ML20199F001

Forwards 10CFR50.59 Annual Rept Summaries for Safety Evaluations of Changes Approved & Implemented from May 1985 - Apr 1986.Reported Items Do Not Involve Unreviewed Safety Questions

ML20199F001
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	06/11/1986
From:	Schnell D UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To:	James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
ULNRC-1330, NUDOCS 8606240167
Download: ML20199F001 (59)

Text

2W8 OE

?3IcnIrr Rounu UNION ELECTlHC COMPANY d[irm ase 1901 Gratiot Street, St Louis June 11, 1986 y-yul g

Donald F. Schnell "C ' $s

, k Vice President g3 p~

3.g fr

~

q yp Mr. James G. Keppler flLL,dl;QO Regional Administrator Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinoia 60137

Dear Mr. Keppler:

ULNRC-1330 DOCKET NUMBER 50-483 CALLAWAY PLANT 10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS

Reference:

ULNRC-1107, dated June 5, 1985 In accordance with 10CFR50.59, enclosed are forty conformed copies of a report which summarizes written safety evaluations of changes approved and implemented for Callaway Plant since the reference report and through April 30, 1986.

The report format is presented as follows:

o Report item number, o

Safety evaluation ID number, o

Title and descriptive text which summarizes the safety evaluation.

All items reported herein were determined to not involve an unreviewed safety question. provides a key to the sources of the changes which are provided in this report.

If there are any questions, please contact us.

Very truly yours, l

ng6%ng unnga R

Donald F. Schnell DJW/ tar M 16 g p/

Attachments i

Mailing Address: RO Box 149, St. Louis, MO 63166 Ol

(

ccs Nicholcs A.

Patrick Executive Director SNUPPS 5 Choke Cherry Road Rockville, Maryland 20850 C. W.

Hehl Division of Projects and Resident Programs, Chief, Section lA U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Bruce Little Callaway Resident Office U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RRil Steedman, Missouri 65077 Paul O'Connor Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 316 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014 Manager, Electric Department Missouri Public Service Commission P.O. Box 360 Jefferson City, MO 65102 James M. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 J. H. Smith Bechtel Power Corporation SNUPPS Project 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, MD 20877-1454 Glenn L. Koester Vice President Operations Kansas Gas & Electric P.O. Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 m

?

ATTACHMENT 1 ULNRC-13 30 JUNE 1986 REFERENCE KEY Reference Description CMP 4 Callaway Modification (Design Change)

.M Callaway Temporary Modification CN f, SP FSAR Change, Standard Plant CN i, SA FSAR Change, Site Addendum OL 4

Technical Specification Change ETP #

Engineering Technical Procedures ETT #

Engineering Test Procedures OTN #

Normal Operating Procedures OSP i Operations Surveillance Procedures RFR #

Request for Resolution TOPRP Turbine Overspeed Protection Reliability Program Notes FSAR and Technical Specification changes are also reported under 10CFR50.71 and 10CFR50.90 as applicable.

~

r ATTACHMENT 2 ULNRC-1330 JUNE 1986 ANNUAL 10CFR50.59 REPORT SUMMARIES (May 1985 - April 1986)

. -. - _. - -. -. ~. - -. -

~ - _ _.. - - -

10CFR50.59 A%NUAL REPCQT SUM 2 ARIES OF UNIC2 ELECTRIC APPROVED CQITTED SSFETY EVCLEATIO45 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEN ID 1

NE-84-0041 RF4 NO.0012 CHANGED THE OPERATING SPEED OF AUX BUILDING HVAC FAN

1. FP NO.0072 CH44GEO THE OPERATING SPEED OF 4UtILIA97 BUILDING HV4C FAN. If REDUCED THE OPERATING SPEED OF THE AUXILIARY BUILDING HV4C EXHAUST FAN TO MEET TWE DESIGN LOW 5*EED CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INF04MATION THIS CHENSE 00E5 NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCRE45E IN PRosaPILITV OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 09 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION CVER PREVIOUS EVALU4 TION 51 04 CREATE THE POS$181LITY OF 4 NEW 04 O!FFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT 04 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: CR INVOLVE 4 $1GNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIg 0F SAFETV; AND 00E5 nor INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED 54FETT GUESTION.

TME EVALUATION CETERMINED THAT AN UN4EVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETV EVALUATION ITEN 13 2

NO-44-0145 4FR No.0533 4CCumutATOR SAFETY INJECTION LINE W45 #ESTRAINED THE N09fM SIDE OF 4 CHECK VALVE IN THE ACCUNULAT09 SAFETT INJECTION SYSTEM was TEMPORARILY REST 8AINED FRON MOVING THE494LLY 9Y *IPE WHIP RESTRAINT.

8U45UANT TO THE P4EV!0US INFORNATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INC4E45E IN PR03AeILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION CVE4 PREVIOUS EVALUATIO15; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFEAENT KIND l

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PpfVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT l

PEDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF 5AFETY: AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY l

QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TH47 44 UNDEVIEWED SAFETY GUESTISM OID NOT EXIST.

I REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITER ID 3

NO-54-0171

• MP 84-0453 REVISED SETPOINTS 4ND TOLE 44NCE5 F04 ACCUM. TANK LEVEL TR4NSMITTE45 l

CM* S4-045' REVISED SETPOINTS AND TOLER4NLE5 70s ACCUMULATOR TANts A,3,C,D LEVEL TRANSNITTEPS. THE CHANGE FACILITATES THE EFFICIENT PE#F3eg4NCg 3F TpANSMITTER CAL 19 RATION UNDER NognsL FIELD CONDITIONS. THE CHANGE W45 CONSERVATIVE 97 ENVE-LOPINE WO457 CASE IN4CCU44CIES.

PURSUANT TO THE P4EVIOUS INFORMATION THIS fd441E DOES NOT INV3LVE A SIGNIFICANT INCRE45E IN PRoaneILITV 04 CONSEQUENCE 0F av 4CCIDENT 0' OTHER ADVERSE CONDIT10N OVER PREVIOUS EVALu4 TION 5; OR CREATE THE FO!$1?ILITY 3F A NEW 3P O!FFERENT KIND f

0F ACCIDENT CR COM11 TION OVER PPEVIOUS EValuaTI?q1: Oa Igv0LVE 4 SIGNIFIC41T l

REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; aND D3E5 49T INVOLVE 44 UNDEVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETE5MINEO TH4T AN U7aEVIEVES TAFETV QUESTION DID NOT ENIST.

1UCF450.57 43:uat REPCGT $5MM4 RIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALU4TIONS MEPGRT SAFETT EVALU4 TION ITEM 13 4

NI-54-0348 C9P 54-0354 ADDED IONIZATION DETECTORS FOR FIRE PROTECTION IN CONTROL ROOM HVAC CMP 34-0354 ADDED SM0KE DETECTOR $ IN THE RETURN 41R HW4C DUCT FOR THE BACK PANEL AREA 0F THE MAIN CONTROL 2004 THE ADDTTION OF DETECTORS PROVIDES A MORE RAPID RiSFONSE TO A FIRE EMERGENCY.

PUA5UANT TO THE PAEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR03A3ILITF OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PRIVIOUS EVALU4 TION 5J 04 CREATE THE POS$19ILITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT CR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 51GNIFICANT DEDUCTION IN A MAPGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNNEVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EV4LUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTIuN DID NOT EtIST.

REPO4r 54FETT iv4LUATION Ifim ID 5

No-34-0146 RFa 40.357$ AEVIEWED FLUM M4PPING CRITERI4 FOR ACCUR4CY aFR ##.05F6 REQUIRED 4 REVIEW OF Flut M4PPING CRITERIA F04 4CCUR4CY. IT REVIEb!D Flux MAPPING CRITERI4 FOR 30 2 AND 50 % POWER TO DETERMINE IF i

l WESTINGNOUSE GENERATED DAT4 W4$ SIGNIFICANT TO THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ASSOCIATED TEST $4FEff REVIEW CRITERIA.

PJR$U4NT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORNATION THIS CHANGE 00E5 NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROSASILITY 04 CONSERUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION CVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONST OR CREATE THE P05518tLITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND l

OF ACCIDENT 04 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EV4LU4Tl0NS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT RE)UCTION IN & MAR 3IN OF SAFETY # AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY ouiSTION.

THE EVALU4 TION DETERMINED TNAT AN 04 REVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

EiPORT SAFETT EVALUATION ITEM ID l

6 NO-35-0C04 ETP-AIC-T0031 PERF0AMED CONDENSATE POLISMER SERVICE VESSEL DIFFER. PRESS. TEST THIS PROCEDURE 03TAINED SERVICE VESSEL DIFFER. PRESSURES AT VARICUS FLOJRATES AND RESIN LEVELS TO PROVIDE TME VENDOR WITH 4DEQUATE OPERATIONAL INFORM 4 TION TO ALLOW FOR VENDOR OPERATION 4L EVALU4 TION OF THE CONDENSATE POLISHER $.

PUR5U44T TO THE PREVIOUS INFORNATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A 5!GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09ARILITY OR CDNSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS; OR CREATE THE P05$1BILITV 0F A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT 04 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF 5AFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED $4FETT QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TMAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

L

~ _.. -. -... - _ _

.. - -._ -.. - -.... ~ - - - - - - - - _.. _. _ _

~ _. - _ _ _ -.

i 13CF350.59 4:MuAL REPSQT SUMm43IES OF U3tDN ELECTRIC CFFOOVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS 4EPORT SAFiTY EVALU4TIO4 ITim 13 7

h0-55-0316 TM $5-E002 MODIFIED THE MAIN TURBINE HIGH VIgeaTION Ta!P TM 85-E002 MODIFIED THE MAIN TUR8INE HIGH VIBR4 TION TRIP. IT REM 3VED THE MAIN TU48INE HIGH VI8 RATION TRIP AND UTILIIED EXISTING CIRCUITS TO PROVIDE A HIGN VIuRATION ALARM.

PJR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORN4 TION THIS CH4N3E 00E5 NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN Pa0848ILITV OR CONSEQUENCE OF 4N 4CCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVEe Pa!VIOUS YVALu4 TION 5; 04 CREATE THE P055ISILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIGd5 EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MAa3tM OF 54FEff; AND DOES NOT INWOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFEff GUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TH4T AN UNREVIEWED SAFETT GUESTION DID NOT EmIST.

REPORT SAFETV EVALUATION ITEM I3 9

NE-$4-0035 CL 1005 TECH SPEC C4ANsf TO ADD TWO SATCH W45fE RELEASE TANC5 TWO ADDITIONAL 84TCH WASTE RELEASE TANL5 WERE REQUIRED TO HANDLE AN ESTIMATED VOLUME INCREASE IN SECONDARY LIGUID WASTE.

Pua50 ANT TO THE PaEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INC4 EASE IN PR06 ABILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIJUS EVALUATION 5; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND j

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT L

REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; ANS D0!$ NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUSTION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED 5AFEff JUESTION DID NOT EmIST.

AiPJai SAFETT iVALUATION 1764 ID l

9 NO-35-0006 TM 55-E055 TEMPORaRf MODIFICATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM.

}

TEMPORAaf M3DIFICAIION OF THE FIRE PROTECTIDM SYSTEM ELIMINATED THE POSSIBILITY i

i 0F ACTU4 TINS THE FIRE SUPPRESSION DELUGE SYSTEM FOR THE M4!N TRANSFORMER CHASE CAUSING 54ME to TRIP.

l PURSU4NT TO THE P4EVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR054SILITY OR CONSEDUENCE OF AN 4CCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION QVER PREVIOUS EvaLU4 TION 5; OR CREATE THE P055tBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND

)

CF ACCIDENT 04 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MAR 4IN OF SAFETV; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION.

l TWE EVALUATION DETERMINED TH4T AN UNREVIEWED SAFETT

[

3UESTION DID NOT CEI!T.

1 l

l-1

I 10CF450.59 AOCUAL CEP24T SUMM* RIES OF EQIO2 ELECTOIC APPRIVE3 W1ITTEN SAFETV EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 10 N3-Si-000F TR d5-E034 TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM.

TEM 7044RT MODIFICATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ELIMINATED THE P055IeIL-ITY OF ACTUATING THE FIRE SUPPRESSION DELUGE SYSTEM FOR ThE MAIN TRANSFORMER PHASE A,

CAUSING SA9E TO TRIP.

Pua50 ANT TO ThE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INC4 EASE IN PR054BILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER P4EVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE P05$18ILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDiNT OR C01DIFION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REoUCTION IN 4 MAR 5IN OF SAFETTI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETV QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REP 02T SAFETT EVALUATIJN ITE9 ID l

11 NO-55-3336 TM 35-E036 TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM.

TEM 702A4Y MODIFICATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ELIMINATED THE P055IBIL-ITY OF ACTUATING THE FIRE SUPPRESSION DELUGE SYSTEM FOR THE MAIN TRANSFORMER PHASE 9,

CAUSING SA9E 10 TRIP.

PUASUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCAEASE IN P408A3ILITV 04 CONSE00ENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $J OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITV 0F A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETVJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 30ESTION DID NOT EXIST.

2EPO4T SAFETY EVALUATION ITEN I3 12 NO-35-0009 TM d5-E035 TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM.

TEMPORARY M3DIFICATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ELIMINATED THE POSSIBIL-ITY OF ACTUATING THE FIRE SUPPRES$10N DELUGE SV5 TEN FOR THE START-UP TRANSFOR-MER CAUSING THE SAME TO TRIP.

PUR5UANT TO THE P4EVIOU$ INF04 NATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 04 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARSIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY SU E S T I DN.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TNAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

O

ICCFR30.59 AO UAL REPCOT SUMM00IES OF UNICN ELECTRIC APPROVEB WRITTEN SAFETV EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEN ID 13 04-34-0306 CMP 84-05-19 INCREASED GREAKER AND CABLE SIIE FOR INTERRUPT AC THIS DESIGN CH44GE INVOLVED ONLY THE INCREASING IN SIIE OF CA9LES AND BREAKERS IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE SPURIOUS TRIPS OF THE BREACERS FEEDING 90P UPS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PRC9 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVER$E CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITV 0F A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 2UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

As*0RT SAFETT EVALUATION ITER 10 14 04-96-00$7 INC4 EASED AIR FLOW THROUGH HOODS IN CONTROL,AUN, AND RADWASTE BLOG M0T LABS CMP S4-05-38 INVOLVED INCREASING THE AIR FLOW THROUGH HOODS IN THE CONTROL 9UILDING MOT L43,THE AUX BLOG 2000FT SAMPLE LAO, AND THE RADWASTE SUILDING SAMPLE N00D$. THE ADDITIONAL EXHAUST FLOWS FOR THE SAMPLE PANEL AND LAS FUME HOODS PROVIDE GREATER ALARA PROTECTION FOR OPERATING PER$0NNEL. SUB-5YSTEMS MODIFIED dERE MON-Q AND DID NOT IMPACT SAFE SHUTDOWN OF THE PLANT.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR094RILITV OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KINO 0F ACCIDENT OR CONSITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETVI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 2UESTION.

THE EVALUATION D!TERMINE0 THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY suESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATICM ITEM ID 15

• E-34-0007 OL 1013 LICENSE CONDITION 2.C.3.(A) EQ DEADLINE EXTENSION I

REQUESTED EXTEN!!04 0F TIME ON THE EG DEADLINE FROM MARCH 31 TO NOVEMBER.

