ML20235B693
| ML20235B693 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry  |
| Issue date: | 04/27/1987 |
| From: | Huff G TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML082340470 | List:
|
| References | |
| 15200, 15200-V01-R02, 15200-V1-R2, NUDOCS 8902140276 | |
| Download: ML20235B693 (28) | |
Text
_
0 EMPLOYEE CONCERNS SPECIAL PROGRAM VOLUME 1 CONSTRUCTION CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY REPORT 15200 HOUSEKEEPING UPDATED 1
l.
"A NUCLEAR POWER l
'8902140276 890206 ADOCK0500,g"9 DR g
.m l
l TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT TYPE: Subcategory - Construction REVISION NUMBER: 2 (Final Report)
TITLE: Housekeeping PAGE 1 0F 13 REASON FOR REVISION:
Revised to incorporate SRP comments, incorporate issue l
classification, add Executive Summary and finalize report.
Revision 1 Revised to incorporate SRP comments, delete issue t
classification and refinalize report.
Revision 2 I
i l
PREPARATION PREPARED BY:
pl-d- 87 wg SJUKATURE DATE l
REVIEWS l
PEER:
)
L,w] O. 00n-1 w 4-L,-s,
' SIGN URE DATE
$5;
& A} 6? A S vbwe'r
]P SIGNATURE
/
DATE CONCURRENCES CEG-
/-
M/8 ~87 4
/h S RP :.A. > w' !b arf O V'2'E7 SIGNATURE DATE
/
SIGNATU DATE APPROVED Y:
i j
F, NL M f A/A J
ECSP MANAGER
\\
)ATil MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE j
CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)
A
'SRP Secretary's signature indicates that SRP files contain documentation of l
full Panel concurrence.
j
)
1970T i
?
Preface Glossary, and List of Acronyms for ECTG Subcategory Reports I
f HISTORY OF REVISION REV NUMBER PAGES REVISED REASON FOR CURRENT REVISION 3
i To clarify that one or more attachments will help the reader find where a particular concern is evaluated l
l l
i l
i l
l
,~.
'I TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
15200 l
SPECIAL PROGRAM FRONT KATTER REY:
3 PAGE i 0F vill Preface This subcategory report is one of a series of reports prepared for the Employee Concerns Special Program (ECSP) of the Tennessee Valley Authority (IVA). The ECSP and the organization which carried out the program, the Employee Concerns Task Group (ECTG), were established by TVA's Manager of
' Nuclear Power to evaluate and report on those Office of Nuclear Power (ONP)'
employee concerns filed before February 1, 1986. Concerns filed after that-date are handled by the ongoing ONP Employee Concerns Program'(ECP).
The ECSP addressed over 5800 employee concerns.
Each of the concerns was a
-l formal, written description of a circumstance or. circumstances that an l
employee thought was unsafe, unjust, inefficient, or inappropriate. The l
l mission of the Employee Concerns Special Program was to thoroughly investigate all issues presented in the concerns and to report the results of those investigations in a form accessible to ONP employees, the NRC, and i
the general public. The results of these investigations are communicated j
by four levels of ECSP reports:
element, subcategory, category, and final.
j j
Element reports, the lowest reporting level, will be published only for those concerns directly affecting the restart of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant's reactor unit 2.
An element consists of one or more closely related issues. 1An issue is a potential problem' identified by ECTG during the evaluation process as having been raised'in one or more concerns.
For 1
efficient handling, what appeared to be similar concerns were grouped into k
elements early in the program, but issue definitions emerged from the
-evaluation process itself. Consequently, some oloments did include only 4
one issue, but of ten the ECTG evaluation found.more than' one issue per element.
Subcategory reports summarize the evaluation of a number of elements.
However, the subcategory' report does more than collect element lovel' evaluations. The subcategory level overview of element findings leads to an integration of information that cannot take place at the element level.
This integration of information reveals the extent to which problems overlap more than one element and will therefore require corrective action for underlying causes not fully apparent at the element level.
To make the subcategory reports easier to understand, three items have been placed at the front of each report: a preface, a glossary of the l
terminology unique to ECSP reports, and a list of acronyms, i
l Additionally, at the end of each subcategory report will be a. Subcategory Summary Table that includes the concern numbers; identifies other subcategories that share a concern; designates' nuclear safety-related, safety significant, or non-safety related concerns; designates generic applicability; and briefly states each concern.
Either the Subcategory Summary Table or another attachment or a combination of the two will enable the reader to find the report section or sections in which the issue raised by the concern is evaluated.
l l
1
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS
' REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM FRONT MATTER REY:
2 PAGE 11 0F viii The subcategories are themselves summarized in a series of eight category reports. Each category report reviews the major findings and collective significance of the subcategory reports'in one of the following areas:
management and personnel relations industrial safety construction material control operations quality assurance / quality control welding engineering A separate report on employee concerns dealing with specific contentions of intimidation harassment, and wrongdoing will be released by the TVA Office of the Inspector General.
Just as the subcategory reports integrate the information collected at the element level, the category reports integrate the information assembled in all the subcategory reports within the category, addressing particularly the underlying _causes of those problems that run across more than one subcategory.
