ML20198J883
| ML20198J883 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 09/10/1997 |
| From: | GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198H339 | List: |
| References | |
| 5000-ADM-7311.0, NUDOCS 9812300282 | |
| Download: ML20198J883 (33) | |
Text
(
o.
l M-21-9810:46:24 ENGINEERING Number l
G EJ DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR (EP-009)
(
Title Revision No.
DESIGN VERIFICATION 8
l Applicability / Scope Responsible Office I
GPU Nuclear-Wide Engmeering Support This document is within QA plan scope
_X.Yes_No Effective Date l
Safety Reviews Required
_X.Yes_No 9/15/97 SE-994100-034, Rev. I List of Effective Pages Eagg Revision Engs Revision 1.0 8
El-1 8
1.1 8
E2-1 8
2.0 8
E2-2 8
3.0 8
E3-1 8
4.0 8
E3-2 8
5.0 8
E3-3 8
6.0 8
E3-4 8
7.0 8
E3 5 8
8.0 8
E3-6 8
9.0 8
E3-7 8
l 10.0 8
E3-8 8
11.0 8
E3-9 8
12.0 8
E310 8
13.0 8
E311 8
14.0 8
E3-12 8
15.0 8
E4-1 8
ES-1 8
Sign *3re Concurring Orgamzation Element
,Date 9//d/f7 Originator WMs
. Procedure Owner Concurred by
/s/
Director, C-figuration Control-TM1 f/4/97
/s/
Director, Cmfiguration Control-OC 9/4/97 l
@M Director, hgineering Support f//,/y, Approved by 8/J Director, Engineering 1/o/fy
& /C A> te..A I
I f
ATTACHMENT 21 1.0 9812300282 981222 PDR ADOCK 05000219 P
-(1
- /xs
19-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number g
DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311-02 muetsan (EP-009)
Title Design Verification REV l
SUMMARY
OF CHANGE ORIGINALISSUE DATE: 6/22/79 THE FOLLOWING SUMMARIES WERE TRANSFERRED FROM THE OLD TECHNICAL FUNCTIONS COVER PAGE:
- 3 His revision supersedes all previous procedures issued with the number EP-009. The procedure has been reformatted and revised throughout. (6-1-81) 4 The forms have changed in Appendix B and C, and Appendix D & E have been added ne text revisions support these changes. (2-15-83) 5 Redsed to correct revision numbers; and, to include requirements for verifications when documentation is not traceable. Revised the Verification General Checklist (Appendix C). (3 83) 6 His revision reidentifies the procedure's Rev. No. as 6. The previous revision was renumbered as Rev. No. 2 in error. (r 15-83) 1-00 Revised the verification general checklist and converted the corporate format. (7-3 i-85) 2-00 Procedure, was revised to base design verification on overall designs rather than individual documents. A new checklist was added to be used for calculations. A requirement for preparing a verification summary is =Med (8-25-86) 3-00 Revised to include design verification of MNCRs, to identify turnover to operations as the deadhne for design verification completion, and to provide minor clarification.
(1-18-88) 4-00 Revised to reflect biennial review and to make a few minor =Aminiezative corrections. (9/12/90) 5 Revised format; biennial review conducted and deleted numbering format Exhibit 6.
6-Major revision to address the followLg: verification of design input as early as practicable, l
addition of a Design input Verification Checklist, requirements for docunenting alternative l
calculations, ra,sponsibility of the manager to select the design verification eagineer and ensure thorough design verification, and establish qualification requirements for design verification l
engmeers. (4/8/96) 7 Changes to reflect the new Engineering Division. Add clarifying note to section 4.7.1.
8 Revised to remove design verification requirements for calculations which has been incorporated
- into EP-006.
d 4
1.1 f
I
09-2i-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number NU EAR
~
~
(EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l 1.0 PURPOSE This procedure establishes the requirements, methods and responsibilities for the performance of l
design verification activities.
2.0 APPLICABILITY / SCOPE This procedure applies to the verification of engineering design input and output generated within l
the GPU Nuclear Engineering Division which affect items or activities within the scope of the GPU Nuclear Operational Quality Assurance Plan (OQA Plan),1000-PLN-7200.01.
l l
'Ihe procedure implements Corporate Policies 1000-POL-7200.01 and 1000-POL-7340.00.
Calculations are recogmzed as an integral part of the design. Verification requirements for calculations and analyses are prescribed by EP-006, and they are not required to be reverified as part of this procedure.
3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Items Within OOA Plan Scope - hse structures, systems, components, parts, materials, and consumable items classified as Nuclear Safety Related or Regulatory Required. [GPU Nuclear Operational QA Plan]
3.2 Activities Within OOA Plan Scone - hse activities for which the method of performance is prescribed in a document designated on the cover sheet as being within QA Plan Scope.
[GPU Nuclear Operational QA Plan 3.2.2.2.b]
3.3 Desian Vefification - The process of reviewing, confirmmg, or substantiatmg the des.ign by one or more methods to provide assurance that the engineering design input and output meet the design and regulatory requirements.
3.4 Verification Pacicane NP) h documentation of the design verification process. It consists of the Verification Plan / Status Sheets (VPSS), Design Verification Summaries, l
applicable Verification Checkhsts, and supporting documentation.
l 3.5 Design Inout - Those criteria, parameters, bases, or other design requirements upon which detailed final design is based.
3.6 Design Outout - Documents such as drawings, specifications and other documents defining technical requirements of structures, systems and components.
3.7 Desian Bases - ht information which identifies the :pecific functions to be performed by a structure, system, or component of a facility, and the specific values or ranges of values chosen for controlling parameters as reference bounds for design. [10 CFR 50,6 50.2]
l 2.0 l.
09-21-98 10:46:24 l
ENGINEERING Number I
DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR p
Title Revision No.
l Design Verification 8
NOTE nese values may be (1) restraints derived from generally accepted "sme of the art" practices for achieving functional goals, or (2) requirements derived fru.n analysis (based on calculation and/or experiments) of the effects of a postulated accident for which a structure, system, or component must meet its functional goals. [10 CFR 50, 6 50.2]
l 3.8 Nuclear Safety Related - Structures, systems and components designed to remain functional for all design basis coaditions necessary to assure the following safety functions:
- 1) Tbc integrity of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary; or l
l
- 2) %e capability to shutdown the reactor and maintain it in a safe (bot) shutdown condition; or
- 3) The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential off-site exposures comparable to the guideline exposures of 10CFR100.
[GPU Nuclear Operational QA Plan]
3.9 OA Plan Scone - His term is a designator used on the cover sheet of approved docueents which prescribe the method of performance of activities or tasks identified in Section 2.2.2 of the GPU Nuclear Operational QA Plan. [GPU Nuclear Operational QA Plan]
i l
3.10 Renulatorv Reauired - Those items which are not Nuclear Safety Related but which must meet NRC regulatory requirements or commitments. Sources of regulatory requirements and commitments, as a mimmum, consist of those associated with expressed conditions of the unit operating license, FSAR, fire protection (Appendix R and BTP Appendix A),
security, environmental qualification of electrical equipment, seismic response capabilities, licensed shipping contamers to the extent committed by GPU Nuclear, generic letters, IE Bulletins,10CFR50.54(f) correspondence, certain NUREG da-c. etc. [GPU Nuclear Operational QA Plan]
l 3.11 Lead Desian Engineer - The engineer representing the engineering discipline with lead responsibility for the engineering work.