PUR$UANT TO THE PREVICUS INFORMAFION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR O!FFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REOUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETT; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED $4FETT OUE! TION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

v 10CFR50.59 A MUAL REP 02T SUMMARIES

$F 00I02 ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SsFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY sVALUATION ITEM ID 16 04-84-0100 CMP 84-05-31 FIXED SECURITY SYSTEM MISSILE DOOR TO PREVENT JAMMING CMP $4-05-71 INVOLVED A MODIFICATION TO MISSILE DOOR SOLENOID LOCK ASSEMBLY.

MISSILE 0004 JAMMING AESULTED FROM 30LT SHEARING BETWEEN SOLEN 0ID AND PLUNGER SHAFT. CHANGE REPLACED SHEARED 80LTS WITH ROLL PIN ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN SOLENDID AND PLUNGER SHAFT TO PREVENT BOLT SHEARING. THIS CHANGE SATISFIED INTENT AND TdE FUNCTION OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGN.

PUESUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR0043ILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND UF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT AEDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETT QUESTION DID NOT EKIST.

AEP04T SAFETY EVALUATION ITiM ID li hE-14-0336 OL 1006 TECH SPEC CHANGE TO SHOW A MORE GENERIC UNION ELECTRIC ORGANIIATION CL 1005 TECH SPEC CHANGE WAS REQUESTED TO SHOW A MORE GENERIC ORGAN!!ATION. IT MODIFIED FIGS. 6.2-1 AND 6.2-2 TO FACILITATE FUTURE CHANGES AND AT THE SAME TIME REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH TECH SPECS DESC4I0 LNG OFFSITE AND UNIT ORGANIIA-TI3NS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCAEASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVia PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT 4 EDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETTJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED $AFETY GUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

AEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM IJ 18 NE-85-0002 OL 1014 WEVISED TECH SPEC ON CONTAINMENT VESSEL TENDON SURVEILLANCES OL 1014 REVISED TECH SPECS ON CONTAIMENT VESSEL TENDON SURVEILLANCES. IT REVISED TECH SPEC 4.6.1.6.1 TO EXTEND THE CONTAINMENT VESSEL TENDON SURVEIL-LANCE TIME PERIOD BY SIX MONTHS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR0349tLITT OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY l

3UESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVTEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

L

1 10CFD50.59 AN:UAL REPORT SYMM4 RIES OF c2 ION ELECTRIC APPRIVED W9ITTEN SAFETV EVALUATIONS AiPORT SAFETY EVALU4 TION ITEM ID 17 NE-85-0004 CMP S4-0405 MODIFIED MAIN 4ND START-UP TRANSFORMERS DELUGE SYSTEMS.

CMP 84-0405 MODIFIED THE MAIN AND START-UP TRANSFORMERS OtLUGE SYSTEMS. IT REVISED CONTROL CIRCUITRY FOR THE MAIN AND START-UP TRANSFORMERS 50 THAT OPERATION OF THE FIRE SUPPRESSION WATER SPRAY SfSTEM DID NOT CAUSE DE-ENERGIZ-4TI3N CF THE ASSOCIATED TRANSFORMERS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE COES NOT INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROSAEILITV OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS; OR CREATE TME POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERCNT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFIC4NT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF $4FETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED $4FETY QUESTION.

THE EVALU4 TION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUEST 10m DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT S4FETY EVALU4TIJN ITEM ID 20 NE-35-0006 RFR 40.0039 TNSTALLED FIVE AMP FUSES IN THE FUEL HANDLING SYSTEM PANELS IN THE FUEL HANDLING, STORAGE AND REACTOR V!SSEL SERVICE SYSTEM WERE INCORRECTLY LISTED AS REcu!4ING 15 AMP FUSES WHEN IN FACT 4 5 AMP FUSE WAS THE COR4ECT SIZE.

PU4$UANT TO THE P4EV!005 INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCRE4SE IN P40948ILITY OR CONSESUENCE OF A4 4CCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A M4431N OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION.

THE EVALU4 TION DETERMINED TMAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETV QUESTION DID NOT Ez!ST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALU4 TION ITEM 10 21 hE-$4-0019 CMP 84-0532 DELETED ME4T TRACING FROM CONTAIN. PENETR4TIONS P-99 AND P-101 THIS DESIGN CNANGE REMOVED THE NEAT TRACE Frog THE POST ACCIDENT SAMPLING SYSTEM CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERi SAMPLE LINES. TNIS INVOLVED PENETRATIONS P-97 AND P-101 To PASS VALVES GS-HV-30 AND GS-NV-35.

PUR$U4NT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR03ASILITY OR CONSESUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 04 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT 04 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED T4FETY SUESTION.

-TNE EVALUATION DETERMINED TMAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

4 i

>2 WE WE I

200 300 200 l

ewe qw2 F

em2 upw upw aw upw i

wwww ww www>

E wwWk wo 2

mZ hD E

>w mO E

O wr>w>

wzke>

Em mzkg>

9 w>

ZOZuw e

EC2w>

Om ZOEuk cuwww E2m ouwww m3 wwwww 20 w

Emm woZ w

N mm JW w

EEm www awwww

>J>

mwwww mwwww ZOZ mm2m MJ Mw2M JZ mm2M ugh (mme

>ew gamu Jw emmo w

wwwe m

J wwwO we wwwa WJZ w>Osw Ow w>omw W3E wpoww TO>

Do 3

wwZ

>O 3

w Do 3

g

>Mw Jgr4w k

3 J4Wew MW d4W4w 3

O O

w ME O

O w

eOZ O

O w

ow

>w w>

E www

>m w>

WMk

>m w>

w wZJ Zw3pw w

3>W Ew3>W 2E Zw3>w

.i

)

>>w wzwJs om2 ewZwJa ww&

M ZwJa J

J J

wrom M

w><m

>zor emw

• EOz 8

e emJ

>O

>3 mM>Z>O

>3 w

a a

50 D3 DOM O

42 M

wO 42 2

3r>

O wE a

Em m2 OwAWZa m2 m

>O ZK m2 W

WEW Ow a

w w>3m Oh M

e w>

Om e

u vek m

Om

> Dunaw Om a

F>O m

Om w

ww w>

Om M

Owa we Ow 3

wer wk Om Z

Zaz Or>

e mmomor>

em OZ>

u upw o w >.. J w

3 Jozoow> ** J w

Ems owwwa w

d M

owmo a

o e

o owMO m

2 wJ owmo m

i etw wwJr>

e OswawwaZ>

e w

w>w wwJzz e

j 3>

ouwOr M

a Jmouwoz e

e Z

3 ouwoz e

o o J

zumww ou Zumww E

>Z Zumww i

w wre egww a

c ww>GWewk O

Ok awwk o

i a

oO>

Z Mew w

w

>DurZ me>

w r

Zw2 Z

me>

w O

Da utM30 3

3 J o su w u t m 3 C 3

O OZm ute30 3

4 4mW EOJE w

a qwmW WOJR w

40J2 w

u m te w

w

>J mm Ae w

A awe M

te w

e e>w wm

>w J

wwwm DM w

wzo wm

>m 2

242 ZOwww w

FwZuTOwww w

e WWO ZOwww w

n e

stu Z

O a

w OZwop Z

O e

> > a >

K O

e w

w>me r

Z

=> a w>ma E

wwwe 2

=

w W34 Eu 3

3 EEEu 3

3 3

EdJ Eu 3

3 E

De O2moe 4 20 O2 woe o

OZO OEwOe WO J

J e

m us > = Z X

O Jwammwww3 2

m w>m wwww2 E

EwM e

emw m34De w

0 mww34>4 4

>34>4 4

EDE Due e@ww MW WOWW W

402 WOWw 300 en E w a m ee w

w>marwaan a

anO Ewmas WEM w

W 4

EMuth e

JWOEMuk>

W m e u MMuh>

W 4>

J Jw OE Z

J Je>>OE 2

m wJ OR 2

>&W

>ZO hCNEW 4

e>edh0Euw DOR mONEw EW3

>>E EuOwm E

SuzuCwm sw Ewowm J

O O

4 m

DE O

OE Om De O

Z Zwe w

De e

hue a

m2 anOM w

F woMA m%Om W

W WEE M ** O W W

ww)

Z TM O MOM E e O

kwMdMom E o w

wo MOM E

• MSW w

3 22h

=>

w wwwp3 E2m wk 2

Zuw 3

22h wk WO ObOOO Em OduwO>OOO EM Z

O>OOO Em 4

Ju>

d WDZ wwww aw e

OJO wwww aw w

wwk wwww am ew>

JW Dw>>E WM J

40mw>w>>Z ess M Z

ZZ

>w>>X ww DJW O

OWJ WJeww p ue O

MA>WJeMw k ed kwE wJeww kw Hwm w

W DO m w 3 c es us M

gw my w3nw eo Tw aw30s w

ff a

M EmJRm Op w

W OdamJra ok e om EmJrm e>

j

+

WRW

=

WW e404 O

m>3 44 04 O

w.

w33 4404 O

O u

usw we>uE FE O

Ow wm>ut P2

>>O wmput EF

~

kw2 O

O*Z Z O ue O

w wZwaZOW O

O O

a ZOW O

m M au J

J>>

eks me we o

a>Ow>m we wo E

F E

kW WW we I

1. 3>

w wO w

LMO wm e

com3 Amo ww w

WEm

&mo

>=

0 a

amm>O 3

2 en a

ereOO 3

2 en a

aw2 eO 3

E en en h w ZOJW2Oww 3

esww2O>w 3

4 m>FO*w 3

MON N

N>

e wwZ JW d

d OJ ww2 JE e

eEmo ww2 J2 h

3 4

4 E>>

DwM e go O

O a >

Dw2 e wo w

w Op>

Dwse eO w

w wwe JwwaOr

>w e woe >2wweOE Dw O

O M4EwweOE Dw O

O OZWWeMmwwo ue >

O Cw>wwMewwo w>

O COMageNwwo wk p

I ekmJ3dnuww m

e p Jwwpetukw M

e I w w su g e t u p w M

4 4

> > M ee t uuk WW d

@ J OMW uu>

eu we m

mwuRMW uuk WW M

MOM >N&W4 3M 23 es St ew2WWW e3M Z3 m

mh ZwsWEe3M 23 ue2 O 3 u w ow p et

>>O3um G ese

>o w303uw aw MO LD3m123h w3 e

aMMu42Dhw3 A

Lor LE>mw3 J,

E ECOZ

=004O E

E 2 W us wCOWO E

EO2m wOCEO u

UKD>

u uw3m u

uKeO I

j r

J z

n a

o t

w w

w l

k e

m a

m e m t

3 N

3 m

3 w

l J

R J

e J

O M

C e

o e

O I

> e 0

een n 4 wna ne o en a

wm wm wm 9

0 9

O O

O w

M w

E w

E m

m b

a i

e 4

4 W

W M

i t

wEm arm mEd i

O ies N OWN OWN

[

4>

ww ww ww E

4 W

1 1

i i

0 10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUM 2 ARIES OF UNIO 4 ELECT 2tC APPROVEB d4ITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS l

l REPORT SAFETY EVALUATIJN ITsM ID 25 40 s5-0014 CM7 85-0157 M03IFIED THE COMPUTER ROOM HVAC SUPPLY CM* $5-01$9 MODIFIED THE COMPUTER ROOM HVAC SUPPLY. THE CHANGE l

MOSIFIED THE PNUEM4 TIC CONTROLS OF COMPUTER ROOM SUPPLY FANS (HVAC) TO SATISFY THE ORIGI44L DESIGN I1 TENT OF THE TUR8tME SLOG. HVAC SYSTEM.

PJRSU4NT TO Tdt P4EVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCRE4SE IN P4094BILITY 04 CONSEGuiNCE OF 44 4CCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVia PREVIOUS EVALuAltuMSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND l

OF ACCIDENT OR CON 3ITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION 5: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETr; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DIO NOT EXIST.

RE*0RT SAFETY EVALUATIJN ITEh I4 26 h0-55-0015 C V. P 84-0!!O ADDED ADDITIONAL TANK TO THE SITE SERVICE GAS NITROGEN SYSTEM l

CMP 34-0910 ADDED AN EXTRA T4NK TO THE NITROGEN SERVICE GAS SYSTEM. THE CHANGE Au39thTED EXISTING PLANT NITROGEN STORAGE CAPACITY BY THE ADDITION OF A 1600 GALLON NITROGEN TAN ( AND ASSOCIATED PIPING AND H4RDWAAE AT THE SITE G45 STORAGE AaEA.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCRE4SE IN P40449ILITY OR CONSEOUENCE OF AM ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CAEATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONSITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFIC4NT l

REDUCTION IN 4 444 GIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY i

QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY

.UESTION 010 NOT EXIST.

REPCAT SAFETY EVALUATIJN L

ITEM 10 27 h0-$5-3018 CMP 85-0090 ADDED JUNPERS AND RENAMED ANNUNCIATORS FOR BORIC ACID TANK LEVEL I

CMP 85-0090 REWIaED 4No RENAMED THE ANNUNCIATORS FOR THE 80RIC ACIO STORAGE T4NK LEVEL L0 LO ALARM $0 THAT BOTH SORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS HAVE TO REACH THE ALAam SETPOINT SEF04E AN ALARM SOUN05.

PURSUANT TO THE PAEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT l

INCREASE IN PAGBASILITY OR CONSEOUENCE OF 44 ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION i

CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KINO OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AN9 DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 4

QuiSTION.

THE EVALUATION SETERMINED TNAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

l 4,~_.__

- J

10CFR50.57 ANNUAL REPORT SU;2 ARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPRIVED WRITTE74 SAFEff EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 28 NO-d5-0024 CM7 84-0030 INSTALLED MIX, HOLD VENT RESIN TRAP IN CONDEN.DEMIN.(AK)SYS PIPING CMP e4-0030 INSTALLED MIX, HOLD VENT RESIN TRAP IN AK SYSTEM BACKFLUSH PIPING.

CHANGE DOES NOT ALTER OPERATION OR FUNCTION OF SYSTEM.

PURSUANT To TN! PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF A4 ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND 0F ACCIDENT OR CON 3ITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARSIN OF SAFETV; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION.

TNE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

4E70af SAFETY EVALUATIO4 ITEM ID 29 CA-54-0315 C9P 84-0706 INSTALLED ISOLATION VALVES IN ESSENTIAL SERVICE WATER SYSTEM CAP 84-070$ thSTALLED ISOLATION VALVES IN THE ESSENTIAL SERVICE WATER SYS. IT INSTALLED TJO ISOLATION VALVES IN THE ESSENTIAL SERVICE WATER SYSTEM FOR EF-V346 AND EF-V076 DOWNSTREAM OF THE ESW AIR COMPRESSORS FOR ISOLATION CHECK VALVES.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION TdIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE I4 PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVAL 9ATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 1UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

4sPJai SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 13 30 OA-34-0022 CMP 34-0331 ADDED A # EMOTE INDICATING LIGHT TO A RADWASTE OLOG SMOKE DETECTOR I

CMP E4-0381 PROVIDED A REMOTE INDICATING LISHT TO RADWASTE BLOG. DETECTOR. IT ADDiD A REMOTE INDICATING LIGHT KC-ML-700-002 FOR VISUAL ANNUNCIATION OF ELEC-TRICAL CHASE FIRE DETiCTORS IN THE RADWASTE 90!LDING.

