ML20151A427

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 4 to Dept QA Procedure E&C 24-10-16, Development, Review,Approval & Release of SCE Design Change Package (DCP) & Assembly W/Proposed Facility Changes (Pfc) San Onofre...1, 2 & 3. Proposed Change Notice 1 Encl
ML20151A427
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 02/01/1988
From: Eastman
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20151A165 List:
References
E&C-24-10-16, NUDOCS 8807190370
Download: ML20151A427 (23)
v • d • e


Text

1 E&C 24-10-16

. Southern Cantornia Edison Company DEPARTMENT o

QA PROCEDURE Engineering and Construction Department ' REV. 4 l EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88 l l

DEVELOPMENT, REVIEW, APPROVAL AND RELEASE OF SCE DESIGN CHANGE PACKAGES (DCP)

AND ASSEMBLY WITH PROPOSED FACILITY CHANGES (PFC)

SONGS 1, 2&3 A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.

The purpose of this procedure is to document the preparation, review, approval, and release of the SCE Design Change Package (DCP) and Proposed Facility Change (PFC) for SONGS 1, 2&3 by the Engineering and Construction Department (E&C) and Nuclear Engineering Safety and Licensing (NES&L), or the Nuclear Generation Site Department (NES). The use of this procedure is ,

limited to design changes which require physical changes to plant systems or structures. This procedure is not applicable to changes to plant computer software which do not cause or are not caused by changes to plant computer hardware.

2. This procedure describes the design interfaces and controls established to verify design compliance with the plant design bases, ensure configuration control, and describes the assembly of the Proposed Facility Change Package R (PFCP).
3. FORM 26-179-1, Interim Design Change Notice (IDCN)/ Design Change Notice (DCN) SONGS 1, 2&3, and FORM 26-179-2, Interim Design Change Notice (IDCN)/ Design Change Notice (DCN) Supplemental Page SONGS 1, 2&3, are used to document design changes and theii approval to design disclosure documents.

The preparation of IDCNs when issued within a DCP will be processed in accordance with E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-10-17. Upon construction completion and Station acceptance of a DCP, all IDCNs within the DCP are converted to DCNs and are distributed to the field against the latest drawing revision to reflect the "As-Built" condition in accordance with E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-8-7. Under no circumstances shall a design change be incorporated into a design disclosure document prior to the actual construction completion.

Prepared By: of,/b /J-// #7 l Author f Date l Approved By: h J A MWl l jResponsibl / Division Manager Date' l l

Approved By:

jHanaqefV Station Technical

/N/N Dale l

l Approved By: O b- k ~

A-M-U

QA Organization Manag6r Date l l l 8807190370 880715 PDR ADOCK 05000361 P PNU

Southern California Edison Company ggg g4,gn_gg Engineering and Construction Department [No'URE REV. 4 EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88 l l

4. New (not previously issued) SCE design and/or Vendor drawings (which provide substantive design information needed for construction) are also R implemented through the DCP Process. New drawings are included in the DCP in a standard SCE drawing format (issued for construction) rather than on the 26-179-1. Upon completion of construction and Station acceptance of a DCP, these new drawings will be distributed to the field to reflect the "As-Built" condition in accordance with E&C 24-8-7.
5. As it becomes necessary to change a new SCE design or Vendor drawing R prior to completion of DCP work, the new drawing changes must be transmitted to the field by means of a revised DCP (see ACTION I) or if criteria permits, a FielJ Generated IDCN (FIDCN) in accordance with E&C 24-10-17, ACTION II,
6. Interdisciplinary review and approval (interface control and design verification) is accomplished on the DCP (system) level. Each IDCN or new drawing must reference the DCP number and revision. R
7. The SCE Responsible Engineer (RE) shall coordinate the procurement of all material associated with a design change. The DCP number must be referenced on all procurement documents.
8. The Quality Class of a DCP shall be the same as the highest Quality Class component, system or structure modified by the DCP as shown in the Q-List (M-37560 for SONGS 1 or 90034 for SONGS 2&3) or Work Request Specification R Design Criteria Document for Unit 1. Any DCP containing a Q-Class change, including additions, deletions or modifications to a Q-Class assignment, shall be approved by Nuclear Systems Engineering (NSE) in addition to the approvals specified in the Document Review and Approval Distribution Matrix (DRADM).
9. Design criteria for the design change are addressed as follows:
a. Unit 1: Design criteria shall be prepared in accordance with E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-7-13.
b. Units 2&3: Design criteria for design development are in accordance with the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Updated Fire Hazards Analysis (UFl!A), Security Plan (SP), and Emergency Plan (EP). Other documentation providing design information and requiring appropriate updating are Technical Specifications, Operating License R documents and System Descriptions. Deviations to the basic design criteria (Design Bases) are handled in accordance with E&C QA Procedure E&C 40-9-13 for UFSAR, UFHA, SP and EP changes; and E&C QA Procedure E&C 40-9-10 for Technical Specification changes; and are addressed in detail in the PFC prepared in accordance with E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-10-15.

Page 2 of 14

Southern CaMornia Edison Company

. E&C 24-10-16 Engineering and Construction Department DEPARTMENT QA PROCEDURE l REV. 4 l EFFECTIVE: 07/01/88 i

10. When it becomes necessary to void a DCP, the term "VOID" shall be used and the action taken shall be as 'ollows:

For voided DCPs,' the Responsible Engineer shall prepare a new DCP cover sheet, FORM 26-178-1, Design Change Package, and document the action by noting "V0ID--To be Revised" in the description area of the form.

