ML20236L983
| ML20236L983 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 07/06/1998 |
| From: | Lanning W NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Durr J, James Trapp, Travers W NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned), NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP) |
| References | |
| 50-423-97-83, NUDOCS 9807130252 | |
| Download: ML20236L983 (105) | |
See also: IR 05000423/1997083
Text
-_-
_ - - _ _ _ - _ - _ . _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
[.
1
July 6,1998
i
i
l
j.
MEMORANDUMS 0:
DISTRIBUTION
l
originalsigned by:
FROM:
Wayne D. Lanning, Deputy Director of Inspections
Special Projects Office, NRR
SUBJECT:
OSTI INFORMATION REQUEST DATA BASE
(INSPECTION REPORT 50-423/97-83)
i.
.
l
The attached is a copy of the data base used by the licensee to track the questions asked
'
during the OSTl. A summary of the licensee's responses is also provided.
]
~
This data base is being made publicly available because some of the requests for
l
information were provided to the licensee by team members on written question / answer
forms.
'
,
I.
Attachment: Millstone Unit 3 OST) Inspection Summary Report-Request Number
Distribution w/o attachment:
W.' Travers, SPO .
'
J. Durr, SPO
J. Trapp, DRS
D. Screnci, PAO
y(O\\ '
,
i
,
e
%. j
.
!
9807130252 990706
ADOCK 05000423
I
G
L_-_-__-_-_-_________
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-____
. _-_
._
-
_ _ - -
_ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _
2
Distribution w/o attachment:
B. Kenyon, President and Chief Executive Officer - Nuclear Group
M. H. Brothers, Vice President - Operations
J. McElwain, Recovery Officer - Millstone Unit 2
J. Streeter, Recovery Officer - Nuclear Oversight
G. D. Hicks, Director - Unit 3
J. A. Price, Director - Unit 2
D. Amerine, Vice President - Human Services
E; Harkness, Director, Unit 1 Operations
J. Althouse, Manager - Nuclear Training Assessment Group
F. C. Rothen, Vice President, Work Services
J. Cantrell, Director - Nuclear Training (CT)
j
.
S. J. Sherman, Audits and Evaluation
L. M. Cuoco, Esquire
J. R. Egan, Esquire .
1
V. Juliano, Waterford Library
J. Buckingham, Department of Public Utility Control
S. B. Comley, We The People
State of Connecticut SLO Designee
D. Katz, Citizens Awareness Network (CAN)
R. Bassilakis, CAN
J. M. Block, Attorney, CAN
S. P. Luxton, Citizens Regulatory Commission (CRC)
Representative T. Concannon
E. Woollacott, Co-Chairman, NEAC
B.' Jones, P!MB/ DISP
l
1
!.
u
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - - -
- . - - - - - _ - _ _ - - _ _ - - - -
- _ _ _ _ - - _ -
. _ - - -
l
l
!
3
L
Distribution w/ attachment:
Region i Docket Room (with coov of concurrences)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
PUBLIC
FILE CENTER, NRR (with Oriainal concurrences)
SPO Secretarial File, Region I
i
NRC Resident inspector
Distribution w/o attachments (VIA E-MAIL):
M. Callahan, OCA
R. Correia, NRR
B. McCabe, OEDO
E. Imbro, Deputy Director of ICAVP Oversight, SPO, NRR
l
P. McKee, Deputy Director of Licensing, SPO, NRR
!
S. Reynolds, Chief, ICAVP Oversight, SPO, NRR
D. Screnci, PAO
4
L
Inspection Program Branch (IPAS)
i
1
i
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\tempfile\\ database.mem
To receive a copy of this document, Indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachrnent/ enclosure
"E" = Copy with
P'tachment/ enclosure
"N" = No copy
IdFFICE
Rl/DRS
lE
RI/SPC y)
l
/
l
l
.
NAME
TRAPP M l
LANfM)6 V
' Dot (
DATE
06/tt/98-
0}/ 6 /98
063a /98
06/
/98
'0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
l
!
(I
r
_ _ _ _ - _
_ _ _ _
i
I
l
,
Millstone Unit 3 OSTI Inspcction
Summary Report - Request Number
Recurst No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .. .
. . . . . . . .
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
I
1
Operations Directives . Conduct of Operations
l
Operations Directives (administrative procedures for the conduct of operations). Include any documentation of management
expectations / goals for operations if not included in the Operations Directives.
l
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
'l
i................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
l
2
System, Abnormal and Alarm Operating Procedures
l
System, Abnormal and Alarm operating procedures for the emergency diesel generators, safety injection, and quench spray.
l
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...... . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
3
System Descript, Design Basis Documents, Training Materials . EDG, $1 and QS
System Descriptions, design basis documents and/or training materials on the emergency diesel generators, safety injection, and quench
spray.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........A....
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
4
Operations. Overtime Approvals
Records of approvals of Operations personnel exceeding administrative overtime guidelines in the past 3-months (if any).
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
ShiftSchedule/ Crew Assignments. Operations
Shift Schedule and breakdown of crew assignments.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
6
Completed Plant tog Sheets . Operations
The completed plant log sheets for the past week. Also provided a copy of the plant log sheets that will be used following the mode
changes.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
l...............................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
Shift Turnover Sheets. Operations
Shift turnover sheets for the past week
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
j................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8
tog Book Entries. Operations
Log book entries for licensed and non-licensed operations personnel for the past week.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
r
$
_ _ _ _ _ __
___
- - . - - - - - -
- -- - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
J
- - - - _ _ _ - - - _ .
_ - _ _ - _ - - - - . --_ - - - - -
)
i
R auret No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
Shift Orders / Night Orders - Operations
Shif t Orders / Night Orders for the past week and all Standing Orders
There are no Shift Orders / Night Orders for Operations at this time.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . ...... ......
. . . . . ....
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10
Operating Training Matrix - Operations
Operator training matrix (or other record) which documents both licensed and non-hcensed operator participation in requalification
training. Also provide records for fire brigade training.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
11
Training Material and Training Records . Operations
Training material and training records for operator training on modifications and changes to operating procedures made during the
q
current outage.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.......
12
Administrative Procedures . Tagging / Equipment status
Administrative Procedures for safety tagging and equipment status control.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13
Valve Check Off Lists / Proc. . EDG, S1, and QS
Valve check off lists and associated procedures for the alignment of the Emergency Diesel Generators, Safety injection and Quench Spray
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14
Control Room Deficiencies / Operator Work Arounds
List of existing control room deficiencies and operator work arounds
i
!
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
l
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
Summaries of Condition Reports . Operations
Summaries of Condition Reports (CRs) written against operations for the past year.
,
I
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
Technical Specifications Interpretations
TechnicalSpecificationsInterpretations(if any)
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
Schedule of Planned Operations.12 Week
Schedule of planned operations activities for the next 12 weeks
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
!
1
i
2
l
l
,_
-
_
_
. _ _ _ _ - _ _
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-_ - - _ - __ _ _
_
Recuest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. ... , , ,
, , , , , , ,
18
Self. Assessments / Oversight Audits. Operations
Copy of self-assessments / oversight audits of operations performed during the past 6 months.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
...... . . . . . . .
. , . . . . . ,
. , , , , , , , , , ,
19
Work Planning and Scheduling Process Documentation
Procedures, process flow charts or other documents which desenbe your work planmng and scheduling process.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . . . . . . , , , , . .
D
Assessments of Planning and Scheduling
Provide recent assessment (self or oversight) of the planning and scheduling programs.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review. Self Assessment 3WM-SA.9711. ETA 2/15/98
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21
Maintenance and I&C Administrative Procedures
Maintenance and I&C administrative procedures which describe your corrective, preventive, and predictive maintenance programs.
o
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22
Training and Re-Training Records of Maintenance Personnel
Documents, including training records, which describes training and re-training of plant and contractor maintenance personnel.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23
Corrective and Preventive Maintenance Procedures . EDG, Si and QS
A copy of corrective and pieventive maintenance procedures for the emergency diesel generators, safety injection and quench spray
systems equipment.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24
Maintenance Activities.OnsiteInspection Weeks
Schedule for maintenance activities planned to be performed during onsite inspection weeks
Provided documentatmn to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
Recent Self. Assessments /QA Audits . Maintenance
Copy of recent self. assessments /QA audits of maintenance activities including any metrics used to routinely measure maintenance
performarre.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
!
l
,
!
3
i
I
\\
L_______________________________--
--
- - - - - -
_
- -__ - _-____ _ ___ __ _ _ _ _
1
R'auest No.
Request /Remonse
!
i
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'
26
Maintenance Rule implementation . EDG, Si and QS
Provide maintenance rule implementation information including the performance criteria and basis, corrective action plans (if A(1)
system), reliabdity and unavailabihty data and other pertinent maintenance rule document pertaining to the diesels, quench spray and
safety injection systems.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review,
8
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . ...... . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
27
Outstanding Equipment Deficiencies
A list of outstandin6 equipment deficiencies. Provide an indication as to which of these deficiencies are planned for resolution prior to
plant restart and assessment of basis for deferral (if available).
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
28
List of Systems. Maintenance Rule
Provide list of systems being monitored in accordance with (a)(1) of the maintenance rule and provide the corrective action plans
associated with these systems.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
29
Preventive Maintenance Beyond Scheduled Due Dates
A list of preventive maintenance which is beyond the scheduled due dates (if any) and is not planned to be conducted prior to plant
restart (not including PMs which require a Mode change prior to perform).
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
!
30
Vendor Manual Information . Proc., Assessments, Updates
Vendor manual information for major components in the emergency diesels, quench spray and safety injection systems. Also provide
administrative procedures for vendor manual updates and any recent assessments of the vendor manual program.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
31
Schedule of Surveillance Tests . Onsite Inspection Weeks
Provide a schedule of surveillance tests planned during the OSTI onsite inspection weeks.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
32
Inservice Test Procedures - EDG, S1 and QS
j
Inservice test procedures and last completed test for the emergency diesel generators, safety injection and quench spray systems.
!
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
33
Surveillance Test Procedures . EDG, Si and QS
Surveillance test procedures for the diesels generators, safety injection and quench spray systems. Also, provide the completed copy of
the last surviellance performed.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
i
f
i
I
A
i
l
,
m
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
Request No. < Reouest/ Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
34
Administrative Procedures . Employee Concerns Program
Provide administrative procedures for employee concerns program
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35
Management's Station Coals & Expectations
Provide documents that provide management's station goals and expectations to the plant staff.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
36
Adminis. Proc./ Findings . Management Observation Programs
Admimstrative procedures and findings of management observation programs (if any).
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37
PRA Insights . Management Decision Making
Documents demonstrating how PRA insights are used in prioritization and management decision making (if available).
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38
Performance improvement Program
Performance improvement program including status (if available)
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
!
>
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
39
Administrative Procedures . Corrective Action Program
1
i
Provide administrative procedures for the corrective action program implementation. In addition, provide a copy of the last 10 completed
root cause evaluations.
!
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
t
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
40
Outstanding Corrective Action items
l
A list of outstanding corrective action items including and indication of those that will not be completed prior to plant restart.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review, January 9th Deferred items listing.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........
41
Plant Startup Plan and Power Ascens.on Program
Copy of plant start up plan and power ascension program
i
I
l
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
l
i
l
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
42
Admin Proc and Self Assess. . Operations, Maintenance, Engineering
,
1
Provide administrative procedures and last two self assessments conducted in the areas of Operations, Maintenance, and Surveillance,
{
and Engineenng.
!
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
f
i
f
i
i
'
5
t
t
1
-
r
\\
E_____.___________
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
_
j
- _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ._-_--_
i
i
Reauest No.
Request / Response
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. .....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
43
Ready for Restart.Self Assessment
Provide documentation of self-assessments which demonstrates that Operations, Maintenance, and Surveillance, and Engineering are
ready to support restart.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ..
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
44
Open Self-Assessment Findings
Provide a list of open self-assessment findings and the status of the corrective actions. Also provide a list of the self-assessment findings
that have been closed in the past 3 months.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . ..... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
45
Open Oversight /QA Findings
List of open open Oversight /QA Findings. Also provide a list of QA findings closed in the past 3 months.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
46
Nuclear Oversights Conclusion . Ready for Restart
Provide documentation which substantiates nuclear oversights conclusion that operations, maintenance, and surveillance and engineering
are ready to support restart.p
j
i
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
{
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
47
Nuclear Oversight Restart Verification Plan
i
1
Copy of the Nuclear Oversight Restart Veri 6 cation Plan
l
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
48
Administrative Procedures implementing the PORC
Administrative Procedures implementing the ? ORC. Also provide the last 3 meeting minutes and open items list from PORC.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
Administrative Procedures implementing the SORC
Administrative procedures implementing the SORC. Also provide the last 3 meeting minutes and open items list from SORC.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
50
Administrative Procedures implementing NSAB
1
Administrative procedures implementing NSAB. Also provide the last 3 meeting minutes and open items list from NSAB.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51
Administrative procedures . Mods and Temp Mods
Administrative procedures for mcxhhcations and temporary modifications
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
l
!
.
6
1
l
I
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ .
._-__-__- - _~
F
_ _ _ _
f
,
1
l
l
l
_
l
RequTt No.
Request /Resr>ome
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52
List of Currently installed Temporary Modifications
List of currently installed temporary modifications
Provided documentation to the inspectcrs for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..
. . . . . . . ....
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
53
Ust of Modifications -Installed
'
I
List of modifications inctalled during the current maintenance outage
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
54
List of one-for.one or like.in-kind replacements
Provide a list of one-for-one or like-in-kind replacements performed during the current outage.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
55
Proposed Modifications to be Deferred
!
List of proposed modifications which are to be deferred until a future outage
o
Provided documentation to the inspators for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
' 56
List of Opens CRs . System and Design Eng.
Provide a list of open CRs and corrective actica items assigned to System and Design Engineering
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
57
Performance Monitoring Measures . Engineering
Provide performance monitoring measures for the timeliness of engineering's response to CRs and AITTS.
Inspector does not require this information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
58
Administrative Procedures . System Engineering
Provide administrative procedures for system engineering.
Discussed expectations during interviews between Engmeering management and inspectors.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
....... . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . .
59
Self-Assessments / Independent Oversight inspections of System Engineering
Provide self-assessments and/or independent oversight inspections of the system engineering program.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review. There are no oversight inspections at this time.
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
00
Operator. work-arounds and Control-Room. deficiencies
Provide status of operator. work.arounds and control-room-deficiencies that are assigned to engineering for resolution.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
--
7
_ _ _ _ _ - _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
- _ _ _ . . - _ _ - . - _ _
. _ _ - _
. _ _
. . _ _ _ . - - _ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- - _ _ _ _
Reausst No.
Request /Responw
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
61
Training Matrix . Technical Staff
f
j
Provide training matrix that desenbes status of initial and continuing training for the technical staff.
,
j
i
l
Provided documentation to inspector for his review.
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . , , , , ,
62
Drawings Revisions
List of drawing that require revision
i
l
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..........
63
Administrative Procedures for Wndor Manual Program
Administrative procedures for vendor manual program and a list of vendor manuals requiring updates.
l
l
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64
Administrative Procedures - Setpoint Control Program
i
1
Administrative procedures and current status of setpoint control program
o
Provided documenta%on to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
65
Operating Experience Program . Procedures
Administrative procedures for operating experience program
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
66
Status of Open items.OE
Provide a status of open items from the operatmg experience program
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
67
Self. Assessments / independent Oversight Inspections . OE
i
Provide self-assessments and/or independent oversight inspections of the operating experience program.
Provided documentation to the inspectors for their review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
68
How long have the M3 management personnel been in their present position.
Please provide a qualitative listing of M3 management personnel and how long they have been in their present position. If less than a
year, where were they previously.
Marked up organization chart, showing management personnel who have been in their present position about one year or less. Chart
annotated to reflect previous position held. Information attached.
8
e ____ - - - ..
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ .
Roqusst No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , , , , , , ,
69
Schedule Completion Efficiency Data
During initial meeting with inspectors, they ex pressed an interest in schedule completion efficiency
Documentation provided to inspectors which shows data for percent started on time, and percent completed on time.
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . .
70
Corrective Action Quarterly Reports
During initial meeting interest was expressed about Corrective Action quantities.
Corrective Action Quarterly Reports provided to the inspector for all of 1997 for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
71
Unit 3 WC L Unit 3 WPC 2, Acronym List
During initial meeting with inspectors they requested the procedures for the work control process and a lists of acronyms.
Delivered copies obtained from BLDG 323 CDL to Maintenance Group. DC2 Attachment 5, U3 WC1, and U3 WPC 2.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
72
Daily Report , Daily Work Schedule
During initial meeting with inspectors they requested information that would be provided in the daily report. They also requested alist
of daily work activities.
Gave inspectors a copy of Daily Report . made arrangements to have it delivered daily. Did the same for the daily work scheduled.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
73
Familiarization Tour
During initial meeting inspectors requested help with dosimetry and a plant familiarization tour. (EDGs, Battery Rooms, Control Room,
and QSS pump rooms)
Plant tours and dosimetry provided to the inspectors.
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
74
Provide Mode 4 Punchlist to OSTITeam
Please provide a copy of the Mode 4 punchlist which is reviewed at the 4:00 mode 4 meeting. Please provide daily prior to the meeting.
A copy of the Mode 4 punchlist as well as the Oversight list of items for Mode 4, was provided to the team leader. Arrangements were
made to receive daily updates for the team.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
75
Corrective Action Plan information for CR M3-971979
Provide a list of all items associated with CR M3-97-1979 including details and status of each Corrective Action associated with
document. MP.97.A06 03.
Cave copy of condition report to inspector for review.
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . .
I
76
Observation of MP3 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Deisel Cencrator Run
OST1 NRC Inspector Tony Vegel requested to observe the MP3 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Diesel Generator Run with the assistance of the System Engineer.
,
l
l
l
NU OSTI coordinator brought inspector to observe the run and introduced him to the System Engineer.
!
>
9
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _
_ _
___
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
77
Determination of Fire Watch Requirements
Fire Watch requirements on blocked open fire door to a RSS cubicle was hourly rove os opposed to cononuous. Question as to how fire
watch requirements are determined.
Provided OP 3261 Response to Door inoperabihty and SF 2483 to NRC team.
Fire watch requirements were discussed based on door
attribute.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
78
Control of Teflon Tape Inside Containment
I
Saw what appeared to be teflon tape on pipe cap threads on 3SIH'V809. Questioned if we have a program to keep teflon out of
containment.
CR M3 97 4509 (level 1) corrective actions address this issue. Provided to the OSTI team.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
79
Method of identifying and Correcting Boric Acid Leaks
Initial plant walkdown identified two boric acid leaks (SIH*MV8821B and RHS*V991). Inspector asked about method to identify and
correct. Do operators identify or maintenance? Once identified, how does someone else know not to report same problem.
Discussed Trouble Reporting System with OSTI team. TR is converted to work order to investigate and determine any needed repair. TR
tag is hung on or near component until repair is complete.
(
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
80
Walkdowriof Aux Feed Terry Turbine
O
Inspector requested a walkdown of the aux. feed terry turbine. His interest concemed the govemor controls.
Inspector's concern centered around the Terry Turbine Governor valve (3FWA.MCV5) for the Aux Feed Pump. He observed in a walk.
down on 2/16/98 that the valve appeared to be partially closed based on the position of the govemor linkage (rack setting) and therefore,
was it in its proper operating position. He questioned whether the terry turbine valve was the primary steam admission valve for the
turbine. He asked what the ramp up rate for the system was (70 seconds). He identified slow ramp rates usually result in high
performance characteristics for the system. Inspector questioned what type of stem material that is used in the terry turbine valve
(Stainless). The history of stem material changes was discussed as well as the plan for installing the new stem material (Iconel). Inspector
questioned what type of tracking and trending was being performed or was planned after plant startup on the Aux Feed System. System
Engineer replied that he has been heavily involved in the day to day activities and was still in the process of taking over as lead system
en5 neer and therefore was still in the process of determining the tracking / trending activities planned for the system. System Engineer
i
provided one example of the tracking of the Steam Traps whcih would be performed once we begin making steam. Inspector stated that
he was trying to determine the consistency in personnel's awareness of the roles of the system engineer and how it fit into the Millstone
engineering organization. (Please see attached for further information)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
81
Listing of Remaining Mode 4 Assignments
Provide a listing of the remaining mode 4 AITTS assignments including department, due date, and assignment text.
Provided listing which includes the above, but not ICAVP administrative issues.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
82
Summary of CRs. Training
Provide a summary of CRs written against training since January 1997.
information provided under Request 204.
!
!
I
I
,
l
10
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
_
_ _ .
I
l
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ,
, , , , , , , , ,
83
Containment Cubicle Gate Held Closed by Tie Wrap
j
The gate door for enty into the "C" cubicle on the 3'8" elevation is being held closed by a tie wrap. If the door is nyuired to be secured .
l
shut, why not use a lock. Otherwise, should the tie wrap be removed.
t
l
This issue has been brought to the attention of Unit 3 HP. The door does not have a latching mechanism on it so it swmgs open into the
passageway. The tie wrap is used to keep the door shut. We do not want to lock it because it is the only exit from the cubicle. The tie
wrap is sufficient to close the door, yet weak enough to break for rapid exit from the room. We are investigating installing a latching
mechanism for the door. (Reference Request Numt>er 126).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
84
RCP Fire Protection
l
Is there a deluge fire protection system for RCPs
There is no automatic deluge for RCPs. Credited RCP Fire deterrence is the oil collection system, heat detectors and local hose racks.
- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
85
Control of Radioactive Material
While conducting a walkdown, we observed a portable plastic tank, located inside of the RCA, was being drained to a storm sewer
!
(located outside of the RCA). We questioned an HP (located inside the ESF Building access point) and he said the tank had been sampled
and the tank draining was a planned activity (Quantity of liquid appeared to be approximately 100 gallons). It does not appear to be a
good Radiological Practice to allow liquid to flow from the RCA, across the posted RCA Barrier, and into a storm sewer. Was this activity
planned in accordance with your Radiological Control Program?
i
i
The above mentioned activity is planned in accordance with our Radiological Control Program. The water was sanepted and
l
environmentally released. The radiological effects of this action are comparable to that of rein. water running across the outside RCA area.
l
The outside RCA area is free of contamination, thus, discharging environmentally released water poses no threat of contaminating the
storm drains or areas outside of the RCA boundary. However, our preference when draining water that has been environmentally
l
released is to have the tank or hose moved to the end of the RCA fence for discharge. As stated above this action poses no radiological
threat, however, discharging water from inside the RCA boundary does not look appropriate. Unit 3 Health Physics will issue a memo
,
l
requesting that all environmental discharges be removed from the RCA envelope or discharged at the RCA boundary,
i
f
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
86
CAL 19-010 training items
!
(CAL) listing of items and status for CAL 19-010 training items.
1
Copies given to inspector on 2/18/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
l
87
SORC (U3) meeting minutes
Make SORC (U3) meeting minutes available for review by 1st week of OST1.
.
Provided f.mpector information on how to contact SORC secretary.
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.........
88
NSAB Meeting Minutes since January 1997.
NSAB Meeting Mmutes since January 1997.
Provided information to inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
89
Copy of SAT test given to instructors
Copy of SAT test given to instructors NITF1MS, #0006207,6208,6214,6223,6226,6244,6274,6327.
Provided information to inspector.
I
17
r
,
f
I
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _---
__
. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _
R *ou ret No.
Request /Remonse
'
....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
90
NTD Self Assessments
All NTD Self Assessments done during 4th quarter 1997.
Several NTD Self Assessments provided.
!
... . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
91
Interview Rooms
Get 2 interview rooms for 3/3,3/4,3/5.
Information provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
92
SORC Procedure
Copy of SORC governing document (part of #87 request)
Informed inspector that procedure was provided as part of original request (#49).
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . .
93
Adequacy of basis for fire watch requirements
Follow up to Request #77. Changes to the TRM and fire watch requirements since moving doors from Tech Specs to TRM and safety
evaluations to document safochange determination.
{
Provided copies of Rev. O,4 & 5 of TRM 7.4 to inspector with copy of associated Safety Evaluation.
. . . . . . . . ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
94
SA Guidance Documents
Looking for the documents that provide guidance or direction regarding Self Assessments (i.e. how many, who, when etc.) If there are
implementing procedurea just need procedure numbers. Include documents that cover effectiveness of Self-Assessments.
Gave mspector NGP 2.38, U3 OA.11, NQOP 1.05, NWS-Dial, SORC approved OA.11, Trainmg Document.
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
95
CAC, TAC Meeting Minutes Available
Have available for review on Monday during 1st week of OSTI.1) All CAC meeting minutes for all training programs (since june 1997).
DO NOT M AKE COPIES. 2) AllTAC meeting minutes for all training programs (since June 1997) . DO NOT MAKE COPIES.
,
,
Copies of CAC/ TAC meeting minutes were made available for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J
. . . . . . . .
%
ComputerSystem Access
4
Please provide access to PMMS and AITIS (read only) for OSTI Team Members.
i
Access provided.
!
)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
<
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
97
Plant Tour
Requested plant tour. First tour was for a general layout,2nd tour for specific areas.
l
l
Several tours conducted with inspectors. General CR Layout and I&C area. Areas included Aux. Bldg, ESF Bldg., Fuel Pool, Rad Waste
and Control Room. Fmal Tour completed 2/17/98 at approximately 1100 a.m.. Final Tour completed 2/17/98 at approximately 1100
i
am. Areas toured today included intake Structure, Turbine Building, Main Steam Valve Building, Switchgear, and Emergency Diesels.
,
i
i
12
1
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . -
_
!
!
RequTt No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.........
.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . .. ... ....
98
Questions during plant tour of 16 February 1998
The following questions require further research: 1. Spring cans . How do we know that they are set correctly. 2. Jacking screws . Is it
j
common to leave them engaged. (Cils. S1 Pumps / Motors). 3. Pass Valves in ctmt, should there be CAPS installed? SSP *V19/V20,
'
SSP'V22, SSP'V24/103. 4. I adders not restrained . Aux. Bldg. 4' penetration area and ESF 4' under Terry Turbine Room.
1. BZ drawings " Support Design" drawings contain settings for spring cans. In addition, during outages, sampling of spring cans for
testing is done in accordance with ASME Section XI by the ISI Department. 2. Per dicussion with Mechanics and an FIS and Conditioned
Based Maintenance Pump expert horizontal jackets are " snug" but not " tight" whereas vertical jacks are backed off to allow growth. There
is no specific guidance in " Conduct of Maintenanc" to address this skill. CBM is available to discuss. 3. Caps / Plugs are correctly installed,
per P&lDs (EM155A) for referenced PASS valves (Ref UIR 67,133,684). 4. Referenced ladders were restrained.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
99
Aux Feed System Open Work Orders . Historical Maintenance
1. Total outstanding work against the TDAFW pump " train" Meaning the open work orders for the associated steam, drain and
discharge piping and the Terry Turbine itself. 2. The Maintenance Rule monthly report for AFW, for the most recent month. 3.
Information about the Governor valve rack settmg, which provides the proper valve position and ties it to ops.
Information provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
100
Seismic Bolting Concern in ESF Building
Bolting in ESF Building 4' and 38' is missing on some structural 1. Beams.
Generated CR M3-984899 t# address the concern. De-briefed with inspector 2/17/98 at 1000. Need further followup. Debriefed with
inspector on 2/17/98 at 1000. Need further followup. Followed-up with inspector on 2/17/98 at 1600, all actions to date discussed. One
item lef t on this issue is ECP followup. Discussed with ECP on 2/18/98 at 0730. Issue closed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . ..........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
101
Protected Train Equipment Signs on Non-Protected Train Equipment
Found signs on East Switchgear (A Train) equipment, Train B was protected train. Train A was being tested.
Discussed issue with Unit 3 Operations.
!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ...
102
Information of Post Maintenance
Information [ data, descriptions] of Post Maintenance tests that failed during the last 6 months.
This is a list of all AWOs coded as rework. The vast majority are a result of failed retests. Some are due to culpment found out of cal
during recalibration. (see attached)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.......m
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...... .
103
Equipment failure history
Equipment failure history for EDG, Si and QS (for last 3 years)
Attached are all type "CM" work orders for each system specified, over the last 3 years. The EDG report covers all systems on the diesels.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
104
AWO backlog,
Provide the followirig in quantities: A history of the AWO backlog as currently designed. Current numbers for AWO's coded: SV, CO,
l
PD, EQ, OT, DC, and MF. Current number of field complete WO's that are not " closed".
i
Provided information to inspector.
r
13
!
t
I
L
______-_._-__.___-_____.__a
_ _ - _ _ _ _ - _
l
Recuret No.
Request / Response
!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
l
105
OA.8
OA-8, Maintenance and Housekeeping of Site Buildings and Facilities
Provided copy of OA 8 and Maintenance Expectations.
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ,,
106
Briefing on Work Control Process
The 3 inspectors requested a briefing on MP3 Work Control Process
Set up brief in I&C Conference Room @ 13002/17/98. Brief complete.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
107
Alignment Procedures for Safety Related Pumps
Walkdown of Charging pumps and SI pumps on 2/16/98. Revealed that alignment / jacking screws were in contact with the pump,
which is contrary to good practice.1. Provide copies of the alignment procedure. 2. Some pumps had missing alignment screws.
Discussed MP3 Maintenance practice with Mechanical First L.ine Supervisors and 3 qualified mechanics. Maintenance practice is to back
off vertical jacks and to leave horizontal jacks typically snug. There have been no known failures of bearings that could be associated with
this practice. Discussed with Component Based Maintenance expert. He agrees the practices used are apropriate. He is willing to discuss
this question further if desired. Missed alignment screws are not a concern. Discussion held with CBM on 4/17. Walkdown with
!
Maintenance Manager on 4/18/98. No further questions. For the vast majority of machines, the holddown bolts are tightened down and
!
in many cases, leaving the horizontal jacking bolts in contact does not effect thermal stresses, etc. but has some potential benefit in
'
preventing the machine fronfshifting out of alignment. However, for a few pumps and turbines with support systems, the jacking bolts
must be backed off (i.e. not contacting) in fact, these pumps and turbines do not have jacking bolts. (charging pumps, Safety injection
j
pumps, and Terry Turbine for auxiliary feedwater pump).
j
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
!
108
Valve Testing per ASME Section XI
1. Provide copRs of the pump & valve sections of the ASME Code, plus any addenda you are committed to for IST. 2. Provide copies of
any OM STDs that you are committed to for IST of pumps and valves.
1. The year of the ASME Code that MP3 is committed to is 1989 which references ASME/ AN OM Parts 1,6 & 10. This is stated in the IST
Program Plan and was conveyed to Inspector at meeting on 2/18, 2. Provided copy of ASME/ ANSI Om 1987 including OMa 1988
Addenda (parts 6 & 10) to inspector on 2/18.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
109
Procedures WPC-2, RP.16, OP 3201,3202,3203, Mode 4 Surveillance List
WPL-2, RP-16, OP 3201, Plant Heatup and Ops Form 3201 1, OP 3202, Reactor Startup, OP 3203, Plant Startup and Technical Specification
Surveillance Required for Mode 4.
