating a two month l preliminary survey of reactor event reporting and analysis. ,
Trends and Patterns Analysis Branch Pursuant to a working arrangement, the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INP0) has forwarded plant performance data to IRM. The data contains quarterly INPO performance indicator data (for part of 1988) for collective radiation exposure, unplanned automatic scrams, unplanned safety system actuations and forced outage rates for each nuclear power plant in ccuercial operation. i Nonreactor Assessment Staff On March 2, 1989, AE0D staff met with representatives from the American College of Nuclear Physicians at their request to discuss their interest in participating in AE00's video tape production on medical misadministration. AE0D stated that their interest is welcome, and currently arrangements are being made for their participation.
Incident Response Branch (IRB) i Shortly after inidnight on March 8, IRB staff members and other NRC staff entered i into an enhanced state of readiness to monitor an event that had occurred at the NcGuire Nuclear Power Plant Unit I at 11:45 p.m. on March 7. The event was caused by a' steam generator tube leak initially reported to be about 100-150 gallons l per minute. (Thisestimatewaslaterrevisedupwards.) The reactor was manually scrammed and the licensee declared an " Alert." Region 11 staffed their Operations Center led by Al Gibson. Dr. Thomas Murley headed the Headquarters !
Operations Center Team from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. and conducted a briefing of Commissioner assistances at 5:45 a.m. Dr. Murley's team included two reactor systems specialists, the project manager, two health physicists, and supple- t mental Operations Center support. Subsequently, an Augmented Inspection Team was dispatched to the site to investigate the event. r On March 8, IRB staff members met with NRR to finalize the Reactor Safety Team roster for the NRC Emergency Response Organization.
On March 8, IRB staff members assisted NMSS in organizing a visit to Andrews Air Force Base by ICRP No. 4 Committee members and NRC staff members to be briefed, and observe, DOE's radiological assistance capabilities.
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE D :
I
if l
l e 1
\' ]
Diagnostic Evaluation and Incident Investigation Branch !
The Brunswick Diagnostic Evaluation preparation continued. A meeting with AE0D, NRR and RII senior managers was held on March 8 to discuss the evaluation plan !
and T.he team's activities with respect to the Cresap effort. The plan was sent i to the EDO for approval. Several team. members will meet with RII on March 10 to attend the Cresap update presentation and discuss the Brunswick plant.
Background information is being sent to team members in preparation for the March 23-24 team meeting.
The Perry Diagnostic Evaluation Team completed a third week of onsite activities at Perry that began on March 5.
l MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE D
j ,
ITEMS OF INTEREST OFFICE OF GOVERNMENTAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS WEEK ENDING MARCH 10, 1989 STATE, LOCAL AND INDIAN TRIBE PROGRAMS Meetings with National Congress of American Indians Representatives l Rosetta Virgilio and Fred Combs, SLITP, arranged two meetings on March 8, 1989 between NRC, National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) and other Tribal representatives to discuss matters related to the high-level radioactive waste (HLW) program. The first meeting involved a 1 presentation by Robert Browning and Ken Kalman, Division of High-Level Waste Management, and general discussions on transportation issues with Charles MacDonald, Division of Safeguards and Transportation. Chip Cameron, OGC, and Ben Easterling, DOE, were also present.
The second meeting with Commissioner Curtiss and representatives from the other Commissioner offices focused on transportation issues, including notifications to Indian Tribes of HLW shipments through Indian lands, the Western Shoshone land rights struggle, and the Licensing Support System.
The need to establish a mechanism for communication between NRC and members of Nevada Tribes not formally designated "affected Tribes" under the Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 was discussed. The need for cross-cultural exchanges between NRC and the Tribes was also stressed.
California Radiation Control Program Review Joel Lubenau and Kathleen Schneider, SLITP, participated in the review of the California Radiation Control Program on March 6-10, 1989 in Sacramento, California. They found the State adequate and compatible.
An exit meeting was held on March 10, 1989.
Meeting with Michigan PUC Staff Member A. Bert Davis, Region III Administrator, and Edward Jordan, Director of the Office of Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, met with Ronald Callen of the Michigan Public Service Commission staff on March 9, 1989 in Glen Ellyn, Illinois. Discussions focused on the status of the Fermi-2 Atomic Power Plant and the Performance Indicator program.
I i
l l
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE E l
Office of Administration Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 Congressional Hearing on GAO Report ADM finalized testimony for Rep. Synar's Subcommittee hearing on GA0's report regarding NRC's Personnel Security Program. The hearing is scheduled for March 15, 1989. Hugh Thompson will testify.
