ML20151A360
| ML20151A360 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 09/14/1987 |
| From: | Mcgee B, Shields J SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151A165 | List: |
| References | |
| SO123-VI-1.0, NUDOCS 8807190346 | |
| Download: ML20151A360 (42) | |
Text
,
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION ll PAGE 1 0F 41 EFFECTIVE DATE /9-/ $ TCH //'3 DOCUMENTS - REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS FOR SITE ORDER
S. PROCEDURE
S AND INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION EAGI 1.0 OBJECTIVES 2
2.0 REFERENCES
2 2.1 Site Order 2 2.2 Procedures 2 2.3 Corporate Policy / Procedure 2.4 Other 2 3.0 PREREQUISITE 3 4.0 PRECAUTION (S) 3 5.0 CHECXLIST(S) 4 6.0 PROCEDURE 4 6.1 General Information 4 6.2 Site Review / Approval Determination for Project and C/S-C Documents 5 6.3 Formal / Interdisciplinary Review Preparation 6 6.4 Formal / Interdisciplinary Review 12 6.5 Comment Resolution 14 6.6 Final Approval 16 6.7 Publication 20 6.8 Late Comments 22 7.0 RECORDS 23 ATTACHMENTS 1 Definitions 24 2 PF(123) 109, Routing and Document Control 26 l 3 CC(123) 261, Review Coment and Resolution 35 lfte 4 PF(123) 324, Identification of Procedures Requiring Site Approval 37 5 CFDM Responsibility Matrix for Project Documents 39 6 Flow Chart 40 l
7 Revision Description 41 l
0117f.aut QA PROGRAM AFFECTING hb AD 00367 P PNU l
1 NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 l UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 2 0F 41 TCN JP3 QQfdWENTS - REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCESS JOR SITE ORDER
S. PROCEDURE
S AND INSTRUCTIONS 1.0 OBJECTIVES 1.1 To specify the method for review, approval / cancellation and publication of Nuclear Generation Site Department Orders, Procedures and Instructions.
l.2 To provide document controls consistent with Technical Specifications: Sections 6.5.2.1, 6.5.2.A. 6.8.1, and 6.8.2 for all Units.
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 Site Order 2.1.1 S0123-PF-1, Site Orders, Procedures, Instructions and Forms Control Program 2.2 Procedures 2.2.1 S0123-VI-0.9, Documents - Author's Guide to the Preparation af Site Orders, Procedures and Instructions 2.2.2 S0123-VI-1.3, Documents - Guidelines for Completing the Unreviewed Safety Question and Environmental Evaluation 2.2.3 S0123-VI-1.4, Forms Management 2.2.4 S0123-VI-1.0.1, Documents - Temporary Change Notices (TCNs), Preparation, Review, Approval, Incorporation and Distribution 2.2.5 S0123-XIV-3.1, Configuration Document Change Control 2.2.6 *0123-VI 2, Record Retention Assessments and Record Preparatior/ Transmittal to Corporate Documentation 4/
Management (CDM)-SONGS 2.3 Corocrate Policy /Procedurg 2.3.1 ESM 3.50.10, Protection of Safeguards Information 2.4 QD.tr 2.4.1 CDS QA Procedure SOS 0123-26-8-16-CDM, Receipt, Control and Distribution of Station Orders, Operating Instructions and Station Procedures at SONGS 1, 2 and 3 Site
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 I UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 3 0F 41 l TCH ll' 3
2.0 REFERENCES
(Continued) 2.4.2 PF(123) 109, Routing and Document Control (previously numbered SO(123) 109) 2.4.3 CC(123)261, Review Comment and Resolution l 2.4.4 PF(123) 109-1, Unreviewed Safety Question Evaluation (previously numbered S0(123) 109-1) 2.4.5 PF(123) 324, Identification of Procedures Requiring Site Approval (previously numbered S0(123) 324) 2.4.6 PF(123) 186, Site Procedures Group (SPG) Review
-Transmittal for Site Documents (previously numbered 50(123) 186) 2.4.7 PF(123) 185, Site Procedures Group Service Request (previously numbered 50(123) 185) 2.4.8 CC(123) 183, Configuration Document Checklist g 2.4.9 CC(123) 184, Configuration Documents Requiring Change 2.4.10 PF(123) 109-2, Forms Review and Approval 2.4.11 SCE 26-22-2, Data Transmittal 3.0 PRERE0VISITE 3.1 Prior to use of a user-controlled copy of this procedure, it is M the user's responsibility to verify that the revision and any TCNs are current by one of the following methods:
3.1.1 Check it against a CDM controlled cepy and any TCNs. g 3.1.2 Access the SCE Document Config'a ation System (SDCS).
3.1.3 Contact COM by telephone or through counter inquiry.
3.1.4 Obtain a user-controlled copy of the procedure from l(t d
CDM.
3.1.5 Reference a current (within one week) Destination Configuration Control Log and associated daily update.
l 4.0 PRECAUTIONfS)
I 4.1 None I
l
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 4 0F 41 TCH // 3 5.0 CHECKLISTfS) 5.1 None 6.0 PRG"EDURE 6.1 General Information 6.1.1 Any new or revised Site Order, Procedure or Instruction, with the exception of Project and Contractor / Subcontractor (C/S-C) (see Definitions, Attachment 1) documents, shall be researched, drafted and formatted, as well as a history file maintained, in accordance with Reference 2.2.1.
6.1.2 Subsequent changes to Project or C/S-C documents that have been determined to require Site approval shall be handled in accordance with this document or P,eference 2.2.4.
6.1.3 Project and C/S-C dccument format shall be in accordance with the applicable Project or C/S-C procedures.
6.1.4 Site Project and C/S-C document and revision numbers need only appear on the Project or C/S-C document cover page.
6.1.5 Project and C/S-C documents may be cancelled by written memorandum to COM when the following requirements have been met:
.1 Documents are determined to be obsolete and no longer j required.
! .2 Site issued document numbers are other than the Project and C/S-C Site document numbers identified in Reference 2.2.1.
Examples: S02-SPSU-0941,501-FCQCM-19.11
.3 Document issue date on each procedure is 1 year or rore old.
l .4 Five or more documents are to be cancelled at the
- same time.
l l
l
{
I
l NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 5 0F 41 TCN //- B 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.1.5.5 Cancellation memorandum identifies documents with quality affecting activities and ensures these activities are either no longer performed or performed in other issued procedures.
.6 SPG Supervisor approves request.
6.1.6 Safeguerds Orders or Procedures shall be handled in ace;*aance with Reference 2.3.1.
6.1.7 A designee may perform SPG functions if authorized by SPG Supervision and/or Manager, Material and Administrative Services.
6.2 Site Review /Acoroval Detennination for Pro.iect and C/S-C Documents NOTE: For those Project and C/b c documents that have previously been determined to require Site approval and are being revised / cancelled, go to Section 6.3, as appropriate.
6.2.1 author (Pro.iect Administration or C/S-C Siti.
Oriainator) shall:
.1 Submit Project Administrative Procedures (APs),
Retrofit Work Procedures (WPs), and C/S-C documents that have ad previously received a Site review / approval determination to the as. signed Site Procedures Group (SPG) writer on Form SCE 26-22-2, Data Transmittal, for submittal to the Manager, Compliance or Designee for assessment of the need for Site approval.
6.2.2 SPG Writer shall:
.1 Forward document to the Manager, Compliance or Designee with Form PF(123) 324, Identification of Procedures Requiring Site Approval (see Attachment
! 4).