A final report will integrate and assess th'e information collected by-all of the lower level reports prepared for the ECSP, including the Inspector General's report.
For more detail on the methods by which ECTG employee concerns were evaluated and reported, consult the Tennessee Valley Authority Employee Concerns Task Group Program Manual. The Manual spells out the program's objectives, scope, organization, and responsibilities. It also specifies the procedures that were followed in the investigation,. reporting, and closeout of the issues raised by employee concerns.
9
1 l
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM i
FRONT KATTER REV:
2 PAGE 111 0F vill l
ECSP GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS
- classirleation of evaluated issues the evaluation of an issue leads to one of the following determinations:
I 1
i l
Class A:
Issue cannot be verified as factual j
Class B:
Issue is factually accurate, but what is described is not a problem (i.e., not a condition requiring corrective action)
Class C:
Issue is factual and identifies a problem, but corrective action l
for the problem was initiated before the evaluation of the issue
)
was undertaken I
Class D:
Issue is factual and presents a problem for which corrective action has been, or is being, taken as a result of an evaluation Class E: A problem, requiring corrective action, which was not identified by an employee concern, but was revealed during the ECTG evaluation of an issue raised by an employee concern.
I collective significance an analysis which determines the importance and consequences of the findings in a particular ECSP report by putting those findings in the proper perspective.
concern (see " employee concern")
l corrective action steps taken to fix specific deficiencies or discrepancies revealed by a negative finding and, when necessary, to correct causes in order to prevent recurrence.
criterion (plural: criteria) a basis for defining a performance, behavior, or quality which ONP imposes on itself (see also " requirement").
element or element report an optional level of ECSP report, below the subcategory level, that deals with one or more issues, employee concern a formal, written description of a circumstance or circumstances that an employee thinks unsafe, unjust, inefficient or inappropriate; usually documented on a K-form or a form equivalent to the K-form.
~
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM FRONT MATTER REY:
2 PAGE iv 0F viii 1
evaluator (s) the individual (s) assigned the responsibility to assess a specific l
l grouping of employee concerns.
l findings includes both statements of fact and the judgments made about those facts during the evaluation process; negative findings require corrective j
i action.
l issue a potential problem, as interpreted by the ECTG during the evaluation I
process, raised in one or more concerns.
K-form (see " employee concern")
requirement a standard of performance, behavior, or quality on which an evaluation judgment or decision may be based, root cause the underlying reason for a problem, i
- Terms essential to the program but which require detailed definition have been defined in the ECTG Procedure Manual (e.g., generic, specific, nuclear safety-related, unreviewed safety-significant question).
{
i l
l l
l
.__.-__2_
e TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM FRONT MATTER REY:
2 PAGE v 0F vili Acronyms AI Administrative Instruction AISC American Institute of Steel Construction ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable ANS American Nuclear Society ANSI American National Standards Institute ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials AWS American Welding Society BFN Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant BLN Bellefonte Nuclear Plant CAQ Condition Adverse to Quality CAR Corrective Action Report l
CATD Corrective Action Tracking Document CCTS Corporate Commitment Tracking System CEG-H Category Evaluation Group Head CFR Code of Federal Regulations
{
CI Concerned Individual CMTR Certified Material Test Report l
COC Certificate of Conformance/ Compliance DCR Design Change Request DNC Division of Nuclear Construction (see also NU CON) l l
l
. TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM l
FRONT MATTER REY:
2 PAGE vi 0F viii DNE Division of Nuclear Engineering DNQA Division of Nuclear Quality Assurance DNT Division of Nuclear Training l
DOE Department of Energy DP0 Division Personnel Officer DR Discrepancy Report or Deviation Report ECN Engineering Change Notice ECP Employee Concerns Program ECP-SR Employee Concerns Program-Site Representative
]
1 ECSP Employee Concerns Special Program J
l ECTG Employee Concerns Task Group EEOC Equal Employment Opportunit,y Commission EQ Environmental Qualification EMRT Emergency Medical Response Team EN DES Engineering Design ERT Employee Response Team or Emergency Response Team I
FCR Field Change Request l
FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report l
FY Fiscal Year
[
GET General Employee Training HCI Hazard Control Instruction HVAC Heating, Ventilating. Air Conditioning l