Significant FOIA Requests Received by the NRC Request for records relating to the Nine Mile Point Unit 1 nuclear power plant contained in NRC's central files from January 1,1964 to December 31, 1974 and associated with the ACRS review of the issuance of the provisional operating license and/or the full-term operating license for Nine Mile Point.
(Mark J. Wetterhahn, Conner & Wetterhahn, F0IA-89-101)
Request for 11 categories of records regarding nuclear power plants in the State of Illinois. (Lawrence Malone, Individual, F01A-89-103)
Request for records relating to the Chernobyl accident.
SeanDonohue,andBrianCongleton, Students,FOIA-89-104)(PatGolden, Request for lists of Phase I and Phase II SBIR awards for 1985 through 1988.
(Walter Schick, Hoefer Scientific Instruments, F01A-89-106)
Drug Testing Program DCPM has awarded a Purchase Order directly to Tracor Technology Resources for onsite collection services for the drug testing program at NRC Headquarters.
I i
1 l
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE G 1
y ,
t Office of Information Resources Management Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989
- 1. Maintenance Rule The'0ffice of Management and Budget (OMB) rejected NRC's request for approval of the information collection requirements contained in the proposed rule, " Maintenance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants," because, absent the Regulatory Guide, it was impossible to assess the information collection requirements.
A meeting was held on 2/28/89 among representatives from RES, OGC and IRM .
to discuss OMB's concerns and the possible NRC resolution. It was agreed that a prompt response to OMB addressing each OMB concern and informing OMB that clearance of the information collection requirements will not be requested until the Regulatory Guide can be released for public commenti and OMB review is in order. A statement will be added to the final rule to indicate that OMB review of the information collection requirements has been requested and that the information collection requirements contained in the rule will not become effective until OMB has approved them.
- 2. Records Disposition Schedules for Research Records New records disposition schedules are being coordinated with the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES) and the Office of the General Counsel.
The schedules will replace those rescinded by the National Archives and Records. Administration (NARA) by Bulletin No. 88-02 because NARA found its General Records Schedule 19 covering research and development records-did not accurately reflect current recordkeeping practices for most of the records. Agency disposition schedules patterned after General Records Schedule 19 were accordingly rescinded.
- 3. Nuclear Documents System (NUDOCS) Data Base Addition An audit of LERS entered into NUDOCS has shown a better than 99% capture
. rate for the year 1987. TheDocumentControlBranch(DCB)willbeworking l with AEOD and/or the regional offices to obtain copies of any missing ,
LERS for incorporation into NUDOCS. !
s
- 4. Computer Security Training f On March 14, 15 and 16, IRM/0P/GSA will provide a three hour Security !
Awareness Training Seminar for all IRM employees. This training is i mandated by PL-100-235, The Computer Security Act of 1987. Employees will be required to attend one of the three training sessions. A rotice has been sent assigning IRM personnel to one of the three sessions.
- 5. Briefing for Connissioner Rogers I I
IRM presented a briefing for Connissioner Rogers and his staff on optical - l disk and full-text technologies. The briefing included a demonstration i MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE H
- _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _--- ___ _- ____ _ - _ _ ._ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ O
( ,
of NRC's full'-text system, NUDOCS, and how it is being used to support J
agency programs. Connissioner Rogers requested IRN to arrange a visit to - '
the Patent and Trade Office to see the PT0's optical disk project, p ,
l 6. -ReductioninPaperCampaign(RIP)FinalReport All office Records Liaison Officers have reported their reductions !
in response to the RIP campaign. A total reduction of 1,289 linear feet (15i tons) was achieved. 1,107 linear feet were destroyed and 182 linear feet are being prepared for retirement.
- 7. INP0 Documents The two INPO documents received have been processed. Data proviaed includes:
(4MR-350 " Valve Leakage Due to Improper Handwell Friction Clutch Adjustment" Booklet " Nuclear Professional - Monticello's Merlin Brant: ,
20 Years as Nuclear Professional," Vol. 4. No. 1, Winter 1989
- 8. Material Licensing Documentation Surge In-the last three weeks NUD0CS has received over 5,400 materials licensing documents for entry to the system. The size of this dramatic increase in d .snent flow has created several processing bottlenecks for i the Document 9atrol Branch and the NUDOCS operations, i ,
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE H
y ,
'(
('
Office of the Controller Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 o :
- 1. 1989 NRC Information Digej l The first annual " Nuclear Regulatory Commission Information Digest" i has just been published by DC as NUREG-1350. Vol. 1. Copies were distributed to all hRC branch chiefs and selected other NRC personnel, including resident inspectors. If you do not have a copy available j to you, and you need one, contact the Document Control Branch (IRM/DCB) on extension 27333. t t 2. Request for Exemption from DOE Order 2100.10A Certain provisions of the new DOE Order 2100.10A require changes in !
the funding profiles of NRC projects which are being carried out at DOE laboratories. Specifically, the order requires the NRC to provide funding for the current fiscal year p_lus the first three months of the :
following fiscal year. The NRC ControiTer has written to the DOE Controller requesting an exemption from this requirement for the NRC.