PURSUANT TO THE PAEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT

{

INCREASE IN PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

e 4

w

__..___.____g

10CFA50,57 A%NUAL REPORT STGTARIES OF U3 ION ELECTRIC APPR$VED Wi!TTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 31 NE-64-0328 CMP S4-05-92 AEVISED POWER FEEDS TO SECURITY SYS. INVERTERS CMP 84-05-92 INVOLVED REVISING POWER FEEDS FOR INVERTERS XSK014 AND XSK010 TO PE0 VIDE INDEPENDENT MAIN AND ALTERNATE POWER SOURCFS. THIS CHANGE PROVIDES ADDITIONAL REDUMDANCY FOR AC POWER FEED TO UPS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFIC ANT INCAEASE IN PROSABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREV!OUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE PUSSIBILITV 0F A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT AEDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

AEPOAT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 32 NE-85-0013 CMP 55-0215 REMOVED FLAPPER FRON CHECK VALVE IN CO9 PRESSED AIR SYSTEM CMP 85-0215 REMOVED THE FLAPPER FROM CHECK VALVE KA-V-214 To ALLOW A TEMPORARY AIR 50U4CE CONNECTED DOWNSTAEAM TO SUPPLY THE INSTRUMENT AIA SYSTEM. THIS CHANGE MAD NO EFFECT ON PLANT SAFETY.

PUSSUANT TO THE 8MEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PA3FABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVi4 PAEVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND GF ACCIDENT OR CON)ITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARSIN OF SAFETYJ AND 00!$ NOT INVOLVE AN uNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETf QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

RIPCRT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 35 NO 34-0042 CMP 84-0410 REPLACED BACXUP LEVEL MONITOR FOR SECOND. LIQUID WASTE EVAPORATOR CMP 84-0410 REPLACED A BACKUP LEVEL MONITOR FOR SECONDARY LIO. WASTE EVAPO. IT i

INSTALLED CAPACITANCE LEVEL PROSE IN THE SECOND. LIQUID WASTE EVAPORATOR TO PRO-VIDE MORE ACCURATE LEVEL INDICATION.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROB 8BILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTNER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITV 0F A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CCNDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETTJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

l 1

i o

10CFR50.59 AN%U4L REPORT SUM ARIES OF U110N ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EV4LUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 34 NO-34-3359 CMP 84-05-36 INSTALLED PLANT DISCHARGE MONITOR T4NKS CMP 14-05-46 INSTALLED PLANT DISCHARGE MONITOR TANKS. THE CHANGE INCREASED WASTE WATER STORAGE CAPACITY OY ADDITION OF TWO DISCHARGE MONITOR TANT 1 THAT ACCOMODATE FREQUENT POLISHER REGENE9ATION.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE 4 $1GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR39491LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF 4CCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION 013 NOT EXIST.

AEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITdM I) 35 h0-d4-0109 CMP 56-0735 INSTALLED DRAIN LINES ON MFP TUR91NC LUSE OIL CONDITIONERS THIS CHANGE PROVIDED DRAIN LINES AND VALVES TO MFP TURBINE LUBE OIL C0hDITIONER FCF32A AND 3 ENASLI13 M4INTENANCE AND CLEAR ACCESS FOR TAKING SAMPLES.

PJR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLvi A SIGNIFICANT INCIE4SE IN PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER AJVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POS$1BILITY OF A NEW GR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CON 3IT!0N OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARi!N OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPOAT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 35 NO-34-3136 CMP d4-0709 INSTALLED PERMAN. VALVES AND FLANGES IN THE SECONDARY LIQUID WASTE CMP $4-0707 INSTALLED VALVES AND FLANGES IN THE SECONDARY LIQ. WASTE SYS. IT 400iD TWO PLUG VALVES AND GLIND FLANGES IN THE SECONDARY LIQUID WASTE SYSTEM TO ALL0s NON-PLANT PROCESSING EQUIPMENT TO SE USED TO PROCESS SECONDARY LIQUID REGfMERANT W4STE WHEN REQUIRED.

PdRSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS C4ANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCRE4SE IN PRoaASILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYi AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPGRT SUMMARIES OF U2 ION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEtt SAFETY EVALUATIONS REP 3RT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 37 N 3-S 4-3141 CMP 84-0573 DELETED LOCKING REQUIREMENTS FOR VARIOUS RADWASTE VALVES CMP S4-0573 DELETED LOCKING REQUIREMENTS FOR VARIOUS RADWASTE VALVES. IT DELETED LOCKED CLOSED REQUIREMENTS FOR VARIOUS VALVES IN THE LIQUID RADWASTE THE 90RON RECVCLE, AND THE SECONDART WASTE SYSTEMS TO PERMIT CROSSCONNECTIUN OF THESE SYSTEMS 45 PA4T OF NORMAL OPERATION.

PJR$UANT TO THE PAEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INC4 EASE IN PR33ABILITV OR CONSEQUENCE OF 44 ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVE4 PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CON 31 TION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETT EVALUATION ITEM IJ 33 NO-15-0010 CMP $4-0729 REDESIGNED FIRE PROTECTION SYS IN MAIN STEAM IS3LATION VALVE ROOM CMP B4-0729 REDESIGNED THE FIRE PROTECT. SYS. IN MAIN STEAM 150. VALVE ROOM. IT RfDESIGNED THE FIRE PROTECT. DETECT. SYSTEM IN MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE ROOM TG UTILIZE DETECTORS WHICH SOTH ADEQUATELY PROTECT 4 GAINST A HAIARD AND ARE CAPAdLE OF OPERATIN3 AT THE MAXIMUM AMBIENT ROOM TEMPERATURE.

PJRSUANT To THE PAEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION I

OVER PREV!0US EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE PJSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND l'

0F ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MAP 3IN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY j

GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

4 i

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION l

ITER I) 39 NO-SS-0017 CMP $4-0740 ADDED TIME TO BORON RECYCLE, LIQUID WASTE,GASE0US WASTE SYS. ANNUNC.

ChP S4-0740 ADDED A TIME DELAY TO THE ALARMS ORIGINATING AT THE R40 WASTE BLOG FOR THE 80RON RfCYC. SYSTEM, THE LIQUID WASTE AND THE GASE0US WASTE SYSTEMS TO j

ALLOW THE RADWASTE OPERATOR AN OPPORTUNITY TO ACKNOWLEDGE ALARMS PRIOR To ANNUNCIATION IN THE MAIN CONTROL ROOM.

4 PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT

]

INCREASE IN PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OViR PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY j

GUESTION.

}

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY

]

00ESTION DID NOT EXIST.

t

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REP 02T SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS AEPORT SAFtTY iVALUATION ITEM ID 40 NO-55-0330 CMP $5-0006 INSTALLED AN OIL DRAIN VALVE ON THE SLW RECIRC PUMP GEARBOX CMP 35-000$ INSTALLED AN OIL DRAIN VALVE ON THE SLW RECIRC PUMP GEARBOX. THE SLW EVAPORATOR RECEIVES RADI0 ACTIVE CONTAMINATION FROM RCA FLOOR AND EQUIPMENT DRAINS. CHANGES REDUCE PERSONNEL EXPOSURE TIME DURING ROUTINE CHANGE OF GEARB0X OIL.

PUR3UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION CVER PAEVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

26 PORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 41 NO-35-0032 CA* 35-0076 CHANGED INPUT SOURCE FOR PRESSURE SWITCH TO AUX. BOILER ANNUN. PANEL CMP 35-0076 CHANGED THE INPUT SOURCE FOR A PRESSURE SWITCH WHICH SUPPLIES AN IhPdi TO THE AUXILIARY 40!LER LOCAL ANNUNCIATOR *ANEL. MODIFICATIONS AFFECT NON-SAFETY RELATED COMPONENTS AND 00 NOT INHIBIT SAFE OPERATION BUT ALLOW CLEAR-ING ANNUNCIATOR WHEN AUX.80!LER IS NOT INSERVICE AND THEREFORE INCREASED INDICATION VALUE FOR OPERATOR PERSONNEL.

P'J R $ U ANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVEA PREVIOUS EVALUATION $J 04 CREATE THE POS$161LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT DEDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETVJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

RiPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM I3 42 NO-S$-0034 CMP 85-0100 INSTALLED A PERMANENT PRESSURE GAUGE ON INLET PIPE TO CONDENSER CMP 85-0100 INSTALLED A PERMANENT PRESSURE GAUGE ON THE INLET PIPE TO THE CONDENSER WATER 30X. THIS MODIFICATION ALLOWS PRESSURE INDICATION ON THE CIRCU-LATING WATER INLET TO WATERB0XES.

PURSUANT TO THE PAEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OViR PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A.1ARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT, EXIST.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMEARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITT5N SAFETY EVALUATIONS REP 3RT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 43 40-35-0047 CMP $5-3505 REROUTE 3 CABLE / CONDUIT FOR A PLANT SECURITY DOOR CMP 55-0305 RER3UTED CABLE / CONDUIT FOR A PLANT SSCURITY 0004.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFO 4MATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCAEASE IN PR0049tLIIY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVAlb4TIONSJ OR CREATE THE POS$19tLITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR COMDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICAhT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QU:STION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY l

uuESTION DID NOT EXIST.

AiPORT SAFETY iVALUATION ITEM ID 44 04-34-0007 CMP !4-05-54 ALLOWED EMERGENCY EXIT FROM D/G ROOMS THIS CMP INSTALLED THUMB LOCKS IN PLACE OF KEY LOCKS TO ALLOW E1ERGENCY EXIT FA04 THE DIESEL GENERATOR ROOMS.

PdRSUANT TO THE P4EVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR03A31LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OViR PA!VIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSST9ILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OvtR PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT RE3UCTION IN a NARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION.

THE EVALUATION 3ETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTI04 DID NOT EXIST.

RcPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 13 45 OA-35-0303 CN 282 REVISED FSAR SP TO INDICATE CRITERIA FOR CABLE CONDUITS, TRAYS,1UALIFICATN CN 282 REVISED SECTIONS OF FSAR SP(9.5 AND 8.3) TO CLARIFY THE SEPARATION-CRITERIA F03 SPACING bETWEEN SAFETY-RELATED CA9LE TRAYS AND NONSAFETY RELATED CONDUITS. AEVISION ALSO CLARIFIES COMMITMENTS FOR CABLE QUALIFICATION FOR LIGHTING,FIAE PROTECTION, COMMUNICATION,AND SPECIALTY USES. THE USE OF COM80$TI-BLE VERSUS FIRE RETARDANT CASLE IS IMMATERIAL. THE MARGIN OF SAFETY FOR FIRE PREVENTION OR P4OTECTION IS NOT REDUCED. IN ADDITION THE USE OF PROTECTIVE CONDUIT AROUND NONSAFETY RELATED CABLES DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT EQUIPMENT FUNCTION.

PURSUANT To THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CLNDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: CR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUAT!04 DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.54 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 46 NE-34-0020 CMP S4-0495 REPLACED CARBON VALVES WITH STAINLESS STEEL VALVES THE CMP CHANGED THE MATERIAL CLASS FOR THE STATOR LIQUID COOLERS SHELL DRAIN LIHi VALVES. THE PIPE MATERIAL CLASS IS SHOWN IN FIG.9.2-1 0F CALLAWAY FSAR.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS Ev4LUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSS191LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT K!hD OF ACCIDENT OR CON 3tTION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INV3LVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 20EST10N DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 47 NE-53-0011 CMP 95-0153 ADDED INSTRUMENTATION TO THE MAIN CONDENSER FOR DATA COLLECTION CMP e5-0153 ADDED.NSTRUMENTATION TO THE MAIN CONDENSER TO PROVIDE DATA COLLEC-TION TO MONITOR CONDENSER PERFORMANCE AND AID IN MAINTAININ3 CHEMISTRY SPECIFI-CATIONS. CHANGE DOES NOT VIELD AN INTERACTION WITH ANY SYSTEM OR C09PONENT REQUIRED FOR SAFE OPERATION.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THis CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR00 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALJATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSISILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

AiPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 4d NE-35-0016 CMP 85-0289 I N S T A'.L E D PIPE CAP ON ACCUM. SAFETY INJECTION LINE TO PREVENT LEAK CMP 83-02d7 INSTALLED A PIPE CAP ON THE ONE INCH LINE ON ACCUMULATOR NITROGEN HEADER VENT TO ATMOSPHERE. THE CHANGE REDUCES A SLOW NITROGEN LEAK INTO CONTAIN-MENT AND PRECLUDES FREQUENT REPRESSURIZATION OF ACCUMULATOR TANK. NITROGEN LINES ARE NON-SAFETY RELATED. SAFETY-RELATED VALVES ON ACCUMULATOR CAN GE USED TO DEPRESSURIZE IF NEEDED.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

SAFETY THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.57 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTAIC APPROVED hRITTEN SAFETV EVALUATIONS RiPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITE1 ID 49 NO-35-0002 CMP 84-03-24 CONSTRUCTED A LUBE 0IL STORAGE ROOM CMP $4-03-24 CONSTRUCTED A LUBE OIL STORAGE POOM. THE MODIFICATION INVOLVED CONSTRUCTION OF A LURE OIL STORAGE ROOM IN THE 2000 FOOT ELEVATION OF THE COM10NICATIchs CORRIDOR FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF PLANT OPERATION. THIS STORAGE AREA DID NOT ADVERSLY IMPACT THE FIRE HAZARDS ANALYSIS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCdE4SE IN PROBAeILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVip PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND I

0F ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSt OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QuiSTION.

THE EVALUATION DiTERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

RiPORT SAFETY EVALUATIJN ITSM ID 50 NO-35-0026 CMP S4-0829 REPLACED PRESS. REDUCING VALVE BY ADDING AIR TRAP AND STRAINERsAIR SY CMP S4-0829 REMOVED PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE FA-PCV-085 FROM THE SERVICE AIR SYSTEM. THE VALVE W45 CLOGGED WITH GRIT ALLOWING THE SYSTEM TO FILL WITH WATER.

THE ADDITION OF AN AIR TRAP AND STRAINER TO THE SERVICE AIR SYSTEM ELIMINATED THE FR0dLEN.

PUR$UANT TO THE P45VIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROSA91LITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION l

OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVI'cWED SAFETY CUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DE1 ERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

l RiPORT SAFETY EVALUATION IfiM I) 51 NO-53-0048 CMP 84-0599 CHANGED STEAM DUMP PRESSURE SWITCH SETPOINTS CMP 84-0899 CHANGED SETPOINTS OF STEAM DUMP PERMISSIVE PRESSURE SWITCHES FROM 5 TO 7 IN. HG ASSOLUTE AND THE CONDENSER PRESSURE ALARMS TO 5 IN HG A8 SOLUTE PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $t OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT, EXIST'.

i

10CFR50.5) ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTOIC APPROVED W4ITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID

$2 04-34-0020 CMP S4-0440 CHANGED SWITCH COVERS ON MISC. CONTROL PANELS CMP $4-0440 CHANGED SWITCH COVERS ON MISC. CONTROL PANELS. THE MODIFICATIONS REPLACED ALL CUTLER-HAMMER SWITCH LENSES ON RP068 TO INDICATE HOLD OPEN OR HOLD CLO3ED FUNCTION. THE CHANGE INVOLVED REVISING THE ENGRAVING ON A PUSH SUTTON LENS. OPFRATION OF THE PUSH BUTTON IS NOT AFFECTED.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INC4 EASE IN PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION 6 v' E R PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POS$13!LITV 0F A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT RECUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION.

THE IVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

Ri*09T SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 53 NE-54-0013 CMP 54-05-01 ADDED OFFICE IN SOUTH PART OF ROOM 1405 FOR EQUIPMENT OPERATORS THIS CMP PROVIDED AN EQUIPMENT OPERATORS OFFICE IN THE SOUTH PART OF ROOM 1405 IN THE AUX. BUILDING.

PUR$UANT TO THE P4EVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN P401 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY auiSTION.

