ML20207A121
| ML20207A121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1983 |
| From: | Franks S, Miller T, Christopher Welch TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206S800 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 CP-SAP-16, NUDOCS 8607110424 | |
| Download: ML20207A121 (40) | |
Text
y CPSES STARTUP ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
.j,CP-SAP-16 TEST DEFICIENCY AND NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING Revision:
8 Prepared By:
S. M. Frank's l
b db' Reviewed By:
ea ' Stagu Engineer Reviewed By-d IUGC0 QA Startup/ Turnover Surveillance Supervisor Reviewed By:
Title:
Reviewed By:
/
Title:
Approved By:
M Date: /[M"N M6 nager, CPSES/Startup i" f*
r P
i 7~b Effective Date L
.u
' k y
3 J
GARDE 85-59 PDR
GP%s9Fm Revision 8-Page 2 of 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION
' TITLE PAGE COVER SHEET 1
. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
1.0 PURPOSE 3
2.0 APPLICABILITY 3
3.0 DEFINITIONS 3
4.0 PROCEDURE 4
5.0 REFERENCES
7 6.0 ATTACHMENTS 7
e Ff! RIM! uun"AT w d a i I
q
~
CP-SAP-16 Revision 8 Page 3 of 8 TEST DEFICIENCY AND NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to establish the requirements and responsibilities for reporting and processing nonconforming conditions identified by startup personnel.
Note Test deficiencies are noncon-forming conditions discovered during component / system oper-ation and/or testing.
2.0 APPLICABILITY The requirements of this procedure for reporting test deficiencies are applicable after custody of the affected component / system has been transferred from construction to TUCC0 as described by CP-SAP-3.
The requirements of this procedure for reporting nonconformances are applicable any time startup personnel identify such a condition, regardless of custody status. TUSI Engincering and TUGC0 Construction Quality Assurance procedures used for determination and reporting of reportable deficiencies as defined by 10CFR50.55(e) are not described herein.
3.0 DEFINITIONS Test Deficiency - A deficiency in the operating characteristics, test documentation or startup procedure compliance that renders the quality of the item or activity unacceptable or indeterminate.
Nonconformance - A deficiency in the physical characteristics or vendor and/or construction documentation which renders the quality of the item unacceptable or indeter=inate.
TDR - Test Deficiency Report NCR - Noncenformance Report STE - System Test Engineer Rework -
The process of which a nonconforming item is made to conform to prior specified requirements.
Rework such as completien, re-machining, reassembly or other necessary corrective measures shall be performec in accordance with approved procedures.
e so N
Cf;YEf;TB Revision 8 Page 4 of 8 Repair -
The process of restoring a nonconforming characteristic to a condition such that the. capability of an item to function reliably and safely is unimpaired, even though the item still may not conform to the original requirements.
Repair activities shall be performed in accordance with approved procedures, and the acceptability of the repair shall be documented and approved.
Rej ect (Scrap) - The determination that an item is not acceptable for use in a safety-related application and must be segregated or disposed of to preclude such use.
(Use-As-Is) - A disposition which may be imposed for a Accept nonconformance when it can be established that the discrepancy shall result in no conditions adverse to safety and that the item under consideration will continue to meet all engineering functional requirements. This disposition requires a description of the nonconformance and a justification of the item's acceptability for use.
4.0 PROCEDURE 4.1 Nonconformances shall be reported in accordance with CP-QAP-16.1 (ASME) or CP-QP-16.0 (Non-ASME).
4.2 Test deficiencies shall be reported on a Test Deficiency Eeport (TDR),.
Attachment A.
TDR's shall be sequentially numbered and logged.
4.3 The TUSI Engineering Manager shall be responsible for evaluating Test Deficiency Reports to determine if the deficiency is potentially reportable to the Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission (NRC) as required by 10CFR50.55 (e).
4.4 When defective items are replaced, the defective items shall be-removed from the plant and tagged or discarded. Tagged items shall identify the item as " defective," the TDR number, and be signed and dated by the individual that tagged the item.
4.5 A TDR is not required to be issued for any failure of control circuits or equipment to perform its intended function during the c nduct of a Prerequisite Test if the malfunction can be corrected by re-calibration, adjustment or incorporaticn of a design change.
4.6 A TDR is not required to be issued for the failure of censumable items such as fuses and indicating lights or if a component fails to operate l
due to actuation of protective devices if the affected cceponent operates properly after replacement of the consumable iter cr.
resetting the protective device.
l i
l ER INFORMATi0F ONi.Y.
L
CP-SAP-16 Revisien 8 Page 5 cf 8 4.7 When a test deficiency is identified which will preclude further component operation or create a hazardous condition, the component shall be rendered inoperable by deenergi ation, irolation, etc., and safety tags placed, as appropriate, to prevent inadvertent use.
4.8 When a test deficiency is identified and the component exhibits no adverse operational or hazardous conditions, testing or operation may continue.
4.9 A TDR tiay be processed to allow continuation of testing if test steps or sections cannot be performed due to unusual situations such as missing equipment or inability to establish required plant conditions and the system alignment will allow continuation.
4.10 When an approved test procedure is not complied with, a TDR shall be processed.
4.11 Trouble shooting may be performed as required to deter =ine the cause and/or required corrective action for test deficiencies.
4.12 If corrective action is unkncvn, the TDR shall be forwarded to the TUSI Engineering Manager for determination of appropriate corrective action.
~
4.13 The Lead Startup Engineer or his Level IV designee shall approve TDR h
corrective action.
4.14 Work required to correct a test deficiency shall be controlled in accordance with CP-SAP-6.
4.15 Receses shall be specified for TDR's, as applicable, and approved by the Lead Startup Engineer or his designee qualified as Level IV in accordance with CP-SAP-19.
Note Special Performance Test =ay be specified as the required retest only if the deficiency was discovered during the con-duct of a Special Performance Test.
4.16 The individual responsible for ensuring that the specified corrective action is taken shall signify ccmpletion of corrective actica on the TDR log copy.
4.17 The individual responsible for ensuring that the specified retest is I g\\
completed shall signify completion of the retest on the 1~DR ariginal.
/
4.17.' If the retest is satisfactor", sign " Retest Comp le t e d. "
l i
FOR NORMA ON {NLYa
CP-SAP-16 Revisic 8 Page 6 of 8 4.17.2 If it becomes apparent, during the performance or evaluation of the retest, that additional corrective action or retests is required, the responsible individual shall revise and obtain approval of the corrective action and retest in accordance with 4.19 of this procedure and implement the new corrective actitn and retest.
4.18 Completed TDR's and retest results shall be processed as follows:
4.18.1 If a Prerequisite test is specified for the TDR retest (see paragraph 4.18.2 for TDR retest cgainst Acceptance, Preope* rational and Special Performance Test):
- a. Attach a copy of the approved retest data, except XCP-EE-3 test record drawings, to the original TDR.
- b. The completed TDR, with attached copies of th'e retest data, will be processed in accordance with STA-302 for storage within the permanent plant records vault.
4.18.2 If a Preoperational or Acceptance test or a portion thereof is specified as the retest for a TDR identified during or af ter a Preoperational, Acceptance or Special Perfor=ance Test:
- a. Review and approval of the completed TDR and the retest data shall be in accordance with the requirements for Preoperaticnal, Acceptance and Special Performance Test Results described in CP-SAP-ll,
- b. Retain a ccpy of the completed TDR and retest data with the official ecpy of the test data package.
Previously approved test data packages in the permanent plant records vault shall be supple =ented with the completed TDR and approved retest data.
4.19 Chr.nges/or corrections to TDR's shall be processed as follows:
4.19.1 Prior to corrective action approval, changes can be made by a single line thrcugh, initial and date.
4.19.2 Correction or changes after corrective action approval or te required retest after retest approval shall be made in accordance with a.19.1 and reapproved in accordance with paragraphs 4.13 and 4.15 of this precedure.
4.19.3 Correction or chanSes to TDR's in Freeperational, Acceptance er Special Performance Test data packages shall be made in accordance with L.19.1, reviewed and approved in accordance with CP-SAP-IL.
I M M
l d
w-mT
.9 Revisic: 8 Page 7 :f 8 4.20 The Startup Quality Specialist shall be responsible for periodically reviewing Test Deficiency Reports initiated by startup personnel, c:
detect and identify adverse quality trends.
4.21.The Lead Startup Engineer shall be responsible for initiating corrective action when conditions adverse to quality are indicated ':y the repetitive issuance of Test Deficiency Reports by startup personnel. The case of the condition and corrective action taken c:
prevent reoccurrence shall be documented and reported to the follo ing, as a minimum:
a.
Manager, Nuclear Operations' b.
Manager, Plant Operations c.
TUGC0 QA Startup/ Turnover Surveillance Supervisor d.
TUGC0 Startup Manager
5.0 REFERENCES
5.1 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, 10CFR50.55(e) 5.2 CP-SAP-6, Control of Work on Station Components After Release frem Construction to TUGC0 5.3 CP-SAP-11, Review, Approval and Retention of Test Results 5.4 CP-SAP-19, Training / Qualification Requirements for Startup Personne'.
5.5 CPSES'Startup Quality Assurance Plan 5.6 CP-QAP-16.1, B&R ASME Procedure, Control of Nonconforming Items 5.7 CP-QAP-16.0, TUGC0 QA Procedure, Nonconformances and Deficiencies 5.8 STA-302, Station Records 6.0 ATTACEMENT A. Test Deficiency Report Form
Revision 8 TEST DEFICIENCY REPORT Page 8 of 8 Startup Sys No.