I 3.12 Desian Ennineer - An engineer from an engineering discipline which is providing engmeering support to the lead discipline.
3.13 lead Desien Verification Ennineer - De engineer from the lead engmeering discipline who is responsible for interfacing with the other Design Verification Engineers and Design Engmeers to coordinate the overall design verification.
3.0
09-21-98 10:46:24 4
ENGINEERING Number U
DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
i Design Verification 8
l 3.14 Desian VerifWtian Enei-r - An engineer assigned responsibility to verify specific engmeeting documents.
3.15 Refer to fl.c " Glossary of Terms" used in Engmeeting Procedures.
4.0 l'ROCEDURE REOUIREMENTS 4.1 General 4.1.1 Design Verifications shall be performed as a control measure to verify the adequacy of 1
engineering designs which are within the scope of t'te GPU Nuclear Operational Quality Assurance Plan,1000-PLN-7200.01.
4.1.2 The design verification process consists of the following:
Obtain Veri 6 cation Number Prepare Verification Plan Assign Design Verification Engineer (s).
Perform Design Verification of Design input and assumptions.
Perform Design Verification of Design Output.
Assemble, approve and release the Venfication "ackage (VP).
4.2 Schedule 4.2.1 Design verification of the design input and assumptions shall be performed as early as practicable to ensure that the input to engmeering work is correct and complete to minimize the need to redo work, and to maxmuze the time availabic to the verification engineer.
4.2.2 For plant configuration changes, design verification shall be completed prior to turnover to Operations.
4.3 Verification Process 4.3.1 Design input shall be verified by comparms the documented input with the source reference, and by eMig the validity of the reference for the intended use. All assumptions shall be evaluated and verified to be based on sound engmeermg principles and practices.
4.0 q.g.
m
L 09-21-9810:46:24 i
ENGINEERING Number lo G
U-DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 mucs. ram (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l 4.3.2 "Ihe design verification of the design output must evaluate the overall design and consider the impact of various engineering disciplines on the design. As a nummum, it consists of reviewing the design and assessing the design implementing Mm** (design output) agamst the design bases and the design requirements (design input).
i 4.3.3 Special emphasis shall be placed on verification of the following: [10 CFR 50, Appendix B 6 III and NUREG 0680, June 1980, Page C6-10]
I Adequacy of the design to perform its intended functions Correct translation of design requirements into design output Appropriate quality standards are specified and included in design documents Suitability of application of materials, parts, equipment and processes Compatibility of materials l
Accessibility and provisions for inservice inspection, maintenance, and repair Suitability with regard to human factors 4.3.4 The veri 6 cation process can be carried out on a project basis or a single d-:+.=t basis. A project based verification is used for a plant configuration change or other activity where multiple documents are used to de6ne the activity. A single document review is appropriate for stand-alone documents such as standards.
l 1
4.3.5 The manager of the lead engmeermg discipline is responsible for assuring that the scope and methodology of project based design verifkstions will verify the adequacy of the overall engineering design. This includes the assignment of the i
Lead Design Verification Engineer to coordmate the overall design verification, j
and interfacing with the managers of other disciplines to develop the overall i
design veri 6 cation plan.
4.3.6 The mar ger of each engineering discipline which prepares an engmecring
)
hme is responsible for assuring that the design verification will verify the adequacy of the &x,s..est. This includes the assignment of the Design Verification Engineer, and the dev-lopment of the verification plan for the document.
4.3.7 The Design Verification Engineers are responsible for design verifying the scope j
of work assigned to them. This includes interfacing with the design engineers and responsible managers to resolve any issues arising from the verification effort.
l
?
~
r 5.0 i
~
l
=
l 09-2i-9810:46:24 I
ENGINEERING Number G
U DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR Title Revision No.
l Design Verification 8
4.3.8 In addition to the respocribilities of a Design Verification Engineer, the Lead Design Verification Enguicer is responsible for the overall design verification and for assembling the Design Verification Package. His includes interfacing with the Design Engineers, Design Verification Engineers and managers to coordinate the overall design verification effort.
4.3.9 Some procedures governing the production of an engineering document contain special instructions for design verifying that type of document. Herefore, the Design Verification Engineer must refer to the applicable procedure for the document being verified.
4.4 Extent 4.4.1 Ac extent of the design verification required is a function of the importance to safety ofthe item under consideration, the complexity of the design, the degree of standardization, the state-of-the art, and the similarity with previously proven designs.
4.4.2 He applicability of standardized or previously proven designs, with respect to meeting pertinent design inputs, including environmental conditions, shall be verified for each application. Where the design of a particular structure, system, or component for a pasticular nuclear power plant has been subjected to a verification process in accordance with ANSI N45.2.11, the verification process need not be duplicated for identical designs. However, known problems affecting the standardized design and their effects on other features shall be considered. He original design and usociated veri 6 cation measures shall, however, be adequately documented and referenced in the files of subsequent applications of the design.
he Special Instructions on the CMT should identify the references to the oriell design veri 6 cation to be included in the reference field on EDMS(Electronic Document Management System).
4.4.3 When changes to previously veri 6ed designs have been made, design verification shall be required for the changes, including evaluation of the effects of those changes on the overall design.
4.5 Verification Number 4.5.1 The Verification Number is obtained from IRMC by the lead Design Engineer or the lead Design Verification Engineer.
4.5.2 All design verifications related to a plant configuration change or other multiple l
document activity shall be performed under the same verification number unless i
for some reason this is impossible. Revisions to ha-ts shall be design l
verified under the same verification number as the prior revision.
1 i
6.0 l
v p-s---
.~.
a z--
l. 09-2i-9810:46:24 '
ENGINEERING Number G
E8 DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 (EP 009)
Title Revision No.
l Design Verificatior 8
4.6 Verification Plan l
4.6.1 - Each verification shall have a Verification Plan which is documented on the t
Verification Plan / Status Sheet (VPSS), Exhibit 2.
4.6.2
'Ihe verification plan should be developed in the early stages of the design activity and updated if necessary as the design progresses. It is expected that the plan will provide for early verification of the design input.
4.6.3 The plan shall address the following concerns:
Verifier: ion approach for the overall design when multiple documents are involved.
Verification ofindivulual design documents.
4.6.4 The manager of each engineering discipline which produces design documents shall identify the design documents to be veri 6ed, specify the minimum scope of work to be verified, assign the Design Verification Engineers, and specify the required completion dates. 'Ihe manager and the i.,esip Verification Engineer shouldjointly agree on acceptable verification methods tc be used. The manager shall initial the VPSS to acknowledge concurrence.
4.6.5 The manager of the lead engmeering discipline shall assign the lead Design Verification Engineer, and supplement the individual verification plans as necessary to verify the adequacy of the overall design.