II Installation Instruction i
INPO Institute of Nuclear Power Operations l
IRN Inspection Rejection Notice
______._m.
Y TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM FRONT MATTER REV:
2 PAGE vii 0F vill l
1 i
L/R Labor Relations Staff M&AI Modifications and Additions Instruction MI Maintenance Instruction MSPB Merit Systems Protection Board NT Magnetic Particle Testing NCR Nonconforming Condition Report NDE Nondestructive Examination NPP Nuclear Performance Plan i
i NPS Non-plant Specific or Nuclear Procedures System i
NQAM Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual f
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission NSB Nuclear Services Branch NS,RS Nuclear Safety Review Staff j
NU CON Division of Nuclear Construction (obsolete abbreviation, see DNC) l NUMARC Nuclear Utility Management and Resources Committee l
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration (or Act)'
1 ONP Office of Nuclear Power OWCP Office of Workers Compensation Program PHR Personal History Record PT Liquid Penetrant Testing QA Quality Assurance QAP Quality Assurance Procedures l
QC Quality Control QCI Quality Control Instruction 5
1 l
I TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 i
SPECIAL PROGRAM l
FRONT MATTER REY:
2 PAGE vill 0F viii QCP Quality Control Procedure i
I QTC Quality Technology Company
]
1 RIF Reduction in Force l
RT Radiographic Testing SQN Sequoyah Nuclear Plant SI Surveillance Instruction S0P Standard Operating Procedure SRP Senior Review Panel I
SWEC Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation TAS Technical Assistance Staff T&L Trades and Labor TVA Tennessee Valley Authority TVTLC Tennessee Valley Trades and Labor Council UT Ultrasonic Testing VT Visual Testing WBECSP Watts Bar Employee Concern Special Program q
I WBN Watts Bar Nuclear Plant j
WR Work Request or Work Rules-WP Workplans 1
l l
I i
I
.m_
d_
J
..y.
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS
. REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAN l
REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 2 0F 13 4
OUTLINE OF CONTENTS i
SUBCATEGORY EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
- 1 1.0 CHARACTERIZATION OF ISSUES 1.3 Introduction 1.2 Description of Issues 1.2.1.- 1.2.3 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) 2.0 SUNNARY 2.1 Supuaary of Issues WBN 2.2 Sununary of Evaluation Process WBN 2.3 Sununary of Findlnts WBN 2.4 Sununary of Collective Significance WBN 2.5 Sununary of Causes WBN 2.6 Sununary of Corrective Actions i
WBN 3.0 EVALUATION PROCESS 3.1 General Nethods of Evaluation WBN 3.2 Requirements or Criteria Established for Individual Issues 3.2.1 - 3.2.3 WBN 1
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 J
SPECIAL PROGRAM J
REVISION NUMBER: 2 l
i PAGE 3 0F 13
(
4.0 FINDINGS 4.1 Cleanliness and housekeeping are of acceptable levels (WBN).
4.2 Roads in the construction area are adequately watered (WBN).
4.3 Medical office was in need of repair and the repairs had been completed (WBN).
5.0 COLLECTIVE SIGNIFICANCE 5.1 Stanificance of Each Issue 5.1.1 WBN 5.2 Collective Significance of the Subcategory 5.2.1 Generic 5.2.2 Site Specific (WBN) 6.0 CAUSES 6.1 and 6.2 WBN Issues 7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION 7.1 Corrective Action Already Taken or Planned 1
7.2 Corrective Action from CATD's l
8.0 Attachments 8.1 Attachment A. Subcategory Summary Table l
,1 8.2 Attachment B. List of Concerns by Issue l
=
l 1
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Construction Category Subestegory Report 15200 Housekeeping
SUMMARY
OF THE ISSUES This report.contains thirteen concerns grouped into three issues
" Plant Roads," " Medical Office" and " Permanent Plant Facilities" - with five of these concerns safety related. These five concerns are contained in the " Permanent Plant Facilities" issue. These three issues are site specific to the Watts Bar Nuclear (WBN) plant and' cover items which occur, daily.
l.
MAJOR FINDINGS There were Eo Major Fi..dinas which would determine deficiencies on discrepant conditions either in the plant or to any facility. 'Two issues " Permanent Plant Facilities" and " Plant Roads" were determined to be Not valid. One issue " Medical Office" was determined to be valid but had been corrected via the approved policies in handling maintenance of damaged or deteriorated facilities.
COLLECTIVE SIGNIFICANCE Management performed their duties in concert with policies, procedures and other controlling documents. The activities, which these issues address, are happenings which are varied in description and occur frequently during the construction phase of any site; therefore, the response time to correct discrepant conditions is predicated on priority of importance.
l Page 1 of 1 4
6
9 TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 4 0F 13 1.0 CHARACTERIZATION OF ISSUES 1.1 Introduction The subcategory of housekeeping contains thirteen concerns.- These l
concerns were all site-specific to WBN. These concerns were grouped j
into three major elements.
l l
Permanent Plant Facilities l
Plant Roads Medical Office 1.2 Description of Issues 1.2.1 Permanent Plant Facilities (eight concerns)
The concerns in this issue were for the most part very general. This issue contains concerns such as:
- Housekeeping in unit 2 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant-(WBN) is less than adequate.
- Housekeeping could be improved. There is very heavy dust in some areas.
- Shavings from rotary files are found practically everywhere in reactor 2.
- Craft restrooms in unit 2 are filthy and in need of cleaning / maintenance.
- Cleanliness all over the site is insufficient due to shortage of laborers.
Every open ended tube steel in unit 2 reactor is filled with tobacco juice, urine and/or feces which is unsanitary and causes steel to deteriorate.
Similar issues involving permanent equipment damage and deterioration are addressed in Construction Subcategory 15100
- Damage and 10500 - Deterioration of Permanent Facilities.
1.2.2 Plant Roads (one concern)
This issue contains the only concern about the dustiness of plant roads and the effect of this dust on parts stored in the <aretiuse area.
