ML20154A108

Plan for Big Rock Point Integrated Assessment

ML20154A108
Person / Time
Site:	Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date:	02/12/1986
From:	CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML20154A073	List: ML20154A070 ML20154A078 ML20154A101 ML20154A108
References
PROC-860212, NUDOCS 8603030295
Download: ML20154A108 (64)

Text

_. _ _ . _ _ . _ __ _ . . _ .

s .

t ATTACHMENT l 4

Consumers Power Company

! Big Rock Point Plant Docket 50-155 - t i  :

d

(

t

.I i

t w l

t i

1 4

4 ,

i

{ Plan For the Big Rock Point Integrated Assessment i

i

February 12, 1986 i

1 5

i i

i 2

l l

i g .

i l

\

t B603030295 860212 PDR ADOCK 05000155 P PDR <

.x l

1 of 6 l .

i l

l l ?LAN FOR THE BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT I. INTRODUCTION I

! Consumers Power Company (CPC) has developed a comprehensive program-l which will enable the Company to effectively manage implementation of significant changes to our Big Rock Point Plant which have been required or proposed by, the NRC, as well as other measures to enhance plant safety and reliability which have been identified by the Company or other agencies (eg, the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations). A j

description of the program, identified as the " Integrated Assessment of Open Issues and Schedule for Issua Resolution (Including Environmental-Equipment Qualification and Generic Letter 82-33' Issues)" was submitted to the NRC by our letter dated June 1, 1983. The term Issue Resolution as used herein refers to the actions necessary to resolve concerns (safety related or otherwise) which have been identified by the NRC or CPC. This may include analyses, studies and/or plant mcdifications.

This program was developed to assess, coordinate and schedule all necessary work at the Big Rock Point Plant, including those mandated or proposed by the NRC, or identified by CPC- and others. The program objectives are to (1) satisfy regulatory requirements; (2) provide sufficient lead times for modifications; (3) minimize changes for operators; (4) effectively manage financial and human resources; and (5) specify the framevork for changes to developed tasui resolutions and associated schedules. Th!s will be accomplished within the overall objective of plant safety and availability.

This program reflects the recognition by CPC and the NRC that fiscal and i manpower resources are finite and that c limit on the onsite manpower is I necessary. The program integrates a significant portion of presently planned work.at the Big Rock Point Plant over a nominal three-year period to ensure that individual issues are properly assessed and that the tasks associated with issue resolution are effectively scheduled and coordinated. It provides a means for new requirements to be accommo-dated taking into account schedule and resource constraints, as well as the importance of implementing a new requirement. The purpose of this document is to describe the plan used to implement the program. It describes how the program functions, mechanisms for changies the program and updating it, the interactions and responsibilities of the NRC and licensee staffs under the program, and its resultant assessments and I schedules. I II.

SUMMARY

OF PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT t The progrks is based on a list of issues, their associated resolutions and completion dates, each of which is assigned a priority resulting from an established assessment method. Assessments are performed by the Big Rock Point Plant Technical Review Group (TRG), and the assessment method involves ranking each issue or issue resolution based on its importance relative to safe shutdown, radiological release potential, s

3

- , - - - , , , , , . . - ,-- s--,,-e. < - , - - - - - --,. --.n.. . , ~ - - - ,-

o 2 of 6 personnel safety, and plant availability. The scheduling of issue resolutions takes into account projectio,ns for budgets and site manpower and engineering support requirements for three years, on an item-by-item basis covering all significant plane modification activities. The list represents that significant portion af the Big Rock Point Plant work list and commitment list which is regularly modified and updated to meet changing conditions, including new NRC regulatory requirements. The final product of this program is the assessment of issues or issue resolutions and the development of associated schedules as discussed below. ,

III. ASSESSMENT AND SCHEDULING A first step in the development of this program involved a listing of significant open issues and their associated resolutions. In cases where a resolution to a particular open issue was not yet identified, the issue itself was retained in the li_st: Upon completion of the work j' listing, CPC determined that an assessment of issues or issue resolu-tions was required to determine theii;4ppropriate ranking. Upon TRG completion of the issue assessment and ranking (using, in some cases, the results of probabilistic risk asseWssent studies), the tasks asso-ciated with each issue resolucion.were scheduled based on thef t assigned ranking and available resources. The issues or issue resolutions were organized into Issue Groups A and B based upon the origin of the issue and its ranking. Completion schedules and, periodic status reports identify critical project tasks, target' completion dates, progress and problem areas which enable management to' develop contingency and/or schedule recovery plans. Both Issue Groups are,briefly described below:

Issue Group A - All issues which have resoldeions and/or issue resolution implementati8n' dates mandated by NRC rules, ord,ers or~ license conditions.

Issue Group B - Issues (of either a generic or plant specific nature) identified by the NRC or CPC shich have resolutions and/or completio'n dates committed to by CPC, and which would result in,either a) plant modifications, b) procedure revisions, or c) changes in facility staffing requirements.

Issue resolutions and/or implementation dates i$' Issue Group A may be modified or 'eleted d only with prior approval of_the NRC, in accordance with existing NRC regulations. Changes,to_the ision resolution and/or completion dstes in Issue ~ Group B require notification to the NRC as described in Section V. , Issue Groups A and B[ taEen together, provide a basis for assessing the ovsrall effects of changes to issue resolutions and/or schedules, and a' departure point for discussion between the NRC and the licensee regarding such changes, as discussed below.

,JB ge'

• 3 of 6 IV. ISSUE RESOLUTION AND SCHEDULE MODIFICATIONS An important aspect of CPC's planning effort is the recognition that the issues, issue resolutions, and scheduled completion dates will need to be modified or deleted at times to reflect changes in regulatory requirements, to accommodate those activities that CPC finds necessary to improve plant efficiency and reliability, to incorporate the results of investigations into issues, and to take into account delays resulting from events beyond CPC's control. The procedure used by CPC for chang-ing or deleting issues, issue resolutions, or scheduled completion dates will be developed andgincluded in a separate volume of the Big Rock Point Plant Manuals.

V. CPC AND NRC RESPONSIBILITIES The proper functioning of the Integrated Plan requires that CPC apply consistent criteria to the assessment of issues, monitor the progress of all work undertaken, manage its activities to maintain the schedule, and act promptly to take necessary actions when an issue resolution or schedule change is needed. As set forth herein the NRC will treat all Integrated Plan issues consistently and recognize that, when necessary, ranking, issue resolutions, and/or scheduled completion date changes are based on a comparison of the issue being changed to all the Integrated Plan issues, and also account for resource constraints.

A. PERIODIC UPDATING CPC will update Issue Groups A and B semi-annually and submit the revised Integrated Plan to the NRC, beginning six months following NRC approval of this plan. The revised Integrated Plan will include ,

the following: I

• Summarize pregress in completing or implementing issue resolutions.

• Identify changes since last update report. l

• Summarize the reasons for issue resolution and/or schedule changes associated with regulatory requirements.

B. CHANGES TO ISSUE RESOLUTIONS AND/OR SCHEDULES Changes to the Integrated Plan may arise from a variety of reasons, such as new issues identified; modifications to the scope of scheduled work; unplanned outages; results of investigations into an 1 The listing of issues in Issue Groups A and B will contain sufficient detail to identify those issues with tasks and/or completion dates keyed to refueling outages. In such cases, a change in outage period (ie, initiation or duration) shall not be considered a schedule change.

s .

. 4 of 6 t

issue (eg, PRA findings); problems in delfvary, procurement, etc; changes in NRC rules and regulations; or other NRC or CPC actions.

Where it is necessary to add a new issue or to change the schedule for an issue, the following general guidance will be utilized to the extent appropriate: s

• Assessthepriorityofr!.eissuerelativetoallexksing Integrated Plan issue resolutions.

• Schedule the new or changed issue resolution to avoid rescheduling other issues, if it can be reasonably achieved.

• Alter Issue Group B items before Issue Group A items.

• Select a schedule for the new or changed issue resolution which will help in maintaining an optimum integrated program of work.

Addition of activities to Issue Group A requires CPC to propose appfopriate issue resolutions and/or completion dates and requires NRC approval of such proposals. Changes to previously established l Issue Group A resolutions and/or resolution implementation dates will be proposed only after CPC has determined that changing Issue Group B issues will not significantly assist in maintaining Issue Group A without change; or that safety, resource or schedule penal-ties from rescheduling Issue Group B activities significantly outweigh the consequences of.a change in an Issue Group A completion date. As with proposals to add Issue Group A activities, proposals co change previously existing Issue Group A activittos also requires NRC approval.

CPC will inform the NRC Prcject Manager when serious consideration is given to requesting a change in Issue Group A. When CPC deter-eines that a change in lasue Group A is necessary.iit will submit a written request for NRC approval in accordance with applicable regulations.

Issue resolutions in Issue Group B may be modified, deleted or rescheduled, or new issues may be added to Issue Group B by CPC

- without NRC approval; however, CPC will inform the NRC Project

' Manager once a change, deletion, or addition is necessary.

CPC will provide the NRC with written notification of changes or deletions of Issue Group B issue resoluticris or completion dates associated with NRC initiated issues'at least 30 days ,

prior to Plan-scheduled completion date. Such notification will also include _ the reasons for Jthe change and describe any compensa-tory actions' which CPC determines to be appropriate.

, +a The change, addition or deletion in Issue Group B will go into effect upon evaluation by the TRG, unless the NRC, in writing, requests further explanation or discussion. NRC requests will be made within 15 days of receipt of CPC written notification. In this k

e k

s 5 of 6 event, discussions will be initicted to promptly develop an issue resolution and/or schedule which is mutually acceptable to CPC and the NRC Project Manager while considering overall program impact.

The written notification.by the NRC will serve to extend the schedule date for the period of time required for such discussion.

If a revised issue resolution and/or schedule is established in these discussions, such issue resolution-and/or schedule will super-sede the. issue resolution and/or schedule set forth in Issue Group B. The revised issue resolution and/or schedule will be in--

corporated in a revised Issue Group B in the next update submitted to the NRC. If a revised issue resolution and/or schedule cannot be established in these discussions CPC changes'to issue resolutions and/or schedule dates will be effective unless subsequently modified by NRC Order.

In the event of unplanned delays, delays which become manifest within 30 days ot the Plan-scheduled completion date or in the event of circumstances beyond CPC's control, CPC shall provide timely notification to the NRC Project Manager of the revised issue resolu-tion and/or schedule date and incorporate it in a revised Issue Group B in the next update submitted to the NRC, VI. NRC REVIEW As pointed out in Section V.B above, changes to the issues and/or schedules are inevitable. Action required by the NRC is discussed below:

A. CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY ORIGINATED CHANGES

1. Upon receipt fron CPC of a request for modification of Isste Group A, the NRC will act promptly (consistent with resource availability and priority of other work) to consider and decide on the request in accordance with applicable procedures.

2. If the request for a modification of Issue Group A is denied.

NRC shall promptly inform CPC and provide the reasons for denial.

3. NRC consideration of CPC changes to non-Issue Group A issues and/or schedules is covered by Section V.B.

B. NRC ORIGINATED CHANGES (ISSUE GROUP A)

It is recognized that formal NRC regulatory actions (ie, NRC rules, orders, or license conditions) may: (1) impose a new regulatory )

requirement with a fixed date, or (2) establish a fira date for a l previously identified regulatory requirement. In taking any such action, the NRC, to the extent consistent with its overall regula-tory responsibilities and, unless public health, safety, or interest require otherwise, will take into account the impact of such ' action on CPC's ability to complete effectively the issues in Issue

. 6 of 6 i.