6.2.3 Manaaer. Comoliance or Desionee shall:
.1 Determine whether the document requires Site review and approval (the criterion to be used is whether the document falls within the categories outlined in Section 6.8.1 of the Unit 1, 2 and 3 Technical Specifications or if it affects nuclear safety).
l l
l
NUCLEAP GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 6 0F 41 TCN ll* 0 6.0 EB,Q{ M (Continued) 6.2.3.2 If Site approval is required, designate one responsible CFDM on Form PF(123) 324.
.2.1 CFDM concurrence with the above designation will be sought; however, should concurrence be unattainable, the issue will be brought to the attention of the Deputy Station Manager for resolution.
.3 Return the document to the assigned SPG writer with written notification of review / approval decision on PF(123) 324.
6.2.4 SPG Writer shall:
.1 Return documents not requiring Site approval to the originator with a copy of the PF(123) 324 form.
.2 Assign a Site document number and initiate Formal Interdisciplinary Review preparation for documents requiring Site approval.
.3 Forward original PF(123) 324 form to CDM.
6.3 Formal /Interdisciolinary Review Preoaration 6.3.1 SPG Writer sjigl],:
.1 Submit to the author as applicable:
.1.1 Review ready draft.
.1.2 Author identified docucnnt(s) to be cancelled or approved concurrently. ,
.1.3 Forms PF(123) 109, Routing and Document Control, and PF(123) 109-1, Unreviewed Safety Question Evaluation for each document to be reviewed.
.1.4 Forms CC(123) 183, Configuration Document Checklist 4t d and CC(123) 184, Configuration Documents Requiring Change.
.1.5 Form PF(123) 109-2, Forms Review and Approval, when controlled fonns are in need of revision or cancellation.
.2 Assist the author in preparation of the document and PF(123) 109(s) as requested by the author.
1
NUCLEAR GENERATION SME ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 7 0F 41 TCN // - 3 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.3.2 Author shall:
.1 Review the reviaw-ready draft.
.2 Note any title change from previous revision.
.3 Review the comitment, Corrective Action Request (CAR) or other reason for initiating the subject draft review.
.4 Review any document (s) to be cancelled, superseded or published with the pubitcation of the subject draft.
l
.5 Review the piping and instrumentation diagram (s)
(P&lDs) number (s), other drawings and documents as applicable or actual plant configuration checked
- during preparation.
.6 Check outstanding Temporary Change Notices (TCNs) per CDM records and provide for the disposition of each.
.7 Determine whether the subject draft was produced as a result of a Facility Design Change, i.e., a Proposea Facility Change (PFC), TFM, a Nonconformance Report (NCR) or a Field Change Notice (FCN), and its identifying aumoer, if applicable.
.8 Process Site Controlled Forms (see Definitions, Attachment 1) along with the subject draft in accordance with Reference 2.F.3, if applicable.
.9 Review the subject draft for effect on other published documents within the author's responsible discipline and initiate appropriate changes.
.10 Review the subject draft for effect on other responsible disciplines.
i
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISIO PAGE 8 0F 41 TCN /113 i'
6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.3.2.11.1 If documents under the responsibility of other disciplines are potentially affected, prepare Forms CC(123) 183 and CC(123) 184 in accordance with M Reference 2.2.5 for each of the other affected disciplines.
NOTE: Based on the interdisciplinary review selection provided by the Cognizant Supervisor, the SPG writer shall prepar's Forms CC(123) 183 and Qt)
CC(123) 184 (in accordance with Referenc9 2.2.5) for those Project and C/S-C docuir,aats which require Site approval. (See step 6.3.5.5.)
.11 If designated to do so by supervision, determine the need for an independent environmental evaluation.
.12 Ascertain the previous spproval authorities by reviewing the PF(123) 109(s) from the previous revision (s), if applicable, which may be obtained directly from CDM or through the assigned SPG writer.
.12.1 Changes to documents, i.e., revisions, shall be reviewed and approved by the same organizations that performed the original review and approval unless Site management designates and approves other responsible organization (s) on the PF(123) 109.
NOTE: Documents that are currentiv designated Not QA Program Affecting do not require QA review. See Attachment 2, Keypoint 13A.
.13 Prepare a PF(123) 109 for the review ready draft.
.14 Indicate subject document's current "QA PROGRAM AFFECTING" status.
.15 Prepare a PF(123) 109 for any document (s) to be published or cancelled concurrently, including previous approval authorities.
l l
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 l UNITS 1, 2 ANO 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 9 0F 41 TCN ll 3 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.3.2.16 Attach applicable information to facilitate review, such as valve list (s) or drawing (s), if appropriate.
.17 Ensure that saperseded or otherwise obsolete documents wfthin the assigned responsible discipline are identified and prepared for concurrent cancell at'.on.
.18 Provide review-redy draft (s), appropriate cancellation (s), applicable PF(123) 109(s) (document '
package), CC(123) 183 a d CC(123) 184 to the assigned l M SPG writer for submittal to the Cognizant Supervisor cr
.19 Submit the document package directly to the Cognizant Superv.sor, if applicable, o.3.3 Coanizant SuoervisgLorfesionee shall:
.1 Review the draft (s) and prepared PF(123) 109 to determine readiness for Formal / Interdisciplinary Review.
.2 Review document (s) to be cancelled to determine readiness for Formal / Interdisciplinary Review and prepared PF(123) 109(s), if included in the document package.
.2.1 Ensure licensing comitments and/or required provisions have been provided for in new or existing documents, unless the progra# provision is no longer required.
.3 Verify author entries on PF(123) 109(s).
.4 Reviw or prepare For'.ai/ Interdisciplinary Review selections, ensuring the following are represented, as applicable:
.4.1 Responsible discipline (s) affectcd (i.e., work required, responsibility assigned, accountability designated or documents requiring change) by the subject document (s).
.4.2 Previous revision approval authori ties.
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION ll PAGE 10 0F 41 TCH //- 3 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.3.3.4.3 Manager, Nuclear Engineering and Safety, review of Emergency Operating Instructions (E01s) and Abnormal Operating Instructions (A0!s) and other documents, if deemed appropriate by the Cognizant Supervisor.
.4.4 Manager, Nuclear Engineering and Safety, review of significant procedure / instruction changes which would benefit frcm review in the special area of expertise assigned to Nuclear Engineering, e.g., Nuclear Analysis, design criteria and certain industry research and development programs.
.4.5 Supervisor of Environmental Services review of s.ianificant procedure / instruction changes which could significantly alter the impact of the Site on the environment.
NOTE: Quality Assurance review it, mandatory for all documents designated as QA Program Affecting.
.4.6 Quality Assurance for QA Program Affecting documents.
.4.7 Superintendent of the affected unit (s) review of all l Project documents (with the exception of Project AP and Retrofit WP documents).
.4.8 SCE Project Engineering review of all Project documents (if required by Project APs).
l .4.9 Nuclear Engineering Representative review of all Project Unit 2/3 documents (if required by Project i
APs).
.4.10 SCE Station Engineering TWG designee review of all .
Project Technical documents under the jurisdiction of the Manager, Technical.
.5 Provide proposed "QA PROGRAM AFFECTING" determination of subject draft's contents (see Definitions, Attachment 1).
.6 Indicate whether QA final approval is required. (The criterion to be used ic specified in Chapter SA of the TQAH.)
l
.7 Determine need for training by the Nuclear Training l
Division and enter appropriate training contact.
1
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 PAGE 11 0F 41 REVISION TCH //< 11'h 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.3.3.4.8 Complete Environmental Evaluation (if designated by the CFDM) in accordance with Reference 2.2.2, if desired at this time.
.9 Dentte comments on PF(123) 109. If comments exceed g space provided on PF(123) 109, record ou CC(123) 261. M
.10 If satisfied with the document, the PF(123) 109 has been filled out appropriately, and the appropriate reviewers have been designated, sign and date the PF(123) 109.
