Text

Rev 0 to Procedure CP-QAP-18.4, Vendor Qualification& Surveillance. Related Info Encl
	ML20207A163
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Comanche Peak
Issue date:	07/31/1980
From:	; BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.)
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20206S800	List: ML20206S792; ML20206U969; ML20207A048; ML20207A055; ML20207A061; ML20207A073; ML20207A079; ML20207A084; ML20207A092; ML20207A099; ML20207A106; ML20207A111; ML20207A116; ML20207A121; ML20207A129; ML20207A135; ML20207A150; ML20207A154; ML20207A158; ML20207A163; ML20207A173; ML20207A178; ML20207A184; ML20207A193; ML20207A197; ML20207A203; ML20207A208; ML20207A212; ML20207A216; ML20207A221; ML20207A225; ML20207A229; ML20207A235; ML20207A240; ML20207A243; ML20207A249; ML20207A256; ML20207A261; ML20207A267; ML20207A273; ML20207A280; ML20207A283; ML20207A290; ML20207A294; ML20207A299; ML20207A306; ML20207A309; ML20207A312; ML20207A320; ML20207A325; ... further results
References
	FOIA-85-59 CP-QAP-18.4, NUDOCS 8607110434
	Download: ML20207A163 (171)
	v • d • e

.

uvoc

< m e. v.:.

.~

PROCEDURE ISSUE R N ON MER DATE PAGE BROWN AND ROOT, INC.

CPSES JOB 35-1195 CP-QA P-18. 4 0

1 of 8 8-6-80 TITLE.

ORIGINATOR:

b [.'Ag,,ws f(

f-J/-f-d REVIE'.4ED BY 7

i, J'o D TE VENDOR QUALIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE APPROVED BY:

- /f E,M pg.f6 APPROVED BY:

[

//D

~~BAR DA Mfnager -

70AJ.E_ ~

g& l,, %

q u a l

~

i0 TABLE OF CONTENTS P

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 RESPONSIBIL!TY 2.1 TITE SURVEITETNCE/ AUDIT SUPERVISOR (SSAS) 3.0 PROCE10RE 3.1 PREPARATTON FOR THE PRE-AWARD Si!RVEY 3.2 PRE-SURVEY MEETING 3.3 SURVEY EXECUTION 1

3.4 SURVEY FINDINGS 3.5 EXIT CRITIQUE g M 3.6 REPORTS 3.7 RESOLtTTION OF FINDINGS L

3.8 APPROVAL 0F VENDORS 4.0 SOURCE SURVEILLANCE 4.1 ESTABLISHING SURVEILLANCE. HOLD, AND WITNESS POINTS 4.2 INITIAL SURVEILLANCE 4.3 IN-PROCESS SURVEILLANCE 4.4 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 4.5 FItJAL SURVEILLANCE i

4.6 NONCONFORMANCES FOUND DURING SURVEILLANCE 4.7 HOLD, SURVEILLANCE AND WITNESS POINTS 4.8 BROWN & ROOT QUALITY ASSURANCE CONFORMAf1CE CERTIFICATE

$(jQ *u,,% q ff,m f r-pg 11.0 FIGURES

~\\

'd hURVEYCHECKLIST a 4 s

18.4-1

~

18.4-2 SURVEY FINDING REPORT hg 18.4-3 VENDOR SURVEILLANCE PLAN 18.4-4 VENDOR SURVEILLANCE REPORT CO 18.4-5 CONFORMANCE CERTIFICATE JA5 gg7 ] jp e60627

~~ ~

GARDE 85-59 PDR

-c emes saw wwts

+

BROWN & ROOT, Ihc.

ISSUE l

CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195

~

CP-0AP-18.4 0

8-6-80 2 of 8

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This procedure establishes the requirements for the perfomance of Vendor Oualification Surveys, and Source Surveillance as perfomed by the Site Surveillance / Audit Section. This procedure also applies tc resurvey activities as deemed necessary by the SOAM/SSAS.

2.0 RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 SITE SURVEILLANCE / AUDIT SUPERVISOR (SSAS)

The Site Surveillance / Audit Supervisor is designated the responsi-bility for assuring that the requirements of this procedure are fulfilled and properly documented.

3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 PREPARATION FOR THE PRE-AWARD SURVEY Each Vendor perfomance history is to be reviewed and evaluated against the Brown & Root Quality Assurance Department's Approved Vendor's List, prior Vendor QA Program reviews and evaluations, Pre-Award Surveys, Source Surveillance visits, audits, noncon-fomances, etc.

If, in his judgement, sufficient Vendor History infomation is available and shows perfoma'nce acceptability, the SSAS or SOAM may waive a Pre-Award Survey by memo distributed in the same manner as a Pre-Award Survey Report. The memo shall state the justification for waiving the survey, Such meno of waiver shall be signed by the Site Surveillance / Audit Supervisor or Site QA Manager and maintained as part of the vendor surveil-lance and procurene'nt records.

3.2 PRE-SURVEY MEETING The Survey Team Leader shall conduct a Pre-Survey Meeting with Survey Team members and appropriate Vendor personnel to establish the scope and schedule of the Survey and arrange for the exit critique after the Pre-Award Survey is completed.

3.3 SURVEY EXECUTION The Survey shall be conducted in sufficient detail to assure implementation of all applicable quality characteristics identi-fled by the Survey Checklist (Figure 18.4'1).

i INFORMATION COPY S

':PPRV

~~

1

WarrYtr vy norn cvst e vat-m ra m cre BROWN & ROOT, thc.

ZSSUE CPSES NUMBER REVIS!ON DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-0AP-18.4 0

8-6-80 3 of 8 3.4 SURVEY FINDINGS If a Program deficiency is noted, it shall be documented on a Survey Finding Report (see Figure 18.4-2) and an appropriate entry shall be rede on the Survey Checklist to identify the quality characteristic (s) found deficient by the Survey Findings.

3.5 EXIT CRITIQUE At the conclusion of the Pre-Award Survey, an exit critique shall be held with the management of the surveyed organization to present Survey results, clarify any points, and present a preli-minary copy of any Survey Findings and/or concerns.

The Survey Team Leader shall also explain to the Vendor the Brown & Root procedure for resolution of Survey Findings.

3.6 REPORTS The Survey Report and any survey findings shall be reviewed, ap-proved, and fomally transmitted to the Vendor.

3.7 RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS Deficiencies documented during the Survey shall require correc-tive action by the Vendor. SSAS shall evaluate the deficiencies and corrective actions to detemine at what point the Vendor shall have successfully corrected the cited problem, i.e., prior to contract, prior to manufacture, prior to release of material.

This detemination shall be included in the Vendor Survey File.

After the corrective action proposed by the Vendor is accepted and the affected problems are re-surveyed, if required, or waived, the cited Survey Deficieiicy shall be fomally closed.

The Vendor shall be nottfied by letter of such acceptance.

3.8 APPROVAL OF VENDORS Based on the results of the Vendor Oualification Survey, a Vendor shall be classified as " Approved," Conditionally Approved," or

" Disapproved."

(Classification shall be as shown on the Survey Checklist.)

Vendors classified as " Approved" shall be designated on the Projeci Approved Vendors Matrix.

Vendors may be " Conditionally Approved" pending ccepletion of corrective action of Survey Findings that are considered minor.

" Conditional Approval" shall be4t-the-Meeretic. ur u.a SOAM/

SS^S-INFORMATION COPY PPR_V

... T

MAR 20 " B'5 18: E4 G-"$LC5REDT WDdt e

BROWN & ROOT, INC.

ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-QAP-18.4 0

8-6-80 4 of 8 After satisfactory completion of all required corrective actions, a Vendor shall be upgraded to " Approved" and the vendor so noti-fied by letter.

Vendors may be removed from Approved Vendor Patrix for one or more of the following reasons:

Deficiencies found during an audit of a vendor to traintain h(),Oh,b,lM status as " Approved" but is not predicated on current or

.I i

extant purchase order.

} TV" 'Q3,

l C%

i Y

f.

Revisions to Vendar s QA Progran that are found unsatis-J-' 11 b

factory.

_Q*-

3p Vendor not awarded an order within one year frca date of D

survey or last annual audit.

_.1 The Vendor shall be removed from Approved Vendor Matrix by revi-sion of'the matrix.

Distribution of this matrix shall be as deemed necessary by the SOAM/SSAS.

4.0 SOURCE SURVEILLANCE The Site Surveillance / Audit Supervisor is responsible for deter-mining the extent of a source surveillance and for establishing the source inspection plan. He will consider the importance of the item / material to safety, its complexity and quality as com-pared to applicable soecifications and Project procedures.

Fu r-ther, functional compliance through receipt inspection or accep-tance testing, the degree of standardization based upon equipment history, as well as the vendor's quality history, are added considerations.

4.1 ESTABLISHING SURVEILLANCE, HOLD, AND WITNESS POINTS The Site Audit / Surveillance Supervisor shall detemine Surveil-lance, Hold and Witness points, i.e., the Surveillance Plan in accordance with the guidelines provided in 4.0 above (see Figure 18.4-3).

Before manufacture / fabrication, the Vendor shall be fomally notifit.d of any stipulated Surveillance Hold or Witness points via purchase order or subcontract, or by letter.

4.2 INITIAL SURVEILLANCE 4.2.1 Perfomance,

When required by the Vendor Surveillance Plan, and as deened necessary by the SSAS, initial surveillance shall be perforced immediately bet' ore manufacture and shall include the fol. lowing surveillance actions, as applicable:

m~- ~

~

{

~ ' ~

...s a-

.s m..s.s.~,

MAR 20 'B5

@:E6 CPSL(5 GLErr #U5Y MWGv5

~

BROWN & ROOT, INC.

!SSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOS 35-1195 CP-0AP-18.4 0

8-6-80 5 of 8 1.

Document Control - The Surveillance Team shall review with l

the Vendor the purchase orders, or subcontracts, drawings, and other applicable documents in use at the vendor's facil-ity(ies). The purpose of this review is to assure that the Vendor has the latest revision of applicable documents.

2.

Quality Assurance Requirements - The Surveillance Tean shall assure that the Vendor is perfoming work in accordance with the Brown & Root approved Quality Assurance Program.

This is acconplished by selecting some areas of the Vendor's CA Program and verifying implementation.

3.

Applicable Codes and Standards - The Surveillance Tean shall review with the vendor the governing Codes and Standards referenced in the procurement documents to assure that the Vendor has them available for reference, and understands their application to the item included in the purchase order or subcontract.

4.

Engineering Approvals - The Surveillance Team shall review the list of drawings, procedures, data sheets, and other vendor-originated documents that require Engineering appro-val before fabrication. When work is perfonned on naterial or equipment that is not covered by approved drawings, data sheets, procedures, etc., that work shall be considered as nonconfonning and the caterial or equipment will be unaccept-able for release.

Nonconfoming material shall be handled in accordance with CP-0AP-16.1.

5.

Subvendors - The vendor shall make available to the Surveil-lance Team, the names and addresses of ma,Jor subverdars (if available at the time of the visit) supplying custm fabri-u l

cated equipment or material.

YIORMATIO Vendor Personnel Oualifications - When qualification of vendor personnel (such as welders, NDE personnel, etc.) is required by the procurement documents or referenced Codes i

and Standards, the Surveillance Team shall review the ven-i dor's qualification program to assure that the qualification

] tests (procedures, perfomances, etc.) were perfon ed and DD]a the certifications are within the stipulited expiration Fi L-dates.

7.

Surveillance. Hold and Witness Points - The Surveillance Team shall review with the vendor future surveillarce hold, witness points relative to manufacture of the caterf al/

or item.

we e

d 7-

~ ~~

- ~ ~ ~ --

l BROWN & ROOT, Ekt..

TSSUE CPSES NUMBER REV!SION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 g

CP-QAP-18.4 0

8-6-80 l

6 of 8 l

8.

Qualification Survey Findings - The Surveillance Team shall review the Qualification Survey Report, when required, and any pertinent survey findings to assure that the required corrective action has been implemented effectively.

4.2.2 Documentation The Surveillance Team shall document initial surveillance acti-vity results in a Vendor Surveillance Report (Figure 18.4-4).

4.3 IN-PROCESS SURVEILLANCE 4.3.1 Perfomance When required by the Vendor Surveillance Plan or detennined necessary by the SOAM or SSAS, in-process surveillance shall be perfonned during the manufacture / fabrication process and may include the following general actions, as applicable:

1.

Verify that personnel are working to the latest approved document revisions.

2.

Review or witness special activities.

3.

Verify personnel qualifications.

4.

Verify measurement and test equipment calibration.

5.

Identify / report nonconfoming conditions.

6.

Verify effective impicmentation of any corrective actions pursuant to audit findings.

4.3.2 Documentation The Surveillance Team shall document in-precess surveillance activity results in a Vendor Surveillance Report in sufficient detail to establish the following:

1.

What applicable documents / drawings are in use; their revi-sions, control, traceability, and retrievability?

2.

What characteristics of the items / material were verified?

3.

khat equipment was used?

NFORMATION 4

When was such equipment calibrated? COPY PPRV

g m _

.,.=.. _

n w c a r ngu mscr a w u =r scuw,<vus

=

BROWN & RCOT, INC.

ISSUE CPSES N!JMBER REVISION DATE PAGE J08 3S-1195 7 Of 8 CP-QAP-18.4 0

8-6-80 5.

Problems encountered.

6.

Identification of components inspected by unique manufac-tuer's number.

4.4 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES This section of the Vendor Surveillance Plan is used to document activities not included in the basic surveillance plan, such as:

witness of qualification testing, verification of effective implementation of the vendor's corrective action to an ADR, qualification survey finding or nonconfomance report.

4.5 FINAL SURVEILLANCE 4.5.1 Performance When required by the Vendor Surveillance Plan or as detemined by the SQAM/SSAS, a Final Surveillance shall be perfomed before shipment of the material / item to verify adequacy of shipment preparation.

The Surveillance Team shall review the required documentation, (i.e., Material Test Reports, NDE Reports, radio-graphs, etc.) at the vendor facility to assure acceptability and compliance with the purchase order or subcontract and cited codes and standards.

The Quality Assurance Confom:nce Certificate shall be signed by the Surveillance Team Leader as authorization to proceed with shipment.

4.5.2 Documentation The Surveillance Team shall document final inspections in a Vendor Surveillance Report.

4.6 NONCONFORMANCES FOUND DURING SURVEILLANCE Any deviation or discrepancies identified by the Surveillance Tean during a source surveillance shall be reported and processed in accordance with CP-QAP-16.1.

4.7 HOLD, SURVEILLANCE AND WITNESS POINTS The vendor shall notify B&R Quality Assuranco of a candinc sur-AID' 'aMMnd'l-N veillance or hold point.

The SSAS shall assare lance hold point is either perfomed, or wai ted

.-..~,B__Y-PP

=

-- g y

=

m,Tr ser va ernrs

u. N av:e esoe.us BROWN & ROOT, !NC.

ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 CP-0AP-18.4-0 8-6-80 8 of 8 4.8 BROWN &ROOTQUALITYASSURANCECONFORtiANCECERTIFICATE(FIGURE 18.4-5)

Vendors shall be required to furnish a canpleted B&R Ouality Assurance Confomance Certification with each shipnent of equip-ment, items, or materials. When final inspection is waived, a copy of the waiver shall be attached to the Certificate.

The waiver shall serve as QA authorization for shipment.

INFORMATION COPY P?RV- - - -

664 M

MAR 20 "85 0:29 CP5ES N-VWtE'.RFD PROCEDURE REVISION E

BROWN & 200T. INC.

NUMBER P E CPSES CP-0AP-18.4 0

8-6-80 1 of 3 FIGURE 18.4-1

,NFORMA.101 COPY g

y 13JAUT'Y ASSURApeCE DEPAAThs4NT 4

is Pt. SUAVEY CHOCKUET poc aset-Joe.o umst _

e.oe i ce 3 i a*. **

l 1

' me.. Data m.s.s

/

I"3

.s.a.e,

venet e. p e ma-j

.i s.ars.

ao

. o rv, tea u e.i F

ytaas umsen.m l=

=...

_ e.

O 1.e=

O tic. W..e e t

8-,,,,,.,,,,,Os.

IE M "=

Ciacsaso a

.. o 0-n O a., G

. O asut s..

O a si O '"H=

f

~ asutT oa suave y CA O C

.e

. e =

C D.m W138'8 0.'.

I

p..

c. 8.n

, t e e =

n e e, e.. seemas em.

.et.se.as.o.

e e "I" e

s..e e., op.st, e.. m een

& F.e t e.e e e n. e

.am sp.

t....i u. ua e.

u.

s.-.

n..,,.

lO s.e oncAuzArion O

G m 4 te,e.me..ry.ns.o., e. -

O tt e.

h u

f.3 Q.. mere.. my.

, w 8. u e

O I.eo - -..o.

O u

~..

O

i.,

-..,-e...

O u.

O 2.0 QUAut_v AssumANCE PecomAM O

.r j

O 1

.i

..,-..a...

O u.. -... -

.e.

. o..

O C 2.3 C. = a e

. er e e

O,O u

.......-.e......

u.., - -..

u o.

a o -.

h 18 M

.w

. se..es. a.m

.f t

e os **.y i

h 13 h

1 10 10 Dt908e CQasT AQL Q

l O

7 c e.....

C 13 A

a e e..n

.,. us.ed

.a

.e Jesva O

u o.e,.............

O 34 he s...e.em.a..m. re es

.=.e ter

..a.

O

.o,.. -

o,O u

. ~

u 2.s on.,..

., w,

. c.

.~

C 3e e..r.e,

.. 6 e.

. w C

19 0

..e ei.

.e

.w O

,ig,=~,......=-.

g O

1f l

&*, M &

^ ~ ^*

..e nn.

~,.m

.e

MAR20 *85 8:30 CPSES GLEN ROSE FMEE.11 PROCEDURE REVISION CE BROWN in ROOT. INC.

NUMBER pgg CPSES CP-0AP-18.4 0

8-6-80 2 of 3 UO.RVATON 1.. "

COPY aplqy 18 P7. SURVEY CMECELIST

. ~....

.o reocumamewr cocuma*r comract c l

o a

,_ c o

a a

a

~ _ _... _ - _... _,

a c......-..--

o o

..,_._.,_..._m

, a o

. - _... _. ~

a u.

o 40 DOCUtsiNT COuTROL u

] a a

a

e..

a a

o a

u.

a

,a coestnot or cuacnasso esatsaial. ecuir eper ANo senvicssa 1_u a

a a

.i.

a i s, 10

.Ot N T).lC A f10 Ap.O CQs.f ACL O F af t A A AL1,.a AT. ANOCO waqrs[]

-._.__ ~ _.. -..._

C. o

..u a.

u

...... ~.._.. _.

a

.. ~

o C o

so comt act _o. spect AL.acesssis C

] a r_.a

...m..,..,..

o u,

o', I' 40 INSatCTICA L j

io.. - ~.............

m L,;

10,

Lj g

...-=

e p.r.m

..e.g 0

e..., c..

.m ms y

0

.4

_..g......

C

.0. 60.*ie.*...a.a.=*.*o...=.**.

o a s.._._..-..

a,,

m..,.....

o.

e

.a e

.o se, L

d, ig.

0.,

N

D 9 O,

T..P

.%.D

.*T

,q g g "P

g* 7 3 g g,

g g g,

g g g*,

g g

MAR 20 '85 8:31 CPSES GLEN ROSE pp6E.js PROCEDURE REUISIO!?

p3gg BROWN & ROOT, INC.

NUMBER CPSES 8-6-80 CP-QAP-18.4 O_

3 of 3 1FORYAT OK FIGURE.18.4-2 COPY I

18 PT. SURVEY CHECKUST suavev eaTE -

,f f

tea < l t bc. 3

_t fe a s.y 110 TEST CONTROL O

].Op ui

..um ga si.:

c..

u.

p-.

ei)

T i gs.g

...a

.a s

.as.

shes n.

to.

e

,n a.

.a r-.,

a e..ie on.e.sww=.=i a.a..eepa.a..e.

LL is 9 Cq

?

e...

.e ae

.m.,

u.

.ar=.am.ag.a.w n a.

si e n:

T.

,. n w

n.' -

eie L.

ti g 12.0 CONT 7iOL OP ML AsuRING AND TEST EQ1.llP.atNT C

} gO wa..a.-

a.o.

iti

-c.

w

~, -

is t i33 f u.a.o...

.... e i

.auem

=.m.se.a.w C y%

it.

...,.o a.n.

u. n.

..a

- 6,l i2.

Tan..,=

in...ri

..,c.,

LJ -

it 4 U

'2t v10 MANDU%G. STC A AGE AND SMil*tNG Q l C-

.........-.a-,...%..~..-,

u i..

C 13.3 C

i3.

14 0 4NEPtCTaCN. TEST A4 07ER Af tNG STATUS Q j Cr i..

,..a, u

m.

a..,

...a J

i. 2 n

,..a.

i., a, i.

.a

.ne

. aam is. 3 C

s.

110 NONCONpOR iNG M Af t AI ALS PARTS CA CO'.i8CNENTS Q j C

.....,........a....-.a,.i.a.

C.

it i 16 2 8.

.a..r.a.ag t

..,e va,a.w

,eg

. se y. u.

O it.

p

.a.,

m.a,..

..a.e. w..

n..

in.

..a.4 c.me...w....c

=.,.

u.fi..t..a

.e e., t

. e

a ".stset.... '. r.'

a.

C m

iS S me.

a U

.iu,....... -

a.

.m i<.an is a tl ?

b i 4.8 it.C COMM tCTIV t AC*10N C l

C n_

io.,

con

.................w w to 7 ca ai

..n.

e m Llm le 3 S.sa d.s.at a

a.

eee.. o.

h aa..

re.... *.aag.a.a' C

14.

i..

17 0 CUALITY A$$UH ANCt AGCCRC5 C

]

r ar..

...e '.t.ae

a. fie,.r......a..a go e.e.a CG i,f,i A......a.~.......

r-u u-ir e a.........

d C-3 ts.$

t.

f.

a9.*.

m iI,9 i

O t9 ?

l iLO AuOsTS G C O T.,

O

.. :.... ~.. ~.....

C i.

te $

A.e e

me.ae 7,

Le i94

..,.....gg..n.. e.

.. e at...

'L7 J. L 8,

~.' h M de (41 U.,

. g O7 -

".d'

4 i r"

..A 7s

..h.

.* 7 4 &

4'

&

b 6 I.* i ".

I f1AR 20 '85 9: 43 CPSES GLEf4 WUVE 6

PROCEDURE REUISION P.A.G E BROWN & RDOT.'INC.

NUMBER CPSES CP-QAP-18.4 0

8-6-80 1 of 1 l\\ 0RMATLON FIGURE 18.4-2 COPY

).)

7.-T:J.,

QUALITY A53MRA8eC8 0EPARTfAtNT 1

EURV(Y Fles018eG RtrQRf saan or

....-...,..e.....

-a w.s.swe e== e n g....,.,..

t

+

estT3..........

j g.a.a,n,m-.--

g.,g,n, 9, - -

3

.I e a 6 a........ e.. 5 v.. g. cr..

..ru I

14e.......-

TOC 0CetF9Nied Dr W SOF I

~

yo..

re an camaw a, asa cw,rv.au.eam,

^

aets s w.... '. e a s u - w s ;. s a s T. w. w s's'.u = 6 4 l

1... a. e C $arinfestory C truerdnerorv

.s

.a..

l^~'"'

C; momG CLOSE0 a

.s.s..

^ ~,^

.,._.,-.n..,,,

_,e._

..n n

MAR EO '85 9: 44 CP5ES GLEN ROSE PAGE.02 PROCEDURE REVISION E

pjgg BROWN & ROOT. INC.

NUMBER i

CPSES a

CP-QAP-18.4 0

8-6-80 1 oL2 If0RMAT10K FIGURE le3.4-3 COP ~

I ODDy me. A., v a

I %mg a

s l

vsmoon sunvattunct rum os u.no.

Ya M4 WI fedi g

g(

FW E Esem og Pegg, seg.

~~N.

p. -

g. go

.y..

/

~

ee e paa,

og

.tg n

ta

--- -=yn e,gtig i l I

e e f I

e tite '8ee f e Aa. 6yn wfis(Am r.1 e

e e

h l e I

O i

6 i

I 4

l l e

i i e e

Er.

w oe..en -

-e

' Of Vf8498 9 d A'C.

6_

g

- ey l

, i e e i

e e, i e

e e

e

.., e pse v.,w,

. e.e e

are==- as esus-ees.en 9 i e4 i

f i e e

1 e

erup ; --

- segnw gpes e

e t e e 6

e J

9 5 4

4 e

I 400 Rev ee cogwwenione ese i

i g

e a e e C.

,_C,,,.44ee, e. i (

e e e e p egtge e, w.ney e

, e 4 e i

8 I

s.asiens-O e

j i

e i

e e e e

f a e i

e 6

6,

W 4 staqpaga sweesists asse I e t ?

ae.e me.nes 9 { e e f 6

i l I I $ f i e e e n

C's Jane.a.ess ee =wner

~

g e e ese de.

ee w e i e 9 9tye.eegf4 - ~ Jeege 5 5 6 6 e

seepseeg i e e I e e

i

~~

e i 6

9

{

M

epeo esatevenwe s*4.

t s 6 6

te e

. e. c.

~1 e e t

en.e..ig sas =c a,

l e i

~-

g, e i

e arymO2iMT3 s mehf MCY:

eis A l'.mmunese==

0. 8,== 1 answ'e==

0. asm w w -ae A. Roma es,.,

h

& tem =umeen L he,*eene===

M. Emen amie==e=e E

0

& Etov 0 emmes F teen w t immen mee.sar, L

I

m: , - s

4 *..-,

9,

--.i --.

r_y_ _,,

-.3

,e-,_-

MAP 20 '85 8: 44 CPSES GLEra ROSE PAGE.03 s

PROCEDURE REVISION PAGE BROWN & ROOT, INC.

NUMBreR CPS 25 a_.

CP-QAP-18.4 0

8-6-80 2 of 2 i

c 6

INFORMATION FIGURE 18.4-3 COPY 0" ]

'[

VENDOR SUAvdetLApeet p g,o,,,,,

scommennem e-aer 6

AIS sue et 3act

&s

~

/ /

MM."ew*ee

/f/ #

O.-

.51*.

- - '!*J."

.e.

t t a t 6 I

ie i I {

4 4 6 i

a 4

3 1

t

! e e i 6.. i 1

e e

t

-f

' 8 i t

e i. e i

3 t_ r t i

e e i {

e I

e e e.

3 I e

1 e

e e i ? 6 i

4 e e t o e t e e

.. e i

r

? * ! 4

.. 4 e 4

. 6.

ei e

e e e i e i

t t

t i

e

[

4 e a g e I

e e e 1 l

8 6 i e a e

i e

3 e t I

e e e t

e 4 % a e f

i t i 4.

o p e

e a

e,

h

] l 8

0 l

6 6

j e

s 1

e e e s e

i i

t e

e e

8 i e 4

t i e e i ee e t i

e 6 s ! i 9

a i I t I !

I i

! e i

rio e

e 1 i e t 1

i a e e e

e e

i i f

I i

I l 6 f f

{

t e

m

~E.-

_s

'.v se" no m.

e e r-nA e ee

.~.s

. = =

f1 AR 20 85 6: 45 CPSES GLEtt Rose F,.' E. 0 4 PROCEDURE REVISION UE

'3ROWN & ROOT. INC.

NUMBER pgg

,CPSES i

CP-QAP-18.4 0

8-6-80 1 of 2 FIGURE 18.4-4 Brownc@oct.inc.

"";:.' fit;"" j vv.coaw.ivuu. a menv

{

..m r.

. w..

j...

L " '

r-l IKFORMATION COPY PPRV l

u.......

y ep@

em ap p....

summae amuss guirem.e em

susumer e

emmah.a m o egmu.

exemmum W

imuy e me simuude h O-emes M*

e e est e

GB j...........

j...._..

i.... g ;-.....

F

.4 5*

e, e.

3 A 4

eg og e ap

MAR 20 *85 8: 46 CPSES GLEN ROSE PAGE.05 PROCEDURE jj REVISION pggg BROWN & ROOT,-INC.

IMfBER CPSES 8 6-80 2 of 2 CP-QAP-18.4 0

NFO.1MATION FIGURE 18.4-4 3 3 \\l Q% l

-g;,]g w.

f mmg VENOCR.SU.A V.EIL.L A*v.C.E. R EPO R T o'2atni e.

ge.ce reenn

.on e.e e.

g..

g.........,

....u................,

I e

I 1

I 4

l I

i

.'3 i

y 1

l i

l...........

i i

MP :.%.

M

-~

n-

,,, e.

n.,.cn.n.

c.

u.,

ae 1

fifM 20 '85 8: 46 CPSES GLEN ROSE PAGE.06 PROCEDURE.

REVISION E

BROWN & ROOT, INC.

WMBER CPSES CP-QAP 18.4 O

8 6-80 1 of 1 NORMATION FIGURE 18.4-5 COPY

.av QUAL TY AssumArect OSPARTMENT 1

CQN50RMAPeCE CaftflFICAT$

aneJacy.

Joe so.

u.e.v ___

.aas. __._.Jr

...........n.

..... sn...

,.o...

,... n

.....f..

l i

..e 64la. eta Y B o...

o

..........<...n...........

...y..-..-..~........~.....-..

,J.

.e.....

n

-.. ~

__*..*..'..*.a--

_v'*--*

I,1,

.~.

u,.-

c.......

3 a

E

.... ~.............

ri

~ -

.v

'i '

...e...........4.....

.z -.

I'

//

...... ~..

~.

..~............-

1

~..

P

T. r.. r...r, e.n...-..: - - t;":.- - - ~r.m.......r.......i r.r.n <- -

1....

L I

/ /

f

//

l e

I.._.mt.

=

I y$ 7i

' h..

' - ~ ~ ~

' ~ ~

[

DiiA

- Y August 7, 1980 Brown and Root, Inc.

P.O. Box 1001 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 Attention:

Mr. D.D. Beddingfield Site Surveillance / Audit Supervisor Subj ect :

Brown and Root Q.A. Audit Report G303-3 Source Surveillance inspection Report IM-19334 Gulfalloy, Inc. letter dated July 28, 1980

Dear Si r:

Per my telephone conversation wi th your department this date, please find attached a part of Mr. Don E. Childers Personnel Records.

As previous 1y stated Mr. Chiiders is now Gul f al loy',s._desi gnated SNT-TC-.l A Level,11.1.

The corrective action that will be taken on the areas of concern may be verified upon your next annual Audit.

I hope this answers your questions on this matter.

If you have any further questions, please feel free to call.

Sincerely, GULFALLOY, I (C.

/

h?/gh G.W.

" Bill" Gross Manager Quality Assurance "QgCQ P

GWG/ga T" O [

s CC: file

{j j } g j"#9

0R NOREI!BN OSY hY E

4730 Danen Street. P. O. Bos 5:518 Houseon Texas 77052 Telephone (713) 672-7451 s

WATS 800-231-3:62. TWX 410 881 1145

.c g

1 m.%%w 4~

$['f d> 5 4 Brown & Root,Inc. "" VM 1*U jkD{X{g QUALITY ASSURANCE 4 hp RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORL UNIT SYSTEM COMPONEN IDENTIFICATI N/ SPIN N DWG./ SPECIFICATION & REY.

}f.2 AN k h e. f p

W

&H22MJMA]/end pygg CC;,,

g, ), y-P.O.

MRR CH ARACTERISTIC INSPECTION:

J6,4/feF-ff9-990

[

SAT.

UNSAT. U NCR HOLD TAG Jot}M APPARENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNS ATISFACTORY ITEMS:

VEND QR B&R l l

VENDOR TRANSPORTER U

[

DATE DEFICIENCY DISCLOSED gg, ITEM QTY.

D ESCRIPTION/R EM ARKS OOI IRJFE /Db, S/4D Aye, SM),5, SA-M/Gic.6, M N A4!5-38ff ?2134(o } 9),Jy 9gj g 4LX&&. Co>,a,)Ted, spo, s p-254 wpfg

04

/Obi Head A o.'s - 4 es, wn b 9, q'gu, pyhy,

l n Wa Ia,.iroa,n=sw w,e,s9 g g yf+gg_g oM Mu, &jb3N l" Soak-D-),et, JoDD2b, S Albf~/f*/J5A 9 I jf f s~

lji A U SYb 1~

)

500 I!If0RMilil0N QQ }

b

~Y

$$l*b

$5

. 02 l3~,I-]. Arce.e>2)} AUTHORIZED NUCLEAR INSPEdTOR NOTIFIC'ATION: /' l DATE:[- b TIM E: b [ M EDI A: M N/A INIT.Y ANI WITNESS: SAT.

# UNSAT.

W W WAIVED DAT 8' N 80 W W ANI'S INITIALS REQUlyD STORAGE LOCATION: )/> M. T f PE: / -f h Q C - 1.1/ 3 -1

jo@N, 4.'3 mm seuru. nr.wa.,, i.u m.wv nw T.'.J,]+y;,$I195 ...h f,..... ' .4 : ' l I." a COMANCHE PEAK S.E.S. Tl l,. 5 y**'.~i' I MRNO. RAGE 'I. CF

l. 7?f.'.V '.= *. ~

N..'D..'-.. B & R 5 .W ? ~ J TUSI ~ OTHER G & H" f. F & N .m P.O. NO. 35-1195 4 ~.:. _- a ..: c.e._ REO. No.'_ -SHIPPED TO: +' ~ . e.. c, ~ >. + ., y ... ~ . r. #.... FR 132759,1322474 ?.

2...,';f d.

FR IJUDD , c.N 5 '? ~. e . ~ %- s? ~ :,3..w.'.-:.,.r.w. r.s : %.,a,. .s' ~ ...?.,,."... VENDCR: - WW..., .e^C.. y -~ '3-A'#e +: & ' ' ^ - DATE: m-m;.y <s:.~.p. 4 4 c, n.,. ?.'g, ' h kb. _. k,w*.. * - [. r, . n ~. ':r: r .? ...f. n *, :

n u.

v. +- ....j. ,e* 3 # -*e .3' ', d ' 'ld ' ~.", - F.O.B. SHIPPER: ' f

n..x 5gy'),

u., &,,. m' v.wmg. ; v.$. *$.,.. *, .' y,;,,.. :.;

?

d. ~ k . s?. nk <, ~ - r ~ vtj

s - l.

? n. .#. ~ y.

o 't.G; y h. 2. :sl+L*: s..

"T, *.,, '. f*.~ ;e# ,,r.

lM
h.., *: :.'. ~.-

. - :, 9 '? p-**.-

4 *: . j,(.,g E..k.L;,.....; a. p 4 J.,.*, 0..;;s.

'. ~:..N.b i.~q~sp,*:.Cy s' ** *ke '. " -M* . %..lr .?, .,.w.- .. p.g. g,., .p a. ,y 3. ; ;.

3..; c

.y ,a ~;t~d..a.i.Q,.Ql:K;'paXQ!.y,yej;cby,. ' _9 'l 4.'M "., ',, t P. gyi;-59 .s,,* f,. ...- r y ~ -#?'e ; Portial, T,'; Co;mpiete;.. .c . -GUANTITY UNIT ITEM -

J '

+ %* MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION y p 9HO +f 7l*w'm.Wri.,.,..*

m %. - Q i.. ^ ;,. %ty

'h' h [ Y d @ k.N k N 5 M.hb }3 'u * ;'

:. >, ;,. tie,.

' ;.o%.,hhof*=.*h :.p. Y.h.y 5NyN ~[' N NN-Y [ h e. s y $iIUhNk.Yh$NbNhbbbbh NN p.,'+.a y. .y-.)* 1,50f Bere,to S/40. Socket tid ASE SA105 %.6 W. 3; 7,... ,7-yy jM{50E k hEEMNk NNNdN E N NENlE$$ M kk EN M @$ M I M M N I N '- b *

A *-

Y' A. 1.$N f f b.dY' ${$.hYk.V W'N'k.hh lfCy W,W '**:.'&c.?W?~\\* Q.?.*'* .ii N.3 0 C C.;& ~'.

2.. *.

'..'-N

h

. l^ G~e@%Qf "$5 N".h$- .-d Q ?, 5 F.4, W '$ $ $ h $.Q l $.' a~' b

My-

&$h Yhh$$$?N}b$$6YWI$$LS.h$h A,... g-d' f 4 ".? j L, s. g * * : 4. - J % *//.,/..S J Q -N-M G - . d~**l-W;Af* J[4Q ** v '. E,sh, ?A ; 3MsT*:b. hjN[4 %.V a'.,f i,j s;mA-> w*s,'$%.s.IS ~d,9 ,7W p*%,g*.e..i.i -' ';. ; af,,J,4 .; jry t,. ....M.; s

j

!'. W/ #.D.,-M,p Qf.

M-d?.
/g d

. -;Q 4 $ p, "9' !"*'# TMI.E9h.M.N**Th '!ee' 8*S'*% ** "* # f i.4 *w d'.'.'J/p.'W.*/'*QS. q +[tYdi!

p..'.

P' c "*.E T* " 8 y.%.%D4t d'd ** ~.'s,f'rN+ ~d 2M M. : M 5' pgg m y g z g gg g gg g gg g y. TieM MMR M E D FM y sffRIGA RKsBfisK

? ** '*;&s'*' N h ".EkIY~

-[ ,,..P y Q M, ??:.

k I'

~

,..,.. % [2...,

?.

..~...Q. i

Nlt ~d - f,?.5Q!e.!:f} *'

.,' ? Ev!

E A^Y.3 s'.i ' *

', Y*.?] l ' ' '. A:lmls!+f:Y*1..* ! '- j 1

d ?
g ihh a k' " :*,...

,l -j hry}. ?S: "I'** ' '

. q' T- '.,#sa.' *5 7, _f; h.%,M.**

' 4 1t

x

'4 *:. ' ',n s k'k*c ,...[*# E . Mt " *' i. -i.,Q

-k i

2,, .."'i I. N@MMfdNENSMiMdN%5MEdN$$M$iNMEEN ' d A f ?*.