. Groups A and B, and, in consultation with CPC, will'try to minimize i such impact. - Although any formal regulatory action (ie, regulatory rule, order, or license condition) taken by the NRC will be effec-tive in accordance with its terms without inclusion in Issue

Group A, the NRC and CPC recognize the desirability of incorporating l such action into Issue Group A, particularly in order to incorporate at the same tima any other appropriate changes in the total inte-grated assessment program. Accordingly, once such formal regulatory action is taken (or earlier, if practicable), the NRC will provide CPC a reasonable opportunity to propose overall changes in the total integrated assessment program which would most effectively accom-modate such requirements. Any resulting changes in issues in Issue Group' A will be (1) reviewed by the NRC, taking in account the

overall objective of the Integrated Assessment Program to use available resources effectively, and (2) approved by the NRC in

> accordance with established procedures, and will thereupon be reflected in a revised Issue Group A submitted by CPC. CPC will

, inform the NRC of any resulting changes in Issue Group B in accord-i ance with Section V above.

i C. NEW NRC ISSUES (ISSUE GROUP B)

The NRC may, from time to time, identify new regulatory issues which may result in (a) plant modifications, (b) procedure revision or development, or (c) ' changes in facility staffing requirements. With l respect to issues which the NRC requests (1) scheduling information 1 or (2) responses by a certain date, these issues may be included in Issue Group B in accordance with the issue resolution priority 4

resulting from the TRG assessment. Issue resolutions and/or date ccamitments resulting from TRG evaluation will form the basis for j discussions between the NRC and CPC. As for the case of NRC-originated changes to Issue Group'A issues,'the NRC uill provide CPC a reasonable opportunity to propose overall changes in the' total integrated plan program which would most effectively accommodate such issues. Any resulting changes in the integrated plan program will thereupon be reflected in a revised Issue Group B submitted by CPC.

VII. MODIFICATION TO THE PLAN The licensee and the NRC recognize that the Plan itself may require

future modifications. Accordingly, all Plan revisions will be submitted for prior NRC approval in accordance.with existing NRC regulations. The

revisions will be made effective upon amendment issuance by the NRC.

I a

I i

l t

i 9 I ATTACHMENT 2 Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point Plant Docket 50-155 Listing of Issue Groups A and B February 12, 1986

.A e - 3 6 -

e 4

4 4

f

+

I I

4 ISSUE GROUP A i

L i

e f

f 1

1 h

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN i

e

} TITLE

• RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECH SPECS ISSUE NUMBER

• 838 -

SCORE: I j COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY SIJAN86.

I l DESCRIPTIOM:

i ISSUE: THE LICENSEE'S CURRENT PROPOSALS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE STAFF AND FRAMRLIN RESEARCH CENTER.

THE CONTRACTOR HAS IDENTIFIED ALL VARIANCES FROM5TAFF GUIDALCE. A MEETING HAS BEEN SET BETWEEN THE HRC STAFF. THE PLANT AND GENERAL OFFICE TO TRY TO RESOLVE THE VARIANCE.(8/24/84 MTG.)

STATUS: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE REQUEST SUBMITTED ON JANUARY 7, 1985 NRC APPROVAL REQUIRED.

s RESOLUTION: IMPLEMENT RET 5.

i i

REFERENCES:

1 i GENERIC LETTER PUREg IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC

! 0828, MAY 84 5.3.27 3472 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FEB8% 07 JAN 85 .

i 135EP84 .

l 13NOV78 .

3IJUL81 .

INTERNAL _ MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 DJV 32-I11 AIR A-ML-84-62 3 LLC 84-48 i

.c _ _. . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . _

I SIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN l; TITLE: FMSR UPDATE STUDY ISSUE NUMBER: 8355 SCOREt 5 1

COtmITNEMIS IMPLEMENT INDEXING SYSTD4 AS SUBSTITUTE FOR FHSR UPDATE BY AUGUST 27, 1986.

DESCRIPTION:

155UEt 19CFR50.71(E) l RE90!RES THAT POWER REACTORS MAINTAIN AN UPDATED FHSRs THE PURPOSE OF WHICH IS TO PROVIDE A CURRENT DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANT DESIGN FOR USE BY THE NRC STAFF AND THE PUBLIC.

STATUS

DETAILS OF CROSS REFERENCING SYSTEM WERE SUBMITTED ON OCTOBER 31, 198h; NRC PRESENTLY REVIEWING PROGRAM.

I 1

j RESOLUTION:

i TRG HAS ELECTED TO DESIGN. IMPLEMENT AME EVALUATE A COMPUTERIZED METHOD OF INDEXING EXISTING I DOCUMENTS TO PROVIDE A WORRABLE SUBSTITUTE FOR ASINGLE CDMPREHENSIVE REPORT.

1 l

i l

REFERENCES:

fENggitLETTER HURES IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 1 SCFR59.71E 0828. MAY 84 5.3.25.1

$PCS. LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED

! 02FE88* 31 OCT 84 .

! 02MAY84 .

i 81JUH83 .

4 i WNT gNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 VJn 31-83 DPH 84-05 DEC 44-02 VJM 93-84 i

~

i l

l

} BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN

?

1

~

TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL SUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (EE9)

ISSUE NUMB 11: 836 .

SCORE

14 COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO COMPLEsE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 3IMAR85.

DESCRIPTIOMs

} ISSUE:

ASSURE THAT ADE9UATELY ALL SAFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SUBJECTED TO A HARSH ENVIRONMENT IS MAINTAINED.

I RESOLUTION:

1. FAILURE' MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) WASPERFORMED TO ADDRESS SUAL E4UIPMENT WHOSE SAFETY FUNCTION IS PERFORMED BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT BECOMES HARSH. AGING QUALIFICATION IS NOT RE9UIRED FOR E9UIPMENT WHICH SUCCESSFULLY PASSES THE FMEA SINCE 5AFETY 1- FUNCTIGHS ARE PERFORMED BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT BECOMES HARSH AND THE EFFECTS OF FAILURE AFTER f THE ENVIRONMENT BECOMES HARSH ARE SHOWN TO BE ACCEPTABLE.

! 2. COMPLETE AND AUDITABLE FLUES WILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR FULLY SUALIFIED EQUIPMENT.

! 3. A LISTSUALIFICATIDM TIONAL OF UN9UALIFIED E9UIPMENT WILL BE ESTABLISHED WHICH WILL REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OR ADDI-EFFORT.

1

4. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN WILL BE ESTABLISHED FOR E9UIPMENT NOT GUALIFIED.

ANALYSIS OR WHOLE5 ALE REPLACEMENT OF E9UIPMENT.

i REGARDING 5AFETY RELATED ELECTRICAL E9UIPMENT THAT WAS MODIFIED DURING THE RECENT 1985 REFUELING ,

OUTAGE, CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY SUBMITTED MEM SYSTEM COMPONENT EVALUATION WORK 5HEETS (SCEW),

APPLICABLE TO THIS E9UIPMENT, ON DECEMBER 15, 1983.

i j THIS PROGRAM DESCRIBED ABOVE MEETS THE INTENT OFIOCFR58.49 AND SUPERCEDES ALL PREVIOUS EE4 COMMITMENTS.

i 5. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR CONTINUED OPERATION (JCO) FOR E9UIPMENT WHICH IS NOT FULLY SUALI-FIED AS AN INTERIM MEASURE UMTIL THE E9UIPMENT IS FULLY 90ALIFIED.

l

6. AN EXEMPTION RE90EST WILL BE MADE TO EXTEND EE4 COMPLETION DATE FROM 3/31/85 TO 11/85 FOR

$ SPECIFIC ESUIPMENT.

l 7. MAINTENANCE AND FACILITY CHANGE ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE EE9 PROGRAM WILL BE ESTABLI5HED.

8. A LIST OF PM ACTIVITIES WILL BE ESTABLISHED.

I l - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _

ISSUE NUMBER 036 RIO ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN STATUS: FOLLOWING RESOLUTION; EXPECT EXTENSION REQUEST TO BE SUBMITTED IN FEBRUARY 1985.

REFERENCE 12, GENERIC LETTER HUREg IPSAR SECTION }EP TOPIC l 8h-2h 0828. MAY 84 5.3.4 CPCD. LETTERS TO HRC DATEQ NR -LETTERS TO CPCO DATED ofTun8s 18 JUL 84 08AUG84 27 DEC 84 e2FEB84 27 AUG 8h 92SEP83 390Cr83 19 MAR 83 15DEC83 31 OCT 8h 26 MAR 84 l 29eJUN84 07 JAN 85 18SEP84

-21 2 -H RWB 14-83 FEDERAL REGISTER VOL 49. NO 146 RAT 11-83 JFC 08-84 .

JLK 84-95 '

JLK 84-95 DJV 84-99 JDW 12-84 JDW 98-84

1 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: ALTEltNATE SNUTDOWN SYSTEM ISSUE NUMBER

• 075A SCORE: 23 i

COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWEst NAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:

l ISSUE: 19CFR59, APPENDIX R. REQUIRES SAFE SHUTDOWN CAPABILITY IN THE EVENT OF FIRE.

STATUS: COMPLETION BY COMMI'INEfC DATE.

RESOLUTIDH*

THE TRG MAS DECIDED TO INSTALL AN ALTERNATE SNUTDOWN PANEL IN A SEISMIC / FLOOD PROOF BUILDING.

PROCEDURES PERFORMED. WILL BE WRITTEN AND TRAINING ON THE PROCEDURES AND ON THE SHUTDOWN SYSTEM WILL BE I

REFERENCES:

GENERIC LETTER HUREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 3 8828. MAY 84 5.3.2.1 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FEB44 08 MAR 33 i 02 MAYS 4 .

21: JAN 85 i

i 4

I l

.l 1

SIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN s

TITLE: ASSOCIATED CIRCUITS ISSUE NUMBER: 975C ,

SCORE: 8 i COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY

) THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: IOCFRSS, APPENDIX R. REGUIRES THAT SAFE SNUTDOWNE9UIPMENT BE ISOLATED FROM ASSOCIATED CIRCUITS

! SUCH THAT NOT SHORTS, SHORTS TO GROUND, OR OPEN CIRCUITS WILL NOT PREVENT OPERATION OF THE SAFE SHUTDOWN Equ!PMENT.  !

STATUS: COMPLETE BY COMMITMENT DATE.

i

.l I

RESOLUTISH: 1. THE TRS NAS ELECTES TO: DEVELOP PROCEDURES FOR NUMEROUS VALVES AND ONE PUMP TO DETERMINE IF MALOPERATION MAS OCCURRED DUE 10 THE FIRE. THEY WOULD THEN ADDRESS THE REPAIR OF THE E9UIPMENT IE, MAINLY DISCONNECTING CIRCUITRY ANO OPERATINCVALVES MANUALLY.

I j

2. REROUTE ONE WIRE (THE CLOSE COIL b1RE) FROM EACH OF THE TWO CIRCUITS WITN THE REST OF THE ALTERNATE SMUTDOWN CIRCUITS FROM THE CONTROL ROOM TO THE EMERGFNCY CONDENSER DECK. THIS PREVENTS j THE POSSIBLITY OF SHORTS CLOSING THE VALVES FOR FIRES IN THE ELECTRICAL E9UIPMENT ROOM, PENETRA-TION AREAS, ETC.