4.7 Design Verification Engineers l
4.7.1 The verification process shall be performed by competent individuals other than those who performed the engmeermg design, but who may be from the same organization. The Design Verification Engineer shall be indapandaat of the design and shall not have (1) specified a singular design approach, (2) ruled out certain design considerations, or (3) specified the design inputs for the design being verified. The design verifier for a document can be the same person who has developed other documents that are used as input for this document.
4.7.2 When assigning a Design Verification Engmeer, the responsible manager shall ensure that the engineer is competent to verify the assigned scope of work.
A Design Verification Engineer shall have a Baccalaureate in engineering or related science and a mimmum of 5 years of related experience. Credit toward experience may be given for advanced degrees on a one-for-one basis up to two years.
l t
l l
7.0 l
m
- - -+
39-21-98 10:46:24 I
ENGINEERING Number O
U DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 l
NUCLEAR (EP 009)
Title Revision No.
l Design Verification 8
'Ibe design verifier of qualitative attributes, such as operability, maintainability, and testability, may have a high school diploma and eight years of applicable nuclear power plant expenence.
1 An individual verifying work affecting an NSR item shall be e qualified Responsible Technical Reviewer (RTR) to ensure that they are knowledgeable about the impact it has on nuclear and radiological safety. RTR qualification is l
recommended but not mandatory for verifying work classified as Regulatory Required.
In special circumstances, these qualification requirements may be relaxed by the manager depe-ling on the education and experience of the individual, the l
complexity of the work, and the relative importance to safety. 'Ibc primary l
criteria are that the design verifier be competent in the areas being reviewed, be l
fully quali6ed to perform the work being veri 6ed, and be knowledgesble about the l
impact it has on nuclear and radiological safety. For example an individual
)
without a degree may be fully qualified through trauung and experience.
4.7.3 A Design Verification Engineer may possess competence in more than one l
engmeering discipline, and the required experience may have been gamed l
concurrently.
l 4.7.4 If the Design Engmeer's immediate supervisor is the only technically qualified l
individual available, the design verification can be conducted by the supervisor, provided that (1) the other provisions of this procedure are satisfied, and (2) the justification is individually documented and approved in advance by the supervisor's man.gend, and (3) audits cover frequency and effectiveness of use of supervisors as design verifiers to guard agamst abuse. [GPU Nuclear Operational QA Plan, Appendix C,~Part 2]
4.8 Design Verification Methods Acceptable methods for design verification include, but are not limited to, the following:
4.8.1 Desian Reviewg l
l Design reviews are entical reviews to provide assurance that the design input and output meet the design and regulatory requirements, and to ensure that design l
documents such as drawings or specifications are correct and satisfactory.
l Design reviews can range from multi-organizaten reviewr. to single-individual reviews. The results of the review shall be Mmented and measures taken to ensure that the findmgs are implemented.
l 8.0
l ]9-2f-9810:46:24 1-l t
i ENGINEERING Number NU EAR (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l Whether the review is conducted by one individual or a multi-organization there are a number of basic questions that shall be addressed The Verification General' Checklist (Exhibit 3) is provided as a guide to ensure that these speciSc concerns are addressed during the design review. The Design Input Verification Checklist l
(Exhibit 3b) is provided as a guide to ensure that all applicable design requirements are identified and correctly translated into the design documents.
These checklists identify the minimum considerations to be addressed and are not intended to limit or defme the scope of the design verification. The manager and j
the design verification engineer are expected to consider appropriate concerns not l
identified in the checklists.
1 A "NO" response to a checklist item may indicate the design or verification is incomplete and action is required. The responsible manager shall review each "NO" response to determine if a TFAAI/EAAI or Engineering Division Task l
Tracking System Request (EDITS) needs to be prepared.
4.8.2 Qualification Testina Design verification for some designs or specific design features can be achieved by suitable qualiScation testing of a prototype or initial production unit. Prototype, component or feature testing shall be performed prior to installation of the equipment, or prior to the point when the installation would become irreversib'e.
In those cases where the adequacy of a design is to be verified by qualification test, the testing shall be identified and documented. Testing shall demonstrate adequacy of performance under the most adverse design conditions. All pertinent operating modes shall be considered in determimng the design conditions where it is intended that the test program confirm the adequacy of the overall design.
Where the test is only intended to verify a specific design feature, the other features of the design shall be verified by other means Qualification testing shall be performed in accordance with approved test procedures which incorporate or reference the requirements and acceptance limits contained in applicable design documents. The test procedures shall include provisions for assuring that prerequisites for the given test have been met, that adequate instrumentation of the required range and accuracy is available and used, and that necessary monitoring is performed. Prerequisites include such items as calibrated instrumentation, appropriate equipment, trained personnel, conditian of test equipment and the item to be tested, suitable enviromnental conditions and provisions for data acquisition. Test results shall be documented and evaluated to assure that test requirements have been satisfied.
If testing indicates that modifications to the design are necessary to obtain acceptable performance, the modification shall be documented and the item modified and retested or otherwise verified to assure satisfactory performance.
9.0
-g
_,09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCf.EAN (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l When tests are being performed on models or mock-ups, scaling laws shall be established and verified. The test configuration shall be clearly defined and j
documented. The results ofmodel test work shall be subject to error analysis, where applicable, prior to use in fmal design work.
4.9 Documentation of Design Verification l
4.9.1
'Ihc Verification Plan / Status Sheet (VPSS) Exhibit 2, is generated to document the assignment and completion of the design verification. It shall identify the scope of i
work to be verified, the design documents, the design verification engineers, the verification methods to be used, and the required completion dates. The VPSS may be a multiple page document.
4.9.2 The Design Verification Summary, Exhibit 4, documents the results of the design verification. A Design Verification Summary shall be prepared by each Design Verification Engineer, and shall summarize the scope, methods, results, and conclusions of the design verification. It shall separately or collectively address l
each item identified on the VPSS. In the case of a project based veri 6 cation, the Lead Design Verification Engineer shall also prepare a Design Verification i
Summary which summarizes the verification of the overall engmeering design.
4.9.3 The Verification General Checklist (VGC), Exhibit 3, shall be used as guidance by the Design Verification Engmeer for all design veri 6 cations except calculations. A separate VGC shall be prepared by each assigned Design Verification Engineer. The completed VOC documents that specific concerns applicable to the design have been adeqvstely addressed, or identifies specific concerns which require further investigation.
i 4.9 0 The Design Input Verification Checklist (DIVC), Exhibit 3B, shall be used by the Design Verification Engineer for verification of desip input documentation for plant configuration changes. A separate DIVC should be prepved by each Design l Verification Engineer assigned to review design input. 'Ihe completed DIVC docun ents that applicable design inputs have been adequately addressed, or identifies specific concerns which require further investigation.