.11 Prepare PHl?3) 109-1 for "QA Affecting" documents, ti desu ed at this time.
.12 Return draft, document (s) to be cancelled, completed PF(123) 109(s), PF(123) 109-1, CC(123) 183 and (6g CC(123) 184 to the author or SPG writer, as appropriate.
6.3.4 Author should:
.1 If received from the Cognizant Supervisor, review document package.
.2 Provide the document package with review period noted (see Definitions, Attachment 1), information regarding the date the document is needed and other.
special instructions to the SPG writer.
6.3.5 SPG Writer shall:
.1 Ascertain proposed "QA PROGRAM AFFECTING" reconnendation from the PF(123) 109.
.2 Enter proposed "QA PROGRAM AFFECTING" recommendation on document cover sheet, if necessary.
.3 Review title of revised document and title entry on PF(123) 109 against CDM Index, if appropriate.
.3.1 Note "title change" on the PF(123) 109, if applicable.
.4 Prepare Form PF(123) 186, SPG Review Transmittal for Site Documents, indicating review period as determined by the author.
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 50123-VI 1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 12 0F 41 TCN ll-3 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.3.5.5 Prepare Forms CC(123) 183 and CC(123) 184 forProjectf and C/S-C documents in accordance with Reference 2.2.5 if the interdisciplinary review selection crosses divisional boundaries (e.g., Maintenance to Operations).
.6 Prepare the appropriate number of copies.
.7 DistributePF(123)186,CC(123)183,CC(123)184andlM document packages to reviewers concurrently.
6.4 Formal /Interdisciolinary Reyiqw 6.4.1 Formal /Interdisciolinary Reviewers shall:
.1 Provide a deliberately critical examination of the document.
.2 Denote A or B comments on PF(123) 109 and record comments, or enter "none" on PF(123) 109, as appropriate.
.2.1 If applicable, utilize CC(123) 261 (Attachment 3) to l record additional comments that cannot be accommodated on PF(123) 109.
.3 Consider the effect of subject dec'iment upon document (s) within the reviewer's :esponsible discipline, 14'g i .3.1 Remove Forms CC(123) 183 and CC(123) 184. l
.3.2 Complete the determination of affected documents on Form CC(123) 184 in accordance with Reference l4ga 2.2.5,an d fonrard a copy to the Lead Engineer, Configuration Control for entry into SOCR.
.3.3 Initiate change to affected document (s), if applicable, ensuring compatibility between documents.
.3.4 When the required changes are complete, return Form CC(123) 184 to the Lead Engineer, Configuration Control.
.4 Return review package to SPG writer within designated review period.
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 13 0F 41
! TCN //-3 ,
, 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.4.1.5 Comments and revit.ws which are not received by the i i due date shall be so noted by the SPG writer on Form
- PF(123) 109. They may not be considered in the l- current revision, but should be addressed in a
- subsequent change (not applicable to Project and l C/S-C documents).
i j 6.4.2 Site Ouality Assurance Manaaer or Desianated i- Suoervisor(s):
)
l .1 Review subject draft per 6.4.1.
1
.2 Review subject draft to determine whether the -
document affects quality.
l .3 Indicate review and approval with proposed "NOT QA
! PROGPAM AFFECTING" determination by signature and
! date, .
) or i
- .4 Alter determination accordingly, then sign and date, j
- .5 Return review package to SPG writer within designated review period.
6.4.3 SPG Writer shall:
1
.1 Check proposed "QA PROGRAM AFFECTING" detemination for Quality Assurance concurrence, as applicable.
.1.1 Enter determination on document cover sheet, if changed.
.2 Collect all comments received for the subject cocument, e
.3 Advise author of missing reviews.
.4 Attempt to retrieve all reviews.
.5 Assist in the resolution of A and B coments, if directed to do so by author.
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION ll PAGE 14 0F 41 TCH //4 6.0 E8Qff W ag (Continued) 6.4.3.6 Provide author with all coments.
NOTE: Project procedures which have received coments shall be forwarded to the Test / Administrative Procedure Prepara-tion Coordinator on Form SCE 26-22 2.
6.5 Coment Resolution 6.5.1 If no coments are received, proceed to 6.6.
6.5.2 Author shall:
.1 Review all coments received.
.2 Direct SPG writer to resolve A coments, if appropriate.
.3 Ensure resolution of B coments with the respective reviewers.
.4 Record comment resolution (s) on coment sheets.
.5 Alter document in accordance with the stated resolutions.
.6 Coordinate typing and proofreading with Text Processing or request SPG assistance.
6.5.3 SPG Writer shall: (Not applicable to Project and C/S C documents)
.1 Review marked-up document for clarity of changes, if requested to do so by author.
.2 Have document retyped, if necessary.
.3 Proofread corrected document, making cNnges if permitted by the author to do so.
.4 Return corrected document to author.
NUCt. EAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION J1 PAGE 15 0F 41 TCN ll' P 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.5.4 Author shall:
.1 Review corrected document.
.2 Determine the need for a second Formal /
Interdisciplinary Review as a result of major technical or content changes due to comment resolution / incorporation using the criteria of step 6.3.3.4.
.3 Return the corrected document to SPG writer, indicating whether comment resolution concurrence or a second Formal / Interdisciplinary Review should be sought, or
.4 Obtain comment resolution from reviewers, providing final approval document package to SPG writer.
6.5.5 SPG Writer shall:
.1 If requested to assist in comment resolution concurrence, submit corrected document and PF(123) 109, denoting coment resolution to respective reviewers, '
or
.2 As directed by the author, initiate a second Formal / Interdisciplinary Review by returning to step 6.3.1 and proceeding accordingly.
6.5.6 Formal /Interdisciolinary Reviewers shall:
.1 Review corrected document for adequacy of comment resolution..
l .2 Initial and date PF(123) 109 or CC(123) 261 to approve comment resolution,
[
or
.3 Indicate disapproval of comment resolution by stating "unacceptable" on appropriate form or by withholding "resolution approved by" initials.
.4 Return document package to author or SPG writer, as appropriate.
l l .
NUCLEAR GENERATION ~ SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISIQN 11 PAGE 16 0F 41 TCN f( ~ b 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.5.7 SPG Writer shall:
.1 If requested to assist in coment resolution concurrence, review appropriate forms for B coment resolution approval.
.2 If all B coments are not resolved per the reviewers, return to step 6.4.3.6 and proceed accordingly.
.3 If all B coment resolutions are approved, prepare document package for final approval.
NOTE: If B coments cannot be resolved between reviewer (s) and author, assistance will be sought through the chain of comand and, if necessary, ultimately will rest with the appropriate CF0Hs, 6.6 Final Acoroval 6.6.1 SPG Writer shall:
.1 Conduct a thorough check of the documant.
.2 Prepare a final approval document package.
.3 Submit documents requiring QA final approval to Quality Assurance.
.4 If the document does not require QA final approval, enter "N/A" on PF(123) 109 and proceed to step 6.6.4.
6.6.2 Ouality Assurance (For Information Only)
.1 Review final approval document package.
.2 Provide coments on CC(123) 261 or enter "none" on PF(123) 109, as appropriate.
.3 Indicate approval by signature and date on PF(123) 109(s).
.4 Return document package to SPG writer.
e
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 17 0F 41 TCN // '3 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) ,
i 6.6.3 SPG Writer shall: '
.1 Review document package for approval.
.2 If additional B coments are received, return to step 6.4.3.6 and proceed accordingly.
.3 If additional A coments are received, notify author of same and resolve or return to author as directed.
.4 If approval has been obtained, submit the document package to the designated Cognizant Supervisor or designee, including Form PF(123) 109-1 with documents determined to be "QA PROGRAM AFFECTING.'