Pending the outcome of this request, NRC offices should continue to do business with the DOE laboratories as they have been prior to the issuance of the new DOE order. If NRC offices encounter any problems with this approach, they should contact OC/DilA.
i
- 3. Distribution of Revised NRC Manual Chapter 1301 i The latest version of MC 1301 has just been distributed. This manual chapter establishes the policies and procedures that govern the agency's long-range planning, budget formulation, and resource manage-ment durtng the implementation of the approved HRC Five-Year Plan.
NRC Appendix 1301 is under development by OC and will be issued later this year.
- 4. Third-Quarter User Fee (Part 171) Billines Third-quarter Part 171 billings with invoice date of April 1,1989, will be mailed on March 10. Payment will be due by April 30.
I l
i I
l MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE I i
Eu_-_______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-- !
e ,'
g.
.f j
i Office of Personnel Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 Arrivals The following new employees reported this week:
Stephen Matthew, Quality Assurance S j AstridLopez,ReactorEngineer(PFT)pecialist(PFT),NRR
, RI Raymor.d Walton, Resident Inspector (PFT), RIII t
Departures Francesta Thorne, Voucher Examiner (Data Transcriber) (PFT), ADM Barbara Dalrymple, Technical Assistant (PFT), NRR Frank McCoy, Asst. Dir. for.TVA Inspection Programs (PFT), NRR l
' Robert Stevens, Sr. Electrical Engineer (PFT), NRR John Stewart, Research Scientist (PFT), RES Rosalyn Arter, Office Assistant (PFT), RII Pamela Krause, Resident Clerical Aide (OPFT), RII i t
-l 1
ENCLOSURE J !
MARCH 10, 1989
Office of Enforcement Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 The following Significant Enforcement Action was taken the week of March 10, 1989.
A Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $2,500 was issued on March 8, 1989 to Computerized Medical Imaging, Inc.,
Eau Claire, Wisconsin. The action was based on failure to secure or maintain constant surveillance and immediate control of radioactive materials in an unrestricted area resulting in the theft of the material, failure to secure used generators stored in an unrestricted area, failure to properly evaluate personnel radiation doses, and failure to use lab coats or other protective clothing when handling radioactive material. (EN89-22)
The following Civil Penalties were paid the week of March 10, 1989.
- 1. Florida Power and Light Company (Turkey Point) paid the civil penalty in the amount of $100,000. The ection was based on the improper reposi-tioning of a security guard posted as a compensatory measure and his resulting inability to maintain surveillance over the area to which he was originally assigned. (EA88-267)
- 2. Wolf Creek Operating Corporation (Wolf Creek Generating Station) paid the civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. The action was based on an event in which erosion reduced the pipe wall thickness of a section of the Essential Service M ter system piping to below that rsquired by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASflE) code minimum thickness andpotentially(EA88-282) requirements. rendered the piping unable to meet design basis seismi
- 3. Precision Logging and Perforating Company, Cleveland, Oklahoma paid the civil penalty in the amount of $500. The action was based on numerous safety violations including (a) failure to complete required surveys, (b unsecured material, (c) failure to post required documents, (d unavailable records, (e) missing shipping labels and papers, and (f improper storage of licensed material. (EA87-184) l t
)
)
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE L
i
.. . I Office of Consolidation !
Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 Subcommittee Hearing on Child Care On Wednesday, March 8, a member of the CONS staff attended the Government Activities and Transportation Subcommittee hearing on " Child Care in Federal Buildings: GSA Oversight." In his testimony before the subcommittee, Richard Austin, Acting Administrator, GSA, reiterated GSA's commitment to establish on-site day care facilities for federal employees where the need has been demonstrated. Robert Tobias, National President, NTEU, who also spoke before the subconnittee, pledged the union's continued support for child care in the federal sector.
i l
I 1
i l ~
l 1
I i
l f
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE M i
. s Region I Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 l
- 1. On March 6, representatives of Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company were in the Region I Office to attend a Closed Security Meeting to discuss Maine Yankee's Security Program Enhancements.
- 2. On March 7, representatives of Public Service Electric and Gas Company (Salem 1 & 2) were in the Region 1 Office to attend a Management Meeting to discuss Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance initiatives.