11. When it becomes necessary to cancel a DCP, the term "CANCEL" shall be used and the action taken shall be as follows:

For cancelled DCPs, the Responsible Engineer shall prepare a new DCP i cover sheet, Form 26-178-1, and document the action by noting "CANCEL." Once a DCP is cancelled, as indicated by the "CANCEL" DCP cover sheet, a new revision shall not be initiated against that DCP.

If any modifications and/or revisions related to the DCP are found to be necessary, a new DCP shall be prepared having a new DCP number assignment.

The Responsible Engineer shall also revise any calculation which may be affected by the voided or cancelled DCP (refer to E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-7-15).

If E&C is the responsible department, the approvals of the Project Group Leader, Project Engineer and Quality Assurance (QA) Engineer (if applicable) must be obtained prior to submitting it to Corporate Documentation Management (CDM). If NGS is the responsible department, the approvals of the Supervising Engineer 1, Manager, Station Technical and QA Engineer (if applicable) must be obtained prior to submitting it to CDM.

12. This procedure shall apply to all design work regardless of safety class within and along the boundary (including the outside isolation zone) of the SONGS 1, 2&3 Plant Protected Area. It shall also apply to facilities outside the Protected Area as follows:

Facilities not excepted by the conditions of E&C 24-10-15, Exhibit 1, Criterion B.5, which include:

a. Switchyard
b. Condensate Storage Tank and Transfer Piping System
c. Meteorological Instrumentation
d. Emergency Siren and Paging System
e. Radiation Monitoring Stations
f. Circulating Water Conduits and Structures Page 3 of 14

Southern Cantornia Edison Company

~ ggg g4,yn_yg Engineering and Construction Department $P T

' REV. 4 .

EFFECTIVE: 07/01/88 g.

Onsite and Offsite Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) Facilities

h. Facilities, systems or components outside the Protected Area which interface with and affect the performance or operation of facilit'ies, systems or components inside the Protected Area (e.g., Fire Protection, including components stored for use on dedicated / alternate shutdown systems, Communications, etc.).
i. Emergency Operating Facility (E0F) N
13. This procedure complies with the requirements of the applicable documents referenced in the Matrix of Regulatory Reference Material for E&C QA Procedures.

B. PROCEDURAL ACTIONS e ACTION I - PREPARATION OF DCPs AND PFCs R Proiect Enaineer (E&C) or Manaaer. Station Technical (NGS)

1. Assign the design change to a lead Discipline Group Leader (E&C) or Supervising Engineer 1 (NGS) who will assign a Responsible Engineer, identify affected disciplines and determine if an Engineering Services Contractor (ESC) design interface review is required.

Responsible Enaineer

2. Identify all affected design documents known at this time, and prepare a brief description of, and the technical basis for changes,
a. Complete page one of FORM CC(123) 183, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Configuration Document Check List. (Responsible Engineer

[E&C] and Station Originator [NGS] shall complete the form as instructed by keypoints on the reverse side.)

NOTE: Page two of CC(123) 183 is completed by Configuration Control after DCP approval in accordance with Site Configuration Control Procedure 50123-XIV-4.2, Site Design Change R Administration.

b. List a f fected design documents on FORM CC(123) 184, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Configuration Documents Requiring Change, for each major category identified on the CC(123) 183.

I

3. Obtain IDCN numbers from SCE Project Administration (PA) as required and R assign numbers to FORM 26-179-1.

Page 4 of 14

Southem Califomia Edison Company ESC 24-10-16 Engineering and Construction Department q["E'ih o l REV. 4 l l EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88 l

4. Prepare the DCP in accordance with Exhibit 1, including the ccordination of affected discipline drawings and IDCNs.
5. Prepare the PFC in.accordance with E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-10-15, ACTION II and ACTION III or ACTION IV.

= ACTION II - PFCP ASSEMBLY, REVIEW, APPROVAL AND RELEASE Responsible Enaineer

1. Assemble DCP/PFC with the following documents:

PFC Section Containina

a. FORM 26-294, Proposed Facility Change (Cover Sheet)
b. FORM 26-294-1, Design Change Package / Proposed Facility Change Package Contents Page
c. Description of change, Engineering Evaluation and Sa fety Evaluation (10CFR50.59)
d. Environmental Evaluation, Implementation Section, Quality Class and Seismic Catagory Section
e. FORM 26-182, Design Change Package Plant Hazards Requirements
f. FORM 26-247, ALARA Design Review Check List R
g. FORM 26-292, Fire Protection Design Check List
h. FORM CC(123) 183, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Configuration Document Check List
i. FORM CC(123) 184, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Configuration Documents Requiring Change J. Security Plan Check List
k. Station Emergency Planning Design Change Check List
1. Changes to System Descriptions, Technical Specifications, UFSAR, UFHA, and other pertinent design basis and licensing documents Page 5 of 14

Southern Cahlornia Edison Company 16 Engineering and Construction Department QA PROCEDURE REV. 4 EFFECTIVE: 02/01:/88 DCP Section

a. FORM 26-178-1, Design Change Package (DCP Cover Sheet)
b. FORM 26-178-2, Design Change Package Continuation Sheet
c. Bill of Material Worksheet FORM A
d. FORM 26-179-1, Interim Design Change Notice (IDCN)/ Design Change Notice (DCN) SONGS 1, 2&3
e. FORM 26-179-2, Interim Design Change Notice (IDCN)/ Design Change Notice (DCN) SONGS 1, 2&3 Continuation Sheet
f. Construction Safety Assessment (CSA) (to be provided with the Constructing Organization's Rev. "A" comments) g
g. Reference Documents (as applicable)
h. Test Procedure Guidelines (Exhibit 4) (to be included in the Rev. A DCP as applicable)
2. Indicate the page count on the DCP cover sheet (26-178-1). Indicate separate page count on the PFC cover sheet.
3. Forward the DCP/PFC (PFCP) to Project Administration or (E&C)

Configuration Control (NGS).