.5 If no Cognizant Supervisor or designee has been appointed to complete the Environmental Evaluation or PF(123) 109 1, proceed to step 6.6.5.3.
6.6.4 Desianated Coanizant Suoervisor or Desionee should:
.1 Review the entire docu:nent package, constoerit.g:
.1.1 Technical accuracy.
CAUTION Procedure provisions which are based on, or
======= extracted from, supplier data (drawings, manuals, bulletins, notices, etc.) must be reviewed for technical content as part of the procedure review process. No reliance should be placed on any previous review or status stamping of suppiter dr.ta unless this review meets the criteria of this procedure.
.1.2 Compliance with policy and requirements.
.1.3 Effect of document (s) on other responsible discipline (s) and on Site document (s) within Cognizant Supervisor's discipline.
.2 Initiate additional review (s) as deemed appropriate.
.3 Provide additional comments on PF(123) 109 or CC(123) 261, if necessary. Pa 1
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISIQN 11 PAGE 18 0F 41 TCN #- L 6.0 f20.CID@l (Continued) 6.6.4.4 If satisfied with document (s) and PF(123) 109(s),
.4.1 Determine the implementation status of any related Facility Design Change (see Definitions, Attachment
- 1) by checking with Equipment Status Control:
.4.1.1 If a procedure is related to a Facility Design Change and is required prior to turnover of the system in accordance with Technical Specification surveillance or other operational concern requirements, the procedure may be approved prior to implementation of the design change.
.4.2 Indicate the status review of implemented, related Facility Design Change (s) by signature and date on the PF(123) 109.
.4.3 Prepare and/or approve (if designated by the CFDM)
Form PF(123) 109-1 for "QA PROGRAM AFFECTING" documents using the guidelines provided in Reference 2.2.2.
.5 Return document package to SPG writer.
6.6.5 SPG Writer shall:
.1 Check total package for proper completion and provide, as necessary, the following:
.l.1 Proper document pagination and format. -
.1.2 The disposition of any TCNs outstanding since document preparation per CDM records.
.l.3 Proper accountability for each indicated review.
.l.4 Sequential numbering of all returned PF(123) 109(s) and all received Formal / Interdisciplinary Reviewer consnents.
.1.5 Proper numbering of PF(123) 109-1, if required.
.2 Prepare final approval package for Cognizant Functional Division Manager (CFDM) (Reference 2.1.1).
.3 Submit final approval packages to the responsible CFDM (see Attachment 5 for a listing of CFDM responsibility for Project documents).
i
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S01230 Viol.0 UNITS 1, 2 ANO 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 19 0F 41 TCN ll4 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.6.6 Coonizant Functional Division Manaaer (CFDM) shall:
.1 Review entire document package.
.1.1 Assess the reviewer selection and note the actual reviews performed on the subject document.
.2 Provide additional connents, if applicable, which may include a request for additional reviews, as appropriate.
.3 If satisfied with document (s) and PF(123) 109(s),
.4 Enter effective date on document to permit training '
if deemed necessary.
.4.1 Review prepared Environmental Evaluation and approve, if applicable.
.4.2 Prepare Form PF(123) 109-1 for "QA PROGRAM AFFECTING" documents in accordance with the guidelines in Reference 2.2.2, Of
.4.3 Review prepared Form PF(123) 109-1.
.4.4 Indicate approval of the document and concurrence with the scope of interdisciplinary review by signature and date on PF(123) 109 and, if applicable, sign and date Form PF(123) 109-1.
.5 Return entire document package to SPG writer.
6.6.7 SPG Writer shall:
.1 Check package for firal approval.
.2 If final approval of a procedure / instruction has been obtained, proceed to step 6.7.
.3 If additional comments have been received, return to step 6.4.3.6 and proceed accordingly.
.4 If subject document is a Site Order, submit final approvalpackagetoStationManager,asappropriate.lOa
- . - - - - . . - - . , _ - - - - - - ~ , _ - - , .
l NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 50123 VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION IL PAGE 20 0F 41 TCN H ' '$ ;
i l
6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) !
6.6.8 Station Manaaer:
.1 Review Site Order package.
.2 Provide coments on CC(123) 261, as appropriate. l
.3 If satisfied with Site Order and PF(123) 109(s),
indicate approval by signature and date on PF(123) 109.
.4 Return Site Order package to SPG writer.
6.6.9 SPC Writer shall:
.1 Review package for additional coments or approval.
.2 If additional coments have been received, return to step 6.4.3.6 and proceed accordingly.
.3 If S' Ation Manager's final approval has been 44 obtained, prepare Site Order package for publication.
6.7 Publication 6.7.1 Author shall:
.1 If circumstances require imediate issuance of a document which only partially supersedes another, issue a TCN (Reference 2.2.4) concurrently against the partially superseded document to delete the superseded sections.
6.7.2 SPG Writer or Desionee shall:
.1 Verify outstanding TCNs per COM records and check the disposition provided for each. -
.2 If additional TCNs have been issued, DO NOT proceed. -
All outstanding TCNs shall be accounted for prior to publication, NOTIFY AUTHOR.
.3 Attach coment sheets, if comen'.s received.
.4 Attach completed PF(123) 109-1 for 'QA PROGRAM AFFECTING"document (s).
i i
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 21 0F 41 TCN flO 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.7.2.5 Attach copy of completed PF(123) 109-2 for controlled (d forms, if applicable.
.5.1 If required, submit original PF(123) 109-2 along with a copy of PF(123) 109 to the SPG Forms Control Clerk.
4
.6 Check if training has been indicated or "NO" checked on PF(123) 109.
.6.1 Check "Yes" on PF(123) 109 if a copy of the and approved PF(123) 109(s) need to be document sent to Nuc(s) lear Training Division, Office Administrator, or indicate N/A.
.7 Assess changes (i.e., new/ revised / cancelled attachments, forms, checklists, sign offs) that have been made to records (see Definitions, Attachment 1) within the document (s).
.7.1 Check "Yes" on PF(123) 109 if records are significantly affected to indicate a copy of the document (s) and approved PF(123) 109(s) need to be sent to Operations and Maintenance Support (Reference 2.2.6) or indicate N/A.
.8 Submit original CC(123) 183 and CC(123) 184 with a copyofPF(123)109 to the Supervisor, Configuration Control, f
.9 Sign and date PF(123) 109 indicating the g
preparation / completion of the document package and submit to CDM for publication.
.10 Submit original non-Project document package (s) to CDM or Project Administration, as appropriate, on Form SCE 26-22-2, noting which document (s) must be cancelled or issued simultaneously.
.11 Return original Project document package (s) to Project Administration on Form SCE 26 22-2, noting which document (s) must be cancelled or issued simultaneously.
6.7.3 Proiect Administration shall;
.1 Record the Site approval in the :ppropriate Project Log.
.2 Route the original document package (s) to CDM on a release package in accordance with the applicable Project procedures.
i NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 50123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 22 0F 41 TCH ll- 3 6.0 PROCEDURE (Continued) 6.7.4 (jg (For Information Only)
.1 If documents are indicated as requiring simultaneous issuance / cancellation and one or more requires rejection, return all indicated documents to SPG or Project Administration, as applicable.
.2 Process approved documents in accordance with Reference 2.4.1.
.3 Affix the effective date, unless provided.
NOTE: A cancellation date, 12 months from I the effective date, is affixed to Special Procedures (SP prefix) (see Definitions, Attachment 1) by COM prior to publication. Special Procedures are automatically cancelled upon the cancellation date and are removed /r= called from Site controlled files in accordance with Reference 2.4.1.
.4 Affix the cancellation date, as appropriate.
.5 Distribute documents in accordance with the distribution matrix.