Tech Spec Surveillance for Mode 4 complete. All complete.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
110
Surveillance Procedures for Tech Spec Requirements
Copy of the Surveillance Procedures that implement the following surveillance requirements: 4.7.1.2.1.b.2 and 4.7.1.2.2
Information has been provided.
\\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
l
111
Discussion and meaning of'MP3 Operational Readiness Plan Performance Window" Status as of 12/97. dated 1/1/98
Several areas are idenfied as "not evaluated" or "Unsat". more info on these are requested: * Human Performance .
Training /Quals/ Maintenance Planning . Unsat. * Human Performance / Maintenance / Mechanical, I&E, Planning . Not evaluated.
' Procedures Program. ' Testing Program /I&E/ Technical Adequacy of Procedures.
This was a snapshot of our * Performance Annunciators" from December of 1997 that was used when the Operational Readiness Plan was
submitted. The " Performance Annunciators" are updated on a monthly basis. The most recent reports for Mechanical,I&E, and Planning
are attached.
i
I
(
74
[
_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
- _ _
- - - _. _ _
_ - - - - _ _ - . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'112
Pump Testing Per ASME Section XI
1. Provide a table showing all pumps in the IST program (Design Req-). 2) Provide the dates of each IST since January 93 on the table. 3.
Provide the bottom line of the test. Sat / Alert /Etc. 4. Provide a contact name,
j
Provided inspector with copy of IST Program Plan, Rev. 5, Change 2 on 2/18/98. 2 & 3. Provided table with data for pumps: SlH, RSS,
QSS, and AFW on 3/5/98. Provided table with data for remaining pumps in IST Program on 3/19/98. 4. Contact name provided on
2/18/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
113
Manual Valves in EOPs
1. Provide a listing of manual valves that are operated in EOPs. 2. Provide the valve ID and associated EOP reference. 3. Indicate test
1
that confirms valve operability.
List provided of valves and associated EOPs. Closed to follow on requests #359 and #420.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
114
Relief requests from ASME Section XI Testing
1. Provide a listing of all currently approved relief requests. include basis. 2. Provide a listing of all pending relief requests, include
i
basis.
1. Approved relief requests are included in IST Program Plan, Rev. 5, Chg. 2 provided to Inspector on 2/18/98. This was conveyed to
Inspector during 2/18 meeting. 2. Pending refief on RSS system provided 2/25/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
115
Provide copy of Unit 3 IST !#anual
Provide copy of Unit 3 IST Manual
' Copy provided
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . .
116
Provide copies of the following CRs:
Provide copies of: 1. ACR M3-97 0191,2. CR M3-97-0871,3. CR M3-97 0872,4. CR M3 97 0873 and 5. CR M3 97 0684.
Provide copies of the 5 CR's
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
117
Copy of WC.1
Copy of WC.1 " Work Control Process"
Copies provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
118
Interview with Appendix ) Testing Engineer / Coordinator
Interview with Appendix J Testing Engineer / Coordinator
Set up interview with Appendix J Test Coordinator at 0800 2/18. Verified start of meeting.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
119
What procedure addresses procedure revisions
What procedure addresses procedure revisions? Work Order Revisions? Provide copy if not previously provided.
Provided copy of DC 4.
15
<
l
t
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . -- _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _
_ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _
R'au st No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
120
Copy of P&lDs
Set of reduced copies of P&lDs for satellite NRC office in Urut 3 Service Building.
Copies provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .
. . . .
. ... . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
121
Feed Reg Valve Bypass Valve Safety Function
What is the safety function of the FRV Bypass? (i.e. why have vital power to non-vital equipment?)
At low power, the bypass valves are used to control feed flow. The vital power ensures that they will receive the proper safety signal to
ch>se if necessary.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
122
Power Supplies to Feedwater Valves
What is the basis of having 'A' train power to FRV and FRV bypass while the associated feed trip isolation is 'B' train power?
Dual train power to isolate the feedline during an accident is provided by using seperate valves with separate power supplies. In the
event of the loss of one train power, the feedline will still be isolated.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
123
Request for Guide to help get inspector into the RCA
o
The NRC Inspector expressed a desire to tour the RCA and secondary side of the plant independent of NU. To support this the inspector
wanted a guide to walk them through the RCA entry process once so they could then be free to tour on their own.
OSTI coordinator took them through the RCA himself.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
124
Document Requests
DC-4, " Procedural Compliance", OA-9 * System and Component labelling", OP 3272. "EOP User's Guide", WC-6, " Determination and
Performance of Independent & Dual Verifications", RP-5, " Operability Determinations", WC-10 " Temporary modifications", and RP-5,
thovided tupy of following procedures to inspector on 2/18/98 at approximately 0900. DC-4, OA-9, OP 3272, WC-6, RP-5, WC.10.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
125
Operator Actions and PRA
Top 20 important operator actions determined by PRA and why. Risk ranking results from Maintenance Rule (i.e. RRW, RAW 2,and CCF
contribution.
Response from PRA, listing Important Operator Actions. The list does not contain 20 actions, but has those operator actions that have a
measurable impact on core damage frequency. In addition, the list is not ranked. In addition, PRA faxed a copy of Risk Management
measures for MP3 Systems / Train Maintenance Rule. PRA, is available for more discussion or meetings.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
126
Containment Cubicle Gate held closed by tie wrap
As a followup to Request Number 83, NU needs to detennine if a closing mechanism should be placed on the gate to the 3'8" elevation
entrance to the 'C" cubicle.
Ongoing investigation. NRC item closed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
127
Documentation request for on-line risk assessment
Provide copy of "U3 WC 14"
Copy of "U3 WC 14" "On line scheduhng" provided to inspector on 18 February 1998 at approximately 0900.
I
16
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
..
- _ ___-- - - -
- - _ _ - - - - - - - -
- - - - .
),
i
Ihiuost No.
Request / Response
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
123
Copies of mission statements, goals and clicctives
Please provide copies of mission statements, goals and high level objectives issued by the President and other company officers and Unit 3
Dinrtor.
i
Copics provided.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
129
Requested a copy of the Unit 3 Annunciator Windows Report.
j
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
l
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
130
Copies of documentation descnbing Mgmt Expectations for Procedure Compliance
l
Please provide copies of procedures, policy statements, guidance etc. describing management's expectations for procedural compliance.
l
1
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
131
SCWE-Studies, Surveys, Assessments, etc. / Copies
Please provide results of surveys, studies, assessments, etc. conducted to determine Safety Conscious or attitude Include those conducted
to determine the staff's williragness to raise safety concerns.
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
{
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
132
Little Harbor Consultants Survey Results
I
Please provide a copy of the results of the latest employee survey conducted by Little Harbor Consultants.
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
133
Fire detection system operability and verification
How is the operability of fire detection systems on at least one side of a locked TRM related Fire Door verified as required by OP 3261,
Step 13.2.1. This allows hourly rove in place of continuous fire watch. Followup to Request Number 77.
shift Manager reviews last surveillance on the required detection system. If this is satisfactory, the detection system is operable.
Inoperable detection systems are also tracked in shift tumover log. This list is also checked.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
134
Overtime Control
Admin. Procedure for control of Overtime. T& A records for Ops Department from December 1997 to present.
Provided copy of NGP 1.09. Time records being gathered. Time records reviewed with inspector resolved several apparent discrepancies.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .
135
M3 procedure indices
Please provide 3 copies of M3 procedure index. Please provide access to electronic procedures and index.
l
Inspector was briefed on use of Navigator /World online procedure /index on 2/18/98 at 0800.
!
k
l
77
_
. - _
_ - _ - - _ - - - - - - - - -
l
Reauest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
,, , , . . , , , , ,
136
Assessments of Millstone Management Performance
Please provide any recent assessments of Mdistone Managements performance and the status of related corrective actions. Assessments
include independent reviews, self assessments, etc.
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
, . , , , , , . ,
137
Assessments done in the last year
Please provide listing of assessments done in the last year. Assessments include Root Cause evals, self assessments, independent
review / assessments etc. inclusive.
Comprehensive list provided and on fde in file.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
138
PORC, SORC, NSAB Schedule
Please provide present and revisions to scheduled PORC (3), SORC, and NSAB meetings for the next 2 months.
Executive Officers meetings occur weekly. Copies of schedules are attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
139
Long. Term LOCA Mitigation Strategy
Provide documentation of qualification of HPI pumps (CHS/SI) to withstand effects of debris in water from containment ECCS sump.
Note May find this in 305.9 package that changed EOP to use MPI pumps for long-term recire.
Reference response dated 3/2/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .
140
Request for procedure indices and acronym definitions
Procedure index (if not already provided). List and definition of acronyms.
Provided procedure indices for C-Ops,3200,3300,3500,3600, SPROCs, ACPs and U3 CMG-OA.WC procedures. Provided copy of DC.2,
Rev.1 (and changes 14).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
141
Maintenance History for 3RHS*FCV610 & 611
I
(
Provide a complete maintenance history on the 3RHS*FCV610 & 611 valves. The inspector had one page of I&C Form 183 and requested
'
complete information on the maintenance history,
j
Provided complete maintenance history on the 3RHS*FCV610 & 611 valves.
'
)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
142
Copy of Request Matrix
i
Provide a copy of the matrix of OSTI team requests.
.
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
')
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
143
List of PMMS Abbreviations
Provide a list of PMMS abbreviations.
'
j
i
!
Provided documentation to inspector for review
,
l
i
i
!
-
18
i
_.
-
_- ._ __
_ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - -
--_--___ -_- - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _
L
Requist No.
Request / Response
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
144
Tech Spec to Surveillance Cross-Reference
Request a copy of or person to discuss which survedlance tests tech spec requirements.
l
Surveillance coordinator discussed issues at 0800 on 2/18/98. Additional request for specinc surveillance submitted. This request is
j
closed.
, .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
....
.. ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
145
Design Basis Summaries
l
Design Basis Sununaries for EDCs, QSS, SI & RSS.
Provided the following Design Basis Summary Documents: Emergency Diesel Engine, R1,5/28/97 (3DBS-EDG401), Emergency Diesel
Generator, RO,5/23/97 (3DBS-EDG-002), Quench Spray System, RO,5/23/97 (3DBS-NSS-002), Containment Recirculation Spray System,
,
R0, 5/27/97 (3DDS-NSS-003) and Emergency Core Cooling Systems, RO, 8/13/97 (3DBS-NSS-005).
t
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
146
Provide copy of latest CRP Deficiencies and Operator Workaround Lists
Provide documentation with respect to Control Room Panel deficiencies and Operator Workaround Lists.
Copics of latest (15-Feb-98) Control Panel Issues, Workaround Sununary, and long Term Workarounds provided to inspector on 2/18/98
at approximately 1000.
... .............................................;....................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
147
Introductions between Ops Management and OSTI Ops inspectors
Requested that a meeting be bet up so that the OST) inspection . Operations Inspectors can meet the MP3 Operations Team (be able to
. place a name with the face).
Meeting set up between OST1-Ops Inspectors and MP3 Operations Management for 2/19/98 at 0900 in the Control Room Conference
I
Room.
\\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
148
Meeting with Unit Director - Organization Changes
J
l
Discuss current organization changes and how will things be during Mode 4. Also, Independent Oversight Efforts.
l
<
i
I
Held meeting with inspector and Unit Director in C4(B at 0930 on 2/18/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
149
PORC, SORC, NSAB,ISEG/ Procedures
!
Obtain information on structure of each group and it's functions.
{
1
Information provided to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
150
Provide 10 Focus Areas with SCWE Effort
10 Focus Areas SCWE.
(
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
)
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
151
Request to witness LLRT Testing
~
Inspector requested to witness the next LLRT testing performed by Operations.
!
1
!
r
l
'
I
I
l
f
19
I
i
t
L____._
__
_ __
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - - _- - - -
- - . .
j
__
\\
\\
i
I
_ Request No.
Request /Restionse
............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
153
Request LLRT Procedures
LLRT Procedures,3612B3 and IM, OP 3612B%1, B3-2, B3 3.141. Latest LLRT SP 31103
i
Complete.
j
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
153
Access to PMMS System
Submit user request for PMMS Id.
!
t
Received Access information and PMMS ID from Corporate Security.
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
154
Meeting with Training Personnel
Request to meet with Training Staff (including Operations-Training Liaison) and to take a tour of the Training Facilities.
Meeting set up with Training Manager (Acting) and Program Coordinators for Thursday,2/19/98 at 1300 in the Training Facility. A tour
will follow. There is currently no Operations - Training Liasion - the position is vacant.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
155
History of TR backlog
l
History of TR backlog inclu4ng consistency and definition of backlog.
Corrective Maintenance Backlog is defined as: Corrective Maintenance work orders (types CM & CD) that have not been finished.
Regenerative type work orders (types SV, CO, PD, TD, EQ; preventative maintenance and surveillance) are not included. Support work
l
I
orders (type OT) are not included. Plant improvement items (type DC or MF) are not included. This definition is used by Planning and
Scheduling.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
156
Questions on procedure backlog
Procedure change backlog. How is it managed? By Who? Prioritization.
Per discussion with MP3 Procedures Group Operations Assistant: Procedure changes are usually implemented via a computer generated
feedback request form. When procedures are going to be changed (biennially or as needed), feedbacks are reviewed for
applicability / implemented. If a feedback for procedures is deemed important by the initiator, or as indicated by an Action Request (AR),
then they will be reviewed / implemented right away. The procedure group is available 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> / day for consultation on procedure
changes for emergency issues.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
157
Please provide the SORC meeting minues for 98-10 (2/18/98)
SORC meeting minutes for 9810.
Provided infonnation.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
158
Please provide copics of the following:
1. Safety evaluation number S3.EV.97 0198 latest rev. plant change number DCR M3-96065 3R1IS*HCV606,607 failure and adverse effect
i
on CCP piping and PORC/SORC minutes for each. 2. Temporary modification index number 3-984)08 Recalibration 3R15*F15 610 and
l
611 to function with incorrect flow and PORC/SORC minutes for each.
Information provided. PORC Minutes provided.
20
_ _ _ _ _ _ -
- - _ _ - _ _ _ - - . - _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _
1
I
l
RequOst No.
Request / Response
!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
159
Training and Qualification of Engineering Personnel
1
The inspector requested mformation that would demonstrate that engineers are quahhed for the work they perform. This question is
intended to cover a broad range including information on the method, the implementation of these requirements and maintenance and
retrieval of training records. The inspector pointed out that a query of CRs the word training in the title issued in 1997 or latter pnxiuced
a large number of occurences. Three CRs in particular were provided as examphs They are M347-1919, M3-97-0275 and M3-97-0553.
(Please see attached for further information).
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
160
level of Knowledge of TechnicalSupport Engineers
The inspector a.sked what level of experience the Technical Support Engineers have.
Tech Support Manager, responded J at Tectuucal Support Engineer's experience levels ranged from 12 14 years to new graduate levels.
Manager commented that the last two years in the shutdown has significantly enhanced their experience comparable to startup experience.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
161
Technical Suppori Engineering Goals
The inspector requested information pertaining to the goals or conduct of engineering for the Technical Support Engineering organization.
l
A procedure (EN 31076) to define the " Conduct of Technical Support Engineering * is presently being developed. A draft has been issued
for review. The procedure will cover processes that are generic to the Technical Support Engineering groups such as training &
quahfications, use of operatidg experience and interaction with other Technical Support Engineering (i.e. System Engineenng, Reactor
Engineering, Engineering Programs and Rapid Response Engineering). "Ihe Roles and Responsibilities of System Engineering were
established and identified as a result of a Self-Assessment (MP3-TS-SA001) performed in the fourth quarter of 1997. These Roles and
.
l
Responsibilities were communicated to the unit and will be included in the Conduct of Technical Support Engineering procedure.
j
Technical Support Manager provided a draft of this procedure an discussed where the procedure is and is going. Inspector was satisfied
^
with this. No further action required.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
162
List of Systems with Readiness Reviews completed
Please provide a list of systems which already have readiness reviews completed.
Please see attached hst.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
163
Extent of Design reviews relative to NPSH requirements
The inspector requested information describing the extent * the following Design Basis Verification efforts reviewed NPSH requirements. -
Sargent & Lundy ICAVP and CMP, *Did these efforts look deep enough to make a judgement on NPSH suitability.
1. NRC needs to talk directly to S&I, NU cannot per existing protocol. 2. As part of the CMP critical calculations were reviewed under
Project Instruction PI-31 (Revision 1 dated 6/6/97). In paragraph 1.5.4 Category A, B, and C calculations are defmed. NPSH calculations
are encompassed by the defuution of both Category A and B calculations. If specific information on these tviews is needed Pl.31
documentation can be reviewed to identify NPSH related calculations for the systems included in the PI-31 calculation reviews.
Additionally, as part of CMP a number of NPSH calculations were revised to support the restart effort, For example, ECCX NPSH
calculations were revised by Westinghouse. An example of two of these calculations are SE/SSE-C-NEU-0162 dated 12/4/%, titled
Safeguards Pump NPSH Under Defmed Conditions (injection and recire modes) and SAE/FSE-C-NEU-0100 dated 9/9/97 Millstone
NPSH Evaluation of ECCs Pumps Recire Alignments at 230 F.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
164
Boric Acid Tank. Potential for Vortexing
The inspector requested information for his review relative to the issue of potential vortexing in the Boric Acid Tank. Information should
include history on the issue, how it was discovered, CRs, ARs and Design Information.
Table of Contents: 1. CR h0-98-0310,2. Reportabihty Deternunation for CR M3-98-0310*,3. Various Tech Specs: 3/4.1.2.1,3/4.1.2.2 and
3/4.1.2.6. 4. Tech Spec Bases: 3/41.2. S Ops Form 36MC.1 1. 6. Calc. 97.ENG-01509M3, Rev. O. 7. Boric Acid Tank Drawmg 2224.101
02 4 024,Rev. M and 8. Engineer's Sketch.
l
21
1
L____
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
_
__ . . _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ - _ _ - _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ - -
p
Requ-t No.
Request / Response
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
165
Contamination Markings on lloses (3CCP*E1 A, Heat Exchanger)
The inspector noted that two drain connection hoses on the 3CCP*El A heat exchanger had different markings. One was marked "is
internally contaminated", the other was marked "is not internally contaminated". Both hoses were durcted to a drum which was marked
i
"not intemally contaminated". Please provide an explanation and indicate actions taken.
1
j
Health Physics investigated the above discrepancy and concluded the hoses were properly labeled. The color coded hose system requires
'
that all hoses used inside of the RCA be labeled as radioactive material (not internally contaminated), this does not mean that the hoses
are internally contaminated. The decision to label all hoses as radioactive material was made based on several cases when clean systems
j
were drained and hoses had to cross contaminated boundaries. The hoses have the potential to become externally contaminated with
!
fixed radioactivity during routine activities, however, they are controlled to prevent internal contamination. Those heses used for
contaminated systems are labeled as radioactive material and internally contaminated.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
166
Operational Readiness Plan Basis Documentation
Please provide the basis for readmess of the following areas in the ORP, Att. 2 page 3. NCRs, Temp Mods, System Readmess, Conduct of
)
Engineering, Results of System Testing, Power Ascension Testing, and Surveillance Testing.
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
167
List of System Engineers
The inspector requested a list of names of System Engineers and the systems they are responsible for.
Provided the inspectors witlfthe attached list of System Engineers at MP3, indicated it was also available on the computer via the
Navigator and provided a tour of the fourth floor pointing out where Technical Support and Design Engineering are located.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . .
168
location and Time for Engineering Meetings
The inspector asked if we have daily engineering meetings that the NRC inspectors couts sit in on.
The attached matrix indicating the types of standard engineering meetings including time and kication was revided to inspectors.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
169
Jacket Water Relief Valve, DG leaking
Inspector identified that the jacket water relief valve was leaking. Is there a work order to repair and has this been previously identified?
(this has been identified to the System Engineer).
The relief valve was recently tested and reinstalled in system. There was no leakage observed since that time (AWO M3-9716734,
12/13/97). At the end of the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> run, the inspector noticed a drip from the discharge of the valve and it. formed System Engineer. The
valve was TR'd (16M3163131) shortly thereafter. The rehef should be cycled a few times cnd then observed for any leakage. If leakage
persists, relief should be repaired. The leakage is minimal, a few drops per minute at most.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
170
Charging Pump Suction Piping - Pipe Supports
inspector identified piping supports downstream of isolation valve on the suction side opf the charging pump as not being connected.
Are these supports abandoned in place, and if so, is there engineering calculation / documentation supporting this issue?
The snubbers for supports 3CHS.2.PSSP463,464 & 465 were ehminated as part of a snubber reduction program. Attached drawings 12179
B274B-177,178 & 179 reflect the removal of the snubbers. Calculation 12179-NP(B) .X7401 justifies the removal of these snubbers. At the
time of their removal a decision was made not to remove the remaining support hardware or otherwise document their removal in the
l
field and that an update of the documentation was aufficient.
!
l
l
22
_
_ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ _ .
- - _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - _
c
j Request No.
Fe3 quest / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .
1 71
Cable Separation for 'A' Diesel Generator
Inspector identified cables from 'A' Diesel Generator that did not appear to meet minimum separation nyuirements.
A field walkdown was done (2/19/98) as a result of the concern about the Class 1E cables exit ng conduit 3CC8MPD in the "B" emergency
diesel generator enclosure, not meeting the required electrical separation criteria with adjacent non-Class 1E metal clad cable [(LS)-
aluminum sheath cable with neoprene or hypalon jacket). The MP3 electrical separation enteria requires a minimum of one (1) inch
separation between the outer edge of metal clad cable and adjacent cable, raceway, barriers and equipment of a different color (Class 1E).
The cables 3CC864PD are approximately two (2) irches from the adjacent non-Class 1E metal clad cable (3AXG0NZ28). Therefore, the
configuration meets the required electrical separatioa criteria. Reference: Section 11.1.11 of SP-EE-076, Rev. 5, * Electrical Installation
Specification". P3AR Table 1.81 (page 31 of 59) R.G.1.75, Rev. 2 (General Clarifications-Degree of Compliance.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
172
SILTEMP on Electrical Cables
inspector Schmidt questioned if the SILTEMP on electrical cables is installed per design requirements. If so, what condition requires
installation of SILTEMP.
SILTEMP protective wrap is installed in accordance with section 11/21 of SP-EE-076, Rev. 5, " Electrical Installation Specification' and
applicable design drawing [CE-54C(2521L35030, Sh. 300)].
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
173
Boron Leaks from Charging System valves
inspector identified two charging system valves were leaking boron, Valve 3CHSV847 had a tag and valve V675 did not have a trouble
h-8
,
Valve 3CHS*V675 has been identified to the FIN team for cleaning and monitoring of an inactive boron leak. This was identified during
CVCS walkdown for system readiness review (MP3-WI.KDWN-97-041). This walkdown actually identified V676 as the leak source.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
174
Trouble Report Tag
Inspector identified that the trouble tag has 2 numbers on it. One embedded and one handwritten. He questioned which number was
used to track the trouble request.
The handwritten number is used with the Trouble Report System (TRS). The TRS number is assigrwd by the PMMS computer as a
protected field. In ad(ition, the TRS number is in the format ' day-plant-time". For example: 18M3091508 is interpreted as the 18th day
of the month, Millstone Unit 3, and the time initiated of 09:15-08.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
175
Leaking Flange in Service Water Building
Inspector identified a leaking flange in the Service Water Building; southwest side near screenwash by catwalk. Need to write a trouble
tag or work order.
Trouble report for leaking slange was initiated by system engineer.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
176
Oil Leak on Train 'B' S1 Pump
Inspector requested a meeting with the 51 system engineer to discuss the oil leak on the Train 'B' SI pump and the operational readiness of
the S1 System,
Scheduled a meeting at 1300 on 2/19/98 for the S1 System Engineer to meet with Inspectors. The following topics were discussed: .
System physical readmess, based on the amount of trouble tags; . Shaft leakage on SlH pump, is it considered excessive; . " System
Headaches' which were identified as: 1. Orifice and throttle valve modifications / redesign. 2. Ventmg of the ECCS piping, associated
modifications and associated tech pec requirements and venting schedules; Use 'OE" Operatmg Experience, how obtained, how often
used; Discussion on the relationship of ECC$, ke.,S!!. SlH, RHR; System Engineer's background and years of experience; Discussion of
CCW system which is systems engineers responsibility; Questions on pump performance on the SlH/CCW systems; System engineer's
involvement with ISI/IST issues; Performance of system walk-downs during operations and shutdown conditions, and plant evolution's;
Knowledge of system activities, how informed, by who; Review of daily TRs to stay current on system condition; Next " Hurdle" closure of
paperwork associated with plant modifications. Additional request: Provide listing of all open work orders and EWRs against SlH
I
system. Note, separate request generated.
23
_ _ _ _ - _ - _
_ - - _ _
__. .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ - _ - _ _ ____ - _____
1
Reauest No.
Request /Remonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . , , , , , , , , , , ,
177
Request for daily update of CR List
inspectors requested a daily update of newly generated CRs.
1
The Daily Plant Report is provided to the OSTI Team every morning. Therefore, since a list of CRs from the previous day is contained
within the Daily Report. the inspectors will have a copy of the previous day's CRs.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . , , , ,
i
178
Training for Inspectors
'
Inspectors requested training for Confined Space, FME and Electrical Safety.
Electrical Safety will not be given. Confined Space /FME CBT Training was provided. Fall protectmn training to be provided 2/20/98 at
0800. Complete.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
179
Need Full Size P&lDs (Elec & Mech) for EDG, SI, QSS, AFW
Provide 3 copies of each.
Provided copies for inspectors resiew.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
180
Procedure Indicts
o
Provide copies of the following procedure indices: FFDs, NUPs, NGPs (100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800), CBMs, DCs, NGPs. QA, MPs,
oms, P1, RACs, RPs, WCs, WPCs, CMGs, ops, ICs, CMPs. Note: ff all " procedure * categories are not included that relate to Maintenance
and Test, please add to list.
Provided documentation to inspectors for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
181
Chaffing on Diesel Generator fuel return lines inside the fuel Ime support brackets
While performing a walkdown of the Diesel Generator, inspectors observed chaffing on fuel retum lines inside the fuel line support
brackets. This was discussed with system engineer who was present at the time of the walkdown.
The system engineer inspected the fuel retum line that was observed to be chafing following shutdown of the engine. The inspection
showed no visible wear of flattening of the piping line. Additionally, all similar fuel return line supports were visually inspected on both
EDGs. None exhibited any evidence of vibration induced wear. A black powdery substance was observed inside the hanger and
determined to be a long term buildup of dirt and oil residue. Typically, vibration wear will result in a long term degradation, typically
evidenced by " flattening" of the affected area and eventualleakage. This was recently observed and repaired on a section of the 'B' EDG
air system tubing on the engine skid. The fuel retum lines immediately off the engine are 1 inch, Class 152, schedule 40s 304 stainless
steel, rated for 150 psig design pressure. The normal system pressure is a maximum of 35 40 psig, which is basically fuel pump discharge
pressure, not accounting for head loss. As there is no indication of any wear, or any history of these particular ',ines developing leaks since
the installation of the support hangers, no immediate corrective action is warranted. However, it is the system engineer's judgement that
these lines vibrate excessively in some locations and the vibration isolation and/or support brackets could be replaced with an improved
design Support of this conclusion is based on eight years of observing operation of these particular engines as well as recent repair work.
Minor fuel oil weepage from the Swagelock fitting that connects one of the 'B' EDG fuel oil retum line check valves (3EGF*V986) to the
engine, was repaired. Please see attached page for complete information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
182
Control of Field Equipment needed for EOPs
Copy of CR M3 97 2896.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
183
Attend next SORC meeting
Inspectors expressed a destre to attend a SORC meeting.
Provided Agenda for the next SORC meeting that was scheduled for 2/18/98 at 1300. Took both inspectors to the meeting and
i
introduced them.
24
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _
. _ _ - - - - - _ _ - - _ . - . _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _
l
l
Request No.
Request / Response
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , ,
184
Terry Turbme Information Request
Terry Turbine Model Number (AFW Pump 3FWA*P2). Model of Governor Valve, size of Governor Valve and specibe materials and
design of stem.
Provided mformation to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
185
Design Changes for Ctmt. Volume
1) Calculation CTS-CALC-010 revised La, part, by changing containment volume approximately 2%. The number in the FSAR is
currently correct. However, the number used in the current surveillance program is not. No CR was written! 2) Please provide CR and
Corrective Action Plan
1) Information has been provided. 2) CR M3-98-0987 and corrective action plan are attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
186
Work Order Backlog
1. Provide a definition of backlog. 2. Provide a monthly count of mechanical maintenance backlog of Q and non-Q work orders: 1/%
thru 1/98. 3. Repeat 2 for I&C/ Electrical. 4. Provide a monthly count of "other" backlog not included in 2 or 3: 1/% thru 1/98.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
187
Rework of Work Orders
1. Provide a monthly count o,f reworked work orders for Q and Non-Q work orders for mechanical maintenance: 1/% thru 1/98.
Include the total number of work orders for comparison, by Mechanical Maintenance. 2. Repeat 1 for I&C/ Electrical
Information provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
188
Work Order Priorities
L Provide a monthly count of newly opened Q and Non-Q work orders that are Priority 1: 1/% thru 1/98. 2. Repeat 1 for Priority 2. 3 &
i
4.
l
Provided information to inspector for review.
.......... . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
189
Open/ Closed Work Orders
1. Provide a monthly count of Q and Nona work orders for the period of 1/% thru 1/98. 2. Provide a monthly count of all Q and Non-
Q work orders that were closed during Jan % thru Jan. 98.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
190
Failed tests in Work Orders
1. Provide a monthly count of Q and Non-Q work orders which had a failed PMT for the period Jan. % thru Jan. 98.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
191
Changes to Work Orders af ter issuance
1. Provide estimates of the percent of work orders that are revised after the work order is initially issued. Separate by Mechanical,
I&C/ Electrical. 2. Provide the basis for the estimation and the time period.
See attached Memo No. MPl.WPC.98-004, from Director Work Management.
!
i
25
l
,
. _ - - - _ - _ _ . . - _
, _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _
l
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , , , , , , , , ,
192
System Abbreviations
Provide a listing of system abbreviations for all safety related systems.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
193
Work Order trutiation. Unit 3
1. Provide a monthly count of newly opened Q and Non-Q work orders by Mechanical Maintenance: 1/% thru 1/98. 2. Repeat 1 above
for I&CE 3. Repeat 1 above for System Engineers gech Support?). 4. Repeat 1 above for other Engineering groups. 5. Repeat 1 above
Maintenance Planning. 6. Repeat 1 above for Operations. 7. Repeat 1 above for "other",i.e. does not include 1 thru 6.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
194
Operating Experience use in Engineering
Provide a descr;ption of how Operatin6 xperience is used in engineering work activities. Include reference to and copies of procedures
E
used. Include statement on the status of the site wide OE procedure NSE 1 " Implementation of Operating Experience".
Provided inspector attached write.up, page 53 of 56 of RP4, copy of NOQP.3DI, Rev.1 and NSE 1. Rev. O " Implementation of Operating
Experience".
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
195
Listing of Closed Work Orders
o
i
1. Provide a listing of closed Mechanical Maintenance work orders by work order number, title, priority, closure date, system sort by date.