REFERFNCES:

SENERIC LETTER gyREG IPSAR SECTION SEP TCPIC 08/8, MAY 84 S.3.14.1

, CPCS LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED

, 92FES$4 .

02 MAYS 4 .

I 0

_ a v >.+ -t. 6- _.~~ _ us.-s _ L. > 1 y ., _s _

9 6

o O

' s 4

e 9

i l

r

/

5 N

A 1

t i

{

s t

I t

I l

ISSUE GROUP B 1

1 I

h 4

4 i

I

• 6 a

n f.

1 1__.________.____.____._

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTROL ROOM DESIGM REVIEW 117tVE MUMBER: 905 SCORE: II C0rmITMENT CONSUMERS POWER MAS CormiTTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE. AS DESCRIBED BELOW. BY 38JU DESCRIPTIOM:

ISSUE:

i POR110MS OF SUPPLEMENT I TO MUREG-8737 COMCfRM THE FEVIEW OF THE ADEGUACY OF THE CONTRet ROOM DESIGN AND OF THE EMERCENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES. THE REVIEW WILL ATTEMPT TO -DEMONSTRATE WHETHER AN EFFECTIVE DURING ACCIDENT MAN-M4 CHINE INTERTACE WILL EXIST IN THE BIG ROCK POINT CONTROL ROOM CONDITIOM*..

STATUS:

DUE IV MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH ELLCTRICAL EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION AND DELAYS IN COMPLETION OF SYMITCH ACTION SET 3 AND ADDING ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES TO RE-LABEL DEF.ARCATE AND REMIMIC AS NECESSARY THE PROJECT COMPLETION M/S SLIPPED AND PRESENTLY COMPLETION IS TARGETED FOR O N FER 31, 1985 RESetUTION:

CONSUMERS ROCK POWER IS CoretITTED TO PERFORMING A DETAILED CONTROL R00F1 DESIGN REVIEW AT THE BIG FO!kT PLANT.

REFERENCES

• GEMEPIC_ LETTER LeVREg IPSAR SECTIOM SEP TOPIC 0828. MAY 84 5.3.2.3 8700 9737 I.D.I

$PCS LETTERS TO NRC BATED _MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 12FER84 19APR83 194UG84 02SEP83 11 NOV Sh SIJUllE3 . 22 JAN 85 INTERNAL MEMOS 9_TM R RELEVANT REVERENCES l A-ML-83-896 l

BIG ROCE POINT IMIEGRATED PLAN TIItJ1 SAFETY PARAMETER DISPLAY SYSTEM ISSUE. NUMBER: 896 .

SCORE: .

COMMITMENT NIHIE AT THIS TIME.

I DESCRIPTIOM ISSUE 8 INSTALL A SPOS TO COMPLDfEMI NEW ESP'S OR JUSTIFY CURRENT CONTROL ROOM DISPLAY.

STATUS: THE NEED FOR SPDS WILL BE DETERMINED DURING THE CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW.

RESOLUTISMt JUSTIFY CURRENT CONTROL ROOM DISPLAY.

i i

REFERENCE $s I

GENERIC LETTER 18Ulftf IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0737 (I.D.2) 9828. MAY 84 S.4.12 l - CPCS LETTERS TO WRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCS DATED ~

I4AUCS4 .

22 JAN 85 i

SIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: Ih5T ALL ATION OF TELLT ALES ON SHUTDOWN HFAT EXCHANGER ISSUE NUMBER

• 889A SCORE: 4 COMMITMENT

• CONSUMERS POWER MAS CorWIITFEB TO COMPLETE THE WORR ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW. 3Y THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:

l ISSUE: REACTOR COOLING MATER RELIEF VALVE FAILURE RESULTS IN UNIDENTIFIED LEARAGE.

l TIME SPENT bY THE OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT PUR5dINGTHE SOURCE OF LEAKAGE MAY BE BETTER SPENT IN

! FIXING THE LEAK.

STATUS: ON SCHEDULE l

l l RESOLUTIOMr AS A RESULT OF THE REACTOR COOLING MATER PRESSURE STUEY, THE TRS NAS CECIDED TO INSTALL TELLTALE ON DISCHARGE LINE Or REACTOR COOLING MATER RELIEF VALVES 10 EMABLE DETERMINATION OF SPECIFIC l RELIEF VALVE LEAKAGE.

REFERENCE 5t GENERIC LETTER NURgg IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 8828, MAY 84 5.2.2.2 CPCS LETTERS TO MRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCS DATED 97MOVS3 .

02FERS4 .

14AUG84 .

L4LEtN_AL MEMOS T DT_HER_RELEVA4LREVERENCE1 RJA r.3-15 PRC MEETING MIMUIES 15-81 THROUGN 8-83 WJT 32-94

~

MJT 83-31 GLF 43-46

i t *

BIG ROCR POINT INTEGRATED PLAN t

i

=

TITLE RWCRER SYSTEM I

ISSWE NUMBER 8 811 .

1 .

1 SCORE 21 i l

l CerW91TMENT: CONSUPERS P9MER NAS C919tITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS BESCRIBES BELON, BY 3IJANSS.

SESCRIPTION*

• i i ISSWE TNE TRUSINE BYPASS VALVE ELECTRONYDRAWLIC CONTROL (EHC) SYSTEM IS INIRELTABLE. SCCASIGNALLY THE i

i VALVE FAILS TO SPERATE PROPERLY DURING START-UP (TNE VALVE CYCLES SPEN AND CLOSED). AND DURIIBG

• POMER OPERATION (TNE VALVE FAISL TO OPEN OR INABvERIENTLY SPENS). FAILURE OF THE VALVE TG OPEN t

! BURING SPERATION RESULTS IN A LOSS OF THE FULL-POWER MAIN NEAT SINR FOR THE PRIMARY COOLANT SYSTEM A MAY RESULT IN A NEEBLESS PLANT TRIP.

1 STATUS: SCHEDULE DELAY DUE '!O MANPOWER NEFDG OF THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION- PROJECT REVISED SCHEDULE DUE OCTOBER 1,1985 -

a ,

RESetWTISIls TWE TRS NAS ELECTED TO CONOWCT A STW9Y TO IDENTIFY THE FRE95ENCY AND TYPE OF MALFUNCTION. THE STW9Y IS INTENDED TO AID IN T10E DETERMINATION OF+0SSICM SPECIFIC PSRTION OF TNE ENC SYSTEM IS MALFUNCTISHING.

i REFERENCES

• 1 i SENERIC LETTER g ECTION SEP YOPIC i

CPCS LETTERS TS IIRC BATED NRC LETTERS.TO CPC9 BATES 92FES8* 31 .IAN 85 . '

I44eG84 25 FEB 85 .

j INTERNAL PEMes 91HER RELEVAllf_ REVERENCES a LER A4-Is PROJECT 424 LER R4-IZ 1

i 1

1

i i._ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ __ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE SEISMIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS IS5UE NUMBER: e14 .

SCORE: IS M ITMEMT* CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO CUMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE. AS DESCRIBED BELOW. BY 31MAY85.

DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: THE MRC MAS REGUIRED SEISMIC REREVIEW OF BIG ROCK POINT DESIGN AND UPGRADES Det DACEFITS WNERE APPROPRIATE.

GTATUS- COMPLETION IS FXPECTED BY COMMITMENT DATE RESOLUTION: W5ING A COMBINATION OF DETERMINISTIC ANALYSIS AND PWA LOSIC MBDELS. IDENTIFY SEISMIC " WEAK-LINES IN BIS ROCK POINT DESIGN. A5 A FIRST STEP. THE FSLLOWING SHOU 0i BE PtRFORMED A! IDENTIFIED IN CONSUMERS POWER'S LETTER TO NRC DATED JUNE I. 1983.

~

I. TO ENSURE AN ATWS IS UNLIKELY. EVALUATION IDENTIFYING TWE WEAR LINP.5 ON THE REACTOR INTERNALS I5 RE4UIRED 8 AN EVALUATION ENSURING THAT THE CROM DISCHARGE PIPINC DOES NOT CRIMP IS NECESSARY

2. COMPLETE THE CABLE TRAY EVALUATIONS BEING PERFORMED B7 THE SEISMIC SUALIFICATION OMMERS GROUP AND ASCERTAIN bMETHER SEISMIC DEPENDENCIES EXISTRETWEEN POWER SUPPLIES AND ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS IN THE ROUTING OF CABLE TRAYS AND CONDUIT. '

3. INSPECT VALVES M07059. M07053. 8 M07063 TO ENSURE THAT TME VALVE OPERATCts WILL Wei IMPACT SURROUNOINS STRUCTURES IF MOTION SCCURS DURING AN EARTHtUAKE.

4. EVALUATE OR RESTRAIN THE MOTION OF M07970. MO7951. 8 MS7961 TO ENSURE TME MOT 9R5 DO NOT IMPACT SURROUNOING STRUCTURES IF MOTION OCCURS DURING AN EARCNGUARE.

5. PLACE A MECMANICAL BLOCK ON THE CLEAN-UP DEMINERALIZER M015T TD ENSURE IT CANh0T TRAVEL OVER i a THE ENCLOSURE SPRAY VALVES.

6. CREATE A REPORT DOCUMENTING THE ABOVE WORK AND MAKING RECOPMENDATIONS REGARDING FURTMER SEISMIC UPGRADING.

REFERENCES

{

CENERIC LETTER LtURCG IP_54R SECTION 3EP TOPIC 8828. MAY 84 4.I2 111-6 CPCS LETTERS TO NRC DATF.I) NRC LETTERS.TO CPCO_ DATED 02 FEB 8!s 01 JUN 83

. _. ._ _ ___ __ . . _ ._ _ _..____ __m__ - . _ __ _ __. .__ ..._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN

~

TITLE

• SECONDARY SYSTEM INST 4BILITIES i

ISSUE NUM9ER: 816 SCORE: 19 COFMITMENT: COMSUMERS POWER NAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON TMIS ISSUE. AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE EMS OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE

) DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE

{ PRIMARY COOLANT SYSTEM (PCS) MAKEUP MUST BE ASSURED FOLLOWING LOAD REJECTION. FOLLOWING A 1

LOAD REJECTION, TME PCS WILL BLOW DOWN THROUGM THE TURBINE BYPASS VALVE TO THE CONDENSER j MOT WELL. A5 A RESULT. THE NOT WELL LEVELS SWELLCAUSING A SIGNAL TO OPEN THE REJECT VALVE OPENS. A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE CONDENSATE PUMP OISCHARGE IS DIVERTED FROM THE SUCTION OF TME REACTOR FEED PUMPS TO THE CONDENSATE STORAGETANR. TME LOSS OF FEED PUMP SUCTION REOULTS IN A FEED PUMP TRIP AND THUS TME LOSS OF PCS MAKE'JP DURING TME SLOWDOWN CONDITION. A LOSS OF PCS INVENTORY COULD RESULT IN LOW PRIMARY SYSTEft4ATER LEVEL TMAT SUB5EtUENTLY RESULT 5 IN AUTOMATIC DEMANDS ON ENGINEERED SAFETY SYSTEMS.

i RESOLUTION:

MCDIFY A LOSS OF TME EXISTING PRIMARY REJECT SYSTEM VALVE CONTROL CIRCUITRY SS THAT VALVE OPENING DOES NOT RESULT IN MAKEUP.