E. "Q Q ' '*

"'EEW ^)* i . ' $ '.*? ki.r.*. N*$. .c s QC.CHECKSY EXP. PP TEX UPS PREpa.? COLLECT I f ~ , RECElVED BY: TTTT 9e ' o. + p . t. n. .I e, ~ ~ dI DELIVERING C AR e t ER '. * / ,%h a % #*.,, e.. %, g' ' e 4 FYTQ8

.c5 C Brown &R6ct,ince ( T---# QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT - CONFORMANCE CERTIFICATE PkOJECT:COMMANCHE PEAK' JOB NO.: CR0422 UNIT I PAGE I OF l s il VLNDOR (2) ADOMESS OF VENDOR F ACILIT Y GULFALLOY, INC. 4730 DARIEN STREET HOUSTON, TEXAS (3) PURCH ASE O R DE R NO. ( As SPECa FICATION N O.. jREV. IS) O R AWING NO.. lR t V I i 35-1195-30418 ASME SA105 N/A N/A ,N /A (6) 4 T EM DESCRIPTIONtSt OfNO.OFITEMS f(8) NO. R E LE ASEO I I SEE BELOW SEE BELOW iSEE BELOW (9) COMPLET E h NO YES (10) SERI AL OR IDENTIFICATION NO(S). Item 41: (14 ea. )-3i-3" x 1" 3000# Sockolet ' HT#P469 Records checkert ( ) below are being transmitted with this CertifsCate as reQJeret by the thown & Root Document Dets Sheet. h Y Material Certifications Operating Elec. Test Records Visues inspection Records a Heat Treat Records Non.coerating Elec. Test Records Dimenseonel inspect. R ecords. _ d h~ RT Film & Records Pressure Test Records Cleanliness Records N 8{ PT/MT Records Seat Tightness Test Records Painting Records

2 UT Records Performance Test R ecords Packaging Records EM

-Z Apo'oved Stress Report Weid. Personnet Qual. Certs. Spare Parts List hj Approved Design Analyses ND E Personnel cual. Certs. Special Handieng instrue. Nerneolate F acsimite Operating Manuses Code Date Recoeff sl Deviations: O tosi.d ee..w None I e 55 l 1p Un!,1 1 t j TH E V ENDOR CE R TIFIES that the itemts! descrined soove are in conformance with the requirements of the Brown & Root Specificatemi with the approved deveaisons ssied scowe. are suitanie for the purpose intendmJ. are free from detects in design. workmanship, and males sais a } and are new anes of specified quainy. A copy of th.s completed Coneormance Certificate was be included with the bill of lading and snippai Z-won the item (s! to Brown & Roos, inC at the eddress designateJ in the procurerrient documents VENOQR QT 62EO S E ATURE l TITLI lOATE: _z E0 ,y. IA !Q.A. COORDINATOR l 7 /& [po l T h e V enrtoe rdscoetitieJ fnat the esems assove meet sI contractua. reauirements Brown & R oot h as r eviewerf ow.cence sucpor tmg smg 3 Ce'tificat e enn e cept as noted undee R om a. h t" ahos e. nas verthed Conformance to requw emeists This Coetsf ecate d oes not weav eny regnts y Brown & Rooi may have under one Purchase Oerter inc6 sing the r.gna to reiect the seemisi upon discovery of dehciencies cu eng or alier arri.. r [ at destination f 6 Wa..ed

ina Su.si.iaace r

,,,,,,me,, a - _ _y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 54GN A1 UR E OF S&R SURVF tLL ANCE lOATE SMIPMENT W AIVER NVMBE R lOATE-Q %PE CI ALIST g f f// SW 1561 7/30 /D { T he,,emi se de,c t,oed euove as e neu env r ec eased a v tt o a n Ab H oot Jua"ev Assurance Sn.pment m ov es made sucos(t to authorisei c'$ t., l ~ B*own & Hoot Purc h aung l

i r eKTs Brown &Fi .1,Inc. 1s81 v~ S. W. QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ,Y DATE: .SH,1PM EST W A1VER PROECT: CPSES JOB NO. 3511. i UNIT PAGE OF bWl SIC,l/#}52S/0 / J/sc, TO: J X s >:ia-i, 7ws 77052-s

REFERENCE:

Purchase order / subcontract number [ ZW,J } our telephone conversation this date concerning shipment waiver. gin:1+=en: /Y(D NPJS Cer:nr=ing the telephone conversation between your ! dG A,, / and our Ms. as referenced above, we have waived final exami.r. ion at your facility of the following items only: Order 1:+.,. No. Q tv. Descriotion [s30. !S-// 93 -3c4/7 IN *l p?,C, J C-// TS-Jc4/c- - - - - 34/ " Jsed'-0-LW C,S. F. S.-M M/OS N#' /4,e, M P=. 6 *J.So 70'<st s s.W. rA & 5 NP 3'+03/6 "Ab O I i 28 3 fi 3 " S;5, 90

ggL, 3, BM SA 403 WP 3#9 "]I6

A00

/Jm 30 gs p=. z ~ s.s, 4S* ass. s, s,w. ss403 wP S04

M B--.c 's Rert. inc. Form QA.015 titled " Quality Assurance r)epartment Conformance Certificate" properly completed f;

ar.d +ic.e385 nos recuired. This shipment waiver does not waive any rights Brown & Root may have under this pur-I c'rsu r-der including the right to reject the item (sl upon discovery of deficiencies during or after arrival at destination. Sincerely, BROWN & ROOT,INC. y,~.f th. Y f & &/d4 ) kJ.f'.-enrke-((l-N' N/#N - Site Quality Assurance Manager JPC bj cc; J D. C arke itt E 8.4 5 :e Receiv r.; I,sp. Dept. E I.te Purchw,g Dept. O

1 1

1

7.. p-.m g ..d k mm m_, rm sc.h wgsi =d. aa ..8 MATERIAL TEST REP 0RT ASE1E ' QUALITY SYSTEMS CERTIFICATE (MATER I ALS) NUMBER N-1241 EXPIRATION DATE OCTOBER 27, 1981 DATE: July 29, 1980 CUSTOMER: Brown and Root, Inc. P.O. Box 1001 Glen Rose, Texas 76043

REFERENCE:

B&R PO#35-1195-30418 Gulf al1oy DT#27-046272 MATERIAL: Item 41: (14 ea. )-3i-3"xl" 3000# Sockolet MILL HEAT NO.: P469 . MANUFACTURER: Bonney Forge WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE MATERIAL FURNISHED ON THE AB0VE REFERENCED PURCHASE ORDER MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION (S)- ASME SA105 (1) ASME SECTION 11, 1974 EDITION THROUGH 1974 SUMMER ADDENDA. (2) ASME SECTION lit, 1974 EDITION THROUGH 1974 SUMMER ADDENDA, NC-2000, FOR CLASS 2 MATERIALS. ll Y $O / REV I'EW&O AND APPROVED DATE AI a 4730 Darwn Srreet P O Bos 52518 Houston. Tesas WO32 Telephone (713)672 7451 s WATS m.1132:. nn gimi.1145

g Brown & Root,Inc, eost office sox 1001, cien nose, Texas 7eo42 g A' Wh d' August 11,1980 BRV-11869 Gulfalloy, Inc. 473n Darien Street Houston, Texas 77052 ATIN: Mr. G. W. Gross i Texas Utilities Services, Inc. Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station 1981-83 2300 Iti Installation Brown & Root QA Audit Report G303-3 and Source Surveillance Inspection. Report DI-10334 s Dear Mr. Gross i Att' che'd is a corrected copy of ADR No. G 303-3.1 which was sub=itted a prematurely, in error, Prior to the lead auditors! signature linef. item W. 15. Please insert this corrected copy with your audit report. Your concinued cooperation and attitude is appreciated. Sincerely. Brown & Root, Inc. t, D.D. Beddingfield Vf Site Surveillance / Audit Supervisor DDB/bc i}[lf tI* F V l. -, ' G., ' s%- k% ) 1. b 4 cc: L. A. Ashley L M. Broom

3. Frankum L Bass

7. Bulten T. Vega QA File

'd!$ [ggry p,,.en7;U[t UliLIy, 'g y gt. m o lidD4isiUUI

4. -

Brown & Root.inc. '= i QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT C AUDIT DEFICIENCY REPORT hROJECT: JOB NO.: UNIT: PAGE: OF lli AWOITED O RG AM 82A Tso.e (Al AWQIT MC (3p AOR MO l {40 ADN CQQE c,,,s.$t v. u...e-- e ,n,_, c,ns, _; I o (St G3SCWSSED weTMs geg agpostTED Sv t g(T) Q ATEs l{53 CATEGO R Y : P. Claes .. Burks ! 7 /10 / 80 IOiii Oisi Gisl 4 93 DOCWasEMT, veGbATEQ AMO PAmasmeros (CIT L3: Gulfalloy Q/A Y.anual para, 11.2 Personnel records will be maintained for all NDE Personnel, Delineating their Qualifications Level in accordance.vith. S:C-TC-1A, their F.:c. inations, scores, &' Racertification dates, U.i ES.5 vr7 o";.. - - ~ Gulafalley P.O. # 22-27-15571 & -15572 for Gibbs & Hill had material with U.T. j at Southwest labs, Inc., Houston. The U.T. Report was signed by D. Childers ASIC E Level III. y Contrary to above Gulfalley Q/A Manual require =ents, no docu=entary evidence g could be produced by Gulfalloy Q/A Dept. to confirm Mr. Childres was a certified Inspector. ( Exams. Scores, & Re-Carrification Date) i (18 3 POTENTI Al. A EPO R 7 AS 6E GEPeCAEMCY C MO YES (las AECOMMEMD AT4ONS: 1. Acquire Recuired documentation 2. If docu=entation can not be produced take_ appropriate =easures regarding material involved. 4 8 38 RESPONS E A5SaGM ED TOs !'(les DATE:7 inJO lllelmEsrOMSEQWE l1986 APrato,iggUaW 'l% i 80 <L/ n x c--.. To be completed by aucited erhanization llT) CD A N ECTIV E ACTIC M R E3PO NSE 6 6 tMCbuG E SCMEDWLED COM PbETROM Q ATE 8 I I (I SI SWSMITT ED S Y t

(133 O AT E.

/ / $391 Pm Ev tMT ATiv E ACTJQ M a isMGbWQE SC ME DWhED COM PbETICM C ATEJ i 14 tl.5W SMITT ED S Y s j (12 8 D A T E 4 - w- / / To be com:letec' bv E&R Cusity Assurance 4338 N EviE w Q F m E spO Mst. l44 8 #EviEw ED S T: g l434 D A TE C Satisfxterv Q Unsatisfxtory l ? / / (Set N E 5WbT1 OP V E mlPIC A TIOM s O Satis!xtorv Q Unsatisfxtory l ._,,('8386caTE. l6370 WEN 8 PLED ST: / / b ![i b $[5"[b'b.I NY).f ' ~'~^~"' .a....., e e

... o ) Concerns: Ref: A"R G 303-3 1. Texas Indicator, Calibration Facility, has confusing and inconsistant calibration & re calibration dates on docu=en:ation and calibration stickers. 2. Internal Audit checklist does not cover all aspects of Q/A Program in that~i: does not address training or M & TE Control. 3. Internal Audit checklist has error at 3-b. The reference to see:1on 6 of QA Manual should be Sec. 7 - for Handling & Storage. 4 Q/A Manual is not specific as to where sub-contract NDE files are to be raintained i.e., at Gulf alley or at sub-contractor f acility; it implies Gulfalley. e e e I l FeilisBP!Hii!DN DAY

4 ~ i% Chicign Bridga & Ir:;n Csmp:ny 550 west 17th South p o box 687 Salt Lake City Utah 84110 twx 910 925 5618 telephone 801. 973 2500 August 11, 1980 Brown hnd Root, Inc. P.O. Box 1001 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 Attention: Mr. D.D. Beddingfield Re; B&R Audit C310-lO Subcontract #35-1195-0585 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station CBI Contract 91918

Dear Mr. Beddingfield:

M U f 0 F A 'i11 0 H O m Attached is Audit Deficiency Report ADR-C310-10.1 with items 17 through 22 completed. The concerns of Audit C310-10 are responded to as follows: 5. Our Q.A. Manual does not specifically require documentation of the ANI witness of the"N" stamping. However, the ANI signature on the Shop Release for Shipment Check List as the fina. piece of documentation does signify compliance with the Code which includes "N" stamping. 6. The audit report from the ANI Supervisor for the audit performed is February 1980 has been misplaced. We are attempting to get a new copy. The second audit of 1980 was performed on July 17, 1980, and an audit report was received on July 28, 1980. 26. Assemblies such as 34-A-1 are normally positioned in the shop to allow as much welding as possible to be performed in the flat position. The l'roduction Foreman assigns welders who are ciualified to perform the work. This is assured by the Welding and O.A. Supervisor. Traceability of each welder to each specific weld is not required per NF4 m """ $ e a p \\ cRa9

~ I. - Chicago Bridge & Iron Company August 11, 1980 Page 2 B&R Audit C310-10 33. A review of ANSI-45.2.9-1979 shows nothing that would restrict using lead pencil to prepare documents. The only requirement seems to be that documents be legible, accurate, and completed as appropriate to the work accomplished. We hope you will find these responses a a is 8 there are any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, M DARWIN C. CHRISTOFFERSON Superintendent Welding and O.A. CBI Salt Lake DCC:aj cc: JWL WGR/91918 DCC MEJ 7 w,

8-15-8t.

.: PJ

~ ~ ~ ~ Brown & Root,Inc. Post office sox 1001, cien sose. Texas 7eo43 K% l August 15, 1980 BRV-11895 Gulfalloy, Inc. 4730 Darien Street Houston, Texas 77052 ATTN: Mr. G. W. Gross ~ Texas Utilities Services, Inc. Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station 1982-84 2300 MW Installation Audit Report G303-3

Dear Mr. Gross:

We have received your letters dated July 28 and August 7,1980, and have evaluated your response to ADR No. G303-3.1 and Source Sur-veillance Report IM-19339. Your responses as submitted are satisfac-tory. Regarding the concerns, your respor a is satisfactory, and no further action is required, and the audi. is considered closed. Your continued cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, BROWN & ROOT, INC. mM,JA D. O. Beddingfield Site Surveillance / Audit Supervisor DOB/pb cc: L. A. Ashley qg 1(. af th,g.Q K. M. Broom 4 -- D. Frankum i V) RijAitssW' P' 501 ten T. Vega J. Hawkins R. Meissner Houston QA File PPR Vault %h hf!j'. i

F m Brown & Root.Inc. - T,' @ QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT AUDIT DEFICIENCY REPORT ..s... PROJECT: JOB No.: UNIT: PAGE: oF $15 AUDITED O RG AMlZATION (23 Avog7 Mo (3) Aom No tal ADe Coo t netl #11 1 m* T==_ _ 53 my.q.,.S n 101 1 0 107 1_1 Q (SI Ds5 CUSSED wsTM s (Si mEPomTED a v e g(7) D ATE: gtalCATEGbev-P. Class . Barks ' 7 /10 / 80 IOrii Otai 0.zi t,# oo Cu MENT veo 6.ATED AMo PAm AG a AP., (C T E): Personnel records will be maintained for all NDE Personnel, Delineating their Qualifications Level in accordance.vich SNT-TC-1A, their Exa=inations, Sc. ores, & Recertification lates. 'iie:TesEav rTioTas - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - ' - - - Gulafalley P.O. # 22-27-15571 & -15572 for Gibbs & Hill had =aterial'with U.T. E at Southwest labs, Inc., Houston. The U.T. Report was signed by D. Childers ASNT E Lev e III. Contrary to above Gulfalley Q/A Manual require =ents, no docu=entary evidence g could be produced by Gulfalloy Q/A Dept. to confir= Mr. Childres was a certified Inspector. ( Exams. Scores, & Re-Certification Eate) (Ill POTEMTRAb mEPO RT ASbE D E FICIENC Y O TES GO { s 23 mECOMMEMO ATioMS: 1. Acquire Required docu=entation g 2. If docu=entation can not be produced take appropriate =eabures regarding =aterial involved. (12* R ESPO MSE ASSIGN ED TOs l'LI4D # ESROMSE QWE 49 5) APPROTEbDwtb. -.- l' t 14 4 O A T E :7 t vt p

- f'ho i eo xA nr n ~., a To be completed by audited orfanization

~ (173 CammECTsvg ACTION m ESpoMst s ilMCLuG E SCMEcubED COMPLETION O ATE) All N.D.E. Personnel records will be maintained by the sub-contractor with the exception of the Level 111 designate. Mr. Don Childers of Southwestern Laboratories is now Gulfalloy's Level 111 designate. See Attached. (e se sueMsTTED ev l(t el D ATE. / / (191 PR Ev EMT A Tev t ACTIC M s (IMC6uGE SCMEDU LED Come rbETION D A TE) Sub-contractor was noti fied that if for any reason the Level iII designate was to be changed, Gulfalloy must be notified. 7-21-80 lat a SusMITTED S T s j 4331 D ATE: / / To be comoleted by B&R Ouality Assurance 12 31 m E v e E w o r m E Sso M S E s (243 NEveEwsp Y jl23) DATE. WSatisfactory O Unsar'sfxtorv JmW 8 //J/2O 136) N E SubT9 O P V E n tPIC ATIO M t (279 vEnlPIED ST: O Satisfactory D unsatisfactory --n <<.Tci'Mim{\\\\) Y,.\\?$TE./ / " "'"*"" calunas ,4 c w .de dwer.1 M1 L'****"~^ lfg NW dwu s+(- ,4u et I~ ? 1 o n..o n

k Chicag bbOG% N060 Ow(dg SMfE(.s 4 Q gg August 18, 1980 &lA q FEE lld Brown and Root,Inc P.O. Box 1001 Glen Rose, Texas I KM611002 Attention: Mr. D.D.Beddingfield Re: B&R Audit C310-10 Subcontract #35-1195-0585 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station CBI Contract 91918

Dear Mr. Beddingfield,

In.our transmittal of Audit Deficiency Report ADR-C310-10.1 on August 11,1980, part of our response in item 17 was inadvertently omitted. Attached is a copy of the ADR form with the missing part of our response typed in. We hope this has not caused you a great deal of inconvenience'. / Sincerely, CK JOHNSTON (f D.C.Christofferson) S perintendent Welding and O.A. CBI Salt Lake l MEJ:aj attachment cc: JWL h I /k f i' 0 v l?"-Q,Q-Q ~j WGR/91918 C DCC MEJ

gw mm UALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMEN AUDIT DEFICIENCY REPORT m oJECT: CPSES JOB NO.: 35-1195 UNIT: 182 PAGE: 1 2 OF til AuosTEo onGansz AvsoN lal Auoit no. tal Aon no las mon Coot l C.B.&I. C310-10 C310-10.1 10 telosscussEo wtTMr tel nEronTED ev s gtTIDATE: (s)CATEGony Mr. Mack Johnston John T. 8. Maxwell 7 / 23/80 Dein Ots Di>> (9) ooCUuC MT Vlo LAT ED A Mo P AR AG n A PM (CITE l: 1. G&H Specification 2323-CSDS-4, Para.10.0 & 11.0. 2. ASME Section III, Division 1, Subsection NF, Para. NF 4424, 5340. 3. C.B.&I. Procedures VT-5 and MT-3r, Pa ra. 5.0. Ison oestnV ATsoMs Source release inspection of completed assemblies Nos. 32-A-1, 34.-A-1, 35-A-1 and 3o 36-A-3 revealed unacceptable weld conditions such as coarse grooves, overlaps, val-leys, weld spatter and slag. These weld surface conditions render indetenninate the u E acceptability of other NEE processes such as magnetic particle examination. d'i NOTE: A sample of the above conditions was verified by Polaroid photographs. FOR W BRM O EII 0 (s el PoTEnTs AL n Ero nT Ae LE otr CsENCv O vEs G ao gial mECowMEno Arnonst 1. Reinspect completed moment restraints to assure inspection requirements to the Code, contractual and procedural requirements; repair as required; reinspect repaired-areas to the requirements of ASME Sect. III Subsection NF as delineated in applica-ble paragraphs of Article NF-5000. /7 (138 nEsponsst AsssGNEo To ll14l n ESPONSE ouE llSl pPPn ~vED Sv t telDATE; ^ ') 2y 80 // /w-./ZGR 9)?tviit//6( ? bg /d Darwin Christofferson 8 To be comilletedpy46dited organization ' ' ~ I73 Co n =ECTev r ACTION n ESPoNSE ltNCLUD E SCHE ouLED CoM PLETaoM o ATE) We do not consider the grooves, overlaps.and valleys on these assemblies as being severe enough to interfere with the proper interpretation of the NDE. Assembly 35-A-1 had six pieces of weld spatter on the base metal along side 3" of weld length. These had been ground partly away and would not have (see attached sheet) 'Is ol D A T E. (t/n sueusTTED sv - /1 g g t' /n /20 g a os Pn Ev ENT A T ev E A cT ro N s llNCLUo E sCH E ouLE o COM PLETIO N ~>

TC)

(( See attached sheet (2JsAX s.w k $svnW"<w $' t a s o A T E : sumusTTro L V //t l 5D To be completed by B&liQuality Assurance ' ' f asi nEvsEw or mESPONSE: [24] mE VIEWEo BY. llI5]oATE O Satisfactory Q Unsatisfactory l / / tasi nE suLTs or vEnirtC A f ton ( 2 F l V E. = I F I E D S V ; llIsl o A TE l / / O Satisfactory 0 Unsatisfactory 12, ) #Euanus ties CLosto av - 13 sl u A T E J

m N Attachment to AT C310-10.1 17. Affected interpretation of'the NDE. These pieces of weld spatter will be removed. . Assembly 34-A-1 did have.4 or 5 of very thin pieces of weld slag approximately 1/8 to 1/4 inch diameter spaced along 4 inches of weld attaching piece mark 34-4 to 32-2. Although is is doubtful that this thin slag would have masked a relevant defect during NDE, we have redone the magnetic particle and visual examinations-after removing the slag. 20. A training meeting was held with the NDE personnel to review the surface conditions necessary for proper performance and interpretation of examinations. O C 4 4hv( W' p~ g#h s.

{A 35-119E 8-18-80 Brown & Root,Inc. Post office Box 100,, cien Rose, Texas 7eo43 l f7 h Nkks4' August 18, 1980 BRV-11898 r Chicago Bridge & Iron }y h} ap 550 West 1700 South FOR N0 Salt Lake City, Utah 84110 ATTN: Mr. Darwin Christofferson Texas Utilities Services, Inc. Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station 1982-84 2300 MW Installation B&R Audit C310-10 Subcontract 35-1195-0585

Dear Mr. Christofferscn:

We have reviewed your response dated August 11, 1980 to B&R Audit C310-10 and have the following coments. Your response to ADR C310-10.1 only addressed assembly No. 34-A-1 and only the slag and weld spatter, wherein the ADR referenced three additional assemblies and concitions such as coarse grooves, overlaps, and valleys. Please assure that your shop inspectors re-inspect all moment re-straints ready for shipment for compliance with all requirements prior to release inspection by B&R which will be perfonned in the near future. With regard to the concerns of Audit 310-10, we will consider all items closed. I will contact you very soon to set up a release inspection sched-ule of those moment restraints you have indicated are ready for ship-ment. Sincerely, BROWN & ROOT, NC. rgMC w /. awkins / ite quality Assurance Manager S r q )' e~ )VH/pb h~ 6. ' \\ $f '% A 0 t

s. - L d o,.

N cc: L. A. Ashley R. Bass K. M. Broom T. Vega <k D. Frankum File ,,J V

-mTh M Brown & Root,Inc. """ "' ". 14sss c,. QUALITY ASSURANCE RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORTARMS Tynrvrn UNIT SYSTEM COMPONENT ID ENTIFICATION/ SPIN 'N'O. DWG./ SPECIFICATION & REV. ' ' ~ " Y MrtW F.ri vsnss A/U^"' AL23-Ms K3A CH AR ACTERISTIC l'N$PECTION: (g/ pg/ QC;..;- F, /- 9-/ P.O. MRR F-N F SAT. [ UNSAT. NCR HOL O3kb /d NN APPARENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNS ATISFACTORY !TEMS: VENDOR QR B&R l l VENDOR l l TRANSPORTER U DATE DEFICIENCY DISCLOSED A/ A } j g ITEM Q T'Y. D ESCRIPTIO N/R EM AR KS h 10 M / g l f " g a x g S p > f g v u c z n g _ 7 y_g g g.7, p g g g,__,y,g, Fsof &ss.1., dm- /5/.z % 8acx % pra scg; 7 15Fa i"x n 'sw;x-sw devuezm Oaisans, gas ap.g2 f30% $lgss'2, D 7 jsy,2 fc,' &gg.g 'f/ji y;rg g y, f /56/9 3lg "X lh 3Av;22'~ 54) kepudrNG &#2zNG,4ME SN'-/El f30s &ss.:t dor e.2 d4 Asei<4% are wr/ Q +' EA & x2 " &axy 3x,i<ose 7, gag g4.g.2 f.gsg Gass i fy O W A 50/-/ G/c G/2ef pr? 877z-2 / QA RECORD r-4 ra s r0!A-85-69 FILE SUBFILE NO. 14155 FOR INFORMAI!0E 0@l,, zm AUTHORIZED N CLEn9 INSPECTOR NOTIFICATION: DATE: 8I' P d TIME: 8,'[dAU MEDIA: [/R A 'f N/A INIT. / ANI WITNESS: SAT.

UNSAT.
W WAIVED DATE M

W W ANI'S INITIALS REQUIRED STORAGE LOCATIONj /> 1h'$b C- ^ g g8 TYPE: .,g Q C - 1.1/ 3 - 1

m ~ ~., s CULFthc.:Si~.:.?.'i IiCUFACTURII:G CO: IPA'iI j'PP **..u i, - " ~ .,. = LTeiiTD FEi?A;;T Itis 5:CTIO.'i REFORT ,'.1 .g + 6fl9!/9RO 'Fittinh Dascriptio'n b% O b CCC # cport Date 80l-Ori-Order 1:o. LO @ O 7L2 Ihterial G-ado.54 /BJ - /~i'od astoner C-sulf ~4LLoy' nat. P.O. IIo. 22.27 /(o694 Lot lio. b 7 9 E~ [ Serial lio. 08CO7 ust. P.O. Item IIo. e h sn=ay O n cr lio. Q.cntit7 ~ Solv. Renovablo /

oced.r e I!o.

EF-D?-3 Rev. IIo. 7 Date 4-12-77_ Water Wash luTF3IALS a PROCESS I?!?0RISTION Pace *- ant Fre-ele:ner Penetrnnt_ Recorar Ievel: er d I!are IT/A Mr.-_2. flux li'.: 2 flu: Ma- -flu.-

1. :2 Insie, nation Acetone SII.-S 5"C-S E.G-S ed/A

'7gD094 7 9 4 o.s 7 ~/9 6 o83 2.t.fn 172. 're--Oleaner Lt-ing Tine

05 nininna IT/A II/A II/A f

'anet:2nb Ewell Ti=a li/A

1'y ninin".2 II/A II/A 4

.e 37er Drhing Ti=c ??/A I!/A

30

--i ~.:n 1?/A ~ avelopi=g Tice ??/A 17/A II/A

07/:20 aveloper Ec= oval W ier V..sh d and Acet'onelP.insed RES LTS a.'

V '/ W W _ / r s- ~> / i Incpected by W/ A /, vweife 'e /157? . glNo'^f t.e sta t..Z~ T4 A n. E. c S:;T-TC-1A Level I,:17*--72' g. g J .} ' Browoc RQ, tm, [i'o:Mt5-lR5.m% g eqq I'll?,.',;c, q lj.. _.. Y05 Ol?0illbhIl0lf j}[Qf 5' f^hd. . " t r-

? i a J Uf-c ulia,-: W./ j d j ud c/' d 1 Lo j No- - pa =, - i Energy P.oducts Group f y I f* f

1

,t cutr + wcsrcrn:t.iu:urACTun!*'G CO?.*?ANY It 4 a s. y-ObsTohlba: Gulfalloy Da:o 6/10/30 CUSTOh)ER'S Order No.: 22-27-16880 U """Y 0"I *' N. WC 0702-1 SHIPPID TO: 730 Darien / Bro # ' b IM-po46-lRrg,ggg 4 074 Q46% Houston, TX 77052 1 1:em Quanti y Bonney Grade o.- Specifi:atien flo. s r:: tao. Lot tfo. Cr.rn;:st AnMys:s, Phy=ica,t ?tepert'es. Re. -ins: 5 C Material (s) covere,d by,this test report are supplied under Material Supplier No. N 2 2 8 7-1,, (expiring 3-30-82), for Purchase Order No. 22-27-16330 Customer Name Gulfalloy s' .i 6 EOR llEDRMAT10N ONI.Y. i We cer:!'y that i,e da:) on this sheet is a true copy te,Nen from c.ir rc:o 15 of rns:2r71 f rnihed t.; by the p ad,.: tion m::!, or cs eb:2 <'<d by ac t:.: 31 la sr::s v h. . Ecnn ey Fo.g e Ced.'r : nd ?.'a.we v S rae's. P.O Ca s 3 59 r,

A!:enta.v. Pea -s. tear ii 101 C 5 (215 4 35 95 ! 1. T;'ei 8 47 4 53 GtAf An f, i Dott/ g

,8 Y 'r C, x A (W$(U f. Kt L4 = MOU Alt I Y /,3 f,'; M NC : *.? /* '.'AC H C. J ol' n Bitely, sr, s o,s. :.:a

e Teylor-Bonnay Division 512; SIE ADMONT - @0 [n l ' Bonney Forge scusion.rexAs 770 0 f 1319391.:50 GUL8. A E ST E Ree 'A APevF ACT,y A :NG

09.a N y C t.,3 T O M E a O * :,E A.NO.

3A76 ,F, C M E R 22-07-1:33P 6117/30 _OuMMov -l caruur.:asa 1*sy.y3QM l cue.uriTy l csscwTien A182-F304 879Z-2 0732-1 4 .6 x 2 6000# Sockolet C.052,.!n 1.05, P.000, S.024, Si.61, Cr 19.42, Ni 8.50, Mo.24, Cu.23, Co.15, N.045; T/S 83,000; Y/S 40,000; Elongation 65.0; R/A ~7.0; BHN 143 5 We hereby certify that the fittings supplied: Were stabilize solution annealed by heating within w the range of 1900 F. to 2000 F. for 1/2 hour per inch of thickness (3/4 hcur min.) followed immediately by water quenching to below 800 F. In less than three minutes. (BEP 4-052, Rev. 2) Are in complete accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Class 1,1974 Edition including Summer 1974 addenda, ASTM A182-F304, ASME SA132-F304, and the Purchase Order. Were passivated in acccedance with BF-20-003, Rev. O, dated 8/15/79. Were manufactured in accordance with the Quality Systems requirements of ASME Section III, Subsection NCA 3800. Are in acccedance with a Quality Systems prog am audited and aporoved by C.J. Bitely on August 6,1979. Were Liquid Penetrant Tested and satisfactor; results obtained in acccedance with BF-DP-3, Rev. 7, By Randal Brown, S? T-TC-1 A Level II. tAwl) Am. \\ -f/75.939g b7M7'ouSidI ~ Rown:wed & Ar;t0ved oush*y Assurar.co Dept GULFALLcY INc. Da,tr. r y.... r." Y l [ .......................,............_....m.....................,,...._,7............~,..-.... pg ggg-- ~, w_ c = 1

.. =m

~ ~ ', l .w c.srx; l ,'5 MATERIAL TEST REP 0RT ASME QUALITY SYSTEMS CERTIFICATE (MATERI ALS) NUMBER N-1241 EXPIRATION DATE OCTOBER 27, 1981 DATE: June 27, 1980 CUSTOMER Brown & Root, Inc. P.O. Box 1001 Glen Rose, Texas 76043

REFERENCE:

PO#35 -1195 -30396 Gulfalloy DT#27-045691 MATERIAL: Item 21: 6 x 2 Sockolet 6000# (4 e=.) MILL HEAT NO.: 879Z-2 MANUFACTURER: Bonney Forge WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE MATERIAL FURNISHED ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PURCHASE ORDER MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION (S): ASME SA182 F304. (1) ASME SECTION 11, 1974 EDITION THROUGH 1974 3UMMER ADDENDA. (2) ASME SECTION 111, 1974 EDIT.10N THROUGH 1974 SUFMER ADDENDA, NB-2000, FOR CLASS 1 MATERIALS. l W0 REVIEWE7 AND APPROVED DATE Rf,*] [ ;",,,,, ' U} fly I ~~\\' Darwn Stn d

P O Bos 52518 Housmn. Toas 77032 Telephone (713) 672 7.s.".

3 W;TS NO2313262

TWX 910 8t! 1145

l c@'s Brown & Root,InC. 1599 S. W. QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT DATE: /* SHIPMENT W AlVER PROJECT: CPSES JOB NO. 351195 UNIT PAGE / OF / TO: bWNN#Y ' # ' Af)o 1.32X '.S S/E g w :,/o r, p x.ps 7 7 e S -

REFERENCE:

Purchase order / subcontract number [ Y' Y / 7 our telephone conversation this date concerning shipment waiver. G:ntlemen: Confi ng the telephone conversation between your / / M M )064 /91'*/ TINY and our Ms. as referenced above, we have waived final extmination at your facility of the following items only: Order Item No. Qtv.

Descrintion 3 S-H99 - 2 /?70/Q

,,4 m 35 Spc< /"x4*+S' dWw/ so - w. c'. 5* /*

fn /0,1 ff00 /6 *

} S~ //Q~_303 9L / YM l f )X o d X 2

fa-Cef.,

fo re F~n JA/82 Cf00 lb - 3 S - //9 5-3o ++1 ,'&,.7 g*) g pc, g, S,S o 70 ' dad.. A

W*

J* JA 4#3 4/6

Brown & Root. Inc. Form QA 045 titled "Qualit/ Assurance Department Conformance Certificate" properly completed and signeddMs not required. This shipment waiver does not waive any rights Brown & Root may have under this pur.

chase order including the right to reject the item (s) upon discovery of deficiencies during or after arrival at destination. 4 Sincerely, BROWN & ROOT, INC. %,/// ShEv -*-P Ct trten1tt W5559C' %ite Quality Assurance Manager JPC/bj cc: J. P. Clarke 111 hI Rj 8 }} y;gg B&R Site Recemng insp. Dept. B&R Site Purchasing Dept. V 53.0 1 - -. ~.

[ bDb q 1\\ j y (,A _NCR NO. M-2512 6 PAGE / 0'F /O fW C i DR1 EVATION RIR NO. 23' -d 2 061 _15026 is I ~ n 7 TREND DOC __ CATEGORY M-17 ^ On P.O. 35-1195-0585,40&-moment limiting supports were received. Support number 32-A-1, 34-A-1, 35-A-1 and 36-A-3 were magnetic particle tested on site. Surface condition of weld areas will not give satisfactory interpertation of MT. See attachment for remainder of support numbers. REPORTED BY: DATE: RF.X APPROVAL DATE: y TIMJ: Danny Leich 9/22/80 ./ w,- f 27-76 f fe /$u. DISPOSITION RESPONSIBILITY: DISF051fl0N ASSIGNEy0: CAR NO.: ASiE CODE ITEM: XX Yes No J. T. Merritt )lSPOSITION: REWORK REPAIR USE AS IS SCRAP RETURN TO VENDOR See attacb=ent 1 for partial disposition. OA RECORD See attachment 2 for final disposition. RTN. CA REVIEW I g L ()'/M4 ?- y l& SUDFILE NO. l & h 0 h {ll Y q$2

1 M *A S A'

^ AIA % bl Y A r '$ OAT'W CO VJ EW/ AFPa0 VAL: 0 TE: Q EW: "' UPLC*W ee# 'A2"#V:A rom Q CE / C ION: TE: / / MI URR E: ' DATE: 1 h"dTIbdfI.e 47djh2 CNA Cc r n l ( > m. 4..s., w 7

x..

gCff9 $$/'h g,,.p, p g Attachment to NCR M-2512 ' Support Number Support Number Support Number 42-A-1 63-A-2 36-C-5 44-A-1 64-A-2 36-C-6 46-A-1 65-A-2 33-A-2 47-A-1 66-A-5 34-A-4 48-A-1 66-A-6 35-A-4 49-A-1 66-A-7 36-A-4 49-B-1 66-A-11 36-B-7 50-A-1 & 2 64-A-3 36-B-8 51-A-1 & 2 65-A-3 36-C-7 42-A-2 66-A-8 36-C-8 44-A-2 66-A-9 46-A-2 66-A-10 47-A-2 66-B-1 48-A-2 67-A-1 49-A-2 64-A-4 49-B-2 65-A-4 50-A-3 & 4 66-A-12 51-A-3 & 4 66-A-13 43-A-1 66-A-14 45-A-1 66-B-2 46-A-3 67-A-2 47-A-3 14-A-2 48-A-3 14-B-2 49-A-3 21-AL 49-B-3 22-B 50-A-5 & 6 21-AR 51-A-5 & 6 24-A 43-A-2 36-A-1 45-A-2 36-B-1 46-A-4 36-B-2 47-A-4 36-C-1 48-A-4 36-C-2 49-A-4 32-A-2 49-B-4 34-A-2 50-A-7 & 8 35-A-2 51-A-7 & 8 36-A-2 62-A-1 36-B-3 63-A-1 36-B-4 64-A-1 36-C-3 65-A-1 36-C-4 66-A-1 33-A-1 66-A-2 34-A-3 66-A-3 35-A-3 66-A-4 36-B-5 62-A-2 36-B-6 [* h }lN~dtNENiib.

,7 "N j%*/ff-2 Nh ) t93 c lit ? N ~ - NCR-M-2512 Partial Disposition A. Examination 1) Perform Visual Examination'in accordance with VT5/91918 Revision 1. 0 2) Perform Magnetic Particle Examinatio/~in n P accordance with MT3/91918 Revision and MT4/91918 Revision 2 accordingly(for those welds deemed unacceptable per acceptance criteria of A-1). ~ All examinations shall be documented in accor-dance with contract requirements. 1 B. Acceptance Upon completion / acceptance of examinations by subcontractor site personnel, results shall. be submitted to Brown and Root Site QC for verification. C. Repair Those welds requiring repair as determined by A and B shall be dispositioned by agreement with the subcontractor. Acceptance of Repair shall'be accomplished in accordance with A and B above. 1 202 liiE0!!Mnil0s bRi.Y

~ ~ - y //c/M M 82 l 35-1195

Brownf5RooUnc.