NOTE: The Responsible Engineer has the option of performing the review coordination providing the following is accomplished:

a. The DCP must be reviewed and approved by an Independent Review Engineer (IRE) and those interfacing disciplines indicated on the DRADM.

Also, route to the ESC Project Administrator for interface review if determined necessary by the Project Engineer (E&C) or the Technical Manager (NGS).

b. Prepare and document all review comments on FORM E0 165-1, Document Transmittal (for E&C), or FORM CC(123) 262, Document Transmittal (for NGS).

Fonvard the E0165's/CC(123) 262's and approved DCP to Project Administration / Configuration Control.

Page 6 of 14

]

Southern Cahfornia Edison Company 16 Engineering and Construction Department QA PROCEDURE REV. 4 l EFFECTIVE: 02/,01/88 l Pro.iect Administration /Confiauration Contrcl

4. Receive the DCP/PFC, Rev. "A," from the Responsible Engineer and verify for completeness.

D

5. Prepare an E0 165-1/CC(123) 262 and indicate the review distribution based on the combined DRADM of the DCP and its contents.
6. Route the DCP/PFC (PFCP) for review and comment to affected disciplines in accordance with the DRADM.
7. If determined appropriate by the SCE Project Engineer (E&C) or Technical Manager (NGS) in ACTION I, Step 1, route the PFCP to the ESC Project R Administrator for interface review. Include the E0 165-1/CC(123) 262 to document the review.

DCP/PFC (PFCP) Reviewers

8. Perform an Engineering review in accordance with the Design Review Responsibility Matrix (DRRM) (as a miminum), to ensure that all design R requirements are included. Perform a Safety review in accordance with ACTION V, Steps 1-3 of E&C 24-10-15. Document the review on the E0 165-1/CC(123) 262.

O NOTES: (1) An IRE from the responsible discipline (E&C) or group (NGS) issuing the IDCN as part of the DCP will utilize the criteria on the reverse side of the E0 165-1 (as a minimum) and document any comments on the E0165-1 (E&C) or on the CC(123) 262 (NGS). (Only one E0165-1 will be required from each discipline.)

(2) Coments for each section (DCP and PFC) must be documented .

separately within the E0 165-1/-2 submittal (i.e., DCP N comments must be separable from PFC comments).

(3) Refer to E&C QA Procedure E&C 37-30-63, ACTION III, for required actions in completing the "Environmental Qualification Effects" portion of the 26-182.

(4) SCE reviews and approves: (a) all ESC-prepared DCPs, which consist of ESC drawings and ESC Vendor drawings, drawings revisions and Interim Design Change Notices N' (IDCNs); and (b) all RC-prepared PFCPs. Formal engineering approval of all the foregoing will occur when the SCE PE approves the PFCP which includes the DCP.

Page 7 of 14

Southem Califomia Edison Company ELC 24-10-16 DEPARTHENT Engineering and Construction Department QA PROCEDURE REV. 4 EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88 ll (5) Project Retrofit Engineer (PRE) (E&C)/ Responsible Engineer (NGS) (with his constructibility assessment) will review piping isometrics on Quality Class I, II, Safety Related l

and ASME Section III, Piping, to ensure adequate provisions exist to identify weld numbers, spool numbers, weld procedure, weld filler metal, Non-Destructive Examination (NDE), etc.

Responsible Enaineer

9. Resolve comments and document resolution on the E0 165-1/CC(123) 262.

NOTE: Include the CSA in the DCP, Rev. "O," prior to routing for signature approval.

10. Obtain responsible discipline approval on all IDCNs and indicate R interfacing discipline approvals in accordance with the DRADM on the DCP coversheet.

11.

Initiate and date Block No. 3 of the PFC Cover Sheet and obtain Discipline Group Leader approval on PFC.

12. Forward the approved DCP/PFC (PFCP) and all comments to Project Administration.

Pro.iect Administration

13. Receive the approved DCP/PFC (PFCP), Rev. "0." Obtain additional approvals on the DCP as required by the DRADM and obtain NES&L and PE approval on the PFC.
14. Prepare FORM 26-89, Document Issue Request, and forward the approved DCP/PFC and all comments to CDM, Drawing Control - G.0. for distribution.

NOTrS: (1) After a DCP/PFC (PFCP) has been released for construction, no additional documents shall be added to the DCP Section g without causing a revision to the DCP/PFC (PFCP), except as allowed by E&C 24-10-17, Exhibit 1.

(2) At this time, Engineering will evaluate the need for a PFC revision. If required, the PFC will be revised in accordance with E&C 24-10-15. A revision to the PFC does N not necessarily require a revision to the DCP.

