ML20155F217
| ML20155F217 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/28/1975 |
| From: | Cudlin R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Lainas G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155E140 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-88-91 NUDOCS 8806160315 | |
| Download: ML20155F217 (6) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,
! UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20$55 JAN t 8 $75 Gus C. Lainas, Chief, Co.sinment Sys tems Branch, TR FORTHCOMING MEETING WITH GENERAL ELECTRIC i
DATE: February 12 and 13,1975 LOCATION: San Jose, California PURPOSE: To discuss the ongoing Mark III large-scale testing program and analytical methods development. (Agenda attached) PARTICIPANTS: GE - B. Sobon et al NRC - G. Lainas, R. Tedesco, R. Cudlin, J. Kudrick, L. Slegers h *cc N [ R. L. Cudlin
~.
Containment Systems Branch Division of Technical Review Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
As stated DISTRIBUTION: - i AEC PDR G. A. Arlotto E. G. Case R. Klecke: A. Giambusso S. Varga R. S. Boyd J. Carter
. D. Eisenhut L - Reading R. Fraley, ACRS (2) CSB - Reading IE (3) Subject File RL A/D's and B/C's J. Kudrick TR A/D's and B/C's L. Slegers 40@O4
* 'z N
G %
% D/s.3916/
8806160315 000606 M PDR FulA ' CONNOR83-91 PDR
. - - . ~ - . ~ . ~ - ~ , .-. .. ~ ? -
C .
. PROPOSED AGENDA ,
GE - REGULATORY MEETING N FEBRUARY 12 - 13. 1975 l A. Containment Vacuum Breakers
- 1. REG 1etter
- 2. Mass transfer correlations L. 3. Design information on spray droplet size and distribution and
'*. flow rate as a function of differential pressure I
) B. Fressure Relief Valves
- 1. Status and description of test program to determine vent pipe
, clearing loads
- 2. Schedule of tests and design of facility
- 3. Tour facility
- 4. Changes to analytical model (from that described in NEDO-10859) and its application to hark III suppression pools
- 5. German test data regarding condensation loads and temperature- -
mass-flow map , C. Mark III Test Program
- 1. Status of program, planned tests in current series, description of facility modifications :
- 2. Tour facility
- 3. Status of GE responses to our test program evaluation #1 ,
- a. need for air blowdown in 1/3 scale 3 b.
scaling effects for 1/3 scale facility
- c. vent flow submodel
! 4. Discuss ASEA / Atom tests vis-a-vis dynamic loads for Mark I and II D. Mark III Suppression Pool Dynamics
- 1. Pressure Oscillations - Analytical Model i
- a. basis for GE's non-concern "
- b. possible analytical models
- 2. Pool Swell - Analytical Model
- a. bulk pool swell model (NEDE-20732-P) with data comparisons
- b. froth impingement loads
- 3. Seismic Wave Generation - status of analysis -
- 4. Design Loads for Structures
[ a. location and orientation of all structures, piping, and components ! update of design guide (Reference Question 3.82 - CESSAR)
- b.
l . 1 ,
m-o< . i ' PROPOSED AGENDA CE - REGULATORY MEETING . . E. GESSAR ,
- 1. Hydrogen Control g
- a. availability of compressors
- b. hydrogen detectors - status of design
- c. hydrogen recombiners - status of design
- 2. Continuous Purging
- 3. Secondary Containment Bypass Leakage
- 4. Subcompartment Pressure Analyses
- a. results for GESSAR
- b. consideration of flev inertia D
9 1 j 1 I n
s-p,w m ew- av :w~r ~.ep.* **<sp=~~~~-- . - - ~ ~ ~~ ~ --~ -- .
~
w I % A e . . ,h- ---- -
), / 'e
( nt .. h, !
.hd.M 7 - 5' ~7 5' S THR r c%n len e r d, d%d ud -
%1utM e fe 2? "
,Osjgt yb _c.*vt.9 d 2 C~
M of M.4 4
~
c_
, ._ Q Jre s4*
i "Sbt 17 l. _.
/m . -
l Aw -E % . ..
. 7'~/8._ _. . ____ .
C ro. >. ..
. Po o. l. $y L.I.( . pt_?!_ m E /,
l
; i .- W ' U .l W y L.--. . ... ... . - _ . . . . .
l Juk. M -. . . - - - . - . . - - ..
.: &e? &<< peel pst./@pslI l-. -- -.-
Ns s tMeywun!. ,de . lo a d _ .
. , . - O Sbu.M.- [ h ._ WN c k l M w . & -..- .. .-
. OC (A. f /coe e le vrM.
. i A // 5 h edu re.r __
4 . . . . _ _ _ . . l t l
- ru + swe d n~f cp e.c f t/G/
I i y . e i 1
.- ayn . .
l _ w , , .- : /. w A' i -4 u.4 m% l, 4_ % 4ss./c 1
. o ~-
. h. - 64 4 e 4 e
. .i' . .. -. -_ . . . . - . . 1?&. _ -. .. 1 Lux
. . Ib ._. % _ lQ.1+ .. 3 .L. .. . .-
. ~ LAM-.- . ..u.c- y MX ;
i M
- l
-- _l l ?
V . _ , . . l _ -_ . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . _ . _ _ _ ___ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ ._ _ _ . . . .
. .66 O __ . ._ . . O _..ft e
_-_ _ . _ - _. essa _e i l t,. . ?c.J . GE
- N' d, *, <* h ' ."( .% * **
.( ' .gk+ i
.y! wj & n. . I ! e-e- .;,
- . _ . . . _. __. . -~ . . . _ . . _ _ ..
" " ** e.e 6*. a. . ..m:.e. e e -e e _e
.e .e - og* .- 6 g.,.-..hg m ,a g. .m 4 e. .h
- s=. -- ._ - --
ND&- P l . , - .
l
, ! I i
l
- 1 L 9 Y - -
s.e i e 1 r i
~
! I c> *&~ 'O o- O- O z 1
\
..Q [ . -.
. aspsa y ..g...y .
.7 ._o_ . y . g..p f.o .
3
. .- p...-ioo,. 2 . teh I
..-{
2 l
. _u-
- c. .,__ o .
,.n o.. . . -
l . . _ . W 4 II ' > 1 . . . _ _ .. . _ . .. . . . . .
* * - * * *- -. ..--e,. .. -er, ,, .e w n.. - - em m . . . . . . . . . .. -
i fk't M.. n. . ud.--. .
} _ ro.v. . .
53 22 J wu%& u& 4 . - - - _ . . . - . . - - _ . . ~ . _ . . . . _ _ _ . . . . . .
~.
. ~ . . .- .. .Y '
h m w ahb . . . . . . . . .l
. .. d . g W#6 8 .NN . M**'.'>hh-e Omw w wAep a g m, -g. e- e. - --e 6.We.. . . - .we .e g ey-ie.Om Ww as g. g e.h6+4e..._4 w gwg ep, gy g eNh.. e, e -r.
O he4.66 p em 4 8 8 "- - .w.... .. .44 , * % -[ 8L. ,
. --- - , , ._. . . _ . . _ . .-., . . - . , . ~ .. ., , _ _ . , _. - ~ , , , ,}}