Note: Similar !ssues are addressed in MC Subcategory 40400.
1.2.3 Medical Ot. ice (fot. concerns) l The conterns in tuia 'roup address the condition of the l
construction medical complex.
d TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM
. REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 5 0F 13
- The Medical Building requires additional maintenance / janitorial services. The root leaks and tracked in mud and dirt creates an unhealthy / unsanitary condition.
- The medical office has a leaky roof and rotted floor.
- The floor in the X-ray room is weak.
- The roof of the X-ray lab department leaks and the floor is weak.
2.0-
SUMMARY
2.1 Summary of Issues This report contains issues involving the general housekeeping and maintenance problems of the plant on a day-to-day basis during construction. The three issues addressed are 1) permanent plant facilities. 2) plant roads, and 3) medical office.
2.2 Summary of Evaluation Process The housekeeping issues were evaluated'by obtaining additional information on the issues from the expurgated employee concern l
files, a review of plant procedures and instructions for adequacy, performance of plant walkdowns, conducting interviews of knowledgeable personnel and a. review of documentation of l
housekeeping tours.
i l
2.3 Summary of Findinas j
The concerns relating to housekeeping of permanent plant facilities during construction and dustiness' of plant roads were found not to be factual at the time of this evaluation. The concerns about the i
condition of the medical office were valid and have been corrected.
2.4 Summary of Collective Significance The cone.orns for the issues of permanent plant faellities and plant I
roads were found to be not valid. Because by nature, housateeping is I
an ongoing process that takes day-to-day attention, an individual may I perceive as a problem a transitory condition that would be corrected IR2 in the normal course of events. The concerns regarding the medical I
office are a result of normal deterioration during use that would be I
corrected upon formal request. Such problems will recur, but they l-will not effect employee safety or the performance of their' duties.
I
l e
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER:
2 PAGE 6 0F 13 i
2.5 Sunenary of Causes The concerns related to the medical office were caused by normal wear and tear. The concerns in the issues of permanent plant facilities and plant roads were found to be not valid. However, because of housekeeping being an ongoing process and the amount of activity within an area dictating housekeeping requirements, problems may occur from time to time.
2.6 Sununary of Corrective Action Corrective action has been taken at the medical office, with the repair of the roof and floor. No corrective action is required on the other two issues as they were not valid at the time of this evaluation.
)
3.0 EVALUATION PROCESS i
3.1 General Methods of Evaluation The issues of this subcategory were evaluated by review of expurgated etaployee concern files, review of plant procedures and 3
instructions (and their docuntuntation), review of NSRS reports, I
I review of construction management responses, field walkdowns and IR2 employoe interviews.
3.2 Requirements _or Celteria Established for Individual Issues 1
3.2.1 Issue 1.2.1 - Permanent Plant Facilities a.
The expurgated eriployee concern file was reviewed for I
additional information.
1 I
b.
WBN QCI 1.36, " Storage and Housekeeping," Revision 13, l
and WBN AI 1.8
" Plant Housekeeping," Revision 9 were l
j reviewed for content.
lR2 i
I c.
NSRS Reports I-85-217 WBN and I-85-744-WBN were reviewed l
for content.
I 1
d.
W8N Plant Managers Office (PMO) response to concern l
WI-85-022-001 was reviewed for content.
1 I
e.
Interviews were conducted with cognizant craft and i
engineering personnel.
l 6
e
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER:
2 PAGE 7 0F 13 f.
Walkdowns were performed of both units 1 and 2.
l I
g.
A periodic (every 30 days) housekeeping tour was attended I
and past taur documentation was reviewed.
l l
3.2.2 Issue 1.2.2 - Plant Roads l
l a.
The expurgated employee concern file was reviewed for i
additional information.
1 I
b.
WBN QCI 1.36, " Storage and Housekeeping," Revision 13, I
was reviewed for content.
l l
c.
Interviews were conducted with congnizant preventive IR2 maintenance and nuclear licensing personnel.
I l
I d.
A walkdown of the warehouse area was performed.
i I
3.2.3 Issue 1.2.3 - Medical Office I
i l
a.
The expurgated employee concern file was reviewed for I
additional information.
l I
1 l
b.
WBN-PMO responses to concerns IN-85-759-001, I
l IN-85-649-001, IN-85-647-001 and IN-85-663-003 were l
l reviewed for content.
I i
I c.
Interviews were conducted with cognizant medical I
personnel and the Construction Superintendent.
1 I
d.
A walk-through of the medical office was performed.
1 4.0 FINDINGS 4.1 Findings on Issue 1.2.1 - Permanent Plant Facilities 4.1.1 Generic This issue was site-specific to WBN and determined not to be generic to other sites.
1 4.1.2 Site Specific A review of the expurgated employee concern file revealed no additional information. The review of WBN QCI-1.36, j
1 l
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAN' REVISION NUMBER: 2 l
PAGE 8 0F 13
'l Revision 13.. dated A'pril 1, 1986 revealed this instruction adequately addresses plant cleanliness and housekeeping of construction (nontransferred) areas. Additionally, the review of WRN AI-1.8 Revision *9, dated January 16, 1986 revealed this instruction adequately addresses the responsibility, frequency, and documentation of housekeeping inspections according to NQAM Part II Section 1.2.