STATUS: PROJECT DELAY DUE TO MANPOWER REQUIr1EMENTS OF FIRE PROTECTICN MODIFICATIONS. NEW COMPLETION

, DATE IS EXPECTED 10 BE END OF 1986 REFUELING OtfrAGE.

i REFERENCES

• GENERIC LETTER IMPRES IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828. MAY S4 S.3.3.2 CPCS LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCS DATED 02 FESS 4 .

l I440G84 .

9IJUNS3 .

4

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN i

TITLE: PCS ISOLATIOM - PC SYSTEM ISSUE NUM9ER: 817 ,

SCORE: 13 COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER NAS COPW9ITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTIDM:

ISSUE: PROSABILISTIC RISE ASSESSMENT (FRA) MAS SHOWN TMAT A LDSS 9F REACTOR COOLANT THROUGN THE PRI-MARY COOLANT SYSTEM (PCS) DRAIN AND VENT LINES HAS A PROBABILITY OF 2 X 18-3 PER YEAR. CORE DAMAGE PROSABILITY OF SUCN AM EVENT IS 7 X 18-5 PER YEAR.

STATUS: MODIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AND MODIFICATION PACKAGES PREPARED; COMPLETION BY COMMI'INENT DATE IS tatimw.

s RESOLUTIDM TME TRS ELECTED 19 REVIEW PCS P8 IDS TS DETERMINETNE LOCATION OF LINES WITH SINGLE ISCLATION i AND TO ADO AN ADDITIONAL ISOLAT*.ON DEVICE.

REFERENCES:

GENERIC. LETTER !NREE lE1AR SECTION SEP TOPIC 8828. MAY S4 S.3.18

- CPCS LETTERS TO NRC BATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATES 02fEBS4 .

I%AUG84 -

INTERWAL MEMe5 RINEW RELEVANY REVERENCES fC-575 j

s ,=- e-_g:m.

3- 0

.e=

= art -

x

v. u -

s s

E!t : <1 g .

ese!

san.

I n-: -s35,=s.a

. ..e n- n.e ,n.- .

5:mi se: 5 e-s-Iat-g  !

ss- g  ::e.  ;

- -e , gu

=

r.s= -e a! E=*=.= e cua: v:: a...- t

~t.c

.r. l --

.e x a- -

s-

= -- *s8 .ece. . .

-exe s- E== e--  :::e:=  : -  !

5 s= = E i

• c 1=ers.E

! .e : e

!=.e,!

. i

= e e e  !

e a Iglrusa e s-n.s-t - -_

le=- .  :. g I._gI gge.-=lg[.

3 e - . gm i g

e

n. c e

=~: 3:

. 3 -

.e m , :: g l_rogle-v

. n e e-m s

.e-l w -

d ga.. z=e m; ma 1. r!. s r 33 - ,e-s%sr .

i e ts ,5 g  :--:gt

-![a,_I: .

.2 r

=

o s.:e-e i.t..,gss:-s te

= :s.1 i: . n--

-  : -rg n-s ss.!ar.ws: a- .

gm . .B

- E 5gly.s,~:5 8 _

_.:ss e

" : r_e. win E

=rg. 3 m n_ger e.:

en:,::1E5

.s E':-

1 g

.  :-r= gh' -

e

. tar

=e- a m.

a e

.r- s.u::sis --

a sn, s n.mns_,:e e I n.ne e - -

X g

. c

.r-egah !1.rt.

=s n . .

. ImeEs ns na E!ressrEe- t sA-e '

s  : -

g 5:. . i .,

r- _ 5: M. -

5E "

5" E b2 iSh h

51: lE_ i_ i l l$

4 Il3

= x 1

l

• l l

l SIC ROCK POINT INTECRATED PLAN

' ~

TITLE: ORGANIC MATERI4L' (WALL COATINGS)

ISSWE NUMBER: s22A

~

SCDRE: 13 C98R91TMENT: NOME AT TNIS TIME RE1CRIPT198I:

ISSUE:

IN ACCSRSAMCE WITN 10CFR5t(GDCI) AND APPENDIX 3. LICENSEES SHOULD ENSPRE THAT PROTECTIVE CSATINGS INSIDE TNE COIITAISIMENT DO NOT CestSIST OF MATERIAL TNAT COULD CREATE A NAZApSJUS ENVIRONMENT OR CAUSE MATERI AL FAILU8tE BY BL9CR AGE OF SCREENS S SPRAY NOZZLES. THE I Min 5EE SHOULD DEMONSTRATE THAT COATINGS WSED ARE GUALIFIED FOR DBA CONDITIONS & WILL NOT CLOG ftECIRCULATION SCREENS. THE LICENSEE SHOULD ALSO NAVE A FORMAL PROGRAM F08t PERIODIC 18tSPECTION OF COATINGS INSIDE CONTAIMMNT STATUS: TEST RESULTS AND SURVEILIRICE FROCP1Jf VERE SUEMITTED JANUARY 18, 1985. REQUIRES NRC REVIEW.

RESOLWTION:

PLAGIT SAMPLES FJRM SURFACES INSIDE CONTAINNENT ARE BEIIIS TESTED Te DETERMINE IF TNEY WILL ADMERE Use9ER ACCIDENT CONSITIOel5. FUttTNER ACTION WILL BE DETERMINED AFTER TESTING IS COMPLETE.

l RErEwENcES:

GENERIC LETTER FJR1f IP.54R SECTION 1EP TOPIC sais, MAY 34 4.19.1 vg_g CPCS LETTERS T9 NRC DATED pRC LETTERS TO CPCS DATED 02Flas* 18 JAN 85 .

02 MAYS 4 l#.II MAL MEMBS RTMER RELEVANT REVEREIOCFJ 155ut Ie5 I

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE

• MING ANO TSRNASS LSAB A889 TetNADO MISS - SEP TOPIC III-2 AND III-4. A ISSWE Nr4Ett 325 -

SCSRES IS CSfWTITRENT* NONE AT TNIS TIME DESCRIPT1988:

ISSWE TNE NRC ISAS RE9 WIRES REVIEM OF TME EFFECTS OF MIGN MINDS AGIO TSRNADO LOADINGS AND UPGRADES OR BACKFITS kBGERE APPROFItI ATE.

STATUS- NBC REVIEVING ISSUE.

RESStWTIgets PGA GRAS WSES TW BETEERINE P998ASILISTIC IIIFSWMATION RESAR97WS NIGet MIN 95 8 TORNADOS. C9N5gMya3 PSMER MILL CONTIIeUE AIDIIIS TME IIRC IN EVALWATIssGA889 REVIEMIIOG TNI5 IleFDet1ATION. A RESPON5F raftM TIDE IIRC MAS EXPECTES IN MARCN 1984 RESOLUTIOet OF INIS ISSUE MAY BE AIDED sY INSTAttAtlGH OF TNE ALTERetATE 588WTDetel PAseEL IN A TSENADS-PROOF BUILDIltG k

, REFERENCES

• l l GEIBERIC LETTER IP3At SECTION 3EP TOPIC 1

82 . MAY S4 4.5 III-2 l 4.8 III-4.A

- CPCS LETTERS TS NRC BATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCS DATED synAYS3 Iinava+

93AGG42 990EC82

, 16 MARS 3 29N6442 l

. 179ECat T

INTEREIAL MEMOS RTNfR RELEVANT REVERENCES JEtet 92-83 A-BRP-83-28 sPs 83-e5 i

_ - -- , .~ _ _ _ . . - ... _ . . . _ _ . . . _ . .

O BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: DEFINITION OF SPERASILITY ISSUE IuYMSER: 831 ,

SCINtEt 3 MITMENT* CSM5UMERS P9ssut NA5 CS8WIITIES TO COMPLETE THE MORK ON THIS ISSUE AS DESCRISED BEL 5W. BY 3tJUNs4.

DESCRIPTI9eg; ISSUEt IP544 (NWWES 982S3 TABLE 5.7 LIST BIG ROCK PSINT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIttt5 MITHOtfi SPERASILITY RLtUltif*PMIS. TNF NRC 59CCESTS TNAT CONSUMERS POWER INCLUDE A DEFINITION OF OPERABILITY IN THE BIG ROCK P9 INT TEC98MICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIOI85 FOR OPERATION (LCO) FOR PAfLTIPLE TR AIts SYSIEns AND INCLUDE LCO'S Feet ITEMS LISTEBON IN TABLE 5.2.

STATIE: TECFNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE PEQUEST SUBMITTED NOVD(BER 1h,198h AND REVISION SUBMITTED JANUARY 17, 1985 NFC APPPOVAL REQUIRED.

l l

RESOLETION: A TEClutICAL SPECIFICATI9It CttAID8E 1945 PREPARES AlfG APPROTES SY TNE 5ARS. LC9'S ARE BEtteG DEFINES

. FOR EteGIteEEEER SAFEGUAWB SYSTEM 5 FDet WNICH LCS'5DO 900T EXIST Feet MULTIPLE TRAIN IIIOPERABILITY IN

~

l TNE EXISTIteG SPECIFICATIGOES.

j THE REVISED TECNetICAL SPECIFICATIOft 15 IIDCLUDED IN THIS SO9MITTAL.

REFEeEmCES:

SDIERIC LETTER LINEG IP5AR SECTIsot  ?EP TOPIC l 8828. MAY 84 5.3.24

, CPCS LETTEWS T9 Net DATES [8WC _ LETTERS TO CPCS DATED

- e2rEsas 11 noV oh IsarRae l

l

!E' 31 MAYS 3 17 JAN 85 i

leeTJttsAL tegmes gTNER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 of.o a+-ei

e _

O g" l 0 l

-W E-

!E We k i 5, E e$

e

" g-E S 5*

2 EW 5

a WW E 8* J. 2 "b gd g CW "3

=

5 W g~

.5 g 5

' g b i

" " gEW "

W E

: AW 8  :

5 5 WE g5 L s E  !!g". ..

u

- ;e

- =- gr r, y-n e

I nt

. W:

- W 4EE

~5 W 4 =

- E5 e .-

e e E: r ! e:

=

gm s gs

.g

x. .

-e .e a

g:  :

22

=rer i a,, a

!*S*J "wg g.

l 0" .32 S--

le*

"5 15!n$"8" 05-

- It S

-.-s a c:s!

• 5 -

I "O

I* 5::!*

$ E Is-e  :

EEEE W*

I a

• p m e 5:" - 4 t, Es=8 e

e g et I4!4 I3 $4J gg E. l=

• s

. E

[W -

E 2*:4 s e. ,..

E.nt.e l-

&w & l1 g

y p,

M g

e ,

= 55

• X l

U e

W w

t

_.--___.____________.__________________1_________00

4 g

rE

.I

• ~

~

y  !!- 5

_ mx a >

! 5* *

[.

t I. g e 2 - E E t

v Idlg gt- -

a dE-E

w

, :8:s y

-  ::e * ,

a t = "gg

- -a

.'. 5 .. E

• :* I 1 ,*I.E

• "J;

!  ! ==

= r_t:e a

- y g:-

a er ,;: .d =

• E*~ r;d

- 58E:

E::=

r E

IWtB t.

o

• n d,m' O

E

!SQ

= E3EE E.-.

m - b

E- -

W-;,I g $y 5 dWE!

g gg s-se h e s I . W 8 g.5**5..

E fj EdlIl

.s,8 c l e

- r p M I 4 -- g

• : I g,a g g [:?