10/10/80 50% ff. yg M INTEROFFICE MEMO TO: J. V. Hawkins, CPSES Site QA Manager FROM:. J. T. kaxwell, CPSES Site NDE Level III

SUBJECT:

JOB 35-1195, CPSES NCR M-2512 INSPECTION OF M0 MENT LIMITING RESTRAINTS The following list of subject restraints were submitted to B&R for final inspection by Mr. R. Carver of CB&I. ASME Code ID Nu.be.s: 49-A-2 36-C-2 % 51-A-4 63-A-1 51-A-1 g' 49-B-2 36-C-4 1 A-7 66-B-1 (0) 66-A-1. 49-B-4 36-C-6 /651-A-2 66-B-2 66-A-12 i 66-A-8 y 50-A-8 36-B-4 A 48-A-2

47-A-2 66-A-14 L
49-B-1 36-C-3

48-A-3

24-A 66-A-6 49-A-4 36-C-1 45-A-2
22-B 50-A-2 36-d 65 66-A-10 14-A-2 43-A-2 i

66-A-5 37,.c 6-8 66-A-13 44-A-2 36-B-8 50-A-4 y,,.c 6-7 36-B-3 45-A-1 36-B-2 50-A-7 49-A-1 36-B-5 63-A-2 36-B-6 66-A-ll. 49-B-3 51-A-3 64-A-4 36-B-7 66-A-4 50-A-6 66-A-2 64-A-2' 36-B-1 51-A-8 50-A-8 51-A-2 44-A-1

65-A-1 1

49-A-3 50-A-3 Sl-A-7 14-B-2

62-A-1
65-A-4
34-A-2 i

Of the above list, al'1 were accepted except Number 34-A-2 rejected by magnetic examination. This repair will require welding. Each of the following items: 47-A-2, 24-A, 65-A-1, 65-A-4, 62-A-1 and 22-B require full penetration welds in some area. At the rathole ends of these full penetration welds there are areas that show overlapping / incomplete fusion conditions between the base metal and weld deposit. These areas were discussed with and visually inspected by Mr. R. C. Barber, Site Welding Engineer for Gibbs & Hill Engineering. He agrees that these areas do not meet the. welding and inspection criteria of the ASME Section III Subsection NF requirements. A:NZW~aW/ l J. T. MaxwelI Project Corp. NDE Level III JTM/jh i cc: R. C. Barber, G&H .,,..,. -..., 1 .,r ,g ' [' R. C. Carver, CB&I, Salt Lake 2 R. Baker, B&R 4 i C. Holliday, B&R i 5 <2

7 m Nf r!05 A f, b[/2 / f NCR-M-2512 ( FINAL DISPOSITION Reference Attachment 1-Partial Disposition: Examination on all received welded members has been completed. Figure A indicates those members which have been accepted by site QA/QC per IM-19683 dated 10 October 1980. Based upon the vendor's acceptance of repair re-sponsibilities, the members indicated per Figure B have been returned to the fabrication facility for repair, examination, and re-subm.ittal to Brown & Root for inspection. In view of the above, all welded support members addressed in the "Non-conforming Condition" of this NCR have been dispositioned "Use-as-is" per Figure A or " Return to Vendor" per Figure B. ,1 FIGURE A-DISPOSITIONi USE AS IS i 1 51-A-1 51-A-8 49-B-3 36-8-5 M 45-A-1 66-A-1 49-A-3 50-A-6 51-A-3 C 63-A-2 66-A-12 49-A-2 50-A-3 66-A-2 64-A-4 66-A-8 49-B-2 36-C-2 51-A-2 64-A-2 66-A-14 49-B-4 36-C-4 51-A-7 44-A-1 66-A-6 50-A-8 36-C-6 51-A-4 14-B-2 50-A-2 49-B-1 36-B-4 66-A-7 63-A-1 66-A-5 49-A-4 36-C-3 48-A-2 66-B-1 50-A-4 36-C-5 36-C-1 48-A-3 66-B-2 50-A-7 36-C-8 66-A-10 45-A-2 43-A-2 66-A-11 36-C-7 66-A-13 36-B-7 36-B-l' 66-A-4 49-A-1 36-B-6 14-A-2 36-B-8 36-P-2 36-B-3 44-A-2 FIGURE B-DISPOSITION: RETURN TO VENDOR 34-A-2 46-A-2 42-A-1 47-A-2 64-A-1 50-A-5 24-A 65-A-3 48-A-4 65-A-4 34-A-3 50-A-1 62-A-1 46-A-3 51-A-6 .i 22-B 35-A-2 51-A-5 E 32-A-1 35-A-4 66-A-3 N 34-A-1 32-A 2 66-A-9 g 35-A-1 21-A 47-A-3 36-A-3 46-A-1 64-A-3 67-A-2 46-A-4 48-A-1 y,In,y n$ k' h,g y s 67-A-1 36-A-1 47-A-4 j,, b s 5 ,iih. i d ' ' P-33-A-1 36-A-4 6 A2 3 \\ 43-A-1 36-A-2 6 42 33-A-2 47-A 1 6 A-1 g 34-A-4 21-A 35-A-3 42-A-2 's O % %(W%@ 6A h0d @

t X.. - //C[ /'/ Mf/2 ( RETURil GOODS AUTHORIZAT10l1 f s fj d t[/C' r s[c. ~ DATE ~ W 0' TI't5 BER 4 6'- M G 'O GS6 - del

A19iS

-[gccd go .C,h e-$v;o Bedq e & ly on. do VEiiDOR A.(bn. 3oe. P. Ldt:2- . ADDRESS 6@ W l1NbN dz:d4-Lab % t U+A e4ito VII ~ ~ ~ ' ~ PPD _ COLLECT REAS' Oil FOR RETURN 2gpew-[12etcod par N C.R -M _2G 17. i s im .r. . =- . QTY ITEM DESCRIPT10tl ~ . m %. ib.s m%,! Mo AS .~.c c e. 2 c c % -A-\\ % z.c60 y .%-A 4 2c6o M, A-q _.. M e z.sc>.. %.A.-2 74o 41 - A-s / cMect -:2m c

41. A 31 v..

g ce o ?".. (,4,- A. 2, v 14.gg; f.s z;.p} 'qslo A 4 9 g.\\ / w ^ 42..A.g 4 lwzo - &1 A-+ / acc>o-h8~- . g (8~' ' ' !MT . i 4..z..r.(T':..tcqi:2P -:g..A.,2. . ~ ' "..? . So-hl% F.,= =.fc'TW 2"A 4-1 -%- 1, .:;mp, . c- .. g.a.- 4 2-A.2 W 4'Ro

2.4 - A,.

(o % 'f"- v. ^ 7 $ dmo (as-h M / 4420 .C I 6.A 4 W -A-4 ' 4.ct w i 4 0-f~.i / e+c-zeo ppj::g. gl -A.6, .G0- 240 (v2.b.- l / st.A 6 / 09'74# '2 '2 'E' YO 4 f' ~ .."; ~G,] .,a.. ..'Jr= ' " ~~ ' '.. c,c. T2GA qd~j _ orj;p,:.s / cn . fi.:,'d@:2{_.} y' gg' e .,,M/.7... EED Ptl Dy'.."CM.@ . c.,.,. cs __, . 1 l ...e 0,)O. ' Y:R Y.' I -..;..?.lb,in:.~ - .::.: i'= i 2 e J. x E 2 T V '.= L. r.CC': M.. A. Q..... ;.. +.,- - od7h. b O . Gi.% /

. r:....

.P.ERSO.N. A.lmiORIZ UiG THE. ABO. VE , ;r-.. ~

N.. edhy mz fdM RETURN GOODS AUTil0RIZATION sli ~~ Qh h @-" N."0. Oa-ff, t;U55ER % -WTG-DG756 ~ DA - ais bhago @ nMq c 4 leen, d o VEll00R GEO Weh l'lth 'footh ObL2b Cd1 d4cb S4-\\10 ADDRESS ~ PPD COLLEC VIA ' .per MC,(2' M-75512, REAS0tl FOR RETUR I bwork [ P.getr' ..\\_. ..... \\ ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY ' ' Mneb4 BC -A- \\ 9 616 %, oc t & A-t.' % 44 GG A-l ZsGG %-A B "2ceo '(f6 4 60c! fo'1 -h '2. ' .6190 \\D cc.. feb-A- \\ &lSo m. t- / G1co . ~;