This-I instruction also requires that.:by executing attachments two j
and three of this instruction, the frequency and discrepancies of housekeeping tours are documented and corrected. The attachments for the latest housekeeping tour.
I shall be maintained as a Quality Assurance record.
NSRS Report I-SS-774-WBN addresses plant cleanliness and I
housekeeping. This report concluded, by reviewing procedures, I
conducting interviews, and performing a walkdown of plant' I
areas, that housekeeping and cleanliness were adequate.
I I
NSRS Report I-85-217-WBN addresses open tube stoel in unit 2 i
Reactor Building being used for personal relief or waste.
I disposal. A.visnal and olfactory inspection was performed in I
unit 2.
This inspection revealed that while no evidence I
showed that open tube' steel had been used for personal relief I
or waste disposal, there were other areas that appeared to 1.
have been used for personal relief and waste disposal. These i
areas were limited to room corners, wall junctures and dark l
recesses.
IR2 i
While this concern could not be substantiated. NSRS did mske i
recommendation I-85-217-WBN-01.
This recommendation stated I
that more emphasis should be placed on housekeeping 1
inspections and additional restrooms should be located I
appropriately.
l l
WBN's response was that existing restroom facilities were I
t adequate and that a revision would be made to the l
housekeeping procedure to place more emphasis on inspections l
)
and improve timeliness in resolving identified deficiencies.
I i
This revision has been made and implemented.
I I
The WBN-PMO responuo to concern WI 85-022-001 addressed I
general housekeeping. This responsu states that in mid-1985 l
a thorough errort was made to clean up all areas of the l
plant and stresses the importance of employee involvement in l
l keeping the plant areas clean. During the fall of 1985, a l
l team of nuclear workers from outside TVA were impressed and l
l commented on the cleanliness of plant facilities.
l
]
I S
P I
I TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER:
15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 9 0F 13 A walkdown performed of a random sample of unit 1 and unit 2 areas showed that cleanliness and housekeeping in both areas were of an acceptable level. The restrooms in unit 2 were found to be adequatel'y cleaned and maintained, especially when taking into consideration these are temporary facilities. Additionally, this walkdown did not reveal any instances of open ended tube steel being used for personal relief. WBN has established a program to ensure that open ended vertical tube steel is capped so that trash, water or other items cannot collect in the tube steel.
An interview with cognizant labor personnel provided explanations for four areas of concern.
Vacuum cleaners are used in all areas of the plant and the use of air hoses to blow dust is done sparingly and conscientiously to make inaccessible dust available to vacuum cleaners. There is an adequate number of laborers to maintain housekeeping at an acceptable level. The restrooms in unit 2 are cleaned at least twice each working day and more often if the need arises. Areas where rotary files are used are cleaned at least once each day.
i Interviews with cognizant preventive maintenance personnel
)
revealed they, along with nuclear licensing, were tracking j
and trending housekeeping discrepancies.
Listed below are the trends for storage and housekeeping as well as preventive j
maintenance for the period from November, 1985 through February, 1986.
Storaae and Housekeeping Total No.
No. Housekeeping Deficiencies
_ Deficiencies Percentaae November 10 2
20.0%
December 13 1
7.7%
January 15 2
13.3%
February 9
0 0.0%
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER:
2 PAGE 10 0F 13 Preventive Maintenance Total No.
No. Housekeeping Deficiencies Deficiencies Percentage November 86 7
8.14%
December 356 97 27.3%
January 49 7
14.3%'
February 26 3
11.5%
The construction housekeeping tours are performed each month in all warehouse, construction. and critical aroas of the plant site under control of the Office of Construction.
These inspection tours are conducted by the warehouse supervisor (WS) or assistant construction superintendents (ACS) in their areas of responsibilities, respectively.
Accompanying the WS or ACS on the tours will be representatives of the quality manager's and construction engineer's organizations and by the safety engineer when available. The deficiencies found during these inspections are documented on Attachment F of WBN QCI 1.36 and dispositioned to the preventive maintenance unit for tracking and trending purposes and to the responsible craft personnel. The responsible craft corrects the deficiencies I
within five working days from the date received.
If the corrections cannot be made.in five days, an estimated completion date is given.
This evaluation revealed housekeeping of permanent plant faellities to be adequate at the current time and did not indicate situaticas to be as they were stated in the concerns. These concerns may have been valid at some time in the past since a date could not always be establis'hed for the concerns, but a review of the records indicate improved practices and more frequent inspections as the job progressed.
If those conditions 6xisted in the past, the evidence indicates they were corrected and plant safety was not compromised.
4.2 Finoints on Issue 1.2.2 - Plant Roads 4.2.1 Generic This issue was site-specific to'WBN and determined not to be generic to other sites.
l I
il i l
l.
j TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS-REPORT NUMBER:
15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 11 0F 13 i
l l
4.2.2 Site Specific A review of the expurgated employee concern file produced no additional information. A review of WBN QCI-1.36, l
Revision 13, dated Apell 1, 1986 revealed this instruction adequately addresses the responsibility, frequency and documentation of housekeeping inspections of construction areas.