L 4.9.5 Other documentation, such as qualification test procedures and results shall be l
l documented in accordance with procedures which govem their preparation (Lg.
l EP-004 for specifications). They shall be included in the verification package.
l l
L 4.9.6 A Verification Package (VP) shall be canpiled by the Lead Design Verification l
Engmeer to document the completed design verification. The VP shall consist of the completed VPSS, design verification summaries, applicable checklists (DIVC/VGC) and supporting documentation. 'Ihe checkhsts, summaries, and l
l supporting documentation shall be grouped with the associated VPSS. Supporting 1
10.0 wyww-m w
w+--
m.
09-21-98 10:46:24 I
l ENGINEERING Number DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCMAN (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
l j
Design Verification 8
documentation which has been released separately to IRMC may be referenced rather than included in the verification package. All pages of the VP shall be identified by the verification #, revision #, and page #. He lead Design Verification Engineer is responsible for the completeness of the overall package.
NOTE l
l If verification is accomplished by an Architect Engineer, be sure VP (or l
alternative memo) is released to IRMC.
l 4 10 Review and Approval j
Each manager shall review the verification documentation for their engineering discipline to ensure that the verification is complete and was performed in accordance with the VPSS. His includes reviewing the checklist responses and the summary. Each "NO" response on a checklist shall be reviewed to determine ifit indicates that the design or verification is incomplete thus requirmg that a task request be assigned. He manager shall sign and date the VPSS indicating that all items have been satist:tetorily completed.
The manager of the lead engineering discipline shall review the completed Verification l
Package to ensure that a complete and thorough verification has been performed. He l
manager's signature on the VPSS for the lead engineering discipline indicates that the l
overall verification has been satisfactorily completed.
l 4.11 Revisions i
When a previously released engineering documect is revised, the responsible manager shall determine if design verification of the change is required.
4.11.1 When a design verification package exists, the verification shallinclude a l
reevaluation of the preceding verification package and evaluation of the effects of the changes on the overall design. The verification package shall be updated to document the results, and the Summary of Change page should include one of the following statements Design verification performed (date) for changes initiated by (Doc #/Rev#, Change Document #, MNCR#). He following changes to the verification package resulted: (List Changes)
Design verification performed (date) for changes initiated by (Doc #/Rev#,
Change Document #, MNCR#). No changes were made to the verification package.
11.0 l
l
,09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number l
G U
DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NvCLEAR y
Title Revision Nt Design Verification 8
l 4.11.2 In those cases where the design change applies to documents for which a design l
verification package is not on file, a design verification shall be initiated to address J
l the change only. System design information shall be reviewed in sufHeient detail to assure that any potential impact of the change has been identified and appropriately addressed.
(
5.0 RESPONSIBILITIES l
Refer to Procedure Flow Chart (Exhibit 1).
5.1 Manager of Lead Discipline l
Prepare and initial the VPSS (Exhibit 2) to document the verification plan for the lead j
discipline and for the overall design.
Assign Lead Design Verification Engineer (LDVE)
Assign Design Verification Engineers (DVE's) for the lead discipline if required.
1 Assure that the scope and methodology of project based design verifications will verify the j
adequacy of the overall ecgineering design Interface with the managers of other disciplines to develop the verification p!r.n for the overall design.
Review completed Verification Package (VP).
Determine if further action is required.
Approve results of verification and sign VPSS.
Release approved VP to IRMC for "USE" per 1000-ADM-1215.02 and include the LDE on distnbution.
' 5.2 Manager of Supporting Discipline Assign Design Verification Engineers (DVE's) for the supporting discipline.
Assure that the design verification will verify the adequacy of the design docunmits.
Prepare and initial the VPSS (Exhibit 2) to 6-at the verification plan for the t~
supporting discipline.
Review comple'ed verification documentation.
i l
12.0 i
i
~
i
I )9-2f-9810:46:24 ENGINEERING Number iVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 muctwr (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l Determine if further action is required.
Approve results of verification and sign VPSS.
Forward approved verification documentation to lead Design Verification Engineer (LDVE).
i 5.3 Lead Design Verification Engineer (LDVE) l l
Jointly agree with manager on acceptable verification methods to be used.
Obtain Verification Package from IRMC if an applicable package exists. Otherwise, obtain Verification Number from IRMC.
Provide DVE's with copies of existmg Verification Package sections applicable to their scope of the verification.
Perfonn assigned verifications in accordance with the VPSS.
Interface with Design Engineers and Design Verification Engineers.
Prepare TFAAI/EAAI or Engmeering Division Task Tracking System Request (EDTTS) if necessary for items requiring further investigat on.
i Coordinate the overall design verification with other DVE's.
Prepare a Design Verification Summary which summarizes the verification of the overall engineering design.
Assemble Verification Package (VP) and forward to manager for approval.
5.4 Design Verification Engineer (DVE) l Jointly agree with naanager on acceptable verification methods to be used.
l Perform assigned verifications in accordance with the VPSS.
Interface with Design Engineers and Lead Design Verification Engineer.
1 Prepare TFAAI/EAAI or Engineering Division Task Tracking System Request (EDTTS) if necessary for items requiring further investigation.
i 13.0 l
_. - _ _ ~ - _ _ __..-
?S-2T-9810:46:24 ENGINEERING '
Number G
El DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 atuctarAN (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l l
Prepare a Design Verification Summary which summanzes the verification of the engineering design.
i Assemble vuification documentation and forward to manager for approval.
6.0 REFERENCES
6.1 1000-PLN-7340.00 "GPU Nuclear Project Approval and Management Process" 6.2 -
EP-005 " Modification (MDD) and System Design Descriptions (SDD) and System
_ Design Basis Documents (SDBD)" (5000-ADM-7313.01).
i l
6.3 EMP-001 " Technical Functions' Assigned Action Item" (1000-ADM-7314.01)
(see notetclow) 6.4 EP-004 " Specifications" (5000-ADM-7315.01)
I 6.5 1000-PLN-7200.01 " Operational Quality Assurance Plan" 6.6 EMP-015 "Engmeenng Change Documents"(1000-ADM-7350.03) l 6.7 ES-017 " Identification of GPU Nuclear Power Plant Systems" 6.8 ANSI N45-2.11 - 1974 " Quality Assurance Requirements for The Design of Nuclear Power Plants" 6.9 Regulatoiy Guide 1.64, P.ev. 2, June 1976 " Quality Assurance Requirements for The Design ofNuclear Power Plants" 6.10 EP -006 " Calculations" (5000-ADM-7311.01) 6.11 1000-POL-7200.01 "GPU Nuclear Inc. Quality Assurance Policy" 6.12 1004 POL-7340.00 " Configuration Management" NOTE Reference 6.3 EMP-001 is currently in revision to change title to "Eng:neering Assigned Action Items". In parallel to the EMP-001 revision is the development of a new trackmg system "Engmeering Division Task Tracking System" which will be the Wred system when available. It is impossible at this time to predict the release of the new system vs. the release of the revised EMP-001, therefore all possible task requestmg options have been iJuusd in this document Please take caution to utthze the most current system n
available.
