ML20211E007

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Removal & Storage of Security Matls Stored in Willste Bldg in Silver Spring,Md.If Suitable Arrangements Not Made by 830715,matls Will Be Destroyed
ML20211E007
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon, 05000000
Issue date: 06/29/1983
From: Chandler L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Strumwasser M
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20209C072 List:
References
FOIA-86-151 NUDOCS 8702240209
Download: ML20211E007 (4)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ e

s..g

( PE., y(.,w s

  1. o, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

) t -n ~ [ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 \\...../ June 29, 1983 Docket Nos. 50-275 and 50-323 Michael J. Strumwasser, Esq. 3580 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90010

Dear Mr. Strumwasser:

As we've recently discussed, copies of security materials regarding the Diablo Canyon facility have been maintained for the use of' the Governor in the Comission's Willste Building in Silver Spring, Maryland. The security aspects of the Diablo Canyon proceeding have been concluded for some time now. I have been infonned that the room in which these materials are being stored has suffered some water damage and requires repair. In addition, the space is needed for other agency purposes. Efforts to find a new suitable location for the continued storage of these materials have been unsuccessf.ul. Accordingly, I must ask that you promptly make appropriate arrangements for the removal and storage of all materials that we are presently storing for the Governor. I would refer you to ALAB-600,12 NRC 3 (1980) which may provide some useful guidance to you. If suitable arrangements are not made by July 15, 1983, the materials will be destroyed. Sincerely, usk[ ma L drence J. andler Deputy Assistant Chief Hearing Counsel cc: Herb Brown, Esq. Thomas Moore, Esq. 5 ae $ 0702240209 MO212 ll HOLMEG06-151 PDH

O ' l d. M. w s. .. ~.. ~ -. ..~. 27, 1983 i THE WAI.L STREET JOURNAL., Monday, June S er > Alters S ' stem W

  • ~

- T ugLawyer: Miami'sH.trse uorn i ForElectronic Office p' .~ - r .is Prouc o1HisRoLeinDope Cases And Reduces the Price M u snnn,2u-ms.m:nen, e tederal agglegg1s, gng ye,, gg,,,g,,g NEW YORK-Sperry Ccip. said it im-l., Jnr try of %:scer. sis law School, set up many Fienda banks are overCowltg wit proved 1*.s Spe.:y: ink electrer.i: om:e sys. Csnnn:.ed Frcnt Ftest Page 'y the proceeds of drag tra:sactons, t**

  • D'* equipment a:d c:=; uter soft-g bM.a 1btheIa:e Ti0s a:dquicyJygot M&. r a feaWre a af:g the f

tts warg u :e7ms og gge gggco,7..ggf,be But Mr. Hirschhorn prefers to des: t Sperry system to wk wi'3 cSce derkes

  • 2N.

..cp hto the :.:;cpdu but b:radre basbess of 3 dt!end.:g smut mer: huts. "I must have tal pr*dA by eq *a d M M m*

  • bY #i#*I *** E"t" E2 *f5-I I,-

hed!ed G ta !c) grto cues." he says. Rights, to be preste.;t:n cf t-.xere ud the c0mp.any said i's new Sperryhmi (! the right to a defense "Idber:y's !ast

      • CU'_ b***f V'd;'~- 20t a:d a I-*.er as the Cc!:22ians txgas to play a

- j;< bigger part b the drag tnde. Mr. Hirsch-WF '. Eseis si~ Cat"cdi5!$5'if.i'm G-Dies 1.hettgs.:,am: - ::o ) g "" *# prombH to treat 1:s preferred stock ~ bvest:rs :-'xp tun. is da rnest cases Mr. If.rschcrn ha2-tess favorah!y tiu ce k eviler for d:-s. h:oce:t ;n-;le gtzera!Jy don't s-Ek wec:d. S:dely had ;;t b a ; git had be:4 Pac; ic G&E Port ^ones b a hs cift:e. w'en a elect is canght ce bves:s:s gmcp. cc :: tin Y Pcueg ce htg. or tags. Mr. Flrxtle='s d d intreue ar. crec is to redze the se::ca:e cr ball. c preferr-1. wrie the trJde:~:ted s:dar h7% year P.7 ant Start Up out the p.:spect of a %% dM er e. He doess't araan sa::eed at Cat. e!2er: we hr cee r~ee:t cuent w:s set at =5 n.ts :=e. S=kely hin:e ea::he i: nest-

2' had
't.

en d : toe w u snm Jew. su:'am g crs g-up im;reve :u cFer, ty a r.s: 5.0 FRANCISCO-Pr$r Cts & Eec-6a r./.::n.c2er cr.ses. Mr. H.rseacts Inight group to redew its ps:dcs. 1: tri: Ca said R ts ps x.bg the ;te;tc*ed q# serie h:s c:.e:::'s c:res by b; dat:g me 0:3. same surt up ci hs Diablo Cuyes No. I n; dear b, pm:cca::t wie m:::= upc3 ft:sM2K is have er:dene s;;;tessed. scme

oer c
it by two to th ce m=ds.1 O EU M

U S; r ro [-rete tie strenge c! the gcVer:rnett'scue. a:d some su.;!y to wear d:wn the c;er ReNatory Ccmmesk:. Pr$c C&S R ~ pretns the unit wt! be rea:y (2e side. He is aidM b that by a sta o 6 4C6f o mg5 g g eig'.t. ine! t:g a tock.uper a:d two leg Wwer tes:::g by Nov. 30. ud t i-Mr. H.rsdL:'s ;ersistence pays off. b * *" 5"5" 3"n '& Emsd 13. s 8 *!! ^*"". t-:*ttnes. M L MEGTON4J.ui. +:*s. The t:3ry p evi:2.:y :sid :t ex;<:: Cne thet, a Cd;mt! s c:umed Frecte Oe thed Iam; tea, wts arrested af:er an air;ta:e dahnas. Eh E Old, said te Wsead de to begt: low ;ower tes g Wea: C M b tie c:m;1:y to the qua: er and to achieve full cer_ men:M c hided wi2 h=dreds c! Munds of coed:e::ved un at a r;ml F'erMs Mrport at 3 sake est he cent: sident of 341, c! the e0 mmc: s' arts e-20% bYtheendof S hia W t C a siid el f a.- sa are.ge s r:2er nu, 2.m.1:d taxid to bs cir. He was cir.rgM equ J C;222 DOE-In a E.:g vid Oe Dr.ndes and pM,E asd sud M hrt ed h.s. seMies.ne sp:eem-J. n 70 cus;;teg 1: im;r.:t ext:e. Its f.rs*f ini! e.dd n0 a h=g h.ty. A ju.y in themed tna! f:=d hm st.;;y. FJ. Farsch. chrge Car..=0.c:. Jna shares wre sc.d Jre 10 f:r C4 20:.s o! ce ;; :t 1.=c

  • = mM2

d c: Se New Y:& S:xk E.dn.e A!- T .b ;er e.. er;vn-j. Fac: CEE is r 3 hm ce: Mrs. add be l;dge to set ce ter ce sale. YJ. Errad :=Ws ';J:!.C3 02?S Ead h18 CI ~3 0 T 'd'3' ! C Od;;;2! 2 = 2? M'200:0; C 0 1 s :-i.n :.s;de cr. ;-:rds c' '-<~'^-a-e4 ea 77.s! 3es s:xb:;- i e-.2 g e,e 3:requ :: s. y.s :: 5;' C*aR15;~;" Zf~'98! 0; !"2: s.:e.

