ML20207A150

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to Procedure CP-CPM 1.1, Procedure for Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Personnel Evacuation. Related Info Encl
ML20207A150
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Comanche Peak
Issue date: 09/26/1983
From:
BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML20206S800 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 CP-CPM-1.1, NUDOCS 8607110430
Download: ML20207A150 (37)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:_ s _m =.. _..,,,. l I, ,/ -- 6 o ..t ? . ::.e. 8 i. : f.a r *- : '".. i ..scwt..e. :..t.*..,. ".. s-

.. e...;

.w

  • 7*

n ue. l

u....-

t i .e + C/2f/32 CF-C2'... ' .'"!

  • i I I ~I t

f,b~.7. 8 ' ~~ A N' - .. -M c. e.ar..... x. t ikyff u... c. /.,,, : l ?

s. #

- <*.'.-~~I ?*CC;~;;;;3. ?C3, .til:~.ii: SY:

e. c

'r.$ 3 se.,e y:ts-Y..w.- mC'tiNm,. CT.. / .,%,....~.

  • '~

s ~;A...I Y hfuA Y ' _ _ -. ~ .iP=RC'li 5Y: / 7* I. ['f:.g'%..*.-- c...;e ;.i. ;f" ;;q.:.. l l .m , '"ULI C? CCar rT-'! ,,,,,4.,.,,. C',..% / 6 ,,.C UC'*- .t_ = =. 1, 'l.a. 1,.. r s a / s -()sglt. I*fAC"A""* f SIC:fAL

  • 0 3.0 s,

.h....M/."),3 I . -l, 1 I"AC"A'"* 'r Qg.& W W CW ., 4 e. ..,,,. e.e s, s y m......g Wo 3 g. <*N,L' dl-s...

1 e

w. a.1 ?ta;C 33'.*6... - UA~0A"-': f 's, ' ./ $;"rx r,. a.1 !!"'": UAC"A * :f

  • s i

e-

v. r*. *.v.....*.r_

.e. a.

s. e_s.eC:tttc.

s s S, j .3 _r.'..c.A...,,..r_ '-- a s 0:e ;ur;cse,of : tis ;;:csdurs 's :: ;;: viia di:3 -*--

ne si:s as 4::ci: ::s avacuti:n =f the ;i.a:= s : ::::ss ::

2:14 :=.sii c: st::::.:. Otis ;;:cadu a is a;;11:a== subc c::sc:sc ;s s===aL vs.-ra::. 1rs. enti: sert:g, ad-* 'st:2: t

sta:11 ass =f c: ;a:7 affi 12:1:.

l ~.,w......t..... s... ' 1.ta ts ~:a evacuti:n si;:21 vill ta a sa. as :f firs (!) s.=:: : i l of ::a ;12:2 si:ss. 1.....f .. ~... -ta= :ts evacu:::n si;:si is girse, al; ;s:::.:e; 3..21; s.es:n: 3 tas ;ias: s ' :s. 1: a saf s - - er as f =1;:vs : I g i Ali <=;i:7ees stall s-:p ver'.:. Icy 4 :1:yees :s ts; f*. A:=:2:'.4 iss :: 4: : s su: :!f :te 3as a- :.s :'.:sas: scur:s. ~c;1 7ses *.C '. ::: a: ac : :: *::2:a ;ers:.s. 14: ;;.:; ::

i: :::12. :u: s.21; a escu:a a: ::::.

s + ...i_ W . - ~. ~ _.-.~ i 7 ]O860627 GARDE 85-S9 PDR

r- ....-...i.e .g .c - un --u .,,,...I .m a .. t.. v.. .ml:4ag5 e ...,.I wi ra....e.. v.u ~ Of 1

  • gg te...::

C?-C7!i L.; 1 9/25/32 ,i w_ .n.sw l !s: soc =al una e::arsd :ha si:e i= a rehicia s.ull ass: ce st:a is a renir.la. All c:har: shall en: c ho t. Ps: soc =el. Sch11=g visi:::s shall a=1: c @ 2::c;: ca l a== snail j ga:s erzugh unch stay ants:sd :ta ;; ject, 3:sas-cut ce sign-out as =ce-*7 :stairsd vne 12av". 3 l t de ;; fec:. l.. . m. c r.y.. A... 7 .Q se cc di:1:ss: Iiacuati = will hs of :vo :7;es, de;eedi:g c f l Pla=: s = c:::as, i=chdi:3 fah shops a=d ad=* **::2:17e l 4"**'* za. 31:a. Schdi:3 ali ;s 'ci:3 10:2. I

  • ains: : se. ::a sa=a evacuati: sig:21 vill to scu: ec.
net: ;::::

l j Ps:sc =e1 r.11 te ;;;visad addi:$0:21 d.1:sc:1::. 4: cfan:. 727 a::e: 1: := securt:7 ;erse al 4=d/ : ka.::: des { l a=d signs. e l 4.L Ff u"l' 51".'.L'."."* li I7AC".A~*:T

racus:s as discussed 2 pars;;sph 2.0.

?s:so::4'. e.11 :e dirsc:ad l

= assac:14 :s es ac:sas ::ad : ear Secs:1:7 7:s: J '.== a: al:ar sta l

a.sa as dt:seted by sec::da 7 ;s:sonnel. Ts:sec=si vill :--**- 5

ia area u=:11 :ss ali :iaar sig=al is given.

O.e 4.11 :iaar si. si vill te a blas: Of ce pla:: sirs =. Aftee sta ali claar si,~.21. persensel.ay escu== :: e.ai. week s:2:1:ss. ,..e s. cu. _.,f ( I I Ivacua:a as discussed b 72:sg:s;h 3.3. Ps:sec s1 r.11 :e 11:sc:ad

23 ;ar' ' ? i:: and ses11 laave ce si:s i=adia: air.

absg e.a acesss ::ad he ;3:s:=11-3ar:1:sdes =27 to se: :: g =cui:::1:g. 727 at::::*_:s :: ::a ia :1:sdas an:.a t:.: :u: l f::. cur : m ars.

m.... e -.t'. !

. C".".......! l u. .~ o I j ~;c: hsaris; es avse:2:1:: a14 =, super-is= 7 ;erset:s1 s.uil ensues

a: ;s:sc=el have hear: ::a a12= a:d 4:s evse:23 ;. 7.:14 =27 le 7 erd:=2d by ;;:7susi su:-teillancs Of :.s arsas :: :7 ; ::a.

Ps:see:41' ac:::: 2:ili:7 iJ ::: :..a su;e:- sces' :ss;::stit 1:7 t i I { s wh _ u-.- c e

(. TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COSIPANY l OFFICE MEMOR ANDUM I l To Distribution Glen Rose. Texas December 19. 1983 Subject Potential Conflict of Interest Having transferred f rom a ' construction activity that you are now qualified and certified to inspect, there is a potential for violation of the following criteria: Qualiry Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants; 10CFR50 Appendix B,' Criteria X (Inspection), Subparagraph 2: Inspection shall be preformed by individuals other than those who preformed the activity being inspected. Should you, as an Inspector, be called to inspect an area or an item that you preformed the craf t activity on, you shall defer that inspection to another inspector. Further, if you are aware of any previous inspections that are contrary to this instruction, you shall bring,them to the attention of your Supervisor or myself for resolution. All Action Addressees shall sign for receipt and acknowledgement of their instructions. / N

f. -t M.G. 'FCurly" Krisher 2.CB QA/QC Supervisor i

!~ MGK/ci Action Addressees: M. Dubay M. Fraley l J. Emerson D. Etheridge C. Eichelberger G. Sauer D. Finn J. Perlaki T. Self M. Gomas L. Scott C. Wilhite C. Patterson J. Shaw L. Lamb R. Laruanoff J. Ponce M. Stonitsch J. Paninski S. Valdez J. Mickel A. Gonzales j E. Niedecken D. Miller O. Pena M. Stephens /S,4 h /m t cc: R. Tolson i [ j /k ]f t.[1== ' T. Brandt K. Pendergrass y 9 d m =t

  1. #y b

K. Wolverton T. Mason l22 ~

N m ira p Job # 35-1195 o l TO: ALL EMPLOYEES FROM: D. C. FRANKUM

SUBJECT:

PARKING LOT REGULATIONS 1. SPEED LIMIT: Plant Access Road - 40 miles per hour Parking Lot Entrance Road,- 20 miles per hour Parking Lot - 10 miles per hour 2. Park facing east. No parking on either fence line or in any roadway. Park-ing within the confines of the rebar post only. Park at least 30 feet from the security tower. 2a. Any vehicle that is improperly parked will be towed away. The driver must go through security to claim their vehicles. 3. DRIVING OUT: East to fence then left (North). Do not drive out West (against traffic). 4. No third lanes allowed while entering or leaving the project. 5. The South fence line is for attended cars only, picking up passengers. 00 NOT block traffic, the entrance of the " cattle shute" or East fence. 6. Leave the parking lot after your shift. No carties allowed. 7. Do not litter the parking lot with trash, especially bottles. 8. Failure to ccmply with the above may result in tennination. The parking lot will be monitored by the Safety Department and Security Department. c&A Ae D. C. Frankum Sam Haggard pW Project Manager Sr. Safety Supervisor FC!A-85-59 m Jn-41Au>O ~ Tommy Racertso'n f Security director 7 I have read and understand the above rules and agree to obey all parking lot rules. NAME S.S.# DATE t me.ee 4me me> - b m eep

  • es e-e

.e

  • =

j ErowneRoct.!nc. BROWN & ROOT, INC. JOB #35-1195 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION

  • S -T-A- T-E-M-E -N - T
  • IT IS dGREED BY THE UNDERSIGNED THAT EVEN THOUGH THE EMPLOYER PROVIDES PARKING FACILITIES WHERE POSSIBLE, I-WILL USE SUCH PARKING FACILITIES AT MY OWN RISK AS TO ANY PAINT SPRAY OR OTHER DAMAGE RESULTING BY REASON OF THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

SIGNATURE: FIRST MICOLE LAST SA0GE NO. 0 ATE: i 0 j 1 e e S l

e

--etr .v_ -..,._.,_.,-.,.,_.-_.,,,,.,,,._.--,-_.-.~,.,...m. ___,,_.,__we,.,.,_ --.., ~_ - -. - -. _.- ,_m7

~ i BASIC SAFETY RULES / Job #35-1195 / / . The Basic Safety Rules to be followed by all Brown & Root, Inc. employees as well as employees of Subcontractor's on this project are the following: 1. Violations of Company, Federal and State Regulations is cause for immediate termination. 2. 0.S.H.A. approved hard hats will be worn by all employees on the project site. 3. For personnel wearing prescription eyeglasses, the use of eyeglasses with a-safety-type lens is recommended. Eye protection will be worn by ALL per-sonnel in designated areas. 4. Approved hearing protection will be worn by all employees in-designated high noise level areas. 5. Approved respirato!y protective devices will be worn in areas designated as areas of high concentration of dusts or dangerous atmospheres. 6. Clothing must give adequate protection to the body. Shirts with sleeves must be worn at all times and shirt tails must be worn inside the trousers, except in the case of welders and burners. Footwear must give adequate protection to the feet. Steel toed shoes are recomended. No loafers, canvas or suede shoes will be al-lowed. Footwear must be a well constructed, construction type shoe or boot, rubber type soles (No leather soles). No tennis shoes allowed. 7. Housekeeping is an:intergral part of every job and each employee will keep his work area clean. A clean job is a safe job. 8. Compressed air will not be used to dust off hands, face or clothing. 9. Nothing is to be placed in drinking water containers for cooling. The teos of drinking water containers shall not be removed to obtain ice.

10. There will be n_o, running on the job site.
11. No class bottles, cameras, firearms, soft drink cans, alcoholic beveraoes or druas, other than those leoally ourchased or orescribed by a ohysican or a project caramedic are allowed on the Job site.
12. " HORSEPLAY" on the job site is strictly orchibited. Violation of this rule is cause for imediate termination.
13. All job related injuries will be reported immediately to the Safety Department or First-Aid facility.

The safety Department or the emoloyee's immediate su-pervisor must be notified before going to a doctor for a job related injury. The above Basic Safety Rules are for the benefit of each employee assigned to this project. Failure to abide by these rules will be considered grounds for imediate termination. You are advised that in the ca e of Safety Rule No.11, assurance of compliance c will be made by means of periodic inspection of vehicl,es, lunch boxes, and cl' thing. o Your signature indicates that you have read and understogd the Basic Safety Rules and that you accept these and all other safety rules as a condition of employment. t SIGNATURE DATE

y., ~l } >i r In addition to the 13 Basic Safety Rules to be folicwed by all Brown & Root employees, the following rules are also strictly enforced on this job site: SAFETY bel.TS l. A safety belt, consisiting of the belt and a lanyard attached to the ~0-ring by at least one snap, must be worn and used when an employee climbs to any height exceeding six feet. If and when the employee stops his travel for any reason, he must attach ~ his lanyard to a substantial fixture, such as a pipe, hanger, or steel beam. 2X4 wooden Mandrails are not desirable to tie the lanyard around. Never detach the Tanyard completely from the be,lt itself. When this is done, the belt becomes nothing more than a tool belt. 000BLE EYE PROTECTION 2. When'an employee's duties cause him to create any airborne, flying particles, then double eye protection must be worn. Double eye protection consists of a face shield and monogoggles. Some of the jobs requiring this protection are grinding, using flapper wheel on grinder, a steel brush on grinder, pencil irrinder, Hilti drilling above waist high, chipping concrete, using blow pipe on air hose, water blasting and any use of bench, grinder or carbon saw. BARHICADE TAPE 3. A. Black and yellow tape, stretched approximatel'y 42" high and parallel to the walking surface, is placed there to 11 form you that beyond the tape is a possible hazard to the employee. There is possibly a scaffold being wrecked, concrete chipping in progress, or a

  • heavy lift being made. Yellow and black tape must not be used as.a physical barri'er for a fall hazard. Do not cross the black and yellow tape. Seek another route for your travel.

.8. Yellow and Magenta (pinkish-purple) tace, eittier with or without Radiation " Keep Out" sign attached, is placed in an area in such a manner as to block entrance, to inforn employees that a pipe ar weld is being x-rayed with radiation. Crossing this tape could result in senseless exposure to the radiation which can have very adverse results to the employee. Any employee must not, for any reason, cross this yellow and pink tape. To do so may result in tennination. TAGS 4 81ockfrig, lock out, and unsafe tags, in many various forns, are used on many systems, panels, and pieces of equipment. Employees should read tags that are attached to items in their work area so as to be aware of what ts happening. These tags must not be removed, defaced beyond legibility, and above all, must not b,y,tgng,r.ed. To do so can result in termination. 1 Your signature in cater that you have read and understood the above Qfety Rules and t you accept these and all other safety rules as a condition of,em ent. 6 O 4 l h .i

2 -)~ ) f(,) i /I y l 1 ..._...) - ) ~ k 2.s,' L .. 3 g3..3---m ' p=~ q 7, t:v '] j The Honorable Raymond Donovan Secretary of Labor U.S. Departrent of Labor Att: Wage & Hour Division Washington D.C.

Dear Secretary Donovan:

Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 5851, and 29 C.F.R. Part 24, I hereby file this complaint with the Secretary of I allege that on%..M$$!Nkl was discriminated against by Labor. my temination by the Brown & Root Company for whom I worked as aQ( /;J ~ cr. the Comanche Faak Nuclear Power sita

C-

_,y .. :,c, under construction in Glen Ecse, Texas. , - - - ~ - Dn v -- I was called into the Erown & Root %_____-) W

, m' c~~7 office b 1 where I was informed that I was being

~ I refused to accept the temination on the grounds that the temi nated. Despite reasons forsarded by Brown & Rcot for my termination were false. my protest, I was teminated imediately. ,r was a direct I hereby allege that my temination on[yi' N ?i m I result of ry continuing refusal to succumb to craft and management pres-sure to violate the Atcmic Ener;y Act and my attempts to expose and to have addrcssed the sericus deficiencics in d::r entation, prc edures, and safety-related hardsare at the C 7:anche reak site of which I was FO:A-854 1 disclosed to management the follo,,ing c:ncerns: (1) inadm;uc te.; unreliat le cca nta wn c: d.tign chn 'p: c. d ..in,., '.Ji x B. in viola tie n o f, in ter a'. a,10 Ci R 50 . ( ) prc-nati fi ca tion of are v t., h e c s.ni r,' t a n a ud i t t r. n, c

in

"' i nt: I? h

L 1 Imlin.

t' L in-3 the p.trpa't of the a*..l 'l' d a t. - "*c. '} a g f: n tio n.tl c. '.i - u;' 0 'n d fit i. w

a lach oi control of saf:ty-relcted de,ign drwing dasurentation, (3) by allowing craf t to obtain partions of doctment pacLeges instcad of the complete packag2, in violation of Nuclear Regula tory Co,-=is-sion directives; lack of adequate doct: ment control staffing and resources to reet the (4) der.cnds of the project; 7 lack of material traceabiiity of safety related materials in the (5) plant, in violaticn of (inter alia) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B; pQ Mh6) lack of independence of quality assurance / quality control from pro-duction, in violation of (inter alia) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B; lack of quality control inspector training, in violation of (inter (7) alia) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B; based on the evidence, what I believe to be intentional and delib-(8) erate falsification of documents relating to the quality of the materials used in safety related areas of the plant, in violation of (inter alia) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B; based on the evidence, what I believe to be illegal upgrading of (9) non-safety related materials to "Q", or safety-related, in viola-tion of (inter alia) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B,; (10)' based on the evidence, what I believe to be improper end illeg voiding of non-confomance reports through the use of infomal ^ Inter-Office Memos, in violation of (inter alia) 10 CFR 50, App. B; a lack of control of vendor program documentation, in violation of (11) (. inter alia) 10 CFR 50, App. B; (12) alteration of final design drawings; (13) widespread drug abuse and mana;crent inattention to the problem; (14) cther examples and incidents. 1 I have al'.nys been rated as an excellent empicyee, I've never been It disciplined, and I was premated as fast as anyone within the company. wasn' t until I began receiving pre:sure frcm craf t and r.anage ent person-nel to violate procedures contrary to the Atomic Cnergy Act that I was I believe that harassed and eventually terminated frca the company. = ~ J S fid d;' - ^^ emed _-- peared COfiCurned U!:Out Iny allegatient. I a *,' for n:]ie[ t r p' ' f hi', i } 1: 'll * 'l in i l m f i O P., bhC' [ J '.', I V i t.'. l 6' ' i. - + y., _ ^~~ ...,m

i. 2 s. o rent, legal fee; and any other expen;e; which I have incurred as r. resu','. of Brown a Root's action. Sincerely, %. ( [N M %,,'L r, ) _y - - ~ s f %E \\ ' w- __m m a J e I i V i i

/J N/5 / liyogo QA/QC Supervisor i ! G.. Je nne t zen _, ___. _.2 , Clerk l L llolland_. pdSO Typist l B. Cavin___ _PJ'/6 l _ QQE. .....__.l Ilyd ro l T. !!atheny 39 . D..Whela.1 .. 'll0 B.Darby, _, yg3 ..T._.Eandolph_...._0345 U* Swa,i_n,,, _,,,,6,77:[ i b* Barnes .. 3003 R. Darby _,, ygq3 2._G iffith.__.. {,' LOB . E !!. Gregory Da jo r K. Ptoss /od ~ ~ R. 11orrow ___/D 3 R. Walters 153 I L. Yates

  • /3 i

Mgj - '/O "~ W. T r_a.u t s ch ol. t.....D2fd .

  • J. Itavkins

/3/ g o,

3. Stdus 67
  • a

,p _ I s .JI Coordinator

c. crossnickle r/A i!%

cD %., j .wg c,As ec n..;,_ v u j u y .- + -

AUX. / SG (llingers) e. t OA/0C Supervisor l.D, _Snoy,, __ _, _____ ___) . Clerk __ i ,,Typis t/S t,a t_us S. White ~DN1 l ... __ g - QCE i i QCE I fle Tpdd,,,,_,,,, j'l],j ,Q. Finning._., %4. ..,K. Robinson __,f9), S." Sanders 'lO - M. Welc.h...... f 3.') - G. Daugherty fl C. Denman Q-C. Mathews . f/ O H. Osterday ff y ' ..S. Duncan '/8 J._ Pa,rk_e r 13 0 _R.. Walston (</ 7 R. Carne r.. SG -.c. S g a n n a ri -- - r i J. ?!assey fl.h A. //.i.(33 45 G.uww w n.LG .6 .6*M6.8 ND6' D.N O eg. g .p. e-4 a.m. e 9 6

c. ) add Lt> n.s ab I * * ' ~.*

o f'. -QA/QC.Su'pervisor [' .h D J oo.dyarA, ( ~ Cl#rk . r'( J. DiVetto CcB7 j" Statu._s.._

q B. IIamm Q '} l0 i

---g- -= ~ ~ ' " 1 r- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QCE Night shitt / Kr B_.,Sims gqp F. Przyby[ ski H $ ~ ~ - - l? J. Rodgers JH$ C. Grunwald isl N'- D-. 18...-. _ Q S { . D. Lankford,_ c}3 R. Pendergrass if) J. Butler, <fg I t J. Lunsford 35 0 -_J. Caldwell.- .6c/ 1 cannon 65 .l W. CamE ell _R. Boykin. b J. Lloyd y _D._Je.11_,,,,,,,,,,g B.i.e.rwi_r.t.h. _.. _v 6 C -- a

11. 111 11-

<g-g S. Wagner JA R. Duncan of 1 lI4BERT__Reviev - B. Barnard 35 _.J,. _S_t a n fo rd ]0 _L f._u c.k.e._r..... -- '// .T l F. Coleman

s. i...i,;.i

..d..SAedsRh'Mai m '\\D ~ . - - - _ _. _. = - - . Jab Shops,, _ _. _.11 s J. Reed J. Radcliffe 10D C. Brown iI t, l' e g I e g. I + i

-~ I ~ BLDG 2

'QA/QC Suparvicor_.c.I

[ { B. Si.e..v_gr.._, l 0 i _ Clerk. I D.. McGui,re I ~ ~ _T Y P a t._. _f _. i s l QCE. ,_,QCF, 1 W Mansfield 57_ _J,, e Wilkerson 5Et ._I _ Col.cmia. n fob D. Kivi 9/ V Fros_t._ _ _ _ j P. Brown /7 B. Chadwick /0 R.'Heuer 15 _ L. Tidwell 15 D. Hayes j/O ~ D. Nisich /?O E. Ray ~~ ~g A. Bagley ~ [ E dracIk 3;d / R t ..A L nwl ._S> Loan to Paint QC . J..Wasylyszyn_.. d b _L _C. ride.t.., _,,,. h,7 I J. Barrett ,,_,ph ...P..Higgins. _,,, B 2.s 3, f e i i 4 l 9 e

% Q (W5 SE I 3 rd-Q U/ "d/ DT TXX-4180 5/25/84 Allecation No. 22 Although the Quality Control (OC) and Construction organizations are represented as independent, it has been alleged that current practices between QC and construction compromise the independence of these two 6 [ organizations. Evaluation of Validity Our review of this matter indicates that there is no validity to this allegation. Although the Building Management Groups are " matrix" organizations, the Building QC organizations report to QA/0C management I and not construction. Each Building QC Supervisor was selected based I on demonstrated ability to work within the Matrix organization.and still maintain the independence required f5F QC personnel. ~ We have found no evidence which lead us to believe that the alleged lack of QC independence exists. Safety Sionificance None I Generic Imolications on Other Systems or Contractors j Not applicable lF0!Ac85-69 / % e-9 .e

ISSUE EROWN & RCOT, INC. ( CPSES NU4BER REVISION DATE PAGE CP-QAP-2.1 11 JUN 111984 1 of 19 CRIGINATOR: ) 2. % L b // d u 9 % TITLE: / QATE PERSONNEL TRAINING //N AND QUALIFICATION REVIEWED BY: s-0 ATE 4 6 /N APPROVED BY: t Site QA Manager v OATE

1.0 REFERENCES

1-A QI-QAP-2.1-1, " Nondestructive Examination Personnel Certification" 1-B QI-QAP-2.1-4, " Auditors Certification" 1-C QI-QAP-2.1-5, " Training and Certification of Mechanical Inspection Personnel" 46 1-0 CP-QAP-18.1, " Processing QA Records" 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure defines the requirenents for documentation of personnel

training, qualification, and certification.

Additionally, this procedure defines general QA Department training requirements and establishes specific prerequisites to the; certification of personnel who pe rform audi ts, surveillance inspection, examination, or testing. l The requirements of this procedure apply to Quality Assurance personnel assigned to CPSES who perfona the above activities for the purpose of satisfying inspection, examination, or testing specified in approved QA Procedures l or QA Instructions. Certifications issued under previ ous revi sions to this procedure shall continue to be valid; however, recertifica-tions shalI be in accordance with this procedure revisien. F0fA 85-59 cono a co>y. CONTROL No../ d, g bzG#Y&&-19,g ~

BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 ( CP-QAP-2.1 11 JUN 11198 4 2 of 19 2.2 DEFINITIONS 2.2.1 Certification Documented testimony to the acceptability of an individual's qualifications to perfonn an inspection function. 2.2.2 Oualification The education,

skill, training, experience or any combination thereof, which provide an individual with the capability of properly perfonning an inspection function.-

2.2.3 Training Instruction provided to personnel through fonnal classroom presentation by a designated instructor, completion of.- directed recuired reading, or properly monitored on the job instruction, k.. 2.3 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.3.1 Ouality Engineering Group Suoervisor The QE Group Supervisor shall be responsible for: a. Implementation of this procedure; and b. Preparing and coordinat.19 the presentation of training programs on new or revised editions of the B&R QA Manual l and general. QA Program procedures or instructions. 2.3.2 Site Discipline Level III Quality Engineers Site Discipline Level III QE's in the Mechanical and NDE l disciplines shall be responsible for: a. Establishing the technical content of training programs presented for the purpose of certifying personnel to perforn inspection, examination, or testing, of safety-l related activities; b. Preparing and coorcinating the pre'sentation of training programs on discipline procedures and procedure revisions; and Ensuring that all applicable Quality personnel receive l. c. specific job orientation, familiari::ation with applicable procedures, speci fied training, and when

BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 ( CP-QAP-2.1 11 JUN 111984 3 of 19 requi red, examination and/or certification prior to performing the Quality activities. 2.3.3 Ou al i ty Suoe ri n tende nts / Supe rvi so rs The cognizant Qtiali ty Superintendent / Supervisor shall be responsible for:. a. Providing employees with the time to comalete training; b. Providing employees with on-the-job

training, if required; c.

Notifying the QA Training Coordinator of personnel who have completed on-the-j ob training prior to certification; and .d. Recommending the certification level of ins pectors. 2.3.4 OA Training Coordinator The QA Training Coordinator shall be responsible for': a. Coordinating Site Quality training activities; b. Maintaining and controlling the training and certifica-tion files for personnel who perfona inspection, examination, or testing of ASME-rela ted activi ties; c. Providing advance notice of Visual Acuity Examinations and recertification due dates for personnel certified to perfonn Quality functions; d. Maintaining and distributing the Certification Status Report; e. Assu ring that personnel who provide ins truction or administer examinations have been designated by the Quality Engineering Group Supervisor, or Site Discipline Level III, as applicable; f. Originating and traintaining QA/QC Personnel Training History; g. Maintaining Required Reading Lists for QA/QC activities; h. Controlling and maintaining all approved lesson plans;

BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 ( CP-QAP-2.1 11 4 of 19 1. Maintaining records of classroom training attendence; and J. Transmitting to the Owner, personnel training and certification files when the individual has been teminated for more than 6 months or at completions of the construction phase. 2.3.5 OA Administrative Assistant The QA Administrative Assistant shall be responsible for the verification of education and previous employment experience for personnel who perfom surveillance, inspection, examination,

  • or testing of ASME-related activities.

Additionally, the QA Administrative Assistant shall maintain working personnel files for all QA Department employees. 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 SELECTION OF QUALITY PERSONNEL s. ' 1.1 General Personnel who will be assigned the responsibility of perfoming Quality functions shall be selected on the basis of their qualifications. The qualifications of applicants shall be compared to the qualification requirements and/or' basic job descriptions established in References 1-A.through 1-C as applicable, to assure that the applicant is certifiable and/or qualified to perform the specific function. 3.1.2 Verification of Qualifications All Quality personnel applicants shall t.e notified at the time of initial interview that their previous education and experience will be ve rified. Based on the individual 's employment application or resume, the QA Administrative Assistant shall initiate requests for verification of an applicant's previous education and employment experience from those institutions or employers whose activities would substantiate the applicants qualifications. The cognizant Level III QE will assist the QA Administrative Assistant in detemining the education and previous employment of an applicant which must be verified. A documented telephone verification may be used as justification for assignment, providing the written requests for verification have been initiated.

SROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 ( CP-QAP-2.1 11 JUN 111984 5 of 19 t.. ? 3.2 TRAINING 3.2.1 General All Quality personnel receive QA Introductory training, and are provided with a Required Reading List for general QA Program requirements, which is developed by the Site Discipline Level III. Additionally, all Quality personnel receive specific job orientation which includes familiarization with applicable QA, procedures or instructions. Required Reading Lists for specific job orientation, other than QC inspection, are developed by Site Discipline Level III; Required Reading Lists for QC inspection activities are developed by the Site Discipline Level III and are maintained by the QA Training Coordinator. File Cus todians require DCC conducted orientation classes indoctrinating them into the Site Engineering documentation systen and testing as required by DCP-3. Subsequent training on revisions or DCN's to DCP-3 is the responsibility of the s Site Discipline Level III. Training must be perfonned on new or revised procedures or instructions prior to perfonning work encompassed within the document. The QE Group Supervisor is responsible for designating personnel who must be trained and the method of training to be employed. Training will be accanpli shed by classroom presentation. 3.2.2 Classroom Training Classroom training is perfonned for certification of QA personnel, or for familiarization with new or revised ,1 QA procedures or instructions, must be presented by personnel designated as Instructors. Classroom training presented for certification of Quality personnel shall be conducted in accordance with lesson Plans which have been approved by the Quality Engiaeering Group Supervisor, or Site Discipline Level III, as applicable. All approved lesson plans shall be controlled and maintained by the QA Training Coordinator. Records of attendance at classroaa training shall be. ( documented on attendance records and maintained by the QA Training Coordinator.

BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CP-QAP-2.1 11 6 # 18 ( .JUN 111984 3.2.3 Required Reading Required Reading is intended to supplement fomal classroom training, or when the personnel who require the training have sufficient education or experience to comprehend the topic ~ without formal classroom training. 3.3 DOCUMENTATION Personnel training and certification files are maintained for each employee who has been certified to perfonn a particular function (e.g., audits, inspection, examination ortesting,etc.). 3.3.1 Training and certification Files Personnel training and certification files shall contain - the following documentation, as applicable: a. Certification Record (s), (Attachment 1); b. Personnel Education & Experience Summary (Attachment 2); c. QA/QC Personnel Training History (Attachment 3), canpleted by the QA Training Coordinator; d. Visual Acuity Examination (Attachment 4); Required Reading List (s) (Attachment 5); e. 6 f. Examination Answer Sheets (Attachment 6); g. Work Time Experience Statenents wi th On the Job Training Log (Attachment.7); h. Records of Training Attendance (Attachment 8) and/or Notice of Completion (Attachment 9), relative to certification; and i. A current B&R resume, prepared in the fo nna t of 0. 3.3.2 Access to Training and Certification Files Access to personnel training and certification files shall be controlled by the, QA Training Coordinator. Files shall ( not be removed from the controlled area without the concurrence of the QA Training Coordinator. i

BROWN & ROOT, INC.- ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JUN 11 bb4 (. '~ 7 of 19 CP-QAP-2.1 11 5 3.3.3 Documentation Turnover Personnel training and certification

files, including supporting documentation, shall be transmitted to the Owner by the QA Training Coordinator in accordance with Reference 1-0, when the individual has been terminated from employment at CPSES for more than 6 months or at the completion of the CPSES construction phase.

9 D = f 9 4

SROL'N & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE 1 1 l98' 8 cf 19 cp-GG-2.1 11 N1 Dowfl& Root.hc. QUALITY ASSURAN C CEPARTMD T" CRTIFICATION RECMD W eet? CPsEs Joe No. 35 1195 enee er NAfE: SOCIAL SEC3ITY NO.: CEtTTn CATICN! INITTAL RECERT CUALIFTCATTON SUNGRY E;;ur.ATION: 'HIG4EST LEYEL CF EDUCATION COMPLETED: (SEE PER$0NNE?. EDUGTION MD EXPERIDGE 5UreWif) TRAINING C3 PLETED: (AS APPLICABLE) TuININs SUBJECT TUTAL HOURS C:MPLETD (SEE CA/CC PERSONNE1, IRAlhlNG HIsiGRY) VISION EIMINAHON: (A5 APPU CABLE) cau!xT VISION EnMINAn0N v!RIrIe san 5rACTcRT AT THE UME OF CERTIFICAT!CN VISION EIAMIMAU DN DATE WORK UME EIPGIDCE: (A5 APPLICA8LI) [ TUTAL AC3 D ITED WTE: YRS. MCS. SEE PERSONNEL CUCATIGN AND E1FERII. NGL 56MGRY CERTIFICATION EIAM CATE: (AS APPU CABLE) EIAM NO. DATE Cl>PLETED RAW SC3E WEIGHT VEIGHTED GRACE CDERAL IPECIM C PuCUCAL TYPICAL ~ ~

  • iTPE AND LEVEL CF CERTIFICAUON:

LIMITAUCMS: THIS IS TD CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE NAMED IN IVIDUAL HAS SATISFIED THE QUALIMCAUCN RECUIRE-PENT 5 FCR THE CERUFICATICN STATED A80VE AS CEFINED BY CI-CAP-AND IS CERTTFIED TO PGFCRM SASED UPON I CERnrianCM CATE j j ExPIRAM ON cATE l CGTIFIC ST: CATE i signaturt SITE n;E d'v a III / 51TE *E GANICat, d VEL III f I ( F l l l

SROWN & ROOT, 8HC. ZSSUE CPS::5 NUMBER REVfSTON DATE PAGE C-JOB 35-119~8 m 2.1 11 JUN 11198< 9 ce is ne 2 / l Brown &Tkx1kic. QUALITT ASS'JtANCE CEPARTMENT l PERSCNNEL EDUCATICN & GPGIENCE SlptVUty Project: CPSE3 Joe No. 35-1195 Page of NAME: $3N: HIRE CATE: CUCATION HIGHEST LEYC. OF EIUCATION CDMPL'TED HIGH ECHOCL OR CDLL GE CITY & STATE IAST In::= A:::::Z::: TYPE & DATE OF CE 2EE CR DIPLOMA IF MCRE THAN GNE SCHOCL CHECK HERE y AND C:MPLETE THE ABCVE IMFCRMATTON ON REVERIE. .f99UtY l REFEL9CE CIL*.IPLINg EMPLOYG YRS.

MCS, DC::.ENTATICN I

I I I I I ml I ~, l YY3!Mrs I ' ' i NF L I I I I I l I I l I I I I I I i I I i I i i l' i i l l xs=~ z== x /' l 5 l l -A e .w.m e-e**MN*

    • ~

BROWN & ROOT. fNC. CPSG NLHSER REVISION PAGE (, JOB 35-1195 JUN 111984 10 ce a WA2.1 11 FM7r 3 y ~ b. = 5 E I E 8 n 11 ji g, SE 4' ii ~ w a g ( g f) fG se 0 5 i((9A1 i 4 5 5 h 3 i i 8 I a te li = 5 E /' i (' 4 i.

BROWN & ROOT, INC. g33ye CPSES NUMBER REVISION' CATE' PAGE (~ JOB 35-1195 CP-GP-2.1 11 -JUN 111984 u er is ATX3C7I 4 ^.;- ; _. s VISUAL AcutTY EXAMINATION HAS RECENED THE POLLOWING EYE EXAMINATIONS. 1.NEAR VISION ACUITY USING THE J 1 SCALE OF A SNELLEN /.lAEGER NEAR VISION ACulTY TEIT CARD. QUNCORRECTED PASSED UCORRECTED FAILID

2. OtSTANTVLSION ACUtTY USING A SNELLEN OtSTANTVISION SCALE FOR 20/33 CR BETTER.lN ATM ONE EYE.

CUNCORRECTED PASSED OcoRRECTED FAILED

3. COLOR PERCEPTION TEST USING THE LSHISARA COLOR VISION TEST.0R ITS EQUIVALENT.

NUMBER OF PLATESTESTED NUMBER OF PLATES CORRECTLY READ TYPICAL. i I ( l EzevenertTras Can Caum Transig Caermasser i i i h Y e i ow 6 mm N em w~w w- ,r .-m

BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMSER REVISION DATE PAGE (8c JOB 35-1195 ~ p 2.1 11 JJN 111984 12 ce is Ar m 7r5 BronnerRect.ht QUALITY ASSURMCI CEPARTMENT REQUIRED READING LIST Project: CPSES Job No. 35-1195 Page of EM: SCCIAL SEC'RITY NO: ASSIGNMENT THE 00C' TENT 5 LISTED BELOW ARE TO BE READ AS PART CF YOUR IMOCCTRINATION/CISCIP'.INE TRAINING. J ANY QUESTIONS OR IqRETATION OF DOC:JEE!!T INTENT SHOULD SE DIRECTED TO YOUR SUPERVI5CR. GIKIPLINE LEVEL III QuN.IT1 L%INEER SIGhATJJ. GATE (X)CIMNT INITIAL /:l ATE !X)C'.NENT INITIAL /CATE - ( Ifa n. I (PIPa r "vitL l l l l P l/ l I have read and understand the documents listed above. 5ignature Gate ( t I I s O ,.y_ ,_y ,-e_ m

ISSUE SROUN & ROOT, INC. CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE ( '- Jos as-uss UN 111984, u ce is m2..t u v ATI:Ac5 MENT 6 M[ 13JAUTY AEEURAsocI CEPAJtTMENT CINT!McaticM CLAMINAUCN Md5W6M SD4EI? puuluggn AM NC. (Att? _ Pact _ C7 MAME SS MC. DATE TEI? NC. N AC13C Ae L ASCOE7 % Aat:87

3. Aac E7
4. Aac 57 L Aac 17
15. Aac=U
23. Am: p
41. Aac tp
2. AsC 37 ft Aac=17
25. Aac=U
43. Aac 37 A ASC=O
17. AAC 57
C. Aac tp 4:. Aac:37 L ASCOE7 1L Aac: 8 St. ASC 47
44. AAC Le

(~ ( L Aat::D 15. as. Aac 37

7. Aac 47 3L Aac p llll:.

4a. Aac=p L Am::e t Asc p 3d. AaC=EP

c. Aac=tp S. Aac D
L Aac p
5. Aacl:sp as. Aac=sp
10. MU
. Aac S
35. Aac Ep
48. AsC 17 tt Aac IF
24. Aac:27
27. AAC La gg 43c=g7 l

l

12. Ascetr
5. Am::tp lls. AsC:s7 i
12. ESF
15. ASCOE7
25. Aac17

..) Cr.usIN 09 =A T3 f 6 i e i e

BROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE i ( c J0s as-us5 JUN 111984 u cf u N 2.1 11 rmc 7 i h 33-1195 N4CE MDc 128 CA TRAINDEC CD02:3ATCt Scts FEDN a(ET: CFfts, Job 25.L195 Documancatise of et lion-time Esperimace w ths . haa (secs.aa securuy a.4 canelated montha vert-time as:eerience sa r~ (EI.*.asnea) durias the pertad of te (.wata ama taars tuonts ans Years at (&penser aan Lesaunas I farther attest te the fact that thia -did-ca for sartiftearim spans as - 1 asst 13 paremac of amenal won-cise W this persed sa thia CE method and that peristmasse was nacisfactory. Une above e =* La true and eerrect to the best of my hasvladge. Amy ,e misrey. - --*'- ef the aheve facts any be greenda far w d4 - - ?. g ,e -, _... a,.p. _or Titas a% signature. r- ,,.g. o ( YU$ESET 1Satbas a l s l p-I o. e w m me e -e ~~~

SROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUP.SER REVISION DATE PAG,: I I JOB 35-119s JUN 111982 13 c 13 N 2.1 11 rmT 7 (#-a9 1 I maut

  • Cart 1 1 4 Ins,.eter.uet b.

Certi.fied to at laast L. val 8ADCE # II in the Discipline for vaich

h. is wm atering 0.J.T.

0.J.T. LDC INDICATE Sum 0.J.T. TRADrDic BCCES AND INSPECT.*ON MCBCDS i a.,. c a.. a.,. a a. ; a u m. i a. . m.i a... u w,c., m i..,te,.1 i Matand 1 Meeted mehod i Meched i Method lin.erneteri Trutse. Dm I l l i l l l l I I I L i l i l i I I I I I I I l l I I I I I I I I i l l l I I I I I I l 1 I k. I I l l l l l / /DIA. I I I I I I l ' ' l&Bf I l l l ~'k I I I i l l l l I I l l I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I i I I I I i l I i = md =n. '.Hd 3=".!'=N 94tes:d e e* ca"""d ""="=r 'ad

^""

i sTnmsca mien:.

m L

i t D e== e== SROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE ( J08 35-1195 CP-QAP-2.1 11 JUN 111984 > 16 of 19 ATTACEErr 8 t 5 E c 2 ? g 3 k3 = 2 : 2 S % O g I 5i p a. = g 2 5 aa 2 k E=* t SS: E X ::J. t gy" i 1 m0

  • g

!ME E {" r I t. i u s.* W 4' 8 3 1 o

2 5

Y= ( l e

SROWN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION CATE PAGc ( JOB 35-1195 6 qa 2.1 11 JUN 111984 17 of 19 ATTACHMENT 9 a enn.w s m a a mmr rac. mme. TutNIns i one.cmxT. MDTT G OF CDPteTiam = Onsa UNE: ssN: CDUR2/!SLVA: CIVI3ICN 28 f: 35-1196 LOCATION OF TRAINING: GLD RCTf, TEIAS QATE STAltTCI: CATE 200 TRAININE TM - Hoults: CFT: e T(?ICAI. J -. <. n Project Trsining C.weginat:r ( ~ ~ -

BROWN & ROOT, 8HC. gSSUE CPSES NUMBER REV1510N CATE PAG,.s . ( !~ JOB 35-1195 gg 11 g34 18 of 19 r e ir 10 NAont E 5' MARY CF UPERIDICE J m B '#h-E V L.15 n m. E J ' E CD HH 6 LUInni ti - em N EC* TY9 5 PU50 MAL QATA Date # 81 m Flace of 51 r=3 Ma m tJ e 5:3 t:Js AC*IVI*IU f%D EMICA*ICN Hien Senacl/Cata Graduated Go a iete/ DeerTer Cate.s at.am:ec G I W TICN$ d LA3EUAGE MCIDM"IU I EUICDfT FORU3N UPGIDCE D E N HIS" CRY Caesarry 5tnca Cammy iears Comany v ars Social Secrity No.

  • ata

(~ s_ I w u gp e - * * - * * * -m ,--,-__,~y g -. _. _ _ - m ,.,---y_.

SROL'N & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE ( Jos 35-119s JUN 11198a '19 cf 19 G-c;@-2.1 11 ATTACEMENT 10 (con'c) ra CUAILD PROFI!!IONAL UPU1ENCE Camew & Dates Title Rescoresibili?f es .e Casew & Dates itsie I ras 00RTibilitief e.. ^@ws y l ( E D#h. I d L B H 2"1 m l ~ RR EI ~ IE E 1 E LI had E aL Caucaw & Catas intle ras 30ftsibili*ies Car:aw & Oatas isue EeSOtmS1Dilitd e5 l l (, ( 1 r 4 e. wh e '-"'*M"O" .--.y.,.., - _ _ _, _ _,. _,,. _ _,.,,

_...,. + - s PROCEDURE I REVISION PAGE NUMBER TEXAS UTILmES GENERATING CO CPSES ,,( CP-QP-2.1 16 JUL 17 198M 1 of 16 M[62f (Mk &hf PREPARED BY: DATE / TRAINING OF INSPECTION PERSONNEL W4, 7 APPROVED BY: / /

DATE,

~* i

1.0 REFERENCES

? } 1-A CP-QP-2.0, "Impkementation of the CPSES QA Program" 2.0 GENERAL i 3 The purpose of this procedure is to to establish the minimum I. requirements for training, qualification and certification of Quality Engineers and personnel performing inspection to provide assurance that these personnel have and maintain the appropriate knowledge and skill to properly perfonn their assigned responsibility, i,n accordance with Reference 1-A. The requirements contained herein apply to Quality Engineers i-and Inspection Personnel involved with activities not under the jurisdiction of the ASME Code, Section III, Division I. Certifications issued to personnel meeting the requirements of this procedure may be issued independently for Unit 1 or Unit 2 activities per the applicable Quality Instruction. j 2.1 RESPONSIBILITIES The QC Supervisor is responsible for ensuring that inspection personnel are trained in accordance with appropriate procedures / instructions. The TUGC0 Training QE is designated the responsibility to maintain the inspector personnel training file consistent with this Procedure and applicable Instructions. The TUGC0 Training QE wil1 review the training records for legibility, canple teness, and identification of the item invol ved. t ( N Y/m TUGCC CA ! 7{ v

.I ~ INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION PAGE ^ TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES l Ok CP-Q P-2.1 16 Jtjt,17 1984 2 of 16 1

1 It is of utmost necessity that all personnel involved in quality activities be aware of the certification process and requirements, and take the necessary actions to assure that inspections are perfonned only by certified personnel. The individual inspector / technician / Level III is responsible
  • for detennining his/her current certification status, l

The TUGC0 Quality Engineering Supervisor is responsible for providing classroom training and certification of inspection / j. Level III personnel.. The cognizant discipline Quality Engineer is delegated responsibility to develop individual Training outline; for inspection personnel. 3.0 PROCEDURE l Level I& II personnel perfonning inspections shall have experience in and shall have completed a technical training course in the area of inspection responsibilities. The education, experience and on the job training, specified i in this procedure or supplementary ins tructions may be reduced by the Quality Engineering Supervisor when other ,i factors can provide reasonable assu rance that personnel ,y, can competently perfonn a particular task as prescribed by detailed written Quality Procedures / Instructions. Such decisions shall be documented as part of the certification ,~ process and shall be included in the inspector's personnel

j.

training file. i 3.1 GENERA. INC0CTRINATION AND TRAINING s. The following are minimm indoctrination and training re-quirements for inspection / Level III personnel. Indoctrination requirements shall normally be satisfied within the first sixty days of employment, and shall be documented on General Training shall be completed prior to certification in any Procedure / Instruction, and shall be i l, documented on Attachment 8. Personnel satisfying documented technical training require-ments may be assigned to inspection or testing functions prior to completion of the QA indoctrination requirements. 4 8 M k.l

I n

g INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION PAGE l

TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. ' j CPSES CP-QP-2.1 16 JUL 17 1964 3 of 16 'ij il a. 10CFR50, Appendix B; ANSI N45.2 The method of presentation of this material will be by reading / study assignment, informal discussions, seminars or other appropriate means. An oral review covering ANSI N45.2 and the 18 Criteria will be given q by the responsible QC Supervisor who shall, upon satisfactorf completion, so note by signing the General 'l Indoctrination Outline (Attachment 1). l d b. Industry Standards i 4 Inspection personnel should become familiar wi th prepared standards (ANSI,

IEEE, AWS, AISC, e tc.)

q applicable to assigned duties as assigned by the QC Supervi sor. The method of present.ation may be through i s tu dy, fonnal semin*a rs, or other appropriate means. j Supplemental exposure is acquired by daily association b with these standa rds. The familiarization is a continuing process and as such requires no formal j' checkout. 1 a c. 10CFR50.55(e) and 10CFR 21 The method of presentation will be by assigned reading, study and/or training sessions. Upon completion and y understanding of the basic requirenents as they relate d to job duties and responsiblities, the individual shall j so note by signing the Indoctrination Outline. Formal Q or informal study sessions shall emphasize the need for 3 prompt reporting of product deficiencies or failures. i d. Inspection personnel shall become familiar with 2 prepared CPSES Site Procedures and Instructions that 1 are applicable to all asigned inspection duties, but do not require certification. The method of presentation may be .by reading /s tudy assignment, infonnal di scus sions, seminars or other appropriate means. An 1 oral checkout covering applicable Site Procedures / Instructions will be given by the individual QC Supervisor who shall upon satisfactory completion, so note by signing the General Training Outline, Attachment ? 8. This outline shall be completed prior to,certifica-1 tion in any activity. i maco cA I ro,m ~.., l l

q, PROCEDURE REVISION PAGE

1 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.

CPSES d l C P-Q P-2.1 16 JUL 1 7 1984 4 of 16 d. .T ] l r.1 j 3.2 PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES l There are three levels of qualification. The requirements for each level are not limiting with regard to organiza-tional. position or professional status, but rather, are limiting with regard to functional activities. ,,j 3.2.1 OC Technician (Level I) Capabilities A QC Technician shall be capable of performing the inspec- ~ i' tions, examinations, and tests that are requi red to be perfonged in accordance with documented instructions. The 4 individual shall be familiar. with the tools and equipment

i to be employed and shall have demonstrated proficiency in their use.

The individual shall also be capable of determining that the calibration status of inspection and measuring equipment is ' current, that the measuring and test i equipment is in proper condition for use, and that the i inspection, examination, and test procedures are approved. 1 t .,l 1 3.2.2 OC Inspector (Level II) Capabilities i 4 .I A QC Inspector shall have all of the capabilities of a QC Technician for the inspection, examination or test. I Addi tionally, a QC Ins pector shall have demonstrated capabilites in planning inspections, examinations, and i4 tests; in setting up tests including preparation and set-up d of related equipment, as appropriate; in supervising or il maintaining surveillance over the inspections, examinations,

j and tests; in reporting inspection, examinations, and l4 testing results; and in evaluating the validi ty and i

acceptability of inspection, examination, and test results. 1 ] 3.2.3 Level III Personnel Caoabilities A Level III person shall have the technical capabilities of a QC Inspector in generating and perfonning inspection, i examination or test. In addition, the individual shall also i be capable of evaluating the adequacy of specific programs used to train and test inspection, examination 3, and test personnel whose qualifications are covered by this procedure. NOTE: At CPSES, Level III personnel are generally assigned to the-Quality Engineering Depa rtnent. TUGCO OA %g3 1 >--w m-c--

c._.,._ l PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAG"" NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. k CP-Q P-2.1 16 JUL 1 7 1984 5 of 16 4 } } 3.3 EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE j The following is the rec amended personnel education;and experience for each level. These education and experience recommendations should be treated to recognize that other factors may provide reasoncble assurance that a person can competently perfonn a particular task. Other factors which I may demonstrate capability in a given job are previous per-i fomance or satisfactory completion of capability testing. Use of the measures outlined in th'is section to establish that an individual has the required qualifications in lieu of required education and experience shall result in documented objective evidence (i.e., procedures and record of written test) demonstrating that the individual indeed i does have "caparable" or "equiv'alent" competence to that i which would be gained from having the required education 4 and experience. This detennination shall be made by the Quality Engineering Supervisor. i 3.3.1 OC Technician (Level I) lj A QC Technician shall have: a. High school graduation and six months of rela ted experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or g testing activities, or

3 b.

Completion of college level work leading to an t Associate Degree in related discipline plus three

1 months of related experience in equivalent inspection,
i examination, or testing activities, or

,i c. Four-year college degree with no experience in equiva-lent inspection, examination or testing activities. 3.3.2 QC Inscector (Level II) I A QC Inspector shall have: a. One year of satisfactory perfomance as QC Technician in the corresponding inspection, examination or test category, or b. High school graduation plus three years.of rela ted experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, or maco cA wom, n a

j.. fia PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAG"* ,) NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES .Ej ( CP-QP-2.1 16 JUL 1 7 1584 6 of 16 1 ~ j b

1 c.

Completion of college level work leading to an

  1. i Associate Degree in a related discipline plus one. year related experience in equivalent inspection, examina-tion, or testing activities, or Y'

d. Four-year college graduation plus six months of related L, experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or j testing activities. 3.3.3 Level III PERSONNEL i' A Level III shall have: 1 i a. Six years of satisfactory perfomance as a QC Inspector '] in the corresponding inspection, examination or test category, or i

i b.

High school graduation plus ten years of related ex-j perience in equivalent inspection, examination,. or fj testing activi ties, or high school graduation plus eight years experience in equivalent inspection, i examination, or testing activities, with at least two .j years as QC Inspector and with at least two years asso-a ciated with nuclear facilities--or if not, at least - 4 sufficient training to be acquainted with the relevant . i quality assurance aspects of a nuclear facility,.or i 9 c. Completion of college level work leading to an 1 Associate Degree and seven years of related experience )j in equivalent inspection, examination, or testing activities, with at least two years of this experience 1 associated with nuclear facilities--or if not, at least j sufficient training to be acquainted with the relevant '.j quality assurance aspects of a nuclear facility, or d. Four-year college graduation plus five years of related

.i experience in equivalent inspection, examination, or

{ testing activities, wi th at least two years of this j experience associated with nuclear facilities--or if not, at least sufficient training to be acquainted with the relevant qua'ity assurance aspects of a nuclear j facili ty. i 3

1..

i TUGCO CA 3 e

l ~ PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE a TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. I i CPSES i (. CP-QP-2.1 16 jgt 17 1cg4 7 of 16 a '= a l 3.4 PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS Each person who perfoms inspections shall be physically capable of perfonning the assigned task. As a minimum, inspection personnel shall have: a. Natural or corrected near distance acuity such that the inspection person is capable of reading J-1 letters on a standard Jaeger's test type chart for near vision or equivalent test type. This. test shall be perfomed annually. b. Color vision as applicable. .j NOTE: Waivers may be granted on a case-by-case basis by the TUGC0 Site Quality Engineering a Supervisor. 3.5 ON THE JCS TRAINING (0JT) 3 Minimum on the job training requirements are established within each discipline instruction. OJT shall be given i; under the direct supervision of a qualified, certified Level I 0JT instructor, whose qualification shall be documented on the instructor qualification fom (Attachment 2). Certification as a 1.evel II Inspector shall automatically certify the individual as an OJT Instructor, q 3.6 EXAMINATIONS .t i Examinations may be oral, written, practical or any canbina-tion thereof. Discipline or functional supervisors are re-sponsible for administering oral and/or practical examina-tions as evidence of proficiency and assembling the results in a manner suitable for a review by the Quality Engineering ~ staff, who shall administer a written examination. Waivers for any examinations must be approved by the Quality Engineering Supervisor. 3.7 CERTIFICATION Quality Engineering personnel shall be certified by the Site QA Manager and Quali ty Engineering Supe rvisor as being qualified to perfom their assigned tasks, by a letter to be placed in the personnel, training file. Attachments 1, 5 and 8 are applicable to Quality Engineers. TUGCO CA

....-c..----- . ~ - - - - - gROCEDURE REVISION PAGE ISSUE JUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CP-Q P-2.1 16 JUL 17 M 8 of 16 ( CPSES I I i NOTE: Discipline Certificaticn for Quality Engineers is as follows: a) Mechanical, including: Structural Class.V Supports. Hiltis i Welding i Raceway Supports Instrumentation i Rad Waste i i

  • b)

Civil, including: Concrete Protective Coatings j The mo-lag c) Electrical, including: Raceway Cable Installation Equipment i Separations Soldering Instrumentation Fire Protection i Cable Tenninations Lighting g Inspection personnel shall be certified by the TUGC0 Site 1 QA Manager and applicable discipline Level III as being i qualified to perfonn their assigned tasks. The Inspection Certification Fonn (Attachment 3) shall be used to document this certification. The Inspection Certification Fonn shall be placed in the person's file along with the individual's i Training Outline (s). The effective period of certification i shall be one (1) year, at which time the individual will be evaluated fo r recertification by his/her QC Supe rvi so r. This evaluation will be documented on the recertification evaluation fonn (Attachment 7) and if daemed appropriate after the evaluation, as delineated by the recertification evaluation fonn, additional formal training /0JT/or retesting 1-may be required before recertification. The recertification evaluation form shall be forwarded to the TUGC0 Training QE, for review by the applicable. Level III. After review, an individual may be recertified on the Quality Control re-certification fonn ( Attachment 4) which along with the re-l certification evaluation fa nn shall remain a part of the j individuals file. TUGCC CA

~ } PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE 1 NUMBER DATE j TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES j ( CP-QP-2.1 16 Jgt I 7 ggg4 9 of 16 .l = 'i When proj ect requirenents dictate an individual may be certified to a limited scope of an inspection activity. The limited scope certification shall be doctsnented on the Inspection Certification Fonn (Attachment 3) and shall clearly delineate the inspection authority given the ins pector. Discipline or functional supervisors may request additional training and recertification of personnel under their 4 '? control at any time that perfomance warrants. 3.8 MAINTENANCE OF PERSONNEL CERTIFICATIDNS 3.8.1 The TUGC0 Training QE shall be responsible for 'i updating of QC technician's and inspector's certifications when procedures / instruction revisions are made. i~ 3.8.2 This certification maintenance shall be by fomal training and/or required reading. Formal training will be conducted by the TUGC0 Training QE or the cognizant di scipline Quality Engineer. Updating by required reading shall be the responsibility of the Discipline / Functional QC Supervisor j under the direction of the TUGC0 Training QE. ~3.8.3 This certification maintenancp will be documented on a fomal Classroom Attendance Sheet (Attachment 5) or a { Required Reading Completion Fonn (Attachment 6). The 2 applicable fonn will be maintained by the TUGC0 Training QE in the technician's/ inspector's training file. 1 i 1 l TUGCO OA -,-.v. e n

-.g...-. ...-.~... ... s. .:...w. ..-w..-..w-l I INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE . TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. 3; CPSES J CP-QP-2.1 16 jut I7 334 9 of 16 j.( LJ ATTACHMENT 1 i.4 ..f'e. i COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION: .} GENERAL INLOCTRINATION TRAINING ,j TO BE COMPLETED BY: (60 Days Atter Employmen.t) .1 3 NA'ME DOCUMENT = i-1. Final Safety Analysis Report . 'i. Chapter (s) 17, 'k .4 2. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations 3 Part 50, Appendix B and ANSI N45.2 s '} 3. NRC Regulatory Guides (As Assigned)* 4. Industry Standards (As Assigned)

  • f,,

5. CA/QC Procedures and Instructions r (As Assigned)* e 6. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21 and 10CFR50.55E i ,1 7. Other applicable documents as listed

t below

,N ?, t VERIFIED BY DATE 'l ,1 CUTLINE APPROVED BY: .1 'I A. Vega SITE QA MANAGER '}

  • NCTE: If Item "NOT' APPLICABLE
  • so State on outline

-1 i 4 '4 i D F TUGCO CA

.. ~. _ _ _. _. _ _ _. REVISION ISSh3 PAGE INSTRUCTION NUMBER DAec i . TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES l l JUL 17 584 10 of 16 CP-QP-2.1 16 ) * ( .6 .q i ATTACHMENT 2 4 5 1 i 7 g i I l I O TEXAS UTILITIES CENERATINC C0F1ANY -3 QUALITY ASS'URANCE DEPARTMENT ..i INSTRUCTOR QUALIFICATION 2 g -f NAME: DATE: j-LEVEL OF CIETIFICATION: 1

g ACTIVITY CETIIyIED TO If2FOPJf:

s i ,3 TUCCO PROCCURE/ INSTRUCTION NO.: .] TYPE OF EXAMINATION CITEN: ORAL VRITTEN PRACTICAL RESULT OF EIAMINATION(s): I COMMENTS: Based upon a consideratio'. of the education, previous work Q experience, formal training in the current revision of the CPSES procedure / g instruction, and the individual's own on-the-job training, a previous certification has been made for this Q.C. Technician in this activity. .j a sattefactory evaluation of the individual's demonstrated prcficiency .t in the performance of daily work has now been ande, and, with recognition 'I that the CPSES QC inspector training program addresses specific QC -{ inspection functions, it is fr.lt that there is reasonable assurance that the individual;can competently perform as an CUT QC Instructor in this ); activity. This certification specifically covers giving CUT' instruction ..[ in this procedure, including the use of personal knowledge and observatica to participate in the on-The-Job Q.C. Trainee's instruction, a i This OJT Training Certification expires on t /j i i I. Level III

\\

1 h Quality Engineering Sus:ervisor i i l 4 I O I i TUGCC CA Arm Nel 1

7 INSTRUCTION REVISION PAGE NUMSER I ' TEXAS UTluTIES GENERATING CO. ~' f CPSES I CP-QP-2.1 16 JUL 17 1984 11 of 16 i '. (' ATTACHMENT 3 4 ? ) TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT INSPECTION CERTIFICATION NAME DATE ~ h LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION f ACTIVITY CERTIFIED TO PERFORM: UNTIL + 2 ~ TUGC0 PROCEDyRE/ INSTRUCTION NO: .i i TYPE OF EXAMINATION ORAL WRITTEN PRACTICAL RESULTS OF EXAMINATI'ON: 41. COMMENTS: 3, RELATED EXPERIENCE: YEARS MONTHS i EDUCATION: GRADUATION / DEGREE 4 FO'. MAL TRAINING HRS. COMPLETED 'j d DJT TRAINING HOURS COMPLETED THIS ACTIVITY EXAMINATION: EVALUATED ON: WITH CONSIDERATION OF RECORDS OF ) EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING, JOB PROFICIENCY AND 1 i DEMONSTRATED SKILL BY 9 ] PHYSICAL HEALTH FOR AS$1GNED TASK OF THIS 1 PROCEDURE / ACTIVITY. RECOMMEND ASSIGNMENT AS A LEVEL j WITH KE-EVALUATION OF JOB PERFORMANCE AND PROFICIENCY ON 3R A600T: .h } Level !!! TUGC0 QA Manager DATE DATE 4 TUGCC CA enem na. s

.-e.- - m. r .~ ; f. ; ---- INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUNIBER DATE t . TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. 4 CPSES CP-QP-2.1 16 JUL 17 584 12 of 16 ATTAC.HMENT 4 'ei I 1 r .s 4 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ..J CUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT CUALITY CONTROL RECERTIFICATION NAME: DATE: LEVEL OF CERTIFICATION: e ACTIVITY CERTIFIED TO PERFORM TUGCD PROCEDURE / INSTRUCTION NO. (S) : .i NOTE: SEE RECI.ASSIFICATION EVALUATION FORM. -i COMMENTS: BASED ON PREVIOUS CERTIFICATION IN THIS ACTIVITY, AND CONTINUED SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE, THE ABOVE NAMED INDIVIDUAL IS HEREBY RECERTIFIED AND AUTHORIIED TO FERFORM ACTIVE CC INSPECTICNS AT CPSES IN THE AREAS LISTED ABOVE. THIS RECERTIFICATION WILL EXPIRE ON SUPERVISOR APPROVAL DATE ~ DATE ~~ 9 TUGCC CA e.- un.

i INSTRUCTION IS3U REVISION PAG: i NUMBER DATE 4 TEXAS UTilJTIES GlENERATING Co. 'I CPSES CP-QP-2.1 16 JUL 1 7 1984 13 of 16 !!( l4 'i -] ATTACHMENT 5 .i.

k

? TRAINING RECDRD CD%NO4E PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION j (,. DATE! 'i TE trCERSIGED AgkNOM.E!I5E RECE!PT & FORMAL TRAINING IN: e i GIVEM BY? (INSTRUCTOR) THIS DATE, AT CDMANOE PEAK PRCUECT. 'i N M (P9fMTE) SIGNATLPf RAfrE 4 1121 i I r I-i. i s J + e ', } i l1 i]i l i

1. -

i INsmucTm'S SIGNATlRE [] IbtRS & TMINING? l l! ' T!m-i [(, TUGCC CA -. ~....

_-~

z INSTRUCTION ISSUE ESlON PAGE NUMBER DATE f*~~

iEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES i( - CP-QP-2.1 16 JUL 1 7 1384 i 14 of 16 1 4 ATTACHMENT 6 'l 1 i .j 4 TRAINING RECORD ^* CDMAMCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STAT!0N RE0u! RED READING COMPLET!ON J's e DATE g 1 THE UNDERSIGNED HAS READ AND UNDERSTANDS REVISION OF /j I i NAME (PRINTED)_ $!GMATURE SADGE i $$N 1 .) - t .1 i 4 4 4 d -i .] 1 S

s

'l b, 3

  • t I

i. i s 'l I OUILD!aG/QC SUPERvl50E l l TUGCC CA e..-... .,-.,,-e w - -,,,, - - -, - - - -, - - r-- m

22. -._.

INSTRUCTICi1 i ISSUE nNSION O '- 1 NUMBER I DATE 1 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. l l CPSES

j CP-QP-2.1 16 g ),7 1984 15 of 16 I,

at ATTACHMENT #7 .i i COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATICN RECERTIFICATION EVLAUATION RECORD 3 L DATE: -l . TO: ~: The certification on procedure for j is due to expire on l Please conduct Jind oral and or written / practical evaluation with .) the above named individual ( and document the results below). 'l This evaluation will help with determining whether or not recert- 'l ification should occur. j 1. Has the individual been active in inspection in this area during the last 6 - 12 months. _ YES _ NO g .4 (la) If above answered "NO" and you desire individual recertified, additional training and or OJT should accompany this form hack to training CE. a 2. Is individual knowledgable of current precedure requirement revelent 4 to this area of inpsection? ' jl J. YES FC j (2a) If 82 answered *NO" refer to (la) above. l COMMENTS: d 9:

3 I

j INSPECTOR / TECHNICIAN CATE QC SUPERVISCR/ LEAD D ATE TRAINING CE/ DISCIPLINE L111 CATE QE SL*PERVISOR DATE 't t ( i t I TUGCO CA

e

  • F~ -

I t INSTRUCTICN ISSUE REVISION EACE NUMBER O ^* ~' C 1 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES CP-QP-2.1 16 JUL 1 i l934 16 Of'16 ( i ii ATTACHMENT #8 i i COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ~ GENERAL TRAINING OUTLINE C ~ ~ ~ ~~ * '~ *" CP-CP-2.1 REV. _ THIS OUTLINE SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO CERTIFICATION IN ANY ACTIVITY = NAME: DATE COMMENCED.: Document: Sienatrure/Date A. General CP-QP's: }. CP-QP-2.0, " Implementation of CPSES QA PROGRAM" 2. CP-QP-3.0, "CPSES SITE CA/CC ORGAN-IZATICN" 3. C?-CP-2.1, " TRAINING OF INSPECTION PERSCNNEL" 4. CP-QP-13.0, " CONTROL OF MEASURING AND I TEST EQUIPMENT

  • 5.

CP-QP-15.0, " TAGGING SYSTEM" 6. CP-CP-16.0, "NONCONFORMANCES" t 7. CP-QP-18.0, " INSPECTION REPORTS" I 8. CP-QP-19.5, " SURVEILLANCE OF PLANT .j CONDITIONS" j

=====_ fB. NCN-QA/QC RELATED PROCEDURES: ~ 1. CP-CPM 6.3. " PREPARATION, APPROVAL AND CONTROL i OF OPERATIONAL TRAVELERS" 2. CP-CPM 6.10,

  • INSPECTED ITEM REMOVAL NOTICE FORM" C.

OE. OC Lead /Suoervisor has reviewed and discussed the above wtth individual. VERIFIED BY: CATE DATC M+(d'a/ TRAINING OUTLINE APPROVED BY n%. AT VEGA g TUCCO SITE OA MANAGER t I TUCCO CA Fecn se,

PROCE RE I REVISION PAGE ug TEXAS UTIUTIES GENERATING CO CPSES '( CP-QP-3.0 15 JUL 3 0198 1 of 6 Mmbd, p /, f, /h 7-37#<4 I PREPARED BY: ~ Y [ CPSES SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL ORGANIZATION APPROVED ~BY: g-es A" 7~'MU "g DATE CONTROLLE) C03Y

1.0 REFERENCES

1-A TUGC0/TUSI CPSES QA Plan C 0'N T R O L N o. m. o n o 1-B CP-QAP-3.1, "B&R Site QA Organization"

2. 0 GENERAL The purpose of this document is to outline the organizational structure as well as individual duties and responsibilities of the CPSES. Site Quality Assurance / Quality Control staff during the construction phase.

This procedure is not directly applicable to activities under the jurisdiction of .the ASME Code, Section III, Division 1. i 3.0 PROCEDURE ~3.1 TUGC0 SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER 1 The duties and responsibilities of the Site (Construction) QA Manager are defined in Reference 1-A. These duties and responsibilities are implemented through the organizational structure depicted in Figure 1 and as described in this doct ment. l i 3.2 RIGC0 QUALITY CONTROL SUPERVISOR The Quality Control Supervisor reports to~ the Site Quality Assurance Manager and is responsible for the fol lowing Quality Assurance / Control functions: a. Review of and conment on quality procedures / instructions. Approval of quality procedures as requested by the TUGC0 Site QA Manager. Approval of quality instructions as requested by Quality Engineering Supsyy sor.

e. f f 6, ho,., 6 %v I ua u.u l

TUGC0 CA 251=L@ gal 388477

PROCEDURE PAGE TEXAS UTIUTIES GENERATING CO. CPSES j ( CP-QP-3.0 15 JUL 3 01984 2 of e b. Coonfination with the CPSES Construction and Engineering Groups to assure that inspection planning is completed in a timely manner. Provide basic' indoctrination and required training for c. assigned quality control personnel. d. Represent the Site QA Manager in his absence. e. Has the authority to stop specific work activities pending disposition of quality related problems. f. Identify, document and, when assigned, verify co.rrective action to deficiencies and nonconformances. 3.3 B&R SITE QA MANAGER L-The ' specific duties and responsibilities of the B&R Site QA Manager, relative to ASME functions, are described in Reference 1-B. Addi tional ly, this position provides [ administrative support for B&R personnel assigned to the functional groups descr1 bed herein. 3.4 STAFF Staff personnel assist the Site Quality Assurance Manager as requested. Basic functions include: a. Involvement in regulatory and licensing matters. i -b. Assist in labor and personnel administrative issues. l c. Provide basic technical training as requested. d. Special Projects as assigned. 3.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE SUPERVISOR The QA Supervisor is responsible to the Site QA Manager for the following Quality Assurance and Records Management functions : t a. Review of and comment on quality procedures / instructions, as requested. Approval of quali ty procedures as requested by the Site QA Manager. Approval of quality instructions as requested by Quality Engineering Supervisor. i maco cA ww, n.. s .,,-v e,-a

r--

r - - - ~ - - - --m-

r

.+--e.T -r--ri---w-- e----- r- --+-~- - -

PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION NUMBER DATE PAGE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES CP-QP-3.0 15 JUL 3 01984 3 of s b. Coordinatio~n with the CPSES Construction and Engineering groups in his areas of responsibility. c.- Provide basic indoctrination and requi red technical training for Quality Assurance personnel in his areas of responsibility. d. Assist and/or represent the-Site QA Manager as requested. e. Supervise the planning and administration of the TUGC0 QA Construction /Startup/ Turnover surveillance program. f. Assist the Site QA Manager in resolution of NRC matters, as requested. g. Schedule and implement Quality Assurance activities in areas of responsibility. h. Identify, document, and when assigned, veri.fy corrective action to deficiencies and nonconformances. i. Has the authority to stop specific work activi ties pending disposition of quality related problems. j. Responsible for interviewing QA/QC personnel upon departure fran the QA/QC organization and for follow up of this program, k. Assure that required Code Data Fonns for CPSES design and installation activities have ber.n completed in a timely manner. 1. Identify and assure resolution of record deficiencies. m. Assist in the development and implementation of the CPSES QA Record program. n. Assist in the prearation of repo rts su ch as i NRC 10CFR50.55(e) NRC Report items, SDAR's and OER's. a. Coordinate activities between Pennanent Plant Records Vault and CPSES Automated Records Management System (ARMS) personnel to assure reconi retrieval. TUGCC CA 3

PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE g TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. I( CP-QP-3.0 15 JUL 3 01984 4 of 6. CPSES 3.6 QUALITY ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR The Quality Engineering Supervisor reports to the TUGC0 QA Manager and is responsible for the following: a.. Development and approval of Quality Procedures and l Instructions, b. Review and comment. of engineering. and construction procedures / instructions, c. Coordination with Engineering, Construction and Quality Control personnel in planning work activities. d. Provides technical direction-and suppo rt to Quality Control personnel for the resolution of quali ty problems. e. Provides training as requested and certification of QC personnel. f. Identi fy,

docment, and when
assigned, verify corrective action to deficiencies and nonconfonnances.

g. Review and approval of Cons truction procedures and instructions, h. Review quali ty related docmentation and reports for trend development and take or recommend corrective action, where appropriate. i. As sure empliance of site procurement activities to established CPSES QA requirenents, j. Monitor selected activities for compliance with project requirements. k. Review and approval of Construction Travelers and nonconformance reports. 1. Review and approval of selected subcontractor and ASiE Quality procedure and instructions. l 3.7 QC SUPERVISORS Building QC Supervisors report directly to the QC Super /isor and have the following duties and responsibilities: I TUGCO CA 1 ~-~ ,,w r->,r----,m.-y-----en.,,w< 3,.py,--y-y ,-%-_,,1 m,- _-,.,.-9 -my-_>%s-%_v-.a p. .m,w,.,,,-,-m i..-wre. .re...w w- --e .,w

PROCED RE f REVISION PAGE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES ( CP-Q P-3. 0 15 JUL 3 01984 5 of 6 a. Review of and comment on quality procedures / instructions. b. Schedule and implement Quality Control activities. c. Assure.that assigned QC personnel are trained and certified to perfonn inspection and testing functions in accordance with established requirments. d. Has the authori ty to stop specific work activities pending disposition of quality related problems. Coordinate with the CPSES Constbetion and Engineering e. groups to assure inspections are conpleted in a timely manner. f. Identify, document, and when assigned, verify corrective action to deficiencies and nonconfomances. g. Review and approval of inspected iten renoval notices. l 3.8 QA SECRETARY The QA Secretary provides basic secretarial / clerical support for the Site QA Manager and staff personnel and has the following specific duties and responsibilities: a. Establish and maintain files relative to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection reports, bulletins, etc. b. Establish and maintain files rela tive to fonnal and infomal reports by TUGC0 to the NRC concerning significant construction deficiencies within the requirements of 10CFR 50.55 (e). c. Supervise assigned clerical personnel, i TUGCO CA Form No. 3

+ ..e 0gmOC2m uD miCm n .Dka Oz >O 2 CEC @ Ob1m D imgmcgcdmtnO $mn.% gg gO Oo"mM oD cCFMo._(CA o% m n n 8o7w.C o ~ ?.

n. sDErn *-

C e I 8 . ij. t i-I u* g '": g Ey ~ Qg g g M w RO a S I V R EP U s S AQ V RA T AE QR C E S RG E M T Y 1 0TE CIC GLN 0 UAA C TUR G QU U S T SA F F A T S RO S I V R E P U S C Q S_ A t E t T A I ER D S TE IG SA R A' F H A ,s BC 2o O o> ,129 w .!i il, ,i e i i' I ,t 4 I' i.

o PROCEDURE I REVISION PAGE NUMBER TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO CPSES ( 4UG 10 GS4

P-QP-2.2A o

1 of 7 g[/gej REPARED y TRAINING AND DAM CERTIFICATION OF UNIT 2 RECORDS VERIFICATION PERSONNEL 7 APPROVED SY:

f. [

U OATE

1.0 REFERENCES

D N Y ~ 1-A CP-CPM 7.1, " Package Flow Control" 2.0 GENERAL .T m. m R 2.1 PLRPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to establish the requirer.ents for the trai61ng and certification of personnel involved in the verification review of QA recoMs for Unit 2 in accordance with Reference 1-A. k 2.2 RESPONSIBILITY 2.2.1 Personnel Selection The Package Flow Group (PFG) Coordinators are responsible for the selection and supervision of records verification personnel and for ensuring that personnel receive training in accordance with this procedure. 2.2.2 Training and Certification I The TUGC0 Quality l Engineering Supervisor is responsible for the adminstration of the training and certification requirements established in this procedure. 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 EDUCATION & EXPERIENCE Personnel perfonning records verification activities shall have a high school education and six months of related experience in handling or reviewing QA recods. Other factors may provide reasonable assurance that an individual is capable of the assigned task. This d e inatjon is made by the QE Supervisor. 's /\\ h I" P I( Y b b '".I.) 7 Y/,/E 4guecedze y.-

1 PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. ( CP-QP-2.2A 0 AUG 10 E84 2 of 7 3.2 TRAINING Training shall consist of cepletion of a QA Program in-doctrination (Attachment 1) and a specific training course (Attachment 2) through fonnal classroan training docunented on Attachments 1 and 2. NOTE: Specific procedures may be added or deleted as directed by the QE Supervisor. i 3.3 ON THE JOB TRAINING (0JT) Each person shall receive a minimum *of 40 hours of on the job training under the direct supervision of the PFG co-oNinator or a person certified to this procedure. 3.4 EXAMINATION Assigned members. of the Quali ty Engineering staff shall administer a written examination (s) to test the trainees knowledge of the material presented on Attachment 2. ( 3.5 CERTIFICATION RecoMs verification personnel shall be certified by the appropriate PFG Coordinator and the TUGC0 Quali ty Engineering Supervisor as being qualified to perfonn their assigned tasks. A Letter of Certification (Attachment 3) shall be placed in the personnel training file maintained by the TUGC0 Training QE and a copy forwarded to the Brown & Root Training Coordinator. 3.6 MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION The PFG Coordinators are responsible to ensure that personnel receive training in revisions to required procedures /in-structions. This training shall be required reading and/or formal classroom training. This certification maintenance is docunented on a fannal classroan attendance sheet (Attachment 4 or a Required Reading Completion Fonn (Attachment 5)). The applicable fann is maintained in the personnel training file by the TUGC0 Training QE and a copy forwarded co the Brown & Root Training Coordinator. TUGCO CA %g 3 i

INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUM;ER DATE s TEXAS UTIUTIES GENERATING CO. CnES cP-QP-2.2A o AUG 101984 3 of 7 ( ATTACHMENT 1 C(MANCHE PEAK STEM ELECTRIC STATION QA PROGRAM IN00CTRICATION TO BE COIPLETED BY: (40) Days After Employment) NAME: DOCUMENT: ' Title'thCodeofFederalRegulations. 1. ( Part 50. Appendix 8. 2. AN51 N45.2 & M45.2.9. 3. Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations. Part 21 and 10CFR50.55E. 4 Final Safety Analysis Report Chapter 17.1. 5. CP-QP-2.0

  • !mplementation of the CP5ES QA Program".

Presented by: QE Date OUTLINE APPROVED BY: A. Vega Cate $1TE QA MANAGER TUGCC CA Perm Pee, t I ~

INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION NUMEER DATc PAGE

  • TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.

CPSES CP-QP-2.2A o AUG 101984 4 of 7 ( ATTACHMENT 2 C04ANCHE PEAK STEM ELECTRIC STATION RECORDS VERIFICATION PERSONNEL TRAIN!NG N#tE: SECTION A. 1. CP-CP-16.0. "Nonconfomance Reports" 2. CP-QP-18.0. " Inspection Reports" 3. CP-QAP-16.1. " Control of Nonconfaming items" 4. CP-CP-2.2A, " Training and Certification of tJnit !! Records Verification Personnel" 5. CP CFM-7.1 & Appendices. " Package Flow Control" EIM SCORE: y QE DATE ( SECTION B. 1. CP-CPM-6.3. " Preparation. Approval arid Control of Operation Travelers" 2. CP-CPM-6.10. " Inspected Items Removal Notice" 3. EEI-6. " Class IE Cable Pull Cards and Vault Control" 4. CP-CPM-8.1. " Receipt. Storage. & Issuance of Items" 5. CCP-14 " Concrete Prepour Inspection & Pour Card Sign Off" EXAM SCORE QE DATE SECTION C. 1.- CP-CPM-6.98. " Weld Filler Material. Control" 2. CP-CPM-6.9G. " Documentation for ASME Welding and Installation Activities

  • 3.

CP-CPM-9.9. "Non-Seismic Category !! Supports"

  • 4 CP-CPM-9.10. " Fabrication of ASME Related Canponent Supports" 5.

WES-16. " Schedule of Standard Test. Weld Qualification Matrix and Welder Performance Qualification Log" EIN4 SCORE QE CATE

  • Hanger Package Flow Group Only NOTE: Only those portions of the above procedures pertinent to records verification will be addressed during these training classes.

ro,m %, TUGCC CA

INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION NUM ER DATE PAGE TEXAS UTluTIES GENERATING CO, CPSES CP-QP-2.2A 0 a.tjG 10198L 5 of 7 'l ATTACHMENT 3 TEXAS ITTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY e RECORDS VERIFICATION CERTIFICATION NAME DATE Essed on consideration of education, experience, training. examination, and demonstrated proficiency,the above named individual is certified to perform records verification activities in accordance with CP-CPM 7.1. ( PFG, COORDINATOR TUGCO.- QUALIIT ENGINEERING SUPERVISOR ~~ .~~ TUGCO CA

INSTRUCTION ISSUE WSION PAGE NUMBER DATE < TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO. CPSES CP-QP-2.2A 0 a.UG 101984 6 of 7 k ATTACHMENT 4 TRAIN!?G RECORD CD%foiE PEAK STEM ELECTRIC STATICN DATE! THE tfCERSIGNED ACXtOLEIEE RECEIFT CF SPECIALIZED TRAIN!?G !N( GIVD! BY! (IttSTRUCTOR) THIS DATE, AT CPn4CHE PEAK PRCUECT. NArde (potP m] MidNATlDE PAT * # 13 / \\ ItasTRUCTCR'S 5iGNAitFE IDURS CF TRA!N!?lG: IttE: 9 TUGCC CA pom, % i

INSTRUCTION ISSUE DN N BM DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO, CPSES CP-QP-2.2A 0 AUG 101984 7 of 7 ATTACHMENT 5 it.1:.:r,c tiiirt. CDMANCHL PEAK STEN! ELECTRIC STA11014 REDUIRED READING COMPLETION DATE THE UNDER$1GNED 18AS READ AND UNDER$TANDS REVI5!DN OF e $1GNATURE BADGE f SSN .NAME (PRINTED)_ t s t E'JILDINC./00 Surf Py!50P, I TUCCO C'A %g,

~ BROMN & ROOT, INC. ISSUE CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE s J08 35-1195 CP-QAP-3.1 7 AUG 201984 8 of 19 ATTACif4ENT 1 B&R OA/0C ORGANIZATION CPSES B&R SITF GA MCD OA ADMIN 9 FER CTARY QE GROUP QC GROUP 9UPCRVT90R 9fpcRVT90R l MECHANICAL QA/QC BLDG. QA/QC BLDG. NOF IFVFI TTI I FVFI_ TTT 91pF RV T 90R StlPF RV T S OR ASME QA/QC N-5 OA 9FRVTCF9 RFFFTV T NG SilpC RVT 90R NTC44T9HfFT OCF TRAINING / PROCEDURES cnORnTNATOR FO!A-85-59 /97 i

O, laonuuut.Aud av yuntiar nh uhAHLc ANU QLAliiY CUf4FROL /M7") I .}}{'7l'?% g [ gg g./ QA/0C Slide Taoe 1 (, Quality assurance and quality control are activities vital to the continued growth and success of Brown & Root. While quality engineering and construction have been Brown & Root's trade = ark for =any years, the Company faces increased demands for quality as it dive:sifies into the complex and demanding field of nuclear power. This presentation will introduce you to the subject of quality assurance and quality concrol and explain how it affects Brown & Root's engineering and construction activities. The.U'.S. Govern =ent has established special requirements which must be met by companies who design, construct or operate nuclear power plants or who manufacture or supply ite=s or services for nuclear power plants. Since Brown & Root is deeply involved in nuclear, power plant design and construction, it must have a program of quality assurance not just because such a progra= helps to maintain the quality of the Company's work, but because federal law requires it. The primary document issued by the govern =ent covering all aspects of nuclear power plant construction is Part 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Energy. You will hear frequent reference to this document as 10 C.F.R. 50. An i=portant addition to 10 C.F.R. 50 was published as Appendix B, co==only called the eighteen criteria for quality assurance programs. You will be given a copy of this docu=ent to study in order to see how your job is related to these quality assurance require =ents. In addition to 10 C.F.R. 50 and Appendix B, there are many other docu=ents which establish guidelines, codes and standards for quality assurance, engineering, procure-ment and construction, which you will use' to interpret the federal guidelines established in the eighteen criteria of Appendix B. These docu=ents will be described and explained to you in another part of your training.

Now, let's take a look at the terms " quality assurance" and " quality control."

You will hear frequent reference to these ter=s as "QA" and "QC." Appendix B defines quality assurance as "those planned and syste==atic actions necessary ~q3 p q -. s ht I

e.,. i to provide adequate confidence that a structure, system or component will perform satisfactorily in service. And in order to insure that all syste=s, components and construction activities conform to quality standards, quality assurance must establish procedures to control the quality. These procedures include all inspections, measure =ents and tests which will be perfor=ed in the field. This quality, assurance activity of field tests and =easure=ents is called quality control. 10 C.F.R. 50 Appendix B defines quality control as "those quality assurance actions related to the physical characteristics of a material st3ucture, component or system, which provide a means to control quality to predetermined requirements." As you can see, quality control is a," hands-on" activity. Brown & Root is required by law to establish and i=plement a QA program. Basically, this program is a syste=s approach to effective management. This program cust include training plans for personnel and engineering, procure =ent, construction and quality assurance. Identification of the safety-related structures, systems and components to be covered by the progra= and a co=plete description of the =ethods of controlling the quality of these ite=s. i To support this program, Brown & Root must establish a QA organization within the Company that is independent of the personnel responsible for costs, scheduling, engineering, procurement and construction. This =ust be the case, since fixed quality standards are set by law. These standards cust be maintained in spite of costs, schedule or other factors. Therefore, =e=bers of the QA organization must have enough authority and freedom of action to identify problets and to reco==end solutions to these proble=s. In the course of imple=enting this QA program, QA is responsible for reviewing procedures written by engineering, procure =ent and construction to verify that government regulations and approved codes are followed. In addition, QA =ust establish

measures:to ensure that items bought from other companies meet quality standards even to the extent of requiring vendors and subcontractors to prepare their own quality assurance progra=. Quality control activity on job sites and at vendors' plants, includes inspections, measurements and tests designed to verify that construction and components meet required quality standards. QA must also ensure that the tools, gauges and instruments used in these QC tests and measurements are properly maintained and accurately calibrated. The quality assurance program must also include procedures to ensure that proper corrective action is taken when a component or activity does not' conform to quality standards. The causes of the non-conformance must be identified, the non-conformance corrected, and action taken to avoid a similar problem in the future. Finally, QA must establish a system of planned periodic audits to verify that the overall QA program is in use and is effective. In turn, Brown & Root's QA program is subject to audit by our client and by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the NRC. The job of quality assurance is not only to verify that materials used meet the codes and specifications, that construction 4 I methods were as prescribed and approved procedures, and that required tests and inspections have been performed, but also to document these facts for later audit and reference. Documents pertaining to all aspects of quality assurance i must be carefully maintained and controlled. These docu=ents cover, everything from designs and procedures through purchasing and personnel training. Now, let's look at the chain of events which requires Br;wn & Root to set up a' quality assurance program. First, our client, the owner and eventual operator of the nuclear power plant must sub=it to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission a Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. Part of a PSAR describes the quality assurance program to be implemented in the engineering,

. { construction and operation of the plant. If the PSAR is accepted, the NRC grants a construction permit for the plant. Our client delegates to Brown.& Root the task of implementing the approved QA program for those jobs that Brown & Root is going to do, such as engineering, procurement and construction. But, this is only the start. Continued implementation of this QA program is required from design through final construction in order for our client to receive a license to operate the plant. Finally, then, what is Brown & Root's responsibility to our client. Simply this 1-to design and build a nuclear power plant that meets both specifications and quality requirements on schedule and within budget. Failure to build a plant that meets these requirements would cost our clients well over $100,000,per day in lost revenues. While QA and QC personnel have broad responsibilities, everyone at Brown & Root must cooperate to produce a quality plant. This includes personnel in engineering, construction', procurement and quality assurance, and at all levels from clerks and helpers to management. It is i=portant to remember that quality must be built into a plant, it cannot be inspected in. Brown & Root builders have been experts in their fields for many years. Their experience results in knowing many ways of doing a job, including some shortcuts. But in the business of building nuclear power plants, everything must be done according to approved methods and procedures. Shortcuts which have not been approved cannot be used. This is the only way to ensure that each job is done according to verifiable standards as the NRC requires. Since Brown & Root is deeply involved in the business of building nuclear power plants, we must be just as deeply involved in the operation of an acceptable QA program. This fact is recogni:ed by the Company managenent. The Executive Vice President for Engineering and Construction has issued a Policy Statement which e

5-acknowledges our responsibility for quality assurance and gives full support to the QA program. Remember that quality assurance is not really new, it's just a systa=s approach to the formal manage =ent of the quality engineering and construction practices that have been used at Brown & Root for many years. 4 9 8 e 9 e 9 $ e e e

~- 6- ~ ~ x s w Tace #4 - Transcriot s L h. s s ~ ~ If the management of any company chooses to view the requirements for QA as just another bureaucratic requirement, that company will have difficult staying in the nuclear field. If the engineers on the project don't follow the procedures arid comply with the codes, the design will not be accepted. If construction project management looks at QA as just a bunch'of restrictions which won't a'llow them to run the project the way they want to, l that project will get into trouble. And, if the workers in the field fail to follow procedures and to document their work because they think ' hey know t a better way to do it or a short cut, they will get everybody into trouble at great expense to both their company and the client. To avoid these~ problems, i Brown &' Root has fully committed itself to establishing an effective quality assurance program. This committment extends from top management to the laborers in the field. 1 k. i 9 e g

., r QA/00 Slide Taoe 6 Q g ch Qp. f QC e Ow S... Inspection'-- how does it function and what purpose does it serve? Quality control inspection uses examination, observation and measurement as methods of checking to see how closely fabricated materials and items conform to quality requirements. In shorr., inspection is simply confirming that what is built is what the engineer specified to meet client requirements. Inspection involves more than simply observation. It requires trained and qualified people so that the production of a quality item can be shown to be in conformance with engineering specifications. It also requires recording the verification with the correct and complete documentation so that quality is assured. The Federal Government requires that a client assume -the overall responsibility for quality assurance, but he may assign the task of actual inspecting to others. In any case, the constructor himself must be especially careful in inspecting the quality of his own work. The task of inspecting to confirm prepar construction performance must re=ain independent of construction. Inspecting nuclear facilities creates a special situation because nuclear jobs must meet the stringent quality standards set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commi'ssion, federal and state laws and other industry standards. Nuclear inspection is i=portant because it contributes toward the safety of the public that the facility will serve and the conservation of the surrounding environ =ent. 9 4 9

s In the nuclear industry, confidence is enhanced because the federal govern =ent acts a third party to ensure that nuclear facilities are built properly. In the nuclear._ industry, acceptance criteria are more stringent than '? they are in conventional power facilities. Quality standards, however, are. g the same. The owners of the facility must meet quality standards set by the govern =ent and ibdustry to get a license. Throughout your career in the power industry, whether on a nuclear site or n' fossil job, re=e=ber that it is of ut=Iost i=portance what you report must be accurate. Even after you have =astered the basics of your profession and are certified, you must follow precise and rig'orous inspection procedures. Errors that see= s=all =ay result in costly consequences -- in time, 'in money, and possibly lives. That is why inspection in all industries is i=portant. It gains the confidence and support of the public. In your past experience, you have probably witnessed the results of some of the situations that we will describe here. In the =echanical area, records lost or i= properly co=pleted are examples of oversights that could have been prevented easily. x For example, a weld nu=ber not recorded i==ediately, but left up to =e=ory =ay later be recorded as another weld. All subsequent inspection and documentation is =isleading, because the weld nu=ber is incorrect. O In the electrical area, cable =ay be inadvertently stretched if the dyna =o=eter is not monitored carefully. Internal damage to the cable =ay not be apparent until =uch later when the facility is in operation.

9 i ( Problems may arrive in the civil structural area if the docu=ents accompanying a batch of concrete are not checked carefully. A =ixture of 3,000 psi concrete may be mistakenly used in a supporting colu=n that calls for 4,000 psi concrete. The resulting structural defect =sy not develop until cuch later, when the building is in operation. A non-destructive examination using rgdiographic testing devices will result in false test results if the proper testing equip =ent is not csed. If surfaces are not prepared properly for coating, conta=inants like rust, oil, dust or water may cause lack of. cohesion and subsequent peeling, ~ cracking or dela=ination. Errors like these are considered non'-co=pliances and they =ay result in legal ramifications for both the Company and the e=ployee. The Code of Federal' Regulations says in effect that known deficiencies that go unreported are a willful violation of the law, and can make an individual subject to civil penalty. Every day 'that you work on this site, you.will be involved in circu= stances in which you may be held accountable. How will you, as an inspector, handle these every day situations? First of all, you =ust know your work. Se' accurate and perfor= follow-up inspections. In addition to these job responsibilities, you =ust be aware of the extent of your authority and be prepared 'to handle any situation in a tactful =anner. Let's look first at the inspector's technical responsibilities. Then we will talk about his role as a mediator. a

It is the inspector's responsibility to know the produce that he is examining and to be familiar with the tools of his trade. This means a knowledge of codes, standards, specifications and drawings,and the appropriate inspection tools. He =ust be familiar with the construction drawings and procedures so that he knows;what items to check and when to check them. The inspector should be aware of changes in construction procedures prior to inspection. And from experience, training and doing homework, the inspector must know quality assurance and quality control procedures so that he will know not only what to check, but what discrepancies.co look for. It is just as i=portant to be up to,date on quality procedures as on construction procedures. This will be acco=plished through ongoing procedural training. For the inspection' task to be effective, good preparation and good job perfor=ance must be followed up. Confirs i==ediately that something is wrong. On the spot verification will save you proble=s later on. Verify the situation according to the specification,

drawings, applicable codes and standards, and QA/QC procedures.

These documents are your primary references. You will want to keep in $1nd that procedures and other documents are kept right at the jobsite, not in the ho=e office. It is your responsibility to work closely with the=. Know the documentation procedure, a'd follow through with all necessary n documents. Errors must be identified and corrected i=:ediately because no one benefits from a mistake -- client, constructor or craftsman. As an inspector, l I e i L

- 11. you have the responsibility of reporting 'what you see, and how it ceasures to the contract specifications. Let's briefly review the inspector's responsibilities. He cust be familiar with the task. He cust-know the tools and procedures that went into making the task. He must know the project's quality inspection procedures. He mus,t point out non-conformances pro =ptly. And he must docu=ent his inspection results. These five points summarize the inspector's responsibilities. As an inspector, you have certain channels of com=unication to follow if you find non-confor=ance to a procedure" If the work that is in progress would lead to a ncn-compliance, try to have construction correct the non-confor=ance so that they are in compliance with the procedure. As an alternative step, you may take the proble= to your QC supervisor. In the first case, dealing with construction, be diplo=atic and tactful at all levels. You are not construction's boss, nor is construction your boss. Before talking with crafts =en, reach agree =ent with the discipline construction supervisors. Develop a working relationship. Make sure the construction supervisor does not object to your talking with his workers. At some sites, the policy is to work through the fore =en, unless there is an e=ergency situation. On those sites, use the following guidelines in e=ergency situations. Determine that the crafts =an is following the orders of his fore =an. Make your suggestions to craftsman, only suggestions. Be extremely sure your suggestion concerns the procedure and that you, the inspector, know that prpeedure. i I L

- Never get into a personal disagreement with construction personnel. Remember that an alternative approach is taking a proble= to your supervisor. Before you do so, talk with the fore =an in charge. If he does }> 0 not take prompt corrective action, or he cannot produce action leading to l compliance, write a non-conformance report, or when applicable, stop work. Briefly develop channels of communication within constructi*on. Cordial com=unication with the foreman smooths the path. So, get an agreement on the route you should diplomatically follow, and then follow that route, using suggestions that will help the final product be in conformance with the procedures. If your tactful approach does not ielp to untangle a problem, or if the situation is out of your scope of authority, let your supervisor handle the problem. A situation is out of your scope of authority when it concerns design or when there is a need for ar. inspector with another certification specialty, or perhaps if you believe there is possibly a better way to inspect. These problems are handled by your going to your supervisor. The QC supervisor then goes to the QA or construction. QA and construction evaluate the probles and take action back to the field or engineering. If it goes to engineering, engineering evaluates and responds back to the site. The site begins work to engineering's response. The QC inspector inspects the repair or rework. This cycle of review ensures that coc=unication will be a two-way process between site construction, QA and engineering, and QC inspectors and field personnel.

13 - W2 htva sxamined five of tha inspector's responsibilities. And the way that good working relationships are developed through good coc=unication. However, an inspector's job requires one additional dimension. And that dimension is foresight. Foresight is crucial to your job as an inspector. You must be alert to potential proble=s, as well as to existing conditions. Schedule your,vork. Be prompt, objective and thorough in your inspection. Being sure ta coordinate with construction personnel. Construction and quality assurance are parts of a team with common objectives. Quality cannot be in'spected into a product. It can only be built in. And, it is construction that carries the basic responsibility for building a quality plant. You, as an inspector cannot inspect-quality into anyone's work, but you do have the authority and the responsibility to sign off docu=entation attesting to the quality of that work. So, aside from knowing the procedures for your job, re ember to be reasonable in your work, but above all else, maintain the integrity that is needed to establish the facts. In doing this, .you will be contributing to safety and reliability of products and services necessary to developing the power industry. Only then will Brown & Root be able to provide the client with a quality plant--on time, and at reasonable cost. e i s 1

  • s O

C" r

CPSES BUILDING MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER J.T. MERRITT Jr. MANAGEMENT GROUP

1. ADVISE
2. PROBLEM SOLVING PROJECT Q/A BUI L DING MANAGER MANAGER R. TO LS O N PLANNING PAPER Q/A

'I"%) STAFF ENGINEERING CRAFT SCHEDULING PROCESSING Q/C .w. qu m. l I I BUILDING MANAGERS p'A s l u l C'j B. MURRAY/ B. WARD - REACTOR Bidg. 3 F. POWERS / D. SNYDER - E.C. 8 Turb. Yard Bldg. J. DITTMAR/B.WHITEHOUSE - AUX. Bldg. '%b-G. CRANE IN. C. SMITH - SAFEGUARDS /D.G. Bldg.

~ liss Figure C-1 Tyeical CPSES Buildine Manacement Organization SITE CONSTRUCTION I COMANCHE PEAK QUALITY CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE / MANAGEMENT QUALITY CONTRO~. t} W% kN

  • 0 t) M

'f)lc*"*g - >) W / O G - d& J AW' l l DONN S IG og ADMINISTRATIVE F0iA-85-59 ~ &&C I t

WMfE'% 0%'mBR5E f-

  1. . Sampson QC Rtc Grp Spvsr HQH132 0000 D

K. Cox QC Rec Grp HQH075 0000 H. Dickson HQH089 0000 C. Payne HQH160 0000 i W. Wolf HQH165 0000 J. Morton HQH167 0000 V liahan TG2794 0140 L.,Damaron Clerk BRD131 0912 Purdy B&R. Site QA Hanager BRD162 0914 i. B. Marlow. QA Adm Assist BRD019 0912 P. Wilson J. Hutson QA Secretary BRA 436 0912 .HQH236 0000 ANI Clerk J. Blixt QCE Group Supervisor BRD387 0914 G. Morris QE Mech III BRD373 0914 S. Ranadive QE BRD372 0914 E. Morris QE BRD325 0914 R. Gottard QE BRD338 0914 . R. Ice QE BRAAS4 0914 HQH045 0000 ~ T. Neely QE J. DiVetro Training / Procedure Coord BRC087 0912 R. Walters QE NDE III HQH153 0000 J. Henline QE TUGC0 Op. QA HQH211 0000 J. Mathis QCI QA Serv. TUGC0 Op. HQH124 0000 L. Taggart HQH055 0000 J. Beck. HQH002 0000 J. Scott HQH123 0000 0000 R. Hasagawa t S. Bell 0000 M. Siever QE S'U/TO Sury. BRD378 0914 T. Ellis QCI " " HQH025 0000 R. Siever-QA/QC Supervisor BRD386 0914 D. Woodyard - Reactor 1 & 2 QA/QC Bldg. Supr. BRD135 0914 D. Doyle / Reactor Bldg QCE HQH008 0000 J. Stanford QCI HQH010 0000 D. Bell / HQH013 0000 L. Tidwell HQH015 0000 R. Boykin-HQH041 0000 T. Linzy HQH053 0000 I J. Caldwelix HQH064 0000 -T. Col eman HQH068 0000 HQH084 0000 V. Frost-J. Wasylyszyn' HQH092 0000 H0iH110 0000 D. Hayes C.Saengerhausen/ HQHil5 0000 D. MacDonald HQH152 0000 B. Sims Reactor Bldg QCE BRA 472 0914 J. Cannon Y QCI HQH065 0000 F. Colemanv HQH066 0000 a J. Staus / HQH069 0000 H. Hall HQH077 0000 HQH098 0000 J. Lloyd < ?" M i f *: T-r HQHil6 0000 .f Q((fp C h - ] _ HQHG 8 J. Rodaers V 0000 J. Massey t

U "' D. Snow. Aux /Sg QA/ G. Fanning Aux /SG QCE HQH024 0000 - 's.. 'J. Pfland QCI HQH040 0000 L. Wilk:rson. HQH058 0000 K. Crider HQH067 0000 S. Duncang)/ HQH078 0000 G. DaughertyX HQH081 0000 J. Frazier HQH083 0000 f H. Higgi.nj \\ HQH097 0000 o ' HQH119 0000 E. Ray i HQH130 0000 J. Parker)/' c' C. Mathews HQH140 0000 C. Swindell HQH248 0000 Aux /SG QCE HQH174 0000 M. Todd R..Duncan[ QCI HQH009 0000 HQH012 0000 S. Wagner HQH018 0000 B. Chadwick H.L. Hill / HQH059 0000 C. Denman T HQH061 0000 HQH086 0000 R. Garner /c K. Moss V HQH104 0000 H.Osterday)[ HQHil2 0000 HQH141 0000 K. Robinson y f G. Bennetzen N-5 Group Supervisor BRA 634 0914 T. Matheny N-5 QCE HQH035 0000 L. Yatesyc QCI HQH043 0000 G. GrossnickleX M4 HQH142 0000 HQH163 0000 - 8. Darby HQH223 0000 - B'. Barnard PA HQH224 0000 - S. White HQH225 0000 }'[* -B. Gavin HQH229 0000 -S. Hines HQH230 0000 - R. Darby ,q cs HQH235 0000 - 0. Whelan HQH238 0000 - L. Holland ~ HQR248 0000 - W. Trautschold g_W. Mansfield N-3 QCI HQH059 0000 D. Kivi N-3 QCI HQH091 0000 F. Przybylski Night Shift QCE HQH148 0000 J. Lunsford QCI HQH150 0000 HQH151 0000 R. Pendergrass l

I u /Ie C32A $ o' ~ ido ). WC Q.A~ ?y i~, $ r c :f t L '~ - c 9-) o c, M o '} d2Dh I. QC-- W-f-&QAlQC qu$" -G O O j 0-O o &j -sW-o- .I e i o r o. 0 i s 1 O d{ / O 1 v o 1 .\\ l o. l . n /( ) l O n() e,, ), v>- / o l' / (F V ,1 n a \\ (P' /) / u c ~ \\ o !77 4 /\\ / / .I /ALA A o o I' n nf/ ^ l/ ) { if7 / ' /> / o T Al/V (f a V (l ' o i I /,) V O / ( Lu t n e r, ~, ~ cn o ~ _ m [M / " l V j / * !'" L / t.T " s.) O O o 14/ Yb' \\{ l 9 /1 #} O -! [- V f O a A N i s

1' p- { 1 ,, ~ ~ T-L g '_,- _W ^ .f T h ;; -!Q 7~P-T A & A L X i~~ Wf y_T ,=: d %.,~,=& A n ca %. T.2-e._ 7-A.'rD .24_' g /r/- qc d

  • A ' p _ /' 3 ~A. A A -

.&B. w: J K A} C~t-A " & sh -662. w .--( A c PS t> q c., : : p %. .T A' ~ -> 7 ym _.w. 2% ~g -y ,.faMac. y W ~. we.a m n,wy am 4 nL ^ =Li 4 '24 'I 4.x A a m b a n ~ M t,, 7-- z' te. 7'ac= c o M rnX-+I8D . l g._s i S -2s -tr4 m

71.. z_4-2 a 4.

0? 0 -A. G-e p = .e. e .m e we

  • ** =

O e j._.

{ }* o i l l, ' I 1-r- ' ) ~~ "C=2 -t _ c[ f~. j'" y h V-L. I l ~ .k i I -/ M- - k " Q. ~.. w p e / <:so -[ ^~ Y ~M ' r_ ~ i O \\l) @ La.; Qf gW. Q, Q-f,~l l (Q(V -LAsW- ~ ~~ kt g j g gy & \\y w W l go ) s W VW' l I /g ~ r ($# f ' y r b '%J4w4 '. y n vr-l u v^ h ~ a D M s s G ' Ww g B ~3'0 (,'Q Un f ~ %j 3 ) i & L fm f ) Q (?Q

w. :9y-.<3.-,m?: )

o, f f(

L.<)O

~ - - - ~

%s;!

/z 3 J~ y$0 g E, A Qi ~ -l 3, 7'WY _. ~- ~,

pgf 3

,.m;&. ;.y..pse.,g;tyyg;Q / w. a:b'O-W;3 g / l + v :+ '. i ;.pd ^f

  • r.

.y a n .^ }O l,;\\ 1 l V Q,7 ' m,.r zff.s..(,,, .h,,};:,,,eg / v... u ~.*?' 3.J,' s-. t Lf -~

~.?.t::y,; *k'.w

',5,. b ou c

.,, k*c,g;v j;fS M. C. $$i;.n*q,,6"n,-

A,N / d'. is / c- .,, t i t'ep%.4.;. - .. e.~, 7, I II

  • ^. n. :.~ d,l.,'~ :x;QF.g.

~ r f ~ d / .4 7 q ,.y / h ..: 9, y / / _ht .. ;;.,, e }'a-g ls~- _;I / J..,, .Q. 'w 2 j g,

e h,

I p. w ;u,,,.g;g, i

o --.hJ b.'t.O?

0 ___~ ~~~-l )

r-En addition to the above, ! am concerned with harassment instances against QC inspectors, in general, and me in particular. From my observation, there was a total lack of independence of QA from the production area. Often, times for instance, a QC supervisor and a craft supervisor (we call them "go1d hats"), would show op at an inspection where I was and both start yelling at me for j f ni t-pi c k.i ng. Last year, I was calledynsp_ec,ygpe hanger, and as I was ~ ~ ~ _ <O inspe *

  • q that han

, I saw another hanger that may have been non-conformin.g N- ~ IT I went over to inspect that hanger, and the craf t gold hat started yelling at ~ me, saying I was not called to look at that' hanger As I understand it, I am [ supposed to report any non-conforming condition at Comanche peak that I see. ~ -1 But I knew I would not get support from the QC supervisors, so I often did not have the energy to fight them. q Another problem I have'seen in QC is. the way that QC interacts so closely t ~ with production eersonne1 s5 N f At many of their parties,6 construction gold hat, and W kM, construction gold hat (both craft goldhats) have been guests cf honor. That has raised a lot of talk. a N Id/M60-CC JO5 /y / / y s

.e j ^ O Ert:*NnC'*r"tcct '.1r. IM 252~0 - Septa =ber *3. L983 i TO: Cist:1buti:n j D.C. 7:s + -s and J.3. Cac ge 7;. M: I SU3JZ : 51:a Iracuati:n C *

  • A si:a evacuati n drill is planned f : es:17 November a:d arsa drill.s f :

selac:ed areas f:: lads November and es:17 December. b ;;sparati n f : ths sita 54 cosa drills. 1: is i=pers:1*ra tha: all personnel assigned :: C?M L.I bdoc::1:stad in :ta requira'=en:s of ::e at: ached tvisi== ::F.ach superrisar is entitled "? cedura f : C?SES Persensel Iracua:i::". ensuri:3 that person =al u da his supertision ars "his isdoc::1:a:icn should be c =pla:ed by Cc::bar !!2. resycesibla f:: '9 udoc :isa:sd. Any :ev t=pl:yees shculd also reesive dis ::si:ing as part of :tei: i:ccc::1:a:1:n. he ::deely 4:d qui:217 executad. 'J;cc haari:q 2a check vi d persc==al vo:H 7 5 each arsa :: :ska

  • hesa evacuatie:s =s:

ala:=, superrisi:n re.s

  • his =sy be d:se by ;hecs or 1 persec. Ps:scnssi surs they heard da ala=.
ts supe:risors' :sapensibill:7 ace:us:ab111:7 is cc:

vill *:s C:s diffaranca is an evacua:1:n drill a=d an ac=al evacua:1:Uc:11 fuel is * :ad "::ci pid p* and Satherics of personal bel: gi:gs. any-1=a es evacuati:n ala== is scu=ded :::1s sh uld be==ed is and as i' i: uns da ace cf the shidt.

er
c:a1 bel::sists gathersd. jus:

08.L.. 4, - 0.C. E:2- ~ . S. G~ s M &% ~ ./, cc: J.11 :epamn: ?.eads and n 1 Ic errisces r/a:::ch=se:s ."f

  • s....J'-p'*p*

., T' .C. Succes::sc:::s f j J. 7. Marri:: I

3. J. Mu:: 7 J. 3. Eid.s M. R. M.diay i

[ *; g I hen DO , ~.,.. s l ~ Y {g / I I r - _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _, _,}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20207A150&oldid=4042198"