'
system Work Order #. Include only Q systems from 7/1/97 to date. 2. Repeat 1 for I&C/ Electrical.
Provided informatmn to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1%
Provide a copy of COLR
Provide a copy of COLR.
COLR provided via Memo MP-95178, dated May 30,1995.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
197
Current procedures and latest performance of surveillance
Copies of the latest performance of Tech Spec surveillance for the following systems: Safety injection Urein B), Quench (Containment)
Spray Urain B), Emergency Diesel Generator Frain ) and Recirculation Spray System Frain A).
Surviellance y rocedures/ forms plus latest completed surveillance for SlH. QSS, and EDG were previously giv .. to the NRC,
Surveillance ' racedures/ forms plus latest completed surveillance for RSS have been reproduced and givm to the NRC OSTI inspector.
Listing of surveillance procedures / forms for the NRC (RSS). SP 3606.1, R 10, SP 3606.3, R.11, SP 3606 *,, R. 2, SP 3606.8, R8, SP 3606.1 1,
R 9, SP 3606.3-1, RIO, SP 3606.5-1, R. 4, SP 3606 8-1, R 10, SP 3606.1 2, R. 5, SP 3606.3-2, R. 5 and SP 'o06.8-2, R.5. Listing of latest
completed surveillance with completion dates is attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
198
Procedure Copy Request
Copies of OP 3201 and OP 3208
Copies of 3201, Rev.13, Op 3201 1, Rev. 5, Op 3201-2, Rev. 5, Op 3201-310 v. 5 and OP 3208, Rev.17 provided.
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t
199
Inadequate Venting on PZR
Provide copy of CR M3-97 3986 and description of corrective action and status of corrective action.
Copy of M3-97-3986 provided. Carrective Action due 10/31/98 prior to refuehng outage 06.
26
.
I
f
I
!
L__
_ _ _ . .
_
_
. _ - . - -
. - - - - - . - - . - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--
___
_
____
__
--
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
......
. . . .
.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
200
Department Tracking Indicators
What does Operations dept. use to nwnitor department performance. Please provide all ops department tracking and trendmg
information with respwt to work off curves, trends,..
Provided copy of "Annunciato. Wmdows" for Operations and Chemistry. Dated Jan.1998.
l
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.......
... .. . .
. .
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
201
Self Assessment 30PS-SA 97-11
Provide evidence of completed corrective action for assessment 30PS-SA-9711.
CR M3-974185," Adverse Trend Noted on MP3 Operations Configuration Control ACRs* writien for OPS Self-Assessment 30PS-SA-97-
It Copy of M3-974185 is attached. In addition, Evaluation Summary for CR M3-9tw383 is attached. This summarizes the corrective
action status for CR M3-974885.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
202
Document request regarding mispositionin65
Provide copies of CRs written over the last six months regarding mispositionings.
Copies of CRs written over the last six months regarding mispositionings provided. The following CRs were identified by the MP3 Ops
Corrective Action group: M3-97-2972,2980,318CL 3192,3200,3303,3367,3434,3474,3611,3987,4G18,4154,4169,4163,4520,4649,4768,
4843, M3-98 005,0G17,0387,0590,0687,0878,0881,08%.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
o
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
203
Mode 4 and Mode 2 Restart items List
Inspector Schmidt requested a list of all items (completed and non complete) identined as Mode 4 and Mode 2 restraints.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
201
Summary CR's against Training
Summary of CRs written against Training since January,1997. Doc., title, Ops 5 reen, Status All(1,2,3,MT and Site)
Report generated and provided. Criteria for report, all CRs with " Training or NTD" in the title for all Units. Document is attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
205
Process for desiminating requirements of NRC Generic Letters into Engineering
Provide a description of the process and copies of procedures used to ensure information in NRC Generic Letters get communicated to
and evaluated by the engineering cirganization.
Process: Section L2 of RAC 08," Regulatory Communication and Docketed Correspondence"(attached) specifies how to handle incoming
correspondence (which includes NRC Generic letters). The basic process involves a review of the Generic Letter by Regulatory Affairs
and Compliance and the initiation of a Condition Report (CR) to perform regulatory evaluations and applicable determinations. The
subject of the CR will direct which organization has the lead to investigate the CR.
27
_ - _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
____-
_ - - - - - -
R$ quest No,
Requent/ Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . ... . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . ... . . . . .
206
Diesel Generator Duplex Strainer Enchisure
Provide the history on why the Diesel Generator Duplex Strainer is contained in an enclosure. The response should address why it is
acceptable to deviate from the origmal manufacturer's design, consideration of the time nyuired to unholt and remove the enckmure to
swap strainers if necessary during an event, and documentation of the change incluthng the existence of a Design Change Record and
Safety Evaluation
Provided information to inspector Also provided some referenced documentation. The enclosure around the duplex fuel od fdters was
added in 1985 due to a failure of a B EDG fuel od filter outlet piping and the possibihty of a hre hazard existing from this type of problem.
The DDR, attached, references this item as some sort of NRC open item although it is not known at this time what this consisted of.
Regardless, to resolve the issue, Stone & Webster E&DCR T.P-07513 was implemented to install the enclosure around tiv fuel filters to
prevent potential spray of fuel from a subsequvnt iailure from creating a fire hazard. The only way that there would be a fire hazard
would be if leaking fuel were to spray onto the exhaust piping. Due to the proximity of the filter piping to the eshaust system, it was
determined thr; installing the enclosure wa,less intrusive than rehicating the filters and would not require vendor approval as it did not
impact system component kication, flow rate, or piping. There was not a separate 50.59 evaluation performed for this E&DCR as it
became part of the originally approved MP3 fuel system design. With respect to the time it would take to swap filters, there has not been
a determination of exact time this takes vs. fdter cloggmg rates. Due to the tight controls placed on the receipt and storage of fuel oil and
the extremely low particulate limits typically present, it is not likely that the fuel fdters would clog to the point where they would require
swapping in a short period of time. Providing the fuel storage tank particulate levels are maintained within the T/S limit it is not likely
that the fuel filters would need to be swapped during engine operation. The system engineer's experience is that MP3 has not had to shift
these filters as a result of nonnal engine operaion since at least December of 1993. This time period spans over 200 engine hrs on each
train, it is not known if MP3 has ever had to shift these filters. Each duplex filter is replaced every refueling inspection, whether it has
been in service or not. It is the System Engineers judgement that the filters could be made more readily accessible by replacing the
existing bolting with hinges however, no formal action has been initiated as yet due to other priorities.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
o
207
Diesel Generator Air Start Capcity
Provide an explanation of the apparent discrepancy between the FSAR Section 9.5.6.2 and the DBS, relative to the capacity requirements
for air in the receiving tanks to support the 11 second start requirement. Include discussion of whether the air capacity requirements if for
one or two tanks.
The DBS information (Section 8.4) was obtained from original Stone & Webster purchase specification requirements for the EDG Vendor.
Based on factory test data, ti.e Starting Air System is capable of starting the engine twice within 11 seconds, from an initial pressure of
approximately 425 psig (both tank aligned). ~fhe MP3 FSAR does not discuss this capabibty as the required functions are an initial start
within the T/S required time (11 seconds) and that the system have the capability of providing a total of five starts without recharging the
air receivers. From a design basis and safety function standpoint, an EDG must start once within 11 seconds on the initial attempt, to
satisfy accident analysis assumptions. The 5 start requirement is derived from NUREG 0800, Section 9.5.6, which requires sufficient
capacity to ensure that five consecutive engine " cranking" evolutions can be completed without recharging the air system between
attempts. Although the basis for 5 starts is not stated, it is logical to believe that this is to ensure sufficient air capacity exists to re-start the
engine should the initial attempt prove unsuccessful. Thus, the capacity requirement prevents the design of a " minimalist" starting air
system. For further information, please see attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
208
Copy of WC.1
Provide copy of WC.1
Copy of WC-1 " Work Control Process". Rev. 2 provided
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ..... ..... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . .
......
, , . . .
...
. . .
..
....
209
How do modifications get flagged
liow do modifications get flagged so that the necessary changes are incorporated into operating and emergency procedures? Don't
Provide DCM, just identify the process.
Provided copy of DCM, Chapter 3, Rev. 6. Form 3-2C, Rev. 6 and Form 3-21, Rev. 6.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
210
Meetmg Times (listing time and kication)
Please provide a hst of all meetmgs held at Unit 3.
Provided information to inspator for review.
28
_ - - _
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ .
-
_-
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ .
_
i
t
1
i
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
211
Copy of " Program Toward Restart Readiness /long Term improvement"
Please provide one additional copy of the notebook," Program Toward Restart Readme3s and Long-Term improvement at Millstone
Station".
Provided information to inspector for review.
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
212
Copy of MP3 fong. Term improvement Plan / implementation
Please provide a copy of the Millstone 3 tong-Term Improvement Plan and implementation Schedule.
This plan does not exist as of yet, Inspector was provided with preliminary infornution.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
213
Weaknesses and Corrective Actions / Nuclear Oversight Restart Verification
Provide a copy of report (s) describing weaknesses identified through the Nucleat Oversight Restart Verification Program and a
{
description of corrective action taken to address these weakneues.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
214
Leadership Effectiveness
How was leadership effectiveness measured and by whom7
o
Survey's were done by NU Human Resources.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
215
Interactive Nuclear Management Meetings
What is Interactive Nuclear Management Meetings
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
216
What are the Performance Imp. Inter. (Pil) Culture Survey results
Provide assessment (s) and results.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
217
What is the formal process to evaluate any requests to revise restart schedule dates
Please provide formal documentation that outlines this process.
Information provided. (U3 WC 14, Rev. I and OH 1 Rev.1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
218
Number of DRs that exist
What is the number of DRs that exist either from Sargent & Lundy or self identified? What is their level?
Total 923 to date, 610 level 4, 314 Level 3, 'l level 2 and 0 Level 1. Valid discrepancies: 376 Not previously identified,100 previously
l
[lentified,234 disagree on discrepancies.
29
_ _ _ __- __-__________
_
_
-.
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ - - . ._ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
.
. _ - - _ _ - _ _ _
l
r
l
Request No.
Request / Response
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
, . . . . . .
219
ICAVP Inspection Report
l
Please provide a copy of the ICAVP Inspection Report.
ProviJed information to iru.pector for review.
t
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
220
Functional basis of the Recirculation Spray System
Has the design, licensing and functional basis of the Recirculation Spray System been completed?
Yes, response on file B17050 Response to request for information on RSS.
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. .
221
Status of FSAR submittal
What is the status of the FSAR submittal for final restart-related topics?
Last 10CFR50.71e submittal made 6/97. Since the.( several addendums including latest on 1/31/98. Plan to submit on 2/28/98 and
g
again on 3/31/98. This will contain all FSARCR's initiated prior to 11/15/97. Approximately 20 FSARCRs open.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
222
Status of 10CRF50.54(f) letter
What is the status of the respense to the NRC's 10CFR50.54(f) letter.
>
Last update provided to NRC on 1/9/98. Final response is expected to be completed approximately 3/5/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
223
Little Harbor Consultants Reports
Has Little Harbor Consultants provided a report on the following 1. Willingness of workers to raise concerns? 2. Line Management
Handling ofissues? 3. Employee concerns programs? 4. Timely recognition and effective response to problems?
Reports (nominally monthly) are generated which cover the 4 areas listed above. (See attached).
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
224
Complex & Conflicting problems which created barriers
g
What are the complex and conflicting problems which created barriers to problem resolution and created reluctance at the worker level as
)
stated in * Progress Toward Restart Readiness and long. Term Improvement at Millstone Station ILC.47
)
Provided information to inspector for review.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
225
Evaluation Method to determine quality of CA Plans
l
l
What evaluation method was used to determine the quality of the Corrective Action Plans as stated in " Progress Toward Long-Term
Improvement at Millstone Station"?
The evaluations are based on selected criteria used by the Multidiscipline Management Review Teams.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
226
Progress Toward Restart Readiness and Long-Term improvement at Millstone
I
Progress Toward Restart Readiness and long. Term improvement at Millstone Station" II.C.4 states that the closure ofitems identified
,
. under Question 1 to the 10CFR50.54(f) (NRCleeter of April 16,1997) has made significant progress (work remaming 317 of 4151). Does
this mean that all action has been completed on all but 317 items? What does it really mean?
l
All actions have been completed on all but 317 items. What does it really mean? Of the total number of items required for restart, as of
2/1/98,317 remain to be done. These two numbers are ever changing. The total for restart increasing as discovery occurs and the number
remaining decreasing as items are completed.
f
30
w__-______________.
I
-__
_ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ . _ - . _ - _ - _ ._.
,
Reauest No.
Reauest/ Response
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
227
Key Issue Managers
Who are the * Key issue Managers" and what are their assignments?
Provided information to inspector for review.
,
)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
228
Key Performance Indicators
Since the Key Performance Indicators have been estabhshed why must their full implementation wait until after the restart of each urut?
1. Waitmg for all 3 to restart? or 2. Wait and implement after each restart?
,
The indicators are being used now but the targets become effective after the restart of each unit for that unit.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
229
Weekly Assessments of Corrective Action Program
Please provide copies of the weekly assessments of the Corrective Action Program made within the NORVP for the last year.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
230
What groups provide independent oversight such as SORC, etc.?
What groups provide independent oversight such as SORC, etc.?
o
NSAB, PORC, SORC, INPO, NRC, Independent Assessment Team as required by Topical Report and Oversight.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
231
Ensure assessments requested include
Ensure assessments requested include: 1. NCAT,2. FCAT and 3. badership assessments.
Provided information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
232
Leadership Issues
What are the badership issues identified by: 1. FCAT,2. Oversight independent Assessment Team and 3. ACR 7007.
FCAT Report, ACR 7007 and Oversight Independent Assessment Team Report provided to inspectors.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
233
Procedure Copies
C-WPC-41, C.WPC.1, C-WPC-3, C-WPC-4, IC 340812, SP 3440A01,3t &C 1.02, MP-3741 A, MP 3710C-1, MP 3710G-1, U3-PI-19, U3-P120,
U3 P124, U3 P126, CBM-107, U3-CMGOO3, DC-4, DC-4-1, OA-5, OA.10, RP4, RP4-1, RP4-2, RP4-3, RP-5, RP.6, WC.3, WC.8, WC-9, WC-9
1, U3.WC 14, ACP.QA-9.03, AND 3-Ui 2.012.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
234
Copy of CRs M3 97-1980 and M3-97-1981
Copy of CRs M3-971980 and M3-971981.
Provided infonnation to inspector for review.
I
31
. - _ - - - _ _
- _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
-_- ._
l
i
l
l Request No.
Request / Response
i
1
.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
l
235
Training and Plant Interviewed for Management Team
List was provided as to whom they want to interview. March 2 (out at Training) .Trainmg Manager (Director), manager of technical
training, Supervisor Engineering Support Training, Mana6er Training Assessment Group. March 3 5 2 Chemistry technicians (1 of
each),2 radiation protection technicians (1 of each),4 non-licensed operators (2 of each),2 I&C technicians (1 of each),2 electrical
maintenance (I of each),4 Engineers . 2 design,2 system (1 of each),2 STA,2 mechanics (1 of each),11&C supervisor,1 Electrical
maintenance supervisor,1 Mechanical maintenance supervisor,1 Design Engineermg manager.1 of each means one with greater than 4
years experience and the other with less than 4 years -xperience. Interviews will be 30 minutes long with 15 minute intervals. Inaddition,
out a training, provide a briefing on status of issues relato to training inspection conducted in June of 1997.
Attached is a copy of Rev. 00 and Rev. 01. Rev 01 will be faxed 2/27/98 afternoon. (will be open until 3/598 - completion of interviews).
........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
236
Copy of ACR07007
Copy of ACR 07007
Provided a copy of ACR 7007 and the IRT Report dated 6/17/98.
, .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..........
i
237
Presentation on Corrective Action Program
i
Provide a brief presentation regarding the Corrective Action Program at Unit 3. This should include an overview of the CR program.
How ArlTS applies to the process, basic acronyms used and any other documents which are used at to Unit 3 to track deficiencies (i.e. .
l
NCRs, EWRs, Work Arounds, etc). Explain how thec,e other programs relate to the CR program.
The Unit 3 Corrective Actiona Manager, provided a presentation to the NRC OSTI team on Thursday, February 19. Questions resulting
are addressed as new items in this database. The presentation given is attached, as well as the flow chart used.
}
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
238
Request for documentation on PJIS System
j
Inspector requested copies of the following documentation: DCR M3 96065, DCR M3-96075, Rev.1, dated 6/26/97,ISE-MP3-97-005, Rev.
2, dated 8/16/97, Westinghouse Calculation No. P-EC-287 (included in RHR Bearing Life Folder, Design Engineering, DCR M3-960965),
Temporary Modification 3-98408, Rev. O.
Provided information to inspector for review.
........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
239
Request for documentaten un RHS System
Inspector requested copies of the following documentation ACR 13427, dated 5/1/96, EWR-M3-97132, CR-M3-971935, CR M3-97-4475,
CR M3-98-0561 and CR M3-98-0897.
Provided information to inspector for review.
.................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
240
Request for documentation on RHS System
inspector requested copies of the following documentation- FSAR Sections 5.4.7,6.3.2,9.2,9.3; FSAR Sections 6.3,8.3,7.4; MP3 Safety
Functional ikquirements DBDP (MP3-SFR); W.O. M3-97-09288.
Provided documentation as requested. Revision verified copies obtained from NDS.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
141
Request for documentation on RHS System
inspector requested copies of the following documentation: ER-96-0269, dated M3-EV-96006; M3-EV-970110, Rev. O, M3-EV-970122, Rev.
O, M3-ERP-97-0008, Rev. 0; M3-EV.97-162, Rev. O, MP3 ER, NUREG 1031, including supplements 1 thru 5, Chapter 10; M3-EV.98-0020,
i
Rev.O
l
)
l
M3-EV-98-0020, Rev. O was provided to inspector.
!
i
!
.
a
1
1
4
)
f
1
,
32
i
i
m___________
_
_
j
__
_
_
-
_
- - - - - -
-
Recueet No.
Rrouest/Rewonse
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
242
Request for documentation on RHS System
inspector requested the followmg documentation: Memo NE-%SAB-213, dated 8/19/9# Memo MP3-DE.%194, dated 8/22/96;
Westmghouse Correspondence NEU-97-516,' Westinghouse Fluid Systems Review of RHR Modification," dated 2/12/97; Westmghouse
Memo NEU.89-538, "R1IR Pump Motor Thrust Bearing Rating Life," dated 4/5/89.
j
Provided information to inspector for review.
....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
.
..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
243
Request for documentation on RHS System
inspector requested copies of the following documentation: Proto-Power Cale %%i, including CCN Nos.1,2,3,4 and 5; Proto-Power
Calc 95-052; Calc. BAT 1-96-12413E3, Rev.1; Calc. BAT 2-%1243E3, Rev.1; Calc. PPC-%O44, includmg all CCNs.
Provided all requested documents to inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
244
Request for documentation on RHS System
Inspector requested copies of the following documentation IST 3-97-006, "'A' Train Modification Flow Test," Rev. 0; ISF 3-97-007,"'B'
Train Post Modification Flow Test,*Rev. O.
Provided copies of requested documentation from NDS.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
245
Request for documentation on RHS System
Inspector requested copies opha following documentation: Dwg. EM 112A, B & C; Dwg. EM 121 A, B & C.
Provided documentation as requested. Revision verified copies obtained from NDS.
......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
246
Computer ID Request to Access NU intranet, for NRC
If possible, where it will not violate policies, procedures or Security, provide read only access to NU intranet.
This would violate the current agreement NU has the NRC.
.. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
247
Provide Sample copies of OER's and Proc. NORVP 1.08
Please provide a copy of NORVP 1.08 procedure. OER's by noon (sample).
Provided a sample.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
248
Control of field equipment needed for EOPs
Copy of CR M3-97 2898.
Copy of CR M3-97-2898 provided. CR deals with EOPs, tools, and equipment not at field location.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . .
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .
249
Appendix J specification
Provide a copy of Spec ME-945, covering Appendix J testing.
Provided information to inspector for review.
33
_ _ _ _ -
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ _ _ _ ____ _ - _ - -
_
l
!
Request No.
Request /Remonne
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
250
Interfacing Programs
Provide 3 copies of NGP 2.32.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
251
Backlog of EWRs, Work Orders on SlH System
inspectors requested a listing of all open Work Orders and EWRs on the S!H System. Additionally,if available provide a listing of open
trouble reports.
1. Provided inspectors copies of AWO and Trouble Reports associated with the SlH System. 2. Also provided the inspector with a list of
associated work planning codes. 3. Still owe EWR listing.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
252
Test Failures
1. When a test is stopped mid-stream due to failing conditions,is it counted as a test failure? 2. Is a new AWO enerated after re-start of
S
the testing?
Information provided. This request is closed to 417.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
253
Self Assessment Advisory Board
Request for information on SAAB, governing documents etc.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
254
Boron Recovery Panel, Bypass Jumper
There is a Bypass Jumper tag, numbered 395109-5, on the Boron Recovery Panel. Does this bypass jumper conform to the current
Temporary Modification requirements specified in WC.10. Please provide an explanation.
. All Temporary Modifications have been reviewed and they conform to the requirements of the latest WC.10 revision. We are using the
same numbering system as previous issues of Temp Mod procedures.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
255
Space Heater in Boric Acid Tank Room
Provide an explanation for the temporary space heater in the Boric Acid Tank room. The space heater is plugged into a welding receptical
and marked do not remove, however there is no Temporary Modification tag on the equipment. Is this an undocumented temporary
modification?
Use attached documents.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
256
Meeting with the MP3 Service Water System Engineer
The OSTI NRC inspectors have requested a meeting on Wed. or Thursday 2-25 or 2-26 with the service water engineer to discuss changes
and testing to the service water pumps.
Met with inspectors. Discussed System Engineer qualifications, overall system condition, mod deferrals, temp mods - specifically TM 3 98-
OGL 1) Provided copy of EN 31084. 2) Left copy of inspection forms for Cycle 6-3 ring binder. 3) Inspector requested to meet with
Design Engineering supervisor to discuss T.M. screening form. 4) During walkdown identified 4 questions: 1) There is a leak on the
3HVK*F153 A 2) Leak on 3HVK'V937 3) Provide information on two drain pipes seismically qualified. 4) One of MCC Rod Control
Booster Pumps is win milling. HVK System Engineer met with inspector and provided information on the 2 leaks identified on the HVK
System. SQR 3 97478 and DCR M3 97097 was provided to address the seismic concern on the drain pipes. Provided inspector latest
results on the MCC Rod Control Booster Pump surveillance. (3SWP*P3A&3B) to resolve the win milling question. Design Engineering
supervisor met with the inspector and discussed the temp mod 198-0GL There has been a CR written to address this issue of the Temp
Mod CR 3-98-2023. Also provided inspector copies of NCR 3-97-124, Temp Mod -198415, and OD MP1075-97. The inspector had no
further questions,
34
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
_ _ _
j
'
i
.
l
Requot No.
Reauest/ Response
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\\
l
257
Service Water Pump changes and associated tests
i
Provide documentation supporting the changes made to the Service Water pumps includmg the impeller changes. Include
documentation governing the testing (e g. horsepower test) following these changes.
1. Service Water Pump Performance Test (SPROC 90 3 6, Rev. 5) 2. Service Water Pump 3SWP PI A Horsepower Test (SPROC EN 98 3
01, Rev. 0) 3. PDCR 94 094, " Service Water Pumps 3SWi"PI A, PlC, PID Material Changeout".
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
258
Work Control . 95 Outage
Requested A. Original Outage Scope, number worked, number deferred, number cancelled and number PMT'd during power ascension.
B. All AWOs generated during 95 outage how many worked, how many deferred, how many cancelled, and how many PMT'd during
power ascension.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
259
Work Control . Request for Overview
Inspectors requested a presentation which provided an overview of the work control process.
Conducted presentation to address the work process and shutdown risk.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
260
Work Control. Reportmg information
o
Requested information relative to our capability in retrieving information from PMMS AWOs.
Presented information on our capabilities for information retrieval No open issues resulted.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
261
Junction Box uncovered, impact on EQ requirements
There is a junction box which is not covered by the B Component Cooling Water pump in the comer above va;ve 3SWPV657. Is there a
cover required for this box and does it have EQ n quirements? How can it be determined in the field if EQ requirements apply to certain
aiuipment?
Issues of this nature would be addressed by Trouble Reports (TRs) Junction boxes should have covers. Junction boxes are not EEQ.
Junction Box gaskets are not taken credit for by EEQ. EEQ equipment is identified in the Equipment Qualification Master List (EQML);
EEQ equipment is also identified in PMMS. There is an EEQ sensitive work planer who takes care of work orders for EEQ equipment.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
262
Equipment quahfication of 3CCP SOVl%1A,90 degree conduit elbows with holes drilled in cover plate (s).
While performing a walkdown, inspectors identified a cover plate screw not fully engaged / inserted on 3CCl"SOVl%1 A. Additionally,
many 90 degree conduit elbows above this valve has holes dnlled in the cover plate. Do EQ requirements apply?
Issues of this nature would be addressed by Trouble Reports (TRs) TRs are part of the PMMS Program. The PMMS database identifies
which items are EEQ and the daily review of TRs would initiate CRs if necessary. Holes were drilled into 90 degree conduit elbows covers
to serve as "weepholes". For EEQ equipment, "weepholes" were added to equipment requiring them by Spec SP.EE.076 or more recently
after a walkdown of EEQ equipment by DCN DM3 01 1395 97 based on enteria provided in Engineering Evaluation M3.EV.97 0265,
" Engineering Evaluation for Placement of Weepholes in Junction Boxes and Conduits for EEQ Equipment.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
263
Diesel Cerwrator Fuel Leak
The inspector noted that there is a fuel leak and puddle on the floor in the B Diesel Generator room behind the fuel oil filter box possibly
due to a leaking T fitting. Please provide a description of action planned to address this.
The continuous vent Ime off the htter box was recently replaced. "Ihere is a trace of fuel at the base of the vent connection, probably
associated with the repair (fuel cannot be drained fully to replace this tubing). There is no ongoing fuel leak. The tubing was replaced
due to chaffing concerns. The small amount of fuel was wiped up.
35
- _ _ - . - _ . _ _ - - _ _ _ _
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
__
. _ _ _
-
._
_- _ _ _ . . _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ -_-- _-
- _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ - -
- _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ _
!
Raquest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
264
Diesel Generator Service Water Expansion joints
Please provide information describing how the limit stop adjustments on the Diesel Generator service water expansion joints are adjusted
and controlled. For example the adjustments on the limit stops for expansion jomt 3SWI"EJ6D appeared to have httle or no room for
expansion.
c
Information provided in an attachment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
265
Service Water Booster Pump Room materiel condition
The inspector noted that the material condition of the equipment in the Service Water Booster pump room, in particular the smaller size
valves was poor. Please provide a description of actions planned for improvements in this area.
The condition of the Service Water booster pump room (3SWI"P3A/B) located in the Auxiliary Building has been greatly improved over
the last year. The booster pump pedestals have been rebuilt with concrete and painted. The pumps were cleaned and painted and motor
screens replaced. All supply piping to the booster pumps was replaced. Some completion work is still required to finish painting
supports and floor plates installed as part of the mod. These lines have not been finish insulated insulated in all areas. In general,
fasteners in the system exhibit surface rust due to condensation resulting from the coolness of the sea water. This issue has been idenfitied
on walkdowns previously. A request to generically replace bolting with stainless steel was rejected due to the material strength
differences which were not adequate to support a blanket change. Experience has shown that although the bolting has surface rust, there
is no significant degradation to the fastener. However, each ase must be addressed on a case by case basis.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
266
Boric Acid Build Up on valve 3CHVS-352
The inspector noted a build up of boric acid on valve 3CHS V352 instrumentation valve for LT-103. Please provide a description of
actions planned to address this condition.
'
This had been previously identified and will be worked under AWO M3-97 22740. This is an RF06 item as the BAT has to be empty.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
267
Ineffective locking of valve in boric acid system
There is a valve in the boric acid system (Boric Acid Pump B bypass to discharge orifice) that has the hand wheel removed and a lock and
chain on the valve stem. The inspector noted that if this was intended to lock the valve to prevent unauthorized operation it is not
effective. Please provide an explanation of the condition and state whether or not it is required to be locked.
Valve 3CHS*V341 in the Boric Acid Pump Room (3CHS*V337 in the 'A' Pump Room is in the same condition) has it's handwheel removed
and a chain is locked around the valve and over the end of the valve stem. PalD INC and OP 3304c show these valves as locked
throttled. The chain placement prevents the re-installation of the handwheel and protects against inadvertent operation of the valve (i.e.
with a crescent wrench). The valve is throttled to control the Boric Acid Flow Rate when the Boric Acid Tank is on recirculation. No
further questions asked by inspector,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
268
Boric Acid Build up on valve
The inspector noted that there was a valve in the VCT room that had a major build up of boric acid on it. It appeared to be due to a
bonnet leak. No tag number provided by the inspector. Please provide a response identifying actions taken or planned for this condition.
AWO M3-98-02849 written to fix leaking DGS connection on 3CHS*LCV112C.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
269
Service water testing on 2-19-98
The test procedure for the SW tests performed on 219 98 referred to the SW OP for operation of the service water system during the test.
The SW OP requires that the strainer be valved in and operable, however, during the test it was tagged out. Please provide an
explanation for this situation.
The Service Water Horsepower Test perfornied 2/19/98 referred to the OP 3326, Service Water, to place a CCP and CCS heat exchanger in
service. There is no requirement to hsve all of the system in service per the OP. The condition of strainer blow down lines being out of
service was discussed with the CR shift during the pre-job brief and found not to have any impact on the procedure evolution. The
,
l
SPROC was hmited to being performed in Mode 5 when the ALPHA train was unprotected.
1
36
_ - - - _ - _ - - .
_-
- _ - _ _ ___.
!
Reauest No.
Request /Rewonee
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
270
Provide a copy of Root Cause Investigation Instruction
Provide a copy of 3 CAD-DI-1.02, Revision 3 for " Root Cause investigation". This was a request out of the presentation provided .
A copy of 3 CAD-DI-1.02, Revision 3 (as attached) was provided to the NRC for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
271
Assessments of Millstone Management Performance
Please provide any recent assessments of Millstone Managements performance and the status of related corrective actions. Assessments
include independent reviews, self assessments, etc. This ties with Request No.136.
Provided a copy of ESAR-97-002, Management Expectations for MP2 Engineering.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
272
Updated Organizational Chart
Provided Organizational chart and it is attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
273
Listing of PORC (M3) and SORC Members
Listing of PORC (M3) and SORC Members
o
Provided (attached)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
274
Listing of System Numbers for System Names
Listing of System Numbers for System Names
Provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
275
LERS on Failed LLRTs
Copies of all LERs addressing failed as-foundLLRTs or Total Type A, B, or C tests or Bypass Leakage Criteria.
Information has been provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
276
Request for copies of PI-19 and PI-29
Inspector requested copies of PI-19 and PI-29.