Page 8 of 14

- Southern Cahtornia Edison Company ELC 24-10-16 DEPARTMENT

-Engineering and Construction Department QA PROCEDURE REV. 4 EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88 CDM. Drawina Control. G.0.

(For Information Only)

15. Log the DCP/PFC (PFCP) as approved and update the DCP history records in R accordance with CDS QA Procedure CDM 26-10-16, Processing Design Change Packages for SONGS 1, 2&3.
16. Return a copy of the DCP cover sheet and the original DCP section to SCE Project Administration (E&C) for file, by preparing FORM 26-22-2, Data Transmittal, for acknowledgement.
17. Forward the original DCP cover sheet to the Retrofit Supervisor (or the Station Cognizant Engineer for NGS generated DCPs), and one copy of the DCP/PFC (PFCP) to the Project Retrofit Engineer (PRE)/ Responsible Engineer (NGS).

18.

R Forward the original PFC section and 5 copies of the entire DCP/PFC (PFCP) to Configuration Control (CC).

Supervisor Confiauration Control (CC)

(For Information Only)

19. Proceed to E&C 24-10-15, ACTION I, Steps 13 through 20.

Pro.iect Retrofit Enaineer (PRE)/ Responsible Enaineer (NGS)

20. Coordinate the implementation of the change (including the partial turnover process) with the organization responsible for construction in accordance with Retrofit Program Administrative Procedure AP-10, Design Change Process, or other applicable maintenance procedures.

Retrofit Supervisor (E&C)

21. Upon completion of construction and testing by Retrofit, the DCP will be processed for Station acceptance by the Retrofit Supervisor in accordance with AP-10. R
22. Upon signature of the DCP cover sheet by the Retrofit Supervisor (or Designee) (in accordance with AP-10), forward a copy of the "closed" DCP cover sheet to Project Administration and CDM, G.0,
23. Initiate DCP turnover in accordance with Retrofit Program Administrative Procedure AP-32, DCP Turnovers.

Page 9 of 14

Southern California Edison Company

  • E&C 24-10-16 DEPARTMENT Engineering and Construction Department QA PROCEDURE I REV. 4 l EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88[ l Coanizant Enaineer (NGS) 24.

Upon completion of construction and closecut of Maintenance Order (s),

process the DCP for turnover in accordance wii.h Site Engineering Procedure S0123-V-4.15, Structure, Equipment and System Turnover.

Retro fi t . Return package to Retrofit Supervisor (E&C)

25. Forward the original DCP cover sheet (stamped "COMPLETE") and attachments (in accordance with S0123-V-4.15) to Project Administration (or IDCN/DCN Conversion ESC, as applicable) and CDM G.O.

Confiauration Control (CC)

(For Information Only)

26. After acceptance of a DCP turnover package by Station, forward the original Memorandum Directing DCN Con'/ersion to Project Administration, a copy e
  • q to the IDCN/DCN Conversion, ESC (as applicable) and a copy to CDM, G.0.
27. Forward copy of signed PFC section to Project Group Leader, NSE.

Pro.iect Group Leader (NSE)

28. Receive copy of PFCP from CDM Project Distribution Matrix release.
29. Prepare memorandum to the Unit Supervising Licensing Engineer, forwarding marked up Technical Specifications, UFSAR, UFHA, Operating License documents or other Licensing / Design Criteria document changes.

Pro.iect Administration (PA)/or 10CN/DCN Conversion. ESC

30. Convert IDCNs to DCNs. Initiate incorporation of DCNs in accordance with E&C 24-8-7 and issue all As-Built drawings.

NOTE: Upon completion of conversion, return the signed receipt acknowledgement (Part II) of the Memorandum Directing DCN Conversion to Configuration Control.

31. Release and issue new drawings from the hold file for the complete DCP.

Page 10 of 14

South:rn California Edison Company

- E&C 24-10-16 DEPARTMENT Engineering and Construction Department QA PROCEDURE REV. 4 . I EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88 l m ACTION III - REVISIONS TO DCPs AND PFCs R SCE Responsible Enoineer/Enaineerina Site Representative

1. Evaluate the condition requiring a change with the Project Retrofit Engineer (E&C) or Maintenance (NGS). Review the criteria in accordance with E&C 24-10-17, Exhibit 1, to determine if an FIDCN may be written or if a revision to the DCP is required.

NOTES: (1) If a field generated change does not meet the criteria stated in E&C 24-10-17, Exhibit 1, Section 1, initiate a revision to the DCP and repeat ACTION I.

(2) If a field generated change meets the criteria in E&C ?.4-10-17, Exhibit 1, Section 1, initiate an FIDCN and process in accordance with E&C 24-10-17, ACTION II.