SS-A-1 ucs

- 14s..s..<.a. 4 e..u-t

.%$f.

~~~ s s. A.2. 'e sw e4-A-t / %+s /.

N 5 E

/ s... c ,y y oc. Sovers% \\w.k % A &dA" K41' l \\ cyct - f .m, u,... ,, g

I e ',

.,'t. _ ke-g j,$d W "

T: >.

e . y g.... r ' ,.,..g. l P_#17\\

a

-..-.or

/ .3 RETURM GOODS AUTHORIZATIO:t /y $'UE Obr > Ir.nuasEa6ticM0f')S6 ATE e. C%l 4 A1% h tPA/j0 h/l(dt, d OVl,(O VENDOR ~ 600WH lWb.ith [JS did Otfu, UT@N 6k110 ADDRESS s. t~ PPD Y COLLECT '( VIA h,J.M QfA. N09, M tGI't REASON FOR RETURN. s#} 1 l \\ ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY ~ 1')t, Y L 0(p-Q 'i. ' %\\fYO (rA !h0b .1 :27.__. 64 1- ~ MhD b6 94 $6 M 4,We Woy 4 %A4 < _6% %M' w10 s'6 R 2 ' Mko / 6tco % p. tr / %'2fi2 GM E/ '%b 'l.\\ 4 44-(\\-I shto 46.I: 4. / %20/ D0 /d')W IC 6@ 3.. .Qg ic M ~ - ecasca nmn0amno 1.bovs_2fb 6'l*

x.. a9-ww ggggg 10-21-80 p f/[l'JYVA.VA j f 7e[/6 INTEROFFICE MEMO IM-19733 $ = TO: J. V. Hawkins DATE: October 21, 1980 FROM: John Maxwell

SUBJECT:

. CPSES, Job 35-1195 Inspection of Moment Limiting Restraints Superceding Ift-19683 Dated October 10, 1980 The following list of subject restraints were submitted to Brown & Root for final inspection by Mr. R. Carver of Chicago Bridge & Iron. ASME Code ID Numbers: 14-A-2 36-C-2 48-A-3 50-A-8 66-A-1 14-B-2 36-C-3 49-A-1 51-A-1 66-A-2

22-B 36-C-4 49-A-2 51-A-2 66-A-4
24-A 36-C-5 49-A-3 51-A-3 66-A-5
34-A-2 36-C-6 49-A-4 51-A-4 66-A-6 36-B-1 36-C-7 49-B-1 51-A-7 66-A-7 36-B-2 36-C-8 49-B-2 51-A-8 66-A-8 36-B-3 43-A-2 49-B-3
62-A-1 66-A-10 36-B-4 44-A-1 49-B-4 63-A-1 66-A-11 36-B-5 44-A-2 50-A-2 63-A-2 66-A-12 36-B-6 45-A-1 50-A-3 64-A-2 66-A-13 36-B-7 45-A-2 50-A-4 64-A-4 66-A-14 36-B-8
47 A 2 50-A 6
65-A-1 66-B-1 36-C-1 48-A'-2 50-A-7
65-A-4 66-B-2 Of the above list, all were accepted except Number 34-A-2 rejected by magnetic examination.

Thi.s repair will require welding. Each of the following items, 47-A-2, 24-A, 65-A-1, 65-A-4, 62-A-1 and 22-B, require full penetration welds in some area. At the rathole ends of these full penetration welds, there are areas that show overlap-ing/ incomplete fusion condition,s between the base metal and weld deposit. These areas were discussed with and visually inspected by Mr. R. C. Barber, Site Welding Engineer for Gibbs & Hill Engineering. He agrees EDR iNE0f!hinsiON Uni.Y w -,-----w w ,.c --~9 y -vr-'

g y

r----------He-- -e- .--+ -

35-1195 . 'QUR@m. 10-21-80 grj g. cgg ; ;. Page 2 (A M '//' tha't these areas do not meet the welding and inspection criteria of the ASME Section III Subsection NF requirements. 1(;' PSh*7,.,., /// John Maxwell Project Corporate NDE Level III JM/pb cc: R. C. Barber, G&H R. C. Carver, CB&I, Salt Lake City R. Baker C. Holliday 9m e g g q p g,.,y LUh Wa'ut,,

l Yh 1537s BrownFSRoot,Inc. "" "' " QUALITY ASSURANCE RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORT UNIT SYSTEM COMPONE T IDENTIFICATION / SPIN NO. DWG./S PECIFICATION & R EV. / d M 2- / M** ^;.I f,/-9 P.O. MRR CH AR ACTERISTIC INSf'ECTION: pf-4/) m, r 9-3 0 -d b /[ p g SAT. [ UNSAT. l l NCR HOLD TAG h' APPARENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNSATISFACTORY ITEMS: VENDO QR B&R l l VENDOR l l TRANSPORTER l l 4 y/ g U DATE DEFICIENCY DISCLOSED ITEM QTY. D ESCRIPTIO N/ R EM AR KS &>elFA2Yk. s-5/H6, class -2, Eaf,-2fbJ-L On>sedPan, kW o 21 19Dl%. 5AIDI-B Pye., HeafHo,-35923$~l & sn2Mwpa 9ow2), Hukode-W88% / oM 0% 219f /6,.5 A/DL-B Pye, h'ut Jh, KE3[94l / ) ARMS it40 EXED

t.J rp.mm ;;c[

T RTN. QA REVIEW 4 L 31A m.e.Se FI N O. _ M.s._!._. _ \\ Jgp%rf )%NT SUBFRE NO. J53 79 .e,t r 0 7,I b 't 5 t[\\p y* g u a.'m r t uas AUTHORI D NUCLEAR INSPECTOR NOTIFICATION: ./ d TIME: N {MN MEDIA: &O N/A INIT. W DATE: ANI WITNESS: SAT. W W UNSAT. W @ WAlVED DATE./ W W ANI'S INITIALS R,EQUtgED STpRA LOCATION: 4 s2 fedM# 4[ [M~~ M e/A f /'#32d TveE: 3 .snam/w / ac - -

5 ..~ j g-g-R$) L> vin ip rwOtein tGe gj QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT

s. -

CONFORMANCE CERTIFICATE '~ 'pR o;E cT: COMMANCHE PEAK JOB No.: CR0422 UNIT I PAGE I OF 1, e t! VL NOOR (2) ADDRESS O F V E NOOR F ACILIT Y GULFALLOY, INC. 4730 DARIEN STREET HOUSTON, TEXAS

13) PUR CH AS E OROE R NO.

14) SPE C' FIC A T:ON N O-l R E V.

($) O H A vv 6 N G NO. ' lRt v i 1 l N/A N/A l N/A 35-1195-30448 SEE BELOW (6) IT EM OESCRIPTIONISI (76 No. OF IT EMS ItS) NO. RE LE ASEO I SEE BELOW SEE BELOW !SEEBELOW (9p COMPL ET E YES NO (101 SE RI A L OR tOENTIFICATION NOIS). Item 21: (197.25 ')-3" S/160 Seamless Pipe HT#359235 ASME SA106 GReB ltem 24: (20 ea.)-4" S/160 LR 900 Ell. HT#W8894 ASME SA234 WPB Re6ords checkair1 ( h I below are being transtmtted witn thes cortificate as reoweral tsy ena tieown & Root Occurnent Data Sheet. h Y Materian Certifications Cperating Elec. Test Records Vesuet inspection Records e *d Host Treat Records Non-Operating Elec. Test Records D emonsional inscoct. R ecords $I RT Film & Records Pressure Test Records - Cleanteness R ecords PT/MT Records Saat Tegntnese Test R ecords Painting Records }{

3 UT Records Performance Test R ecords Packaging Records Approved Stress Report Weed. Personnes Owai, Carts.

Spare Parts List bj Approved Design Anotyses NOE Personnes Qual. Certs. Special Handting instrue. Nameolate P sesimist Operating Manuais Code Data Reportis) Osweations: None Listed Sesow wt M i FOR INFORiifAil0li OM.Y: C; N TH E V ENDOR CE RTIF IES that the seemis) descrioed soove,are en conformance wien tne requerements of tne Grown & Root Specit. cat nn witn tne approved deviations tested suove. are sustanse for the purpose intenceJ: are f ree from detects en oesign worsmanship, ano maie. ais g, h and are esew anst of s cefied Qwalesy. A copy of this compseted Conformance Certif ecate will os included witn the boH of lading aan sneppee wn & Ot. inc, at the address designatt3 in the procurement documents with the esp! t j Z~ VENDON ' E O S/4 A1URL: { TITLL; 4 0 AT E: !b / ,g//' lQ.Ae COORDINATOR 9 /// /gd The [endor he[cer't.hei snar the eieras auo.e meet ein contracewas reawirements Brown & Root has reviewed evidence succor tseng enes 2 Co s.8 scale anr+r e. cept as noted unde "Remaa ks'* anove, has verified conformance to *equiremeests This Certificate ooes not waive any rigats Brown P, Root may nave under tne Pw cnase Oerter inciuoeng the regn t to re,ect une itemis) woon oiscovery of deficiencies durersg or atte* are..at at (testination _. i n.i s r v e... a.,c.._________________rt _ _ _ _ E_}

_a 3,

O Per or e l OATE-w StGN Al URE OF B&R SURVEILL ANCE DATE. SHIPMENT W AIVE R NUMBE R N

,P E CI A l tS T :

h !// 9/16/80 SW 1645 i g , h e... s, d

r..e suo.e a.e

e..o.

e...ase o... o n o.ot Ow...ty.sswe ance $m om.nt m..

o. m.,e s_, to.w t or e,at.on...

Brown P, Root Purcess.ng O A ce t

mi C 4 W .-:---I-L'z sfi.. ' - ~ ~ L mm _,p.. -: .T

W h w%,; s r

?M'. .c. me I MATER IAL TE5T REP 0RT ASME QUALITY SYSTEMS CE?,TIFICATE (MAT ER !!.L 5 ) N'f'.E,EF. N - 1241 ' EXPIRATION DATE CCTOBER 27, 1981 DATE: September 15, 1980 Brown and Root, Inc. CUSTOMER: P.O. Box 1001 Glen Rose, Texas 76043

REFERENCE:

B&R PO#35-1195-30448 Gulf alloy DT#27-046948 - altem 21: _197.25 ')-3" S/160 Seamless Pipe ( MATERIAL: MILL HEAT NO.: 359235 MANUFACTURER: Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE MATERI AL FURNISHED ON THE ABOVE ~ REFERENCED PURCHASE ORDER MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COLLOWING SPECIFICATION (S): ASME SA106 GR.B (1) ASME SECTION 11, 1974 EDITION THROUGH 1974 SUMMER ADDENDA (2) ASME SECTION 11, 1974 EDITION THROUGH 1974 SUMMER ADDENDA, NC-2000, FOR CLASS 2 MATERIALS. Q/ i IW Y6//c ._EV.IEWED //4D APPP3VED DZTE ' R FOR Wrlsf:4rsi0d UM e . ~. - 1 l'. [ y[a fy C @-udf g d.A ' J. 47.V D.eric. 5 rc*. '

I O.i.n 3 2 *.'
liotst on Irs.n ~~03
Tc!c;4,nr. ~' s ' 07' 7 ;3:

a h A ' 5 fN-23. *:c 2. **.T 4. ' fJ 1145

,m, me 'Q:.L- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - aceoar no. 15863 ,B.rownf5 Root,Inc.gus QUALITY ASSURANCE 9 RECEIVING INSPECTION.REPORTN ioc~rinexTg~( $dfld23M54M $-3 u~ir svsrco com.osc~r o w a.,s,c cin c ric ~.. cv. Wll /ff, MEE//' l>lse. P.O. MRR CH AR ACTE RISTIC IN S PECTION:_ $7 pg/ CC:... A f - y jp j/9p /14'"H-n -fa /p 7gQ SAT. UNSAT.l l NCR ~ HOLD TAG APPARENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNSATISFACTORY ITEMS: VENDOR QR B&R l l VENDOR l l TRANSPORTER 4 NA DATE DEFICIENCY DISCLOSED ITEM QTY. D ES C RIPTION/ R EM AR KS / 0W OOl'Oh 01 o b $0 fL

2. 0f~bbb$l'sb,0.c].5$~

Cr2I~. ~ /d03-2, Omxpe,A 8lee n W Uczsb i }/eah /Vo, ~ NFM00 QA RE ORD ru,sj., l i s. EUDFILE NO. EF. s 3.<W ' / aq5

. m t,_

Y ~ s / 70e m ngw x /e L g nu.:.4, !!gy [ygy ,5?l)- J73? ? AUTHORIZED NUCLEAR INSPECTOR NOTIFICATION: fi/d DATE://d _h TI M E: MEDIA: MJf _ N[A N1T. _ /41 !d d ANI WITNESS: SAT. W D UNSAT. W W WAIVED DATE W W AN1'S INITI ALS,Rf oUlp ED jj g 'C ATIO N : fM c.Q STORAGlE,Dr~ "B~ % M'/AE% _ww Q C - 1.1/ 3 -1

- -. ev~ ~oyc - - .~o ;;. :,. ,.w-~.. ,na

,/ 9.y Nd'~35-1195 "D O ~ x C> COMANCHE.8EAK S.LS.

]M ' ~ 107652. ,,.d.g 'w,%z.- p a

y'.. ;..-

.,/ ,. p,. PAGF I 1 -l MR N D..... _ OF -W TUSl OTHER '5 e- , -cO....?'.p*W. B&R G & H'.,. F a.N ! P.O. NO. 35-1195-9 ?. SHIPPED TO:\\ c - .c. 3 (. REO. NO. ..:.M:.; ;;,. ~ L .~,+ . :.'W i~ f,. c. _Q FR 13388 <.e. -. L -,;,y.. v. c DATE: ( :.', ; VENDOR: ' . ~... .~' .,. ;..' ' N ~ L l .y ..;... q ; ; L' GDLFALLOL IE. w...,. ' ;.a.. M00$70s. TEIAS ~ 4 11-19-00 ..w ,2 3 SHIPPER: c.. F.O.B. p '~ ' ,:7 ::. sff IT,, -[ ) - 2. ..y.s.,n eh e '8,. ' ' s.. *'r c-T e o ' ' '* f '3. ,.y.f,,, mvlr..:a , ; r, 7n 7,:,. *. . Q! . },' - .g.- i .e s -g'...y&.:.5-$'..;w w -. o a.: . &a ~l J,. '. JH,, % ';.Yhl=E.5 h, f -3 '. kb,, .f."' f lp .;,. f., yg: . Comple.m. :.... :.? m ::; " ygg_ : W > ?:.q;Sh i ~' ,,c = te. .:W.:: q.; ;;..- + -.y 4 > ~4 .. :. Partial _ _ ).. at.'!

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -

LOCATION ' ' f UANTITY UNIT ITEM Qt*" ' fi s'MP i% JM *9 M*' /43.WM',Mj.W?QMWW. y [W u M2MA,n t i M a s' g A m u m e' M,h'dsp %ms msg"M*.Y.ih [Lmi J.lU U.N.rf ~ M da a=M . w..:.: -.... w a :,,m ~2... c. ~ v'd w/ shipment.3 I J'R. <.- IssuedQARec e @.. w

y. j.... eMrg 1st r g.

c ~ TC catTS rec i SPANS 8ff REMM E N TdWR M Es# M M MET 65Esil Lu

w:

~ :. ...: ^. - =;:n w-+u. ,.9:.- +.,. a

y...

. ;.. ;z .m e. (e 3 y 1 .~ MrWG2W5My GS7 G.hf!3stf$riDMW MM M h fM M WS.yM @% w 3w2 'iMIMdM;qwmsw:w MIsr3iE M MI M n

w e..

p:;w::.go.m:p; *m.x.y'v. :ce m' ky,:b.a w.: n:> 7.ewq n W..;1 p ut r e,'

2.Qce. f:

'. m - " W. - g~f.q :.;.; '.L = c t C . m.n ~ym.:vr,x.. >.y~..,,. -- e,v;r.m. m.

= -

.:.uv n .. *t ;w;;.: . v.~;c w ,.n, s. m... m.:;.e .n,.,,W:m. g -,. .z. - ..n

k r. v,.,, ~: w v

,v n ~2. ?. ,m.. v-3%. .,n s. -m ~,...g..- .w - N .bbbNIbb N bbbkh. I . u;.,.:,2.u.,a:1 -.~ u...w.r.m.. ~.... a: : y g n. w a n. . s.: : d h $' w & yS M'W 12 k Sin 2 Wid @ M 2 At;i s k:m m : w n. m n 8 p, fg," p82 %pb$ >wnv m:.. pn um 181 .A... Gdl55Mb. 19.8b.'hOs v I- ?,. ',. ; )' T, g e')' q Q.!.4 e. A, . t. r ....;. y i b '~ [ t.c, e, - . ". <+ c, , y, .' g r.. g..... .s t ,. ty ,, p4-i MWW~t1alW= x GTIONFRUREWS a&2F N sayaupaHM g m m as aua. zmm x. .J' '.

.. +DOCUME ED ON -. m 7,.

k@NGNiM3 Tang m 4 m m aiffirM K5ENAM-m.w:RlR NO. n-e. .= O C.CHECKSY ERP PP TEX UPS PREPAfD CCLLECT '^" R. McGlothlia N RECEIVED BY: Vendor \\. s DELIVERING C ARRIER N " " " ~ ss 11-20-00 Hech 2:g - Pipe. i. f EXTRA l

r#md <g 4 E s:.'A -M.- ~ ' i/:. Fu..m :- C. 6_i _. g._. : % 2. b E cc.=WkM,7 y (l:g MATER lAL TEST REP 0RT ASME QUALITY SYSTEMS CERTIFICATE (MATERI ALS)- NUMSER N-1241 ' EXPIRATION DATE OCTOBER 27, 1981 DA E: November 7,1980 CUSTOMER: Brown & Root P.O. Box 1001 Glen Rose, Texas 76043 B&R PO# 35-1195-30%S REFERENCE.* Gulfalloy DT# 27-001149 MATERIAL: Item 5: (307.05 ft.) 1" X/H SMLS LOW TEMP PlPE MILL HEAT NO. : E71448 MANUFACTURER: Gulf States Tube Division WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE MATERI AL FURNISHED ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PURCHASE ORDER MEE bM b 3 h b - FOLLOWING SPECIFICATION (S): A (1) ASME SECTION 11, 1974 EDITION THROUGH 1974 SUMMER ADDENDA. (2) ASME SECTION 111, 1974 iDITION TH' ROUGH 1974 SUMMER ADDENDA, NC-2000, FOR CLASS 2 MATERI ALS. (( .. s

}

khQ (gh s T[EVfEWE D Att0 ' APPROVED DATE QUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATOR M.j.L.?? -.iCU d3.li.n M.. c, J. 47R D.irwn 9ttet P O !6 3'y : Het. ron. Tna m3:. Telephore ;713' n72-7451 w ais rm:n a:e:. TV.T c'.<e r 4s i

,',%5SDN GULF STATES TU8E DIVISION PRICES ON THIJ 1022 PRINTED REGl. Remit to: P.O. Box 200381 NO. 222 CH. Ill 1 y Hcuston. Texas 7721:1 c 84102 21-27-1028 1-19-79 21 00 23 - 01 l00260034GSY 4 5 4 - sGulfalloy 5 Gulfalloy amou==v== P. O. Box 52518 7 4731 Darien oHouston, Texas 77052 P Houston, Texas ASAP T T O O Ppd. truck /cpatFtoyrrockreports must accompany shipment mo,,.. test O "" .30 Max carbon - seamless pressure pipe per ASTM /ASME '" ~"' S'." ".*.* SA-333 - Grade 1/ Grade 6,- average wall - plain ends lacquer coac - test reports - charpy test required- " g,../ test reports to include: Charpy test with la'teral expansion and percent ductile fracture, ladle analysis and product analysis, heat treat procedure. y ,.7 THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN PRODUCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE Q.A. M% 2 / t vJ. PROGRAM AS AUDITED BY GULFALLOY, IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCA-3800 J'~ HF ou..,,,, . A u. ...v- .Au c o.. 1 11,520' 1.315" .179" Rdm. 17' - 24' 2.172 25021 complete 1" Sch. 80 333 pc3, 12727'3" I h Mm nam 4,,pf _*I . 0. 57 - Il 9.s - 3 c q q ~ I al ? - 0 0// t,/9 I l_ i / / PIDf!CAJ ANALJsIS (Average Ladle Analnis) MEAT NO C / MN V P V S V1 51. V' Ne i CR MO V CU REMAmus E71448 .21 .78 .005 .021 .20 Avg. Ladle Analysis .21 .75 .005 .014 .17 Product Analysis .23 .76 .004 .015 .17 Product Analysis .j/ / pfTrsicAL TEST ULT STR

SI V' Vf ELD P S I L./

ELONG A TION 2" / FLANGE HVORO TEST ROCMWELL NO REMamms 67500 47900 47.0 2500 psi Flattening OK 67200 46500 48.0 OK ChapyImpactTesty 64700 44700 48.0 -50 F,in Ft. Lbs. 64800 47000 48'l6 Incact Mat.Exp. ' F ra c. i .' 8. 5 .054" 7 0 ". f. k brmaht:1 m '/80 . oF. Held af temp. for !T Ma. then air Cooled m a certtrotteil afmetthere g e. 9...i.6 e,..n v. 7 I i wearer cenriry TH AT THE Facts st? ronTH HarnelN ARg TRug bWOpH TO AND SUBSCRl8EO pt* CME Mt THIS ANo coanecbo THEla% ev t T acs? or My nNowLtDGC ANO BEUEF. [,Q, // N.TA., .mc U M A-K.Q.

66S4/ D ) nw 5036 ~ Brown & Root,Inc. neeonT no. ms QUALITY ASSURANCE RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORT INDEXED. s UNIT SYSTEM COMPONENT ID EN TIFIC A TIO N/ S QJgg DWG./ SPECIFIC ATION & REV. .t. 5l'!SG""** } ar nrkw N/A P.O. MRR CH ARACTERISTIC INSPECTION: OC: '!- R/-/Q

wP 3 5 -// %

/076 76 g SAT. g UNSAT.l l NCR HOLD TAG 8685 /O 76 74 APPARENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNSATISFACTORY ITEMS: VENDOR QR B&R l l VENDOR l l TRANSPORTER l l 6/.3 Z. N)) N0 DATE DEFICIENCY DISCLOSED ITEM QTY. D ESCRIPTIO N/ R EM AR KS k t.ht A hik%M W\\ O N\\e Mu n', '7_4 a ! 2 0. A - I f, h L o - 7 ,.31 A - I a.*o tt thwo e nn 't, Sw A - t, Sw a - 1, 1w h - %, A$ A.2__ . sc. w s la A-w,.11. A - \\ s 3. L h - 1 i.hild I 2.L w - 4 6LA-1 x: b A-T.N i \\ ) hov 9, k9.bt D.h \\Mt% .hnNLb21% hh 9.f k tk 9c R. % D Ac_%t.& U faL OD A 't. t E, v.l w n,.E R- ) i d e.w. mu N. s s\\A un-t g hove S"s4fLhsMk.4. kt\\n.n.S d OMb lek h9 Ech c.k os h h % S t e. M it. mh men wn G wwer.ug br r-i ' ;* i ** 8 O, ~) 8 u 2, g',1 ( 1 M l'.'d E-t'" 6M. o M 'th i T_t E 'R \\-"N % T AUTHORIZED NUCLEAR INSPECTOR NOTIFICATION: DATE: M S. TIME:_ (G I Y DM MEDIA-bOM N/A INIT._ Ill/k ANI WITNESS: SAT. O W UNSAT. O W WAIVED d DATE l 'l' S

EO W W ANI'S INITI ALS REQUIRED

^ h&gCC_\\.unL STORAGE LOCATION: P W"'~ \\ b '.h.*_bO_ h___M__ _oc d ai _t

i i-FIGURE 8.1-12-1 BPOWil & ROOT INC. Quality Assurance Department ~ "RECEIVI!;G !!!SCELLAtlE0US STEEL" i SAT. UNSAT. N/A 1. Did all required documentation accccpany shipnent? / j 2. Is shiprent packaged satisfactorily? / 3. Are caterial rarkings in accordance with soecification l recui renents? V i 5. !s there any da. age? / 6. Faye all NDE requirements been rtet? y ) 7. Was shiprent acccnpanied by a B&R Departr.ent l Confomance Certificate? J7 { Was the Certificate stoned by a B&R Surveillance ~~ Specialist? j If not, is a B&R OA Source Inspection Waiver Fom available? / 8. Applicable PC Peceiving tags have been applied. / i Coments: J.,//P 1 i M _. d\\b l , g@S*" y-QC Ir.s:ector ggffs-gr Date ,/S $-8 i I

. -. +, n-?;D:;2. -, No. 35.li.... o95.Y N..'h. ',r.,4 [.mY55[lh.COfAANCHE PEAK S.E.S. [ef p,,. - '. (.[ ob

p. ~.. m.;.w.>, -.

a.: p n i.y

s...

.y...e

.i [ ~ LI,hP GE ' OF ' b f.M:.E. ' '..% @g... i.r.77. 1 ~ ' '. " ', .~ '... ? MR NO. ,'.g.3 p $.@r m..s' : l:-dH. m 9.v.-Q.,B & R.,, .. ::,.g..

1. * ".

G & HNf & N '.'Vi$% T* Sl

L

> $' 'N . OTHER '.,,. p,0 no.35.}}95.- G$$$ ~ _, :, y '. A;. - y b..f SHlPPED TO:W. ch.'t.- '. W.- k'. ' ~w.

i

.i i , w :y':.::s ' - .W ~ %k G.f.W~is:A%REO. NO. rA " W' 4.t.. '^:5Q.::M i.$;. N.; ;W..!; ",;. M:,q.YW, ':..L RW* F'lf % :t; M :b..a M :.N N : MTWTi.Fr i.'~M $ i.! 3MW.Wp ?., - / T2%-$,M;-,f '"if'. I,'D,;,; 49,. X' '.S$9},.m /.:*.4.',G,, :,. ; ..'Qy_':. ~MM h O f. *f, N,Y.t.S.s f ?. ' %..f.f?'$~ W d --.c., n. Ja..m, y.. !,r..%2;,; a'.

}g --

v * (.M0,,. ':?. *._',g.'s&_..*. '.,.. f. ..h.,c p >7 a v. .% =n

a- <3,.

,o..... n g. - < = 8 ...v;me, g,,. w.

_ 4./, 3 [N.F'.I5 f-:i* 7 @*c) <Q ^ *'If$ /7 )alN [. ', ;.

0-' ' " ' ' ~ -k M '[- "4i f W,,c' J:' ' DATE: t NA.,;: VENDOR:r' A r a' "6' x l-. - i; *.'W .1 ;.'.~ ~ '.* f 9 6 ' h.' :QHCf40 Buc2 C D U n'ii.'l.1i. @..'OC.. ~... 'q ~... w -.g . '+ TA * * 'e ' g ',. l. "s r in. 2A,.W,5!.L7.MU.QTf.tTW 11-1A-C0 ~

c. u e.

~.,.c..~ w b.;.

x.e %,

%., ; s:. W. . ;.*m>. ' -b 2 + . j s.- 1.,. -.. .....w.., m. Y ~. F.O.B. -.,s ~5..A... SHIPPERE <' '.9.4: ?- a'- WW S' ? ' b'!WW ' M ' ?' a 'l.L,N a l.~w$,.c5 $. ! l;' ; J, $.;. l,.l!.&;h'lQ;; Q. Y ' ui Jgn...:~:jlMl:17',W:'G -': c, .. ':::7;;;;.y,.r.:Q-y.:.< ; '.p. '1 3" y& ?,. ,Q.. Q.y.c.,s n+ :e;M,: 5.; m .;. w, f : y. L':s:a . p:. b :... g

cs

u v..-

.5 f'..

n l_.. 4 4. Dj,"l'.

l'

'i'l. -. ~.. ~. -jl "' ? ~. -

5. -&,n; lhi ;g. %". 'l-) W;> A ~, f... -

m

9 - bNf..u',5W."% ~.T & '

),,,,,' W hhts 0 7&i &; }& $ U C ? &. ~$E.~~.'A:s+:.*:ee.

r '

C. '* .r -l X W.' [ U A N TITY 'l UNIT ITEM

.F. 6 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION -

T +-' LOCATION - la - gy 7 v [+ E M h t CQ3t73fthf' g.a b.:-p ;igtgg q m rovmgnicMycW.v m m,g, M4;.g['? wM.vci r' M W -W.a & M > N =x'-M ,,.o ff'ptdM*$ fYC4M I fS IJll h-d.Mn- _.r S$MM/. ..TG . % aj.u. b _ s,.!. 3 dej,,..A_x .t h _.,a,c m %, - _ _.. x. 3 M. ~ m'&.,4,44. 4:.u. q.yQkv.w;ep:s....qQ7M. m:mmp:q-kW O'h, =;&mk. y g.e:.&m,.p;,ywr-q.k ry.0:fg?n@..upft p- .w w;y g. ,, JN.4g,p.c h.;s. 44 m A s .k A ..,, t y g.s 7,.k*,%.,,.w.m a.w+7, %m @.M; em.e % ;c: Cw y>

4. A 2..n. y,, ve #;,

" - h y. M ,,g n av s;% m.h*.,M.w. e4 .g,g;g . "~ s' i.w, L h. xs v u w e., W" o g w ~}' . :. ' ue '.: Q:-Q ' i, ...W ;,g, g.' y :- F '. : ' ,;s. #^ ,,.,I' <, * :;; ^ ' .,, ; a; 's, .m.. L .e. . g. ~ -. .n, j., ., ~ L.0' *V'?.R,Q. . ;q

n. s,

'ie. ...a'

% &-m'*

-w n'. vs a, %rp,k ;;.,:Q.WEQ W@Q%. #g:W-EWL ;U.gf$. MS*W w 35$ Y-vWQM [y^"@,&. K Q ..%%'T l:,' W~q:,:.xj.,%,,Gk; Q: % %&!N & L w -),% &r'."Q,ac? %

A. m.W Q*s, 4 p)v yy. Y' w%.:.t:

'.;; k,, f.M: y-i mk M'.,'p%>g ,t% ; " " *% q 1

k. h w. a,..c... r.- r...c.,w #;. m.,'% A* y,

,w., a. _.s.,.h...tw. Y%g.. 3 = M" D K' A' , v*. ,n c.. y.,,, h. sa... .,.s, i, %,..,. s. p.n y.:%..}Jn;.%:., g:..r& ',, n,, ;,. <. w

m..y ;,

.,:.,,a .,. s..,.4.. -,..

c. m.%m a),s

.%w.,..- q x n, y. s .'ay'L. ,4 e o ~ c<h..r. s> e b. 4- .4. .e ~.k u A y m.ra y..e L ~ *.M ~ s 3, se.- - o >,. c ,f,.a r. p% m =: bh @p T.J m g: wyy,p--A"'C'M,.f4 9,,.,@h0bb Y N ? ?l0 N ' h. $ Y S f&$$Y,c:u

v.emmrw w,; *

,,kiY _ hY Y . =s... h $p e.&-.. W 2,. Q %v..QVS 'r-

C-: 9. 'j. : -

;i....m.: %c:.cm.w.*.p;,; n..,

W.". %. r Y;, m..' M......n. '.~.wJ u.q ':e.eAe,D,1:,1.r.V^. c i .~ . + - o cY I ~. +... a.%.m w.w.4 .. 3 (.= gt:.. s. Ab 4 %.,.. P.: e,,. - c..d,w.s. ~.o .:p. . ".....i.-. tt

s. r m-

-s .. NN Mh khk $ x.w,1 dwau

k. a..:. m &- d 'h

~ n*"'U ~ ;) .sunne n,~.mr - h.',:*jYWM3 l &.6 N. w,.:;{ m\\'" m<-W W 25 6,2 $19 %': Q. mgmvew*.C-Qg? g;,97':~w"'m f * ' q.l ' W E w%r*'c'=rm, w!gm.n@lf.Q '.s f . w-Mm 2y

r ys w: .% y *,c~r* W v.

K

,,..:'.n cy qs.4'%'* A. % c y:.

9.~5rt:n .. ifi.nyhMm +;a.p*m..:.gp M'3L'd'L2 E M,~ T. d 1 E;,x i., M : tQ:yst:pA M Mi$id.,;n f7 VQf11 C i .*W :..a

k.. m t.1:,

,.,8: .v O...: - p !bt.DM $5Ehd ,9 MJi ltilfMi!*Q~WS-f-di.2 hMNNNMbI MNE.5M2h""Md.3d N Y 7 , 7 ' T 6. U W G M. Q) M@W$ 7 @f ; Q.j p% [h N [p M ;a:. w w. w m.d.u. w w C _ n:.>,. g w w M '., p&,q:.' &.n %' Ld &,w}r..Lh4'.;k.%,, >k%.,. :J - ~ s. G, u r.g,L,uca ha %r J .u 2:, v.::a-4 :,,.] O. .uth;.J m

.s u..:4.u J..:

j ., +. -.... -r.p : . n s., ~:4 ~4. ... ~

.,y.

.-,..~:n ..i. m '. /. _- 1 .p* y n a~;:cy. g(,a r w~w>;'.'.h.5 + 'n m.. W r a. ..j;:,. - 4 7"" ? & '1,'.4'l- . u- - ~' W.

r,

.?:4'm'.

m' *s fj :4M^'tT w c.-

d

% w.

n.. y. :..w c ~ "w g f.~" rM GEu.Lij.h,%d;h'*8.!p7?'*"M *C'E.G*~/"7,'*Tf"'O.% yn. f,.gpmW > M:p *Q.G.t %'! ~t ' FY ~Lt@MT, e"j'?.";'.9'] u f Wy'kui,Q, 2,..y.., s sn.s 9 ~ 32MM,&h. wb : u L 1$,d u!Myw$ nut 9 w 1 Z d220W2 b,2.t.sq E ' ?*&..,lE ';.$ 1% ' ~;W: ' >;3[,=; :@. Q&. >;* Q'..L s. 'r,,,- C,i.($. t. i:48['.^;..?::

L.

^ O m CC C H E'C n a v EAP PP TL4 UP5 PN EP AID C O LLEC T PAM r. 3, (ly.g m, y...s. c.. c.x b U '. + t...IS ~ -o m. ~ V..w T JM m,.'-. . REC. EIVED BY:. ' t e, e ' *..., i d b,h a 4, A,,, ., 7 e i 7G.Qf,. ; ;,.,1 ; :9.': ~ Q> f

7..

F g e^ ~- 1 f.'u., W : i; f +., "; r.,."3 '(r l.l.. ' ~, v ~* .A g,a

- de DEUVERING CAMRIF.It

=.,...,,,,; ,.s. ..c,,o ,..p.,., )}e M .e.... c. TQ hbf$ [*h. ' O!. son u: a.x. o, Q' ~ C.. ' g,;\\. b - ~ ,.;h W. EXTRA

'I @ N kD E '. *%'d ' i. 4,.5.' ? -sh::.ob NN$5 dM' m.t.ug$V' ".Ng.TCOMANCHi! PEAX $.d.'.',M'@Y'Wwx .h y p W7 u... c....gpk'in <;.:. a C. g .:A.T. ~ } +f. Q,..,. w. g:e 4.: T..,a...%q., g f g p f p.,.4. t.,>.Q.G;[. yy yo,4,<. r .r gyu T.,.u'..,:n. M: ;pW.y.:.::+.W:: . ~* M.,.o.. ' . c 4~,.. . w XE..n,.. a: 4.E V,. c m .yQ, ,.;n . Q ;[. g:,. s. r.v.m. ypg. O.........,.n, ..A>. e....., r .y _ j. :.

of n

ieg h xwie m m v w w w w w ;.w.MWw me.'..r.a.e.&w$. E>g J.fu.;;0 l,f;./,('.y ;M, . r 3. >.1., .y.>_ r, ;..,; {;.&m,75@$ pep; REQ. NO..nw * '. ':W.M@, . y ;9 L.I W +y " 5,;:.. RP,+ LJ ".W..'v'P.O NO . $. - Jg..35. 1195 . r-y.s y .y g%- R, SHIPPED TOiSMI .W': ..u y y.q?:H:;g' e./.y.:p,'.g.s'rgg,i,f, 'gg.y !+!.. % Qn amwwm 'a :w':w'mmqqdQN.ve::. 'A.?W.;.mscr..:.

i. w. nq w;M W W cvlurn.:.->X;rs:

mnamas ww.e.nz .n whom.244 L '.' A*"W.h e,i ~.s =.a, w".:#.~ m.b:n M h.s m *w.#. e w y"v N

~ M Q 7 ' *1 Y j

$M .. -we ?. k.+ C N #

JI

%e. M @ [*I.C Y.d.F*.D j* + .g.t .t ,.,.e-- c.s y ..'g,..* * .A f %, , g ;,' 4,,, " .q w.p..le. M....,4, h,.. S....b.? h.,,.*4. hA.,."h,f.? &.. W.T M, W g. W R j - ,,. ]M.

i, s,..,?hN

.b.' l5 e . y J

. fas: t. is e

.m.;, gy c.s.w,y. 9 -.;.,e egg y. >-4e.

w..,,

,. o.. m.-, s SHIPPER: W *qr. m$1?.W.'O'N - W-MW... y;....e ,....y.. . n.w....%.~ - N....-# m' .. ; -W.w% -F.O.B. -".y-'. *

J F t r.t * '

o M.e :c,w;,. : w.=l+ mw <?..--:* s,G **1 o'. 'e s4 ; ;.4 -'* *"M's ?**'p**v t *

n4 -. !

P '. ~ W g;i... '.;p. c;" A."j ..u.,y% ng:ec,R. m.: ^ + J. m,~.,,!;g!%i:s g;... .::.:e. N.. m... wy 4.,.:.y:.. ^h .y.O + r,,. :. v yr t. ..~ ' n, . w 1.. yi v m.v.w. +

.y t

.2. ..uc... ' ~ %.: s. - n.> %..]'t;y u - v.2.~<~ q. 93 T m.. %.1 y;,n;.m.. .:;y, l e c:.N.Q sw." W.y.w

y N.e;g.r'.

~......g.. &q5 y;.d. -.n-.~ .?r.. .. r-

.=*

5.w,%p..C. o.mpleta L. ] o c;.-P.. rv.. v... M n

c...

%~ .. *:4 f..o. rt.ia..l, 'h;;.?,TouANitTY TkI '. U Nit. ' IT E M ' MATERf AL DESCRIPTION LOCATION a wmW.w ^ w' ' w-~ n 'w ' w?:. +- w' wm.- 'n. E. ;w,.v.!:v g v.a%w w 'mw s .w.... t. mwk-c e - e s k.... c. a. 1. r,.. ' y.3. -e., r 3,r v. y f,.&$.. 5. e ...;c, g i,,-,w. a,,.. ,= ,. c. :..,, n.. -l*;%~ $g;,,..., s,,$.ei} ~ ;L !W,.....: W. <.% Q - ' A:. c.w. . m BM.Wh4 !.W 3.YM. hi ..A. j; e, n. . t.. 4 s +..... M#* n,a.v.:g1.E,9.'d. & w, .,...,.....,.e ..1n.s JSt,. u..,., g. _.... c, :. 4 a s. r. ..,:: *,y ~ w n. .. ~;;,1 .t. p >. 'M. ...k

m.

'~J.. ...s e n n a~ n v . r.m;v.-- & ~ -w N l ? -rW?m 4:U ys%p 3;.,. .'~.s* w.s an..m.,Jg.,slf,.h. y yW* - g,n p .v,..&. T,,n; y:w.~r , - Q.. . &.,.a + yc: .:z-w.. w-w m;: m-v .s+&c.,,,yw%M($;.

p

. c.a . e :.y >. ' ' ' ~ ~ ~ os & NW. -.>.-W

1

~- n e .'.- d. ,5

.'e '~s,4 MW;,..rp.&*f :&,".M 'm.~

~ W;' 5 :l *N V st .. aQ -.- wi p:4> ' m,u m {w 1'3.n. y.* ,p .c L.mg.m, w ~ - ~. m$...w:.. ...,., f.. muI 4.- M.>. v ;.. m::o..1 , n,.,y. ~ w n.r., s.,n.*6.f e...~es.,t. - m u: ...Ja t.

..t.m d y: ..b,..

'.n: sq ra, +**m- ' -..0, c:s..:;u <a +.. -4~ ~.. t y ~. ..~:.: ~ -. w. n ... m,. -. eg e . e.. u. 1, m... ~~ e ' Oe: - <O 5 W M,.W QQl T.h.?%KQ* &Mj h Tu Y W ~.;. Q w Y. o...- &e,Q.w v^y&,W;M.. dy%.p.. s.: q..yw >..-.. - s _- 2 n f '.;- w.t..t. R.M i;,.2.X - 4?: .?r '. M.,., y a... _. w u - n s. u { ..p' o, -. ( w' ' 24. .J;W.N., '1 u, 6.ua..N:. 1; ::;n,, s.@ - , i. 5. W. n m-% ..,0+. T ..v e ;-:~+. ~ .c '~. *s. % .'.8 im Lw$ o 4 <.1 .o-y A.s m a..D.~' A.g:' 3 w. .,c n..% , O... >e. 6.U. v '.:ceL m,p - ,~s.5 - %j $ {,.*.'

i..f 4W.j i./Mfi O.$ 1Q /E'

.;.,.1:'.w,1 4 ' s' {..hy.}.. Q C. C HtclL O Y ERP PP TER UPS PNEFAlO CCWECT 8, Ward .c r. E b ^ 7-Nb,*q RECEIVED BY:

0. W

^ ~.. ,,'a l .%' w' d y.;... r, !v:a .. p.. j u.c.T ..~.... ..v s,.:. m . n,,- a >* **.,n 4

=?-

~ .L:et,nS.)hsa

.J, y,
s %

s %,. g %n f. g.z-i,..,.t: a ; g.v:e.v.f.?dQl,)wA 7, 3 y.. M,,.3 y,.:. g.

9..

"7 . w. c.. - w .. c. oemeni~o cAnaic-A ;. a. m. ..o .u. . 4 c, ~o ,~,. . un gs'.112540 . Riggtes A h w iterh m T4,50 a 4 s.,c :.r...

e..;.

..n.:,.. - . ;,. :.....s.. m e ~., ~.. ..t .. ~.

m..

. z. A......: n.... a.. ;.. ~,. - ... a...h, n . ;;. > %...,': m,v.. + .a ex m

Brown & Root,Inc. "" "' ". 15114 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORT UNIT SYSTEM COMPONENT IDENTIFIC ATION/ SPIN NO. OWG./ SPECIFICATION & REV. Tncyne.nh AAFEAoAtb hst A n{Mk 6eA 13Elous 2.3 2 3 -d5DA - V P.O. MRR CHAR ACTERISTIC INSPECTION: CC: ? ! - ff, f - / Z 5 1196 Q2 o# SAT. W UNSAT. U NCR HOLD TAG og 9,cl \\O R10 ) APPARENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNSATISFACTO9Y ITEMS: 1 ~ ~ VENDOR OR B&R l l VENDOR U TRANSPORTER l l ) d%I. Mh /^ DATE DEFICIENCY DISCLOSED ITEM C T Y. D ES CRIPTION/R EM ARKS MowsCLdh kP._s.to.A(tskb 1 a. E ha u- % - t,- 1. 84 E.A. % -h -1 %n.u 4 g.. %s. m-R-\\sk4 ARMS %-n - i two.u q ^ o > >f ' INDEXED '2 n. lB-50- A - \\, 6

DArE,

'l EA. 51-w - 6,- lo \\ h QA RECORD '[h fL55% /* FILE No. 0 D. 15//%

"i e

f' /* +'-. ' >~,l;; 4 u A 5 to AUTHORIZED NUCLEAR INSPECTOR NOTIFICATION: (( N A % f;,__ N/A INIT. d \\d _k DATE:. \\' %h_-h\\__ TIME: _Y,dM bM M EDI A: ANI WITNESS: SAT. W W UNSAT. W W WAIVED DATE l-2N'kl. _s W W ANI'S INITIALS REQUIRED 3 ks14Y d.j$93 '~ STORAGE LOCATION: ? -- 2M- _7_ _._.. __. - =- -- n e

FIGURE 8.1-12-1 BPOWil & ROOT INC. Quality Assurance Department "RECEIVI lG !!!SCELLAtlE0ll5 STEZL" SAT. ,,UN5AT. N/A 1. Did all required documentation accccpany shipnent? / 2. Is shipment packaged satisfactorily? /' 2. . Are material rarkings in accordance with specification requi re,ents? i. Is there any darage? / E. Have all NDE requirements been rnet? / 7 Was shipment accmpanied by a B&R Departnent Conformance Certificatc? - * ~ ~~ ~ / Was the Certificate signed by a B&R Surveillance Specialist? / ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ If not, is a B&R CA Source Inspection Italver Fonn available? 2. Applicable CC Receiving tags have been applied. C:rrents': //M .. k / ? g A NY ?.- ,s,a...ie_s/l ./m. # Date J. 24-//

:esce: tor 7

. _.....,. _,.m.,.... , m..,,, n..-w. ru., r.,-- m., w., m,,,... f, , *'. y tif-g. M.,,f.Qff .}.. 7, w... -Q @,.. T COMANCHE PEAK S.E.1

p' ~

J A. W.y? f. 7.;.i,t h..W'~,. [* M, loch No. 35-1195 W. ,. ~ : ~ ';.. - g".., a G. P.Y n'i.sr f,,,e,.,: q i.. ;;.. %.>. :J... . #,*y;u. ,, L:..;. ,f @$.sw ~r., . p.. r. 4; .., =,..,....., - .,%.g... .y..... , N A..; W.c. Tw ~ G N. ;.{, S Q>. p.a,'.' ~. $..c'd.-,..:OTHER ' "*%V^ Of 1', . MR NO. .E.'., PAG.m.E ".6 . n n....

.;.: W ' w..

....v:.. m y.m. uc.e~....,c..n" j? N. i m m.3 p.g a g'p.. N. EU '" " M.". - G&H F&N .W .TUSl s ~ ' ' SHIPPED TQ: W.W Lb : :r,..LJ ;,W ~ t '. f.-l '. c,. t '. -. .J. :,. a.O. NO. 35-1195- .c ;; t ..P

s. m. r u....., r T. r

';'h p '., .<.# e u u *p*:C'r. c , c;... 9x;M.:*.. *: 7,'~e.Q**.s%m: .. M. V+fk,e_ v.t ,.:% ~.C e. ?~' Q. Q ;. m* Q n:,'L.!.

D '...

..M % Q:%.y O ' 'L. -M '3.Wi.".;,.W REO. No.b #.%

M* 7: G

- T.J.,.<.

p 9,' W a* a.et.o.* Q, h )}:,J.h),j;*vJi',,**f*.e..

~ >. Q . ~.. T-k....., .**L..n*.,,,.$. L t..%.. l %., w r,% '%,<J.. 4 a

o.. ;.":

-* '~ y<> 3 *.,,.. s.,.:-., ' -p s ,.e, 7 .) . '. ;*^"+~. ". - c-< 4;

b : ~..N,Q,q e.-* * # ' ~ -

s y.. A:4. 4. P. "'. </<'?. y~ ~

r. a e'e.m,w,: 5..

' <?,' A., 'm.

y1,e..

.w.'. ; p.,;U" '.,.e- -' v' e,g ~y::.:;W. v .~ :- o-v p - 3...

M. -, sp.,s. g,;

.t. .. 1.4 $. ,, : w< s..,. a, ......,,,p.4+ ...>.3 gAgg e f, m, .w. 9n,,. ~. m>, A uv+- o.

m.: r._
a

?;s..Q 'L.~ *' ' ...*.1...... u . &. 1^* 3.,:,.p...L'. .,~y..,... t 3 ,g ;. .M .g. 1 ' '--T s.. t .~ ?.' e.. ..;? f, W., a

p.

s.

G.L ; '

,;,... ynOQg'. ';.M4 m e ...y...y q w .v

.x. e.: s. *; i., * -, 1,;

?.= ;.3, ~y; [. T W CITT. UTNi '. (1-22-31.M>:SG ,.'[ h ~,.. .s +;q u.w v.wfa,!.u.+.L v.=.c r., -:.,m .:&.m.:; ~ * - F.O.B. A.., - > A >.6 .., x,W 1. Q. c +, D%. g,(.h SHIPPER: W ^ Y.a. a.< ' ' - M *..,.> W-W. , ~ ? ne.. ' G:. w . ~. '.!:.. + - s. c

<.' m.?. u..,.. *

'. *!i; LPi%;Ap.., j.'v'J,: G.

n. 1p0,s.

..s.;;p'.. ".a .r

s.. '....,

~.. v +...,f : >A. w ..e-'.,.,..,.'.. 5 %.,,, &, s. .,e" *.

:> '%n. *.'T~.,r s..;* I;* , 'd.%

~.' * ' 'sp;e L- .,,.: w..,'e - s y ,...a. :.. ~..,..,... ch*a de h. l.Q? :/*~ T , a. s. , r. -w. -s ?.

m i,'

? i ?. '+'..? *L R. f-~'~ b

. : Y,b. 4fi;.Yl*eh e K {X** * **

..r ,. s .......,,.....y..... ,...s,., n . ?.. i r'. 4 . ~,. *..fu'- i ~/ o f r.R.,,.. g..* >. e,..... :ff.. .,e t. -f ., w,,,.; , u ; e., ..:.,1 p - '1;... 5 " r. ; 3 1, -I,. ' ... ~.. N. ?s

y***

. '?, .;./.,,.. ., s t. 11 9t." C lete b 7'.Y.'(y.- ' i. - l. ' * ^ 7 E ' "O i W: .,-t. g..e., t /ce .. ? ...*-?. .'~l. M.i;,s,p N..., $. ~- 4 Qoruci h (,ss. -v.g..Smp- .,-e.- p. v. W.f T Q'

;;L '

4.

l LOCATION C U ANTITY UNIT.

-ITEM ' WATERIAL DESCRIPTION $YNWh ? I&,N5 & Ydf$f j.QM 'RJbE,6%*bs. s e %. h.%'.f f & M ([hhS N [tS Y Yb $Q 5? h * ' j' Yi %* '."h g;ll[MYhY'1h>;;;N 45 & (.h Y$W1 k$$$

i u. w ~ m* " l. s a u. u.. ~. n l.

v. y&Oh.u:pl.C3&ml ca T.i;Y.' ' l R.D W..

Td M

!k... .T.. Q. .M00=b1 O.C.N : dw Wmum M M[ a*2 & q W. p w k. w n w w w

. % T W M W3M.$$$N DOEncMi ElC,Ms..u. a,1.1+a m'NiMM+ NN.IPs NM d

V. +ffl.lft!Clifu,s ..- u. a w.m.O.151.nSpGC u.O.Hy g~.pg,.. .~ a m@.,aam%m.e T., ~ e f,,. .Y; Nam 1:.<.r t '. W myd. hy h.u.usb $h $, n"Yk'$;w!*h? v.g w m m.g, wn

n.,.

S h h hh f,gf h Y a .;. Q. c.p. g cap. w. . g ;.4 3... c;:. 7.;.c,,.g.:. g m,; r~zw mp:.a u .;......x...,q. s. .. n,3. y .. J,. 4.. f.)Q. . t.a... g. g. s,a.: gn c.... 'Q Q ' ~.- h '4 .UDdU df h' l N $3S[$y6$2SMfM h(5 M'h8M%. 3.$ 3MdW4MEM,@4.M M,%dDfi .-f W8'4M. .as mm =m... w' a~ : Y.m.j.t h,~.,..g* N, U. ) ~.%.ew. lr+f W 6 Q r'?9:*? .v , ; A.m%7l%v e a w%:.y.~_l dxr,. %m w~ ':6%,%r"f}M%: m ca dN, mmhy%" A_ ggg,$~cm,% pr m,s yy. ; ;$$ %M'NO e g*:*! m-c v;,c N W &.),$ &at My ' ?. +4N~' WW & b Yl W Ww.::; .. ~.am: M wC W e6' 2

M s.Q. %

w 4x .#Ts racTithhfpens 2: :." m@.vo... necn w/!.9 W.w.mion myn.c m ,R..m. m.m.v ':eed,.y. .M em9.sM ed, .g.ep y id:><..r -:W h h r , m m,. m, w,,._,,.3 m b ....g. .c,,.,..,.. o...., - . m:o :.-y... 9 r.r.,,.*.n ; i..~.,.

1.,

. a,.o. ,. s,,."n.,.. ..n p r 4.; 3.V. am s* W 2, .r.e,y.3.1,p,. ".... .w. o. - m.,,... i,.

.,: , O,rl.; M,'

6,,n, 5. .,..' i; .m...-..; r:; e +. ....y,,m.;.,.

s

. e..... o..,~ 3., g. ..r..,

s..,.. c.

,ME5MMy; ME. /S$HMM,%A,;..bd + 3 c m, w -. .e.w.. - ~r,. y.p -. -~~ m.* w, .m. .~;m w - -y d$$pn.p,.yM.a....MM M 6 .n. . =.* u 4.'jt,y. q.,,.,,.,n; y..x . u..r.-. ~.., +. .c ..p:.n. ;p

o. \\

, r,J. n'.. \\. r. =,.. i on. .>z %nwq.:. ;. '- ',-.; g:.. m. w. . n.-.... .m;... w.n. ;& ,.[ m.< e< rn -m 7 f%,. ty@a,eMCM.1:pt.n :m u.:. n d m, @q my m$ m?vlW;~*..rm em m r~ w mr Wm49.,7.pn % -~m 1 7::- '.e,.~ m r pk.,a;n~r @q w - Wn

y m

4 a,f &.2 g ww:w . L ".,;. r w; s:. w a.. g. ul. m..,. :.w. ,,..t. m,.. =.a ,w .P.,.,......., .:.~.f.. j };'..y . *%. e.,.2; . ~:. .~r, u1 =.. .m', ~., ;,l 't W,.,,,..t. yr ,8 g e......e., hi.,.# .s. ~. 9 .,*~v,. .4 r ~ o c cHEcm av tue Pe tra uns putra : coutcr D. t:ard. ~4' " d' .S:Y' M d'J M ....' RECEIVED BY:..tr. q..c. ,m,,. .+, ,, q,I, g,, g.p p,,. W.;,f.c .,..3.,* v'.d,..ypf,-.'ftl A '.'",

a.

,,. N..

, V.' * 's ' %. M.,go - C.J ..,,. [ t 1.* ,s .- - Q LUWE NING C AM E.14 6.~~k

p g., je '[. t ),

h....

nnNem~8pi*.>.c, M,' 3 l. u*2 7".U,',7,, ', ', ' MM. D ITCf3 DTMT:3 MsM- ,. ? * '. h;.V ?.g., / .v - r a wo. 3, .m., .t j. t a v. + j e h' .,.e*I. ( c g(pA 1 ',,

t t' CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPAtU WELDING AND NDE i CERTIFICATE OF COMPLI ANCC I f Gibbs & Hill, Inc. : Specification 2323-CSDS-4 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station MOMENT RESTRAINTS l CBI contract 91918 Restraint Quan. CBI Serial Dwg. Description No. Piece No. Rev. l tb rk godC M' lV 42-A '1'. 5-42/2 Koment Limiting Restraint (A', g.e 3 4/ 46-A -hhru4-46/1 4/ 47-A -ithru4-47/2 'f j.3 2/ 48-A -1,4-48/2

Y N 2/

50-A -1,5-50/1 / 51-A 6-51/1 2 ,,, f,,, go-$-5 gf.A 6N I '&pf i We certify that, to the best of our knowledge, all welding and nondestructive examinations have b.2en performed and evaluated in accordance with the specifications and the j applicable codes and standards contained therein. Documen-tation of the welding and NDE is on filo in our Salt Lake Plant and will be included in the finni dccumentation submittal. /// CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY w_ a a r,e . s,. a. -w ..t. ~ I t

M) Brown &RootcInc. REPORT NO. 15117 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECEIVING INSPECTION REPORT UNIT SYSTEM COMPONENT BDENTIFICATION/ SPIN NO. DWG /S PECIFIC ATIO N & R EV. (hom e_nt b A A l'E&unn b % s4 a m'nk at or Lout 2 R 1 % - C 6 tM - h' P.O. MRR C H A R A'CT E RI S'fiW I N S'# ECTIO N: WC CC: '- 9, )- / R M- \\ \\ % n-nbf GCGnP SAT.l d UNSAT. ] NCR HOLD TAG OMR% TO MB% APP / RENT RESPONSIBILITY FOR UNSATISFACTORY ITEMS: VENDOR OR B&R VENDOR l l TRANSPORTER g C%T-N% 7A C ATE DEFICIENCY DISCLOSED ITEM QTY. DESCRIPTION /R EM ARKS \\ D. hb v% Ad bl.AMNh N'> Ol'b'b td. i n t. 6%- A - 1 S I % M. m\\L i to '$- A \\ hu 4 1.EA mLt Lto 4 - 1 ) ci 12-W0l1 lol-R - i, ') w. ARMS ? 1NDEXED 0 ATE gg\\h QA RECORD [*,P,'d ~~ [5 A RCVICW 1 ,n \\ L2.U - ![f~ h j < i, L. FILE N - hs00r;,,.c NO. y 'J u'r /l'7 AUTHORIZED NUCLEAR INSPECTOR NOTIFICATION: D ATE: _hMadd__. TIM E: _D.Q3@ M EDI A: _b. 'w E N/A INIT _h.T ANI WITNESS: SAT. W W UNSAT. W W WAIVED _M DATE I

k W W ANI'S INITI ALS REQUIRED R/

H DATE TORAGE LOCATIONI%tb b9g _ h . DOM _. hh)( ""fr5_. _Sd 26 f oc h.va 1

FIGURE 8.1-12-1 BPOWil & ROOT INC. Quality Assurance Department i.. "RECEIVIt:G t'ISCELLAtlE0VS STEEL" SAT. UNSAT._, N/A 1. Did all required documentation accccpany shipnent? / 2. Is ship ent packaged satisfactorily? 3. Are raterial r arkings in accordance with specification f recuire ents? 5. Is there any darage? / 6. Have all flDE requirements been met? d 7. Was shiprent accompanied by a B&R Departnent Conforrance Certificate? ~ y~ ~ ' ~ ~~~ Was the Certificate signed by a BaR Surveillance Specialist? / If not, is a 93R CA Source Inspection Waiver Fom available? / 8. Applicable CC Peceiving tags have been applied. j Coments': A//f4 l \\ ig\\ 'h f w <d\\ s-0i CC 1nsce:'or b pan C Pfft k Dale l 2..b../.f'._ e