Copies of Pl.19 and Pl.29 provided to NRC inspectors as requested.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
277
Safety Function Requirements Manual (40500 Issues)
The inspector requested a summary of the 40500 inspection issues relative to the Safey Function Requirements Manual issue.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
278
Restart Evaluation
1) Provide a copy of Restart Evaluation Criteria for TRs/WOs (Fax copy to Rockville) 2) provide Restart Evaluation Criteria used for AR's.
1. Previously supplied. 2. Evaluation Cnteria attached
37
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - _
- - - - .
-
. _ _ _ _
. _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
_
Request No.
Request /Runonse
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . , , . . . . . . . .
279
Completed Data Packages
Completed Data Packages for Last 4 performances of SP 36M2 and SP 3609.1.
Information has been provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
280
DCN DM3-024329-97
Please provide copy of DCN DM3-02-0329-97 relative to RHR Recirculation Valve. Barton Range change.
Provided copy of DCN DM3-02-0329-97.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
281
Doors in the Screenhouse Service Water Cubicle
Please provide information that states how doors are controlled in the Service Water Pump cubicle. Information should be for watertight
requirements.
The fire and watertight doors accessing the Service Water cubicles may be kept open with Shift Manager (SM) approval considering plant
conditions and a fire watch assigned. Regarding the specific issue of the doors being left open presently, the U3 Shif t Manager confirmed
he was congnizant of the affected doors being kept open and had allowed the condition. A roving fire watch had been assigned. Durin
Mode 5, there is no technical specification specifically for Service Water but the system is a support system for other OPERABLE systems
The affected cubicle, however, was considered the non-protected train per the SM. In general, closure of the watertight doors is required
by Technical Specification 4.7.6 when sea level rises to 13 feet to prevent flooding of the SW cubicles. During normal operation, the doors
should remain closed exceptior normal access /cgress. This guidance comes from Reg. Guide 1.102 referenced in FSAR Section 3.4.1.1.
The Reg Guide states that,' Additionally, the plant should be designed and operated to keep doors necessary for flood protection closed
during normal operation". In response to NRC FSAR question, NU stated that "the watertight doors will be administratively closed in
such a fashion as to preclude intemal flooding of one service water pump compartment leading to a consequential fadure of the service
water pumps in the adjacent compartment". This criteria is satisfied by maintaining at least one door closed at all times except for normal
passage. FSAR change 96-MP3-015 was imtiated to clarify the FSAR to explicitly state the requirement for one door to remain closed at all
times. However, the F3ARCR was cancelled during the review cycle based on the FSAR being adequate. Tech Spec PEO rounfds
procedure OPS Form 3670.2-6 administratively verifies door position on a shiftly basis during modes 1-4 for both the fire and watertight
doors.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
282
PORC Meeting Minutes (December 17,1997)
Provide PORC Meeting Minutes for December 17,1997, including items related to RHR Recirculation line valve.
Requested information has been provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
283
Calculation 12179-NP(B) X7401
Provide a copy of Calculation 12179-NP(B)X7401 relative to snubber reduction.
Provided copy of calculation as requested.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
284
AWO for 3RHS*FCV611
Provide copy of AWO M3-96-15475
Provided copy of AWO M3-9615475 to the NRC inspector.
I
\\
f
I
38
_ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _
. _ _ _ -
_ - - - . . . - _ _ . .
!
Rcauest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
285
Evolution of the EWR and EWA
Provide an explanation of the thfference twtween EWR's and EWA's. Include a time hne identdying changes in the terminology and the
correspondmg controlhng procedures. Desenbe the evolution of the EWA or EWR from the imtiation stage, through approval and into
design changes, AWO's, to the chme out. A process flow diagram summarizing the controls in place would tw helpful.
Provided attached flowchart and copy of NCP 3.0L
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
286
Temporary Modificalmns
Please provide copy of latest Temporary Modification list (ones that are being deferred). Also provide copy of circled temporary
modifications on attached sheet.
I
Provided inspectors temporary modifications circled on list, also latest temp mod update. Also provided copy of NCR 3-96-318 and BWG
2362.200-1fM12 and 013.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
287
CRs issued since 128 98 update
Provide a listing of all MP3 CRs written since 128-98 that are related to Engineering *. This is an update to item SG and should tw tracked
separately. (* Tech Support & Design Engineering)
Attached list provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
288
List of DCNs on drawings
Provide a list of all open DC?Ts on MP3 drawings.
List provided as requested.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
289
List of CRs that 40500 looked at
Provide a list of all CRs that the 40500 NRC inspectors reviewed.
inspectors determined that this item was no longer needed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
290
Minor Modifications List
Provide a list of all minor modifications opened or closed since January 1,1995 to present on MP3.
In 1995, all minor mods were done as PDCRs, please see attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
291
List of Modifications Update
Provide a list of all modifications (DCRs and MMODs) opened or cksed since 1/28/98.
Per concurrence with inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
292
List of MP3 LEE's
Provide list of all IEEs for MP3 that are in MIMs. The list should include detail describing scope of IEE. system and safety related status.
Provided list and details as requested.
39
_
_
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . . - - _ _ _ - - _ _ - - - - - _
--- m
- _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _
Requost No.
Request /Hesponse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . ,
, , ,
293
NGP 6.12, MPM 3.00 and 3.05
Provide copy of procedure governing the IEE process, also provide a copy of Eng;ineering Self Assessment PES-97 039.
Provided inspector copy of NGP 6.12, procedure governing the IEE process. provided copy of Engineering Self Assessment PES.97-039.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . . , , , , , , . . .
294
Copy of MEPL Spec
Provide a copy of MEPL. Spec SP-ST.ME.944.
Provided inspector copy of MEPL Spec SP-ST-ME-944.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
295
OE items closed since January 1997
in follow up to response to item 66, provide a list of all OE items closed out since January 1997.
Provided information to inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
296
RAC Meeting Information
Please provide information when the next RAC meeting is. Also provide a copy of the RAC Agenda
o
RAC meeting is Re-scheduled for Monday, March 16 at 0930. The previously scheduled meeting had no new items identified for
presentation. With this additional time, it is expected that several new items will be completed for presentation. Provided information to
inspectors that RAC meeting was on 4/14/98 at 1300. This item is closed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
297
Restart Action Plans
Please provide background information, including actions taken regarding 1. RAP item C.4e (Adequacy of surveillance tests / program);
2. RAP item C.41 (Maintenance bacMog managed and impacct on operation assessed); 3. RAP item C.4j (Adequacy of plant housekeeping
i
and equipment storage); RAP item C.4h (Effectiveness of the plant maintenance program).
'
Providal information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2%
WP&OM Dept. Charter, Bregg Memo and NUMARC 93 01
Please provide: 1. WP&OM Department Charter," MSS-94-32. Work Planning and Control Organization and Responsibilities". 2.
NUMARC 93 01 " Industry Guideline for monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance and Nuclear Power Plants" 3. Are we working to
this memo? (4/14/98)
Does not required NUMare 93 01 (4/14/98) This was a memo that sent out a draft organization chart and responsibilities out for comment
in March 1994. This memo is not being worked to.
..............s................................................................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
299
WC-9 and WC.9.1
l
Provide the following procedure: WC.9, " Station Surveillance Program" and WC.9.1, " Station Program implementation".
l
i
!
Provided information to inspector for review.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
300
U3 WC.14. C WPC 1, DC 1, U3 WC1.1 and U3 CMG 001
Please provide the following procedures- 1. U3 WC 14,"On Line Scheduling",2. C WPC 1," Conduct of Work Planning and Outage
Management",3. DC 1," Administration of Procedures and Forms",4. U3 WC 1.1,"Urut 3 Minor Maintenance Process Controls",5. U3
i
CMG 001, " Conduct of Maintenance Job Briefings".
'
Provided information to inspector for review.
40
I
I
l
!
i
l
_____ _____________________ _ __
_ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
. _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ -___-____ ___-__ - ___ _________ _ _ __ -___ _ -_ _ _ . - _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _
l
t
!
,
l
i
'
!
)
Reauest No.
RequestStesponse
l
,
l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , , , .
l
301
Corrective Action Procedures
t
l
Please provide: 1. RP.16," Problem Reporting"; 2. RP-4," Corrective Actions"
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , ,
302
Use of Planning Feedback Report (U3 WPC2)
1. Please provide copies of filled out Planning Feedback Reports (Attachment 3 to U3 WPC2) as a result of "Q" Work Orders performed
within the last 12 months. 2. Explain how individual concerns are addressed. 3. Provide actions taken in response to t above.
Duplicate to 362
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
303
Work Order Breakdown by System
Provide a monthly cotmt of work orders by "Q" systems and job priority for the penod January 1996 through January 1998. Provide a
listing of system abbreviations if different from standard abbreviations.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
304
Work Order Status Sorts
Please provide Monthl count of Q and non.Q Work Orders whose status was "Prework," Working","Postwork" and "Closcout* for the
f
period January 1996 thru 1938.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
305
Provide a copy of NCP 3.04
Please provide a copy of NCP 3.04
Provided copy of NGP 3.04.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
306
Completed data packages
Completed Data Packages for last 4 performances of: SP 3609.2 and SP 3609.1.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
307
Overtime Worked . Maintenance
Summary information about the level of overtime worked in recent months by employees in Maintenance.
Information provided to inspectorifor review. Information acceptable to inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
3C2
Perfonnance Annunciator Panel Reporting System
Provide a copy of procedm a and guidance documents applicalbe to the Unit 3 Performance Annunciator Panet Reporting System.
Provide a copy of the Operational Readiness Plan dated 1/31/98 and a copy of OA11, Self Assessment, procedure dated 2/18/98 (SORC
approved) for the inspectors review.
i
41
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------
Request No.
Requcet/ Response
......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
309
Manhour estimates for the current Workload Backlogs . Operations
Provide manhour estimates for the current workload backlogs in Operations.
l
Scheduhng has no manhours associated with Operations work.
!
. . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. . . . .
310
Mantwur estimates for the current Workload backlog. Maintenance
Provide manhour estimates for the current workload backlogs in Maintenance.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
311
Manhour Estimates for the current Workload Backlogs . Engineering (Design and Tech Support)
Manhour estimates for the current workload backlogs in Engineering . Design and Tech Support.
Scheduling has no manhours associated with Design or Tech Support Engineering work.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
312
Overtime Worked . Design and Tech Support
Summary information about the level of overtime worked in recent months by employees in Engineering (Design and Tech Support).
o
The attached table provides the average hours of overtime worked by NU full time employees for the last three months in Engineering.
Information provided to the inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
313
Overtime Worked - Operations
Summary information about the level of overtime worked in recent months by employees in Operatwns.
Information provided to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
314
Provide information regarding schedule reference codes
Please provide information regarding the schedule reference codes related to the listof " Outstanding Equipment Deficiencies" which was
provided to the C TI Team in their initial request (Reference Request #28).
Reference item #316: Provided details regarding the schedule reference codes and specific items associated with deferred work. A hst
was provided for further action and is addressed in request #316.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
315
Clarify what the pressurizer water volume is
Provide data related to LER 97-63. Clarify what the water volume is for the pressurizer. Figure 15.S.2 in the FSAR indicates that it is 1800
cubic feet while Section 5.410 indicates it is 1400 cubic feet. Please clanfy this discrepancy.
FSAR Section 5.410, Pressurizer Design Data Internal Volume was changed to 1800 ft3 on 10/97. A copy of the latest table 5.4-10 is
attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
_ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
316
Questions on AWOs that may have been Deferred
Inspector has a listing of AWOs that he would like additional information on concerning deferral status.
Telephone calls to discuss the attached list all but 4 items were resolvd. Attached are 4 work orders with follow-up responses for the
inspectors review. (AWO's M3-9840474, M3-9717165, M3-9711268, and M3-98-00V76).
42
. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ _ _ _ _ _ .
4
I
Reaucet No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
317
Copics of Audits . Operations, Maintenance, and Engineering
Provide copics of audits and other assessments performed by Nuclear Oversight of Operations, Maintenance and Engineering during the
fourth quarter.
Copies of audits provided to the inspoctor for his review.
l
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
. , , , , ,
,
318
Copics of Self-Assessments performed by Operations, Maintenance and Engineering - 4th quarter 1997
Provide copies of Self-Assessments performed by Operations, Maintenance and Engineering during the 4th quarter of 1997.
Provided copies of the following self-assessments to the inspector for review: 3 OPS-SA-97-07,3 OPS-SA-97-08,3CY-SA-97-05,3CY-SA-97
06,3CY-SA-97-07,3WM-SA-9711,3MNTC-SA-97-13,3MNTC-SA-9716,3DE-SA-97-07,3DE-SA-9710,3TS-SA-97-07,3TS-SA-97-98. Still
missing 3TS-SA 9711.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
319
Provide listing of design change . current outage
Provide a listing of design changes to be completed during the current outage.
Information provided to inspector for review. Also provided a copy of " Millstone Unit 3, Plant Design Changes and Modifications Outa6e
06UO2 (1996 1998) , Rev. O.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
320
Meetmg with Engineering on RSS Sump
RSS Engineer to meet with inspector and discuss RSS Sump Mods.
I
This meeting was cancelled per inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
321
Tech Spec Amendment for Pressurizer Level
Following interview with the MP3 Regulatory Compliance Manager on LER 97-63 (Pzr Level), inspector requested copies of License
l
Amendment Submittais and Request for additionalinformation.
Provided Amendment Requests under B16625 and B16892 with NRC Request dated 2/13/98. Please see attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
322
Management Oversight of Maintenance Activities
Provide Maintenance Department Performance Indicator reports for the last six months.
Information providad.
.......................................................4, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
323
Nuclear Group Policy 2.6,'On-Line Maintenance *
Provide a copy of Nuclear Group Policy 2.6,"On-line Maintenance"
Nuclear Group Policy 2,6 "On-Line Maintenance" has been deleted. The policy information was disseminated to 3 other documents
(copies provied): Nuclear Group Pohey 10, dated,12/8/97, ' Station Operation and Authority"; and Northeast Utilities, " Nuclear Safety
.
Standards and Expectations" manual, dated 5/28/97, and O A10,'Milsttone Station Maintenance Rule Program *, current Rev.1, dated
2/26/97.
43
L _ __
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
, _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i
Reaucet No.
Request /Hesnonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
324
Nuclear Oversights " Conduct of Operations" Audits
Provide any periodic reports of Nuclear Oversigfhts ongoing reviews of MP3 " Conduct of Operations"
MP3 Operations liaison to Nuclear Oversight, provided Feriodic Reports (weekly) from 8/1/97 through 2/20/98 (see attached). In
addition, Audits and Evaluations branch of Nuclear Oversight conducted an Audit (MP-93-A01) of " Conduct of Operations". Reference
attached memo AE.98 4057 dated 2/2/98
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
325
List of training to be completed to support restart
During the Training briefing, inspector requested a list of training that will be completed to support restart. Not training that has been
conunitted to previously but rather trainin8 which the department determined would be necessary to turn the station from a shutdown
mode to an operating mode. (exclude motherhood training like 2000. SCWE, etc). Technical and operations training.
A lat of training conducted to support restart was provided by Technical and Operator training branches.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
326
Program Descriptions for Electrical and Mechanical Maintenance
During the Training briefing, inspector questioned why the Electrical and Mechanical Maintenance program descriptions were brand new
(EL 007, Rev. O and MM 007. Rev. 0).
It was explained by the Manager of Techmcal Training that these items were complete rewrites in a new format and assigned revision 0 as
a result of this action.
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
o
327
Qual. Matrices without Dates
During the Training briefing, M AB questioned why the I&C and ESP matnces didn't have due dates (expiration dates).
It was explained that I&C and ESP matrices did not have due dates because there was no expiration dates assigned to the qualifications.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
328
Objectives for new NTM staff training
ED Initiative to redevelop the NTM. Once the NTM is developed, training will be provided to the staff. Inspector asked if objectives for
that training have been developed. Training stated they were being developed. Inspector requested a copy of what has twen developed to
date
A copy of the draft training objectives for NTM 6.01 was provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
329
TQR not being put through the NTM 5.06 process
During the training briefing, the NRC questioned why the TQR had not gone through the process outimed in MM 5.06 which pertains to
OJT. Their point was that a TQR was essentially the same thing as an OJT.
The TQR process defined in NTM 7.202 was desenbed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
330
Restart Training for Maintenance, Chemistry
various departments are providmg 2 days of Restart Training. Request is for lesson plans for this training for the Electrical and
Mechanical Maintenance. l&C and Chemistry.
Copics of lesson plans provided.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
l
.331
Limitorque Training
l
Provide copies of exam (s) and answers to recently provided Limitorque training (given in the past few weeks).
Copies of the exams from the most recent Limitorque training sessions were provided.
44
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ . ___ - _ _ _ _ _ _
, _ _ _ _ - - _
l
! Requwt No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
332
Documentatmn of DCM, Rev. 6, Change 4 Briefing
huipector provided a briefing to Design Engmeering at the end of February on Change 4 to Rev. 06 of the Design Control manual.
Inspector would hke to see documentation of what he taught.
Per discussion with inspwtor, he provided "familianzation' of the change to Design Engineering. lie discussed the highlights of the
changes that dealt with the process. He provided a handout. In addition, even though the DCM is not governed by the DC procedures,
the Change was taken to SORC and the form identifying what level of training was approved as familiarization.
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ..
333
Corrective Actions for CR M3-974185 (Mispositiorung)
Questioned if commitment to review / revise OP 360B had been completed or due date extended.
Check AITTS. It has been extended. Submit copy request to Events Analysis 3/7. Provided copy of date extension to inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
334
Corrective Actions for CR M3-97-0485 (Mispositioning)
Questioned adequacy of corrective action for briefing on outcome of CR's, major procedure changes and other pertinent information.
Closed to Rev.10 of OP 3260 but shift briefing section does not mention these items. A/R 97003745-11.
j
l
Provided copy of Rev . 9, OP 3260 which had no requirement for reviewing "DAS topics" during shift turnover. Rev.10 has this and DAS
topics includes CR's and procedure changes.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
335
Corrective Actions for CR MA974185 (Mispositionings)
Questioned validity of cancelling corrective action which required treating secondary components with same degree of importance as
I
secondary, A/R 97003745-06.
Submitted paperwork to document closure instead of cancellation.
.... . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...... ....... . . . . . . ...
336
Follow-up to Ops Readiness
Provide a copy of CR M3-98-0036
)
Provided a copy of CR M3-98-0036.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
337
Follow up on Boric Acid Tank
Provide CR's M197-0341, M3-984883, and MS97-0934.
l
l
Provided copies of CRs M3-97-0341, MS984183, and MS97-0954.
. . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
)
338
Temporary Modification 197444
l
l
Provide copy of Temporary Modification 197484.
1
3
l.
Provided information on Temporary Modification 3-97414.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
339
Provide copies of deferred EWR's
Please provide copies of EWRs and basis for deferral (summary of workscope is adequate in lieu of copy of EWR). EWR's (94-090,94-094,94-175,94-213,95-27.94-25,) (97 132,98 010,98-012,98-015).
1
Provided EWRs94-090,94-094,94175,94 213,95-27. 94-25,) (97132,98-010,98 012,98-015, to inspector on 3/10/98.
1
I
!
45
!
I
i
L.
_
-_.
_- _ _ _
.
.
__________.___-___________-a
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - .__-- . _ _ _ _ - _ .
!
6
i
I
f Request No.
Request /Remonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
340
Follow.up on Doric Acid Tank
Provide setpoint calculation M-51C-01 1187E3.
Provided copy of setpoint cale 34 51C-011187E3.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
341
Follow up to Operational Readiness
Provide copy of EN 31097 " System Readiness Procedure"
l
Provided a copy of EN 31097 from Records.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
182
Followup to Boric Acid Tank issue
Provide copy of MLEV-97-0256
Provided copy of M3-EV-97-0256.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
343
Follow-up to Boric Acid Tank issue
Provide copy of DCR M197109.
Provided copy of DCR M3-97109 from Nuclear Records.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
344
Followup to Boric Acid Tank issue
Provide de ferred reason for corrective action # 4 of CR M198-0310.
Provided reason to inspector on 3-9-98. The reason is on 98001414 05
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
345
Provide documents from Design Modifications
Provide copy of DM3-00-0432-97, DM34138-97, MMOD 97-555, and Temp Mod. 3-97-044.
Provide copy of DM1004132 97, DM1004138-97, MMOD 97-555 and Temp. Modification 3-97414 from Nuclear Records.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
346
Provide documents for Design Modifications
Provide copy of MSEE 00El-97.
Provided copy of MSEE O-0064-97 from Nuclear Records.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . .
347
Requested list af CRs
Provide copy of CR's per attached list, their associated AR's and their reason for deferral.
Provided CR's (please see attached list). Also provided copy of their corrective actions and reasons for deferral.
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
l
348
OSTI CR Request
Please provide copies of CR's (ACR M1970488, M197-0653, Mt97-4531). Also provide status and basis for any deferred items.
Provided copies of CR's ACR M3-9744888, M197 0653 and ML97-4531 also status on deferred items.
46
- _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
. _ _ . - -
. - - _ _ - - _ _ _ - - - - - - - _ -
-
Request No.
Request /Respon e
-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
349
Provide copy of MEPLSelf. Assessment
Provide inspator copy of MEPL Self-Assessment MP3-PES-W 009.
Provided copy of MEPL Self-Assessment MP3-PES-97-009 from nuclear records.
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , , , , , , . . . . , ,
350
Provide information on PORC and SORC schedule for next 3 weeks
Provide inspectors copies of PORC & SORC schedules for the next 3 weeks.
PORC and SORC schedules provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . .
351
Clarification on Item 53, Line 365
Please provide clarification on meaning of "Various NCR's", required to support NCR closure" as previously provided in response to item
53, line 365.
This question was cancelled by the inspector. The inspector has no further questions on this item (4/14/98).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
352
Provide System Readiness Schedule
Provide schedule for System Readiness Reviews for Mode 4.
System Readiness Reviews are tracked by SPROC 97 3-30 "Startup and Power Ascension Sequencing Procedure * The systems listed in
sections 4.4.1 and 4.5.1. These systems will have either a final System Readiness Review or an intrim System Readiness Review complete
prior to Mode 4.
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
353
Most Recent List of MP3 Opciability Determinations
' Please provide most recent list of Operabihty Determinations. Provided for MP3.
j
Provided current list of Operability Determinations.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
354
Nucicar Oversght Audits
Please provide copies of Nuclear Oversight Audits: M3-97-A45aL M3-97 A 0903, and MP1TS-SA-001.
Provided copies of Nuclear Oversite Audits M3-97.A-0504, M3-97.A4903, and MP3-TS-SA-001.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
355
Provide references #2. 3 and 4 to Calc. 97-ENG-019M3.
Provide references #2,3 and 4 to Calc. 97-ENG 019M3.
Provided copies of Refererwes 2,3 & 4 for calc. 97-ENG-01509M3. These references are ones that are used for similar calculations to 97
ENG-01509M3.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
336
Request for Deferred EWR's
Provide EWR's per attached list. Also provide copy of their deferrals.
Provided copies of EWR's and EWA's and their reasons for deferral. (please see attached)
i
47
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . -
- - . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
. _ - . .
,
y
,
1
I
I
Request No.
Request / Response
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
357
EWR's
l
l
[
Provide copies of EWR's per attached list,
l
}
Provided copies of EWR/ EWA to the inspector. (please see attached)
{
' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., ..........
358
Provide copies of self-assessments
ESAR -PES-97-040, ESAR PES97-016 (MPE ILRT), ESAR PES-97 015 (Setpoints), ESAR PES-97-003, ESAR PES-97-005.
r
i
Provided copies of ESAR-PES-97-040, ESAR PES-97-06, ESAR PES-97-015, ESAR PES-97 003, and ESAR PES-97-005 from nuclear records.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
,
359
Testing of Manual Valves in EOPs
Q
'
l
I
The inspector is concerned that no testing exists for manual valves in EOPs. Testing should exist for these valves commensurate with their
l
importance in EOPs.
1
CR M3-98-1564 has been written and the corrective action plan for this CR will ensure that manual valves referenced in AOPs/EOPs that
play a role in minimizing the consequences of a transient or accident are identified and cycled. If they have not been cycled during
,
'
normal plant operation (system aligmnents, to support work during surveillance) they will be cycled prior to Mode 2. The corrective
action plan has not been finalized as of 4/21/98 but is attached for your information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3G
Slipping Entry to Mode 4
I
"
1. Please provide copies of each schedule change for entry into Mode 4. A " Change" would be defined as a one day movement in the
schedule. Begin with the first date that Mode 4 was scheduled. 2. For each one day change in the schedule, provide a brief explanation of
j
l
why the change was made. 3. Contmue to uridate schedule changes until Mode 4 is achieved.
Provided.
i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
361
Recently Completed Safety Related AWOs
Please provide a printout of safety-related Wos that have been closed within the last six months. Include the WO Number, an abstract
indicating 'he WO issue, initiation date, closure date, and the responsible department (as a minimum).
Provided information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
362
Use of Planning Feedback Report (U3WPC2)
Please provide copies of filled out Planning Feedtack Reports (Attachment 3 to U3 WPC2) as a result of *Q" WOs performed within the
last 12 months. 2. Explain how individual concerns are addressed. 3. Provide actions taken in response to l. above.
Provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
363
Valve Testing Per ASME Section XI
- 1. Provide a table showing all valves in the IST Program (include valve #, size, type of test, frequency of test, type of valve, Design Req.)
2. Provide the dates of each IST since January 1993 on the table. 3. Provide the bottom line of each test - SAT / ALERT /ETC. 4. Provide a
contact name.
4 Systems provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
. . . . . . . . . . . .
364
Ravision to Corrective Action Procedure
Inspector requested status / copies of revision to Corrective Action Program from 40500 inspection which were mentioned in !l + % 'To
the Point'
RP4 not SORC approved yet. Scheduled in nest few weeks. RP4 SORC approved and copy attached.
!
l
48
.
a___-_-__-__-____-__.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - -
- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -
-}
i
l
l
!
Reorest No,
Request /Res ponse
I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
....
365
PORV logic Qualified to :EEE 279
i
Inspector requested to know if PORV logic was quahfied to IEEE 279 students.
Regulatory Comphance Manager met with inspector and verbally provided rsponse that it is not IEEE 279 (does not apply' We have a
hybrid of IE and Non IE circuitry.
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
366
Flowcharts of Work Control Process
Inspector requested copies of work control process flow charts.
1
1
i
Provided information to inspector for review.
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
367
Request for Calc.12179-P(R)-945, Rev.1
Provide copy of calc.12179-P(R)-945, Rev.1
Provided Calculation 12179-P(R)Al5, Rev.1 to the inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
368
Ileatup to Mode 4
When is it whcduled?
,
Letter B17080 attached. Information phoned to Inspector on 2/25/98 at 0815.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
369
Overpressure protection for RCS sampling Ctmt. penetrations
P&lD shows no rehef valve for penetration overpressure protection. Inspector desired to see a drawing that shows these penetrations.
Provided isometric. No relief valves are provided because Target Rock isolation valves will unseat to relieve overpressure.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
370
Response to Genenc Lxtter 96 06
Inspector requested copy of NU response to Generic letter 96 06.
Provided docketed information. Response concerning containment isolutic,ns/ penetration overpressure is due to NRC on 4/15.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 71
CR M3-97 2599 Follow-up Information
Has the procedure been revised and contacts tested? Overlap review (GL 9641) discrepancy with SWP"MOV71 A/B close control circuit
test.
The procedure has been revised and the testing has been performed. No further questions asked by the inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
372
Follow-up on CR 97 4434
Has AR 97029754-02 been completed? Please provide information.
P.ovided copy of AR closure notes for this assignment.
!
l
l
!
49
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _
.-
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _
l
!
l
l
Request No.
Request /Rearmnse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
373
CR M3-97-2515 Follow-up Question
it is not clear why the EOP's do rwt require boration in accordance with Technical Specifications. I don't understand why natural
circulation EOP is not compatible with Twimical Specificatens.
EOP 35ES42, Natural Circulatitm Cooldown, Rev.11, Step 2 required boration of the RCS to the highest concentration required for each
MODE the reactor will pass through during the cooldown process. Step 4 requires verification of RCS boron concentration using OP
3209A, Shutdown Margm is greater than that required for hot standby, hot shutdown, or cold shutd; vn. OP 3209A uses the applicable
Tnhnical Specification for required shutdown margin (TE No. 4.1.1.1.2.1.b).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
374
Follow-up to CR 97 4192
is it accetpable to defer known FSAR discrepancies? Has a 50.59 screen been completed?
'lhere is no IST requirement to verify the second check valve be tested with a periodic reverse of low test or tested for back seat leakge.
The IST requirement is rnet by performing RT to venfy closed. The FSRCR is an enhancement to clarify what tests are perfomed yet. A
safety evaluatmn is required for this issue, so a screening will be performed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
375
CR M3-974003 Follow-up
Please provide status and copy of other CR's. Referenced Section 2.
Provide status and copy of CR's 6585,6586,6587,8231, and M3-97-2552.
o
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
376
Safety Evaluation E3-EV.97-0014," Mods to QSS, RSS & Safety injection
Page 5, C. Pump HPSH for Post Loca Sump Recirculation Please provide pump vendor information indicating that the charging pumps
and SI pumps were designed to operate with a fluid temperature of 230 degrees Fahrenheit.
. See attached vendor information which shows 300 degrees Fahrenheit design temperature.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
377
Follow.up on CR 97-4462
Provide information on how Tech Spec 6.8.4.e is being complied with including Preventive Maintenance & Periodic Surveillance
j
programs, Pre-planned operatmg procedures, and Administrative Procedure requirements.
1
See attached documents.Provided to inspector on 3/12/98. No further questions from inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
378
Follow.up to Cr 97 4571
A/R 97030022-03 "TS requires Bst Effort. does not preclude mode change", does not seem like a valid deferral justification. Are Tech
j
Specs bemg complied with or not?
'
This AR 9703022-03 is now complete as of 3/5/98. See attached AR. Provided to inspector on 3/12/98. No further questions from
!
inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
379
Justification for Modification Deferral
f
Please provide additional information on the 1ollowing EWRs: M3-98003, M3-97172,97171,97144, and 97125.
!
Provide copies of EWRs: M3-98-003, M3-97172,97171,97144, and 97125. Provided to inspector on 3/12/98.
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
I
I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
380
Follow-up on CR MS-97 3940
t
l
Provide entire CR including Root Cause Evaluation and c escription of all corrective actions and the status of them (deferred, open, closed,
basis).
'
Provided entire CR includmg root cause Evaluation and description of all corrective actmns and status on them.
l
.
i
50
l
'
l
L ____--
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - -
\\
l
Beauest No.
Request / Response
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
381
Follow-up on CR M3 97-3954
Concern on where abouts of missing part not addressed. 3SWP-STR2B lower strainer clement missmg.
Although not documented in the CR response, the following items were considered in the evaluation of the condition. The piping
i
down tream of the strainer has a vertical rise and then drop of 6 ft. Then there are various dead legs at flow transitions including a dead
leg drain at each cire pump supply manifold. The final tie to the cire pump is 3/8 inch tubing. The affected piping does not lend itself to
disassembly /inspectwn easily, however, many sections were or will be removed / replaced due to leakage or valve replacement. Each
supply line to the cire pump is checked daily for flow and pressure by plant operators on daily rounds which would indicate any loss of
flow due to flow obstruction.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
382
Fo!!ow-up on CR M197 4055
Walldown identified 3RCS*MV8098 is installed backwards. Is valve in GL 89-10 Program and if so, has position been accounted for in
thrust calculation?