- 3. On March 9, representatives of Boston Edison Company (Pilgrim) were in the Region 1 Office to attend a Management Hecting to discuss licensee followup to the March 4, 1989 scram.
- 4. On March 9, representatives of Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (Haddam Neck) were in the Region I Office to atteno a Management Meeting to discuss requalification examinations.
i l
l MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE N l
_ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . l
i Region II Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989 ,
- 1. On March 6, Mr. Arie de doooe, Reactor Safety Inspector, The Netherland's l Ministry for Social Affairs and Employment, begins his eight-week tour in l the Region II Office. While in the Region, Mr. de Joode will be attending i the Regional Meeting of Resident Inspectors, observing our SALP process, and accompanying the Operational Safety Team Inspection at the Duke Power Company's Catawba facility. For more information regarding Mr. de Joode's visit, refer'to Regional Office Notice No. 0102.
- 3. On March 6, representatives of the Florida Power Corporation are in the Region II Office to attend an Enforcement Conference at 1:00 p.m. to discuss the undersized'Asco solenoid valves issue and the potential failure of four containment isolation valves at their Crystal River Nuclear Power Station.
- 4. During the week, a Headquarters audit team was in the Region to review Regional Operator Licensing activities.
)
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE N
Region IV Items of Interest Week Ending March 10, 1989
- 1. Meeting with General Manager, Texas LLW Authority The General Manager of the Texas Low Level Waste Authority met on March 7, 1989, with the Director, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards, Region IV, to describe the status of Texas' efforts to establish a low 4 level waste disposal site.
- 2. Commissioner Rogers Visit to Louisiana Facilities Commissioner Rogers, accompanied by his assistant and the Region IV Deputy Regional Administrator, toured the River Bend Station. nuclear plant near St. Francisv111e, Louisiana, on March 9 and the Waterford 3 nuclear plant near New Orleans, Louisiana, on March 10.
- 3. Houston Lighting & Power Company Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P) entered liode 2 (startup) for South Texas Project (STP), Unit 2, at approximately 11 p.m. on March 9.
HL&P will commence a controlled approach to initial criticality by boron dilution and anticipates achieving in'itial criticality for Unit 2 late Friday morning, March 10, 1989. STP, Unit 2, received a fuel load / low power license on December 16, 1988. STP, Unit 1, began commerical operations en August 25, 1988.
- 4. Nebraska Public Power District The president and CEO of NPPD has approved plans for an increase in the Nuclear Power Group by 83 positions. This increases the district's staffing .in support of Cooper Nuclear Station from 469 to 545, not including consultants. Approximately 28 of these positions will be assigned to the engineering organizations. The stated purpose of this increase was to reduce NPPD's dependence on consultants and vendors.
- 5. South Texas Project, Unit 2 j 1
Congressman Greg Laughlin (D-Tex) of the 14th Congre sional District and his aide, Ken Bryan, will visit South Texas Project (STP), Unit 2, on Saturday morning, March 11, 1989. The proposed itinerary includes a tour of the STP site training facility, a tour of STP, Unit 2 (excluding containment), and lunch with Houston Lighting & Power Company officials j at the Bay City (Texas) Country Club. The 11RC Senior Resident Inspector j will meet Congressman Laughlin when he arrives onsite and will be avail- l' able during his visit. STP, Unit 2, received a fuel load / low power license on December 16, 1966, and anticipates achieving initial criti-cality on liarch 11, 1989. STP, Unit 1, began commercial operation on l August 25, 1988. l l
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE N j
e Houston Lighting & Power Company continues preparation for initial criticality at South Texas Project (STP), Unit 2. Replacement of power l supplies for three of four power range nuclear instruments and repair !
.of a seal leak associated with one of four reactor instrument port column assemblies has delayed startup until early tomorrow morning.
I l
l l
l l-i I
MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE N i
L
l i
Region V Items of Interest Week Ending March -10,1989 I
- 1. Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 3 An Augmented Inspection Team was dispatched to Palo Verde Unit 3 on March 3, 1989 to review the March 3, 1989 Unusual Event (PNO-V-87-07, 07A). In that event, the plant tripped following a grid disturbance which resulted in a load rejection, reactor trip, loss of forced reactor coolant circulation, and failure of atmospheric duirp valves to operate from~the control room or remote shutdown panel. A Confirmatory Action Letter was issued to the licensee on March 3, 1989 to require a complete investigation of the event prior to restart. A second Confirmatory Action Letter was issued on March 7, 1989 to require that significant lessons learned from Unit 3, and from a less complicated reactor trip at Unit 1 on March 5, 1989, be promptly incorporated into operations of Units 1 and 2. Unit 1 is currently shutdown to review its trip, and Unit 2 is at full power.