!E E 2 i

l.i:i-cE4

. t>c n E

$~

l I

e SIG ROCE POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLEt EMERGEMCT SPERATING PROCEBL4tE OFCRADE ISSWE.N9MDER: 832 ,

SCSRE: 17 C9mITRENT: CSM5uMERS PSMER ISAS CSFWWITTED TO CSMPLETE TME We'MC ON TMIS ISSUE. AS DESCRIBED BEL 9W. SY 3INAYS6 DESCRIPTISM ISSWEt SECTISIE 5.3.2.2 SF IPSAR IleuREG 33783. TNE NRC RECSFW9EN95 TNAT CONSUMERS P9MER*

I. PREPARE PLANT-SPECIFIC PROCEDURES TNAI IN CEMERAL CONFORM TS EMERGENCY PROCE99RE SWIDELIIeES 5 IMPLEMENT TMESE PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED IN SUPPLEMENT I TB NUREG-8737 TRAN5MITTED BY GENERIC LETTER M9 82-33 MTED DECEMSER IT. 1982.

2. PREPARE SUPPLEMENTS TO TNE CUIDELINES TNAT C9VER CNAN9ES. NEW E9WIPMENT OR NEW KN9WLEDGE AND INCMPMATE INESE SUPPLEMENTS INTS PL ANT-SPECIFIC PROCEDURES.

STATLS: INTERIM MIIs>1um HAVE SLIITED DUE TO LACK OF MANPOVER AND SLIPPAGE IN COMPLETION OF STMPTOM ACTICN SETS. CCBGL*. TION BY COMMITMDiT DATE IS STILL Enwiw.

RE39tWTItest PLAetT-SPECIFIC TECentICAL SWIDELTIeES A TRAINIIIS PACKAGE. A IRITER'S SWIDE AND A VERIFICATI988 AND WALIMTISee PR9 GRAM MILL DE SetMITTED TO TME NRC.TME TECNIIICAL GUIDELINES Ate 9 IstITER'S GUIDE WILL SE WSES TB UPGRADE PLacef Ef9LRCENCY SPERATIe8C PROCEDURES. VERIFICATIOes & VALIDATISM PROGRAM WILL DE ACHIEVED BY: 13 AWSITIIIG TME UPCRADE PROCEDURES AGAINST TNE WRITER'S GUIDE AND PLANT-SPECIFIC TEC30eIICAL GUIDELIIBES Acet 23 CONDUCTING CONTROL RD089 MALK-T90ROUGM5 AND 31 TRAINING S TESTING TME SPER ATORS Set TNE PROCEDURES.

REFEBEMCESr GEWEMIC LETTER LBUREG IPSAR_SECTI988 SEP T9PIC 9737 I.C.I U. 3.3 l 9828. MAY 84 5.3.3.2 S2-33 8737. SUP I l .

I CPCS LETTERS 79 IstC DATED IIRC LETTERS TO CPCS DATED

! 9IJUset3 .

l 92 FESS 4 .

l l

! o

e S

O g

.H >

s 2 gi B

= m o E -

g g __ -

" 5 m o

% U g

g M -

Ei '"

t E

-l" :h

=

I

~

g w

I. 9E l 3 $

e I a. n l

e e

r2 se

-(~

g E

[ l {* . . -

E kE E

ed lo C x,e 5 E:~; 7 r _

~ 8 . .A$ S*L E I *tg~

g g;e ;m.sfm 24o ain es

. 9k ~ R o

" *$ w 15 " M W

i-[ g. e ,

g.e2

. I -

y t- g E

• t M g a f

j" b

.8 a 1 - a M

g == 2n g g

. 3, r I2[ f3l a y ;a I

sg g5 m

=~

. E

- C5 g .-.h

-o [ o I'

E l5 g i t E ile

!E g- -

E iIEEE E[. =EE l l e r- ==a 5

I X

• BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: PR0sattE MAXINUM FLOOD CONSIDERATIONS ISSSE NUMBER: 837 .

SCORE: a COMMITMENT: THIS ISSUE IS COUSIDERED RESOLVED PENDING ISSUANCE OF THE APPROVED PROCEDURE REVISIONS.

DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: FLOODING OF TME SCREENNOWSE OR TURBINE BUIDLING.RNOCKING SERVICE WATER PUMPS OUT OF ORDER, NECESSITATES TAEING CERTAIN ACTIONS TO ENSURE SAFE SNUTDOWN.

STATUS: PROCEDURES REVISED TO INCORPORATE OPERATOR ACTIONS FOR FLOODING OF EITHER SCREENHOUSE OR TURBINE BUILDING. SEE ISSUE 87 AISO.

RES9t9 TION: DEVELOP F1999 PROCES9RES.

REFERENCES:

GENERIC LETTER SWWgg IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC es2s. MAY 34 4.2.2 II-3.s II-3.B.I

> CPCS LETTERS T9 MRC 9ATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO BATED

. 260Cl42

. 22MARa2 INTEINSAL MEMOS 91N LRELEVANT REVERENCES eAe5 472-a4 ISSUE 87

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN

~

TITLE: VERIFICATION OF B585 VALVE DATA ISSUE MUM 8ER: 944

~

SCORE: 8 COPWIITMENT: MONE AT TMIS TIME DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: DURING PLANT DESIGN REVIEWS WHICH WERE CONDUCTEDAS A PART OF THE LICENSEE'S PRA. SOME B555 AIROPERATED VALVES WERE FOUND TO MAVE OPEMIMG AND CLO5ING PRES 5URE SETTINGS WHICM DIFFERED FROM INSTRUMENT DATA. THIS ISSUE CONSIST 5 OF GATHERING ACCURATE AND RELIABLE DATA OM EXISTING PLANT COMPONEMETS F0W GETTING THE BEST PERFORMANCE OUT OF THE VALVES AND MAINTAINING THEM EFFICIEMILY. SUFFICIENT TESTING IS DOME TO INSURE CDMPONENTS ASSOCI ATED WITH CORE CUGLING DR -'

CONTAIMMENT ISOLATIDM FUNCTION PROPERLY.

STATUS: FOILOWING RESOLITTION RESOLUTIDMS OSTAIM DATA AS VALVES ARE WORKED ON DUE TO ALARACONSIDERATIONS.

REFERENCES *.

GENERIC LETTER HERES IE}AR SECTION SEP TOPIC

, 0828, MAY 84 5.3.17 CPCO LETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FE584 .

02MAY84 .

02 NOV 8h INTERNAL MEMOS DTMER_ RELEVANT REVERENCES PROJECI 422

}

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: ECCS TEST TERMINAL BOX ISSUE NUMBER: 845 SCORE: O COMMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE:

18C EFFICIENCY CONCERN. PRESENTLY. TECNNICIAMS MUST OPEN PRESSURE SWITCNES TO ACTUATE CORE SPRAY INITIATION SIGNAL TO PERFORM TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TESTING.

STATUS: LOW RANKING, NO SCHEDULE DEVELOPED.

RESOLUTION:

MODIFY ECCS TEST TERMINAL BOX TO FACILITATE TESTING OF CORE SPRAY ACTUATION CIRCUITS.

REFERENCES.

H IERNAL MEMOS DLNilLErAEVANT REVERENCE 5 PROJECT 204

J i

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CLEAN-UP DEMINERALIZER SYSTEM PUMP REPLACEMENT INVESTIGATION 155UE NUMBER: 848 SCORE: 14 COMMITNEMT MONE. THIS ISSUE IS CONSIDERED RESOLVED.

I DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: THE CLEAN-UP DEINIERALIZER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR CONTINUOUS FULL PDWER OPERATION OF BIG ROCK.

THE PUMP NAS EXPERIENCED FREQUENT MOTOR CASE EROSION.

4 RESOLUTION: A STUDY MAS CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE MNETNER TO REPLACE THE PUMP MITH A DESIGN MORE SUITABLE FOR OPERATING CONDITIONS OR TO PROVIDE A BYPASS AROUND THE PUMP.

THIS ISSUE IS FURTNER ADDRESSED IN ISSUE 48A.

i REFERENCE 5 1

I GENERIC LETTER HERES IPSAR_SECTION SEP TOPIC 1

0828. MAY 84 5.3.9.I l CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC L2TTERS TO CPCO DATED l 14AUG84 .

j 92FEB84 .

i ~

INTERNAL MEMOS 91 Nit _ RELEVANT REVERENCES ISSUE 48A 4

PROJECT 415 9, 55T-25 i EMPLOYEE SUGGESTION 85-192-82-909 4

1

BIG ROCK POINT IMTEGRATED PLAN

'1 TITLE CLEAMUP DEMINERALIZER SYSTEM PUMP BYPASS ISSUE NUMBER: 048A SCORE: 16 COMMITMENT

• MOME AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: THE CLEAN-UP DEMIMERALIZER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED F OR CONTINUOUS FULFL POWER OPERATION OF BIG ROCK.

THE PUMP HAS EXPERIENCED FREQUEMT MOTOR CASE EROSION.

STATUS: MODIFICATION WILL NOT BE SCHEDULED UNTIL AFTER 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE.

RESOLUTION: THE TRG HAS DETERMINED THAT A BYPAS3 OF THE CLEAN-UP DEMINERALIZER SYSTEM PUMP SHOULD BE INSTALLED.

REFERENCES:

GENERIC LETTER HURES IPSAR_SECTIOM SEP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 5.3.9.1 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC D/.TED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED

. 14AUG84 .

o i

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: MSIV BACKUP VALVES - LEAK TESTING ISSUE NUMBER: 950AI .

SCORE: I4 COMMITMENT CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW. BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE A NYDROSTATIC TEST AT THE END OF OUTAGES. WHICH MAY IMPACT PLANT AVAILABILITY. IS THE ONLY MEANS OF TESTING THE MAIM STEAM ISOL ATION VALVE AND MAIN STEAM DRAIN LINE VALVE.

STATUS: MANPOWER RESOURCES WILL CAUSE THIS PROJECT TO BE DELAYED PAST THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE.

A NEW COMMITMENT DUE DATE WILL BE ESTABLISHED LATER.

RESOLUTION:

THE TRG MAS ELECTED TO PERFORM MODIFICATIONS TO PERMIT AIR TESTING OF THE f* AIM STEAM ISOLATION VALVE.

REFERENCES:

GENERIC LETTER HHkEG IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828. MAY 84 4.20.5 VI-4 4.20.7.2 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED HRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FE884 09DEC82 92 MAYS 4 .

14AUG84 .

24SEI'84 .

INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES RMK 04-84 RMK 03-84

_ _ _ m - - - - __-_--_____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

l BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTAINMENT ISOLATION - ONLINE TESTING OF MSIV ISSUE NUMBER: 050A2 ,

SCORE: 19 COPMITMENT: CONSUMFRS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW BY 28FEB85.

DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: THE NRC STAFF BELIEVES THAT ISOLATION SHOULD BE INSTALLED IN ADDITION TO EXISTING SINGLE MAIM STEAM ISOLATION VALVE (MSIV). PRA HAS DETERMINEDTHAT THE MAIN STEAM LINE IS THE LARGEST COM-TRIBUTOR TO CONTAIMMENT ISOLATIDM FAILURE.

STATUS: MANPOWER RESOURCES REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION MODIFICATIONS HAVE RESULTED IN SLIPPAGE OF'THE COMMITMENT DATE. MODIFICATIONS TO PERFORM PARTIAL STROKE TESTING ARE EXPECTED TO BE COMPLETED DURING THE 1986 REFUELING OUTAGE. TRG HAS ALSO DECIDED TO REEVALUATE THE COST BENEFIT OF INSTALLING A SECOND MSIV.