Please see attached response.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
383
CR M197-4117
Discepancy: Error in calculation for ESF Building flooding rate (ICAVP DR-MPSO476). It is not clear whether the floor drains should or
should not be credited in this calculation.
The design basis floodmg evaluation for the ESF Building is contair ed in calculation 12179-P(R)-1194. Consistent with Section 5.2.2 of
ANS-56.11 this calculation does not credit flow through floor drains to evaluate the potential for flooding consequences in the ESF
Building. Calculation 94-ENG-101kM3 (the subject of CR MS97-4117) does not represent the design basis flooding review for this area of
the plant. Calculation 94-ENG-101-M3 was performed to determine, for Probablisite Risk Assessment purpm a more realistic flooding
scenario includmg flow between cubicles through the floor drains, since for the intended purpose this is more conservative. The corrective
action that has been assigned for CR ML97 4117, is to clarify calculation 94-ENG-101LM3, so its purpose is clear, and to remove any
apparent conflict with the design basis flooding calculation 12179-P(R)-1194.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
384
Service Water colluting in floor penetration seal area
Service Water leak below valve 3SWP*V22, appears to be collecting in the floor penetration seed area. Provide information.
The water in the penetration had no indications of being salt water. The penetration was dried and inspected for pipe leakage. The
system was left in service for at approximately 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> at 60 gpm and the area re-inspected. No signs of leakge or water accumulation.
Water was possible due to mopping or other non-system related process. No further questions or concerns from inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
385
Od Puddle below Hydro Motors for 3HVQ* MOD 2A2
Oil puddle below Hydro Motors for 3HVQ* MOD 2A2 also from the motor above this one.
The subject damper actuators (3HVQ* MOD 26A2, B2) have been previously identified as having hydraulic oil leakage. This leakage has
been evaluated and the leak rate is acceptable for continued operation of the actuators. The leakage is currently monitored by system
engineering personnel as well as by operations personnel dunng rounds. These actuators hold approximately 31/4 quarts of oil and per
telecon with the vendor (ITT Barton did 30-April-1992) these actuators can operate with no impact with slight leakage. As a general rule,
the vendor indicated that a loss of a quart of oil would be a concern. Current leakage rates (as indicated by the visible oil accumulation
below the actuators) indicate that the current oil loss is well within an accep' table range and do not warrant immediate attention. There
are currently two work orders in the system to inspect and repair if necessary these actuators. AWO numbers M198-02010 exists to repair
the leakage from 3HVQ* MOD 26B2 and AWO M3-98 01131 is written to inspect and repair if necessary actuator 3HVQ* MOD 26A2. The
latter AWO is scheduled to be performed on'a monthly basis. Should the leakage rates of either actuator be determined to be adverse to
continued operability of the system, the actuators will be repaired. In any case, the actuators will be repaired at the next available outage
window regardless of their condition.
I
!
51
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- - - - _ _ . _ _ __ - _ -
_- _ - .
i
l
l
RecuMh Request /Rewonse
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
386
QSS*P3A & Sil-PP1 A&U Pump Seal leaks
The pump seals on QSS*P3A & Sif(*P1 A&B are leaking more than the NRC inspectors are used to seemg. Is there any plan to fix these?
To prevent boric acid build up7 The leaks cppear to be gettmg worse.
Please see attached response.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .
387
IWQ*ACU1 A Freon Trap Supports rusted away
HVQ*ACU1 A Freon Trap Supports rusted away. This item was found during inspection walkdown. Provide explanation.
The supports are not rusted to the extent that they present an immediate concern. Trouble Report / AWO M3-98-01966 has been
previously submitted to restore the condition of these skids.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
388
HVQ*ACU1B Fan
HVQ' ACU1B Fan tagged with a Trouble Report tag stating that the fan telt is loose. Is this an operability issue . when are these fans
required to support operability, Mode 4,27
This unit is required for Modes 1 4 and 5&6 to support RHR. The belt was TR'd because there is a slight noise indicating that the belt is
becoming loose. Monthly PMs are performed on the ACU's to assure they are running properly and a six month surveillance is perfomed
to verify correct air flows. Presently there is no indication that the ACU is not performing it's intended function. This is a long term
reliability issue.
.............................. .....
. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
389
HVQ Penetrations
Service Water penetrations between HVQ and Pump rooms. Some have boots, some do not. Some have seals only. Some have standing
Water in penetration. Please explain.
The subject penetration seals are ES-98-4-A, ES-98-4-B and B-ES-D13F of Map Drawing Series 25212-24279 Shs. ES014 A-D. Penetrations
ES98-4-A and ES98-4 D each have a service water pipe pentrant (3SWP15007203 and 3SWP15007103, respectively) and are sealed with
Silicone RTV Foam in accordance with seal detail M14 A (Drawing No.12179-2400-680 024). There is a 1/4 inch thick layer of 96-081
silicone adhesive scalant over the foam. This detail does not require a boot to maintain the SLCRS boundary. The other penetration is a
ventilation duct opening. The fire damper provides the fire seal. A silicone boot is installed for SCLRs. The insulation has Wen removed
from the service water hne. There is a Controlotron flow measurmg device attached to the service water line. The service water pipe is
,
cold and can sweat when conditions permit. I did not witness the pipe sweating during my walkdownk, but talked with the HVQ System
Engmeer who indicated that he has wen the pipe sweat. I also did not witress any pipe leaks. It is likely the standing water in the
penetration is from the pipe sweating. However, Trouble Report 12M3093807 has been initiated to have the water removed from the
sleeve and to verify that there is no pipe leak at the penetration.
............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
390
Conduit 3CX9770A found corroded
Conduit 3CX9770A found to be corroded. Please provide information.
This item was walked down. A Trouble Report was submitted for this item, TR #12M3160939.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .............. . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
391
I-Beam above conduit 3CX977A not supported
(
l-Beam above conduit 3CX977A did not appear to be bolted or welded to the room side support. Found during inspector walkdown.
l
Explain.
!
l
An investigation determined that there is no, permanent bolting hardware missing from the structural steel. The design drawings show
'
that the areas which were questioned are beam erection seats which are used to temporanly hold the beam in place during initial plant
construction, until the final welded connection is completed. Since the beam seats do not perform a function after the final connection is
in place (which was confirmed to be the case), the beam seat and optional bolts are not required to be installed. Note: The correct
conduit number in the vicinity of these beams is 3CX9770A.
l
52
_ . _ _ _
_
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
!
l
,
i
Request No.
Request / Response
i
{
1
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
...... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
393
Further information on Deferrals EWRs/ MODS
Please provide copies of the EWA's/EWRs for the items with further review in the states column in the enclosure (2) list, dated 3/11/98.
Provided copics of EWAs/EWR for the items with further review in the status column of the attached list.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
393
Additional Information on Mod. issues
Please provide includmg the DCR/MMOD and Safety Evaluation. If the package is very large there is no r.ced to make a copy. Just let us
know where it is. For items with further review in the states column enclosure (1) dated 3/11/98.
Provided copies of requested EWR information on DCR/MMOD or calculations. All documentation has been provided to the inspector
for his review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
394
Shutdown Risk
Questioned if placing freeze seal on line for 3 Sill *V011. S1 Pump suction from RWST was classified as a Higher Risk Evolution and if it
was handled accordingly.
Evaluation was not classified as high nsk by management and shutdown risk review group.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
395
Communications within Operations Department
inspector requested back coDjes of Operations' Manager Briefing Sheets.
Provided OM briefs back to mid February.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3%
Vendor Equipment Technical Information Program
1. Has an audit been performed or is there a documented basis for the conclusio that the Vendor Manuals for equipment supplied
through the NSSS Vendor (such as charging and Si pumps) are accuratge and up to date? 2. Should Westinghouse Tech Bulletin 8519
(coupline Pin wear inspection) have been included in the Charging pump VTM? 3. When was the last time Pacific Pump and other
related Charging Pump Component Vendors were contacted to update the VrM? 4. What is status of AR's generated as a result of
1/5/98 Self. Assessment?
Provided inspector with a copy of the response to these questions.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
397
Drawing for 3SWP*TV35A&D
Please provide copy of valve body drawing for 3SWP*TV35A&B.
Provided copy of valve body drawing for 3SWP'TV35A & B. Obtained drawing from records.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
398
Latest Temporary Modification List
Provide a list of the latest Temporary Modifications for MP3.
Provided list of Temp Mods to inspectors.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
399
MP3 AWOs
Please provide copies of the following , WO's: M3-98-0685, M3-984)0915, M3-98-0M80, M3 97 21194 and M3-97-21195.
Provided AWOs toinspectors.
53
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ - - - - _ - - - _ - - - _ .
Reaucet No.
Request /Rewonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
, , , . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . . . . . , ,
400
MP3 P&lDs
Please provide a set of P&lDs (Information only copy) for inspector's area.
Provide inspector copy of *lNFO ONLY" P& ids for their area.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. ,,.... .
0 71
Generic letter 964)6
A review of the RCS Sample Lines indicates that these Penetrations may be susceptible to the pressurization described in Generic Letter 96-
06. Unit 2 stated that these lines would be modified (1/27/97, Penetration #21, GL 96-06 Response). Please provide difference between
Unit 2 & 3 penetrations.
Please r.ee attached. (Please Reference #406).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..... . . . . . . . . . . . .....,
032
Setpoints
Please provide setpoint/cale. incorporation on the attached setpoints.
Provided copies of setponts from list for items 1-10 and 14. For items 11 & 13, there are no setpoitns they are analog computer points. For
item 12, they are values from spec SP-EE-321.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
403
Provide Boric Acid Pump Root Cause
o
Provide Boric Acid Pump Air-Bindir.g Root Cause. Also provide a copy of Operations procedure used during 3/12/98 event.
Provided copy of Root Cause for Ibric Acid Pump Air-Binding. Also provided copy of OP 3304C.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
,
t
4N
Information on Fire Protection Requirements for SW Pump Cubicle
j
Provide information on requirements for fire doors in the SW Pump Cubicles.
Provided information to inspector for review.
!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 035
Procedures for Operatmg RHR
Provide copies of OP3310A and forms, OP 3260A and forms OP3201 1 and DC-4
Provided DC-4, Rev. 4, Change 2, OP 3260A Rev.10 and Changes 2-6,8, OP 3260A-3, Rev. 2, OP 3260A-4, Rev.10, Change 1, OP 3260A-5,
Rev. 3 and OP 3260A-6, Rev.1. Also provided OP 3310A, Rev.14 and Change 1, OP3310A-1, Rev. 6,OP 3310A-2, Rev. 8, Change 1,
OP3310A-3, Rev. 9, OP 3310A-4, Rev. 4 and OP 3310A-5, Rev. 4 Change 1.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
4%
Generic letter 96-06
i
a
in reference to request #401, the inspector has the following questions: 1. The supplied text and drawing (on request 401) model #'s are
j
l
different. The drawing is for a model 1011105-4 and text is for 101105-2. The exact value will make a difference (drawing 25212-29654
(
l
SH. 500). 2. The inspector feels that we need to review our response to question #401 to make sure that the answer correctly identifies the
j
operation of the valves. 3. There are 4 other valves that operation of the valve is the same as response to #401. Please verify to be
correct. 4. Need to discuss verbal information that was provided by the vendor on this issue. Inspector would like a phone call on
l
Monday or Tuesday to discuss.
Provided information to inspector for review.
.
1
1
!
-
54
l
_______________ ____ _ ___-_ -_ _
-
--
_ - - - --_
i
l
Request No.
Request /Rewome
1
..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .
407
GL 9M)6 issues
l'
inspector looked at Tech Manual for Target Rocks and said that there is an "OIM Cross Index" at the front of the manual, and it lists
CTV26 as " Cat 2"-inspector would hke an explanation on what this means.
See attached. Also, spoke with the inspector and informed him that sample valves 3SSR*V9, V10, Vil and V12 upstream of check valves
are chmed. Therefore, fluid is trapped in the area of interest.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
408
Inspector would like to see our GL 91 15 response and to provide documentation that the Target Rocks that we are crediting are not the
1
1
" pressure balanced bellows" or " pressure balanced piston type' valves whicha te ' tight' in both directions.
See attached. Also, spoke with the inspector and informed him that sample valves 3SSR*V9, V10, V11 and V12 upstream of check valves
are closed. Therefore, fluid is trapped in the area of interest.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4C9
GL 96-06 issues
inspector requested a copy of CP 3807F sampling procedure - at other plants, he feels that the CIV's are open, and there would be a long
dead leg of water, so the trapped leg would not necessarily get hot.
See attached. Also, spoke with the inspector and informed him that sample valves 3SSR*V9, V10, V11 and V12 upstream of check valves
are closed. Therefore, fluid is trapped in the area of interest.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
410
GL 96061ssues
e
It is not clear to me that when hot hquid is trapped between closed CIVs that a space would be formed for further expansion during a post
LOCA het. tup. Is the assumption that following a cooldown a vacuum is formed in the section of piping between the isolation valves? If
so, would the lines refill with colder water.
See attached. Also, spoke with the inspector and informed him that sample valves 3SSR*V9, V10, V11 and V12 upstream of check valves
are closed. Therefore, fluid is trapped in the area of interest.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
411
Operator Rounds
Copy of completed rounds / logs . including Tech Spec Rounds.
l
l
Copics of Rounds / Logs completed 3/15/98: 3672.1 1,3672.3-3,3672S2,3672.3-5,3672S4,3670S1,3670S9. 3670S10,367016,3670S
11,3670113. Rounds included applicable temporary logs (367014).
,
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
412
Temporary Modification Audit
!
Verification that the monthly temporary modification audit was completed for Feburary 1998. (This request is due to a lack of " official"
signoff in temporary modification package.
Provided an unofheial signoff sheet that the PEO uses to perform the audit. As noted on the sheet, the initial and date of the TM Control
Sheet was performed 3/15/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
413
Copy of procedures used to stop RCP/ Vent RCS
Provide actual sign-off copies of procedures used to stop the "B" RCP and to vent the RCS. Provide copy of procedure currently in use.
Provide copy of sign.off of OP 3208. Include'd also a copy of DC Form 41 We em currently in OP 3208, Rev.18, Step 4.6.8, copy
provided.
l
1
!
55
l
'
i
l .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ - _
. _ _
i
i
1
l
Request No.
Request / Response
'
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , ,
415
OP 3250 45B Copy
Provide a copy of OP 3250 45B "Removmg 120 Volt Wtal AC Bus from Service"
Provided copy of OP 3250.450, Rev. 2 and associated forms (3250.45B-1, Rev.1; 3250.45B-2. Rev.1; 3250 45B-3, Rev. O, and 3250.45B-4,
Rev.0)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .
416
Level of Knowledge Test for SAT
During an interview on 3/4/97, inspector requested the level of knowledge test for the SAT process and a copy of the CAC meeting
minutes that approved the SAT training.
Copies provided to inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
417
AFW Room Design Temperature
The temperature in the AFW room seems to be cold (approximately 40 degrees Fahrenheit) and the heater fan continuously runnin6-
What is the design temperature for the room required to support the current Mode 5, as well as Mode 4 and 2. is the heater thermostat
designed and operational to control it?
The normal ventilation system is designed to maintain the ambient temperatures of the AFW Rooms in the ESF Bldg between 50-104
degrees F during normal operation (Ref. FSAR Section 9.4.5.2). Section 9.4 of the FSAR also notes that the specified design temperatures
noted in the HVAC FSAR sections are nominal design values and that actual values during plant operation may vary. The minimum
temperature is designed to be maintaoined by the area unit heaters and the electric duct heater (3HVQ-CH2), which is located in the
normal ventilation supply dectwork for the AFW rooms. During Mode 5, the emergency ventilation fans, which ventilate the non-SLCRS
areas in the ESF 111dg. (mcluding the AFW rooms), are also operated to support RHR. The supply air setpoint for the emergency fans is 50
i
degrees F. (PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PAGE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
418
Test Failures. Supplemental
Testing definition: 1. Surveillance Test; 2. ISF; 3. Post-Maintenance; 4. Post-Modification,5. Please see initial request #252,2/19/98.
See attached.
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
. . . . . . . . . . .
i
419
Generic Letter 96 01: Testmg of Safety Related logic Circuits
1. Has Millstone 3 completed actions to closeout GL 96-017 2. If ongoing, provide status, and clsoure dates of outstanding issues. 3. If
i
closed, provide closure document indicating actions taken to address testing deficiencies.
1. The system review iin accordance with GL 96-01 and SPROC 97-3-3 has been completed. All affected surveillance procedures have
been revised. All reportable conditions discovered were added to LER 97 0172. - Satisfactory completion of the remaining revised
surveillance procedures will be performed prior to Mode 4. SP 3622.3-1 Ucrry Turbine) will be completed as a Mode 3 Test (need
steam). - See attached " Generic Letter 96-003 Overlap Testing Review Report of Results "and SPROC 97 3-3 and "M3-EV.97-097".
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
420
Manual Valves in EOPs . Sup.
1
Provide justification for not mcluding manual valves used in EOPs in some type of monitoring program as indicated by 10CFR50.65(b)(1)
j
& (b)(2). *See previous information request dated 2/17/98.
j
l
CR M3-98-15M generated for this issue and followed-up with inspection team. Item is closed to CR Corrective Actions.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
421
RF051nformation - Sup.
1. Provide copy of RF05 Outage Summary Report. 2. What was the original duration of the outage? 3. What was the cause(s) of the
I
outage scope changes? Original request dated 2/17/98.
Provided information to inspector for review.
56
l
. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
____
U
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
___- -
. _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _
l
i
huuest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
J
422
Work Order Breakdown by System . Supplemental Wyuest
1. Pleaw re-send the 12/1/97 hstmg - page 3 is mi'. sing. 2. Pleaw send the listing dated 9/96. did not nreive)
1
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . . . . . . . . . . .
.. ..
..... . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
423
Open/ Closed Work Orders . Supplemental #1
1. Provide a monthly count of"Q" AWO's and the number that had a completed retest for the period January 1996 through February
1998. 2. Provide a monthly count of closed "non-QA" AWOs and the number that had a completed retest, for the period January 1996
through February 1998.
Information provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
424
Failed Retests in "Non4" Work Orders
1. Provide a montMy count by department, of work orders that received a retest. 2. Provide a monthly count of sat /unsat retest results,
j
also by department. For the period January 9 through February 1998.
Information providad. See attached.
(
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
425
Rework associated with "Q" work orders
1. Provide a monthly count, by department, of work orders completed and those that were " reworked" for "Q' work orders for tM
periodjanuary 1996 throegh February 1998. 2. Include a summary for the entire period.
Information provided.
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
)
. . . . . . . . .
426
Provide Basis Documentation for Pump and Valve Testing
The inspector would hke to see the basis documentation for pump and valve IST Tests.
The inspector should review the design basis for pump IST as follows: 1) The IST basis document which has been superceded for certain
ECCS pumps by 2) the Engineering Record Correspondence 984058 (and note that RSS will be revised after mods are compi te).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
427
Provide copy of EWR 3 954XX185
Provide copy of EWR 3-95-00085
Provided inspector with copy of EWR 3-9540085 on 3/12/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
428
List of Umt 3 CRs initiated since 312-98
Requested list of Unit 3 CRs since OSTI Team left mid-March.
Provided hst of Unit 3 CR's since 3/12/98 to Team Member.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . .
. ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . .
'429
TDAFW Cold Start Test
Requested copy of procedure and expected time of test.
Provided portedure and time of test (brief at 11:00 test to follow). Provided information request
.w. W i
nd observed test.
l
i
- sa w .u
57
L____________________.____-___
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .
-
Request No.
[tequestAtemonse
.... ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
430
Warping of fuel assemblies
' Do we have any fuel assembhes. that are in the core, that have been burned more than 3 times?
See attached e-mail. There are 16 fuel assembhes which will have been burned 4 times at the end of this gcle.
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
431
Authorization to Exced Overtime and new Organization Chart
Provide any Authorization to exceed established overtime limits sheets in the past 2 months. Provide a new copy of the new
orgardzational chart.
4 ' Authorization to Exceed Established Overtime Limits" forms, NGP 1.09 for Operations provided to inspector. Forms dated 2/17/98,
3/5/98,3/11/98 and 4/6/98. Copy of temporary organization provided. Temporary organization includes the new ' Assistant Director"
positions.
. ...........................e.........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
!
433
Copy of Technical Specifications
Provide a copy of 'For Information Use" copy of MP3 Technical Specifications.
l
l
Uncontrobed copy of MP3 Technical Specifications have been provided to the inspector. These Tech Specs include up to record of change
{
- 152, dated 3/20/98.
I
...........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
o
433
List of outstanding QA items
List of outstanding QA items
Provided Attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
434
Schedule / Agendas for meetings for next 2 weeks
Schedule / Agendas for meetings for next 2 weeks
Mode 11 Readiness C103 @ 1500 PhysicalUpdate C301@1400 SORC Wednesday @ 1300 in C201 - See Agenda NSAB Thursday @
1130 in Video Conference Room . See Agenda (Next regular mtg scheduled 29th . 30th). Weekly Officer Meeting.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
435
Copy of Temporary Modification
Copy of Temporary Modification # 3 97 075
Copy obtained and given to inspector.
.... ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
436
3HVR-DMP1015,1013,1021 Operation
Provide the DCN/ Temp. Mod that installed the ropes used to operate the dampers 3HVR-DMP1015,1013,1021.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
437
Ops Procedures
OP 3322 and SP 3522.7 and forms.
Provided information to inspector for review.
58
_ _ _ - _ _ . _ - - _ _ - _ _
_ _ _
_
'
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
--
_
i
3
1
I
i
Request No.
Request /R esponse
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .. ..
. . . . . . . . . ..
t
438
Recent MP3 Events
l
Provide informaiton on following events: 1) Missed pressurizer heatup surveillance. 2) Non. compliance with Tech Spre 3.4.1.3. 3)
Missed LEO Action requirement: Ddution paths venfied isolated. 4) AFW automatic initiation. 5) PORV Lift.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
.. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ..
439
Maintenance Rule Data
List of performance enteria for risk signficant Maintenance Rule Systems.
Provided the Maintenance Rule Scope Report for all Risk Significant Systems.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
440
Use of N/ A's in procedures
During the pre-inspection period,it was noted that Operations Department practices for use of N/ As was not in accordance with the
I
i
Station Procedures.
'
1
Reference CR M3-98-1402 (closed).
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
441
Observations.4/13/98
See attached 3 observations noted 4/13/98.
o
Observations noted.
J
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
442
Failed to follow procedure
See attached summary of the concern identified on 4/13/98.
Concern addressed with the NRC.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
443
Valve Lineups
NRC has questions regarding our valve lineups. Ilow can pen / ink changes be made? Is it acceptable to reference tagouts?
CR M3-98-2081 has been written to address this issue.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t
444
Qualification of System Engineers performing Readiness Reviews
I
Please provide the original CR. the actions to resolve the issue, and the responsible parties for resolution. Provide extent of condition, i.e.
how many system engineers are not qualified. Question . Why did system engineers not have proper TQR(s)? Question . How are the
TQR(s) validated for System Engineering? (related to request No. 329)
,
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
445
Provide any CRs for past 3 months where causal factor of communications / supervisory oversight a concern
,
!
Provide any CR's written in the last 3 months where areas of concern or causal factors related to corranunications; or supervisory
j
oversight.1) Provide a copy of cause code list. (Other Disciplines: Corrective Action /Operatums)
j
Provided information to inspector for review.
l
I
i
!
59
t
E_______________._____
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ . . _ _ _ _ _
a
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
I
Request No.
Renuest/ Response
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . ..... ...
446
Provide copies of the most recent performance improvement plans for ops, CAD, TS & Maintenance
Provide copies of the most recent performance improvement plans for the following line organizations; ops, CAD, Tech Support, &
Maintenarre.1) Identify the cognizant individuals who would be knowledgeable about these reports. (Other disciplines: Corrective
Actions, Operations, Mainten.un)
Provided information to inspector for review.
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
447
Nuclear Oversight Memo to VP, Operations on Unit 3 Readiness for Mode 4 (March 2.1998)
March 2,1998 Memo from Nuclear Oversight to VP, Operations 1) Provide written response provided for this memo and a list of any
actions taken as a result of the memo.
)
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
448
Set up Interviews with Individuals on Restart Readmess Affirmation
Briefmg sheet for 1st line supervisors, provides basis for Restart Readiness Affirmation. 8 criteria are listed. Identify the cognizant
person (s) who can be interviewed to determine: 1) Status ofissues 2) current actions in progress / planned 3) Who has responsibility for
carrying out actions.
Interviews arranged with action item managers. Interviews have been completed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
449-
Meetmgs to discuss Performance Measures / Expectations
s
Would hke to meet with Engineering Director,(Plant Walkdown if possible), Maintenance Manager and Unit Director.
Set up meetings for 4/14/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
450
Meetings to discuss Root cause Analysis
Would lite to meet Root Cause Analysis individuals.
Set up interviews for 4/14/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
451
Copies of CRs M3-981907 and M3-98-1922
Requested copics of CRs M3-98-1907 (RCS Temp Ind) and Mk981922 (Control Room Ventilation).
.
Provided copies of CR's M3-98-1907 and M198-1922 the inspectors (obtained from Corrective Actions).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
452
Temp Mod MS97-036 Copy ( Service Water D/ D Strn)
Requested copy of Temp Mod M197-036 ( Service Water B/D Strn)
{
j
Provided copy Temporary modification M197436 to inspector on 4/14/98.
}
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
I
453
Request EWR's M3-98419, M198-024, M3-98027, etc.
Request EWR's M198-019, M3-98-024, M3-98027, M3-98-029, M3-98-035, M3 98030.
Provided requested EWR's on 4/15/98 to inspectors.
60
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
______
-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ .
]
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. . . . . . . .
454
Interivew with Responsible Person regardmg Boric Acid Vortex Calc.
Follow-up request to discuss calc input for ik>ric Acid Vortex Pump
Engineering response attached. 0571 inspntor requires information from NRR to judge acceptabihty of NU's use of a particular formula.
OSTI management requested that the insgwetor issue a formal request for resolution with NRR. This will tv an open inspection item. This
item was discussed with the respons ble design enginecirng. This item will remain open as a question still exists as if calculation was
conservative. This item will be reviewed by NRR.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
435
Procedure SP 3061.62
Request copy of procedure SP 3061.62.(Ctmt Spray cans)
This is complete. The number is incorrect. Engineering supervisor sat with impector and discussed issue of ctmt spray cans. The
inspector has no further questions.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
456
DCN DM3404177-97
I
Request current information on DCN DM3-004177-97 (spring cans)
Provided copy of DCN DM3401177-97 to inspectors.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
...........3........................................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
457
Meeting with Temporary Modification Manager
Set up a meeting with Temporary Modification Coordinator
Engineering supervisor met with inspectors on 4/14/98. These were 15 questions left open. These questions are documented on the
attached. As a result of these questions,3 engineers also were interviewed resulting in two (2) CRs. No further questions.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
458
Meeting with Design Basis Summary Manager
Set up meeting with Design Basis Summary Manager
Provided list of DBS's and responsible individuals.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
459
Meeting /Walkdown with 4160Kv System Engineer
Set up meeting /walkdown with 4160Kv System Engineer
The System Engineer for 4160Kv met with the inspectors. There were no follow up questions or documents requested.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
460
Meeting /Wallkdown with Diesel System Engineer
Set up meeting and walkdown with Diesel System Engineer
1
1
System Engineer met with inspector on 4/16/98 and had follow-up questions. New questions are seperate items in database.
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
461
Meeting /Walkdown with DC/ Battery System Engineer
Set up a meeting /walkdown with DC/ Battery System Engineer.
System Engineer met with inspectors on 4/17/98.
l
l
61
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l
l
Reauest No,
Request / Response
{
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t
462
Provide summary on System Readiness Information
{
Provide summary on System Readiness Summary Reports.
Provided copies of System Readmess Reports for the followmg systems: EDG, RHR,4160Kv,12SV DC Sptems Batteries, Boric Acid
System, Volume Control System, Service Water on 4/15/98.
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
463
Meeting /Walkdown with AFW System Engmeer
Set up a meeting /walkdown with AFW System Engineer
System Engineer met with inspectors on 4/17/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
464
Meeting with Nuclear Oversight Manager
Set up a meeting with Nuclear Oversight Manager
'
Nuclear Oversight met with the OSTI inspectors, on 4/14/98 at 10:00. Discussed the NORVP process and the status of Engineering. The
inspectors were provided a copy of the Engineering portion of the 4/2/98 NORVP report. Inspector requested a copy of the NORVP
Meeting Agenda for 4/16/98 and 4/17/98. (see request #571).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
465
Meeting /Walkdown with Deign Engineering Manager
Set up meeting /walkdown on Thursday with Design Engineering Manager
Meeting among inspector and Engineering occurred on 4/15/98 @l300.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
466
Set up a meeting with Charging System Engineer
Set up a meeting on Thursday with Charging System Engineer
System Engineer met with inspector on 4/16/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
467
Meeting with System Engineer on CR's
Set up meeting with system engineer on CR's M3-981907 and M3-98-1922. Provide brief summary of event.
l
System Engineer met with inspector and discussed the M3-981922 CR and no followup questions were asked. Also System Engineer, met
with inspector to discuss CR M3-98-1907 and there were no followup questions.
)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
468
Copies of CRs per attached list.
i
l
Requested copics of Condition Reports per attached list.
j
Provided copies of CR's from list on Request #469 from the Corrective Action Deaprtment.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
469
List of Unit 3 CR's initiated since 3-12-98
Requested list of Unit 3 CRs since OSTI Team left mid-March
Provided list of Unit 3 CRs since 3-12-98 to Team Member.
J
l
,
l
l
i
62
I
i
t
_ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ - _ _ _ -
Bequest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
470
LLRT, Historica! A&Found Data
0800 4/15/98 Meet with inspector to discuss this issue.
1) Provided a complete hst of historical data; 7) Discussed LLRT failures, identified T.R., Check Valve, Pratt.; 3) Identihed corrective action
3
for each (Enertch and eval, flushing, test method, and MOV 23 changeout, purge valves changes).
)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . . .
471
Provide copy of Open Operabihty Determination List
j
Provide insp& tor lat(st copy of Operability Determination List.
Provided copy of OD list to inspector on 4/13/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
472
Follow up Questions
1. Copy of Unit 3 Root Cause Instructions 2. M3-97-4517 Removal of 3 MSS *MOV18A-D from EEQ. Why did not consider financial
consequences as contnbuting cause? 3. Why start to worry in 1993 about blankets installed in 1984 (what changed?). 4. Why do we
replace 2 years if not done before 19937
1) Provided copy of 3 CAD-DI-1.02. Arranged a response to questions with Engineer involved in Root Cause.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
473
Would like to see Root Cause that we consider complex
o
Complex Root cause involving multiple Root Cause Analysis Techniques
,
Provided copy of CR M3-97180 Root Cause.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
474
Follow up for Interview
Follow up for Interview
Follow-up .no committed actions. Looking at due dates and time lines of corrective actions. Gave AITI'S Corrective Action Plan for CR
M3-97-4459. Work performed on MOV without active tag clearance.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
475
Inspector to attend Officers Meeting 4/15/98
Inspector would like to attend Executive Officers Meeting
Meeting to occur 0900 1130 in C505 on Wednesday,4/'5/98. Inspector was informed and will attend.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
476
Request copy of Commitment Record 39029
Requested a copy of Commitment Record 39029 and letter B15983 detailing commitment to include FPI methodology in guidance for Root
Cause.