A walkdown of the warehouse area did not indicate dust on I
critical items to be a problem. All humidity and temperature monitors observed were working correctly and should give an indication of any deviations.
Interviews with cognizant preventive maintenance personnel revealed a problem with dust in this area did not exist, nor did their records indicate any problem with dust to have existed in the warehouse' area.
Interviews with cognizant nuclear licensing personnel j
indicated dust in the warehouse had not been a problem.
j This evaluation showed that roads in the construction area do appear to be adequately watered when conditions warrant.
If this condition did exist in the past, there is no evidence l
l that equipment stored in the warehouse has been damaged or
)
I that the safety of the plant has been affected, j
4.3 Findinas on Issue 1.2.3 - Medical Office 4.3.1 Generic This issue was site-specific to WBN and' determined not to be generic to other sites.
4.3.2 Site Specific l
A review of the expurgated employee concern flies revealed no additional information.
l The Construction management response to concerns IN-85-759-001, 1 IN-85-663-003, IN-85-647-001 and IN-85-649-001 stated that IR2 repairs had been made to the medical office complex. Any I
additional repales will be requested and performed as needed.
l An interview with the construction superintendent showed that repairs to the roof and the floor of the medical office have been completed.
A.
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 12 0F 13 Cognizant medical personnel were interviewed, agreeing that repairs to the medical office roof and floor had been completed adequately.
A walk-through of the medical office indicated the repairs to the roof and floor were acceptable.
5.0 COLLECTIVE SIGNIFICANCE 5.1 Significance of Each Issue The issues of permanent plant facilities and plant roads will be addressed together in section 5.2.2.
5.1.1 Issue 1.2.3 - Medical Office Concerns addressing the medical office are caused by wear and tear, which by nature will periodically occur. Specific problems that arise are handled by reporting them to the appropriate manager so corrective action can be taken.
5.2 Collective Significance of the Subcategory 5.2.1 Generic These issues are not generic.
5.2.2 Site Specific Housekeeping is a continuous process that requires daily attention. While there are areas that have temporary cleanliness problems at or during certain times of the day, these temporary conditions do not reflect a persistent cleanliness problem.
If a perceived problem arises, it will be brought to the attention of the appropriate manager and corrections will be made as necessary.
6.0 CAUSE 6.1 A cause was not identified for issue 1.2.1. Permanent Plant Facilities, or issue 1.2.2, Plant Roads, since the concerns were not valid.
1 l
l
)
1 i
a TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER:
2 PAGE 13 0F 13 6.2 The cause of concerns identified in issue 1.2.3, Medical Office, was from normal everyday use and the elements. The repairs regi. ired.
would be considered normal maintenance for buildings of this type that were 10 to 12 years old.
7.0 CORRECTIVE ACTION 7.1 Corrective Action Already Taken or Planned The only issue in this subcategory requiring corrective action, issue 1.2.3, Medical Office, has been corrected. The roof and floor of the Medical Office have been repaired.
7.2 Corrective Action From CATD's i
None Required 8.0 ATTACHMENTS 8.1 Attachment A Subcategory Summary Table 8.2 Attachment B. List of Concerns by Issue l
o N
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1
O I
4 2
2 4
42 4
2 e
T g
C
,5
,5
,5
,5 a
E 1
1 1
1 P
S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E
- 2. 1
- 2. 1
- 2. 1
- 2. 1 C
4 4
4 4
NE
,5
,5
,5
,5 1
1
,6 1
,6 1
6 6
R E
F 21 d 21 d 21 d
- 2. I. d E
n n
n n
H 35 a 35 a A
35 a 3 S. a E
E. S N O
y AN RN S
C OS I
t W A E
SR RI S
H N
HE I
i 0H I CS NI NRSS H
NE U
I l
WTBNTN I H NJ i
b RTRI I R EBSH N
ARR 0
EOTRTE R
B A. E R D R L A S. F C I
I A CNT c
TN ECHD l
S NI NOPHI N
L ECUE g
A
& N U T 'Q YEOAUF EOO E
EA i
n WE ERR p
RSGTUE ATB OFESNNC TF TBS l
ip AE SFR WAAEREHRA I O SOI O p
PAN LULSA TEPS S
T e
A e
RSI OOT AQ U
P R
AT E
E H
c k
O D. P S C N O E
,OLHP EG BHCl liA UTI E e
O1 I
N SD
.DS DBO E
i s
P0N S
AASAUNEA.RI D TT TI HE r
WW u
FOS e
o SF I 2HU J I T EG N
RO F
n DS e
H I ASH D
ASELUEO
.T EH 0.E. C G
CI T&I W N E T N H C 0.THCSSD VS E
H I.