1.,, .u, M Jc.h No. 35-1195 CCMANCHE PE AK S.E.S. ~ y 3 08902 ~ ~ a PAGE OF MR NO. B&R G&H F&N W TUSl OTHER P.O. NO. 35-1195-C$35 + y -} ] '] . ] -] ] ^ ' REO. NO. ( i w ~~ c D/K ' c s.. VENDOR: DATE: _= CUCACD MWI 11503 S. 1 31 , '&T LAR CITY, tTTRI M s SHIPPER: FOB e a' r = L S Pomai 14 compwe U ~ a- .I. 7 QU A N TITY UNIT l ITEM bt A T E R I A L O f 5 C R, P T ' C N LOC A T'O N W - -4 < " 3 b n

~.'~ @dc' J.~' 9 P'W*' i -#,. g

t <ay > - e,, ' 'ea,T.c

'f ' e " #'65,*,; y' t. w, *-*Q 6.+.,q. )'

~ ' ~

l L.Mid I'S,V,fM M1'12 h*$tT?.Inth.ildM'

r**>

~ vi?F2 ,VV' ' + p 7; - Q", p-9 C i,5 ' P',g ' ~-'l ', r: ' U (* i t' ? --t.7 % vW a % -e ' q s gf F t qingdL- ' - CLE.3sdadh b,.,A.0T.d.,w,,21 .O= r2Ldi'4 h. .en ,c. 54-A ' t.mydamn Yd it E './ 1 s i ' I .n .,: - 6 M,,-,..., m.'. s m

m. n.,,. m. m, x.,~,,,:.7 m,

w.p ..,, m;a. ~ <.. 9 n,m, [r.x

J: :i. -

.. ~,. ~,i. a ., y,v y,1:,. ,,..,\\. . i, q o a- ~ < c., a 4 .A O.de bass. LA.N .5 d YL +L M U $b-:.5sb,.a.k.k.,.E M.orWo i $ s$ mA , n5 $s s '. h.'.,. $ s-. N a ni.* m'* .n me cr. 65-?e3 1 [ ~ q 6%4 1 f WmpngV::WC dei.0 W h%:e E.1 Ix. M E 3CMr".LitK:y'7T Y tg,,,g r ~ v =' [2/g g g pra ..M5i5L.a Nihb.l .E rWTp77g b.0.L$ Q,Ych i i ca L s74.-1 ,1. '. ' I (+ Q. f RWC05 q psA. r-Saf5?Wf ' Me '7 QM WVTEXW "lN[TC9 I?e&MUId m s sta h 3 u s 4 1 R 31 M . 3'm?, fit,ql5 Mis y webm e n...,- 1, M,. W W ~ M lii F l E 5 9 $ $ @ M3 W M M M @J w@egMN. W i = za m 2

p. s o

a..g u,.m, g

7-s x f 4*F* **% ' 'j r**"'%*"*F'1**;* P."1E*,' Ff"Id' F,/a'W g j' ' f { % 7'79 8* j K49 ym,r y gg l y tto. -e y - wag e.a 3.syg, *A =ry 4 g t Y b:0 iW.$5M..O '$Y $ 5 % Vj'b &,oh.$u.~ w '. YY$$$ 5 v Eg-ll . ~ ' ' ' 2 b v,T, :vs t , r '.~r, + -& a y->v e..v. p,,-...m 9 ~- J' ._qw/aw-y nm m v: r. y.p; _ vo y-g-m -,sp.. wvg w.m =

, c

..ys .-f ,on ? t T 'r,ie.k, yt r. ? f.,".e,1.' y y, s yg #, i L 4 ,, + -. E l _ x .,p. ,,- m ' a ' 'nw.~.2 f -.~ . *.\\,, l s' 3 %.~'. ' pt.j. sa'. . w.u..' a,.a s u'

m 3,

= .w .,~ -2 L j J

s m $.e-yq* dil*[

u~,, +7 r,T % r .r. ,, c,,,, e r. we & c- -. - -~ r m - re -- - p'v.

- y 3 - ~ " e '

' 6 2 i(% $ij*,[;- -.y-.;,, y..

A/ d' sSI j
d j.

.; j ,( h,3 g.D [' ,, d { 1.d.Os.s M.* u' j t ),2 . 1.~. M,i ne.s; h u,.'s A '!L' $ur'N*dardd M W,h.s o i'.s. b. s s.

e ME j

s g l t' M e b be UId i e E I t i UTG ? +J i i i MrJMDhr i. f i b j

a a

TJ m _2 K?

CHICAGO DRIDGE & IRON COMPA?N ' WELDING AND NDE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANC1; Gibbs & Hill, Inc. Specification 7323-CSDS-4 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station MOMENT RESTRAINTS CBI Contract 91918 Restraint Quan. CBI Serial Dwg. Description No. Piece No. Rev. Ma rk 1 62-A 62/6 Moment Limiting Restrair. 2 64-A -1,3-64/1 4 65-A -ithru4-65/2 2 66-A -3,9-66/1 2 67-A 2-67/4 \\ We certify that, to the best of our knowic3ge, all welding and nondestructive examinations have been performed and evaluated in accordance with thu specifications and the applicable codes and standards containod tharein. Documen-tation of the welding and NDE is on l'ilo in our Salt Lake Plant and will be incluied in the final documentation submittal. /' C1!ICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY + /Jek/ Ch>i w V / Date f /

2 81 J Brown &Rookinc, east arrice sox 1001, cian nose, Texas 7eo43 BRV-12394

gTQQ, MXhW l

February 4,1981 Chicago Bridge & Iron 550 West 1700 South Salt Lake City, Utah 84110 . ATTN: Mr. Darwin Christofferson Texas Utilities Services, Inc. Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station B&R Audit C-310-10 Subcontract 35-1195-0585 $hiM

Dear Mr. Christofferson:

We have reviewed your letters dated August 11 and 18,1980 and have evaluated your response to the subject Audit Deficiency Report. The follow-ing is the present status: The corrective and preventative action response for ADR-C-310-10.1 is satis factory. The verification visit at your facility on January 15 and 16,1981 by Mr. Jim Hawkins (B&R) was also satisfactory, and this audit is con-sidered closed. Your attitude and cooperation during this audit process is appreciated. Please call Mr. Ron Meissner at 817/897-4881, Ext. 207 if furthe. in-formation is required. Sincerely, BROUfl & ROOT, INC. f/2%.'L +~ w Ron fleissner Audit Coordination. Supervisor RM/pb

Att, i'R }\\

Q C cc: A.Vega-TUGC0 Dallas (IL,1A) f V ; JT (, _ ~' u v Qk L \\

gg' L.M U Y V4 i V R U U 4 11 N. ? OUA1.lTY ASSURANCE DEPARTM..T AUDIT DEFICIENCY REPORT 1 2 PRDJECT: CPSES JOB NO.: 35-1195 UNIT: 1&2 PAGE: OF (el AuoiTED ono Aniz AYeoM (3) AUplT MO

13) Ao n No (4) Aon Coot C. B. & I.

C310-10 C310-10.1 10 (slosscuento weTMs tei nEponTEo ov e gt73oATE: (s) cartoo nv. Mr. Mack Johnston John T. B. Maxwell 7 / 23/80 0]io Oisi []ni (si pocuMENT vioLATEo AMo pan Aan Arn (cite 3: 1. G&H Specification 2323-CSDS-4, Para.10.0 f,11.0. 2. ASME Section III, Division 1, Subsection NF, Para. NF 4424, 5340, 3. C.B.&I. Procedures VT-5 and MT-3r, Para. 5.0. (8 0) case nv ATions: Source release inspection of completed assemblies Nos. 32-A-1, 34-A-1, 35-A-1 and 3 36-A-3 revealed unacceptable weld conditions such as coarse grooves, overlaps,. val-u C leys, weld spatter and slag. These weld surface conditions render indetenninate the E acceptability of other NDE processes such as magnetic particle examination. 5 NOTE: A sample of the above conditions was verified by Polaroid photographs. FO R m par m il0 R O W.V (s t) PoTENTs A L nEponT Am LE DE Pacsa.mcv O vES G a0 (s al nacoMMamo ATsons: 1. Reinspect completed moment restraints to assure inspection requirements to the Code, contractual and procedural requirements; repair as required; reinspect repaired areas to the requirements of ASME Sect. III Subsection NF as delineated in applica-ble paragraphs of Article NF-5000. /7 -M 7//Aw//d'pl el o A T E :A9 /p,2 'VEo mV: (t al m E spoNSE ASSIG N Eo TO '(8 4l R E s po N sE ou E (99) PPM Damin Christofferson ^d'I 2y A0 . ff -) To be comklete&dited organiz5 ion ' ' ' ~ (s ti counscTavE Action m ESPO NSE s (INCLUD E SC HE pubE o COM PLETION D ATE) Soc attached sheet sl'tttlDATEa (9 suSMITTED BY l1 4 u g /L [ 9 /rs /Sc (d el Pn EV E N T A TIV E ACTIO N-llNcLUO E SCHE pWLE D CO M PLETIO N o A TE) See attached sheet l ll21X s.m A,., t*kwN/ mew l(33) o A T E t//r lSC SUSMlf T ED B V a g 8" To be completed by B& R Quality Assur;bce f ' ) l'tasiomit la ni *E va.w or nE sPonsE, -< i s.1 H E v e s5w t o _sa w. / Blad (,MY m B { W, Q n /. W J M fQ Satisfactory 0 Uns.stisfactary p* ian vEntevo.7, / / ps. oAvt o.i a. suLts o r v E niPic A viou, & Satisfactory D UmstisfJCtOrY f(s O.'.* v eT"' ,f. j / /$h ~ oi,o.r. & n. i, u a... v noi .o.v 6. d a w. v,,a iJ A 490 4

][f?W '%$y @S/E M b s B M W s M52 61 Ff E $$$$ @5 AQ.go Me0an #2 ,.4 X Rik:, N ggg.g.@ Dg, Brownf5 Root, loc. 1624

s. w.

QUALITY ASSURANCE del'ARTMENT .//-Y D') f. D AT E.' SillPM ENT W AIV ER. g, 3 JOB NO.: 35-1195 UNIT /E PAGE / OF l'ROJ.ECT: CPSES - -a Y 0 ' ' TO: . ' /- ' .4 /j *~ W.: 1/// .c T,. g... '-1. r. r2 .,.r v. c.-K/,/; 9//F /

REFERENCE:

Purch.a:se order / subcontract number D ~ / N b U C.. - ctur':eLephone conwrsat. ion this date concerning shipment waiver. G:ntleme::: . M r. / C:nfirm5ng the talephar e conversation between your Ms. f i'T '/i,,~j vf and our kts WD ~ as referenced above, we have waived final ~ ' - exarr.ination at yc>ar facili:y of the following items only: Order Itm So. O v. Devriotion C. 6/Z //W.T .,.,- d _.. ;;,e..i.' w f.. J u t / / b ^ t - - < ' d '% _. __

~

.4 i -/ i.. ;y;J, 2.: ,.>. /- c. % Z . i..., ~i.. :

G7*+

t.f.:.,*c: . w; -.Nd G - . 2...: i *hJ. i.;. ( s. t wh-) Y X'** Y' 3, 'i, 9 1'~ lo -l 4.- _7, <1. -S*/ oo so \\ Sc.:/. /-/ g 2r.'. 2-2 -?? : 0 Brnwn & Roo'..Inc. Forn QA415 titled " Quality Assurance Department Conformance Certificate properly completed an.I sigrwl Ms enot reqtire-d. This shiprnent waiver does not waive any rights Brown & Root may have under this pur-chase onfer ircbding the right to reject the item (si upon discovery of defic encies during or after arrival at destination. Sincerely,' 13ROWN & ROOT, INC.

7 t k,,v /,,..?.

$,'-l!yr...:. j s ,jf.> -J.P-C1atkrtlV /. Site Quality Assurance Man 30er JPC!bi cc: J. P. C:Ja k e 'll BS n 5 = Fete w? tm. D-pt. i e. O& R She P.st*..ns*; Dict. a V53 01 ~ MTAMA I'~'EA '" V N %/sy cllC2 l

-p 94-Mr L d)-2.0 1 5Id e,r-Al H. Mu<nu f.& Q 6) ob la.s r l Co erelc v e-A-c.hsor Repor b c A-(L - 4/ Tue 7,1m .gsg ( c a.s - e d QA Sd e. sseve L -c. s-co 2 4 80 ~ 's 5 oo 't 6-2-80 ese ~~ lii 388 -" d w ( }}j (h \\)ew.lo[F Qah he u beos $ 6*r o oil % cc p eo c.e1.es c,.,.,,- 2 Y ~jcP.QAPIB-9 &'J L )19 90 s -I-omd ut. I Ja.~ 82. ,.c, ~ ed.,, % Lwer,ec 6'I '~b c fan, A u,o e I -.-,w- .r ve eg. o,,,,g q, y hd t-NtouJq dd x d '/I C $ c o g h e r.s x649 .4% 0b In houohema.n Le. fepor{ Al0, /// A5/A - k' vi G5]b5CS h /lba.or.CPGGS response-b-o LR*80-22 ~BtR-QuAb bu.d de.d5 wdk luposd.un f i A gd aeLuc-w ceporte (Ab6 s e e -lV0$6 ? ,,4* j (Ahuter st0.d b S~ 171ess in ec 8 90 $Y2-20 ~ ac 1 j i SuJ ~ IG24 fa may be wraa3 we. user pr t ,..s uo.. ~, .s 4 s.

kQ-2D .4Il #1 8-3-84 k dl, <> l cl b f O b hI [ 4 M Co e-sk,pp,~J }his a.s ders/ ggg 6) coks b rrr igj b L constradon s,h ? nn: boscrep b tra.hcro a l hous Is recesuog o shrwel bbb O o g u,4 bems sk,get ? Ah Ob kua o wlo b repor$ re(erenc el, ~ n h e r o Wo e e Lc-T \\w L,- s 6a T<. a. et,~,,+ swLel. um Luc 21,, 9 a o, -hole 6 EA Sc y Su) k 4) Oo f~e insgevb<oA ref e r f k t she d k h w e-be4 n gen e ee 4-4 4 n 43 is spe a,om _ o F. momcdeer} <- ~es .ct g er 5 3 <_, i n y, (fE L. cob && s-3) ng so ~~LcOJVo g3, g \\ po -s

~~40-2~~

~~ks,1 a s -e 9' M 42,A u ObGem)ebt o a %~~
A-3 -8h IIs o \\ G) pye cesbm.<-6s sk ppel 9roa c.a <1 w ere. ud( km clefncie-c'<es-4ke a y e c h,o. c9oort, sLff,yi pyeework o~ Ein ese.sw ik inspeub<o ~ kave-mb ye t hm %~L sp ggf b insp<.ub, ors. y EH - iii c.seee~ l-Qk/a c. p ro ee Lsee.s ypsur bo & cea g' ho_~l L3 o fr Lscrp~ c, es % L be y sa w e e.t. t~spsubwns. ved.c ce.e.u v.s repoes,o e 699 a.v 1. re c.civi 4j g e.h cop i e s. [Of-44P-B.3) pac h,/ ider ole Qrou T.%wks ha Sx KI, w 1 h uen o y. d e. f.,
~~Iwvte, M~~
li80 Skwbes d.M IwJpe-obs o sr ok 3 Ec. hts kc c,hory ( kt. add refa och C E %.I. vatet r se. m _u + o v ma u,ss.4 very LswL %\\\\ a.wl. h espe r b, i O i
A G 2<3 M *1 2-4 -8'I A b s d /r: e k@ 0 9 9 -'I - 8 'l OL se-v cdiou a.s o m 3 ces6ckids 4 o%cd b w er e. WQL %c anspeubio$ u.,t bi ( Sep. nz,19 80, L aNe & A>/2c myeobes ha.L de ck L den 8"fb / I)' 'l V 8 e. T4 ers /v a r 6.r on as: in Sa kde opyw % k.v e sFM beer ll3 c h o( 6.p k e!fiiso. d .5 home 4, ukes s'Qine,,e,es a s,)e J.9 nL w ece. adV loa A.wc, 5-i s -n, o s 80 na TJy .T.2.23,neo ogspeek on bwb a.aLk d e%e., s~e y c po r.4- (kb(L) c ac-s % sel a:.s cyaet ay a eL,s x 'p,oAwk (w b cak~,,ds)@S deQiue v,u ese<< e ,1em bC, 1 fm 4ai r b u. c & tlc- % 4. ~ mcde<. ( d & c,e - ' for... V.Sft ts e - r e et-4, m _ r an<pe< axe 6r A CL A yo cedu.re pe D +b mQc proWe-a e<Cc a. la.& o f day ~Le. /as a C %\\ tow q proeekes, _ pro c e6ces oc ab e, HLa p coe ed.wc-s ad eswh17 iLe~b Cy y 4 b& FLe Oc th.ui 3 reg me c c & eve ~bs ? F01A33-59 a-e sa omWa%e-+ a ea,., b/ (D uedoc disa.p esel w A C P, of e obe a, x - ac &, u n gee, n. g,,,.,g-g.eewe a w _.,,,,,q
4 0 -20 All Z l e-v -8 Y N e r b t re k i d /b3k6 W3 W 06 GO A (kf[dc,h/cg if compoueJr recewed wJLo4 ~ t Ahee de k4 specml 963o vspec.h n o r regv.,res. upor c~rm a w \\ n o+ p eeve~6 + lese h) ek does paper kI gggjjj cof ne.w6.s Cros E *- ge h5 t eg ~s c el > ~ sp< c 4. ~ ? n: MW Cl b*5'8[ bilf [ -L 9 'e* .---g + 4 4 i i lO p -**-.*W-m --==wh-
~~w**-d~~
~~l /)0 -2 0~~
~~3 fr'dit4 /NFM9L"r' f/dNY~~
/... so urc e.' :s,Oee Be/ ander E-A /. /Vardrare svaa 0 ,6roceoa' re' QS/ Z O, A'e v 3, wdich ftoeecLr'e tefaired te-Ns,pecnor ol' dhere,a rf ira Te/ik l af 7Ae source or, /! source re-/oyecin/u wa.s k Waived, af';8ece/IYno fNs/'eclibr'.' //cDikc2?cs: / j Of.kece/v/ryt fr/.r,6ec$bst Yd@ D d-/93,6esZbn 2 P ~f{ -fAe Source dao' been wsive d a nd wou/c/ i (1 bbb be A"fa/Yed d,Y~kece/V/n} WA5 by' Ni$ r-b DN/he- /79e/770. QS {' ,7 0 was su,aefse ded b ' C0 -gat 0 - /P. </, on F/4/f'O y w.1s wa../e d' b L Or? 9/3/20, release l9s,oecEs n y CA-0 4P-/2 '/., a7'/xaf~ /l d Meiwier. s; er-C.' .m a y a,c a a,oec u a,a,rsn a a a, O W A4ky,,- d- /ayyed; ff 7e' -ksfechEa.' aA e i z sourc e were ZMex wa/ved axd & 1 $ff ~ ) } sn W Aave,5cen sbkc Aed ; the red-/sy.s wou u' a/er/kd Aece,'v/ng ne,oecDbn := non/j h.a ve I G// 75^,evh,,aect But,
~~x. dacause 26 Asi c/wste~~
~~'w as.xax,ee..hpech l defore ehath m9 was ksuedr!,the 5s/doare ^ p ,~ J70Y~ le d{ l'dffed ' a nd' Q)ll/,Y l9 ) ( ) Wd3 e &ca-c ,e-/sep= n wo = ws i ve s a =< 7 A w xo s.,,,.&s,ae,c -c I~~
~~i a_x - z.~~
e Ci ! [ [ / 6 L2s,oeckn 4,y h/e/offke memo &t l. /e-hs,sec77oiv at~A aa/ce 4kcDe&n waiyes, and 7%f te-bspec&n a f ieecei wna was i s t?e cessary. eee / hhh $. faFOWafe $ ebb /bMC/53, o u >1 $ du/tn} $6 0b! I "I au dit/su <ve1//a nc e-were docu>rsnn s on a,t a i5i Audif bef*cfer,cy Ae,corf, Vs.Mer 7/la n sn We u llencloid'urveifance fe,oorr whihd AS$ 7a <ce,<a e \\s.: ? 't Ys l8 '.l li i t l1 a l
i il rm

i W l
P
i l w/// ~ J/ //eS cid k }?YAkf/ W /) / // kVM IO Source -/<is,oecL/ defo/e Axy. ,/??o sad h a' n d cl/ s d r e,a o d C O st / Alad n a ree - re -hs,oec7/br-Wai Ve d ~ fi de5,a/n n',4cchiry was so%A d JAet lll Lese &ayr fxsfechi > ox-si72 was resui/ed. 4 ?? Sean o/ baW,Narrei7/ anew /de/eare /h[* desu n 4 / (fom 3-/O-26 fo /2- /9 - 70 a s: c ' Wai:/e /J du over sjopeoumarc9 & ra>ne perias' show on/y x-ar-/etoy aa a] possidJe.s. as O( coa,ouM/ s down, no/~~ bs d up /VH e Hw Heed comps / 7dy~ er fff iraAe/ C Mid /k,0 sci ay e} d paast tu osy & soaac igecru n,opea rs 75] ave deert In,sosed we when bydro /esh on esirpeed sere 75~ Ae wihress e d g ) ) v o,L4o.f 's.19 v5 ?i b ,g"? A x i s s
0h- 0kh- /E / 10eV4:.U b 5 3 ()n&!!ecf W}sn l -c/Wro 5/$ eAego /f. Y we is saed k (7/10ef a o fe NCn ed m o h <icu l Tc h e 1 l l {ed - ra-3ce d, witL 63 removed wdez /ky i s alea/es' l /1. 4 Kwofw Ga.aM/baZbr a,:d JLae&ce ggg /4. / 6,17iol of }/s/ress /s < min 8 Zhmr ars ~sa C"4
~~6 ara QSP 7o para Sz. z rep, /es~~
.'l re Arycem ar ercurce e r, / / wa bed, ~ re-linp ec M >o af A.d 'l tt f l' r v m,---. .n e--,-e.- %,e -.-e.
I l Annex 3 Conversation Record i Allegation Number M Time I '00 hM. Date 6 G f Type isit Conference Telephone / Incoming Outgoing g Name of Person (s) Contacted g or in Contact With You Organization Telephone Number-Koh: Shf ePTb W13 l 3
~~SUBJECT:~~
~~S /, ',z ep&w e & // j'S 3 gun g /S. sdiv f'nn h I-eI+Sp cir?, g g eper/g $7 'S~~
~~SUMMARY~~
&f $dc f Y" ' / ~ ~ * ' ' i 1 ~ }l Name of Person Documenting Conversation /Swil d b I ~ 0 Signature Date Name(s) of Other Persons Who Were Present During Conversation i I have reviewed the sum.ary of the conversation with the individual (s) named belcw and agree that it accurately represents the conversation. Signature of Person Providing Infomation (f)J j( f y-File: Allegation Work Package N D j T L]h)"'hy'f ( cc: Project Director I ~ Group Leader Additional pages may be attached as needed. Additional pages should be i identified, signed, and dated. t .--o.. s ..-.-,.~.-.s,
Annex 3 Conversation Record Allegation Number d.Q 40 b ' ime /3,'60 Date p p 2. h Y Type Visit )[ Conference Telephone Incoming Outgoing i Name of Person (s) Contacted i e=tn=Gon i.as.-MitW Organization Telephone Number i Bob %1r 8 cf K BT9 DDiv/t/y b/ h l$ $ k 5
~~SUBJECT:~~
~~Thtcd/kj' winkrtN h Sonpo-u b) will 66hmm Nr d f6 r Jx Yb d PJ FS~~
~~SUMMARY~~
'f[ pgggS g hg y y p-p fo Wec t/wHT ncen een&w eM 1/? h rQl fun "W fe/ h wm & cuwd <A-kMM 1-< etivaj I / f 0 eptt~t INhwf n 'w & cdY( l' /98f +1/ e be/~ d.J W WA S w w.k !?~) p hu.y dvd/f;/ h // v s w ch e ups.,~ 6 ~ to Name of Person D ed,menting Conversation /#7e/J d'. /o ads Signature s >A C b _S4 Date # .11 T P i f Name(s) of Other Persons Who Were Present During Conversation Gvae) 70 m w e., I have reviewed the sumary of the conversation with the individual (s) named below and agree that it accurately represents the conversation. Signature of Person Providing Infomation File: Allegation Work Package M 'I O E~ "'7' ."(v L u4- #v % v.h bj ( i 6 s v u cc: Project Director Group Leader j i i Additional pages may.be attached as needed., Additional pages should be identified, signed, and dated. i m rr__-_ m__ ._m-w vm ' u 1 E=F-- %
i i s-p, s 4 s \\ 'N w s \\ g T.*:.._, 4 % ' -.-+l'.'.:-.--.-.:--------- -- y- - -. -- .Y. -. -. ,60 -$..... $~'~. ~ f M ~ / S ~ ...a:. 3..Y.cf._. p n .....- _._.., _,)-.C 2sho g - thr/tc ~~ . l. at $Q. /. *s, f --..b..- W ? f Q. $.C^- {} A U t ^ n i li - ... - _._ __ p.,._..._. m,-_ ,--- j - - 4 g~.o - - - -civ/ l .. h. g. & en. ; - -. s 3 9'.cf'al f..' -.f&..,-~-..,z /,0....._;ry i ~ ' ~~,>f./() -..F'O..-.-i h~. f &:f... .{- 'O - f~
~~....s y.~~
-) r_.%_/C Wl/C PT.. 'gopr,e:.< 'e.rs a.h.. &...c {' .p J 4 '~. ~e,,., t 2,___ _ _.M.. .L-...-. I,.- .'n x& .t .s- /..' s y 2 ......., ~...-~. _ - -_. -. -.. - -.. - - - - - -... .-...... _ _ - i ...4. 'Ye. I S W ~ J .[, f f J../ - h,.... J. hoff_0 +f f.2e)~ @ ' \\ C s q s. /fS9 m_ _ y d,;r '.y_ -.....' t.i_ a.. N.. - _,_..'. f..,'t v ll r ..u..___-. ,j p 'v 'y. ,~ 3 .--i------. '....... L._ ~.. - U-.-.,-'..*........- gc J + e' _.+ y ... _ 4 _ ___ - - -c or . AOr 'P" y u. 4, .j - 3dYf6~ ~ t . -.. ym...qg g...y,a f s a i.f - =. -.. )['. -_ :.-. g. & _b/s g,u;$ e $ 9L/ch.tlpN _ -.. cn. kwi& wh . =. L... :~ /r n.%. Y6. /+...o vb4> ~ y v .-y... .g 9 .g l,... .._..s. _
q
~~,,,, k .-(. O .t .g .J. y.... -. ...._...:_._.-s._' L ~ ~s s~~
~~.- w e e.e po.~~
~~- wium .,e. ..-e.ee.--..g- .-e.* .e. .-m. +*- -._. / E'~~
~
g 3 2 .f k ss ...1 E k + 'i ? rg - I I h j ^1' l f _ i -.. 3,.
1. a. s p s c ~ }/ . i. /t,tfy7 & . & P f / t 3 C /].) ' b -. =. 3--..~ C & 3 Y ~ A '/ ~ f 'h S A ~ l ( i H Pf rt), .s q t e s- ,..,...w*. .....\\- a- ~- s ,s
~~i. z~~
. _._._-. $: N.,- 3..< u. o. _ _, o __7 g j .s. n ~ ..-. A. V. '~=.--.._.._.w..~....._ . =. I: Onet% f~ ~.~~ /~M,5 v5 0l$' Q 1 ' f );?. h }- l $ n y a d, ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ jy - ~ J. "'~ ~ u._... -..;.. ..... _.. =. -
~~..=.-.~~

~~... ;.-= .u._ a w y .z-. .g .1 4 > ,.s j g ....,...-;.t 1 ~ s ' p s. - +. ,.. x.s. .L.. ~. yf // ,,f. M /t ~~ J .s. ~ 3..._. ....~//vut ; g.6_.2A'=. g I r ~ ~ .. _. Ci. & k. b j.. / G. G~~
~~1, N-~~
~~,_. ^_ y _ _" J .5 ge ..n._. ~, -, ~. ,n._. __._../.. ,...-_s.. _...g.3._. .p.~~
d
~~+......-.,....,'m.... s ~~~
~~s. -~~
~~.~ ... ~, 'O ' 5~~
. s.

y
~~'s ~ ~ ....J..s..._ lL, ... y .; s-.- ~ /1 _ ~.-.. / ~ _.v_[... D _ M /5/2 W f._. _ _p o l-c 2... R. T Z-._.,....?/[.D 9.. \\. 3P fj ? . /0 3 M L-id TO I + ..y 1 ._.!/i3._3_._-.........3..o_.w...F'~~
o. 9_ 9 X'O

... f.. Y... T0..
~~.t. / o ....i /l( &.}. Y$) } o f...a.. ~ c. 79 @ # . w-.7A3 [ [ /.NI: . h ' ~ i _..... -.. 1 e,~~
~~c.......~~
~~~ h 'l ff e? hans & h -j, b ' f Y @*: ' /f({l b. l' 'Y 8 Y( O gi,, gx y g c ~. o r~~
~~6. w __~~
0 'l i p O A 9O $ ~ TJ " (- fl-W ....i,.l'l b Y 99 2 9f-5: 7('8 ky?;)ff ?'N ?' is j e f l
V i' 0 b t .e 1 os s w no m s .e* [ 4 ....,. ~..... hA .. A h t
~~i....~~
~~_... ~. ' 1. '.. .t lf / .bJct22.W.w &_N&yMh k S Scd't^ W h 0 [{ l.' ? ......- - -u. 1.. w. -.... s -) 1 e t -...)-... ._.2 s ~~~
~~f. _,....N..~~
~~.C . h. fjk. - [. *b /O' -/0. (, ~.QprY,f/rryf@ f., k yr.sa-/ i u4 . s 3.~~
~~. m.~~
~~.-.3 i = =. -. - - - - - - - * * * - = = = e 2. ~.. khwkm/ty/ro &.W ]? > TO i/AfL M -J(/ bp:.,t:'i c. .. s. .m - ' x, c. :.... ..., -. ~... _. _.. _ _. ., _.. _' _. }... 3. _ _.;= -~~
~~g q,.~~
N 'l ..-..'.1 .. ~ _ '\\ - - u-.~:...'_-._ ...[-_ _ d'.......-: k ..a h..-.....-.~-,.. _....... .3.. ..,.. Oykfro!y..s. m. L. k .I u,. -...__. u _._ _..... t. .q- ..__ p ,r. N y b 2 b T -If <} $~~-- D r V f.. -_.__'.. ,/,
~~.e fp~~
&ph.x, [N y p g.. V. !!&mr,' A f-d;g'r.s., 4, <,M _) A %. $ &.. w.., A _ ~.... i... 1 n. .r l .D ~ i/ a f s j, / .f ~ / 7 'l ..... b. 3-h/f.*b JI k_, 4 4 .A 3 Y$ ~. ?.. 0 A *. N t h. $%w 9 70 $*lST-77ts?. b A ' M-2 C 7 y 1' 'i i I - t
A-action plan format /CP5 Draft jE 8/28/84 COMANCHE PEAK OPEN ISSUE ACTION PLAN Task: Determine significance of vendor components with documented. defects released for shipment to CPSES site. Defects and inspection activities are involved. Ref. No.: AQ-20 Characterization: Concerns involve lack of NDE inspections, lack of traceability of heat numbers on weldolets, and possible waiving of QA requirements by management. Initial Assessment of Significance: Initial disposition has been made in IR 80-22.. There appears to be sufficient specificity to warrant followup. Source: QA/QC Category 7 - Defective material. Approach to Resolution: 1. Review IR 80-22 to determine if documentation adequately supports findings. It documentation does not support findings, take appropriate action to close allegation. 2. Review procedures, for adequacy at time work was performed; were codes / standards, FSAR, contractor requirements and other commitments met? ~ sg g.
V Discuss adequacy of procedures with personnel involved with vendor 3. QA/QC activities. 4 Refer any examples of wrongdoing or significant deficiencies to TRT manager. 5. Evaluate allegations for generic / safety implications. 6. Report on results of review / evaluation of allegations. Related Open Issue Identification: 1. Using system codes, pull open items, previous inspection findings, etc., from the tracking system open item list. (Region IV identify and add to this work package.) f 2. Review activities necessary to close or partially close related items, l cither based on inspection conducted above or reasonable additional inspection while the inspector is familiar with the areas. Status: I 1 i t
3-Review Lead: Support: Estimated Resources: Estimated Completions: CLOSURE: Reviewed by: "F ~ TRT Leader
i j' DOCLMENT COMTENTS SHEET N Here contained within are the documents as of a result of the bEM d 'D-- W3~ Audit / Pre-A.ord Name of Vender [ Survey conducted on N = M -- - ----- Date ONO I ? j---- - ------. At Location of Facility REQUIRED DOCLHENTS: --- Audit Notification. 1-- Checklist or letter of missing checklist. t / --- Audit report. b-- Vender response. Y ~ ~~ Resolution of deficiencies. b-- Closure state =ent. -./- Trans=ittal letter # A9t-323.7 REMARKS: i, LEGEND: I J - Document (#/ contained within Missing from files i M N/A-Not applicable ,l @ /. "" Q m a ,a. j., c., ?,.,s,N. n r
c. / i 'lg;g Q
=
~~T /S~863 j y 3 9' 7 SOURCESURVEILLANCEREPORTIM-1933'97 .l. Gulfalloy presented 25 P.O. line items for inspection. All but three (3) items were released. A. P.O. 3044,8 Item 21 ) /[h7~~
~~f -j, g~~
,7_. B. P.O. 30418 Item 41__ /V6 Fo h,, AM cc ~ C. P.O. 30396 Item 21 /W.rF f " /I79 T/e/ro 2. Of eighteen comments on report, twelve concerned docu-ments not signed by Gulfalloy prior to presentation for source inspection. Gulfalloy's policy is that documents such as Gulfalloy C of C's, Gulfalloy CMTR's and QA-045's are not signed prior to source inspection or prior to receipt of a formal waiver of source inspection. This . acts as an extra step to preclude unauthorized-shipment by Gulfalloy warehouse personnel. 3. Gulfalloy had filled cut QA-045's in accordance with methods which had previously been accepted for Job 35-1195. Additional customer input to our documentation methods is always appreciated. Gulfalloy will follow inspector's recommendations in the futHre concerning l' P.O. requirements to be shown on QA-045. 4. Gulfalloy has placed new personnel in key areas of QA responsibility. These new people were trying to accomo-date both an annual audit team and a source surveillance inspector and normal daily business simultaneously. These circumstances gave rise to some real problems ,.i, d \\\\ h ,(\\ (items not released) and some situations which could G J have been preceived as problems (some disorganization and absence of Q. A. Manager during simultaneous audit / N;7 ((,p surveillance). f (, j, r-r f' p, (Ui:!T'D0~00 l \\9 V .M esiiE!!0!] ONI.Y 4730 Darien Street P O Bos 5:518 Houston. Texas 77052. Tei phone (713) 672 7451 g WATS 800131326:. TWX 9148a111e l
~~f. 5.~~
The professional attitude and actions of Brown and Root audit and surveillance personnel provided both a good " trial by fire" for new personnel and an opportunity i for these new personnel to take advantage of the help i and information extended by the Brown and Root team. Sincerely, GULFALLOY, INC. i f <V i G. W. " Bill" Gross Manager of Quality Assurance GWG/mem J 1 f I e S a a 1 F0ilINDEiGi9il 0!iLY i I
NG c & W ($f 6 M date, 1980) identification of numerous discrepancies indicates there are significant generic problems in implementation of procedural and specifi-cation requirements." CAR S-41 goes on to identify 24 incividual NCRs which were issued as a result of findings in surveillances S-003 and S-009. CAR S-41 was forwarded to the " hanger group" with a " reply due date" of June 23, 1980. Reinterview of Individual A On Septemb.er 10, 1980, Individual A was reinterviewed and stated that 11 NCRs were prepared regarding material nonconformances during the period S-009 was being conducted. Individual A stated that the remaining 24 identified nonconformances listed in 5-009 were prepared based on the findings listed in that surveillance report. Individual A stated that, to date, he is aware of no corrective action being taken regarding the 35 NCRs. Interview of CPSES 0A Supervisor On November 11, 1980, Individual B, a CPSES QA supervisor was interviewed. Individual B stated personnel have been assigned to work on corrective u tion relating to CAR S-41. Individual B stated the assignment of these duties resulted from the determination that satisfactory corrective action had not yet been taken regarding the NCRs on CAR S-41. Individual B stated these unresolved nonconforming conditions primarily consicted of " house-keeping" problems which may result in CAR S-41 remaining open for a long period of time. Individual B stated CAR S 1 has been recently revised and Field Deficiency Reports (FDRs) relating to similar " housekeeping" pro-blems were added to it. Individual B stated that CAR S-41 has not been ignored and will not be in the future. C' !ADeaation':nomqqigMin.qf f W In June, 1980, a Brown & Root vendor audit at Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (CBI), Salt Lake City, Utah, determined that the required NDE procedures were not being accomplished in the manufacture of "Q penetrations." These noted discrepancies were waived by a TUGC0 QA auditor in order that the penetrations could be shipped to CPSES. Investiaative Findinas On August 22, 1980, Individual A was interviewed and stated that in about June, 1980, a B&R vendor audit was conduct at CBI, Salt Lake City, Utah, at which time the B&R auditor determined tt. CBI had not accomplished the required NDE procedures in the manufacture f a number of "Q penetrations." Individual A stated that the auditor's inspection.of the O penetrations determined that.they contained slag and crate'r. cracks, not in conformance with applicable NDE procedures. ' Individual A stated the B&R auditor pre-pared an Audit Deficiency Report (ADR) concerning the noncompliances which 7-'r,1 s -~ yn F;v ;,1_ _, q. e. e., 4 ,.s c
7 would make mandatory the correction of the noted deficiencies prior to CBI shipping the penetrations to CPSES. Individual A stated that subse-quently a TUGC0 auditor had waived the deficiencies on the penetrations in order that they could be shipped to CPSES. Interviews of B&R Personnel On September 9, 1980, Individual C, a B&R Procurement Supervisor, was contacted and advised that the equipment identified as deficient during the June 1980, CBI audit, identified by Individual A as Q Penetrations," were actually moment restraints and~not Q penetrations. Individual C stated the B&R Project Quality Assurance Manager had waived all deficien-cies identified concerning the moment restraints in order that they could be shipped to CPSES. Individual C denied being aware of any corrective action planned regarding the moment restraint deficiencies, which would be effected upon their arrival at CPSES. On September 19, 1980, Individual D, a B&R QA Engineer, was interviewed regarding his June 1980, audit at CBI. Individual D stated that'in June 1980, fabrication of the moment restraints was reportedly completed by CBI and they were ready for shipment to CPSES; however, the project QA manager (at that time) had insisted a release inspection of the moment restraints be conducted prior to shipment. Individual D stated that an annual B&R QA audit of CBI was due at that time and D was selected to go to CBI to conduct both the audit and release inspections. Individual D sta+ed inspection of four of the moment restraints at CBI disclosed various unsuitable weld surface conditions which were unacceptable. Individual D stated CBI management was advised that the moment restraints would not be approved for shipment. Individual'D related having prepared audit defi-cier ' reports (ADR) regarding the unacceptable conditions identified on the ment restraints which would require correction of nonconforming condir. ions. Individual D stated that in about August 1980, the current CPSES Project QA Manager had shown them a copy of a CBI response to the ADR which basically stated that the unsuitable weld surface conditions, identified in the ADR, would not interfere with proper interpretation of the NDE. Individual D stated this CBI response took exception with the inspection findings and was not approved. Individual D stated that D has not, to date, been again contacted regarding any corrective action on the moment restraints. Lastly, Individual C related having no knowledge of a TUGC0 auditor having instructed that t% deficiencies be waived in order that the moment restraints could be sLpped. On ptember 10, 1980, Individual B was reinterviewed concerning B's kne edge regarding the waiver of deficiencies on the moment restraints. Individual B stated that normally a venoor will notify B&R 72 hours prior to shipping fabricated components and equipment to CPSES. Individual B stated B then prepares a B&R vendor surveillance document relating to the shipment and takes it to a QA supervisor who either directs that release inspection be conducted prior to shipment or waives inspection in order that i l
8 l. the item may be shipped. Individual 8 stated that the QA supervisor had waived the inspection of the moment restraints, knowing that the deficiencies were outstanding. Individual B stated an assumption that the QA supervisor intended that an inspection of the restraints would be conducted upon their arrival at CPSES. Individual B stated that if the moment restraints were not found acceptable, upon their arrival, they would be repaired on site or returned to CBI for repair. On September 11, 1980, Individual E, a B&R Quality Control Receiving Inspector,'was interviewed. Individual E stated E's duties require that E inspect received components / equipment; however, E's inspections relate only to the scope of requirements included in the purchase order and would not include any other technical QC inspection. Individual E furthermore stated E would not be aware of ADRs reported regarding any specific item. Individual E related having received no special handling instructions regarding the CBI manufactured moment restraints and they would be issued to the construction personnel, subsequent to their receipt, if they met specification requirements in the purchase order. Review of CPSES/B&R Procedures On September 11, 1980, a review of B&R/CPSES QA procedures relating to both vendor audit and vendor manufactured components release inspections was conducted. This review determined that: (1) no CPSES procedure was implemented prior to August 1980 providing guidance regarding vendor audit and vendor manufactured components release inspection. QA/QC personnel at CPSES utilized the B&R corporate QA procedures manual as guidance at that time. It provided for audit deficiency reports being used for adverse audit findings and NCRs for adverse product inspection findings. (2) On August 6,1980, B&R CPSES procedure CP.QAP 18-4, entitled " Vendor Qualifi-cation and Surveillance" was issued. Review of this procedure disclosed it provided no mechanisys for reportino of product deficiency during the surveillance action.M CP-OM-id 60 PA 4 6 <uhw ti - LP-M P-tG.( tw e w Q Selective Examination of Moment Restraints On September 11, 1980, subsequent to receipt of information indicating the subject moment restraints had arrived at CPSES, a selective examination of the components was conducted by the NRC resident inspector, Individual D, and the investigators at CPSES. The NRC resident inspector judged that. there was validity to the allegation that the CBI manufactured components contained unsuitable weld surface conditions. Subsequent to September 11, 1980, the NRC resident inspector made arrangements for, and had conducted, visual and metallurgical testing examinations of the selected components. NRC Inspection and Enforcement f.eport (Notice of Violation) 50-445/80-20; 50-446/80-20, reports findings that on " September 17, 1980, the NRC Resident Reactor Irspector, in conjuction with other NRC Inspectors, selectively examined four of the ninety-five components received at the site under subcontract 35-1195-0585 and noted
9 discrepant conditions. The examination, conducted in accordance with Procedures MT-3 and MT-4, revealed indications that were considered unacceptable in accordance with the criteria contained within the re-ferenced CB&I procedures. Specifically, the welds in components... were not sufficiently free from coarse ripples, grooves, overlap, abrupt bridges and valleys to render the surface suitable for proper interpreta-tion of the required magnetic particle or. liquid penetrant examination. This is an. infraction." Alleaation No. 3 Nonconformance reports are being disapproved by the site QA manager and the NCR numbers issued to those respective NCR drafts are then reissued. Investicative Findinas On September 22, 1980, Individual A was interviewed and stated that the site QA manager frequently disapproves NCR drafts submitted by QC inspec-tors. Individual A stated that the NCR number issued by the NCR clerk is then reissued for use on another NCR. Individual A statcl that the dis-approved NCR is returned to the initiating QC inspector. Individual A stated that there is no procedure available which would allow the QC inspector to appeal the disapproval and no permanent record is maintained relating to the disapproved NCR. Review of NCR Log On September 10, 1980, the B&R QA Department NCR Log was reviewed for the year 1980. The NCR log is designed to sequentially identify, by NCR number, each NCR and provide various items information relating to each respective NCR, such as the " issued" d. ad and the " disposition clo-sure" date. Examination of the B&R NCR log'noted numerous instances wherein the chronological order (dates issued) was not maintained, giving the impression that the NCRs, although listed sequentially, were not issued chronologically. In most instances, the chronology varied only several days; however, a review of NCRs issued between June 1 and August 18, 1980 disclosed 19 NCRs which were issued seven or more days out of the normal chronological order. Review of Acolicable Procedures On September 10, 1980, a review of applice 'e TUGC0 and B&R procedures related to handling of NCR's was conductec TUGC0 procedure number CP-QP-16.0 stated "The cognizant Quality C. trol Engineer may disposition an NCR to state 'Not a Nonconforming Condition' or similar wording. de shall provide justification for such a disposition. When a NCR is dis-positioned in this manner, the original is forwarded to the Permanent Plant Records Vault. A review of B&R QA Procedure CP-QAP-16.1, entitled " Control of Nonconforming Items" was examined and found to