Compenent Tag No.
TDR No.
Page __,of __,
Deficiency Identified during:
If during test, Test Operation Other (Circle One)
Test No:
Deficiency
Description:
Can Component Operation Continue?
If NO: CP-SAP-5 Auth. No.
YES NO (Circle One)
STA-605 Clearance No.
Engineering Evaluation required to determine Corrective Action:
YES NO (Circle One)
Ref. Correspondence for Engineering Eval:
Deficiency Reported By:
Date:
Corrective Action:
Corrective Action Approved By:
Date:
Required Retest:
Required Retest Approved By:
Date:
Corrective Action Completed:
Date:
Retest Completed:
Date:
Distribution: Original to Log TUCCO QA Startup/ Turnover Surveillance Superviser MSP Group TUSI Engineering Mgr.
Initiator Operations Support Engineer STE ER BlFORMAT;08 ONLi.
Mevision @
TEST DEFICIENCY REPORT Page 8 of 8 Startup Sys No.
Component Tag No.
TDR No.
Page __ of __,
Deficiency Identified'during:
If during test, Test Operation Other (Circle One)'
Test No:
~
Deficiency
Description:
-Can Component Operation Continui?
If NO: CP-SAP-5 Auth. No.
YES NO (Circle One)
STA-605 Clearance No.
Engineering Evaluation required to determine Corrective Action:
YES NO (Circle One)
Ref. Correspondence for Engineering Eval:
Deficiency Reported By:
Date:
Corrective Action:
l Corrective Action Approved By:
Date:
i l
Required Recest:
j Required Retest Approved By:
Date:
i Corrective Action Completed:
Date:
l l
[
Retest Completed:
Date:
l Distributic,n:
Original to Log TUCCO QA Startup/ Turnover Surveillance Supervisor l
MSP Group TUSI Engineering Mgr.
Initiator Operations Support Engineer
- L'. -..
.: '" ~ ~
- ~~
l v
f REVISION ISSUE i
PROCEDURE PAGE NUMBER l
OATc j
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO CPSES CP-QP-19.5 4
1 f6 FEB o 1 1984 l
//1 ISO-PREPARED BY:
DATE SURVEILLAfiCE OF PLAtlT C0f1DIT!0NS 2 '1 IO f I APPROVED BY:
M 2 [.
w 1.0 REFERENCE 1-A CP-QP-18.0, " Inspection Report" 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this procedure is to outline the method used to implement, document, and when necessary, resolve findings of planned surveillances of plant conditions.
2.2 SCOPE The scope of this procedure is the surveillance inspections performed on activities related to the safety of the plant within Category I structures.
2.3 RESPONSIBILITY The Quality Engineering Supervisor is responsible for the implementation of this procedure,at a frequency sufficient to maintain confidence in plant conditions.
l 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 IMPLEf tENTA710N Surveillance inspections of plant conditions shall be done by the Quali ty Engineering Supervi so r's designees.
The designees shall be from the Quality Engineers and the l
Quality Control Supervisors.
l The su rveillance inspections shall be perfonced utili zi ng I
" Surveillance Inspection Guidelines" (Attachment 1) as a
{
minimum.
I i
FOR FORhiATON ON.Y (2.3 _c8,) ' A. -Oten g
g7
i
! PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE l
.-TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
2 of 6 CP-QP-19.5 4
FUb %' DH l
l 6
i The surveillance activity shall be planned on a rotating I
basis such that any one area is surveilled the next time i
by. a person other than the one who surveilled it the time before.
3.2 ACTIVITIES TO BE OBSERVED Activities to be observed during this surveillance include:
a.
Housekeeping 1
b.
Contamination of stainless steel c.
' Equipment protection i
d.
Material storage e.
Installed itens I
f.
Any other adverse activities that affect safety related items.
I 3.3 DOCUMENTATION An Inspection Repo rt (Attachment 2) shall be used-to document the surveillance inspection results.
The IR lists the activities to be observed.
I A copy of the IR do'cumenting the surveillance results shall j
be sent-to the Assistant Construction Project Manage r.
Upon verification of completion of the required corrective action, the IR shall be closed.
j
?
The IR shall be processed as per Reference 1-A, except that upon closure the IR shall be sent to the Quality Engineering I
Supervisor for subsequent filing in the Permanent Plant Records Vault.
i i
i T
t l
t TUGCO OA
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE
. TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
'CPSES CP-QP-19.5 4
FEB 21 1984 3 of 6 i
ATTACHMENT 1 SURVEILLANCE INSPECTION GUIDELINES 1.
HOUSEKEEPING a)
Work areas sufficiently clean and orderly.
b)
- Garbage, trash,
- scrap, litter and other excess materials removed or temporarily stored neatly.-
c)
Areas of activi ty adequately
- lighted, ventilated, protected, and accessible as appropriate for the work being performed consistent with the quality j
requi rement s, 2.
CONTAllINATION OF STAINLESS STEEL a)
Slings handling stainless steel made from nylon or l
stainless steel or have adequate protection such as being covered with rubber or wood to prevent contact between ca rbon steel slings
'and stainless steel' su rfaces.
b)
Tool s (e.g.
wi re brushes,
- files, flapper wheel s,
drills) used on stainless steel materials designated i
by a fluoresant orange color code.
3.-
MATERIAL / EQUIPMENT STORAGE a)
Evidence of damage or deterioration.
't b)
Pipe Spools i-
- Stainless steel pipe ends capped with plastic caps or wood covers-and plugs
- Carton steel pi pe ends capped wi th plastic / metal caps or wood covers and plugs
- Stored off the ground in racks or on dunnage.
s c)
We'd Rod
- Field storage in plugged-in ovens l.
d)
Motors stored in place shall have all ventilation holes covered wi th fine screening to ensure that the internals of the motor are free from debris and rodent infestation.
- rucco or l
--...--,-w-
.,e...._.r-..-,.
rv.
,,v_--
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO, CPSES CP-QP-19.5 4
FEB 21 1984 4 of 6 e)
Space heaters, if provided on motors and motor operated limitorque valves, energized.
4.0 It1 STALLED ITEMS 4.1 CABLES AtlD CABLE TRAYS a)
Cables covered wi th fire resistant materials anytime wel di ng, grinding or torch cutting is being perfomed in an area that could damage cable, b)
Items such as nuts, bol t s, stru ctural stee'1, pi pe fi ttings, etc. shall not be stored or lef t in cable trays.
c)
Metal grating over cable trays should be covered to l
prevent trash from falling or accumulating in the trays.
d)
Flex conduit to equipment not broken, damaged or used to support any weight.
e)
Trays containing cables shall not be used as walkways.
Besides being potentially damaging to the cables, the cables could be energized and cause severe personnel hazard.
f)
Trays shall not be used as work platfoms.
EXCEPTI0t15:
I When standard work platfoms or work accesses are not
' i feasible, the following procedure will be used:
I 1.
A 1/2", or thicker, piece of plywood extendi ng across the top of the cable tray fran siderail I
to siderail and stabilized so it cannot be i
accidentally dislodged, may be used as a temporary j
work platfom.
l t10TE:
This exception shall not be used when additional siderails have been added to extend the depth of the cable tray.
}
i 2.
Alternatively, a 3 fold fire blanket covered with an approved electrical rubber blanket may be used when leaning over or into a cable tray but not i
for the purpose of supporting full body weight (i.e., standing, kneeling,etc.).
TUGCO CA I
m
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE 1
NUMBER l
DATE r
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
FEB 21 1984 5 of 6 i
i 1
g)
Cable trays shall not be used. as structural supports, or to lift from.
l i
h)
Hoses and. cables may be-suspended from the bottom' of trays, but shall not be laid across the trays.
i)
Doors and covers 'to electrical equipment in place when l
]-
no work is being performed on the item.
4.2 MECHANICAL r
l a)
Open ends of components covered unless work is being performed on them.
i b)
Installed pi pe, especi ally pi pe connected to valves and equipment, properly supported (by permanent or l
temporary 'hard' supports).
i t
I c) flo rigging off supports (unless authorized by Engineering in writing on a traveller, etc.)
l 4.3 IflSTRUMEllTATI0ft i
a)
Protective coverings installed and maintained whenever working around indicators, gauges, tubing, etc.
j i
3 i
i i
i a
t i
f l
I l
l 4
POff'lNC 3 I
1 l
i
. _ - ~ _.. - _ _.,. _..
INSTRUCTION ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
CPSES 4
FEB 21 1984 CP-QP-19.5 o of 6 ATTACHMENT 2 COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION surrt A.
INSPECTION REPORT ino I
pc.
ITEM CESCRIPTION
'LLN I8P ICA T 80N f4-
. GY STEM / ST AUCTudt~ k5eGEf.h PLkIT SURVE!LLANCE 2
?
a setC.No.
Ev.
aEr oc. ccc. e aEV & CMANGE NO Mi;ASVAE CR TEST EGuio.. CENT No s
e CP-QP-19.5 y
O l",f,*ij,5l, O Pa[p,g,t^= O F,1,72,'c:t1,'og O P,*nEct,c,,
O P,9,E g,c,;
y 3
C 9
INSP. RESULTS C INSPECTION COMPLETEo, ALL APPLICA8L* ITEMS SATISFACTCRY O i~5eECrics CouatErEo. unsifisr2CTCar iTE es usTEo eELow
'c^
to ITEM NO.
W QC INSPECTION ATTRIBUTCS y gayg
.p
'I t2
- 3
.3 1.
Heutekeanina i
1 2.