THE EVALUATION DiTERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM I3 54 hE-!5-0005 CMP 84-0909 ADDED ISOLATION VALVES TO THE SERVICE GAS SYSTEM CMP E4-0909 ADDED ISOLATION VALVES TO THE SERVICE GAS SYSTEM. THE CHANGE ADDED !$0LATION VALVES IN NITROGEN SUPPLY LINES TO THE MAIN STEAM AND FEE 0 DATER ISCLATION VALVES TO IMPROVE MAINTAINADILITY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION 1; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARJIN of SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED IAFETY JUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CF150.57 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED W9ITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS 4EPORT SAFETY E V ALU A T I-)N ITEM 10 55 NO-d4-0139 CMP 84-05-11 MODIFIED PLANT PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM TO INCLUDE THE FUEL BLOG.

CMP 34-05-11 MODIFIED THE PUBLIC ADDRESSS SYSTEM TO INCLUDE THE FUEL 9LDG. IT MODIFIED PLANT PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM TO AID COMMUNICATION DURING FUEL HANDLIN ACTIVITIES.

PUR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09AeILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT GR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBIIITV 0F A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PAEVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY au!STION DID NOT EXIST.

A! PORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITiM ID 56 N0-$4-0172 CMP S4-0701 INSTALL!D PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS AT TEST POINTS AT FEEDWTR HEATR EXIT CMP 84-0701 INSTALLED PRES $URE TRANSMITTERS AND ASSOCIATED TUBING AT PRESSURE TEST POINTS AT DISC 4ARGE OF LOW PRESSURE FEEDWATER HEATERS. THE PRiSSURE TRANSMITTERS WERE ADDED TO THE NON-0 CONDENSATE SYSTEM PIPING TO OBTAIN ADD-ITIONAL SECONDARY PERFORMANCE DATA.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION TH1$ CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09A91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF PN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVE9 PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDiNT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSt OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DiTERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DIC NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 57 hE-34-0011 CMP 84-05-47 REVISE 0 FEEDER BREAKER TRIP SETPOINT THIS CMP CORRECTED A DRAWING ERROA BY REVISING SETPOINT E/21023 FOR TIMERS IN THE DEGRADE VOLTAGE FEEDER BREAKER TRIP AND DEGRADED VOLTAGE ALARM TO AGREE WITH THE DESIGN INTENT.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PA03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS F.VALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 58 NE-S4-0014 CMP 84-04-56 INSTALLED CONTROL ROOM DOOR CMP 84-04-56 INSTALLED THE CONTROL ROOM 000R. THE MODIFICATION INSTALLED AN INNER FIRE RATED BULLET PROOF 000R AT THE CONTROL ROOM ENTRANCE.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED 3AFETY 00ESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 59 NE-84-0009 CM* 84-0149 INSTALLED C0/CO2 DETECTOR SYSTEM IN CONTROL BUILDING HVAC THIS CMP PROVIDED ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT FOR INDICATION AND ALARM FOR HIGH C0/C02 IN THE CONTPOL BUILDING HVAC.

PUR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBARILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREV!0US EVALUATIONS; 04 CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY 1 AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

l THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID l

60 NE-85-0085 OL 1023 REVISED TECH SPECS TO EXTEND INITIAL 18 MONTH SURVEILLANCE INTERVAL OL 1023 REVISED THE TECH SPECS TO EXTEND THE INITIAL 18 MONTH SURVEILLANCE INTERVAL FOR MANUAL INITIATIONS FOR REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM AND ESFAS;FOR PORTIONS OF DIESEL GENERATOR TESTING;FOR ESFAS ACTUATIONS ON SAFETY INJECTION AND LOSS-0F OFFSITE POWER;FOR CONTAINMENT SPRAY ACTUATION! PHASE A AND 9 ISOLATIONS OF CONTAINMENT;AND FOR CLASS 1E 9ATTERY SERVICE TESTS. THE REGUEST ENTAILED AN APPROXIMATE SIX MONT4 EXTENSION IN THE MOST LIMITING CASE. WITHOUT THE EXTEN$ ION THE PLANT WOULD HAVE GONE INTO MODES JUST TO PERFORM SURVEILLANCES.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBAPILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS! OR CREATE THE P055tBILITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY WUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFRSO.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 61 NO-34-0018 CMP S4-04-66 INSTALLED RADIO IN CONTROL ROOM CMP 84-04-66 INSTALLED A RADIO I4'THE CONTROL #00M. THE MODIFICATION INSTALLED A CENTRACOM DUAL CHANNEL CONSOLE RADIO 04 R.O. DESK IN CONTROL ROOM.

THE CHANSE IS SHOWN ON FIG. 7.3-1 AND FIG. 9.5-4 IN THE CALLAWAY FSAR.

PUPSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INF0PMATION THIS CNANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICAMT INCREASE IN PROBA91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $i OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYi AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEdED SAFETY QUESTION.

l THE EVALUATION DETEPHINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATIUN ITEM ID 62 NO-84-0138 CMP 84-0189 ADDED BACKPRES$URE REGULATORS TO THE SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM CMP 84-0199 ADDED BACKPRESSURE REGULATORS TO SOLID RADWASTE SYS. THE CHANGE ADDED TWO BACKPRESSURE REGULATORS ON THE DISCHARGE OF THE ACID CAUSTIC ADDITION METERING PUMPS IN THE SOLID MASWASTE SYSTEM TO PREVENT INADVERTENT DRAINING.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBAPILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSteILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFEREN'T KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 63 NO-64-0148 CMP 94-0379 ADDED PRESS. GAUGE TO AUXILIARY STEA9 GENERATOR SYSTEM i

CMS 84-0379 ADDED A PRESSURE GAUGE ON THE FUfL OIL B0OSTER PUMP DISCHARGE WHICH

'S LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY STEAM GENERATOR SYSTEM.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSt OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DIO NOT EXIST.

J l

10CF950.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC AFPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION 4'EM ID i

of ~

No-85-0005 CMP 84-0851 INSTALLED PU9LIC ADDRESS BOXES IN MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE ROOM CMP 84-0351 INSTALLED PUBLIC ADD 9ESS B0XES IN MAIN STEAM 150. V4LVE 400M. IT INSTALLED GAITRONICS PU9LIC ADDRESS SYSTEM BOXES IN MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE ROOMS TO ASSIST COMMUNICATIONS TO THE CONTROL 900M DURING EMERGENCY CONDITIONS.

PURSU4NT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT INC9 EASE IN PROBA9ILITY OP CONSEQUENCE OF AN ECCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSI91LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MA9 GIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UN9EVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

TNE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 65 NO-55-0040 CMP 84-0842 ADDED UNIONS TO DRAIN LINES FROM STEAM SEAL HE4 DER S4FETY VALVE CMP 84-0842 ADDED UNIONS TO A90VE SEAT DRAIN LINES FROM THE STEAM SEAL 9ELIEF VALVE. THE CHANGE FACILITATES M4INTENANCE ON THE VALVES. THE STE4M SEAL SYSTEM SERVES NO SAFETY FUNCTION.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INF09MATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 09 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT 09 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVELUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFIC4NT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEJED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TN4T EN UNREVIEWED S4FETY QUESTION DID NOT EKIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 66 NO-35-0059 CN 259 REVISED FSAR TO DESCRI1E INTERNAL REACTOR VESSEL ULTRASONIC TESTING CN 258 REVISED FSAR SECTIONS TO DESC9IBE TH4T 9EACT09 VESSEL ULTRASONIC TESTING WILL SE PERFOR9ED FROM THE INTERIOR RATHER TH44 EXTERIOR. THIS IS P9EFERA9LE METHOD SINCE EXTERIU4 METHOD DID NOT PERF09M AS WELL AS INTERIOR DEVICE, AND THE PRESERVICE INSPECTION TEST WAS PERFORMED FROM THE INTERI0t.

PU45UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IM PROBA91LITY OR CONSE3UENCE OF 44 ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EV4L94TIONS: OR INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIE'JED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION g

ITEM ID 67 NO-35-0061 CN 265 REVISED ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR CHARCOAL ADSORSE95 AND HEPA FILTERS CN 265 REVISED FSAR TABLE 9.4-2(SHEET 15) 70 REFLECT TCCM SPEC CONSISTENT ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR CHARC0AL ADSORSERS AND HEPA FILTERS BYPASS LEAKAGE.

PURSUANT TO THE FREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT j

INCREASE IN PROBAPILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATI3N DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY UUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 68 NO-85-0062 CN 268 REVISED FSAR.TA9LE 3.11(91-1,$HEETS 4,5, TO LOWER MIN. RELATIVE HUMIDITY j

CN 268 REVISED FSAR TA9LE 3.11(31-1,$HEETS 4 AND 5 TO LOWER THE MINIMUM RELATIVE HU.MIDITY FROM 30% TO 10% FOR SPECIFIED #00MS. A REVIEW OF THE HUMIDITY RESTRICTION OF THE EQUIPMENT IN THE ROOMS INDICATES THAT A MINIMUM ALLOWABLE RELATIVE HUMIDITY OF 10% WILL NOT PREVENT THE EQUIPMENT FUNCTION PER DESIGN.

PURSUANT TO THE FREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT i

INCREASE IN PROBAPILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSI?!LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARSIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEJED SAFETY QUESTION.

l THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

4 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 13 69 NO-55-0063 CN 266 REVISED ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR CHARC04L ADSORBERS AND HEPA FILTERS CN 266 REVISED FSAR TA9LE 9.4-3 To REFLECT TECH SPEC CONSISTENT ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR CHARCOAL ADS 0RBE45 AND HEPA FILTEOS 9YPASS LEAKAGE.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT 3

INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION l

OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND I

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT RESUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETVI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

i THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TNAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

I a

4 4

4 e

10CFR50.57 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN $AFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 7D NO-85-0065 CN 255 REVISED CHAPTER 14 FSAR TO DELETE SU9C00 LING McNilom TEST FR3M STARTUP CN 255 REVISED FSAR TABLE 14.2-1 TO DELETE THE SU9C00 LING MONITOR TEST F909 THE INITIAL STARTUP PROGRAM. THIS TEST WAS DEFE44ED TO FIRST REFUELING AND WAS PERFORMED UNDER CURRENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT q

INCREASE IN PR03A91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POS1101LITY OF A NEW 08 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETTI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DffERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWID SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 71 OA-84-0004 CMo F4-0502 ADDED 9EACTOR COOLANT PUMP HIGH-LOW ALARM CMP 84-P'"*

ADDED A REACTOR COOLANT PUMP HISH-LOW ALARM. TNE CHANGE ADDED A REACTOR COCLANT PUMP UPPER BEARING LUBE OIL RESERV0IR HI-LO ALARM.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A.SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBAEILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE 80SSIBILITY OF A NEW 09 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT 09 CONDITI3N OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MAR 3IN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UN9EVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEVED 1AFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 72 04-94-0039 CMP 34-0401 REROUTED AUX STEAM CONDENSATE TANT VENT LINE TO RADWASTE 9 LOG CMP 94-0401 REROUTED AUX. STEAM CONDENSATE TANC VENT LINE TO RADWASTE BLDG. IT REROUTED NON-SAFETY RELATED AUX STEAM CONDENSATE TANC VENT LINE TO TIE INTO THE VENT LINE F3-130-HeD-12 IN THE RADWASTE 90!LDING.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA9ILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFEAENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SISNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AM UNREVIEWE0 SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

4

10CFR50.51 ANNUAL REFORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED URITTEN $AFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 73 04-85-0004 CN 272 UPDATED FSAP SEC. 9.4 FOR TESTING OF HE*A FILTERS TO COMPLY WITH ANSI CN 272 UPDATED FSA# SECTION ?.6 TO REVISE TESTING METHODS F0p 4 epa FILTERS TO COMPLY WITN TNE LATEST ANSI, STANDARDS. TEST ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ARE NOT CHANG!D AND NO EQUIPMENT OR SYSTEM CHANGES ARE REQUIRED.

PURSUANT TO THE P4EV1005 INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PN09A91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 09 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE TNE 00SS!3iLIIY OF A NEW OR DIFFEDENT KIND OF ACCIDENT Op CONDITION OVEP PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVF A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MioGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNDEVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIFWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EWIST.

REP 0RT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 74 OA-55-0005 CN 271 CORRECTED' REFERENCES FOR TEST METHOD A10 ACCEPTANCE CDITERIA FOR DAMPERS CN 271 CORRECTED REFERENCES FOR TEST METHOD AND ACCEPTANCE CRITE914 FOR FIRE DAMPERS AND FIRE 0000$. CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVF COMP 0NENTS OR OptRA3ILITY 9UT c

CORRECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS. THE QUALITY AND PE2FORMANCE OF FIRE 000R$ AND DAMPERS REMAINS UNCHANGED.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CNANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA91LITY OR CONSE30ENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVE955 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE P05S191LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS- 08 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

5 M2 H2 200 200 ew2 em2 e

em E

www w

w>w WZ O

wwW>

0 www>

m 34 o E

we 2

mn 2

D w22m w2>w>

O

=7*e>

O wEwO E

2O2um e J FOZw>

w 2

kwkO o w w w su 6a Ww t9 ww=w eWWpwO w

www

>F M

M 4 h a

Ew3m wwwww e

eO m w us w w 2

ww as mm2m 4

Zm um 7m w

Owe w

gamo 3

w>

wamo J

W M F e t9 T wwmc O

w wwwo a

MDww2>

w>Omw a

ww we>Omw

>Orrw DO 3

a

>w

>n 3

m aan>>

Jwwww s

n2 Jwwww w

oAw zm O

O w

w4 o

O w

s Dww

>w w>

F

.s c

>a W>

2 ZJo=Ow Z w 3 > us w

Qu Zw37W O

WJwmko M2wJa O

w O m 2 us s a e

4

>202 2

e

>2O2 E "3 w M

4 EE 50

>D w

sk W O DD v

w I t9 0 4 O

'2 eu O

W P D

D>>200 2R m2 7

24 20 m2 a

U2 wm Om a

w wa om ww22 m

On a

or v

On m

E tS D & 2 w>

Ow w

F w wm O u-2

> & p o w ns 02>

A w

O2>

O 2 ** O W F-OW>

e. J w

D n.as >

==J w

w wDrOW2 OweO m

e 7J O=mO m

JOZw

=

wwJ2>

ww wwJ2>

e Lwwwme wuwCP e

O

" V ewwCT en 2

h w>

Zwe==

we 2vmew w

>>>wa2 ew=>

O n w w e =>

O a

222O30 2

mwh w

w 25 T

• a w >

w 3

h*wWOOw v2mDC 3

(*

e c-6-FeDO 3

O EJEEw

<CJ2 ue P

4 eDJ2 w

wk2 we e

4e

. mo a

3 m

h w w

O E

mmow wm

>m Z

Ow ww

>m w

theeEO ZOwww w

w TO lowww w

M e

m 2 k eu k D 2

O a

m2 T

C a

w D

EwPr J

w>mo 2

a w>mo 2

m s

Zonwu Zu D

D O

Om Eu D

D a

w Mew

>w O2 WOO m

k u8 O2wCD de 2

er www w ue b w 2 2

O wus>w2 P

$! w m C

Kh>>A kDW)4 q

N NO WDWDM 4

EDE E

WWOmw gewW I

i wOwW DOO w

2 EL MEe E w w a es N

N ese E ees a w..

Mew a

>2>w gewa>

w e

se emw4>

d 2

mmDOm2 O2 Z

c e2 O2 T

kha O

v4C M>

hDErw w

40&&W awD w

O2 ZwOwh G

G2 ZwOwm O

J J

ZOOWw

• w De O

w ww w

>4 O

fwe 4

O22 EW m es o m w

w w

r es o m W

i.