- 2. Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station The Regional Administrator and Region V staff met with SMUD on March 2, 1989 at Rancho Seco to review Rancho Seco's readiness to restart following the January 31, 1989 auxiliary feedwater system overpressurization event. The licensee expects to certify readiness for restart fiarch 9 or 10,1989, 1
1 MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE N
, ' ~.-
l l
c' ITEMS ADDRESSED BY THE COMMISSION - Week Ending March 10, 1989 A. . STAFF REQUIREMENTS - AFFIRMATION / DISCUSSION AND VOTE, 3:30 P.M., THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1989, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) - SECY to V. Stello, Jr., i EDO dated 3/6/89 i
I. SECY-88-204 - Final Rule on Emeraency Prenarednras for Fuel Cycle and Other Radioactive Material Licensees The Commission, by a 3-2 vote,* approved (with Chairman Zech and Commissioners carr and Rogers agreeing) a final rule which upgrades emergency preparedness requirements for fuel cycle and i other radioactive taterial licensees, as modified on the attached page.
Commissioner Roberts disapproved the rule, he would have approved a rule based on more realistic assumptions.
Commissioner Curtiss disapproved,. indicating that he' believes that the justification for the action proposed is exceedingly weak.- His separate comments, to be published with the rule are attached.
The rule,-as modified, should be returned for signature and publication in the Federal Register.
B. STAFF REQUIREMENTS - BRIEFING ON STATUS OF PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEVELOP-MENT, 9:20 A.M., WEDNESDAY, MARCH 1, 1989, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, ONE WHITE FLINT NORTH, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE) -
SECY to V. Stello, Jr., EDO dated 3/9/89 The Commission was briefed by the staff on the status of efforts to develop indicators of power reactor performance.
The Commission complemented the staff for their excellent work in developing additional indicators of licensee / plant safety performance.
Chairman Zech and commissioner Carr encouraged staff to continue developing additional maintenance effectiveness indicators to include balance of plant performance.
Commissioner Rogers requested to be informed of cases in which the indicators do not detect known problems.
- Section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 5841, provides that action of the Commission shall be determined by a " majority vote of the members present."
Commissioner Rogers was not present when this item was affirmed. In order to allow the will of the majority to prevail, commissioner Roberts did not participate in the formal vote. Accordingly, the formal vote of the commission was 2-1 in favor of the decision. Commissioners Rogers and Roberts, however, had previously indicated that they would respectively approve and disapprove this paper and had they been present they would have affirmed their prior votes.
1 MARCH 10, 1989 ENCLOSURE P
A t r n n i
- T e e a o f
_ N l b d s O a w a i t
_ C c e h d e S N T E k R c R . . . . o N D S M G d
_ e v
i
_ t
_ . c l o e p
/ aC TS r s NE ec C L e AE ni L & r CD er E P P IN Gt C P F e
_ LE / c / / / h PT C e C C C t PT Rl R R R AA NE N N N n
. i s
e d ri nt e n E i t ocE c gsG ei ieC c a ni hl sj s ti l o seR'C .k ti c nurr soe n o
nt i s p
sdNscna ocpu i oi d u saof i s t t Pl n ct eeb ti mu c i a onh c nt aDef A yb fet oeos n l g
ea e d rdie i af kb . l .
l i d pi t t m So n rot b 4 l cn va i g i s
urn a 2 i canomR l nf g TPe l 4 S
wa RipoB orrW Ei on t i n
e eas m i a
7 E newt fS sess c . h s v 2 C 9 orb aon set n . is t re a 9 I 8 i eAcsid aMl es Le os 4 T 9 E sv il n p uct l sfs y O 1 S seefada n
ynsic wu s us A l c
g n
N O ushi B g el e ed P c ttl uR ir j ie cnk i i G 0 R se rl oW Ds do vh sas l l N 1 U i hf eirB Tef nr ec il i b l I P Dt o c w gA RDoap RS D pR u a T h p c E c E r e y M a d b M a R r d R e N e n b i
. a
. & l s t o l m b o
Ce5 r i o u2 g
. e g
. wor e cn1 w s i e5 d o d gt b
rv9 l P l tA B y B nn n c A an i e a erC t i a t t m c l e n3 np n3 eu En , i1 am vo i 1 ec mod s
e N t e l - l -
O l rs FB l C FB c I auo 4 y 6 e i T rCJ e st e sc t A e t m nh t m ei o C n5n io ng io hl n O e7a h o ei ho tb g.