RESOLUTION: THE TRG MAS ELECTED TO PERFORM THE MECESSARY MODIFICATION SO THAT A MEDIUM TERM (THREE YEARS)

STUDY CAN BE PERFORMED IM ORDER TO BETTER ASSESSAND TO IMPROVE MSIV ISOLATION RELIABILITY.

REFERENCES:

GENERIC LETTER HURig TP9 4R SECTION 1EP TOPIC 0828, MAY 84 4.20.5 VI-4 4.28.7.2 LPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 22JUN83 09DEC82 02FEB84 .

92MAY84 .

24SEP82 .

INTERNAL _ MEMOS STHJR T RELEVANT REVERENCES DED 34-13 -

FC-574 DED 84-03 PRC MEETINGS 17-83. I-84, 6-84 THROUGH 45-84 RMK 03-84 LER 83-807

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CONTAINMENT ISOLATION - LEAK TEST OFCHECK VALVES ISSUE MUMBER 6508 SCORE: 9 COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER NAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELON, BY THE END OF THE 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE DESCRIPTION:

, ISSUE: PROVIDE LEAK TEST PROGRAM FOR INSTRUMENT AND SERVICE AIR LINE CONTAINMENT ISOLATION CHECK 4

VALVES.

STATUS: COMPLETION IS EXPECTED BY COMMITMENT DATE.

RESOLUTION:

LEAR RATE TEST CONTAIMMENT ISOLATION VALVES ON SERVICE AND INSTRUMENT AIR SYSTER.

REFERENCES:

GENERIC LETTER  !!UREG IPSAR SECTION 0828, MAY 84 REP TOPIC 4.20.4 VI-4 CPC0 LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 09DEC82 1h AUG 8h i

.l l

BIG RUCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN j l

TITLE: DESIGN CODES. CRITERIA AND LOAD COMBINATIONS IS5UE NUMBER: 85I .

SCORE: I COMMITMENT 8 COMPLETE THE WORK ON TIIIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED IN 'IIIE RESOLUTION BY JUNE 30, 1985 DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: IPSAR(NUREG OS28)SECTION 4.13. SEP TOPIC III-7.B(DESIGN CODES. DESIGN CRITERIA LOAD COMBINATISMS AND REACTOR CAVITY DESIGN CRITERIA). REQUIRES EXPLICIT EVALUATIONS CONSIDERING AFFECTED STRUCTUR ELEMENTS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS ON A SAMPLING BASIS IN THE APPLICATION OF A " WEAK-LINK" APPROACM SEI5MIC. WIND AND TORMADDES. MISSILES. HELB AND ORIGINAL PLANT STRUCTURAL DESIGN ANALYSIS. PROB BILISTIC ANALYSES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED COLLECTIVELY WHEN DECIDING ON SELECTIVE PLANT UPGRADING SO THAT A RELATIVELY EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF PROTECTION IS ACHIEVED FOR ALL HAZARDS CONSIDERED.

STATUS: ISSUE RESOLUTION IS DELAYED PENDING RESOLUTIONS OF ISSUES 90 AND lb.

RESOLUTION: AI. APPOINT A PERSON TO REVIEW WORK PERFORMED BYCONTRACTORS BM SEISMIC WINO AND TORMADOES.

MISSILES. MIGM-ENERGY LINE BREAK AND ORGINAL PLANT STRUCTURAL DESIGN / ANALYSIS ISSUES.

2. PURSUE PROBABILISTIC WORK ON INDIVIDUAL TOPICS WHICH MAVE BEEN ADDRESSED DETERMINISTICALLY.

3. INTEGRATE RESULTS OF WARIOUS ANALYSES ON A SAMPLING BASIS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL STRUCTURES.

SYSTEMS OR COMPONENTS FOR MODIFICATION.

4. REFER MODIFICATION CANDIDATES BACK TO THE GROUP PERFORMING PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS FOR COST /

BENEFIT ASSESSMENT. OR BI. IMACTION MAY BE JUSTIFIED BY RESULTS OF ISSUE 90 AND 14.

REFERENCES GENERIC LETTER RVREG IPSAR SECTION 1EP TOPIC 8828, NAY 84 4.13 111-7.5 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED MFC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FEB84 385EP82

. 825EP81 INTERNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 JENK 95-83 JLK 84-82 ISSUE 90

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLEt CONTROL ROOM NABITABILITY ~ SEAL D0095 ISSUE NUMBFA 857A SCORE: 6 M )! MENT: INSTALL SEAL BETWEEN SERV 7CE AND TURbICE BUILDING DESCRIPTION:

, ISSUEt THE TRG DECIDED TNAT ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS SNDULD BE PERFORMED FOR TNIS ISSUE TO DETERMINE IF THE DOSE 5 RESULTING FROM ACCIDENTS IN WHICH SERIOUS CGRE DAMAGE OCCURS COULD BE LOWERED FURTHER.

STATUS: NO SCHEDULE D2rERMINED.

4 RESOLUTIDH:

THE TRG DECIDED DECREASE SEALING IN DOSE, DOORSOF REGARDLESS BETWEEN ITS COSTTHE SERVICE AND TURBINE BUILDING MAY PROVIDE A SLIGNT EFFECTIVEMESS.

I REFERENCES

• I 9f5ERIC LETTER LIVREG IPSAR SECJJ95 SEP TOPIC 0737 III.D.3.4 VI-8 8828 5.3.5.2 INTERNA 1 MEMOS RTHER REl.EVANT REVERENCES I RNB 83-14 ISSUE 57 RMK 93-54 A-ML-82-241 1

?

i i

+

em

9 BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN JUi.Es 'C6MTAINt1EM PURGE AND VENT -

MSSUE NUMBER: n63 7 CORES .

[9PW1LTf9ENT: CONSUMERS POWEst NAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 28FEf85.

DESCRIPTION ISSUE: THE DR3FT IFSAR 5.3.6.2 STATES THAT CONS!;MERS POWER IS NOT LIMITING THE NUMSER OF NOURS OF VENTI.

LATION AND THAT TEST FRE9UENCY IS INSUFFICIENT. THE IPSAR ASSUMES TPAT CONSUMERS POWER IS TESTTM ONCE EVERY It MONTHS.

j STATUS: MATERIAL NOT RECEIVED AT PLANT. PENDING RECEIPT, THE SCREENS WILL BE INSTALLED BY MAY 31, 1985 RESOLUTION: TWE TRG CONFIRMS THE PREVIOUS CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY POSTION REGARDING SURVEILLANCE TESTING OF CCNTAIMMEM? PURGE ISOLATIDM VALVES, AS PREMNTED2N CONSUEMRS POWER TO NRC LETTERS DATED 10/24/89 94/20/79, 5/26/81. 11/19/82, AND 6/1/83. ACCORDINGLY, 6 MONTH TEST INTERVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 3.17(A) ISADE9UATE. INSTALL DEBRIS SL'REENS.

1

REFERENCES:

Sf.PER. IC. LETTER HUREg IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 8-24 0828, MAY 84 5.3.6.2 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC' DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 240CISO 28JUN83 i 29APR79 . I4SEP82

, 26MAYSI 275EP79 19MOV82 250CT79 OIJUM83 24NOV79 92 fen 84 24NOv8I 17DEC79 080CT80 28APit81 .

04AUG89 .

02 NOV 8!

a

,,,m,- - - - ,s i

. I

, i t

a l l

l 1

i l

l i

i in W

U E

W N

' W E >

4 W mo E b

O E W 4 M >G l 4 W@ 10 @ 1 g .JG ene m l CW B eG adJ KMI 4 l

> 4SS .

E IWW I m a EUU

> I WW E 4 th eft w I O '

b W

U i C <

K C

, w i

I 1

I a

f et a M V e o O i

i CC d 8 g 4% 1 Eas b

E E *8 l y

a to M

(

0 ee

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE RADWASTE MONITOR FLUSH TIMER ISSUE MUMBER 966 SCORE: 2 COMMITMENT CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE. AS DESCRIBED BELCW. BY 3IDEC87.

DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: MEMBERS OF THE PLANTOF STAFF UNATTENDED FLUSHING THE RECOGNIZE THE NEED TOREDUCE RADWASTE R.*,DIATION MONITOR. FLDW INTO THE RADWASTE SYSTEM CAUSED BY STATUS: COMPLETION EXPECTED BY COMMITMENT DATE.

i RESOLUTION: TME PROPOSED RESettTION IS TO ADD AN AUTOMATIC TIMER AND VALVE CONTROLS TO REDUCE THE CHANGE OF EXCESSIVE WATER GOING TO RADWASTE FOR PROCESSING

REFERENCES:

GENERIC LETTER HURE9 IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828. MAY 84 5.3.23 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FEB84 .

INTERNAL. MEMOS RTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES IC-540 PROJECT 339

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: FACILITY MODIFICATIONS - WAREMOUSE ISSUE NUM8(Er 872 .

SCORE: .12 COMMITMENT

• CONSUMERS POWER MAS COMMITTED TO CDMPLETE THE WORA DN THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 385EP85.

DESCRIPTIOM8 ISSUE EXPAND THE "4" WAREMOUSE FACILITIES (OA AUDIT FINDING) ORIGINAL ISSUE INCLUDED ANNEX MODIFICA-TIONS BUT THAT PORTION WA5 CANCELLED.

l 2 STATUS.- AN OFFICE ANNEX TS TO RE IN PLACE LATER IN 1985 WilICH WILL ALLEVIATE THE PERSONNEL HAZARD i

CONSIDERATION OF Tile PRESENT OFFICE WARE 110USE BUILDING. WHEM COMPLETE TRG WILL RERANK THE WAREHOUSE ISSUE RESOLUTION.

RESOLUTION: THE LICENSEE MAS PROPOSED A PROJECT TO IMPROVE STOCK STORAGE FOR SUALIFIED r.9UIPMENT.

, NOTE: WAREMOUSE MODIFICATION IS PRESENTLY ON MOLD DUE TO BUDGET RESTRAINTS.

1

REFERENCES:

GENERIC LETTER BMRES IPjAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 8828 MAY 84 5.3.12 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED HRC LETTEAS TO CPCO DATED SIJun83 .

12 Fens 4 .

14AUG84 .

INTERNAL MEMOS gTHEK_ RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 IEIR P3-04 PROJECT 443 D-QG-83-55 i

1

__ --- _ . . .- a

_ ~ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ - ~ _ _ _. . _ _ ._._ ..

1 l

i RIS ROCR POINT INTEGRATED PLAN 4

i .

_ TITLE: CONTROL OF NEAVY LOADS I ISSUE NUMBER: 673 .

SCORE: 4 I

i COPHITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME , ESTABLISH RESOLUTION UPON ISSUANCE ON NRC PHASE II GUIDANCE.

DESCRIPTION:

l ISSUE: THE NRC STAFF MAY REOUIRE CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO ENSURE SAFE MANDLING j OF NEAVY LOADS. ONE POTENTIAL MODIFICATION WAS TME INSTALLATION OF INTERLOCK 5 TO PREVENT TME

CONTAINMENT CRANE FROM PASSING DVER CERTAIN AREAS.