Contamination of Stainless Steel l
{
lIl l.
3.
l Material /Ecufptwnt Sterace ll l
4.
Installed Items l
I 4.1 Cables and Cable Travs l
l l
4.2 N hanical l
l 4.3 Instrumentation l
l I
!I III I l l l l 1
l REM AR K$ (CwGS,5PEC5, ETC.)
Rc.arto NcR ao jCATL i sicu Tun IS I
TUGCO OA Form No. I t
ah,,b
's..%e c. s
/'*--l/ / 'N
, p*, _ j v
o OA 2.ICCRD Quali:7 Assurance 0.epar en:
307. NC. M-Noncenicr anca :.a;'::: I.M C?.)
C?SES-35-l'.95
?AGI
/
/
jr~v. -.c. i Cs
- r. 7 ", n.. - ". i
- c..- :.."..
,.m..e..,.
2 r.,
.a.g.
..,. y, _. :. -.,,.;
wa..
.,.4a.s.-.su
.n
.....u..
M A
'l.5"b Lbtvc 7~0/3 E
~3 0~ 2 '-A h
NCNCON7CO'#I'!G CC:Q'-~CN SL'35YSTEi j
'/#/ 8'.9 /
?.CCM UC..J ~kM
.n : v.: %,. r..= - -. ~.,,.,
- 2. 1 2.n< y
- s.s'~
6C C, 2..:=j.
I.n.,c v. :.,...
e e--..
.a.,
.v s.f // cs s97i civ' s,c C/rMnw.) C A.adA'divCc TNG 2 f. c9'77-/ V l
'
- S - a d Z" " ' " " """ # "" *"'* **
occadsta m' c*~
70/J -d', <3 WA 2CE '/'7 dunic//Zid ME /.rs:c/s *l.
,ry:vn / sac s A'L R' 7C /,.I-A~
8 >*-A /ns.U wf/CWi M,27. CE m C v 5 :) -; a; y n:. /
ac v<v2 7.:ui m c2end.svcE rA G.:riu. e TrAcsta.
I t,
I l
I I,
.,.=. e.:.
=. =,e n.p :v g.~
~.w=~..~4.
- c..e.v.,
- i.,.
.. a. c.,
3 A-
.n (f. W A M k*
- ?
AC-'CU ACCP.I5SEI
'N' S R9 0 I Et N05-2 :.ECCI'l A5MI CCCE ~~E!:
^
go e YT.=C, t.l'U V. T.;.
.14
- 4
.gy
- a
(
l v.*J..e.n. r9 C,. *.. ~L. e.1
?
J s.
g.,
.,,,., = C.
C.,
- A.
c.
. -: v.3, 3
4 g
- 3. 3..: a.s.
.-e u
I n- - -..
a c.
2 A i. U :.c.,
l e
4 i
I i,
I t
t 4
e e
e l.
I.
w e
a 1:
l s. A :n -.
. s..G.
.q :. <. =.s.
<n
., A :
.---pe...
i l
- .~7 j
- T* *
- T * ;, * * * * """; ; T *
- a ?.
a:. o. :.s e.-.
- 4..: : :.u * :- -
.a C... g.,.s..
- '- ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ - - -
.^- -
I
.u,-............::.....
.n.
9%.
.a
..;..--.,.a......
.n
..s i
.A 7 - a v a.
,..J.
4... $ w :.b '..
'...p---.
,A {..
w 14 :.:.: s w J. :
b w.
- b. :.i.a. r. l..
. A. J.
I a i ag.
.,.=;.
Mn ; T. e. -...9 /.-.
A.;.
.A.
t I
f V
.jt/
1; l, 59
. '.0 M 2 % :' Q 3.:... g n :...... =...
'd,.
l ISSUE PAGE PROCEDURE REVISION DATE NUMBER TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO CP-QP-16.0
/
1'4 I JUL 0 21984 1 of 9
(
^
j fl4)).U W,y -
. zw_ h : *
., ~
PREPARED
/_
j NONCONFORMANCES nm. :.;
~
k
/4/-
APPROVED BY:
.u'
/.
'0 ATE "g
REFERENCES _
1.0, 1
CP-QP-15.0, " Tagging System" 1-A CP-QP-17.0, " Corrective Act dfbOO8E 1-B GENERAL CON NO
- CM 2.0, PURPOSE AND SCOPE 2.1 this procedure is to establish a raethod The purpose of of documenting the identificatiorL resolution, and closecut It is the C
of nonconfomances as definedy in Paragraph 2.2.
responsibility of all site employees to report items of
?
nonconformance to their Wparvisor or to the TUGCOSite QA Supervisor.
The requirements contained herein are to 'nonconfonnances identified for material s, services or items associated with safety-related structures applicable systems and components not ASME Code,Section III, Division 1.
by inspection When nonconfonnances are detected and testing, they shall be reported in accordance NOTE:
describing with quality procedures / instructions the inspection or testing functions.
Where specific guidelines are not given in quali ty the provisions of this procedure / instructions, When a specific person shall govern.
procedureis assigned responsibility for an activity his/her designee may act in his/her place.
4 2.2 DEFINITI0f Nonconfonnance_
2.2.1
_A deficiency in characteristic, d_ocumentation, or procedure item unacceptacle or in-which renders the quality of an
(
detenninate.
f, I
m Y tra c0 h es-gn, W.
6 m^ ' '~u'~n"0G ci g
1
~*
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE i.
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
(
CPSES N
CP-Q P-16. 0 14 JUL 0 '2 1984 2 of 9 3.0 PROCEDURE 3.1 NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION 3.1.1 Field Identification When a nonconfonning condition as defined in Paragraph 2.2.1 is identified, the individual shall immediately apply a Hold Tag, when practical, (Reference 1-A) and note his name and
~
telephone extension on the tag. He shall return and note on the Hold Tag the appropriate NCR number when obtained from the TUGC0 NCR Coordinator.
~
h NOTE:
For electrical activities, the inspector may use his judgement to apply a Hold Tag to a nongonfoming J
j'y internal component.
For example, the inspector may
/"
apply a Hold Tag to a brqken/ damaged tenninal strip and note on the Hold Tag' wording such as " Applied I
to Teminal Strip Only." On the NCR;the statement i
would be " Applied to Tenninal Strip Onty - other L.
unrelated activities may proceed."
t Y
.I E
.+
3.1.2 Reoortina
-5 Nonconfoming). conditions shall be reported on the NCR fom (Attachment 1 Supporting documentation, e.g.,
Inspection Reports, NDE reports, drawings shall also be attached to 'or referenced on the NCR where appropriate.
The location of the nonconfonning condition (structure, roan nunber, elevation and area code) and the system /subsysten number shall be recorded on the NCR fona.
\\~
NOTE:
The systen/subsveth n.1ber is not required for discrepancies "e' tne :o conduit, cable trays, protective coat &.gs, Ale tray hangers or anchor bolt locations provided that the structure is identified.
3.1.3 Numberina the NCR Before sending the NCR to the appropriate Package Flow Group (PFG) the individual reporting the nonconfo rmance shall i
obtain a nunber from the TUGC0 NCR Coordinator.
This number L
shall be noted on the NCR and on the Hold Tag per Reference 1-A that is appli ed to the nonconfonning iten/ equipment.
!(
c Tl SMFM A.
F
.Jg N
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVIS!CN PAG ~*
"j
' NUMBER DATE
-j TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
~.
CP-Q P-16. 0 14 JUL 0 21984 3 of g 4
l The TUGC0 NCR Coordinator shall assign numbers as follows:
100214 e.g.
NCR M
80 sequential NCR nunber for that year Issued to 1
Unit I and common.
2XXXXX is issued to
..a Unit 2.
e year Discipline (Mechanical, Electrical J_nstrumentation,,C,ivil )
For NCR's.on items / components turned over to TUGCO, the TUGC0 NCR Coordinator shall add the letter "S"
after the NCR number and forward a copy to TUGC0 Startup fo r infomation.
._._4-The TUGC0 NCR Coordinator enters the NCR number and brief description of the nonconforming _ condition in tte NCR Log
,k (Attachment 2) for Unit 1 and common or Unit 2 as approprJate.
- - V-NOTE:
The PFG NCR Coordiiiators shall periodically review th,eir NCR Log (at least monthly ) to ensure accuracy and agreement with the TUGC0 NCR' Log.
~
3.2 PROCESSING NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS 3.2.1 Draft NCR The inspector signs and presents the NCR to the QC Supervisor for review.
The QC Supervi sor indicates his review by initialing after the inspectors signature.
The inspector forwards the NCR to the appropriate PFG NCR Coordinator who logs and forwa rds the NCR to the appropriate Quali ty Engineer.
When individuals assigned to departments other than QA/QC or QA/QC persons outside the Unit 1 and Unit 2 management organization are reporting a
nonconforming condition, they shall forward the draft Nonconfomance Report to the Uni t 2 (PFG) NCR Coordinator for processi1g -in accordance with this procedure.
3.2.2 Pre-Issuance Review and Preparation i
l The reported nonconfo nnance shall be evaluated by the Quality Engineer for clarity, accuracy, validity, specificity and legibility.
o
[
PROCEUURE REVISION ISSUE NUMBER DATE PAGE
.(
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
CP-QP-16.0 14 JUL 0 2 iso 4 4 of 9 i
(
3.2.2.1 NCR's may be voided at any time if it is determined that nonconfoming conditions do not exist, the nonconformance was previously reported on another NCR or other similar conditions exist.
