ML20206Q509
| ML20206Q509 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1987 |
| From: | Daniels R, Gough E, Knight S SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206Q480 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-870403, TAC-65195, NUDOCS 8704210414 | |
| Download: ML20206Q509 (60) | |
Text
r-WIRE AND CABLE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND ACTION PLAN FOR ,
RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT SACRAMENTO REVISION 0 MARCH 31, 1987 PREPARED BY:
APPROVE :
N /7 11 . - A 1 3 Electrical Group Supervisof Wanager or(usMpf Dept. ' /
R. E. Daniels Stu Knig / , '
ff- Cwp ^ hsg ph
. Manager of Electrica' Engineering E. J. Gough Minager of Nuclear Engineering G. V. Cranston 8704210414 870403 PDR A ADOCK 05000312 PDR l
Table of Cont:nts 1.0 PURPOSE 2.0 SCOPE
-3.0 , BACKGROUND 4.0 WIRE AND CABLE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND ACTION PLAN 4.1 Resolution of Known Physical Problems 4.2 ' Resolution of Concerns Regarding The Location of Safety Cables Installed Since Commercial Operation 4.2.1 Sampling Plan 4.2.2 Development of Cable Population Lots.
-4.2.3 Personnel Training 4.2.4 Walkdown (Cable Tracing) Procedures 4.2.5 Reporting and Evaluation of Walkdown Findings 4.2.6 Results 4.2.7 Exclusion of Original Cable Population From The Sampling Plan 4.3 Resolution of Concerns Regarding the Completeness of the CRTS Data Base 4.4 Resolution of All CRTS Data Base Problems and Discrepancies Related to Safety Cables 4.5 Resolution of Minor CRTS Data Discrepancies 5.0 PROPOSED ACTIOE AND SCHEDULE 5.1 Resolution of Known Physical Problems 5.2 Complete Cable Tracing 5.3 Rationale For Not Sampling (Cable Tracing) Pre 1975 Cable Operation 5.4 Complete 50.59 Reviews 5.5 Revise USAR and Nuclear Engineering Documents (Where Required) 5.6 Complete the Resolution of Questions'Concerning the 630 (approx.) Security and Communication Cable Discrepancies 5.7 Completion of Outstanding Questions REFERENCES ATTACHMENTS 1
l
c . .
i 1.0 PURPOSE i
This document provides details concerning SMUD's program to evaluate the adequacy of the Cable and Raceway installation at Rancho Seco including the. adequacy of the Computerized Cable and
- Raceway Tracking system (CRTS). The SMUD actions are referred to in this document as the Action Plan.
l 2.0 SCOPE The scope of this document includes the evaluation of all scheduled cable and raceway installed at Rancho Seco.
" Scheduled" Cable and Raceway is all Cable and Raceway installed
- at Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station (RSNGS) and recorded in~
and controlled by the CRTS. The only cable and raceway
! designated as " unscheduled" (and not included in the CRTS) is i wire.and raceway installed in separate conduit systems dedicated to systems such as lighting and telephone wiring.
This program identifies and addresses the resolution or action 1 plan for the following con. erns:
4
- 1. Do the CRTS recorded cable locations match the "As-Built" j cable locations?
! 2. Completeness of the CRTS Data Base including verification and j validation of the software.
I 3. Resolution of overfilled / overweight cable tray questions '
i j including proposed actions in conjunction with USAR and 50.59
- analyses.
- 4. Resolution of cable mix questions.
I
3.0 BACKGROUND
1 The principal concerns initiating SMUD Actions are listed as 1
references 1, 2 and 3. ODR 86-125 resulted from an employee allegation to the SMUD Ombudsman (Mr. Carl Andognini) concerning I cable tray overfills and the validity of the CRTS (Cable and Raceway Tracking System) Data Base.
Initial action taken by SMUD was to initiate enhancement of the i CRTS Program and to use the enhanced program to check for Raceway overfills, violations of separation criteria, intemixing of instrument cables with power and control cable, and other
- discrepancies as listed in Sections 4.4 and 4.5. Although a number of discrepancies were " Bookkeeping" problems, generated by the enhancement, a significant number appeared to be of real I
concern. The existence of known problems in LER 85-16, ODR i- 86-125 and LER 86-10 raised questions concerning:
l n i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . ._ l
- 1) The degree of control exercised on the. cable installation.
,2) The accuracy and completeness of the CRTS Data Base.
l Late in 1986 a decision was made to signal trace a significant i sample of safety cables installed from 1975 through 1986 and 4 compare the "As Built" condition with plant documents and the i CRTS Data Base. The sampling plan and methodology is summarized in Section 4.2.2 and detailed in Reference 4.
Early in January the various on-going activities were integrated
- into a five part " Wire and Cable Action Plan" under a single -
j . program manager.
- 4.0 WIRE AND CABLE ACTION PLAN
} 4.1 Resolution of Known Physical Problems
- The known problems and the ~ status of each are listed in Attachment 4. This attachment lists all problems published as Occurrence Description Reports (ODR). Licensing Event Reports
, (LER) or Non Conformance Reports (NCR). Infonnation listed
- includes dates and dispositions.
4.2 Resolution of Concerns Regarding The Location of Safety Cables
! Installed since Commercial Operation.
4.2.1 Sampling Plan THE CRTS Data Base has identified 2800 Safety related cables
! installed since the plant went into Commercial Operation in
! 1975. The numbers of non-safety cables (installed since j commercial operation) is not known with the same degree of I accuracy because the number of installed security cables and j communication cables has still to be defined.
. The location of the 2800 safety cables are being sampled to i establish a confidence level in the CRTS Data relative to cable 4
locations. The cables are listed and the samples selected from 1 the design drawings and not from the CRTS Data Base. This avoids reliance on the CRTS for developing the sample populations.
} The sampling methodology and degree of conformance to QAIP No. 3 j and MIL-STD-1050 are detailed in reference 4. The sampling plan 1 identifies 238 Safety Cables which have been randomly selected i
~
for signal tracing to verify the CRTS recorded cable route. As detailed. in Reference 4. the number of major defects will
- establish the confidence levels for each of the 4 populations i selected for investigation.
I 1
i i
1
.. . l A major defect for a signal traced cable would be a route which differed from the CRTS Data Base and also violates plant safety.
The decision process classifies three levels of defect through a detailed engineering review which utilizes a decision process illustrated with diagrams'in reference 4. These levels are:
- 1. Major Defect
- 2. Minor Defect-3.' Insignificant Defect 4.2.2 Development of Cable Population Lots t The following is a summary of the method by which the sampling program selected .the cable lots to be signal traced. Full detail is contained in reference 4.
The population lots for the Rancho Seco CRTS Sampling Program were developed based on reviews of CRTS related problems that were identified at the time of the program implementation. This review took into consideration known problems with the CRTS database, the following specific plant documents (LER 85-15, LER 86-10, ODR 86-125, and NCR S-5270), as well as interviews with Rancho Seco personnel (engineering, operations, and the CRTS staff).
A meeting, held on December 12, 1986, between SMUD, Impell, and MAC, settled on seven possible categories for the lots. These candidates for lots, to be used in the sampling program for CRTS, were selected based on the aforementioned review of CRTS related problems. They are as follows:
- 1. Safe Shutdown (SSD)/ Safety Related (SR) circuits installed prior to commercial operation.
- 2. SSD/SR circuits installed during the major outages in 1981, 1983, and 1985.
- 3. Cable pull cards with questionable signatures.
- 4. Appendix R circuits with fire protective wraps. l
- 5. SSD/SR circuits that were rerouted since conmiercial operation.
- 6. Class 2 Appendix R circuits.
- 7. SSD/SR circuits installed between 1974 and 1980.
From the above categories, with the exception of item 1, it was deteniined the information contained in items 2 through 7 could be consolidated in four homogeneous independent lots as defined in Impe11 Calculation No. 0790-201, Revision 3, Section 6.0 (Reference 4).
The populations for Lots 1 and 2 were initially organized chronologically by the year the cable was installed or routed.
Class 2 Appendix R circuits and circuits required to be provided with a fire protective wrap to meet Appendix R requirements, in general, were grouped together and included at the end of the chronological listing of circuits for each lot. as appropriate.
Lots 3 and 4 were fonned subsequent to the definition of Lots 1 and 2. The sample selection process proceeded as noted in Impe11 Calculation No. 0790-201, Revision 3. Section 8.0 (Reference 4).
The lot selection, the.crganization of the lots population, and the initial sample selection methodology were designed so as to yield the greatest amount of information regarding any potential defects that may be found during the circuit tracing process.
These results could then easily be evaluated to determine if a connon cause was surfacing as the result of any deviations found and the sample program expanded accordingly.
4.2.3 Personnel Training and Responsib111 ties Four two-man inspection teams were utilized at peak with additional personnel for supervision and recording and evaluating resul ts. All personnel were experienced and qualified and their names and resumes are on record.
Training Training was given and documented in two areas:
- 1) Use of Standard Test procedures STP-976 (Attachment #1) and useofStandardTestprocedureSTP-972(Attachment #2).
- 2) Use of the two signal tracing devices used:
o Radio Detection Corp. RD-600 Locator.
o Pacer Current Tracer Model CR-10.
Training for the RD-600 was by factory personnel and is documented. Training certificates are on record.
Additional instruction was given in the use of administrative procedures:
AP.3 Administrative Produce Work Requests AP-4A/B Safety Clearences/ Test Authorization procedures, respectively.
AP-22 Occurrence Description Reports.
Entrance into Carbon Dioxide Fire Protection Zones.
AP-30 l
1
. - _ . . _ _ _ . . . _ - _ , _ - . . . ,,,----__ ,-__ - . _ . , - - _ . . - _ - . . - . _ , - - _ _ , , _ . - - . _ _ .. . ~ _ _ _ , , _ - - - .
l RESPONSIBILITIES l
Responsibility for the program is with the CRTS Program Manager l (Jim Gough). Direct day-to-day direction of this cable tracing effort is by the Deputy CRTS Program Manager (Bob Carroll).
Resumes for both are on record. The personnel for the Cable Tracing Work are supplied by Impe11 Corporation under Contract Tasks 271 and 334.
