ML20151K784
| ML20151K784 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/19/1985 |
| From: | Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151K612 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-87-866 NUDOCS 8504250270 | |
| Download: ML20151K784 (1) | |
Text
.
,/ *pa nc%[o
=
g UNITED STATES
,.g, s- (
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.l WASHINGTON, o. C. 20$$5 e., 3 a
\\.,: )
APR 1g y MEMORANDUM FOR:
J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator Region II THRU:
James M. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Enfore n
FROM:
Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor, and Technical Training Center Programs l
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
SUBJECT:
ASSESSMENT OF REGION II REVIEWS OF QA PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (QAPD) CHANGES
)
1.
Stone In accordance with the FY 1985 Regional Assessment Plan and IE Office Procedure 0200, "Assessment of Regional Implementation," this assessment provides an evaluation of the reviews performed by the Regional Offices of licensees' QAPD changes as required by 10 CFR 50.54 and 50.55.
This assessment is to determine the timeliness and adequacy of program implementation; the consistency of program implementation relative to the review of QAPD changes both within and among the five NRC Regional Offices; and the need for additional guidance i
or change to IE inspection procedures regarding review of QAPD changes.
Draft Inspection Procedure 35001 transmitted to the Regional Offices in J. M. Taylor's memoranda of July 11, 1983 and February 29, 1984 is the baseline document which the reviews are evaluated against.
This procedure instructs the reviewers te t
compare changes against the latest accepted QAPD to check for any inconsistency in the QAPO because of the changes, and to complete the reviews within sixty days fr:m receipt of the change.
II.
Assessment Activities An assessment of Region II's review of licensees' QAPD changes took place on March 19 and 20, 1985, at the Regional Office.
This involved conducting an entrance meeting with the Region 11 staff explaining the scope, objective and methodology of the assessment with principal reviewers; summ;arizing the results of the assessment; ande reporting the preliminary results of the assessment to the Region II staff at an exit meeting. contains the plan used in the assessment of region reviews of QA program change descriptions. identifies i
Region II personnel contacted during the assessment and QAPD change packages evaluated.
John Gilray of the IE QA Branch performed this assessment.
Fox e - ? ?- Nt>
/
N (d
GM
~-
g
-