ML20210A729

Requests That Util Response to Cygna Findings Be Included in Review & Evaluation of Comanche Peak Review Team (Cprt) Program Plan & Incorporated Into Cprt Program Plan Sser. Draft Sser Still Due on 851223

ML20210A729
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	12/05/1985
From:	Noonan V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Calvo J, Calvo L, Shao L NRC
Shared Package
ML20209E570	List: IA-86-657, Advises of Meetings Scheduled for 850701,10,17 & 31 in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Util Program Plan.Nrc Response Will Be Sent to Util by 850807 ML20209E567 ML20209F940 ML20209F945 ML20209G005 ML20209J318 ML20210A660 ML20210A729 ML20210A774 ML20210B207 ML20210B978 ML20210C077 ML20210C318 ML20210C513 ML20210C590 ML20210C696 ML20210D123 ML20210D374 ML20210D403 ML20210D459 ML20210D880 ML20210E104 ML20210R211 ML20210S437 ML20211H073
References
FOIA-86-657 NUDOCS 8512230288
Download: ML20210A729 (2)

Text

.'/ 'o,, UNITED STATES p 8 a NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMM!SSION s l wasuinotow. o. c. 20sss

~s.,*****/

DEC9g125 MEMORANDUM FOR: L. Shao J. Calvo FROM: Vincent S. Noonan, Director PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR Licensing-A

SUBJECT:

APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO CYGNA'S FINDINGS l

Please include TUGC0's response to the CYGNA findings in your review and evaluation of the CPRT Program Plan and incorporate it into the CPRT Program Plan SSER. This will preclude the need for the NRC Staff to issue a ' separate SSER on the CYGNA issues at this time. The draft of this CPRT Program Plan SSER remains due on December 23, 1985.

~'

.o d ctor Projec Direc rate #5

• Division o PWR Licensing-A j cc: S. Burwell l

i i

fozn- ?? -" 7 l

V' T 5 i N 5 5 5 D 8 8 h l

/

STAFF COWENTS ON CPRT PROGRAM PLAN GEERAL:

. CTPREHENSIVE SCOPE STRUCTURED TO ADDRESS EXISTING Al0 FUTURE ISSUES PROGRAMATIC CONCERNS

. BREADTH OF DESIGN REVIEW NEEDS EXPANSION ALL EXTERNAL SOURCE ISSUES NOT EXPLICITLY ADDRESSED ACTION PLAN FOR DESIGN EVIEW 0F CABLE TRAY AND CONDUIT SUPPORTS NEEDS CLARIFICATION (EBASCO EFFORT)

. INCLUDESSER11(QA/0C)INPLAN EXPAND PLAN DESCRIPTION OF PIPING AND PIPE SUPPORT REANALYSIS PROGRAM CONDUCTED BY STONE AND WEBSTER l .

EVALUATION OF ISSUES SHOULD BE BASED ON FSAR C0mITENTS RATHER THAN SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE l'

CPRT OVERVIEW.0F TUGC0 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NOT DESCRIBED i

j .

CLEARER DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS NEEDED:

- CPRT TO CPSES PROICT l - GIBBS AND HILL (AE OF RECORD) AND STONE AND WEBSTER i

\

azn - 8& -"7 ah.

L

.