ML20210C513

Discusses Review of Util 851122 Responses Including Qa/Qc Isaps.Comanche Peak Review Team Program Plan Consistent W/ 10CFR50,App B

ML20210C513
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	12/18/1985
From:	Hale C NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To:	Noonan V NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20209E570	List: IA-86-657, Advises of Meetings Scheduled for 850701,10,17 & 31 in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Util Program Plan.Nrc Response Will Be Sent to Util by 850807 ML20209E567 ML20209F940 ML20209F945 ML20209G005 ML20209J318 ML20210A660 ML20210A729 ML20210A774 ML20210B207 ML20210B978 ML20210C077 ML20210C318 ML20210C513 ML20210C590 ML20210C696 ML20210D123 ML20210D374 ML20210D403 ML20210D459 ML20210D880 ML20210E104 ML20210R211 ML20210S437 ML20211H073
References
FOIA-86-657 NUDOCS 8702090403
Download: ML20210C513 (2)

Text

.

4 *.9 i

l 3

l I3 / -

'l Ii MEMORANDUM FOR:

.':) I Vincent S. Noonan, Director, Comanche Peak Project FRCH:

C. J. Hale, QA/QC Group Leader, Comanche Peak Project

SUBJECT:

REVIEW OF TUGCO NOVEMBER 22, 1985 RESPONSES-QA/QC AREA This review has included the QA/QC ISAPs, the quality aspects of those items in section VII of the CPRT Program Plan, and the CPRT umbrella QA program plan as described in Appendix G of the subject document. During this review I have interfaced (ISAPs). and exchanged comments with John Gilray (Appendix G) and Jim Malonson I have73reviewed page of 180 ofthe theresponses to each of the section VII concerns beginning on subject document.

to each of these concerns. I have obtained It appears that TUGCO has been responsive copies of the matrices referred to on these pages and provided copies to Jim Malonson for use in his review. Further, I have not reviewed disagree with the theconclusions draft of JimheMalonson's makes. Section 4.6 of the next SSER and do

> Appendix G describes accurately the QA program in place for control of CPRT activities.

The manuals implementing this program are the CPRT Program Plan (as amendedl, CPRT Policies and Guidelines (six at present), TERA's DAP manual, I and three ERC manuals (Comanche Peak Procedures, Quality Instructions, and the ERC corporate manual-site related).

This program is consistent with 10CFR Part 50, Appendix B, relative to the activities being performed by the CPRT. Based on my review, I believe the following items remain yet to be resolved:

1.

The CPRT Policies and Guidelines manual is the first level implementing document below the CPRT Program Plan, but is presently a draf t document.

2.

While the CPRT program is consistent with 10CFR Part 50, Appendix B, the NRC has not required such a conunitment, and thus must be prepared t

to defend the position of not making this a requirement.

3.

, Apart from the CPRT Program Plan there are no documented procedures or instructions related to SRT responsibilities and activities. One l activity that the SRT is apparently not planning is audits by themselves or by others of the CPRT activity for which they are responsible.

jQ *tA 6 $7 B//.

8702090403 870129 PDR FOIA CARDE86-657 PDR

[ ""'" > ................... ..................... ....... ............. .................... .....................

' can > .... ............

.... ............ ................... .................. ..................... . . . . .r....o t. .t.h. . . ,Q. .l. . .

. . .Q.

w.wan- = - = = = - - - -- - - - - - - - .'.) . .

cNhk '

I Discussion with J3hn Gilrcy indicstas his preliminary review of Appendix G is yielding results similar to those above. I will continue to interface with bot:a John and Jim as their reviews progress.

I C. J. '. ale .

i cc T. Westeman J. Malonson i

(

I i

i 1

l t

i k

1

. . . - . . . . ~ . . . - - . . . - . . . . _ . - - - - - . - , - . . . . . . - - . . . . . - , - . , . . _ . - . - - - . -