Provided information to inspector for review.
1
!
l
l
63
l
_ _ _ _ _ _
_.
_-
_
_
- _ _ _ _-_ ._ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l
Reauest No.
Requent/ Response
l
~~~~.- - ~ ~ . ~ ~ . - ~ . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . .....
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .
,
477
PEO Rounds
Accompany PEO on primary rounds.
4/14/98 During a walkdown of Primary PEO rounds with an OPS PEO, the OSTI inspector had the following comments:1. Informal
markings on plant equipment. Many instances. One example: 3CilS-V366 and V365 had open / close indnations marked in a felt tip pen.
2. Poor ra liological controls: a. In primary sample sink area, the PEO identified that the RCS tiow restricting hot leg sample onfice was
leaking. b. In primary sample sink area, the OSTI inspector identified that there was gross baron crystal buildup around the cabinet. HP
i
survey indicated 10-15K.
c. A half filled 5 gallon Wie was marked " radioactive" and also marked as a vent bottle for 3CHS.TK4 outside of the A boric acid
transser pumrEle. The bottie cas not restrained and its hose was wrapped around the bottle with a cotton glove acting as the stopper
for the open end d. A fitting was founo en the HP desk near the CTMT hatch marked as " radioactive rnaterial." All these issues have
been referred to llP and appropriate corrective actions have been taken. 3.The HP brief prior to entry into the RCA seemed too detailed
and made the inspector think that there was some excessive showmanship. He was glad to get a good briefing but he questioned whether
that much detail was typical or just for his benefit. In general, the inspector was pleased with the operator's diligence and attention to
detail during the rounds. He believed that the PEO had sufficient plant knowledge to adequately perform his required duties.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
478
Licensed Operator Requal Records
Access to Licensed Operator Requal Records for the last year.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
o
479
Inspector request to witness evolution
Setup program to ensure adequate team to see revolution. Inspector wants to witness evolution.
Discussed with work week manager. He willinsure that insepctors have adequate time to be available to witness plant evolutions. He
will discuss this issue with other restart managers, to ensure that this issue is carried over to back shift.
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
480
Review Terry Turbine
1. Terry Turbine Vendor Manual (CDL) 2. CR Report . Spring on the mechanical overspeed device. 3. Is the overspeed trip a
Maintenance Rule function?
'
Mil 11 stone Unit 3 Maintenance Rule System Basis Document . Auxihary Feedwater (3322) Revision 1 dated 3/17/98 provided to the
inspector. CR M3 98-1944 provided to the inspector. The answer to question 3 above is the turbines ability to trip is not a maintenance
rule function. Among the MR functions are: 1) provide cooling water to SGs; 2) Maintain level in SGs; 3) Interfacing system isolation.
(see attached for details). The failure of the valve to trip would impact the unavailability time of the component, which could then impact
the MR category.
. . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
481
Requested copies of Engineering Self Assessments for 1998 (also Design Engineering)
Requested copies of Engineering Self-Assessments for 1998 (also Design Engineering)
The following self-assessment were provided:
3TS.SA-97-11 "lST Program Self Assessment . SWP System"
3TS-SA.98-02 "MP Unit 3 IST and Appendix J Program Corrective Action"
3TS-SA.97 08 " Followup Self Assessment . System Engineer Roles and Responsibilities"
Engineermg Self Assessment Check Off List 2/28/98
EngineeringSelf AssessmentCheckOff List 1/31/98
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
482
Requested a copy of the Unit 3 Performance Indicator Report
Requested a copy of the Unit 3 Performance Indicator Report
Provided Mr. Gibson with a copy of the Millstone 3 Performance Indicator Report dated 4/9/98.
,
64
!
l
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I
l
t
i
Requent No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
483
Requested a copy of the Unit 3 Annunciator Wmdows Report
l
Rajucated a copy of the Unit 3 Annunciator Windows Report
This document had been previously rneived. Inspector indicated this request can be cancelled.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
484
Requested a coy of the latest NORVP Key Issues Startup Report
Requested a coy of the latest NORVP Key lasues Startup Report
Provided inspator with a copy of the NORVP Key Issues Status. Millstone 3 for 4/3/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
485
Requested to attend the Daily Engineermg Meeting
Requested to attend the Daily Engineering Meeting
)
Inspector attended the Engineenng meeting on 4/15/98 and received a copy of the Daily Status Report dated 4/15/98 and the 4/15/98
CR List.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
486
Requested an interview with Corrective Action (CA) Manager
Requested an interview wit 4 Corrective Action (CA) Manager
inspector met with Corrective Action manager on 4/15/98. They discussed PORC Meeting 3-98130 which was held on 4/15/98.
Inspector indicated that the meeting was well run, there were good questions asked and good pariticpation by PORC members. PORC
ptovided added value. Inspector, however, indicated that PORC continues to function as a final barrier and that the Engineer presenting
a SPROC was not well prepared. Inspector also asked if the Engineerirs Director ever attends PORC Meetings. CA Manager indicated
that he does not. A second mceting was held on 4/16/98. At this meeting Operations Management turnover and use of a Jr. Engineer to
brief the NRC were discussed. Accountability, the Procedure upgrade program and timeliness of performance reviews were also
discussed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
487
Requested an interview with VP, Nuclear Oversight
Requested an interview with VP, Nuclear Oversight
inspator met with VP, Nuclear Oversight on 4/5/98 to discuss the Nuclear Oversight function. There were no concerns identified.
Inspector did indicate that he may want to have a follow up meeting next week.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
488
Request to attend the Unit 3 PORC Meeting
Meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 4/15/98 at 10:00 in room C501.
Inspector attended Unit 3 PORC Meeting 3 98130 on 4/15/98. Also attended the Unit 3 PORC meeting 3 98134 on 4/20/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
489
Request to attend the SORC Meeting
Next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 4/15/98 at 1300 in C201.
t
t
hispector attended the 4/15/98 SORC Meeting.
l
65
L-________.__
_ _ . _
_ - . _ - -
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
l
l
!
l
i
!
l
Request No,
Request /Respome
i
1
. . . . . . . . . . . .
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
4Q
Request to attend the 4/14/93 Shift Turmver Meeting (and Management)
Request to attend the 4/14/98 Shif t Turnover Meeting
Unit Director took inspector to the 4/14/98 AM shift turnover meeting.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
491
Request to attend the Unit 3 0800 Meeting
l
Request to attend the Unit 3 0800 Meeting
Inspector attended the Unit 3 0800 Meetmg on Tuesday,4/14/98 and was provided with a copy of the Daily Status Report for Tuesday,
4/14/ 98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
492
Request to attend the Unit 3 0630 Daily Meeting
Request to attend the Unit 3 0630 Daily Meeting
inspector attended the 4/14/98 0630 Daily Meeting and received a copy of the meeting agenda. There were no follow up requests as a
result of this meeting.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
493
System Walkdowns
o
inspector wants to walkdown the following systems: SIH, RSS, QSS, EDG
Walkdowns conducted 4/20 4/21
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
494
Tagging Process
Inspector wants to verify that tags hanging in field are supported by clearance.
Walked down east and west switchgear. Identified approximately 10 red tags. Inspector reviewed clearances with backroom SRO.
Resolved two apparent discrepancies. Completed walkdown. No unresolved issues.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
495
Tagging Process
p
inspector wants to see tag clearance and then verify that tags are actually hanging in the field.
Inspector selected several clearances and verified tags hanging in field.
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4%
How DCRs are incorporated in procedures and training
Inspector desires to see how plant modifications are incorporated in procedures and how training is done.
Provided information on DCR's M3-96064,97111, and 96077.
(
""- ~ ~ ~"~~.~. . . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . , , , , , , , , , , ,
497
Extent and basis for PMs on Terry Turbine
i
Provide interview on PM Program for Terry Turbine
Main Stem Trip throttle valve information requested. Follow-up interview requested with plaruting.
l
66
- _ _ _ - _ . _ - .
._
l
\\
l
Reauest No.
Request /Hesponse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . .
498
Observe Terry Turbine Teatmg
I
The inspector would hke to obwrve the post failure testing on the Terry Turbine.
Olmerved. Called late, however, did not observe the testing.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
499
Copy of LER 9M)1, Rev.1
Provide update to LER 9M71.
Provided information to the inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
500
New Rev. to DC4
Please provide the new revision to DC4 that is effective 4/15/98
DC4, Rev. 4 and Change 3 was approved and effective 4/15/98. Copy provided to NRC.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
501
Listing of completed Work Orders
1) For last 60 days, provide a list of all work orders completed by Mechanical Maintenance on the following systems: RSS, QSS, SI, AFW.
2) Smce 1/1/98, provide liskng of all LLRTs completed.
Provided information to the inspector for his review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
502
LLRT Information
Open CRs and ARs on LLRT Failures. Discover Corrective Action Program.
Provided CR 10397, IN30,13240, M3-97 4708, M3-9M)o45, M3 97-4135, M3-98-1115,10398,1M33,10393, and 13234.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
503
Issues identified by NSAB (backlog) Identify restart and Safety Significant Issues
Provide a hst of issues identified by NSAB (backlog). Identify any Restart issues and any Safety Significant issues which have to be
dispositioned.
Information provided to the NRC.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
504
Containment Debris Evaluation
Please provide an evaluation of the trash found in Containment during the closcout inspection to ensure the operability of the RSS
screens / systems.
Per Engineer (MP3 Design), this condition is historical in nature and the trash has been removed. A successful retest, containment
inspection, was performed. This event has been determined to be reportable (see attached Deportability Determination). Reference CR
M3-981797.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
505
Documentation Requests. Ops Records
Please provide: SI System Lineups, OP 3201' copy used for most recent Mode 5 - Mode 4 transition and RSS System lineups.
i
Provided copies of 3308-1 (4/1/98),3308-2 (9/11/97),3308-3 (8/19/97),3308-4 (9/6/97),3308-5 (9/7/97),3308 6 (2/26/8). Op 3201 is
!
available in the CR for review . it is with the Unit Supervisor. RSS lineups provided.
67
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ .
- _ _ _ _ -
_Recue-t Na Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . .
506
Tie Wraps on Safety Related Dampers
In the Instrument Rack Room, the inspector noticed tie wraps holdmg dampers closed. Some of these dampers were 3HVC*DMP83&87.
Please explain the purpose of these tie wraps.
The tie wraps do not hold dampers m poution. The quandrant handles of the dampers are secured via a locking not. It is not known why
the tie wraps are on some dampers but they currently serve no purpose.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
507
Painted Dampers
Some dampers have paint marks indicating where their normal position is, currently these dampers are not lined up with the paint mark.
Please explain.
White spray paint was used to mark balancing damper position following initial air balancmg test during plant startup. These HVC
dampers were repositioned dunng rebalancing performed following PDCR MP3-95-059. The new positions are recorded in the air
balancing report, maintained in Engineering.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
............ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
508
Control Building HVK-LI45B Expansion
The HVK-LI 45B is reading greater than 100%. Is this normal? why does this condition exist?
The chilled water expansion tank level is typically in range when the chiller is operating. Once the chiller is shut down, the water
temperature within the systern increases from 45 degrees Fahrenheit to ambient (approx 70 degrees Fahrenheit). This temperature rise and
expansion causes tank level to increase, sometimes off scale high. Tank level will return to on scale valve when chiller 3HVK*CHL1B is
placed back in service.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
509
Backlog Maintenance. Priorities
Question revolves around whether a deferred item presently scheduled as RF06, can be deferred again to a subsequent RFO.
Information provided to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
510
Backlog Management
Provide copy of response to 10CFR50.54(f) letter to review information about backlog management.
Provided copy of response.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
511
Provide copies of OD's
Provide copies of OD's MP3-025-98, MP3-028-98, MP3-035-98, MP3-0E98, MPE.045-98, MP3-047 98, MP3448-98 AND MP3-054-98.
Provided copies of requested OD's to inspectors on 4/15/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
..
...... . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
512
Battery A2 Hydrogen Indicators
HVC.A!83A reads approximately 1 % all other indicators read 0% .1/2% Please provide explanation.
The hydrogen indicators for station battery rooms 1-5 are calibrated using Instrument loop Calibration Report 3HVC.032 every 4 years.
The hydrogen indicators were calibrated on March 8,1997 under AWO M3-9344609. This AWO indicated that Hydrogen Indicator HVC.
Arr83A had drifted considerably since it was last calibration. After reviewing the above AWO it is believed that Hydrogen Indicator
HVC.AIT83A has again drifted. TR No.16M3154749 has been created to determine whether the indicator has drifted or the indicator is
accurately showing the present hydrogen content inside the battery room. It should be noted that station procedures associated with
entry / work inside the battery rooms have a statement that states " Hydrogen meter has a reading of 2% or lower" as a prerequisite.
Therefore, since the sulicct hydrogen indicator presently reads approximately 1.0% which is well below the high limit this issue has not
been since as a problem.
6S
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
- _ _ _ _ - - _
l
1
Request No.
Beauest/ Response
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
<
513
Review new M&TE Program
,
i
Schedule meeting with MTE coordinator (0824) and get copy of M&TE Program procedure and CR M19M614
{
Meeting was held.
I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'
i
514
Ust of all open NCR's
I
Provide a list of all open NCRs and Status
i
!
Provided documentation to inspector for review.
li
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
515
Corrective Action Manager interview followup
Provide significant Condition Adverse to quality lif t. Provide same list with level 2 CR info.
Provided SCAQ list for levell CR's in hard copy and electronic form Ust with Level 2 info does rot exist. Corrective Action manager to
follow up with inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
516
Uft of all open EWR's
Ust of all open EWR's - arngate which have seen deferred.
Provided attached list.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
517
Ust of allopen UIRs
Provide a list of all open UlR's and status.
Provided the attached list.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
518
Copy of Root Cause Evaluation Guideline related to RP.o
Copy of Root Cause Evaluation Guidehne related to RP-6
,
1
Copy of Unit 3 Root Cause instruction provided. CR ML98-1945 written to discuss minor discrepancies / enhancements for RP-6 and Root
Cause Guidelines.
.
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
519
Would like a copy of RP.17
Would like a copy of RP.17
Copy of RP-17, ERT provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . .
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
520
13acklog of equipment waiting to be cahbrated. Resources required for calibration.
Total M&TE inventory 3500 items. Usting provided. Also copy of CR M1981713, Self Assessment Outline 1 MET.SA 98-01 and report
1 MET-SA-98-01.
69
_ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
.
i
i
i
Request No.
Request / Response
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
521
Trending of Work Orders
Backlog f listory . Meeting Work Planning and Schedulmg
Meeting was held and inspector was satished with response from meeting members.
...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
522
Follow up to Technical Support Manager Meeting
Provide inspector a list of System Engineers, years they have been with their current System and years experience as an engineer.
Provided copy of Unit 3 System Enginwring organization chart (4/17/98), System Engineer lists, years that System Engineers have had
their systems and years as an engineer.
I
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
523
IEE Process Walkthru
Inspector requests walkthrough of IEEE process.
Meeting /walkthru held on 4/16/981530 with U3 P-Team. Per Inspector no further action required at this time.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
534
Response to specific IEE questions
Inspector had specific questians concerning IEEs 0020mN,00208436,00208M7,00207611,00207106.
Memo from Unit 3 P. Team addressin$ specific IEE questions provided to inspector on 4/16/98 addressing this issue. Per inspector no
further action required at this time.
...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
525
Calc. 89-094-122E3
Request copy of Calc. 89-094-122E3
Calc. 89-094-122E3 provided to inspection team. This cale was obtained from Nuclear Records.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
526
Copies of IEEs 0020m04,00208436,0020804,00207611,00207106
Request copies of IEEs 0020M04,00208436,00208N,00207611,002n7106
IEEs listed above provided to inspection team. Records obtained from Procurement Engineering.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
527
MP3 Engineering Performance Improvement Plan
Is there on engineering performance improvement plan?
Provided memo MP3-TS-97-N6 dated 2/5/97, Engineenng Performance Improvement Plan, Rev.1.
70
_
_ ___ _ __ _ _ ,
Request No.
Request /Remonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,,
. . , . . . . .
528
Technical Evaluation M3-EV.984XN1
liow is auxiliary feedwater flowpath operabihty verified per Technical Specification No. 4.7.1.2.2 Surveillance requirement? Please
discuss how steam generator pressure during the test is factored into the acceptance criteria.
The surveillance requirement is completed by check valve surveillance procedure 3622.7. NNECO's interpretation of TS 4.7.1.2.2
surveillance requirement is that its purpose is to verify proper AFW flow path alignment by verifying flow to each steam generator.
There are not complex acceptance criteria developed for this surveillance which would ensure the AFW system is capable of delivermg the
mininum required flow assumed in the safety analysis. Rather, a gross AFW flow acceptance criteria is used just to verify that the flow
path is properly aligned (e.g. a valve is not closed when it should be open). This interpretation is better understood by looking a historic
l
surveillance procedure for T.S. 4.7.1.2.2 which is attached for information. To double check the reasonableness of this interpretation.
NUREG 1431, Rev.1, Standard Technical Specifications (S'15) Westinghouse plants was reviewed. The STS equivalent of the MP3 TS
4.7.1.2.2 surveillance is STS SR 3.7.5.5. The STS SR 3.7.5.5 bases section is attached and it has a bases which is in agreement with the above
stated NNECO interpretation.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
539
Provide a copy of Surveillance Test Results for the Terry Turbine SP 3622.7 2
Provide a copy of Surveillance Test Results for the Terry Turbine SP 3622.7-2 for the Full Stroke of 3FWA*P2 (Terry Turbine) Auxiliary
Feedwater Check Valve, which was performed on 4/14/98. Provide a copy of the signed off procedure also (not just test results).
This item is included with request #530. See request #530 for information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
530
AFW Turbine
1. LER 9441, ?rovide Corregtive Action implementation procedure for PM (Cleaning and lubrication of governor output linkage). 2. We
have CR 1944, need other CRs on TDAFW Pump Failures since 1994 (or any ACRs/PIRs). 3. Provide work history CM and PMs on
TDAFW Pump since 1994. 4. Provide surveillance test history for TDAFW Pump smce 1994. 5. Provide corrective action implemented as
a result of event of LER 9444. 6. Operating experience review of NRC IN 9644 and Supp.1 and 2.
Provided copies and commitments for LERs 9441 and 94-14, CR's on TDAFW pump failures since 1994 (including PIRs), work history
since 1994, surveillance test history and operating experience review of NRC IN 9644 suppl.1 and 2. Provided information to inspectors
on 4/15/98 to 4/17/98. All information was provided as requested.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
531
Do ERT's use analytical methods / technical
Question if ERTs use Root Cause methods for analysis.
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
532
Would like to attend MRT when Terry Turbine ERT Discussed
Would like to attend MRT when Terry Turbine ERT Discussed
Provided information to inspector.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
533
Copies of Mode Change Assessments by managers
Would like a copy of Mode Change Assessments made in response to MP3-CAD-98-029 when completed.
Provided copy.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
534
Response to specific IEE questions
hupector had specific questions concerning IEEs 0020NN,00208436,00208047,00207611,00207106.
Provided answers to specific IEE questions for inspection team.
71
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ -
-
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ - _ _-
i
l
Eequest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
535
EWA 95056 Questions
Need to have discussion on Local Operator Actions RHS Hx bypass MSS *74 A.D.
Meetmg held 416-98 at 11:00. No follow.up queshons or actions.
..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
536
Interview with System Engineer responsible for DCR M3-97089
Request interview with engineer responsible for DCR M3-97089 scheduled for 416 98 at 1500.
1
1
Interview conducted.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
537
Requested an interview with Self Assessment Coordinator
Purposenof the interview is to discuss self. assessments, and self-assessment procedure OA-11.
Meeting was held 4/16/98. Discussed the Self-Assessment program and timeliness of performance reviews. As result of this meeting
inspector requested a meeting with Human Resources . VP (See request #570).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
538
Requested an interview with KPI coordinator
j
Purpose of interview is to dscuss the Performance Indicator Report which was provided to inspector (Request #482).
0
)
l
Interview was conducted.
4
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[
l
539
Requested an interview with PRA
Purpose of the interview is to discuss the PRA process.
Interview was conducted on 4/16/98. Discussion included mode applicability of procedure SAB-3.08 and questioning why PRA is
located offsite.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
540
Request to attend the Nuclear Oversight NORVP Meeting
inspector is interested in the Engineering area.
Inspector attended the 4/16/98. NORVP meeting to hear the discussion on Engineering. As a result of the meeting, additional
information was requested and provided (see request #573).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
541
Requested an interview with PUP coordinator.
The purpose of the interview is to discuss the Procedure Upgrade Project.
Discussed the overall Administrative Procedure Upgrade Program to include Managements Role / Buy-in and use of contractors. Also
discussed use of N/ A on procedure steps.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
542
Requested an interview with Director of Special Projects
Purpose of the interview is to discuss the Long. Term Vision which was included in the 4/16/98 'To The Point".
Discussed the Long Term Vision Plans and provided copies of the following: The Nuclear Safety Indication 1998-2000 Performance Plan,
.
1998-2000 Performance Plan for Millstone Station Draft 4/14/98. Nuclear Safety Indicator chart dated 3/27/98.1998-2000 Performance
Plan for Millstone Station Strategic version draft 4.14/98. Action Plan for Streamlining Station Administrative Programs. Inspector
indicated that the OSTI Inspection Report will probably criticize NU for not having an approved Performance Program for 1998.
72
. _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - -
Request No.
Request /Rewonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
543
Requested a copy of Nuclear Oversight Procedure NOQP 1.08
Requested a copy of Nuclear Oversight Pnredure NOQP 1.08
Provided copy of NOQP.1.08, Rev. O.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
514
Readiness for Restart Assessment
1) Why did I&C determine procedures were not technically adequate in December 199'7.
2) Provide oversight reports on Planning and MNTC from 12/97. present.
Provided information as requested.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
545
PRA Top 20 List
Follow up on PRA list. Inspector questioned how the PRA " Top 20 List' of operator actions were implemented and noted in procedures.
Provided portions of procedures which implement the PRA risk significant operator actions. Actually 14 items on list not 20.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
546
OP 3250.08 Draining SlH/QSS to RWST
Inspedor questioned apparent vahue direction (monitor for proper indication)in procedure. Is PEO expected to know what to monitor,
what valves are to be used. ,
,
!
!
Reviewed procedure with LLRT coordinator. Determined that it had not actually been used. Feedback to procedure group provided to
!
either improve procedure or delete it.
J
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
547
Copy of Procedure U3 OA5
Provide copy of current revision of U3 OAS.
Provided a copy of current revision of U3 OA5.
'
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
548
Information on NSAB rating of Safety Evaluations
1
Provide a copy of the NSAB subcommittee ratings and presentation on safety evaluations made to the NSAB.
I
j
i
\\
Provided this to the inspector.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
549
Additional Information/ Documentation from Interview with Tech Support Manager
Provide the following documentation: 1) TQR for system knowledge qualification; 2) List of system walkdown/ dates / performed by; 3)
l
4
l
List of JTA's for system engineers; 4) system engineer qualification matrix.
1
Documentation provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
550
Documentation Requested from Interview with Self Assessment Coordinator
J
!
l
l
During the interview the following documentation was requested; 1) Self Assessment report; 2) 1998 Self Assessment Plan; 3) CR on Self
Assessment on SA Program; 4) Completion number of corrective actions from self assessments.
Documentation provided.
I
l
73
.
t
l
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . .
j
551
NRC Observation of Management Observation (U3 OAS)
l
Inspector would hke to observe a management observation week of Apnl 13 and April 20.
l
One Management Observation was observed by the NRC Inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . ...
. . . . . . ,
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. ... . , , .
552
TR Written for Sticky Substance Found on Terry Turbine Trip Valve
Will a TR be written for the sticky substance noted by system engieners on the TDAFW purnp trip valve stem. What will ensure it is
evaluated and corrected?
System engineer willinclude this condition in his investigation of CR M3-9&.1923(attached). Will TR when he determines extent of
condition, cause and best method to fix. This will be determined during mvestigation of CR. The method of responding to this " sticky
substance" will be determined during CR investigation. Any corrective actions wdl be reviewed using our deferral determination
j
methodology.
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
553
Design Document that Installed Rubber Hose on Terry Turbine
'
During walkdown OSTI inspector noted rubber hose on journal / thrust bearing oil return. Interested in design document that may have
I
installed this. If found providecopy.
The original desi6n for the Auxiliary Feedwater pumps (3FWA*P1 A/*P1B) and the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump (3FWA*P2)
showed oil sight glasses consisting of tygon tubing held together with hose clamps between the thrust end bearing housing and the lube
oil reservoir. (Ref: O!M 252124112, vendor drawing # D-18237). E&DCR T-C-07560 replaced the existing tygon tubing on each pump with
new EEP/ sight flow indicat8rs to enhance system durability. This E&DCR provides the installation details and specifies that all new
piping used to support the installation of the sight glasses is to be class 153 (150lb Type 304 Stainless Steel). The installation details shown
E&DCR T-C.07560 page 5 represent the basic configuration of the new sight glasses and the new piping arrangement. A field walkdown
of the present configuration at each Aux Feedwater Pump identified a small (approx. 3" in length) piece of black rubber hose installed
with hose clamps at both the lube oil reservoir nozzle and the new class 153 piping downstream of the new sight glasses. This would
appear to be acting as a hose between the new sight glass hard piping and the lube oil reservoir nozzle. Taking a closer look at this
configuration and discussions with the engineer who initiated the design change, it seems apparent that the new class 153 piping installed
downstream of the flanges was designed to fit within the existing return nozzle of the tube oil reservoir. The intent of the smalllength of
black rubber hose is believed to be a barrier to prevent tube oil from splashing out and from o mtaminants from entering the tube oil
reservoir. At this point in the lube oil system, there is no system pressure. If the rubber boot shool fait, loss o lube oil would not occur.
The installation of this black rubber hose was not addressed in E&DCR T-C-07560. In addition the E&tG was not clear on how the new
sight glass and associated piping was to interface with the nozzler of the tube oil reservoir. A supplemental DCN will be written against
E&DCR T-C-07560 to reflect the installation of the small len6th of black rubber hose and will be posted against the appropriate vendor
drawings. Refer to the attached for additional reference material.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
554
Interviews for inspector on Maintenance and Work Planning and Scheduling Activities
Please setup interviews with the following people for approx.1/2 hour.
All interviews have been accomplished.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
555
Provide Copies of Management Observations performed during last 2 weeks.
Provided copies of any management observations performed during the last two weeks.
Copies provided to inspector for his review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
556
Provide Copy of Self Assessment Advisory Board Meeting Minutes
l
Provide copy of self assessment advisory board meeting minutes from meeting conducted on 4/16/98.
I
f
I
Copies were provided to the inspector for review.
74
_ _ _ _ ______ _ _ _ _ ,
t
1
I
i
l
1
Requant No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
557
Deferred PMs
Provide du cussion/information on how PMs are trackeJ/ deferred (reference CR M3-98-1974)
Inspector will attend Unit 3 Maintenance meeting scheduled for 4/17/98 at 1300 to get information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
558
Mechamcal AWO's " Rework" for last 6 Months
Provided a listmg awchanical maintenance rework work orders for the last 6 months.
Provided listing to the inspector for his review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
559
CR on Magne Blast Breaker PM
Provide a copy of the Condition Report written on the Magne Blast Breaker PM pro 5 ram.
Provided a copy of CR M3-98-1640 written on 3/27/98 on the Magne Blast PM program. Operability and Deportability evaluations also
provided.
. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
560
SP 3609.1 Quench Spray Pump A Op Test
Provide copy of data from lag (3) performances of SP 3609.1, Tech Spec 4.6.2.1.C.2 and 4.6.1.D, copy of surveillance test that implements
these tech specs and data from last performance.
Provided copy of the following for the inspectors review:
OPS Form 3609.1-1, pages 13 dated 4/4/98
OPS Form 3609.1 1, pages 1-3 dated 2/13/98
ENG Form 3112122. page 1-1 dated 2/11/98
OPS Form 3609.1 1, pages 13 dated 5/8/%
' OPS Form 3609.1 1, pages 1-3 dated 1/10/%
OPS Form 3616A.171 pages 12 dated 3/30/98
AWO M3-93-11560
SP 31105 pages 1119
l
q
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
{
561
Maintenance Rule issues - EDG
l
Provided copy of system basis document for EDGs.
Provided copy of system basis document for 3346A Revision 3 dated 11/7/97.
I
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
562
Deferred item Review
Provide additional information on the following deferred items: AWOs M3-9716618, M3 98-01750, M3-98-02116, M3-9843574, M3-98-
!
05213, M3-98-06112, M3-98-06590. CRs M3-97-4208, M3-98-0236, M3-984154, M3-98-0368, M3-98-0903.
Draft copies of listed AWOs provided to inspector.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
563
Copy of ACR 10797. Cold start times of Teny Turbine
!
Provide a copy of ACR 10797 and actions taken to address corrective actions (96007517-01-03).
Provided copy of ACR 10797 and AITTS 810 report for AR No 96007517 (assignment (rl 03) to inspection team.
.
1
.
]
75
j
l
l
._
.__
1
- _ - _ - _ _ _ - - - -
-- .__ - - _ - - -
Request No.
Request /Rewonse
-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
564
Provide a copy of the 10CFR50.54(f) Submittat dated March 31,1998
Provide a copy of the last submittal of the 10CFR50.54(f) letter dated March 31,1998, which addresses actions to identify and address the
fundamental causes of Millstones performance dechne.
Provided a copy of the letter dated March 31,1998 (B17165).
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
..
. . . . . . . . .
565
How are deferred PM's tracked on the Deferred items List?
Meetmg held 4/2/198 to discuss this issue. No open items.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
566
PM Program
1. How are we addresing PM's previously deferrred to insure that any deferred PM's are completed prior to system operabihty?
2. Will the IPMP process and CR corrective actions resolve problems with the present PM program.
See attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
567
Meeting to IMacuss the PM Program
Set up a meeting to discuss the PM program.
o
A meeting was held on Friday, April 17,1998 to discuss the status of our PM program.
Five questions came out of the meeting and require response. See items 566,568 and 565.
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
568
Terry Turbine . PM Program
1. Does the governor valve on the Terry Turbine fail open or shut on an overspeed trip?
i
'
2.Should the overspeed test of the terry turbine be done with the pump end uncoupled for personnel safety?
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'569
Copiesof Mechanical AWOs
Provide copies of the following AWOs: M198@379, M3-98-02996, M3-98@724, M3 94-02646, M198@573, ML98-03846, M3-984398,
j
M19841259, M3-9841795, M3-98@634.