4.2.4 Walkdown (Cable Tracing) Procedures Procedures are Fully detailed in STP-976 (Attachment #1) and STP-972 (Attachment #2).
4.2.5 Reporting of Walkdown Findings The engineer on the two man cable tracing team records any deviations on the routing verification sheet. Deviations involving possible safety concerns are imediately reviewed by. .
the supervisor who verifys the deviation. An Occurrence l Description Report is then prepared for signature by the CRTS -
Program Manager or his Deputy. This process occurs within the I shift in which the Walkdown takes place.
Deviations of a minor nature are evaluated and the evaluation recorded. Attachment #3 is a typical evaluation record. This :
evaluation assigns a classification of " Minor Defect" or
" Insignificant Defect". After review by the CRTS Program Manager ,
the evaluation is submitted to the Plant Review Committee (PRC) )
for review and concurrence. '
A summary of results through March 24, 1987 is given in section 4.2.6.
4.2.6 Results A confidence level of 95/95 (as detailed) will be accepted as !
demonstrating that the CRTS Data Base is acceptable without 1 further signal tracing. l An unacceptable confidence level (less than 95/95) will require additional signal tracing to a level which will demonstrate a confidence level of 95/95.
The following table gives the results of the sampling program as of March 24, 1987. Signal tracing is expected to be complete by of April 30, 1987.
l t . )
l l
l DESCRIPTION LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3 LOT 4
-Population size 424 1702 190 78 l Sample Size (238*) 52 56 48 78
- Circuits traced 42 46 42 76 Major defects 0 0 0 7 j i
Minor defects 8 2 1 2 Insignificant or no defects 34 44 41 67
- DEFINITION OF LOTS Lot 1: Safety related and safe shutdown circuits with rerouted vias between commercial operation-and December 22, 1986. ;
1 l Lot 2: Safety related and safe shutdown circuits without rerouted l l
vias between commercial operation and December 22.-1986.
- Lot 3
- Safety related and safe shutdown circuits without revised vias
- and with questionable cable pull card signatures, q Lot 4
- Safety related and safe shutdown circuits with rerouted vias and questionable cable pull card signatures.
- With the refonnation of Lots 1, 2, and 3 (due to the addition of Lot 4)
, one additional circuit in Lot 2 was traced and three additional circuits in Lot 3 were traced, but were not selected by the random sample. The
, total number of-circuits to be traced therefore, equals 238.
4.2.7 Exclusion of Original Cable Population (Pre 1975) From the Sample Plan The Cable and Raceway installation at Rancho Seco at plant turnover (1975) had been designed and installed by Bechtel Power Corporation (BPC). BPC was both the designer (Architect Engineer) and Constructor. The BPC design office was in Nomalk, Los Angeles while the construction was by Bechtel direct labor.
The computerized Circuit and Raceway program used was a ;
proprietary program EE553 of BPC. The current program, named i CRTS (Cable Raceway Tracking System), is one written by Control Data Corporation (CDC) to SMUD's specifications during 1978 and l- 1979, and instituted in July 1980. .
4 l
- y :-j
.l s s < j The design, installation and quality control of, cables installed
- at Rancho Seco, prior to plant turnover, was centrolled by Bechtel Power Corporation Procedures. These BPC' Procedures were standard for BPC Projects of this vintage and were adequate to control and document the Cable and Raceway installation.
Documentation supporting this decision is being furnidhed by the
'Bechtel Power Corporation in the following:
h o Hard copies of the 1975 EE553 cable and raceway reports, n a a o CopiesofBechtelprocedurescontrollindthedesign, installation and Quality of the Cable and faceway System.
o Statements from Bechtel personnel concerning practice and procedures. -
g\; As of March 10, 1987 the two cables identified in LER 85-16 are the only known problems in the original cable population. As
,, identified this was a unique design error;not related to the type of problems under review. The possibility of a Generic Bechtel Design problem has been raised by the Plant-Review Committee and Region 5 and is being investigated. . Documentation, supporting this decision will be furnished when received and evaluated as previously described.
4.3 Resolution of Concerns Regarding'The' Completeness of the CRTS Data Base The quality concerns raised'concerning the completeness of the CRTS Data Base will be addressed as follows: '.
A review of procedures governing cable installation from commercial operation (1975) through 1986. This review will address questions such as:
(1) Did QCI No.107 result in the destruction o'T raceway and pull cards? How many?
(II) How many procedures existed (governing cable installation) in this period; How many SliUD entities j (Engineering Design Maintenance, etc) initiated cable l installation? j (III) Did authority exist to by-pass procedures and was this authority exercised? Were procedures by-passed and to what extent?
(IV) To what extent are security cables included in the CRTS Data Bank?
(V) To what extent are comunication and other cables included in the CRTS Data Bank?
s l
l 4 s l
m,
.* . 1 I
(VI) What-is the SMUD document of record for installed cable l locations: q o- Form 1010? .1 o Cable Pull Card? I
' o CRTS Data Base?
o Combination of the Above? l lResults From This' Effort Will Be:
(I) Documentation of the Level of control Exercised by SMUD (1975-1986) in installing cable.
(II) Definition of the SMUD documents recording / controlling cable locations at Rancho Seco.
(III) Identification of lessons to be . learned from the level of control exercised (on cable installation) from 1975-1986. j 1
This work has started. Progress reports will be provided.
4.4 Resolution of All CRTS Data Base Problems and Discrepancies i i Related to Safety Cables I i' l The Resolution of CRTS Data Base discrepancies has in its scope l 1' the entire cable population. All discrepancies with' safety l implications will be addressed prior to restart. The schedule l l for completing evaluations is April 30, 1987. The total number l of discrepancies (Impell Status Report #9) is as follows: j Class 1
- 1. 0 - Intennixing of Class 1/2/3 763 Note (1) 2.0 Overf111ed Trays (Power / Control) 38 Note (2) 3.0 OverfilledConduits(Power / Control 107 Note (3) 4.0 Overfilled Conduits (Instrument) 13 5.0 Raceway Connections 200-6.0 Duplicated Numbers 35 7.0 Document Discrepancy 551 8.0 Tagging / Identification Discrepancy .7 9.0 Missing / unsigned Construction Cards 53 4 Sub Total 1767 NON-CLASS 1 1.0 Intermixing of Power / Control / Instrument 125 2.0 Overfilled Trays (Power / Control) 131 Note (2) 3.0 Overfilled Trays (Instrument) 19 Note (3) 4.0 Overf111ed Conduit (Power / Control) 639 Total 2681 1
I I
e- 4 m- e,w - .--,-,-w-,u--e ,ev me.w-- ,-, ..,y -- , .* c,p-p ,m-yg He.- ,i--e---- e.r.cw gw-d
I
- Notes
(1) No Action required for cables installed to original plant design
! criteria.
- (2) Ampacity and weight checked (3) Ampacity checked 4.5' Resolution of Minor CRTS Data Discrepancies -
The CRTS program enhancement has generated a number of discrepancies .
which require action to complete the program enhancement, but which have no safety significance. The resolution of these CRTS Data Base Discrepancies has in its scope the entire cable population. The schedule for completing evaluations on these minor discrepancies will be provided when completed and is not a restart prerequisite. The total number of discrepancies -(Impe11 Status Report #9) is as follows:
l Non-Class 1 1.0 Overfilled Conduits' (Instrument / Telephone) 151 2.0 Raceway Connections 1390 3.0 Duplicated Numbers 33 4.0 Document Discrepancy 1594 5.0 Tagging / Identification Discrepancy 130 6.0 Missing / Unsigned Construction Cards 92 Sub Total 4304 SECURITY 7.0 Raceway Connections 177
. 8.0 Duplicated Numbers 29 9.0' Documentation Discepancy 276 10.0 Tagging / Identification Discrepancy 4 11.0 Missing / Unsigned Construction Cards 88 4
i Total - 4878 5.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND SCHEDULE f
5.1 Resolution of Known Physical Problems See Attach 4 5.2 Complete Cable Tracing April 30,1987 5.2.1 - Resolve Major Defects Prior to Restart 5.2.2 Identify Minor Defects and Prior to Restart t Proposed Resolutions and Schedule 4
- -- ----.,m,,--em,--.,-v.--- m,--~s. , . , ,.o n, w- , . , - - , - , - , , , . - - - , , , , , , - , , , , , _ , . - , - - , ,,_y_,,,,-,--,,,. ,v- a ---... ,- ~ . . , - - , , - --,
.j 5.3 Rationale For Not Sampling-(Cable Tracing) . .
Pre 1975 Cable Operation April 30.1987 5.4 Complete 50.59 Reviews Prior to Restart 5.5. Revise USAR and Nuclear Engineering Documents 7 (Where Required) Prior to Restart. I 5.6 Complete the resolution of questions concerning the 630 (approx.) security Prior to j- and connunication cable discrepancies. Restart' 5.7 Completion of the following:
- Documentation of the Level of control In progress -
Exercised by SMUD (1975-1986) in installing for completion cable. post restart 4
l Definition of the SMUD documents recording / Prior to i controlling cable locations at Rancho Restart j Seco. ,.
- j Identification of lessons to be learned In progress -
from the level of control exercised (on for completion cable installation) from 1975-1986. post restart *
References:
~
- 1) LER-85-16 Spurious Closure of DHS Dropline Isolation Valve.
- 2) LER 86-10 Redundant Cabling in the Same Fire Area.
- 3) ODR 86-125 Cable Tray Overfill Concern.
- 4) Sampling Plan For the CRTS Data Base t
Attachments I
! 1) Special Test Procedures STP-976 Verification of Power and Control Cable Routing i
- 2) Special Test Procedures STP-972 i
Verification of Instrument Cable Routing. I l
- 3) Typical Evaluation Record (Cable Work Request 127023) 1 4) List of LER, ODRs and NCRs related to CRTS.
- REPTJG03 4
EFFECTIVE DATE A UACN 4r/ 01-22-87 Original WP4597P D-0312P STP.976 VERIFICATION OF POWER AND CONTROL CABLE ROUTING 1.0 PURPOSE To provide instruction guidelines for performance of cable tracing /
location verification activities for plant power and control cables.