1 l;
L 14.0
09-21'-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number G
U DIVISION 5000-ADM 7311.02 (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
l Design Verification 8
7.0 EXHIBITS 7.1 Exhibit 1 Procedure Flow Chart 7.2 Exhibit 2 Verification Plan / Status Sheet 7.3 Exhibit 3 Verification General Checklist Exhibit 3A Transferred to EP-006 l
Exhibit 3B Design Input Verification Checklist 7.4 Exhibit 4 Design Verification Summary 7.5 Exhibit 5 Summary of Clange 15.0 1
,,9-21-98 10:46:24 0
ENGINEERING Number DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 l
suctrAn (EP-009) l Title Revision No.
I Design Verification 8
l EXHIBir 1 PROCEDURE FLOW CHART
^
l 1
LOVE MLD PERFORMS LDVE l
VERIFICATION a
REVIEW &
PREPARES OOMPILES VP LEAD DCUMENTATION APPROVE VP DISCIPUNE LDVE PERFORMS LDE l START VERIFICATION PREPARES RESOLV~.S DCUMENTATION DIFFERENCES MSD REVIEW &
j APPROVE VP, FORWARD TO IRMC SUPPORT LDVE DISCIPLINE FILES (iF REQUIRED) v DVE E
IMPLEMENTS PERFORMS VERIFICATION pg COMPILES ASSIGNS WE PREPARES VPSS DOCL E TION t
DE RESOLVES DIFFERENCES KEY DE DESIGN ENGINEER DVE -
DESIGN VERIFICATION ENGINEER 1RMC -
INFORMATION RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CENTER LOVE -
LEAD DESIGN VERIFICATION ENGINEER MLD -
MANAGER LEAD DISCIPLINE MSD -
MANAGER SUPPORTING DISCIPLINE SD SUPPORT DISCIPLINES l.
VP VERIFICATION PACKAGE VPSS-VERIFICATION PLAN / STATUS SHEET i
{
El-1
l 39-21'-9810:46:24 l
l l
ENGINEERING Number i
O DIVISION
$000-ADM-7311.02 yy,,,
l (EP-009) l Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 2 VERIFICATION PLAN / STATUS SHEET
" TYPICAL" l
l i
O Verification Pten/ Status Sheet g
NUCLEAR Rev Date Home toes see, gestion N, w, Aegive, No..
h Svetem Tale System No.
Scese of Osegn VeWication h
Deswasat Tee Downens see.
neveen see Desumen Tune Deewnent ase me en see.
h Document fee Deewaent he me.een ase.
- ~.
n ~.
Desunient rate Duesment ass.
Revuon No.
Verthessman Acean hem No.
Depth of VerWiestion Reeuired VN8# NM O
G e
G e.
l l
i i
E21 i
,09-21-98 10:46:24 l
ENGINEERING Number l
GN DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 N"
(EP-009)
Title Revision No.
l Design Verification 8
l EXIIIBIT 2 (Con _L)
VERIFICATION PLAN / STATUS SHEET COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS 1.
Verification number obtained from IRMC.
2.
Number of verification sheets, date VPSS initiated, and revision number.
3.
Home Base number of section performing the verification.
4.
Station identification.
5.
Budget Acf ity number.
6.
Plant system title (refer to ES-017) and number.
7.
Brief description of design or work being verified.
8.
Title of document (s) being verified, document identification number (s) and revision number (s).
9.
Item number (several verification tasks may be required per system to provide for different engineering disciplines).
10.
The responsible manager shall identify work to be verified and the method to be used. Verification should be segmented and assigned by engineering discipline.
I 1.
Verification required completion date entered by responsible manager and, actual completion date entered by engineer doing the verification. Design verifications for modifications must be completed before turnover to Operations or use.
12.
Responsible manager enters typed / printed name of engmeer assigned to do verification. Design Verification engineer must sign under name when the actual completion date is entered for a j.
specific verification number.
13.
Responsible manager initials when VPSS is prepared. Responsible ma. sager signs / dates approving the results of the completed verification.
E2-2 y
09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number O
N DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXH1 BIT 3 VERIFICAHON GENERAL CHECKLIST
' TYPICAL" pg Verificatlon General Checklist mML8Ah ener (Pensi w
new.
Pese a
m
- __O, e.e,
-~
an.e i vee p.s i
=
- =s.neen e
. emen d
'me. eass y..
tens ass.es.tsv4pues 3r..
11 Seus fwwere eJ 40 Des 00 Ceeman e and 8000 Creers t3 Meie to essnesses --
et te Ptus Laser Caesu (90DCC40 lyt 04 f t 4001 toen seemmest t4 Dange (gweegt ennemme ( sseensa tems essJ tS Pe8enemen %
-(passear seusease, ens) ee usesweem -
(w esem ennen, eW momen sween, ses )
1.7 3 rushes (townesspek mopeqa sus-l tS Lan94 lesesak neut. feet elemust out.)
19 Esteweeses eeamos enempened esug speeden greemse tesy,lesnegly. _
. esuunsa, send armeeun, emanur mamast ereen et memows easJ l 10 Hypiada est asusgeness
_ esPsel, pusews emps, mas vuesmus ans )
t Il Choeury mesuuwen.
Imr essges DeerJune en mehr enemmey een.)
t 13 Ettette caessessen leewee a pseer, w stessess m sum) t 13 16C seesesses imeusg retwnerm essen SW sinens Iur asumen tuseg og essemeyue). Anos viceases type of eiseumwes Amused essen, esgo eruf lauseen W teseler. een t 94 Latend fed spenessere - ~
t 95 Assens me _
enree -
_ hr aunt eenser 3
e M
. MM h eidep'.3 t, >, %N' 11 Aanmarup se ehwesy somewswe er ammaana ayensiv sd 2.2 Sessman -
. d skusWek statsun, and 33 fehas essen seasoneses er eeuthpes, eseApet. and. _ _ Sehstg e dp% Gen af Wees events WW esedsee usauk Way maal te demynd It eWWWW. (Cereagr resessen meh eter emsstrek pychspit mW essessee) ekseeerm v.
'.h M
- - cn s s
' *.u-
. s 41 Omar ensaueussen et
. (OCL shoesset) a3 Are QA we Qv seemeewes esenter?
M1 34 Men swarmee repassai seen eerseems ehem esysssuest l
,s. -
,4 43 Wee to camedi Cadet Bureres eis apastry vuosensus W W ema pas assusen) h h qm m Wgg h g WM l A,..M -A'd; P <i# ~
.J w
9f
M_
w s,w !
Fr E~
A
'iT 6" St themnry meet Wess tJ Beamed Leeds edO233 (119E9 E3-1
09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number G
E8 DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 3 (Cont]
VERIFICATION GENERAL CHECKLIST
" TYPICAL" VPSS 1em he V
so. _
%_W_.
Revow Chun see.
esse Ves ses saga S3 TEl Remy Room Capeak B4 F4 peg and F4pe Ses*4m 3
Rasess, Laeen gg
_(haemeenenW tasches Coweenene
_=
II E89 M * "#
II I*"8 CasalW Cenorme Reser Ceaug
& 10 Pine Canone CenAgweene
$ 1I Hwnsn Feemre Et2 RF 1_
and theette Name 513 Assenen R Casseense y
.y.