Provided copies of the following AWOs: M3 9840379, M3-9842996, M3-984724, MS9442646, M3-98@S73, M3-98-03846, M3-98@398,
M19841259, M3-9841795, M3-98-05634.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
570
Requested an Interview with fiuman Resources
Requested an interview with VP of Human Resources to discuss performance reviews to determme if they are being performed late and to
discuss any procedures that exist to address the review process.
Inspector met with VP- Human Resources on 4/16/98. Requested a blank copy of the semi-annual Leadecship Assessment Survey form
which was provided.
-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
571
Requested Copy of the NORVP Meeting Agenda for 4/16/98 and 4/17/98
This request was made as a result of a meeting with Oversight personnel to discuss the NORVP process. See request #464.
The meeting agenda was provided to the inspector for his review.
- - . - . -
76
- _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - -
_ ._____ ---____--- _- _ __.__________ -__ - ___-____ _ __ - _ _ - _ - - __ _
Requent No.
RecueWResponse
__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
.. . . . . . . . . . .
572
Requested to Attend the Audit Exit for Audit MP.98-A0; " Corrective Action"
)
Requested to Attend the Audit Exit for Audit MP.98-/ 2," Corrective Action *
. Inspectors attended the audit exist and neeimd copies of the " DRAFT" audit report.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .. . ...... . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .
573
Requested Information Coccerning Issuance of CRs for NORVP issues
Does Nuclear oversight issue CRs for all Negative items (weaknesses) presented by in. NORVP. If there are no CRs, how is it assured
that the issues are resolved. This question was geared specifically toward report on Engineering presented on 4/16/98 concerning
docvnents presented to PORC not meeting expectations. This request was a result of attending an NORVP meeting on 4/16/98 Request
- 540.
Director of Analysis and Programs explained how NORVP data is obtained. If Oversight has a problem they write a CR. NORVP also
uses line generated CR's for input to the NORVP reports. Copies of CR M3-981100, Draft of a new CR (attached) and a draft report on
10CFR50.59, Safety Evaluation / Screen Reviews. Draft documents were stamped ' DRAFT". Inspector is concerned that PORC is being
challenged due to Engineering Documents not being adequate and this is a continuing problem. Inspector is attempting to evaluate what
is being done to resolve this issue.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
574
Upgrade of Oper tiorial Lineups
The following questions were asked regarding the Operations Department Valve Lineups: 1. Werelineups part of the PUP? 2. How
come some lineups look like they are the old format? (i.e.1995 vintage)
Attempted to perform hneufs when upgrading the procedures, however, resources were sometimes limited. Lineups are accurate,
however, a walkdown order would be more effectin for performa:s -
'>id not change lineups just for format sake.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
575
Copies of CRs associated with MP3 Tagging (Jan. Apr 1998)
Plear provide the following CRs associated with Tagging at MP3: M3 984341,98-0343,98-0344,98-0507,98-0542, and M3-98-1086.
Copies of CRs associated with tagging at MP3 during January . April 1998 were provided to the inspector. (M3 984341,0343,0344,0507,
0542,1086).
.......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
576
Operator Work Arounds/ Control Panet Deficiencies
Please provide the following- Discussion with Operations regarding OWA/CPDs, Walkdown field locations of OWA, Copy of COP 200.9
and KPI for Control Room and Annunciator Deficiencies.
Discussion with Operations occurred on 4/16/98 (0730-0830 and 4/20/98 0730-0745). Field of k(ations of OWAs walkdown with
Inspector 1330 -1400 on 4/16. Copy of C OP 200.9 provided, Rev.1. KPI for Control Room and Annunciator Deficiencies dated 4/12/98
provided. Justification for Deferral of EWR 96-0066 written by Engineer on FWS . Master Speed Controller, provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.......
577
3htSS*V5 Binding Issue (Maintenance also)
During cold start testing of the Terry Turbine, the trip / throttle valve was observed to be sticking. What was done to fix this situation?
Provided information to inspector for review.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ........ . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
578
Documents Request
Provide copies of ECA.0.0 and ECA-0.3.
EC-0.0, Rev.13 and ECA.O.3, Rev. 6 latest revs with changed provided to the inspector on 4/17/98.
77
._
,_
_
__
_ _ _ _ _ . _ __
_.__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
!
l
Recuert No.
Reauest/ Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
579
Lack of Risk Assessment in Modes 3 & 4
.
Probable Risk Assessment personnel from the Safety Analysis Department have not been consistently consulted reharding the work'
l
l
schedule during Modes 3 & 4. This has left the opportunity for the plant to be in higher nsk configurations with various combinations of
l
equipment out of service. (Please see attached summary for further information).
,
laue discussed.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
....
. . . . . . . . .
(
580
Documentation electricallineups
Provide electrical lineups for QSS, EDG, and SlH Systems.
Provided electrical Imeups for SlH (3308-6, Rev.1), QSS (3309-1, Rev. 4) and EDG (3346A-11, Rev. 8 and 3346A-12, Rev.10).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . ...
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
581
Corrective Actions for Self. Assessment 3 OPS-SA.97 04
Provide copy of CR associated with improvement items in 30PS-S.97-04
Copy of CR M3-97 3532 provided. This CR is the improvement documentation for Self-Assessment 30PS.SA.97-04. Corrective Actions
are due 9/30/98-11/1/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
582
Control Panel Deficiencies Not Identified
o
j
Walkdown of Control Panel Deficiencies vs. Control Panel Issues determined some issues that were not identified as deficiencies.
Operations discussed differences between issues and deficiencies with Inspector. Monday a.m. 0730.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
583
PM Program
How are defened PMs tracked on the deferred items list.
There are no deferred PMs on the deferred items list. This is because we do not intend to defer any PMs in the context of 50.54(f). There
are several PMs that are deferred by PMs, but they are considered future scheduled work for 50.54(f). Most of those are tied to refueling.
There is also a group of PMs that were deferred because of plant conditions. An example might be to change motor oil every quarter.
These PMs were deferred because the equipment was shut down. However,it was intended to perform the PM either prior to start up or
during its scheduled time after startup. These items are not considered to be deferred for 50$1(f), as they are being performed as the plant
moves back to operational mode. There may be some nems that were missed. The Terry Turbine gov oil change is an example.
Maintenance department to look at this issue to see if there are any 50.54(f) deferrable items from PMs.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
584
PM Program
How are we addressed PMs previously deferred to insure that any deferred PMs are completed prior to system operability?
Please see attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
585
Interview with Electrical Engineer
Additional information requested as a result of interview.
l
interview was providad.
i
78
i
l
\\
_ - _ . _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
- _ _
_ _ _ - - _ _
. _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _____ ___-__ _ -_ _ _ _ - _______ _ __ -
l
l
Rrqu st No.
Fequest/Remonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ........ .
586
Terry Turbine
1. Does the governor valve on the Terry Turbine fail open or shut on an overspeed trip? 2. Should the overspeed test of the Terry Turbme
be done with the pump end uncoupled for personnel safety?
1. The governor valve receives no signals on an overspeed tnp, all signals go to the inp throttle valve. 2. OP 3622.3, section 4.2 uncouples
the pump from the turbine for the overspeed test.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ..
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
587
Addi*ional documentation request from Meeting with System Engineer Root Cause
The following procedures were requested during a meeting with the System Engineering Qualification Reat Cause Team.1. NTM 7.202
ES Training Program implementing Procedure. 2. EN31097. Millstone Unit 3 System Readiness Reviews. 3) EN 310% Millstone Unit 3
System Engineer Walkdowns.
Procedures provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
588
Follow up information on M3 97 21105
What was the initiating document for M3-97-21105? This is the AWO that will provide the repair for 3CHS-PIS140, Temp Mod 3 97-075.
There was no initiating document. The problem was verbally reported to the FIN team. The work order was subsequently generated.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
589
Requested a copy of the Nuclear Oversight Organizational Chart
J
Requested a copy of the Nuclear Oversight Organizational Chart
Provided Inspector with a copy of the Nuclear Oversight Organization Chart dated 3/17/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...... . . . . . . . . . ...... . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....
590
Requested copies of the last 3 Audit Reports
Requested copies of the last 3 Audit Reports
Provided copies of Audit Reports. MP-97.A12-02 " Emergency Preparedness and 10CFR50.54(f) Review", MP-98-A01 " Conduct of
Operations Millstone Units 2 and 3" and MP.97.A1103 " Software QA".
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
591
Provide written Management Expectations
Provide any written Management Expectations from Tech Support, Corrective Action, Operabons Maintenance, Maintenance, Chief
Nuclear Officer.
Written expectation provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . ...... .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
592
Schedule Meeting with NSSS Supervisor to discuss Terry Turbine
Meeting scheduled for 4/21/98 I&C Conference Room.
See Response 632.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
593
Requested Information concerning how many contractors are in Nuclear Oversight
Requested Information concerning how many contractors are in Nuclear Oversight
This information was available on the Nuclear Oversight Organization Chart provided under seperate request.
l
7)
l
i
l
!
i
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
594
Requested an interview with Manager, Work Control and Outage Management
Requested an interview with Manager, Work Control and Outage Management
Interview conducted 4/20/98.
. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . . . .
. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
595
Requested an Interview with Recovery Otficer, Nuclear Oversight
Requested an Interview with Recovery Officer, Nuclear Oversight
Scheduled for Tuesday,4/21/98 at 1600. Interview was conducted as scheduled. Inspector requested documents concerning Oversight
.
Staff Qualifications, Information concerning Oversights review of Open Audits and Surveillance for Restart and a copy of the Nuclear
Oversight improvement Plan. These will be provided under a separate request.
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
t
5%
Requested an interview with Director, Audits and Evaluation
{
j
Requested an interview with Director, Audits and Evaluation
t
!
Inspector met with Director, Aadits and Evaluations to discuss the Audit Program.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
597
Request to attend an ISEC Meeting
o
Request to attend an ISEG Meeting
Inspector attended the meeting.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
598
Requested an interview with Manager, Technical Support Engineering
Requested an interview with Manager, Technical Support Engineering
Inspector met with Manager, Technical Support Engineering , to discuss Quality of Engineering Documents going to PORC and the
l
!
Operability Determination Procedure RP.5.
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
599
Requested an interview with Manager, Corrective Actions
Requested an interview with Manager, Corrective Actions
interview was conducted.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
600
Requested copies of Nuclear Oversight Procedures NOQP 2.01 and NOQP 4.02
Requested copies of Nuclear Oversight Procedures NOQP 2.01 and NOQP 4.02
NOQP.2.01 " Nuclear Oversight Audits", Pe v. 2 and NOQP.4.02 " Performance, Reporting and Follow.up of Surveillance Activities and
Field Observations at Millstone" Rev.1.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
601
Requested a copy of the latest Performance Indicator Report
!
Requested a copy of the latest Performance Indicator Report
Provided Inspector with the 4/17/98 Millstone Urut 3 Performance Indicator Report.
80
l
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ ._
i
i
i
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
602
Use of Info Notices on Terry Turbine CH Valve Stems
Please provide documents that show response taken to industry problems with control valve s i ms.
Attached is a copy of Dresser Rand letter dated 1/15/%, and EWR No. M3-%.241 with deferral Jued 5/21/97. These documents
describe the design change to the governor stem and the justification for deferral of the stem replacement.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j
i
603
AWO Questions
i
i
1. AWO M3 98-02996, why was longer stroke time found to be acceptable. TR was written because of longer stroke time work resulted in
j
an even longer stroke). 2. AWO M3 98-03274, why is U3 WPC 3 Att. 4 not filled out.
Provided response and all background documents directly to inspector.1. Reference stroke time was reset (DCN DM3 03-012197) and
l
packing adjustment done by other AWOs. 2. CR M3-9&O676 and CAP identified and set in place corrective actions. Attachment 4 is
l
being treated as a duidelines/ checklist. Not expected to be filled out for each AWO.
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
604
Operating Experience
1. Please provide issued Procedure NSE-1 " Implementation of Operating Experience" 2. Provide a list of OE issues awaiting evaluation
that includes an evaluation of which are required for start up.
1. Procedure NSE.1 prov:ded to team (421/98/0900). 2. List of OE issues awaiting evaluation which are required for startup provided to
team (0900/422/98).
..................................................3.........................................................................
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
605
Followup to EDG System Meeting
"A" EDG starting air compressor copper tubing is kinked. What action is being taken?
Initiated TR #16M31M038. The tubing should be replaced during next scheduled air compressor Quarterly PM outage.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
606-
Follow up to EDG System Meeting
Air start Dist Filter drain valve not labeled or on drawing. "A' diesel had no handle on valve. How is this controlled? If valve was left
open, this could prevent starting of diesel. What prevents it from opening?
Although the valves are not controlled, they are not operated either. There is no requirement to operate the valves. There are no
operating conditions or maintenance that would require valve operation. Basically, someone would have to intentionally open the valve
and leave it open, which is directed by any procedure. I wrote CR M3 98 2031 to resolve issue. I recommended removing valves and
installing plugs.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
607
Follow up to EDG system meeting
Drain valve for 'D' lube oil strainer 3EFDC*V188 was out of position (Operator came and fixed). Please provide summary of Corrective
Action.
Operations contacted and they closed valved, which is the correct position. Initiated CR M3-98-2007.
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
608
Follow up to Service Water Engineering Meeting
MCC Rod Control Booster Pump, one pump is within melling the other is not. Both pumps are at approximately 70 gat per min. Please
provide results from last 4 surveillance.
'
Provided inspector copies of last four surveillance OP 3262.101 and OP 3626.11 1.
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
699
Setpoint Calculations
Provide information almut the Stone & Webster procedure for completing the calculation cover sheet.
1
Provided procedure SWNEO S.06, Rev. 4 dated June 4,1996, " Design Analysis and Calculations".
81
1
L
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ -_. - _ - _ _ . _
_.
_. ._.
i
s
.
I
Reauest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
610
Provide copy of procedure MP 3762BN and procedure for level 3 coatings (ARCOR, etc, CM P 3710C)
Retrieved copies from 4th floor " controlled distribution hbrary"
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. . . . . . . . . . . .... .. ...
... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..... ..
611
Setpoint Control
Provide the procedure for calculating changes to setpoint (uncertainties).
'
Provided specification SP-ST.EE.286, Rev. 6.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
613
Follow up to EDG System Meeting
l
EDG 'A' & 'B' thermostats on dryers have a range of 200-700 degrees. Some of these thermometers are readmg 700 degrees Fahrenheit.
There is an EWR on this. What currently is being done with regards to operator indicators on these?
The air dryer temperature indicators are not suitably ranged for the application. ACR 888 questioned the range of the temperature
indication. A/R 95052493-01 is assigned to the System Engineer to investigate and recommend a more suitably ranged temperature
indicator. The temperature indication is not logged suitably ranged temperature indicator. The temperature indication is not logged by
Operations and there is no need to record the temperature considering the intermittent operation of the compressors. However, the
,
l
System Engineer has found the Tis to be of some use, on an infrequent basis,in troubleshooting air compressor run time anomalies (air
. leak causing excessive compressor operation). The tempertaure indicators were installed with the air dryers durig RF01. The range was
l
seclected by the Design Engineer based on the calculated air compressor outlet temperature. However, the compressors and the T1 acts as
a heat sink. Thus, the actual temperature at the air dryer inlet is normally less than the minimum range (200F). Based on System Eng.
l
observation, the only times that air dryer inlet temperature is within the Tl range is when charging a completely depressurized air receiver
or as a result of excessive air compressor operation. These are both infrequent occurrences and should not be used as the basis for this
temperature indicator's range. System Engineer recommends replacing the existmg Tis with a suitably ranged indicator however, this
should not be an immediate priority based on the limited value of knowing the exact air dryer inlet temperature. The A/R tracks this is
an open item to improve the air system. Presently, air dryer filer dp and air compressor run times are monitored, which experience has
shown to be of most value in assessing system performance.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
613
Provide summary of RHR Mini Flow events
Provide summary of RHR Miniflow Events FCV610 & 611.
Provided copy of preliminary (not PORC'd) Root Cause for RHR Miniflow Events.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
614
Deferred Engineering items (also NDS)
Please proivde a copy of the highlighted items and any available deferral documentation.
Provided requested copies of NCRs and EWRs of inspection team (may obtain copy of NCR M3-98101 from NDS).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
615
Review cf AWO M3-9713881 PM 4160 Breaker
Please snwer the following questions regarding this package: Planning feedback from . FME Checklist not signed, incorrect Procedure,
!
Wrong change number on procedure and Kirk Interlock on breaker not addressed.
- Provided requested information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t
616
M3 97-018912 Year PM Molded Case Conduit Circuit Breaker.
MCC starter for 3 POP-RCI'r. Note: could not test manual trip because this type of breaker does not have one. Respond to the above
issue. Is cycling 5 times proper PM activity? (cycle or tube)
Responded to atmve request.
t
82
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_
___
__ _
__
_--
Request No.
Request /Remonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. .. . . . .
. . . . . . . .
... .
617
Provide copics of CR's related to Unit 3 PM Program
Based upon Unit 3's review of Preventive Maintenance items that were deferred, provide a coy of the Condition Reports that were
generated.
Copies of the following CRs which were written to address Deferred PMs were provided to the inspator M3-98-1842. M3-98-2058 and M3
98-2059. Discussed with inspector and found to be acceptable.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . .
. . . . . . .. ... . . . . . ....... .. . ... . . . . . .
618
Provide information related to Terry Turbine Trip on Electrical Overspeed
Provide an eylanation regarding any potential Root Causes associated with the Terry Turbine Trip on Electrical Overspeed during the
performance of surveillance test SP 3622.7-2 for full stroke of 3FWA*P2 (Terry Turbine) Aux Feedwater check valves. Provide any insight
to why this may be associated with a failed governor. Additionally, discuss signature level and timing of corrective action.
~
Meeting was held with members cf the OSTI team. Discussed briefly some of the previous history associated with the pump including 2
previous failures to trip and a previons trip on electrical overspeed. Test in progress was determining flow verification to each S/G with
data being taken for both flow & vibrations. When valves were shut the load change was sensed by the turbine governor as a speed
change. Expected the governor to decrease the amnunt of steam to the turbine. it was operating at 4500 RPM & appears to have tripped at
greater than 4700 rpm. Current plans are to change out the oil in the governor which is more than 2 years old -(PM was for 18 month
cycle). Alignments will be checked and the needle valve adjusted. Have receivwd some input from the vendor regarding PM activities,
and appears changeout of oil may be a Sood first step. Note: A separate request input sheet was initiated to provide the test procedure
and completed data for this test that was performed on 4/14/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
. . . . . . . . . .
........... ... . . . . . . . .. . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
619
CR M3-98-?H9
CR M3-98-2049 was issued t$ document that one of the NRC inspectors found the alignment of the 'C' CHS pump to be questionable.
Issued CR, investigation is ongoing.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
620
Meeting regarding Fire Brigade Advisor Quals
Arrange a meeting to discuss Fire Brigade Advisor Quals.
Meeting took place on 4/20/98 at 0830.
.................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ..
. . . .
621
HVK Chiller Sight Glass
During a plant walkdown on 4/17/98, it was noticed that an information placard for HVK chillers refrigerant level sight glass were
broken.
Placards are not necessarily as Operator Rounds indicates allowable level. Placards were removed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
622
Turbine Building Rounds
Accompany PEO on Turbine Building rounds.
Tour went well. Cml performance by PEO. One follow up item, HVK Chiller refrigerant sight glm nas no component label and
Lamicord info card / placard is broken (see next input sheet).
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
....
623
Meeting with 'P Shift Manager
Arrange meeting with SM regarding miss=d LCO 3.3.1.S.a action (verify dilution paths isolated).
Inspector met with SM on 4/21/98 at 0730.
83
- _.
- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
624
Training given for T.S. 3.4.1.3 Change
Provide the training given for T.S. 3.4.1.3 change.
1
1
Provided training material.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
625
Just in Time Training
i
Provide a summary of the schedule for the planned Just in Time Training on 4/18/98 at 0730.
l
Provided schedule
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
626
Operator Proficiencies
Please provide documentation of operator proficiencies. This should include operators who have been off-shift (i.e. backroom support).
Person responsible discussed tracking of operator deficiencies.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
627
Unit Supervisor Control Room Limitations
IAW 3260, Conduct of Operations, the US is limited to the Control Room without turning over supervision. US's typically turnover
supervision when going to the kitchen area or IRR or Computer Room. They do not necessarily do it when going into tagging area or SM
conference room. The NRC believes that the Control Room envelope is too loose of a guideline. The areas should be specifically called
out.
Management's expectation is that the US will remain within sight and scund of the board operators and CR annunciators. Refer to CR M3-
l
98-2150 procedure change requests were submitted to the procedure group.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
628
Interview with Nuclear Oversight Auditor
Interview with Nuclear Oversight Auditor
Discussed the Oversight Organization, improvements to the Audit Program, use of contractors, communications l'etween Nuclear
Oversight Recovery Officer and the Oversight Employees, integration between the audit and surveillance group and interface
improvements with Line Management.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
629
Request to attend meeting
Meeting between Nuclear Oversight, and Engineering concerning a CR issued Friday on Safety Evalutions.
Meeting not yet scheduled, will probably be Thursday 4/23/98. This meeting has taken place. Nuclear Oversight discussed this with
inspector. CR's M3 98 2109, M3-98 2018 and M3 98-2107 were issued on the issue that was to be discussed. Copies wera provided to
inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
630
Requested information on KPIs/ Performance Indicators
Does a procedure exist to control the KPI process?
Discussed with members of the Special Project staff. There is cunently no procedure to address the KPI Performance Indicator Reports.
They indicated that they are considering adding the information to Station Procedure, OA.11 "Self Assessment".
i
l
_
84
-
__- _ - _ _
_ - - -
_ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. -
- _ - _ _ - -
ll E.equ0st No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
631
Testing requirernents for ECA class separation valves
i
)
What are the class separaation testing for the following valves in the EGA System (EM 1168). 3EGPV30 and 3EGA*ESF35Bl?
1
Air receiver inlet check valve 3EG A*V30 and excess flow sensing line valve 3EG A*EFV35B1 are both reverse flow exercise tested and leak
tested per the ISI Program by surveillance procedure SP 3646A.22.
,
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
632
Schedule meeting with NSSS Supervisor to discuss Terry Turbine
Meeting at 0830 on 4/21/98 in the I&C Conference Room.
,
Meeting held between NSSS supervisor and inspector.
i
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
633
Documentation Provided at Interview with Assistant Director
The following documentation was provided during an interview with the Assistant Director: 1) NORVPforweekending4/17/98. 2)
Weekly KPI Report for week ending 4/17/98 and 3) Department Windows Assessment for 1stQTR.
Documentation provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
634
Request copy of the NRC Briefing Book
Provide copies from the NRG Briefing Book on the Sucess Criteria for Self. Assessments and Corrective Actions.
The NRC briefing book update for 4/23/98 was not completed on 4/24/98 at 1700. Discussion with NRC Inspector resolved that the
Briefing Book was not required to support any of his items.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
635
Impact of Backlog
Provide a copy of the results/ field notes of the assessment on impact to operations from Maintenance Backlog. Readmess Assessment
Plan item C.41
Meeting with Manager of Work Control,4/22/98 at 1600 hours0.0185 days <br />0.444 hours <br />0.00265 weeks <br />6.088e-4 months <br />. Inspector attended the scope control mtg. and received followup
documents.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
636
Surveillance Program Self-Assessment
' Provide most recent program Self. Assessment for Maintenance Surveillance Procedures.
Information provided to inspector for review.
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
637
Status of Mode 2 Surveillance
Provide list of open/ required procedures.
Attached are 2 reports.1) List of all Mode 1 & 2 required surevillances that come into their grace period by 6/1/98. 2) List of all mode 1
4 required surveillance that nter grace period by Friday, April 25,1998.
........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
l
638
System Readmess Review Status
l
l
Provide interview with subject expert. Expectations, status
Interview took place at 12'0. Followup questions: 1) Status of reviews. 2) QSS/LPSIinterim reviews (provide copy). 3) Provide copy
of any final review.
85
,
m__--m-____:______.____-_____ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ __
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
t
I
i
l
Reauent No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
639
Planner Interviews
l
Interview with 2 Mechanical Planners .one that planned M3-94-02M6 and other as available.
Interviews between Mechanical Planners and inspector occurred.
,
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
]
. . . . . . . . .
640
Failed Surveillance Tests
Provide listing of all failed tests (I'S Surv) within last 6 months.
See attached report of all CRs written to document surveillance failures.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M1
Requested copies of PORC Meeting Minutes
Meeting minutes for PORC Meeting 3 98130 and 198-134 were requested. These are the meetings inspector attended.
Provided copies of the requested PORC Meeting minutes. Minutes for meeting 3-98134 are in DRAIT form and have been stamped
DRAFT.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
642
Motor Driven Feedwater Pump
Provide information relate 4to near miss situation when mechanic was close to motor driven feedwater pump during start.
Provided requested information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
643
4160 Circuit Breaker Upgraded to Magneblast
Inspector requested list of 4160 circuit breakers which were upgraded to Magnablast.
Provided status of 4160/Magnablast breakers to inspection team.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M4
DCR M3-97-097
Did the referenced flow calculation take into account any effects of the screens being added per DCR MS971117
Calc. 97 ENG-01427D3 was revised and superceded by Calc 98-32 to specifically account for flow /DP Data taken post mod scnen
installation. New normal, alert and action acceptance cunes were developed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
645
Post Mod Testing
Provide status /results on Post Mod Testing for modification . DCR M197029 for the following valves: 3CHS*SV8152,3FWA*SOV61 A,
3 MSS *SOV31 A2. 3SlH*SV8871 AND 3SIL*SV8880.
The individual DCR testing attribute sheets (form 3-25) for each SOV is attached. I have included pages of the IST Testing sheets to
demonstrate acceptable testing. The attached exel sheet provides the I form date (dete of turnover to Ops) for each valve.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
646
Service Water System Strainer Tech Manual
laspector requested copy of Service Water System self< leaning strainer Tech Manual.
l
Provided copy of OIM-01611B " Service Water Self-Cleaning Strainers" (available from NDS/ Vault).
l
l
(
.
l
86
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _
__ __ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - _ _ _
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , ,
, . . . . , , , , , . . .
M7
In reference to 3FWA.P130A
is this gage used during surveillance testmg?
Yes. 3FWA-P130A is used for quarterly pump operabihty testing in surveillance procedure SP3622.1, documented on form 3622.1 1. The
gage monitors pump discharge pressure.
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
648
Temporary Modihcations #3-97 075
l
'
Temp Mod requires a functional check . how was the functional check performed?
The functional check consisted of an inservice leak test when the Temp Mod was placed in service. There was a CR written on this issue
M3-98-2101.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
l
649
Copy of WC.10 " Temporary Modifications"
l
Inspector requested a copy of WC.10," Temporary Moddications".
Provide copy of cunent revision of WC 10 to inspector. (Rev.1, Change 4) (Obtained procedure copy form NDS).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
650
4 Hour Wait time for Ter y Turbine Cold Start Test
o
inspector would like to determine the basis for the 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> wait time pnor to performing the Terry Turbine Cold Start Surveillance. Is there
documentation for the 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> wait and " maximum condensate load".
!
Memo from System Engineer, MP3.TS.94-745 dated 10/5/94, provides input to the Ops procedure group that 4 hour4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> wait " ensure (s) we
are as conservative as possible "for cold start testing". There is no calculation to back this up. Tr.e memo was based upon System
i
Engineering experience and Engineering judgment.
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
651
" Extent of Condition" Process
is there an " extent of condition" process that rg kes CRs to be reviewed for generic conditions.
RP4 (reference Rev. 4) " Corrective Action Program" has 2 locations / requirements for " extent of condition": 1) The investigator must
evaluate the condition for generic implications (Petition 1.9.5). 2) During the management review," extent of condition"is considered (i.e.
generic implications) (Reference section 1.8.2).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
652
On-Line Risk Assessment
NRC inspector would like to talk to someone concerning on-line risk assessment and how it is applied at MP3.
Meeting to discuss peformance criteria of Maintenance Rule Risk Significant Systems and On Line Risk Assessment was held at 0900 on
4/15/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .
653
Regarding TDAFW Turbine Governor Valve
1. From whom was the stem purchased? (you indicated verbally Dresser-Terry). 2. What other parts were replaced; when and from
whom were they purchased; and of what materials were they made? 3. Who installed and tested the replacement parts? 4. Was all
work, including testing, performed under tlw direction of Dresser Rand. Terry Turbodyne, or using their detailed procedures, or the
NM AC Guide?
Infonnation provided to inspector for review.
,
I
87
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
__ ______ ____-
i
i
l
l
Rwucet No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . .
. . . , , , ,
654
Diesel Generator Air Start isolation Valve not locked open
Inspector requested information on diesel air start isolation valve which was identified in February 1998 as not being krked open, and is
still not locked open.
Provided copy of CR M3 981078 to inspection team to show corrective actions to date.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .,
, , . . . . , ,
655
Bat rah BAT 1-96-1241E3
l'
'
Need to discuss Attachment 3 to this Calc. (i.e., Justification for acceptability of lower voltages).
Individual discussed calculation with inspector. Inspector was satisfied with discussion,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
656
SWPimpeller replacement
Provide calculation for new BHP on SW Pump impeller. Issue was done in 3 parts as follows: 1. Data 2. Evaluate 3. Prepare SE.
This issue is addressed by CR M3 96 0351. AR 96026539-04 performed SPROC SPROC EN 98 3-01 measured motor BHP less than or equal
to 588 HP which is less than motor naineplate rating of 600HP. AR 96026539-05 will revise PDCR MP3-94-094 as necessary (Mode 2
items). Individual also met with inspectors to discuss this issue. Inspector had no further questions after discussion.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
657
Meeting with individual on Self. Assessments
o
Set up a meeting on Self-Assessments.
Individual met and spoke with the inspector on self. assessments. No further followup requested.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
658
4160 Breakers Maintenance CR 98-2070
Please set up a meeting with CR orginator to discuss CR.
CR originator met with the inspector to discuss the issue of the 4160 breakers. No further questions were asked.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
659
Request RHR System Engineer . Interview and System Walkdown
Set up interview /walkdown with the RHR System Engineer.
System Engineer met with the inspectors on 4/20/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
660
Meeting with Root Cause Evaluator
Set up a meeting to discuss Root Cause Evaluations.
Meeting took place on 4/29/98 at 1300.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
661
Walkdown of ARCOR app'ication (also requested by inspector Scholl)
Set up walkdown with inspector of ARCOR application,
inspectors walked down ARCO application job with System Engineer.
L
1
l
l
1
i
88
_ _ _ _ _ _
_ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ -
-
_.
- - _ - - _ - _ - - -
_
__
J
.
_
_-
__
__
_
___
-- -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
_
-
Request No.
Request /Rewonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . .
..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
662
Provide followup on BATPissue
llave the high points in the VCT been looked at in relation to the binding issue?
System Engineer had discussion with inspector, lie is currently in the process of reviewing this before the inspector brought this up.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . ......
. . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . .
.....
. . . . .
. . . . .
663
Request copy of SPROC 93 3-26 and Engineering Tech Eval M3-EV.98-0042. 2) Comp. measures . based on postulated fouling rate (Oct 3,
1998) how is data from monthly EDG runs used to see if fouling rate changed?
System Engineer spoke with inspector on this concern. No further questions on this issue.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
664
Request copy of OD MP3-055-98.
Provided copy of Operability Determination to inspector on 4/21/%.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . .
665
TM closure
Request copy of list of recent TM (Temp Mods) that were closed since 1/98
o
Please find copy oflist attached.
. . . . . . . ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
666
MCC and Rod Control Area Booster Pump 3SWP*P3B operational Test 3626.11 1 Rev.11
Data sheet SP 3626.11 1 page 2 of 2, Step 4.12 lists valve (35WP*V86 full stroke open). Valve 35WP*V86 appears incorrectly, should be
valve 3SWP*V867.
Information provided to inspector for review.
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
667
MCC and Rod Control Area Booster Pump 3SWP*P3B Operability Test SP3626.11 Rev. 8
Page 2 of 7. in discussion states that "the isolation valve is tested by timing and locally observing the valve as it strokes *. This procedure
does not time valve stroking. Also, this procedure requires stop watch with accuracy of 1/10th sec. (why?).
This procedure used to have stroke time testing of 3SWP MOV130B. The valve has since been abandoned in place and electrically
disconnected. The procedure does not time test 2 valve (s). The stopwatch is not needed (no time testing is done). This should be
addressed by Operations procedure writers. Note: added to Oscar for SP 3626.11.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
668
MCC and Rod Control Area Booster Pump 3SWP P3B Operational Readiness Test
12/6/97 test . page 2 of 2 of Data Sheet has restoration, independent verification for 3SWP*V847 (MCC & rod control area A/C unit B
booster pump P11MB isolation) was N/ A, why?
3SWP*V847 may be throttled if the operator wants to get a steadier discharge pressure reading. If the operator did not throttle the valve,
he did not position it, and restoration and IV thus would be 'N,'A'. No further questions.
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ...
. . . . .
669
CR M3-97-2956
Improper RWST draw down assumption. Please provide a copy of the CR.
Provided copy of CR m3-97 2956 to inspector on 4/20/98.
89
..
_- -
f
!
I
l
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
670
Self Assessnent on DCM Process
Provide copy of DCM Process Self-Assessment
Provided copy of DCM process Self-Assessment and References as per attached sheet.
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . ,
671
ESAR 97-020
i
Provide copy of ESAR-97 020
Provided copy of ESAR-97-020.
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
672
MODS DCR M197-054 and 3-97-511 (MMOD)
{
Please provide packages.
'i
<
l
DCR M197054 and MMOD M3-97511 provided to inspection team (retrievable from NDS).
{
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
673
Copies of Engineering Assurance Assessments
l
Inspector requested a copy of the following FSARCR Assessment (RES-SA-98-001), DCR/MMOD SA (PES-97-036) DCR/MMOD S/ A
l
Follow up review, IEEE SA Sollowup Review.
Above SAS Provided to inspection team (copies retrievable from NDS/EAG). Inspector has no further questions at this time.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
674
Provide CR M197-4795
,
CR provided to inspection team. Inspector spoke with system enigneer. Additionalinformation requested on characteristics of corrosion
products found and why we feel these corrosion products won't cause the remaining SOV's to bind. System Engineer spoke with
inspector and resolved all additional questions.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
675
OE. Boric Acid Air Entrapment
Team requested information regarding Operating Experience related to Beaver Valley. Boric Acid System Air Entrapment.
Provided NU's draft report " Potential loss of High Pressure injection and Charging from Gas intrusion'.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
676
CR 1560. EDG ' A' Start Time 10.128 seconds.
Requested information start time on previous starts since last engine overhaut
Provided list of diesel start times during testing from 1 1-98 through 3-5-98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......
677
DCR M196065 Final Revision
Request a copy of DCR M196065 Final Revision.
Copy of DCR MS96065 provided to inspection team (retrievable from NDS).
90
t
!
!-
u______________.______
_ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._
Reauest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
678
DCR 96060
Please provide 50.59 evaluatmn.
DCR 96060 (including 50.59 cvaluation) provided to the inspection team.
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . ,
679
DCR M3-97 029
1. Was EQ group involved in post-installation for walkdown? 2. Was EEQ database / SPEC updated? (Provide info)? 3. What is tracking
EQR to address qualified lives of new equipment?
Schedule meeting for 1300 4/21/98 with Design Engineer. Meeting held with inspector and Design Engineer. Per Inspector, this response
is complete, no further actions are required.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
680
RSS Temp. Instrument Clogged
Provide additional information on RSS Temp instrument clogged.
Inspector conducted interview with Engineer on 4/22/98 regarding above issue. Ir.>pector has no further questions at this time.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
681
When EDG enclosure tornado dampers close in response to a low pressure can the EDG engine air intake / exhaust duct / piping withstand
the resultant differential pressure?
The combustion air intake and exhaust piping for MP3 emergency diesel generator is designed te.3.3 psig and 3.0 psig respectively. This
can be verified by the MP31 ine Designation Table (LDT) and the original Stone & Webster FSK drawing No.12179.FSK.19-7A.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
682
CR M3-98-1532 PCV'ACUSlB not working
1. What was cause? 2. Corrective Actions Taken?
Provided inspector with information.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
683
Two Tomado Dampers in series in EDG Room
Are these tomado dampers designed to operate with two mounted in series? Does placing a second one in series introduce failure modes
that have not been analyzed?
The Tornado dampers are in series to account for one failing. Only one is requi -t to function in the case of a tornado event. The tomado
dammpers were specified, purchased and designed to withstand a pressure in e en of the design tomado differential pressure of 3 psi.
(Ref. Mp3 Specification No. 2103.430-668,"Tomado Dampers"). If all but one blai o a damper close there will be sufficient dp and air
flow to close the remaining tornado damper. Also individual met with Inspector to brther explain response to question.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......
684
Commercial Dedication
Inspector wants to talk about the procedure. Has this been treated in any recent NRC inspection?
Individual met with inspector and discussed the Commercial Dedication process.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
685
Modifications Concems
Provide any self-assessment / Root Cause evaluations relative to recent modification problems (i.e. RHR Mod with incorrect SOVs, RSS
Onfice plates and Resultants expansion joint damage, cracked weld in RSS pipe). Include any information presented to NRC Management.
Information provided to inspector.
91
- - _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - _ - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ _ - - -
Reauest No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
686
OD MP3-045-98 - Main Steam Relief Dypass Valve - Stem Release Capability in Excess of what assumed in Safety Analysis
1. Why not a 50.59 cvaluation? 2. Effect on 3 MSS *MOV74A/B/C/D Main Steam Relief Bypass Valve Qualification . If flow is up, how
does that not affect ddl. pressure across the valve, which is an input for thrust.
Provided inspector information for review.
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
687
Deferred issues with regards to 3CliS*112D&E
I
Are the affected valves used in EOPs?
A system function review of the charging system identified that the VCT could lose inventory prior to the generation of an SI signal (Ref.
CR M3-97-4342). In addition, the VCT signalis not safety related. Presence of the to-lo VCT signal would prevent switch injection to
sump recirculation. Correction of this problem required a cable pull for one of the RWST supply valves (3CHS*LCV112D&E). The other
valve had an available spare cable. To prevent using two different designs, and due to the low probability of this event, a greyboot
connector was installed via MSEE40064 98 (DCN DM3-00-0065-98 attached). This greyboot connector allows the operator to remove the
Lo-Lo VCr level signal from RWST supply valves. Use of this greyboot connector is controlled via the " Transfer to Cold Leg
Recirculation" Procedure, EOP 35 ES-1.3 (appropriate pages attached). The deferred EWR is for a future cable pull and more user fnendly
defeat of the to-Lo VCT level interlock. Inspector had no further questions.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
688
TM Closure
Request copy of list of recent Temp Mods that were closed since 1/98.
Information provided to inspector for review.
............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
689
Requested a copy of SORC 98-13 minutes
Requested a copy of SORC 9813 minutes
Provided copy.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
60
Copy of Startup and Power Ascension Plan
OP 3274 and SPROC 97 3-30.
Provided 2 copies of OP 3274 and SPROC 97 3-30.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j
691
Meet with Correchve Actions Manager on Monday afternoon 4/20
-j
i
Meet with Corrective Actions Manager on Monday afternoon 4/20
i
Meeting occurred, no followup.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
692
Will attend Officers Meeting on 4/21/98 at 0900
i
I
Will attend Ofhcers Meeting on 4/21/98 at 0900
i
Inspector attended meeting.
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
693
Copy of SORC Meeting Minutes 98-24
i
Will be done early next week.
i
i
Provided copies.
'i
92
i
i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
_
- - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -
a
Roouast No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
694
SORC 98-05 Status of long Term Man for Admin Manual
Attached SORC minutes refer to long term plan for admin manuals and programs.1. What is progress? 2. is SORC routmely updated?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ,
695
SORC 97-75. Explain comment "even with unqualified chairman"
1. Explain resolution of having unqualified SORC Chairman. 2. Show present qualifications if SORC meets all requirements.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6%
How can we use a Department instruction to Root Cause Quality Issues
DC1 requires quality procedures for quality work. Explain how Department Instructions for Root Causes on Quality
Equipment / Programs fulfills this. Mike Covell to answer.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
697
Root Cause M3-97-3761
Were Westinghouse fuel test assemblies on demonstration fuel? Trying to understand barrier analysis.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
698
Copy of UIR 1068 Root Cause,
PORC 97-003 indicated Root Cause to be done for 1068. Would like a copy.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
699
Would hke the Final Report of Manager Mode Assessments
Would like the Final Report of Manager Mode Assessments
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
700
Following ongoing Root Causes and ERTs
Would like to follow Root Causes & ERT on Terry Turbine, ESF, PORV events. Meet with Team leads, and needs copies of nuterials and
drafts in progress.
Provided copy of PORV event. Awaiting others and appointments to be made.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
701
List of PORC/SORC open items
PORC/SORC open items / recommendations
Provided copy of attached AR's.
....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
702
l.
1. How is the missing door on SW ductwork controlled? (SW Pump Room Ventilation). 2. Request copy of Tech Eval M3-EV.980038 and
!
cale. #SWP01515M3, Rev. 0.
l
The removal of the access door is controlled by EM.150C (P&lD). Also attached is Tech Eval. M3-EV.980038 and calc. SWP 01515M3, Rev.
O. No further questions.
93
I
,
- _ - -
- _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ -___ - -__ _ _ _ _
-
l
l
l
Request No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
703
In reference to 3FSS*El A
Why is this item deferred when AWO says required prior to Mode 27
AWOs were created to quantify leakage, if any from the RSS side to the Service Water Side prior to Mode 2. All four heat exchangers were
tested during the performance of IST 3-97 013 and 3 97-014 under AWOs #M3-9842815,02816. 02817, and 02818. Commitment has been
satisfied.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7 41
3RCS-425 Flow Indication
What is the design function of this instrument? Indication? Alarm? Protection?
See attached response. Also see memo concerning corrective action for problem. No further questions.
!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
705
In reference to 3FWS-P130A
Is this gage used during surveillance testing?
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
706
Fire Brigade Requirements
l
'
Provide the NU Licensing dyument that desaibes NUs requirements for the Fire Brigade advisor. Provide the procedure that estabbshes
and implements the plant knowledge required for the fire brigade team.
Training material provided. Fire protection evaluation report provided. Additional issues were raised regarding the FPER. The 0571
team does not believe that a PEO qualifies as a Fire Brigade Advisor. The FBA is required to have a license or equivalent system
knowldege. This will be an open issue in the OSTI Report, however, no further mformation is required.
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
707
OP 3201 Precaution Basis
1
OP 3201 Precaution 3.1.5 limits PRI-SEC dP to 1600 psid and SEC PRI dP to 670psid. The precaution is confusing wlut is the basis?
'
Provided a copy of the basis procedure for precaution 3.1.5 explained that the precaution is out of Westinghouse PLS document and is
based on testtng limits from W steam generalized Tech Manual.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
708
Provide clarification on Unit 3's position on the SM acting as STA. OP 3260 allows the SM to act as STA if qualified.
.
AR 97030272 (Corrective Action from CR M3-97 4671) requires revising procedures to reflect a dedicated STA. These are required prior to
I
Mode 2.
'
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
{
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
709
Deferred PMs list 4/18/98
l
Provide basis for PMs on attached list. Provide vendor recommendations per attached list. Provide Maintenance history relative to
bearing replacement per attached list. When were they scheduled? Whats the new schedule?
See attached.
j
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
- f10
31 IVY'FN2B AWO M3-8711926
t
i
i
Provide scheduled start date for the above.
See attached. Vibration readings are down, SSD RF06, fan to be monitored closely, to follow vibration readings.
!
i
94
i
i
'
i
j
I
________-_-_____
____ O
_.
-
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
!
l
l
l
R+ quest Na Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
711
Wrong change number on procedure for AWO
Provide information as to why wrong change number is on pnredure.
Wrong Change number on Procedure. This refers to the feedback form, ATT. 3 to U3 WPC 2. This form provides a mechanism to
feedback to work planning, and is administrative in nature. It is placed in every work order as they are prepared and the form was the
proper revision and change at the time of package preparation. Feedba.k form is attached.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
712
Schedule meeting with IRLT coordmator.
Meeting to discus CR M3-97 4135,3SIL*V012 AWO Status and 3CCP*V060 AWO Status. Meeting scheduled for 0800 on 4/22/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
713
Provide information on status of backlog
Provide information on status of backlog
Meeting held with Manager of Work Planning and Control.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
714
Provide the status of 3HVP" MOD 23A
Eric Swanson update OSTI ipspector on status of 3HVP* MOD 23A.
Meeting with System Engineer arranged no open issues results from the meeting.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
715
Documentation Requested as a result of Interview with VP Oversight
The following documentation was requested.1) Three field observations. 2) Copy of oversight monthly report. 3) Audit on the Conduct
of Operations (MP.98-01) located in fue Request No. 590.
Documentation provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
716
NSAB Meeting Minutes
Provide a copy of the February NSAB Meeting Minutes.
Copy Provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
717
Terry Turbine Room Heatup during loss of all AC
Please provide documentation /cales to support Terry Turbine operations during loss of all AC with regards to room temperature.
Environmental design conditions are found in FSAR Appendix 3B Zone ES07 (Ref. Loss of AC Power = 162 degrees Fahrenheit). Calc. US
(B) - 276 supports the 162 degree Fahrenheit (Ref. Pg. 9)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
718
Operation of the Master Pressure Controller
-
Provide an understanding of how the pressurizer master Pressure Controller works. Provide I&C and Training information.
I&C, provided a good explanation of how the controller works. Training provided training materials on operation of the Master Pressure
controller.
t
i
!
95
,
I
,
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
s
_ - - _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _ -
- _ - _ -
l
l
Request No.
Request /Itewonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
. . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
719
Charging Pump Recirculation through RV meet code
Isolation valves exist in line between charging pumps and relief valves. Is this line exempt from code requirement NC 3677.2(b).
The ' relief valves" in question are not used for ASME Code system / component overpressure protection purposes; therefore, the code
provisions, cited in the question, for overpressure protection are not apphcable. These valves are used in an automatic pressure control
application (similar to a pressure regulator) to provide charging / safety injection pump minimum flow control (i.e., provides pump
" alternate miniflow" protection during emergency core cooling system operations). This is somewhat evident from the setpoint of the
valves (around 2200 psig - associated with the minimum flow requirement of the pump) which is considerably lower than the dcsign
pressure of this system (2735 psig).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . . . . . . ,
720
AFW Maintenance Procedure Questions
inspector requests a meeting with person responsible for reviewing AFW hamp Tech Manual for impact on Maintenance Procedures.
Inspector met with Maintenance to discuss issue on 4/22/98 at 1040. Later met with Maintenar.:e Personnel to discuss procedure review
process.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
721
Tech Eval. M3-EV-98-0098
Inspector requested a copy of Tech Eval M3-EV.98-0092 "MSIV Data Evaluation and Recommendation".
Provided evaluation to teant"
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
722
1. Do any of these MOVs require 'T' drains on the in the motor: 3RHS*MV8716B,3RHS*MV8702A,3SlH*MV8802B,3SlH*MV8807A. 2)
Does 3RHS*SOV606 require a low point drain in the conduit? 3. 358*7525 is drain hole rquired? 4) Valve SSR*SV65 has one nut rusted
others appear to be stainless steel,is this EQ component?
1. MOV's are located in ESF Building. no T-drains required. 2) DCN DM3-00-0285-98 verified that there is a weephole in conduit. 3.
3JB'7525 is a pull box. Located in ES-4 no weephole required. 4. 3SSR*SV65 is not an EEQ component.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
723
RH Walkdown Issues
Support downstream of 3RHS*V33 (support # 3RHS-4-PSS4034) Spring cans are loaded differently. Why are they different?
A walkdown confirmed that both springs are loaded as designed. In discussion with the vendor (NPS) they indicated the load markings
obviously is variability from component to component. It appears in this case that we have on spring on each end of the high & low range
which gives the appearance of incorrect loading. We have also confirmed that the springs in each can are the same diameter. The
installation is acceptable as is.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
724
RH Walkdown Issues
3RHS*1975 RHR 'B' vent valve appears bent. Is there an evaluation?
Vent valve appears to be not perpendicular with the pipe. Visualinspection does not reveal any damage or bend wrinkles or other
obvious marks indicating a bend point or push point to cause the lack of perpendicularity. The valve could also have been welded into
the joint in a cocked configuration versus having been ' bent'. No readily available evaluation was found. Past and present AWOs were
reviewed. Past U!Rs and ARs were also reviewed with no results. A Trouble Report 21M3172650 was submitted for Materials
Engineering to review the condition.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
725
3CCP*C560 has seat leakage
3CCP'C560 has sealleakage
96
!
lc
--
-
- - - -
_
-
_-
_ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . ... _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ .
_ _
.-- __
_ _ _ .
-
I
Reauost No.
Requent/Res ponse
]
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
726
Quality of Documents Reviewed by PORC
Quality of Documents Reviewed by PORC (also from Oversight)
Provided additionalinformation.1) Oversight surveillance MP3-P-97 076. 2) CR M3-97 2229 and 3) Memo MP3-PEG-98-015.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
727
Requested copies of eadier NORVP Reports
Requested copies of earlier NORVP Reports
Provided the 9/19/97 and 12/19/97 NORVP Reports.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
728
Deferred AWOs
What is basis for differing work on MSIB solenoids? (e.g. AWOs M3-97-23974 24007)
See attached (provided to Team).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
729
RH Walkdown Issues
Vent Valve on 'RHR"B' system upstream of support 3RHS-4-PSSo1504
o
The boron build up appears to be dry and does not appear to be an active leak. This could have been the result of use of the valve during
the venting process. There is no current AWO/TR identifying this as a leaking valve. The HP department was notified and the boron will
be cleaned off.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
730
RH Walkdown
Valve S!L MV8440 (v25) has active leak around stem seal . water build up.
AWO M3 98415N identifies a leak from a stem leak off plug. The leakage is currently being collected and directed to a floor drain to
maintain housekeeping standards. This leakage does not currently present a problem with the operability of the valve.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
731
RH Walkdown
RHR Heat Exchanger Flange leakagea equest documentation of previous leakage and corrective actions.
Documentation has been supplied separately.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
732
RH Walkdown
Valve 3Silf V999. no plug . leaks should this valve have cap / plug?
l
Valve 3SIL*V999 is shown on P&lD 112A dwg zone B-7. No plug / cap is required for this valve. Trouble Report 21M3134626 has been
submitted to report this item for repair.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
733
RH Walkdown
RHS Pump Romm 'A' . Penetration cooling valves mislabeled,3CCP-V125. *RHS Pump B Suct. Pent. Cooler E6A inlet",3CCP-V127. RHS
Pup B Suct Pent. Cooler E6A inlet."
The CCP system enginee had discovered this labeling issue. This currently being investigated and the discrepancies will be resolved as
required.
97
_ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _
__- _
- _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _.
_
Requost No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
734
RH Walkdown
RHS Pump Room 'A' . Penetration coohng thermometers not reading consistently. RHR 'A' approximately 39 decrees Fahrenheit per
A.V. "B' approximately 80 degrees Fahrenheit.
Response: The amount of leakage is mmor, consistmg of perhaps 1 drop every 5 minutes or longer.This meets industrial valve seat
leakage standards. The water is not contaminated and therefore does not degrade the overall deanhness of the cubicle.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
735
OD MP1045-98. Main Steam Relief Dypass Valve. Steam Release Capabihty in excess of what assume in Safety Analysis
1) Why not 50.59 evaluation. 2) Effcct on 3 MSS *MOV74A/B/C/D Main Steam Relief Bypass Valve quahfication. If flow goes up, how
does that not effect differential pressure across the valve, which is an input parameter for thrust.
There was a discussion between Regulatory Affairs Manager and inspector, and it was concluded that this issue CR and OD fall into
normal course of business so that the SE will be performed when an FSARCR is processed.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
736
Operating Experience. AFW System
1) How often are steam lines to TDAFW pump drained? (IN 86-14). 2) What design changes have been made to keep lines drained? 3)
How is the governor control setting verified monthly? 4) What is the status of overspeed trip mechanism modification . was it done?
(Committment188-1371, AWO M3-88-02986). 5) Was new governor installed during RF04 identical to the old one? Provide copy of
work order. Why was it replaced? 6) Provide copy of procedure 3622.3 and OP 3670.4. 7) Provide iso's that show steam supply piping
from TDAFW back to steam traps. 8) Provide copy of AWO MS94-21399. 9)When is next overhaul of governor valve scheduled? When
was last overhaul performed (CONTINUED IN REQUEST #737)
Information provided to insi ector for review.
f
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
737
Operatmg Experience - AFW System (CONTINUED FROM REQUEST 736)
10) Was the governor valve ever instrumental during testing to chart valve position vs. speed? Provide most recent data.11) EWR M3
%241 Defferal evaluation . what is basis for stating there has been no indication of corrosion or sticking of the govenor valve.
l
Provided responses to attached questions. No further actions at this time.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
738
Request for DCN DM340-1908-97, DCR M3-97004
DCN DM3-001908-97 and DCR MS970G8 (Install stem travel limiter) collar on FCV610.
Provided a copy of requested DCR & DCN from NDS.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
739'
Reviewing DCR #M3-96059
Request copy of Sketch No. RTD 97-01 showing Target Rock Model 81 AB-005 solenoid operated modulating globe valves.
System Engineer explained the modification to AFW containment iso valve and provided sketch RTD 97-01.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.740
RHR Hx leakage
It appears that during RSS System operations following a LCOA the RHS System would be pressurized back to the RHR Pump discharge.
l
This would result in the leakage of containment sump water into the ESF Building due to existing RHR Hx and pump seal leakage. SCR
!
2398 indicates Hx is 1/2 gpm. Have the effects (Post Accident) been evaluated.
See attached response. Also meeting was heId with inspector and individual More followup is needed for this.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
741
Provide copy of CR 198-1760
i
Provide copy of CR 198-1760
l
l
Provided copy of CR .1981760 to inspector on 4/23/98.
98
!
l
iL______._._______.__.__
. _ _ . -
- - _ _ - - - . - - _
l
1
.
I
1
l
l
Roaucot No.
Request / Response
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . ,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
. . . . . . . . . . . . , .
I
742
Documentation requested from interview with Maintenance Manager
l
l
A copy of the previous performance improvement plan for Maintenance was requested during the interview.
1
Copy provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
743
Provide Documentatmn that Task Qual Records were abgned with Task Analysis
NRC requested documentation of the completion that Engineering Support Task Qualification Records were aligned with the approved
task analysis.
Provided copies of Curriculum Advisory Council (CAC) meeting minutes that documented the completion of this item.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
744
Request for documentation from Recover Officer . Nuclear Oversight Interview
As a result of an interview, several documents and information were requested. See Request #595.
Provided Inspector with a summary of Quahfications for Oversight, a list of Open Audits and a list showing what and its were conducted
in 19971998 and their status. Also discussed the fact that all Audit and Surveillance issues are identifed on CR's and all CR Assignments
are coded to a specific made.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
745
Requested copies of Two ISEG Reports
o
As a result of a meeting with ISEG, the inspector requested copies of ISEG Reports.
Provided ISEG Reports. A/R 97001899.03 " Review Activities Related to Condition Report M3-961330. A/R 97023220"The MP3 Spent
Fuel Pool Modification Using the Dry Habitat".
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
746
Self AssessmentsandCrs
Requested copies of recent Self. Assessments and CR's for Work Planning and Scintuling.
Self-Assessments 3WM-SA-9711 and associated CR M3-98-1035 were provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
747
Strategic Plan and Vision Statement
Millstone does not have an approved Strategic Plan or Vision Statement.
Provided Inspector with a copy of CR M3-98-2127 which was written as a result of the 40500 Inspection Report and Observations during
the OSTIInspection.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
748
Requested an interview with Nuclear Oversight individual.
To discuss Work Planning and Scheduling Issues
Meeting was conducted.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
749
Requested a meeting to discuss Work Planning
Requested a meeting to discuss Work Planning
Meetings were held on 4/22/98 and on 4/23/98 to discuss the Work Planning issues.
99
(
{
!L__________________
_ _ _ _ _ _ -
__. - _ _ _ . --____ - - - _
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _
.--
l
b
Requent No.
Request / Response
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
72
Refuel PM Deferral
THIS IS A DUPLICATE OF 753.
...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
' 751
Plant layup
Provide formal program / procedure used to layup equipment not being used during outages.
Procedure provided to inspector "NUC CHM 04, Plant Systems Layup Recommendation"
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
753
MDFW Pump (information & meeting)
What was done to ensure the MDFW Pp would be available after a period of being shutdown for 2 years?
Provided NRC Inspector with CBM Memo. CDM 97.304, subject "MP3 Secondary Plant Startup Walkdown".
.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
753
Refuel PMs
Provide a list of all Refuel PMs with their last performance date.
o
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
734
Rework Rate
Provide rework rate numbers . Over last 6 months, last 3 months, over the last month.
Rework rate: Last 6 months 1.4%, last 3 months 2.07% (Jan-Mar). Last complete month . 88 (Mar).
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
755
Documentation of previously identified locked valve event
Provide information on previously identified locked valve event of 8/24/97.
CR M3-97 2582,3S!H*V71 found not locked as required, was forwarded to inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
756
Copy of CR M3-98-2009
Please provide a copy of CR M3-98-2009
Copy of CR M3-98 2009 provided.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
757
Extent of Condition Process
is there an " extent of condition" process that requires CRs to be reviewed for generic conditions.
RP4 " Corrective Action Program", (Reference Rev. 4) has 21ocations/ requirements " extent of condition": 1. The investigator must
evaluate the condition for generic implications (Section 1.9.5) 2. During the management review," extent of condition"is considered (i.e.
generic implications) (Reference Section 1.8.2).
100
- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ .
_ - _ _ _ _ _ .
._
i
i
)
l
l
Requat No.
Request / Response
J
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
758
Walt time for Cold Start of Terry Turbine
Why do we wait 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> after any valve manipulations, prior to performing a Cold Start of the Terry Turbine? What is the basis for the 4
hours?
(
See attached reponse dated 4/17/98.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
759
Implementation of Surveillance Reuiqrement 4.5.2.b.2
How are C11S/S! Valves checked for completion of Surveillance Requirement 4.5.2.b.2.
I
Provided copies of 3ME51 (Rev. 5),3608.4 2 (Rev. 4),3610A.3 2 (Rev. 4). Also provided ICAVP Request No.142., same subject, and
associated CR (M3 97 2832).
f
!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
760
Documentation for TDAl W Pump
a
Provide documentation of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> wait tune prior to Cold Starting the TDAFW Pump.
,
l
-
l
l
l
Copy of LER 94-014 provided.
l
l
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
761
Control Panet Deficiencies Not identified
Walkdown of Control Panel deficiencies vs. Control Panet Issues determined some issues that were not identified as deficiencies.
a
l
Assistant Operations Manager discussed diferrences between issues and deficiencies with Inspector , Monday,5/27 at 0730.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j
762
MedeChanges. April 7,1998 to April 13,1998
'
I
l
I
,
Please provide dates / times of any Mode changes made from 4/7/98 through 4/13/98.
'
l,
Mode Changes during 4/7/98 through 4/13/98 are as follows: 4/7/98 - 10:54 p.m. . Entered Mode 4; 4/10/98 3.09 p.m. entered Mode
3; 4/11/98 12:27 p.m. . Mode 4; and 4/11/98 10:01 p.m. . Mode 3.
!
<
5
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *
763
Lack of Risk Assessment in Modes 3 & 4
See attached summary of concern dated 4/15/98.
i
Concem addressed with NRC
,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
7 61
CR M3 97-4342
1
I
Provide copy of CR M3-97 4342
e
{
1
't
Copy of CR M3-97 4342 provided to inspection team.
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
765
Inadvertent S1 discussed at 4/20/98 at 0800 meeting
l
Inspector requested information on inadvertent SI dixussed at 4 20 98 0800 meeting.
I
r
Walkdowns are planned for 4/21/98. Provided this information to inspector
101
,
I
-
i
L
j
. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ . - _ - - -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Request No.
Reauest/Remonse
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
766
ACR 10797
Provide actions taken to address ARs 96007517 01.
1
!
Provided copy of ACR 10797 and A11TS 810 report for A/ R No. 960CT/517 01 thru 03 to inspection team 417 981030.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
767
CR M3 981854 Sapoint
I want to review the work done on Rev. 6 of Calculation 89 0941015ES and the disposition of this CR.
Meeting with MOV engineer on 4/23/98 at 1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br /> to discuss how to calculate the setpoints for the MOV hmit switch and thrust
calculations. Provided calc. requested (from NDS).
)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
768
DC.16 Reviews of VTMs
!
1
Please provide completed procedure reference review of new VTM for Turbine Driven AFW pump turbine manual.
]
Provided attached review Inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
769
4160 Ckt Bkr Magneblast Upgrade
Inspector discussed issue wit) Technical Support Engineering. Although issue is not considered an operability issue, the O.D. should be
.
4
strengthened to support our position on deferring magneblast upgrade on all breakers until after restart.
l
System Engineer to revise Operability Determination.
........
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
l
770
Interview with Manager, CBM
l
[
Interview with Manager, CBM
1
l
4
i
i
Interview provided with inspector.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
771
DCR M3-97111 Revi
.'SS Hx Screen Mod
j
1) Request copy of maintenarice procedure that installed screens. 2) Request detail drawing of as built conf of screen. 3) What type
screens were used #3 Mesh,1/2" perforated on 1/2" #16,70% opening (48% free. space). 4) Request copy of procedure SP 3646A.17. S) Is
l
there calculation to justify statement that " flow will recover" between tube and screen?. Is there potential for cavitation?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t
772
CTMT Strip Chart Recorder for ! MS-TR21
I
It was observed that two of the CTMT strip chart recorders are sticking out farther than all others. This board is seismic. Should these be
this way? Explain.
1
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
{
....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t
773
PM Program Scope
!
i
Provide estimate of total PM task population.
i
Approximately 10,000 PMs.
I
I
102
,
3
o--____
_
-
- - - - _ - - -
- - - - - - - - - - _ - - - _ _
_ - - - -
- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - _ - - ----- J