ML20210E104

Responds to 860613 Memo Re Review of Three New or Revised Isaps Concerning Hot Functional Testing Data Packages, Receipt & Storage of Purchased Matl & Equipment & Onsite Fabrication

ML20210E104
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	07/13/1986
From:	Johnson E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Noonan V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20209E570	List: IA-86-657, Advises of Meetings Scheduled for 850701,10,17 & 31 in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Util Program Plan.Nrc Response Will Be Sent to Util by 850807 ML20209E567 ML20209F940 ML20209F945 ML20209G005 ML20209J318 ML20210A660 ML20210A729 ML20210A774 ML20210B207 ML20210B978 ML20210C077 ML20210C318 ML20210C513 ML20210C590 ML20210C696 ML20210D123 ML20210D374 ML20210D403 ML20210D459 ML20210D880 ML20210E104 ML20210R211 ML20210S437 ML20211H073
References
FOIA-86-657 NUDOCS 8702100229
Download: ML20210E104 (2)

Text

- .

JUL > b 1986 I;EtiORANDL'ti FOR: V. S. hecnan, Director PWR Project Directorate #5, Divisicn of PWR Licensing-A FFCM: E. H. Johnson, Of rector, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects, Region IV SubJE.CT : REVIEW OF THREE I4EW GR REVISED ISAPS - C0ftANCHE PEAK In response to your June 13, 1986 memo same subject as above, we have the following coments:

A. ISAP III.a.1 (Revision 4) - Hot Functional Testing Data Packages Ward Smith has indicated that he has no comments. He also does not believe that the comments by Mr. Halonson should be forwarded to TUGCo.

fir. Malonson's comments can, for the most part, be answered by review of the CPRT files. It is suggested that you discuss Mr. Ward's comment with Mr. Malonson and have him contact Ward Smith.

D. ISAP VII.a.9 (Revision 0) - Receipt and Storage of Purchased Material and Equipment We do not consider that this ISAP appropriately . addresses original Region IV concerns on this subject, in that it does not provide for detailed assessment of compliance of vendor items / components with procure-ment document requirements. The applicant has indicated that the ISAP will be revised and should provide a schedule for submittal.

C. ISAP VII b.1 (Revision 2) - Onsite Fabrication Sections 4.1.1.1 and 4.1.1.2 address concerns which may be evaluated by review of tabrication document packoges or by review of precedures, surveillances, and audit records. However, the TRT findings are concerned with ongoing activities within the fab shop which may not have resulted in documentetton e.g.,

1. Shop foremen lacking knowledge of shop procedures.

2. Craf t being asked to perform work without knowledge of paperwork.

3. Failure to comply with material traceability or identity requirements.

4. Fabrication not in accordance with procedures.

(21 f) % M /

g, . h 8/.W RIV:RSB9

/ ,0kSP s TFWesterman:gb E 7 //6/06 l'HJohnson

/,(/c6 3' ,

0702100229 070129 POR 0$ deb 657 Fu , L i v . V ~ <; i

.. f,. Noonan However, in view of the above specific concerns by the TRT of onsite fabrication activity, within the fab shcp be evaluated in this ISAP or othei ISAPs.

Describe how these concerns will be addressed.

The TES (Malonson) comments have been reviewed by Region IV. The information requested should provide additional clarification to the details of the ISAP. Much of the informattan has previously been provided orally to Region IV personnel.

Ongc.i :..e . .

(pmca L r.u:

E. H. Johnson, Director Division of Reactor Safety and Projects