... g t,u I
.ty ca.es t:: der ce em;::sud ce 501l *=4~

At:e C.m. g c;: -::=s. c:1.rzg e'.:: 1 " "C E :: ...,c.s ne '. -$[:Dl'$ bh'c[th$ re$-Os ':3 E~~s' -A C:mp10y sxys: n

~ =

v = n,d =,~ e. =. a = =;=d l W' O' ; 2 3 kPN C ' Ci -

.~ e,w' tr.

a est M;. .u u a PJ 2.rd d' Mi E'~id Ud 2t fC8 i' I : umber '.N :W 22 &%Ci 'r e

:: As $::wJ u : erie :.:*.e time l lUF T*'*dDY 2'! IJ E~3d Cd'541 - lmM crid :-ne ce (r.: :.

it'; P' - f 2C C'U~

c.n;
. 'dr. R--Crem stems} Cf M8 Mid Do2 fit c Ed C2";OM C IG b ci ty d.,,stt; int et ;e;d :-arg ;Se

.'.8 I;Zd!'3-4.:: m: .5.;- ') , g 3 w:. d.CIl l' PSIC' Sh'J8 N221$1i th' l e#.4:ne r.itu !1. i!y sr.'J ev.?. bc T !.cGCf Lmlhi mil /:~~'i d'd h* Gmad":ia: Chrm :. :' ' ' Yei.1e :-.ys. 2,. cf bs c:.e-.3 h: e e I N *8 N O M 312d-20'213M 'S E M MNhd ' a~ % f i' d. u n d ?e '-r d dev et t'.r;M '~ C 2 'Ti 1 ~ * :S ' ~ ' ;f3-Pt ; ~... E s. 2 4 , n i ;. fr t t r ers 0 u :s ar.;: g h.p.1, y r 2;.. t* b )I i l b b) t ~* ,' i e .e e ,--.--w.

I O' W.. -~- ( m. s. .s ..~~- 27, 1983 i Tile WALL STREET JOURNAL, Mooday. June Sperry Alters System W ~- ~ T uo Lawyer: Miami s H.irserorn For Electronic Office r -- - r And Reduces the Price .s Prouciof His RoLeinDope Cases I ' ***" 5Wl ' 'P""

    • * * " *f'M CTE Sud k h-C geferg omeggs, god yes. We vat'.s at
  1. . D U:!ver i:y of Wisconsis Law School, set up many Florida banks are overCoe-g witt pr ved its Sperryh..k electro-Je clf.:e sys-

'- y Cataned From Fsrst Page

ment ud com;eer sc!
.

the proceeds of dmg tr.'asa:do s S.~4 a fea:=e afwag ce w hop in Waml b the late VOs and quickly got But Mr. Hirschhorn prefers to desc:1be S;c y system to werk Mt o'S:e devices N. bto the epopular but lucradve busi:ess of his work in terms of the ratta's f -dar en.d ofD ## d *'3-If tM pr'. ci;1es, by referr:::g o 15 3 defendi:t smut merdants. "I must have I I e cumpany said 1:s new Sperry!!:k ( Rights, to the presumptica of inoche and

Vducts c'fers better pert =ar
e a:d aWr - N ha:Ced W to W pomo caus." he says.

A "Jhs Later. Es ce Colombians began to play a , L_Ibe*L.,!jas. titur part b the drag trade. Mr. Hirsch-the _right..to a defen,se ~., - - ~ u --Wy.ven so, thEcase e._ w a m.~ a w , % _1:s Befernd s ock "to g " - s.,_ s e -% g.a.. m. t prxtised to treaess" faverat:y eas ce eves =rs g:wp t'en, as da mest cases Mr. II:scibom han-h ar!!er for ces. baoce:t seeple genere!y dort waa lwx:d. S::kely had put ta a ; g et t R had he:d Pacific CdE Postpondi b:s ha c!flce. %3en a cie:t is caught the 1:ves=rs g-oup, cc ag t a tdt:g de bag, or tags. Mr. Hirsch10rn3 Cdde:d 1 ::else out ce ; cepect of a.?e ,.7 (n.a w *. ^> d a::n c: en is to reduce ce se::e :e ce tail. ca prefermd wh'.e the cide:"5ed ra :r } aa s o nae .+4 4.w-* He dwsit a; ways su:c.e-d at t:at, e!2er: Ecrd hr cce recent tient was set c t.5 nis t:me, S=kely h?.:M that te 1: vest- ~ f'3' hadft. S ~ ^ ' '^0"L" o.g Ove tu cfit*, ty ad?.sirr Oe M.**d P"00-r?'n%: C,s & :..e:- c:s g up i ;:

-1;en.

b caer cases. Mr. Hirschhom might group to review 1:s ;csd0s. tra C.'sd R '.s p; ;c:2g de ;med yc SA' r A%---* 2

erve his c!!ent's 1:".erest by i-=dat:g the 2210 Ca::) : No.1 cudear pe.
-'
secu:ct w12 mcc:s upcn :c:::. some sta:t up c! its 0:

I pcwer ca ey two to e.ee :::.es.b to -rce ce stretra of the government's {Guj Tnan g]Tody ]Mej sen: Z to have eviden:e su;;tessed, scme l S-cicar neg=a=ry Cc====. Fa=!a c&E cas'e. and sa:ne simp!y to wear dom: the Red' ces Hs. Hold:.ngs prednts *at t;:ut ud be ready l:r Nel1:.d-caer side. He is aided is that by a staff of u s bg by Sep* E It ut be ns# M W.~. !:w a eJ.'t. i=Lut:g a to9 keeper and two legal power test:g by Ncv. E a:d to 8-awm sme som. surf ar;-tre \\!r7iE!:schom's persiste::ce pays off u. dt ;eei L WASHINGTON-Kaui-.a & E: cad 12:/s su clai:=20. Eli Eroad said he I: weed be j e i a Cckmtia t2::ed Fredte h 0:-d j One clianwss arrested after an air;1ate

  • rea.

e L=dd et t=ireds cf poeds of cocai: t: ded d:wn at a ra.al Fiorida airpcr a' 3 s*.2 eam, cd tr.xied to his en. He was eta red @22d2E-b a U8M CI"~ C' cf 'ir ::=mm 22. 25 15;W am2 - e-s = ty be end d M Eu: 1rs sd c hmu a e meu cer tu C;3 to import ext:e. H:s L:st "8-3'd d U"3[4 } UZd 22d YO ssp:>asm a re: 2: p w:0 cespiraw'a a t5 rhy A My t: "b-( 22U DJ'IC're s'o:ead e Y <j~ d.T=e 10 hr - st ta,= t . $15 Hrs t-,' ended wi 52nd trial fc$nd ht:= then persuaded the judge to set the[ ccm.mn stres we . 3 T :r u o tr.c t e m.:t a u d : i aa g _a.. 33.. c. g :. -. c,.._.g

j... ey.

fC C: 32225 Cd h'3 G22..s u ;.r:f:e { rg @_2t suv,,e d r.;p:. y m R: ; ; s. u. emerg 7_ C..#.*",I "bb:-J-e cr. c = s. 0d: 2: exntat:e "Cg. ys ,,A.'.,X ca-es eder the e.m;.me r:xA-c; t i "1 :y a# C,,,,". : - v.?ste:. ws? t u,.. s.j..... ...... m.... N 5 m Lt, :q C.r.:r, R i p. A e"n;ry rpi.mm.: 5.d Oe 5:2:k ,,,,_6~~ n..: c$ E,U )$rN b 5,5 Si iiita nm...sf"W $ 1 M O*M Of10'~iW 2f 3 ir prre 'erm ; ; - r n.- ?-r. :e nd;;s cf $1s en: -ded 2e ; ,>.3....,4 U ^ 7 d ". " ' by i.r. m.: r.: Ce es:::e c ! ;T k't~ M .5u s d3f 2 E'[-NE:h$.3,it.5b,2y.nw.-a;r.y:edb2$ebslOfM8M'aEi~10C;'CI.28'~'4 n: 1-d car.=0:n t -! OM : ,. s.s...%. ,3.. -