. c i r. #
g-pengageggens ;.r v.,'
t1 Fhe Messen Arnhens Regen (FMARU -
(RW EPS3 42 Fte _
_ taas Pte Hammes Arnhees taan eenguded?
I-9tuplatestmut ahsume des $mmen tass eenshAgued9
'1*
w
?1 Amfeuews?
72 ChW9kushaarf 73 Ensstart F4 tenefwend?
7$
teenfetusi terwoest 74 t&C7 7f thaleuri 73 eammen Featre Ecumesm(#
f9 beertue sneesmues
_ ps acusases, sysseme and -
7 10 gewese r-
.W (hr eDuchsedk probine rd 8
_ 'A
+ - < O T'a i,,9 rp,
4 81 Are sees esammedy enacedied?
e3 Asa cues samensaast 63 Wars r uNeb pagaud verdesume manegger venged?
N 9a2 gammeilusesse # ?r. '4F e *,W 4 e...^ 3 3 2 t* *a e
81 Was mi asyeurisas and mesgame daugn meses uneart l
l
}
~ < -
w+
n e.
.. a... 7 --
s,,
141 h De W eeugwee to menu?
---~-a 12
- e
- e... e,
.,s e,
19 3 Dess em ewemoriesame
- m eenosinen m eres mernass==t m-
~
m-
'.-p 11 9 Are acesseres amen esamesser?
g.2 hahafsfD9mfsEL A'4'#+ i
'*I
I til Am De opesAnd Imm -r" Wie pueseaue senses sur sin ceases eggecedenst 12 2
. Mas t t egened Per e momed team-
^ Seules? taaf EF4131) seg2139 (t t.es)
E3-2
,09-21-98 10:46:24 1
ENGINEERING Number DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 su E4a (EP-009)
Title Rey.. mon oo.
e-l Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 3 (Cont.)
VERIFICATION GENERAI, CHECKLIST
" TYPICAL" l
,e,i. _ e,_.
Wu -ine-n ecnom 68*
ves j he l sera same a
m sie til Ase 9e seendes onwas eenpense est enen seer ses me emagn comme esimumme to essen se mesmew as to esgmesp t33 staeus.
._ goosemasey, essestuel powheg pusernes, enemy seg esesosi
. osang eesk% ens )
[
es n'
a.
141 Amemenemy..
_ esser ene 5%sness fusosamn-
_ ler We pee sumagg he eerdsste weer ernen meno es as smanimes 142 Mme seseneasy arW eper dueys yesusens taan easedred fu portroenee of nandes sepersi 14 3 Deus sossemesy been poesed to pe sse ogereies eussenen eessnee a se eased eseg me pays Ife?
e W.
I
- 4
.~,J-3 $ W.
t t
~*
SS t in e,s or.
e,s.r e
e.p se. ore
-.n ens,.
- e.e e-s - =ren
- e.orm-e t8 3 Penomes enesesese ew hsemeens summg ou ensissaan ed esseur af swessv. eueaumes tu sure speseem te -
p.'.'.u
,r
- l y:
.A ?.
m'~*
r
- p. ' M: +
r
- 5. t A,e s.,u.
es mas.a e.en to 3 Are guns enseme?
95 3 Peneenne seemumme me tassames mannsg ein --
we nunner W pervennel meanse der --
gp c hw
. v4 % l ( g,
.7 j.m r. o Q s
t tF t Ase ;
man asesmen 17 2 De Base meet 9e supdestry emermeeres b esaum ed metenes?
17 3 Ase senses test sueeweissus speeden 17 4 De meme enest Ois seyduhmy gue&amere, emeek WW deseawee?
17 8
- weenne sneawwt se besseere msnmey se essassmos se nweeer W perewee sessanse ser teseg ed gg n y-^
___ng m m nr en w ~ ~~
-s,.
s r
lat Mme eens base eenmeses e emmyi1 10 2 As retuus egensated ami appetg egetwee meesAed 9'
Pushas Asp hagWit O lcm ; %d.t.
d',a 19 l Hsue Redman Piemme hemi 7
19J Mas. _ _. seen pean D #essessed ime af aripares estaruaL eesspo prmuse tem ensaansum yearukg Of elesense erehsee?
10 3 Hue e Sesesy Eehenen af es endowed eeneiho tems ps,comest W pas. meruime esseet tS 4 preannel seeste seamase tu ess:ded erset WW eeneent W
h GtWAAE CLAIssub AW WWWee.
j_,
30 1 Hous>g semeen og sNsysg mes wieres 30 4 Afe essman easyme enemurepus aposten 4
h!M E3-3
09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number g
y DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 Ni> CLEAR (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification g
l
.EJHIBIT 3 (Cont.)
VERIFICATION GENERAL CHECKLIST
" TYPICAL"
..e v
,0 __ e,_
- evow Chase he teme vee ese e>A N.S Afe edeDNSe W44W4 889EM WEBAnd MS Tswusseter assawwee im wesesse. ehessg enget lance femus, ICC W. es i N7 trassumereus Ceumme ausgated erug etwege (petess hms uansvuspy. ese em see easeen.
auseum spessun enumen a seenwe. see.)
B$
1
._ seneene weegged eswg.
, see M 7 mouel to tussesmesseur 21 %
ase oesamme tsaressmanisomemwee sessmen l
{
l 211 Aee - -
tu -
sossene l
l ni a,s e ei se. e
- e. e w n w e,e==,
2L3 Muse appegmas energue teen sehseef to deewnse eeJewd tendEhene?
21 4 l le to eMews eenman esempesmy asueed
.u+f.
r t
2 w '.% d t
M L W M 0? ,.d'# h WMOHMM 4
m gaow 6mse 4m geopMW=mpp EGG tWN Oh 66 m emuur
,ww
-- w m
, w weg
-. NM M@
WW mpm _
6 S'**
m m,mme nm 4 e M M***MM**^
O
- M l
uanM em
[
E3-4 l
l I
09-21-98 10:46:24 l.
l ENGINEERING Number G
48 DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR i
(EP 009)
Title Revision No.
l Design Verification 8
EXHIBIT 3 A (Cont.)
LALCULATION VERIFICATION CHECKLIST l
(REFER TO ENGINEERING DIVISION PROCEDURE EP-006) l i
E3-5 f
w
09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 muer. rant (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 3A (Cont.)
CALCULATION VERIFICATION CHECKLIST (REFER TO ENGINEERING DIVISION PROCEDURE EP-006)
E3-6 l
(
,09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number g
DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02
)
NUCLEAR (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EX1HBIT 3B DESIGN INPUT VERIFICATION QiECKUST
" TYPICAL" Qg Design input Verification Checklist ausstAn ther Ep4gg) y Asv.
Pep of m
...s,_
~ G
__B
.,~.m, Review Checa lh l ayA sea soie Ves w e
.ee
.e t1 who peamm se suggwouun auge um enha e3 iAM se eenGpduhn Wenga n.