2. Evaluate E&C 24-10-15, ACTION IV, Steps 1-4 to determine if a revision to g the PFC is required.

C. REFERENCES

1. CDS QA Procedure CDM 26-10-16, Processing Design Change Packages for SONGS 1, 2&3
2. E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-7-13, Design Criteria Documents for Engineering Construction Project (ECP) Activities for SONGS Units 1, 2&3
3. E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-7-15, Performing Design Analysis and Verification for SONGS 1, 2&3
4. E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-8-7, Development, Review, Approval and Release of New and As-Built SCE Drawings and Obsoletion of Existing SCE Drawings for SONGS 1, 2&3
5. E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-10-15, Preparation, Review, and Approval of Proposed Facility Changes (PFC) and Proposed Facility Change Packages (PFCP) R for SONGS 1, 2&3
6. E&C QA Procedure E&C 24-10-17, Development, Review, Approval and Release of SCE Interim Design Change Notices (IDCN)/ Design Change Notice (DCN)

SONGS 1, 2&3

7. E&C OA Procedure E&C 37-7-9, Evaluating Potential Problem Equipment (EPPE) and Processing Control of Problem Equipment (COPE) List Action items Reports (CLAIR)

Page 11 of 14

Southern Cahtornia Edison Company E&C 24-10-16 Engineering and Construction Department DEPARTMENT QA PROCEDURE REV. 4 EFFECTIVE:02/01/88 l

8. E&C QA Procedure E&C 37-30-63, Development, Issuance, Revision and Cancellation of the Document Package to Establish the Environmental Qualification (EQ) of Electrical Equipment Listed on the EQ Master List for SONGS 1, 2&3
9. E&C QA Procedure E&C 40-9-10, Preparation of Amendment Applications for the SONGS 1 Provisional Operating License and the SONGS 2&3 Operating Licenses 10.

E&C QA Procedure E&C 40-9-13, Control of SONGS Licensing Document Changes and Coordination of Documents Prepared for Submittal to the NRC in Support of an NRC Operating License for SONGS 1, 2&3

11. Retrofit Program Administrative Procedure (AP) 10, Design Change Process
12. Retrofit Program Administrative Procedure (AP) 32, DCP Turnovers
13. Budget and Cost Control Procedure 50123-XIX-3.0, Process Site Work Request R 14.

Site Configuration Control Procedure 50123-XIV-4.2, Site Design Change g Administration

15. Site Engineering Procedure 50123-V-4.15, Structure, Equipment and System Turnover
16. Site Engineering Procedure S0123-V-5.ll, Station Engineering Review of Preliminary Design Change Packages
17. FORM 26-22-2, Data Transmittal
18. FORM E0 165-1, Document Transmittal
19. FORM 26-89, Document Issue Request
20. FORM 26-178-1, Design Change Package i

l 21. FORM 26-178-2, Design Change Package Continuation Sheet

22. FORM 26-179-1, Interim Design Change Notice (IOCN)/ Design Change Notice (DCH), SONGS 1, 2&3
23. FORM 26-179-2, Interim Design Change Notice (IDCN)/ Design Change Notice (DCN) Supplemental Page, SONGS 1, 2&3
24. Bill of Material Worksheet FORM A N'
25. FORM 26-182, Design Change Package Plant Hazards Requirements
26. FORM 26-247, ALARA Design Review Check List Units 1, 2&3 Page 12 of 14

1 Southem Cahtomia Edison Company ggg g4_y9_lg Engineering and Construction Department $$$RE l REV. 4 l EFFECTIVE: 02/01/J

27. FORM 26-292, Fire Protection Design Check List
28. FORM 26-294, Proposed Facility Change 29.

FORM Package 26-294-1, Contents Page Design Change Package (DCP)/ Proposed Facility ChangeQ'

30. FORM CC(123) 183, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Configuration Document Check 1.ist
31. FORM CC(123) 184, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Configuration Documents Requiring Change
32. FORM CC(123) 262, Document Transmittal (NGS)
33. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (B&PV),Section III, Rules for Construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components
34. Design Review Responsibility Matrix (DRRM)
35. Document Review and Approval Distribution Matrix (DRADM)
36. Emergency Plan (EP)
37. General Design Criteria Document for Unit 1
38. M-37560 for SONGS 1
39. 90034 for SONGS 2&3 R
40. Memorandum Directing DCN Conversion for Unit 1 or Units 2&3
41. Project Distribution Matrix
42. Security Plan (SP)
43. Site Distribution Matrix (NGS)
44. SONGS Units 2&3 Technical Specifications
45. Topical Quality Assurance Manual (TQAM)
46. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) for Units 2&3,Section III
47. Updated Fire Hazards Analysis (UFHA)
48. Unit 1 Final Safety Analysis (FSA) N Page 13 of 14

4 Southern Cantornia Edison Company

- gSc 24 1n.gg Engineering and Construction Department DEPARTMENT QA PROCEDURE REV. 4 EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88 ll 49.

(POL)

Approved Ammendments and Conditions of the Provisional Operating License Q' D. DEFINITIONS Refer to the E&C QA Reference Procedures Manual Glossary.

Page 14 of 14

E&C 24-10-16 Southern California Edison Company "MU m mxmme l Engineering and Construction Department , , 4 EXHIBIT 1 l urwnVE: 07/01/88l SCE DESIGN CNANGE PACKAGE (DCP)/

PROPOSED FACILITY CNANGE (PFC)

CNECK LIST

' When SCE Engineering initiates an SCE Design Change Package (DCP), the Responsible Engineer is responsible for assuring the following actions are completed and approved and inserted in the appropriate sections of the PFCP as identifled in ACTIOW !!, Step 3.

PFC SECTION l

The Responsible Engineer shall prepare the PFC in accordance with E&C QA Procedure ESC 24-10 15 and assemble as follows:

1. FORM 26 294, Proposed Facility Change (cover sheet)
2. FORM 26 294 1, Design Change Package (DCP)/ Proposed Facility Change Package (PFCP)

Contents Page (Exhibit 8)

3. Proposed Change Description 4 Proposed Change Engineering Evaluation
5. Proposed Change Safety Evaluation (10CFR50.59)
6. Environmental Evaluation
7. Implementation Section
8. Quality Class and Seismic Category
9. ALARA Review
10. Construction Safety Assessment (CSA) Section
11. References
12. Indentification and Tracking
13. Attachments NOTE: Items 7 through 15 (page 3 of 3 of Exhibit 1) completed during DCP preparation are attached to the PFC Section of the PFCP.

See Page 2 for Document Check List for DCP Section EXHIBIT 1 Page 1 of 3

Southern CaMornia Edison Company gge 24_79_1g l m DEPARIIstr Engineering and Construction uepartment a em l REV. 4 l Em:CrIVE: 02/01/88 l l EXKIBIT 1 DCP SECTIce

1. The Responsible Engineer shall prepare Form 26 178 1, Design Change Package (cover sheet) and Form 26 178 2, Design Change Packige Continuation theet. Form 26 178 1 must be approved in accordance with the DRADM. The Froject Group Leader (ESC) or Group supervisor (NGS) shall also sign indicating hazard requires .'ts have been met.
2. Indicate DCP number on CCF cover sheet NOTES: (1) Number determined in accordance with Budget and Cost Control Procedure 501E3 xtX 3.0, Site Work Request Process and Station Engineering Procedure $0123 V 5.11, Station Engineering Review of Preliminary Desisp1 Change Packages.

(2) For a DCP containing Safeguards Information, a discipline code.

"Z" will follow tho g:

3. The Responsible Engineer shall identify all design documents (SCE, Engineer Constructor, and other Supplier design documents) affected by the proposed design change and request the appropriate discipline or the Cognizant Systems Engineer to initiate IDCNs for each document and forward to the Responsible Engineer for inclusion in the DCP.

Each affected discipline shall review and approve each IDCN in accordance with the DRADM.

4. Prepare IDCNs in accordance with E&C QA Procedure ESC 24 10 17.
3. Prepare Test Procedure Guidelines in accordance with Exhibit 4.
6. The Responsible Engineer for each affected discipline shall prepare Bill of Material Worksheet FORM A and route with DCP Rev. A. The Responsible Engineer is responsible for initiating the procurement of necessary materials and ensuring the review of the Control of Problem Equipment (COPE) List. The DCP number must be ref erenced cn all ef fected doctnents, including Purchase Orders (PO).
7. Ensure CSA is received from constructing organization and include in Revision 0 of the DCP.

The following are prepared by the responsible engineer during DCP preparation but are ultimately incltzied in the PFC Section during PFCP assembly.

8. The Responsible Engineer shall coordinate the preparation of FORM 26 iB2, Design Change Package (DCP) Plant Hazards Requirements. If the proposed design change has an effect on the hazard area, all documents affected shall be identified by the Project Group Leader (EAC) or Group Supervisor (NGS). Form 26 182 must be signed ty the Nuclear, Mechanical, ard Civil Group Leaders (E&C) or Supervising Engineer 1 (NGS). Envircrrnental Qualification (EQ) fequirements must be considered for each DCP. Review the appecpriate Unit EQ Master List to determine if EQ is required for DCPs affecting existing plant equipment; items on the EQ .6 Master List require EQ, all others do not. For new plant equipment, consult with Nuclear i Systems Engineering (NSE) to determine if EQ requirements apply. Ensure that for equipment requiring EQ, the DCP reflects any orientation or sealing requirements, and that applicable test data has been submitted and approved by Nuclear Systems Engineering (see ESC QA Procedure 37 30 63). If any DCP adds tinc or aluminum inside ccntairrnent, the irpact a) the plant design basis shall be assessed and a UFSAR Change f orwarded to Licensing as necessary.
9. The Responsible Engineer shall prepare a nd approve FORM 26 247, ALARA Design Review Checklist, in accordance with ELC 24 10 15, as required.
10. The Responsible Engineer shall prepare FORM 26 292, Fire Protection Design Checklist.

(Refer to ESC 24 10 15, Exhibit 4).

11. The Responsible Engineer shall prepare form CC(123) 183, Page 1, San Onof re Nuclear Generating Station Configuration Document Checklist and include Page 2.

EXHIBIT 1 Page 2 of 3

4 Southern Cahtornia Edison Company E&C 24-10-16 DEPAmm7r Engineering and Construction Department QA HOCEUBE l REV. 4 l EXHIBIT 1

12. The Responsible Engineer shall ensure that each affected engineering discipline prepares Form CC(123) 184, San onof re Nuclear Generating Station Configuration Documents Requiring Change; and identifying all engineering documents af f ected. The Project Group Leader (E1C) or Group Supervisor (NGS) f or each discipline shall review and concur with Form CC(123) 184
13. The Responsible Engineer shall evaluate the proposed design change against the Security Check List (Exhibit 7 of ESC 24 10 15). Any "YES" answers shall be explained in the PFC and N, denoted on the DCP coversheet as on impact to the Security System (Physical Security Plan / Barrier Change Required).

14 The Responsible Engineer shall prepare the Station Emergency Planning Design Change Check List (Exhibit 6 of ESC 24 10 15).