  • it.
.
:y's f:cde:2. ~;p2,e:

l' '- } " ;7 f C;; 3 O f CC 15 C'. ...... s .. l ;, ....s %.. L.,..,. ..s....,. y.. ..:-=<s-== =r.:e cf hs c2ents havel EC: Of 28 U !"12 Shi'~i 032'- 7 ; !? ? : c'72: .~...4 . = ::; .. l., ;.,. e., p -- :: 9 '.a :. w ar,= z su1. ' Yis. 5 p.ys. m s:....n.4 d _- + (- ., i... v. g... Cf.... ~. _. 5..:., !.D...'.; ~4.. l

  • r ':- n. L E,-.d t t R:

~., neu en 5.s ctr :;=g 114 ers. ;dce ard!,., -4 ~ s.,i ',. I t 4 I - ) d> t s k

l. Y V" f% 0 w t

u.,

s. r.- .. ~... l 27, 1983 r THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, Monday, June Sperry Alters System IN. .O. rugLawyer: MiamisHirse norn ForElectronic office And Reduces the Pdce h Prouc.oiHis Ro einDopeCases h a wau. s= Jomaa. swf aw federal offidals. And yes, the vaults of NEW YORK-Sperry Corp. said it im-posanned From Ftrst Page many Flortda banks are overflowb8 wnh pmved its Sperryllak electronic office sys. . yI Univet sty of Wisconsin Law School, set up the proceeds of drug transact 2ns. tem with new equipment and computer soft-w Au g a feature aHowing the I hop b \\tiamiin the late '60s and quickly got But Mr. Hirschhorn prefers to describe d i ? bio the unpopular but lucrative business of his work in terms of the nation's fundamen-Sperry system to work with office ev ces defending smut merchants. "I must have tal principles, by referrtng to the Bi!! of made by rival computer makers. " he says, The company said its new Sperryllak handlert W to 503 porno cases, Rights, to the presumption of innocence and bter, as the Colombians began to play a the right to a defense. "Uber.ty's,last products obrs better performance and a bigger part la the drug trade, Mr. Hirsch- ..---m m Q ~ ~ Even :r), n'ar ius'e Yio'aNC = ^.' l __ ? ^^ 7 l .e' stock ano omised to treat its i estors group tien. as do most cases Mr. Hirschhctn han-prss" !avorably than the nYa plug earher for c@EN@ms d!es. Innocent people generally don't wt'k teould.Stokely had pu n ti it had held Pac bto his office. When a client is caught we investors group, noting that holding the bag, or bags. Mr. Hirschhorn's th ut the prospect of a20% dividend increase 14CMGr DGMt of0Tt nUp L nL ce aun otten is to reduce the sentence or ball. on preferred, while the unidentified suitor He doesn't always succeed at that, either: o adn't. ~ ratt-Bord for coe recent effent was set at $25 h This time, Stokely hinted that the invest-avewm s Jw.a.swraw toI the-rs group improve its offer, by advising SAN FRANCISCO-Pacific Gas & Ele In other cases, Mr. Hirschhorn might oroup to review its position. ric Co. said it is postponing the projected yOt

  • rml!on.

serve his client's intenst by inuclating the g start up of its Diablo Canyon No. t nuclearb t prosecutor with motion upon motion, some TOGd bief power unit by two to three mont Sa seeking to have evidence suppressed, some to probe the strength of the government's attMGM clear Regulatory Comminion, Pacific C&E case, and some simply to wear down the IE ' cther side. He is aided in that by a staff of 36dt4C65NifNOfd$ngS predicts the unit will be read ac elgtt, induding a bookkeeper and two legal power testing by Nov. 30, an to 88 8 *^'.a. s J-as. swf aw 's secretaries. Mr. Hirschhorn's persistence pays off. ted gy. WASHINGTON-Kaufman & Broad Inc. ects. The utility previously said it expecthird One client, a Colombian named Freddie chairman. E!! Broad, said he lowered the to begin low power testmg withm t e O h Lamprea, was. arrested after an airplane h t he controls in the company to the quarter and to achieve full commercial o loaded with hundreds of pounds of cocaine it stake t a eration by the end of 1383. But a spokesma touched down at a rural Florida airport at 3 equivalent of 22.16 % of the common shares said all forecasts are targets rather than a.rn. and taxied to his car. He was charged outstanding. with conspiring to import cocaine. His first In a anng with the Securities and Ex-hard and fast schedules. The spokesman said the postponement Mr. Broad said 3:3.000 trial ended with a hung jury. A jury in the i change Commiss on, common shares were sold June 10 for $24 from modifications of the plant taking-second trial found him guilty. Mr. Hirsch. I New York Stock Exchange. Af-longer than expected. Dacific G&E is mak horn then persuaded the judge to set the , each on the ti andin 2.613.633 ter the sale. Mr. Broad controls ing adjustments to the construc on verdict aside on grounds of insufficient evi creasing the strength of supports for pipe s common shares and has options to purchase and cable conduits to improve the plant s the employee stockop Churning out motions, calming excitable. 104,000 shares under dence. e ability to withstand earthquakes. clients and complying with Internal Rev tion prograrn. k nue Sqrvice audits of his own tax return A company spokesman said the stoc The Nuclear Regulatory Commission sus s pended the plant's low power testing e r. debt of a company (he is on his third in a tow) keep MIt was sold to lower the the dhcovery of de-d d the estate of Hirschhom busy for 80 to 90 hours a week. La November 1981 after js e jointly ownedby Mr.Broa anthe late Donald Kaufman, one of is a schedule that seems to leave little tim d h lant unsafe in an pany's founders. Together, Mr. Broad an ms il-feared could make t e p for contemplation. Mr. Hirschhorn see earthquake. A second unit at the site is u n-the Kaufman family still own about 4.2 m bored by questions about the larger meani ng lion of the 12 million shares outstanding, tdergoing similar modification and is s he 3 I ed uled for commercial operation in late 191 of his work. Yes, he says, most of his cilents ha ve Spokeswoman said.Kaufman & Broadis a1.os Angeles bas the spokesman said. ged committed the crimes they are char company. i with. Yes, the drug trade is a bloody bust. ness that is corrupting lawyers, p I k .1 9 z-1,i J i 2 M b .-. - ~ - - -.. - -. - -. -..

^* 4 13 -Distribution: Document Control 50-275/323 i PRC System JUL 5 1983 NRC PDR L PDR NSIC LB#3 Reading DEisenhut/RPurple HDenton/ECase TNovak GKnighton M Dr. William E. Cooper JLee Teledyne Engineering Services LChandler, ELD 130 Second Avenue EJordan, IE Wal tham, !1assachusetts 02254 JTaylor, IE ACRS (16)

Dear Dr. Cooper:

He recently received the attached letter dated June 23, 1983 from J. R. Reynolds, Counsel to Joint Intervenors, to H. R. Denton, Director of HRR. The letter relates to an IDVP meeting with the PG&E Diablo Canyon Project on June 14, 1983. The dRC was not represent' d at the meeting. Among other items the resolution e of E01 File 1132 was discussed. According to the enclosed letter this discussion did not only pertain to the technical aspects of the E01, but also to the procedure for identification and resolution of the issue. In particular the letter raises a question concerning the independence of the IOVP in its inter-actions with the Project. We request that you detennine and fully assess the factual circumstances of the IDVP interaction with the Project at the meeting. This thould be based solely on information from IDVP participants. You should specifically evaluate the events with respect to any actual or apparent influence from the Project on the IDVP representatives. We also request that you determine and evaluate to what extent, if any, similar circumstances arose at other 10VP/ Project meetings and what overall effect such conditions could have on the IDVP. Finally, we request that you provide or describe the guidance that you had given prior to the June 14 meeting to the members of the IDVP for such situations and what guidance you have provided since the meeting to assure that there will be no influence on the IDVP, apparent or actual. He request that you provide us with the above information as soon as possible. Sincerely, . GTIW ) (f7I l.)-Y. ! "&f " ' Y' ( l-Darrell G. Eisenhut, Jirector Division of Licensing Q Office of fluclear Reactor Regulation /,4f cc: See next page

  • See previous page for concurrence DO omeg, DLjlB#.3 DL:LB#.3..