W mom 2

• Wm>

M 64 Dom mom 2 e EEW J

WED D

ZZE w>

^ ^

w WJ D

22h mk w

4222 O>OOO Tm w

ww O>OOO Em Ju>

Z 00==

• 2 wwwm aw A

Am wwwm Ew qw>

w w2M Dmh> R wm e

m>

>wh> 2 WM DJw km20 wJwmm k un wJwwm ww Zww O

wrow> erw3Oc w

Z 2

• ww Doc w

2 W

w ODwwkOp e F. J F a Ow w

ww 42m wa>

v22 eqOe O

w w>*

O rJ2a Ok g eO4 O

O A

Q>>mD wwm>w2 22 k m Wm>wE 22 Sw2 O

Om MM2>2Ow O

w IOw O

m2w O

420 k W Iu > E rw wo O

Q3 k m NW me eD>

w O22m2 Emo km w

wo Amo kw O

w=OZ2wo D

2 wo e

me O

D 2

<O mww e

m

• wo m>2Ok=

3

=

wm

• >20k m D

eor e

mem>who ww2 J2

> > sm

==2 J2 h

3 0

0 2O4 2

>w2 e

40 W

Wa>>

>w2

• wO w

m emawww22uewoO2

>=

a M C22mwcO2

>w o

O OmeOZEwama==O w>

wwsmammo w>

e a

e 32J42 D40 w>w e

N N mE Dem.u >=

m W

404 JmOmW wwk ww w

w >>mW wup ww w

m EWAW2WtE*De 23 O

CamaanwDu ZD OW2 kmDuw Ow

>p e

w WEDuw OW WO E

&W wCP&AZ>hWD

&E42>b WD E

E t9 h M2O3 wooaO J

JDO woOMM i

u wDougun O

Cew j

l I

J l

2 2

O O

w

=

j W

W W

N D

4 D

m J

O J

O 4

0 4

0 8

d i

uom wem wm we 0

0 w

W W

2 W

X m

m W

W m

e

\\

E2m EE@

i OWN OWN l

ww ww

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT 3UMMA2tES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED URITTED SAFETY EVALUATIO%S REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID

??

NE-d5-0084 CL 1021 MODIFIED TECN SPEC 3.6.4.1 AND DELETED TABLE 3.5-1,CONTAIN. ELECTRICAL OL 1021 M091FIED TECH SPEC SECTION 3.E.4.1 ON CONTAINMENT PENETRATION CONDUCTOR OVERCURRENT DEVICES AND DELETED TA9LE 3.8-1 ON THE SAME DEVICES. THE LIST OF CONTAINMENT PENETRATION CONDUCTOR OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICES WILL BE MAIN-TAINED IN PLANT PROCEDURES RATER THAN TECH SPEC TABLE 3.8-1. MODIFICATIONS TO SECTION 3.3.4.1 DELETE REQUIREMENTS FOR RESISTANCE CHECKING OF FUSES,$INCE THIS TESTING GENERATES DATA 9UT IS NOT INDICATIVE OF PERFORMANCE.

PUR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OP OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSI91LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 78 NO-15-0060 CN 259 REVISED DESCRIPTION OF FSAR SP 11.4 FOR SPENT FILTER PACKAGE-WASTE SYS CN 259 REVISED FSAR SECTION 11.4 ON SOLID WASTE PANAGEMENT OT DESCRI9E PACK-AGING OF SPENT FILTER CARTRIDGE ELEMENTS IN KEEPING WITH BURIAL GROUND

1. EQUIREMENTS AND REMAIN FEASI9tE AND ECONOMICAL. SSIPPING OF FILTEPS AND THE MANAGEMENT OF SPENT FILTER HANDLING AND PACKA3ING DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT OPERATION OR SAFETY.

PURSUA1T TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSI91LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUAT!3NS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MAR 31N OF SAFETYT AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED T'H A T AN UNPEVIEWED 34FETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SunMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED CRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIO25 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 79 NO-15-0054 CN 2P3 REVISED FSAR 9.1.4.2.3.1 PROCEDURE ACTION FROM 1F00T TO 1281NCHES l

CN 283 REVISED FSAR SECTION 9.1.4.2.3.1 TO REFLECT RAISING THE VESSEL HEAD 128 INCHES DURING REFUELING PROCEDURES. A LIFT TO A HEIGHT OF 128 INCHES INSTEAD OF 1F00T ALLOWS RCC DRIVE SHAFFS TO CLEAR THE GUIDE TUBES IN THE HEAD.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN P4098BILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS! OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGN FICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWE3 SAFETY QUESTION.

r THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEdED SAFETY 30ESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 80 04-84-0056 CMP a4-0117 PERFORMED REPLACE./ MOD OF RTDS OF STAND 3Y DIESEL GENERATORS CMP S4-0117 INVOLVED REPLACEMINT/ MODIFICATION OF KJ-TE-4,5,014,4ND 105 RTOS OF STAND 3Y DIESEL GENERATOR $.

THE CHANGE INVOLVED CLARIFICATION OF DRAWINGS AND ALLEVIATION OF PHYSICAL INTEoFERENCE.

oURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE 8 SIGNIFICANT INCREA$E IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSi OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 09 DIFFE8ENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEJED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNDEVIEWED SAFETY 2UESTION DIO NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITtN 10 81 NE-85-0083 OL 1015 9EVISED TECH SPEC 4.7.10.1.2.C FOR FIRE PUMP DIESEL ENGINE INSPECTION t

OL 1013 REVISED TECH SPEC SECTION 4.7.10.1.2.C 50 THAT FIRE PU"P DIESEL ENGINE INSPECTIONS MAY BE PERFORMED WNEN THE PLANT IS AT DOWER. THREE FIRE PUMPS SUP-PORT THE FIRE SUPPRESSION WATER SYSTEM AND ONLY TWO ARE PEQUIRED TO MEET THE LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADV~RSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSI9ILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUAYIONS: 08 INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DIO NOT EXIST.

1

10CFR50.57 ANNUAL REFORT SUMMARIES

<l 0F UNION ELECTPIC APPR3VED WRITTED SAFETY EVALUATIO%S 1

1 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 82 NE-35-0088 OL 1028 REVISED SPENT FUEL POOL STORAGE TECH SPECS FOR CYCLE 2 0FA FUEL DESIGN CL 1028 REQUESTED REVISIONS TO FIGURE 3.9-1 4ND TECH SPEC SECTIONS 5.3.1 AND 5.6.1 TO INCLUDE CYCLE 2 0FA FUEL DESIGN. CHANGES 4LSO INCLUDED AS-9UILT RACK DINENSION AND AN EDITORIAL DELETION OF FIG. 5.6-1 WHICH IS IDENTICAL To FIG. 3.9-1.

SAFETY IVALUATION WAS SASED ON 4 C#ITICALITY REANALYS!$ FOR THE NEW FUEL DESIGN,AS WELL AS THERMAL-HYDRAULIC, STRUCTURAL,$EISMIC,AND ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATIONS. ALL ANALYSES INDICATE THAT ORIGIN 4L FSAR CRITERIA IS MET OR NEW ANALYSIS IS BOUNDED SY FSAR.

PU4$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORFATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT I

INCREASE IN PROBA91LITY OR CONSEQUENC E OF AN ACCIDENT OP OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POS$1BILITY OF 4 NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EvaLU41 ION DETERMINED TH4T AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT ENIST.

i REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID S3 NE-S6-0011 TM No.36-M001 REMOVED PORTIONS OF SECONDARY WASTE DIPING AND INSTALLED FLANGE 1

TM NO.86-M001 REMOVED PO4TIONS OF THE SECOND4RY WASTE SYSTEN PIPING AND INSTALL-ED 3LANC FLANGES. THE LINE IS USED ONLY WHEN L0d TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS (TDS) 3ECOMES OUT OF SPEC AND NEEDS THE LINE TO TRANSFER TO HIGH TDS FOR NEUTRALIZA-TION. CHANGE REQUIRED DUE TO ACID CAUSED LEAKAGE. THIS LINE PERFORMS NO SAFETY FUNCTION.

i PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICENT INCREASE IN PROBASILITY 04 CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER 4DVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $i 01 CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MAPGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE 44 UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

, - +. - _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

- ~ _.

_ - ~ _.. -_

10CFR50.59 AN1UAL REP 0if SUM % ARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIC S REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 84 NE-96-0051 ETP-BG-0101A PROCEDURE DEVELOPED TO VERIFY VALVE SG-85464 CLOSURE CAPAPILITY ETP-0G-0101A PROCEDURE DEVELOPED TO VERIFY VALVE BG-85464 CLOSURE CAPABILITY.

PLANT SAFETY NOT ADVERSELY IMPAffED.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INF0FMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09A91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT c' OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PAEVIOUS EVALUATION 5; OR CREATE THE POSSI9ILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MAR 3tN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWE0 SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

I REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION i

ITE" 13 85 NE-86-0052 ETP-eG-01019 PROCEDURE DEVELOPED TO VERIFY VALVE eG-85469 CLOSURE CAPAPILITY j

ETP-9G-0101B PROCEDURE WAS DEVELOPED TO VERIFY TWAT VALVE 9G-85669 WORKS PROPER-LY JITH CLOSURE C AP491LITY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INF04 NATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA91LITY OR CONSE90ENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 04 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POS$191LITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT CIND 0F ACCIDENT OR CONCITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID

$6 NE-56-0053 ET8-EN-0101A PROCEDURE DEVELOPED TO VERIFY VALVE EN-V-003 CLOSURE CAPABILITY ETP-EN-01014 PROCEDURE WAS DEVELOPED TO VERIFY VALVE EN-V-003 CLOSURE CAPADILI-T

Y. PROCEDURE

INPLEMENTATION 00!$ NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT l

INCREASE IN PR09APILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 08 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT CIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERNINEC THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

t

10CF950.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMM4 RIES OF UNION ELECTDIC APTROVED WRITTED SAFETY EVALUATIO25 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 87 NE-96-0054 ETP-EN-01013 PROCEDURE DEVELOPED TO VERIFY VALVE EN-V-009 CLOSURE CAPABILITY ETP-EN-01019 PROCEDURE WAS DEVELOPED TO VERIFY VALVE EN-V-007 CLOSU9E CAP 4 BILI-TV AND DOES NOT ADVE95ELY IMPACT PL44T SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09APILITY 04 CONSEQUENCE OF Aq ACCIDENT 09 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEJ OR DIFFERENT EIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EV4LUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 M443IN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION.

THE EVALUATION D!TERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALU4 TION ITEM ID 88 NE-86-0035 ETP-EM-01001 PROCEDURE DEVELOPED TO VE9IFY VsLVES EM-S?26A,8 CLOSURE CAPABILITY ETP-EM-01001 PROCEDURE WAS DEVELOPED TO VERIFY TWAT VALVES EM-67264 AND EM-39263 FUNCTION WITH CLOSU9E CAPASILITY Ali DO NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE 4 SISNIFICANT INC2 EASE IN PROBASILITY OR CONSE3UENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVE1 PREVIOUS EVALU4710NS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT EIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INV3LVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; 4ND DOES NOT INv0LVE AN UNREVIEJED SAFETY 2UE! TION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT A*4 UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10

$9 NE-56-0063 CN 304 REVISED FSAR ?.1 FOR NEW FUEL STOR4GE FOR JEST. 074 FUEL DESIGN CHANGE l

CN 304 REVISED FSAR $5CT!0N 9 AND APPENDIX FOR NEW FUEL STORAGE A9EA DESCRIP-TION CHANGES FOR WESTINGHOUSE OF4 FUEL DESIGN. THE NEW FUEL DESIGN UTILIZES HIGHER INITIAL ENRICHMENTS. A C4ITICALITY REANALYSIS WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY TH4T ALL SAFETY AND DESIGN CRITERI4 ARE MAINTAINED.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS C H ANS E DOE S *:01 INVOLVE 4 $1GNIFICANT 11 CREASE IN PROBABILITY OR. CONSEQUENCE OF AN 4CCIDENT OR OTHER 4DVERSE CONDITION i

OVE4 PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI 04 CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF 4 NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE LN UN9EVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETE9 MINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFP5005Y ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC ADPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITi1 13 73 NO-34-006S CMP $4-0547 ADDED SEPARATE PIPE DRAIN TRAPS ON AIR COMPRESSORS CKA01A,9,C CMP 84-0547 INVOLVED PROVIDING SEPARATE DISCHARGE FOR K4-DT-0054,55,AND 56 To FACILITATE EASIER DRAINING. THIS CHANGE SATISFIED THE INTENT OF THE ORIGINAL DESIGN.

PudSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGN!71 CANT INCREASE IN PR00 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 3R DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT 34 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDLCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION.

THE EVALUATION O!TERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

RiPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITcM 10 91 h0-$$-0034 CN 294 REVISED FSARSECTION 9.1 TO CHANGE SEQUENCE OF FULL TRANSFER ACTIVITIES CN 294 REVISED FSAR SECTION 9.1 TO CHANGE SEQUENCE OF FUEL TRANSFER ACTIVITIES IN ORDER 70 SAVE TIME AND LIMIT EXPOSURES. KEY CHANGES INVOLVE USE OF PORTABLE RCC CHANGE TOOL FOR CHANGE 00T OF RCCA'S IN SPENT FUEL POOL AND ORAINING FUEL TRANSFER CANAL AFTER EACH REFUELING TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE. IN ADDITION NEW FUEL CAN BE TRANSFERRED DIRECTLY TO SPENT FUEL POOL. CHANGES 00 NOT ALTER VALIDITY OF CURRENT FSAR SAFETY AND HEAVY LOADS ANALYSES.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION TH15 CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $J OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

RiPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEN 10 92 OA-34-0072 CMP 84-05-52 ADDED FIRE DETECTOR FOR CHEMICAL STORAGE BLDG.

CMP 84-05-52 INVOLVED ADDING AN ADDITIONAL FIRE DETECTOR TO TURBINE BLOG(1933)

FOR CHEMICAL STORAGE OLOG. THIS ADDITION INVOLVED A NON-SAFETY RELATED SYSTEM AND DOES NOT ADVER$5LY AFFECT PLANT OPERATION.

PUR5UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROSA91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR COND' TION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT'A4 UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

~

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES Of UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WAITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFiTY EVALUATION i

ITEN 10 13 OA-So-0001 CN 312 REVISED F3AR SP TA9LES 3.2-1 AND 3.11(9)-3 FOR FUEL TRANSFER SYS CLASS CN 312 REVISED FSAR SP TA3LES 3.2-1 AND 3.11(B)-3 TO REMOVE FUEL TRANSFER SYSTEM CONVEYOR AND CONTROLS FROM ANS CLASS 3 AND SEISMIC CATEGORY 1. WESTIN3 HOUSE AND BECHTEL CONFIRMED THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS NON-SEISMIC AND ALSO NOT INTENDED TO SI SAFETY CLASS 3. CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE PHYSICAL CHANGE TO EQUIP 1ENT AND NO CREDIT WAS 3IVEN IN FSAR ANALYSES FOR ITS BEING SEISMIC AND SAFETY RELATED.