15. The Responsible Engineer shall prepare changes to the Systems Description, Technical Specifications, UFSAR, UFMA, EP, SP and other pertinent Design Basis and Licensing Docwents as appropriate.

p EXHIBIT 1 Page 3 of 3

Southern California Edison Company E&C 24-10-16 Ogymn Engineering and Construction Department @ HOCE M E l REV. 4 l 1_ EFFECTIVE: 07/m dal EXHIBIT 2 i

GUIDELINES FOR A CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ACSESSMENT The purpose of a safety assessment for construction activities is to review the potential impact on plant, and public safety resulting f rom the proposed installation and installation activit!es of a component, system or structure. By prov' ding the review not only are legal requirements of 10CFR50.59 and the License satisfied but potential construction problems are identified and resolved in a timely and tppropriate manner.

The most appropriate method for providing the review is by preparing a separate attachment for inclusion with the PFCP and summarizing its conclusions within the body of the safety assessment.

The contents of the Construction Safety Assessment attachment shau incitz$e the following as appropriate:

1. List of Equipment being modified.

This may be a listing of electrical circuits, line numbers, equipment numbers, support numbers, structural column numbers or the like.

2. List of Safety Related Equipment in the area.

The listing shall include all equipment in the area whose accidental removal from service or damage could result in unnecessary chattenges to safety systems, removal of safety systems from service, create a loss of redundancy in safety systems, or reduce the required degree of protection in safety systems.

3. List and description of Specific Unique Construction Activities not addressed in approved procedures.

This would include (but not be limited to) such items as the transport of extraordinarity heavy items to and within the construction area, removal or ad1Itlon of missile protection, unusual radiation shletding, personnet or equipment protection requirements, electrical equipment being worked "hot", etc.

4. List and description of temporary modifications or temporary changes to the permanent plant necessary to facilitate construction. Particular attention should be given to equipment remaining in service during implementation or electrical equipment which is worked "hot".

t EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 1

Southern California E6 son Company E&C 24-10-16 DEPmmerr Engineering and Construction Department @ ECEWRE l

l REV. 4 l l EXHIBlT 3 lJIrwnVE: 02/01/88l

. r. m F Southern California Edison Company SCE DCP NO._

DESIGN CNANGJ PACGGE (d Q San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 213 REY. W UNif U1 Originating Discip!!ne/ Resp. Engineer

(}1 DCP QC Dett5 p) m Highest QC of Drawings Within DCP Seismic Cate M y (6)

. v DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE j i

!ech. Spec. Change Required? QYes Qo Plant Hazards impact? QYes QNo UFSAR Change Required? Oyes ho Physical Security Plan 8 hes ON 3

/ Barrier Change Required UFHA Change Required? h as ho Emergency Plan Change Required? hos ONo EQ Package Revision Required? Oyes ONo Startup Systems Affected EQ Master List change Required? Ot es ONo 0 List Change Required? hes ONo BASIS FOR CHANGE NCR No. SPR No. Licensing Commitment Other INTERFACE APFROVALS (INDICATE AFFECTED JISCIPLINES PGL's)

Date Date

1. Civil Eng. 5. Nuclear
2. 11C Eng. 6. Arch.
3. Elect. Eng. 7. Other
4. Mech. Eng. _

APPROVALS Date Responsible Engineer independent Review Engineer Responsible Discipline Group Leader /

Station Supervisor Project Engineer /

Manager Station Technical Quality Assurance N0ilFICM10N OF CHANGE COMPLETION Retrofit Supervisor Date 261781 REV 12/87 EXHIBIT 3 Page 1 of 2

Southem CaMomia Edison Comoany E&c 24-10-16 aEPeerr Engineering and Construction Department oA mocEamE l RD/. 4 l EFFECTIVEr 02/01/88l[

EXHIBIT 3  ;

KETPOINTS  !

1. Affected Unit
2. DCP Number and Revision
3. Engineering Discipline and Responsible Engineer assigned the responsibility for design change by the Project Engineer (ESC) 4 Date DCP initiated
5. Indicate highest Quality Class of Drawings included within the DCP. Indicate DCP Quality Class based on Quality Class of System / component modified.
6. Seismic Jategory of system or component modified
7. Description of change / justification
8. Indicate if changes to the following documents are required:

Technical Specifications Updated Fire Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR)

Updated Fire Nazards Analysis (UFMA)

Environmental Qualification (EQ) Package Revision EQ Master List Change Q* List Change Plant Hazards impact Physical Security Plan /8arrier Change Emergency Plan Change

9. List of Startup Systems (SONGS 213 only)
10. Basis or cause of change
11. Interdiscipline approval signatures required in accordance with DRADM
12. Approvals necessary to release DCP
13. Signature of Responsible Construction organization Supervisor attesting completion of change i

EXHIBIT 3 Page 2 of 2

E&C 24-10-16 DEPARIMDir Southem Cahtomia Edison Company og m Engineering and Construction Department l REV. 4 EXHIBIT 4 l EFFECTIVE: 02/01/88[l TEST PROCEDURE GUIDELINES PREPARATION The following outlines the format, content, and requirements for preparation of Test Procedure Guidelines. Test Procedure Guidelines must be prepared when specific engineering parameters are to be verified. If the proposed change involves no critical engineering parameters or cannot impact the existing system critical engineering parameters, so state in the LCP Engineering Evaluation and identify any standard startup tests or processes deemed necessary, (i.e., continuity check, system flush, etc.). In such case, Test Procedure Guidelines are not necessary.