.6 Recall Project or C/S C documents from the field upon written notification from the Site Procedures Group.
6.8 Late Coments (Not applicable to Project and C/S-C documents) 6.8.1 SPG Writer shall:
.1 Submit the original Nuclear Engineering and Safety consents on E01s or A0ls to CDM for retention, if applicable.
.2 Return late coments to author.
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 23 07 41 TCN 11' 3 6.0 ERQ(EDURE (Continued) 6.8.2 Author shall:
.1 Review late comments.
,2 If late B comments warrant an immediate change, initiate a revision in accordance with Reference 2.2.1 or a TCN in accordance with R$ference 2.2.4.
.3 Retain other late comments for the next revision.
7.0 RECORDS 7.1 Approved Site' documents PF(123) 109(s), comments and applicable PF(123) 109-1(s) shall be filed in CDM.
7.2 Approved PF(123) 224 forms shall be filed in CDM.
(
Falcone:0117f.aut
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 24 0F 41 ATTACtMENT 1 TCN (19 j DEFINITIONS
- 1. A Coment - An informational or editorial coment which should be resolved prior to publication.
- 2. B Coment - A significant technical coment which shall be resolved prior to final aoproval of the document, e.g., issues pertaining to responsibilities, safety, environmental impact and QA PROGRAM AFFECTING determination.
- 3. CEQH - Cognizant Functional Division Manager ;
- 4. ContractyjM:entractor (C/S-C) Document - A document generated by an ,
independnu mtractor or subcontractor to perform a specified activity.
- 5. Facility Desian Chanae - A change to the physical configuration of facility structures, systems or components. Facility Design Changes may take the form of Design Change Packages, Proposed Facility Changes. Temporary Facility Modifications, and dispositioned Nonconformance Reports.
- 6. Egrmal/Interdisciolinary Review - A cal Aerately critical examination of a document prior to publicativn which f^ sitiated by the responsible Cognizant Supervisor and recorded on form PF(123) 109, Routing and Document Control.
- 7. Imolementation Implementation of a Facility Design Change is defined as turnover of the system / system components to Station.
- 8. Hay - The word "may" is used to denote permission, neither a requirement .mr a recomendation.
- 9. Pinina and Instrumentation Diaaram(s) (PLIDs) - Diagrams which function to define process flowpath parametric boundaries such as flowpaths, pressures and temperatures and to provide schematic representation of instrumentation.
- 10. A oiect Document - A procedure generated by Project to perform a specified activity.
- 11. 0A Procram Affecting - A term used to indicate programs and activities controlled by the Topical Quality Assurance Manual or activities subject to a 10 CFR 50.59 Review. Within the text of documents, QA Program Affecting may be abbreviated as 'QA Affecting."
- 11. Records - Those documents which furnish documentary evidence of the quality of items and of activities affecting quality.
M ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 1 0F 2 '
i
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 25 0F 41 ATTACHWENT 1 TCH i'h DEFINITIONS (Continued)
- 13. Review Period - The designated number of working days permitted for review.
A standard parallel review is ten (10) working days and a rush review is five (5) for Site Documents. A two (2) day review is requested for C/S-C and certain Project documents.
- 14. Shall - The word "shall" is used to denote a requirement.
- 15. Should - The word "should" is used to denote a recommendation.
- 16. Site Controlled Form - A form whose design is controlled by Nuclear Generation Site Department Forms Control anti 's properly approved for use.
- 17. Site Document - A document that has received approval for use at the Nuclear Generation Site in accordance with this document (S0123-VI-1.0).
- 18. Soecial Procedure - A special procedure controls a specified activity which is to be performed only once or over i short period of time. Twelve (12) months from th~e effective date a special procedure is automatically cancelled for use by COM, who retains a file copy.
- 19. Temocrary Facility Modification (TFHi - A Temporary Facility Modification is required for a facility structure, system or component which, when used to perform its function as a part of the facility, is in an other-than-as-designed condition, Oll7f ATTACHMENT 1 PAGE 2 0F 2 b .
1 NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI 1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 26 0F 41 ROUTING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL - UNIT (1)
PF(123) 109 NOTE: Entries should be typed or written legibly with a black, medium ballpoint pen, l
(2) A.
Title:
(3) Site Document Number: Rev. No.:
(4) Document Author / Originator: PAX:
(Print Name)
(5) Date flouted: SPG Writer: PAX:
(Print Name)
(6) 8. Reason for Review:
(7) C. This document has been verified against the P&lD(s): YES j
NO N/A P&ID Number (s)
(8) Verified against actual plant configuration: YES NO N/A PERFORMED BY:
Author / Originator Date (9) D. TCNs: N/A Incorporated Cancelled No. No. No.
Disapproved ._,
No.
ps (10) E. Is this document (or revision) a result of a Facility Design Change?
(PFC, NCR, or TFM , FCN) YES NO Facility Design Change Identifier: __
Type Number l
FACSINILE 1
l ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 1 0F 9 i
l
Y NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATfVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 27 0F 41 I ATTACHMENT 2 TCN ll 55 ROUTING AND 00CUMENT CONTROL l PF(123) 109 ]
(Continued) 1 (11) F. Disposition of Site Controlled Form (s):
No Change Needed New, revised or cancelled (See attached PF(123) 109-2]
G. FORMAL / INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW: (Blank areas are for independent reviews. Print in person's name and organization.)
(12) REVIEWED BY:
(13) (141 (13) (14)
(X) If Position / (X) If Position /
Reard. Ora. Initials Comments Reard. Ora. Initials Comments Shift Supt.
- 1. STATION MGR 17. Unit 1 2 3 DEPUTY Supt.
- 2. STATION MGR 18. Unit 1 2 3 Supvr. Engr.
- 3. MGR OPS 19. (Comouters)
Supv?.
- 4. MGR TECH 20. Chemistrv Supvg. C.gr.
- 5. MGR MAINT 21. Power Gener.
Supvg. Engr.
- 6. MGR H.P. 22. NSSS Enara. 99 MGR OUTG Maint. Supvr.
- 7. MGMT 23. Unit 1 2 3 MGR PROJ Supvr.
- 8. I23 24. I&C MGR 0&M Supvr.
- 9. SUPPORT 25. CC MGR B&C
- 10. CONTROL 26. MGR NE&S
- 11. MGR M&AS (13A)fX1 29. 0A/0C MGR NUC.
- 12. TRNG. 28.
MGR
- 13. COMPLIANCE 29.
MGR
- 14. SECURITY 30.
MGR
- 15. EMERG. PREP. 31.
MGR
- 16. MTRL. SPPT. 32.
FACSIMILE ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 2 0F 9
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI 1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 28 0F 41 ATTACHMENT 2 TCN ll-%
ROUTING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PFil23) 109 (Continued)
(15) H. Training Required: YES NO Discipline Contact for Training Coordination PAX (Print Name)
(16) I. QA Program Affecting Determination:
~~~-
CURRENT (X) one PROPOSED (X)one hd QA PROGRAM AFFECTING NOT QA PROGRAM AFFECTING ;
. Ob Proposed Not QA Program Affecting Determination APPROVED BY:
~
(17)
QUALITY ASSURANCE DATE (18) J. o m ent Requires QA Final Approval: YES D~EU NO (19) K. Doc 0 ment a.1d Review (s) Approved By:
Cognizant Supervisor Date (20) L. Reviewer Comments If comments are informational, enter "A" and initial.
If Technical comments require resolution prior to approval, enter "B" and initial.
In~dicate acceptance of the resolution of B comments by entering initials and date.