L G1S WR PL WR u fp n o i l t sa e ec e i o m R 5 / / rl E 0 78 01 a e B 6 88 55 md s M N - 33 22 mn e U T0 - - ua h N S5 0 0 s t 5 5 C fR f oN o 0 0 E 0 0 0 0 se g M 0 : 3 : eh n I 9 : 91 9 : 9 92 it i T 85 81 83 8 81 p t
/ / - / - / - / / - on s E 30&40 30 40 40 Ci i T 10 10 13 13 13 l A / : /: /: /: /:
D 39 39 31 38 38
- A 5E3 5 38 ?
EP{'Ao 2
T C
A T y e k r d N o n o
O C o a C c t l o M S C H R .
R . . .
N M J R D y r g e er a . w se io o
/ un c hC P p
TS oE i l c e NE h l k .
AE grs b ei CD nam u d r uo I N iee P at DC LE /tl t / /l c /
PT C scs C Cie C PT R euy R Rhl R AA NWNS N NPE N 1 s r d e a
. r yre t n i e s a t oc i o ttl e dsif n1 ndo . e iac d snnl a Uat rsr v u o cnaoisl m o eni isn C i otibnl e fl spoF ft e e riStaoil o e n pi ocvs ss aciea R aots uc e. t rcecitvS s l Cas . s a ti 'y oi eehili r t ,P cus ugan h n G S t f pd uo l s rice t nia go ipnSt und el su aitp nr f" cao sont pi s t sim it o ,f oepe C d "s n
eiaamDs rt wI I snno eiC
- t u 9 S se n 0 0. S h g a nt csd ) ec E eN o - tn senescn spoes o hi yr tl te .
C 9 W i 74l anton ine usiFu i ews I 8 d t8 c .t ssfon T 9 E se a d coiie cnt O 1 S sc crni mt r . sI ces2c suaP o M O un i ean)i ai2 i eci e uos i
, P ca l t hSL ru Dlj uDtt ci et G 0 R sv cT e qd eod i o srdk a N 1 U id p pe t 0. e S f p e n ) ure) nr ianut I P DA AL3T( oORa aFPRbUP DvaDs T h E c E r M a M
R R
N
. h h g t t d r r l o o B N N C eN t3 t1 t1 t n1 i ,
n1 n1 i - i - i - Ss N lB l B lB u O F0 F4 F4 ei I 1 1 1 rl T e e e tm ie un A t m t m Gr C i o ic i o O h o h o h o co L WR WR WR MC
//
/ / /705 R 21 23 9071 E 71 55 6234 B 23 33 2///
M - - 094 U 0 0 0761
_ N 5 5 5234
_ 0
_ E 0 0 0 M : 0 0 I 92 9 : 9 9:
T 8 - 84 8 83
_ / /0 /- / / -
E 40 40 50 60
_ T 1 : 10 10 10
/: /:
A /0 /:
31 38
- D 31 31
_ $j g 8$ .E0 35m S
A n T i N g g O n g C o i L W R
R . .
N W D t
h h c ag cr . ni ia o aL
/ re C i TS tse sd NE cet c i n AE eR ui uay CD l t r c n IN Erit Lra LE /et c /ep PT Cwse Cwm PT Ronl Roo AA NPIE . NPC g
n '
i s sf mt t t neod an ,
a nwd n re s e eousa gd oi cm i r ,y
,H nvdl e-oet cct .
rce l e l tt unnnd r gh i eer pch .bT noin atrsu erl e ens rto d etP ed gti m di 8enf neot n cnonb n rd o8fi r artaeRraroai Ort 9f e gvg e WmWueL osy dCl a ot Cgs a 1i nt doa nent rASnHdon R esy W i sihi . o nC o Nroang
- f tgu: ,i ,a c l Monf S efaiqsl t s s ot io E iol Lenapenit t nonsd C 9 r e Rooml orc etit ng I 8 bwrd iGuuib e em nan T 9 E e- ers srter seggeti O 1 S siscosysdaDi ncnnmst N O uvent utAnr D oriiera
, P t ruacce uee podl t er G 0 R aesvasfAonrd sf aoad e N 1 U t vsaeiaR reon eneot np I P SoiARDSPGGCa REl csuo T h E c E r M a M
R R
N h c
r ae eu3 sn0 ee3 .