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 AP.3, Administration Procedure Work Requests 2.2 AP.4A and 48, Safety Clearances, Test Authorization Procedures, respectively 2.3 AP.22, Occurrence Description Reports 2.4 Layout Drawings (See Enclosure 8.1) 2.5 Wiring Diagrams (See Enclosure 8.1) 2.6 Elementary Diagrams (See Enclosure 8.1) 3.0 PREREQUISITES NOTE: Signatures for prerequisites are on Enclosure 8.1.
3.1 Nuclear Operations shall review plant impact statement on Enclosure 8.1 for concurrence.
3.2 The shift supervisor has been given a copy of this procedure. He shall determine the need for test tags depending on the requirements of the work request. The cable is shown on the cable data sheet, Enclosure 8.1.
3.3 The appropriate sections of Enclosures 8.1 and 8.2 shall be completed for inclusion in the Work Request package.
STP.976-1
4 PREREQUISITES (Continued) 3.4 All personnel performing the cable routing verification are familiar with the following aspects of the circuit as listed on Enclosure 8.1.
_ 3.4. 1 Circuit function 3.4 .2 Plant system 3.4 .3 Plant arrangement and location of equipment 3.4 .4 Cable and raceway numbering system 3.4 .5 Terminal identification 3.4 .6 Grounding connections' 3.4 .7 Plant impact statement 3.5 Radiation protection coverage (where necessary) has been coordinated and the necessary Radiation Work Permits are existing or have been prepared.
3.6 Refer to layout drawings shown on Enclosure 8.1.for ALARA planning and coordination.
3.7 Training in the use of test equipment has been conducted and the walkdown team members are proficient in the use of the required equipment.
3.8 The test equipment has been checked for proper operation in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.
3.9 8efore the start of verification, the group leader has performed a walkdown of the area to visually check for. accessibility (ladder or scaffolding is provided, where necessary), location of equipment and power supplies, and any unsafe or abnormal conditions.
3.10 Test Engineer to ensure that signature log on Enclosure 8.1 completed.
4.0 TEST EQUIPMENT Each test set includes a volt-ohmmeter (VOM), a circuit tracer with its accessories such as flex hook-up wiring with alligator clips, and an 18-volt to 24-volt battery. Three types of circuit tracers can be used in this STP, as follows:
STP.976-2
sO. 90'
. TEST EQUIPMENT (Continued)-
4.1 Pasar Current Tracer 4.1 .1 Model CT-10: For deenergized circuit tracing, use model CT-10.
transmitter, model P-23 probe, and an 18-volt to 24-volt' battery.
See Enclosure 8.3, Figure 1, for connection diagram.
4.2 RF Open-Circuit Tracer 4.2 .1 Pasar RF Tracer Model OT-1000 This includes model OT-1000 transmitter and model P-1000 probe, SRC 15 signal return cable, and EP-1000 ear ~ piece. This instrument.
will operate-on. a deenergized ungrounded circuit only. The output power is 10mW maximum, 445 kHz carrier frequency, and ,1.7 kHz audio modulation frequency. ' See Enclosure 8.3, Figure 2, for. connection diagram.
4.3 RF Multi-Frequency Tracer 4.3 .1 Radiodetection Model RD-600 Tracer equipment has been designated "No Calibration
~
NOTE:
Required" by the Calibration Lab.
The RD-600 transmitter / receiver has four different- frequencies: 1, 8, 33, and 130 kHz. The frequencies to be used in these tests will be 1 or 8 kHz. See Enclosure 8.3, Figure 3, for connection diagram.
5.0 LIMITS AND PRECAUTIONS 5.1 Verification of cable routing shall be performed only during cold shutdown.
5.2 Only circuits of one train of the redundant systems shall be tested at the same time.
5.3 For cables routed in common raceways or in raceways close to each other, tracing shall be performed using different frequencies or uniquely identified audio signals (continuous or pulse-mode).
5.4 Each circuit has been deenergized before access to cable and electrical l equipment and hook-up of the trace equipment. )
5.5 00 not unterminate conductors at terminal points.
1 STP.976-3
6.0 PROCEDURE NOTE: A test log shall be kept on Enclosure 8.4 NOTE: Signatures.for.all procedural steps must be signed on Enclosure 8.1.
6.1 All the prerequisites have been initialed and dated.
6.2 The engineer will determine the circuit information from the wiring diagrams for deenergizing the circuit-before testing. The routing of the cable shall be determined from the CRTS routing data and the appropriate raceway drawings.
6.3 Cable routing verification.
6.3 .1 For cable runs in conduit, cable tracing will be visually performed as follows:
6.3 .1.1 When access to the "from" and "to" end of the cable in the equipment or enclosure is available, identify the cable and conductor numbers and trace the cable to the conduit at its point of entry to the enclosure. See Enclosure 8.1.
6.3 .1.2 Fill out the cable routing verification sheet with all cable vias. See Enclosure 8.2.
6.3 .1.3
~
Visually trace the conduit between the "from" and "to" equipment or enclosures 'and verify all conduit numbers and pull boxes (vias) against the routing verification sheet.
See Enclosure 8.2.
6.3 .l.4 The engineer will verify routing,. record any. deviations, and initial and date the routing verification sheet. See Enclosure 8.2.
6.3 .2 For cable runs in trays or combination of trays and conduits, use a cable tracer for circuits (480V and below) as described below:
6.3 .2.1 When access to the "from" and "to" end of the cable in the equipment or enclosure is available, identify the cable and conductor numbers and trace the cable to the conduit at its .
point of entry to the enclosure. See Enclosure 8.1. -'
6.3 .2.2 Fill out the cable routing verification sheet with all cable vias. See Enclosure 8.2.
6.3 .2.3 Record the type of tracer used on the routing verification data sheet, Enclosure 8.1.
STP.976-4
s ..
n PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.3 .2. .4 Recheck that the circuit is deenergized using the V(Mt.
Circuit will have a clearance or test tag per AP.4.
WOTE: .Either Step 6.3.2.5 or Step 6.3.2.6 will be performed.
Annotate step not used as n/a on Enclosure 8.1.
6.3 .2.5 When using CT-10 or RD-600 transmitter:
6.3 .2.5.1 Connect one end of the conductor to, ground perl Enclosure 8.3, when using CT-10 or RD-600 tracer.
6.3 .2.5.2 Connect transmitter CT-10 or RD-600 to the grounded conductor at the ungrounded end per Enclosure 8.3.
6.3 .2.6 When using the 0T-1000 transmitter: ,
6.3 .2.6.1 Connect transmitter OT-1000 to designated terminal' at the "to" end per Enclosure 8.3. Make sure selected conductor to be traced is ungrounded.
l 6.3 .2.7 Use probe / receiver to trace the cable routing from the "from" to the "to" end.
6.3 .2.8 The engineer will verify routing, record any deviation, and
- initial and date the routing verification sheet, Enclosure.
8.2. 4 f
6.3 .2.9 Disconnect test hookups and ensure all connections and '
I ter-minals have not been damaged, loosened, or otherwise degraded f rom their original condition.
6.3 .2.10 Close all equipment-and enclosures. Lock, if necessary.
I 6.3 .2.11 QC is to verify the retorquing of enclosure bolts per the work request. Document on the work request, i 6.3 .2.12 Inform the shift supervisor upon completion of the test.
6.3 .2.13 Nuclear Engineering shall review deviations noted on Enclosure 8.2, per AP.22.
i i
1 1
STP.976-5 a
. , , , . + . . . , , , . . _ , , . . , . . - . - - . , - . , . . , , . . . . , . . ..
t 7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 1.1 Data for the selected cable is recorded on Enclosures 8.1 and 8.2.
8.0 ENCLOSURES 8.1 Cable Data Sheet -- Power and Control Cables.
8.2 ' Cable Routing Verification Sheet -- Power and Control Cables 8.3 Tracer Connection Diagram 8.4 Test Log Sheet l
l l
t STP.976-6 d
,_ 7 ENCLOSURE 8.1 CABLE DATA SHEET -- POWER AND CONTROL CABLES Cable number: Circuit function:
Layout dwg no.: Work request no.:
Elementary or wiring RWP number diagram dwg. no.: (if applicable):
PREREQUISITES 3.1- Plant impact statement:
-INITIAL DATE Prepared by:
Nuc Engr Approved by:
Nuc Ops 3.2 Shif t supervisor review ,
Shift Supr 3.3 Appropriate sections of Enclosure 8.1 and 8.2 completed and included in Work Request Test Engr 3.4 Circuit review by test personnel Test Engr 3.5 Radiation protection review RP 3.6 ALARA review ALARA 3.7 Test equipment training Test Engr ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE 1 0F 4 STP.976-7
ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued)
CABLE DATA SHEET -- POWER AND CONTROL CABLES INITIAL' DATE 3.8 Test equipment check Test Engr 3.9 Accessibility walkdown Test Engr-3.10 Signature Log Name (Print) Signature Initial ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE 2 0F 4 STP.976-8
.- s ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued)
- CA8LE DATA SHEET -- POWER AND CONTROL CABLES INITIAL DATE PROCEDURE 6.1 All prerequisites complete Test Engr 6.2 Review of drawing package Test Engr 6.3.1 Cable runs in conduit 6.3.1.1 Trace cable to first raceway entry Test Engr 6.3.1.2 Enclosure 8.2 filled out Test Engr 6.3.1.3 Trace conduit per Enclosure 8.2 Test Engr 6.3.1.4 Complete Enclosure 8.2 and note deviations Test Engr I
! 6.3.2 Cable runs in combination of trays
! and conduit 6.3.2.1 Trace cables to first raceway entry Test Engr 6.3.2.2 Enclosure 8.2 filled out Test Engr 6.3.2.3 Record tracer information Test Engr l l
Tracer instrument serial number Mode of operation Frequency !
Battery voltage ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE 3 0F 4 STP.976-9 i
l I
ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued)
CA8LE DATA SHEET -- POWER AND CONTROL CABLES
-INITIAL DATE 6.3.2.4 Recheck circuit with V0M Test Engr V0M serial number 6.3.2.5.1 Ground one end of conductor Test Engr 6.3.2.5.2 Connect tracer transmitter Test Engr 6.3.2.6.1 Connect tracer transmitter Test Engr 6.3.2.7 Conduct probe trace Test Engr 6.3.2.8 Complete Enclosure 8.2 and note deviations Test Engr 6.3.2.9 Disconnect test hookup Test Engr 6.3.2.10 Close equipment--lock, if necessary Test Engr 6.3.2.11 QC verified device closure QC 6.3.2.12 Shif t supervisor informed test complete Test Engr 6.3.2.13 Review of deviations noted on Enclosure 8.2 per AP.22 Nuc Engr 00R number:
NCR number:
ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE 4 0F 4 STP.976-10
> - 6 9
ENCLOSURE 8.2 CABLE ROUTING VERIFICATION SHEET POWER AND CONTROL CABLES TEST ENGR CABLE NUNBER RACEWAY BY CRTS ACTUAL RACEWAY INITIAL-
/DATE ENCLOSURE 8.2 PAGE 1 0F 1 STP.976-11 w - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
ENCLOSURE 8.3 TRACER CONNECTION DIAGRAM 6~N CL OSUAE 8* 3 EbWER AND CONTR64 CA A>J__ S A/G, 2 US/NG PA SA R. A /OB."L C 7*- /0/P23
. ~o .c 7"AA C/NG DffNERC/CHO PobW"K <*ND Coot <ol. C//?CU/TS
'. ~.coM ' ~70 '
SuuRCE CABLE. 70 20A O
-O , ., O =
i W
l P2S W Cowic7 GRO.; War:
Paoss COW 40GYOR To G nou.vo C EE 9 ANSM: TTER. ,
Co.vbucroA q CT
~IO TRANs.k*irr& R I
{.
/8-24 V SA TT AY IT A/o ffs :. /) Fo.e G.cou,vz.c b ,2-twEr 20 rl/cc y sec C/A'CU/ 7*, C D A'.\'C C,7* 7R* A NSM/ 7 f.ER Yo PHA S E Yd' .RM/NAL A T TN!, YO AND ANO CONNsC73AME P,Waca A wr focu 's,vc 7c cgouxa. ,
- 2) FOA 4 d*C V A C 3 AHA C.f* C xe,w:~;rrxa ro avoce w,u'RCeD/7 a r30neVygc
're -f* '
EN.3 4WB CCA/A'Z*C 7" SA V!E ANASA AT THE FACA1 4*Nb Yb G AC.'./.r'b ,
ENCLOSURE 8.3 PAGE 1 0F 3 STP.976-12
ENCLOSURE 8.3 (Continued)
TRACER CONNECTION DIAGRAM f/G.2 us/Na @ a O 7 '3 0 0 / 7 2 o 8 w 7kAcig fo e 7d'ac mi;; DEENERG/$Eb YOAJEA c/ C<;;V/7A'?O/- C/ACU/YE s \ /
FA'oM ~7"o FRoN To / o.o o souncf CA812
? , r 0 r U
! y *C.L/*J[.' V
~'P/o00 ~72?nMCA/'77C.9 Eu suxs' . _ /72054:. 7b 0,v4 72 Djinn
$/)/,3Z LV/A'd CM W44 *NC8$
/3 MV GKOuN-b f b _
lO7*- /& ~7K' nt/Dn ?t.4 fuv!,3 "'oi: HH
/?n.3i475,y
=.-
//0 YS S '. .
I
/) foR .Ro JN.as-3 s - W/RE .232,.!/2o V e c C/Rc o/7> dONNACY TRA M.SAs **fCR s TO A%9C.E 7 1* R M / N ,a .'. 4 f @E > ?o EN.O 4W.3 EA/ R u <? 7~C 5 7" W/A'E /3 :/.vCsqouis b Ct.
/ HAC.E W/sef AS /N /.) .
C i
I ENCLOSURE 8.3 PAGE 2 0F 3 STP.976-13
s ..
l
.. .)
i I
ENCLOSURE 8.3 (Continued)-
TRACER CONNECTION DIAGRAM Fi G. S US/wG Mus r: - mEc?.:i-S v c y RD - G oo for v'40 e wG 4L'ENEAW/sco POW 2):, (Cons ?.<'ot .ciRcoirt s , s /
fro.W 70 f,aou cAas To ~
i , O , O ;
S ou.a.c.e: (
( ) 'onb b3 & ca.v v.tc7 G.ed.im.t.:
l' coa /NEC Y Casibuc,fo4 fo
@mse.w We .>'*
=*
'7E' 4rpuAL
- c. s.v,ol' x s.
7o" G,couA/O
- W BOO 1.easicMirrcs:
n's1.+< / o R 8 kHz T"fNE.7 mKc
~.)
A/o TEC :
/. foA Cd:2u4hE4 -# w/.9E 2oe A c cs.Rcu)7- Ccsi ucc r 7<' pa:s d,b'20 77c,?V 7'o /'i ' C 4 8 '-ft.c u l.v.n z. Ar "=f '7o' '
EN.O ANs COMvfc7 YME 4*-WE AMC:2 4 7 Ye E ,'c'RO N/ 'A.V4 T o' G' acou.yb
- 3 , .fod -WoY 3P.uA25 A: CA<ccoJY OZZ ONE AWAw hys.ex A C /4 /.
A.Bo v's .
I i
i 1
1 ENCLOSURE 8.3 PAGE 3 0F 3 i ST P.976-14
- ' .W e
d k ENCLOSURE 8.4 TEST LOG SHEET TEST NUMBER STP.976 ENCLOSURE 8.4 PAGE 1 0F 1 END STP.976-15
- i - '
r .
EFFECTIVE.DATE.
A rrsen # 2 02-21-81 Rev. 1
/WP4596P D-0312P ,
STP.972 VERIFICATION OF INSTRUMENT CABLE ROUTING 1.0 PURPOSE To provide instruction guidelines for perfornance of cable tracing /
location verification activities for plant instrumentation cables.
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 AP.3, Administration Procedure Work Requests 2.2 AP.4A and 4B, Safety Clearances Test Authorization Procedures, respectively 2.3 AP.22, Occurrence Description Reports 2.4 Layout Orawings (See Enclosure 8.1)
I 2.5 Wiring Diagrams (See Enclosure 8.1) ,
2.6 Elementary Diagrams (See Enclosure 8.1) 3.0 PREREQUISITES NOTE: . Signatures for prerequisites are on Enclosure 8.1 3.1 Nuclear Operations shall review plant impact statement on Enclosure 8.1 for concurrence.
3.2 The shift supervisor has been given a copy of this procedure. He shall determine the need for test tags depending on the requirements of the work request. The cable is shown on the cable data sheets, Enclosure 8.1.
3.3 The appropriate sections of Enclosures 8.1 and 8.2 shall be completed for inclusion in the Work Request package.
Rev. 1 STP,972-1 ,
PREREQUISITES (Continued) 3.4 All personnel performing the cable routing verification are familiar with the following aspects of the circuit as listed on Enclosure 8.1.
3.4 .1 Circuit function 3.4 .2 Plant system -
3.4 .3 Plant arrangement and location of equipment 3.4 .4 Cable and raceway numbering system 3.4 .5 Terminal identification 3.4 .6 - Grounding connections 3.4 .7 Plant impact statement 3.5 Radiation protection coverage (where necessary) has been coordinated and the necessary Radiation Work Permits are existing or have been prepared.
3.6 Refer to layout drawings shown on Enclosure 8.1 for ALARA planning and coordination.
3.7 Training in the use of test equipment has been conducted and the walkdown team members are proficient in the use of the required equipment.
3.8 The test equipment has been checked for proper operation in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.
3.9 Before the start of verification, the group leader has performed a walkdown of the area to visually check for accessibility (ladder or scaffolding.is provided, where necessary), location of equipnent and power supplies, and any unsafe or abnormal conditions.
3.10 Test Engineer to ensure that signature log on Enclosure 8.1 completed.
4.0 TEST EQUIPMENT Each test set includes a volt-ohmmeter (V0M), a circuit tracer with its accessories such as flex hook-up wiring with alligator clips, and an 18-volt to 24-volt battery. Two types of circuit tracers can be used in this STP, as follows:
Rev. 1 STP.972-2 .
' TEST EQUIPMENT (Continued) ,
4.1 Pasar Current Tracer 4.1 .1 Model CT-10: For deenergized circuit tracing, use model CT-10 transmitter, model P-23 probe, and an 18-volt to 24-volt battery.
See Enclosure 8.3, Figure 1, for connection diagram.
4.2 RF Multi-Frequency Tracer 4.2 .1 Radiodetection Model RD-600 ,
NOTE: Tracer equipment has been designated "No Calibration
. Required" by the Calibration Lab.
The RD-600 transmitter / receiver has four dif ferent frequencies: 1,
' - 8, 33, and 130 kHz. The frequencies to be used in these tests will
- . be 1 or 8 kHz. See Enclosure 8.3, Figure 2, for connection diagram.
]
- 5.0 LIMITS AND PRECAUTIONS 5.1 Verification of cable routing shall be performed only during cold shutdown.
5.2 Only circuits of one train of the redundant systems shall be traced at the same time.
5.3 For cables routed in common raceways or in ar'ceways close to each other, tracing shall be performed using dif ferent f requencies or uniquely identified audio signals (continuous er pulse-mode).
l 14 5.4 Each circuit shall be deenergized before access to cable and electrical equipment and hook-up of the trace equipment.
5.5 No test equipment shall be connected until the "from" and "to" leads of r the instrument cable have been lifted at the tenninals. An exception will be rede in the case of devices in which the cable connection at the device end is difficult to unterminate, as in the case of RTDs and thermocouples. Provided the device is nonelectronic, hooking up the transmitter without disconnecting the cable at the device end, is e acceptable.
5.6 After verification of cable routing, the circuit being verified shall be restored to its original configuration. Wiring diagrams or other documents depicting the verified connection will be utilized to unterminate and reterminate. Conductor markers will be provided if none exist.
Rev. 1 I STP.972-3 ,
LIMITSANDPRECAUTIONS (Continued) 1 -+ 5.7 Do not unterminate conductors at splice points to gain access to conductors for test equipment hook-up. Lift the conductors at the
- - panels, terminal box, or at the device, if possible.
6.0 PROCEDURE -
NOTE: A test log shall be kept on Enclosure 8.4 NOTE: Signatures for all procedural steps must be signed on Enclosure 8.1.
l 6.1 All the p requisites have been initialed and dated.