13 put se suspe eene towebryk 14 Wut la W mahdefP g
_p
., " : 1" d *>:.
d r s
11 Ase Star etap% aated and W W hase sedamun?
3:
Ase may en essenmet
' W.R f.< % TV.4
- i a v 8
em;% A T.n %?
-@ f -
3e a sus e amusman as e es sessesses enus m en toe W em emwiist?
33 Ase W m m Byftwingr.M. m eensus, em pgs a tyse nemmer. 341 peesses9 3.3 As aggenmas N Dessuun t se DMr8DSO samis me enemme 34 As egghetis af 94 ftse Leal Csema (SODCC400 e sm>Ttelun espeanse 5.5 Ase se essmaail deepe --
. mdamass is sown set to emespui vuesumeres as se sensusep 38 Are tutuse semesuurde esteh seem here - -
essesy tagast. mW mg sufrees e lashng fespmed to esMne Dume -
Wesmep 37 e to tsunMed e ampung game tu aman -
suas e seaseent escues B e slausg shamss 34 A4 _
eprak., pufbee ye eensius (ful.
_ e ph77 3$
Deeg euespiegnd tehde gods gasese baan efen tus W sud Ines t -.
_9e fue teussef
. ese est tse..anas munn, esempe W ages. _
sans e cassamment 3 to
- e amari samme e essmem4 ese ein esseu tir osmang to venim epv9 3 11 W meeg a fugendis venur se e neue tenses af se Sumpt IB 9e esgageres ysse speestad e end se the enemme eW ausPeas tus erthmeg 9e tesf?
1 13 Carte put seememoren we auf seusesd at estme amiesse et emest Repshese sumes e _
enes a shree a sage et sue sees End met We Stur g
"f',
,T._
-, my.se (,. %
y
.1 is...e ms -e
.e e e m e e,
i l
l m.,
_ n,w... m
,~:
31 Asespamaanseseus emarerepasesy a emmenes.en spessynne supereueIn en emees 83 Ass unsrerg ets mepansy "
_ ten es tiessag eposAmsensm esammess1_
........ -. ~..
r QA Plue
...m.
.~
7be passyes Anmyan Resen(Iber EP4138 Phymneul asemos pun e SS39 pe6)
E3-7 t
09-21-98 10:46:24 l
ENGINEERING Number G
U DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 3B (Conti l
DESIGN INPUT VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
" TYPICAL" e,_.,_.,
vPsa se,s v_
no..
u no casen les Anne Vee he SA Pbw tmounpared tmge I $wenwg N ~ ~~
i ed* DEB #ernes EO Pinyue Reimer Les sus -
- 2. Freemasus enseMee uneyamiam Pitywa (154 QPUN emunes centepumaanes useen eunes as a been Apr em NRC (SER)e spur genurestrek 9'
M 4*'A V MJD<;3F. Mai4Mf'.*'e.M *-4 % < ' ' d' R ' *.
+-
- en. - -
e -
S3 tsareten aus messy assas ens senssue
_ senhaeg the team by seen -
Wi.% ' M M M M Ve}llUhjY.*'f
- -(4.YYf$$1%"'.
- rh ?.I "'
F1 amense - -
sur wena teansun tegens one eruguswa. eensruren em. Wel argumeAr --
se suusun eenW pe emailun 73 name smenin g -
F3 hew -
'_ hr eW ereasuGWed _.
i I
7e Sgusemut stepuumes ter emsedek stems she 73 DheggBy.
~ Agt endset, egelune ud ApupstafM 8t %
^Y'2.? 'E??','*.9lQ& M.R $.$ W e'$,bl $ &T%3XN'y ? ^ N C V O n a m s1 n
e eim W e m.g sia SJ Speemus psgenas sewhee meaumeren er eenh
. symmit 5.3 iyuedue tsnanuus septues semperests Iur each teutmerg equasus $uss summede hr eerunes we t'esterg
.e
.e e
.e. -. ee =
D2.
MW' e D ; tR' Twdf.pm%N.M4.h'.8"_* tJ 8;; G
.' A r +
> + '. -
ei s m.emei smemmes ause se me ma
. ed meserta Deegn remus pensant eurves, senses aumen eseeimum es messm enesses esses Lane asestuluuk Lemogs misub e estrum neut syneset
{
s3 semens swees awe est aseye seemeg one sene, was, e,em m e. puenay at anse usan (ner vnet em 71tesek 8J 8eesA's D N85 Wee stutL ensammer unuse temme stra ese swahmt.
13 c.
_ww(' 6ygg 'Q @ % g.33 pfg'. t!? ' =
('
AV.
^
90 1 SomeAus
^ mash at Asaat cases we Anna seemsmes M en SpWtade DenAIWW
' gt ;
- s ' vs_ M ;'t.MK :ky '
j.,f_rt'!;),:33
- fl ? _4
~
m som.n mi Flag selmeanum 88831813 5)
E3-8
09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number GPU DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 wuctran (EP-009)
Title Reym..on No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 3B (Cont.)
DESIGN INPUT VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
" TYPICAL" h
Heites Caess 8h Isas vee l see I #en s..
m.4
,,s or p..
..,; _ m. m
..u 11%
W thGhd 8egSWBupW thAAh es:
Basse et pesar.
Aunumer tasmies summmet neues Resign. esmal W esgo agesummut geene mW eup ma veggen eth 9?
' ^
_ ?-'d.h*N *W,tA:.'" Y'?n:W 'O .0 '
nv4 W -
v3i n
m.
e.
e n.a j
13 2 ApnenhusISC -
. tu esman appenn auf enest 13.3 asusema sumasseur 134 esemann espuusun -
tag asessustous et pusw ira 138 tenemen negs mas homem a nuesunut 13 7 assumss emanusun 114 Spessnes semiser. assomsey ens e e.
gs'.G
~" %fe"U.q;d/qyt.Ng,it;7;,W:T f; y Sof.j+r: * /.. r ' ;O '
""'.N s
2 2
ui Mas can em e ename Pm messa mammes emmy ses er _ _
enva womemus a svuem l l
l eseh eaWERL engM W estutAge Bugams senSA/P l
l 9 f-
_ 'MF I^[ MyhE6 ts.? Kel.) Till,$VW.I 'T.M T #J ? d.'
d""
J it,i an
.su uim..
Psammas
.y Y6. - s
- a - -,.
W m
sw 5
Je smaammenet N
me
' = = =
tammaar mashspL
- nem III M WW M M M NWIE'WWED# M M tS 3 tesGenegpensesfumapsa _ _
gang messed a ses pressey of essag poet Asius haseres M g. W 144 Spemens b to poterseus in sashale peleed ungest af W messaa Ste staarts AN Goedb4 Gee D 6 afWgB LanW4 m egestWW shpe 4 h seggGap D Ghe95
%f ~& M :i;('l fiW h"': W e<, "* Td' &,s* O' tQ L
l i,
C__.
"-a*=
1 u er$a3tC (Saal E3 9 au.-
09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number G
(f DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 wuctc4s (EP-009)
Title e
on No.
Design Verification l
EXHIBIT 3B (Cont.)
