ML20210U023
| ML20210U023 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palisades  |
| Issue date: | 03/22/1984 |
| From: | Jorgensen B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210T938 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-266 NUDOCS 8606020155 | |
| Download: ML20210U023 (1) | |
Text
....... -...
.n....~.w.
,,.,,,..s,.,.v.u.
,sn
- n.,w.
.~
, 4.
.y_,
is as..-
g..' 8 8 6.,
g i.
. o.11 81:
,j t # 5 8. !'rs
- 'F
' t i11;Y 8 :f f.*,1.11SSIOlJ
' "' }
p. J l11
{<'
q
'4h,,[
J.
re.'.!:vtLTi:ot.u
+%,
-.g r.u s' r uvr.', it urmis r.ntar 1
?! arch 22, 1984 i
i Memorandum For:
W. D. Shafer, Chief, Projects Branch 2 l
l From:
B. L. Jorgensen, Senior Resident Inspector SUR. LECT PALISADES LER 83-74: 1:AIN STEAK! SAFETY VALVES i
i 4
I have been advised by Walt Paulson, NRR Project Manager, that technical i
reviuw at MRR concluded the referenced report does not constitute identification J
of a ge'atric issue. No other LER's relating to this or similar problems have i
been received.
The NRR review impugns the 1981 safety valve testing performed
~
by CPCo end suppor.ts a crAictusion the 1983 test results represent the actual i
valve conditions (many high lif t retpoints) during. Cycle 5 operations.
If this is se, the licensee was in noncompliance with Technical Specification i
3.1. 7. t, tequiring 23 of 24 valves " operable" within specified lif t setpoint 1
Idmits, in that.14 of the valves would not have lifted in the prescribed pressure brnd.
t; i
The R.RC sh.culd consider a request to DE in RIII to review this matter.
So j
far as I know, the "what if" questions about potential overpressurizations duritig the past cycle have not been examined.
That is, how significant is the nonec:xp*if ance represented by this LER?
l f
B. L. Jorgensen 4
Senior Resident Inspector i
l-t i
i i
8606020155 860016 r
0,b'
.