- 6.2 The engineer will verify the cable termination information from the l
wiring diagrams and a visual inspection of the equipment or device. The i
routing of the cable shall be determined from the CRTS routing data and j the appropriate raceway drawings.
6.3 Cable routing verification.
6.3 .1 For cable runs in conduit, cable tracing will be visually performed as follows:
6.3 .1.1 When access to the "f rom" and "to" end of the cable in the equipment or enclosure is avaiable, identify the cable and
, conductor numbers and trace the cable to the conduit at its I point of entry to the enclosure. See Enclosure 8.1.
l 6.3 .1.2 Fill out cable routing verification sheet with all cable vias. See Enclosure 8.2.
6.3 .1.3 .. Visually trace the conduit between the "from" and "to" equipment or enclosures and verify ali conduit numbers and pull boxes (vias) against the routing verification sheet.
See Enclosure 8.2.
6.3 .1.4 The engineer will verify routing, record any deviations, and initial and date on the routing verification sheet. See Enclosure 8.2.
6.3 .2 For cable runs in trays or combination of trays and conduits, use a cable tracer as described below:
Rev. 1 ST P . 9 7 2 -4 ,
L___----------_-___---
PROCEDURE (Continued) :
6.3 .2.1 *When access to the "from" and "to" 'end of the cable in the equipment or enclosure is available, identify the cable and
! conductor numbers and trace the cable to the conduit at 'its point of entry to the enclosure. See Enclosure 8.1.
l 6.3 .2.2 Fill out cable' routing verification sheet, Enclosure '8.2, -
l with all cable vias.
6.3 .2.3 List on Enclosure 8.1, all conductors to be unterminated.
6.3 .2.4 Record the type of tracer used on the cable data sheet,
. Enclosure 8.1.
6.3 .2.5 Recheck that,the circuit is deenergized using the VOM. The circuit will have a clearance or test tag per AP.4.
6.3 .2.6 Disconnect the "from" and "to" end connections including grounded shield wire, as listed on Enclosure 8.1.
6.3 .2.7 Connect one conductor to ground per Enclosure 8.3.
6.3 .2.8 Connect transmitter CT-10 or RD-600 to the grounded conductor at the ungrounded end per Enclosure 8.3.
6.3 .2.9 Use probe / receiver to trace the cable routing' from the "from" to the "to" end. ,
6.3 .2.10 The engineer will verify routing, record any deviations, and initial and adte od the routing verification sheet, Enclosure 8.2. ,
6.3 .2.11 Reterminate all conductors listed on Enclosure 8.1.
6.3 .2.12 QC shall inspect the enclosures on instrumentation devices ;
to be torqued and sealed properly per the work request, Document on the work requests.
6.3 .2.13 Inform the shif t supervisor upon completion of the test.
6.3 .2.14 Nuclear Engineering shall review deviations noted on Enclosure 8.2 per AP.22. >
7.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 7.1 Data for the selected cable is recorded on Enclosures 8.1 and 8.2.
l Rev. 1 STP.972-5 ,
- . ,.,,.v- , . , . . , , , _ . . , , - . , , , m-. m 4._
% _.m. ._ _ _ , _ _ . ~ . . , , ,
p l,
8.0 ENCLOSURES I 8.1 Cable Data Sheet -- Instrument Cables
.8.2 Cable Routing Verification Sheet -- Instrument Cables l
j 8.3 Tracer Ccnnection Diagram -
8.4 Test Log Sheet
- I L
L a +
1 L
l:
Rev.1 STP.9 7 2 -6 ,
i * '
E ENCLOSURE 8.1
! CABLE DATA SHEET -- INSTRUMENT CABLES I
Cable number: . Circuit function:
1 '
- Layout dwg no.
- -
Work request no.: -
l l Elementary or wiring RWP number l diagram dwg. no.: (if applicable):
PREREQUISITES 3.1 Plant imp ct statement:
INITIAL DATE
- ' Prepared Ly:
Nuc Engr Approved by:
Nuc Ops 3.2 Shift supervisor review Shif t Supr 3.3 Appropriate sections of Enclosure 8.1 and 8.2 completed and included in Work Request j Test Engr r
l 3.4 Circuit review by test personnel l Test Engr 3.5 Radiation protection review RP l
3.6 ALARA review ALARA 3.7 Test equipment training !
Test Engr l
ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE 1 0F 5 l
Rev. 1 STP.972 7 ,
l
ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued) -
CABLE DATA SHEET -- INSTRUMENT CABLES .
I 1* Work request no.:
INITIAL DATE 3.8 Test equipment check -
Test Engr l
( 3.9 Accessibility walkdown l Test Engr 3.10 Signature Log Name (Print) Signature Initial 1
i l
i i
! ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE 2 0F 5 l
Rev. 1 '
l STP,972-8 l
~
ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued)
CABLE DATA SHEET. -- INSTRUMENT CABLES ; _
ri 1-*- Work request no"? '"'
. -INITIAL DATE PROCEDURE 6.1 All prerequisites complete Test Engr 6.2 Review of drawing package -
Test Engr 6.3.1 Cabl runs in conduit
~
6.3.1.1 Trace cable to first raceway entry Test Engr 6.3.1.2 Enclosure 8.2 filled out Test Engr 6.3.1.3 Trace conduit per Enclosure 8.2 4 Test Engr 6.3.1.4 Complete 4nclosure8.2andnote deviations _
. O*' ,
Test Engr 6.3.2 Cable runs in combination of trays and conduit 6.3.2.1 Trace cables to first raceway entry Test Engr 6.3.2.2 Enclosure 8.2 filled out Test Engr 6.3.2.3 All conductors listed on Enclosure 8.1 Test Engr .
- 6.3.2.4 Record tracer information !
Test Engr Tracer instrument serial number Mode of operation Frequency Battery voltage ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE 3 0F 5 Rev. 1 STP.972-9 .
ENCk.0SURE ' 8.1(Continued)
CABLE DATA SHEET - INSTRUMENT CABLES- _ .
1* Work request no.:
INITIAL ~ DATE 6.3.2.5 - Recheck circuit with'V0M - -
Test Engr
-V0M' serial number 6.3.2.6 Disconnect conductors per Enclosure 8.1 ,
. Test Engr 6.3.2.7 ' Ground one end of conductor
. Test Engr 6.3.2.8- Connect tracer transmitter- ,
Test Engr !
6.3.2.9 Conduct probe trace .
Test Engr 6.3.2.10 Complete Enclosure 8.2 and note deviations Test Engr
~ ~
6.3.2.11 Reterminate conductors on Enclosure 8.1
.., / Test Engr 1
r 'I g!>
/ 6.3.2.12 QC verified device closure QC
!t 6.3.2.13 Shift' Supervisor informed test complete
. Test Engr ,
'I J :
6.3.2.14 Review of deviations noted on l Enclosure 8.2 per AP.22 i Nuc Engr DDR number:
NCR number:
8 ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE 4 0F 5 Rev. 1 t
STP . 9 7 2 -10
.j I
- p,. . , , , . . . . .,e r- y - -, , , - . - - ,m ., , y, . , % , , . . - , . , - , ,,-r- m , -ie p.-
ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued)
CABLE DATA SHEET. -- INSTRUMENT CABLES ,--
1* Work request no.:'
FROM QC*
SCHEME END UNTERMINATE RETERMINATE VERIFI-CABLE ------
WIRE TERMINAL TEST ENGR TEST ENGR CATION NUMBER TO NUMBER NUMBER INITIAL /DATE- INITIAL /DATE INITIAL END /DATE b
l l
i
- QC to verify terminations per drawing specified in Enclosure 8.1 prior to unterminating and reterminating conductors.
ENCLOSURE 8.1 PAGE.5 0F 5 ;
Rev. 1 STP.972-11 l
ENCLOSURE'8.2 CABLE ROUTING VERIFICATION SHEET INSTRUMENT CABLES 1 *- ~ Work request no.:
- TEST ENGR CABLE NUMBER RACEWAY BY CRTS ACTUAL RACEWAY INITI AL -
/DATE 4
I ENCLOSURE 8.2 PAGE 1 0F 1 !
Rev. 1 ST P . 97 2 -12 l
1
ENCLOSURE 8.3 ,
f TRACER CONNECTION DIAGRAM
' PFC M' ,- ~'TO'
- >... . . . . . .c y L..-_.o I 4 ,
~
-e y UPT CONNECT ONG P23 PPOSE OFT CONNECT)ONS AND-CONNECT GROUNDED- l ANP MHNECT ONE =*= CT-10 coNDUCTDR TO coHoucTon Tt) MWMIT iER .
GKouNp 418-24Y BATTERY FIGURE i USING PASAR MODEL. CT- 10/ P23
' FROM ' cAe,t.E 'TO' 3......
, . . __.c -
W - -- 5 Q
sTETBoscoPE ReceNGR p) --
gp WANsMtTTTR un coNETioHs (8015 4-) UFT CONNECTIONS gog WIW IOKS PtGURE 2 .
h USING MULTl - FREGuENCY ED-GOO NOTES f, i
- 1. M1EN MO8E TW TWO coNPuc4DRS ext 9T , piscoHNECT A1,.t.' coNouCTORs~ l i ANP Hoc 6- uP ONL.T ONE AS SnoWN ASOVE .
2.WHERE CABLE SBLELP IS TERMINAEP ANP/CR GFouNDEED uPT" SHIELD-i CONNECTION AND ISOLATE P8CM TEST BOOK- UP . .
I i 5.THE 'F80M' AN p 'To' ENDS OF THE CABLE ARE INTwcHANGSA2 LE AS FAR AG #ANSMiTTER 9001<.-uP CONNECT 108S ARE CONC.E1%NEP . ]
4 6 FOUNDING AT THE PAF. ENp (AWM FROM KD-GOO TRANSMITER) IS I NOT REGutRED. FOR HON- ELECTRONIC u)APS (suce AS RTP'S AND THER- h. -l MOC04PLES ) IN WHICH THE TERMINALS ARe NOT ACCEste.t.S (HEAT l SHRINK SPUCE),UFTTN4 OF wE coNoucTbRS AT THE. DSVICES IS NOT REGutREP l@VIPEP THE EST ctRCutT IS uNORouNDED , THE 0T-1000 MM BE USEP IN LIEU CP RD-GOO. ,
ENCLOSURE 8.3 PAGE 1 0F 1 l:
4 i" Rev. 1 ST P . 97 2 -13 ,
i i.