I PUR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCAEASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARSIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DITERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

AEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 94 0A-66-0032 CN 313 REVISED SECTION 5.2.5 FSAR SP FOR CLARIFICATION OF SAFETY INJECTION SYS l

CN 313 REVISED FSAR SP SECTION 5.2.S.2.1 To CLARIFY THE LEAKAGE DETECTION I

PROCESS FOR THE CHARGING PUMP SUBSYSTEM 0F THE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM. CLARI-FICATION DOES NOT ALTER RELIABILITY OF THE METHOD;PROVIDES A CONFIGURATION IN WHICH CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT ARE LESS SEVEREJ AND PROVIDES CONDITIONS BOUNDED BY ALL PREVIOUS ANALYSES.

PURSUANT TO THE PaEVIOU$ INFORNATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCRESSE IN P408 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POS$1BILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT l

REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 4

QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

I h

i 10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES 0F UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS i

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITiM ID 95 04-86-0003 CN 230 REVISED FSAR SECTION 5.2.4.2.7 VALVE PRESSURE BOUNDARIES FOR ASME SECT 11 l

CN 280 REVISED FSAR SECTION 5.2.4.2.7 TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION MI 0F THE ASME CODE,1985 EDITION INCLUDING THE WINTER 1981 ADDENDA. CHANGE AFFECTS i

VALVE PRESSURE 80UNDARIES. CHANGE HAS NO IMPACT ON DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,0R

'i OPERATION OF VALVES AND IS CONSISTENT WITH LATEST REQUIREMENTS AND CODE FOR INSERVICE INSPECTION.

Pd4SUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND I

0F ACCIDENT 04 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 76 OA-36-0004 CN 281 REVISED FSAR FOR AN EXCEPTION TO AWS 01.1 Foa WELDING STRUCTURAL ST. EEL j

CN 281 REVISED FSAR SECTIONS 3.d.3.6.3.3 ERECTION AND 3.10(9).1 SEISMIC QUAL-IFICATION CRITERIA. REVISIONS IDENTIFY AN ADDITIONAL EXCEPTION TO AWS D1.1 FOR WELDING STRUCTURAL STEEL. THE EXCEPTION DOES NOT REDUCE STRENGTH OR IMPAIR FUNCTION AND INVOLVES NO PHYSICAL CHANGES.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEOUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND t

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

1 THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION 010 NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 4

97 04-36-0005 CN 279 REVISED FSAR 5.3 TO REFLECT RX VESSEL /RCS HEATUP AND C00LDOW1 RATES CN 279 REVISED FSAR SECTION 5.3.3.1 ON REACTOR VESSEL INTEGRITY TO REFLECT REACTOR VESSEL / REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM HEATUP AND C00LDOWN RATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.

PURSUANT 70 THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION FHIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION t

r OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $J OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT'AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

i t

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUM 4 RIES OF UNION. ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 98 0A-86-0007 CN 316 UPDATED FSAR SECT. 9.4 TO REVISE TEST METHOD FOR HEPA FILTERS CN 316 UPDATED FSAR TABLE 9.4.2(SHEET 14,15) AND TABLE 9.4.3(SuEETS 9,10,11)

TO REVISE TESTING METHODS FOR HEPA FILTERS TO CONPLY WITH THE LATEST ANSI STANDARDS. CHANGE INVOLVED TEST METHOD ONLY AND DOES NOT CHANGE ACCEPT 4NCE CRITERIA, EQUIPMENT,0R SYSTEMS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR094BILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN 4CCIDENT OR OTHER 4DVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONSI OR CREATE THE POSStBILITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFEff! AND DOES NOT INVOLVE 4N UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALU4 TION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 99 NE-85-0025 CMP 85-0333 INSTALLED 4 G4tTRONICS HANDSET AND SPEAKER OUTSIDE PERSONNEL HATCH CMP $5-0333 INSTALLED A GAITRONICS HANDSET AND SPEAKER OUTSIDE THE PERSONNEL HATCH 4T ELEVATION 206F FEET IN THE AUX. BLDG. CHANGE FACILITATES COMMUNICATIONS AND HAS NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON PLANT SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE DREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY 04 CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSI91LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

1 THE EVALU4 TION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALU4 TION ITEM ID 100 NE-85-003S CMP $5-0138 REPLACED VOLUMETRIC TERRAIN FOLL0 DING UNITS CMP 85-0138 REPLACED VOLUMETRIC TERRAIN FOLLOWING UNITS.

PUPSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFIC4NT INCREASE IN PROBA91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 04 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI 04 CREATE THE POSSI9ILITY OF 4 NEW 09 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT RECUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEdED S4FETY QUESTION.

THE EVALU4 TION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

4

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REFORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIO%S REPORT SAFETY EVALUAT!0N ITEM ID 101 NE-35-0049 CMP 55-0408 ADDED FOUR ADDITIONAL FUEL HAND. TOOL STORAGE RACKS TO FUEL BLOG.

CMP 85-040S ADDED FOUR ADDITIONAL FUEL HANDLING TOOL STORAGE RACKS TO THE FUEL RUILDING. THREE RACKS WERE LOCATED IN THE FUTL TRANSFER CANAL AND ONE IN THE CASK LOADING PIT. RACKS ARE LOCATED SO THAT ADDITIONAL LOADS ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE EM9EDDED MEP9ERS 9EHIND THE STAINLESS STEEL LINER AND WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE STAINLESS STEEL LINER.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICAN1 INCREASE IN PROB ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID HOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 102 NE-85-0050 CMP 84-0572 M0DIFIED CALLAWAY SECURITY SYSTE9 CMP S4-0572 MODIFIED THE CALLAWAY SECURITY SYSTEM. CHANGE PROVIDES SYSTEM.

WITH MORE STABLE POWER SOURCE AND DOES NOT AFFECT PLANT SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA91LITT OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

AEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 103 NE-55-0051 CMP 84-0571 INVOLVED LOCATION OF SECURITY SYSTEM COMPUTERS CMP S4-0591 INVOLVED THE LOCATION OF THE SECURITY SYSTEM COMPUTERS. DETAILS OF THIS CHANGE ARE CONTROLLED UNDER SECURITY PROVISIONS AND 00 NOT PROVIDE l

ADVERSE SYSTEM INTERACTION OR AFFECT PLANT SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBAPILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND r

OF ACCIDENF OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT I

REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TMAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY f

QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

l

- ~.

10CFR50.59 ANHUAL REP 39T SUMMARIES OF U ION ELECTRIC APFROVED W2ITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 104 NE-86-0020 TM NO.86-M008 TEMPORARILY BLANKED OFF THE N09 MAL EXHAUST IN TWO AUX.BLOG ROOMS TM NO.16-M008 BLANKED OFF THE NORMAL EXHAUST FROM ROOMS 1501 AND 1512 IN THE AUXILIARY SUILDING. WITH THE MODIFICATION THE EXHAUST FROM THESE ROOMS WAS THROUGH THE AUX. BLDG EXHAUST. THE CHANGE ELIMINATED A POSSIBLE UNMONIT09ED RELEASE AND MAINTAINED ACCEPTABLE EXHAUST FLOW AND ADEQUATE NEGATIVE PRESSURE.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INF04MATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILTTY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

INE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 105 NE-96-0045

' 9 " * * * "F.U UI E OVERSPEED PROTECTION RELIABILITY PDOGRAM REVISION TOPPP,TU9BINE OVERSPEED PROTECTION RELIABILITY *ROGRAM PROCEDURE WAS REVISED TO ADD " NOMINAL" TO DESCRIPTIONS OF ACTUAL OVERS *EED TRIP AND BACKU* CVERSPEED TRIP SETTINGS. CHANGE ALLOWS A RANGE OF VALUES FOR ACTUAL AND BACKUP OVE95pfED TRIPS. THI$ FACILITATES SURVEILLANCE TEST INTEDP9 ETAT!0N OF " FAILED". GENERAL ELECTRIC,THE VENDOR,PROVIDES A RANGE OF ACCEPTA3LE VALUES FOR THE MECHANICAL OVERSPEED TRIP. CHANGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSI3tLITY OF A NEd OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UN9EVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TNAT OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 1

10CFR50.59 AN!4UAL GEPORT SUMNARIES OF UOION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIO s REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 106 NE-86-0047 ETP-ZI-ST011 PROCEDURE CHECKS AN ALARM ON RCS PRESSURE AND OPEN VALVES ETP-ZZ-ST011 PROCEDURE CHECKS AN ALARM THAT ANNUNCIATES WHEN VALVE 99-PV-3702A OR EJ-HV-87018 IS OPEN AND REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE IS A83VE 692PSIG.

THE PROCEDURE SIMULATES A HIGH PRESSURE ON THE APPROPRIATE OUTPUT CONTACTS OF THE K735 RELAY AND WITH THE VALVES OPEN. THIS NEW TEST PROCEDURE CHECKS ALARM CIRCUITRY ONLY AND INVOLVES NO TRIP OR CONTROL CIRCUITS.

PUR$UANT TO THE PRFVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA9ILITY 04 CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: CR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEdED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 107 NE-36-0048 ETP-9G-ST002 PROCEDURE WAS DEVELOPED TO CHECK CLOSURE TIME OF 3G SYSTEM VALVES ETP-BG-ST002 PROCEDURE WAS DEVELOPED TO CHECK THE CLOSURE TIME OF VALVES DG-HV-8147A,8,C AND 9G-LCV-457,460. PROCEDURE PREREQUISITES ENSURE AGAINST POSSIBLE EQUIPMENT DAMAGE AND PLANT IN COLD SHUTDOWN NODE.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09A91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $i OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND l

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETT7 AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

l i

4 T J

= - - -.

10CFA50.59 A%NUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 l

108 NE-86-0049 ETP-EF-ST001 PROCEDURE WAS DEVELOPED TO DETERMINE FLOW THRU CONTAIN. AIR COOLERS ETP-EF-ST001 PROCEDURE WAS DEVEL OPED TO DETERMINE THE FLOW RATES THROUGH THE j

CONTAINMENT AIR COOLERS DURING VARIOUS VALVE LINEUPS TO DETERMINE THE DIFFER-ENTIAL PRESSURE ACROSS THE CONTAINMENT AIR COOLER

S. PROCEDURE

ALLOWS TEMPORARY DEVIATION TO VALVE SETPOINTS BY REMOVAL OF MECHANICAL STOPS AND MANUAL MANIPU-LATION OF VALUES BETWEEN O AND 100% OPEN.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT

. INCREASE IN PROBA9ILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND j

0F ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MAPGTN OF SAFETVI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNDEVIEWED SAFETY

{

QUESTION.

1 THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUEST!0N DID NOT EXIST.

1 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 109 NE-86-0061 CN 300 REVISED FSAR SETION 6.2.4.2.1 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH AS-BUILT DRAWINGS CN 300 REVISED FSAR SECTION f.2.4.2.1 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH AS-3UILT DRAWINGS.

SPARE CONTAINMENT PENETRATIONS P-42,P-70,AND P-90 ARE NOW IDENTIFIED AND P-98 IS NO LONSER A SPAGE PENETRATION AND P-98 IS NOW INCLUDED ON FIG.

6.2.6-1.

PENETRATIONS P-42,*-70,AND P-90 HAVE ALWAYS 9EEN SEALED OFF AND CLOSURE HEADS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY ATTACHED. PENETRATION P-08 IS NOW USED FOR THE 3pEATHING AIR SUPPLY TO CONTAINNENT. CHECK VALVES K9-V-001,002 PROVIDE CONTAINMENT ISOLA-TION. THE PENEY3ATIONS AND VALVES ARE TESTED USING TYPE a AND TYPE C TESTS AND 00 NOT IMPACT SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT UR REDUCE THE MARGIN OF SAFETY.

PUR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBARILITY OR CONSE2UENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVE4 PREVIOUS EVALUAf!ONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF SAFETVI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

1

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 110 NO-86-0001 CMP E5-0331 PROVIDED WAY TO PUMP CONDENSER HOTWELLS TO RADWASTE SYSTEM CMP 85-U331 PROVIDFD WAY FOR CONDENSATE WATER IN THE HOTWELLS TO 9E PUMPED TO THE PADWASTE DISCHARGE MONITOR TANKS TO BE 10NITORED BEFORE DISCHARGING TO THE RIVER.

PUR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA9ILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSI91LITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEJED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.'

a REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 111 NO-86-0005 CN 289 ELIMINATED NEED TO MAINTAIN A CONTROL CHA97 FOR CHECKS 00RCE AND 3ACKGROND CN 229 REVISED FSAR SECTION 11.5.2.1.5 TO ELIMINATE A NEED TO MAINTAIN A CONTROL CHART FOR CHECK SOURCES AND BACKGROUND COUNTS. THE CONTROL CHART WAS NOT AP-PROPRIATE TO MAINTAIN PROPER CALIBRATION AND DEMONSTRATE OPERA 91LITY. CONS!$ TENT WITH TECH SPEC REQUIREMENTS FOR CRITICAL OR SAFETY aELATED MONITORS, PERIODIC CHANNEL AND SOURCE CHECKS WILL 9E PERFORMED WITH ROUTINE CALIBRATIONS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A'SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09A91LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED.THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

~-

i 10CFR50 59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES 0F UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS i

1 j

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION d

ITEM ID 112 NO-86-0006 CN 290 REVISED FSAR 12.3.4.1.2 TO ELIMINATE MAINTAINING A CONTROL CHART CN 270 REVISED FSAR SECTION 12.3.A.1.2 To ELIMINATE THE PROCESS OF MAI'NTAINING A CONTROL CHART FOR CHECK SOURCE RESPONSE AND COUNTER BACKGROUND. AREA RADIATION L

MONITORS DO NOT READOUT IN COUNT RATE AND MAINTAINING COUNTING STATISTICS AND CONTROL CHARTS IS NOT APPLICABLE TO THEM. MORE APPROPRIATELY CHANNEL AND SOURCE J

CHECKS ARE PERFORMED PERIODICALLY WITH ROUTINE CALIBRATIONS.

j PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OR CONSE9UENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 08 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND i

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY j

GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 113 0A-86-0006 CN 325 REVISED FSAR TABLE 9.A-12,$HEET 4,TO REFLECT ACTUAL DESIGN FLOW RATE CN 325 REVISED FSAR TABLE 9.4-12,$HEET 4,T0 REFLECT MACHINE ROOM EXHAUST FAN ACTUAL DESIGN FLOW PATE OF 1150CFM INSTEAD OF 1000CFM. CHANGE TO REFLECT THE i

SPECIFICATION FLOW RATE DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR03A91LITY OR CONSEOUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE C0'NDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND f

0F ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT I

REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY j

QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED.THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 114 04-86-0012 CN 339 REVISED FSAR 6.3.2.2 FOR TECH SPEC SURVEILL. REQTS. FOR ACCU 9.

CHK VALVES CN 339 REVISED FSAR SECTION 6.3.2.2 TO MEET CALLAWAY TECH SPEC REQUIREMENTS FOR SURVEILLANCE OF ACCUMULATOR CHECK VALVES. CHANGE MAKES FSAR CONSISTENT WITH TECH SPECS.