/ \\ CTr' tin i.TRCCt.!r,C. )O DATE: A u g u., t 2, 10 ': " N s..N \\ Termir.ation : ate CC Er.cloyment Date flame Actiye - =- rNN.~ .h/.}M.M, g\\,( fNb,R-uWfg.$..iS.c$fhfr'.f.u.ag..w!W zggAq t,.: IT ?^ M ' T F i_ n c w p. ieJ &'9.se.yIEU;$'glj[Y!h[!jh4.y1pgntymg$'"? - Aw pu, htpg(. :9; T,jlCNYEf. U liW'l$ IO'O.L 'k' m. 4-ffc N! i ~ Y '.h[ CME > 5'k,jf&.I!h
~~$Nhi,~~
~~-J i N)&.WD8k $?fQi q Mf,i ,m { M '2 d 52 Active - i jk h %f,,f' gp d .,.f.u .ug y , flyld Active ~~~
~~k. y F#T,~~
~~~ i~~
~~.v. hdk~~
~~?. ].25 jNh hh .#R[ (^tt rney has fH e) Y jg D !b/k h5!fffk,b,(3.w,.g,.f.v [ hiffff. I[ n' e + o.,c cc / (Attorney has file) > mp:,[f 5 U .- 4 pp hp i i g,, .y c e. j+ c;3.:. l-ll 4,,,,4,3,, [,,~~
~~r m.gr fg e ;. y 4.~~
f,' {j; (!'i.jtpf'((. N; .,. yj, j,.
== Ed t (.i: IM b s.
~~c.,,-~~
e ;- s a 7 ei '?? ! t lflt L- /* Paulette Wilson QA Administrative Assistar.t / / l I I 20lA-85-59 I l
um n o :.,;.iw [f'*~~Q CI MUCLEAR REGULATOP.'I COMM155:0?! w .~ i l,' R E GIOri l'/ f ~ G11 RYAN PLAZA DalVE. 0UITE 107J k ',.. hg O A3LtNGTON. TEXAS 75c11 APR 2 01c34 MEMDRANDUM FDR: D. M. Hunnicutt, Team Leader, RIV Task Force Richard P. Denise, Director, Division of Reactor Safety FRCM: and Projects SU2 JECT: B&R QC INSPECTDP. MATERIAL IMFDUNDED BY flRC AT CPSES e 4 Regarding the subject material, please take the'following actions: Reproduce two copies, keep parts of copies segre;pted accordir.g to 1. inspector. Send ene copy of material to RIV, Arlingt:n, Attentien: U. Er:.<n. I 2. !!r. Erown is committed to have the material available for revie < by 3.1.0 8.g.,,bn May 7, 1c84. 3. Retain the present copy of the material at the SRIC office. -t i 4. Send a copy of the relevant material to each QC inspector. Transmit b;. a letter signed by you; copy of letters to me. For those not available j on site, send to last address. 5. Have your inventory typed and copied. Copies to W. Erown and me. Prepare, as best you can, a short narrative of events related to these 6. files, include date when acquired, hcw acquired, TUGC0 or E&R access, copies sent to others, etc., up to and including return of ccpies to C:- l i inspection. Send ccpy to me and W. Brcwn. I f i inanks N kj\\.\\. ,8 Richard P. Denise, Directer J Division of Reactor Safety { and Projects a i ~~' i cc:. F I g. f. Collins I l' } t .s. L. Eancart. ~ l' a51 i W Ercun 8&DSREGJd Lp' =
(Q. ,q :.,i g - i, / : Y.: Summey c; m.o r ei e w w. n U v v %,' s m / .f ,4 th? 'k, ((/Q $s 0$$/ /)"f hr?f }/[ff*rf,/f, ,f,'l 's '.', j % t-en @yigp%g. y&Qtf ,/ s-l a rea as G c Supnvust l G C S tq u e/ y / c r S *'{ k //19. 7 p. ///cks gya S ct. r 7 l /9s4, ef7 t -ehdrica !GC upsts 4
l.
~~On M a rch E, ~ in y;. f..+y y SNu/2 W : r-z / - f.wirs~~
~~s < r.,.,e,~=~~
.~ .e pick.iy i.G h , am ni f44 Actim. - e,s h p.c k y e 1 i w. LU:/c4 +::/cl +k.ez74+ 6b inpodcr.s rb y M /*~ $e 6)/ o 5 O / ./* / / 80 g p y + g j j' - / f ll.. ' ., ' ' ~g 't,, '/) /c / - l'!.'// ~ ' C I A-85-59 5 9
.~2 (/c-) 8 9 ~ l j .N'?.*, Y 'h f.. hr, I M-f _,, bbWC Nl {A f O!!$'I T $lN' I f f I '*l -l ) o 0,,,o.,'. $b' *[ri.,' i'EI ,N.l'- x ., a. a. h 3 /,V 0C /n9v:,:)5 E :n/ '!Ncl. 7UC[O 5fdilSyb/f/'b i 7 C DN& v' /J f' S. YJ C+1'W Gi C $c/PJ g(cii d 8W/YC/l/ " 7-S Air & in vs/to d'. c;L +/J.eiri n.o r.e 7 Y/ N 'I ' -l# l C S S'f'"' ) 9 /924, cf f4 -!ipdt &c oyv:pbu k,G Mi-e 'T-shins in volv'cl > +MO W* In$ wL J :E a s k +c{ lu b.e faicl eft ; c/M due.: Vic nGrk:( h om,,o>ojid b aba.co sn va n /ne. i cu y .: :.m u* > ' 21a : fa;cl eff a/ cry su:M =2o cM f j / & }* $ ~/f" N? f fj { p %, ,,, [l[f s" La f hp ~
~~a.,~~
~//fe }/ nl< q' '7/Y ~ =. i,$// .' ;. :r. 7 E*' 'hh ' h:k5 hk h,;' ', _. i {f)&l } f/s f/ l }}} [j [fj C Wrcipe/ sap k/iM hsyd -/c idy=uAun /%n: cenc{ c7 Af CtthMMaf~ chtny v'ht? insf cRon.c. p%.;>:,4n Liu I
../h ~ , Qty';.';f :
~~i. J~~
~ $ef///?/1&l}/ C.5 fil, f2'/U 2') S')<'.!t$ t NY *5W? l ) !C l'-: l//N* G /I C '-- !k2 A ']/!? 8 C //.': '-l': 'i (YN$$Wh5NyYY$1rI_k,]_ /l'0'?3 7 c /> Mc</c4 2, /9cfd. toor x }Jc T-SI/I& ! h4%ftfh[bd ban aiin commich pak,cight fr / 0 $'c!I'3. I Ost' l/h2 h/f2/T Ct.: ~2hc7'//c'a / GC/ '4 :7'c l'. ff il< fIy E ,0 fc b h' )ll,N ( s., -C. 2 k.,$.c y $h..kb' S l h 'I Y 'h' i } l ' V.
~~1 fh. ~~~
s i o. f) C /1/ li'(cf CJn7Q,f4i;;tiI?e /. 6c/ko cs///ll f/ p / H E,0 C b W. ?hC!//$< / $C / /5 'c!OS 2 Ct 5 i / ?. b'c S44{ Qbsccf -? fry i?ufac;4C e te k / s [ h 4 T-S h 'i w:M +/s ale e m-1 s ; e. He Atoaf At -s vp.,,-
~~w O~~
~~b I,, { Q h' { l'/ / ~ ~ ~ - /~ 4 },(} / l lY / ~ ' /t f/, tv:M c/,jj'c; :,: t.u.w: - +'s.~~
~~.- /)^ V"/,~~
,I. - / i ,. = -h-dt%Cf -g c fu..< )., ', ; ;.r' e a l __.(W* f fjW ~ . i,, ~_ - - ~, ~~
T~ s-kW m en .s,,,,<1 .S y f h y j pnsson/ 7'r ch'nye v'4g p ;,,Ci, e,; ,:, w,,i g lfE4. b'l -k a d 2/o f ty c r n y/ic, f i-S 4. i f -g..,L 3 J./e/?. ii S- //-e Sc< lc/ ;4Ief k-< c//W f//dcc/ Li? C,afctn'w.?: c u t' i w N t a r' u v u h ,Nrf nu 4 4c/nec.i GC in s aec/r'on -r
~~7. Swd co 4U murbac-e w,Y4 %,picje d, N N~~
W e y ( } f ,,,w l4 e V d qsr [ g a y :TJTl{n /Cf r}+ -f a f(f ti') / - i- ..'. -l-L F e j i, t,:' 5l'c?//2 7s C}} [ fj '--.r' I v ~E S ( ll ! (/C l.'i 'bik / < }' /5 C,( } l,,,' d ', ' l e A C l ]. l L n = 4 e% a 9 1 1 4 i \\ ame
g ,. v.., - h a! h(//71}7)dfy Cf //1/Yf WOY $UrYl hkYh o&~'/A" 449//t G C /nife:fea.Wfa _htlhkj?k?ih_.hf,5h$ $ ten 3 c')' e k/cre +4e T-Shir& on A/ arc /I B, /ftf4L A $$l1@b@hM}$ 5"d A" 4A C'"'"'"Ne ' " ? '/ VU W ~ GC /kJ/;eekr&;4l< f4 TY 2h3 Y $Z 'f't"a 75, /9S' yeu rs. 2. hLe sf b/ fh t /f< -kac/ h /b/?# -fc Cc,nkg u:2,r< j Orot7b 'fbe T-SA AE - h!* y'doigAt -b scuet a,lh T-s]&& toh ps+ /jke + w'oy c/h! 7=- s&t c/,&'e>hn& J1w15ps. to;Hi l7 t &c i);y>c/cis da a' ::ae A .5. Re -fa /+ +4- [ Y A c 3csd jch tii kn.n ef,mr/chdy /Ny=%:5 e s l St { {0 hd &/,'? f !Yi, / ' ll l { '(ll ![ lt { f/Y 5 ' t,,w<co-: ; F9 p.g5_59 l 59 w-_
N-rh, ,,I n t RM%ewg;,, I crn l-( "Me',2f;,/ SG tcf jY? f P L n b /)s v'4 }' c/ca-Q [ f2 wepekaps aiwi pspec+ h kpc/,un /ne ait c/ ,/bfriit facifiW 4.c.
~~s. H< 4/nh+ & io L t a u 4 :g k w i;,~~
o-7ermS of ekch/b/ d Saf-4 ??lani14 7 //) b>Sh//abb/JS in fd< S n y Co g u.,i s l O N c'. f'Ob//m3 alff S-NE Seild f[qf !< dacl 770 I i {$ cf f b1S/}MclibriS, 7)oi' p i ? u e :t' til ';L.I 7 /1'E lna9cafecl +Ae f ~rh wps i b f h ('."f'll# /Yl?// lYlb Allll~' l /k l // l / k'l '!N b l- ) // i S / ll [ / [ lll / . -: ) f~'n ^,' /'}Q'}^/ ! ,?' S biE S V 9.5 )?c f (?.' '
~~i < Of Gli.'/~~
p I !D. ; y's,('r2/) / -) ~ 7/ L? c~ O. r { j ',, t/f,< ', l /._ / ( l
w //ny/:?.2',yyy.p d pp. .:. a; :.. a...- S unnnay c,' /&nuy ai;;4t> Qf};.Qj f, g. s hhh.hfhh h '; W S O/?e Of +A# 4 sy/ f 6? C it?5,4v +i:s DJ/}c ci / 4ll0M vie 7~- Sl/]'t o.n Marc // 6', /784. da c[ bwi Wlfd Cc/>/onck bA fJojAf - / I 1. S / t'ai Bit / Wi j A YG$ $f$$/ e = G C lns,ccr'=f }r.c adsa & f p;;m'd; CtX/M a.S pnst 40 iciaid6., /7c5F 4 2. /-/x SCd +e 6 dea r +/a t' 7=. SIS & Wa s jaSt -f<>F~ /a4/iB;GisNosi. He clic/' Mst4 ave ciny had khi.f N f .e / l Gc liu,sader. .5'. He fd +b t n'e x;;H G c hisam>'as m psd i i v Yl uG n'. ^n l)GkN') l,.D,9 c' ' '! / // / ,',C' C b l 5 f /,' 'l5 l ,'g g ,8 O S 8 'W i ,,((/,,s;) (h' ', ;!- // ' ),l l../. 'l
~~j.r ? - {~~
-)
(?) .- i - z g hP- \\ L -( \\ x,L. /h Sc,icf lla? !e c/ c ?? o ? -;{:., g c,, ainiydswps w,+1 ppa /d /s incpen,.,,si;;; i, g m* l f
~~5. //e felf An? /h p/o? n'as A&j de,*/F a Sah ?nnur )}i &~~
c tu c+ s4cfnei/ su iknflofsn C s +y uo in' c red. 6. /k gs,' y'he w ass 7e f ir'a TuEco 4: ckr;u Mauil a Ms+. & m'enof %!e T-5/!ui' cn //a /c/! S', /9 84. 'is tc)cyK c /> W ; / f T lI Q-C C Gi ( }/ O f /n'd c^ /. fjl-2 Scr ac !T^jSc;>a/ / )aja:;- tt, 9 y' / ci ~$%)' lYE ~ PE 'r'? l Ed JL1l)h5:ek[ 0. (U2 ~ ~ I ~' ~ dt ~ t< ,s 'l ' fp i l' f ') { /, ' s.' ~
,5 .l l ' [ [ 'I }. };l.2 [o /f fb&l~ /If l&' / C l= 'AI//}' ( ineia%+) Me h4/(9 n> dam..~7-~( v u q= c o
~~n a n g n r w n t.~~
)'V/NSTO/J Liu
a / p.m . - ' g
~~'jc '~~
WC.:t.-- / WW ., - es>.. y' Q ^ ./ M, 5 % 7-/ v m s, . :.s. ' -,n o:,. z.~ h & f '.f/ y. ~ ~ - 5 l g; h' > L ~z w -.,8 D gz;Wp& Ql$ & f ^}[,G & f j j /2.? ~ Y'. /*",.. e,y:$ Aff~~y n d.-~ - g .)& d I f. Al 1,!: ) 2.
~~p.x~~
...t: v: w:, G.....; > ;,, _/ .y V:D y c.,,n,,,e s :: -f.;i.i'5. c.. e.,. c s. % '.. * '., *W -l' jt ~ \\ Cg,-j C :i .} l~~) ;-' 3. Cha r i.1:E%'. Y V ili:MWfift;.. NW.?.Y/^pi:3.. we/ -Z[-.M ec:rical - - - ~ ' ,:.:.:.w==i.::.w u w-wu.m w-u-~~ ~ ->- QC inspectors assigned to the Safeguard Building area wore T-shirts bearing the slogan " Comanche Peak ftit Picker, I am in the Business of Picking Nits." Because the insoectors all reported to work in the T-shirts, they ared to TUEC Managemen)to be articipating in a pd at.4en.'& 1%ese. @- er-c's W-uw ' irk s ! cec-ch M7s Assessment of Safety' Sicnificance: The inplie significa.ce of { j4 this allegation is that an organized disruption by the eight electrical QC g in'spectors cculd have a hu1_i cact on electrical installatier.gn ee_,. g N.cau Safeguard Euilding an d" :entially ch ic spreac to other areas c: :ne site.) si el. / da/,.$' V- / 1 g7 ~
~~0bG' / 5 b$16 bdU4 fI'~~
' 'S ? The NRC Technical Review Team (TRT) reviewed TUEC's final report of this thrch 15,1984, and previous interviews between three of th '.gNa;. incident Y,: b :... eight electrical QC inspectors and NRC Region IV personnel. Between ..M&GM M ggg"e 6 I~ffer& jgn/ftFl August 1 and 4,1984, the TRT interviewed five electrical QC ins;ectorR - d (three of whom wore the T-shirts on March 8,1984) who were assiped to_Jie ? f g, i hCC, ~ f ranace ent personneD who were i.volved o TUEC c; Safeguard Building area, te h,h oao(f,'withtheT-shirtincident,andoneelectricalQCsupervisorfremErown&<. \\ / p Root, who worked with the eight QC inspectors prior to March 8, M31 J /_ h p')??$s,J awaka& S A TwaQ
~~A A,* g,]~~
Eased on an examination of the TUEC report and the interviews cc.cucted, J /Et/hR cW-the-TRT learned that the eicht ir.scectors at no time expressed treir desire q /- to participate i d. -an orcanized dis-urtim U D In fact, in respcnse to a gg t0, J.i.-t f@ n g.;/.. request from TUEC management to return to their homes on l' arch S. 1984, replace the T-shirts, all eight inscectors did so. Since March 5, 1934, GEi --r
~~U,.~~
a.lWJ[L LW ' V v Is %uT.a! none of the inspectors involved ha,e ever worn the T-shirts tc we.w again. ' M: g 't (j 9 /."t c*.. g a c</ i, 7 Further, the TRT could find no inic natien to link the eight wit-P'y - ' Tir. t overt di sru;'t i on. Their only greur activity involved their all w aring
~~L o~~
la r.z e the same shirt to work on the the saw day. d \\ 9ep ye-9 '*MM*ew, _4,M M.B 6 h M.'. 4- @
0 Eshd " is n eecG d. M,[,ug hm 2 (G <pese. &,wpedots) M* ' i o assess whether the work of these spectors was acceptable, the TRT also reviewed 40 inspection reports that had been accepted by the 8 QC inspectors before March 8, 1984, and 10 inspection reports accepted by 2 g v Y other QC inspectors who were not involved in the incident. The TRT could I find no differences between the two groups of inspectors in the thorough-ness or objectivity of the inspection reports they accepted. g 6sh. it,> Between August 2 and 8, 1984, 12 inspection report which had previously h# been accepted by the 8 QC sp g n accordance with j M dcu. inspection procedures and instructions by a qualified QC inspector who had ] not been involved in the T-shirt incident. The inspector identified no ] deviations from procedures and instructions resulting from the reinspec-tions that would indicp a + hat revious inspections by this group were r inappropriate or incorrect. Ar/c m.o 8' % % As.s % [ ~ ( 5. Conclusions and Staff Positions: The TRT found no evidence of an organized disruption that was either intended or created by the eight QC inspectors. ~ Sin 9 no deviations were identified in the 12 inspection recorts which had g een accepted by the8QCinspectorsjtheallegationcannotbesubstan-do tiated and has neither safety sionifican ~ no M c implicat ons. falk de.5 ' h the proe g of assessing this allegation, the TRT of an
~~Ndat :~~
k rent a M toward QA/QC activities that raises concerns about TUEC's g,g mana ement commitment to quality work at Comanche Peak. The T-shirt slogan psE T appears to have been created in response to a continuous stream of comm fpm craft personnel that QC inspectors are " nit pickers." L mi:,ain-(% ' 2tt* %_ ;;;
~~'? a LQLj TUEgn n. ~. img_ T=ss=%eW~~
~~@t-M + l~~
~~J ' # "ib.~~
IhMRT b. lieves %' LfMrreactice to the incident v L ' [ Construction managem7nt. the eight. inspectors in a room {k the f ,/ ytad +n grk, search'ed-their work stations nilq:~j we l=',cgo g gI without obtaining their consent,'.an h secuentiv reassioned the % g is / 4t&t441% db b 2 r ~ ' t g... l.= ;. Q - ~.., bi. 'm. Management's immediate reac g g 1 g was to act as though the insp ctors were guilty of disruptive behavior 4)tc llu,$$ . }* h .e4dy e M a'en ' mJ E.' l i
q /f h. 7 g . 'p -j,As-P~ s, / M Y, , ' '~ & " ~~~' ~s -.lSl#> a M ,,Q .+%% 4 A ~~.&;y>=-cu LYS i, j i,
Yc ( '~^' ?' f

W'j)4d.eL,d (dlte aee,c., dne(*
/M 'rather than @ examine the incidentlto determine its cause. Of significan concern to the TRT is the fact that TUEC GC and QA management accuiesced in construction management's overreactic>n. b <do F# - 35 FK TeH s S TA-TEA 1P ' ' AT ~~>;il5 SSC' U lgh, wha s ? / .g6. Action Recuired: TUEC shall exary:e the# Quality Assurance aspects of the (6M in idant, da+ar.ninetQrootcause,andprovidecorrecti e action to vN h TUI'C7.o. ocus on QA Management's p-W
~~2 prevent recurr ace.~~
~ N e; Ld a as.d r examine the separation;of QA Management from th influence' of Construction Management.gTUEgnf.. Ashall g, d.
== m w % e C j addres W the results e review and w.::h5=sp-U#' 4d4 documentt the specific actions taken to preve t recurrence-Mjo #Cp ~ r j of )4/&bC$ ? l t 8. Attachments: None. re w i. e # ~fm d -{l 3 9. Reference Documents: tt.J/;gt tega-gmer;t f ~ 1. TUEC final report on iss6es resulting from interviews with the electrical inspectors, dated March 15, 1984. 2. Twelve inspection reports that were reinspected and verified by a non T-shirt inspector. 3. Twelve inspection reperts numbers that were reinspected / verified by l a qualified QC inspect:r. El-0004118 ET-1-0004149 El-0004452 ET-1-0004173 ET-1-0019966 ET-1-0004175 EC-1-0009037 ET-1-0004152 E-10015178 ET-1-0004S17 ET-1-0006098 ET-1-0006134 i l i i
}."- i t l 4. Fifty inspection reports that were partially reviewed by the NRC TRT._ They are: y El-0004118 E-10015178 El-0004121 EC-10026963 El-0004124 EC-10026888 El-0004115 EC-1-0026893 El-0004440 EC-10026895 EC-10002044 EC-10004782 El-0004452 EC-10004750 El-0004454 EC-10004717 ET-10003939 EC-10006133 ET-1-0003941 ET-10006098 EC-10019075 ~~ EC-10019076 ET-10004175 EC-10019077 ET-10004173 EC-10019446 ET-10003986 EC-10019409 ET ;'0003984 EC-10009622 ET-10003979 ~EC-10009603 EC-10021776 EC-10011898 EC-10021779 EC-10009037 EC-10021781 b f EC-10004691 ET-10021777 ET-10021782 ET-10003962 ET-10004149 EC-10004040 q ET-10004152 EC-10004077 J EC-10009624 EC-10004084 EC-10014328 ET-10004032 ET-10004041 5. TUEC Management 3/84 Allegation. 7--
t f ,v. - 1 1: -5 l
~~10. This statement prepared by:~~
TE b[ / / /L5-/79 WinstonLuian[# Date HerbIrt Uvermore, TRT echnical Reviewers Reviewed by: ,g js Herbert Livermore, Date I Group Leader l Approved by: Vincent Noonan, Date i Project Director L 5 %Q \\ \\ C'+ '%~ 3 I I e _.w. -~~
l \\ e f ' A,95C!?c,0. ' S,ihy' [_f4 T' /2_fy//,V.),d_ ^ I W i- /Mc9)c/H_fW4LPutai/m nrp. A,a f6' // sf / 1 D af?~~9,'<iMMQ&b...:/0shGXl isa es ,y,9 ^. M.</ E s amuoa mys r,w?wwzezan, no - mr h rsn a b l it s/:ie y_ w - IB~ "' Sazcui } f ~ WNOsLM-DR2G> l A$WW /N6_On!ENLf' _st'2 86/D/P e I ,l ..h /. Y' //. / l l?I /f$ ll.. * ~ t s?,-.l i/ *. '~..p' l t w l.._ tj,3LME7,w/6 /i/$_pbAnI j/- .bx_Giwnwemiu/rsn.smcrt h u n h iac A w z L fo &./'E n i n. J_ f-eBD_# iee nwwaur s' d6 2 494-te?D s 0 6 'Y~ ' hl /~. ') };Y f/ pl$ / ju /* l
~~g,., 4 l..--.-.Gluf!C W/M ZiU2127/p,v,0EtciG5 fito.y f//a: ? 2..~~
)..---: T,;w ;E W 2 ',17 r,;,1:. / 5,? o a d y. // f p : /n/t .5693 / lLDC.? l (if 4.i.?u. :.' L..'.G?fP.C/'/!. ( I < l/ 7 ; / l.-~.. c .) - -[] a u 7 ;a,,., i.? ? i u,s., < ~,,ye.o,..// /.,:.,:,, %,,.>.,i., u \\ i / ? w . Y,, j.l,',/.. !,b ?,'l '? '5 'b',' v ,c,-,y, .~ i ., y,,.. n.< J
-/- --.--_.3 ~ '- j a.!. t( fIC ^ A T-Shirt Incident -1 r mza Intervenor alleged that electrical OC insp6tcrs wearing T-Shirts we e ,7 ,,p-- p ir.timidated by management. Certain electrical DC inspectors were wearina T-shirts referrinc toandtheir/4ig. D-A- " nitpickers." They were subse:uently sequeste-ed by manecemer.: b cesks searched. (There is a cuestion cf their prior involvement wit.. " destructive testinc" prior to the incident.) Some of those involvedx ~. were'later transferred or terminated. /,pplicatns assert manactment -ich'#.- have overreacted, but the acticns taken.were not intimidation. ~ /' / /* r' '/ Cf b W - O f (' f.u -( Evidentiary depositions: g d,, g.2 ~ ~ ~j.t,,6 ;01954...f(.TrF-.53,0G'l. \\ ~ .gQ. ju 1 d6PYdilf5?3f T; J eg%ce.j a \\ $ET6p6HEoT~o?If.%f'hbTCM,,' N..Jif17.I7'J"1954ff(fEf5'5','000d15?7 ru V u /x. 31;-1984;i.(Tr.573750045 5) M l M.. #9 9 - e m-- i @gogj;t-ECJackCPitts;" July m %u c,u, <[3' [#. Depcsition of Rcnald Tolsen; July 10, 1952 (Tr. 40,545-552) . // c,' -<. % Capositicn of B. R. Clements; July 10, 1954; (Tr. 40,095-105) y
~~Depositien of Thcmas 5randt; July 11, 1952; (Tr. 45,12E-149)~~
~~Deposition of Scyce Grier; July 11_ 1954; (Tr. 45,591-599) r. 1,,1S,, 19r,), g ___ GC M L qu.cosaac., ov. Gercen Furc.m - ly..16.-..s.19;c -.f(a s,._,~~
~~y ;-J u o~~
~~.5/ e Dcos3.aor..o.1 u[fj;;C;.___.... Ju ty47 5 c1984,(a-Tr.5..54 008. ~-055);j x,,4~~
~~g.;.,r2s :~~
7~ , ~... -. ~. w, w m Hearing Testimcny: Testimony of Michael Spence, Tr. 14,924-920 (9/10/84) Testimony of Antonio Veca, Tr.15,055-C5C; 15,191-192; 15,197-:51; 15,273-415 (9/10/34) 2-521 Testimony of E. R. Cle ents, Tr.15,415-.':E; 15,470-502; 15,5: (9/11/E4) Testimony cf Th mas Erandt, Tr. 16,107-122; 16,175-201 (9/12/52' Testimony of Garden F'urdy; Tr. 16,2EE-372 (9/12/S4) Ta s timon:, cf Renaic Tel m., Tr. 16,299 (9/12/S4); Tr. IE,f52-65T (9/13/E4' !a is / 2(s9
[W \\i ~. O [ kQvc (k5 i
b,
~ l ~ wtE \\ $ fI~.9 Lavfa Asun, sy~k c i , L L u / n,o p ', 6./3 e S cm/ s. jay. s & #a - y/sLs/ ia A } r ~. ..m>u.hIl D ~ //u/r, o cp & i~~ La l .tA w (qw/pamu~ du aV i 1 4 y-u~~ 4 r /ac --n J n d i s-a m . fw ~&%e gm tk. L,_.2. l a & w. D'ou h j s A en n / i f ' g { ( U h ( 6 o - p i. 'c e '4.f.**'h FCIA-85-59 c-un ofW 4 .~ -
,,act-A Name: I S5ER AQ-46 Y., Reques.or 2 i : PAT Author's Name: Chet Posiusny Document Comments: 10/31/84 Redraft li space m .-,.. -v,-w..-1
:.n ~., s....

b. s.s,%.s ;:..,.,.,..... t....
~~....6. '. s f+*... -p..j n, :, r;,...... 3,. P ~~~
~~nm' '...y~~
~~.. : r:x:,;., :; - (.P,.. c.* s. .... c... s .:,. v <.pr..: n,: u. E. .' tiW.~~
~~6. r...(a,', *.M.. ml 'liO *..,. J,l ~ Ic;i-~~
,tl.,-). %'t...' a i.,M. $:9:: *. ;~: ~, ~ e.,.%..,T;*,l.:;-:.',%'.% T...% t, ,:00;y. 7 2..* ..,:,~..,....... \\ e.s c.>,,,... y-.sc :... ~t. ... + w.t.T.2 " >:y W 3 ?y p'/ M LoV7.c n..y y.pc,'.q.y?:[ Y p' ","*. m : y ' N Fl$.I;M. O'RiNW M' 6.;.:..,.. - A.: - e !. a. p.?:V. ?
~~4y:,.m;ry*.?.':';?.:. w %.$.y.~~
M %,.. c. l:.d~;' n;&3 E.. nhg;..:M(:y; k. ?I'- ,e:.q.i e,a,ec a: L g I y _\\ p;;. "+.% LlQ.:T 1:'. ',*?^4.!l:.d..':.',':.,{;!.,.ki)Y h;5' 5', f.k.?x., n $ f >5:.: -.t.,,.,... .Y'.:h. ',ql., Q 'k;3M /.w.r,w;%q.y :W{7.:;q.el !,: 3. f u::?., e; * ;.*,.,.c ----w.-~~~--- n " " $D: s. 'n1 q: g u..';..s. (.y,f,,' Al :v ... ;" '.Q.Q.. ...l l A yJ J.,.& w. c?: e n.s ((.y&p....,. in9y...
~~43gn' un~~
~~..e (e g-----a.g w n. y ~ m. .nn,N $- Q5lW W v....:...m %. my l R V. m.... w ~ i j.,t .i .. v,r~ ~ ~ ~* -. ".,c..... ..., n.~~
~~u. o~~
~~~. ,4. weae.sa.e4 /.a... ~.... f '..., g,w' Iw .'I. '.i~~
w
) r;j g ( / Jt-[j t,J y w %%*.'%.Q t w sJ W N.:. n y, L .'-] .h ,,,.n.....w.n.~,r. :k.,anyn.n t":u !.';,? t',*S.'.c;R,, "";"~WY.,.e W. Y, A.' 0.: ,,\\.., ~' T- $f(,.,4.,a, fy. m, :. .~, A y< r a:,y.yy:;n:p.x. : m~. (,,,,, @McM,, il (;w.te nr .g, ~" , u.. .c '..,..,..,. 2.e. d. a.Q.:;a; n. M ~* 'f Y .va, ...... w. e an; g .....e.~ a.........:. 2.
~~n...~~
~~s _Aq }QLggf*;t;if' o d ..,.2.,,.e.-<,~ -c,'v-'y p -2 m.l.. ,fij'fw;g y._:6 w(.,,W 6,, .,".3 ^* .j M; g a. h.?. -l n,L q r's.. . :%.. 7 i '. ; **,..l.~~
s
s
~~? w .y 1 1; '/ '. h;wt g~~
~~i c, 4' p~~
~~s i f; I kl; :c -w fkk J,x<)(, & 0 & ' c. ,a-w, d.g ib. b T~~
~~/[ Q Ls %A,,4~~
~~..o,.m.m.n w.N:N* & ) W ) kkx,9'f',-/ a .w 3 w t,,(c G). ,C;' f'.? ?.fGYQU U u,.,i... i .e< . 0 .;Vd~LM. "),yjA :s,.,' ' ~ %p, . c w. 'l i, i.. u.o. a i, - I 4,*, bgg' : (g%,,, y -t-9.h ! l~ W l~~
~~s....~~
.y .u.. e ."[j j hQ,,/./1,,CkT. 4-h. 7 k %%m,...a,WW #An6~ Gu anc.dr+ W E L. h :c 2 c h h3. k.b & & n, q W,,,- * %. 1 u .<. a. w. ~. y *M e+ggf2%. Ognieww 3 8 C M-***.6 .. e.g. de 4 a
. u 7ne n. r ac :. :t an ' ?.lia t :an A;ainat the rost Can c t r J e t ion C.2 f e Juard 1 Tack /orce and The T-Ehirt Inc: dent.
~~In late 198 3 TUGCO inc t i tu ted a new progra.~~
to root out any poscibility of harassment and i intimidation on the CPSES cite. By Mar en 13 5 ; the newly formed eight point program was known, er should have been known by all project management and employees. Presumably management for both TUGCO and Brown & Rco t had become sensitive to the issue of harassment and intimidation of Quality Control inspectors. Yet, in spite of all of the provisions provided for by the Applicant, two major incidents -- the retaliation and harassment of the QC inspectors on the Post Construction Task Force in Safeguards 1 and the T-shirt incident occurred. These two incidents could be examined separately. However, because the incidents involve many of the same personnel, and a're closely intertwined, it is more appropriate to consider the two events simultaneously. Also evident through these incidents is how the NRC regional staff failed to deal with independent requests from cuality control inspectors to assist in keeping the CPSES werkplace free from harassment or intimidation. The evidence is that the Staf f did not respond in any acceptable manner to allegations of serious impropriety by an employee, that their inaction was based on unsupported testimony of Applicant, and based en no evidence, no inspection, no investigation of the employee's concerns. T-Sniet Incident 182. The Safeguards Building Task Force was formed en or about l;ovembe r 1983. ( T 't. 55,008) It was part of the Building Management Program which reorgani::ed all CC in';pectors on four buildings -- Safeguard, Aux 1111ary, T2 actor, Electric l Controls -- into Task ?creen (Tn. 13,015) under a d if f erent caiorvicary ctructure. (Tn. H,ol U. A c co r,t in ; te{2 L' y a 1 i t f e n j i ne.n, r.e a i -- .h
~~n. ~~~
. m r u.. -.,. u ~ - .a a.= - ~
.Ag " responsible for coordinating completion of project menager construction work." (TR. 53,014) The building management program jas broken down into four areas of supervision, construction, and the QC building eng ince t ing, pape r flow, superv:isor (who reported to the site QC supervisor). (TR. 53,015) The supervisor for the Safeguards Building 183. electrical QC inspectors was Greg Bennetzen (TR. 55,008), and Mr. Vore's assistant was the " lead" was Stan Vore, D,gg iTE. 55,009) A subgroup of this division was the iXf Force ("Pos t") whkh Safeguards Post-Construction Task ~ / F^' ~. consisted o There vere 10 other electrical QC inspectors assigned to the Safeguards Building Task Force the end of February four other OC inspectors and on or about were added to the Task Force. (TR. 55,010) the same time as the reorganization, 184. At about procedures were being developed f or the' post-construction The procedures caused some of the CC ver if ication ef f or t. inspectors assigned to " Post-Construction" to become concerned that potentially serious problems were not going , to be looked at as much as was needed (TR. 55,015; or that violated national standards (T.. the procedures, as written, 55,021) because of the use of a Deficiency List inntead of to NCRd. They br:ought. thene conearn,n about the procedures their in ci n a. p in o n t. (TH. "5,02l)
- y, 1E5. Alec in or about Ceconher 19S3 a major i n s p e c t i c.- cables, te r n in a t ic n c, was done,on all Class 1-E equipnent, conduitc,' raceway. (T3. 55,024) The inspectors, under the i f ound " subs tantial problems." ( T E. cupervision of Dan Hicks 55,022). the Post-In late January or early Fehruary 1994 186. Construction Task Force began inspections in the Safeguards Building according to the procedure for Post-Construction, Q I-Q AP-18. 2-4 0. (TR. 55,014-015) f -!rk'Nc/_. 187. Tne si:: " post" inspectors told $i'.v? Y M9 tnat a.c.cr ox ima tel./ 5 0's cf the lighting te rm inacion the.v. Icoked at nad deficiencies. (T2. 55,061) That was repor ud to Gordon Purdy through Greg Eennetzen.(TR. 55,061), who instructed that a 1001 inspection be done. (TR. 55,062) \\ L ,a. y,, c11)a l s o v e r i f i e d t ha t there was a "f airly high ~ occurrence of lignting deficiency.' (TR. 53,060) iacpections were also done of the electrical 183, " Pest equipment boxes." ( T 3. 55,043) Gaining access to the electrical ecxes recuire that the inspectorc adhere to a-which requir e; the preconce of a TJ300 acces; procedure engineer, an engineer craf thand, and a 1cadman to open :ne equipnent. ( T 3. 55,049) Tnis was done only about fcur ci five timec by four of the c i:. ":' c a t " incpectorc. ( T 3. c_ _,, n e, - v.. O .=y $0 I b .y e. t-l, s j: , a ' (T*'. 5, t) E $ ) '.. s !' < 1 v r : t t ,1 i 11 *:I e...
- ;3 [ 55,055) Ac a resalt no r. re ir.s p e c t io n c were able t o c.e Finally, Mr. Greg ':anino).y done on' j'enction boxes. the inspectors to write "unsat" on all of inctructed the inspected because an engineer be equipment wnich could not (TR. 55,056) available to witness the box opening. was ndt Shortly thereafter the procedure was changed. (TR. 55,051) " communication" problems Tnese changes caused, at a minimum, between the inspectors and management approximatcly one week cefore the T-shirt incicent. (TR. 73,513-14) These to the attention of procedure changes were later brought management as an exampic of unresolved proble.s which concerned the Post-Construction inspectors. there was a " general s ( 196.E; qi;M.p. tectified that d id situation" in which construction and building management not understand all of the concerns or deficiencies identified by the incpectorc in inspection (TR. 53,049) including pcot construction, lighting inspection, separation inspection, and other in-process i n s p e c t.io n s. 191. By the third wee:. of February the Safeguards becauce "t!.2y Dailding craft managenent was getting upset felt like (the C0 inspaetarc) chouldn't to looking at these
~~o x e s" tocauce "the had been previeucly incpected." (TR.~~
al;o enld they..are 5 5,0 d -0 6 3 ) Tne cc inc;ostn; were _2,142) na;o cor m w. .:eiding up c;cpietten, ' :de ;y t:.11.! in ; nini' a' t.' o f. h e r CC in: : ':<; te : s ! ;' i' r. 1 l' ..n .,i'4) 1 a t. .1 t t 1 <
= incident t h a t t h e r e w a s a p o C J i b i l i t y i n s t O c.~. e o f t h e C personnel in the electrical porticn of the building were being "somewhat destructive" in the way that they went cr.:ut accomplishing their inspections. (TR. 40,580) 192. Following this report Tolson testified that he participated in meetings for approximately two weeks witn Oc and craft in the building, and ultimately had a formal meeting with Greg Eennetzen and the building supervisor and " concluded that temporary reassignment of approximately six people mignt b3 in order." (TR. 40,581; 40,589) This mee ting took place "a day or two bef ore the T-shir t in c id e n t. " ( T 5. 4 0, 5 5 2 ) 193. It was not until immediately prior to this meeting that he received a fermal allegation of a destructive examination. He personally went to view a loose wire f re.. a termination lug and some flex conduit. He testified that he "had no reason to disbelieve that there was a potential fr: some destructive effort on the part of some CC people." ( T 3. 40,536) 194. Tolcen testified that cuch destructicn would hr 2 not only been cericac, but could have pctentially been sabotage'. (TR. 40,554-586) As a result of these concern.: he wanted to have an independent review. (TR. 40,588) 19 5. The r e is ne tactimeny tn.it the QC inopoctcr: ' r.' ' th e r d t r ec t' y.ie: m J cr a.'.
~~aut involv :.ent in~~
.:e n f. r u e t i v e e um ina t tan: r-7 c 1 .j. tb P Lh }O e. ,' t '? m w.- ,,1-
- 73
(
~~other than that gained from being involved in d isc.:s s icns w ith Mr. 'Hichs and Mr. Tolson. (TR. 53,105)~~
~~ielch As r.0 J~~
f I aware of.an, ..c t i o n s (including an investigation) ti;en by Hicks or Tolson prior to the T-shir t incident to establish the v511dity of the concerns. (TR. 53,105) 197. T$ere is some testimcny that Mr. Tolson questioned " destructive examinations" of the 1 Mr. Bennetzen about ,I j junctions boxes. (TR. 55 074)- The inspectors -.M d8dN N Nk M Ik[NT 5 f$,II[,M )] 4 l 198. g m _. -. ' 'h _ _.- hj[hkly{." -- the only inspectors who had been ecxes, had a 4 involved in the opening Of electrical equipment i t the discussion with Stan Vore and "other people" atout i equipment being " torn up" (TF.. 55,053-055) during these 4 { l inspections. Apparently no accusations were made directly I j to the inspectors, not any action taken (TR. 55,055; 73,521) r a few days before the T-shirt incident, I j 199. However, Ron Tolson called James.Cummins, II of the Nuclear F.egulatory Commission at CPS S and reported that he may "take action" against seme inspectors for having per fermed Of destructive inspectiona ( in '.u d ing pu ll i n ; w i r e s c.: t lugs). (TR. 54,058-061) 200. Meanwhile other preb' ems were being dia : vere;: cy th) CC " post group" duri: g tha laut ucek of Fqbruary. Cne cuch peculem wa.: with t.u " g c - j o " g a u j r;.hich a n.s e erinp0 on 1 lij h t i n g. ( T P., 53,?'J; !* :<. 43-2) A'Je]r '; sf J (
~~4. m.~~
~~.. g. u...~~
~~4. m~~
~~. q t,.. m i / 'AI you u.* d f.h t'-~~
~~t '.~~
.1
,-,w--...u- ,s...,.. c 5 ~ 1 .,...c... .e, ,c. .,- v m ) ..s generic implications for every Iv/el cf the t.; iding, cn; .c o c s i b i" 'o t h e r c. 1 201. Still another problem, which the CC inspector at tnis identified on the Pc:t-Ccastructicn Deficiency
is t the configurations of the lighting restraint time, was that nad been designed in a way that "the actual length of the restraints weren't long enough." (TR. 55,060) 202. At about this time Mr. Nelson Smith, a craft
.. ;q:, -;x q:,,:., j.;j p:'<jtg.py,(q@3:,g. a QC inspector, that craf: supe r v is o r, told was going to J.T. Merritt about the QC procedures which r ec.u ir e d the cecond incpecticn in the " oct" ccnstructicn e verification program. (TE. 55,053) Evidently :. meeting cetween craf t management and CC nanagement f ollowed the which included Mr. Nel :n reported meeting with Mr. Merritt, Smith, Mr. Bennetten and Mr. Tclson. ( T3. 55,064) 203. Subsequent to that meeting Mr. Bonnet:en reported to the CC inspectors that CC was c.oinc. to " hold um. on Icokin; at the lighting until Mr. Toisen could ovaluate tna situation ac to how he wanted to handle i t." (TE. 55,065? (.... (..s.,.. 2 u, s
~~t....~~
~~. i .- o, n i n~~
~~4. _.. a,.~~
.m y.. 55,063-070), at the reginning of P. arch. When it resuned, it was only f or a f ew dayc, but dur ing tha t time pe r iod mor e c: the came typ2 protle.a were id :tified. (TR. 55,070) .131. On 0: a t:c :- th..: h c.
~~n 0:~~
~~'t a r c- . ; n t-~~
~~'.... : 2:1. ('.".~~
a. !i: Janatro./t1.>n i'ariiiJ r i .1 P:e ;; 95,071; 5, :' a) 8 I I 4, ( 't .e e ,I .~ n ~...
electrical OC incpo:tc :, m:1;uing a'.'. in the past t construction group, were ::se?. T-ch ir t; w t n th e m e c c a y. e n r3. a c,..,,, %... -,s,. .ce,n c ..e f o,. of t i,.., a-3. 4... vz ~ i e Peak ::itpickers. We're in the Busine:s of F ick in'; lii ts." T [Tne slocan for the T-shir ts was eviden ti.v t h o u c. h t u.o by O, c,4
~~s. :A. g,.lp> G.s. (TR. 55,127) after a craf: accused him of Wn:m: sw N N-~~
..r; ~ " nitpicking" his work. '(T?.. 55,127) The whole group of QC inspectors ordered shirt. (TR. 55,128) The term in " nitpicking" has been utsd on the site by all craf t connection with CC inspectors for at 1 cast f our and a half ye a r s. (TR. 5 5,15 8 )] ~ 44 a r ; + '. '... ~ .s".d..*... w.
~~r.. a e..,~~
4. .. u,...,. 3... a. n. c. ~.. 4 ,07"- ~ o t h. e i.n s e c ~. ^. '.. o u. ', o. m'..i.. -. u....c....'.**.... ( '... a 5 the craf. tothered or thronened any of the 73,510) 1;one of [j'cVer cpocifically N xc; 7 T-shir t weare r s, the T-shir ts. (TR. 5 5,0 3 f ; 7 3,5 21) 207. On the 6 th or ~.h of March Mr. Bennetcen inf ormed that he was being tranc'er red cut ci y.s the QC incpector: cupervisory ecle ( ' 7.. 55.071) for porrrnal reascas. [# w 3 o. e. m c 4e.(.s.. g., ..,S .,...c.,r ew 4.., 4 ..ww. w. cr. : uniet. tion 70 iti0n becauce cf a c.22rn r ela in; :: 00 tween "QC and tn2 othe: cegani:stienc in the building." (TR. 53,233) r .r ) 223. On or. '.: c a t : - n e :: :, ! a *j, ', ', j called D t' ..... ~..
~~i..,~~
~~s ....c~~
~~g..,.,..i~.....,~~
.s . ~ j ,o.at !tet M uculd 1: a t.d. i r - Gr 1 ! :c. (T:. C ;, 0 ',' '. ) s s l d m..^ -h-
-qc-thing back to no r mal." ( TR. 5 5, ',7 2 ) t.othing wa: caid by either Bennetzen odb hillto the incpectors about the T-e thhy had worn by !!cnday. (TR. 5 5,07 4 ) shirts 209.'On Thursday, March 8, 1984, 10-12 electrical QC inspectors again wore the T-shirts to work. (TR. 55,083; 73-Those inspectors were(sh ? W s N %:kihpSj f{h 4, 9#U:jf hk, N, ~,. n w.. p b,& &n M[ k A ki 511) M ff i Shf h [ N .k$ I'h$ ~~ d$% hfd tTfdIM 1 $ Ei and possibly two more. (TR. 53,083) 210. Tolson testified that[Ml@d$!@ called him at 7:45 and told him about the inspectors' T-shir ts. He criginallytoldf.%: to send them home and have them ch:nge tneir T-shirts tecauco that " cemed the thing to do at the t ime." (TR. 40,551) Tolson then changed his mind and ached f:r the inspectors wearing the T-shirts to be brought to him. He wanted t6 soo who they were, and " communicate the incident to Dallas." (TR. 40,55S; 53-120) 211'. dlYN 3 newly appointed supervisor (TR. 52,012), came into the QC trailer betwoon 8 and 9 o'cicel: a.m. and "said he wanted the nano and badge numcors of overyone wearing the T-shir t " (TR. 55,037-89; 53,124) presumacly becauco the OC incpoeters were to go nome and 53,12i f y' W W '"r fltectified take their chirts of f. (TR. that ha told the QC incpectorc that "the meccago on their T-anirt: p r. ven ted the.n fI e n e f f ee t t'/ely pe r f o r m in'J the ir 203." (TR. 53,124)
( 212. At that time only eignt in poctors wearing T-shirts were in the trailer. (TR. 55,037; 53,123) They were 7 a;y kc. w h S,u, v. *, %...n,... % ~ - nL u y:m%, uq.m%l.. :,;i,,. .~, f q h @h$h 'f\\$4}Nhh h,r eyb;b.q % ~V. q:C...;: gyp:.p; J iw J 2:, ~C: ,8 ?. tmh,:f{$lhh Ykhkbbkhh 'ip>tw y a: hkhh?Y,,.q,..t;q.. :t b ,m A 4a% 1 w,;u., e g -
~~b. g Nr bh k.~~