4
. . - - , , ._. . . . , , - _ - . - --,v. ,-,
3a ENCLOSURE 8.3 ,
TRACER CONNECTION DIAGRAM
.- 'fgold y
'TO'
( . . . ..c y .-
4 , p J L.-- d h 4 P23 PPOSE W
UFT CONNECTIONS 1 AHp UPT CONNECT ONG. - CONNECT GRouNpEp 4
ANP CONNECT ONE 7 C,T-10 CONDUCTDR *110 CONDuGTOK T'O TFANSMITTER .
GMouNp 1 -% iB-24Y BATTERY 1
_L T
F16uRE i l USING PASAR MODEL- cT- 10 / P2 3 1
' FRoM ' CABt E
'TO' s...... , - - -- c 2 l w -- -- - 4 STETHOSCOPE p ~~~
Q ~
Receiver.
RD mRsMITTER LIFT CONNECTIONS (NOM 4) LIFT CONNEC.TtONS gg WITH I OK S ;
T, KE SELECTED l Psauae. 2 ustNG MULTI - FREGUENCY KD - GOO l
NOTES :
1.wuEN 140RE TN 1WO CONpuc@RS EAST , ptScoNNECT ALL. CONDuGTogs ANP HCCK - uP oNLY ONE AS SHOWN ASOVE .
2 WHERE CABLE SHtELP iS TERMINATEP AND/oK GPlOUNDED LtFT SHIELP CONNECTION AND ISOLATE f*FoM TEST WOOK - UP .
j 3.THE 'F80M' AN P '10' ENDS OF THE CABLE ARE. INTERca+ANGEABLE AS '
FAR As 11%NSMITTER ttOOK-MP CONNECTIONS ARF. CONC.ERNEP .
4 6KouNplNG M THE PAR ENp (AWAT FROM KD-GOO TFANSMITTER) is NOT REGulRED
- Fo8 HON- ELEC.TRONIC. LOApS (SucM AS ETPh 'ANp' THER- h',
t4ocouPLES ) IN WHICH WE TERMINALS ARE NOT ACCESISLE -(HEAT
! SHRINK SPuCa),ufTTN4 CF we coNouc1bRS AT THE. DSVICES is NOT
- REauiREp . pT<oviDED THE TEST ctRcutT tS uN6 ROUNDED g THE OT-1000 MAY BE usEP IN LIEU c7 RD-GOO.
i l
ENCLOSURE 8.3 PAGE 1 0F 1 l
Rev. 1 ST P . 9 7 2 -13 -
1
. . . . , .- , , . _ - --, - - . , , - _ . . , _ , _ ,. . , - -,.,.n..,.-, . . . - . . - _ . , , , . - - . , , -
5- ENCLOSURE-8.4 t.
- ' TEST LOG SHEET - ,
' TEST NU'MBER STP.972 1* -Work request no.: '
4 4
- i
)
- 5 d
?
i r ,
r a
4 f
d 1
i
(
i r
p i
1* Walkdown Team Leader: Date:
! . ENCLOSURE 8.4' . PAGE 1'0F 1
- END Rev. 1 i STP.972 I . ..
i-I' e -1 F 1
-s - - y - e 2 e----- + ryeyewm y=-+e.ew--- e i+-,.-- e etw - , -r- P---w- e=4r, +e .r vs .-w r
ENCLOSURE:8.4 i
TEST LOG SHEET.-
4 TEST NUMBER STP.972 '
- 1+* Work request no.:
p i
1 l
I i
I -
J I
i a
1 1
l i
j i
i i
+
i 1++ Walkdown Team Leader: Date:
4 ENCLOSURE 8.4: PAGE 1-OF 1 END
, Rev. 1
! STP.c72 . .
-ty #ev 'W y-.g,' 7,,- v y, , g w.. .c y , wyy- g g p., , . . - -
., ,9- 9 g- L-3~v y *y-.yg g-r---- -
y y
.\
'f ' ,
l ENCLOSURE 8.4
]
TEST LOG SHEET--
TEST NUMBER-STP.972-1 *- Work request no.:
f 4
4 1
i
+
1 a
1 a +
i i
i i
i J
! 1 *- Walkdown Team Leader: Date:
ENCLOSURE 8.4 PAGE 1 0F 1 END.
1 Rev. 1 STP.972-14 F
q + - y . w- -
,s e , , , - , , , -
.-,--- g, +p--,- g- y +--1 *--ye e--
, .g. e ., . . ~ g- ,-- .
- ,, ,v
~~
.- 2
- y. - ,
+ .
- \
Arrsca. "E
,. y.
EVALUATION OF SAMPLE CABLE ROUTES sYSIE.a {-4\/ 6 LOT NO.: s.usiE Mo.
CABLE NUMBER: I Ivi l A 3 22. A i "AS-BUILT"/CRTS DEVIATION WORK REQUEST NUMBER: l27O23 YES NO I
II 49 M N !D S 6 9 1 EfE:. ED W M ASSIGNED TO: k7 ND REVIEW FOR VIOLATION TO:
CRTS COORDINATOR: Ni bM\l 6 O USAR CHAPTER 8 DATE: 7'M'N NEP DESIGN CRITERIA APPENDIX R II/I CRITERIA N[d HELBA N k HEAVY LOAD CRITERIA FINDINGS:
- 1. Is the cable an Appendix R cable? Yes No
- 3. Is USAR, Section 8.2.2.11, violated? Yes No
- 4. Is NEP 5204.22, Section 5^.2 (Raceway Yes No Fill) violated?
- 5. Is FEP 5204.22, Section 5.3 (Physical Yes No Separ 2 Y ion) violated?
- 6. Is NEP 5204.43, Section 5.3 (Shielding Yes No of Conductors) violated? l
- 7. Is NEP 5204.43, Section 5.5 (Instrument Yes No i Cable Installation) violated?
9 dt6v% %%h EXPLANATIOt OF EACH VIOLATION:
"l- CCddo ches L NdCk Wh W bok 4 l b cm e, Qw .-
h 1
1 l
Page of
.a..,
. , m, c. ,; .r . . ec;
- . ,-i.y
- r8.. W. w i.w - ;.
. Wr, : a . 97.T. . .- . x n., . ,.; ; . . .. , ,, , e,r;;ps,. i <~ -:m '2 c 1. .% . . .w -c .n c- <,.+~+v. ,--o 1 -
4,% j.gg . 7; ;,. .~ 7..:n . . n< -?,g q.; ,1j,;c.
. ;. .. ., >:p
.- .- ..: .= -- ,
t- ,, ,
.y.
- l4 ' zj
_ , .a. _
_ _ , _ . _ _ - - - - - - . . . _ - . , ....~~.m --.- .-. - --- g. - -
. 37
- Y ,
lcAnn WM96Ci 1M\A312A-RECOMMENDED ACTION:
( .
8- }
1 t
~. - \. \ ml' .n,- .Gw. >
i.. .<n
.- s r
n, v g .c ..svu ed.A. v I
Reviewed by:
b F+~ # _
'Date: } - 17 "D Q
t
' ACTION TAKEN:
he Nh $bh CthCsCbud Reviewed by: [ M M 'Date: 1 7 D
?
Checked by:
m9.b,do i, - .
Date: YN -87 t
\
i i
I 1
e Di Pago 2 _ oC. 1 .
n_..
, :.a .v-..n- . _.. ; 3 :.. ,. ~-:-.. y.. . w-.
, . . . - ~ . ..
- x. .- o n.. ..
w .-,w:c.w .;
. .m -- ., -
. . 4, . ,
_ j .. .
- ...-. ....- - -.. . - - - - - -. -. .. . . . . - - - . . . - .~
, _. N' .. .
,. r ,
I tANCHO SECO N ONCON?O3?.il]NG R2?O37 Page 1 of 1 No.S l' 4 ' Rev. #
\
L DESCG"nON OF NONCONIURMANCE Qualiry Cass I EQ 1:em: Yes @ No Das Systan M*C Equipment 1.D. No. C" A~7a far** tecanoo ""* U1 #* Da # Affected Drawings b*' "
Air I?andlin- Etr. P. O. , Co.,r,c, No. . 9022 ECN No.! N/A uCD No. N//. wo,= maq,est No. 127023 i
During the perfor=ance of 1.'E !127C23 to verify the routing of cable 111A322A, a discrepancy in cable ter:1 nation were found. Ter-htien of cable IM1A322A,
- do not agree with ele =entary diagram E-206 sh59, Rev 2 and wiring diagra: E-342 sh70, Rev 2. Drawings show:. conductor Il ter=inated at T34-C4 and Conductor C1 ter=incted at TFA-C5 while the as built condition has .Il ter=inated at T34-05 *
- and C1 at TTA-C4.
,,,, ,y Paul Gill ext. 4531 OPER C , NON4PER C UL DISPOSrnON ACUON:
H. MAJOR
- O ACCEPT C RErEcr - O REPAIR O REw0ax 0 REPtaCE SL*PERVISCR ASSIGNID Dese Dwanatio. Dee TH:S DISPOSmON AND TECHNICAL JtJSURCARON WILL REQtJIRE: (Asy "Yes** Decman aaquires a Buy-Off in Secuan Vm N
., > A Design C4:cu; anon C Yes C No > A Design or Dramung Ch.ange C Yes C No > A menest of the System / (Jnis C Yes C No Cal No. ECN or Trans. No. Test No.
i
/
9 i'
il 1 COGNIZANT DGl%ER 04TE IE A. CAL'SE OF NONCONIVRMANCE i UI 5. ACTION TAKEN TO PREVENT RECL*RRENCE CIA List. C iTS. C NO l
E 1
I I t cesw.oT ocam mrt l ouuTv e.coua art IV. DES!GN RZY1EW AND le CTR SECTION MD RDTEW REQtTRID Y. ENGDiTIJtDG REVIEW 3(MRD (requend an en sucepurepser espassanes) '
o Yan. 30.39 Log Na , C No '
d' Nuclear P' ant (Tect Summan Deu _ i
_ . . . . . . l VI. SCMIDL1JNG Of71,G (d appletanie)-
. . g
-s wea R.ps.= x.m scw N. N,,,,,,..,,,, ,,, .
k EEBMR.SEUUORK.3ErtJG (X3hEFRATE e,d ACCEPTAttA = ..- . i
- b.5^.*'$ t~ D' .a yak,J p- ,[. ENS ~ "
I-*I
_ - : w, ,.' , ... , , , : - - - ,
L- . ; :. . a :~ ',. <. m ,-:n -:.", %.giy,7 T x ,
. . s. m., ,
. - ~. ~ ~ - . . ~3..,
. v.*
2----
'RANCNO SECO WORK REQUEST PRESS FIRMLY, USING ONLY BALLPOINT PEN
- Uh6 CEPr. STATU$ equip
- eENT - G v$ EM pa cmyv 9 I '. -
sOwevth T NAME
& WCAE A40t.EST - EN NO.l127022 cs s-4 rA m e Iaws O !A 13 !L 10 l ' Pet TA T.cN Q A !i C.A PJL E IM1 A322 A
, .bisTrA! ON Svg e OEF-QiNCY ?AG J a ."s 1.