4 i

i i

! RESOLUTION: THE TR'J NAS DECIDED TO COMPLETE MORR ON DETERMINING THE COST EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROPOSED i

MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONTAINMENT CRANE. ADMINISTRATIVE C0hTROLS (IE, PROCEDURE REVISIONS) NAVE BEEN COMPLETED (SEE CONSUMERS POWER LETTER DATED 1/I8/84).

l

REFERENCES:

l l gg_NgRIC LETTER HUggg IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 1 81-07 0828, MAY 84 5.3.20 J

9612 M J9TTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED i 190CTF# 93FEB81 1 97JAN80 94FEB74 8

98MAY81 3tJUN75 1 19JUH81 96FEB76 91JUL81 28JUL76 j, W25EP81 17MAY78 4 15JUl83 17AUC79

! 18JUL83 21JUL82 i 18 JAM 84 19DEC83 l

1

ISSUE NUMBER D73 i

1 BIG RDCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN l 13APR84 g,MAygg l

l INE RNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCES -

RNK 03-84 l

1 l

l l

1 1

i l

l i

i l

l O

o Q

i k

i BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN 1

, TITLE: REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM-HIGH POINT VENTS ISSUE NUMBER: 974 .

SCORE: 18 COMMITMENT: REMOVE HIGli POINT VENTS UPON APPROVAL OF NRC.

DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: IPSAR (NUREG 9828) SECTION S.3.26. THE NRC CONC LUDED THAT MODIFICATIONS in PLACE THE HIGM-POINT VENTS IN OPERATION ARE NOT WARRANTED. THE EXISTING HIGH-POINT VENTS POSSIBLY ADD TO THE OVERALL

SEISMIC RISK OF THE PLANT AND SHOULD BE REMOVED.

i STATUS: PENDING NRC APPROVAL HIGH POINT VENTS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED DURING 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE.

i

! RESOLUTION: THE TRG MAS DETERMINED THAT THE HIGH POINT VENTSSNOULD BE REMOVED. THE SYSTEM IS UMNECESSARY SINCE: 1. THE RDS CAN BE USED TO VENT THE PRES 5URE VE5SEL 2. THE LIKELIHOOD OF CORE UNCOVERY IS SMALL. AND 3. THE COST OF SEISMICALLY 9UALIFYINGTHE VENTS IS HIGH. '

i

REFERENCES:

GENERIC.. LETTER JPSAR SECTION SEP TOP 11 HV!b'II.B.I 8737 5.3.26 0828. MAY 84 I

CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED HRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FE884 135EPJ9 i 02MAY34 3ODCT79 1

01JUL82 28 MAYS 9 19APR83 155EP81 27DEC79 12AUG83 4

19 der.83 .

a G9JUL81 .

l 85FEB82 -

1 1

. . _ - - _ . . . .~.

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: INVESTICATE INCORE AVAILABItITY PRDSLEM ISSUE. MUM _BER* 077 SCORE: 12 i

CO W TMEMf* NOME. THIS ISSUE 15 CONSIDERED RESOLVED.

DESCRIPTIOM 155UEt SEE ISSUE 77 REMOVE INCORE DETECTOR 5.

}

i j

RE50LtfTIOM t REVISE PROCEDURES S THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONSTO DELETE REFERENCES TO THE IM-CORE DETECTORS REELRGCEi!.

OEMERIC.. LETTER !IVRE9 Lr1AE_1EC H RH SEP_Te m 0828. MAY 84 5.3.13 EPCS LETTERS TO MRC DATED MRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED e1JUH83 .

92FEB84 .

92 MAYS 4 .

i 14AUGe4 .

INIJIINAL MEM01

_ 9TllER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 JRn 83-42 A-BRP-83-21 JRK 93-47 A-BRP-83-96 JAU 65-83 PROJECT 429 I

. - _ _ _ - --l

BIC ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: INWESTIGATE INCORE AVAILABILITY PROBLEM 115!!FME(* 977A .

SCDRE 12 COMMITMENT: SIIBMIT TECHNICAL CPECIFICATIONS CIIANGE DESCRIPT10Mt ISSUE: IN-CORE DETECTORS ARE UNRELIABLE DUE TO DETECTOR FAILURES. FLUXVIRES HAVE RECOME Tl!E PRIMARY SOURCE OF ANALYTICAL VERIFICATION OF LOCAL FLUX PREDICTIONS DURING POWER OPERATION.

STATUS: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CIIANGE REQUEST TO BE SUBMITTED BY FEB 20 1985 RESOLUTIOMs REVISE TECH SPECS AND PROCEDURES 'ID REMOVE INCORES REFERENCE.

REEEMEMCE58 91MRIC LETTER  !!URig IP$AR SECTION SEP TOPIC 8828, MAY 84 5.3.13 TTERS TO_P_%C DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED

.rauB4 .

1940GR4 .

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: RDS DEPRESSURIZATION PILOT VALVE LEARAGE ISSUE NUMBER

• 882 -

SCORE 8 29 COMMITMENT 8 EVALUATE PILOT VALVE LEAKAGE BY JUNE 31, 198h.

DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: RDS PILOT VALVE LEAKAGE CAN LEAD TO PREMATURE OPENING AND DELAYED RESEATING OF THE PILOT-DPER-ATED VALVES. AS A RESULT OF SPURIOUS OPENING OF THE RDS IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO CbMPLETELY DEPRESSURIZE THE REACTOR.

STATUS: AN EVALUATION BASED ON THE MANUFACTURERS PRODOSAL FOR MODIFICATION OF THE PILOT VALVES DETERMINED THE PROPOSAL WOULD NOT ALLEVIATP THE PROBLEM. RECENT INSPECTION OF A PILOT ASSEMBLY HAS REVEALED AN ACCUMULATION OF GRIT AT THE STEAM PATH BETWEEN THE VALVE TOP AND TIIE PILOT VALVE. BECAUSE INSPECTION OF TIIE MAIN VALVE BODIES HAVE FOUND NO GRIT IN THE TOP ASSEMBLY IS SUSPECTED TO BE THE SOURCE OF THE GRIT PROBLEM. INVESTIGATIONS WILL l RESOLUTION EVALUATE LEARAGE REDUCTION. CONTINUE.

i l

l

REFERENCES:

GENERIC _ LETTER HURER 0828, MAY 84 IPSAR SISTlM SEP TOPIC 5.3.1.1 CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED i- 02FEB84 11 FEB 85 - 18 DEC 84 92MAY84 26 NOV 8h INTERNAL _ MEMOS DLNER RELEVANT REVERENCES DPN 84-71 D-BRP-84-19 CRA 84-07 D-BRP-84-21 DPS 43-96 D-BRP-83-89 RMK 93-84 A-BRP-81-07

, PRC MEETINGS 33-84. 22-84. 7-84 l

l' l -__ .-

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: FULL STRORE TESTING OF REACTOR DEPRESSURIZATION VALVES ISSUE MUMBER: 983 SCORE: 5 COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER HAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 31 MARS 5.

DESCRIPTIQ3:

ISSUE:

TME PLANT STAFF FFELS THAT PARTIAL STROKE TESTING OF THE REACTOR DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM DE-PRESSURIZATION VALVES MAY MOT ADE90ATELY VERIFY OPERABILITY OF THE SYSTEM. THE PRESENT TEST ONLY VERIFIES A FRACTION OF TOTAL STROKE.

STATUS: INVESTIGATION OF METHODS TO FULL STROKE TEST THE VALVES AND SUITABILITY OF PRESE!!T TESTING ARE CONTINUING.

RESOLUTION:

THE TRG ELECTED TO PERFORM AN EVALUATION TO DETERMIME SUITABILITY OF THE PRESENT TEST OR MEED FO IMPROVEMENT.

REFERENCES:

REMERIC LETTER HURE9 IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC 0828 MAY 84 5.3.1.3 CPCO. LETTERS TO MRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FE884 .

18 DEC OI8 26 NOV 8h

(

l i

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE SCRAM DUMP TANK VALVES - LACK OF REDUNDANCY (STUDY)

ISSUE NUMBER: 884 SCORE: 14 COMMITMENT: NOME. TNIS ISSUE IS CONSIDERED RESOLVED.

DESCRIPTION:

l ISSUE: THE PLANT STAFF RECOGNIZE 5 THE NEED TO EVALUATE THE POTENTIAL FOR A LOCA DUE TO

• INGLE FAILURE I J

IN INE SCRAM DUMP TANK WENT & DRAIN INSOLATION SYSTEM. ALTNOUGH NO SCRAM DUMP TANK VALVE FAILURE HAVE OCCURRED AT SIG ROCK POINT. THE SYSTEM IS CHALLENGED DURING EACH SCRAM. A LOCA WOULD BE j LIMITED TO LEARAGE FLOW THROUGH THE CONTROL ROD DRIVES BUT WOULD MOT BE EASILY ISOLATED.

RESOLUTIOMt AN EVALUATION WAS PERFORMED AND PRESENTED TO THETRO WHICH:

1. DETERMINED THE RISK OF A LOCA DUE TO 1HIS EVENT.

3

2. DETERMINED Pos5IBLE SOLUTIONS.

1 THIS ISSUE IS FURTNER ADDRESSED IN ISSUE 84A.

! 1.EE EfffCE51

$[!!!RIC LETTE4 PUR[g LP1AR SECTION SEP TOPIC 81-18 0828, MAY 84 5.3.8.2 f

CP Q FTTERS TO MRC. DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 42WoWst .

22MAYSI .

l 31JUL59 .

770CT89 -

26 JAM 81 .

INTJWe6AL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE %

pc5 44-e2 1EB 8e-14 IES 80-17

! A-BRP-83-18 t

I I

O i

i BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN j

• l}1LEt SceaM DUMP TANK REDUNDANT VALVES

, 1111PE WYtMLitt 4844 -

SCORE

• 14 ,

19tW3ITMEpit MONE AT THIS TIME I

i DEscRIr112!!:

ISSi1E

REDUCE THE RI5K OF A LOCA DUE TO A SINGLE FAILURE IN THE SCRAM 00MP TANK VENT AND DRAIN ISO-i LATION SYSTEM.

STATUS: NO SCHEpt'LE DEVELOTTD TO INSTALL REPUNDANT VAINES.

RES6ttfTION: ADO DOUBLE ISOLATION TO SCRAM DUMP TANK VENT LINE AND DRAIN LINE.

i REFERENCESt.

GENEMIC LETTER IMlRES ELAR SECTIOtt SEP TOPIC 8828, MAY B4 S.3.8.2 AL MEMOS 91EER RELEVANT REVERENCES o a+-ez Issue a+

F i

1

, ~ _ _ _ __ .. . . . - -

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRAftD PLAN

~

TITLE: PIPE BREAR DUTSIDE CF CONTAINMENT 111UE_ NUMBER: 587 .

SCORE: II iPMMITMENT: NONE. THIS ISSUE IS CONSIDERED RESOLVCD, l'ENDING ISSUANCE OF THE APPROVED PROCEDURE REVISION.