In the event that an NCR is detemined to be invalid, " Void" shall be entered in bold letters in the disposition block with the reason and justification for voiding the NCR. Any pertinent supporting documentation
(
shall be attached to the NCR and referenced in the' reason and jus tification statenents.
Voiding of NCR's shall be approved by the QE Supervisor or his designee. The original voided NCR will be forwarded to the (PFG) NCR Coordinator, f
3.2.2.2 If the NCR is detemined to be valid, the reviewer assigns an " Action Addressee" and signs and forwards the draft NCR to the (PFG) NCR Coordinator.
3.2.3 NCR Issue The PFG NCR Coordinator enters the da te issued in the
(
NCR Log, maintains a copy and forwards the original NCR3o the " Action Addressee".
.c p 7..
3.2.4 Discosition 3.2.4.1 Final Disposition (Rework, Repair, Scrap. Use-as-is)
/
The
" Action Addressee" shall evaluate each reported I
nonconfonning condition and determine an appropriate dis position to correct and/or resolve the nonconfomance.
The disposi tion shall be clearly. and conci sely recorded in the " Dis position" space on each NCR according to the following:
a.
The respective di sposition block (s) shall be checked (i.e., Rework, Repair, Use-As-Is and/or Scrap).
b.
Rework Di spositions shall specify the rework actions required to correct the nonconfoming conditions and bring the affected itens into compliance wi th the specified requirements.
h TUGCC CA
i l
PROCEDURE RWISION PAG:
ISSUE NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
O3 CP-Q P-16.0 14 JUL 0 2 584 5 of 9 c.
Repair Dispositions shall specify the repair actions required to bring the nonconfoming characteristic (s) to a condition such that the capability of the affected item to function reliably and safely is unimpaired, even though the item still may not confom to specified requirements.
Repair dispositions shall also include appropriate Engineering technical justification for acceptance of the item with characteristics that do not comply with specified design requirements.-
d.
Use-As-Is Dispositions shall include sufficient Engineering technical justification to establish that the nonconfaming characteristic will result in no adverse conditions and that the affected item will continue to meet all Engineering functional requirements, including perfomance, maintainability, fit and safety.
-e e.
Scrap Dispositions shall be made when it is detemined that an iten is unsuitable for its intended purpose and cannot be feasibly or economically rewo rked or k
repaired.
c P-3.2.4.2 Temporary Waiver c5
~
For those nonconfoiming itens which Construction / Engineering desires to continue to process on
- t. " risk removal" basis, authorization shall be requested in the NCR disposition.
In order to receive this authorization to continue the process, the following conditions must be satisfied:
a.
The NCR disposition shall include sufficient infoma-tion and direction for accmplishing the work.
Detail shall be provided to pemit adequate evaluation of potential impact to affected parties (i.e., construction, engineering, QA/QC, records, start-up and operations);
b.
Engineering Review / Approval shall be by the Engineering Grm!n Supervisor or above; c.
Quality Engineering Review / Approval shall be by the Discipline Level III QE or above.
Af ter approval of the disposition a Blue Temporary Waiver Tag, per Reference 1-A, shall be affixed to the item.
The NCR number shall be noted on the Temporary Waiver Tag.
-. -.. -. ~. - -
.}
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE 3
NUMBER DATE TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
- ". (-
CPSES CP-QP-16.0 14 M 2 1984 7 of 9 i
3.2.9 Verification / Closure The appropriate QC Supenisor shall ensure that the NCR disposition work items are verified and/or witnessed by QC.
QC shall docunent their inspections (Via inspection I
reports, checklists, travelers, etc. as required).
The QC Supenisor shall ensu re that all documents required fo r O
closure shall be either attached to or referenced on the NCR and forward the NCR to the QE for closure.
The QE, shall close the NCR by signing the " Verification" block of the original.
The closed' NCR will then be transmitted by the PFG NCR Coordinator to the Pemanent Plant Records Vault (Unit 1 and common) or when the data package is complete, to the Interim Records Vault (Unit 2) and the-dat-e entered in the NCR log.
Copies of closed NCR's are transmitted to the TUGC0 PCR coordinator for closure of the TUGC0_NCR log.
l\\
3.3 CORRECTIVE ACTION
_ _ ~
F-Copies of NCR's shall be tf ansnii tted daily to the' QA Supervisor for evaluation of the need for corrective action.
8 1
il
.s l
r ---
~.....:...--
- 1 j
PROCEDURE ISSUE REVISION PAGE NUMBER DATE t-TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
((
CP-QP-16.0 14 CPSES JUL 0 21384 6 of 9 3.2.5 Action Addressee Review /Acoroval Only the authorized representative of the Action Addressee may sign the Engineering Review / Approval block.
?
? 2.6 Ouality Assurance Review The NCR disposition shall be reviewed by the Discipline 3
Level III Quality Engineer for adequacy and confonnance to applicable specifications, code requirements and current drawing / design change.
If the disposition is satisfactory the Pra NCa Cooreinator enters the date on the NCR log and puts the NCR into the data package.
If the disposition is not satisfactory, the Quality Engineer shall resolve all conments with the Engineer l
who dispositioned the NCR.
Upon Quality Engineering approval of the disposition, and prior to beginning any rework /repadr, QC shall. remove the y
red hold tag and blue waiver tag-(if applicable).
3.2.7 Revision of Nonconfonnance Recoets.
$b When changes are required to the nonconfonning condition or disposition, the NCR shall be revised.
This revision shall be denoted on the NCR nunber and the reason (s) for revision included in the comments section.
The necessary approvals shall be obtained in accordance wi th this procedure for the portion affected by revision, s
3.2.8 Imolementation of the Discosition l
NCR's shall be sent by the PFG NCR Coordinator to the appropriate department responsible for implementation of
,j the disposition.
[
E For NCR's identified with an "S" after the NCR number, an infonnation copy will also be sent to TUGC0 Startup.
l l
,,. ~.., -. _ _. -
(
, 'a i
t l'
t 1
INSTRUCTION ISSUE
' (
REVISION PAGE NUMBER DA4c
- . t TEXAS UTIUTIES GENERATING CO.
CPSES l.lj CP-QP-16.0 14 JUL 0 21984 3 of 9, c.
l '4 ATLOIENT 1 l
?d L
.,p,,,.~,.,.....,.,......g9.'. w *.;c.
r.
~*- 2s%,% q,.nf g.t:f7 9 p y p. -r
. --.,.~.,
, -. ~~M. %;,n o'*.*".- '9 :s, ' < ~ '
.5 i
CCMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC' STAT 10N
~ _
. ~
m mEs
~
oeseRArises cc.
i NONCCNFORMANCE REPCRT (NCR) 174E7 STRUCTURE /STSTEM ITDd/COMPCNENT TAG /l0 NUMSER LOCATION CR ELEVAflON RIR NQ.
,j 8eONCONFORMJ40 CCNOITION
.J w
ZZO M
l T(PICAI, 2y
.g O
c.wE e
k I
- c REFERENCE DOCUMENT' REV PARA
- W REPCRTED ST:
CATE:
1 CE REVIEW / APPROVAL:
CATE:
/
/
w O
ACTION AOCAESSEE DEPARTMENT CISPOSITION:
REWCAN REPAIR USE AS 13 -
SCRA#
tu wm M
W c:
G o.
o<
r 9no<
e ENG. REVIEW /AFPAQvAL DA T E -
/ '/
CE REVIEW MyAL:
CAft:
tu
/ /
O DISPCSITION %1RtFICATION & CLQ$URE:
pAgg; I
/
f i
\\,
CCMMEN T S:
e TUGCC CA
l U
REVISION 1
PAGE NUMBER 0
- j (
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO.
J\\~
CPSES JUL 0 2 $84 cp.no 16.0 1c 9 of 9 ATTACHMENT 2 l
.i.
J
'. N I
I 45 i
g t
5.
I
.s I
K E
t -
~
8 f
J L<
Eh a
2-
.r 7..r
'n -
c
.I '
~
g s
y r-m i
l h
s=
a g
a e
h*
e 1
1 1
11 lillli e
R g
l a
E3 e.,.
g.
Et l
a
'o l
1 m
da l
93 p
m_
(
T4 o
- x.
g g
a.'
.t 1
ll Tucco OA re,m % 2
x 1
~ ' ' ' ~
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING CO5IPANY ogg_gatsg il OFFICE MEMORA ND UM To R.
A.
Jones Glen Rose. Texas July 12, 1984
(
Construction Startup/ Turnover Surveillance subject Defic 4,ency Reports (CSTS-SDR)84-010.and 84-012
Reference:
1)
DQA-34181 2)
DQA-84182 After meeting with you and your staff on July 10, 199'. and learning the problem areas identified in the above CSTS-SDR's had been identified by your staff and were being investigated, no reply to this office is required.
I recocmend the investigation your staff has co==enced in this area be continued.
Based on the above information, (CSTS-SDR)84-010 and (CSTS-SDR)81-012 are being rescinded.
h
. 2. Roberts O
ce=====c:1c= s ce=c=9 /t===cve=
Surveillance Supervisor JHR/pr cc:
C. H. Welch A. Vega J. T. Merritt RMS f
P l
?
~"
12 5
i
-*-w,+4,, - -
--m,
,sy----,-e-, -, - - - - -
-.,,,-,-,w, n
p
--m
(
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY DQA-84181 OFFICE MEMORAND UM O
1.
- a. A. aceee c: a,.. r.x,
ze1v 6.
198:
Construction Startuo/ Turnover Surveillance Subjea Deficiency Report (CSTS-SDR)84-010 l
The attached deficiency report identifies a problem within your area of responsibility which requires corrective action.
Please complete Section B of the attached report and return the original by July 13, 1984 If you have any questions or require assistance on this subject, please contact the undersigned at B&R Extension 567.
l i
x
- JJ J Ad J / ll. Roberis ' ~
Cojstruction Startup/ Turnover Survetilance Supervisor g0)
JHR/pr attachment cc:
C. H. Welch f jf t/ i
^*
9x s/
Y S
\\
I
'r L3 y
/
NJ U
f J
k i
9,
. g I
TEXAS UTILITIES CENEPATING i;0 r--
CONSTRUCTION STARTUP/ TURNOVER SURVEILLANCE
%S d ()i.. n. _ :
/
1:
- /
[ SURV REPORT DEFICIENCY REPORT DEFICIENCY NO.
CSTS-SDR-64-010 N/A REFERENCE DOCUMENT DATE REPC?.TED
-[CTIVITY
)
Design Change Author 1:atian 15196 07/06/54
?
Operations I&C DESCRIPTION OF DEFICIENCY Reactor Water Storage Tank (RWST) temperature indicator 1-TI-4793 was changed fro 15196.
0-100 deg. F to 0-200 deg. F scale by Design Change Authorization (DCA) No.
g I&C changed out the =eter scale and ran a calibration check on March 5, 1984 Lec; E
recalibration was not done at this time.
On June 13, 1984 I&C signed off Table II C
7 of ICP-PT-48-02 as a 0-100 deg. F meter scale based on the last calibration on 7
Test Procedure Deviation (TPD) No. 6 to ICP-PT-48'-02 had to be November 28, 1983.
written on June 27, 1984 to use local temperature probe due to calibration of 0
g temperature indicator 1-TI-4793 not being valid.
A REPORTED BY REPORTED TO TS UPER7ISOR DPROVAL -
DUE DATE h n Roberts /
07/12/84 D.A. Eddie R. Cowan A
DISPOSITION / CORRECTIVE ACTION U
S E
C I
I O
l N
B CCMPLETED 3Y DATE REVIE*iED BY DATE CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFICATION i
S E
C T
I O
C VERIFICATION 3Y DATE CSTS SUPERVISOR CLOSEGUT DATE
i 1
^. QPEC, EAH, TJCCO (2),,ud (4)
,.~:
- 01 0F' 'C; A11lJ n
p PAGE 1 CF 2
EliG'l\\El-'R'i\\'
SE Ol\\"2 Y Cd>1GE INDEX:CEI g}
CCtdANCEE PF).K STEM EIECTRIC STATICI
- II 1,d CESIGi Ca>2EE AUISCRI*ATIQi
- IIIggc, I
I (WII.L) (N!II.XI;OO) BE DA u.wPATED Di CESIGi CCCD.EC CCA !O.15196 1.
SAFETY F)CED CCCTST": XX YES 10 2.
CRIGriA'ICR: CPPE XX CRIGDIAL. DESIGTER
=
3.
CE5N_. FITCN:
A.
APPLICABLE SPEC /Dr.#CCCNEtc 2323 MS-605 REv. 1 s
B.
DEIAII.S See cace 2 of this DCA.
O
,1CO 90. 25 -110" l7 E C E I V E l9 M DEC 011982 k !.
. c P c f V C' 4.
SCPitRrrn CCCwsmTICti:
5.
APFFC'v"AL SIGCC RIS: WRX/bb November 29, 1982 A.
CRIGDIAICR:
[
k[M.
CATE ///?e /81 B.
CESIGi REPRESECATr/E:
ja,an/
CATE // # -
~
6.
VD tCR TPA':SMI""X RECUIRED: YES XX (2)
!O CF-MOS 7.
SMTAFD DISTRIEUI"Ot:
- O,u AF?dS (Criginal)
(1)
TUSI S.U. Scecial cro.f ects(ICA FCFM 11-6C cuality Engir.eering (1) B. F. Jones Procurement (2)
M::un. Pav 7-s!
TS for Crig. Design (1)
Wastincheuse-Site
( 1)
CFP (AC (2) l 1
- aNI,eli-
? 5h?l}{h?~t -
l O
- $sig '
' 0CA-15196 0
Ism
. Page 2 of 2 is/ 3 i
I 3
i Change the following data sheets as specified belcw:
DATA SHEET TAGh0.
SCALE UNITS / RANGE 13.11 PI-2001A PSIA PI-20018 PSIA PI-2002A PSIA PI-2002B PSIA PI-2003A PSIA PI-20038 PSIA PI-2004A PSIA PI-200dB PSIA 13.09 TI 4793 0-200 13.05 FI-4352 0-55 FI-4355 0-55 N+
13.15 FI-2251 0 450 ENGINEERING JUSTIFICATION:
(1) Consistent scale Units required by Human Factors Engineering.
(2) Correct error in data transposition.
(3) Range change to match transmitters.
(4) Range changed to match maximum ficw of FE-2251 and FT-2251.
M I
AT""ACICiEN C CP-SAP-6 g %,2fj'fh d t Revision 9 y'g3Qjl h ;L Startuo Work Authoriestion Page 17 of 17 System
Title:
N/ftb6 4 N>t
- u. eb Unic No.:
/
Startup System No.: [263 Authori:stion No.: /8864 Work Description (Include identification of,co:ponents affected):
A)A>jor: deJf dd/>+ sol Anud d,di,.sks suAn sArco,i ~,
/
A N/k h*
/Y.
/?alem Le+,Lin/ -xct cl^ew1 iM,hn sw/ AL4
/
~ f Abr2 8),efurb
?dou 0
ui hL&oM (t]IC\\ dO3 kd 614/ J'2-004 /2 N/:c/d.
/
Reference Drawings:
M
/
/ A f/11/R.f g/ $d' 1
Work Location (Bldg., elevation. room, ares, etc.):
Reason for Work: (i.e., DCA, CMC, NCR, etc.) 52'A/rda,Ise,/d Gz.X/g,6Gd7dd O*
u; Est1=ated time required to complace work:
AtuAfS Work Requested By:
e/>AA./
h2d
/d'6-M3
//
Name/ Phone Extension /Date Safety Tags Required:
YES If Yes, CP-SAP-5 Authori:ation No.:
/
STA-605 Clearance No:
- //'
Work Authorized By:
! C.,jo2/ /d "d laced on Ecid by:
e//4!
/
STE/Date STE/Date All Construction Work Completed:
RETURN ~3!S FORM TO TUCCO STARTUP Construction Department /Date Work Verified Complete:
Startup Engineer /Date f
Retesting Required:
- >AC //v4/ a -J-o[mu+f,I'nI[nd'.6 A/he S',2 bs' A go" <s ) n nwr'b Jtatest C.:= plate:
Startup Engineer /Date Required Recests and Retest Data Approved By:
Date:
h
WRY-EZ-004 l
Pa;;e 3 of 3 yJ-252 INDICATOR DATA SHEET D)
,fff v
PROJECT:
Alb TAGHliMBER:
/- D~_
/764 SERIAL NUMBER:
/V/
EQljfPMENf' MODIFICATIONS:
The followirig cgrtify that those rodifications and only those modifications identified in a
J WRY-82 003 have been performed.
PERFORMED BY: _
DATE:
S. S'-8F t
/
' ELECTRICAL TEST:
As identified by WRY-82-004
[, /h.$ '
OA.TE:. '.. 3 - T-l!
PERFORMED BY:
G u,;p:
IC-/7S-
- lc,5 ?.M 4 4 g g c. v. 2.'- N Tes&
g, s
' RESULTS SCALE' READING:
MEASURED INPUT'5IGNAL
% OF SCALE 1ST TEST r 2ND TEST (IF REOUIRED)
' COMMENTS st
- 50%
e M77 ;.h
/A 100%
- 9. 9.V..)e.
N/t
~
50%
i p).'
d W,.,, Je.
0%.
i l<
,+.ilo be
/d,
~
()..
~
l e
-,_.m. _.,
3,.
-O DcCcxzNT NO.
.Sc-58-o TCTAL PAGES 8
COMANCHE PEAK STEAM, ELECTRIC STATION WESTINGHOUSE 7300 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTD'.S SCALING CALCULATION j
\\
C 1-T 4 93 V
\\
R'4ST TEMPEMTURE REVISION:
1 Zlk.ALwdk n 6 - 2 7 - 8.L ORIGIN '0R /
Da:e Eb bi
\\
REVg4E
/
Dace A&
d$W N
0$
etGas REVIE*4
' Data f:f/*,h
$ *2 5 E*/
CiGRG APPROVED Date O
z.
SC-58-OL l
Revision Page 2 of 8 j
1.
PURPOSE Loop 1-T-4793 monitors temperature in the RWST and prevides indication via 1-TI-4793 in the main control room.
I An alarm function is also provided in the =ain control roo=.
2.
SCOPE Loop 1-T-4793 is comprised of the following ite=s:
A. 1-TE-4793: Conax Platinum RTD (nominal 100 chs @ 32 *F)
- 3. 1-TT-4793: RTD Amplifier, (NRA) Style 2837AiSG01 C. 1-TI-4793: Vertical Indicator, y. Type 7X-252 ll D. 1-T3-4793: Analog Comparator, (NAC) Style 2338A32G01 l
E. 1-TT/4793: Annunciator Interface, (NAI) Style 2837A88G06 3.
REFERENCE DOCL'MErrS In addition to the Standard Reference Docunents in Section 2.0 of the Scaling Calculation Manus 1, the following references were used in the preparation of this docunent:
(j A.
Specification Sheets:
MS-622 Sheet 2-11 (RTD)
MS-6113 Sheet 18-46 (R/E Converter)
MS-605 Sheet 13-09 (Indicator)
MS-6113 Sheet 16-14 (Comparator)
B.
Drawings:
W IWD 8815D34 Sheet 31 ICD 2323-M1-2232-06 C.
Miscellaneous:
CCA 15196 l
g
[{
V~
K k-.2 g[if - )F l
SC-58-01 f$N. /p R viston
'@i 74)
(.-
fz j-i:t(v &pfp];
p*8* 3 Og a
.wt J.
a y y; 7
', Wl!;:n -jsag 7 y.7. -
q/'if.k;h, cALctrLATIONS b<
h;., c g @e s'W 4.
hhh 7, g, k.. w..'
A.
SENSOR -
yL
- f gjj RTD, Tag, E s.1-TE-4793 b'
The Conax Platinum RTD has a calibrated range of 0 to 200 'F
(
with exact and lineart:ed resistance values given below (See f""Of Appendix A, C or F of the Scaling Calculation Manual as applicable for derivation). The errors resulting from this linearization are given belev. The percent error is the ratio of the cenperature error to the temperature span expressed in percent.
- T O".P RTD-EXACT
- RTD-LINEAR
- LDIEAR-ERROR
- LINEAR-ERROR *
'F OEMS OHMS
'F
% of Span *
=
l 7
=
=
l0 93.030 93.124
-0.438
-0.219 n
50 103.904 103.859 0.210 0.105
=
=
=
=
=
- 100 114.684 114.593 0.424 0.212 n
,n s
a a
=
- 150 125.373 125.328 0.210 0.105
=
n n
- 200 135.970 136.063
-0.434
-0.217 The accuracy of this RTD is specified as the greater of : 1*7 or
- 0.52 of the reading in G&ll Specification MS-622. Section 3.6.2.
Scale Factor for Tc=perature = 0 to 200 'F
- F Delta g / Delta T = (136.063 - 93.124) ch=s / (200 - 0)
= 0.21469 ohns / *F Were: ( = R D Linear resistance value in ohns T = Process Tenperature in *F
\\.)
O
~cv 3
1;f YD.f:j + MS.g '
SC-58-01 fehb-yh.
Rwicion
.c Page 4 of 8 I
l:? Sifd.'
QM3);f$$)p1 '
i.
- gh N [
,r %
y B.
CABINET MOUNTED EQUIPMENT -
< y.4r, f r?
e p
Vlil' NOTE: The total accuracy for all cabinet =ounted signal f~"
process cards in a Loop is assu=ed to be 0.5% of
?'
span as listed in }[
'a' CAP-9712, a document issued for NSSS Lastrumentation.
This is a reasonable value for BOP instrumentation.
NSSS and BOP }[ 7300 series hardware is assu=ed equivalent.
1.
RTD CCNVERTER - NRA Tag No. 1-TT-4793, Located CI-04-04-34 The NRA card =ust be calibrated to give a 0 to 10 VDC output signal for the linearized (R ) input. The reference accuracy for the NRA card is specified (See Appendix H of the Scaling Calculation Manual) as t 0.25% of span, which for a 0 to 10 VDC span is equivalent to 0.025 VDC.
Therefore, the calibration points for the NRA card, based on the linear values of input resistance (R ) rounded to t
the nearest 0.01 chss, are as folicvs:
SRA QUT?.'T R, CEMS
=
. =
GC a
93.12 0.000 t 0.025
- n a
103.86 2.500 t 0.025
- 114.59 5.000 t 0.025
- 125.33 7.500 t 0.025
- 136.06 10.000 0.025
- The R
- "#* 2 "E~
E*# #
cold span derived using the methodology listed in Appendix A of the Scaling Calculation Manual, and are reiterated below:
cold R, sin = 93.12 ch=s R
=
u t.
= 136.06 chen L
=
not L33X 136.06 - 92.12 = 42.94 ch=a R
R
-R
=
=
span not cold The R conductance is defined as:
span 1/R. = (1 / R
) - 0.00008 c
span 0.0232. Thcs l
1/R
(! / 42.04) - 0.00003 a
=
g
W w
l SC-58-01 Rsvision Page 5 of a i
From Table 3 in the NRA section of the W 7300 Process Instrumentation and Control Equipnent Reference Manual:
I R
dipstick: Drill all holes EXCEPT AI, A, A, A12, A17 6
8 9
span NOTE: A and A are not used.
7 yg From Table 4 in the NRA section of the W 7300 Instrumentation and Control Equipment Reference Manual:
di stick: Drill holes A R
P 10 cold l
Install jumper TC, TA, T3, TD, TE, JU3-1, JUS-1 l
2.
Tag No. 1-TT/4793, Located CI-04-08-36
)
3 Annunciator Interf ace (NAI6) l l
Accuracy: Not applicable.
i C.
LVDICATION l
L.
INDICATOR - Tag No. L-TI-4793, Located C3-02 3 Type 7X-252
- ($
Input: 0 to 10 VDC Scale: 0 to 200 *F I
Scale Factor = (200 - 0) *F / (10 - 0) VDC = 20 *F / VDC Accuracy *F = 2 1.5:: of span or 3 *F.
II l
g b
u i
f
as-an-uu r
. +
t-Revision
.:a, i;,,['Tv:5[f 93}!!$;tRy l
- @y '.skh
?^
?agn 6 of S n
"i"f M
lt f;"i%f s; r; G
- - i e -
. i%:> -
- 1.,, ',E '
D.
SIGNAL CCMPARATCR(s) -
y
)
f The setpoint voltage is derived from the general equacien:
1
'vI setpoint = (Process setuoint - Trans=1tter ninimum) x 10 7DC f
~
Iransmitter Cal. Span 1.
Tag No. 1-T3-4793 Located CI-04-04-46 k', Signal Co=parator (NACL)
Input: 0 to 10 7DC Accuracy: : 0.5% of span or, ! l.0 *F LO ALARM setpoint, listed in I&C Equipnent List (2323-M1-2400) is 35*F.
7 SETFOINT = ((35 - 0) / (200 - 0)] x 10 7DC.
Y setpoine = 1.750 7DC : 0.050 7DC Using a ec=parator deadband of 0.35% of Input Span gives:
V reset = " As Lef t" 7 setpoint + 0.035 7DC Equivalent resistance at the input test point:
R trip = 100.64 ch=s : 0.21 ch=s
= "As Lef t" R setpoint + 0.15 ch=s R reset
- (
d
I SC-58"U Revis ti"5 I "I '
Page 5.
FICERE{
Figure 1. - FUNCTIONAL BLCCK -SCALDiG DIAGRAM.
6.
LOOP ACCURACIES A.
C. tI3 RATION TEST 3
1.
SENSOR - The accuracy specified vill be equal to the a c r "'
specified in the engineering approved docu=ents for char
,,,,./
component. Typically this will be equal to the vendo r d','
value.
2.
TRI? (CCMPARATOR) SETPOINT - Since the calibracien of th*
modules in the chain will be perf or=ed in such a manne r,dd to compensate for any upstream =edule errors, the "tri?
setpoint accuracy on a 10 VDC input span basis will h* 3", g i to that of the comparator. The cc=parator accuracy of.
10 VDC input span basis is : 0.050 VDC of span and t';,r a f"',
will beco=e the calibration trip accuracy.
3.
DTDICATION - Accuracy of both indicators and recorder * '#I' require an additional accuracy factor to account for readability.
A value of : 0.50 ef span (10 VDC) or 0.050 VDC will be utill:ed in =csc cases as a "rea0 05' constant". The actual ccepenent (indicator or recor'e r' accuracy will be calculated by arich=etically adding t**
S r ',,9 ccmponent accuracy to the " readability constant" to the overall indication accuracy value of the indicat:f recorder.
The indication accuracy is listed belov:
Indicator 1.57. + 0.50% =
2.0" or : 4.0 *F i
i t
h1 L
lEQra:i'e;;lK Q' Y l
r?rf 4p-y:p 5,.:.
Wi2M;;">,,
,,y m m.
sc-ea-n w,W!. I um1 i
y g.. -
~ a a --.
,,fy R WS T TEMPER A TLIRE l
0 '2.00*j;~
p,.,,,,, ;,,,,,,
& (=)= 0..:1.us T @ r ?.1u ws-na L2of 24Y.i4 (& = c,c97-[op)
(
,4 e
.J' 21i
- A 5 7"' M CfE43 7% M jy og 0
- 93. !& I36.C6 (UHf,Mf fQ n,Q EEE I.E t**.
50**. be $ = 4J/8 Agos.n a 93. l C., kuy l% CS =~-
A h.
2
-n la.sl I l-TY Rug zips ;,tx : pagu, g,, agg ;uwr,q 7e l
~
+%q 2.sm DtP ~:e 2 : ::Riu, Au. Excepr A.L, As Aq A t:.oA,t i
y o
i l
~~s a.s t* c t.t v> <.
C =fDVCd J I - Ta, y, ya ys
- 793
'*'~0'
- 4 Y l:C
~
ya y g*p-
~
Y Rg: jen.4.*.n.
[?'"'M*6HS
- y Spec of 5-i*
- f
(n f4 /f,,4
,(
+79 7 SA /3. 39 f-77/
?797 j,,0W ALAA!11 Q JUEM ANH.
I 9
w Who l
E f
e e U
i s
/
r l
n.-
l p
,* 'r $ e mood e
i
L W.
i.
e8 4-
~
Pace'1 ef C CI5IW VERIF: m-' we.
O'
\\
6/ Al @
,I cal:.:lation
_ S:ecifics *-.
Dravirs.CCG ',rA8 C-3.e:
Ui. e==D
=
SC. - Fo -O I Nt==e:
Favisien:
1 2 0. m 5:le: SCALidCr CA LC.. M I-7-D 3 NM 6I T&tY1fMTd(2.E~
I
% : %.dts) cf Verificaticn:
N Cesien Review
- Idternate Cale:istiicns cualifiestion n s:
(A::26 C:edlist)
(A::ac= CalcJ.latiens)
( A -**. 3s: Occ) j Yes X !b: rege. ired Interdis=ipline S,,b._i.
Reviews:
x
,,,,,,,Civ/S t:
5" ect
_I&C
_ Mech _Nu=1 I:2 Sys ser.s
- ni_ial ta.e DCA 15I 9(o 12 0 Q
.her :ccmen:(s) reviw..
SC A Lit 0 C-C.A LC. M M i) AL.
d 0%-
cm.:s:
i i
i
)
e 2.is dec=ent is desi:n wified.
i msi== veizie two aco) /zU6l0 I
'o
,c,
,9 u,.1,, *,/ ~ -
/.,,,
- s.,'
%J
.q p
i
,f
., ~.
este c / c.-
.' r ', c, c,s
.o up
/
' oiy4/
,=. = - -;..
i Pm in, 4
l
E,w d'aJ4 w+.W;W.tp'@ @e..w+s..
I m
.%- gy.a.g L,q**. W-
, u.
g.%, yip, :.. '.jgg.,,.,c,m.e'.
l u
- .m9
.,-i.
s.
, u ~s p.,..,~L.,,Mw; m.-a
- 9. A; *dn, o.. : * -
s
- q,+ <3x 37 W$,'. ";;~
CES*W PLvn-A W-2 LLM" 'f, '?
(Pace 1 c:i 2)
Pac.e 2 ed _
i: '
94AtidCr-caleda i=
spri--tica crawi.s DC UhtEVi' c-w (5:e._:y) nxcer:
SC O 1 Pavisi.~:: k Yes Ib N/A Are desi:n 1. pa_s =ce::1y selec_ed, 1.
des =ced, ed a;:;: lied?
2.
Esve design interf2:e reezirements been N
zde;;a ely addresced aM'sstisfied?
I fI 3.
Eas inf :: s-4m L.m refcenc=i rc==es and gevi : sly desi=n verified i =s been =ced %_c-;;1y?
4.
Ems a=li---Te c=na_.:::i= and cper= i.g e:c:=rience been c=.sideed?
o N
n 5.
- s a ;:=pz: me_h::d=1=7f e:=leyed?
6.
Are results reasen21e t-~
-ed :=
b
~
design ing::s?
y 7.
Are c
. iate cuality assur:nce A
reg =ements specified and/cr satisfied?
i B.
Are %.
. iste c: des, sez~*-
.2.s er reculat :7 re7;irer.:s iden~d #1ed X
~
f s
~,a m 4s.n. m..
N s
9.
F_m TEU. c=mi:=ents been adeqcstely M
ahmM?
10.
7:e ~ =er.:s f= rec =:d p: eparatien,
- renew, a,___
ssi, recentien, etc.
ly 350Tl3*ely a p ified?
11.
Aru tre s=e_-_"ied =rts, egaipant, r.2:crials, a-d ;: : cesses sui:2 le fer th X
/
4 reezired. ;:licatien e.d envLennent?
[
J Ihe ts. 6 ed epine h og e se 3:*d Md. re"'*2*.ts :"*.% -Ocell.fied?
_/
M' he.8
(
,-~s*
e
- s. s--
A M./
6.
, ['t.
.N I4 g
- /..
~
i
- d rei
- t. ?
'.i s' - ? w>
-y
( Jm d
V %..;;L ;W' f?
shnl$, 2
,:4kg D E3 TG& P M.d CECTi' %:
hge 3 cf 3 l}h (Page 2 of 2)
':.V scudcr 1
Itc.omEATi ceer cal =ulatien spec <<
tien nr.wn; (SpecL:!)
SC.-56-OI uu=er:
h visiLn:
Yes
!b WA A:l~e 2tecessibilD*f reqJ.irmar.ts fOr f
13.
- sintenance, m..a1 cperatien, and q
p=st-ac=ident uti=ns a5eg2 tely
^
c=nsidered?
i v
- 14. Are @ste dippi.x;, han:!1ing, u_.:sge, A
and cleani.g req.:irements w4 M?
Are mie==*:e idW "- -J~2 regim s E
15.
. W ed?
- 16. Ess a,
, - 4
~a c=.sidersti=n h given t:
O
- =distien==:ecti=n and safety cf =lan:
X -
r i
~
W2..iel an:1 de p 211c?
Ibes de design eet de intent of 9.e desi=n T7.
bases and de design req +ements dec..:re::s?
.t...: TE r-8.2a _
S..
W 1
i
'O c
't
.h i
I e
e i
l
hl;^KVi'91 ll?l, p 9b v' - &5 ' SW ~ O ff?
N OUALITY SURVEILLANCE CHECKLIST 002 Category No.
Administrative Category Title Richard A. Getchell 07-19-84 Pre re B Date 7-24 ~f4-s Ajiproved By '
Date l
002A05 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT The Operations Superintendent shall be responsible for UNSAT developing and implementing procedures and instructions N/0 specifying shift manning requirements. These procedures and instructions shall be contained in the Operations Department Administration Manual.
(OAC/QAP 5.1, Rev.
M og no1 - 101 l
maqu 6 ** 4
""S :
k 002A06 ATTRIBUTE:
l SAT The shift manning requirements shall be in accordance with I
UNSAT the requirements specified in the Final Safety Analysis N/0 Report.
(OAC/QAP 5.1, Rev.
C0FDfENTS :
l f
7, n
r.
+.
\\,
n 4.
e 002A09 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT A Shift Technical Advisor shall be onsite and within 10 UNSAT
, minutes of the esin control room at any time either u W N/0 is operating in modes 1-4.
The Shift Technical Advisor ~is qualified to provide technical advice and engineering sup-port to the Shift Supervisor in the areas of transient analysis and accident ssessment.
"T.S. %W - 6,2-l --*
(OAC/QAP 5.1, Rev.
3g
,10 (T5(,e2.sg NkM b A%p.
COMMENTS:
c0 A-3o t.
d
$$ k k btI N&
.5.lb Gu com.
x r.
., -. m. iu m.
- + -,
' ~ ' *
' - ~ ' ',' " ' '. STn Q 002A12 ATTRIBUTE:
No5-7o1 fer GME
- N" SAT _!
Shift Technical Advisors shall utilize a procedure that UNSAT describes the minimum information exchange requirements kUus M %w,)
gdQg [s,,
N/0 needed to accomplish the STA relief and shift turnover.
(OAC/QAP 5.2, Rev.
g, g h 4 ghcp COMMENTS:
7
- g. g g y Gul.vAM Wi%g g_
y$
3/
Ms >Y...Y. h x
w m
002A14 ATTRIBUTE:
Prior to assu.ning responsibility for being ooerstnr at he SAT cAls, the relief operator should be properly brief ed UNSAT N/0 on the plant status.
In order to ensure that proper relief occurs, adciinistrative procedures should be written to describe what is required.
- l* 2 (R.G. 1.114) g _ g q,3 { p g gek m,Ji IC
%... '.. m S
\\0re.Udr W g
g M ejosu llc.u. E,0 C.f 88,MS /D4
~ U- -
~
d eftb P d LA Mta 6. %...t. 4,.tk.h w.4, m g a % w...... 3 w
6Y *
@Ms&c:E*/
U'
~
002A15 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT Administrative procedures should include, as a minimum, a UNSAT definition of proper relief (e.g., what information is N/0 required to be passed on and acknowledged between the tum
!!15)
CbA COMMENTS:
y n
w t
/
/1 002A25 ATTRIBUTE:
/
SAT Administrative procedures shall provide provisions govern-UNSAT ing required shift staffing and moveme w _of key individuals i
N/0 about the plant. These provisions are required to assure that qualified plant personnel to can the operational
/
^
shifts are readily aveilable in the event of an abnormal
'{
or emergency situation.
f l
(NUREG 0737; I.A. 1.3)
COMMENTS:
KA h e M M tota-g'l ML M NCh b
NM Ok y 002A26 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT [
These administrative procedures shall also set forth a hlf UNSAT policy, the objbetive of which is to operate the plant N/0 with the required staff and develop working schedules such that use of overtime is avoided, to the extent practicable, for the plant staff who perform safety-related functions.
(NUREG 0737, I.A.
1.3)
COMMENTS:
002A27 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT Operating license applicants shall complete staffing f.i i
h UNSAT procedures before fuel loading.
g[h f
N/0 V (NUREG 0737.
I.A.
1.3 L
(}D' COMMENTS:
j 002Bil ATTRIBUTE:
g kemewd Records shall be considered valid only if stanped, initial-Too I.M SAT w
UNSAT ed, signed, or otherwise authenticated and dated by autho-S Ia*38-N/0 rized personnel. These records may be either the original 30, QC w.
- N.*r 4 or a reproduced cop.
g g, gg K.
(OAC/QAP, 3.8, Rev.
~
' Soot.4G. g /,-g COMMENTS:
b Q,
$5-Locf-9-,A.gy v
002B13 ATTRIBUTE-SAr y co-3dl Procedures shall be provided to prescribe the conduct for UNSAT the control of operatin ogs and documents.
L s
(OAC/QAP, 5.2, Rev. p?
M/0 Y.
COMMENTS: ObA-73i
]
FAMAGA D
N.
b dh arp Imy't 6'Wtc Mn d.fft., Afrieve/64l/u dad &m-(f clu.ep, Ip ' ru a u u d
- ?
6 A_. m / a A_, P, 8 1 % 244w Ns.
002C01 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT The Operations Department Superintendent shall be responsi-UNSAT ble for developing and implementing instructions and proce-N/0 dures to prescribe responsibilities of shift personnel and the conduct of shift operations activities.
h (OAC/QAP, 5.2, Rev.
)
COMMENTS:
9 002C02 ATTRIBUTE:
f
/ obA-iot SAT Are the responsibilities and authorities of the plant
-c-UNSAT operating personnel delineated in the Operations Depart-N/0 ment Ad=inistration Manual?
4 (OAC/QAP, 5.2, Rev.
~
COMMENTS:
002C05 l ATTRIBUTE:
- g SAT During periods when senior management personnel are not on UNSAT site, the Shift Supervisor assu=es responsibility for all N/0 station activities.
(OAC/QAP, 5.2, Rev. Z COMMENTS:
p qg a w L a d d ;
s s e r e y d h o %. r.s d t l e wM-e
-- a e
2s 002C10 ATTRIBUTE:
.1,rundselc.lhet b b ].,
g.gf)p 7
SAT The Shif t Technical Advisor shall -r+.. W the Shitt UNSAT Supervisor when assigned to on-shift duty and will provide N/0 technical advice and engineering support to the Shift Supervisor primarily in the areas of transient analysis and accident assessme t.
(OAC/QAP, 5.2, Rev.
,3 Q. M tQ Q
j COMMENTS:
.V 002C14 ATTRIBUTE:
rgg SAT Operating personnel (i.e., AO's, RO's, SRO's, and SS) shall UNSAT ensure that control measures such as locking or tagging to N/0 secure and identify equipment in a controlled status are complied with per station racedures.
04 (OAC/QAP, 5.3, Rev 3
06&4%9A COMMENTS:
7 k
i 002C15 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT Operating personnel shall ensure that control of equipment,
$Th-60 $~
UNSAT as necessary, to maintain personnel safety and equipment g
N/0 safety and to avoid unauthorized coeration of ecuipment is adhered to per station equiremente.
(OAC/QAP, 5.3, Rev.
)1,,
Z-Fj-
% *) * ~ [ E ' } ^ b COMMENTS:
hJ #j y%V l
1 L
~ -
{
002C16 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT [
Operating personnel shall conduct independent verifications, f
UNSAT where appropriate, to ensure that necessary measures, such
/
N/0 as tagging equipment, have been implemented correctly.
These independent verifications shall be documented per station procedures.
og NW \\f j ~ -
(OAC/QAP, 5.3, Rev.
2 COMMENTS:
m 002C19 ATTRIBUTE:
O bsett<
SAT Permission to release safety-related equipment or systems UNSAT for maintenance shall be granted by the Shif t Supervisor..
(f'[,i,g bg (gg N/0 Y
Prior to granting permission, the Shift Supervisor shall verify that the equipment or system can be released, and y
deter =ine how long it may be out of service in accordance with the Technical Specif cations.
(OAC/QAP,'5.3, Re.
g ol COMMENTS:
- N90,
~
002C21 ATTRIBUTE:
f.
f."< j b
[~f
.J
- 4\\
SAT Operations Department personnel shall document the infor=a- - y 'g}&' '
hr,1 UNSAT tion as noted in Question 002C19 of this checklist.
[
.L9W$ ',,
N/0 X
(OAC/QAP,5.3,Rev.[
g
-.~>
y e<
p
- f i '(
COMMENTS:
\\
I
- c. h;\\ / /
N h!
h sF Y@@ /
}/g(/
r 4
k' e
k 002C22 ATTRIBUTE:
h k
'f When equipment is ready to be returned to service, the SAT UNSAT Shift Supervisor shall order the equipment placed in N/0 operation and verify and document its functional accept-(OAC/QAP, 5.3, Rev. [
2.gg.
,,j))
ability.
COMMENTS:
f, g
,9% dQA M @ - q w
s
-,UpIs -
002C28 ATTRIBUTE:
3 01 SAT Prior to assuming responsibility for being operator at the
[
UNSAT K controls, the relief operator should be properly briefed N/0 Y on the plant status.
In order to ensure that proper relief
'N~
occurs, administrative procedures should be written to describe what is required.
(R.G. 1.I14)
Te.a.
COMMENTS:
s as '-
9 1
i t (fj\\
x 002C29 ATTRIBUTE:
ur The administrative procedure should include, as a minimum, SAT w UNSAT a definition of proper relief (e.g., what information is T
N/0 W required to be passed on and acknowledged between the two 5
I operators).
}
I (R.G. 1.114)
%/
COMMENTS:
t
_g 002D07 ATTRIBUTE:
3 mea,M SAT
/
The SORC and ORC shall review reportable occurrences, as UNSAT required by the Technical Specifications.
N/0 Mk (OAC/QAP, 3.6, Rev. 2)
COMMENTS:
002Dil ATTRIBUTE:
d S +ott &
/ gpfC Operations Center shall be notified by telephone.as SAT UNSAT soon as possible and in all cases within one hour.
The N/0 _ X )
Manager, Nuclear Operations and the ORC shall be notified within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> in the event a Safety Li=it is violated.
(Tech. Specs. 6.7) k....~. ( b kW 1 ~*d.
COMMENTS:
A 3
A %d um 002D12 ATTRIEUTE:
g(g SAT M A Safety Limit Violation Report shall be prepared.
The UNSAT report shall be reviewed by the SORC. This report shall N/ *x7 describe:
(1) applicable circucstances preceding the violation, (2) effects of the violation upon facility components, systems, or structures, and (3) corrective action taken to prevent recurrences.
(Tech. Specs. 6.7) g[,
C0F0!ENTS:
?~
_ he Ltm 002D13 ATTRIBUTE:
/
The Safety Limit Violation Report shall be submitted to the UNSAT-Commission, the ORC, and the Manager, Nuclear Operations N/0 within 14 days of the violation.
(Tech. Specs. 6.7) 574d COMMENTS:
002D31 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT The REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES of Specifications 6.9.1.10 and'
}
UNSAT
.9.1.1 including corrective actions and measures to N/0 X
pr eut recurrence, shall be reported to the.NRC.
Supple-mental reports may be required to fully describe final h4 hk resolution of occurrences.
In case of corrected,or supple-mental reports, a Licensee Event Report shall be completed and reference shall be made to the original report date.
/[b gh (Tech. Specs.'6.9)
COMMENTS:
002D32 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT The type's of events listed in 6.9.1.10 shall be reported UNSAT within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> by telephone and confirmed by telegraph, N/0
\\/
mailgram, or facsimile transmission to the Regional Office
('
of the NRC no later than the first working day following the event, with a written follow-up report within 14 days.
The written follow-up report shall include, as a minimum, f[g a completed copy of a Licensee Event Report form.
[\\
(Tech. Specs. 6.9)
COMMENTS:
m 002D33 ATTRIBUTE:
SAT The types of events listed in 6.9.1.11 shall be the subject UNSAT of written reports,to the Regional Administrator of the N/0 K Regional Office of the NRC within 30 days of occurrence of the event. The written report shall include, as a minimum, a completed copy of a Licensee Event Report form.
,5 (Tech. Specs. 6.9)
COMMENTS:
I h
l A
{p
N 7
END OF CHECKLIST 4
I e
L_
[
TUQ-2260 TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY i
OFFICE MEMOR ANDUM J.H. Roberts Glen Rose, Texas July 31, 19 8t.
To Construction Startup/ Turnover Surveillance Reports Subject
'l A review of several recently issued construction Startup/ Turnover Surveillance Reports and corrective action for the findings in these reports indicates that we have a rather cumbersoce system for ident-ifying and resolving these ite=s.
A majority of the items identified by surveillances (screws loose, bolts missing, loose u-boles, etc.) could be corrected on the spot without the generation of forwarding memorandums and memorandums in response.
In addition, so=e of the findings (dimensions out of tolerance, are strikes on vendor supplied piping, lack of traceability, etc.) are items which should be identified as nonconforming conditions and be tracked as such by use of Nonconfor=ance Reports.
To more efficiently handle the identification and correction of findings to _ surveillance reports I am establishing the following policy for the reporting of Construction Startup/ Turnover Surveillances, a.
Minor ite=s which can be spot corrected as mentioned above should be brought to the attention of personnel at the time these ite=s are identified, such that the items can be corrected on the spot.
b.
For items identified'which clearly cannot be corrected during the surveillance activity and meet the requirements for the issuance of a Nonconformance Report (NCR), an NCR should be issued with reference to the NCR/NCR's in the surveillance report.
The personnel perfor=ing the surveillance reports should c.
continue to use the CSTS deficiency report. system to identify j
items where this reporting system is appropriate.
l
- d. ' Discussions with cognizant personnel during the course of the surveillance and prior to formal issuance of the surveillance report should occur frequently.co ensure the right persennel are contacted to implement corrective actions.
This policy should be placed in effect in conjunction with your verifying that existing procedures in the surveillance area support this policy.
f,f
4 f
C H. Welch s
TUCCO Site QA Supervisor j
\\
CHW/1j
[" c ^
^
cc:
D.N. Chapman l~
A. Vega J.T. Merritt
.