.O. ELD DL. :. AD: L _......D.I R summer pc.h,1,e,r,1,,i,n,: p,h *GKnighton

  • LChandler
  • TNovak DE4sehtd. I..

7/.1/.83 ,f["f/87 "f/f/8T"" "' "f/i/55""'" "7/..",7,. /55", ) sac rom sts oo 4on.acu om OFFICIAL RECORD COPY m a.i-m,

.~

  • ' *h ~ '

Diab 1.o;C'inyan J &,.6 .g , f.',.y, Mr. J. O. Schuyler', Vice President Nuclear Power Generation c/o Nuclear Power Generation, Licensing Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street, Room 1435 San Francisco, California 94106 cc: Philip A. Crane, Jr., Esq. Resident Inspector /Diablo Canyon NPS Pacific Gas & Electric Company c/o US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 7442 P. O. Box 369 San Francisco, California 94120 Av11r Beach, California 93424;, -; Mr. Malcolm H. Furbush Ms. Raye Fleming Vice President - General Counsel 1920 Mattie Road Pacific Gas & Electric Company Shell Beach, California 93440 Post Office Box 7443 San Francisco, California 94120 Joel Reynolds, Esq. John R. Phillips, Esq. Janice E. Kerr, Esq. Center for Law in the Public Interest California Public Utilities Connission 10951 West Pico Boulevard 350 McAllister Street Third Floor San Francisco, California 94102 Los Angeles, California 90064 Mr. Frederick Eissler, President Paul C. Valentine, Esq. Scenic Shoreline Preservation 321 Lytton Avenue Conference, Inc. Palo Alto, California 94302 4623 More Mesa Drive Santa Barbara, California 93105 Dr. William E. Cooper Project Manager - 5511 Ms. Elizabeth Apfelberg Teledyne Engineering Services 1415 Cozadero 130 Second Avenue San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 Mr. Gordon A. Silver Mr. Dick Blankenburg Ms. Sandra A. Silver Editor & Co-Publisher 1760 Alisal Street South County Publishing Company San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 P. O. Box 460 Arroyo Grande, California 93420 Harry M. Willis, Esq. Seymour & Willis Bruce Norton, Esq. 601 California Street, Suite 2100 Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94108 3216 North 3rd Street Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Mr. Richard Hubbard MHB Technical Associates Mr. W. C. Gangloff Suite K Westinghouse Electric Corporation 1725 Hamilton Avenue P. O. Box 355 San Jose, CA 96125 Pittsburg, Pennsylvania 15230 Mr. John Marrs, Managing Editor David F. Fleischaker, Esq. San Luis Obispo County Telegram Tribune P. O. Box 1178 1321 Johnson Avenue Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101 P. O. Box 112 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406

'.J 2 O Diablo Cahyon r, 2-Arthur C. Gehr. Esq. Snell & Wilmer 3100 Valley Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Mr. Owen H. Davis, Director Federal Agency Relations Pacific Gas & Electric Company 105017th Street, N. W. Suite 1180 Washington, D. C. 20036 Regional Administrator - Region V US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Dr. Jose Roesset 3506 Duval Road Austin, Texas 78759 Michael J. Strumwasser. Esq. Special Council to the Attorney General State of California 3580 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 800 Los Angeles 90010 Mr. Thomas H. Harris San Jose Mercury News 750 Ridder Park Drive San Jose, California 95190 Mr. Mark Gottlieb California Energy Connission 1111 Howe Avenue, MS 27 Sacramento, California 95825 Maurice Axelrad, Esq. Lowenstein, Newman, Reis and Axelrad 1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D. C. 20036

l CENTER FOR' LAW .. r.w IN 'TH E Pu su c UTEIn t'sT .r......... 6.,,, ., m... 6 sov.1,e e...... ~1 3...... ,... ~.. g =,;'66s-6.....6...u,............ "M"'".%*,"a *ii.,'3,.o ;'. g,OJ;,*"'pl,"i,..,. v.'s-. c<a'ai*>.a... $$iE*.9,*"'" U .,s.. r v....e ..., =.. - m:...... 6...... Juna 23, 1983 v. ri...m

  • E"=8i."". 6........

j '.3.t;" ".*M.o.. u. i Harold Denton Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4 Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Denton:

l Since the Independent Design Verification Program ("IDVP") for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant ("Diablo Canyon") was instituted by the Commission eighteen months ago, the question of the independence of the auditors has been a continuing concern of the Joint Intervenors and other interested parties. Without such independence, the audit and its findings will do little to restore lost public confidence in the design and construction of Diablo Canyon and the effectiveness of the commission's licensing review process. I-am writ.ing on behalf of the Joint Intervenors to relate to you a discussion at a recent IDVP meeting which provides disturbing evidence of Pacific Gas and Electric Company's ("PGandE") continuing failure to appreciate either the meaning i of or the necessity'for such independence. Specifically, our i i concern arises out of the June 14, 1983 meeting at PGandE's offices in San Francisco between the Diablo Canyon Project ("DCP" or " Project") (the PGandE/Bechtel licensing team) and 4 the IDVP regarding the status of certain Error Open Items ("E0I"), in particular E0I File No. 1132 (Auxiliary Building Corrective Action Program). l l The EDI in question (a copy of which is enclosed) concerns j the DCP's failure to report that auxiliary building slabs at Diablo Canyon have not been qualified for in-plane loadings, i despite the fact that the joint DCP/IDVP Schedule, EPS-616A Revision 3, dated May 16, 1983 (" Schedule"), clearly stated W > hat the DCP has completed auxiliary building member i t l _ y n e, y 7 7 (

clm, l

{ /fD R t',h (/ / 2.r-f ~. l .e.no or taustres

.
  • . 7
?.
:.,' L
  • '."t'""::~
    "L..
    • 1::.:.*C.*:.?

'.:7:l: :.~t.. "! 4.""."'. ., l.' !. P47., 1 7.~.!?." rl:f'.l..t r!.;"'"

P.:'. ".J "'

oe ~.. n,__,,,

--~ I ": I) 'D -i, y ij,

  • g-Harold Denton Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation June 23, 1983 Page 2 4

l i evaluations. This error was further compounded by the PGandE Final Repogt,,,May 18, 1983 (" Final Report"), which also implied that these evaluatl'ons were complete. The significance of this discrepancy,-according to EOI 1132, is that " required corrective action was not fully implemented, yet reported as complete." + In a discussion among Dr. Robert L. Cloud and Edward 1 Denison of the IDVP (Robert L. Cloud and Associates ("RLCA")) and Gary Moore of the.DCP, Dr. Cloud defendgd the issuance of the EOI, explaining that although the Final Report might be a i subject to differing interpretations regarding qualification of the slabs, the Schedule unequivocally stated that all member evaluations were complete when in fact they were not. On that basis, he concluded that the EOI was appropriate. 'his brought a heated response from the DCP's spokesman, Mr. hvore, who focused on the fact that "certain parties" might i try to use this sort of report as an indication that the DCP t l was trying to cover up its failure to qualify the slabs. During this exchange, which lasted the better part of an hour, j Mr. Moore and other members of the DCP repeatedly urged Dr. Cloud to consult with them before committing this type of EO7 to paper. They further stated that 1.1 RLCA had done so in 2 this instance, the DCP would have made clear that it had not j yet completed its evaluations of the slabs for in-plane loadings, and hence an EOI would have been unnecessary. l In addition to pressing RLCA to consult with the DCP prior to issuing its EOI's, Mr. Moore strongly urged Dr. Cloud to i alter the language of the " Significance of Concern" item in EOI l 1132. The DCP's position was that the EOI should simply state l that the slabs were not yet qualified for in-plane loads, omitting all references to the inaccurate statements in the Schedule and the misleadin'g nature of the Final Report. I Clearly responding to considerable pressure, Dr. Cloud ultimately agreed to reconsider the language of the EOI. l Furthermore, Mr. Ron Wray of Teledyne Engineering Services ("TES") observed that TES, as Program Manager, had not yet accepted the EOI and that its contents were therefore subject to revision. l l l

J '.} 6 .go as ~' Q Harold Denton Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation June 23, 1983 Page 3 e e i i There are several aspects of these discussions which the Joint Intervenors find especially troubling. The insistence of the DCP that the IDVP " clear" its preliminary conclusions with the Project prior to issuance of an EOI is wholly improper. This suggestion is reminiscent of PGandE's editorial review of i the Cloud Report which gave rise to our concerns about RLCA's independence almost eighteen months ago. The purpose of an EOI is to document discrepancies for subsequent resolution. Once i an EDI is issued, the DCP has every opportunity to respond and, l if possible, to justify the existence of the discrepancy. On the other hand, if these issues are resolved behind closed j doors, in private off-the-record discussions with the IDVP, i neither the NRC, the parties to the Diablo Canyon proceeding, l nor the public generally will be informed about or have an opportunity to evaluate the concerns or the appropriateness of i the resolution. Indeed, the very reason for an independent audit -- to ensure that the errors and discrepancies which had remained hidden from public view in the past will be fully disclosed and corrected -- would be frustrated if the DCP's suggested " pre-screening" procedure were adopted. t l The improper and undesirable effect of such a proposal is j well illustrated by the specific context in which the June 14th j discussions arose -- EOI 1132. The position of the DCP -- that i j prict discussions could have obviated the need for an EDI or 1 resulted in an EOI~that merely noted the necessity for l j qualification of slabs -- is indicative of a fundamental i misunderstanding of not only the specific EOI, but the basic j purpose of the IDVP. The significance of this item was not simply (1) that the slabs had not been properly qualified, but ) (2) that the DCP Schedule erroneously indicated building member evaluations were complete, and (3) that the Final Report was sufficiently ambiaucus to reinforce the erroneous statement in the Schedule. Each of these matters warrants concern and, l thus, should be documented through an EOI. i The DCP personnel repeatedly stated that an EDI was unnecessary because the discrepancy was simply the result of poor communication between the DCP and the IDVP. Even assuming j that to be true, this EOI is significant because it raises the J generic concern of whether additional representations of i completed work may also have been made by the DCP where the ] work is not in fact complete. The existence of this and other I i i i .ww -,--,.n,-.~..,n,.,-,c - n- ., ~.

(8 m,) ... J.* Harold Denton Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation June 23, 1983 Page 4 L' such representations is particularly significant in light of the importance that the DCP has attached to its three-step licensing schedule in order to obtain reissuance of the low power license at the earliest possible date, notwithstanding the fact that numerous safety-related modifications and critical reports remain incomplete. The DCP would obviously prefer that the concern underlying EOI 1132 never be revealed to the NRC, the parties, or the public. Its preference, however, is inconsistent with the basic principle of independence so critical to the IDVP. The kind of pressure exerted on the IDVP by the DCP personnel at the June 14 meeting.-- pressure sufficiently great to cause the IDVP to reconsider the language in EOI 1132 -- will undermine the progress of the audit and public confidence in the integrity of the its findings. We trust-that adequate steps will be taken to address the concerns discussed above, including procedural safeguards to ensure that the DCP is not permitted to pre-screen EOIs or, through' improper pressure, to cause the nondisclosure of information and/or safety concerns discovered by the IDVP. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Sincerely, delR. Reynolds Counsel to the Joint Intervenors JR:av Enclosure cc: Diablo Canyon Service List

1.. Gate reporteo to PGLE anc IES 6/6/8 (Originator) Semtmenthly Report No. Juna 1983-t

  • 2.g, Scheduled for RLCA1
3.. Resporrsive to PGLE recnnical Programi Tast

/- (if ' applicable) ~ 2+- 4. Prepared as a result of:

a. E3 QA Audit.and Review Report of
b. t3 Field Inspection Deficiency
c. t3 Independent ~ Calculation Deficiency
d. C3 Seismic Input Deficiency
e. O Design Methodology Deficiency-e
f. E.0ther Deficiency 5.

Structure (s), system (s) or component (s) involved: Auxiliary Building (Corr'setive Action Program) 6. Description of Concern: The joint DCP/IDVP Schedule, EPS-816A Revision 3, ' dated 5/16/83. states ~ DCP completion of the auxiliary building member ivaluations. ~' ' i The PGandE Final Report, May 18, 1983, reports DCP completion of the auxiliary building member evaluations: c-Page 2.1.2-12 .. Appendix 2A recommends criteria for evaluation of auxiliary building shear wall and floor disphragms for in-plane seismic forces..." Jage 2.1.2-16 .. Typical results for the critical slabs and beams are t - given in Tables 2.1.2-25, 26 and 27 for DE,.DDE,,and Hosgri events, respectively..." Page 2.1.2-17 ..The slab capacities for the in-plane effects are eval-usted according to the guideline of Appendix 2A." Page 2.1.2-21 ..The auxiliary building slabs, walls / columns and lead dissipation to the foundations were evaluated for criteria given J' in Section 2.1.2.2." ~ ... Tables 2.1.2-25, 26, and 27 indicate that the slabs can adequately resist' the =aximum loads imposed by the criteria..." The DCP list of qualification analyses does not include an evaluatt en of alabs for in-plane loadings. In addition, at the June 1,1983 Civil / Structural meeting in Boston, the DCP delineated a revised model to qualify all sla6s for in-plane loadings. This model was required because the slabs ceuld not be qualified with the loads obtained from the original stick models. 6 P d 4 l y, a J j J. Page 1 of 2 7~ ',, b _...,-,..,__,._.7..,_._.y,,,-,,,,_ .m _.._m,_-_ m.,___,...._,,.,,,,,,--_m ,,,,.____,y._, ...,_-c.,_

r k s e e.evn.an..o. u !<.I.D L0a'te reportad to PG&E.and TES 2 6/A/82 T. Sch2duled fo'r C atcA (Originator) Semimonthly Report No. Iun,1983 i '3.* Responsive to PG&E Tecnnical Program: Task (if app.licable) 4 Prepared as a result of: a.-O QA Audit and Review Report of

b. Q -Field Inspection Deficiency
c. O Independent Calculation Deficiency-
d. O Seismic Input Deficiency.

g

e. O Design Methodology Deficiency-
f. s.0ther Deficiency S.

Structure (s), system (s) or component (s) involved: [' Auxiliary Building (Corrective Action Program) a l Z. Significance of Concern: i. The're is no present concern,with the engineering analysis of the slabs. l. This item is a design area 'which was reported.by the DCP, to be complete and acceptable. Mcwever, the slabs require additional analyses as stated at the June 1, 1983 meeting.. The significance of the concern is that required corrective action was'not fully implemented, yet reported as couplete. IIR #8' Revision 0 requires the IDVP to verify t' hat the DCP corrective , action, program has been fully implemented. This aspect of ITR #8 was acccmplished as fo116ws: a.. Select. samples from lists of completed desigrt work b.~ Sample each category of work following completion of the entire, scope" t e ) 6 Recommendation: RLCA will continue the review in the civil / structural area to assure that the Corrective Action Program is fully implemented, as required n by the program plan. I s

7

} y f~ e . Page 2 of 2 I 9. Signature: b eL_ $ _[ f.3 (Orig inator/ Organ ization)

.e, j i JUL 121983 s s Jcel Reynolds, Esquire Center For Law In The Public Interest 10951 West Pico Boulevard Ill RESP 0!lSE REFER Los Angeles, CA 90064 TO F01A-83-267

Dear Hr. Reynolds:

~ This is in response to your letter dated May 16, 1983, in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, all documents associated with the anonymous allegations regarding the Diablo Canyon !!uclear Power Plant sub.titted by David S. Fleischaker on fiarch 28, 1983. 1 Documents 1 through 5 are already available for inspection and copying at the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) located at 1717 H Street, N.W., Washington, DC Copies of documents 6 through 8 are being placed in the PDR.

f The NRC has not completed its review of the remaining documents subject to your request. We will respond as soon as that review is completed.

ga The NRC has not prepared a response to the allegations. Sincerely, (r.rwu1.x.Femt[ J. M. Felton, Director Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration

Enclosure:

Appendix 4 q q s qm ge ft or t-v / W ( & VV N7)~(I DISTRIBUTION DRR Rdg PDR DRR subj QiSchierling] PGNorry RFortuna ECShomaker DHGrimsley A SDIsaacs I VWilson

  • Concurred by telephone

/"i 1 ADMRI NRR ,,,0,I,.. . 6m{:QRR,?,,', ,,6Q';}) DRR o,,.ce > sur.uaue >..S..D...I.s.a.a...c.s /..s m 1hDHGf,im'sley .y................ wVW... ilson... 4 RFo r.t.u..na...... on 7.. . /. 5 /83 7/...'.\\ W83 7 .../....... 8 3 .. 7../..r..'./. 83.... 7../...c, /. 8. 3......... oata > q........... NRC FORM M po.q NRCM ONO OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usw. mi-us.= t.

.v. P Appendix ,FOIA-83-267 1. 5/4/83 Transcript of NRC Meeting with Pacific Gas and Electric Co. in San Francisco, CA, pages 3/4 'and 135/136 (See Board Notification 83-69, dated May 18,1983) Accession No. 8305250186. f 2. 4/21/83 Letter to D. S. Fleischaker from D. G. Eisenhut, Accession No. 8305180622. 3. 4/4/83 Board Notification, Memorandum to NRC Commissioners from D. G. Eisenhut BN-83-48, Accession No. 830407045, 4. 4/15/83 Letter.to D. G. Eisenhut from P. A. Crane (PG&E), Accession No. 8304190165. 5. 5/4/83 Board Notification, Memorandum to NRC Commissioners from D. G. Eisenhut. Accession No. 8305200266. 6. 4/12/83 Memo to R. H. Volmer from J. P. Knight. 4/27/83 Meeting Notice tiemorandum to G. W. Knighton from H. E. Schierling. 7. L 8. 4/28/83 Letter to D. G. Eisenhut from D. S. Fleischaker. E

V'TELEDYNE UNCONTROLLED COPY MIETING ANN 00NCEME :T

)b ;/lMU(1 DEPARTMENT 0
NPP *DVP BY i*. E. Cooper /J. C. Cracin-

SUBJECT:

IDVP Closure 45 Fremont Street LG ATION: San Francisec, CA R00f': 2nd Floor, Roc-L Wednesday, July 27, 1983 DATE: Thursday, July 28, 1983 TIV.E : 9:00 - 4:30cm (See at achment'; TES. R' CA, DCP PAP.TICIPAT:TS : AGENDA: A) Discus ion of IDVP Closure Plan (7/27, 9:00 - 12:00aN e 1) Status of present review of DCP CA? work by RLCA/TES

2) Generic E01's a) Method of closure b)

Field verification recuirements 3) Issuance and Revision; of ITR's

4) Clarification of completion Sample a) Samole selection criteria b)

Field verification requirements c) Schedule 'or selection of completion sa ples B) Discuss Implenentation of Closure Plan by Discipline Areas (5ee Attachment)

  • IDVP to takt the lead in presenting their closure plan.

Recipients: G. A. Maneatis H. R. Denton J. B. Martin H. E. Schierling P.. R. Fray E. Denison R. F. Reedy F. Sestak M. J. Strumwasser D. F. Fleischaker J. Reynolos/J. R. Phillion

5. Nc-ton A. ". Gen-()D i.. C. Hubba'd i

J. noesse-4.e -a c ho\\) 's307220334'830727 PDR ADOCK 05000275 P PDR 1 0

m. m ELEDYNE UNCONTROLLED COPY ENG!NEERIN3 SER\\CEE MEETI!i3 ASEtiDA 70F. Ill?LEl1EtiTATIO!i 0F CLOSURE P' AN Date Time

  • Outstanding Areas of CAP Review 3y :37? E
o
aoletion 5amale 7/27 1:00 - 3:03pm Piping

- Large Bore Stress - Large Bore Supports - Small Bore Stress - Small Bore Supports 3:00 - 4:33pm Equipment (11e:hanical Equipment, Ele:trical Equipment and ins ruments, and HVA: equipment) 7/28 9:00 - 12:00 civil /Stru:tural - Containment Annulus - Con ainmen-tion-Annulus - Aur,iliary Buildin; - Tur'ine Building o - Fuel Handling Building - Intake structure *- 1:00 - 3:00pm Civil Supports / Rupture Re:traints - HVA: Supports - Raceway Supports - Ruoture Restraints - Instrument Tubing Supports 3:00 - 4:30pm Soils (HLA Work) - Outdoor Water 5torage Tanks - Aux. 5altwater Lines - Diesel Fuel Oil Tanks

  • Times are tentative and will be adjusted as necessary to at:om:odate actual discussions.
    • Related to :37? Soils Review l

t l

e n=uaruz 1 UNCONTR0llED COPY MiETINC ANr:0'JNCEMEt:T y,z; l;fVD A - Q n," DEPART.H l:T' DONPP 9ye By 'r.'. E. Cooper /J. O. Cracinl

SUBJECT:

IDVP Closu e 45 Fremont Street LOCATIO!!: San Franciscc, CA ROOM: 2nd Flcor, Room L Wednesday,,,' DATE: 1hursday, 31 rigg: 9:00 - 4:30pm (See attachment) PAP.TICIPA?;TS : TES. RLCA, DCP AGEf;DA: A) Discussion of IDVP Closure Plane (7/27, 9:00 - 12:00a-) 1) Ststus of present review: of DCP CAP work by RLCA/TES

2) Generic E0I's a) Method of closure b)

Field verification requirements 3) Issuance and, Revisions of ITR's

4) Clarificati6n of completion Sample a)

Samole selection criteria b) Field verification requirements c) Schedule for selection of completion samples B) Discuss Implenentation of Closure Plan by Dis:iipline Areas (See Atta:hment) ~

  • ID'/P to takt the lead in presenting their closure plan.

[ I Recipients: G. A. Maneatis p/-{-1., M, h.A H. R. Denton J. B. Martin ~., i H. E. Schierling R. R. Fray ~, ;q.t.;a.s l E. Denison ~ R. F. Reedy -? ! '. l. 4 V C F. Sestak M. J. Strumwasser D. F. Fleischaker J. Reynolds/J. R. Pr,illips B. I;o' ton ('. 's-( ..z, _fm A. F. Gebr s T.. C. Hubba-d .; C):% ~ p v ' L' J. Reesse'. 3

c. 3 c..

,m. yf A. e, -e.- t,. a af f (. c6

c. -

'A 1 4 .o. i

c.... :. ('..t. :

b.

m e =0YNE UNCONTROLLED COW ENG!NEERIN3 SERVCEE ...' ~ ' MIETII;3 ASE! DA FOR IIl?LE!!EtiTATIOi 0F CLOSURE P' AN Date Time

  • Outstandinc; Areas of CAP Review 3y IDY? E

~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ - Co:soletion 5smo1e 7/27 1:00 - 3:00pm Piping - Large Bore Stress - Large Bore Supports ' - Small Bore Stress - Small Bore Supports 3:00 - 4:}]pm Equipment (itechanical Equipment, Ele:trical Equipment and instruments, and HVAC equipment) ~ 7/28 9:00 - 12:00 civil / Structural - Containment Annulus - Containmen: fian-Annulus - Aur.iliary Building - Turbine Building - Fuel Handling Building - Intake Structure ** 1:00 - 3:00pm Civil Supports / Rupture Restraints - HVA: Supports - Raceway Supports - Rupture Restraints - Instrument Tubing Supports 3:00 - 4:30pm Soils (H'_A Work) - Outdoor Water Storage Tanks - Aux. Saltwater Lines - Diesel Fuel Oil Tanks t

  • Times are tentative and will be adjusted as'necessary to accommodate actual discussions.
    • Related to IDVP Soils Review 9

"RTR FDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES c v&u ;9p @, 9 MEETING ANN 0UNCEMENT UNCONTROLLED COPY DEPARTMENT DCNPP-IDVP BY W. E. Cooper /J. Q. Cragin .C DCP Rupture Restraint Program 45 Fremont Street _~~ ~ - lt00M: 26th Floor - Conf. Room D37 LOCATION: San Francisco, CA 1:00 - 3 00 pm Thursday, July 21, 1983 TIME: DATE: TES, M,D@ PARTICIPANTS: AGENDA: 1. Pipe Rupture Restraints a. GAP Calculations b. U-Bolt Calculations 3-51 and 3-52 c. Miscellaneous Questions Recipients: G. A. Maneatis H. R. Denton J. B. Martin H. E. Schierling R. R. Fray l E. Denison l R. F. Reedy ( F. Sestak l M. J. Strumwasser D. F. Fleischaker J. Reynolds/J. R. Phillips B. Norton A. C. Gehr R. B. Hubbard J. Roesset M. Axelrad \\h -8307190044 MO719 Ol f PDR ADOCK 05000275 P PDR l l

5 GIN 5EiilNG SERVICES ? - 1, MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT UNCONTROLEO COPY ..E. Cooper /J.Q.CragingOsc W DEPARTMENT DCNPP-IDVP BY DCP Rupture Restraint Program 45 Fremont Street LOCATION: San Francisco, CA i ROOM: 26th Floor - Conf. Room D37 1:00 - 3:00 pm Thursday, July 21, 1983 TIME: DATE: TES, M,D@ PARTICIPANTS: 0 AGENDA: 1. Pipe Rupture Restraint h, hdf a. GAP Calculations q b. U-Bolt Calculations 3-51 and 3-52 c. Miscellaneous Questions OS k4, k / Q( b 0, UM ON ." R. J. B. Martin / (Q 1 n on ( H. E. Schierling s( Q gd [ R. R. Fray (,. E. Denison L R. F. Reedy F. Sestak M. J. Strumwasser D. F. Fleischaker S q /0 J. Reynolds/J. R. Phillips 7 I4 B. Norton i A. C. Gehr R. B. Hubbard J. Ro et 7 0 Oc y n

.....\\ ( ~

. u v gus09 W g {,.

Dtcket No. 99900920/83-03 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Advanced Energy Systems Division ATTN: H. Arnold General Manager P. O. Box 10864 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236 Gentlemen: This refers to the inspection. conducted by Mr. G. T. Hubbard of this office on June 21, 1983, of your facility at Large, Pennsylvania, and to the discussions of our findings with Mr. N. R. Pfeifer. This inspection consisted of witnessing the seismic testing of a Hagan Manual / Auto Station for the Diablo Canyon Unit 1 Nuclear Power Station. Specific areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of proced'ures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. Within the scope of this inspection, we found no instance where you failed to meet NRC requirements. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any information that you believe to be exempt from disclosure under 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4), it is necessary that you (a) notify this office by telephone within 10 days from the date of this letter of your intention to file a request for withholding; and (b) submit within 25 days from the date of this letter a written application to this office to withhold such information. If your receipt of this letter has been delayed such that less than 7 days are available for your review, please notify this office promptly so that a new due date may be established. Consistent with Section 2.790(b)(1), any such application must be accompanied by an affidavit executed by the owner of the information which identifies the document or part sought to be withheld, and which contains a full statement of the reasons on the basis which it is claimed that the information should be withheld from RIV EQS SC:EQS BC:VPB D:0 % P/ GTHubbard/lk HSPhillips UPotapovs RLdan'gdtt p / 83 /g/83 g/ /83 (,7//t/83.v s I M,Y

  1. m s.m 7

unn,wJt t

Westinghouse Electric Corporation Advanced Energy Systems Division public disclosure. This section further requires the statement to address with specificity the considerations listed in 10 CFR 2.790(b)(4). The information sought to be withheld shall be incorporated as far as possible into a separate part of the affidavit. If we do not hear from you in this regard within tne specified periods noted above, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room. Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you. Sincerely, Original Signed Byn lis Potapove Ubldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Program Branch

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A - Inspection Report No. 99900920/83-03 2. Appendix B - Inspection Data Sheets (2 pages) bcc: JTCollins, RIV RLBangart, RIV JEGagliardo, RIV TFWesterman, RIV MIS Section (J. Perry) VPB Branch Chief VPB Section Chiefs VPB Inspector DMB-IE: 09 SDRichardson, OIE-ORP RFHeishman, OIE-RCB NBle, OIE-RCB WSFarmer, RES GBagchi, NRR-EQB VSNoonan, NRR-EQB RGlaGrange, NRR-EQB LDBustard, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM JE$chierling, NRR-OL JCHobel, Westinghouse Electric Corporation Power Systems P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 l t

s ) ORGANIZATION: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEMS DIVISION LARGE, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT INS'PECTION INSPECTION Nn - oconno?n/A3 n1 DATF(S) 6/21/83 ON-SITE HOURS: 8 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS: Westinghouse Electric Corporation i Advanced Energy Systems Division ATTN: H. Arnold, General fianager P. O. Box 10864 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236 ORGANIZATIONAL CONTACT: J. L. Koetting, Manager, Product Assurance TELEPHONE NUffBER: (412) 892-5600 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Seismic and dynamic qualification testing. NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: The Westinghouse Advanced Energy Systems Division (W-AESD) engineering laboratory pr6vides seismic and dynamic qualificaticn testing services of safety-related components and parts for nuclear power plants. ASSIGNED INSPECTOR: M2k kV/f 3 G. T. Hubbard, Equipment Qualification Secticn Date (EQS) OTHER INSPECTOR (S): APPROVED BY: , /_ / Ms) b!N l H. S. FniYlips, Chief, EQS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE: A. BASES: 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B. I B. SCOPE: This inspection consisted of: (1) review cf two seismic qualifi-cation test plans, STP-069 Part I and Part II; (2) witnessing cf seismic I l tests; ano (3) verification of test ccmpletion in accordance with 10 CFR l Part 50, Appendix B and W-AESP quality assurance (QA) program requirements. i l l PLANT SITE APPLICABILITY: l Docket No. 50-275. _ r i^ % f W s ^n f l ,5

ORGANIZATION: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEMS DIVISION LARGE, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT INSPECTION NO.: 99900920/83-03 RESULTS: PAGE 2 of 4 A. VIOLATIONS: s-None B. NONCONFORMANCES: None C. UNRESOLVED ITEMS: None D. OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS: 1. Test Program: The purpose of the testing was to seismically qualify a Hagan Manual / Auto (MA) Station to the most recent seismic requirements for Diablo Canyon Unit 1 nuclear power station. The seismic testing was performed in accordance with approved procedures " Seismic Qualification Test Plan of M/A Station for Diablo Canyon Project, Part I," STP (Seismic Test Plan)-069, dated June 1983. Functional testing of the M/A station during the seismic tests was performed in accordance with the requirements of " Seismic Qualification Test Plan for Diablo Canyon," STP-069, Part II, dated June 1983. Westinghouse Nuclear Technology Division (W-NTD) had overall responsibility for the test effort. Westinghouse Nuclear Systems Instrumentation Division (W-NSID) was responsible for functional testing of the M/A station during the testing. W-AESD's responsibilities were for the actual performance of the seismic test and data recording. 2. Test Item: The test specimen was a Hagan M/A station which was specially modified for Fischer control loops. The M/A station was identified as model number 124, tag number HC-86, item 149, board section 2VB3, serial number 145, assembly 4111081-601. The test specimen was installed in a test fixture which simulated the vibrational characteristics of the main ' control panel at Diablo Canyon.

ORGANIZATION: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEMS DIVISION LARGE, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT INSPECTION N0.: 99900920/83-03 RESULTS: PAGE 3 of 4 3. Test Setup: Testing was performed on W-AESD's magnesium (MAG)- shaker table. This table provides a simulated three dimensional environment for test specimens. Table driving force is provided by a single hydraulic cylinder at an actuation angle of 35 26' from the horizontal axis of the table surface. The test fixture was attached to the table at a 45 degree angle to the horizontal component of the table driving force. This test setup provided equal input forces to the test fixture for all three (X, Y, and Z) axes of vibration. 4. Test Results: M/A station seismic testing was conducted on June 21, 1983, and consisted of one sine sweep test with the sweep going from 1 hertz (HZ) to 50 HZ and back to 1 HZ. Following the sine sweep tests, five operating basis earthquate (0BE) tests were performed using a "multifrequency multi-axial" sine beat input tape provided by W-NTD. Frequency ranges of the input tape were 1 HZ to 32.95 HZ. After the OBE tests were performed, four safe shutdcwn earthquake (SSE) tests were perf w ed using the same type of input tape, but at higher "G" levels than the OBE tests. Between each of the SSE tests, the test fixture, including the test specimen, were rotated 90 degrees clockwise (looking down on the table) from the previous test position. One deviation from the approved test plans was coserved during inspection of the test setup. This deviation had to do with the location 'of input and response accelerometers. Their locations for the testing were not in accordance with the approved test plans; however, proper approval of the locations used during testing were obtained and the deviation was properly documented. 5. Inspection Results: The NRC inspection was accomplished by discussions w;tn personnel from W-AESD, W-NTD, W-NSID, anc Pacific Gas and Electric Company; review of test plans, data ano documentation; and witnessing of test operations. The results of this inspection are as follows:

ORGANIZATION: WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION ADVANCED ENERGY SYSTEMS DIVISION LARGE, PENNSYLVANIA REPORT INSPECTION N0.: 99900920/83-03 RESULTS: PAGE 4 of A a. Siesmic testing was accomplished in accordance with approved test procedures. b. One test deviation was observed and it was properly identified, reviewed, approved, and documented in accordance with W-AESD procedures. c. No nonconformances were identified relative to the control of testing in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, W-AESD QA program and IEEE Standard 344-1975.

PERSONS CONTACTED %"e 2 / ^ /90 company We st % g b e-r e-}h's n r*dEne O Y}lu it. ' ~ Dates ly ste se MPO.,e //v & J Docket / Report No.99Td8 92d/I8d 83 Inspector Page / of

  1. ME(Please Print)

TIT 1.E(Please Print) ORGANIZATION (Please Print) Wk SE/fE2 * ~ EAftet SUG/Nf' ER 8uR8/uryf$hk$a ~ m % 4m E&A W. N)T2:> T. K. b u 3 W.T.b ud S exie E ~ ; 4 a,

e. m e o. CLt. Amt.- Kro A. C. d e A s t-Peowser YiSA.

tH usdea coeeAnws& D. p4. /%ma Ensma a PGa4E, MeM4%c Oyi: k. W. k ( Lt bj G E!IN 6tN s s/L Eq.Qu n t_-class IE s'ET.-NSIC 0L fdaw se sL..- se-na us,.A~ Ai $AEsb c3. om - %.s ic syst. E J.(J. Snuseer ea.iu s a. 3 i WP. Sremt wsv Emo ut FW b me,w m5vs.ho.

9. \\lu -

O, bets a

pa$e*", yf kos 8 pe/ttorlule._ -__ a oocut1ctns cxattitte0 II 1 2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3 .4 I ~J Seism > c Qnl<'fic 1.'o-Test //ax af h/4 HaMon for _Taef3 Ld 9,'a.ble (noc yr.,. Pwjec t, f < TI. S TIG -bG9. 2 y,we<ab'_f. Labs' Test Record L u Boal<- th>-Wij z 1 for I t-r ~ 3 f A t A e # :s :7,'o .1h e e t So e 0 aIol-G ~ - Te> r ' //1 f 5 n _3 se:s -.'e. % I.'RcJ, - TeJ P4-fa< p,'-h Ca nysn x~, <. f 3 feu D_ fff-0G9 b r7$ 5 l ~5 _ pa t Sheois for Hwa tia na I/A.J' ft4'o^ f/Ds4 &'2/-YI ~ (, 3 f,n a 1,'cos a -.I fol;cies if En,;,,eer;<,a L. abs take:e> Pes /. M, <<h 11 Rev & f >< Cutra et Ies T'np few s'c'es, E [I 79'? Document Types: Columns: 1. Dr. siinq S. Purchas Order ~1. Sequential item fiumber 2. sp <ification 6. Internal llemo ?. Type of Document 3. Pi <>r erf or <- 7. Letter 3. Da te of Document 4. f)T tunna l 8. Other (Speci fy-i f necessary) 4. Revision (If applicable) l

,s O D1STR1BUTI0il Cencral File r,rg j sg gg ORB 1 File D. Eisenhut OELD E. Jordan D. Fischer-Mr. J. J. Sheppard, Chaiman C. ParViih Westinghouse Owners Group 11 SIC _ c/o Carolina Power & Light. Company.. J..Taylat..... 411 Fayetteville Street ACRS (10)~ P. O. Box 1551 G. Lainas Raleigh,I; orth Carolina 27602 S. Varga p u nonua- % enc)) =

Dear Mr. Sheppard:

O-The fiRC staff has reviewed the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) generic - design modification to provide. automatic reactor trip system actuation of-the breaker shunt trip attachments. The details of this modification were provided to the liRC by letter dated June 14, 1983, from J. J. She? pard (WOG Chairman) to D. G. Eisenhut (Director, DL). The staff considers autocatic actuation of the reactor trip breaker shunt coil trip attachment to be a safety related function. Therefore, the circuitry used to implement this function must be Class IE. Our review consisted of an evaluation of the WOG design modification for confomance to the criteria of IEEE Standard 279-1971 " Criteria for Protection Systems for fluclear Power Generating Stations." Based on our review, we conclude that the generic design is acceptable and our Safety Evaluation Report on .the proposed generic design is enclosed. Although the proposed generic design is applicable to most Westinghouse plants, specific design information will be required for each individual plaat incorporating the automatic shunt ' trip modification. The required plant-specific infomation is identified in the enclosed Safety Evaluation and sumari::ed in the attachment to our safety evaluation. Per our discussioqs-with you and your recommendation, copies will be trans-mitted by you to all Westinghouse owners for their use when responding to Generic Letter 83-28 " Required Actions Sased on Generic Implications of. Salem ATUS Events." Sincerely, ....g ri );c' U' "}ed'f'. .f. l L.am f,r/ M *1 m q ~ + i~. ' 4 /) {9 l'arrell G. Eisenhut, Director m -i Division of Licensing ce of Mucicar Reactor hgulation 7.3 Safety Evaluation Report f( l NW cc w/ enclosure: .See next page SEE PREVIOUS C0t4CURRE';CES* ADi g 0Rk Ddt (DiiB 1 Q "FR5ss" ORB 10/4-I ICSB* AD/RP* I 3 ... l............... "..g...'Ust'6ii' I ".Gl"eiriif' [26sWinI0t

  • 'f0FiihTr7?s" "Xgeg3J RH6

, s.w e g.'j. .g.... .j.g......g. o %.................. i. .........,.............l.. .j..t...... e x r-=..tsa o:.= r c e:u CFFICIAL RECORD COPY .w: % -w

AUG 10,1951 2-cc: Bruce King WiiSID Box 2728 Pittsburgh; PA 15:30'.- G. A. Copp Duke Power liuclear Prod. Dept. 422 S. Church St. Charlotte, l4C 28242 G I 0 = a ,e .}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20211E007&oldid=4010559"