PREPARED RESOLUTION BY TYPE COMMENT (S) RESOLUTION APPROVED BY DATE ,
Attach CC(123) 261 form, if necessary. E FACSIMILE ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 3 0F 9
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRAT8VE PROCEDURE S0123-VI 1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 29 0F 41 ATTACHMEhT2 TCN IV 9 ROUTING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PFil23) 109 (Continued)
(21) M. QA Final Document Approval:
APPROVED BY:
Quality Assurance Date (22) N. Environmental Evaluation: (Guidelines provided in 50123-VI-1.3)
NOTE: If an environmental question is posed, the document shall not be approved until the Supervisor, Environmental Services, has completed an environmental review.
Could implementation of this document pose adverse environmental effects #
of any type directly or indirectly? l POS$1BLY _ Reason:
N0 _ "The nature of this document is such that it will not result in a condition which significantly alters the impact of the station on the environment nor does it pose an unreviewed environmental question."
APPROVED BY:
Cognizant Functional Division Manager or Designee (23) O. Facility Design Change Implementation REVIEWED BY: __
Cognizant Supervisor s .e P. Final Document Approval and P.eviewer Concurrence:
(24)
APPROVED BY:
Cognizant Functional Division Manager Date (24A)
(25)
ORDER APPROVED'BY:
Station Manager Date FACSIMILE ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 4 0F 9
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 30 0F 41 l ATTACHMENT 2 TCN II 9 ROUTING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PF(123) 109 (Continued)
(j (26) Q. Document Package Preparation ,
PERFORMED BY:
SPG Writer or Designee Date (27) R. Copy (ies) to be forwarded by CDM YES/NA Indicated by SPG
- 1. Copy of PF(123) 109 and document to be sent to:
YES N/A 44 Nuclear Training Division (Office _
Administrator)
Operations and Maintenance Support Div. _
- 2. Copy forwarded to Nuclear Safety Group PERFORMED BY: __
CDM Date o
FACSIMILE ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 5 0F 9
I NUCLEAR CENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 31 0F 41 I
ROUTING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL ,
PF(123i 109 I (Continued)
Kevooints:
Author
- 1. Enter SONGS unit number (s) to which the subjact documert applies.
- 2. Enter tha full title as it appears on the subject document.
- 3. Enter SPG/CDM assigned number and current revision number.
- 4. Print name of individual responsible for content and clarification of a new or revised document. If cancellation of a document, or C/S-C document being submitted, print name of originator.
Enter PAX number of author or originator, as appropriate.
- 6. Provide a detailed reason for revision / review, including as appropriate:
CAR /NRC comitment(s) and date(s).
. Licensing commitment change (s) and implementation due date(s).
. TITLE CHANGE, if any title change has been made to the subject document draft.
. TCN incorporation
. Proposed Facility Change (s).
. Nonregulatory comitment(s), e.g., INP0.
. Implements turnover package.
. Cancel - Superseded by -- . Licensing comitments transferred to _ .
. Cancel - Program / Provisions no longer required.
. Supersedes .
. Issue / Cancel simultaneously.
ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 6 0F 9 m - _ -- - -- - - . - - , . ..,,n-.,, .,- . . , - - - - - - - , .
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI 1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 32 0F 41 ATTACHFEQ 2 TCN frp ROUTING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PFfl23) 109 (Continued)
Kevooints: (Continued)
- 7. Provide answer. If yes, enter P&IO number (s).
- 8. Provide answer, sign, and date. If answer is N/A, then N/A may be entered on the signature line.
- 9. Provide the disposition of each outstanding TCN recorded by COM or check N/A as appropriate, if
- 10. Check Yes or No. If Yes, provide that design change's type / category and identifying number.
- 11. Provide disposition of Site Contrclied Forms.
- 12. Based upon review of subject draft's effect upon other responsible disciplines, or possible adverse environmental impact, check and/or write in apprcpriate reviewers.
Consider previous review and approval authorities from prior routing documents.
13A. If the document is currently designated as Not QA Pt ogram Affecting, it does n9.1 require QA review. For current Not QA Program Affecting documents, put a line through the QA block, initial, and state "Not Required" in the adjacent blocks. All other documents require QA review as a minimum.
Coanizant Suoervisor Review Author entries.
- 15. Determine whether formal training is required on the subject document's contents. Provide the discipline training contact for coordination of formal training, if applicable.
~16. Check "QA Program Affecting" determination.
Proposed Not QA Program Affecting determinations must be approved by QA and reflected in Keypoint 17. Enter N/A in Keypoint 17 for all other determinations.
ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 7 0F 9
.o
- a. . - _
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 Vl-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 33 0F 41 ATTACHMENI.2 TCN IF4 ROUTING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PF(123) 109 (Continued)
Kevooints: (Continued)
- 18. Indicate if the document requires QA final approval, depending upon whether the document describes and controls activities affecting safety related items.
If the document does mLt require QA final approval, enter N/A in Keypoint
- 21. l #,
- 19. Indicate @ proval of subject document and appropriate reviewer selectionge approval by signature and date.
- 23. After interdisciplinary review and just prior to CFDM final approval, provide signature and date of Facility Design Change impleinentation.
Enter "N/A" for procedures required for the turnover of the system in accordance with Technical Specification surveillance requirements, other operational concarn requirements or if the document is not related to a Facility Design Change.
SPG Writer
- 5. Enter date do::ument is distributed for review, name, and PAX number.
24A. A line may be inserted for an additional document approver (i.e., Deputy p S.tation Manager), to facilitate document sign-off.
Formal / Interdisciplinary Reviewers
- 13. Indicate review of subject document by providing initials on PF(123) 109.
- 14. Indicate presence of coments by entering "A" or "B" on PF(123) 109.
l or Indicate absence of comments by entering "none" on PF(123) 109.
- 20. Record coments on PF(123) 109. If necessary, attach CC(123) 261. lfE Indicate coment approval by entering initials ar.d date.
Site Quality Assuranca Manaaer or Desianated Suoervisor(s)
- 17. Review and approve proposed "Not QA Program Affecting" determination or alter determination. Sign and date to indicate review and approval of l determination.
Quality Assurance (For Information Only)
- 21. Indicate final approval of document (s) by signature and date, if required.
ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 8 0F 9 1
1
NUCLEAR GENERATION SfTE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI 1.0 l UNITS 1,- 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 34 0F 41 ATTACHM{N,T2 t TCH lt 9 ROUTING AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PF(123) 109 (Continued)
Kevooints: (Continued)
Coanizant Functional Division Manaaer or Desionee
- 22. Approve environmental evaluation by signing and dating.
(Reference 2.2.2)
Coanizant Functional Division Manaaer
- 24. Indicate final approval of the subject document and concurrence with the review the subject document has received by signature and date.
24A. Indicated Acorover (If entered)
Indicate final approval of subject document by signature and date.
Station Manaaer (For Orders Only) M
- 25. Indicate final approval of Order (s) for Station Dvisions, including those reporting to the Deputy Station Manager, and concurrence with the review the subject Order has received by signature and date.
SPG Writer or Desionee
- 26. Indicate document package preparation by signature and date.
.CE
- 27. 1. Provide copy to the Nuclear Training Division and Operations and (t)
Maintenance Support Division when "YES" has been indicated, which includes subject document and PF(123) 109.
- 2. Provide copy to the Nuclear Safety Group, which includes subject document, PF(123) 109 and, if applicable, PF(123) 109-1.
- 3. Sign and date.
ATTACHMENT 2 PAGE 9 0F 9 FACSIMILE
4 se
-me o $",
as W o
@ .J C W < Q z -
a m =
m an e
M -
w -
g i g
- ) o w
o=
a 4 .
5 o
a 3 1.
.o 1 s
aa s
OT W a c I-M L&. >=
.o.
eQ a -
a
==
>m r.
.M W
-o 3 M d NW 7 5
-o 04 o - 8 ]-
w I M o. s a c u w W g <
W a
O W
-=
3 7
-0 g Q w G ..=
N* K 2
w m N. -
=
b d
d @ i l 2 0; 8 m w , -
c a
r OC o r.)
~. 3:
g 3 W O
- Z o
> 2 O I M < D h
- 4 Wm
- g 0 as; - > W x -o E E 2 o 5 r.eeE.Qw 2E
%gl* a ;
e-E N
- == m ( W
>HE ..
=
WWv 3 l
a<r w w w
oc
.Y. -i ?;;
c O h 3 C b 1 3a -I
- i M
Ol 2
l z .50 "l
r u ..
o W w .a.
=
W D 3 u
M
- 3" -t l @
-m o a4
- H w Z
1 o < $
w o -
ud 3 I 6
- 2 '
E WN W
3
>. g - 3*I C a l
- w g
- w c .a - I e
cc m - N. O*
w<
8 l
eC e* w m- 5-l WM =
4%
E e 4m
>>e ~
w z
=
( >=
- a. -
wz m--
e w o u '.;- :
.<a 2 =
m x x. >.
MMM w : :
NNN m f m w
- e. > - :
O i
aw o t
. M- m > ME a OOC w .=
A A mee w
- G '
4 l
l l
l l
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 36 0F 41 ATTACHMENT 3 TCN ll'h )
REVIEW COMMENT AND RESOLUTION - CC(123) 261 ked KEYPOINTS l
l DOCUMENT REVIEW AND COMMENT
- 1. The reviewer records the identifying information for the document being reviewed.
- 2. The reviewer records coments, the initials of the reviewer and the type coment ("A" information only and "B" resolution required). Coments from several reviewers may be entered on one sheet.
- 3. The principle reviewer or supervisor is identified for follow-up and coment resolution.
COMMENTS RESOLUTION
- 4. The person responsible far resolution of coments reviews the coments and deter: sines the resolut'.on to be .51de. Either this person or the reviewer should record the resalution.
- 5. When the coment is satisfactorfly resolved, the reviewer or supervisor initials and dates the Resolutinn Approved column. If telephone approval'of coment resolution is obtained, this fact is recorded (e.g., "Per Telcon with-(name) of (date) (sianature of resolver)."
Oll7f ATTACHMENT 3 PAGE 2 0F 2
s NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 50123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 37 0F 41 ATTCHMENT 4 TCN H-3 REFEREleCE: 50123-VI-1.0 ENCODE :
50 m . o.se IDENTIFICATION OF PROCEDURES REQU1 RING SITE APPROVAL The follcuing procedure (s) are being assessed to determine if they affect Nuclear Safety or if they fall uithin the categories outlined in Section 6.8.1 of the unit 1. 2, ard 3 Technical Specifications.
Procedure Type Contractor / Rev. Unit (s) Site *.pproval dequired?
lt*j (ie.. Project. C/5-C. ether) Subcentractor Document Title Document No. No. Af fected leo Yes
- Cf0M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 l
(
PnEPAnf D SY; APPnOVED eY:
9 10 SPG Date renager. Compliance or Designee Date
~ ~g g .. ., ..r o
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123-VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 38 0F 41
,, N
[ IDENTIFICATION OF PROCEDURES RE0VIRING SITE APPROVAL PF(123) 324. REVISION 0 KEYPOINTS SPG WRITER (1) Indicate type of procedure being assessed (i.e., Project, Retrofit, C/S-C, other).
(2) Enter name of Contractor / Subcontractor, if applicable.
(3) Enter document title.
(4) Enter document number.
(5) Enter document revisi m number per e.C!i .ecords.
(6) Enter SONGS unit number (s) to whi;h the subject document applies.
(9) Enter name and date.
MANAGER. COMPLIANCE / DESIGNEE (7) Indicate whether Site approval required for the subject document.
(8) Select responsible Cognizant Functional Division Manager (CFDM).
(10) Sign and date indicating approval of determination.
0117f ATTACHMENT 4 PAGE 2 0F 2
s.
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123 VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 39 0F 41 ATTACHPENT 5 TCN l' D CFDM RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX FOR PROJECT DOCUMENTS Pro.iect Procedure Desianator Resoonsible CFDM AC - Acceptance Test Mgr., Technical AP - Administrative Procedure Various
- CT - Calibration Test Mgr., Maintenance CV - Cleanness Verification Test Mgr., Technical GP - General Procedure Mgr., Tecnnical GT - Generic Test Mgr., Technical MP - Maintenance Mgr., Maintenance PA - Power Ascension Mgr., Operations PE - Preoperational Test Mgr., Technical SP - Specific Test Mgr., Technical ST - Special Test Mgr., Technical TI - Test Instruction Mgr., Technical TP - Test Procedure Mgr., Technical WP - Work Procedure Various *
- CFDM responsibility for Project APs and WPs is determined by the Manager, Compliance (see section 6.2.1.1).
NOTE: The Deputy Station Manager shall approve Project documents,g within his jurisdiction (Security) in addition to the P appropriate CFDM.
l
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADNINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE S0123.VI-1.0 UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 40 0F 41 ATTACHNENT 6 TCN //- 3 FLOW CHART MTM llaltlate ressest. ~! IBesolve commmets.1
.--IPf fl23) 185 form. I IDeterstae If 1 I g i Isecond routlag i i 4, leecessary. l l ,
. Ic or<limate tsping. I t 4 IBeview doc.png..
IPrepare 1R3 a l Iceilect review. I 1 Review dec. 1 I SIlf PaoCIDunf5 I s.4att resteu reabl4 . lite for pro- 1 Ireture all i fpkg., prepare I lsubmit origtaal 183 1 Ga0W (5K) I lerart and approprt-l I lject and C/5-C 1 l cements te I lfer final ap- l 14 184 with a Copy off I late forms to autherl 1 leets. Distri- I lauthor er le 4 1roval by Cf0M i ipffl23) 109 to the !
I land y epare mistoryl i l ibute dec. pags. I Iresolve,as l l for Statten l 15mper. Config. 1 I Itoo. I l l Ito restewers I lapplicable. Up-l i l IMgr./Mgr. NGS l 4 Control, forward I l l l l land update I idate tracklag i l I las appropriatel lpkl. Le CDM or i l 1 4 l ltractlag system.I lsystem. l l l land update i lproject and close i l I leestew of C/5-C/ l I 1 Itracktag I laut History tog. l l 8 l Project documents. I i l 1 sy stem. l l Es, CoetIAmCE I loetermine -Aether I i 1 l i 158te approval I i l i i Ireentred. 1 I I I I I I i 1 i i i i i i i cuALITY l , 9 I I A55URmCE l IRevlaw/approvel i I Idec. pkg.. I I I Iprovide com- 1 l l leests,as I l 1 v <r laps /opet ate. _1 l t IReview Pi (123) wy _I laeview<bc, pts..I l COGNIZANT *-eltstries. Review / l Iprepare Eastron- l l SUPCRVI5CA latter/ approve dec. I laestal Evalsattoal I 196 9 I 1' lead pall 23) 109-11 1 IRev ew/ces- l !*f appi$ cable. I 3 laent as app-I I I Irepriate. 1 I'l- l l Complete de-I l l l Et vit ut ti iterstaatten l I i l let affected i l l l Idocuests oni i 1 " l 1184 Form. / 1l l Review / approve I i i / I Idoc. pag.. 8 l CftDt i / l provide com- l-> 1 leemts as l l l appropriate 1 i 4 1 JEeview/ approve I i
[ 15tte Order ske.1 l land provide l-> l STATION MGR . Icemmients as I I a lappropriate i l{
l i inevseu 4.c. ,a ,..I l l record approval 1 ptGJECT lla project tog & I
( ADMINI51RA!!ON lsubmit doc. pkg. I l Ito CDM for i i l a ssuanc e i 1' l iM' 'A d i s t r i - jg .------. I CM lbute duumment . I
NUCLEAR GENERATION SITE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCECURE S0123-VI 1.0 UNITS 1,'2 AND 3 REVISION 11 PAGE 41 0F 41 ATTACHM li 7K 7 TCH REVISION DESCRIPTION ABSTRACT S0123-VI-1.1, Station Approval of Startup Procedures and Temporary Change Notices, and S0123-VI-1.2, Station Review and Approval of Contractor / Subcontractor Procedures after Unit Licensing, are being cancelled in order to establish a unified Site document processing system. All document processing provisions exclusive to Project and Contractor / Subcontractor (C/S-C) documents have been inccrporated into S0123-VI-1.0, Revision 11. All document numbering requirements have been transferred to S0123-VI-0.9, Documents-Author's Guide to the Preparation of Site Orders, Procedures and Instructions.