Rv4 g A9 d r l ewA B weC oi t1 P v , n1 l o i -
N cl t l B O iil F0 I rHA 1 T t e A c2o t m C e1l io O l4a h o L E3P WR R 2 E 8 B 3 M 9 -
U 6 0 N 6 5 E 0 M 0 I 9: 9 T 85 8
/ / - /
E 60 00 T 13 20 A /: /:
D 38 32 I
5Rx g_ g$
,I EPS5 o
8 A a h n h n K9 T l g o g a E1 N l i D i m E O e e c e a W ,
C r m a m r 0 G E M E G E1 C H R . . . . .
Th N A C C C R c
Rr Oa f FM , h f s
p g a i t ees e s C tRf m R R u f E aCN T tda tR G irt . dtN ,
S tas C ne n so ai ,a
/ ,
nBC & rni ST a h g
I R fanm EN l yN h fMau EA l i ng t a md DC e e rr& i t nar NI r m ee m sira EL G E tnL S tGY TP sEN Er TP . . e L . Oa . .
AA A C W L C DMRJ N n O on e .
I n io h T o ti t ce S.
A at g iU T e ca l nnt R rt im a iooe O ua fr d t nh e P t io o eA t e S cn rf M eEt t N eo en mArn t S A li vi n I oi i E R t o a h m C T day An dss m I ett Eg g nn n o T D tri Ai n iaf o C O N i os I s iB oi N A vpr e tE eA t g nse ed eI tSsc n G S i nv t ay M eW aCse pA e p i
r N D ai I R rrn nt h i c ,en ns e T A etU ii lt e E U v dl ai iS vi t E G E S
irs l ar ri oc cw tOi rDtm Sg n
M E i F O eee oa ny a co Si S A P dl g cf hd ph ed St S S R ct cu tf n Me M U ouu of et oif a Me N F P TnR To TS Twer NM O
J A A N N V, V, O , g , g I
S k r o r N I c u c u T V i b s b I w h i h ,
D s c c c e N n n n n g O u y a y d I r L r L i T B F R A , ,
C w W n W k O e & aA & a L N B SC B O TR EE KB CM OU DN 9
8
/
4 4 5 7 1 1 1 1 E 3 3 4 5 6 T 1 1 1 1 1 A / / / / /
D 3 3 3 3 3 3!# S kc$l e
_ A h t A
_ T c r T N o e N
_ O R b O
_ C a o C L R C C R . . R N
_ N G J
_ l a
_ l c
_ ye i
_ Bt vh m S eece
_ MfLnh I a aC
, Swr oB w
/ eel o s /
ST hl lD t ST EN cc a r EN EA oy cf e G EA DC RChi o b N DC NI a cn o I NI EL Ll nh s R N EL Y TP eacp O TP T TP .uree . I TP E AA GFBTR J S AA F S A I S n M
. go l M R ni e p O A it u u C E - na Fon E L wofrc t ry D C otoei r ,ut U L cl a D N hl np e .bi l N dcaop l ora A L nncca cCoc A aai u fi T C
I rm yB en0
,2 Nt nei t N E
D t h a3 hecr M E elCg smnc i ea E
G M fa i0 acWh2 dgwl A D Si0c eaoe N 2 N nDil wnl u A A eh Ma Salf M l ch n Ma L cet ,i h ts E A E yTidf tesni T E I S C wnar it ses wsupy S
A S
O R O l T P l etli acsl W P S R eved e gW s a R U U ueeih t inn L U D P FL mMt M&dia E P N V I E L
F 3 3 -
O 1 1 W
- - O N B B L O - -
I 6 6 F S O I N m m N V O o R N O I I o O I D T R , I T A - N S A C 1 F I C O F W V O L W G I L D
TR TR EE 7 EE KB 1 KB CM - CM OU 0 OU DN 4 DN 9 9 8 8
/ /
E 3 0 E e T 1 2 T n A / / A o D 3 3 D N gh .gg $9O
d T e N n O n C e K
C R .
N J
/ f ST ff EN af EA ta DC st NI s EL M TP WE TP LO AA HD T
N A E Q M
E n G o A
N g A n M i t
E e T e S M A
W y l
L h E t 3 V n E o L M H E E G S O I O D H P /
R C F U R O P N N
)
i e S ncne I iiovV V afiiN I tft r D nOnD ,
u e s N otvra O Mcneg I eot e T ajC nV A co e C cr1Cs O uP0 a L Y 1 l TR EE KB CM OU DN 9
8
/
E 2 T 2 A /
D 3 Bg o" y w PO Ao
_ C o n n
_ A s h h a p a
T p g g l l
- N m u u t p t e e O o o o i C h l l w r w T B B S T S
_ C
_ R . . . . . .