DESIGN INPUT VERIFICATION CHECKLIST
" TYPICAL" v,u
~
a-s.__ v _
v Romew Chest ha mass Yes Na MrA I9W M M N'fQ?$N U *C H Ty "V.;w M,&4*" * (r 0,. &
1 17 9 INer anunusy sessuusum ne h 17 2 Sepgang summuuses mW essemans sur esschs e
[ h D
4 eri4 it s asemsmewummes ems.o m nWm.m..eiun-
{
iu as ass e.e tE3 emuumm seamens a me mumms a seweems se s. esemassl e44 heemme suena a seemus sus emmega se am Beams Ceanut Spease ser 45014 SEe oi I k(Ngyd,esYeM%NMMj2IM.[?.TMw'Wt L'e,Q 4 7I T ? VU** /*.7 is t
--- e e.en. nam.e e s.ees e.ssenen.e-a.s.u. mast====i esse.m., s e j
n
- m. -m
- e. es. e.. - as.
18 2 Fease samma ---
_ el ablabouk agesse und
_.schd$g e estegn W Suns meMs ses eausemum usan may susul en desynes a N (Causfy sepassa um eger grisesen, spessuis, sus W
[
~ ~'"MV,W@{f%f 4W49.5I4rt? $Mb '5M M s W%:.-
It1 summann emunes-swlessen sunseg emusmuniseur aseen a as no esammes.
3J m ensang --- _
M asesans pumanse hr ammis posese 3L4 temen eeu pasasse amaud kr
[
^^h'kMNe V^N
- TAU,*
TI#' *** d Z 2 ~.t".A
- 1 W'
99stV au am-sus amme n-emm mes m.m as Assam som esuk Penmes tesessun._,_
Mansung sur spaans 21 2 ammunne AaadE tePV Cass, amma a sessummen 2i 3 toesrae to CFR IB Asumnas J --
31 NMDdDtJ@t MM O M'Mm k' 4
- 5
, ' 4 4 l' "
st t spasm menemananenseg._
- se m.unnim ee-mi memes.
met Be audpsden sfuge semen See AdesasulWW dudyt _ _
qpun.M heenut 9er esmye amass en eensnar psyuse wome eness se en mumps seemet).
ensuus 1
. me ages sf Bie s% erwge en De phre.
22.2 agadhusimposessus em 22.3 ammuseos tomaren Tang sammenwen SW MeM~
% n'4d LMy? $:W O,? i'1M 'IT%. '_s._-_-% 9 M 51 m w em W w w w-m j
23 2 0metasto Z
~ rheuen Guam opuesens (ES4De e ES41Nk essreWL
-tasag WW sessenen, sus penneeses pseemus mesman esenres sur spuemme wesy ses suum Waf*_ WM MU ;^:f&a v& G 'r.fA?;: ? N m f*
b"
- o. o ; r
=v 34 t esammes 0944 sueeuswes auf user amWember embdy 24J asemann ALAslA
- (Es. set) 88E8350 pas)
E3-10
l 09-21-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number E8
\\
DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAi.'
(EP-009) l Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 3B (Cont.)
i DESIGN INPUT VERIFICATION CHECKLIST t
" TYPICAL"
)
b784 Bern 845. _
V_
"88 -
Page _ W_
Rueen Cheen he Rose Wes ses WA H3 Seanous Pwe &mmae Penn :
_ sueeg ennuno mW.
_ emeess.
r
>e sessens n
_ rumme a asser massen a sem guesmen a penwu peas em m
. m ammena w guess _ _ mesmase huse _-
my se symannt
__ Z:; - => v. e its Je t se e omspennes een cass2 Omey --
uns (QCL 3B 2 tese aume enemass a sessenes een Ocb 1
53 Dufheen W Quay comanasumen eenmenten a smur es sp. -
enamsgrnagamaang *., ~
'3 ; ~ '
- 3 i %~.,
y u
r as 1 QA -- -
me sammens e ash ee-
_ 0a rum l
l l
pu
%.4...o
. ;e..
'% T'Q '~'
,se.
pegungyMaunuesustaansasamistaesensalmstmSS4EEF.A
- L<7'
v s
IF t asseawy Sinuar weae 27 2 Ghosend Lsess p3 mi ammy ason Ceemess v4 Peng es see sissues It s Ramamav tasen 27 8 ousamens W aussues e p7 Fte w ansyme nesst
- s i
D.
27 9 CeeesW Canouer Aans Casug rF to l 8wu Ceauner Censpwussa 27 tt Maun Feast 27 12 RF Deadamese mW Eisettes Nases rf it assenen R canmeone
~
4
.a J...,
- 5
+3 h
p.;
yw
~
~....
=
g i
l E3-il 1
l
.09-2i-98 10:46:24 ENGINEERING Number E
U DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR p
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 3B (Cont)
VERIFICATION CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS 1.
Verification number from VPSS.
2.
Title of document being verified (same title from VPSS).
3.
Engineer's name performing verification.
l 4.
Engineer's home base number.
l 5.
Date checklist was completed.
l-6.
Place a checkmark in the applicable box (Yes, No, N/A) for each item.
l "NO" may indicate the design or verification is incomplete requiring a task request per EMP-001 be assigned by the responsible manager. The SM shall review each "NO" response to j
determine if Task Request needs to be prepared j
(Not Applicabic) does not require any further action by the veri 5 cation engineer.
l The DVS (Exhibit 4) may be used to outline the engineer's work or for comments dcunod appropriate by the verification engineer, 7.
The verification engineer shall sign and date the VGC.
l l
i l
E3-12
- 09-21-98 10
- 46:24 ENGINEERING Number G
U DIVISION 5000-ADM-7311.02 NUCLEAR (EP-009)
Title Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT 4 i
DESIGN VERIFICATION
SUMMARY
(REF. EP-009) i l
" TYPICAL" Verification #
Rev.#
Page of VPSS Item #
Summary of design verification scope, methods, results and conclusions I
Based on this evaluation, the design is verified to be acceptable.
Verification Engineer Date l
i I
E4-1 l
L,09-7M-9810:46:24
(
l ENGINEERING Number g
DIVISION 5000 ADM-7311.02 muctrAs (EP-009)
D' Revision No.
Design Verification 8
l EXHIBIT $
l'
SUMMARY
OF CHANGE
" TYPICAL" occume=Two.
TITtt
- EV
SUMMARY
of CHANGE APM40 VAL DATE d
a 2
C I<
1 e
i E5-1 i
4
\\
OVERSIZE ~
^
t 1
4, e
i DOCUMENT'
\\
PAGE(S) PULLED i
~
{
f
\\
i SEE APERTURE CARD FILES '
4 8
k j
i r.
i APERTURE CARD / PAPER COPY AV
....................................AllABLE THROUGH NRC FILE CENT
/
l kUMBER OF OVERSIZE PAGES FILMED O 0
.......................................N APERTURE CAR 0(S) _
l ACCESSION NUMBERS OF OVERSIZE.PAGES:
f 0/0bdUf 990/Olav?9 rrosae
\\
196/040rd
\\,
9 TOM 48//V l
i 1
...