d. f yjug W Y!Md'ipy! h.[r - a y nc t+ y Y b 213. w*gh ;n &p M.9. m.ngp.y g, and others, responded by as 4 i .e T "w hy P. (TR. 55,082; 73,506) (Kgj.ggfiy40g) asked i_ (h:nmdM2 if ne knew what a " nit" was. (TR. 53,124) 214. R Q V / h D $;)gave the CC inspectors an option, if they "didn't want to go home and take our shirts off, that they could go talk to Tolson." (TR. 55,088; 73,506) 215. The eight QC inspectors then went to Tolson's o f f ic e w i tCif. if yd' l (TR. 53,128) He was there. So wera ( .2 two or three others, including Stan Vore (TR. 55,08S-059; 53,094; 73,506; 53,131), Gordon Purdy, Dan Hicks and Bill Cromeans. (TR. 53,131) 216. Tolson testified that when the T-shirt people came in they were all smiling. (TR. 40,557) Toisen testified that the word " nit-picker" triggers an emotional proble.- f or Tc1cen. And the wear ing o f the " nit-pic.':er s' T-rhir to trigcered, in Tolsen's mind, me: cry of a recent news at:icle .g-T8 on costings. (TR. 40,546-547) In fact, Tolson tock the w s I'f wearing of the T-chir ts as a personal slap in the f ace. (T2. .i . 'e '\\' 40,543) ': 17. Toisan t>Jtified that ha r.'eo;niaed that com> c' e'$'. [ b8 ' Ne#N [' [ 0 d(5e Nk f 's "I 'n b t 4 h e' s * ( 49 t* e e'I eti e e I h.e l P n pl ein in : .i e,.. :. : t...n 'r.+'. ('?'. 's,~'/) i l l )
1'M hack.edMr. Telnn ;f h e. .;in h d if the 213. t cc inspectors recorded the meeting. (TF. 55,C89; 72,506; 53,129) Tolcon said "no", that the meeting couldn't to t a p e d a n'd t h e n h e l e f t. (TR. 5 5,0 8 9 ; 7 2,5 0 6 ; 5 3,13 0 ; 4 0,5 5 7 ) the reason he minded was becauce he Tolson stated that first place, and didn't plan to have a conversation in the cecause he "took the request and the expression on.the individual's f ace (a smile) as a direct tie back" to another cencion with the coatings incpectors that was taped unbeknownst to him. (TR. 40,560) Clements alco was aware of in regards to the Harry W1111a..c the " nitpicking" phrace haracament incident that was the subject o f E:c. 38-1. (T?. 40,086-087) 219. Either he or Merritt then called Clements and gave including the names ('.ements a description of the incident, of those involved. (TR. 4 0,086) Tolson testified that he notified the Dallac CA 220. have the inspectors ef fice, and rocaived directions t0 which he eccorted to a room directly acrccc f rom hic of fice, cid. ( T ?.. 40,561) He alce tectified that ha receivad tha T-chirt men that if directions f rom Dallac to advice their job was available the next day, they could return. [Tolcen tactified that the work they werv doing was net reneduled to und am! tr.. w,r e no o tt r X in W e t e r u thu n a f rFa r d t>u i l,l i n ;../alv ! in
~~t. ' -~~
i n s ' ' t '. e...! +
79-221. William Clements verified that he was notified by [ either Tolson or Chapman by phone (TR. 40,086) and was told that people were wearing T-shirts that talked about " nit-picking". He testified that he told Tolson to put the. inspectors in a room to isolate and protect them "from the folks at the plant." (TR. 40,009) Clement.s doesn't recall if the inspectors were already sequestered at the time of the discussion (TR. 40,100) but that he thought a security guard was posted outside of the room (TR. 40,101) and that they were held until until af ter lunch so Boyce Grier could interview them. (T'R. 40,101) 222. Clements testified that af ter he talked to Tolson or Chapman he called Paul Check at the NRC "several times", I (TR. 40,101) and told Check that he was concerned about the safety of the inspectors. (TR. 40,102) He testified that he also told Check that the inspectors had been doing " destructive inspections." (TR. 40,105) l 4 e O ( i I
2 22. S tar Vor e then le f t to go t.:ck to wor'. ( T.'. 55,034) aftorI $. . i!',) p r epa r ed a memo s ay ar.g he.i a.:
~~r. : :~~
y-wearing the T-shirt. (TP. 53,132) a 224.'The CC incpector: were then escorted by s' w s [ ;_s Q, .,L. 4.1 a n d Bill Cromeans to the auditor's of fice (TR. s4< ) 55,093) which was empty at the time. 225. At about this time Curtis Bigga was called by R:n Tolson's secretary to come to his office. (TR. 71,598) Someone, unbeknownst to Biggs, explained to him and Eill Cromeans that they were to escort "certain unknown individuals if they needed to go anywhere, they needed to go to the tathroon, to get a cup of cof fee, whatever tnay needed to do, we were to escort them to the room until whatever they were there to do was over with." (TR. 71,533) 226. Mr. Biggs thought it was unus.:al (TR. 71,600), but didn' t a s k w ha t was go ing en. (TR. 71,6 01) 227. During the time in the auditor's of fice the inspectors were not free to leave. (TR. 55,105) They wero m~., f...n 8, ;1 b y E ill C r o m e a n c ? > s, ";&
~~g;, :&,M.nand Curtis Eiggs.~~
~~told this (TR. 55,106) They were told that they had to be kept there~~
~~protect t h e.- from craft. (TR. 55,106)~~
~~They were tt id tnat if they had to go the restreen they would be ese:r ted. (TR. 55,106) 228. Brandt tactified that he was in the adm in is t r 2 t '.J tuilding when h 2 ran into 7.' '. w n~~
~~w. c D:an !t' le :: i ': !~~
2 ".,'.et". lo:c a r d i n.; to F r a n,t t, rc' ': t a '.! ht,. that hy ! l '- i.' ' l. ; i s ! ? L ' : ] (l10 0 ; [,* n. ;,,i,'. h{rt 'n? ~' i.' (J'. ,2, ' t. -I' i -- :'1e i: an.- 't t. in'. 2 y
' ?_ v l s e a c. s t / h w e Tol:ca. (TR. 45,126) to perconally hara:: cart 2 2 9 J : vo~ ' : e one of the in:pectors being there to " keep them believed they were kept seauestered ! we r e co inc;- to isolated until manac.ement decided how thev. 4 handle the s i tu a t io n." (TR. 73,540) inspectors were then escorted 230. One by one the QC a to see Boyce Grier (TR. 53,168) after they were (TR. 5.5,094) 55,091) we wer e going to do." (TR. was what told "tpat (TR. Wayne Whitehead was directed to see Boyce Grier, ~ f5,091, 55,094), and ct:yed about 15 minutes. (TR. 55,095) t h ;- "[Grier's ef fice] wac the next door over. They stood at walked down there." d or and watched while : the OC inspectors "were ( 231.[#]'.ffdrecalledthat given a chance to voice any dif ferences or conflicts" they (TR. 73,507) in the field" with Boyce Grier. were having out the interviews with the Ecyce Grier testified that
~~However, the were already scheduled at electrical CC inspecter request of Tolcon due to complaints on the par t of and mattars" (TR. 45,590-91)~~
~~~ in pectcrs about "prce:durec it was the sane day tha: and it was "j ust coine;dence" that psM~~
~~ne T-snirt incident cecurred. (TR. 45,592)~~
.n. werd 23 2. Accord ing td6 ' 'jall of the inspector thencalvac to I: ? if they would allcw ac.r} 07 D ill Cr enca:.? ~. the :-chirt; o n a n,1 th >y ref. J. (T'. photcgrapned w ith s a, k .I 1 . $} ' [ {} l r:- g \\ c, .m i ic 4 . i l ',. l .,f .q ;.. 7,, { 4
3 testimony that any of the inspectc,rs were asked by the ;;RC to have their pictdre taken, contrary to the representations i + made to D5yle Hunnicutt by D. Ecliey, as te s t i f ied to on pace 5 of'Mr. Hunnicutt's prefiled testimony. 233. h, < Wl<yG4.] was taken to Tom Brand t's of f ice. (TR. 55,101; 43 145). @gg:.;] was an ESASCO employee and Ert ndt f the supervisor of lESASCO employees on the site. (TR. 45,127-128) Brandt explained to gm~2 that wearing the T-shirt was i not in good taste, lacked professionalism, and was t der ogatory to thE company. ((jgd then returned to the auditor's office. 234. The CC insrectors were told they were being kept in there to protect tnem from craft. ( T R. 55,096) 23 y3.@gy estified that it was "the position of in r' elation to why they were in the auditor's management office" (TR. 53,175),. out that he had no knowledge that the x inspectors were in danger. (TR. 53,176) {y$$v@/@RQp? that he 'didn't told the people that delivered that message i s think he was in danger. (TR. 55,096-097) "To be honest, I casically laugned at them and told them I couldn' t believe i t. " (55,057) II b [a~1so told Tom Brandt that he d idn' t think they were in danger. (TR. 73,537) 236. The inspectors didn't talk among themselves. s cerause Bill Cromean.: 'tas writing down everything that was said. (TP. 73,511) " guarded" (T'. 55,101) er 237. Tne innpecte:s we:e "esecrted" (Ta. 7 3,5.: 0 ) on t r i: : f rom the "' liter': office ta c": r e -: t r oo m (T'. s,l'I' I
~~t i'~~
' i 'J ' 'ill C# n ,7-. ,e,. .-,,y
_ 33 _ b m and{6pf.t.gggnygg(TR. 55,101; 53,158; 53,169) 238..[Hff:6e yW estified that Tolson wanted him to go to the QC work area to accompany two security guards to search the work tables including the drawers of the eight inspectors to look for utility documentation. (TR. 53,161) [iy3"pjfqpersonally saw that the security guards did so and did confiscate utility documentation. (TR. 53,162) / 239. During lunch the QC inspectors were told, by @ \\ b hhhh['fh who brought lunch to the auditor's \\. that "they had our trailer locked and were going
~~office, througn all of our personal belongings." (TR. 55,104) 240. According to~~
'i.(( all eight inspectors were (' " mad" and " upset." He told the other inspectors to " calm down" that they "would take care of it when we found out w ha t w as go ing on." (TR. 5 5,10 5 ) 241. During the time that the inspectors were in the auditor's of fice there was an attempt on the part of at least one other person, apparently an incpector, to get' the l NRC to intervene. James Cum:ains, senior resident inspector of construction, testified that between 11:00-12:00 someone i called to report "that the desks of QC inspectors were being cone through, and the inspectors were being held in Tolson's of f ice." (TR. 54,000-014) The caller recuested the NRC cend a reprecentative to the cafeguards bu ild ing. 242. Instead of either going to the cafeguards (' building, er going to firJ the inspectorc, or calling security, lir. Cu:m ina called Ecgkan IV, c o:ne t h ing he is not
required to do and us'ually does not do. He was told not to intervene, so he didn't -- even though he believed the anonymous call to be " leg itima te." (TR. 54,010) He testified
~~he didn't consider whether the NRC's intervention would have been beneficial.~~
These instructions were reiterated by D. Hunnicutt to D. Kelley a few minutes later. (TR. 54,011-012) 243. Mr. Cummins received a second call about an hour later from an individual who " reiterated that some QC inspectors were sequestered and requested that the NRC intervene." (TR. 54,013) Cummins told the caller he'd been instructed not to intervene. (TR. 54,013) He reported this call to Hunnicutt and was again told not to intervene. (TR. 54,020) 244. According to Doyle Hunnicutt the decision to not intervene was determined in a meeting at the Arlington Region IV office between Paul Check, Deputy Regional Administrator, E. Johnson, Branch Chief, Richard Denise, Division Director and Mr. Hunnicutt because "there had been no indication so far that NRC regulations or a threat to nealth and safety of anyone was involved." (Hunnicutt, p. 4) i 245. Apparently the reported electrical wiring damage i l was of concern to the NRC, even if the inspectors were not. ~ l Mr. Hunnicutt testified that Kelley was " instructed t6 go to the Safeguards Building and attempt to find and photograph electrical wiring which appeared to have been damaged." (Hunnicutt, p. 4) The only damage which Kelley was able to find was one wire "which appeared to have some scratch i
j 48- .Jb -l...- -y5-( marks, but no other indications of damage." (Hunnicutt, p. 5) ~ 24 6.@@.CyM,hKjffll.;['J emember ed being told by so.. sone s in management that the NRC had been notified. (TR. 55,038, 8%dN#$ -[ testified that he thought that the NRC had been contacted because he saw the resident inspector outside of Tolson's of fice (TR. 53,154) and because of conversations he. had with the resident inspector. (TR. 53,155) f 247. According to Curtis Biggs, "by the end of the day, the guys were kind of f rustrated because of the amount of time that it was taking to get the thing taken care ef." (TR. 71,610 ) 248. At about 2:30 the QC inspectors were informed that they were being sent home with pay. Then they were es:Orted ' back to the QC trailer, they gathered their personal belongings up, and were escorted to the gate. On the way to the gate six of the eight, excludingjp.$Q % % 4] land [b,g;.-] s for a meeting ' '} asked Rill Cromeans andlfjNW1 [_--. with Ron Tolson and % 'ifR for the following day. 249. During the afternoon anothar NRC inspect 0r, Cnat frer an Oberg, apparently also received a call and a visit individual who " asked the NRC to help" w ith the sequestared i GC inspectors. (TR. 54, 022-023) 250. The ne::t day an article apreared in tha F t. Werth Star Telegram. (C:!I Ex. 5) The article contained a crate-4e -O keus 9 g f ': ~
~~$6 gg e~~
k k 4 s B 5 OY - ~
. c aco tage the plan t." (TE. 5 5,113 ) 251. The next day the "T-shirt e ig nt" met w ith Tony W. ( A.su.. mary of tha t meeting is included </ega and@# W m:r i l as CliI 6 )* (TR. 55,119) At the meeting the inspectors told Vega and[.W, flof orcblems they f elt they had in _= l Safeguards 1, "such as lighting problems, problems ~ with 4 loose terminations, just basic problems with post-3 cons t r u c t ion." (TR. 55,120; 53,064) The inspectors told P. r. i l Vega that they disagreed with the suspension of the post-f construction verification program (TR. 55,120), with the changes in the procedures (TR. 55,122) which could allcw 2 I some problems to fall thrcugh the cracks (TR. 55',122), w i:n the lack of support by their management (TR. 55,123), with the use of the post-construction deficiency list (TR. 55,123); with the problem of turning over a building to i. i TUGCO without clearing out all the NCRs. They told them 50-60% of everthing the inspectors looked at were bad that - -,...w... e m u.-.. c s r.. w.i +- 5. ^ c. r.. =...... *. o.# t.'. s t
~~2,.3 0,.),.~~
(..:.. 4 1 pcs -construction varification program (TE. 55,124), and 2:aut the actica: t '.. encineers in discositienin:.. MCRs "us2 I as is." (TR. 55,125; 33,1SS; 53,191) 252.g Ws,1 %.A t. testified that he had heard the concern m o 3 from the OC incpectors that they believed precedurec were i changed to heep ther-f r c :- f :nd in g p r ot ic.c. JP. 53,12) e tactified that he was aware of, but never e e a '. a a t e d, the 4 g k. b I t, ' P .t i i a 251. Th-in : -eta. .;i I 1 -r w - - - ,____r.-.. ,-..r ,u._. . _ ~ _..,_
c, temporarily delayed." (TR. 55,125) i 254. The eight inspec:crs also on March 9, 19 5 4 w r o ta m - and signed a one-page statement (r e e e x h ib i t p@fs.g.4 4 2-3, July 17, 1984) which disassociated the eight individuals who the T-shirts with""any knowledge of the release of wore inf or mation to the press or news media in regard to the it. Worth Star Telecram article." They did this because thev. wanted to notify Dallas (the TUGCO Personnel) of the fact that the inspectors "had nothing to do with the newspaper article" that appeared that day. (TR. 55,121; 73,530) Gy_. 'a ...g '- ' d _1 0.,0. '. eY 5 >>?,"... ~-
~~c.,~~
~~9. - - w c a. -,a~~
~~.w,". o n. ,.me.4 s.. u c, - ~.~~
* *. e' a re.-
~~h.o n..- ..7 2., "u~~
~~h. <.= "s.. d C. '.'.= A~~
's# "..' s. a g: worried about the eight CC inspectors. (TR. 73,531)] aost-construction 255. Ae.croximatel.v ene week later the e and infermed-verification group was called in by management thev were being transferred to Unit 2 because there wasn't enough work to keep everyone busv.. (TR. 55,131-see Vega t i ..s. . 4.w..4 6)
~~m... m. 4.. e e-,a,. c. 4...... e.u.mg 4,~~
~~t n a- ..,,..4..~~
~~4.,,, _ _, ;~~
m.
~~s..... t.,.~~
V : hat thev did not believe their j s. S t a n Vo r e a nd i} WW > 4 *- i-s e. ~,13.'t ), .3.,,-,e. 2...,. ~. i o n. o.r t "...= * - '... #.2. a-( '~ 7.. t 0 t t Celieved instead that the real reason was either becausa thev wer e the T-shir ts, er because constructica management r;- t of the safeguard: Ouilding. wantad the CC inspectors cut '"d' '.I'- <+-, ....,, i n '.'. '. '. m 'u ". ' 'u-l'. '. ~_. ^..~. ~. -'..'.. 1. '; '. w, ea [ (. ~: 3, 2 : q l 1
~~.e.~~
t ] COCOCO UhOse k.'lspOt'Ucr0 b' h J w e C..' tO '02 E r.TI C s [ *_* r : 2 d (TE, t b " }r f.**..*.*.".*/.**.4 3 8 a.. m. (. 3 3 p )4.).' 1 } $ ' I.h.*g 1 L.s-l.9 & s i. g '.' ..+ a .s a l a,. g ..\\. s 'h 8 -4 h g B y 1. % ( J t ' }. t '. O. *P d M. b g y. 2.. 9 t ~ .n--rrm =
- EB - inrpo tcrs whose names appear cn Exniti 33-4. 256. Following the trcnsfer to Unit 2, three of the .x ya _- _ c.. -,,;.., y. 4 *c2..,.M,,,. ;6 4. e a.s.g.Mn, p c /r... .q. Ehhh?$bh.i ?YN lp ec EOFed, f,..m..wv;.;.N,; site voluntar11v. .' e e - thn ...+ s _rn. t. s., a ,y was 0h transferred by ESASCO to another site, andonlyljihhk*k$( W %>,$N.Nr c on f i r m ed th a t the d$$ was lef t in Unit 2. + s 5 transferred out of Safeguards 1 -- f'] f ollowing persons gg}?gh@{"jy~ An[d"Uhh -j[ [NTN3Nb1kNSbh I and sometime later 'f di '~ '1%pe'h /: p'l,fj@W and [;g,g;3Q4y<%"k;${.,? and fina11y !($.l!%qgA.u;.aF ~ ff] v- $pA g s [RY.,d i y was %g. j Hy agj.; transferred by E3ASCO and James Griffith left the site. (T7. l 53,025) Approximately three wee::s af ter the transfer [6. MQq'went to see Tony Vega to ask him why he had been transferred. (TR. 55,136) !Mk(f!!'[kh;finformed Mr. Vega at the meeting that he believed he was transf er red as a result of the identification of problems in the T-shir t s .. ~. c 55,137)kc..+.,.@Mp't y/{$@[ did not believe the inc id e n t.- (TE. exrlanation civen by Mr. Vega that he was transferred l because they "didn't need two leads in safeguard 1 t tu :1d ing." (TR. 55,137) Mr. Clenent, Vice-President of part of this T.eeting (TR. 55,136) and TUGCO was cresent at admitted that he had.cerscnally made the decisicns to do the day cf the T-shir ts." what they had done on 'Ol:t'll bal; aves that the r e n c.- fer 257. ( s %.46 G&. Le b-k .b ah 4 4 44 e e4 a r e ' 'I r 0; . %: ! A fi r. !! O d ii! 'Ot li.lV.' h1' P"' 1:fdr W.2 :2 1 I i a '4 e $). [l [ ' ,,9 .,} 6 l u
(TE. 55,140) However, he also believec-that nanagement wac transf er ring them "due to the f act that they f elt like we were caus'ing problems holding up Safeguard 1 completion." Further-he believes that if he had never worn the T-shir tc, that. tney would not have been transferred. (TR. 55,145) Ee told the NRC that he felt he had been discr iminated against oy being transferred to Unit 2. (TR. 55,147) 258. Since the T-shirt incident about 60% of the QC ~ inspectorshaveaskedhj5$N.IkkkN)about the inc id en t. (TR. 55,143) The comments were generally in the form of "a lot cuestions about "what happened in safeguards" because of people were under the impression that things happened in Saf eguard 1 and that is the reason why the T-shir ts were w o r n. " (TR. 55,143) 259. William Clements, TUGCO Executive Vice President / Nuclear testified that he would have handled the T-shirt incident differently. He said "the management reaction to inappropriate." (TR. 40,008-009) it, I thought, was testified that it was goed .; hcwever, 2 5 C. J y n, management practice. (TE. 53,225)* 251 C fr,...-- felt that because ahcut half cf the
{-
electrical CC inspectors were T-shirts on Welch's first day as their cupervisor that there was some connection in the two circumstancoc. (TF. 53,205) He still believes that. He alcc telieves the T-shir ts implied 'a pocition of subjectivity on the par: Of tha innpactor in pe r f or ": ing h:s ,3..- ass 1].* k n s {s)<] ( f *);'," ( '..$, 31 -+U y 9
_ 90 262. Gordon Purdy, site QA manager, testified that he thought the T-shir t incident was "probably a show of or a sign for be'ing_what they considered being a concern for being imp'eded in their inspection ef fort." (TR. 41,197)' He thought, but did not know, that there was some fear of physical reprisals to the QC inspectors by craft who did not take the T-shirts humorously. (TR.41,198) Purdy testified he was " disappointed" by the action because he thought it was " childish, unprofessional, arrogant, and of disruptive spir it." (TR. 41,200-201) 263. Mr. Brandt considered the wearing of the T-shirts " unprofessional and unacceptable attire." (TR. 45,128) He thought the T-shirts could have aroused or aggravated the craft people (TR. 45,128) but had no knowledge that it occurred. He was told sending the inspectors home was a ( disciplinary action (TR. 45,146), but he felt that paying them for the day made the action not a disciplinary action. (TR. 45,147) 264. Tolson considered the concerns about the safeguards building and the T-shirt incident as two separate i issues. (TR. 4 0,58 3) 265. Boyce Grier, site ombudsman, says he was not consulted on how to deal with the T-shirters. (TR. 45,594) l 266. Doyle Hunnicutt, Reg ion IV NRC, testified that in early April 1984 three of the T-shirt personnel were l selected "at random" and interviewed. ( Hu n'n icu t t, p. 8) Interestingly those inspectors interviewed were neither on the list of names provided to Paul Check f rom Bill Clements
on the' day of tne T-chirt incident nor, therefcre, 2,r: rd the Post Cons t r r c t ion Safeguard: Task Force. 267. The Applicant attempts to argue in.its pre-filed testimo'ny of.Vesa that the transf ers to Unit 2 were nade a t random. That however, ignores the testimony of Tolson that he intended to transfer six people for their alleged in " destructive examination" and that of pg involvement d transfer of the six Safeguards I ggyaho testified that the .r Post Construction inspectors varies was based on his " evaluation ofethe needs and the capabilities of the inspectors", (TR. 53,022) and on "certain circunstances that were pertinent to about ene or two people" that basically just made it easier to cperate..(TF.. 53,022} ( 263. The argument is implausible, but reveals tha: Applicant, to this day, is incapable of recogni::ing serious errors in judgment and taking appropriate corrective action. Even the eight point program is apparently only of . appearances but no suts tance. i 259. In sum, the T-shirt inc id an t and the transfer of i the six members of the Safeguards Post Constructica Task l Forca reveals how weak Applicant's commitment to its l tested. o.rofessed orocram really is when '70. The manner in which management handled the l l 1 incident was itself an act of intimidation. Incpecters, or known by managemear to have been comF aini. l thought about safety problems, <ecte T-shirts inscribed 'iitn tn2 4 , = * = - - - * =,....., 4 y. Y' ""N M,-----w----,
message concerning nitpicking. The facts show, and the Applicant admits, that the inspectors were rounded up and j sequestered in a room for several' hours under guard. Their f celongings were searched. They were afraid to talk among ~ themselves because a QC lead supervisor took notes on 'everytning said. They were even escorted to the bathroom under guard. The management story that the inspectors were sequestered for their own protection is ludicrous in light of the fact that the shirts were worn previously and nothing had happened. Even assuming that the incident is not connected to the Post-Construction Verification Task Force, which Intervenor submits, the manner of response of e management was wildly inappropriate rand inconsistent with their stated policy that supposedly protects inspectors who raise complaints. 271. Moreover, Intervenor submits that QA manangement at Comache Peak transferred the members of the Post-Verification Task Force, who were complaining about \\, i management's interference with the Safeguards inspection. The history of the task force itself bears this out. From its inception the six-member task force identified an extremely high deficiency rate in their inspections. Even though the procedures were re-written to make it practically impossible for the inspectors to perform, the group still found problems. Finally, the team was abolished, the 6 supervisor replaced. The T-shirts were worn the following Monday by 20 inspectors w ith no rehercussions f rom their supervis6r or craft. Several days later, however, the
O
(
inspectors wearing T-shirts were rounded up and sequestered. The company notified the NRC of the action and gave them a list of nam'es of tho'se kept in the room. The list contained e the names of the six inspectors in the troublesome task force, but actually only three of those inspectors wore T-shirts. This gives rise to the strong inference that management knew in advance who they wanted rounded up. 272. Apart from the list, another f act which points to the theory of pretext is that management claims to have taken the action to " protect" the inspectors from craft. Yet, earlier wearings of the same T-shirts had elicited no response. After the incident, all six of the inspectors in ( the Post-Verification group were transferred, terminated or resigned. (
~ 7 u. r, -165- ~ ) ,o K. T-Shirt Incident 362. Approximately two weeks before the T-shirt incident, the Building Manager for Safeguards Unit 1 came to Tolson asking for assistance becaur.e, in his view, " things were not working as well" as they should be. (Tolson tr. 40,580-83). In response, Tolson began attending daily meetings of craft, QC and building management personnel, to get a flavor of how things were functioning in the building. Tolson also talked with QA personnel to find out generally how things were progressing. Tolson tr. 40,656; 582; 659-60. 363. About 8 to 10 days later Tolson was informed that a few of the electrical inspectors were being "dastructive in the s manner in which they were accomplishing their insp( tions" (Tolson tr. 40,580). Tolson was informed that the inspectors were jerking wires from terminal lugs, rotating flex conduit to such a point that the conduit would loosen up, and then identifying the items as defective. Tolson tr. 40,580; 582-83. 364. Tolson asked to be taken to the field and shown where the inspections in cuestien were conducted (Tolson tr. 40,660-61). He saw that wires had been pulled from termination lugs, and loose conduit. Based on these observations, Tolson believed that some inspectors could have conducted destructive examinations. Tolson tr. 40,580; 586. Tolson then met with the FSlA-85-59 ~ d64
-lCG-Safeguards CC supervisor, Greg Bennetzen, and the lead electrical TG __' d, asking for their inspector, Stan Vorejiy/L 3 input regarding the matter (Tolson tr. 80,581).30 365. At this time, there was also a communicaticas gap betseen inspectors and management regarding the post-constructicn l lew:tish verification procedures being used in Safeguards Unit 1 tr. 73,513, 73,518[RJQ; d,tr. 53,048-49). Some inspectors had w concerns abouc whether a gauge they were to use to measure crimps u_ after installation was out of tolerance E'.v:9VTM3tr. 53,051). They were also concerned about inspections of lighting terminations f' < " tr. 53,055). See alsci! $1R)tr. 55,014-16; 020-21; 053-59; 55,060-63. Thc:e matters, however, had.heen brought to s the attennion of management and were being resolved iy - - ~ ] 55,063;{.g[j,%tr. 53,055-060A; Grier tr. 45,590-92). tr. 366. On Thursday, March 8, a croun of acproximately twelve CCIs wore black T-shirts to work on which was printed the phrase " Comanche Peak Nitpickers, We're In the Business of Picking Nits"
~~m. 4. s.~~
MMM.R; tr. 55,083; @ -' tr. 53,119-20). On March 8,(/p g _= E . ha s the CC superviser in Safeguard Unit 1; it was his firs: i dav. in that.ec sition. l -- tr. 53,115-232. He had.rrevicuciv. o l s o n concludei that an iriependent review of the matter was warranted and that these pericrming the review sh c u '_ J be free cf any influence frcm the in pe ctora invol.ed in the in ' f m:t ionJ e Therefore, Tolcen conc l u.iM t h.i t .t t o:- N ra ry reassignme: c '-- '0,501; 40, W. those insn.cters was warranted. .a l : ' '. tr.
-1C7-received instructions from his super /icor, Dan IIicks, thn: if the inspectors showed.up wearing the T-shirts they shculd sen: hcne to chance.h g s..ly tr. 53,121). u - c. ) 367. Between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. M..slpff, learned thr.: se/eral J electrical QCIs were wearing the black T-shirts, and he called A Tolson's office to confirm his instructions ('Wh'ftr. 53,119-121). TolsoninstructedN/[Mh]tosendtheinspectorshometo change their shirts. (Tolson tr. 40,551). Yf.QQ then went to the electrical ~QC work area where eight of the' inspectors wearing 2 u$;}w[jjjg;g:r..w<g.e the T-shirts were gathered. The inspectors were i ,.,w~., :-2 ,.... m, >.4 ;w,, u.. . [g. .,. [ i, ','j * # x ,, e , s. c. ;.,+, '34>
~~, c..~~
~~... +.. .; p. y p p * '.. Q:p,' v ' t.., ~. -.,; j,. :.. y ua I 0,, p g p,.'.'e..,. 'l i,':,'..,...n-M p; 5, ..,t*,s.. j [ j Ni yy, i v .. n a..e.~~
~~1L.nqn2.~~
~~.m ..c... c .~ . m,..../. e- ,n m, v> < e ic w, s , ~ c..a,. t. . x,.s. c........ v~. '9 .. a: .x,, 1 .. a..~~
~~x..~~
r following his instructions, asxed the inspectors to go Y ^m9 l M-) hcme and change shirts. Scme of the inspectors asked why they were being required to change, towhickNb+.5M_.. responded that the p message on their T-shirts prevented them from performing their Msuip.o m u 5 3,, m.,. .: o a c.e cec.;ve-y..g.;g,g u u_. - J. 365. I.l '%) told the inspectors that if thev had c.uesticns, they could talk to Tolson. The inspectors clearly perceived G h,; remark as an option, not as a threat. C'N/(]tr. .3,125 4;.w. $39"7 tr. 55,093. The inspec cro requested to meet with s Tolson, af ter which{J [ffQcalled Tolscn's of fice. $t ify 'lIwas a. - th em t o T ol s c n ' s o f f ic o. c'.$?.W. a y, tr. instructed to brinc ~_ 7 l ~ .a l 7..narantiv four o'-her we re the T-c',irt a s we l l. p:,. 2 55',dS4-85)'. tr.
-l#E-52,126.When the inspectors arrived in_Tolson's office, Tolson had no pre-plannad intentions. Tolscn, however, did want to see the T-shirts and the individuals invcived. Tolson tr. 40,557-58. 369. When the inspectors were in Tolsen's office, a number of other individuals were also present, i.-cluding Stan Vore, ~ Gordon Purdy, Dan Hicks, and Bill Cromeans EV@id[j) tr. 53,130-31). ..-- -., w 1, )tr. 55,091). As soon as Cromeans was a QC sucervisor D 0$SEM,4/hg_ p= A W. N the inspectors were all in h~lson's office one of the QC o + pf hf f{fg}yhj},asked Tolson if he could tape record inspectors s recm.[1T^4lN...P tr. s -_- the meeting. Tolson said no and left the ,n. g 2 --.-~ d tr. 55,059; Telsen tr. 40,557. Tolson had 5 3,129-3 0 rT6..6+89 iO[a-V ,y y heard a rumor that he was' taped surreptitiously during a previcus &r4 to that incident. f r ei x.;.:c5,4.:... meeting and he tied the request w;
~~w. p - -~~
3 u r_ Tolson tr. 40,560-61. frc= his effice to the Assistant Project 370. Tolson went General Manac.er's office to await direction frcm cor. carate head-quarters in Dallas (Tolson tr. 40,558). Tolson was instructed by ccrporata headquarters to keep the inspectors in a room 9 i==ediately across the hall frcr his office until headquarters aad time to consider the natter further (Toisen tr. 40,561: 576'. This decision was based en what vas at the time perceived to be a need to avoid any physical violence or any verbal abuse between craft and the inspectors (Clemente tr. 40,099-100).
-v,:- 371. Tolson then returned to his office and instruc cd Cromeans to take the inspectors to.the GA auditors' office, whi:h M was done. The inspectors were escorted by Cromeans and'L<Tybn 9 \\ W w!"e fwho was also a QC supervisor. y Je '< ^ 1_tr. 53,151;. r lr ~ C['IUF$$fId!$[tr. 55,091; Q93. At this time Tolson's sec:etary called Curtis Biggs and asked him to meet Cromeans in front of Tolson's office. When Biggs. arrived he and Cro= cans were instructed to escort the inspectors if they needed to c.o an.ywhere and to make sure that they were returned safely to the auditors' office. Bic.e.s tr. 71,599-600. Oneoftheinspectors,[H}, m4[wenttoBrandt's 372. offico about ten or fifteen minutes after they were taken to tha ? was the cniv ins =ector involved in the '\\., _. ~ a auditors' office. T-shirt incident who was emelov.ed by Bhasco. Brandt was his immediate supervisor with Ebasco. Pitts tr. 73,507; Brandt tr. a- _.I 45,326-27. Brandt andlf*fMsG discussed why he wore the T-shirt, T and3!@$(blac.reedwithBrandt that wearing the T-shirt was not 0 professicnal. {I Yd tr. 73,507-50S; 536-37. 373. Scyce Grier interviewed the inspectors throughout the corning of March 8. Tolsen had asked Grier, at the begin-ing cf the week cf March 5, to meet with all Safeguards Unit 1 electrical inspectors and Grier scheduled these interviews pri:r to March 8. Grier tr. 45,590-91. Tolson's instructions to Grier
-17G-were to interview the inspectors concerning their corolaints about the procedures, and report to Tolson on the mitter. Grier tr. 45,591. .374. One of the inspectors wearing a T-shirt was meeting with Grier at 8:30 a.m. on March 8, in accordance with the schedule Grier had established. During this interview Grier was interrupted and told that the inspector he was interviewing was to be sent to an office a short distance away. He was also told that another inspector would be brought to him. During that day Grier interviewed the eight inspectors involved in the T-shirt Grier interviewed the rest of the electrical incident. inspectors the following day. Grier tr. 45,591-92. 375. After the inspectors were settled in the auditor's t o f fic e, l$gc'rs:J..7f,,d. i :,j' returned to Tolson's office. Tolson instructed -9 n to search the work tables h(flhytoaccompanysomesecurityguards s of the inspectors for utility documentation.gj{Gtr., 53,160-161). The guards searched only the desks of the eight inspecters known to be wearing the T-shirts and confiscated utility docu-mentation. The documentation was then put in a file folder with the inspector's name on it. They did not confiscate perscnal s belongings.hk- 't- ' tr. 53,162-164. By around 12 ncen @Jp;f i finished assisting the guards and returned to Tolsen's office with the documents.{ft 7 _and Cromeans then put the documents in o / another nearby office, where Crcmeans examined them.g ', tr-53,170-171.
Of 1: .t I ni <H a8 .f i'
D
~~.e t11 ,s : ei e! II' Ii~~
~~I' I~~
~~() I') ti) 81 ; 43 ,1 : a 1: c' G l b 4) at tj 14 ,r : 48 et () J O af O 4J 't.1 le .' l 1-m ,t si o n'~~
~~t t.~~
~~t* .t Se si o en ,t : s. m t,. f, 48 t t' , i s' o 4: m to c-ni is rf~~
g tt ,t
3

',O >g ,t Ii 43 () O 4i il 4) ,1: "I rj .21 1' -t 'O 4) et 48 1 Mi () ti ej rj 43 .e l 4J O 4J (b is t- .I ci it O O la le e! "I O O is O ta U) v 7 ta et On 4J 4) ,1 !1 f'l ,6 0 4J D. (9 ft 48 il si ,t tJn Q' rj 5, C .I r) .i ,4 ,1 0 -3 J O Un C1 4.. 3 le ,t l o c t .rt u cm 51 ., e O o .O 41 r3 n. ei in 'O t: te M at 14 la O ' d', ~ us to O he c 0 50 .,1

)

~~le t's t<1 U be 'O O .4 q O La 11 48 is t Ili (1. 4J r} t: rj J' j O el el O~~

=

I44 y O (fi O ta 'O ,4 J: 41 -4 t 1e O O c) O 48 Ui 124 c -j th 4J u O H 0, os y 0 .,t 43 d o O / 4 on tu o d O E4 to 4) M M i is 'l l e-t a 1 ,r: ta O 'O U O 14 4J O II: O I O d n) ta ( N p. v O 'l I' 4' Os 4J et Os 14 J ta 4J 48 et le c O t: 4 4J O O O O 1: fi G 42 0 ,G ,C G 83 >+ t' o d t') 43 0 ,1 O rj .'O 41 0 .e t O ,t 11 0 43 la ej T 3 3 [- I w ta G l 'O H ,C in .e{ 10 0 D 0 U 14 ,c c Un D. rJ ts O e-4 U 43 10 ed Cl to tj m 4J .s : ,- i .4 f* O to 3 rj u le O r* O U 44 .. t 1: -f h d O as c)

~~J U~~

w .'O v p, tu a ta .t a g .t " d ,1 is ,- t ,i : 43 0 ts .t * 'O 4J. O I 5: 4J O O O .O 48 +2 of .t. 42 0 .C 41 4> A ,d (7s O 4) C) c4 O 11 H O la O al t' 4J O !I ta ri m O ,- t r, ,1 .c Se 42 la fI .C U .r: 42 d C.

~~$. e o~~

~~'d 'a t 4f M 48 -ri O O di O~~

~~9 "s~~

of en rp ,o ,t a '4 e te ea O 3 d t') O t1i .. ; ?. .e 1 et O ,t 03 tt) ,- l O .t I rJ G t 'i t (I n ,0 t'; t-rj () O 41 On rj 0 [* <*p c1 M t 7f'8' e-1 H S. O, et U ,G te e' r.5 9 ,4 0 04 o li rif O O is 4J o (a o ") m 4; It la O n) 4J O O 14 41 MF e-1 et O .t : et .r) l ?, .O 4J O .d 3 .C yh yc} O C

)

~~te. Se rJ L4 4 4J~~

)

~~0, O 4J t1 sn U O t-4 'd{ 3 W O N m al m c) (fs "I h In O c1 48 O O J: le f.) tii O U 4: O et r)~~

~~e 43 is~~

~~.',1 h 4J r1 c) n. .I O, O ti l CJ ta I 10 ',9 ,Q O Q) -ri H 4) 0) r4 0 'O C 'O Q) tw d ,C la d 3 d O ,1 'd a d C H ,C 48 3 C O Di 0 3 t' O C 2' C 1~~

~~p fu ej~~

., 4 0 O $4 rJ rd O 4J LO O 45 rj ,C 14 il 'O ,i 0 H tw Q) C) O 42 t'i II JJ et H r-tw ,C ej U 45 41 = 43 4J ri GI 43 O L1 tw ,G .O 48 O t') 4J 14 O U (Q e-4 43 rj C U M 4J O C e-4 U2 -f f'i 41 t*. O O Ui d tfl is 42 0 0 'O e

~~t-c r3 0~~

~~0 0 H ,C C .rt Un di O ej H -,1 4J H th 5, O 'M H C t' 11 0 ,y St a 4J .cl d Un H O 1; O d U t') 0 ,t is 41 0 -r4 0 Un., 4 (* t)~~

1

,4 .G ,t ! O I: .f It U rl I-4J 44 4J I4 3 ,Q rj (1) O O ri O 4J 15 ',1 43 43 .U V-C recuested a meeting the previous day (h'NJ$])tr. 53,IE5-{b6.'Wh_ tr. 55,120; Vega tr. 36,71E-19). Tolson asked Vega to sit in for him during'that meeting because of Tolson's decision to seek a transfer (Tolson tr. 4.0,663-64). During this meeting Vega andhh0k' a _ listened to numer-379. ous concerns of the inspectors, one of which involved a' newspaper article appearing in-the March 9, 1984, Fort Worth Star Telecram. The inspectors wanted to disavow any connection with that article 19sNNIIN}tr. 53,185). The newspaper article stated that the ins.oectors were accused of beine. an orc.anined c.rou.e trv. inc. to sabotage the plant, which was not accuratef$,_., W R:iM - W tr. 55,113). The article also stated erronecusly that there would be a change of procedures so that non-conformancen or unsatisfactcry. conditions in junction boxes and terminal blocks were nc: going to be reported and fixed y'$v-}WJ tr. 73,529). -r 380. The inspectors asked Vega how they could shcw that they were not involved in the article and he suggested that they prepara a statement. Vega did not suggest what should be in the 5 statement.bg'! "'$s J/[ tr. 55,153-154. After the meeting the "l \\ -jtc draft a statement, which they all inspectors askedC ' ' '" ,.,Emade one er two suc.c_ested word changes so that reviewed. R_ .i the statement would better reflect what the inspectors were trying to state and he then arranged to have the statement typef. Each cf the eight inspectern then signed the statemant. g, 6,*

~~s m '. ;.~~

55,154-155. tr. eM --r -173-381. During this meeting discussions also tock ple e regarding inspection procedures, managenent support, turning over Uu.erous buildings with open NCRs and dispositioning of UCRs. P ~.l other issues were raised as well. QGE.M.- 'gM )tr. 55,121-125; ,,y"\\, 7 s; e s .rv a tr. 53,188-195. Vega subsecuently initiated acnien with hv /@ 1 engineering to address the technical concerns of the inspectors. He'also initiated action to address their non-technical concerns. Veca tr. 36,718-19. 382. Additionally, Vega andQ.S!M discussed with the GCI's t why they wore the T-shirts. [IIl V$r}{ stated that he were the shirt for reasons unrelated to safety and that it had n :hing to do with any earlier incidents at Comanche Peak. It was simply a 55,14E-49. N % - wore the T-shirt 10 fit in joke. 6:. t I r. %u with the group of CCIs with when he was working. He also regarded wearing the shirt as a joke. (kfi.9]') tr. 73,502; 550-51. 383. The slogan on the T-shirt was based on an exchange which occurred when a OC inscector "unsate'd" comethinc. and his craft counter-part stated that the inspector was nit-picking. The inspector respended by saying that he was in the businers cf 'E IItr. 55,127. Vega concluded fcliswing a.- picking nits. [ > investiganica into the T-shirt incident that the shirts were worn as an act of levity and that the inspectors did not intsnd to convey dissatifactica or ecnarns (Vega tr. 36,718). _ ~ -.. _ _. - -174-t 384. The URC Staff reached the same conclusion after 6 ,i i ' interviewing three of the inspectors involved in the March 8, i v 1984 incident (Cur; mins 54,070-1; 54,072). 4 Meetinc with URC and Utility Manacement 385. In early April, six of the QCI's involved in the T-shirt incident met with Darrell Eisenhut, Ben Hayes, Jchn Collins, and Michael Spence. The purpose of the meeting was to i discuss the T-shirt incident._@ SIN $$$MAktr. 55,148; Spence tr. There was an air of complete openness during that 48,077-78. meeting and senior management of NRC and the President cf TUGCO l i i' enpressed their interest in hearinc. any comelaints the inspectors y (- had, including complaints about intimidanion (spence tr. 48,085). 1 During this meeting, the inscectors ac.ain reiterated tha: wearinc.- the T-shirts was not related to safety concerns. m@c. w g# r-l= N'ecbr. e -M. 55,148). 386. The inspectors also indicated that there was no 4 friction between CC and craft in their work assignments and that l they felt free to write up non-conforming conditions (Spence tr. 48,078-79). Because of the cpenness of the meeting, it is likely that if the ispectors had first-hand knowledge of acts cf intimidation raised acainst them thev would most likely '. ave exc.ressed them (Spence tr. 48,C95). 4 f I I i I. l l 1-r--, , ~ _ - -,. _. _, _ _, _. _ _. _, _, - 1 z :; - Subsecuent Ecoloyment History of CCIs 387. In March of 1954, a stop worh order was issued on final post-construction electrical inspections in the Unit 1 Safeguards Building (Vega tr. 36,720). Because of the stop-wcr.% order there was less work for the electrical inspectors, and at a result, it was necessary to reduce the work force. Vega tr. 36,720. 388. As the building CC stipervisor,Nih6fl)was responsible for selecting the QCIs who would be transferred. He decided tc $, hem.edfp.mty;;f ~6%c.+ny%,pw,p3;;.nlw w%;y.:.i m'). ii.., - K

~~s. i~~

.. p1. :6. ;"~%- ^ %.r. r' *'>.%M,t.,vm. y..r 1 Mi CM ~+: ys x :i pg., g.+ : +. - 1r% ' .m,. transfer w m?.uc , ya,,+g., v:&s. n v.- w~ - N.h .. t _ n X - % :, w. q d g_. k':y? G.g : fif.jk,3 Q blf;? Q W. M. f C 'n :4 TlR:Q.us V. ~ s * ' 3 9 '. ' ~ ~ '. q ' 'g& * ' y-w.n:p;9;. W.?-- y-.. < - =- m ._ to transfer,l? Vega e::. 6. When deciding which CC inspectcrs used a number cf criteria, including level and number of certifications, number of absences, number of late arrivals, and number of early outs. [bNdh wanted the inspectors with the bes: attendance records and the most, certifications to remain. Vega tr. 36,721-22; Vega ex. 6. 389. When!IO.N, ac.ciied thes e criteria, seme insc.ectors a involved in the T-shirt incident were transferred to Unit 2 while c hers were not (Vega tr. 36,723-24). Specifically, of the si:. s i.h" ~.,. t. were

~~.n s c. o c to r s transferred, e 1,, v..~~

k[e v., I.% * ' * (N Q .. A "U-tr. 53,122 23; Vega tr. 26,722). involved in the incident s a '~h e c n iv. inspector transferred for reasons other than attendance ,. ff~ and certifications wac :E.';,/ s f no was tranc ferred be,:ause M W ; :. i~ wag QCtin] GG 10~1d and../ n 0'? d e d Cnly One 1 eld in ba '?

~~I I'l-~~

., b wa n p'- - 'i l' n i. t 1 at that t i :"". VNa tr. V,'722. 'c s '. i -176-result,I __ S'id_ believed that and acted as a natural leader. A: a / other inspectors uculd go to{ ' .,c y, and not to the decignated lead, therebv com.oromisine. the supervisory chain (Vea.a tr. 36,722-23). At bottom, none of the transfers to Unit 2 was motivated by the T-shirt inciden gif.p)..g tr. 53,216; Vega tr. y 36,723). e o 390. hff{f;?fdh)h was subsequently transferred to the Unit 1 Control Building h((kkftr.55,139; 156) and has expressed satisfaction with his job (Vega tr. 36,726). He has also been complementarv. of the CA pr:c. ram (Veca 36,726). 391. Of the eight wh: wore the T-shirts on March E, five are no longer empicyed at Comanche Feak. These individuals are

,gri_w., M ;,.u.[~ h;wm.IMNh*

~~M' l ih; 4$ [ $p.py@g,p/j.p.:,y{ljg;/.QfQp[v(gv._.jp;p %@&,$ K. f8WQJM,.'!g %, MW yw;b.-k r. n.~~

~~r. p1~~

.S w l .n., 41,361; 363). ~ na NhhNMrequestedan'ROFinearlyMay1984, because 392. he wanted to move to Virginia in order to be closer to his ciderly parents. Vega did not approve the ROF until he spoke ,-~..,,Ja with ~4 'S :: {c d..o make sure that his request was unrelated to the p, _l f '" shirt incident. (( V'."c;' 4 stated to Vega that he had experienced no adverse treatment, that he was happy with the wa.- t thina.s were coing, and that he was very complementary of the r i crogram. Cace Vega was catisfied that this was the casa, he I I i approved the RCF request. \\*e g a tr. 36,725: Vega ex. 7. P a r d'; -177- ] ...r w QQ. %. fjf. pu also approved the ROF and concluded that severence m. from Ccmanche Peak was in no way associated with the T-shirt incident.(Purdy tr. 41,365). r m _y.dn'M. - 3 9 3. i:Y'@... w.u.. - n..:s#.. resigned from Comanche Peak on M'93-(. i.% y. W,y y,. y c.,.l M 9 He did so in order to accept a position at another facility. His resignation was unrelated to the T-shirt incident. Purdy tr. 41,366. Beforeh M resigned, Vega met with him to make absolutely sure thatN& R d]was not experiencing any kind of s [DW 3 _ assured Vega that he had received no adverse. treatment. ill treatment and that he was anxious to take advantage of a higher paying job in Louisiana. Vega tr. 36,720-27. 394. l3,j a..!, 3 also is no icnger employed at Comanche Peak, m- ?~ although he remains employed by Ebasco. Erandt offered W ~ transfer to Clinton, where Ebasco had been awarded a new Brandt knew thatb[..fUff8N was uncomfortable being the contract. .y w e cnly Ebasco employee in a group of Brown & Root employees. Fcr thisreasonBrandtthoughtthatfMyglwouldbeinterestedinthe transfer, which he wcs. Erandt tr. 45,323.-27. statedtch, ]that he could transfer to 395. Brandt Clinten or to the South Texas project, or remain at Cccanche Feak 45,327).j[ ]voluntarilydecidedtotransfertc (Brandt tr. Clinten. He believed that doing so would further his career with Ebasco because the work at Clinten was just beginning and he cculd get in at the grot:nd floor. ltr. 73,505: Erandt I o unrelated to the T-shirt ine:Jent t 45,327). Iy:i, .jtransfer was e j I -w==.-- -175-except to the extent that as a result of that incident Erand learned thathp Q'lfelt unccmfortable being the cnly Ebacco employee in his group (Brandt tr. 45,326). 396.ph(.f.gyjg.f{esignedafterbeingimplicated,inthedrug hen 5' -investigation at' Comanche Peak. A polygraph examination and corroborative evidence suggested that$5MNOED$had used drugs unlawfully on site. \\igis$hellfl_d.enied the charge and stated during a meeting with Purdy and others that he would resign rather than have his credibility threatened. Purdyasked$?Y?@Tdtocontact him during the next few days rather than immediately processing his resignation. hntf r* fN} failed to do so, Purdy accepted his resignation. Purdy tr. 41,361-62; Purdy ex. 14. ( g -. l y..,a resignation and his employment situation were not affected in any way by his participation in the T-shirt incident (Purdy tr. 41,362-63). k),UkhvolunteeredtobeROF'd. Again, his departure 397. from Comanche Peak was unrelated to the T-shirt incident (Purdy t r '. 41,364). Conclusions 398. Based on these findings, the Board concludes that the T-Shirt incident did not constitute harassment or intimidation cf CC inspectors.

~~.!.0.~~

~~T-ShlRT INCIDE.T N 111.0.1. The "T-Shirt incident" has been descrited to the Ec v; and parties by.Intervenors in the enclosure to the June 27, 1984 letter from i~~

~~a - T W,wl$p$$Q Mr. Leonard Eelter, counsel for Applicants, as #:llcws:~~

MNN Eight QC empicyees in the electrical department re;;orted to work wearing "T-shirts" that said "f;IT PICKERS PICK NITS." These employees were rounded up and taken to the office of Ron Tolson where they were questioned by management, the.ir personal caterials taken frcm their desks, and then interviewed by the site ombudsman. Efforts to attempt to get the NRC to stop the detention failed. CASE will demonstrate that the T-shirts were worn as an expression of the frustration of site QC inspectors, that the response by management was oppressive, and that the lack of response by NRC was nonfeasence (sic). Further that instead of there being no. reprisal against those who wore the T-shirts the employees were first cut down to 40 bcurs per week, scme were transferred, s:me cuit, and most recently scme were laid off. Of all the inspectors only a few remain en the job. 111.0.2. On March 8, 19E4, T@ny W,i'was on his first day as tre o Building QC Supervisor cf 17 (C electrical inspectors assicned to the Safeguards Buildinc. (Deposition offdM$fikiN%3; July 16,1952 s (Tr. 53,000-2Ea); )i/a M, at 53,C01-012, 53,031, 53,045). The c:ber participants at the onset of the incident who have given testimony are: n M. <,J, W X.g.Uu;,4f Ju.iy 17,.... a P-uepcsiticn c; w, j s. y, ,j, (Tr.55,C00-164);[ {, and h q i MCepcsition of('g, .:6. ] J ul y 31, 1984 (T r. 73,5 C C-5 53 } ; h., ]). (if:.f. ' ' f c. i .]an:il ~] \\ the were (C Electrical Inspectors a> signed to the Safeguards Euilding 2: a t 55,006-CC9;[h? E]a t 73,504, '3.512). \\ [,,,,. time of the incidcnt. l .~. 20lA-85-59 ~ \\ 447l --_...~.--..m. s pg&' n r;. 4 !O testi:ied tu. threr: c r : c u r c.:;. s ;. r : c r. : 1::.0.3.'t assigreent as QE. Supervisor fcr the Ee'eguarc: Euildirg, Dan Hic; ;,..e 7 Assi. tar.t QC Superviscr, mi MADE aware that scme T-shirts existe:. It q P. _ _ _. = - - - - V,ii+" a t 53,121). Hicksu.MS$. jthatifinspectorsshouldshcw a. -u s ' ' wearing the T-shirts [t-$9% shculd have the inspectors change their 3 s$1irts. (M.). Hicks did not tellI. 7,.];specifically why the ins;e::crs Q .should change treir shirts, tup' ).y dur.derstood that the T-shirts had words cr. them derogatory to the inspection group and its purpose. M.a ' %m 53,121.122). VG W.i was also not tcid what the T-shirts said or whe-her QC to inspectors had previously worn the shirts on the site. (M.at53,122). f.,,,1I1.0.4. Ob the morning of March 8,1984,hsfiQwas informed by Harry m m... n. .- - m wohnscn, an incividual reportinc tcy L',; t;.y[ho wcrks ing, w 9..p 4 j.- 'that several individuals in the QC electrical grcup. were wearing "t e bi c c LT-s h i r :r. " (Id. at 53,119). Ee ween 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. ( .,en: / over' t.c taik to;the inspectors. (Id.at53,120). Before he left he called r F.cn.;Toi2 ?n's office and talked to either Tolson cr Hicks to ccnfir:- his x. previcus d1Nctions by Hicks as tc what acticn he shculd take. (M.at 53',120-121). m.a-e w-w-,. __ __ ' ?mm==WTmscr., whc at the time or the incident was I I h 0. 5. 1 .dMT~iTcacn_=_0_.4__supervj. senior TUGCO, has testified abcut the incident. - m Ceposi icn of Sanald D. Tolscr, July '.:,19Ea (Tr. 40,5C0-65) ("!:'scr"). Tclson ccnfir$s thct it was he whc receivec the call frcr{U . c.icr at 40,545). Telsontolj'l:. m:o sene the inspectors hcme and hr.e :~er ~ Tolscn had heard of the e.u :ence change their shirts. (M.at20,E51). cf tha T-shirts earlier in the week, : cugh he had nc t seen the-. of t'.s ke'. personnel. ( b.1 !- c e. e r, s alar ,,a s a warc a r.) ,~. w 9 z e 1 4 y / .... - ~ ~ -... _,. ~ ---ee- =--%, - 118 - .s had the work "nitpicler" on.ther and he c;rsiered i: perscnal 3:3: at hinself and his office. (J_d. at 40,454-551). mm Approximately 5 a... that merning[M d arrived at the ;C m 1I1.0.6. s 2 ~ There cf fice. _{f1M@ at 53,122;g:g.qgj at 55,057; q;PQjat 73,505). $$i,!yz,j were eight GC inspectors in the cffice wearine the T-shirts: @%g~~'hh p$h%p @.Y 'N g) M A __x f;S d R fj.? 9 !! R % @h E h

~~VMj~~

^ ~ M 7 WMSM at G testi-w y y - fied that the words' on the T-shirt were '" Comanche Peak Nit-Pickers. k'e're in the business of picking nits." he.%MQat 73,550). He is r.ct clear on 1here the phrase came from; he was just asked if he wanted to 2 buy a T-snirt byh5@,M?3!hjkfhhj{fi[ (Ilkk!f whcm he believes cesicned the shirts. (!d.). III.0.7. / e{i Upsked the inspectors for their names and badce c.m'er; t sc he could fill out the documentation to enable them to pass thrcugh the ~ gate to go home and change their shirts. hW[at53,124;M5fL} at 55,087(fh e M at 73,506). The inspectors did not giveM their at 53,124; hE M N at 55,083). 5:me of names and badge umhers. the inspectors wanted to know why they had to change their shirts. F(igh2[ 53,124;h h hat 55,0EF Q at 73,506). 3 Ther[hljy. told :nem a: that if they had cuestions or a probie abcut-changir.; their shirts, they eculd talk to Mr. Toisen. 45:N. ' a t 53,125 ;f ".S b ' a t 5 5,0EZG a t The inspectcrs decided as grcup te ec to see icison. p i]at 73,5CS). 53,126;W 'dat 73,505). I11.0.8. %. 4_.then called Toisen's effice and was told to br :9 the m .c:scr at 4, ). ir m c.., =.'..)

/

~~u !at '0.129; group dawn to the 01 fica. -~' ':ad byh , 7 the grcup of inrpccters wen~~

~~tc Tolsen's 0:::ce, s~~

i l L ,.-q 5 tan ',' ore, t!.e le Ed ir.;pec tor, vJ :,a r.;t w:ri ; a T-shi rt. F [ at t. \\ Toisen wa in his 53,127-125 ;Q;y g 7 at 55,05Ef[ at 73,E5). s j asked cffice when they arrived; cne of the ir.:;ect,rs,[- Tolsca if'he could record the meeting, and at that point Tolson left his - f s ',-_~)at55,029;[f"j. at 73,5CE-507; _ i,,c.U,m;t 53,129-120;tt' n. office. y. Tolscn at 40,557). 111.0.9. Tcison testified that his leaving was an " instantaneous reaction", tying it back in his mind to a previous session he had had, which hac'been taped without his knowledge. (Tolson at 40,560). Tolson then received directions from Dallas (TUGC0 headquarters) to escort the inspectcrs to a rccm immediately across the hall frcm his office. (I_d. at 4 0, = =. '.. III.O.10. Mr. Eiily Ray Clements, Vice-Frasider.t for Nuclear 0; era-tiens for TUGCC in Dallas, testified cancerninc this incicent. Deposition cf 5iily F.ay Clements; July 10, 1954 (Tr. 40,000-192); ("Clements"). Mr. Clements testified that he was informed by Tolson at 9 or 10 a.m. that there were eight QC inspectors wearing T-shirts which had scmething written en ther concerning nit-picking. (Clements at 40,C'96). Clements ard Toisen discussed the situation. (id.at.'0,100). Clements was not sure if he tcld Toisen to isciate the inspectcrs, but they both agreed they wanted the inspectors separated frem the ;;;ulaticn of the rest cf the piar.:. (g.). Clements remembers tellirg Tcison te make sure the in:;ectcrs were protected; he didn't kncw what the situatica was as far as anim sity be: ween craft and inspec crs. (M.). Clerr.ents also called Paul Chea, FC 50s c, Mr. "hi f rence, Freican; of TGO, and Fr. hi: I I l 1 i L ' ;ep ty Regicnal Adm.inistrator, Fegicn IV, and told S.,abcut the

~~ituation.~~

~~(M. at 40,097). 111.0.11. Cic ents testified that he telephcned Check several times c~~

~~he day of' the incident.~~

~~(M. at 40,103). Clements told Check the T-shir;~~

ecple were being kept in a r

0m because Clements didn't know what the relationship was between the c:nstruction hands and the inspectors, and he didn't want any violence " cut-there", physical or verbal. (M.at

~10,105). Clements also menticned to Check that it had been reported to Clements that the T-shirt wearers had been doing " destructive inspection." (M.). I11.0.12. Upon receiving directions from Dallas, Tolson had the inspectors escorted to another office. (Tolson at 40,561). The inspectors ~. were moved to a then-vacant' auditor's office. {? _. d at 53,142.f n M ~, j a: 55,092; at 73,507). I11.0.13. At that time @r_ m went to see Mr. Thcmas Brandt, his e wf immediate supervisor with EEASCO. sq Q at 73,507;;.<.;;sgat 53,142-143). Mr. Thomas Brandt, at the time of the ' incident ar, Engineer on the QA supervisor's staff, employed by EBASCO, testified cencerning this inci-dent. Deposition cf C. Thomas Brandt; July 11, 1984 (Tr. 45,000-225); ("Erandt"). Brandt tcidly &lthatfq/g] wearing cf the T-shirt was

~~.nprofessional and, as fa'r as Erandt was concerned unacceptable attire.~~

~~(Srandt at 45,12GE 14]at73,507). Acccrding to Erandt, the T-shirt~~

~~Led fun at an already sensitive issue and cculd easilj have aggravated er arcused the craft people.~~

(Erandt at 45,128). '@ told Brand: that he was the only EEA:C0 CC insrector in a totally Erewn & Root group ar.d - 121 - i-. e he was wearing the T-shirt in an effor; to fit in. [h;bhja: 73,507; Brandt at 45,143);595'75]} agreed it was a lack of professionalism cn his part and told Erandt.it would not happen again.ni6Mi.lat 72,507-505; Erandt at 45,143). Brandt considers the counselling. session he had with I 4;i$[(whichwassubsequentlyputinwrittenfccmandsigned g.gjf} a disciplinary action. (Brandtat 45,146-149). 111.0.14. While the inspectors were waiting in the auditor's cffice, they were individually escorted to the office of Boyce Grier, the site r ombudsman. @G54 flat 55,094-095;[WMliat 73,508). Mr. Boyce Grier has testified to his knowledge of the incident. Deposition of Boyce A. 4 Grier; July 11,.1984 (Tr. 45,500-614); ("Grier"). Grier interviewed the eight inspectors wearing T-shirts that day, but it was purely coinci-i dental, because.the interviews had beer, arranged in advance. (Grierat 45,592). Grier had previously been recuested by Tolson to interview all the inspectors in the Safeguards electrical QC section. (Id.at45,591). i There had been complaints on the part of inspectors about procedures, and Tolson asked Grier to conduct the interviews and provide him with a report on Grier's assessment cf problems. (Id.). Grier identified his handwritten notes of the interviews .i 111.0.15. l which were offered into evidence as Grier Exhibit 42-6. (Grier at 45,594-599). The Board notes that Grier was not cuestioned cn the The Scard aisc notes that Mr. Grier cid nc: contents of these notes. 4 record any cearents on the T-Shirt incident in Grier Exhibit 42-6. 1' 111.0.16. Accordina tc((^^ ?] a: apprc.simately the time the C: j. inspectors were waitinc in the auditer's of f:ce cr taiking te Fr. Gr' r, I Tolsco teid to acccmpany same security c ire to arch the wcH. i I l . ~.. - -. -. -.. - -...-.. ]at52,'.0). l tables cf the-QC inspectors fr.r Ltilitj d: curer.tatien. ( ((N Iyent with two security pard: tc the inspecters' cffice ar.d the cuerds looked thrcuch the papeo.crk cn the tables of the eigh: inspecters who wore the T-shirts. (J_d. at E3,161-162). The guarcs then ccnfiscatec the utility documentation by picking it up and putting it in a. file

~~m..n folder with the ins,'ector's r.ame en it.~~

( M. at 53 162-163). GCJR was -not aware of the guards confiscating personal effects. (M.at53,162). After several inspectors and craftsman had tried to get in and cut of the 1 office, the door was locked; other inspectors had desks in the office. (M.at53,164). The entire prccess took between one and a half to three (Id. at 53,165). ((!?ihtook the documents to Tolson's office, and hcurs. then to l'r. Scott's office where Mr. 'n'illiam Crcmeans went through them. (M. at 53,170-171).h&a - had nothing further to do with the T-shirt personnel on that day. (Id. at 53,172). s After the ins;e: tars talked to GrierD' W%MN

~~estified III.0.17.~~

~~that the inspectors who were waiting in the auditor's office were told they were being kept there to protect them from craft. g M @ {that 55,C96). l~~

~~M..%,,Mh.; id not feel in any danger and "couldn't believe" that was the reascn they were being held.~~

(:d. at 55,096-097). EIfM*dalso re: ails i. that screene came into the auciter's office and told the inspectors that the !GC had been notified arc =20 canagement was trying to decide what i to do. (Id. at 55,093). At lunch time, :wo other inspectors sk$d/ fand Gerald 111.0.18. Fryor brought lunches to ther in the auditor's office and told thea that the QC trailer had been locke; and scmeone was searching the effice. i \\ y j:;r

~~n. >uGG,1(j=,1 Af ?~~

~~.{g. s 'y> l ' T. G ". G ~ --i- ~~ tu, v.~~

~~;e I~~

III.C.19. Curinc the ccur:e of t. day, Tc.cen recei.cd ac.:: ;rSI 1 instructicns frcm Dallas to sera the it.:pectcr: hcme, with p2j, ar: tell tncm that if their jobs were available the next day they could re:tr : withcut the T-shirts. (Tolson at 40,561). Tcison infcrmed Brandt and Gordon Purdy of the decision, and they informed the EEASCO and Erc e i Foot employees respectively. (M.at40,562). 111.0.20. Gordon Purdy testified that he was called in to interface with the Erown & Root employees, and, apparently that morning, he t:ld the inspectors they were to stay in the area because constructicn personnel might not think the T-shirts were humorous. Deposition of Gordon Raymond Purdy; July 10,1984 (Tr. 41,000-272); ("Purdy"), at 41,198. Shortly after lur.ch, Purdy told the Srcwn & Ecot inspectors they could co h:re, but please don't wear the T-shirts back in acain since they were cbcicusly creatinc a disruption in the project. (M. at 41,199). 111.0.21. Erandt called r~' ~ 1.back in, told him the decisicn was to senc him home with "an option to ccme back without the T-shirt." (3randt at 45,149). At that time,!45;# signed the written copy of the ccunselling pul session. (M.). 111.0.22. At abcut 1:30 p.m., the inspectors retrieved their personal things, ccats and lunch buckets, and s.ere esccrted to the cate. l[ ] f h at55,1CT, ]at 73,509). They were sent home with pay. (M.). III.O.23. While these events were taking place, Applicants were ccmmunicating with the !GC Staf f. f:r. James Curmins, tGC Senicr Residen: Insp2ctor for Ccnstruction at Ccmanche i'eak testified to ever,ts witnin his knchiedge. Deposition of James E. Cumins; July 17,19E4 (54. :J-075); ( " C um.- i n s " ). On Augur: 20, 1952 p: ant te ag wrent of cc._ 1, t h. - 124 - Staff submitted the Test'.in.ony of Doyle Hunnicutt Regarding the T-Shirt Incident, (pp. 1-8), ("Hunnicutt"). 111.0.24. Cummins first became aware of the T-Shirt incident when a telephone call came into the office of Douglas Kelley, NRC Senior Resident Inspector for Operations, between 11 a.m. and noon. (Cummins at 54,008, 54,014-015). An anonymous caller told Cummins, and Kelley, who was on the extension, that Brown & Root Secruity was going through the QC inspectors' desks and that they had some of the QC inspectors in Tolson's office. (M.at54,008). Kelley relayed this information to Mr. Doyle Hunnicutt, their supervisor in NRC Region IV. ( M. at 54,009; Hunnicutt at 2). 111.0.25. Hunnicutt instructed Cummins and Kelley not to intervene at the present time. (Hunnicutt at 2; Cummins at 54,009). Hunnicutt believed it was a management labor problem and not something affecting the health and safety of the plant. (Hunnicuttat2-3). About noon, Hunnicutt received a call from C. Oberg, an NRC reactor inspector at CPSES, who told Hunnicutt that Oberg had received an anonymous phone call and visit, and the information Oberg received was that plant management personnel were going through the desks of persennel in the Safeguards building and it was because some QC inspectors were wearing T-shirts which referred to " nit-pickers". (Hunnicutt at 3; Cummins at 54,022-024). 111.0.26. Hunnicutt discussed the available information with his Branch Chief in Region IV, and they decided to remain out of the dispute between CPSES nanagement and the T-shirt wearers. (Hunnicutt at 3). He phened back to Cummins and Kelley and told them not to interfere. (I_d. at 3; Cummins at 54,013). Hunnicutt discussed his information with senior NRC manageaent, and was informed by Paul Check, Deputy Regional Administrator, that ---.mv-m--.e-y . ~. - - - - - - - - - - -- 125 - Cleme'nts had already telephoned to tell Check of the T-shirt incident. (Hunnicutt'at4). Clements had also told Check the inspectors might have been involved in electrical wiring damage. ( I_d. ). 111.05,27. Meanwhile, Cummins had gone back to his trailer, where he received another anonymous phone call telling him the QC inspectors were sequestered, and requesting NRC intervention..(Cummins at 54,013). Cummins told the caller he had been directed by Region IV not to intervene. (Id. at54,013-014). Cummins reported this call to Hunnicutt. (Ld.at54,020. 111.0.28. About 12:30 p.m. to 1:00 p.m., Hunnicutt instructed Kelley to go to the administrative building and make a reasonable attempt to meet with the T-shirt personnel, and if possible to take photographs of the T-shirt personnel wearing the T-shirts to aid in determining the extent of the overall management-inspector concerns. (Hunnicutt at 4). He also instructed Kelley to go to the Safeguards ~ building and attempt to find and photograph electrical wiring which appeared to have been damaged. (Ld.). About 1:30 p.m. Kelley called Hunnicutt and told him that he had been to the administrative building and that the eight QC inspectors had been escorted to the site exit by CPSES personnel. (Ld.at5). Kelley also told Hunnicutt that he had not been able to take any pictures of the T-shirt personnel, and that he had found one wire which appeared to have scme scratch marks, but no other indications of damage. (M.). 111.0.29. That afternoon, Paul Check told Hunnicutt that Clements had told Check that plant management had taken documentary material from the desks of the QC inspectors. (M.). Eric Johnson, Hunnicutt's supervisor, called Cummins the next day, March 9, 1984, and instructed Cummins to get custody of the material. ([d.; Cummins at 54,028). Cummins acquired the - 126 - material, making copies of any originals, from Tolson. (Cummins at 54,028-029). Cummins phoned Hunnicutt when he had secured the documents in the NRC trailer. (Hunnicutt at 6). I11.0,30. On Monday, March 12,1984,( came and got the documents back. (Cumminsat 54,033-034). Cummins contacted Hunnicutt and was told to retrieve the papers. (Id. at 54,034; Hunnicutt at 6). Cummins got the documents back within half an hour. (Id.). The next day, Hunnicutt came to the site to take an inventory of the documents; he completed a physical - inventory of each of the eight packages of material that were identified by a name attached to each package of material. (Hunnicuttat6). Several i days later a copy of the physical inventory was requested by, and given to Tolson by Cummins with prior telephone approval frcm Hunnicutt. (Id.). 111.0.31.. On or about April 2,1984, Richard Denise, Region IV, requested that Hunnicutt make up a list of interview questions and inter-view scme or all of the eight QC inspectors involved in the T-shirt inci-I 1 dent. (Hunnicutt at 7). On or about April 3,1984, Cummins and Hunnicutt made up a list of eight questiens that they deemed appropriate to cover the areas related to the CPSES-inspector problem. (Hunnicutt at 7; Cummins at j 54,046-047). On April 5, 1984, Hunnicutt selected three of the T-shirt personnel at randem, and with the assistance of Cummins, he interviewed these three QC inspectors individually between 1:00 p.m. and about 4:00 p.m. on April 5,.1984. (Hunnicuttat8). Copies of the questions and summaries cf the answers were marked for identification as Cummins Exhibits 1 through 4. (Cummins at 54,045). Cummins was unable to explain i the reasons for asking the particular questions. (Id. at 54,053, 1 54,054-055). Hunnicutt testified the purpose of the questions was to i 4 .r-- ,,-we-.-+.--+yw-- ym-----,ye-,--w.,m$-w-.ymmv-.%-m-w-,+.-.m--- ww. --.-,w +-----+-+--w--s- -3 v - ye p-- - < -.-,aw-e-em 'l provide the J.'FC with a better ur.derstar. ding cf the ir.cidsr.t, crd to heb determine whether there should have been tlRC invcivement. (Hunnica:: at 7 In response to cuestioning by Intervencrs d$iM'W) testifie 111.0.32. concerning trar.sfers of perscnnel to Unit 2 subsequent to the T-Shirt incident. Acccrding tc' - )_therewasnoconnectiontothe"T-Shirt 8" u and any transfers to Unit 2. ;S$ 3p. Q N % g ftj At.hisdeposition,( l reconstructed a table he had made with the names of his 17 inspectors. Of the T-shirt personnel, thre e \\fm.@@f,Mip$$$$k j (M.at53,027-028). jiNM were transferred to Unit 2 in a group of six shortly after the T-Shirt incident. (Id. at 53,033, 53,242). Subsequently, k./3.M, E,8,$.$h, g. h ere transferred to the Unit 1 centrol building as the worklcad reduced. (M.at53,034,53,243). Prior to the other transfers, @,was transferred off-site by 55ASCO. (I_d.) U []testifiedthatnonewelec-trical QC inspectors have been hired. (M.at53,055). Eventually, the entire group was transferred to Unit 2 because the Unit 2 Safeguards Building had been virtually ccmpleted. (M.at53,243-244). According tc gs@j k k % subsecuent to the transfers to Unit 2, h. y.lkff:fgis N jQp!f.f) quit voluntarily. gjg{g at 55,134). Respectfully submitted, /

~~a 25 i~~

Geary W izuno Ccur.sel for f;RC Staff G &m/ 'f :Q fl8* ( ~j -w "ichard G. h cro..en ( Counsel for NRC Staff [... ' 1 M.1 yU nm G rd;o r;.{ ~)s. / Eerry 4;f k Ceunsel for fRC Staff 9, b se 9 ss thin 4th day c' h pre rer, it5N W-- T-Shir: Incident Intervencr alleged that electrical QC ins; ector wearing T-Shir:s w s 4 intimidated by management. Certain electrical OC inspectcrs were wearing T-shirts referrine to ~ i " nitpickers." They were subsecuently secues ered by management anc' treir desks searched. (There is a cuestion cf their prior involvement wi:r " destructive testing" prior to the incident.) Some of those involved i were later transferred or terminated. Applicatns assert manacement -icht i have overreacted, but the actions taken were not intimidation. 4 Evidentiary depositions: \\ w%m,p$r,:,p..A @g y: p ty % w:: p 2ps g g hhh. fNa vuum.waywg,e +Ifh5hkNk d S Nh h s.hw4c e NG.2,bf$,s,e /

~~r.&.'y....e'[ ' y.',m~y&1-Q$%,;y,&; f.~~

@w". p :phg?,y :. A u l s ..q ,. m.,.. w .w ,? n .a n [... n. v i.M 3 q,?y '..? i.,", ! ?.$ t;M..,n.,& pdy)?A :&.pf, "p%;[gqq: ,C 'y 'i' 6 a.QK,e eM 9M.:n 6, ; /9. : ? %. M&j'yag.3;%y;. sey gg;y%yL:py -

~~pf f f g(,Tg " r.~~

~~. O W qy, ' :;;yy,.,,fi; 9 x. Q.g%g ... c..,. r c. :s t,w~.R. >wa. s.,,Jw;,. +9.. 's. A.,t. p;7,. l 1 Wwo:s :. wm?r. y;,fr\\ g.,. i v . u..... n: .+ N ((h. p v w.A h. Mm, h.,,,f h a -e~~

~~$y g,~~

~~,e -wu., ',, e W 1<v g m:X. 3d :j.W.a.fm.,;M,'.n m' u +W 4. Jiw:kW g/m ;.L. -~~

r n.;,., 4,

n :y c a'

~~. c 3- .m' e }~~

~~< t. v:~~

.. i.a v m.v.m e s w x, 9 Eg l ns s.cgg;ee w.m.wrgwe:..w g e.e,% ww; i w g i - 4 Rsnn ukyl3wh h h$ h kkh am. h bib hm p. k m y G.g g g( k Nk N s'.fg f.4{gy/ M p N,$s.p.ng$g$p p$N$[j w ;.m m>. g:e ye. ~,g. % em w& i

9.y#

w w. w n w I gs p :

c y d $'.IsMUdids gfg[N hQf yy h 2 ~ y M m:;9 f Hearing Testimeny: Testimony of Michael Spence, Tr. 14,924-920 (9/10/84) Testimony of Ant:nio Vega, Tr. 15,055-050; 15,191-193; 15,197-:5'.; 15,278 416 (9/10/22) . c l u =.. ".., T r.

~~1. :., t. '... d.'.., 1:,270 :.n - '..:...: ~. 2 : '.~~

Te +. s o..o..v c #. *: w m .~, c. (9/11/Ei) i Testimony cf Theras Erardt, Tr. 16,107 '23; 16,175-201 (9/12/Ed' Testimony c' Garden Fure,'. ; Tr. 16.352-3'3 (9/13.'Sa) Testimony cf Rcra'c Te'c . Tr. '.J,29:-5 5 (9/ ; '54) ; Tr. 1-:,5?:.:E-( c.,m.u / p: \\ 201A-85-59 268

~~.Tw---.~~

e -e .y g--y -e c.re, g- -5 y y .y--w --.--my,.- --~+rg.---w g----- ---7 8-I Testimony of Gregory Bennetzen, Tr. 17,745-934; 17,954-968 (9/20/84) Testimony of David Chapman, Tr. 17,969-18,031 (9/20/84) Testimony of Doyle Hunnicutt, Tr. 18,515-669 (10/1/84) OI Report 4-83-001 (24 August 1983) O e O e t 9}}

ML20207A163

Contents

Text

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Dear Si r:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

Dear Mr. Beddingfield:

Dear Mr. Gross:

Dear Mr. Beddingfield,

Dear Mr. Christofferscn:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

REFERENCE:

Dear Mr. Christofferson:

REFERENCE:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML20207A163

Text

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Dear Si r:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

Dear Mr. Beddingfield:

Dear Mr. Gross:

Dear Mr. Beddingfield,

Dear Mr. Christofferscn:

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

SUBJECT:

SUBJECT:

REFERENCE:

Dear Mr. Christofferson:

REFERENCE:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search