N T R R P L P
/ -
ST D C G
_ EN L L E P &
_ EA C & & N A E
_ DC R P P O Y S NI J P P C M P EL / / / / / /
TP C C C C C C TP R R R R R R AA N N N N N N g
g n n i i r n g s de sd r rvt se e n ss aoc un c i un g u cr n n co eld sat o r si roo i ex c e it rr dl e e c da et p n et n e n S cny os ca on c oi E nob tne nr coi n t m C ec oh e e gx a
I r d gst rn gt r T efe ns fo ew ir na f
e nE O fos ief e i N n n tl og nd ta n t n ose e a ol ep o eo G Csc eeet Co ee C ei N E oi Mgpu o Ms it l
I S tll aoo tc t a T O n- - -
tt c n tl n tc E P egys nusd ee na e ni E R mnll eo e mv ec m e
ef mi M U eil a m el ei mi P crai eth u cs er c r
el ga I rrrr gntd rs gt R ouee ae e oe ac o au f cnt ncdh fc ne f nq neea aenc nx al n ae Ergm Mras Ee Me E MR e e e e e e N c c c c c c i i O i i i i f
I f f f f f T f f f f f f A O O O O O O C I I I O I I I L R R R R R R 1
0 TR 0 78 78 7 9 4 EE 0 88 88 4 0 5 KB 9 33 33 2 3 3 CM 9 - - - - - - -
OU 9 00 00 0 0 0 DN 9 55 55 5 5 5 E . .
- m. m. m.
M 9 m. 9 9 9 9 I 8a 9 8 m. 8 m. 8a 8a 8a T / /p /p / / /
/ 10 1 1 30 90 90 E 23 20 20 20 20 20 T /: /0 /0 /: /: /:
A 30 3: 3 : 30 30 30 D 01 01 01 01 01 01 3Nx 5, eE EP85 *
[ l l; r! !
l l
1 T C r A e 0 T t s s t t 1 N s e e s e O n y y n n h C r e e r b c E R R E E r C a R M N r
ot s ,,t n Q rs t sae df H or f nrrdf nf io df ectif aa d nt na mtssa
,t n ec at eaiet a S e S grnRS A. S s ds p A aei n p m ol nI I r RI nI I e nn DI aOd ea
/ ,R Rb aI ,R l
f At n ST m k co EN ed de tt ed ecl ei EA ees eM nn ees eial g DC str t ee st r nce swnee NI nce cf dd nsosR EL eeb ef ii eeb eni TP cl m l a ss cl m c u gd d TP i ee et ee iee i renn AA LsM SS RR LsM LBR aa y -
e y i e E &k t tst C
I gru r
gl i 'sr - rri eoS T net ni o n Ct O iw ic t o ak N t o- ta c iy f rc eP y eF e tt oei pw G e yt e p ai N Mani Me s tl nOs I dal e n ni o n T ti pi d n I ec i ou E nrmc ro sa ttr E eooa ac t eF a B M E ml CF oO ng r t s S eF B en Pr nee I O g tt - di e eth I P ahh n P it P m sat R R nt gi LC se Lm ec U aiio AP ee Au rit P MwLP SD RM SS Pfa C
S
, C e M l
e e l ,
L c c i t N F i i v r O f f s o I , f f n p T i O O i h A m k t C a I I n u O i I I e o L M R R J S TR EE KB CM CU DN E
_ M 9 9 4 9 9
_ I 8 8 2 8 8
_ T / m / - / /
/ 6 p 0 1 8 9
_ E 10 2 2 2 2 T /0 / / / /
A 3 : 3 3 3 3 m
_ D 01 0 0 0 0p fNI . ;8 I
- mMGaA
C l l
V a I C R J
/
TS NE C AE R CD N IN /
e p
o o
C D h E t L i U w D
E e H c C F n S S e O r S P e G R f N U nn I P oo T Ci E t E ta M nt eS V m I er ca R
re ol fc nu EN V
N I O
I n T o A i g
OU 0 DN 5 9
8 9
1 0
1 h
c E 3 r T 2 a A /
M D 3 3E $ E$ 2aN5m i
y r
r
~
e T b C n A e T k N l O u C a F
C R .
N B y
r
/ r ST e EN b EA n DC e NI k EL l TP u TP a AA F S t E gi C ns I ii T tv O
npm a N
E iia G S ce N O yit I P rt T R rrt E U ean E P b pe M n m eve V kI g l a N unn O aoa I Fim G g E .en R BRi V
N I O
I n T o A i C g O e L R TR EE KB CM OU DN 9
E 8 M /
I 1 T 3
/ -
E 7 T 2 A /
D 3 IMx 5, G$ EPS5m 5
l
!l ,