When necessary, Test Procedure Guidelines shall address the following:

SECTION 1.0 - SCOPE Briefly identify the scope and description of the proposed design change including addition / deletion of significant equipment (e.g., purrps , valves, i ns t rtrent a t ion, etc.) -

SECTIOW 2.0 - OBJECTIVES Identify test objectives and critical engineering parameters to be tested and confirmed.

SECit0W 3.0 - PREREQUISITES Identify pre test requirements including mode of operation, system conditions, system requirements, special valve / equipment status, special test equipment required, system flushes required, etc.

SECTIOW 4.0 CENERAL METH005 Wrtefly identify the test methods to be utilized (e.g., meggar, special continuity checks, hydrostatic tests, flow tests, pressure tests, etc.)

SECTIOW 5.0 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA Specify detailed acceptance criteria necessary to meet the test objectives identified in Section 2.0. Acceptance criteria should identify specific quantitative parameters, equipment status (i.e., valve position expected, pump status expected, flow requirements, instrument indicition, system pressures) and/or other measurable parameters necessary to confirm expected engineering parameters.

SECTIOW 6.0 - REFERENCES Reference pertinent documentation sections of FSAR Section 14.0, existing test procedures that will facilitate test procedure preparation, pertinent ANSI standards or ASME Codes, P&los, Elementaries, etc.

EXHIBIT 4 Page 1 of 1

c NGi= t e ni=G 4 = o c o~ s r ave reo=

24 10 16 4

=ao 1 E&C Rev *~

NGCLEAR E N G 0 Pe t t A t he G $ArtTV A N O LiC E N$ LNG O f P A A T a4 E *e T 1 j Procedure Change Notice (PCN) to 04/15/88 For ESC Q A Procedures ' " " ' ' " " "

Development, Review, A p p r o v a"t and Release of SCE Design Change Packages (DCP) and

2. Procecur e Title -

Assembly with Proposed Facility Changes (PFC) SONGS 1, 2&3 D. Hall

  • 28456 3 Originator PAX No.

03/09/88

4. Oate Originated
5. Reason For Change Reflect the requirements for CARS S0 P 1088 and 1089 re provisions to allow edi-torial changes to be made to DCPs following SCE approval, but prohibits design information changes without resubmittal for approval; and all vendor documents included in DCPs to provide design disclosure information shall include appropriate design reference information
6. D'e"sfrIMN6f MN.y Cl as s, consistent with requirements of ESC 24 8 7.

In A. GENERAL INFORMATIU , Step 4, add new Note to read NOTE: When converting or superseding vendor documents which provide specific required design disclosure information not already provided on SCE drawings, the Vendor drawing must be converted to a standard SCE design disclosure drawing, containing all required inforestion, including Quality Class (Ref. ESC 24 8 7).

In g. PROCEDURAL ACTIONS, ACTION II, Step 13; add New Mote to read NOTE: Only editorial changes are allowed following SCE approval. Editorial changes are prepared by tining out, initiating and dating the change. Design content changes, including changes in Quality Classes, are not allowed without resubmittel for SCE review and approval.

7. Acorovals
x. sc ....

- 4,A. A.se .

a4/

.<... r ..................

W, W V^

l

. . . . . . .L. . . . . . . . . . .w. . ... s. .,. /. . . . a.. . .g. ,r. +N

. . . .,y

.a o,ou,,,,as. .. ..

b/Afd*Y.,fd q, 1 1 3 D>w ct su a...., . . , . . . . ,

ENG ewit etNG A MO CONS t euC reon

, .~o 1 E&C 24 10 16 MucLCAR (NG Smit RIN G SAFETY A N D LIC C N 51NG Rev. ~'

" a '-'~

9 pcy y _ 2 Procedure Change Notice (PCN)

10. 04/04/88 For ESC Q A Procedures ' " " ' ' " " "
2. Procecure Title Assembly with Proposed Facility Changes (P 3 , 12WGS 1, 213
3. Olginator A. Tsan -

28H8 pgx gg

4. Cate Onginated 03/10/88
5. Reason For Change To include provisions for Software Modifications if a design change impacts any plant computer systems.
6. Descnotion Of Change:

In 8. PROCEDURAL ACTIONS, ACTION I, add new Step 3 to read:

3. If the design change impacts any plant computer systems, contact the Station computer Group and subalt a Software Modification Request in accordance with Station Engineering Procedure $023,V 4.70, Software Modification and Verification.

Renumber current Steps 3 through 5 to 4 through 6 In B. PROCEDURAL ACTIONS, ACTION II, add new Section Item i to read:

I. Software Modification Request (to be included in the Rev. A DCP as applicable)

In C. REFERENCES, add new Item 17

17. Station Engineering Procedure 5023 V 4.70, Software Modification and Verification Renumber current Items 17 through 49 to 18 through 50 In EXNIBIT 1 of 24 10 16, Page 2 of 3, add new Item 8 to read:
8. Include Software Modification Request in accordance with f.tation Engineering Procedure 5023 V 4.70, Software Modification and verification.

l l

l l

l Accrovals

---.A b b d, 1

yy,b .... - Y. lll88

. y .o. ,.................

A$ (

................... g p / ...

.. 9'7h.r

. .: saa,,f d 4 e s th 7A.b..r o, ue,,,, ,,,u,a,,e .

3. P 3-;e of l sca s. s es .s v e s .e L-___
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20151A427&oldid=2970234"