ML20195G633

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to ,In Which Recipient Made Two Recommendations on Proposed Final Rule Amend to 10CFR55, Initial Licensed Operator Exam Requirements. Staff Intends to Seek Commission Approval
ML20195G633
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/29/1998
From: Callan L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Seale R
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Shared Package
ML20195E260 List:
References
FRN-64FR19868, RULE-PR-55 AF62-2, AF62-2-009, AF62-2-9, NUDOCS 9906160123
Download: ML20195G633 (1)


Text

'

AF vt-2.

L o%

l

. fp A g 4'*5L - UNITED STATES g-

] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20086-0001

\;,g h-- May 29, 1998 Dr. Robert L. Seale, Chairman-L Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~ Washington, D.C. 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

PROPOSED FINAL AMENDMENT TO 10 CFR PART 55, " INITIAL LICENSED i-y OPERATOR EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS" '

l

Dear Chairman Seale:

l 1 am responding to your letter of May 8,1998, in which you made two recommsndations on the subject amendment to 10 CFR Part 55: first, that the amendment should be issued for use by the industry and, second, that the staff should analyze the results of the pilot examinations to ensure that the quality and level of difficulty of the examinations are consistent across the regions.

With regard to the first recommendation, the staffintends to seek the Commission's approval as soon as the affected offices and the Committee To Review Generic Requirements (CRGR) concur in bs final rulemaking package. A memorandum requesting the concurrence of the office directors was issued on May 13,1998, and the CRGR is scheduled to review the final rule during its meeting on June 10,1998.

With regard to the second recommendation, the staff is analyzing the examination pass 4

rates and the average written examination grades on a regional basis to determine whether the results are consistent. In response to the discussion in your letter, the staff is also

considering performance measures that might provide insights with respect to the overall effectiveness of the revised examination process. I We~ apprecia'e t the Committee's comments and will keep the ACRS informed of sig'dicant activities in this area.

Sincerely, i I L i i

1 n

Ex

-)

tive Director

! for Operations , j cc: - Chairman Jackson l Commissioner Dieus  !

' Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan '

SECY OGC-OCA'-

OPA CFO  !'

' CIO  !

9906160123 990608 PDR PR

\1 L, 55-64FR19968 PDR i

- 0_D0 YO 0 b l