PUR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ 04 CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFEAENT KIND j

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEVED SAFETY I

j 1UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

I I

1

=-

10CFR50.57 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEM SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 115 NE-35-0003 CMP 84-0668 RELOCATED AREA RADIATION MONITOR CMP $4-0665 RELOCATED AN AREA RADIATION NONITOR. THE MODIFICATION RELOCATED AREA RADIATION MONITOR SD-RE-41 FROM 340 DEGREES PLANT NORTH ELEVATION 2056 IN CONTAINMENT TO THE MANIPULATOR CRANE.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PRORABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVFR PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 116 NE-35-0036 CMP 55-0206 REPLACED THE DIESEL GENERATORS KEEPWARM LUBE 0ll PUMPS CMP 55-0266 REPLACED THE CRANE-DEMING ASME SECTION III KEEPWARM LUBE 0!L PUMPS 04 THE DIESEL GENERATORS WITH VIKING PUMPS QUALIFIED TO MANUFACTURERS STANDARD.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POS$1BILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 117 NE-85-0045 CMP 84-09U0 ADDED HANGERS TO THE FEEDWATER HEATER EXTRACTION AND DRAINS SYSTEM CMP 84-0900 ADDED HANSERS TO THE FEEDWATER HEATER EXTRACTION AND DRAINS SYSTEM TO PREVENT EXCESSIVE PIPE MOVEMENT DURING PLANT OPERATION PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI 04 CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DI F F EREN-T KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNPEVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 1USSTION DID NOT EXIST.

o

-~.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIOXS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 118 NE-85-0089 OL 1029 REVISED CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS TECH SPECS TO INDICATE CORRECT PRESSURE OL 1029 REVISED CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS TECH SPECS TO REFLECT THE CORRECT CALCULATED PEA < CONTAINMENT INTERNAL PRESSU9E OF 48.1PSIG AS GIVEN IN THE FSAR SECTION 6.2.1.4.3.3 AND TABLE 6.2.1-2. CHANGE NAS No EFFECT ON THE INTEGRATED CONTAIN-MENT LEAKAGE RATE TEST RESULTS,SINCE THE ERROR WAS WITHIN THE UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH THE TEST METHOD AND THE ERROR IS CONSIDERED INSISNIFICANT.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROSAe!LITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVEP PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSi 0R CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETVI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWFD SAFETY 2UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 119 NE-85-0090 OL 1035 REVISED SECTION 6 TECH SPECS FOR QA ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES OL 1035 REVISED SECTION 6 TECH SPECS FOR QA ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES TO ENHANCE THE EFFECTIVENESS AND CAPA31LITY OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION. A CORPORATE QUALITY SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT WAS ESTABLISHED. CHANGES DID NOT ALTER MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS OR ANY ORGANIZ'ATIONAL COMMITMENTS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09APILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHE8 ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS! OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SarETY 20ESTION DID NOT EXIST.

e

T.

i

'10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES 0F UNION ELECTRIC APPROVE 9 WRITTEN LAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 120 NE-56-0021 RFR NO.1330 RESOLVED STEAM GEN. FEED PUMP STARTup SUCTION STRAINERS PERMANENT RFR NO.1330 ALLOWED THE STEAM GENERATOR FEED PUMP STARIUP SUCTION STRAINERS TO 9E PERMANENT. THE STRAINER $ WERE INSTALLED IN THE NON-SAFFTV PORTION OF THE NAIN FEEDWATER SYSTEM ON THE SUCTION SIDE OF THE FEED PUMPS. LEAVING STRAINERS INSTALLED DOESNOT AFFECT SAFETY RELATFD FUNCTION OF THE SYSTEM 04 ANY INTER-FACING SYSTEM. LEAVING STRAINER $ PROVIDES ADDITIONAL PROTECTION FOR FEED PUMPS.

(

PURSUANT TO THE P9EVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA9ILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OP OTHER ADVE#SE CONDITION OVER P e r.* I OU S EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYi AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVAL'JATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 121 NE-46-0062 CN 309 REVISED FSAR TO ELIMINATE C-16 INTERLOCM CIRCUIT FROM PROTECTION SYSTEM CN 309 REVISED FSA* TO ELIMINATE THE C-16 INTE1 LOCK CIRCUIT. THE CIRCUIT WAS

}

DESIGNED FOR REMOTE-0PERATED PLANTS TO PROTECT NSSS FROM EXCESSIVE COOLDOWN

{

AND THE TUPBINE FROM OVERLOADING. CALLAWAY IS NOT REMOTE-OPERATED AND C-16 j

INTERLOCK ~IS NOT ASSUMED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION IN ANY PRIOR ANALYSES.

PUR$UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORM 4 TION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT I

INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POS$191LITY OF A NEW 09 DIFFERENT KIND

}

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT I

REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY j

QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERNINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT' EXIST.

i 1

?

I i

1 i

1

10CFR50.57 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED dRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 122 NE-66-0071 CN 310 REVISED FSAR 10.3.5.1 TO TAKE EXCEPTION TO FEEE HYDROXIDE 4NALYSIS OF S/G CN 310 REVISED FSAR SECTION 10.3.5 1 TO TAKE ETCYPTION TO 9fP MTEP S-3 WNICH REQUIRES A FREE HYDROXIDE ANALYSIS OF STEAM SENE*ATORS TH4EE TIMES PER WEEK.

CALLAWAY SECONDARY CHEMISTRY PROCEDURES WERE DEVELOPED JASED UPON WESTINGHOUSE AND SGOG GUIDELINES WHICH DO NOT RECOMMEND THE FPEE HYDROXIDE ANALYSIS WHICH IS NO LONGER STATE OF THE Aof.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE a $1GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR098PILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF 41 ACCIDENT 00 3THEa 4DVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSIaILITY OF A NEw OR DIFFERENT KIND 08 ACCIDENT 02 CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 01 INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MA4 GIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALU4 TION DtTERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWE0 34FETv QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 123 No-34-0103 CMP 36-0271 CH44GED SIZE OF MOTORS ON FANS IN AUV 90!LDING HVAC CMP 94-0271 CHANGED THE SIIE OF FAN MOTORS IN AUX 9LDG HVAC.

THE NEW FAN MOTORS ALL0d THE NORMAL AUX BUILDING EXHAUST SYSTEM TO OPERATE IN GOTH THE NORMAL 4ND FUEL BUILDING ISOLATION MODES.

PURSUANT TO THE *REVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR03 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN 4CCISENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONSI OR CREATE THE POS$191LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFIC4NT REDUCTION IN A NARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 124 NO-85-0027 CMP 84-0579 REPLACED CARBON STEEL VENT LINE PIDING ON HEAT EXCHANGERS CMP 84-0379 REPLACED CARBON STEEL VENT LINE PIPING ON HEAT EXCHANGERS ON SGK0AA,B AND SGK05A,?. REPLACEMENT IS COMPOSED OF COPPER,3RASS PIPING OR STAINLESS STEEL PIPING. THE CH4NGE REDUCES CORROSION.

'URSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORM 4 TION THIS CH4NSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCTEASE IN PR0349ILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI 04 CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 3R DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETVI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE 44 UNREVIEdED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALU4 TION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 20ESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 125 NO-85-0042 CMP 85-0180 PROVIDEDREDUNDANT OVERCURRENT PROTECTION FOR VARIOUS CIRCUITS CMP 85-0180 "k3VIDEDREDUNDANT OVERCURRENT PROTECTION FOR CIRCUITS IN THE KF, 08, SR, GFs AND QA SYSTEMS. THIS CHANGE COMPLIED WITH REG. GUIDE REQUIREMENTS.

PROVIDED REDUNDANT CONTAINMENT PENETRATION CIRCUIT PROTECTION PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBAEILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 09 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 126 NO-85-0049 CMo 84-0039 EXPANDED THE PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM CMP 84-0089 EXPANDED THE PU9LIC ADDRESS SYSTEM TO INCLUDE THE START-UP 3LDG.,

HEATH PHYSICS CAL LA9, ESW PUMPHOUSE AND THE UHS C0 CLING TOWERS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09AaILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHED ADVERSE C3NDIT!04 OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI 04 CREATE THE POSSIGILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 00 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND 00E3 NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEdED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TNAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

t REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 127 NO-55-0054 CMP 25-0244 REVISED WIRING IN THE REACTOR DP3teCT!0N TEST CIPCUIT CMP 85-024A REVISED WIRING IN THE REACTOR PROTECTION TEST CIRCUIT T3 REFLECT THE CORRECT FUNCTIONAL CRITERIA PUPSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHsN1E DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI 04 CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENI OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 09 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUnMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS-REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 128 0A-85-0002 CMP 84-020F PROVIDED TRITIUM SAMPLE CAPABILITY FOR RAD MONITORING SYSTEM CMP 54-0207 PROVIDED TRITIUM GRAS SAMPLING CAPABILITY FOR RADIATION MONITOR-ING 9Y ADDING SAMPLING CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING DUCTWORK IN THE FUEL ELDS.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETTI AND DOES NOT INVCLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

AEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 129 04-S6-0008 CN 339 UPDATED FSAR SECTION 3.6 FROM PIPE 9REAK STRESS ANALYSIS RESULTS CN 338 UPDATED FSAR SECTION 3.6 FOR PIPE BREAK STRESS ANALYSIS RESULTS AND PIPE BREAK LOCATION INFORMATION. CHANGES REQUIRED TO REFLECT AS-90lLT CONDITIONS AND DUE TO REANALYSIS OF ANALYZED NIGH ENERGY LINES. REANALYSIS STILL MEETS 1

ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR IDENTIFIED BREAK LOCATIONS.

{.

PURSUANT TO THE PR!v!OUS INFORMATION THIS CyaNGE DOES NOT INVOLV A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA9ILITY 04 CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION

{

OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE 'OSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETVI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 7

QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 130 04-8o-0009 CN 353 REVISED FSAR TABLE 10.2-1 FOR ACTUAL OPERATING SETPOINTS FOR TUR91NE i

CN 353 REVISED FSAD TABLE 10.2-1 FOR ACTUAL OPERATING SETPOINTS FOR THE TURBINE PROTECTION SYSTEM CONTROL VALVES AND CONTROL INTERCEDT VALVES. THERE IS NO SAFETY DESIGN FUNCTION OR IMPACT ON ANY SAFETY DESI 4 FUNCTION ASSOCIATED 3

WITH THE TU99INE OVERSPEED PROTECTION SYSTEM.

PUR$UANT TO THC PREV!OUS INFORMATION THIS CNANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09APILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OD OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF & NFW OR DIFFE9ENT KIND 1

0F ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 02 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT IEDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

~-

m 10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUM" ARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED i

WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIO2$

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 10 131 NE-54-0056 CMP 84-0116 REPLACED SWITCHES ON MAIN CONTROL 004RD FOR HVAC DAMPER POSITION CMP 84-0116 REPLACED SWITCHES ON THE MAIN CONT 80L 90ARD TO ELIMINATE AN INDIC-ATING LIGHT FOR DAMPER POSITION. THE CAVITY COOLING FANS, ASSOCIATED 00CTWORK I

AND DAMPERS ARE NOT SAFETY RELATED. THE SWITCHES ON THE $4FiTY RELATED MAIN CONTROL BOARD WERE REPLACED FOR HUMAN FACTORS CONCERNS.

PURSUANT TO THE PR8.VIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBARILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF 4 NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER *REVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUdSTION.

THE EV4LUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 132 NE-55-0071 OL 1036 REVISED TECd SPECS IN SUPPORT OF RELOAD LICENSE FOR CYCLE 2 FU!L CHANGE OL 1036 REVISED THE TECH SPECS IN SUPPORT OF THE RELOAD LICENSE APPLICATION FOR USE IN CYCLE 2 0F WESTINGH0USE 1?X17 OPTIMIZED FUEL.

SAFETY EVALUA-T!ONS WERE 0ASED ON CORE $4FETY ANALSES($1X ATTACHMENTS) SU9MITTED JITH LICENSE APPLICATION. OPTIMIZE 0 FUEL DESIGN FEATURES AND 9ETHODOLOGY WERE GENERICALLY APPROVED BY NRC.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN 4CCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE P053fBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MAPGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE 4N UNREVIEdED SAFETY GUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION 010 NOT EXIST.

4

-_m m

l

(

1 i

4 1

>F

>2 J

FOO w

200 w

(w2 F I dw2 3

Out upw DJ ukw m

2>&wo wwMk mmo wwMk 3

w 20 Or2 me 2

E muw we 2

w OweOme

=F>w>

3 we

=2kw>

=>wJw s 2O2uk Emm ZO2u>

O wwo de o u ue w w A

w ouwww 2

g cE>ww w

www o

em w

amm 4

K Ost um wwwww 3WJ m us w w w mwTW w

wh Fm M

ODE wh 2m a

w upo armo JFE wehe J2 J>w wwwo P

we wwwe e

wwwwaZ w>Omw O

wJ w>Oww e

u we >

DO 3

Zhw DO 3

• w ms Jwaww ass

> e J W y 4 gas E

Oeywum O

O w

>2 O

O w

O ZWW Da w>

J 2We

>E w>

w mem>

m Zw3>w e

Ow2 Zw3>w j

a Op 3>

wZwJr Fu MZwsm W

m EmWJ

>2O2 MF

• 2OF N

u2=wE*

>O

>D F

2Ow kO

>D M

aOOW 2

O M 2 O

muZ O

w2

=

=&4 we Zu m2 We>

2K M2 i

J 3>>EZ om e

e aw Oh e

wew

>> e On 2

00 e m

Or u

Zamw >

ue >

Ow

=

wk Ow w

e ow O2h e

>wn 02>

3 mL>20m Owk e* J W

k WZ4 Owh ee d W

i w

00 0 4F4 Owmo h

O kJ k m OwMO m

j 2

m eZwm wwJ2>

d a m WM JZ>

a

>>ud OuwC2 m

k

• w ouwc2 m

a

>MJ ww Euaww W

3mu Fumww 1

0 2Oww37

• wwk a

w O

w 0

m wACTw>

Z Me>

w M

J us 2 Z

Mew w

F p us UFmDO 3

me r uFmDO 3

W' Dow FF wCJF w

3 mwm 4 0J2 w

2 u2m

• w m

&a w

O

@w m

&W

=

w OEDN>

wm

>m J

OK wm

>m E

O WWmo ZOWww w

w FDC ZOWWW W

,i e D

kmJrw k

Z O

w e

e>E E

O r

w u

>mmumm w>mo 2

m w>me F

w O

Zwh>mD 2u D

D o

w&M Zu 3

3 O

wk&u O2 WOO 2

>Fe O2wCO MO O

a wm m us > w F 2

e ODu wwh=2 2

Ewm EJw>22

>De>a e

me

>De>d e

E > tt 2

• • >E>O Woww w

40W

• Oww 300 w

w2O3 Ewam%

wR E w a m **

Maw O

MO em>

muut>

e O

www Empt>

4 i

i he weJwk OF Z

Zhm O2 Z

1 who e

Ok2JpE m o m u us e

a homKW EdD u*

OuwwwD ZuCww ED EuOwm O

J m

O2 use m

De o

O 0C>

w De e

i EWE wD>

m M ** O m W

MMOM w

i ww>

O Dw eres mom 2

• du mom 2

• i KmW O

N WOu D

22m M

erW D

22h wk O

>>mwk O>OOO EM w

wWA O>OOO Em Ju>

e WOJ Er wwww aw U

OEk' wwww aw wwp D

ZZwmmO Dwh>2 WM 2

EwD

>w>>2 wm DJw m

Ou a

wJeww kw e

we

• wJeww kw ZWm 2

WZA m= DOC w

J J

W a r w D e t9 us

{

2 M

O COwhuD

&mJF4 Op h

h E Z > & SJ J 2 =

Op MFm W

W mmwm weOW O

WW2 deCE O

O m

MOD we>wE 22 O

Ow wwe>uK 22 Sm2 M

MWp2 2

ZOW O

w wehrXOW O

. m2w Dm4WZO o>r mW we O

OMOOka se we I

eD>

w wesww=m amO

>=

O 0

Emo km O

a new>w>wo D

2 ee e

42JEO D

E we i

i mmM L

3WWp20*w 3

04Cw2Okw D

t MON WZED YL mmE J2 m e

>u mm2 J2 m

3 W

WOwwwwe>

Dw2

• MO N

NwO k

>W2 W O

)

u w

w>>220 Z ue w e O F Dw O

O > L > 2. w w= c O F

>=

O O

Oka w-Zemaw=O wk O

OJww m

=-O

=>

w 0

0 Ww>k2WDEEubw e

8 S EKwDet upw m

e ME>umwwww uwk ww 45 mew uw>

w ua W

e m D us =

pauraDe 2D w m wermamme ZD O

Jm2 Duw ow WO Ek mDuw Ow wn I

&wwmFOwaZ> mwd AO4 F&2>hwD E

E2ZwOwZ wCOrn E

Ze>O MOOme u

uwkmup>

u umM Z f

4 2

2 O

O i

w w

t 4

e e

O 1

3 O

D e

J O

J O

4 O

4 O

0 0

WO4 we@

s we we I

0 i

W W

w 2

W 2

i m

m 4

4 i,

e M

i

[

i l

NEm mEd Owm Owm i

I

&>w App wm wm

=

E o

---

e,-

-..m--

.,w. - =

,,m.n.