Maior Chances Include:
- 1. Elimination of multiple reviews by SCE Station Engineering and Quality Assurance on Project documents. Presently, SCE Station Engineering and QA participate in both the Project internal review (TWG) and the Station 50(123) 109 review processes. This revision will combine the TWG and 109 reviews into Sag Site review process. The Project TWG approval sheet will be eliminated in favor of the Site 50(123) 109 form. The previous TWG Chairman will act as the Cognizant Supervisor for 50(123) 109 purposes, selecting the necessary interdisciplinary reviewers from Project and Station.
- 2. Elimination of Project TCN equivalent forms (i.e., PCNs, WPCNs, TICNs, APCNs). Presently Project TCNs are approved within Project, attached to Site TCNs (S0(123) 110), and routed for Site approval. The Project and Site TCNs are equivalent in content, the only difference being the signatures required. This revision will eliminate the Project TCNs in favor of the Site TCN. Project TCN approval authorities will be maintained by allowing these individuals to sign as Plant Management Staff on the Site TCH form.
l 3. Unification of site document numbering. Project and Station will no longer j have different document numbers for the same Site document. Project and
> C/S-C documents will utilize the Roman numeral system presently outlined in l S0123-VI-0.9.
- 4. Formalization of Project Management and Manager, Compliance roles in I determining which C/S-C documents require Site approval.
FOR INFORMATION ONLY LFalcone:Oll7f.aut ATTACHMENT 7 PAGE 1 0F 1
strtat=Ct : 50ir>.vi 1.0.i y NO. ACioAC r .n um n.,,ee o ,8 I ituroR A.1v CHAsect peotect Page i cf I f TIClel! CAL $PECIFICATION VIOLAf!0N If NOT CCptPLITED WifMIN 14 DAT5 TCN 20. [!*
(ree c m .se oniy>
Site noc ent no. 50123-VI-1.0 ,,,,,,,, ,,, 11 Simte u$t TCM n5 NO X uocuments - Keview ana approval Process for Site Orders, Pr'oceduriS
$1te Documset Title and Instructions
- i. ,Re,4Rao sw l.. Falcone pu: 89447 CacAntzAr:04: M&AS/SPG Crfginator 7/27/87 1 p.m. 3. 155uANCr eart: S EP 14 1987,c,,, ,,, ,,,
- 2. 0Anmic Ce:GINArro:
4 SINGLE USE TCn cancels on: (C!st U51 ONLY) l
- 5. If reovired, TCM Cevf ation Approvelt Cf0M (or desfgneel: U/d signatwre/Ir of telecon print name and so state cate/Tfse
- 6. Check sooropef ate bos: Entire Doqueent Attached O Affected ra,eti> Attacaed Sveerseded/ Incorporated s is): Il-4 (Not apolicable No. (fr noae, so state) for $1 %LE Uit TCNs)
?. rhis chan ,e ca m t wait untii the ne.t revision of the Site Doc - t and is reevir H : RECEIVED CDM A. to f iement ruiiity desi,n chan,e (erC, =CR, trN, etc.:
Facility design change identiffer /
SEP 141987 Indicate FFC. 8icA ITM etc. Identfrier i iementation of the fuiitty design change has bon deter.ined, n5 No SITE FILE COPY has been fluglemee (If NO a T p ate SeCtlOn .2 to address B. X Cther f e.g.CN
, CAA, cannot'be approved until Licensing Commitments) theReason:
Specific f acility design c .
records being forwarded to 0&MS; reference current forms and update k 123) svi avrm, asivvrpvrc6c viyoinstoLivri vit o rig e n .
(Use reverse side, ir reewired)
- 8. Is the document befag TCN'd QA Affecting? YI5 X NO (If Yt$. cosqilete the bones below.) (If NC, see
- beloo.)
(This is indicated on the Table of Contents pagfof thTTite OoIweent. If not indicated, treat as QA AffMting.)
Does this changt arrect 75)ut or Tech 5pec. commitmentu ru mg A A.
B. Does this Chan9e affect the nonradiciogfCal environment of any oEsIIe area previously Wadisturbed during site preparation and plant construction? YES NO y C. Is the intent of the original document altered? Yt3 NO A
- 0. Is the docwnent to be changed an taergency Operating Instrucilon? Y NO X
- t. Does this change pose an unreviewed safety question per 10 CFR 50.59, f.e., does it f acrease the pro 6 ability of occvrrence or the conse4vences of an accidents create the possibility of a different accidents or reduce tne Tech. Spec. margin of safety? Yt3 k1 X (IF T)( AR$Wct to A, B, C. O or t 15 YT5~ A TCf75 NOT AUTNott!!D.)
- 9. Does this change effect Itcensing cosattaent requirements? YES _ No_L
- 10. Copy forwood to the nuclear Safety Group. PERFORMED 5Y:
(QA Affecting TCNs only)
K
- 11. The entf re document was reviewed in con. function with this TCN. n/g REVIEwto Am0 APPRQVf D WW CHM or Designee Date
$1GRAtW E5 stoutat0 c) ,
12.
,p i . m --- gpr
( 0 ON TWc UNlf ATTICit / 7 // g,83 J.G[Jhield
- ii REVitWEDg APPROVED WY9
[.I. N O Flant Menegemast 5taff [ Unit 'l D r) n. N
'/ Date Ties FlantRenagement5taff.UnittZ&J' Date 7, - .", dY yeersa i~
Tlae Cov1d this TCM affect or does it represent a change to a plant Could this TCN affect or does it represent a change t; operation progress? Yt5 m NO =%. a plant operat on in progress? YtS*** NO #
- 3) w- _- a 'l48-En M'$ e) / f rr_f 7b1ll7 NG
" WW_A N 1}a7l$ NYV " ' "' Wh &S 65b! HST m
":7W g"
,In In ., ALfwh ccangwtg manager g y t/ As:eraare Unft: 1. E and J Deto
- If a docuneat is Not AffMting, ootain f aitf al soproval from the Cognf rant Supervisor (s) on the affected unit (s) (signs on Plant Management Staff Itse(s)) and final approval from the Cftpl prior to sutaittal to COM. do other signatures are required.
" If CA Affecting, sporoval shall be by two meet >ers of the Plant Management Staff knostedgeable in the areas af fected, at least one of unos holds an SA0 License on the vnt? or watts affectH. (For TCn approval, meseers of the Piant Management Staff are defined as the supervisor in charge of the shif t, or as designated in writing by the CFte*, esercistag responsibility in the specific area and unit (s) addres:H by the change.)
l m If gts, the Shif t Supertateneent shall provide the required $A0 sporoval.
.co n ,(ii > > . i e . e v. . .u s,..
.- -- .. - ._ . - . .