- Q t
I
[ '-3 C-h 7-
. ....,.s...
!ll0CC 4N ! YE3 0 W7 I HSTCRY ma -- 6f.dc4-M.f-k M , . W -m
[' .
I Pd!?R2M CABLr /NSP=c7/6 Al h~i* _T/'P - 9 74 i
[dA!C TI CA) : ESS'. Y/4 7RA 7 scal .S :~ - A -7A NEA TC 72/i?//- A d \
l IA)T?RLDck FRCH FAA) ke7DR T YAr? 7ER 6: "W/$
C/L.7)?A~/* / CAJ UAl>T, d. 2r% ? A 3 R R ,
caoraroa y ecu.cc.s ,u o waa uca
- OY g ecu.oc.v uo. ; oA w ..i+Auua w . wca ~o 1 t
ns C wo)C vis C NoN - I
, ) i l
uset:ncu re yi, recczzsesyyp- yyg gy;p_jpjg;7giy cp ,gm,gg tw.ac:w s As. tysc o ras 4 :tscur,'ce. '* '~ $ c~cAITRcL cA2LC RBu~rs AiG - -
'~
"'. o ' ' *
- _ ~ f <: W' ~*
4 SAIGRt~. . "Yo t 2 2/i~ Y TAE CAM r C'.$ Reu1~/Ak= AG AIAKT via'~ C275 tl/ C-- % PRO f.'t f)SD /D TM A77Ac4Eh b A n w =7:7"aS.
s' W # :n I T" "M. G P ys-i@ => _=@ ~~ ira tina) 1*4 4 C A L.-. %
. 'D v ~~ '. : 4 r* *v * ~.--J'*
l0
, %v.= j
.D\i r
s h
-c : a.~ , , , _
'.;? d_ / L ~. d' ' _
b UL1
.3o N.scn:n .ca . ~a ,=~. ....,w.. - est > ; est o ut2 se %
fo6 Sh l-.L2-W-}% t M M,',;
p . > ,m : : w **-*
m --
i T" ' ?_ "';
- t'f h<~-
- v , ECT:VE ACTCN.WCAK PER8CWE:f ?
2 -L j t- ~-
ri l/-> :. , !., r_ c .-r 7> . i w, ~.e # '
. >< .c s e l*,7 !*r ~~*:%
y* Sri!FI hIGif LW SI'(",LRi I *
>- )._
- ],a.~/?>./,/-u. - - _
V,', .
O.
~
/ ' v:>>. , ../ r, ii L. . .,
~
p
. a t.a
./2 ,
- IY3?5 f? 0 !._$ , /.
- J/ * /*.* ./ 0 ?", r , 'ss. ,.T.,,.
3J
. . ./
U " ^ >* ow _ /Y r st _ ?t _f *_. M 2 an* [b" * - ~.* -'
e" f5 * *)' .Y !* gY 0' ^ ////;ff),yjgVf.f.'. $a .! G i
,, {
- ~~ ,, ,.;;,%
N2.bEM ,;r~- - -
cnea ,cco. r r~x v,: anro m eisrs 7-:i-o 5m
?' ro r : ? . * *' ll .l s :is:'sm. ~~a. > > . , . ,,.~_.,- - , 9 .. ,,j m O
-// . . ,f. . , . , l - ~
O l l o
i "
7:
,s' 7,. 1. ..~; .j' ' ~ ~ -1: .-) [>._' R_ *< t:~ , .: i <1 =
m s' , U ~[
/L~ / -
r /1
- f, T_: .=*2.f l '7 . .- .: ~ 9 ur ecuisv<=r i sin 46Ac. . teat.saanaso e ' di 1 acra .c u. ~
. .can am>4=o e , uArt e >A o ' u ut . a uis, M '
- $$ ] .ci,0 /_ . '(br ; -oO*e r cd 6 :LL ,: . : *- *"
- ,* ] .1 o ss.w a. u.m.mmeA. .
44.**2 (E4/
l t.1 g
%m, ua s .: r ,.ru ,:.."siu . ua i i i
o :
"a i
'! e C i fW 2' , f.4
- L .
e ,,/
t x c,+ n o..-, .2
- :n - v > . m;q
,am ,.-:.,,,;,.- W,--a:
=
_. n.z.c;c.g;.;,.-
~, .;- y. > ;
.e
. . ... . m ,;.
a_
z-
. u l. _
M 3ST1A4* l'3% 9 A.L 4ADLAA3 ENCLOSURE 6.1 CABLE DATA SHEET - POWER AND CONTROL CASLES SYS H%'S .SF-A-TA Hs;TGR ruRW-cM cable number: /MIA322M circuit function: w T m cdf R cn A M STR T5 G-74C, Gr764 Layout dwg no.: f-7SI #-7N ' F-743. Work request no.: /27623 Elementary'or wiring E-2.c4-59 RWP number diagram dwg. no. : E.4c4.-d.d , 2-342 -70 (if applicable):
PREREQUISITES 3.1 Plant impact statement: 408$ 0 f /MT. T/l 7@A 7/6A/ UN/ T
.< F /4 - 7A I4PA 72R INITIAL DATE Prepared by: , E'/)- [/8// 7 ff* 'Nuc Engr /
' Approved by: 9 11/I 4 - /[Y7
.Muc Ops 3.2 Shift Supervisor review /xjh/ J-/#-$7 Shift'Supr 3.3 ADorcpriate sections of Enclosure 8.1 and g 4 -2./ -3 7 8.2 completed and includea in Work Request Test Engr 3.4 Circuit review by test personnel M 2.- 2./- p 7 Test Engr' 3.5 Radiation protection review ,-
RP lkM 3.6 ALARA review h ALAR '
3.7 rest ecuipment training d[ L - L / - A' 7 Test Enge 3.6 Test equipment check 8 Test Engr g_2 j .e 7 3.9 Accessibility walkdan" -
8/ 2. - 1/ - T J '
Test Engr .
- STP.976-7 7 l
- _. ,s_ , cv. .. . ,- ,- . .,
- ; a: [T 3;K. -.,; " 9
. _ - ;;y.y~3;.p.
- r.
- w. -
r,;p. ;;. ,;.,.,
. - .,es.s 4 .
~ -
3,p - ,
- y. ..
, 3 , e :, , , . .
~t
- - - - _ _ _ _ ~ _ . - . . ..-_. _ . _ _, __..,_' _~~ .. _ .,_ _.,. ,y .:
.~_
L ' _ ___ .
.I, I
~- _,
.r-i
< /., A ./ - p ?. cn --
ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued) vv/A rf CABLE DATA SHEET - POWER AND CONTROL CABLES INITIAL' DATE PROCEDURE
~ ##'# 7 6.1 All prerequisites comp 1'ete M Test Engr 6.2 Review of drawing package M 2.- D -8)
Test Engr 6.3.1 Cable runs in conduit 6.3.1.1 Trace cable to first raceway entry Test Engr
- 6. 3.1. 2 Enclosure-8.2 filled cut N/h Test Engr 6.3.1.3 Trace conduit per Enclosure 8.2 N/8 Test Engr 6.3.1.4 Cecolete Enclosure 8.2 and note deviations Test. Engr 6.3.2 Cable runs in combination of, trays and conduit
- 2. - 2./-W 6.3.2.1 Trace cables to first raceway entry Test Engr 6.3.2.2 Enclosure 8.2 filled out gf 2. - 2.e-S /
-Test Engr 6.3.2.3 Record tracer information M 2"2/-F1 Test Engr Tracer instrument serial number G'48E Mode of operation N/B Frequency A/S .
Battery voltage 2. 4.v or.:. ;
i
~
STP.976-9
~ *
~ _._f.
- ..M.: . . c JM,v. : .: e - - 7 . ? :,, ,. z m= :n
."~
.l._. l ._ _ =.
j MM r
l
. I. It i , >i., 1 ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued) .W,/A ri ~ /'ea-CABLE DATA SHEET - POWER AND CONTROL CABLES INITIAL DATE ;
6.3.2.4 Recheck circuit with VOM $ 2 - 2./-g 1 1 Test Engr VOM serial number 0 I'~
- 48I 6.3.2.5.1 Ground one end of conductor $ 2 - 2 /-g7 Test Engr i
~
6.3.2.5.2 Ccnnect tracer transmitter 2 - 2_/-4 7 Test Engr 6.3.2.6.1 Connect tracer transmitter N/A Test Engr 6.3.2.7 Conduct probe trace M 2. / L e /<i' ) l Fest Engr 5.3.2.8 Ccmolete Enclosure 8.2 and note deviations M 2 - 2/-g 7 Test Engr 6.3.2.9 Disconnect test hookup M 2. - 2 / - 9 7 Test Engr 6.3.2.10 Close equi:: ment; lock, if necessary N 2-2/-87 Test Engr 6.3.2.11 0; verified device closure N/A QC 6.3.2.12 shift supervisor informed test complete M 2. - 2 / - e y Test Engr 6.3.2.13 Review of deviations noted on #6 Enclosure 8.2, per AP.22 / *O - M I /7 j
Nuc Engr 00P. number: N4?
NCF numoer: L.a rat g
= g a
- !G ..r L 77n 6 J!? VLt} 7'IChi i
l STP.976-10
- w. ..
-- - - . . . . .-c- . .. . w ; : _
a
- - ' . . . . , , . . -._______i .-~.r...
. ..; w . _,;. ._ , . . p . .y . . . ~ ;. 9
->~; i+
.. .~ ' ,, ~~,.-
_._._._._1. . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ , _ . . _ . . , _ .
~
- ,. ~ . . N . ~ ' . . . . .. . . .:
ENCLOSURE 8.1 (Continued,) k/[R / 2. 7 o 2. 3 CABLE DATA SHEET - POWER AND CONTROL CABLES 4/A(/?7 3.10 Signature Log Name (Print) ignature Initial' s r W0 h ///.[A h h ~
o w b
\w (Mopm\ 0 Q1 Deam .
h
- e. A m e h 1#sdi ho
/$ aun .b g.% x
- M Y/
/
Pau t.- 6rLL lMA $ E' f fwx s k : /
x%~ ZsA i
I 9
A 519.916-8
~
= . _
w/..;;;m:qn,n:. .~.=.
- . ,~.
.w:
- a..;.y
. ;x,=
u.;.:.:,.".r
- e
-r;;;;
u.o.;.a. . t: vx::q,ac.
, + -
.A.
+
ca< .-:.
.x :..
4 x ;,. -nr z :.-v r.3-r -.
. . n, v.-
s~
- e .-=
EHCLGSURE 3.2 - / jz y /2 7 c23 CA8LE ROUTING VERIFICATION SHEET
- POWER AND CONTROL CABLES TEST ENGR CABLE NUMBER RACEWAY BY CRTS ACTUAL RACEWAY INITIAL
/DATE tMiA322A n?cH (2A RR3 l Jaiam M z/2r/ n I L.9IC64- . s'oe ' l <>..' -s' L' Th - f/ ,rg, ewi .vw
- l 56 l \ m nan c. .
\$h <*6 e s , * -y: . -> '
\a'{h V/& :%.* 349 'r
- I U$ y/ /,-, ;&1 a
l t
Ad Y s.i .ea .v: . ; -
Nh kbk g.99pa / x/r y}ri-
/hbk . ,. s.ced /a a r' vht-k(h J& <f *
,6W z.6, ? '
- \l & ,'a -*ss. .vn a - -
t j 6
( ^*
h .
- ;- f AJ k' !
A *.e. s. * . , . ,
s j $ [b 1 l ./ y .* I h.. . :-
AC2 l l s-. l n. . ,:.
. i ;
\;,?2 *
?y --
< se. - . . ...
b 0) [] { d!- . .. ; -
(U2 T .'Y A -
I". IJ. .c bT04 F. - ) i <* s i
y , g[ c-u ..: un a > ':) , _ . . , . r. - _. .
TC t.% Ct.;%fM*4G/)
- sip.976-ll # -
s *
? e I.R.$, lN..,.?5.7._%: i' :?&?hC:B i-Vi.b.Vf.. ..f!? . ';B. f .y .':- e.:.-:,x... W :;m; w,,.. :
_ 3.L
. _ .. m .m _- .. y- :s . .
..,z
.~L. ,
l.\ + -
Enclosure e.2- y ja 7c.z3 CABLE ROUTING VERIFICATION SHEET POWER AND CONTROL CABLES TEST ENGR CABLE NUMBER RACEWAY BY CRTS ACTUAL RACEWAY INITIAL-
/0 ATE CC h T' w E l cn I M I A 3 2.2 A
- M7.T %,C2 l ~~.J:05 t A 4~
l L b4(,hk aus -. ~
. L-l H 7 J 3 T2.R l- afe/o l .:g;~
L64IC5 scoca Iw .m
$ Tn SFA7A MTR u* ' z * +W ] < wo -
I
/
- pp.9M_it y " f'O-l'/U #7 i
- = , .
.g...,
..m.,........,.
-~
- .g .g m
- . .. -- .....:
-. ~._ n ;
3 ,
s.
x - , - . . .y . . w. .w.;y
,9, 7
.a....._..__- -
m
. . - - . - x ENCLOSURE 8.4 {, 7 ggg3 ;
TEST LOG SHEET
./197L .- L - Z/-87 TEST NUMBER STP.976
~
h'/!ci Nr*.D Ai?c hanii <-/ .cc A m S M 12 T A D ra,n x.no wn </ .30 Am toi.4PLg riro e A pia TRnen /&co e'm
,DI G& un de RAD 75sr AdurAmaivr J /S Pro UP4/)L/* TsD .Dcloro GN 7A ney,s /.3c PN.
I I
OrscanpAney acu~D THE TannEnn rzen s;c d ce.v.D u c rc 2 5 xi2 ci i
c5 &Anut Im/ A 3 71n .ZN c;- A-7n er re dA B.cn A*r A .~ e r .96 Ras ui. 7s 7xa-
/9 5-Eurs r se ~3r. rre s.i jn s> ansa re i-u r e,y r^1EAZH6 Tid MZA/Arzeru frfc k/H en Me fm s- 2c4 . sd 54 z 2. .nsis w /p ,e- RW, sis 7c /ls o 4, YM'E TAR /*1ZA/s4fIrH e5 st uDi'r rcit* <* X/ } L. /
r0 Pa v >i n & ni.i. rsi r u c i-r a xi e , p , .we a. ys A.'iKDED Tc 4 G % /_ v G rurg K T e a's ys % c ~s N/L-21-[]
i I
t
.f-s l
D0 t 5TP.9 76 -15 F
r-
e .
j Attachment #4 LERS, ODRS and NCRS RELATED TO CRTS ITEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT REMARKS 1 Power Cable in Instrument LER 85-16 -
l Tray - Decay Heat Removal Sept. 5, 1985 Suction Block Valve -
HV-2001 and HV2002 2
LER 85-16, Rev. 1 ECN R1295 Issue To Nov. 11, 1986 Correct Field ,
Condition i
3 Wrong ID on Conduit NCS S5270 NCR Closed
- In MHD-22 Jan 20, 1987 9-8-86 4 Redundant Cabling in the LER 86-10 NRC S5597 Issued ECN same Fire Area June 16, 1986 R-0765. Rev. O Issued To Correct Field Con-dition.
5 Instrument Cables Routed LER 87-013 NCR S6374 Issued Through the Same Fire March 6, 1987 Work Request 128636 Area Issued to Correct ,
Field Condition. '
6 Class 1 Raceway Overfill ODR 86-125 No Field Work /NCR February 27, 1987 Issued 7 Cable Routing Verification ODR 87-120 NCR S6362 Accepted February 2, 1987 Installed Condition.
DCN R-1536 Issued to correct drawings.
LERS, ODRS and NCRS RELATED TO CRTS l ITEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT REMARKS-8 Cable Routing Verification ODR 87-109 DC0 R1536 Issued To February 3, 1987 correct drawings 4
9 Cable Routing Verification ODR 87-127 See Item 4 Above February 4, 1987 I
10 Cabe Routing Verification ODR See Item 4 Above ,
Number Not Assigned to Date j February 4, 1987 11 Cable Routing Verification ODR 87-135 See Item 4 Above February 6,1987 l 12 Cable Routing Verification ODR DC0 R1536 Issued To 1 ' Number Not Correct Drawings Assigned To Date j February 6, 1987 i
4 13 Cable Routing Verification ODR 87-171 Work Request 127363 February 9, 1987 Issued To Correct
' Limit Switch Cover Locations.
l 14 Cable Routing Verification ODR 87-259 NCR S6457 1: February 23, 1987 Dispositioned to l Accept. DC0 R1536 Issued to Correct Drawings
, 1 1
1 1
LERS, ODRS and NCRS RELATED TO CRTS ITEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT REMARKS 15 Cable Routing Verification ODR 87-260 Work Request 127135 March 4, 1987 Issued to Correct Limit Switch Cover Locations 16 Cable Routing Verification NCR S6362 000 R1536 Issued February 3, 1987 To Correct Drawings 17 Cable Routng Verification NCR S6374 See Item 4 Above February 4,1987 18 Cable Routing Verification NCR S6454 NCR Dispositioned February 24, 1987 Rework to correct terminations.
19 Cable Routing Verification NCR S6455 Not Assigned for February 23, 1987 Disposition to Date Terminations Reversed 20 Cable Routing Verification NCR S6457 See Item 13 Above j February 23, 1987 21 Cable Routing Verification NCR S6458 Cable Jacket Damage February 20, 1987 22 Cable Routing Verification NCR S6460 Debris in Trays February 20, 1987 l
LERS ODRS and NCRS RELATED TO CRTS i
ITEM DESCRIPTION DOCUENT REMARKS ,
1 23 LER 85-16 Rev 1 ODR S6561-Issued Re-Checked Number Not March 19, 1987 j Assigned to Date j March 19, 1987 i
! i j 24 CRTS Cable Tracing NCR S6523- Superceded by NCRS i' Unacceptable intermixing Two 00Rs. Nos. S6561 to S6566 .;
of Power / Control not assioned.
LER 87-26 F/c 4/9/87 t i
25 CRTS Cable Tracing NCR 56561 Superceded NCR.S6523 March 20 ,1987 4
26 CRTS Cable Tracing NCR S6562 Superceded NCR S6523 March 20, 1987 j 27 CRTS Cable Tracing NCR S6563 Superceded NCR S6523 March 20, 1987 i
i j 28 CRTS Cable Tracing NCR S6564 Superceded NCR S6523
+
March 20, 1987 29 CRTS Cable Tracing .NCR S6565 Superceded NCR S6523
March 20, 1987
, )
i
~
- LERS, ODRS and NCRS RELATED TO CRTS ITEM DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT. REMARKS 31 Overweight Cable LER 87-24. Detailed Evaluation Is Trays March 27, 1987 In Progress-To ODR # 87-204 Determine If Dispos 2-27 Corrective Action Is87-204 Feb 25 Required i
d P
1 F
I 4-RPTJG326 i
- _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- _ ___. _ - -_ _ _ . ..-. . _ . . _ _ _ _ _