PE?tRIPTION:

ISSUEt THE ISSUE IS A RESULT OF SFP TOPIC III.58 AND IPSAR MUREG (9828) SECTION 4.II. A PIPE BREAC IN THE SCIEENHOUSE MAY RESULT 1A A F1000 DISABLING DIMINERALIZER FILL PUMPS, FIRE PUMPS AND WELL MATER PUMPS. THIS WOULD LEAVE NO MEAN5 OF SUPPLYING MAREUP WATER TO THE FNFRGFMCY COM-DENSER S EVENTUALLY (4 HOUt3 LATEM) WATER IN THEEMERGENCY CONcENSER WOULD SOIL OFF TO A LEVEL BELOW THE TURES.

l STATUS: ISSUE COMPLETED AS PER PR OI/UTION IN JANUARY 1985 l

RE58LUTION: YME TRC MAS DETERMINF3 TPAT AN EMERCENCY OPERATING PROCEDURE SHOULD BE MRITTEN INSTRUCTING THE OPERATORS IS Pt*0NF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TN ORDER TO FILL THE DEMIMERALIZER TANK IF SUCN AN EVENT WOULD DCCtNt. A COST SENEFII ANALYSIS WILL BE PERFORMED TO EXAMINE POSSIBLE MODIFICATIONS WHICH WOULD P8tDVIDE A SDURCE OF EMERGENCY CONDENSER MAKE-UP IN THE EVENT OF SCREENHOUSE FLOODING.

j REFEREwCEse ggN_ggIC LETTER PUtig IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC

9828, MAY 84 4.11 III-5.B I

I __ _ _ _ __. _. __ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _

- . . _ . _ _ . _ _ - _ _ _. _ _ _ _ . . , ~_

BIG ROCR POINT INTEGRATED PLAN l .

TITLE: CLASSIFICATION OF STRUCTURES. SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS 135UE puMsgr GTS .

SCORE: 11 1

COFMITMEWit CONSUMERS POWER MAS CDPMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORR ON THIS IS5UE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 31MAY85.

RL1CRIPTIGNr IS5UEt IPSAR (NUREG 9828) SECTION 4.4. SEP TOPIC III-I RE9UIRED:

I. PERFORMANCE OF SAMPLE ANALYSES TO CONFIRM ADESUATE MARGINAL SAFETY FOR PIPING FATIGUE.

l

2. PERFORMANCE OF SAMPEL ANALYSES TO CONFIRM ADEGUATE MARGIN OF SAFETY FOR VESSEL FATIGUE.

STATUS: COMPLETION BY COMMIDQ2iT DATE FXPECTED.

i RESOLUTION

• THE TRG MAS ELECTED TO:

1. SLPARATE SEISMIC LOADS FROM FATIGOE LOADS.

2. SELECT A SYSTEM WITft EITHER THERMAL OR MECMANICAL FATIGUE INPUT (PPEFERABLY A $4FETY SYSTEM).

3. ANALYZE TME SELECTED SYSTEM ACCORDING TO FRANKLIN RESEARCH CENTER hETHODS.

R EFERENCES *.

4 GENERIC LETTER IMMtE9 If3AR SECJ1RH SEP TOPIC 4828. MAY 84 4.4 III-I

$PCO LETTERS TO NRC DAlED tlRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02ftB84 I6APR82 IPJ1RMAL MEMOS 91t!st. RELEVANT REVERENCES' JLE 44-57 A-BRP-85-28 JEMR 90-85 A-BRP-84-3I l

4

. _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ - * - v

BIG ROCK POINT INTECRATED PLAN TITLE INSTALLATION OF 150L VLVE UPSTREAM OF CV-49??

111EE_NtfMSER 596 .

SCOstEt II CSFW9ITRENT CONSUMERS POWER MAS COFWIITTED TO COMPLETE THE MORK ON THIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOM BY THE EMD OF THE 1955 REFUELING DUTAGE DESCRIPTIOM ISSUE TME LOCAL LEAK RATE TEST METNnD NAS CHANGED TO MEET APPENDIX J RERUIREMENTS. THE VOLUME AND MUrt9ER OF VALVES FOR TESTING THE CLEAN-UP DEMIN/ FUEL PDOL DRAIN LINE CONTAINENT ISDLATION VALVES CREATES A PROBLEM MITH INE RELIABILITY OFTHE NEW TEST METHOD.

STATUS: TESTING OF TiiE CONTAIFD!SirT' ISOLATION VALVES DURING THE LAST TWO REFUELING OUTAGES HAS BEEN SATISFACTORY AND THEREFORE T!iE MODIFICATION VAS NOT NECESSARY AND DEIJ.YED. IF UPCOMING TESTING IS ALSO SATISFACTORY THE PROJECT WILL AGAIN BE DELAYED.

RESOLUTION: TNE TRS MAS DECIDED TO INSTALL A NEW VALVE MMICHMILL MARE THE LOCAL LEAK RATE 1Est McRE ACCURATE AND WHICH MILL MAKE IT EASIER TO IDENTIFY VALVES TO BE FIXED IF THE TEST FAILS.

REFERENCES:

]

CPC9 LETTERS TO NRC BATED NRC LETTERS TO CP_$0_ DATED errEsas .

14AUcA 4 .

INTERM4L_99EM01 91NER_ RELEVANT REVERENCES

1. C-548. PROJECI 9s3

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLES REVISIOtts TO 125-VOLT DC DRAWINGS ISSUE NUMBER

• 998 SCORE: 13 COMMITMENTS CONSUMERS FOWER HA5 COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON THIS ISSUE, A5 DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 39APR85.

DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE 125-VDC FUL PANEL IN DESIGN LOADS AND ARE NOT TAGGING EASILY IDENTIFIABLE.A SOURCE (DRAWING) LISTING LOADS WOULD BE HE SITUATI0d5.

STATUS: THIS ISSUE IS COMPIATE.

RESOLUTION:

THE TRS NAS ELECTED TO IDENTIFY LOADS DM BREAKER 5 IN THE 125-VDC PANEL AND REVI5E DRAWINGS APPROPRIATELY.

REFERENCES:

GP_C94 ETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 02FE8st .

, 14AUi84 .

g MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENCE 5 l

e 1

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: VENDOR INTERFACE AND MANUALS ISSUE NUMBER ISS .

SCORE: 8 9

COMMITMENT: CONSUMERS POWER NAS COMMITTED TO COMPLETE THE WORK ON TNIS ISSUE, AS DESCRIBED BELOW, BY 3IDEC85.

DESCRIPTION: -

155DE: THE MRC IS CONCERNED THAT UTILITIES MAY NOT BE COLLECTING AND CONTROLLING VENDOR MANUALS IN AN ADEQUATE MANNER.

STATUS: COMPLETION EXPECTED BY COMMITMENT DATE.

4 RESOLUTION: THE TRG DETERMINED TNAT A SYSTEM SNOULD BE DEVELOPED WHICM CROSS REFERENCES E9UIPMENT AND MAN- ,

UALS AND MAINTAINS THE MANUALS IN A CURRENT FASHION.

REFERENCES:

SENERIC LETTER MURE6 IPSAR SECTION SEP TOPIC ','

43-28 (2.2(233 M LETTER $ TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 91NMa3 .

INTERNAL MEMOS OTNER RELEVANT REVERENCES GCW 84-13 RME 93-84

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: CORE SPRAY PUMP SUCTION STRAINER BLOCKAGE ISSUE MUMBER: IB4 .

SCORE: 8 COMMITMENT

• NOME AT TMIS TIME DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE: IN AN ACCIDENT ENVIRONMENT THERE IS THE POTENTIAL FOR CORE SPRAY STRAINERS TO BECOME BLOCKED BY MISCELLANEOUS DEBRIS.

STATUS: PROJECT SCHEDULE HAS NOT BEEN DEVEIDPED DUE TO LOW PRIORITY.

• RESOLUTI0tl* TME TRG MAS DECIDED TO INVESTIGATE THE POSSIBILITY OF BACKFLUSMING THE SUCTIDW STRAINER SCREENS OR ADOING INSTRUMENTATION TO DETERMIME PUMP BLOCKAGE.

REFERENCES:

IH1014AL MEMOS DTMER RELEVANT REVERENCES RNK 03-84 PROJEC1 521

- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ = _ _ _ - -

e BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: REACTOR DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM HANGER REPLACEMENT ISSUE MUM 9ER: 105 SCORE 7 COMMITMEMT* NOME AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTIOMt -

ISSUEt NDS PIPE MANGER IS DISCONNECTED EACH REFUELING OUTAGE FOR SYSTEM HYAROSTATIC TESTING. EXISTING HANGER DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SUPPORT THE HYDROSTATIC LOAD.

STATUS: PROJECT SCHEDULE IIAS NOT BEEN DEVELOPED.

r RESOLUTIO*lt REPLACE RDS PIPE HANGER. -"--

w

REFERENCES:

W" a=

=

i i

BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: REMOVE TURBINE GRATING' ISSUE NUMBER: IS6 +

SCORE: Il COMMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE TURBINE TIONS UNDER GRATING BLOCRS AN ESCAPE ROUTE FOR MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL PERFORMING PIPE LEAR INSPEC-THE TURBINE.

STATUS: COMPLETION EXPECTED BY END OF 1985 REFUELING OUTAGE.

RESOLUTION: REMOVE GRATING AT TURBINE GENERATOR STANDARD, INSTALL ALARM / LOCKING DEVICE (VITAL AREA).

FIE.EAENCES:

INTERNAL MEMOS 91HER RELEVANT REVERENCE 1 REQUEST FOR MOD FROM GCWITHROW-3/20/84

i BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE: BACKUP HIGH RANGE STACK MONITOR ISSUE NUMBERt 139 9

SCORE: 3 COMMITMENT: NOME AT THIS TIME I DESCRIPTION

• ISSUE REFERENCE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT RE9UEST DATE0 12/16/83. MRC WOULD LIKE THE TSR TO  !

BE CONSISTENT WITH STS WORDING. IMPLEMENTING AN ALTERNATE PREPLANNEO METHOO FOR HIGH RANGE STACK MONITORING IF THE NEW STACK MONITOR IS IMOPERABLE.

STATUS: .A TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST WAS RE-SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 8, 198h TO INCORPORATE

NRCs REQUEST. PENDING NRC REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

RESOLUTION ROUTE THE EXHAUST OF TME NIGH RANGE STACK MONITOR THROUGH THE 'OLD' MION RANGE STACK MONITOR SHIELDING SO THE 'OLD' HIGH RANGE STACK MONITOR CAN BECOME OUR BACKUP MONITOR.

1 j

REFERENCES:

CPCO LETTERS TO NRC DATED NRC LETTERS TO CPCO DATED 16DEC83 .

16FE583 .

INTERNAL MEMOS OTNER RELEVANT REVERENCES JLB 84-55 A-ML-84-57

, 9A05 1217-84 i

k I

1 i

e BIG ROCK POINT INTEGRATED PLAN TITLE LIGHTNING PROTECTION

ISSUE NUMBER

• IIS ,

SCORE: IS COMMITMENT

• NOME AT THIS TIME i DESCRIPTION:

ISSUE LIGNTHING STRIKES MAY CAUSE EQUIPMENT MALFUNCTION / DAMAGE.

I STATUS: NO SCHEDULE DEVELOPED.

i i RESOLUTION

• I. REDESIGN THE WELL PUMP MOUSE ANNUNCIATOR ALARM CIRCUIT, REMOVE THE DC CIRCUIT TO REPLACE THE i GROUND LOOP OR ANTENNA EFFECT.

2. INSTALL SURGE ARRESTERS BETWEEN WELL NOUSE CABLE AND MCC IC BUS.

3. REPLACE DOMESTIC WATER PUMP CONTROL CIRCUIT FUSE.

4. IMPLEMENT A PM PROGRAM TO TEST PLANT GROUND SYSIEM RESISTANCE.

4 REFERENCES

• 13]iRNAL MEMOS OTHER RELEVANT REVERENL U LARK 3-84 PRC MEETING 84-35, 22-L%

i 4

4 4

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _