ML20195G624

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Office of Chief Info Officer Reviewed & Concurs on Final Rule,Initial Licensed Operator Exam Requirements Amend to 10CFR55.Rule Being Placed on Hold Because of Addition of Section 55.49
ML20195G624
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/28/1998
From: Shelton B
NRC
To: Tovmassian H
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
Shared Package
ML20195E260 List:
References
FRN-64FR19868, RULE-PR-55 AF62-2, AF62-2-008, AF62-2-8, NUDOCS 9906160120
Download: ML20195G624 (3)


Text

p

{*

./

j # *' % g hf~lp2.Q

[" lt UNITED STATES g g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

  • % * *** l May 28, 1998 j 1

MEMORANDUM TO: Harry S. Tovmassian, Task Leader Division of Reactor Program Management l Offi of Nucl r Reactor egulation

^

un im FROM: Jo S ie Records Management Branch Information Management Division Office of the Chief Information Officer

SUBJECT:

OFFICE REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE: ON A FINAL RULE, INITIAL LICENSED OPERATOR EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS, AMENDMENTS TO 10 CFR 55 The Office of the Chief Information Officer has reviewed the subject final rule and concurs in it.

However, the rule is being placed un hold because of the addition of section 55.49 which contains a new information collection requirement that was not approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) at the proposed rule stage. Consequently, this will result in a j burden increase to licensees. Please complete and submit the attached NRC Form 670, j "Information Required for Making an insignificant Burden Determination," which solicits j information about the significance of the change and whether or not the information collection is controversial, so that we may submit it and the rulemaking to OMB for an expedited review, we will apprise you of OMB's decision and whether or not a complete OMB review and approval are 1 required. At that time, we will also inform you of any changes to the " Paperwork Reduction Act Statement" that may be necessary. Please modify section 55.8(b) to include "55.49." l Should you have any questions, please contact Herbert M. Parcover on 415-7226 or e-mail HMP.

1 2

Attachment:

As stated cc: R. Ingram, NRR D. Meyer, ADM g61g120990608 55 64FR19868 PDR L 090blLQ A0 ,

l

1 8

NRC FORM 670 m=> u.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR MAKING AN INSIGNIFICANT BURDEN DETERMINATION TO SUPPORT A DECISION THAT OMB CLEARANCE IS NOT REQUIRED TITLE OF COLLECTION: Attach document containing proposed information collection (s).

l DESCRIPTION OF COLLECTION For rulemakings, provide, for each section that adds, deletes, or modifies infcymation collections, all information requested in the table below. For all other collections, provide a general description of the information collection or a description of all modification (s) to the existing collection, and include all information specified in the table.

l 'Section Number Current ! Revised Revised Total Number of Burden l Number Burden Burden (Rules Current Hours peri of Hours per Hours Description of Change Only) Respondents Response! Respondents: Response Change p ._

l f

,I .

I l

I 1 i i l

\

l l

l i

i I

l ac,0- m r,=, mmoo _ ,mo - m.....-.,~.

L

.- l.

y:'

I i s NRC FORM 670

+199e; U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR MAKING AN INSIGNIFICANT BURDEN DETERMINATION

' TO SUPPORT A DECISION THAT OMB CLEARANCE IS NOT REQUIRED (Continued)

NEED FOR/USE OF COLLECTION:

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Has NRC had any consultation with the public, industry groups, or ofner agencies, etc., regarding this YES NO proposed collection? If yes, explain and indicate how any issues were addressed and resolved.

l 1

j Does NRC expect to receive comments on this collection? If yes, explain. ~'YES ;~] NO I

Are the information collections considered controversial? If yes, explain. m YES ~~!NO j

I l

EXPECTED IMPLEMENTATION DATE:

NRG e ORM 6/0 (41996)

I