,--g

,,----v-

+. -,,, ~ - -,

e,> w y

10CFRSO.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPCOVED ERITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIO%$

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 135 NE-85-0022 RFR No.2200 ALLOWED TEMPORARY OPERATION OF UNIT VENT GAS MONITOR WITHOUT PRCCES PFR NO.2200 ALLOWED TEMPORARY OPERATION OF THE UNIT VENT WIDE RANGE GAS MONITOR GT-RE-213 WITH THE UNIT VENT PROCESS FLOW MONIT02 IN0PERA3LE. THE UNIT MONITORS EFFLUENT FROM THE UNIT VENT ONLY AND HAS NO SAFETY ISOLATION FUNCTI3N. AUTOMATIC FEATURES RENDERED IN0PERA9LE DUE TO LOSS OF *a0 CESS FLOW MONITOR CAN SE MANUALLY PERFORMED OR INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM SUBSTITUTE SOURCES.

PURSUANT TO THE FREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBAeILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OP OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER *REv!OUS EVALUATIONS! OR CREATE THE POS$191LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 136 NO-54-0072 CMP e4-0013 INSTALLED 1040 FEET OF CHAIN LINC FENCE FROM MAIN SECURITY FENCE CMP E4-0013 INSTALLED 1040 FEET OF FENCE FROM MAIN SECURITY FENCE. THE CMANGE INSTALLED 1040 FEET OF 7 FT HIGH CH4IN LINK FENCE SPACED BETWEEN TWENTY AND TWENTY-ONE FEET FROM THE MAIN SECURITY FENCE.

PUPSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVEPSE CONDITION OVfR PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POS$1SILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; 4ND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIE' DES SAFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 137 NO-44-0176 CMP 84-0419 MODIFIED DEMIN WATER DEGASIFIER SYSTEM *! PING CMP 54-0419 MODIFIED THE DEMIN WATER DEGASIFIEW SYSTEM PIPING T3 ALLOd THIS SYSTEM TO MEET THE DESIGN SPEC FOR DISSOLVED GASES PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE 4 SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; 04 CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUAYIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY; 4N0 DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 2UESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

10CFR50.57 AN10AL REPORT SUM:4 RIES OF U%IO3 ELECTRIC APPROVED URITTEN SAFETY EVALUATICNS REPORT SAFETT EVALUATION ITEM ID 138 NO-85-0053 CMP 85-3214 REROUTED AUX. TURBINE DRAIN LINES 70 THE CONDENSER N0!!LE N0.131 CMP E5-0214 REROUTED AUX. TUR91NE DRAIN LINES TO CONDENSER N0!!LE N3.131 TO ELININATE STEAM CONDENSING IN THE FILTER UNIT OF THE TURBINE BLOG HVAC PUPSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBAPILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF A1 ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION $J OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFE9ENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID r

139 NO-S6-0307 CN 376 REVISED FSAR 10.2.2.3.3 AND 10.2.3.6 FOR TEST FREQUENCY FOR TURBINE CN 376 REVISED FSAR 10.2 2.3.3 AND 10.2.3.6 Y0 ALLOW TEST FREQUENCY TO ONCE PER 19 MONTHS OR AFTER MAJOR MAINTENANCE FOR TUR91NE OVERSPEED PROTECTION. IN ADDI-TION TIGHTNESS TESTS ARE REQUIRED OF MAIN STOP AND CONTROL VALVES EACH MAINTE-NANCE CYCLE. STANDAoD TURBINE COMPONENTS AND OPERA 9ILITY OF MECHANICAL OVERSPEED TRIP DEVICES CAN BE TESTED MORE EFFICIENTLY AN9 WITHOUT UNDO CYCLING.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OR CONSE30!NCE OF AN ACCIDENT 3R OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW 04 DIFFERENT KIND 08 ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETY! AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETY EVALUAT!0N ITEM ID 140 04-94-0008 CMo 24-05-12 ADDED CONAX CONNECTORS TO TARGET #0CK VALVES THIS CMP REQUIRED CONAR CONNECTORS FOR THE ELECT #ICAL CONDUCT 08 SEAL FOR SOME CHE4ICAL AND VOLUME CONTROL AND HIGH PRESSURE COOLANT INJECTION VALVES.

PURSUANT TO THE PPEVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES N3T INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OR CONSE30ENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POSS191LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A $1SNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A M48 GIN OF SAFETYI AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED 34FETY JUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TNAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

)

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTE1 SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATIOM ITEM ID 141 04-34-0319 CMP E4-0442 INSTALLED TWO SYNCHRONIZATION VOLTMETERS FOR D/G TO ASSIST IN THE SYNCHRONIZATION OF AN INCONING $ 0': R C E TO THE DIESEL GENERATORS AT 3USES N401 AND N302, TWO VOLTMETERS WERE INSTALLED BY CMP 84-0442.

PJRSUANT TO THE PRFVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCAEASE IN PR3BABILITY OR CONSCOUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREV!UUS EVALJATIONSI OR CREATE THE POS$1BILITV 0F A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CON 3! TION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT AEDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYZ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION.

I THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETT JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFETT EVALUATION ITEM ID I42 OA-SS-0010 CN 381 REVIsiD FSAR FOR RESULTS OF LATEST MSL3 IN THE TUNNEL ANALYSIS l

CN 391 REVISED FSAR SP 38 FOR THE RESULTS OF THE LATEST MAIN STEAM LINE BREAK IN THE TUNNEL ANALYSIS. THE REVISIONS WERE BASED ON PRESSURE ArsD TEMPERATURE RESULTS. THE NEW ANALYSIS UTILIZED REVISED DATA AND RESULTED IN A HIGHER TEMPERATURE SUT DIO NOT CHANGE PEAK PRESSURE. CALCULATION-AL MARGIN IN THE ORIGINAL ANALYSIS ADEQUATELY ENVELOPES THE SHORT DURATION TEMP-EGATURE INCREASE,WITHOUT REDUCING THE MARGIN OF SAFETY.

PURSUANT TO THE P4EVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PROBA9ILITY OR CONSEQUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION

(

OviR PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSI OR CREATE THE POS$181LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND l

OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT 4 EDUCTION IN A MAR 3IN OF SAFiTY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUEST!0N.

l THE EVALUATION O!TERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION DID fl0T FMIST.

l t

l l

i I

l l

10CFR50.59 A%NUAL REPCRT SU;MARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS AiPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITi1 10 1=3 04-50-0311 CN 368 REVISED FSAD FIGS. 18.2-5,6 TO REFLECT C09 RECT RADIATION ZONE VALUES CN 366 REVISED THE FSAR FIGURES 18.2-5 AND 18.2-6 TO REFLECT CORRECTED RADIATION ZONE V4 LUES FOR AUXILIARY BLDG AND ELEVATIONS 2026FT AND 204?FT.

CHANGE dAS REQUI4E0 SECAUSE OF AN ERROR IN THE ORIGINAL CALCULATION. CORRECTION 3ESULTS INCREASiD VALUES FOR TWO AREAS 4ND DECRE4 SED V4LUE IN ONE AREA. CHANGES ARE NOT C0nSIDf4E0 4 SAFETY CONCERN SINCE AREAS AFFECTED ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE 9ANNED POST-ACCIDENT,AND 00 NOT AFFECT SAFE OPERATION OR SHUTDOWN.

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT g

INC9EA$i IN PR09 ABILITY OA CONSEQUENCE OF 4N 4CCIDENT OR 0!HER ADVERSE CONDITION CVia PREVIOUS EV4LUATIONSJ OR CREATE THE POSSI91LITY OF A NEW OR DIFfERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN 4 MARGIN OF SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETV QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION CETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

RLP3RT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM I3 144 hE-55-3001 CMP 84-0345 ADDED AN ISOLATION VALVE AND VARIOUS CONNECTIONS TO INSTRUMENT AIR CMP 64-034! ADDED AN ISOLATION VALVE AND VARIOUS CONNECTIONS 70 THE INSTRUMENT AIR HEADER. CHANGE ALLOWED INSTALLATION OF A NEW AIR DRYER SKID WHILE MAIN-TANING PLANT INSTRUAENT AIR. CONNECTIONS PROVIDE AN ALTERNATE AIR SOURCE TO COMPRESSED AIR PIPING SYSTEM IN THE EVENT IT IS NEEDED. THE ADDITION OF THE CONNECTION POINTS DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT PLANT SAFETY.

(THIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)

PU450 ANT TO THE PAiVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PR094BILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN 4CCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EV4LJ4TIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFEAENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CON 3ITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARSIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QuiSTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUEST!04 DIO NOT EXIST.

- -. ~ _ - - -. - - _. _ _. -.

- -. _. -.~.

10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SYMMARIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS I

REPORT SAFETY EV4LUATIJN i

ITiM ID 165 NE-35-UOT6 CMP 85-0316 ADDED YORK $ ROW COIL UNIT TO AUXILIARY BLOG HVAC SYSTEM CMP 95-031$ ADDED V3RK 3 ROW COIL TO COOLING UNIT SGLO2 TO ADD ADDITIONAL COOLING CAPACITY TO THE CONTROL ROD ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM. THE NEW CO3 LING COIL l

DOES NOT CHANGE THF SYSTEM CONFIGURATION OR ANY SAFETY FEATURES OF THE SYSTEM.

THE NEW C0ll ENHANCES THE SYSTEMS CAPACITY. (THIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLE-MENTE3.)

PJRSUANT TO THE *REVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NSE DOES NOT INVOLVE A $1GNIFICANT INCREASE 11 PRO 1ASILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVia *REVIOUS EVALU4TIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSI5ILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDE"' OR CONSITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION I P. A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

i THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVI!WED SAFETY 20EST!0N DID NOT EXIST.

REPORT SAFiTY EVALUATION ITEM ID 146 hE-Jo-G003 CMP d4-0689 PROVIDED NEW DESIGN FOR ACCUMULATO# LEVEL TRANSMITTERS

-CMP i4-06SA PROVIDED NEJ DESIGN FOR ACCUMULATOR LEVEL TRANSMITTERS AND THE ASSOCIATED HYD44ULIC ISOLATION DEVICES. CH4NGE F4CILITATES CALISRATION OF t

LEVEL TR4kSMITTERS. THE NEW TRANSMITTERS MEET ALL FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORIGINAL TRANSMITTERS. (THIS CHANGE IS PARTI 4LLY IMPLEMENTED.)

]

PUR$U4NT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT j

INCREASE IN PR0343ILITY OR CONSE00ENCE OF AN 4CCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION i

OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POS$131LITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: 04 INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT i

RE00CTION IN A MAR 3]N OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QuiSTION.

j THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY i

GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

i REPORT SAFETY EV4LUATION i

ITEN ID 147 hE-3o-0005 CMP 85-0113 PROVIDED ALTERNATE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY FOR CONTROL 400 POSITION INDIC.

CMP 85-3113 PROVIDED ALTERNATE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY FOR CONTROL ROD POSITION INDICATION WITH AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SETWEEN THE EXISTING POWER SUPPLY AND THE

=

ALTiRNATE SUPPLY. (THIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)

PURSUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT

[

INCREASE IN PRoaABILITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN 4CCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OViR PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT (IND 0F ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN OF SAFETYJ AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION.

THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TNAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY j

QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.

l r

r 10CF150.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMX4 RIES OF UNION ELECTRIC APPRIVED W91TTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REPORT SAFETY Ev4LuAT10N ITiM 13 14e OA-54-0027 C9P $4-0164 REPLACfD STEM AND PACKING ON MSIV ACCUMULATOR SHUT 0FF VALVES CMP !4-0164 REPLACED STEM,P4CKING ON MSIV ACCUMULATOR SHUT 0FF V4LVES. IT /

2EPLACED SOFT-S!4TED STEM AND TEFLON PACKIN3 04 MSIV 4CCUMUL. SHUT 0FF VALVE $

dITh MAAD5EATED STEMS AND v! TON PACKING TO ENSUR! DESIGN LIFE OPERA 3ILITY AND TO UPGR4DE FOR ACCIDENT CONDITIONS. (THIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)

PJ45UANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT I f40 4 E A S E IN PA08431LITY OR CONSEGUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVia PREVIOUS EV4LJATION53 OR CREATE THE POSSIBILITY OF A NEd OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDEidi OR CON 3ITI3N OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REQUCTION IN A MAR 3IN OF SAFETYJ A!40 Dois NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION.

THE iVALUATI3L DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY JUESTION DID NOT EEIST.

AiPCRT 3AFETY EVALUATIJN ITiH 13 14+

0A-34-J044 CMP S4-0375 INSTALLED THE CONTAINMENT SREATHING LIR SYSTEM CMP S4-039$ INSTALLID THE CONTAINMENT BREATHING 4IR SYSTEM.

THE INSTALLATION INCLUDED PIPING AND VALVES NEEDED TO MEET THE CONTAINMENT CRITERIA FOR 150L4 TION. (THIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)

Pu?SUANT TO THE PREVIOUS INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A 51GNIFIC4NT INCREASE IN P105A3ILITY OR CONSEQU(NCE OF AN ACCIDENT OR OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS; OR CREATE THE POS$1BILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EV4LUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A M47 GIN OF SAFETYJ AND 90d5 NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED S4FETY QUcSTION.

e THi EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT 4N UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTIO% DID NOT EXIST.

ALPOPT SAFiTY EVALU4TIJN ITEM IJ 150 04-54-0333 CMP 34-0523 ADDED CHICK VALVES TO CENTRIFUGAL CH4RGING PUMP LINES.

CMP d4-0523 ADDED CHfCK VALVES TO CENTRIFUG4L CHARGING PUMP LINES. THE CHANGE 4DDED TWO TdREE INCH CHECK VALVES To CENTRIFUG4L CHARGING PUMPS DISCHARGE LINE 00dNSTREAM OF VALVES 9G-8483 A AND C ALONG WITH THE APPROPRIATE HANGERS.

(THIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)

PuaSUANT To THE PREVIOU5 INFORMATION THIS CH4NGE DOES NOT INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT INCliASE IN PROEABILITY OR CONSESUENCE OF AN ACCIDENT 04 OTHER ADVERSE CONDITION OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONSJ OR CREATE TdE POSSIBILITY OF A NEW OR DIFFERENT KIND OF ACCIDENT OR CONDITION QVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS: OR INVOLVE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN A MARGIN of SAFETY; AND DOES NOT INVOLVE AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY SutSTION.

/J THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN U4 REVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.