AREI T I
OVOR O
Tl ES ENE O
0 SS C0 1
J d
0 S
TSNUDTLCI L. T GiFU n
2 E
N NF 5
N
.I DT
.O HEPUWEFNNA U
l a
I. SDEI NF C
AI V Q
AE E
R T. E NR U B 0. E E 1
p I
R V NR
.E U
LSO l
I N
NO
,OUE I HA
,BRR
,TLNR SD I
i h
O AOFM C
FTEM EYSAO S
N D
LFE - NN LU YEWTUNI P ET E2 NA y
NI E. F O R s
I OO S.CU LH NDOTU NN P#A r
R T n
A o o
EP C
NCI I
CNTSI I A -
I. E O
g CI EDTR T
YNAO RDFTMW I
I R.
i T
e NH THEOE
.A TiOV RE OARO NC YOEA l
t N
t OC NTNNCTM SEDL R OL AI RTNT N l. S D. I a
E a
CS TLI TEFL A. N E. S O E O A
NPR E. F F
ECiI E A. !
I V AN N l
M c
E b
D POI I CDF lPFEU TAWSIT 0. O I
! MI life PNO l
i e t
R F
CU EEUAA C
u A y S
T t
T e n
H R
O N
A f o
PSH S
S N
S i
a t
N S
c O
N I
l N
N g
u 1
l r
STT Wi W1 W
i n
t N A R i
s SGO 4
4
/
ta n
NI P 7
7 1
o
/TE 7
7 2
c C
CSH i
TE 5
5 5
d O
QV 8
8 8
n C
N I
I I
I I
sn yr r
e o
C. UB Y
Y Y
Y g
M T
T H
I I c
e R PSQ NN NN NN NN n
t E P O
O O
O o
a NABL NF NP NP NF C
C E
E E
f G
BF NK NN NN NK o
t TC N
l L0 l
N N
N s
l i
i i
i.
PI W
Wi W
W 1
BT 2
2 2
2 UA 5
5 5
5 SC 1
1 1
1 TA O
O O
O C
C C
C C
5 6
3 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NR RE 4
6 35 35 EB 86 1 4 4 4 4 4 CM 26 37 50 50 NU
- 1
- 1
- 0
- 0 ON 5 0 50 55 5 5 C
85 85 8T 87
- T
- T N
N N
N I
I I
I
(
a b
3 1
6 f
2
- 2. 2 2
2 o
32 1
N 32 2
O
- 3. 6 1
32
- 1. 2 I
46 4
46 4 6 e
T 4.
,2 g
C 5
a E
12 1
1 2 1 2 P
S 2
- 2. 1 E
- 3. 5
".2 32 32 3
- 2. 5 C
45 4
45 45 N
,1
,1 5
,1
,1 E
,1 R
31 7 7
31 7
- 3. 1. d 1 2 31 7 EF 2 1.d 2
2 1.d 21 21 d E
n n
n
. n R
35 a 35 a 35 a 34 35 a
~-
y K
t A
N E
I A
PE i
NL Y
2LN ER l
I
.ND SAML N.
IEE R
i b
a S
.I AU A
IsD R
I NB SN.
i c
ITHRO E1SF TcN OI NEI A EAT g
PT C
C A
I I AEFC URAL R
N i
n
) E N
I NEY DV T
N AMI I ) E i
lp NDMEN FI RA DRSAA O
N
/A UDM p
p O
OHO F
AM AEKEE
.I ISGV QEP e
e TAF T
OEE S
ECAEA SOI RTU k
CL SI LOMN ELL NM MINS OQ c
e U
KTD ALOO RA DYNR OTAL NRE ir s
RYAEN CFSE I RFUROO OAEI O
e u
TAEKO I
M UOOMASF RVLA I RY
+-
w o
SRWCC DENO QTO TRN HE T.
TOA x
n EHI S EI RDIEI SL' e
H N -
U c
AOD TLY 2
G OISBGD MT RN NNP AEr i l
0 C
I NR KS AEAA L
U O
SFR x
d 0
(
DI A N
/ 7 R
/E n
2
.RNDZ O
.EA N/TTNEN S3DE DSV a
5 EROULA I RWE I E RURO M7 EH I KE 1
CI OOI H TI F
D.NNDYJT CSI / UI O
p I ALRU CAY ODNR EF I
N FFFABY UPRF I AI TNI RN U
LLO i
h O
_T REEF UNANLID TANF A
- y NI OREKEE TRVA BERIA D
S I
CFT sn r
RT HLHF S
T.
T EGA E9 O
I ON A
o o
EP LFTATA NFSSH LNTDHN R2DN DOE g
CI AO W
S OOI G
AI IENI O 7N ERM i
T t
e NR C
D C
EU CA KUTN T.A M( E N
t OC IDNT
.A DMHO I MNC A
F C
a E
a CS DEASG EEOTR D
EADED A8YE ERA l
l l
M e
c E
EE UNE HEO i
EI.HRNRA R0HC i I L H
R b
D MNSMI B TNRDT MAWTATH C7 TN TAP C
u y
S s
~
A T
t T
e n
O O
O O
O A
f o
PSR N
N N
N N
i a
t N
1 1
3 S
1 c
O 0
0 0
0 u
g u
I 0
0 0
0 n
r STT t
RAR 7
9 3
9 m
i t
s SGO 4
4 6
5 a
n NI P 6
6 6
7 o
/TE c
C CSR 5
5 5
5 i
d TE 8
8 8
8 e
n O
QV C
N N
N N
N I
I I
I I
I s
y nr r
e o
C WB Y
Y Y
Y Y
L T
T T
T T
g I
cn e
RPSQ NR NN NR NR NR t
EP O
O O
O O
o a
NABL NP NP NP NP NP C
C E
E E
E E
E f
G BF NR NR NR NR NR o
t TC N
N N
N N
s LO B
B B
B B
i L
PL W
W W
W W
BT 2
2 2
2 2
UA 5
5 5
5 5
SC 1
1 1
1 1
T A
O O
O O
O C
C C
C C
C 1
1 3
3 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NR T
RE 72 92 3
37 95 0
EB 46 46 67 47 57 7
CM 60 60 66 70 70 9
NU
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0 1
ON 55 55 50 55 55 C
8T 8T 85 8T 8T
- T N
N N
N N
I I
I I
I
~
l llLl lllj l
3 O
I 4
2 2
2 42 4
4 e
T g
C
,5
,5
,5
,5 a
E 1
2 1
1 P
S 21 2 1 1
1 1 1
E C
4 2. 1
- 2. 1 4 2. 1 5 5 4
N
,1 E
,5
,5
,5 R
2
,6 1
1
,6 1
,6 26 E
F 2 1.d 2 1.d 21 d 21 d E
n n
n n
R 35 a 3 4 a 3 5 a 35 a y
t N
R S
UE E
2 E
S l
i OTI H
D#P T
iS L.
ES l
HFR T
N I OP TASI LT) i b
EOC R
U RUNE EAO U C a
R SU OOQ D
RHF SNT c
g AENAF FTES
. A I ( E i
n WRO C
AT D
I O O
HO EAOHS EECN
) H l
i p
p EHTCN RET NT VM -
NAR PSS SU D
ARNI ON OO l
p e
i A
e TNUSSE I CCE RS BRG k
WD AR EN R
P NN WTH c
MNRO
(
ODFN U
I E.
.U I I EI ED i
s r
u OEI Q FEGPNC CT 2VE YD MCE R
U O -
ETNA I V e
o n
H TETP R
YED.DTM I E BSOM TSO I R NI Rl UCR I SM e
iI G
0 NEUU
.P AWUEAA D. D O
NEE TF UCR TOQSU TY ONMR I
0 I
d 2
I WA GW RE EOE OVEI NEF n
5 V
FU0 VSLFM CAD I
O A
1 EEOAI MEGCNI E
.D E
D I
p EBH GL O
N I T GHNA E GTSN N
H TS O
RYI T./
N ONR NATU i
h y
O TD MDF FL.ANA VOI I YI OI I URO NI LEEN PRTI U PQAR s
r lAH N.
R T NU CTAO S
EECTQ EEPA n
o A
E P I
l D
S NI I I R K
RDR K A
,G 0UI N
GCSFON EVU I E ED o
g CI i
i e
T NR SSEl.E I TE TE ESTD E
SN t
t N
a a
OC D
VCSTI C SI SAP S N T. I R A V. T E
CS A*
Cl A AENDN 0
N U
U A t
Y l
c l
e b
E OEOI AN M
liR i E DO 0EOOW l
O H o A.
Cl R
u D
RSTTV E SPTMAC 1
R CNO S
I TBI 1
l A
y T
t n
T e
o O
K R
O A
f i
PSR N
S S
N a
t N
S c
1 u
O N
0 I
g r
B 0
STT W
n t
R AR 2
i s
t n
S GO 4
2 a
o NI P 7
0 c
C
/TE 7
CSR 5
i d
O TE 5
8 n
C QV 8
N I
I I
I W
s n
y r
r C
.WB Y
Y Y
Y e
o T
M T
T I
c g
R IPSQ NR NR NR NR n
e EP O
O O
O o
t C
a NABL NP NF NP NP C
E E
E E
f G
BF NR NK NR NR o
ts TC N
N N
N L O.
B B
B B
i L
PI W
W W
W BT 2
2 2
2 U A 5
5 5
5 SC 1
1 1
1 TA O
O O
O C
C C
C C
2 2
2 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NR R E 1
4 9 30 28 EB 4 5 4 2 06 24 CM 99 1 1 31 00 NU
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0 ON 50 65 65 55 C
85 8 T 8 T 8T
- T N
N N
I I
I I
W l\\
l
~
v i
l TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: 15200 SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 'O PAGE 1 0F 1 Attachment B
'.ist of Concerns by Issue Category: C0 Corisieuction Subcategory: 152 Housekeeping Concern Number Issue WI-85-022-001 1.2.1 IN-85-284-005 1.2.1 IN-85-316-006 1.2.1 IN-85-543-003 1.2.1 IN-85-543-004 1.2.1 IN-85-647-001 1.2.3 IN-85-649-001 1.2.3 l
IN-85-663-003 1.2.3 IN-85-743-003 1.2.1 IN-85-759-001 1.2.3 IN-85-941-002~
1.2.2 IN-86-144-002 1.2.1 IN-86-303-002 1.2.1 f
j l
- - - - - - _ - -. - _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ _.