ML20147G697
| ML20147G697 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point, 05000000, Shoreham |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1985 |
| From: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20147G281 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-56 NUDOCS 8803080299 | |
| Download: ML20147G697 (131) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:OTGL\fL-
~
UN11ED STATES NUCLEAR R:EGULATORY COMi%:SSION . IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO:
\
INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEW (CLOSED MEETING) , l l
. I l
1
\
LOCATION: coLUMBos, OHIO PAGES: 1 through 54 DATE: TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 1985 lnfermation in this record was deleted in 3recr6nce w:th)he Frccdem of information Mt. e- ' lions IM P)iA-dk ACE-FEDERAI. REPORTERS, INC. Ofick! .W m North Ogitol Street e803000299 F01A e80303 hhington, v.C. 20001 l PDR PDR
,PALASTse-56 (202) 34.7-3700
, (
I 1 1 A L L E G A T 1 vh 1 ( 2 ; - - - - - i a !IN RE: : 4 S a t e ty and Quality Concerns: 5 Regaoing Nine Mile Point, : RI-65-A-0012 6 Unit Two Presented a 7 By Mr. W. Gordon Dica. e I 9 . Interview between Mr. W. Gordon Dica ano l 10 'Mr. william Lazarus, taxon at Shsraton Airport I !. n , 11 17th Avenue, Room 4JUO-A, Columbus, Onio, on Tuesoay, . 12 March 5, 1965, at 8:59 o'clocx a.m. ' ( 13 - - . . - ( 14 APPEARANCES: I 1 f 15 Mr. William James Lazarus b31 Park Avenue le King ot Prussia, Pennsylanta 19406 17 on behalf of Nuclear Regulatory - ! Commission. l 18 li 19 ', 20 21 22 , 23 k!
'l 24
( kl
\ l 25 i!
RUHFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 l'i
,1 ,
I l
I 2 1 l'uasoay re o r n i n g scJ,1cn k ' 2 March 5, 1105 3 o:59 o' clock a.m. 4 - - - - - 5 P R O C E E D I N G S 6 - - - - - 7 BY MR. LAZARUS: 8 -Q. Today is March d, 1965. Tns time in 9:Vw 9 !a.m. Prasent here at che Airport Sneraton inn in
, lu columous, Ohio are myselt, hr. Bill Lazarus, Prc]cet 11 : Engineer, Region 1, about to anterview Mr. w. Goroon 12 i Dicx about concerns involving construction qua11ty
( 14 at Nine Mlle Point, Unit Twc, ano also concerns I l .1 14 irelating to tne readiness assessments time at tha , 15 lSnoreham Nuclear Power Station. I i 16 l As a matter of tormality would you read -- i l 17 , this is chapter -- Title 16, USC Section 100A, tnat I 18 area I marxed nere, Just involving statements saae 19 to the government. 1 20 A. (Witness complying with request.) Oxay. _ f l i i 21 Q. Do you have any questions? 22 A. No. i 23 Q. Mr. Dica, for the record, would you state l l your name? { 24 1 25 A. Yes, my name is W. Gordon Dick. 1 i RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 j
J 1 v. ano your prwsent address? 2 A. Present scoress is 3 I 4 g. Are you presently employeo? l 5 I A No, I'm not. ! l. 6 u. what was your last position with Stonc anc l 7 l Webster Engineering Corporation? e 'A. My last position was at the Nine Mlle I 9 Point No. 2 Nuc1 war Power Station, wnere I was Lne -- 1 I 10 my position was assistant superintendent ot 11 ' cons tru c tion tor the electrical construction 12 ; management team at tnat project. ( 13 u. Were you given a written description ol 14 your outies associateo with tnat assignmentt Also, 15 ;to be a little acre specitic, wnat were you vxactly i 16 'responsicle tor? l 17 A. At the i rpecitic location, I was not given 18 a written descr ption. I did ast tor a written 19 description from my immediate supervisor, but as a
, 20 general u n d e r s t a n d '. n g Stone and Webster has pat I I
21 descriptions of the various management positions, l 22 and I was certainly faciliar with the generic duties l 23 ot the position, but not specitic to that site, l 1 24 Q. Wnat I would like to do is sort of 25 bacAtracx through your work at Nine Mile Two ano to l RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (bl4)445-8477 l l l
4 1 niolanc and ocvelop your concerns at S n o r e n a ni , sincc (' 2 you inoicatto tnsy relate to tnings you identitatu 3 at tinne Mile Two. i 4 I A. To aid you on that, I woulo 11xe to ottc: 5 this into the testimony. I've developed this e document to help maybe guide us tnrougn the thing, 7 11 you want it. 8 ,Q. All right. 9 MR. LAZARUS: Oxay. You can inoicate tne 10 , title et this in ene record. 11 !bY MR. LAZARUS: 12 lg . I think what we can do, it'ycu woulo 11x6 ( 13 to, you can reter to tnat as we go thecugn. I nave 14 it outlined in my mind, cne order I woolo lixt tc 15 taxe tnis in, it we can do it tnat way. Prior to i 16 worxing at Nine Mile Point Two, you indicated you 17 were at Midland. What was your position there? 16 A. Consulting QA, and I was on the CIOR Team + l 19 Q. What is the CIOR Team? I ' , l 20 A. Construction implementation overview, anc I 21 it was a special task force that had been assigneo ! 22 to the Midland project to oversee the i 23 re-implementation of construction there. The l; { 24 construction, et course, had been -- at least on I i 35 satety related components had been terminated Dy RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477
l 1 i 1 NRC, oirection or posatoly by 41sc by tne Utilitisc 2 ! Quality Absurance Department, but alac by the 3 , Commission. And Stona anc houster haa oeen r6tainda l 4 lLo overview the re-implemen ta tion ci construction c1 1 5 that site, which, I guess, subsequently was 6 unsuccesstel, but nevertheless, they were therv ter 7 that purpose. 8 Q. what time perioc wnere you assigned at 9 : Hic A a nd? lu A. I arrives at December 30th, ano 1 lett 11 ;Miclano to go to Nine Milt Two, 1 oclieve it was tnc 12 lotn, arriving at Nine Mile Two on the 13tn ot Maren, . f i i i 13 '19o4. 14 {g . So tnat was December 5, 1963 until's ! 15 IA. Until March tne 10th. 16 fQ. 19d47 17 A. 1984. le g. And your time at Nine Mile Two was from 19 March -- 20 A. March the 13th until May the 2nd. * ' 21 g. May the 2no. Continuing bacx on prior to 22 your assignment in December of 1983 at Midland, you ! i 23 were at Shoreham Nuclear Power Station? I[ 24 A. That's correct. { l ! 25 Q. Could you describe your title and job (
) RUHFOLA & ASSOCIATES (bl4)445-u477 l, 1
( 1 descrirtion and the tire terice ycu were e;. r 2 c y<. ~ 2 there? 3 A. My title, I had varicus pcsitiens stars 4 with Stone and Webster, assistant superintendent et 5 construction. I had various occitions. Initis)3v E when I arrived at the site, I reported to the 7 vice-president of nuclear, Fr. Andy Wolferd en a 8 spe cia l nesition tha t was -- the purpcse of which 9 was to a dvi se him and counsel with him in recstdr tc 10 tre Psc 2.ucit tha t was about to depin at the 11 Shoreham project in 1979. 12 Pc11owing that I was asked te particirste 13 in the compila tion of nev scheduler -- revisee 14 schedules for the project + rellcwing that effort I 15 wa s asked to head that effort up a t Ehcrchar. I ci d 16 tha t for the be t te r part of a year, and then I was 17 assigned as the superirtendent of electrical le construction, again, tha t wa s a ccnstruction 19 management role in which I' was managing a major 20 contractor who was responsible for actually 21 performing the construction. 22 Then in the la t te r -- in the final year et 23 ry a ssignment at Shoreham, I was involved as a { 24 special superintendent for overseeing the quality 25 accountibility program in various other aspects of RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
7 1 tt e vali5aticn cf the croject, if ycu vill, !re- .
-l 2 quality standpoint.
3 0. Ycu indica te d some cencerns in your 4 correspondence and telephone converse tions vite 5 nyself concerning the readiness assessment tesn t ! 6 conducted at Shereham, and yeu mentiened the way 7 tha t the close-out findingr cf tha t inspection verc 8 handlad. o A. Yes. 10 0. I would like te try te devolep the 1 11 cencerns of tha t in tha t area. 12 A. If you would like, I will read that irte (, 13 the record -- that document dces not dircctly re la tt J 14 to Shoreham. These are -- if you like, I will read I 1 15 into the record the ra tters tha t concern me in 16 regards to Shoreham. These ma tte rs were previded to 17 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the recorc, in l 18 accordance with 10 CFR 212. 19 The objections are provided retresepetivelv i l 20 as a result of subsequent inspections at Midland, , 21 Michigan, and Nine Mile Point No. 2 in up-state New i 22- York. The matters are germane to conditions at Nine ; l i ] 23 Mile Point No. 2 where the interdependency cf l (' 24 programs effecting safety and quality exhibited , l 25 similar characteristics and similiar to C o u r. t 4, RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477 l
o ' ! 1 ;were interoepenaency tnrougn power managsment, AacA 2 'ct tnoroughness and a pervasive aossnct et l 3 oo3ectivity has adversely errected sa te ty ano 4 quality. 5 The items are as tollows: one, in mio 6 1983 the investigative and corrective program 7 initiated as a result of readiness assessment was 6 included with the acknowledgment et the Nuclear 9 !kegulatory Commission. 10 Two, premises ano assumption on which tn. 11 scope and eventual outcome of post-reactnass : 12 Iassessment measures were based were not evaluates i k 13 prior to tne conclusion or the program to valicate , 14 valloity. 15 , Three, especially satety relateo
! i 16 components, systems and structures selected tor 17 evaluation were chosen partly on the basis of thosv I i
16 tinally inspected, and did not insure representation 19 of overall plant quality. i i 20 Four, guidelines and evaluation method I 1 1 21 which evolved during post-readiness assessment werc 1 l 22 not evaluated and formally approved to insure i 1 l 23 sttectiveness and applicability. Findings were 1 j { 24 classified and categordzed by these guidelines. 25 Five, readiness assessment and the RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-b477
W l i 1 post-correctiva measures were intencea to assess .! 2 'ove ra ll plant reauinosa. The NRC appsereo to J .concluoe tnear readiness assessment tollow-up on tnt ; 4 basis ot examining corrective measures tor 5 inoividual tindings. 6 Six, extreme cost and senedule pressurss 7 existing ouring this period impaired ob3ectivity, 6 anc to an extent, tne thoroughness ot investigativa 9 imeasures. Uncertainty arising trom major lu organizational ano personnel transitions turther l 11 81mpaired continuity ot follow-through essential to l 12 lthe conclusion or the program. ( 13 !g. I have some questions on tnat. l l 14 -A. Yes. ' 1 i 15 w. I will reter to this, II I may? 1 .
- j 16 1A. Yas. '
17 g. i. , Itom No. 2, the premise ano assumptions ! I l i la were not svaluated prior to the conclusion ot the i 19 program to confirm validity, could you amplify tnat 20 a little bit? l 21 A. The item No. 3 is the major example ~ot ' i 1 22 that. When the program was initiated, there were
- '( '
- 23 assumptions made with regards to wnat piece of tne !
4 24 plant would be sub 3ected to these corrective { ! 4 25 l measures, and the majority, 11 not all of the attort, RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
t W
, AV '
1 'was tocusec on tnat wnich was remeaning to cc k 2 linspecteo. 3 Now, I, at tne time when I was 11rst t 4 introduceo to my role in that particular ettorts 5 went about examining the assumptions and raised tn. 6 questions with various individuals that were 7 involved witn the ettort and haa oeen in on the 8 : inception and agreement with the hRC. And, you a n c. , I a 9 !it was reporteo to me at that time that this was I 10 ,wnat had been vorxed out witn the NRC. 11 How, at the time I clo question tnis a 12 matter, but in the rusn to get on with tne program i ( 13 accepted tne assumptions with tne uno=rstanoing Lnat 1 14 we would eventually go bacx ano con 11rm tnose
}
), 15 l assumptions. l 16 v. I think I -- the way I remo tnis, your ~ i 17 concern was tnat tney should nave looxsd at itwas i l le tha t had been comple ted, also? 19 A. I think in light of the outcoma of the I 20 post-readiness assessment ettort and the measureao16 l 1 level of detects that were encountered a f ter finaA 21 , 22 inspection, even in a population that had not been i 23 11nal inspected when the readiness assessment attort i I' { 24 became known, it seems to me there shoulo nave been 3 25 some retlecting upon the populations pr ior t0 ~ ~ i RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)44b-6477 ? l
. i I
1. I prior to the reaoiness assessment stiort. 2 lQ. Those would be once tnat hao alremoy usen j 3 11nal inspected? i That's correct. 4 A. That's correct. 5 Q. Item No. 4 the guacelines ano evaluation o guidelines when evolved during post-readiness 7 assessment were not svaluatec anc tormally approvac, e are you reterring to NAC g u i c t l a n t s 't 9 'A. No, the evaluation metno6, the regulatacns, i 10 ' tor example, 10 CFR 21, tor example, a'nd I'm 9Ging i . 11 to surmise 10 CRF 50, but I'm roterring to 10 CFR 41 12 lhers inoicated a tine in the evaluation process in , ; ( 13 the evant violations or satety related components j 14 are touno. There is no -- there is very littis 15 speciticity beyono tne cetinition, wnat tne
- i 16 perimeter would be tor evaluations. '
Evaluations i 17 would be tailoreo tor indivioual findings. 1 18 Now, I attempted, by making raierence to 19 initially -- initially attempting to get a copy ot 1 20 Military S tandard 105 D, I attempted to create 21 quantitative methods far evaluating whatever signt l-l 22 come out of the -- of the post-readiness assessment i s
- 23 effort, and that particular evaluation method was !
l 24 never iormally approved. { t 25 It was entered into the record ot j RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 i
42 I reaoiness assessment and it was unto in a very ta n s: t ; 4 2 way, out in retrospect, 1 belivve tnat such a 3 quantitative method, in light ot tha measurmable-
/~ :
4 4 level et detects that were exiting 'trom the o v e rs i a 5 evaluation, tha t a quantitative method should havt 6 been religiously developed ano applieo t.o 1'i n s u r e , A 7 No. 1, that the assamptions going into the 8 post-reaoiness asassament attort wcre valid, and No. '
/
9 2, tnat the -- that we coulo then insure ourselves 10 tnat the -- that those c o m'po n e n t s that nad aliiaoy 4 11 been tinal inspected and not subsected to tne rigors l s ' 12 lot readiness assessment, w o r r. , indeeo, satistetory, , 1 i
! ( 13 in 11gnt ot what wa tound curing readiness '
l 14 , a s s e s s m e n't . That's -- 1
- 15 .y. I thinx you are saying tnat it shoulo nav.
i e 16 { Deen analyzed tror,a a,t6tistical stanopoint to tino ; 17 out what sort of sample we neece)/ to have a vallo -- ', i l 18 to understand you had a valid retaon tor closing at
- 19 out?
- i 1 20 A. For cloring it out. Now, the close-out I i
21 was somewhat sudden -- the close-out of tne ettort ) 22 was somewhat sudden. We had a meeting, as I recall, l } 23 I could not give you a date witnout going bacx ano 1 ( 24 checxing into the records, but it was a meeting with l 25 the commission which I attended, one og sever al-j RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (.614)445-6477
. _ . . - - _ ~ _ . . - _ ~ - ._
p: 1 l la 1 rnis one occurred in mio-19ea, tr.a t is the closcat 4 ! 4 2 Ican give you with regaros to tne timing, and i v J immeolately tollow1ng that meeting the woro was tnat 6 4 the NRC is well satisfied witn the ettort and we can 1 5 wrap up these tinal items and close out the program.
' 6 Now, you Know, as I indicated to you in s
7 retrospect, I believe that that was premature, vnat , e waat a premature decision, ano at that particular I 9 itime, many 01 us were very, very Dusy. ut hau meny, , I 10 many otner tasks to conteno witn, ano, t re nx1y , we i 11 viewed that as something that was acceptable, that 12 !the NRC tound it acceptable ano let's get on w i t r. ! ; ( 13 ,tne business os solving the other puzzles tnat we 14 had. I' l 15 g. Were you not convinceo tnat there vers i lo problems that existed atter readiness assessment ! 17 that were not done, investigated, that the NRC tela - 18 ARCO what they needed to do? 39 A. I don't think there were any -- there was - 1 . 20 nothing found during readiness assessment that was ! 1 21 not analyzed during readiness assessment and fixed 6 l
- 22 it it needed to be tixed. There was r4othing anyone 23 blatantly said, we are not going to tix that.
{ 24 Certainly those items were aodressed. Anything i 25 'tound during readiness e.qsessment were addressed ' RUNTOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-b477 4
- ~. - - - -. .
\' 5 ,
i
)
14 1 fresponalbly by tne inoivsauals at tha tim.. 2 g. You state the.NRC appearto to conclucc 5 I.their readiness assessment tollow-up on tne oasis ot ; k 4 examining corrective p a a .s u r e s tor individual 5 findings, what wculd you have expected to see? ( 6 A. I would have -- given tne initial thrust 7 of readiaeas assessment, many indiviauals trom sne d , C o m m i s f i ta n coming'on-&ite anc a very in suJpense 1 l 9 nave examination, then a wery relatively oetaileo ! 10 report ewergang at t 4. e so-callwo readiness recoro ct i I 11 6302, then there seemed en be a relative vacuum, it i 12 !you will, and tnere were intermittent, sporadic 6HC ; I i 13 ;1nspectors that soulo arr2ve, ! 14 t. And with the assistance of Mr. Higgins, I I ! lb twho at that time was a senior inspector, but usually ; 16 (on their own, would review the data tnat was being ! 1 I ! 17 } presented on the basis or indivioual tindings, so ' 18 that it did not appeer to be, to the best that I :; e ! ! 19 could determinfa, and again this is -- this is ; 20 retrospective, my. experience at Midland and my 21 experience at Nine Mile and my subsequent 22 exanination of tree s e matters led me to reflect upon 23 these ma t t e ris at Shoreh6m and acx myself, in all I ( 14 honesty, what were my real perceptions in regard to ' 1 ; 25 these satters, and thtse are my real perceptions, !; RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 '
._._ .L '
[
y i 1 that NKC tocusco largely on tns inolvicual Lindin34, r ( 2 'a no to tns best of my Knowledge, eney old not 3 re11giously anc quantitatively examins the mattcra 4 to insure t h. the overall plant had been assesato 5 correctly in the afternatn of readiness assessment. b was my impression. lTnat 7 Q. To make sure I understand, I'm trying to 8 . clear your concerns over the way the readiness 9 : inspection was cone. It did not look at the scopa 10 or loon at tne reasons ter particular tinoings, it i i 11 tocused on incivioual tinoings, rather tnan looxing ' 12 .at the causes of the tinoings, or was it more ( 13 relateo to the closs-outs or the iinoings after tney 1 14 were identitieo? 15 j A. I am not really sure tnat we mignt j 16 eventually be talxing nere at croes purposes, but 1 ; i
- I 17 will attempt to answer your question. f) 16 Wnen the individual inspectors woulo j l
19 arrive on the site periodically during the period or ' 20 January of '83 to the middle of '83, they appeareo ' 21 to take individual -- they would come, to my 8 l l 22 recollection, they would say, "I want to look at i i l 23 this and this ano this today," and leave, and I i i 24 another tellow would come and say, want to sec ( "I l l 25 this, this ano tnis," and it was discontinuity in RUNPOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
t I l L% i saying this item is clearea up, tnis iten. is cAwarss 1 2 Iup. There did not appear to be an examinetton c t. 3 idata as a whole. 4 Q. _Oxay. 5 A. And then some a ttempt made to say, let mt o s ta tis tically e x t ra pola te the plant as an entity, et 7 the sa t e ty related portion of tne plant.as an entity. 8 Q. I think what you're saying is it would 9 have satistied your concerns more it essentially a 10 jaecond readiness assessment team nac come in ano 11 cone another loon in the same area to verity tnat . 12 'the correct actions had been taxen, to get a look at j k 13 the wnole picture, insteaa or incividual, isolateo -- l 14 A. That might nave achicved the satistection. l 15 However, I guess my concerns to a greater extent 16 tocus on the lack of qua n ti ta tive e x tra pola tion t r o sa i 17 a sample we hao taken, back to tne whole plant. 18 Tnere seemeo to be an aversion, to be cancio witn 19 you, there seemed to be an aversion to loox beyono 20 the, scope of readiness assessment back to the whole 21 plant. 22 The idea was, hey, let's n o t -- let's not j 23 open up the can of worms to say this might retlect i { 24 back on the whole plant. That was an unspoxen word, !; 25 but it was pervasive, ne ve r theless.' It was, y ou RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477
i l l i ~t 1 Know, an unspoken axiom, it you w1AA, or tnt e t t cr t, k 2 lit seemed to me. Again, that is tc the best et my 3 recollection, to tne best of my a u1 Aity. I honestly 4 give you tnat into testimony. 5 Q. We are just trying to oevslop wha t you'es 6 concerns are, and tne way I unde rs ta no it, one was 7 the scope of readiness assessment, inspections clo 8 not go back and loox at the wnois plant, focusao cn f 9 {a narrow variety or items whicn nac been tinal j i 10 inspected? 11 .A. That were awaiting tinal inspections. t 12 !Q . Tnat were awaiting final inspectionst ( 14 A. Since, if you will, the ca t was out et tne , t 14 bag, the consequence of readiness assessment ' 15 construction, QC and quality assurance was alerted 16 so tne wnole process was not s ta tis ca lly ' 17 representative of wnat might have gone betore. Now, 18 how the NRC and others within the organization 19 arrived at that conclusion, I do not know. I 20 I am not testifying to you that I Know, ; i 21 No. 1, how they did it, and that, No. 2, their 22 methodology was unsa tisf actory. I'm saying I raiseo 1 1 23 the question at the time, and I was told tha t is an { 24 initial assumption, we are going to look at unis, 25 this and this that remains to be done. Given the RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
, Ac i
1 ' pressures witn the business or acing it, you tcAe i 2 the initial assumptions and you run with the initial 3 assumptions, and certainly I dio that to the oest ct 4 sy ability. 5 Q. And the second ma]or area was the 6 closa-out ot items after eney hao caen icentitlec', 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Individually rather tnan programmatica21yt 9 A. Programmatically, correct. The whole 10 tenant ot readiness assessments was programmaticaAAy 11 we are going to take a poloroid shot, 11 you will, 12 of coming nere and do a very intensive polorolo anot ( 13 and try to get an assessment of your s ta te ot 14 readiness, and then enere was -- seemeo as tnougn, I 15 to an extent, a vacuum beyond that point wnen it le Decame sort of a more -- intensity was reouceo to l 17 individual visits. 16 Q. Are you aware of any specitic items tnat 19 were overlooked because of this approach, that we 20 could go back and loox at, or are you just really 21 concerned about the methodology right now? 22 A. Principally the methodology. I could say 23 well, there were things -- in any large management 24 { team you -- especially when you are meeting witn 25 various individual departments tha t have got wioely RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
I 12 i 1 seperated responsibility, such as quality assurance, ( 2 l quality control ano construction, enere is a 1 3 'tsnoency, you xnow, among most human beings to 4 arrive at the consensus opinion as to how one shouac 5 proceed. 6 There were individual things that I was 7 not necessarily in total agreement witn, but as tnc 8 substitute chairman on behalt of the director et
,,, 9 nuclear in the meeting, it was necessary Ior n. a tc 10 oehave in a responsible manner and to listen ano to 11 jattempt to assess the consensus of tne various 12 responsible managers that were representing
( 13 construction, engineering, quality control ano 14 quality assurance in the various meetings tnat we 15 conducted to discuss the indivicual items.
- 16 Q. Do you have concerns that --
outsioe tna 17 scope of the readiness assessment concerning the i 18 construction quality, or are you really Just
, ,,s . -
19 concerned that we don't know enough? ! 20 A. I didn't come here -- I came here to give 21 you that testimony. The question you aaxed me tor 22 me to go on the record to say no, I have no other 23 concerns. I came here to focus on those concerns. - 24 It we followed up on that, and if I went bacx and 25 did some more research, you know -- RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 ! I E
. _- ... -. -. .- - i
I 4U 1 ,Q. You con't nave anytning specitic? 2 A. I'm not coming here to testity tc ycu tn6L 3 I have any other concerns, no. 4 Q. Is there anytning else concerning the 5 readiness assessment issues that we haven't 6 discussed? 7 A. I don't think so. I don't thinx so. 8 Q. Then I woulo like to -- 9 lA. Lot me otter tnis into tes timony with i 10 :rogaros to tne qua n ' ita tive reaoiness assessmant. I 11 There was a definite reluctance to pursue, ror 12 example, the utilit2es of Mill s ta nda rca R lv5 D. ( 13 I oon't recall wnetner tnat reluctance was tully 14 shared by the Commission. The question of l I 15 nomogeninity ot the inspection or tne arriving l 16 product was a contention. It was a non-nomogenous l 17 product tha t was arriving, and therefore the 18 application of 105 0 was, at oes t, dittacult. 19 I questioned that and there was -- i t' 20 seemed to me that the aversion was, at least in part 21 due to the fact that testimony had already been made 22 towards dealing with concerns by autficient folxs 23 that 105 D was not applicable to the industry, and I { 24 in light of that prior testimony about 105 D that we 25 discussed, we couldn't begin to reter to it or use RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
I I I 41 1 it at the site bccause we alreacy maos enat l \ 2 jatatement, and let's not open that issue up.
)
I 3 And I, personally, am someone wno Icels 4 that numerical repre sen ta tion or concitions is a 5 very powerful -- is a very important supplement to 6 the evaluation of any condition, and theretore, 4, 7 in retrospect, I wish I had been more aggressive, in 6 .saying, "Now, I insist we utilize 105 D 2nstead or i 9 ia c c e p tin g the consensus view tnat is in error, i 10 'Let's try to resolve this matter or readiness 11 assessment witnout empnasizing tnat area." 12 U. Cla ri tica tion lor tne recora, M111 ! i ( la Standard 105, is that a methoo tor oeveloping a , 14 s ta tis tica l sample? 15 A. Yes. 6 16 v. Describes now large your sample snoulo os, 17 so it tells you what you need to xnow? 18 A. Right. 19 Q. Let's go forward in time, bacx -- we went , ; 20 through the Midland Project and arrived a t Nine Mlle I j 21 Point Unit Two, again your title at -- 22 A. Assistant superintendent of construction 23 for electrical construction management. 24 { Q. I'll be reterring to the two letters that 25 you sent to our ottice, one da ted January 26th, I RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477
44 1 icelleve -- January 2u, 19d5 eno the otne r one 2 ' February 14, 19e5 to amplity some or tne concsrno 3 .orought to our attention in tnose two istters. 4 A. Okay. 5 Q. In the January 26th letter, one or the -- 6 I'm sorry I have copies here it you do not have tnum. 7 A. These letters, by the way, are maoc a part 8 of this record here. 9 -Q. Fine. Attachment one to your January 20tn 10 . letter, Item do. 1, you reter to ma jor mile s tone 11 Ischedules containing signiticant xnown ommissions. 12 Could you be specitic aa to wnat ommissions you are ( la rcterring to? 4 14 .A. T .c major ommissions that were ot great i 15 ' concern to me, anc this again is within tnis I 16 $ document that I'm giving you here in greater detall 17 g in the reterence, tne major ommissions were in tnree l I i le principal areas, No. 1, the assumption that quality , i 19 control will support the schedules, the assumption 20 that engineering will support the schedules, and the 21 assumpi:icn that contractor interphasing difficulties i 22 will not be made a part of these schudules, these 1 23 seneaules will be s ta nd alone schedules. 24 Those are three assumptions on the recorc { .
. \
25 in writing by the indiviaual developing tne 1 RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)446-6477
' l I
2a i 1 .senedules, ana to me, it was my personal, tirst nera l l 2 l experience that those assumptions wees simply 3 l contrary to good practices in tne incuatry, anu in 4 my opinion they were contrary to safety and quality 5 at that project. I teel very strongly, if I reca1A, 6 with respect to that. 7 Q. You reter to it as being highly relevsnt u .to your recent experience at shorcnam, is tnat wl.s t i 9 l
,you are referring to?
I 10 'A. Absolutely. Absolutely. I saw repeatecly 11 lwhere the product arriving tor inspection was being 12 lhancled in a manner that was being nurried, I ( 13 narrassed, get it there, meet the seneoule. Ano 14 steps tnat were, I teel, important to qua11ty, were 15 being overlooxed in no uncertain terms. i 16 g. Could you be a little more specatic on the ' 17 steps that were being overlooxeo? 18 A. The most obvious was the triple-CP program - l 19 which I discussed, but the construction completion 20 control program where these forms -- it was like a i 21 anow stora. It was lixe a blizzard, and these torms 22 were on their way through the established routing i ' 23 system, and it seemed to me there was hardly time i
! l 24 tor signature, let alone time to go out and examina
{ 25 the components being discussed on the forms. RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (o14)445-8477 i l 1 _ . 1
e% i 1 lg. In the next pa ra g r a ph , Paragraph 2, is 2 I that reterring to the same area, nil l e s t o n e scneau4.t, 3 A. That is what I'm roterring-to. 4 Q. The poor work practices, procedural anu 5 quality ommissions, are these ene same items you 6 just reterred to? 7 A. Yes. 6 Q. As tar as pusning paperworx tnrougn 9 'without sutticient time to really analyze it? 10 A. Yes. i . 11 .g. You also reter to, in that Paragrapn 2, 12 Iexcessive quality ce3ections? ' 13 n. Yes. I ' 14 IQ. Examples of what area tnose rejections i i 15 '. t e l l into, this is still the electrical cable? . I { 16 .A. Yes. Wnen I was there, there were -- 1 17 was confronted witn a situation wnera qut11ty 18 control wanted to return batches of, en masse, or 19 documentation and, you know, since I had just i 20 arrived there, it was difficult for me to objectively f 21 conclude why this was quality control, why they 22 wanted to do this, if you will, so even getting 23 myself acquainted with what the problems were and 24 why they wanted to return batenes of tnia ( 25 information, of these forms for inspections, but RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477
i - 4D 1 there were several examples ano some are deveAopea ( 2 .and reterred to in more de tail in the document 1 3 nave. 4 Q. They are talking about concerns tor CCCP 5 program -- 6 A. Tnat was the focal point. Let me say tnic: 7 That was the main area. Let me say that tne tinal e inspections and acceptance et safety relateo 9 components that were, in tact, pieces or complex 10 . equipment, sucn as switen gear, and tne 11xe, 1 11 tound those, and also control panels, I tound tnoas, 12 in my experience, to be vastly the most ditticult I ( 13 areas to insure quality, because changes were coming 14 along, cables were being installed and tw rmina tt u 15 later, so the re was constant two and tro, accepting 16 these panels ano assessing these switch gears. 17 For example, at S hor e ha m it was going on 18 rignt up to the last man and probably going on todey 19 as they prepare for these diesel generators. Until 20 that process is controlled, the assurance of quality 21 in my position -- it's my position that assurance or 22 quality is suspect, and there was just -- at Nine 23 Mile it was the processing of triple CP torms was a 24 { blizzard. 25 Q. I believe you're indicating that the RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477 g
40 l l I i 1 : quality control inspectors were toentitying tnc i 6 2 l problems ano sending tne tnings bacx, cut your ; i 3 excessive -- l 4 A. When I was arriving they were attempting i 5 to send them bacx, but it's my concern, again, 6 reterring back to the recollection or Snorehani, tnat 7 the quality control inspectors are only human. 8 There are some that they arc going to miss, ano, ycL 9 xnow, tne quality ot an in-coming procact arriving 10 at quality assurance is a tactor in wnat gets missec. 11 ,It's inevitacely a tactor in what gets misseo. 4 12 kJ . In item No. 4, you reter to solicitation k 13 or tuncing? 14 A. Yes. ; 1 15 Q. By whom are you speaxing tnere? ! 16 .A. I'm reterring to the solici ta tion ot . 17 runding by those individuals who are tunaing the l 16 project, Niagara Mohawx and the live other utilities. , I. ! 19 Q. So this is Niagara Mohawk's public i 20 solicitation of funding? 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. Through stock sales or bond sales? i l 63 A. That's right. 24 Q. { And you'ce saying that Niagara Mohawx xnew ! 25 of the intormation and had unrealistic assumptions *t RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
I 2) i, , 1 'A. 1 Knew it ano I reporteu it. I 2 jQ. To Stone ano weoster? l 3 !A. To Stone ana weoster and also to -- 4 eventually in a meeting immeola tely prior to my { b disenarge, in a meeting in tront or Mr. William - 6 Morrison, wno was the project director. Althou3n .n 7 was a MAC employee, he was also, to my understancing, 6 ,a vice-presiaent ot Niagara Mohawk as part or tne 9 ' integrated team, and that was at 5: 0u p.m. on May 10 tnt 2nc, and on May tne Jra I was terminatec. 11 Q. An example of the omission of sign 111 cant 12 lworx trom these -- ( 13 A. Tne omission or -- again, this oocument i. 14 provides you witn examples et wnat was omittea in 15 some oetail, but again, tne assumptions that quality ' 16 l wiAl support the schedule, the assumptions that 17 c on t ra c t'o r interphasing or these seneoules will be 18 stano alone schedules, the assumption that i t 19 engineering will support the schedule, there were 20 repeated examples at this project and other p r o ] e- e t s 21 that made these kind of assumptions simply 22 u na c ce p ta ble . The assumptions were grossly 23 simplified and unacceptable to any reasonable { 24 observer knowledgeable in that industry. Tha t is 25 very firmly what I believe in that case. RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-0477 1 1
l 1 1 I I 4w All rignt. Paragraph ac. s tne gus11ty I 1 fv. 2 altticulties werc brought tc managements actenticn. 3 ISpccitically, which quality dit t icul tie s ? Are you l l 4 ta1xing again about the -- l 5 A. About the processing or these -- the l 6 product arriving for inspection was simply not osiny 7 nandled properly. The process was oeing abusec, 8 snortcuts were being taAen, and people were 8 overwnalmed by it. And although -- it was my sensa 10 in the oriet perica tnat I was enere tnat vc wouac 11 be overwnelmed by tnia, quality control woulc be 12 'overwhcimed by this, the intensity or tnis attempt k 13 to get tne paper over and taxe tne pa r t i c u l e. r 14 'attituco or trying to merge une senedule ob3wctivs 15 ;with tne quality oojective. 16 ig. And putting tne load on quaAity control tc 17 really -- i i l 16 A. Right, which was the very essence or -- l 1 i 19 one of the biggest points made by readiness 20 assessment, which as I pointed out to you, made a 21 believer out of me. In retrospect, as I observec , 22 the consequence of readiness assessment, that you i l 23 cannot blindly rely that QC will picx up all the i) i 24 errors. You must address the question ot the 25 quality of tne proauct arriving for inspection. 1 RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 ,
. .. l
l l' is : 1 'believe you must do tnat in a quantitativt menn.r, ; t 2 'suppAcmentea witn good Juogment. Goco j u u g w. c n t , i t. l 3 my opinion, simply coesn't oo the 3o0. 4 Q. In paragraph No. 6, you refer to some h 19.".1 3 5 experienced employees who sought to ioentity enus, 6 ditriculties were discreotted and criticizeo, can 7 you give us some names of wno was involveo with tnsse 8 A. Two main ino4viduals come to mino, 9 .altnough there were severaA. One is tne g e n t i c :n a n 1 10 ' replacea anc wnc I nac Irequent conversaticas w i ; .. . 11 wnen I arrived tnere, the inoivioual 1 replacco, wn: 12 II did not know, nis name was J ohn Ronco, ana Jonn, ( 13 my replacing ot John was to nas discredit. He nac 14 jevery reason to be very resentIul of my arrival at 15 the job site. 16 I thinx in light oI tne prussures brougnt 17 about by that, I think he was a very objective - lo incividual, in spite or the pressures ot tha t
, l 19 i*
situation. He attempted to apprise me of the real l 20 situation in regards to these matters, and I , 21 listened to him. Initially I listened with, I gucss, , 22 a 3aundiced eye. I felt this man has been 4 23 discredited by the organization, ne has been puaneo i ( 24 aside, but let me listen to him because it was part 25 or my Job to listen to him, he reported to me. Anc RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (bl4)445-6477
e
; av 1 ',I amvelopeo a 11rm Dcliet tnat ci r . Ronco's 2 .ooservations that tnis abuse or progtammatic 3 anortcuts to attempt to acnisve scneaulso goals wns 4 real. It was not a --
it was sometning, No. 1, I b was Deginning to observe myselt, anc No. 2, tnat 6 what Mr. Ronco was saying was -- seemed to ring true, 7 in my personal view. 8 Now, anotner incivicual that nappens to ca 9 'a Iormsr colleague or minc, was br. Daylo Fr=cer1CA, 10 wno ne even Detore 1 arriveo at tne Job site nac 11 !conversa tions, and wnen I arriveo at the Job site 12 talso nad conversations, and he ottereo observations ( 13 that incite, it you will, to nov the programs west 14 being abusec, and I nesitate to enter into testimony 15 that ena -- that oeceptions were ceing engag=o in. 16 I hesi ta te to say that, but nevertneless, I, my own l 17 personal belief is that in orcer to try to bring tne lu whole business together ano maxe it loox as tnough 19 we were attempting to achieve schedules, were i 20 attempting to achieve quality, that the project hao 21 disintegrated into a massive deception. I hesitate i 22 to say that, but frankly tha t is my personal belier. j i 23 I don't say tnat with bitterness. I con't { 24 say it because of my personal circumstances. I say 25 it with nonesty and conviction. RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (014)445-8477
l
?
44 l 1 4 You reter to these experiencec employees i 2 lbeing discrecited ano criticisea, by wnom? 3 I. A By tnear immedia te supervisors. Frec,raca 4 was run over trom Nine Mile. He was sEnt to 5 Millstone, in what I would descrios as servituae tc 6 reprogram him, it you will, for raising these 7 absurdities with management, and Ronco was 8 discrecited immediately on the site, and eventuaAAy v transterred to usaver valley. i 10 I tninx tnat enere were otner inalviouais, l 11 iI tecl, but I don't have -- altnough I Know tae 12 !1ndivlauals, I aon't nave -- I cio not nave airect f la conve rsa tions with them, so tneretore I preter nct 14 io t entar their names into tnis recoro, but 13 i nevertneless, certainly the treatment ot Frecericx, lo I tninA -- it's my personal bellet that it was l 17 improper, and it was indictive of the management l l 18 tactics that were in the process at enat tims. 19 Q. You nave a concern that Stone and 20 Webster's handling of people who brought concerns 21 would have a chilling effect on anyone voicing 22 concerns? 23 A. Absolutely. And quite trankly, I tninx, 24 althougn I attempted, as you will see trom tne ! ( i 25 record I submitted to you today, I made attorts to RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (ol4)445-o477
l i J4 1 l' communicate my concerns to tns extunt teastole, t 2 l e x e n.p t i ng me trom my -- pcroonally Irom correctivs J l measures, at least initially, hevertn=ltsa, 1 cntnx 4 that my dismissal would have a enilling ettect on l 5 individuals, because in spite of reclamations tnot 6 deal with these matters, I tninx the record snows, 7 as best I can determine it, tnat employment at wil., 8 tot example, is a very powertul coctrine, and you 1 9 'can nave regulations until tne eno or time, but a 10 ~ company has got the employment at will coctrinv to i 11 stano behinc and say, "Hey, we olon't laxe tne loos 12 jof tnc guy. He dion't tit into our scheme ot tnings, la and we hao to get rio ot nim." Put t h a ,t on tne 14 record anc wna t are you going to ao about it? 15 Q. You also reter to the manager or i 16 electrical construction abruptly tirea? ; 17 A. That was myselt. 18 Q. Tnat was yourselt, oxay. 19 A. Right. Please forgive, if you will, tne ; i 20 ' most exact title that described my position was 21 manager -- I was electrical manager over electrical 22 construction, but my otticial title was assistant ! 23 superintendent. We were over construction mode as , { 24 opposed to directly managing tne cratt. It's not ' I 25 intended to be a misrepresentation there. , i RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (014)445-8477 , t
i i
, as 1 .g. I undc rs ta no. In paragraph no. e, you 2 reter to occumcntea owtails suostantiating c c r. c c 5 r. s ,
a 'a rt they included in tnis intormation you have nsrst 4 A. They are in part, and they are also 5 referenced, and some of tnese are on tne site, but 1 6 nave referenced them here tairly explicity. , 7 Q. For the record, could you give us an losa d la s tar as the cocumented details? 9 A. I was going to reac into tnc record the 10 introduction to this occument, ano tnat woulo maxo l 11 treterence, tor the record, or tne specitic 12 Ireterences. Thcre is more than Just one, there arc ( 13 many. I will give you one example or tnat, I tninx. 14 iFor example, I tnink Reference 4.10 to the document l 15 !that was submitted into testimony, ano I tninx tnst f
\ l 16 'reterence 15 on page 14 ot attachment 2.2 to tne !
i 17 document submitted into testimony, ano, specitically, 18 the attachment to reference 15 is a good indication 19 of attempts that were made to identity ommissions to 20 schedules that were overlooked. 21 I recall, for example, sitting in a l 22 meeting with -- it was an informal meeting with tha l 23 planning manager and the superintendent ot 24 construction at Nine Mile Two, and a t ter I conveyeo { 25 my concerns to the planning manager that these are
- RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 l
l
l as i 1 'grcss ommissions ono nere's wnat 1 propose, his l 2 ! response to me was, "Loox, I Know Morrison, I n i. v a I l 4 , talked to Morrison, ano it I taxe this to nim, I sst i 4 this as you're saying we can't meet tne seneoule, l 5 milestones tna c we re drawn. It I ta x e it nim, it wc o can't oraw it this way, pacx your bags and go n c n.s . " 7 That is wha t he told me sitting rignt in the meeting. e 'Tnis is acvelopeo in gecator ccta11 tnat tnis is y roterancou, but tnis xina ot -- well, I believe tni 10 recorc speaks tor itss11. i 11 'g. vie'll attach tnis occument to tna 12 interview transcript and reter to it as an ( 13 ia t ta chmen t so we can reler alrectly to the skcticns 14 'in this -- 15 'A. Yes. 1 lo 'g. l during tne review or tne transcript. t ,
, 1 17 !A.
Um-hmm. 1 l 16 g. You also indicated in pa ra g ra ph 6 tnat ! i 19 documented cetails in existance at that time, ano
~
20 evolving in subsequent months su bs ta n tia te these 21 concerns. Where did you get the information ior tne i i 22 time period, I assume after you left the site? ' l 23 A. I do have some information that I obtaineo, l l l l ( 24 and it is Nine Mile Two information, anc it is l 25 included in the record. RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477 l l l l
e JU 1 s. Tnis is yout entro psety in t e rma tion , it's i 2 not olrectly -- you are not alrectly ocserving tnic 3 .intormat iont 4 A. No, the information was sent airectly tc 6 me. e Q. By anotner incivioual? 7 A. Tnst's correct. e .q . Can we Know who tnst other incivioual as? 9 iA. On the reccro -- 1 preter not to put f. i s 10 name into tne recoro. I will be nappy to make tnat 11 .intormation -- the inoivioual nas inoica teo tc mc 12 ltnat ne will be happy to go on -- pernaps not go on ( 13 !tne recoro, but to nove oiscussions with the 14 Regulatory Agency in regards to tnis ma t te r , but n. -- 15 I don't nave -- he aid not retuse to ist mo use r. i s 16 name. However, I don't nava his specitic a u t n or i ty 17 .to use nis name here. le Let me give you one claritication. The i 19 document I enterpd into testimony today has both my 20 name, and if you look at the bottom, and the name et 21 nas reviewed this 22 in.toraation witn me, and in the majority ot areas 23 that ne can support the intormation, ne is in 24 concurrence with this document. { 25 g. All rignt. Continuing on witn pa ragrapn o, RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477
1 Jo 1 you reterrea tc pctentially oisruptive management i I 2 changts? J .A. Yeah. nell, to begin with, I thinA that -- 1 4 I even tninx of Ronco's displacement, in retrospec , 5 ,was oisruptive. I thinx tne essence or the p 6 o b l e s, i 6 there, as I coulo perceive it, was management's 7 tailure to support Mr. Ronco in tne pericrmance et e ;nis outtes as ne saw it. Tnere wetc, you xnow -- j s tranx1y, I tninx ne could have been utilizeo mor. 10 ettectively by listening to wnat nu nao to say o r. I 11 Inow to get the job ocne. 12 He was a nignly wxperienced anoivicual ( 13 iwatn a lot ct electrical bacxgrounu, but tne l 14 ;superintencent or construction Mr. Larry Brown, gavt 15 .me a list or indiviouais tnat ne removed trom tn. lo l3cb site over a perloc et time, ano I ne s1 ta te tc 17 enter eneir names into testimony, but, tranx1y, when le I Anow wno the inciviouals were and tne tact that n. 19 discrecited them, I think that those -- it's my 1 20 observations -- and I told him some -- that I telt i 21 that tnose decisions by him were disruptive and i 22 detrimental to the project, given the individuals 23 that had been -- In aooition to tha t , it you examint { 24 the record of removal ot indiviouals trom the Nine 25 Mile 2 project in 1984, it's my observation tnat RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (o14)445-u477 i
n 1 'sometning disruptive was going on tners. i 2 ! Let's examine wno is. nagner, aonco, t ' L. I a gone trom the project, Mr. Morrison is gone trom tn. 4 project. They brought in Mr. John Capus trom 5 Millstone who has executive PWR experience but nss 6 very little recent bwR experience. There are tncae 7 tnat argue that when you were in senior specitic ' e type or rwactories in seconcary business. You ors ! v ,qualitiea it is my personal beliet tnere is a l 10 'oitterence between PnR and 8Wh, ano it is suen tnat, ! 11 tranKly, tnat is not tne case. 12 l And in adcition, they nave brougnt in nr. 1 ( 13 oisnop, torma11y the nead man trom meaver Valley, 14 iagain a Pwk unit. I have got to oelieve that oAsc i. i l 15 ih r . Ptax has lett tht project. It's my observation lo to you that there is sometning disruptive going on , t 17 that is not in the best interest of this project, I t lo and this is what I refer to. 19 Q. Okay. ' The last paragraph, paragraph 9 i 20 refers to independent subsequent assessments by i 21 other agencies? 22 A. Um-hmm. j l 23 g. Which other agency are you reterring to? I
)!
?
24 { A. Well, the only tning I have to ester to, l 25 and I didn't bring: it with ma, there was a Canaolan RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-d477
i i Jr 1 reterreo to a process wherecy equipment was being i 2 tested with a Alst et -- with a cocumentec list et 3 loeticiencies, such as the use or PL1x6, you may or 4 may not be tamiliar with that terminology -- 5 Q. No, I am not. 6 A. They are punch list item reports, and l 7 frequently somebody will say along the way, "Can .t 8 run tnat piece or equipment withcut this and tnat ;
\ l 9 la no the other component completec, or coulo we tax. ,
I i , 10 tnat component trom this component ano transter o r. L 1 11 l temporary basis to make this tning over nere worx." i 12 lSo in essence, the terminclegy in the business is l ( la gerry-rig. i 14 jg. I understano that term. I 15 A. So tranx1y, these steps are -- tne lo question as to wnat excent tnese steps were taxen, a 17 third party at the site tells me that right now tney ! le are running water around the system with welos 19 within middle boundary that are incomplete in an ' 20 attempt to meet the milestone tor the reactive 21 vessel. They have been hustling to meet that 22 milestone. Now, if you understand the logistics ot 23 now paper flows through the various agencies and now i 24 you oocument quality, these circumstances impair, { 25 unless you have, in my opinion, unless you have an RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-u477
%w 1 'w6tablibned qua n ti ta tivt me c re s to assass wnat is e
2 gCing on, you retdin the C1EK ot naving owluCES git 3 iceyono tnat tinal step, ano I -- I tninx 1 mau. L t. . ; 4 point citar trom the Shoreham. 5 g. Would you like to taxe a breax? 6 i hh. LAZARUS: nhy don't we go ott tne 7 record tor a couple minutes? e (Discussion ott the record.) 9 MR. LALAh05: The time is 10:v7 anc wa lu will r& sums tne interv1ww. 11 BY mR. LAZARUS: 12 g. In your secono letter dateo F6bruary 14, j k 13 19c5, I woulo line to amplity some et Ine conccrne i 19 you brougnt to our attention tnere. In the s.cono t 15 paragrapn ct that letter, the second concern or tnat i l 16 iletter, you reter to omission ot those allowances ! 17 causeo ano propagateo conditions adverse to satety lo ano quality. 19 A. Yeah. 20 0 Is there anything you are reterring to 21 there that we have not already discussed?
.22 A. No, the essence of what that is reterring 23 to, we nave already discussed.
24 Q. For the record, in that tnird item, we 25 already discussed the CCCP program, but t et it in RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (bl4)44b-0477
- 1
wa 1 ,ths interview transcript, wculu you descrius tn;t :. I ' i 2 a pre-quality control inaptction program peticimc; J oy tne enginwers? 4 A. Yes. 5 g. Tne tourtn paragraph roters to interacticn 6 or programs at release tor checkout and initial 7 testing being nighly reounaant, inconsistent,.3ven 8 chaotic, and 3eopardizeo cocumenta tion ano t r a c11 r. 9 9 et quality s ta tus. I woulo 11xe to get a little lo imore intormation en tnate I con't know 11 we
/ ,
11 already oiscussed those items or not. 12 A. The quality inspection program, thust a rt ( 13 sometning I discuaseo witn Earl Conrad who is tnc i 14 CPC cooroinator, and also with soma ot the gC ? 12 Individuals themseAvas, t7c transter or i n t o r m a t i c r. 16 trom tne CPC program, the cocumenting or wnica CPC 17 pertormed, reterred to, unien QC inspection tormcc l 18 tne documenting or, wnich becams PLIRS within ths VC 19 house and which subsequently became BPLIRS within 20 start-up agency, was -- I can best characterize it ', i 21 that it was widely accepted, that it was a mess. 22 You know, I could -- everytody agreed it waw a meas, i 23 the problem was nobody ever said, "Let's get on witn I { 24 it." 1 ! 25 Get done with it and get out ot here was , RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (bl4)443-6477 1
l l i ns 1 tne p ovailing attituou at tnat time. i 2 jc., You reter to tnese proolcms jocpatolaing 3 ,cocumentation ano tracxing et quality status? 4 A. I'm sorry. 5 Q. It says j e o pa r o i z e d 't 6 A. Yes. 7 q. An example of cocume n ta tion problems in 6 e .tnat arca? v A. I reter again to tne coming togetner ct 10 tnese practices ano the transterring, the 11 cross-reterencing anc tranaterring or cata simply 12 lett wice open. In tact, I useo several times tnc k is ,aine Mile, in private conversations with Larry orcwn, i 14 'you can orivs a coacn anc tour tnrougn tne pecblun. 15 ;we nave in tnis program. I con't Anow it you art I f i 16 l tam 111arwitnthat particular phraseology, it tenos 17 to evolva througn old Englano. Essortially, you 18 cculd drive a caoen and tour norses tncough tnw 19 problems. The problems were coming to lixe tive 20 rivers meeting in a point, and the amount of 21 turbulence there was -- and again I reter to tnis in 22 the record, and had I not observed ano nad the l 23 opportunity to observe these matters first ano at i T . l 24 Shorenam and to snow you'tne extent, again, at { i 25 Midland, I contess as a numan being, I woulo nava ' 4 RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (bl4)445-6477 I I i l _h
~
., g; e i
.i _ _-
%4 I
1 not oeen quite as conherneo aoout them. Having - 2 observec them at tnosc two Accations, I was t r y i re, n 1 , a to convey to manajoment, as a result o1 tne d $xperience I had gained at tndse locations. t 5 g. In item 5, reterving to uguipment accesa e control being neticient 7 A. Yes. . a ly. Wnat creas di tne pla n ts are you reterring - 9 to aa far as access c o n t r o l'.' l AL i A. Mainly a,witen 9sar uno contrci panels. . i il Tne -- you could never get start-up to admit, cr tns i 12 turnover group to admit or tne utt11ty or I! i e
\ 13 construction, wno used tne p a r. a 1 last. One guy ,
I i 14 would go in and tay, "ney, tnat is not tne way 1 ; 15 lett it," ano wnco I argiven enis was a -- enere . i i > lo were suveral memotandum regaroins, you xnow, wno was . 17 tne last guy in Lne panel, who is the last guy in a j lo piece og s w i t.c h gear. j 19 Q. You are not referring to really security 20 measures? 21 A. No. ! 22 Q.
- Ao much as you are to conttol the worx i
23 process? 24 A. Controlling tne worx. Tnere were repeateo ( 1 25 concerns that became, being termina ted and retrained, i RUNFOLA 4 ASSOCIATES (014)445-b477 j i l
. l l
- l M4 l 1 tnat coors were not being properly securto to
( 2 equipment, that sort or tning, that access was not 3 controlleo in a manner consistent witn gooo satoty 4 and quality. Tnsre seemed to be a -- well, I tninx I 5 that pretty well -- 6 Q. Was it ditterent atter tne tinal QC 7 inspection, atter a particular caoinet or piece or o equipment -- 9 'A. r; nile I was tnere none or tew signiticant i lo ' electrical components nao been 11nal inspecteo oy ws. 11 lIt was my tinal concern that this process, unicss 12 !Drougnt under control, would be a continuing process k la because the eviconce suggested, 11 you examine tna 14 remaining scope ot worx, there would be many 13 attempts maoe to turn tnis equipment into the 16 testing pha se betore engineering coulo posalbly ou ., 17 cone with all the various additions to those i 18 components in a large number or cases. 19 Q. The next ites, No. 6, refers to a senior ' l 1 20 manager advising that only bootleg copies of ' 1 21 drawings might be available tor weexand work, which l 22 senior manager are you referring to? i j 23 A. I was in a meeting, and it was in -- I I 24 will checx my records and see the meeting, I ( 25 believe, was Wednesday, the 14 tn ot March. I had I I RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477 !
nu 1 been on tne site at that point approximatcly 24 ( 2 nours. Tne meeting was brown, Larry brown, 3 superintendent ot construction, Jonn Ronco, call 4 Donahue, Steve Glover, Scott Delnuusen ano a tw14c. 5 called olindly of L.D. Comstock, and as I recall, 6 there was a -- there was -- in order to meet a 7 milestone -- I think it was a non-satety rela teo -- e arco, it was a water treatment system, ano it was u 9 sketen. I believe tnt sketen was 2-530-u15-12oto), 10 and Brcwn said in responso to tnc lact that sActen 11 magnt not be availaole, ne saio, "Let's not get 12 paranolo here, xwep it out or alta when uc was I ( 13 around." t l 14 I was sitting in tne bacxground, naving ! 15 just arrived on ene site. I am on tne site ous11y 16 maxing notes, and tne statement came up, ano it t 17 caugnt my by surprise ano I maae a note or it. au t, 16 again, in the pressures of getting tne worn cone, 1 19 may have made reference to this quictly to Brown en i 20 the side, but I don't recall that I confronted crown - - I 21 ne was my immediate boss -- and I don't recall tnat 22 I confronted nie and said, "That is a wrong move. 23 Even though it's not sa le ty related, let's not I 24 anject that in people's minds because it starts nere i 25 and goes beyond that." I recall thinxing tnat at 1 RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
.< u i
1 tnt time. I'm onAy nere a cay, Aet me not got -- 2 1 Do you xnow c1 It nappening in a ca ls ty a :relatwo system wnere samliar guioance was 91 von? 4 A. No, I do not. 5 Q. Are you concerneo that woulo water ocwr. 6 I the system, ano 11 tney old it on a non-satety 1 i 7 relateo system they would consioer coing it tor e satsty relatoo systems? 9 A. Tha t would certainly oe a conccen. That av woulo certainly bc a concern. 11 -Q. Item No. 7, a senior construction 12 representative parsonally marxed up enargcs ano ( la ueletions to tne engineering specitication to A4 accommooate the scneoule requirements. 15 n. Agtin, tnat was Mr. Brown, who was tne lo superintencent or construction. Engineering was , 17 very relu c ta n t to proceed in tnis airection, anc 18 tnis old reter to -- this did relate to satety l 19 related compone n ts , 'a t least in part. It woulo nave 20 to go. 21 Q. You refer to electrical switen gear l l 22 tastners -- 23 A. Again, it's a part of the recora tna t As l 24 containea in the recoro tnat I suomitted to you, anc l { 25 in cata11. RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-o477
I 47 l 1 (g . Coulo we-taxc just a secono to o s t o r ci a n s i 2 exactly wnat system we are ta1xing aoout en6co, cc i j wnicn switen gear? ! 4 A. Yean. 5 A. Oxay. Tnis was page 9 or reterence 2.4, 6 paragrapn 3.4, Gould venoor requirements. 7 Q. What switch gear is tnis? 8 A. Gould supplied. 9 ,
- y. You con't know wnat system?
10 A. It was all over, it was many sy4 tin.s. 11 Q. wnat were tne enanges ano deletions tnat 12 you are reterring to, maos oy Mr. erown? . k 13 A. It was an attempt to contorm the , 14 specitications to omit tne requir.uent to e n c e r. euen ; 15 tastner tnat were being recommenced oy bouto, tnat , 16 were required by Goula's manual. i 17 g. Tnese are the torque enecxs tna t you're -- le A. On the lastners, yes. The thing that 19 astounded me about that is that one of the major . 6 20 issues that it was -- that I Eas anxad to c.ddress l. 21 while I was there was taking an outage on the 22 templa te and power so we could spend a weekend going 23 around tigntening up on all tne various tastners en 24 tne template and power systems so we would not navs ( 25 a spurious outage and cause wnatever number ot RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (bl4)445-6477
4. i 1 c r c s s nie n t s in any given area to be sub3tet te s o in s i 2 ' spurious outage, but yet we were ottempting Lc 3 ,centrom tnw specitications tor permanent plant 4 equipment to say we don't have to go in and enten 5 tnese tastners to maxe sure during snipping anc 6 installation tne fastnsrs dion't tall short at tne -- 7 I telt it was proper to bring tnese concerns up tc 6 management and tne solutions tnat tnere were, as 1 y 'olo suggest some solutions here. One or my 10 sugg.4tions .as, "ney, it we aon't want to checs I 11 t n t a. all, vny con't we at least get coulo to agrce 12 to ranoomn sample, and it tne ranoom sampAe ootsn't ( 13 sorn we will w x t ra pola te trom there." but tnt ovstraci: 1 14 ' issue was it that doesn't meet the scheoule, Act's i 15 joo somatning else. lo iv . I understano. You also incicate tnat sit. i 17 angineering personnel were pressureu, even 18 railroadeo to accept the changes. Was tnere i 19 resistence when Mr. Brown brought up these c n a n g c s 't 20 A. There were about seven weeks of resistence, 21 anc the meeting was really the culmination of tnese 22 resistence. There were misgivings about it. 23 g. And you're saying that Mr. Brown admitt6c 24 that ne did not have the expertise in the tielo, ano 25 still insisted on the deletions? j RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477 i i
l 4v 1 A. Yean, ne ano I nau a clacussion regaroing ( 2 this, ano on tnis I wouAo like to maxt it cicat, a tnis is my recollection as part ot tne attermatti ct 4 that meeting, you Know, Brown said something to t i, + 5 etteet that -- Well, I thinx at woulo oc e inappropriate for me to attempt to recollect a 7 direct quote trom dr. Brown in a casual discussion, o but tno essence et it is in tnere. y ,v . I unoerstano. Finally at Paragrapn Wo. o, l 10 'reterring to tne program anc personnel cnanges i 11 proposeo by tne management analysis corporation? , 12 A. Um-nmm. ( 13 g. You refer again to a senior manager, are 14 you referring to Mr. Brown? 15 A. ho, I'm reterring to non nagner, tne , 16 construction manager. ' Tnat meeting was attenato by i 17 ben Carlson, Ron nagner, Larry orown, Mr. Olsen et l l 18 engineering, Mr. Clements, and one otner Anoxvioual l 1 19 whose name at the moment is escaping me, but it was ! 20 a la te night meeting, and it was in the a t te rna tn et 21 the meeting with Mr. Morrison, and closed door, it , i l 22 you will, and the position that Mr. Wagner's l 23 introductory statement was, "Let's just take a 24 moment to look at the commercial implications ot ( 25 this. Let's just talx commercial." RUNFOLA 6 ASSOCIATES (c14)445-6477 l i I
I up 1 To me, at tnis point, I was convincto tns; I t 2 tnis was anoictive ot a pervasive concation, tnut, J 'ney, we nave a big joo here, we're maxing a lot ct l 4 money, let us not blow it by -- it this is wnat 5 Morrison wants, let's give it to nim. 6 Q. These are att11, essentially, concerns 7 tnat they wanted to streamline the process or 8 eliminate steps to meet tne sensdule? t 9 A. I asxeo repeateoly to sit cown with I av I was born anc raiseo in Scotlano, anc na lMorrison. 11 obviously was. I don't know it you met nim, out 4 i ! 12 suspect you nave. I say this in Jest witn regatos ( 13 to my nationality, but I tigureo quite ca ncioly , 1
- le coula persuade Morrison, you cannot sit nere ano 15 responsibly oraw senedules unoer tne guise ot 16 seneoule ennancement process wnero you xeep tne eno l 17 cates taxed and reanuftle everything in between anu le say that is wna t we are going to oo, and you simpAy 19 cannot do that. Somebody turn my loose with Mr. i 20 Morrison and I will make that clear. And, trannly, !
21 everybody refused to step aside until I was in a j j 22 meeting on May the 2nd at Live o' clock. Morrison ; I 23 was finally chairing a meeting, and I believe I very 24 responsibly conveyed my concerns -- and that again [ l 25 is on the record -- to Mr. Morrison, and he explooeu 1 RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-d477 i
si 1 gon tne spot, canceleo tnw mectan9, and tnen tn. I 2 lattermatn ot ena t was I was removeu trom the 3cc a lwitnan -- in worning nours witnin tnree nours or -- l 4 in worxing hours, not in chronological hours, within b about three hours I was gone trom the job. 6 Q. I thinx tnat we've alreacy discusseo t r. s - 7 last sentence or that, it saio resulting 1.cex, 4 8 policy ano personal attituces were intluenced by 9 this p r e - c o n d i t ). sn, and in my juogment turtner i 10 compromised adnerence to acceptaole gus11ty l, 11 stancaros. 12 A. Yes. i ( 13 Q. There is notning new in tnet tnat we 14 naven't alreaoy oiscusseo? , 15 A. ho. + lo Q. Is there anytning, or any aspect ot this, l 17 either a t Nine Mile Two or S hore ham tnat you oon't ; t I 18 think we've addressed or your concerns have not oeen 19 surfaced? 20 A. No. I think we've covered -- we've l l } 21 covered the matter nere. I thinx, as indicated 22 earlier, I think that this document provides greater 23 development into that, and it nad been, lixe I say, 24 sy intention to read the tirst couple ot pages or { 25 this into tne recoro, out it's obviously on the i RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 I
I I 34 l 1 ' record as a part or tnis r6coro sc 1 con't Anc. -- t 2 ignat woulo be recuncant. l 3 jg . I'll reao into the recoro now, tne titic 4 of the occument, which is Program Interdepenotnciss, 5 Dericiencies Detrimental to Pro 3sct Sagety, Quality, 6 Senedule and Cost at Nine Mile Point No. 2 Suc1ccr 7 Power Station. The contents are, Part 1, Prograw b Interdepenoenciws/Deticiencies, ano uo. 2, Relatto 3 j A tta cnme n ts ano Reterencca. These ma t te rs arc to comp 14eo tor review, action ano correction by 11 appropriate agencies ano parties, and as requestco 12 !ior the record by tne Nuclea r Regula tory Commission, ( 10 5. . Goroon Dicx, Maren 2, 19op. 14 fTnis will oe entered as an attacnment to this 15 interview transcript. I 1 le A. Tnese are mins. ' 17 g. Yes, those are your copies. One otner l lo item zor tne record betore we close tne interview, 19 you are requesting f or anonymity. We maintain you i 20 a.ionymity in view of this. 21 A. I can address that here. This also 22 applies to but only to i 23 Botn ne and I do not request anonymity in regarcs to I { 24 this, we ao not. 25 Q. Do not? RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-6477 I
..~
I i va 1 o' s . Tha t is cotrect. ' 2 MR. LAtaRUS: 1 can't nove any more 3 questions. 11 tnere is notning elas you nave, ycu 4 would 11xe to bring to our attsntion, this will 5 concluce our interview. 6 THE WITNESS: I woula simply 11xe to 7 confirm that I would like to nave e copy or the 6 transcript for review ano tor my r coros. 9 MR. LAZAROS: Certainly wc will oc tnat, 10 Tnis concludes tne i r. t c r v i t w . 'A n e tims is 16:a4, 11 - - - - - 12 Thereupon, tne intervatw was
! IJ concluceo at 10: 32 o'clocx a.o.
14 - - - - - 15 ' 16 i 17 : j 18 19 ! l 20 21
-)
l 22 '
- 23 l 24
( l 1 l 25 \ l RUNPOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477 i l 1
I 34 1 CSRTIFICATL l 2 1, hath h. Tocoe, a botary puoAlc in a r.c I J : tor the S ta te ot Onio, ao nereoy certity enat i tecs 4 ene above captioneo interview, and that tne 5 toregoing transcript et such proceedings is a tula, e true and correct transcript or my stenotypy notes sc 7 so taxen. e I co turtner certity enat I was calleo 9 {tnere in tne capacity ot a Court Reporter, ano am t . 10 !not otherwis+ interested in tnis proceecing. i
} !
11 ', IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I navs hereunto set n:y 1 12 l nano and attixeo my seal ot ottice at Columbus, Gnic, ! 13 on this lmb cay ot kox.i ,, 19o5. 14 13 727. 9 A RUTH'M. TEDDE, a No ta ry
~
16 Public in ano tor tna ' S ta te ot Onio. I 17 ' 18 My Commission expires May 20, 19u5. 19 20 8 l 21 l l 22 I 23 ' 24 (~ 25 RUNFOLA & ASSOCIATES (614)445-8477
CERTIFICATE OF OFFICIAL REPORTER MO PAGE !!O. , 1 Th.is is to certify that the attached proceedings before the ( NITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION in the matter of: MAME OF PROCEEDING: INVESTIGATIVE INTERVIEW (CLOSED MEETING) e
- i
\.
4 DOCKET No.: NONE PMCE: CI) LUMBUS , OHIO - DATE: TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 1985 were held as herein appears, and that this is the origiEa1 transcript thereof for the file of the United States Nuclear l Regulatory Comunission. I t i (Sigt). ed 7 3d M (TYPED) ' Ruth M. Tedde l l Official Reporter Reporter's Affiliation e e 1 I i . i , p ! L i i . i ! ( 1 e I
L
~
PROGRAM INTERDEPENDENCIES/DETICIENCIES DETRDiENTAL TO PROJECT SAFETY, QUALITY , SCHEDULE AND COST AT NINE MILE POINT NO.2 NUCLEAR POWER STATION
.. CONTENTS ~ *
- 1. PROGRAM INTERDEPENDENCIES/ DEFICIENCIES
- 2. RELATED ATTACHMENTS AND RIPERENCES
~
THESE MATTERS ARE COMPILED TOR REVIEW, ACTION A!TD CORRECTION BY APPROPRIATE AGENCIES AND PARTIES, AND AS REQUESTED FOR THE RECORD BY THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. i
- W. GORD0N DICK
^
st C MARCH 2. 1985
~
- 1. PROGRAM INTERDEPENDESCIES/DETICIENCIES Mr. R. Kelly, Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. Vice President of Quality Assurance requested on March 7,1984 that Mr. W.G. Dick transf er f rom Midland, Michigan to deal with serious problems at Nine Mile Point No. 2.
~
Collective experiences in the commercial nuclear industry. Attachment 2.21, especially at Shoreham, Attachment 2.7. provided a comprehensive basis to assess, as serious, the interdependent program deficiencies detrimental to project safety, quality, schedules and costs at Nine Mile Point No. 2.
. An additional opportunity f or W.G. Dick to observe the disasterous effects of failure to account for these program interdependencies occurred as Quality Assurance Consultant at Midland, Michigan. Attach-ment 2.19 illustrates interdependencies af f ecting quality confidence levels, product submittal rates and personnel resource requirements f or the Midland imple:entation overview ef f ort and adaptable to other project applications in the industry.
Details which identify specific examples of poor manage =ent practices seriously impairing project safety, quality, schedules and costs at Nine Mile Point No. 2 are contained in Attachment 2.2. These details were presented t esentat ves of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
. in follev-up to letter to John G. Haehl, Attachment 2.1. nagement recogniti of poor controls is separately and independently confirmed by internal memorandum, Attachment 2.16.
These separate cor.firmations of poor management and management controls are contrary to Niagara Mohawk's assertions, Attachment 2.20, in which Niagara Mohawk states that Stone & Webster's performance and actions are not detrimental to their project and ratepayers. Observations and prior relevant experiences at Shorehan, Attachment 2.2 Section II, especially in connection with readiness assessment (83-02), demonstrated that the final quality of components systems
~~
and structures which are safety related and important to safety, was adversely affected by the quality levels submitted for inspection.
. At Shoreham, special quality assurance audits of finally accepted work identified a measurable level of defects in safety related 1 components systems and structures.
~~
By direct knowledge and participation at both projects, the conditions , at Nine Mile Point No. 2 affecting rafety and quality were consistently worse than those at Shoreham, for the reasons itemized previously to the NRC, Attachments 2.17 and 2.18 and as detailed in Attachment 2.2. l l i f"3-.I I __ w
The preparation and use of schedules at Nine Mile Point No. 2 omitted or grossly misrepresented quality control steps, contractor interf acing dif ficulties and engineering / purchasing real time perfor-mance contributed to personnel pressures, f atigue and the misuse of ! programs to control quality at completion of construction (Attachments 2.2, 2.17 and 2.18). ' 4 The extent to which work was misrepresented is illustrated by Attachment 2.14. Management demands to maintain schedules and incentive milestones under these conditions caused errors, omissions, and program short cuts detrimental to safety and quality Attachments ' 2.2 and 2.18. These observations and concerns were separately documented by a major contractor in Attachment 2.10 and further independent obser-vations are included in Attachments 2.8. 2.11, 2.12, and 2.13. Attachment 2.2 also contains specific references (e.g. Ref erences - 15, 20, and 22) which identify program interdependencies brought to management's attention which were ignored, rejected or resulted in disciplinary steps against the employee including transf er and dismissal. Other attachments and references identify additional examples of poor management, imprudency and seriously impaired objectivity with adverse consequences for project safety, quality, schedule and cost. These also indicate an indif f erence for industry regulations on the part of senior managers and executives contrary to responsible thorough self-regulation. o
. ?
M9 6 4-M ee I
-~
. r-l 6
- 2. RELATED ATTACHMENTS AND REFERENCES 2.1) ter Haehl Jr.. C.E.O.. Niagara Monawl Power Corp, from dated May 8, 1984 itema:ing the causes for resignation. ( Al so ref erence 5 of 2. 0) below.)
2.2) Additional details presented to personnel of N1 agar Mohawk Power Corp. representing J. G. Haehl Jr. by and W. G. Dick on May Ol. 1984 as requested follow-up o -. a ve. 2.3) Letter te W. F. Allen. C.E.O. of Stone and Webster Engi neering Corp. from W. G. Dick dated July 00. 1984 adentifying reasons and requesting reversal of W. G. Dick's termination. 2.4) Letter to F. W. Ries. President of Stone and Webster Engi neering Corp. from W. G. Dick dated May 19, 1984 documenting prior tel ephone di scussi ons. (Also reference 1 to 2.0 above.) 2.5) Letter to W. G. Dick from E. F. Haslam. Vice President of 5 tone and Webster Engineering Corp. dated May O. 1984 documenting cause of termination of W. G. Dtek. ( Also ref erence 2 to 2.0 above.) 2.6) Summary of certain facts that refute the documented cause for terminating W. G. Dick (Also reference 3 to 2.0 above.) 0.7) Letter to E. J. Braba:on, Stone and Webster Engineering , Cor o . Project Manager for Shoreham from W. J. Museler, Director. l Of f ice of Nuclear for the Long Island Lighting Co. (LILCO) dated '
~
November 30, 1980 summarizing W. G. Dick's contributions at Shoreham from 1979 to 1983. (Also reference 4 to 2.3 above.) ' 2.8) Memorandum to L. W. Brown, Supt. of Construction for Stone
~
and Webster Engineering Corp. at Nine Mile Point No. 2 from W. G. Dick dated May 2, 1984 documenting observations and concerns af f ecting the Nine Mile Point No. 2 proj ect. ( Also ref erence 6 to 2.3 above. ) 0.9) Letter to J. G. Haehl Jr. from j dated August 24, 1984 as f ollow-up to meeting on May s , 1984 with Niagara Mohawk representatives. (See 2.2 above.) 2.10) Memorandum to R. L. Wagner. Construction Manager for
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. at Nine Mile Point No. 2 from A.
1
Fallon. Project Manager for L. > " . Comstoci. Electrical Contrector dated April 26. 1994 summart:1ng concerns relating to the M11estone Schedules for the project. 2.11) Memorandum to L.W. Brown. Superintendent of Construct 1cn for Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation from D.R. Friedrich. Chief Construction Engineer - Electrical. dated March 29. 198;
, documenting problems with engineering support at that time.
2.10) Memorandum (hand written) to W.G. Dick. Electrical intendent for Stone & Webster Engineer orporation. frosi dated May 2, 1984 documenting schedule supper acu les. 2.13) Memorandum (hand written) to W.G. Dici.. Electrical Superintendent for Stone & Webster Engineerine Corporation. from "Focumenting schedule support di f ficultles. ' l l l O.14) Nine Mlle Point No. 2 Dynamic Fercent Complete Plan - I Progress Update. dated August 19 1984. l l 2.15) Project memorandum f rom W. Morrison dated August 01, 1984 describing NMPO Project Control s Organisati on. 1 0.16) Project memorandum from J. G. Kappas and L. W. Brown dated October 1, 1984 identifying poor control of the wori. forces. 2.17) Letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commi ssion f rom W. G. Dick dated January 26, 1985. 2.18) Letter to the Nuclear Regul atory Commi ssi on from W. G. Dick dated February 14, 1985. 1 q , 2.19) Computations to illustrate the interdependencies af f ecting quality confidence l evel s, product submittal rates and corresponding applied resource levels of manpower for implementatien over vi ew (C.I.O.) at Midland, Michi gan dated February 10. 1984 I l 2.0G) Let from John Weib of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. to dated Sept 14, 1985. 4 -
, 0.21) Resume summary for W. G. Dick.
a
-- ,-n .-. , _ , . - . - -_ . ,_-- , , ,_ ,-.,-., n, ,
i wy ? A. SYRACUSE HILTON INN Jcha 3. Eseht, Jr. . Chaire.an & Chief Executive Of ficer i Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Erie Bouleverd West Syracuse, New York,13202 Daar Sir: Today, with concern for your corporation. I identify to you my revi tnation from Stone & Vebster Engineering Corporation at Nine Mile #2 for the following reasons: 1 I have witnessed the persecution of a collaague eminently qualified in this industry with the acquiescence of the office of the President of Stone & Webster f.agineering Corporation. 2 I have witnessed the virtual dem!se and near death of a past leading northeast utility, LI140. 3 I have witnessed the exposure of imprudent management and management practices to the hisbest level in Stone & Vebster to ne avail. - 4 I have witnessed clear, sound reco::nendations based on first hand recent experience go unheeded and criticized.
- 5. I have witnessed the endorsement of unrealistic schedules and scheduling methods which distorts management visibility of the project.
6 I have witnessed the apparent attempt to boy and cover up these travesties.
. It is my belief that immediate remedial actions are essential to correct these matters last the recently announced cap by the PSC will not even be clo.a.
I.look forward to responding in greater detail at your request. dd we William J. Catacosinos Villiam F. Allen W. Cordon Dick Chair: nan & Chief Executive Chaisman & Chief Executive Columbus, Ohio L it.C0 Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.
. 4 ,;.,e e s. . : , . .
..1J ill D* 10
- l
I J. HAEHL JR. FROM DATED 5/8/84 DEALING WI NINCIDENTS NAND RESIGNATION OF CERN LEADING TO THE 5/8/84 ADDITIONAL DETAILS TABLE OF CONTENTS , PAGE I I. IMPROPER TERMINATION OP COLLEAGUE W.G. DICK. 1 l
- 11. PRIOR OBSERVATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCES AT SHORERAM. 5 III. IMPRUDENT MANAGEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. 6 IV. RECOMKENDATIONS SU3MIM ED. 7 V. UNRIALISTIC SCHEDULES AND SCHEDULING METRODS. 12 VI. POSSIBLE ACTIONS AND AFFARENT ATTEMPTS TO COVER UP. 13 l
A. LIST OP REFERENCES. 14 d 1 l e i l
PAGE 1 I. IMPROPER TERMINATION OF COLLEAGUE
- 1. Mr. W. Gordon Dick was terminated for cause by Stone & Webster on Thursday, May 3, 1984.
~ 2. The termination interview waw conducted by Mr. J. Barrett, Mr.
R. Wagner and Mr. L. Brown, in Mr. Brown's office.
- 3. The meeting lasted approximately five minutes.
- 4. Mr. Wagner said Mr. Dick's services were no longer required at Nine Mile 2 due to irreconcilable dif ferences.
I O
- 5. Mr. Barrett said Mr. Dick had just not done the job he had been sent to do.
- 6. Mr. Dick asked if Mr. Barrett would confirm this in writing.
- 7. Mr. Barrett said "No, that's your problem (Mr. Dick). You put too fucking much in writing".
- 8. Mr. Barrett got up and left the interview.
- 9. Mr. Wagner said he had nothing further to say and he '.ef t the meeting also.
- 10. Mr. Dick excused himself and lef t the meeting also leaving Mr. Brown.
- 11. Mr. Dick had been at Midland, Michigan for 3 months prior to Nine Mile 2 and at Shoreham for four years prior to that.
- 12. At Shoreham, Mr. Dick was Manager of Planning and Scheduling.
Electrical Supt. and Special Projects Supt. for Quality Account-ability and matters relating to readiness assessment.
- 13. Mr. Dick is a degreed engineer with B.S. from Glasgow, Scotland (1965) and M.S. Irom Birmingham, England (1966) .
- 14. Mr. Dick has eighteen years of power industry experience in management, engineering, design, construction, start-up and maintenance.
~ 15. He has contributed to various phases of twelve power plants in Britain and America, arriving in the U.S. in 1968,
- 16. He had been at Nine Mile 2 for seven weeks connencing March 13 1984,
- 17. During this mobilization and settling in period he lived at the Hilton Inn in Syracuse while searching for a permanent residence j
vith his f amily. a M
- i PAGE 2 l I i
- 18. Based on his prior experience, especially Shorehan, he observed l significant problems with organization., personnel. scheduling and l cost, quality and contractor control.
- 19. During his seven week tenure he reported these problems through l the chain of command with recommendations for remedial action. ;
- 20. Tne ongoing re-organization and the initiation of the schedule l
~
"enhancement" apparently impeded effective consunication of his ;
concerns, as he was frequently ignored or brushed aside. j
- 21. He prepared a comprehensive sunmary of his conce.ns in an attempt to get the attention of Mr. Brown and Mr. Wagner and others on May 1, 1984. (Reference 1).
- 22. On May 2,1984 he attended a milestone schedule review meeting also attended by several key management personnel including Mr.
Morrison
- 23. In this meeting Mr. Ubling stated that engineering support. FQC paralleling construction and contractor stand-alone schedules would not be included in the schedule review of individual activities but would be considered generically at the end of the meeting.
- 24. On this basis, and also being asked to treat rework and paper processing time similarly, the contractor personnel in attendance had dif ficulty giving dates and did not commit to the schedules.
- 25. Mr. Dick, addressing Mr. Morrison, pointed out that the assumptions set forth by Mr. Ubling made schedule connaitments moot.
- 26. Mr. Morrison adjourned the meeting saying it was a vaste of time and asked to see Mr. Ptak Mr. Charleson and Mr. Wagnar in his office.
- 27. Later at 5:30 pu Mr. Dick was called to a meeting with Mr. Wagner, Mr. Brown, and Mr. Brinley, essistant project manager for L.E.
_ Comstock.
- 28. In this meeting, Mr. Wagner advised Mssrs. Dick and Brinley that
*~
they displayed a negative attitude in front of Mr. Morrison and if they did not change this immediately Mr. Morrison vanced
,_ thes replaced.
- 29. Mr. Dick stated that he certainly had not been negative and stated his strong objection to this as being offensive to his ef forts and contributions over the past seven weeks.
- 30. He then presented Mr. Brown confidentially with his comprehensive sununary of the problems he perceived are affecting the project, compiled on May 1,1984. (Ref erence 1) .
._ 31. The meeting was adjourned and the following morning on May 3, 1984 Mr. Dick was terminated af ter 10 years and 2 days with Stone & Webster.
a: - l PAGE 3 :
~
- 32. In the late af ternoon of May 3,1984 Mr. Dick attempted to ,
call the Nine Mile 2 site to obtain acknowledgement that he l
~
could call SVEC Boston management to question and appeal his dismissal. After numerous attempts it was established that a telephone line problem existed and Mr. Dick decided to call Boston direct f rom the Syracuse Hilton.
- 33. Mr. Dick contacted the Deputy Director of Construction Mr.
E.E. Ehrlandson who had originally contacted Mr. Dick while _ in Midland and asked him to go to Nine Mile 2 and do the same job that he had successfully accomplished at Shoreham.
- 34. Mr. Ehrlandson told Mr. Dick he was aware of the matter but had to "cravfish" advising Mr. Dick that "As you know, around here there is a tendency to shoot messengers". Mr. Ehrlandson referred Mr. Dick to the Director of Construction, Mr. Warren Piper and suggested a call be made before 8:00 am Triday, May 4, 1984.
.. 35. Mr. Dick called Mr. Piper on Friday May 4,1984 at 7:40 am.
Mr. Piper returned the call about one hour later. The discussion was amiable but Mr. Piper stated he was not aware of any of the details having simply directed Mr. Barrett to take care of the probles. Mr. Piper said Mr. Dick couldn't return to Nine Mile unless he (Mr. Piper) removed Masrs. Barrett, Wagner and Brown and be couldn"t do that because he had to back his people there since, although he didn't know the details, he had to believe that they had good reasons for their actions. Mr. Piper said he had no objection if Mr. Dick vanced to talk with Tr'ank W. Ries and stated to Mr. Dick that he couldn't help him because at this time openings in construction just didn't exist at his level.
- 36. Mr. Dick called Mr. Frank W. Ries at around 10:00 sa on Tridt; May 4,1984 and briefly explained the matter and cot.ditions of
. his termination from his perspective offering additional details ;
if Mr.11aa wished to be appraised. Mr. Ries said that Mr. Dick
; should call back late on Monday.
- 37. On the af tarnoon of Friday, May 4,1944 Mr. Dick made arrangements for his family to fly to Columbus, Chio to be with other f amily members. During his absence, a call was pisced by Mr. Jack V1.111aas, a senior construction manager associated with the
~ Beaver Talley project. Mr. Dick did not return in time to take or return the call.
- 38. On Monday, May 7,1984, on behalf of Mr. Dick, returned the call to Mr. Williams. Mr. Williams a vise !
" that he ves aware of Mr. Dick's situation and asked to )
advise Mr. Dick of a "potential opportunity". I
- 39. On Monday af ternoon, as agreed with F.W. Ries Mr. Dick called again. Mr. Ries told Mr. Dick he had talked briefly to the
,, people at the site and they were very strong and adament in their ll position. Be stated he didn't see that he could do any more l ;-- at this time but he was in f act scheduled to go to the site l l later in the week and would take a closer look at the documenta- I 7 tion. Meanwhile he stated the matter had to stand as is. l
. PACE 4
- 40. Mr. Dick told Mr. Ries he continued to believe strongly that he had been unjustly and improperly terminated for raising serious concerns relating to the Nine Mile 2 project. However, he stated he now felt he had discharged fully his obligations i to Stone & Webster in this matter and could, if he so chose, purs her r ies of redress. He also advised Mr. Ries that was also aware of the details of these
,, matters an ad specifically advised Mr. D ek that he (Mr. Dick) was not accountable for any actions whien sight also take.
- 41. In view of the sequence of events and telephone calls at various management levels and taking into account the content and outcome of these calls, it now seemed appropriate to defer on the return call to Mr. Jack Williams until at least an outcome, if any of Mr. Ries' visit to Nine Mile 2.
. 42. In light of the apparent acquiesence of the Stone & Webster management in this matter on May 8,1984 concluded his services at Nine Mile 2 could no longer be e ective and he chose to resign incediately, return his f amily to Long Island i
and advise Niagara Mohawk of the events contributing to his resignation. i e 1 . r i r= J l 1 1 .. l 1 I == s " t ' ~
l PAGE 5 I l
- 11. PRIOR OBSERVATIONS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCES AT SHORIHAM i
- 1. At Shoreham spent two years in the electrical construction management op ment and four years in the planning and scheduling department, three of which were in the capacity '
of manager of planning and scheduling and finally assigned to the PSC prudency matters. l
- 2. Mr. W.G. Dick spent four years at Shorehas reporting initially to the Vice President of Projects, then for one year as the manager of planning and scheduling, two years as Electrical ,
Supt, and one year as Special Project Supt. for quality account-
, ability and matters relating to readiness assessment.
I _ 3. In these various capacities Mr. Dick an re aware of and participated in many aspects of management, scheduling, cost. and quality directly relevant to the completion of Shoreham from the late seventies through 1984.
- 4. At Shorehan, programmatic attempts were made to allow for Engineer-ing, procurement. quality inspections. rework and system completion documentation.
- 5. In spite of these programmatic allevances. Shoreham proved to be.
in part, the victim of optimism and wishful thinking, as the fuel ' load date slipped repeatedly. '
- 6. Optimistic allevances for engineering changes and regulatory interpretations contributed to schedule deficits and cost escal-ations at Shorehan, i
- 7. Optimistic assessments of procurement requirements especially for safety related materials and equipment contributed to schedule ;
deficits and cost escalation at Shoreham. '
- 8. Optimistic allevances for quality control inspections and re-inspections contributed to schedule deficits and cost escalation
, at Shoreham.
- 9. Optimistic allowances for rework and documentation processing i
time contributed to schedule deficits and cost escalation at Shorehaa. 1 4 10. in conclusion, failure to allow for these factors at Nine Mile 2 can only result in management imprudency as schedules slip and a costs escalate. Empathy may be afforded Shoreham in light of i the TM1 impset, emergency evacuation and energency diesel generators. The same empathy is unlikely to be extended to J Nine Mile 2. l i - l
- i
-- . -. . - - - . ~. . - -
i
,, FACE 6 I
III. IMPRUDENT MANAGDENT t
- 1. Management organization a?. Nine Mile 2 was and is dif fuse and redundant causing multiple lines of reporting, communication ,
.- and authority. !
U
- 2. The electrical contractor is subjected to direct and conflicting , !
communications frca various levels of construction management !
- F and f rom various on-site groups. t
- 3. The electrical contractor was allowed full credit for partially i i pulled cables and received payment and awards accordingly.
- 4. The electrical contractor was awarded over 85% of his unilateral 7 award fee for the six months ending in March 1984. (Reference 2)
L
- 5. The electrical contractor accomplished apprcximately $5% of his I
.. schedule objectives during the same period. t
- 6. The vide difference of greater than 30% is caused by "restraints" (
by others, and by the cumulative effect of unrealistic schedules. l 1 [ 7. The frequency, content, and structure of management meetings to l i chase the status of priority boundary identification packages (BIPS) { l r- contributed to the ineffective management of the work. ! 1 i
- 8. The selection of personnel for key management positions without
- ,. prior knowledge or experience has contributed to the ineffective- ,
i ness of site management, at this phase of the project. !
. t 4
- 9. The electrical contractor is being subjected to simultaneous
! and thereby conflicting priorities and objectives including '
, 3175, milestones, bulk workplans, bow wave work plans and also his contractual obligation to manhour rates. The contrac-l l
1 .- tor also responds to SWEC incentive milestones. i l l [ ' ~
- 10. The electrical construction management chart was submitted on !
r April 4. 1984 (Reference 3)for annagement review and approval. i i Verbal approval was given on April 6.1984 but personnel required i j - for only partial implementation were notified on May 1. 1984 ! only two days before termination of Mr. Dick. j l i ! ) - 11. The 1984 work plan for L.K. Comstock signed and transmitted to , l - A. Fallon by R.L. Wagner on March 6,1984 contained a combination ;
- of bulk commodity objectives and RIP turnover objectives for cable l l ~
pulling and terminations which were unrealistic and unschievable. j The letter did not solicit any response (Response- N/A) and ] i j . referred questions to the Supt. of Cost and Scheduling (Reference 4). ' l -
- 12. Sections I. IV. V. and VI of these additional details contain i
) further examples of imprudent management and management practices, i l g' not included in this section to avoid duplication. ) L l
.I ;
I _ _ _ , . . _ __ . _ _ _ . . _ _ ._ , . _ _ _ _ , . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _ _ _ . _
~
PAGE 7 IV. _RECOMMINDATIONS
- 1. MANAGEMENT AND MANACD1ENT PRACTICES
- 1.1 Reduce organizational "gridlock" by consolidating constrv,ction management agency, reducing numbers of personnel and groups.
, (
References:
1.3.5) 1.2 Focus contractor management through a principal construction management group on a discipline basis for effective control 7 and accountability. (
References:
1.3.5) t 1.3 Objectively and thoroughly examine personnel experience and qualifications for key management roles (
References:
1.6) 1.4 Re-structure major contracts including methods of measuring progress for payment and incentive fees to align with the principal project objectives of schedule and quality installa-tion.(
References:
1.7.18). 1.5 Evaluate contractor organization formats to ensure these are '{ compatible consistent with project needs for optinua communications and direction. (
References:
1.7) 1.6 Implement effective and workable methods of measuring vork progress to reduce the known vide inconsistencies between, 4 for exasple CMS and ECSIS programs. (
References:
1.8.9) 1.7 Evaluate and streamline the interactions occurin,t among the various construction completion (CCCP). quality inspection (QCIR) and pus.ch list completion programs (PLU1) to r. void the personnel and documentation incumberances in existance. (
References:
1, 10) 1.8 The introduction and implementation of key man [Aenent directives such as the schedule enhancement program must le communicated clearly, videly and uniformly to avoid non-communications, mis-communications and other occurrences causing inef fectiveness. (
References:
1.11) 1,. !~ 4 i me e j l 9 w
y FAGE 8 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS '
- 2. SCHEDULES Ah*D SCREDULING METHODS s l 2.1 Realistic schedules must be drawn and implemented taking full account of engineering, procurement., contractor inter-facing, kqC inspections, rework and paper work / documentation. ,
(
References:
1,12,13,15) 2.2 Scheduling methods must be developed much further than time allowed during the rapid implementation of the schedule enhancement program, to assure that the scope, logic, and objectives are understood by all. (
References:
1,11) 2.3 The schedule enhancement program could and should be greatly simplified thereby improving schedule awareness and commitments. The use of four connected schedule "phases" described in Section V could be reduced to three and even two "phases". (
References:
. 1,11.14) 2.4 Clear and simple direction must be developed, issued and implemented on how to track, record and report schedule progress on a quantity basis. To avoid duplication, redundancy and error this method should be compatible with the quality completion reporting methods and the cost reporting system should also be j aligned to this. (References 1,11.14) l 23 Methods of tracking and reparting scope changes, schedule restraints, engineering revisions and rework scope must be ,
considered and beplumented, otherwise existing schedules in ' seme critical arent could become quickly unrepresentative of j the actual work scope and management visibility is lost. (
References:
1,11.14.16,17) [ eau. l D-l e+ i I j l
. l 1
L. E' t
~~
~
- ~. . . .
PAGE 9 IV.\ RECOMMENDATIO
^
d 3. OTRER RECOMMEy ATI0 g
, 3 , 3,1 W.G. Dick recommeoded that R. Dewald of L.K. Comstech be utilized f rom Shoreham pt least during .A. Fallon's vacation period but also as a porgible permancnttroject manager reporting to A. Fallon an senior project manager. L.V.
Brota discouraged this, saying Dewald reefsded him of a
. , . bull in a china closet. (References 7,19).
3.21 d.G. . Dick strongly recommended that Mr. Brown re-evaluate the Amdency of issuing his weekly memandum on recovery of system negativity, especially during the peric4 of schedule re-appraisal brought about by' tha achedule enhancement prostam due to the multiplicity of corJ11cting schedule signals. (
References:
18, 20) 3.3 W.G. Dick reccamended to L.W. Brown on March 30, 1984 that the second shif t BIP activity proposal by 7. Vonholtz could
, orly add further confusion to the contractor coordination dif ficulties end should not be implemented. (
References:
21) 3.4 Gould vendor requiremts for torquing accessible f asteners on electrical equipment in their supply was an unresolved problem for more than si.x weeks during March, April, and into early May. W.G. Dick recommended several resolutions including randes sampling. The requirement was finally to be celeted in May (
References:
22) 3.5 W.G. Dick reconnended to L.W. Brown that many problecs arising with engineering and other dir,ciplines required prompt highar management actica to ave.,id delays. L.W. Brown agreed but later had second thoughts apparently due to the f requen:y and dif f1-culties in resolvbg these probMas., (
References:
5, 23) 3.6 MJe pulling recmmendations were compiled by W.C. Dhk and
- 5 sto L.W. Down by IOM on April 16, 1984 to address the
'~
. declaration of the bulk cable pulling program. This recom-aindstion, lika others, seemed to get lost in the overall management evolutions during April. (
References:
24)- 3.7 Completion and inspection of raceways prior to cable pulling
, , , appeared to be inerenef agly restrictive to the schedula and quantity objectives of the electrical contractor. W.G. Dick recommended these restrictions be eased prior to and again ;
in writing on April, 16, 1984. L.W. Brown resisted this ! reconne.nd.stion. O,cferences: 24)
~
3.8 Recommendations to resolve a controversy over pulling sleeve locations vers submitted to L.W. Brown by W.G. Dick on April 17, 1984 following a meeting to Jddress proposed E&DCR C 02362. ' The recommendation contributed to' the cancellation of the UDCR.
' .' A different solution to pulling tensions however, must be
+ considered to achieve pulling targets and manhour rates.
1 x (lteferences: 25,26)~ s
... 1
~ \
, - .,_...-m. . - , _ . ,
.. l PAGE 10 - l 3.9 Recomendations for prompt re-organization and consolidation '
, of the electrical construction management group was submitted l to L.W. Brown on April 4, 1984. Personnel were not made avail-able until April 30, 1984 to implement this, only 3 days before Mr. Dick was terminated. (
References:
3) 3.10 Problems and recomendations such as the examples exhibitied by reference 27, etc. were frequently encountered and submitted for resolution to the responsible party with copies to manage-
. ment. These seemed not to be welcomed by the recipients even though project schedules were slipping by the hour, the day, the week and by the month while problems went unresolved. , (
References:
27,28,29) 3.11 Recomendations were made by W.G. Dick to L.W. Brown to address engineering problems thoroughly in advance in writing. This was agreed upon. A detailed meeting agenda was prepared by W.G. Dick with advance time for engineering review. The meeting was held on Monday, April 30, 1984 at 10:00 am. Later, on May 3, 1984. L.W. Brown stated that W.G. Dick had not handled this matter as L.W. Brown would have liked. (
References:
30)
, 3.12 During April, on several occasions in meetings with L.W. Brown and again with L.W. Brown and T. Stanzione, W.G. Dick recomended that be be permitted to raise his management and scheduling concerns direct to Mr. W. Morrison. Mr. Brown refused, saying ': hat Mr.
Morrison just "tunes out" everybody and everything he doesn't
, agree with. In these meetings, they agreed that a lot of problems existed with the schedule enhancement effort that they did not like but had to go along with. (
References:
later) 3.13 During March and April 1984, Mr. Brovu stated on several occasions that Mr. W.G. Dick, as the Electrical Supt. , was fully responsible for L.K. Comstock. Mr. Dick recommended on these occasions that Mr. Brown examine more closely the reality of this matter in . view , of the ultiple groups and several management levels dealing i directly with L.K. Comstock. This matter remained unresolved 1
,, throughout Mr. Dick's time at Nine Mile 2.' (
References:
31) 3.14 Mr. Morrison, Mr. Wagner and others hald weekly meetings esca Thursday with L.K. Comstock. Mr. Dick recomended to Mr. Brown I on several occasions during March and April 1984 that he be l permitted to attend these meetings if indeed he was fully ! responsible for the electrical contractor. Mr. Brown agreed this was a problem but refused Mr. Dick's recommendation, saying
'" that even Mr. Wagner had to fight to get into this meeting.
Mr. Dick cautioned Mr. Brown on these occasions that his accountability for the contractor was diminished by this. (
References:
31) 3.15 in March,1984 Mr. Brown advised Mr. Dick that Mr. Dick was an "ex-of ficio" member of the L.K. Comstock unilateral fee award committee. Mr. Dick stated that this seemed completely incon-sistent with being "fully responsible" for the electrical con-tract. Mr. Brown said he agreed but could not do any more about l l
" this since he had tried many times before, te no avail. l
(
References:
32)
PAGE 11
.l.16 On Friday, March 30, 1984 with Mr. Dick's repeated insistence, he was invited to attend the incentive f ee meeting in R. Wagner's ,
office. Mr. Dick noted that previous quality and schedule weight- ! ing factors showed an unfavorably heavy bias in favor of scheduling over quality of almost 3:1. Mr. Dick recommended this be changed. ; Mr. Wagner, noting a prior commitment to the NRC C.A.T. concerns, 1 agreed that these should in f act be equalized. (
References:
- 33) '
O 9 9
==.
e
- w.
- ee 6
me b ene M
--- _ , , . - _~ . . , - . . . ,- --
I
, PAGE 12 V. UNREALISTIC SCHEDULES AND SCHEDULING METHODS
- 1. Milestone schedules vere drawn during the schedule enhancement program without detailed engineering input nor allowing for the axisting engineering track record.
- 2. The milestone schedules were drawn without detailed purchasing input nor allowing for the existing procurement track record.
- 3. The allestone schedules were drawn without realistic consideration for contractor interfaces.
- 4. The mildstone schedules were drawn without input of or realistic consideration of the FQC inspection of category I safety related equipment .
~
- 5. The milestone schedules were drawn without realistic consideration
- for rework, especially that which is encountered or discovered during completion, turnover phases.
- 6. The milestone schedules were drawn without realistic consideration of signiff eant vendor modifications still outstanding.
- 7. The milestone schedules were d.rawn without full consideration given to detailed notes and concerns raised by the electrical contractor ,
and by construction management representatives. l
- 8. Milestone schedule dates, durations, etc.' submitted.by the contractor vers changed af ter the meeting with the contractor without supple- {
mental discussion and concurrence.
- 9. In summary, the milestone schedules were drawn unrealistically and management contrived to extract commitments on these schedules in a f ashion that can be likened to "railroading".
. 10. The schedule enhancement program is incomplete, vague, or not defined on how the four major parts of the program will interact for control, tracking, and progressing the work.
- 11. The schedule enhancement program in calling for four major segments
. . (milestone, area / system, thirteen week look ahead and three week look ahead) conceives that separate groups will manage and take
' ~
over these separate segments.
- 12. This means that several groups of individuals require to pickup and be cognizant of the work while it is in their "phase". The sequential "programming" of new people and brains as the work ,
passes through these phases is highly redundant, expensive, and ' has a high potential to be unworkable.
- l
- \
4
- , - - - - - . , , , - - -,,-m, . . . _ , , , , . . . -
PAGE 13 I VI. POSSIBLE ACTIONS AND APPARENT ATTEMPTS TO COVER-UP l
- 1. The development and repeated issuance of unrealistic schedules can result from and can be interpreted as an attempt to cover-up the final completion date and final total cost of Nine Mile 2 under the guise of optimism, aggressiveness and ambitious thinking. .
. i
- 2. The open threat to W.G. Dick and R. Brinley on May 2,1984 that they have displayed a negative attitude and will be replaced if
.. they do not change this attitude is a possible action and an apparent attegt to cover-up the development of unrealistic schedules at Nine Mile 2 using unrealistic methods.
- 3. The dismissal of W.G. Dick on May 3, 1984 under circumstances existing during April 1984 involving re-organization and schedule enhancement is a possible action and an apparent attempt to cover-up the development of unrealistic schedules at Nine Mile 2 using unrealistic methods. .
I 1
- 4. The acknowledgement by the SWEC deputy director of construction that he had to "crawfish" since "as you know, around here there ]l 1s a tendency to shoot messengers" is indicative of conditions i which can result in attempts to cover-up unsatisfactory conditions 1 and methods at Mine Mile 2.
- 5. The assertion by the senior construction manager that W.G. Dick has a probles because he puts too much in writing is indicative of conditions which can result in attempts to cover-up unsatis-f actory conditions &nd methods at Nine Mile 2.
l
- 6. Mr. Brown's assertion that Mr. W. Morrison "tunes-out" everyone !
and everything he doesn't accept or agree with is indicative of ; conditions which can result in attempts to ignore and cover-up j unsatisf actory conditions and methods at Nine Mile 2.
- 7. Mr. Jack Williams' statement t on Monday, May 7, 1984 that Mr. W.C. Dick should be aware of a potential opportunity"
~ af ter Mr. Piper's statement that construction positions within SWEC were not available at Mr. Dick's level is indicative of a possible attagt to cover up unsatisfactory conditions and methods at Nine Mile 2.
,, 8. Other factors cidents including the initial refusal to l transfer rom Shorehaa to Nine Mile 2 are indicative l of possib e attempts to prevent the exposure of unsatisf actory conditions and methods.
)
1 1 l 1 l l
~
l . (l. t l _ -- . , _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ___
PAGE 14 A. LIST OF REFERENCES
- 1. Summary of personal observations and concerns relating to the Nine Mile 2 Project dated May 1, 1984.
- 2. Unilateral award fee schedule assessment for the electrical contractor for the six month period ending March,1984
"~
- 3. Interoffice memorandum to L.W. Brown from W.G. Dick dated April 4,1984,
Subject:
Electrical Construction Management Organization.
- 4. L.K. Comstock 1984 Work Plan signed by R.L. Wagner on March 6, 1984 and addressed to A. Fallon of L.K. Comstock.
- 5. Personal notes by W.C. Dick of meeting with L.W. Brown in his office on March 19, 1984 at 4:45 pm.
- 6. Personal notes by W.G. Dick of meeting with L.W. Brown in his office on Monday, April 16, 1984 at 11:00 am.
- 7. Personal notes and recollections by W.C. Dick of meeting with L.W. Brown in his of fice on March 21, 1984 at 2:30 pm.
- 8. Personal notes and recollections by W.G. Dick of meeting with D. Rogers of Cost Dept. in W.C. Dick's of fice on March 16, 1984.
- 9. Personal notes and recollections by W.G. Dick of aceting with L.W. Brown during his staff meeting at 4:00 pm on March 16, 1984.
- 10. Verbal recommendations made to E. Conrad and separately to L.W.
Brown as a result of the quality accountability meeting of April 6,1984.
- 11. Memo (hand written) from to W.G. Dick dated May 2, 1984 on the review of the schedule enhancement program.
- 12. Memorandum free A. Falloa of L.E. Coastock to R. Wagner dated April 26,1984,
Subject:
Milestone Schedules.
13. Memo (hand written) to W.G. Dick fro dated May 3, 1984
Subject:
Schedule Support Summarizing Meeting with W. Morrison at al on May 2, 1984.
- 14. Notes and recollections by W.G. Dick of meeting in his of fice
~
on April 3,1984 at 1:00 pm with Blain Nickerson, R. Kuzawski, and W. Czclusniak. I --
- 15. Interof fice Memo (IOC) from W. Czelusniak to 0. Ubling dated April 6,1984,
Subject:
4.KV Hilestone Schedule Commitments and General Observations. l I eq l
_ l PAGE 15 1 l
- 16. Interof fice Correspondence (IOC) f rom W.G. Dick to T. Stanzione dated April 16, 1984,
Subject:
Data Bases to be Used for
~
Scheduling Electrical Work Remaining.
- 17. Interoffice Correspondence (IOC) from D. Roberts of JCI to r L.K. Comstock, with copy to R. Kusawski and redirected by l W.G. Dick to L.W. Brown and T. Stanzione on April 26, 1984 !
at 6:30 am. ; I 18. Interoffice Memorandum to L.W. Brown from W.G. Dick dated April I 10, 1984,
Subject:
Item 1 of L.W. Brown Memorandum dated April 5,1984 - System Turnover. 1 P i
- 19. Memorandum f rom A. Fallon to R. Wagner in April (date unknown) notifying Mr. Wagner of Mr. Fallon's vacation plans.
- 20. Interoffice Memorandum dated March 22, 1984 from L.W. Brown to distribution identifying priority BIPS with negative slack of
, almost four months and calling for working seven days a week, i 24 hours per day. ;
1
- 21. Interoffice Memorandum from F. Vonholtz to L.W. Brown dated March 28, 1984,
Subject:
Second Shift BIP Activities. i
- 22. Hand Written summary of Gould vendor manual requirements by l J. Ronco dated April 9, 1984.
- 23. Example of problem referred for information to L.W. Brown, IOC
. from J. Trimble to T. .Landry dated April 9,1984 and sent to l L.W. Brown by U.G. Dick on April 10, 1984. l l
- 24. Interoffice Memorandum from W.G. Dick to L.W. Brown dated !
April 16,1984. l
- 25. Hand Note to L.W. Brown f rom W.G. Dick dated April 17.- 1984 to address pulling sleeves.
'~
- 26. Voided EkDCR CO2362.
- 27. IOC to D. Herman from J. Trimble dated April 17, 1984 referencing N&D 7140.
4
- 28. IOC from R. Brinley to T. Landry dtted April 11, 1984 referencing
.. spared cables.
- 29. IOC from W.G. Dick to engineering, management and scheduling
- (date unknown) to address 130 conduits on hold in the reactor building at el 328' .
- 30. Agenda for meeting with engineering called by W.G. Dick for April 30, 1984 including supplementary agenda issued for a {
future meeting. ' j
t PAGE 16 F
- 31. Personal notes and recollections by W.G. Dick of meeting with L.W. Brown in his of fice on Thursday, March 29, 1984 at 5:00 pm.
- 32. Personal notes and recollections by W.G. Dick of meeting with L.W. Brown in his of fice on Friday, March 23, 1984 at 11:00 am.
- 33. Personal notes and recollections by W.G. Dick of meeting in
- i. R.L. Wagner's office on Friday, March 30, 1984 at 9:30 am, r-P 4*
se 4 e 6 9 h ese B G oe 9 4 in d e e M ese 9=9 GWG W
===
m - W.F. Allen, Chairman & Chief Executive Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. 245 Sucmer Street July 30, 1984 Boston, MA 02107
Subject:
Termination of W. Gordon Dick i
Dear Mr. A11en:
I was terminated by Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. on May 3. 1984 at the Nine Mile 2 project while assigned as Assistant Superinten-dent of Construction - Electrical. I firmly believe my termination was unjust and improper as stated in my letter to F.W. Ries on May 19, 1984,
,' Reference 1. I have not received a response f rom Mr. Ries. As a former employee of ten years dedicated service I consider this also improper, and ref er this matter to you for your attention. ~
The cause of my termination was documented by SWEC as "Unsatisf actory Performance" in Reference 2. I strongly reject this characterization of my ef forts at Nine Mile 2 and of my tenure with SWEC and summarite to you some of the f acts which support this, Reference 3. The actions taken against me are a disservice to Niagara Mohawk, the system ratepayers in New York and the construction industry, and undermine the SWEC corporate goals to be the finest in the world. Last but not least, SWEC has injured my career and livelihood and by direct extension has threatened the welf are of my f amily.
' I sincerely assure you that neither malice is held nor revenge sought by me in this matter. I request and expect simple justice by your reversal of my termination.
I look forward to your full and timely response, however, no acknow-ledgement or response by Friday, August 31, 1984 vill identify your personal and corporate concurrence with my termination. Very Truly Yours,
/, ** , /A * * . . , .
~~
f Gordon Dick
.W.
WCD/ tid LIST OF REFERENCES (ATTACHED) ! L. Letter f rom W.C. Dick to F.W. Ries dated May 19, 1984,
- 2. Letter from E.F. Haslam Jr. to W.C. Dick dated .'hy 3,1984 with attach-
~ ment, received June 19, 1984.
- 3. Summary of certain facts that refute the causes for terminating V.C. Dick.
- 4. Letter from . Musele E.J. Brabazon dated Novenber 30, 1984 ,
- 5. Letter fro )
to J.C. Hoehl, Jr. dated May S 1984
- 6. Memorandum rom . . Dick to L.W. Brown dated May 2,1984 (Attachment
,, dated May 1,1984 - original to L.W. Brown.)
m
F.W. Ries Executive Vice President Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.
~
245 Summer Street y 19, 1984 i Boston, MA 02107
Subject:
Personal Termination at Nine Mile 2 on May 3,1984. j
References:
, (1) SWEC Travel / Transfer Form (green sheet) dated May 4,1984.
(2) Telephone conversation with you on Friday, May 4, 1984. (3) Telephone conversation with you cn Monday, May 7,1984.
Dear Frank:
I received the SWEC notification form (Reference 1) yesterday
- Friday, May 18, 1984, signed by E. Erhiandson on behalf of J.F.
Barrett. This is the first written notification received which relates to my termination. I choose to respond to this notification by re-stating in writing the essence of our telephone conversation on May 4 and ; May 7, 1984 (References 2 and 3 above). I have been unjustly and improperly terminated by SWEC af ter ; only seven weeks at Nine Mile 2. This period was largely a mobil- ) ization phase which included searching for a home while residing in , a hotel with my wife and children. Tha '"tors which led to my I termination are as follows: j
- 1. I observed the application C wrudent management methods !
at Nine Mile 2. I notified our management through correct ' chain of command including remedial recommendations but this seemed only to hasten my termination. _ 2. I observed the existence of redundant and inef fective management organization, and during April observed the fitful and poorly coordinated evolution of a revised organisation which exhibited the potential for even ,
~
greater redundancy and ineffectiveness. I notified l management of my concerns through correct chain of i command including remedial recommendations but again, ) this seemed only to hasten my termination. ;
~
- 3. I observed the preparation of unrealistic project schedules j using unsound scheduling methods and assunptions. I l
. notified our management through ccrrect chain of command including remedial reconsnendations but again, this see med only to hasten my termination.
'~
- 4. I raised a serious concern, through the correct chain of command, that these conditions could expose Stone & Webster to sign ant sk. This concern was expressed also to me b hose perceptions of these matters I respect se his prior contributions as a Stone &
Webster employee. Again, this seemed only to hasten my i termination. I .. 1
2 On Thursday, May 3, 1984 in a meeting with Mr. Barrett, Mr. Wagner and Mr. Brown lasting all of five minutes, I was advised we had "irreconcilable differences", "You have not done the job you were sent to do", and "One of your problems is that you put too f_ _ _ing , much in writing". I was an employee of Stone & Webster for ten years and two days on the date of my dismissal. I have always strived to i I contribute my very best, aggressively seeking to uphold our corporate l
, goals, to be the finest in the world at what we do.
l 1 The imprudency of the unjust and improper actions taken against me is best illustrated in a comment made to me by tele-phone on May 3, 1984 when I called Boston in the late afternoon to question the matter of my termination. The gentleman with whom I spoke stated that he was aware of my termination but had to "crawfish" since, "as you know, around here there is a tendency { to shoot messengers". I believe and I am confident you agree, that ; the finest companies cannot sustain themselves by resorting to prac-1 tices attributed to medieval times. In conclusion, *. recommend the following as originally expressed in our first telephone conversation: J. That I present to you my very serious concerns relating to the imprudent and unrealistic methods I used at Nine Mile 2.
- 2. That you initiate immediately an objective review of the circumstances relating to my termination to address my firm belief that this was unjust and improper.
I am very proud of my ten years with Stone & Webster and I remain ready and willing to look to the future including a renewed association when these matters are resolved. I do not intend to dwell on the past. - I
-~
I look forward to your response, and trust you will respond at your earliest convenience. Very Truly Yours,
}' Original sinned by W.C. Dick -~
l W. Gordon Dick
] WCD/ tid l l
1 N
STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMen STmtrT. BOSTON. M A ss AC HU sErTs ADDRESS Al.L CORRESPON0tHCR 70 P o. som 1338. sostoN. M ASS. Oste? W W TELER 9 4>C01 L'."'*", . m it;#""
.".".#.". ut,';;"l,';*."'
=,';*:'........ "*'"""*
..?,' Won.ec.
W. Gordon Dick May 3, 1984
, This letter refers to your separation from our employment and is issued as a reminder of the fact that, as a part of your. relationship with the Company, you entered into an Invention and Confidentiality Agreement.
i You are aware that as applied to confidentiality, the provisions of that Agreement survive the termination of your employment, and we feel sure that in any subsequent employment connections, you vill respect both l 1 the letter and intent of that document. Ver/ truly yours, !
. . , E. F. H 1 , Jr. l Tice Frasident and j l
.- Senior Personnel Manager 6 l i
... 1 I
~~l( Y t U W. G. O!r.K J0!i1i13N AW)b ,.
l Y I !
-,- ,--_ , . . , . , , , - - - . - -ea,- ----- -----
itwiriAllyn ut LMrLUIMLRl omomAL STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 24s suwuta star:T. sosToN. wAssAcMustTTs cato7 ins =Y a r. ...
. eats W. Gordon Dick Mav- t 14Rc
.6 ur ec.A vrem oe accow=vmo A_nat Suot Cent
'C AT1ste Of g ee P 60 Y as E M T J. -
Lycoming, New York #12187.00 64T1 GTAATES aremE LAST D AY WOREED 5-1-74 6-1-84 k sAty.4 PO4 ftA se tM ATIO N Onsatisfactory Performance To insuu PeoMPT PAYMENT OF UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS THis FORM SM00LO St PRC5tNTED BY TOU TO THE EMPLO WHEN ToU FILA A CLAIN FOR SUCN BENEFITS. IN THE EYDIT YOU Do NOT FILE A CLAIM FOR UNEMPLOYMEMT BENEFITS IMMEDIATEL). YOU SHOULO RETAIN THis FO I iMTttM MONTMS. IF. OURING TMLS PtAt00. YOU FILE A CLAIM THE FORM SAOULD THEN Bt PREstMTED AT THE EMPLOYMENT OFFIC CONVERSION RIGHTS WITH RESPECT TO GROUP INSURANCES FOR WHICH THE EMPLOYEE MAY HAVE BEEN ENROLLED DURING EMPLOYMENT BLUE CROSS / BLUE SNIELD-MAJOR MEDICAL Employees enrolled for these coverages at the time employment terminates remain covered under the Stone & Webster Group contract for the remainder of the month within which the termination of employment occurred. Such employees will receive an invoice from the Blue Cross / Blue Shield organcation approximately two months after ernployment terminated covering a three month period commencing on the day following the last day of the month within which employment terminates, if this invoice is paid within the time allowed by Blue Cross / Blue Shield the terminated employee's coverage is regarded as continuous (no new waiting perted will ce recuired However, they are automatically set up on the lowest Blue Cross $30 a day Plan. They may increase their coverage by filling out a health statement. l I GROUP UFE INSURANCE Employees enrotted for this coverage may convert their Group insurance to any form of ordinary life insuranc offened by Metropolitan Ufe insurance Company without a physical examination if apphcation is made per-sonaBy at any Metropolitan Ufe Insurance Company office within 31 days from the last day worked as set forth above. sNont Tsau cAsN slCxnEssINSURANCE LOtte TERM DISABNJTY N480RANCE GROUP ACCIDENTINSURANCE TRAVEL ACCIDENT None of these coverages can be converted from a Group to an individual policy STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1-
I
, Letter fron W.G. Dick to W.F. Allen dated July 30, 1984 - REFERENCE 3 )
SUMMARY
OF CERTAIN FACTS THAI REFUTE THE CAUSES FOR TERMINATING j W.G. DICK l
- 1. I was assigned to Shorehan for four of my ten years with SWEC. i
. until November 30, 1983. Shoreham has characteristics cousson to Nine Mile 2. My assignment and accomplishments at Shoreham are sunsaarized in Reference 4.
- 2. Mr. Kelly of QA then Mr. Erlandson asked me to go to Nine Mile l and accomplish the same results I had achieved at Shoreham. l While at Nine Mile I dedicated my efforts to this.
- 3. Prior to this I had been advised by direct knowledge of a third party that Mr. Wagner and Mr. Brown opposed my involvement at Nine Mile 2. I raised this with Mr. Erlandson and he responded that Mr. Wagner had little to say in the matter. This alerted me to a volatile and possibly adversary situation and confirmed the direct knowledge of a third party.
- 4. I was at Nine Mile 2 for seven weeks, mainly a settling-in phase 1 i
searching for a permnent residence on weekends and evenings while residing in a hotel with my wife and two children. To effect rapid mobilization I worked mainly from 6:00 AM to 6:00 i PM and later, rising at approximately 4:00 AM and not returning ' to my f amily until af ter 7:00 PM.
- 5. Ihe period of my assignment at Nine Mile 2 coincided with major organizational changes and schedule "enhancement" efforts.
These ef forts were superimposed on the ongoing work effort which included attempts to recover existing significant schedule defi-cits by working six and even seven days per week. The convergence , of these efforts produced a tragic situation bast described at ' management "gridlock" and forleed a back-drop totally inappropriate, unjust, and improper upon which to terminar.e a new arrivs1 in a complex management role.
- 6. During this period I observed maj)r problems which I coanunicated
,, to my inanediate supervisor including specific recommendations for action. Many af these were rejected, ignored or criticized. I referred these matters to Mr. F.W. Ries (Reference 1)vithout response as stated previously. As you are aware were also communicated to Niagara Mohawk by l
. Reference 5. '
- 7. On several occasions, when discussing these matters with L.W. Brown.
~
my imediate supee risor, he stated he had released or neutralized ; several project personnel at peer levels, naming R. Reidel, N. l Sedgeley, J. McLaughlin and J. Ronco as inef f ective. These statenents appeared to be a veiled threat to me and a mark of significant inexperience on Mr. Brown's part. I have worked directly with three of these individuals. s *
-e , , n,,.- - -
_ -, .- - - - - - , . . , - . , - . , , , - . - - s--,.,,, --
REFERENCE 3 - Page 2
- 8. On May 2,1984, following a milestone schedule review meeting, Mr. R. Wagner called a meeting attended by a non-SWEC employee, R. Brinley of L.K. Comstock. He threatened to have me replaced
~ and accused me of being negative in the schedule review meeting attended by W. Morrison. I assured Mr. Wagner I had not been negative but he rejected this. I offered to explain my position to Mr. !!orrison and this v=s also refused. At this point I asked to see Mr. Brown in privete e.nd presented him with a summary of serious concerns compiled by me on May 1,1984 and previously discussed with Mr. Brown to no avail (Reference 6).
- 9. I was terminated on May 3,1984 in a meeting with Masrs. Barrett, Wagner, and Brown which lasted about five minutes. Mr. Wagner stated only that we had "irreconcilable differences" upon which he did not elaborate. Mr. Barrett said I had not done the job I had been sent to do and that I had put too much in writing.
- 10. Within the period May 3 to May 7,1984 I contacted Mr. Erlandson, Mr. Piper, and Mr. Ries. Mr. Erlandson said he had to "cravfish",
Mr. Piper said he did not know the details but had to support his people anyway and Mr. Ries said he was interested in what I had to say but so f ar I have not been contacted on these matters, l I I 1 l 1 1 i l es ems eux. e en M
,.- - , - - - - ~ - ~ ' * - ~ ~
- i
. I gg Asymmruunt LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION P.O. tot e04. Nosm4 Couwmv 204D e wADese Rfvtm N.Y.11792 November 30, 1983 Mr. E. J. Brabazon
- Project Manager l Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. '
P.O. Box 2325 Boston, MA 02107 Reassignment of Mr. W. G. Dick SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 1 WO10-48923 4
Dear Ed:
Tomorrow Mr. W. Gordon Dick, Stone & Webster Assistant Superintendent of Construction, is being reassigned to Midland from the Shoreham Project. This will conclude four (4) years of extremely dedicated and productive performance on the Shoreham Project for Mr. Dick. The purpose of this letter is to formally thank Mr. Dick for his contributions to this project, and, since he has been working with and for~LILCO Management for the past four (4) years, to draw to Stone & Webster's attention, the signift-cance of Mr. Dick's work at Shoreham. His capability and flexibility has resulted in three (3) successful, assignments over the past fourvery(4) diverse, years:and very
- 1. Mitnager of UNICO Planning and Scheduling
- 2. Electrical Superintendent of Construction ,
- 3. Quality Accountability Task Force Leader ,
- All of these assignments required innovative management -
techniques, rapid recovery plans for pre-existing problems, and major interfaces with contractors, quality organizations, and the NRC. With respect to Mr. Dick's assignment in the Planning and Scheduling area, he took over the Planning and Scheduling group at the implementation stage of a new planning and scheduling system as the Plant
" entered the Startup testing phase. He not only success- i t
fully implemented the planned program, but significantly enhanced it through the addition of his own innovative
- techniques; principal among which was the computerized restraint program, which enabled virtually real time assessment and corrective action to be employed on Construction restraining items.
.- In 1981 the Electrical Construction effort was experiencing problems and Mr. Dick was assigned as the l
- ,7 . - . . ,,- - ., -. ,.- - _ - . - - - - . . - _ - . _ . - - . - - - - - - - ..._..--I
l_ , November 30, 1983 l Page Two E. J. Brabazon Reassignment of Mr. W. G. Dick
- i I
Electrical Superintendent (even though he is a mechanical ! engineer by trade) and, in this case, Mr. Dick utilized a number ! of innovative management techniques in order to "turnaround" the Electrical reduced. problems and schedule slippage was significantly i i He was able to meld the Construction Management !
' and contractor tion program in efforts the Electricalinto a cohesive area. and successful construc-Finally, subsequent to the NRC's extensive Readiness Assessment Team (RAT) inspection
, last January, Mr. Dick was called upon to develop and implement i
a Quality Accountability Program to demonstrate to the NRC that Shoreham's overall QA program was achieving its intended i function, that is satisfactory hardware installation in the field. Very rapid program development and implementation was required in order to satisfy NRC concerns and to provide LILCO with the necessary Quality ammunition in the Licensing arena. Again Mr. Dick met the challenge and by mid-1983, the program was so successful ordinary measures thatemployed the NRCcould itselfbe indicated eliminated.that the extra-I have taken the time to expand on Mr. Dick's assignments at 1 shoreham in some detail because I believe it is important to , point out the fact that Mr. Dick is an independent thinker and a pragmatic problam solver, who keeps the ultimate ; objective assignments. formost in mind as his primary goal in all of his i 1 While there are many competent engineers from : a technical standpoint in both S&W and LILCO, there are very few who possess the qualities I have just mentioned, and ! these few should be recognized. In my opinion, Mr. Dick is an extremely valuable S&W resource and I believe you are fortunate to have him in your employ. I further believe that he saw ascan his and capabilities should be considered are very evident. for advancement within Mr. Dick will leave Shoreham with our regrets, but also with
' ' our sincere thanks for a job 'well done" and for a dedica-tion to Shoreham which went well beyond his professional responsibilities.
g d_M W. . Museler 4 -- Director-office of Nuclear WJM/ph
~ cci M. S. Pollock W. Baranowski LILCO Conf. File J. A. Smith W. Piper K. A. Bowe W. G. Dick *
,,-,------a,n--,e-,- - , - , , , , e m-,
- - . , , , - . - - - , .c.,-- --,----.,,-----n---,-,-----
__.----,,,,-,,...a.-, ,,n,,- , , , , , . . - - . - . .
~
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
- " gg ej 12187 SUBJECT NINE MILE POINT No. 2 PERSONAL OBS':VATIONS AND DATE 5/2/84 CONCERNS FROM WC Dick:pl TO tw 3RowN cc
Attachment:
Same subject dated 5/2/84 to LW Brown i om WC Dick summarizing personal observations and concerns. The attached memorandum addresses matters we have discussed and reviewed increasingly over the past several weeks since my arrival here at Nine Mile 2 in mid March. Several of these concerns in specific or generic form you have concurred with and some you have taken under advisement agreeing to advise management at a level higher than you. As you are aware, definitive responses have either not been forth coming, have begun to be addressed in part a n d.. in some instances the direction of actions taken have been or appear to be the inconsistent with the timely and orderly completion of project. I feel very strongly and sincerely, based on my qualifications and prior experience that I have an obligation to make these matters known to you higher management level.and that they be addressed to appropriate It is my sincere desire to contribute effeetively timely completion of Nine Mile 2. to the Failure to address these matters immediately and implement effective corrective action will in my best judgement result in significant additional delays, ceses and quality difficulties for the project. ; I l l
.,Gord.6 D 12; w
w h e4 j
- .a .L . . .. . . . .
3 t > . .i. !. 7 .: :. .. . . . .! ..: '
.'.. c 9..; .
.. _ C.. . . .. .+;_e .,_ a.: j .. j .! 4t..m.;cuepa, ..
5/.i
.i g 1 i . ... .
... .n.t. , t a4 . . ....i .,
i
**1 - . H. .
- i. ,.
-4' FF?.#.4 ;! .. i,,:
e 1, ...' . L . .W ..G i' .O 3 C# , . '
'y .;.....:........ . . :. . . . , . . : . ,
.i ,
i i- ,
.i. [ , i.:.
i.
-......a....>.
st.e'ctdTi 4'...i ) . . i .; ..
. ' . ; . . j - .J . ... L.J.. _.;.. . !,PEIc.o
. .. E LAT N A L . : C '..'4cVAT. O N'i 4_c__o. .w. .. r. .N'.s ING fc. fl..+c N I N.G-- Mt VL 2.. F'.Eccs.cr . . . _ , _
.,t i
. .. . .j. ._ .
i i
. y . . t .. 4.. .
.. .A
[y-l-q ;. _ q -t
..e-"-..-- .
;..g
.. m . - . ..:.
..;..'g..)..j..>._ .-" - , J { d - .1 - . i -I~ l " L - ' ! i .'
.r Iwnw --i .- i _7 . 1 .-
.a .m; co.um sc i .u-N. -.mnmo ol--i-
- 3.-
. . . . . .. .. - ..e..i....!
e .;...__ .
- i. 'oen,c94AtwfD .M.. Cont (*T4 le.M GNi'C; 'to TMe.. NIM .. a l UL l1) . ...
- , Ptt.,o:r ./:i2 ..), d MC.A eoM. i etc .
--j- W,e.t. MJv.f oop. . 79c. i e eM. A. te s AtobM. w're c4..coico oric 1 ATh,, w (24.cemnetopm i . . s A w tvF <T LA> IT R omt. se rAL.,ete np.
4t r.a .! p; td tW D .t .. ty @j. tMy A-f. A.c r\ M. u,. y . A .S .f? o E W .-- I
.t. To ..cdtvir spre.. rW t 5 f rvo 7t. W. 'Ar, , 5,o c.N ._
A e, . go ss i e4.q,- !w t T.1 \ N ) req.UpOLrX SAFE-T f .4 UAt JT* . A N D..... c.o c;r ! eA cAroC%#,S 15j .;U.51, 3 W ott KMILC. ., M AN 6 e rNLTIT_, . !
- me T.y co.s. . AND. iQ U ALi fM c D ' . E~ .X Pt!Ot c bMO . . PEES otW.' TD.._ .
E . rse. mi.v'.. .t.o v AN.Tra i c.,e . o, F;-tac. YC,M e CT , , . [, . . , ; . ; _., ' . , . .
. l d
- 2. _.:
l ;-- . .i !--4 --- - -!p m., - . S
' 1 l .
.f.. . i . ,,l -] . ..h I -.' ,--{, .d.
e
- - - - J.
2 r - -- . - ' - + - '
- .e. - .i . ~ . . . - - .. ~ . . ..-. -
_4 C o ta S. : P..v C T.t: -:4 Clfd f.;.N F-(5ch4";.N'T. :. Cil'. G AN12.-P.T.4 CN) l
......5_ ..
.t . 4f i.t'K..by.Az cW A t. .Rdx.c., IT . WAs. cvtc.cter~---:.)
- . .) . .! .'_ . 5.-;. . . L 4. ! . . : -.:.. ., . { . . . . . ... L .
. p . .:... c ... 2. -
. .{ . . . _ . . . ..! .
. .. i n.p.y. ..Q o ich ty ..To..rM 79 m: .rWe_. :. c.c s rrrw cit c rs M 9 % tirt.s :
- y. . , ca .2.s rw~,<.m. o M.> .W..A 3...' . .U N. .W l ebo d/.7 . .I7-o oV N ort.tsT*, . l N.ft.C-f:icL.,tsTF l
. . i n spec or t vt. .,' A N D. s o .- OC f Ust.OJ .AM QiCW .THe .W@te s ' l
._ ' , . c.e.n.a.Trw.e.: TH AT T14< t.ege r -crs o i a ens e s WA.s.. ANN.1.s ! .
L.o c- : ys . AoN.[:v se.o. . .J._c era mvw i cmrco .rH+ w .caN cccm T.a .y,o, p.' '? iris..! enccrnredor-sr@.s. ANC) WEmq. p .. _, . . .
. l . .ne.oeos.:.p. m,c cT.c. tomt. .p4r.:T;.>=.sq.c nn r.wri na f*ocacer.:.4.
- re.o., . ormter a N... E Nz.t.. i A r4 t t_. ,, .t ..! ; -
. 2 .. . ..:. . ;. . . L.l...L..:._..
- .. :'fF W42 OP b N. . ^/'So/ 8 Y. ' AN Ar.n t4.c'Nr,4 o .. _
. , _ . _, ' cw e g(atw:' prW ..WAS .,..I 5SVcp . , '.L M rve . V r.,v1W.t;;t . 7.141. 5.. .. . !
A N D W.Nrc be d CW Q4Ol.. TB.fM"T. * .TIHit. AM MCND4Q. 30fM felMAh.s g
! ... .t s c.v te.r.J. MNLA .cctn P.LtM t' o N F V S4 r> 4. U NW cElc& G Lt ._ !
.. _.!. .;Tp r.N; tNc.v.icus t>/. : j !._714_. dc RsN t. e L.. _.'r.cLe, erto ..f-og,; M)W
;m .14' .i Po 0.l rg eg5~,, , A g . ., N Cl TM.L'
; G. O At t EM.cc . N o tn.. M/ PE i
. . :L.4?/ .W}C 4 pt.). IN.TH15 ..DM
. #. /.#.p::.: !N TNis. Ir! D U.5T-C./ . .. ,
U.' iTIIML..C F...c.r2.1 si s. . . . ... n ,y c c v i c. . .T(u. w o y <; .;A N TW l l "ff'TA..T.i.T9,.1,WI!
.i..,
4CPr.c.cr W14c+J ; cetw.re r enc ri.og w iTN af'ct f.U,L /
. . . . . g , . . .
.+?.....,;.
;;. J.i cm ccWm...m _. c, ace;:-u A .N 9 .H ey' t.9C.Fe~ A.(.H p stunv ....._
10W Q . E
- . g ..
F"8 f4.fEC"4T- XfM-OV LE.$ : W I Lt.' la of ts .
. j.;; .!. cs > ll::.T.h > W.).%.: p S C # L W1 5 y f.- ., t4 o . iM N
.I'.Sf. J ?.TiTMT.QS 1'.L:.>..j..y,}.k.'.i..i..F.1..J..i...f..i.i.
e
- _ j. i._ ..J : ..! L y i ! .. .. . .... ;j.,
,,. _:,j ...._;~._; , , MT.c b . hW,N 'D AT( 1..j.. .,. .i .;{.l. . . i . . ...! .._' _ j. . .. .
. .ObJ. 5.. ;..x i L. i .i. . : . ..
. t _,._
.y. ..:L .3. ..L 4...i . .: .. ... . y...; n. . 4 _ L . .: _ [ . !.. . . < i
.... m . . . . . . . a .-. i . . . . . q . . - . . 7 --.
- F.. P o I4 or; l.to P LCt%c.6FT, .lT3-4 j . ;.:.. ! j... l .l. % 5 ,. V t.,4;;>l.j', (
. . . j . . i . 6... j. o ' ' .* *-WJ.l~N-T'.o.':1 1-.!. . p.1 : .2 .f t J. [7. c CC . > IIT
.....% L.,
vn %u qu -___
.i.o i : .: m..m.c _ - _ - - . - - _ _ _
- e. .- .
. ~
~ . , . -- . . .
.l' .." . iM ** A S!!.IG M . K Caf Fo.tu.et.rtic L rr'.,. Fe s m oin2 L.p v n e., .
. ., . ; . .'.. ' . A N D. . fR O Lf.-5 TO IS C S; P . " F % k U;L. # D W .t.tr y - t_F rpe t F
. i.mur- t.t wm oun, 2 x rec.tr.ne.c._ hu o %r..cn e_2 i , : , .
.,,;,, '[i .. . *r .2 RC.D Ur c ,' CUCl?.,nLL.. ' C4 N 5 TT'.U C.TI c ty Iw p.N prge .:Ait pc g.gc t yr,,;,,,
E'.1 -/ CLt.- f.' L L fI b t N'.!%T cf. SIl\ \ l'L'IltS 9tn ') C f* PC t (\r.TT,*r-N TJ
. ; . . ...To F ft O V I f.- O V P.L l d-6.T t.D F UN M i @3 g U td l.l-c cc.SSnt'.s/ .
~
, i WTtt.T-0 T tWS. d . , .!. ' p.;.. . . , . . . . ... ._I..
' ..'. :. ! .l. i .
. i.2 i
. . . ' L .L.J . !_. ,
lI.
.... . . .t. . .i -; y. L-. i. .. i . & .
. i ~
,' r ' 2 ' 7 ..pt M int?C'CtRC/ PT OnlOM.S! 8 VENDOR' DC_l VCf,'
- - - C f "- c. ,* -.. . . . _ .
' i.
. .i .
. i., ...
I 6 F . L. t. . i . l . . ..i . .. . . 1.7NC~ t NC*M 't ty S.u tormt :t'., , & W.ND*:Q CM.t 1 V".{'D.'C J Cc fg:- 5 U PF'Di=' .TV..Pys.y.t<ny:..tHot'. T V - e :tL C L.~. t./~r" rih H12NCC.O ..
, ,Fic -acf", 60:Lt c OVW FC M L.-f, ; rHe S CcN-~ 5. AP-4.- ..
c!! 3.cgtu,@p Q. RAY *-0'T?-GL.\[ . Y4 flA V Cj H DVT . 'TW Pg.cCrs' f."T W I T t.1 l tJ d. , i
,.. w t 79ouy . 'rW ' E.' M ML1. c. At ; 'D) StWtI V<* S .. *l A f'F C 6's Q.M.. . I'5 .
c.o q p7rU N PC O Tb y 2 49-..f:TA.C'T.. . TH fT% A.S.. IND LC.WTT 0. 1 Q. . _ _
. ., , c. -5 cc,(Y N N (4 64Q M R' C'r . S CW.C L (-Q . A P-.C- '
pc.p W N W l'T.9 ' LESS T.A Fh..dTM P C C': N . T"Rc y.o uj t.\ c.ctui sca.wnotQ rot .,
. ( N C i toCC4f 5.1T~. g . $ F.UM N M W C.KII'H. 'S::.*FA*T"T3 $ . F'20 4 12.e g
1 ~~., S . A N O, . _
%,f t.4 Wr c... :~l4I% ..cc M5lW 4";") 9 IF3... A W.. l N CC WD F MO...T4 t / . , .
p, g.c., yy.r. O c m .i N p.t -'n y. . } N CMW-O C.)N ; 6 V ".t* 5.j OFT 1mt;T1cL..
~
er ot.s. W rr A Lt rt o_#o!7. . No. c.ct:cs t.oqwncW.r-oE TWI : .; _ _ i
, p*% t 3. T"t(NJtg "I't2-t4C ,4f 12A C.#) (7.O h '_... ...,..
.. .......q... . . . ...'...._. i
,\ .'
g ,
.. ..i. r
. 1
..>...s.
E G C,ci*nf.'$ N'*"')P*"fICU N .5 ,. j. 4
. . _ . . . .. . . _ l
- . l
; 4. .s .
. i d hW6.O;%TC- $ : d'.o' rri t or tr.f .1.; tc . c N P.N,..c.5 l.' t h.,. . .' .
- - t M, d:r.c Q',4 un g . M AN A C CO'@tJT' .FC.tLS'ON uct A. f. Oh , tytO.EO D;
. t $. W.C S 2 N& WA f TO: 1 M P COY'L
- T'l 41 5. S IT"4r;T'.cid . . . .. ',t .. . . . . ;
.. , p. ' 8. , l" U N D AtN,t 4 T[s t CNll W ,t*4 {N .*i1 4 I.4E"fl.1?.C S.f'C.~rt..
lt!CCll.f*l.EPTij-Tt, Cr MI*jlbJC. 6 'l'lTT.j . C.C W '.'.C W # ," COM M '.'fIW.+TT! .!fv'TC . .
)
{. * ! _. '.) P i t ' I '. C# V CMit.M ., P C.MC. W '. 5 M-O LJM. S . I N!:.t . E!'.C.fM t ST l C .
..,\ Atwaw.o-aM.v Act.: ._c. ora . cx t s.nNg.
oei..Et ud JeNcec@s, 4 D . E it. C c.0 SH.i i .; .:stro cie.. ... '_M' - .
.. l.. . i . ..- . _:-.'
l ' : ..
.j . ._...: >
.. E. : m..L '. . . l . . . .. . . ..L . . .. . . . . . . . . - . - ...+.;_......
. ; . .. : .. .._..: J . , , . . ... . . .. .. .. .. _:. .
.. .. 3. . C C NTO.M'i Of.' l NTW.?;M c..f,,3. .
.- ] .
TW. c@ T*12.MTc7,.. , i(9T?.t.r. g.c,e. 3 : N WS P'fl.O'J-c t.."I" , ..
. L . . AT L*' 4',. 'd~' ..S' $ . li'< IC CIWU D.. W l.T O 'TM ; E-tft cT:2.t e. n t.- CDTNt*'it/.s'~. ,
l- iM'!.e. . MT.\l!y'j IV f.M/N P A MT' A M D tr A O ~70_ U N M TSQ':W.;!! c nu.vm
;-Yr.c m i.cu c>ur.c o.u cN T m w c:. w n u=. m u. .
~
}%'T, W F.l',CT . *?L*.t.\C. lC. , . 'rt MrC Nl,6C 141'. s' ,
C'. t&~. n*V T VR. ..
. [ . C. I ' W i.715% H4GC.,"W1.yIrvo TD C.r?c R T't . C M.04 K ...f'I N . .
.:c. s ere 3 To r%o TomT. T>k) o-wreac rc e. rvintracr cretat. .
.; . . :. m . w e d. n a t e e m .T.r. v . - e ,=. = Tm
- s.e i t a u n M y . M r< u w to C Q ) C - c Z. LcNeUttw lec. ..TI.:.'S acew. s. r w.m vs u.c.m,cnv..tn nvet..s wwwn '
A Nf3 .9. p W N 1" ' ' ~ ~ ' ' " ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~
~
... . .! .i . !. . .; i . .; . . .
. [, , , ,
e .
.C. C t<"-Tr2.u c.Trc1 ;) . h,\ inn u.;<~,q_ te J o p;;,cyc,,.T Of M r. (;r a D, ,
.I a . .. ! .; ! !. .
.! : , ;.l ;
l y, . WC CJ Int %NOF.MChT."_, , } . _ i. _ . i, . . ! . ,. , , .
. i ; . .-
1 i
~
i t. :.. .i . : ;., : i .. : : . -
- i. .i. . . . ... ..
( .! ' h.f .T'IM 9-0 N'5T12N C'MM . fW Th N gc.,@>Q,NT L'. f4 L( N IhCJ~T m t,rsT~ c.LR_A iMf . E 5 t'AB Li s. W .~nic LitJe.5 or . comm UNt cecIc1 l
,. 4 !! 0.PD)LTLNTg "T"D .T M-C 'i~,I T cJ . C.C l J "l l'4 UrC 170 , . . .. ...
l 3 , '. ; ,
! j i
- 1. : ; . ... i. -
! i 4: T4< .! .Lt Ne-5. 'o 7 CeTwr n twttATicia .q. g.e-r's.fi to g , .W tT9 (tJ LTNM carv.&r W T.\ cy.M nN t%utcNT d t;' e;%N r;', AT1W., M V 5T , G c i c,w s.c.ct. TowAse.os vee; cc wrn= Twt. rutcou cp coTcme !
MANM-<.WCTI' i ; ! t
. Git-O V )'- : ..l.:i t - -
. i
., . ....... . .. 1
, i ! , i . .
v .. . - - -. t .
,. . #4 4 , t-+- i
-t , , -; .
l
%. TW C .. . C. V 12-fLO. N P . C.ON T12. ACT*' M V 5T E C 'f? uV.t,SR.O. 7t l
. At.A C ri N1Yli AND3 C
4 C'T" '. T Fl-C.- . O [h (3tv i ?.aWI oN f . .S NC O '. l
. s .. c.o <,T' . C-c /-M _5 .,5IC I (CG C: CTA,tbLi S Mt.r'3. Tb C 0TY11'l4 7<.._. TMC. 1 FT2.0 7t".C T ,. ' ';. .
.;. ' 1 l , .; }
l.. , 4.j.:! ..
...,.....L
. . . . _ ; . ... r - -- -
'7---
- a. j. . J ... F-. , -_ F4. '._j. .. . . . .- u-i -
. .: ' ! . . i.. ' .
k CC t.1c.o VLA:.- S C,o CT-c' d,0,,_c t .F'.13.f4M - . . -. ' . ' , I t .- .:- i.-
., .. 1 .. . ..
A~'.TRt c.)c.,t'.. o f= 5 0 i tsJtz A e c ' WN1 n 5. dict: Tsc .c rA r c - H42.t. : .:t fSe.LLAve ,e. O_oF.FLir'ANC.,yd ri.i AT TH.R._ L f .T'e . .. l 10 ps.f,u m t.. NNc LU A N I 5 c f-3 r x . c. v A T M :,s .' TW rt r
- T MR_. IY,e.D! U f' '
- 1 ", TN f._
. rn.c. t..c ne c !' W A 5 Nev CtCJ . P.:.7..TTeM .t LL.vsmtg.Teg TA 9
( N .C1 M r 1- N 1tW f LC 2 ' . ; AT; T'M i M FC.070.T & C. 14 v W. C.o.rNc
. o r Tu:c F4 i . TM e w o eMe t m st1./. (,TAovAtv-co..
'tM M4o i VfQMN c.NRef4 E.T. T%e CW. I fif-0C. WTW t:n,c 4 NTT.NC.G.f*.) .. . i rv@. .l. S G A E.6t-Lo. 6. I NEPPc.cT'l VC AS WEL
. l ( r a c. .. .
c:.cNT 'IN W-.: "I D ' MMV-j . TIMC P D h f I I't.C. O IC. 6Af.**FA-]CD ' _ c:.AFl. e.q c_.'. e V T. T .O Ne i V<Lv..vl .s.m p.t 4, '.y cT tes7 i Nt, t g N i r's ,
, s w n w tt_.; o r T N.I.s .: I L TI Lc.. ! L t:: , c.crn sToc4 :'._ . .I c) E 49. .
l WOt./ M. PLA14.I5,4V' o _oIQ t y A is:. c 9 6.-
- i C) S. :.'r' UN!X t"l._. .
, l '?. I tC N rap (R. 9 & T.H C .;C @ Tt1t.ur..Tlo d <K *T'c.$ '17.hL6 1 1. M , .401O STOY-. k*- IV\ ANWg(%/
td., 4-C . QV. . V !J , i I. H AW.. O l.5 C'TO 3 C-r".) P!:'.X"T*'.C.Y W n i.1 y o U. f\$l'4 i" W. 4 Cf T EC r%COy Ci0: . . .! _ I
. [. T Mi3 5 W M OLb5f \NihTW.G,VT W-4 ' D O c.U tec.N'T*, .'~_. . . . .
'~
1'
. . : .. T'14-Q .i C V V.ILC f G *. C C N 0-D V l.C. TC N i ! 0,NT.O P.5:. f.[7'.. .C lM ' fl.
RiY' M I E TG. .ti.rf ! A 4;A LLMITT VcT . O LAW?.Q tA T T C. M l'. ....
. . . ~~fD Tu tm ,-fYt'Sj_/s:t;Tu I::Ir.1 ot i . AP.cViJD , . AC cv K.N c W
~ f .Whv" .. ATmtMTeo.! .TD .. O!"Fcit 's(oc.i r.1 c 21co ty,n c.we p;v,ct/. J._..I v % thb u.y , 8.lN..W C.iTlltci 'To .N O . ./AFrN.c,t TT. AVA IL.: 8 !4'?
OPfr two rD r.IT.i W (T FL TNR. f't?.07 r.T . Q t Fc_c TLfC 'i~c . O t'-f~".~..k __ . C:010:.Tt9 CTWr' 1 N 9 V'T* W iT 4 0VT Cp_&O vr , ALTN O'R *W 1 "'O P I4
. . ! .Wc f .12.c . c.c,I A*: N V Iq Tc C.X/.w I ts C.. ~n.1 e 0c. .c.C H C D U t.A_ 5, j . .
. . .' . .T.i 44.- P U to AtM NT!*'w W', Gt:.No. r Ic . I L:.; v4. $ . oT. I*r'A.5iF,It rTs l
' :(%
..- ; C.c NTVM L. , M 4 h. i Tci*.1 te r.. ,, TTI.,fu. It.H.;q . .-:. TI'/ TUC i its
. 1 VJ ! t,.L. M D',-' l d o. AW ,M./ /lW W I(.L- N 'e W L'A l< e ' '
1 1
.a * ,
...n....
j }
.s . . . . . . . ,
g
. . . . ... .. a .. . . . :.
1 a.. . .. ...
. h, i c,o w :. v.r 1.... :,s.)
_ . . .. l . . .- e omva. rw s q u nu.cr.y nrs,rce:ncu P% et.n.M
. . ., . , . . . , . . , . . . . .i
] ruc. VArdtcJs t%L09tu,rrvs W t.c t4 . Apotu "a .wov 5c m : . .. _! .
- c.c:> wcer,o t a . e, C e m s T c.vc.TT o w r
.AN o . Tiu. rtLmewrq e =.
, ,! Q U 1:. L\ T; ( N 'J F T l 'O B C ~7 j V N S A'r'5 E.-/,C.C. FTi CT3 A(% D
. .. ; . . , o r%:: Pd , V N c.(4 Lt "JP iT.depS.l(.PLllE.s (S . A CCNG., LC)W:Af.Tt c b
. ;. .e e .m.st.- m.imm, vrz.m ci rcarcs-3 y t.a c. u Acc cuteu-
... #.- PtgcA:W.o.L r> s M Arecc. s . tr Aoiq_. rz:r W-tea.f3,.f%pr<j
; rtz.a cu. i g . onc.um ww% , 6...mTAt i_LeaCac . o e . w ot:<.e.vcacmw
.i. i i ia.N td .STTci-US. MN '~~ llc j , W b 1C' .lbI fT..TLJ cd . ,N M._ . r22,P (n<.T . .
. >. v F6J. l TMe . AGt L. tTN-/ . '~3 lEtC Cec $ .12.R f'or--T' . .c N MV A L: TTY
. A.fTi?.4 5 VM.') . A No : -
TAT U .-'s . . . TIM & n.. !:s.m.' O c C FfLocp7.Ye-5. 1 .. . [ D .P',tc.Sc.r4T' A; M ATC 77 C rec.SS TCOh, c 5. . AT..W HICq .< ONSTini'J -
... .; X'Q VA.L1 CDTNTti.cL ST At" T, - O P: '
. E N" di i NCC. C % . A N D . T H.t,_,,,
.. : C,L.Lt-tJT ALL l'A4 d T O M T.I 'Ek . .. F A CA- C N ..C.d'<.fl 5 l C fr3
. . ; . T 1 4-cL : N U C U'. Al'C ANC 5>~A.T.e-- .
51 SC. A L fir-C.U L.C*TO CS , ._.; AT . Pf.c.cco JT, PCOPVO t=1GCtYN VAC.\ OU S . 4 Cmc tsic.A~4. . C.'a'^ P RP't.44 To c. H tM.e F-10 F Lc.: T~D C W Ar.A.. P p. Pe fr - -- . -e.:, h: , . . y N t L.c_ .r!.:,y S C rM . C N IWt
. , . ) 1: N O'?
6j S c rr( C r f v \ t 7_.r W . 4 ,
... T14.t w ov.c . W: ' o rt. rwG,y. N r.T GCST D'ON'C_ , VM law, a_. Or E. '.
1 G r.' w P3 (, s te..tc t 4 La.t x e r,<.o . c, ypc._ P A pc g ep g.-_ re.3vt.. - -
. j
- Aec .:, rn P t.t ! H flic t v- AP P Wt /t <:.o T7 s,m, TH.t.y . Av3 /:. t s C: (c.;.:.t/1'rj_T Q, 1 C, CONC #
'O rL Lt.t.;TC.r.,_, T 2) t N p,:r, C .I g g gkey
,_ , Ai,4 D. T 9cc e> / A G c.n/ ate._ J,'g., t.:, c j. wu t / m .t i g e.n .e Q T /st lC. co MTgnc eror,_ l ec.T I4-q .c.at.ce.;; p g ,7 p r.J r .p.Aon$,r c t. w p a. w p h M :.t4 c.c)t e c.g j D 14 ' .c. .r I t I-r( , AN D .5" V F CU. V.I 11M.,\ Tl.?.o ' W ti: ?
(2.Gccrm.m V. _ ._ . . . . _C.o- h~ _ .'.,... .
. ! . . . . :. ;... . z
..,t t .. . a .
. .. . - . . . . . .. . .i_..._... .
.f : s '. A. r vi f orster t.~. . . . .
d . : . ',.. _ Si(G Py010 p.via.) ~ C P .TH.C. A'... C, T./" G". c. f' : F.rt.,c q t;.,re m ...I s . .r.^1 upwtyr.)
/. Pc o rr.f_ p cw c 'c TC AVc@ .,
cu Pu CAT. @3 ..W ) TH.. IEr.QV 6/Adv y . CAv At 1T*'f. I N SPe ma cy_w.. .:, , r , i
- g. ,. . .
- Twe reo th_ o r. ri.:c. c wNt.n.. s INS Fv e r.og 3.' 1:n,p )or,t l
- f ;.:.c . r: t v 11 i M. I'd t N t: ec c:rar.!.. 6: c P4 c p ? f- .
- t. . t. p- r. t g cy'E ti,jc j .
c:a. m.f .
- st.m.cp n r4yego e vyi.j, egmg e., ,uj e n,.,
r c.c er y s i.:.o n4rcrv ic.tu:c u;s .. .
,o r:. 's.,, t,;Iet -
. . e .
-rc'., Ti. t P u'. cyt: c c c.3.' f , p f, ip- _.r' :1 ', r: em Pug?
occurnc> 4 m.w..u u.nm :: .c ty.(p j g;.3,, p y.,,y,y, y,. r vptvycy; 4 e - .. ) .. ,. CTNW-l pje egg . rin t b'3 g, y e J.t p, :.. <r ;.; .c. cr. h*, rf ;.c, ; o p , ,, gg .g , ,, 11 9 ftiitri f VtLF.',M C \ f Uf.4,gg, - Il c q .,c c n a , jj y; ;fi.j ,t, y, ge, r; f'*1.I f.T. c M X' L . '.) , Avq, f.,@ w ry s p. p.c,,,, 4 y, - t,. , p., .y g g,,,,, ,;, ;.4 f A i .t t:. c o r../ . . ru.c. .c2N q.y r.;_ g p..w g , 9 n g ,., ,;. . ) w eur f c.: . n. . '..: c~ v o . .. a' . . '.L Q. J. ....:..>..; n. . . > . . . .i d-; . ' -'- - - - h ;-- . -' ....L ._M A NA W.C tJT PC. RC-TI CC S 1 IM T M C 7>.S I . . . i :. . l . . . .' ; ...[.. . .' I . ' -: - i . - A. . . . .... t J 2; \ rme. e ew=a.n/ ..co v euw m rwo ce_ e v m t N: -'%, F.A.A c., W r;*f..' Fif::: se'. 6 T- M. s.1 N cf r r. o f'i N W ' . . u e a o y F A r4 r y : t.\.[ G Ob.~~'Q 6 VTC. y r'c(Lset a /w f OE.C: CC . , c e .. c a. a m s.. Io e 9r2crtTg wATci T'..!-9sy o u=v M rnosy pAM r:.cf eg A.u ram. e e. u ctme pr. , Asc IC N !t<t':. fr1Pa*:~CK TASV S mcwc. . rc . mruy Acr ace 3 U tV R v fau PtA-D 1 N e #e r,.t0 t. c.c. , .. p.ee5oNt : f.$. A T"W.AM FT'IPk TD'. .l.fM NirWJP Pol I CM.5
- Pf!!O*.0 Ot/ ri.0 .! . y O spTtc.c.3. Mt.4i Ct-t.1 Nbth/ t Du MU.] . . tYi t y A??N, wum u wtrwir na.cccua.e3 u.ocrweu.f.; s . c 4w_c 'sam mut.rn.iacnesym.netwwsr zoren:,t._. e.t r; t c cx/
.. , ,; 1 p:s. I e :.T .. C.c. L U C P [,4 FC.. PCC'SCA NC 4 .rw.moe u s % , .t' NFCCW' Sih A(_ M .DCAV C; MT.. I N < CfW US 8 r 9 G C G D It( /VW.W .VJt T14 . L lTP( G 4 EF Fcc.T t VC . .IP.C. CC 0 f G4 .$VT 'TD, e a e u cr .1 a.. : ;s t :.2.s i s.= C ALC f% ~ . +. ..s 1. m . u : 4 . . 3... C y.A M ot.ec C F T Wt3 A SC.~ l N D1 V t DV AvtA/.. . S M Q u EMI" t . A p.c s:c:, ;g Vm c.iceU~5 A ND . PC4VA T.-l '.% . A S ' .TC CC PolScN O U S CV65 A f 4M-. SrM.Acc-0 ' AC (t,osS "T SS._ P LiY O-A Dc3c.c ~T A:;;, A N :) LL V sm!4.:n cN 1. WAs, . ADVI S-6o T N At. rH.C., PCf rc t . te c.m cot AsC u: tai lT. c.V r' .WoV LD M E r'.o F.T. 7 0 . TruL A ty O ._ w N. ~-%./ Me ST t :/ <: o to,.9L .L.E f:T . W B 5 V F i'b_..lYW-..,..T . _ . f{do C P.c r.X:C lIN 'i-'. i ls D i r t CT I o t .' /AND; . AS.S 1C j Nf O- .M ira To A V.s'..A.[ 12 0 L.CL C b. L. . TL. f: I t4.D . .T131%T. # 1I-Q VICU LD. 13> R P \ )LT- F ! .' T* 0 tty'. ; h * . D D ' fW Ti M.NT._.8ais Ca ! N *.* Y' M. (M T T f.lf.. M P',.,% t..'/ to r i.s c;< n W -- LE.Oi ?T . Tb P1LL . .
- W.c..
ll! Tue m w.3.f x.. m t.te.m_'o v t u v a c w _. a _ c 1Tut t- . O tut.s e.,ia , resc ui:cre- eyEC w N .] r I c, M e wccw.; .9 ('r y'.ov 5, t.s. /' . u Ir D ! S C.t O U;T C. O c.9iL'j. 1. U h'1 LI?f::.TV l'y /.':.5 p rg:. A t 11l.') A b) * # N g .p t' e e.;7 \ y Q ,, M G t4 r cj e (f.,,.. # ANp 'I p '.*'. 0-P , L Q. A O f..ff ,'" . . . : ., 4 . . . ' . . l CfIi LV*< T*' >'Itr,6 F N f, i i A f!.> 0 V r, f.) , ) N Ct4. p ; =(T 1NstDi3U.s wID/ .S.) 's?.c rsQ. . Co..L'r/c. I?..c.sPJ.,T ni.'. t *f >N tr i r9is Jorn m f T u.c , N : cHcsT. K ect onrr ccwsre.,< N -TfJrx.rTiet M1.st'i Ap ~~ C C t4 ' ' Q.Ccf.T".W~5 . ! N (h O P I ti>014 . Tt::> .4.. A N p g:V.CT4 1(Q T'c E*.'XFt,%.'CtM.R ! P f.1.:4'G (IT/M ' { ,. C"'.U? cT t4.y 3ot418'1, C U /1 L.I > t.C,rs noW-5 . Afv o F:e ov*.' t.) . Ar.u u T y :r . i . C . '. ! ?. . fad '/ (51 U.c m.f t 8 , TN IS W ] PR .t. '.,/ P i C e.4J "::,e D /L.N is W l*C>C t '. s )<Now t 1 N',tw m y ; < i. A. s T k;).e W !Q rr.,6!%4 c,et S,o w .e c.e-) .I 5 t'.c.FCri C, tr ; l P,.g(# 'T4 ;##Tr. t.)C A .y " t;- 7 e,,, ,/?// .' % d q %. .S J.% y pi, e.4.,M gpyq y e- , ' , p, y e fj,.[ .; . ."5 O h'.s: M .* l L, s n e ... c. g ,'Pti M .31 w.r.~c.n ( . i. . M rn g 7., . r n )ur,.cl; g;f*.co pt3,,;71)RT ' \M!t 2-CI ~ i ; ff f .T., Dr.) NOT DC 'a3 T' G 4..i' - ..n w A y a , . n .; .. . , 3... ,. . 1 M P/t. cT c t-) . Cat ? P t.;r .T. d' f , - , m ,; q ,;i ( i. W 1- N. . g,.'is., 3 .i - ' [.'._(.'(4 N l'.,..6l r.'M.2 M. 5 . l - 6 G.,P.c.o r.st,e.c.,t.;g.yt.).A m .yc t,c479in , ~,; rg . e, y g4 .,j.,. g , . ,. r.n s.y v ' t- t ^. *! l .' V q L.s f M p, c . . r- ] p, ; p c, c g * . . , , g ,, IS* (.1,W '. r .' .p , C .; i r., I1 ' tu c.(J- e.',r) / g 7., - . p.. .; m c m . .. c . .. . ,. *./ q y g p t,.(,,g *, ; 7, i p, g . , ,.,*t .- . . . :: . . : . _ , s. . . . . -~ . . . .i . . . . !'7 ..t 'f_'.O Ne;ry_Uct, GW !M1MIA&@.#,'ct'7I' . /MR.sdNi,0 L. (/riLt2 ATION . l
- t. , , ,: .~, . . . . .
9 AT nM . Pra: .? Tirec.. - NVM 5C ' cou<. CAvT, cc Tac r.os t.m.uyte %n.p_.e3e vNvAtLD m y> s un rep.F.- u. C1 6y 1tEFFdC W,'<L. O (? C @ g Nl'Z.971014 ANO R. Ty c._ gsr ci: U NQ O AL IPte f> M 9r?CJflM.M. Q.V f0LI F-LA t N cg Fe.t/ c.t,,t.o.,o . Fce.s o MM-eA f H ic; N t#-VC L. M1ANThc 6 V- + 7T' . .I H AM A (f., I N 'M 6NN ' C 5\ ~~( C N .5 I t< cb t t':' ~. Tue TH fhN A q cti CICT C p?lAj li.fil'd.C.T17tJ <FM-Dy Applu mp . ;f t4 .p0NCActw N* l AG^NC . a\. ' ;.. i., . q .. ~ .. . ' g.or.. r','.M.At To cu rt r.ct4T W ISOOM : TIM- U.56 ov P'"ote' . p,eg.gr.s1 -t%... 1 \,4 ITH: P C.15. . (LC.t.c.u PNT' l SX f'LC@W-G M . C Yi %.*. f r mE rsT -r HW<:. v 5if..s br'ou mT t3h. T LGedC.5 t4 S c c.NDS . . A Lt. V'/Or!.Z3 C'c NCC s#T T9 To ) P At.t4%'c.o ST V w ot!.ic. ' 4.NQ 9 CC.d.LCE.WTC S . 5 C.H C. Q d M- 5 j. I M PILoW.S CQ3 P.LtT-e wa ru. ov e.c c cas.r s '. ' - i : - i ,
- i Ord TW f s. F C o00 c'T- ).N T16 W ks iv. ST. t.4. v< L s 40. CoffsTu--
r.T r.s M', )c tM t T AND ~l N V A R.i t \r'S (4.E </ P D T 1 T VO N I T N ('Z W C;9 c 5 c.q'rd c.nc r,tst r.u'no N, TN4_ cWl h6V rys. ' PLAcr rewT. AND y~J_ at ec.r/ e a t i p c..L., MN Tf') T-" X P C.F., iC9'-at: . N AC f.L. h rd A N D W .{( A ,,, e CoNTINVC' N M-E X YWh'Id~D O. 'Pf' ~IN C - I NCCIN'T FlM TJ 3. .a tv r.) eT. c. cF , l F t tr \.C.,N't 0.O !?S-/ otW-2 L.,. - t-T W A VC. AS 'yC1) A fA ' A WA fL . M ACC H E.C(F.!'c ~ Ats O CACV; C t?.'. C . I c-C.cmns.w::.:i \ 'n s 1 N T1 A \ S WGih =tp ) (LC tr e tt.'L . T*0) *E. P c c ) F tc.- f C T.1 flots 5 C cat T.Til. C.T 1.c d c l N (.~ L V O lO- Tl d v.c N r -d.. c< q . T"' M - E . (> F./3 t> 7 L c D U Fl r 'O F c ., a c. T v o e n m Tu c.i., e..c_ rw a ;rtw . et.c cT2 t 14 e s, u r r-cma.v conwe s cre .c.m_Tr Ar.i a .c o ns.2_. i.a r.er 4 . Iscrei R ) .S c u s t e.1,> , . . P ^ c o nu s.e tot: TYats[- r 714 c.2 e N hs,i.c_ f, t - . ' t- T.. F C' d L p.t.co.r d opM t.'s:,p goicc. vI cu c, Ly ; ,j p g yg - ; .4 o '.: L p : G q . n sw7.e y ;; C rd i. L. / ! r. T N 1 OM t #. ; tv.Nf.sc' iv.c tcT tf v.c L.s . . / i CO - c , _ .N._C.A..U._.T.\ ._ _. c._t. 3.- iNCCC A V. r'.. !iv M N/ C Ft N thN G - (4 [o t,J.3, n p h D g t c f rr w: .e.m.:: va ' . u r,tue. . /oJN o w i u - Appe. cr rirm u,f ppio C.oB \t ' tP .Y I y1 i (*,P N 1 N c t, W q. LAN 9 sf J j41 c.(3 ;;,p, q i g. , ,,,,, I M PM- O l GV C' ANQ T-* D D l'TN N At C l-h',Nr.P.S . T6 7 W_t',,,, j l .114tase4 c.re r.;te. - Ar O T 9.c A N O ' A FP ',Z TsC M In ttu p.e .g v r, g1p . r.,gerryn p,g ' CT"..' C'At sN l t,*,, c,,, [Q t p.;*'t M t t. e,,, <. ;pgr.,4.g p, \14.L \.,' N 1C- 1.\ W.) 5. td c rt: f.)c T Q y.(..,2 t , p, y r.g y.,) m T [.g , . L4 W4 OF c.., i %0_.rs b Jt) t W r., g._, t
- p . ~ .r- - y g c .t.: L ,,. ..;
v It.m-t o e i J. G. Hashl, Jr., Chairman and C.E.n. 4 .: .'tarara .vohawk Power Cor,poration , ') 00 F r i a lloulevard ' Syracuse, New York, }32Q} ur.u s 2 , }9ll ;j. D e a r S i r.: . ,e On May 8, 1984, you were advised of certain serious events, reference fl. On May 31, 1984, relevant additiorial details were ll presented to your representatives, reference f2. Your represent-atives c gourii t t ed to a follow-up and response by June 15, 1984 This did not occur. - 11 , '1 Tmmediate remedial actions were uN,ed on May 8, 1984, referene. fl, to correct the matters brour.h) to your attention. . . ' ~ - ',- 9 . . . i As, principal. owners and pro ject line manar.ement directors in nn int eg r,ated ma, nag ement; structyre .you are direc,tly responpihle p ' 5 o .i e c t . ,,' , ..'..< .r),. ..,n; , ? { ..-
- t-
. . . . .,~,/,.,.., ,t o ,.y , . ojij'p.r ., . .g . . . .. .e .s. % permit _ and perpe tirst e tt1es's condi tions i s !'a d to your corporation, y ou r ra'fe-pay e'rs , y our co-owne rs.is-s e rvi ce = ' - and violate the parpmeters prescrthed by th6ss responsible for fiscal and legal regulation 'r e *' of the utilities.ht New t York. '., , .. . i, r . .s**
- 9 ,
) ' ' Sincerely. ~l pz- -(.,.l.3, . .g .f.y /,*.4 ' . 3 :. g '. 4 ,t , , . ,, ,gl73,,[ $ ' . ', 9 N ' . .7PD/dd . " i~ , . *@L'h,' ', 1 S. cc *
- c. .
, .v .. 4, . f references: ' "' cf 15 . h[1 1 . 4.*'h,,. ,
- 11) 1.et t er f rom to .1. G. 11 hl, J r. , d a t ed .n.ay A, IpM
. d2) . Additional detalis consih tint'. 'of 16 paces and 33 ref erences. e S J . p . . t
- e a .
I ie 1 l _ N ., -I . - , - ,ww----,-,-- , w r, %m,,-.,--,c,. -v-.------eyr,- - -....,-,---,---.-,m--,- -------..--.,-,,-~-,-.vre- .w--,-- -,.r- =1 4'? L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY. INC. Memorandum g, R. Wagner - 0%e b'MP2 From. A. Fallon gp. Milestone S ed Do9 4-26-84 The following is a summation of our observations and concerns involving the development of the new "12 Major Milestones". In developing these milestone schedules several key assumptions had to be made in order to produce a usable product in the short timespan allotted. , We had to assume that CHOC Engineering information was or would be available on site in a "timely manner" to support these schedules. We assumed that T.Q.C. vas properly staffed and had sufficient inspection procedures to de timely inspections. We also assumed that schedules and installations by others would be done in time to support our activities in these schedules. , These assumptions were, and are, our biggest concerns in meeting these sched-ules, i: During the entire milestone scheduling process CHOC Engineering was not represented nor did they provide any input or comments on the schedules. This highly concerns us because of their past performances in supporting site gen-ersted schedules. In developing these schedules, it was found that there were a few missing engineering items for the near term milestones, but the missing engineering information for the longer term milestones greatly increaseL rnis is anacceptable if these schedules are to be met. In order to meet these i schedules, CHOC Ingineering wat improve the existing information and have ec,eplete information on site a minimum of three montha prior to Construction's turnover. The much talked about "Engincaring Tronze" must be in ef fect now for the near term milestones and become mandated three months prior to Con-struction's ternover dates for the long term milestones. Because of the ever increasing interference problems and the accelerated schedule, it is suggested ! that engineering solution and signatory powers for these problems be moved to
- i the site from CHOC office. This will greatly reduce the time required for i correspondence from site to CHOC and back on these problems. Engineering must l co _.it t o,, th e s e s ch e d u l e s ,i_f, v_e, ea r e ,t_o, o e s u c c e s s f ul .
b_e, In developing these schedules T.Q.C. support was not directly addressed. ~ Their support has been improving but is not at a stage where these schedules can be supported. It is recommended that F.Q.C. revien these sche; oles and develop a manpower loading to support our efforts. It is recognized that hard spots will be encountered especially in regards to Q. A. Category 1 components inspections where insuf ficient or unclear direction is provided T.Q.C. It is imperative that quick and specific clarification be given to T.Q.C. by Engi-neering, Construction, and others to minimize any potentially long rer.olution ._ time which will 1:: pact these schedules. i s.y M.g ,. J.E'ONCC/R. KU2hE%/w) c.zrLowg/e,. , m rs = - w n o = m y cc m e 637? -- \ m
- O=
- Milestone Schedules Page 2 The schedules reflect our direct dependency on others to complete their work on time. There is no slack built into these schedules. An slippage in their schedules vill create an impact on our schsdule. Reports en their - progress and installed equipment r.u s t be developed for.use by other contractors to meet their schedules. t ~~ The Milestone Schedules are, at best, an optimistic '%all park" sequence of events and quantities developed seperately for a single goal. Thes6c sched- , ules must now be combined to highlight problem areas. Manpowerloadije. Engineering, and F.Q.C. support must be quickly reviewed to establish the - feasibility of these schedules. A realistic view of these schedules cust be taken and adjustments made to schedules to make them achievable. Because these schedules are so compact, it is essential in our opinion that an assessment be made of the probability or expectation that the final product can be achieved. . LKC has and will contin 2e to support any schedule developed to complete this edte. EcVever, support and dedication from others is needed. We can ne r-long2r acce;* delays by others and work around these delays. There is no more slack to allow this type of approach. , cc: R. Brinley R. Burke ' L c. Dick T. Stanzione P. Ubling {~ L. Brown t, .e RNB/cp 9 8 e m -. j l k .. t 6. l - ; j \ _... . . . . i i TT:0 .' :s . L. .. Is L. W. Bre:- CC .l . H. t-- 3 [ W. M. Delder! C. Lawrence t T. Stantions
- becace in olved late in the canagement review rneetine of the "harc spott' r- in ene Eid, on Thursday with C. Zappile, K. Varadarajar.. I:Gediting and P! n ..%. -
l Lurine the discussion and proposed resolution by CHOC and site, severs 1 iter: vere discussed and stated which have me very concerned. I . ,or issue, or at least in terms of quantittes, was the EE-3 series d.-.n. d t-listed in the ERL which involve terminations for the instrument and control cable termination
- cabinets in the ' ntrol Building. Elevations 28E'-6 and 303 '
I GECaPNL700 series). As you are a m ;. CHOC Eng e eerin; and GE b.ve bcon i.w [. : .! forth atte=pting to resolve the designs or re-dcrigns ef fectia; th6sc : 6:r esbinets. It is anticipated a resolution will be available in N y 1983. ~he p S'0 f or these drawings have been and remain 12/6/82. However, to put thest ' d:avings and construction's "real" needs inte perspective, K. '.'aradarajan s'.stsc t'. i t all the EE-3 series drawings identified in the IRL (not issued at 90'-ho* d s , ,. laters or 80% issue presently on site) involve only the NSSS and do not involve ! EOP syste= or BIP's required in 1983. Therefore, construction does not need L. these drawings now or before May 1983. i l Cratrary to that statement a very quick and dirty audit was made of these draw- ; - ings. The first two lookt.d at (EE-3AR aid 3BA) are issued on site less than ' 90'. withinecqlete information in the form of laters involving cables and terminations needed for the 115Kv Yard Milestone and BIP. To support the con-struction schet'u2e theref ore, these drawings are required now, not in May. This, chearly indicates CHQ'; Engineering did not research each drawing to i *~ deta.rnine the subject matter, yet confidently stated drawings were not required j by construction to support'the current turn-over acitivites. ' The other ites of concern involves the issuance of drawings to sspport the current Level 11 Schedule. In particular the discussion pertained to the issuance of '- the exposed conduit drawings. Secondary Centadarent Elevation 240' and Elevation M 9' (EE-460AG, AM, AS and AT). Mr. Varadarajan brought our attention to a pachge presented by CHOC management in the Co-Tunant's Meeting Tebruary L. 1W3. This package identified drawing issuanees of 8/1/83 and 8/15/S3 for the above drawings. Be advised that these datss do not in any manner support the field activities. I informed Mr. Varadarajan of this item and was told that the co aitments were made as identified in this report and CHOC Engineering is vorking to those co==itme.nts. Again, quick review of this report shows mny diserepancies between site fhld required or site need dates which do not su;.;, ort the construction ef fort to complete the vacious installations in a ti .ely and cost ef f ective man ter. Unless you are aware of other cor.=itments -ade and accepted by construcchn, it is requested that CMOC Ingineering re-view the dates identified in the. Co-Tenant's Meeting and revise as necessary to support the Project Schedule. e. V* * .w - -. -. i i - s . ; 5 . e :, , It is felt that the Exception Restraint List is and vill contfrue to M a useful and beneficial tool to identify and resolve restraints and;or + lari.ing equipment. Ilowever, the inforsation supplied by all partici, i d C'?' ndsi2 cust te accurate and reflect the needs of th: p r e ,' c : t . . ,,_ tE.ievr.that the statements made in Thursday's meetinF tne ap . identified i , , .poove ce nor support this viewpoint. ' i Yo.r review and assistance is requested. ? , i ' / J;fMd Q h ( g es! Li fo< L/ D. R. Friedrich : ; Chief Con'structien Engineer ! DRTi: ef , i c l ,, i . -) ' 1 ? , - . p s 6 k f 1 0 [ , ,I I i J > 0 * $ @ p I .- r ; Le ' l - 1 L l f -
- p. [
.f t l I e
- 4 me s /
9 j 1 = 4 6 8 > - i .i / e. I 1' i , , - y ._ _ 6 ,_ _m_ , ,, a / I ce u.),Gr.D'(.K m Ay - is eq FR. $vd b.krwir Su pot + 6 v.)E c. E.Ae.t. EL 1 C. A.\ b E.p t . Piu s m i\s b y t Ir u .P.S. is c h. d R c u i cv )E..b 9.tv dc.b bc RE de ls, i feoc,g a st: deb ;r a Av E.ra.AyA,7.Peo 'd.8pod - B i.A.L" .I o Dt A.4E.6 Wi.s T7c dig e
- x. Hww d o m mu R $ C A40 b LOid 7 LA.Yoiv& A.ob u. bv le.c.K .
[ cT T-NE. bl.AVUICCP- .hp4. p 01::> M C'A B E E 6 oT tRE. E L e< h.c
- l. DE pt, A L S o E E.0 l G'.u2 ED 1O E.9 E. -4*A C Y ld G. YM t I Ebdo CE
,_ h. Rcc o ls.s 4Q. A9 6 m'i++c.6 "bg mcmo oF tb.c gh.tz\e3co L.
To a I m p t e. m s u + A4 to L.) .
, C, e-o ERM !
I '
T4sss. % McDo ls6" st:t E u u r2.c AJ s+ Cc Aod mist Nioc VoA Paoyac.+ c ompi.t.4 ioo 5+ ad eS , tvn Icd 4 ces Ac H i eve. met (Aub m Acut.mEut \[i Si b's lih .
T"RE 'h= 0 i sE. b Sc. Mr bo (C. PC.o&E4# P t i
o podA L" L A.c.ii il c Av 5c. N* E Sc.nioqs peoBLg. ins ic 4- R E Fv 49 E1iE VoS S W.G.C . 9 @<
Aub +HE 4.o c4sN:Aov .
SS H ed o ls.s bo co+ A.DPGLESS g v M i 4 Tbt. L AAc.'t> A-hoi 4 e t'c ) HE. h,t2.EA$ oV 0.o C.tb4R.cC.4IoC 3 fEC.41 o O A.c b i-ME. '
.g gpE9 Q. E.) 8 A E b T2.E A,1 ism , e t- % d A.y R o c. L s N t, iodev Sc. HE coles Aub ho&E A M.S AQE D o + 0 o rn vvww> )c. AA ED l MJttH Ac ZO+EMiGEWC.E,TE l.At K OF Cove R, y W yv)od b ID5uhT D't Q. Ecd i o s.) A.'ob os 6m mo cic Woos g g +u:sev ! '
., AG.E cc.
P C.b p4 5' BL E C E M El O 1P c.6 P o u birSt E v g. g. l L i c.s ete x4ioo,D94oeU+
5c Mseu\ E lu DuT- D A 4 A. AS 49Au6PE1%FD
._ V So M +ac C.o otQ.N:.% R. Jo Pt.* cdiC G. r)UN is oo+ i oc.o9tpom A47:.d o Q. Oo4E o o O 6 C (MD vie 6 ( 4Ri d pc.o C5L1E.m. nk.s
, T5ECO I DE'.A Git b * 'PL Au ui o(vi .+RC.Y.,H Au c. Aso v a.cd *
-4% E PENLCMb U l\ SE. Q.*'GOTt t t> A p p F M u R.E Sc BCDug
.. uJ t' 1 dc.,o2 o Q A,4 k p.ik D W 4C* 0$ 'NEh D' E I cf:>p,1 tPAMO tb i *JC-lvDIog O cr 4 > 3 $c.14E.t> tG 4 + Ara 4[:$ 4.o ql < JG c s + s s = + :. ,
,_% HcooIa d be u o + i o c o R p o n. S.t c o R. Cts 5:"Eec.+- Q.Euscez.)<
F r ~ e x%s . _ _ _ _ _ _
q p ._ g ,
g 7.-
, _ . __, ,_, ..q _ ___ ) __ q -_- g . , . , ,,
N s
i f N Nb f5S #
k'0 AQ Ed k i* ' i g$ d as Ak cgFU 1 a r.. et P5 wm h 4- f an 2 de1"?seg$p r +
c5 3gn"5 Exx i
4E ml-c
.o U (Uby C Cnd 1
N g-iO M o4 s
ve. e 6 s
N s c u- 6 i
e er o
*gFC r1 c G7 0
b' h
- j u e v +
0 5
IE lo- r =p k l a' 19 7;1ri oC .
pt
-Qs /
ft 08_ 5 0 +CF 1 el r
- M (7 0 l
- y CUP e
d i
. CP
- S- R{zo_ gf hN
\ 6 4 p3 l
S k =
I
. i er q 9 +
To t.o. w. O h K.
_ _ . . Su b . s< uv. cola 5 o gou+
.. Sw sc Etc.4 a.v u- bspi-wou mas No+ z Ae:s.
~~
_Y A,3 Tr. ute4te +HE Yetiocioc, a.isNt %zW e 4e wgwiic49 mq sp+iocs or tus i+w' e .e9 Ete4/c At- Sc.Hdwie s
- ri,.eb u.) mt:c+ i'o &.
._ . .. . G.cuen.AL : S 4 a o cq m a n A 4 e m E.u + couctaus iobic.Aked
;-. _ . _ . B
. tHE = 7 SER'oR H S1*+ 1.E V E L hME 4 ._m%e x&e.cscu c Emeo+ p c=.ow osw.it 1. ito o/Hu.iiTo u s. us x s
. ui A wiet.w co m m i+ mw.c+ VEo,w v t ech icM.
[ ,_4coo . e q+ a % 4 c re + ocom M a. i.vo e. k B3 w.s tv,54ece 6c,M5boIE i
- 4. e.us sce.V~ic Al . **pt-c4cp t o r t u vi w 9E. Sc bie eo4 Dsvtec+
use t.k. A c t:, i+ c.c A 3:,
1 i
_t im poss4 1bLE -te g ros A TecMh.4it compLc4tou b A.w. l G W B'CP ot. Miles +o u s..
__Is,pec.idic., oMke0 MU.,os i apcI:,E rAe c)' Tov.s , "Pi f:>ic (., A.c b !
_ , .)O a=+ qui rAtx*Mfo O s.c Ett.C Q.E.o scus(6 l I
_Sc. R EDclES ),), lD9 \.0 *=4 3.bGCh'T~uil2>. %,g %q
.Dw't.K.E 4M4Atest W
.4BEst 4i.co b ie<.ipliues at Nam.' m. Mi4s c5 Rr.spooss +=
A H t29 (9& 4REs E. ScHGbcIEd A b .'Dt.As.o u. 3)
. L..'...A,tmt se E
_ _ . . t'e4 (c &/u c(k'A us >.4t.= &ME i Ir w ko I
- >.c.R si: V 1. % . etHEts, m.oM .De.ohVid 'h w m.A LiOe %4 l' i6
_ t._ .
1% 2 R 45L't0cr t:4.u4 7 sz E.cvt ,
bpott4 > c.t. it,a M g. $ iuE. ge. 4?' l
, _ _ 4ws.sw. xst,v.uc>+too> 4 t 1+ io+. +ws. s lasi utes it-i .
,c.. vooolk 9v d he,A\\u. I eo 6.o s,t t.uu4 to 0 A h ui-{.4.
... .. 9 tr '
R+ 0ecS4E.w< +1oe A.4 4io4 Ld:s Qw+/PoR.,scillbo cotkb w be.4400 Ah, 64m.lt> AA.ocF., . b) ut.
l 1
_ __ t.4 St.ic (r 'tdAR.+ Eti. R.6015.W us(t% 841t.o tsr Rsbols Liot '
l __
bbe Aop tr+ a. % tt.Eoi sio . us ou tte ce t c.cs i t> s k. .. l l l.. %> % v'M.icos,useo t b tbE Abegsware lasPAhWh< Eb l
. . _ . . .. tvtit. L,B O ibebWd'iYb e.oo>cctt.O Aro hvsc oWat
. iin ybtwM.S AuO Oo c<J 1 it + f? E m A.iGlucs, usoat". F.) s.othsu.':
C o c c.e t o s % m 2.. S. S 6 ot *.y vs s.a.s v'i% s+- iewo tWited
_.. -4 % Q E R.E A-WC#q>MED % L , 6 ,Ta o( c c h gg hVgG L-$44 oo c%n . G.) ich b. t.co u ld coi Miou>- !
+,R it. '%.
4 A.onI'6C 4.p>eeM c cc1e, g M4 AS, 4 n s g. to sq.e h>tro Ws jre 9 ioi I'L E A L c . i, w y' l s 4 i o o be ,-+Cs . 7 00.teon.nuscuc i0 CD dLeo CEw.o oV RTNhy of
$c.,4g ou l ES 3') D 1 DG LNITik b 6e., net >3\E t> us59.E oot E
- witMemt C00m,K /T) ic.'.mR.opost. c=h6c eV At,t.ou p+m e {I o>
t W eQ.EISo c A$ K E.D Wit, t>ic.M iF H wi.
I[ m E W 4 * ""~$ 4 5 b ols @ w2 5 t.C po q ooD. to6,b Q.E5poobs;p
- 1
. w l vaERE M oc+ d t W o u 4 l o c.o ut.p o t A % C S m mp
'"TA W.8 p1t.*wEo Ah C.-4%+to OOC.Eth:>> e.:>s cc A<iO4:> M OV \cVo4.m @ 6o ( GQ
'?sviaLc{deW k:^) s. PA:4
Nput Auo a t:cMiViCh 5:x:o 'C ws ij 0 -Ec5i pswt.d.4 .
' t.gAAw L:::o go.r= %,4a.w\s.s. t.'> c
- f. 'm)ri.tr.noo tesob%sw WA wG ci Ab A up A %E . o V' -+ iM E ,
- b i13.itc.4 :M 4*o C.,"St(EC do y M C o115c4 t o
- TLEvN Act>
% G 4 M 5 tt N o o lt.Q E b MEJiE.+iC tr . . . . . .- . . . . . . - _ . . .
bMMAEM% M E 8 *V l'" bl r o GbERGE 6. Wb ibeNkiYlh ;
i
.k o ou, fwE. p9C o V. M E.b o i 5 s . W tW out 't5,5 *I c.-
. . t' o m oD141 GE.5 b ot . >'.t> - ..E- / Puft !
. t>s o eto dules/9C [ R Guport.K. , l
?"Tws 1!.yes u oe as A.h%+4 ses3c% c1r tbbs_.MEs+i ci (' A.\oo! '
.):De+ 13apr.p?lb 6 ME Ab tMAlbE 2:vAEbulEh w E W.T. !
;- . _ p R. N.4 0 4w LGM t*AQ . AJ"-(E P+A.4f.E . t #LStE R A. .
l ADDittoC A.\ Co b>cAE.R R M.lbEb IC. M A,to u +- !
'4WE 4 :>odt+i VE. ?_ C.oM M C L:ri6 m h,d u ,it,> % W4i b t:p.
i?. s 1:n c q. w o c.,.c h , !
" . _ _ _ .. ___ .449 ' (2i")i0& %utb .tCts4tw m ges,:>t-n.Asc 3,+ A4% c o +M is
. . . . . . . = _%14'G.. doe.+o % .. d.lo w.G.it.:t4 Eit.F Ae E witf+ E Lwc.4eic. A.L l i
. AC'P . et% .D isc. i ?. i.l.QEG.. (.coICK.5c.MEbolEb f4. ib 1 iw)Ev. A+ u s .k> Nws Wei.s e.om es 0+s. ;o ves+$... l i' .. _ . _ .
i .
A W o ..'T~o rt. . Act yta W / Ap t> c.o o c.v m.rt A p r E u.p). P S.
ScMNioV%
._ekOE. tRGt M't:>ltec.i:>liCes.M w w A.n 1oGEosr/.Poss4wy' Ei C:) Cot.6%% \ . . . . . .
Q C /. A,o D,. .R5Wo8LK_ A.DDR.3iBMG C). . o.
..Po4.eR.,C.bK')I.e.fto,.
. . . _I. . MGM ov- .. .
[
l l
g.; .
{~ ._
7 .
*9". . .. .
a .
e . .e=.
s W
.es s
1
_ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . ._ _ ___ _. m m_ _ . _ . _ _
-] {" p l .
c 6
8 7 T 6
I
- q f ~~"] "7 ."7 ' [ ' '
I r
9
- WIKE MILE POlpt DUCLEAe STATIow - UNIT 2 '
1984 *DywAMIC PESCENT COMPLETE PLAN
- PDOCSESS UPDATE - AUCUST 19, 1904 TOTAL CowSTRUCTIOW 1904 PLAw 1984 mostra ninEis M0wfM DEC 1983 8pCS$ 10,926.379 INCR4'VAW'(-) 18,926,379 cAS*(-) 19a4 Eml>runrn f AC 'taaf t 1984 Eure 27- fEifn 1tWEB -
19,686,846 VAR *(-) A.R.R. 19,22s,89e VAR *(-) C.R.R. ,
- f5 weekst files _elt At f 21 at erws CRf21 fc-at . na meue in_mt rt acup an_rt
} CompENT 3.Je 366,139 frInn rn reue sn- rt # F /nl i 8.32 te.963 3S8,157 (36,832) 47e,972 (128.015) 1.3679
' JApWasY CUM 1984 *
.3e 346,109 1.32 te.e63 464,177 (184,929) 1.3256 359,151 (16,932) 478,972 (128,815) 1.3679
* (1388.264 CUM TOTAL 72,08 19.292.568 72.el Jg,t(1 J L 226.136._116.9321 464,877 (114.9203 1.3256 2
Cuppset 1.03 403,498 2.Je s.47 6ee,42e 124,929 IL115 R.13.lRR9.2eZL I Ran.L 822,536 19_E92_9es felE_dett 1_e21&
i e FEsp0Apr COM 1984 3.21 e49,600 3.62 9.41 958,577 100,e97 (214.116) 1.3519 774,900 (164,560) 1.2730
* (1975.54% CUM TOTAL 74.71 19,776 e59 71.12 1,3el,50s (342,931) 1.3578 1,239,164 (2ee,547) 1.2927
- l 9.41 19_911.116 _lAS 897 CUseEw? 1.46 307.965 1.e5 e.39 23.188 15a sitassemi 1.asss ma_aan_e12 asat_anat t_aies i MApCw 4e9.333 182,268 697,511 (19e,17e) 1.4eSe COM 19e4 4.67 1,236,745 5.47 0.00 1,447,91e 640,849 (159.516) 1.3248 211,165 1,9e9,e10 (541,198) 1.3737
* (1374,944 CUM TOTAL 76.17 29.163.124 76.97 e.es 29.374.239 1,000,e11 (440,191) 1.3see CUSSENT 3.50 398,129 1.e5 211.155_ 21_675.ase #11sts7%1 1_es19 21.11s_m19 (742_sist 1_aise 1 APRIL 0.35 498,284 92,155 693,967 (282,783) 1.4836
' COM 1984 6.10 1,634,874 7.32 1.14 659.587 (160,883) 1.3443 (1375,994 CUM TOTAL 77,6m 29.561.253 70.02 _.1.14_ 1,935,194 303,320 2,602.e95 (743,091) 1.3930 2,547,098 (6e8.9e4) 1.3142 ,
CUppENT 1,77 20.e44.573 181.129 22.36e.931 f15313331 1,3721 e MAT 468,515 2.30 e.61 629.214 16e,699 732,722 (183,580) 1.1645 21_775 986 #911_1111 1_salf CUM 1984 7.95 2,383,309 19.63 2.65 2,814,932 711,543 784,386 (75,892) 1.1193 (1971.384 CUM TOTAL 79.44 21.029.768 82.13 2.69 21 111.311 711.543_
3,414,807 (599,375) 1.2131 3,251,494 (436,472) 1.155e '
CUSSENT 1.35 356,476 1.81 13.131.653 111693425 1_8111 22.4as 212 f71e_9e11 Jrat e.46 470,876 122,408 577,597 1_e14e
- f1171.915 CUM 1984 9.29 2.459,065 12.25 2.94 3,242,216 102,351 (98,721) 1.2962 3,992,483 (758,187) 1,2314 557,758 (78,882) 1.1647 Cun TOTAL 39.79 21.1e6.244 81 7s 2_95 22__ t SE.39s 7s2 1%1 21_K79_249 3,e89,161 (566,9453 1.1749 CUneEnt 1.21 323,3e2 1.62 f1stessen 1_s> 21_m17_949 JULY CUM 1994 10.51 2.181,167 e.41 429,226 107,924 576,126 (146,7ee) 1,3422 fant_17en t_m192 (1171.924 CUM TOTAL 02.09 21.787.546 13.93 3.43 3,6ee,499 9e7,332 4,568,529 (80s,e38) 1.2306 557,779 (128,553) 1.2995 CUSSENT 31.6) 1_41 22.614.373 _Je f . 311, 24,231,}13 Jigggeg73 1_g72s 4,346,940 (675,441) 1.1839 1.35 356.647 2.44
- AUGUST 8.99 645,e96 249,859 21_sts_7ea stas _afg1 1_ a g 1_g' CUM 1984 11.35 3,137,814 16.56 4.7e 4,302,583 1244769 762.973 (117,167) 1.1984 736,e82 (99,276) 1.1390 a
(1371.584 CUM TOTAL 03.35 22_064,193 RS.06 5.331,5e3 (940,928) 1.2165 CUORENT l.00 264,290 4.78 21_181.142 1241163_ 2 s _ a t a ,133 _112es312LL e 13. 2 5,103,e22 s _ n t _ a sa (728,439) 1.1644 i SEPTEMSEs CUM 1904 12.05 3,402,112 s t a22 anal LeaAs COM TOTAL $4.15 22.329 491 CUmpCwT e.92 243,700 __
OCTomte CUM 1984 13.77 3,645,012 CUM TOTAL 85,27 22.572.121 -
CURRENT e.97 256.466, ___
e povtMeta CUM 19e4 34.74 3,9ez,278 CUM TOTAL e6.24 22.e21,1)] 7 CURREWT 8.66 174,946 SECEneta CUM 1994 15.49 4,976,325 i rum Tavarm a& _9a 21_se2_7ai) i J
d 4 CUMULAftvt AOJUSTMENTS:
- paste t 25- A *
(1500 CUM & TOTAL CUM) WOTE: (1) 8e.83 Cumulattwe 7ercent Complete based on te,926,379 Total Earned
}
i Oltect Manheurs thew December ISS), calculated agelnet a base of MaY (ECwP) =
- 247,524 Mums (SWEC) 23,65e,000 Total Estimate Direct Manhowts, as shown in January.
JUw (eCwr) =
(51,592) Mwas (MULTsPLE) This Cwwwletive Percent Complete will adjust per wete (2) below.
JUL 8 DCwP) =
- 17,857 MNm5 (MULTIPLE) (2) 1984 Oynamic Planned and actual Percent complete will be calculet.
A9C inCwr) =
- 40,270 MMp5 (MULTIPLE) ed usin9 the respecttwe current month MOO I Estimate as follows:
45 Jaws 4 MOO 1 = 23,579.756 MN 35JULS4 MOD I = 26,317.e4e MN i
, 19FEtte MOO I -
25,054,529 MM *19AU6e4 MOO I = 26,47e,781 MW i leMAmet M06 1 = 25,25),933 MM 365Erse MOO I - As identlited i 15APped MOD I a 25,286,135 Mu 840CTe4 M03 1 - Ao 2eMAve4 MOD 1 = 26,546,133 MN Ident9 fled '
87JUW84 MOD 1 ISwovee MOO I
- As Identified
= 26,387,e54 MH 160EC04 NOO 8 - As identitled i
_ _ . - , . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ - - , _ _ _ . - _ . _ _ _ - . . _ ____.__-_-______ __.-_ --.__~ _ , _ - , - . . _ , - , . . , . . -- ._
_---a..---- .. . .. .. . . . .. . ..., _ __.
DIRECT PERFORMANCE BY CONTRACTOR j
(* DYNAMIC PERCENT COMPLETE) 1 AUGUST 1984
% CONTRACTOR _BCWS BCWP ACWP ECWP AE WALSH CONSTRUCTION CO. 9 59,992 37,829 i*
AI WILTSIE CONSTRUCTION 6,999 9 9 i i AP ITT GRINNELL I.P.I. 195,768 126,167 219,516 192,625 l AR JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. 37,899 24,962 51,969 '
,. AT L.K.COMSTOCK COMPANY 78,999 167,119 184,197
. AW SCHNEIDER POWER CORP. 9,360 31,933 31,933 i M2 SNYDER & MACKIN/SCHAFFER 1,813 2,363 2,363
-1 STONE & WEBSTER 73,973 292,994 188,938
'[ SUB-TOTALS 312,894 613,739 716,646 689,755
, AH CENTRAL CITY 1,431 278 278 AJ STACK 2,395 2,889 2,889 AK PLIMOTH FIREPROOFING 648 561 561 AN REACTOR CONTROLS, INC. 2,792 2,599 16,625 AQ INSULATION 12,894 972 972 AX GRINNELL F.P.S. (WATER) 487 1,794 1,794 BA TUSCARORA (PROT. DIKE) 4,970 2,568 2,568 BF CIVES STEEL CORP. 2,139 2,961 2,961 BM DOORS 597 8 9 BN GENERAL ELECTRIC (T.G.) 12,428 15,286 15,286 BQ MIR INSULATION 1,291 249 249
{
i, BT COOLING TOWER ELECTRIC BX GRINNELL F.P.S. (CO2) 9 178 1,883 29 1,883 146 CB R.R. TRACK - PHASE III 9 9 9 l- CF H.H.ROBERTSON 9 569 569
>t' CM PARTITIONS 49 9 9 CX GRINNELL F.P.S. (HALON) 9 9 9
,. DX FPW RADWASTE 427 392 392
- EM DOORS 12 9 9 t- EN METAL CLADDING 9 9 9 FM DOORS 258 9 9 GE PHASE II CIVIL 9 9 9 HE COOLING TOWER FLUME 727 0 9 HM ELEVATORS -
9 64 -
--64
,.. LM FLOOR FINISHES '132 9 9 i NM ACOUSTICAL CEILINGS 178 8 8 PM STEEL WALLS 9 9 9 SN RADI ATION SHIELDING 9 9 0
._ SUB-TOTALS 43,8M 32,9/6 46,327 46,327 ADJUSTMENTS 9 9 9 9 TOTAL DIRECTS 356,647 645,806 762,973 736,982 RATE RATIO 1.1814 (ACTUAL) 1.1398 (EFFECTIVE) t PERCENT COMPLETE - CURRENT MONTH 1.35 2.44 (181.98% OF PLAN)
. (
- PERCENT COMPLETE - CUMULATIVE 83.35 88.96 (+4.79)
- CURRENT MONTH MOD 1 BASE = 26,479,791 DIRECT MANHOURS
, NOTE: PERCENT OF DISTRIBUTABLES TO TOTAL HOURS WORKED = 26.68
_ CUMULATIVE ADJUSTMENTS: (BCWP) +48.278 (Mtif,T T ot.r rnWnartnoo
i
*06 yep a4 , 8iP.0'litf.1 MMOUR #[ PORI AUGU$I lfliee i
l
... .......... . ~ ....... - ...... ~ . . ~ ..... .... _ ... - .. - .. - . - .....................
- MSCAlPl!CNS : : Ct M C AL l C RMAWAL MMUAl, MWAL : 1014L NRS. : TG1AL NRS. :10TAL RAW 4:101 N0hMN :
- : : $1.hR$. : DI.HR$. : $1.NR$. : Of.ht$. : FCA a stM : 10 H it : Mas.10 Catt :HR$.!0 cal [:
( :. .....
- ..:. ........:.. . ..:...~.. . :.. ..: ~... - : .
' :sutC Lale Iw:t ut:-: 175,810 : 32,448: 26t,112: 35,021 : 513,011 : 13.130.031 : 6,717,722 : 6,412,301 :
- $wCC LA30R FOC :..: 46,728 11,301 : 545 ! 0: 58,622 1,652,541: 67,480 : 1,545.101 :
r ! : : : : : : : 67gsa fo: :
j lWAL5H COM512. Co. l At: 7,472 : 312: 146,213 : 10,t11 : 164,988 : 12,591.605 : II,7tt,143 : 7tt,742 :
lli ER!hNELL P!Pt !AP: 73,787 19,806 i
{
,, 110,297 : 52,617 : 336,507 : 10,358,678 : 7,670,640 l 2,600,03t : !
l : : : : : : : : : l I
lL.E.CDR$f 0CK lA1: 21,t77 : 4.419 ! 158,214 : 43,627 : 228,387: 4.411,631: 3,108,146 : 611,485 :
$/M/S :nt: tit : 73 : 16,556 : 3,002 : 20,519: 1,003,811: 939,398 : 64,413 :
l : :: : : : : : : : :
- $CHMilttA P0vtR lAv: 3,227 : 517 1 24,887 : I,740 37,371: 555,633: 476,539 : 7f,094 :
, i : ! ! ! : : : : :
, !JOHMSON CORTROLS lAR: 17,513 : 5,693 : 43,119 13,217 : 79,612 : 725,138: 455,844 l 269,214 :
, ttACTOR C0xiROLS lAM: 2,547 : 408 14,878 1,747 : 19,5!0 l 275,568: 218,216 : 57,352 :
- i. :6.E.- TURI.5(N. :lN: 1,740 246 : 13,403 : 1,tts : 17,2'?l 273,464l 234,958 : 18,506 :
lCivt$ STL. IlF: 504 ; 29 : 2,061 : 0: 2,594 : 502,137: 431,771 : 70,346 :
f~ : : : : : : : : :
!N.H.RDB(RT$CN !CT: 01 0: 561 : 0: 541 : 63,271: 61,831 : 1,448 : '
,. : : : : : : : : : l l
- PtlROUTH R651. AK: 160 1 0 560 0: 720: 38,602: 34,400 : 4,202 :
Q :2u i p.
- M: 0:
0:
0:
0:
0:
m,m :
!a ,e20 :
57,350 :
[ : :: : : : : : : : :
; lCINTRAL Clit ROOF lAN: 0: 0 278 : 0l 271: 13.581: 13,581 : 0:
l l
. lA.A.tIA5t[Y lAt: 0: 0: 1,052 : 0: 1,052: 1,!57: 7,812 : 545 :
- 0IAM0KD Pvt :ll: 36 0 : 0 240 : 0: 600 : 600 240 : 360 :
- TilSCARORA ilA: 640 : 0! 2,568 i o: 3,208: 31,962: 26,983 : 4,971 :
- stileELL TP-H2O lA!! 320 : 0: 1,714 0 2,114: 43,582 : 36,147 : 7,4;5 :
, :GRltitELL FP-C02 :ll: 0: 0: 146 : 0: 146 : 14,320: 13,149 : 1,171 :
!$ttle CLL FP H4 CR :CI: 0: 0: *0: 01 0 3,251: 2,6ft : 553 :
- VltlIE FF.tv l11: 0: 0: 392 : 0: 3t2 3,208: 2,600 ! 600 :
!NAUENT0s [LCVAf04 :MR: 0: 0: 64 : 0: 64 : 4,131 : 4,131 : 0:
- PULLMAk Pat ;&J: 400 : 2,889 : 0l 3,369: 12,667:
0 10,147 : 2,520 :
lRANDALL EL..CL TWR:lf: 0: 8: 1,833 0: 1,883 : 7,388 : 7,343 : 40 :
.. IntTAL CLA03!R$ :ts: 0 0: 0: 0: 0: 11,936 : 15,400 : 3,536 : j
- DAVIS Ft1CN lIM: 0: 0: I: 0: 8: 834: 134 : 0:
CA$1ALCO lAt: 200 : I: 1,855 : 0l 2,063: 31,142: 30,020 : 1,922 :
16tKES Alt CCND. lUl: 0 0: 596 : 0:
- Sf6 : 6,3t5 : 6,3t$ : 0:
!!NACT/C09. CCNit.:-: 0: 0: 0 0: 0 2,417,945: 2,067,416 : !!0,529 :
- TOTAL FOR At6-Itti : 354,433 : 75,338 : 8tl tt! : 170,t!: : 1,415,677 :
e : : :
.. :CUnUL JULY.ltl4 l11,214,504 l1,451,633 : 30,314,110 l4,103,001 47,163,159 : : : :
,g :Cuaut AU6 Itti :11,648,f 31 l1,526,171 : 31,209,801 4.273,924 : 48,65tc635: 41,65t,615 : 35,483,725 :13,175,t:0:
, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . - ...... _ ... .... . - . ....................
.L.
[ICLUDCS: lativies: TOTAL PROJECT PMHOURS 4/15/84 ($flMf(
f !! J.0. Ic. 1282$ ll latichargen RAWAL (INCLL' ($ Afl & CONilkS(R0!!$141,788,3t$
u a . . m . .: .,,,, suc -. , nam e ue.
e - . _ .
el:8 RILL Polgt euctata statles . Ost? 2 """
" sucefut? Patcent*Cs OP I 1
D.ISTRIDOfAats mocas to to?A.L noess __ !
h m u... .
F 35.. .
I { . 34..
34.. . I 1
. 31..
n... . = 34..
\ n... . l i .
" n....
n.. . . l n...
n.. .
; .p e. u"."........j....
n..
n....
2,... .
.......v.___ v .:....:. . . . . . ./. .:..
22...
,n ..
. n...
c
~ 24... . 8
' . ti...
23.. . e.WINft8 '...'1*l = 24...
22... l 19 1 l 23...
l *= W2 I NT.t t..
Pt3Clut -
i
~
i '.l.' . 22...
PlattNT se eveie ..
JAN IFt.l MAR I'APR lRAf lJUN l*JULlAUC l'stP l OCT l 80V l'Otc l 'l weete e+ . e k sia s a. sn! e s_ sea! e n e e. ...s e i e .et t e e ass i e,e e ! .e, >., i s.a e ss ess pis m .6 asses _
4.,,* e j ,ei n s t i - A s a t t tJ n ro ,w ,.. i s tw s es ned. s p e,a .. e 6J s . 4 6 *.*. * .e * -s $*
- oisme ei cu, s a. u , a s 't t 3 *. 9, i H. #9 e 2,. 6 3 i a.o .4 9 12 9. ,
- i t v.7 'i i k P.
- 9 14 9. tr ! P=. s a i 30. s F
- r. 34.. . e 35.. . 8 l . 36...
8 34.. . 35.
. l l . 34. .
- 33. .
- 32. .. *.. .
g i
I
. 3 32...
- 3. .
31.,... .
,, , . , e,.e n.m. .e s.s.et.e.i . . . _ _ _ _ ., t_ _ _ _ . . .. 31..
;;.;; .:.e u u . . . . ..;_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . .:
n... . . l
. ,,3 ;;.;; . n..
n.
- t. 25. .
. n...
n... .
. . 25...
t n.
- 22. .
.i.n n..n. :i . . , : .-i ., n . . n..
i n..
PttCta? 2.. 3 . 22.. !
,. PERCtwT I. g- eis, sis se lJhulFH l MAR l'AP8 lMAY lJUwl*JULlAUC l'Itt l OCT lBOV l'Ottl'lweeks
. e . a o ,ss e a. . su. s i ,s. ses i . n. *ss e ,a * *s' . .,. s
, , , . . .. t . rs e . ... .ev i,.. s** !,u e s , # . e s sea.
'A Mu rt e.a tes !'s 3*
- uea ts,iert s s t e r.'ses .e ws . s rs ta .se e.4,s.a_ * *, i es',s e eu.. n.c a., ise s at , s. I ke
- t. 3 is. ,g t a s. ss ,4.. sa. 6 g g. 72 , a s. no I a . 6.2 , 73.9 2 i t s. s v l a s..? iss.~.8T"
[
34... . '
' 35.. . I . 34...
l 8 . 35..
34.. .
t 33.. . I . 34...
32.. . ' e . 32..
3 32...
3,1.
29... .
t H.s.a a.e.s .e s.t.t ; .o . . . . . . .. ' . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . _ _ _;I'....... . _ _ _ _. . 3,1.
3,, ,. .
e e . 2..
2....
n...
.... e l . 33,,..
3 I
l n... . --
' t
, ., n..e.
2 .
( -.5...
4.4 . . ,s ..
8 W
.*
- 2 6 . . t.
25..
2 3. .. ..
22.. .
wipits '.2.'.3.* I t
l..);'l g o.wt ut.ta. ..
= 24.
- 23. .
22....
F ptactar? e '.3.* 4 PttCtu?
L si st e ie .am. JhslFttl'
,.e.,e s i, .s t MAR lAPRl MAT l'JUN lJULlAUCl'$tP lOCTl90Y l'Ottl85weets me s ta ..ie *
- a i s-? tea id es. i to isss 6e t an m .6 . .. ,i n i e _ ., 6..,.., - ,.. : n. .e,i 8.. .
~u.s t es,e ..e ce t.ra.u .9 i,fs .se
,$e ' w..t*uatt i t
- e, I e s s v e i s n.c as' au .a i P- 14.17i15.*7 125.9' lab.14 17. 5062. 42 lif. E 123.o'o 2 6 6 6 its.22 7*.97 f.. D 1
. e,.
ic es, yet gess all d h.46 !de. M ide.6did$.6, $2J. 6 j e dd6 2 3. idi.,5 IJ 7.e.J e { t { l P * * * *C 3 5 . . . . #
34.. . 3, . 35...
33... . l t . 34...
I . 33...
n.
3 ... s. .
- 32. . .
- . .I 8
- 32..
. i
. n..
n..
- . .... .... . . 4. ..... ........ ,,,
2,... .
. 2,...
L. '
r !!:::
u..
- .. 'N
- s. : u.
i n..
- n. ..
P t DClut
., n n . . 4 - ,
, I n.. l l
, . i n. n. . .. n..
n..
L ' '
Ptattut JAu
*ttel MAR lAP. l' MAT l JUN l JUL l' ADC l StP lCCT lep09 lDEC 'l weets o n ,s i e seen i ts 24, 4 4 9t e . t. '.N.e e40 m. a i.
#% e .* i e te_ esi .Ja s; pg ,
m .6 u e su es (er. ++d SM eS vi tee > M w_en d es 3 d fi i e .* s **I . ](tp=Me 1.9 I # s& s.
469d*d*.6- 25 83139. I #6 63 e F eistese peerset J g.de 4 h4-6 t
g
- -m r " ' I ' *
- I y s
( 1 [ ] f L.K. COM570CR .0MPAKT - NM72 1984
- DYNAMIC PERCENT COMPLETE PtAN PSOCSESS UPDATE - AUCUST 19, 1984 L,K. COMSTOCK COMPANY lhe4 PLAN 1984 1:ApMED DieECTS 1984 ExprunED f arvisar t 1934 Exprenrn (ErrECTIVEt MOWTN DEC 1983 ;3pCat 2,20s,22e INC99 VAR *[-) 2,2ee 27e VAR *(-) 2,311,les VAp6(-) 4.R.R.
e f5 weenst (1966.1et Al f 21 B1 Scut Ct121 fr-at nn new, fD-Rt en acup 5/A VAR *(-) E.R.R.
in.rt fr/nt rt rrwe in-rt f r /nt CumpCw? 2.es Te,ees 2.56 e.15 1se,te6 6,186 1e7,174 (2.98ep 1.e2e7 w/A N/A N/A JANUART CUM 1984 2.41 98,999 2.56 S.IS Ie4eIe6 0,Is6 107,174 (2,90s) 1.e207 i
* (1766.let COM TOTAL e4 2.378.27e 10.50 9.15 w/A W/A N/A 2.104.45i 6.186 2.411,111 (33 1261 1 e142 m/h m/A m/a CuppCNT 128,880 e
. 4 1 2e 1.14 174,292 46,292 175,685 (1,393) 1, sees N/A N/A FEeRUAPT CUM 1984 5.55 226,989 6.04 1.29 27s.47s 52.478 w/A
- 2e2 e59 (4,381) 1.s157 m/A w/A (1104.294 CUM TOTAL fl.57 7.586.27s iliti 1.29. 2.550.741 %2_473 _ 2_%91.967 #1%_7191 t_stia y/A CumaswT 2,58 182,e90 n/a M/a ufa 3.46 8.95 140.669 3e.66e 14e.4el (e,921) 1.9579 w/A MADCN 0 CCM 19s4 e.e6 320,988 te.to 2.85 411,34e e3,34e 431,54e w/A y/A
* (1168.274 (2s,2ee) 1.si11 w/A w/A CUM TOTAL 4.se 2.600.279 66.13 2.e5 2.691.61e __11.14e 2_742,11a _tst_ stat 1_s19s m/A CUnaENT (1.4e 101,999 3.39 e.91 13s,918 37,918 m/a u ra u fa i 152,969 (14,951) 1.1083 Arnst CUM 19e4 to.54 429,888 13.58 2.95 549,35e 12e,35e See,5e9 w/A N/A W/A
* (1368,294 (35,151) 1.e64, afA w/A CUM TOTAL 66.56 7.799,27e 69 12 2.96. 2.029.628 _12a.151_ 2.e95.617 .f6%.9891 1_s711 w/A CUmptNT 2.97 321,see 3.92 m/a M/a y/g_j e.95 159,7e5 3s,7*5 179,732 (19,947) 1.1240
- MAY CUM 19e4 13.51 550,989 17.42 3.91 7e9,143 159,143 m/A N/A w/A
- 764,241 (55,898) 1.8777 m/A f1156.let CUM TOTAL 69.53 2.039.27a 73.44 3.91 2.989.413 149.141 w/A w/A 1.e75 149 fas.9161 1_e2a7 m/A m/A u/a CURRENT 2.21 98,988 3.se e,79 122,974 32,874 142,967 JUNE (2s,093) 1.1782 w/A N/A CUM 1984 15.72 648,ess 28.42 4,7e e31,217 191,217 9e7,288 w/A fil56.let cum Torat 71.74 (75,991) 1.8914 w/A w/A 2.928.27a 76.44 4_7e 1_t11_4e7 19t_?t? 1_?ta_11E flee _a791 1_m141 w/A i CURRENT 74,ees m/A m/a n/a 1.82 3.96 1.24 124,416 59,416 141,0e5 (17,469) 1.1484 s
- JULY CUM 19e4 17.54 714.988 23.40 5.94 955,633 241,633 ,
W/A N/A N/A 1,849,093 (93,460) 1.e973
!* (1156.924 COM TOTAL jLlill 2.994.27e 79.53 5.94 1.215.981 231,633_ _3.36E.231 g/A w/A y/A CUtaENT 1.92 ft24_29at t_ sine m/s u/m
; 70.see 4.le 2.19 167,119 s9,119 104,107 (16,9ee) 1.1816 m/s AUcus? CUM 1984 19.46 792,988 27.5e 8.12 1,122,752 N/A N/A N/A
- 330,752 1,233,20e f1156.e25 CUH TOTai ?S.43 _3.972.21e 83.6o _e 12 1_ del,122 11m_7s?
(110,440) 1.ete4 m/A y/A y/A CuppENT 1_ t 4 4 _ taa tiet_7ast i_ sets 1.23 58,000 ufa - u fa . mfa SEPTEMeta CUM 19e4 28.6e e42,ese CUM TOTAL 76.71 3 122 27a
, CUARENT I.23 Se,ses j OCTosta CUM 1984 21.91 892,008 CUM TOTAL 77,93 3.172.27e
- CUppENT 1.52 62.see .
- WOVEMaEs CUM 1984 23.44 954,988 f CUM TOTAL 79.46 3.234.27e [;
i CUsmENT Go,see I" 9.9e CECEMsta CUM 1984 24.42 994,ees I; CUM TOTAL es.44 1_274.27e l' pas eet 25-8 '
8 CUMULATIVE AOJUSTMENTS
- WOTE: (1) 66.18 Cumulattwe Percent Complete based on 2,200,27e Total Earned (1984 CUM & TOTAL CUM) Direct Manheurs thrw December 1983, calewlated a9ainst a base of i
MAR (NCwP) = ( 7,790) MNR5 ),449,924 Total Estimate Direct Manhours. as shown in January.
This Cumulattwe Percent Complete will adjust per wete (2) below.
s j
i (23 1984 pynomic Planned and Actual Percent Complete will be calculet-ed ustn1 the respective current month MOO 1 Estlaate as follows: * '
15 JANE 4 M00 1 = 3,449,924 MN 15JULs4 N00 1 - 4.07e 4e8 MN 2
19 Fesse MOD I - 3,728,5ee Mu *19AUGe4 N00 1= 4,e78,400 MN .
teMAmed MOO I - 3,703,324 MN 16sErse MOO 1 - As Identitled '
15APme4 Moo 1 - 3,7e2,324 MN 140CTe4 MOD I = As identified (
2eMAYe4 MOD l = 4,eSe,54e MN leNOVs4 MOO I - as identitled e 17 JUNE 4 MOD I = 4,ess 54s MH 16DECet MOO I . As identitled ,
it i,
._e c 7r - --
(q O V
~ . , , , e-- , -,, I g -r- ( -~~r y --' fm ( 1 s s s .
aa *4 i. . t . . ConorOct i,84 PERroRnANcr oAvA AB ,nt ,. ! ,,,,4 I .._.... . _ _ _ . . . ...... .___..._._.._ __..___._-_ _ ._-. ___ __........__..._.__ ._--_-__.. __. .... _.......
8 I
I t CONTRACT Tf) D4f[ t CURRENT FTRfDO 3 8
8 I
. I I i 1 .--___..._ ......... ._..- ._..--________.---.-. --- ...---..------..g.----_----...-- =__ __=
! I 8 I 2 8 3 8 4 5 6 7 I 9 9 I
4 8 8 8 8 30 t II I 82
- t----.-----1.----.----8.---------l----------l----------l---------l--- -
-t =
-I=- --
-g..----.-t--------t t I 3/1/93 8 Cur r en t I Schedule 2 Actual 8 Earned ISchadule a Pudget 35chedseles Acto : 1 Earned 85chedulet fs.dget !
8 8 Estemate I M00 s I titCWS t t (ACHPs I s taCWP D fvertence svarlance I e f=CWS p I (ACWPB 8 EDCWP3 IVertencesvartencet t--------*t----------t-----.----t------- --S----------t.--------- ---------l------~~-t-- -l--------l--~~~---l---~~---t---~~~. 1
! I ! ! ! I t ! I 8 8 8 I t
! ElRECTS s2.as3.343 84 orie 4..e : N/A 23.544.See 13.403.922 I I4/A 2t848.2069i N/A 3804.907 3867.589 8 N/A 8456.9998I I I t 8 8 8 8 i B I I I t.-.... __ I..--__.--.!__.._.....g... ......t_.-----..,3-....--.--g-..------C.--------g.------ 3- ---.. 3--------3...-----8.......-t I ! ! ! I I f 8 1 1 8 8 I i
! C IST h i teS 3 226.564 3 247.452 I N/A I 246.626 1 225.375 8 N/A 3 428,46898 N/A B $6.527 8 9.000 8 N/A I (9.53703
- I I I I i i t I 8 8 8 8 g..... .-.al.. _----._g..........g---._--.--g.------.-.5---- -----g--......--g.-~.-----g--------g-------.g-n------g--------t~._-----g i i I t ! I I I I 8 8 8 8 8 9 TOTAL 82.937.703 84.337.86o I N/A $ 3. 79a s,94 4 33.629.597 i N/A 8(362.7473i N/A 12OO.644 8875.889 8 N/A 8425.52588 I I I I I I I I 8 I I E I I 1 4
!==========I==========t==========3==========t==========f==========8=========t=========t========3========t========t========g========3 I
I t I
I t i
CONTRACT TO DATE e 8 CURRENT PERIDO
! ' 3 I g I
i.____...___-_...._-..--_.._-____.__--__-._________..__.___..______.g.._________-_-___.___-_-____I3____ =._-___.--..,
t t t I .
i i t i i t t I C t i t 8 I I t i I I l' t BEY Estimate IEstimates % 8 Pl anened I Actual 8 f Pudget 3 Actua18 I Dudget I Actual ! Unit 8 Unit I Rate I Curr ent s unit IActual 8 Earned B 8 IDudgett B B
- j. '
!!NDICATORSS Ouentity IManhourstCompt i Otsent6ty I Duantity I (PCWP3 I (ACWP Rate a note BRatio IOuentatys mate StACuPS t e tom t I t I t I i I e I I e I t i I s I t..........t_.._-..-.3-..._.._3..----t.__....-_-3--...---...-------t-...----l---------.3-----t.----~~-8 3-------l-.-----t
! I ! 8 I t t I I 8 8 8 8 I I 3 f.C.C.P. I I I I I I I e a t e 8
- CAltt.E 19.4n3.903 8 6 6 9. 8 84e 568.59 8 5. 67(e. 4 45 8 4,954.e.e35 1488.*123 84&e.942 t e s. e =83 30.n95 II.839 8298.038 89.077 338.40s 822.448 8 863400-34608 8 8 I 8 3 t ! I 8 I ,
IC303-442698 8 I I I e 3 : 3 I I I e t 3 3........--3...--...--3........t...___g-_...._.--g._...___--t---------l--------I----<-I------l------t-- --I----~~t-------l--'----t t I I I I 2 3 3 I I I I t i 1 2 e f.C.C.P. ! : : : 1 1 : 8 3 I I TCRn8MA I 276.66* I I R3. t s.e4 14**.38 I 363.979 8 184.008 3 74. hts 332n.746 30.649 83.828 88.726 3 33.772 30.626 BI4.9a5 t R.629 t If3500-35998 I I B t 1 i ! 1 I I I I I I 305U3-459988 ! l 8 I I i t 3 I I I I t I t..--------8.---------t--------t- .--t=.---....t......--.-t--------3--------t-----.3------t------3--------l------t-------t-------!
- a i I t : I I 3 I 3 I I 3 1 e 1 g I CONDUti 1 ! 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I I I t
$C853-4089 n40.736 3745.748 302.52 8 670.927 8 697.703 8 6 3 5 . 3fl3 ! a l l . l e *=. t a s. 902 3 (e. R 76 t o). 99 3 8 24.033 88.394 136.956 133.272 2 3 2 ! I t ! I I i 1 2 3 8 I 8 3 t I t t 3 8 I 3 I t ! I t t t {
E!Et RlLt PO!W1 rWCLtas 8 TAT 103
- uilt 2 stees222.s L.e. Com8f0Cp CO. e sti Im01 CAT 008
~
AC*UAL 8&ft 8Atl0 1994 OU1NTl?T 2:8t&LLattou lt S1pC ACwP)
AND BAtt BAtle PteFoemANCE L a t . 8 86 t left l C ASLt Put.48 I thr) P LA N u t9 0... . .O.. . . 0.....O 8 4.17 8.14 8 LF e ACTUAL - -
l l
L-e '
4.584.009 4.202.999 1.520.000
. ** .a **,,4
. 4,lle.ete 4.202. egg 3.438.000
- 3.tle.see
, 3.056.000
, ,,# * * . p . 3. 4 n.0 8 0 2.614.006 .
. 3.054.e0s 2.292.008
- a * *
- s> * * , , # *
- 2.614.ett
. 1.918.466 .
**.o='**,. U .'e'.'.'ve T . Y M'
**'=.***w'=*
. 2.292. sos
. 1.91 889 n.in.een 1.146.006
.:":"*'". ~ ;a ,r . 1. lle . e n n4....
., .n.,ae sse m . . 1.146. 6 4 e m en. 4. r.e.a
.. .. e.a. . il4.p .
1 n2.m .
n;";;s,;;n ov;;l . nl. n y e,
-. e Cum LF '
JAu 'FIS MAe App Cum Lt
' MAT JUN JUL 'AUC 8tP OCT *WOY lOttI*$weets r .n....,,,, ,,....m.... n,oso.. .u.., sa,a r u s.. nu,, n , .n us ,r. . o._ .. a n ., ,, e ter w.6 ee .. , e n t..op!Aso.orat 18?s vets s*be e n *,1 .'***6 ! *13?
a .. e n . .c s . . . . e. my o u,,a sa%sanmaroes) son no) H o. 9 w at .s0 te <. tn)s CAsht pWLt8 . _
{ t matt e ATIO) cue eATC eA?10 0.... 0.... 0.....D Cum eAft s&tto - - -
l
1.Ieee . ......................................................................... .
l.1980 . 4 1.0ea4 1.6800
. 1.1988 p.***,e......c'*,.
- 1.6888 f 1.5003 1.4800 1.3000 a
1.1880 1.4 ele b --
1.2003 .
. 1.3 set 1.ltes .
. 1.290s 1.4004 . *..". . 1.184e I. 4.1448 .
- 1.seet 4.8888 .
. . tees
- l. 8.16s4 .
. 8. toes
. e.itse 0.4gg3 ACT se . ......................................................................... . 0.6888
ACT se lJAu l'Ftp RAI '
API ' mat JUN lJUL *AUCl8tP lOCT 'MOV Ott 'l weete
\ n . . . ., . . , e u . . . ,..,.. ,,.... e., ..,,, . . . , . n . . s ,, . . , , , ,
44 .cv 6 e ns m.,s uvie ! e. t s, I s. t , s.ith e.tse s.26* t. 3ee l!. J / r. f D i 1
Caskt itess .
ttA) PLAum to 0.... 0.... 0....
{- ACTUAL* -
0 *192.S49 tA 192.608 .*
*
- 192.688 I
til.nle .
o **, 4 - 116.158 140.109 .
j 144.458 . 4*,,.4***...,
- 169.580 144.458 128.484 112.350
. .*,..b',,. . 129.49e
. 111.358 16.380 89.258
*a*.**p "e r.+'.". . u.:" 6 **, **. m n** . 96.380 64.208 . .*,** .* . m e esw
****'***'*"*'*.**n*o
.. . 3e.Ile 44.250 L* i l .1 H 32.10e cm.m r v.
r e rs m . a sa.ua ce.
- 88+II8 ac,ns on ee.no . -9).198 16.gle nauses.s :
me. seecaw, s es .t,e e . 16.958
' us . nn i Cum LA '
Cum tA m.. e..
JAu
'Ftt RAI API ' mat JUN l jut 'SUC 8tr CCTl*wcv Otc 'l wen s n .. .., ..,,, ,..., ,,,,.,...,8 acvs.6 ,. . ,n
. . . . . . , , , , . ,,, e., ,,..,
. . e e ..c a . .. .
. ,, s ts
, es 4*e e ess 3.64s " #69 A9w .
aw r1 fit e set (o. s m !. e.e y(s s e a) is son) le t.*) bl. Sos)s ce e.s>
' \
L e A... tte ,
toAtt 4Atle) Cup IAtt #Att0 0.... 0.... 0.... 0 Cum 8 Aft 84f10 ^
r* 1.II89
. . .......................... 3.s. A ...................................... . 1.aeoe
.o.... ,,..*
1.1964 1.6069
. Ar*,
. % ..**C . 1,1ees 1.1940 . .
- 1.4s0.
1.4000 .
. 1.less
,. 1.3908 .
. 1.eees
. 1.3 pop 1.2050 .
I i.ute .
. 1.2000
%. 1.8000 .
. i.i e
= 1.s8se r 4.9006 0.8089
. 8.9ete
/ e.ne.
. 8 stes t.6000 . lese L Act et . .............................**.......................................... . 0.6e00 6CT 88 Jam ' rte nas APs 'm&T JUN JUL *AUC 8tP OCT 'mov Otc 'l weeks 4c3...., e.'s u s ,
- s. ,r2 e d ee /.499 /. 6 W 8 74J r"* e dce i. 7se 6 7JJ
, %....ee,e... f.,,3 a. # ,A s. set e. f W a.4 7 7 e. a s s s.est i.669 l
w
. . . . . . .. - -- - ~ . - - w.
5858 AILt P31WT puCLt&B 8tition . U31? 2 L.A. C 0 8 f 0C E CO. = Rtt Ir01CAteel esteel22 3
+
(CtWAL s Att # Atl0 1994 OUhutiff Im8?ALLAT10m IVilleC ACwt)
AkD BAtt R ATIO PtercamAwCt LBC.$nt left
- lConDUlf .
l tLP) P L A u s -t0 0. .. . .o. . .. .o.. . . .o
- 2 4 4 . 9 9 9 t r ACTUAL 249.000 = '
228.258 *. 249.00s
(
# * ,,..o 20s.500 .
220.238 106.150 144.000 287.190 106.159 145.219
~,.* # ...* .
164.400 124.164 . w. ,.. m . ,, ..
181.218 s w w++ a 103.719 .
124.les
***4'E's .au .'7C','
03.000 . .,
103.750 n,2 . u n vu i.. .
- 03.e0
.rv en. v...m .,u.e
- c. 41.5.3 .
u-u .25.0 20 ,5 .
,T.
.e .J..n::,
o.m L CVR SA
. . i n ,, .
- n. tie O
Cup IA
~
J JAu 'rtl MAR APS ' rat JUN JUL 'AUG 8tP CCT 'pov Otc ** weets
~*u..sm eesen n sa w 8.s 000 ti,eec 21 **
- t ues now 6 es.. vin , a_ ,.. f t e, ,
- t! eoo re aeo floao 10 000 ** m t * *0e rit ado
## sit n ess !Je ts u _ , ._e <
- en <* eu i seensete ee.e
- (a s M toft ers sta i(a *ct)_ 993 s e %S l g es3 s ConDUlf I IRAt; RATIC) cup RAtt 3At!O C.....o.....o...A.o f CVR SAtt 94730 - -
(~ l.
1.,00ee 006 . . 1.eaee 1.6800 . . 1.1033 b.5088 . . 1.430s 1.4899 . . 1,50ge 3.3006 . . 1.4 pts 1.2988 . t . 1.3930 1.1004 1.0980
, A * * . o . * * * @ * * * * * ? * * * * "> " "
1.2989 3.1000 I 9.9008 -
. 1.8003 If
', 0.0000 . . 0.9999
- t. 8.1988 . . e.gege 9.4099 f~
ACT RR . ......................................................................... 8.19g0 e.ltet JAN 'rtl M9 Act 33
'
- lAPR l' rat JUN JUL 'AUC '
StPlOCT l*WOV Stt *$ weeke i
k tesesseo use usee sco euvi.e use uva, o,t.c _ o. ore
,. t .c i .~ e,
- s. o c . o. e e s o. os,
- w. !,.s n (,.cc r, o y f, ,,.3 o.o s s
,,ce,
,,,9e ,
6 M/A s
6 . .
L. . .
h .P -- e
. g r
L i l u. rt. A. lA,. i..A, , U ,, m .AU, ; ,,, i o,, .,,, , ,,, :,,,,,,
I
{ t e . -
I I f* L
- i i i w u/A
- : l
. j
. . . I
\
r
.s L
- u. :.,t. ... A,, :..A, ,U. m .AU, ,,, ,,, . . , , ,,,
l
. FL~
p g I, .i j f _ _1 7 t I -
j i f-] -
g [ ;
l +
ITT CQINNELL 1.P.I. - NMP2 1984 *OYNAMIC PERCENT COMPLETE PLAN PROGRESS UPDATE - AUCUST 19, 1984 ITT CalNNELL I.P.I. 1984 PLAN 1984 EARNEO OspECT5 1984 EMPCNDED (ACTUAL) 1984 EXPEh0ED (EFFECTIVE)
MONTH DEC ida) INCat 3,921,361 EWCRt VARe(-) 3,921,361 VARe(-) 4,988,639 VARei-) A.m.m. 4,359,592 vAme(-) E.a.m.
< f5 weekst (1174.99% I' A I f 21el OCUS Cl f 21 (C-Al D1 DCWP fD-al El ACWP (D-El (E/DI r) ErwP (0-P) M70)
CuanENT 2.Se 1J2,386 a.54 (i.eSt 78,610 (53,76e) ist,185 (1s2,4s7) 2.3836 JANUAny CUM 1984 2.Ys 132,386 1.54 78,618 166,389 (87.691) 2.115e (1.55) (5),763) 181,194 (182,486) 2.3s36 166,3e9 (87,691) 2.1154 (t)?e.ses . CUM TOTAE 79.16 4,e5),747 7s.it (i.est a)999,W49 (5),76el 4,989,734 (9e9.755) n.2474 4,516,9el (516,922) 1.1292 CuanENT ).81 195,188 3.40 te.33) 177,99e (17,11e) 327,921 (149,9313 1.e424 20s,372 (102.182)
< PrepuApr CUM 1984 6.4e 327,494 5.68 (1.30) 256,6es (70,e86) 1.5752 589,e25 (252,417) 1.9837 446,601 (19e,873) 1.74s7 (1775.4Lt CUM TOTAL 82.97 4.248,855 sl.59 (1.)s) __4.177.969 (78.ess) 5.117.655 (11394s6) 1,272e 4.197.273 (619.3s4) 1.14s2 CUmpTNT 2.69 137,56) 2.70 e.81 138,292 719 26),191 (124,9s9) 1.9933 224,52e MAaCp CUM 1984 9.es 465,857 7.71 (1.37) 394,498 (78.167) 772,21= (177,326) 1.9555 (36,246) 1.6237 (1975.421 CUM TOTAL 05.66 671,2e9 (276,319) 1.6997 4,386,419 84.29 (1.37) 4,316,251 (78,167) 5,58e,846 (1764595) 1.2938 5,821,001 (7e$,558) 1.1635 CURAEur 2.74 148,157 2.14 (0.6e) 109,499 (38,6973 261,3s8 (151,898) 2.3873 227,408 (117,915) 2.877e APRIL CUM 1984 11.52 6s5,244 9.85 (1.97) 584.300 (180,064) 1,833,694 (529,2?4) 2.8492 898,617 (394,237) 1.7816 (1775.421 CUM TOTAt 88.40 4,526,6e5 56.43 (1. 9 7) 4,425,741 (195,e64) 5,842,234 (141649)) 1.320e 5,249,299 (82),469) 1.1861 CusMENT 3.13 162,650 2.59 te.59) 132,685 (38,845) 225,851 (93,276) 1.7834 e MAY CUM 1984 197,46$ (64,868) 1.4891 15.se 767,894 12.44 (2.56) 636,9e5 (139,989) 1,259,485 (622,588) 1.9773 1,096,982 (459,897) 1.72si (1)75.424 CUM TOTAt 91.57 4,609.255 09.87 (2.56) 4,558.346 (130,909) 6.e68.115 (1589769) 1.3312 5,446,674 (ese,32s) 1.1949 Cus>ENT 2.12 190,59e 1.66 (0.46) SS,22e ( 2 3,3 7e) 164,582 (79,274) 1.9391 JUNE 144,663 (59,435) 1.6974 CUM 1984 17.12 876,492 14.le (3.e5) 722,211 (154,279) 1,42),9s7 (7e1.734) 1.9717 1,248,745 (518,532) 1.7189 fil76.961 _ CUM TOTAf. 93.69 4.797.853 98.69 ._(3.11] 4.643.574 f154.279) 6.232,617 (1589943) 1.3422 CUnpENT 5.591,337 (947,76)) 1.2 eel 1.85 94,772 1,15 (8.78) 58,859 (35,913) 155.619 (96,768) 2.6439 137,272 (78,413) 2.3322 JULT CUM 1984 1s.97 971,264 15,25 (3.71) 781,872 (198,1*2) 1,579,6s6 (198,534) 2.0224
- 1,37s,s17 (596,945) 1.764)
(1776.961 CUM TOTAL 95.54 4.892.625 91,8) (3.711 ' 4.792.4)) (198.192) _6,Jss,7)6 (1685 e s )) 't.35s5 5.728,689 (1826176) 1.2182 CUpptNT 2.96 195,760 2,46 s.es 126,167 20,399 219,5a6 (9),349) 1.7399 192,625 (66,458) 1.5267
- AUCU57 CUM 1904 21.0) 1,877,e32 17,72 (3.32) 987,231 (169,793) 1,799,122 (891,883) 1.9831 (1176.594 1,579,642 (663,4e3) 1.7312 CUM TOTAT 97.61 _.4.99f.393 94.29 (3.321 __12f192f 9.8 fl69.7931 __is197.752 f177?!5Z1 1.3605 5.921,234 CummENT 1.36 69,473 (19924341 1.111]
SEPTEMsta CUN 1984 22.39 1,146,505
- CUM TOTM J fE ...5.961Jij
- CUppENT tose 51,475 OCTOeEm CUM 1984 23.39 1,197,90s ,
CUM TOTAI. 99.97 5.119.341 CURNENT 9.89 45,553
+ WOVEMBER CUM 1954 24.2e 1,243,533 CUM TOTAT. 199.9 _S.164.994 CumpENT S.37 19,184 EECEMeta CUM 1984 24.66 1,262,717 CUM TOTAL 131.2 5.134.37h I CUMULATIVE ADJUSTMENTS muses 125-C' a
- WOTE: (1) 74.9e Cumulative Percent Complete based on 3,921,3e1 Total Earned (1984 CUM & TOTAL CUM) Direct Manhours thru December 1983, calculated against a base of f.UC - NOME TO DATE 5,235,396 Total Estinste Direct Manheurs, as shown in January.
This Cumulatlwe Percent complete will adjust per pote (2) below.
(2) 1984 Dynaale Planned and Actush Percent Complete will be calculat-ed usin9 the respective current month MOO I Estimate as follower .
15JANS4 MOD I = 5,235,396 MH 15JUL84 MOD 1= 5,s95,361 nN ,
19 fee 84 MOO I - 5,197,879 MH *19AUC84 MOD I - 5,328,755 I,H (
10 MARS 4 MOD 1 - 5,199,567 MN lesEPe4 Foo 1 - As Identif$ed 15APRS4 MOD I - 5,199,567 Met 140CT84 MOO I - As identitled
- 2eMAYe4 MOD I - 5,199.567 Mn leNOve4 MOO I = As identlfled !
17JUN84 MOD I - 5,e95,368 Mn 160rcet MOO I - As Identlfted I l
e.
e S t-..====**=="****"0 e i t L t a i = .*
* * *a*4= .t = = = = = = * . = = = = = * " " " * * * * * * " = *i * * * " = * * = = * * * ' '
5 1 8 8 t 8 5 g gi 4 1 D38 &4 S8 P4 e 1 4 i fe I t 9 8 f4 i O I A l o t
e C '
= a n 1 1 .e 4,7 U 4 et OI N Ol P. B 40 t bg i M i 4 0 [4 8 4 8 e I e A t tCW I M. 34 ee 1t 4 CJ t O 8 = i Q t p 1 f,8 '
. i e,s i 4. e M. i8 P. .l h. e. 6u a i e a e. Ii t.- i14 .gi i Mi 40 0 Pm e Pi 1 Pg e e
e 4&
i 8 1 I
i s
==
i 8
4 N
i -
I .*
8
. 4$e i geoiw 434 P Il w4 It w=
- 8
- 0. th g ,e a 1 W I a 8 i I . --= = *. .l. = = =e 4. =*u '
.e. >{ t== .I===.==1.=.0 I i g a e 4 4 6 4 I i
{ e g 4 .
g gI I I 6 9 gL 0 0 f4 4 o i h
N 4 e 8 i
86 e
3 y 3 1 3 I I t 3 . 4 B 4 8 I 4
, 4 3 g i 33 $ h i e t 3 I O '
g 5t g 3 I l $ 4 y I et U l e I e >= S I ^ '
((
- 6 4
> l = l g I 4 8 4 1 ( 0 g 6 u l N I M t M 4 h I = 8 t ta i % % % '
, {ga ri g a gg 9 3 4
4 i
E 1
1 3 0
$ e.
8 t =w==*==.t.=.i. 0
= .9. =4 === 8 6 t I w 1 8 2 I w I 8 0 0 8 8 a
F-
, g
, =
.e.
1 d ).4 t. .s.
3
= .I.
4
= .i. = e 0
I g
4 twt
' ., e e
4 e
i 9
re 4
8 9
h
=
6 0
=
fe 1
t P
P*
8 4
5e
. 1 1 L . s i i e. i e P. I e S. 8 e t . N
. 1
, , 1 e 4 i i e i i a i = i M ,
a i e i t w W O C l 4 8 8 8 """ '
"e P. . . > wi-g l
=
l g
4 I
1 4 t
4 . 0
- I i N e e 0
I
" " "gt " " "ii """"l""""I""""e""""4 Pd i 4 1 ** I S I M i
3 j 3 g y.d to i I e g P*
- i h fe
, ; y 1 $ 1 gu P9
> O a
f ra I I C 6
I y4e 1. 4. =. .I. .i.
4 6 1
=
1 I
1 e P% 1 4 I i .
i i
- 4 30 4 i P9 4 I i 4 8 4 i.
$ $ l 1 0 t U t i i 4 i l 1 I t 41 0t Ps i e i M i p 4 = = = == = - = = = = = = = = = = = .. = = = .. " " '
t*
6 tpl e, ut
*I=
i ls l i o. t oim i y0 1 h I f4 I t e f e i t8 . .
e t .
e r4 8
- v. 1.
0 6
I Da es e 0 I e
i 4
i i
t N
1 i
6 n I.
I N
t i
- i 4 V i
I
, t 1(1 w ap i fe 1 A MI 4 48 8 4 4 I e. t
- I . I t
- I i 4 I I 1 I fe f4 i e i 8 8 EE I
- I .* 1 ** 4
- I " I i
l &.. 1 I f l ====================*-8
- i. .e 4. f.g = - .4 1. f.t.=0 4 I I i i I f
, a t i #* I e t
- l M i 0 8
1
. i =.6 , i i .
1
. .uk 4
i O i - i i i 4 8
, , . 3m. . . . . . 3- i e* i 6 i . e. . f. .
i
, I I t31 ( i C I ( 8 I er e 9 1 I 8 e. 4 h t
- 8
. I e1 6 L* I % 1 % i s $ l u$g 1 M $ $ i e 1 = l O 4 L e s i
a i gww & .e Z 8 i
2 e 2 e i d I e re e t - i is i
i . . = = = - - = = - = - = - - = = = = - - = = = = .I I
i m...ie.1
. .i t .
.e.- -=i i i en i
I =
e t e e
- M i
i f4 e
P.
i s
. e.t . e i e i F
- F C
e 1
4 8
4N4eiO 84 i t1 i n 8
- P=
A 8 IN ee.I =.e8 i Oatu Dee e
t C.
8 8
1 6-e.
a 8
t C
a I
l fe M.
t i
t 4
I 8
e4 -SSE
} t ev3I=1 48 N C
a 6CU8 *8
- 8
- eI
*8 M i si e
*4 *e e I fd I si e Pi i e i h a C
a 6 6 h e N I N t 1 - e t 4 4
- e i ig9wI&4 s i P 1 @l M i-e40 S1 O 1 pm t e. ~ = = = = = = = -
I
= = = = = = = =
&16 8' i
9 t w '
t I L 36L i ' ,
- I OisP. w I O I I 4 1 4
I 4 4
I ti 4
i O I I. e t&93I t
eI e f .I I ei eI t I f4 I t 4 C 4 g i O ;
i
)U 1=1 l 1 9 4 4 8 Pm i e 4 e i v i e 1 l I w i
i - 44.==1 1. . 0 = .i. .=. =0 ,3 0
1 ft
=
t
- I a
e i e
e t 6 @
a k i i 1 M fe e 1
i i
O I l l 1 9 6
e 99i 6
s O
4
#- e 4
M e i o e e i
i 8e e n t
1 C i 4 3 i C C ( 0 e e t t 8
P W t 46 9 8 % % s = ===========
1 t
t 1 = = = = = = . ~ = '
ab 8 6=l 2 2 2 I l l i e 4 i
(
4 l n 26 t 1 i F C f4 e O l 6 1 4 I t .
L( =
e i
1 i i
1 m .i. 5 >4 1.i.- .i. - -
ll I
.i. w
. 6 w.
,.1 6
=
4 1
i to 4
4 i
4 f.
I i
i r
P.d I
i =
t fa i
= l 1 i t i I ( l u i I t I l 0 1
g 4, h I C t & 4 4 8 89 8 C 8 l te I
[" e. I { i M 0 a = 4 P= a C 6 C i
.J a ,
i e
i a
i 1
lt C34 ai 4
- i -
4
- e I
Pi h
e i
4 e.
p e
I
- 6 a
4 N 1 e
fe i i
g e i =.
e t
es i i
. ,l 6 6 eoi 1 8
$yi
- 9. 9 g I t
e i f4 e . -== = .e. .t =
. . i
= l I i I h a b 4 i t t t 6 W= l I i 4 er 0 q i i i i C. i 0
e W 0
i .= i 0 .=
n 0
i :
h 6 I gi ;
. =
2
.i
. u . i 6
a i 2, i i i
h i i
4 I .i. .i. .e. .t. = .i. n.
. .i. = a w g e. =.
f.
t e.
i P-i
*. I l 1 e 3 . t t 4 4 1 1 I 9 2 e u 4 8 9 I ni t 0 t = '
> I I I Nf eiO .e.
t
. =
3 6 I a 6 0iMi k Pm O
f4 0 -4 Q y
l ) 4 C 1 4 (e t . I ff e f.(IN3 le8 4 1 =
e t ia4 iih I ft i Pi 6 30 3i eI e 8 e Oe .
ea ee e
0 (. Q
. = .t. = .t. .a. f a .i. .e.
a 1 t > t t t 4 w I eeuayaP I = t fe e ege I e eu s e t
e t
i e p = 1 aga wi e fe a A i e e : E= i e a i t 1
i l 1 >0 & S1 *w l l e
g 1 . . . .S k..l . i . i. k. 4 8 9
( ( 4 ( l C t C -
I e i te4 i s e s i s i s i s i
.e. .i = .4. .i. 0 6. s 2 2 2 2 Z
~
** 4 e c..
s t
.i. P. .#. 4. .a. g
.e. . g e
g g a
i 4 1 i f 9 e i i i e e 9
e
.g.=6 .e1. .g. . - - .9. .t. =1 ==
4
. s= 0 0 a t t t a g g
.t.I . l. es g
t i i - e g e e i
- i. 9.
i
- f. i h i e i i e
e t re i t i
cs 4 i
e s
e i i e. i N 4 n.
P 4
= i.
i t
i i .: v. :i 2 yw t i
I t
i r e e
x .i c
. i
. f.
i y e 6-e
. i K.
W I
9 e w i e i a
e a
s=
y .a.-=y y e
.e. e .i.
g
.e .
p 1
t 8. 9. 1. 8.
s t i t f" =9 a gp g te s 4 p.
i I l t g = l ? e i t t g
.,, g g e g pm pg pg 4 4 4 4 n *.
- I
- I g g 3 e
(
I 4 4 4 4
- e i .
i C-i i n P- i
- l. O. . . a6 i - - e. f d. t.
0 8 & i
- I
. i 1 a. e 3
t
=,
1 g N, p
g P.
r3 1 - . : . 4 i f. 1i 698i i f N .e o i t. .
f g
I %
g T,
g e
i i wz t 4
. i
- . n e
. .i I
4 i
3 W 3!l r 4
. i
- 1 s
4 .
a 8
i i
e ,
i t : -
i 8 ""="===""=
e a o a a i 4 e e . .
4 g>
. . .. =
1 e....,.= .,. e
' ' 0 ww I 4 9 g 4 M s e t 4 1 6 6e 6
A 4
e p 4
4 8
e e
a g .
g ,
y e . I e a 4 i =
I I n=a 4 re g ,
, a h.
i ..
' i O4 * =
P e e a
, e e . ; . Ps. i. e. ,i )
i i % e i
t e . e i e o e c 4 I g , e . ,
i i = i = .8 ee = i M
- 6 n
.e e e. = s = e to a = t fe e i e s ., e i n e
i A
. w 6..Ii. .=. .i. l
=
- i =, t f.
e i e t - e e e .
,p
.i. .f.e .i. .. .e. .. .i, i e i . . . , p .
.' 4 wt * '
- 8
. ek e ei e e, g a e ,g
, i e o e n== .t. n. .. ..8 .
t =
, 6 l
i g .
et4 e, .l.r ,
t,gehi r.e ,.
I i e i s i i i e > i r i i wh g
a 8
i
- W 8 *=
E 0 J C
G e w( l s.
.t 4k i >% C s .c, . 4e g I 0
8 1
l
, e s e 8 e su .NOw a &.re.,,s b
c . c .N wt% Ca e 3. Pe wi C I 4
y i y i > a = e e k. == is a ,
V4 I a i W i O 4 0 0 0 I 0 4
&. .c. 4 i
4*-
I = 1 " i O
P= 8 6 2 0 &. 4 C 8 e. w el &. =4 4 &. w I
t J P*
g t
l
. . . . . = = . O.
. .l. . =l - = = 4
.s.
.I. .W. .= .t. .p. =
ta=
.l. a.
. .e .*.
t m.
.- -. )
I elst SilLt Pols? EWCLlas statlos . U211 I seestygg.g i
{ lt? C e las tLL 1. p ,3, . s e t tw0lCAtee8 j 1
_ l EfftCtivt patt tAtto 1994 CUArtlTT I;5?ALLATID# !
{ tW81mc ECwP) AND SAft aATIO PtarcomamCE Itt.8mt let)
LA8CE 8088 -
- 1 P1Pt tLFi PLAmuED o.....o.....o.....o *21,193 kr i ACTUAL - -
b 21.898 .* ,,...,.....c......o...**=0 ** 25.4st
{ wp****
g 23.618 .
23.458 21.108 . . 21.508 19.380 11.200
#..**,p.
- 19.358 11.288 l
15.059 . p.**,. .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . Il.ene 12.tet . see.m ,e .a w . . 12. tea
. gg.t$g 0.669
,*y.*,.* . m m
_um mn n r. m e me es.s.r.re.u.
o le.tle 8.ae8
" 6.450 . . rs. w m . n.m - . 4.418 e,300 . asms m se.ase . e,30s 2.110 ...*e / neinase.e i ese. nece . isines e,i, . 2,lle 9
. p CU" LF Cum LF Jam ' rte MAR APB ' mat JUm l JUL 'AUC SEP Oct 'uov Ott 'l veets e=
leu. m .n m ...s
. 4 Jee . eed
. J.d t) JWe ,. . n r e's s es ses see 478 ses l ise,e.s ee..s m e,e, . ss} s ets
., , e b
- s e s ! , ? 9e.
,. bs4 I s se e w t..e..-e..., <t w> <e,,>. no.3 s so em i a o m ,1, As L.S. PIPt . - .
F. t&ATC IAT101 CUB BATE 84710 0.... 0.... 0.. *.O CVm_tatt aATIC -
k 1.gg80 . ...r ...a...... ...........f".*.** W.**** ............................ . 1.t0gi 1.7000 . %. 8 . 1.1000 1.4808 . , . 1.4008 1.1988 .
"**<k.**..E / . 1.ltte 1.4098 . . ,
*
- 1.4808 1.3908 - ',
j . 1.3est
*. . 1.200s 1.2908 . .
l 1.1990 . 11 . 1.1888 r- 1.0988 . . 1. seed 1 0.9900 . . 9. tees
{
t.9040 . . e.etet 6.7000 . . 4.1898 9.4300 . ......................................................................... .
8.6e00
. tFF te tFr 98 I jam l'Fttlpaa APsl' MAT l JUw JUL *AUC Stt CCT *nCV Ctc 'l weese t e s . . ., . .s e m. v i e d . e *2 . ,. s t t , s. eo - i..w,,,.,,. 2 , tj 3 t,4 3, . 3eso
'h ice u m e e es uvaseJ.s ,1+2. C o i t. s ee < 7se i r. s a a t i.u z ,, 7e ,.e,f I LADCE 80pt -
, l MANCER$ Ital P L A k h t D D. . . . . O. . . . .O. . . . 0 ' l . l l 'l S A l ACTUAL ^ -
5.l20 = *
, . . .o *. S.lle l.049 .
***,.p .*** . l.elt i 4.600 . . 4.698 4.140 3.680 a * ,, a * * ,, p
- 4.140 3.488 3.220 .
*,,..o.**,. .-* .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
. 3.22e 2.144 . . ..e m . 2.968
[. 2.308 .
************ . 2.3ea i 1elet . ..."..* . "*""***.***n".'eu.
%.vm m
. I.see L. 1.388 . .. ns u m. a. m . 1.3se fit . ..
-- .- . s.se . 33 460 . ..#.* .acm6 en.,o.,ee,s,,e u,se,n
, ,, ti n aa,r,s,, ,,
. 46e r* Cum LA Cym tA lJAul*fte MAS l App ' RA T l JUm JUL 'AUC stP DCT ' 'upv Ott 't weees i eu.. as e. .., m .Pe .,J .e7 vee e e. ., .ss see ve =ec J50 4H s evens oe..s m 4t4 & se ses eet 192 th atf 222 t
f . . . e . .< e . s. s ca cD s.. er O,3 t',*> <Ons) onsb t r a L)
L.B. mawCtti - .
i 8478 B AT10) CUs Raft SATIO o.... 0.... 0.....c Cum _sAtt #A?!O -
l.0000 . ...a.... 6.... 6.....sg................s....
1........................... . 1.tese 1.7006 . ., * . 1.1999
_ 1.itte .
- g *. . 1.A080 1.1990 . . 1.5888 1.4000 . . 1.4888 1.3909 . . 1.30P8 1.2000 . . 1.28st 1.1000 . . 1.1889 1.0008 .
- 1.8888
, 0.9008 . . 8.9888
,. l t,3064 . . e.epop
%* 8.1004 . . p..pos t.4004 . ......................................................................... . 8. lore
-- Efr et tFF 99 JAs *tte man Apt ' MAT JUm JUL *AUC str OCT *nov Ott 't weves
- [cs..e., e.ee e.,se s. .n s.aen ,.e,s d.eef s.417 d.uv 2.76F .(.s.,
[ce.ws.ve.e o ee n.eio . J. .u d . 4.t t.een t.i n f J.##' d.*82 4.s 76 I d. N
_ ~ ~ - --
. 1 CIEE CIL8 P0tzt cWCLtas stAtles + V219 2 sege0134 0 3" 08350tLL 1.P.I. e sty 3:0lCaf084 EfetCtivt 34ft AAtl0 lite DUAN?lty InstALLatten IUll*C ICwfl AWD BAtt RAf to Pitf 09AADCS ltT.Shi ISI)
J9CC 60Et
~ wtLO8 itA) P L A su t 0 0. . . . 0. . . . 0.. . . .o . 4,13 3 EA
^
" ACtWAL -
4*200 . *
- 3,35g . *
- 4.266 e.--*,....,...0.....o 3,3eg .
,.....'0... . 3.818 3.108 r- -
3,33e 3,333
- p. *** .
. 3.198
- 2.450 .
.,JP*,.*
- 2.880 L. 3,3ea . , , , , , . . . . .
- 3*8I8 ewe. Ie100 1.400
. * , . ,gr . .
. m w
. 6.
emu w.e.me
- e. .
em . .
3,73e l"" g,pgg . ou m ru v e s6 i v .ws w i
- 1.488 rue.se evt. l.050
, 9,, , 4.srs .
})g .
actea6 ett 3.tet . tgg en.ent L
9a _..e v a e essset.t c a s, e s en.tt'
- 8 gy, ga ' a 3
- a. JJAu *rtt MAR AP8 ' MAT JUN JUL OCT l*NOV
' cwa la
'l weets
_m..se ee.., a n *AUClstP OSC t .ewis s ee.es e n ssoi too 600 occ d.= +40 2d lio ! * '/ 28 M
. ~ as i 9 90 ?)9 sft + 3 4, t r,r 3LS 00h f i ...= . .... (ss3i ato a69 09 3 77 I eae d* 45 4 L.B. wtLDS leatt BAT 10) CWB SAtt SAfl0 0.... 0.... 0....'.0
. CWm RAtt RATIO ^ ^
1.3eee . ...
1.7008 ................................ A ................................ . 1 t880
' i..
p** 's
- 1.7080 1::::: : '
1.3841 . N . . . . . . . .e.. ,*. '. : i:!lll 1.2988 1.1008
*y .
1.3088 1.2890 1.4108 . . 3.1884 9.9894 . . 1.0000 6- '*' * . 0.9000 8.7008 . . g.gegg e,4 egg tri ..
8.1990 g.4990 MAS trr lJAN l'FES APR l' mat lJun JUL l* AUC l 8tP l OCT 'uCV OtC 'l weeks i rse e s.. e.. e , s.
anaPas *r.*ie
, ~ ,.. '. S &r a. + .0 i , a ,Afri.aew 2. 4 5 , s. (# *
- t
.e ...,..,..
- , . . . , . , . . ~ ,,. n ,... ,,,.-,,,.u.,,....,
- 1
{ msA i l
. 1
! *
- l i . .
1 i . .
u 1
i . .
. . l
. . 1
. u. prt.
A.
i A, .
..At i ,,,,i,;L .,;C i,;,iOe, ..;V , DEC :. ....,
* ' ' 4 l l
' I e 4 9
9 g ]
S/A
. I ee .
. I
, f . 1 s ., , .
tum. a .
e a a a a a n a
- u. .rt. .A. A,. .A, Ju. j ui. .A C ., Oe, e,0V i Ote .. ...
I t ;
I I i 1 I
'! l
l slbt altg P0137 uwCLtte stat:0s e g389 2 lt? CD12:tLL 3.p,l sit inclCatoel estes333 3
-- Efftttivt haft tatto life OUAufttf luttaLL4?les IV81mc EtwPl aWD Batt BAtl0 pt9F09manct lit.0%t left 8m4Lk test titt ttt) PLaust0 On...o.....o.... 9 'll.314 LF l
gg,34g ,,
10 $00 .
pe.**
... .. o . . . . .o. . . . .+. o * . I1.360 17.000 . . 10.100 16.030 . ..**ap***, . !?,000 I 14.340 12.440 16.020 14.248 l 10,400
. .*,#*
- 12,448 8.900 . w,,,%.a,,,,,,,,.,
emee.es.n e
. 10.408 1.120 .,", . 0.908 5,340 .
- t. *'"" E',,,,* ","
,, , , , . 1.lle
,. ru u . y .1 se m .
),540 .
***4
- n.m
. l.34e teilt
- n esa sc'o". e. a .,st
' 8's'e"is
- 1.
4 0 ne e n ec e e ii.nei
- g * ,5,6,0 Cym LF ' ' ' '
.. O JAW 'FCI MAS APS l' mat Jyw Jgt CVm LF
** i'4UC str OCT ' sty Ott 'l voets t ew..se ve*.,e n . doo s edo A sea tw s. s.ao e. mmo *** de. <3e t 6cin6 e .n s e, 2.fr* ,AM a ett 3 di/ 2 ao#
<J 5e ao ~
A*Y e>290 e.* J 2
, . w ss set e t.n U g?O (res) w.2 ) o,Il, _ twee) \ (05.) 29 s !. r 0
- 8.8. PIPt (SAtt RA?!01 I CU8 RAtt 3Atle ca n.0.o no..so o Cum SAtt RAtle ^ -
, !.0000 ......................p..e..*.*.*.*^** c 1 1.3000 . , ............................. . 3.0088 1.g000 .
,e
. i.2000 1.1000 .
/
. 1.6800 1
1.4000 . . gf . 1.1000 i 1.3000 . '
* . 1.8000 1.2000 .
- 1.30es 1.1000 .
'tr
- 1.2000
,, 1.0000 . . I. leet 0.9000 . . 1.00se 0.0000 . . 8.9800 8.1000 . . 0.0000 0.6000 8.1000
...*.*** ..**...........................................=*****....**.** .
f Eff 88
- 8.6080 JAW EFF 89 t n . . . ., . . . e u , , . ,,,.,
'Ftfl mat lAP9 ' mat JUN JUL l'AUC 8tP Oct . suCV Ott 'l weets
.n wee.e u.e mane , . sa t i.s.ito
., oi ,s.f
, .92. .e6 <e., 0)
,.n,, e..o.
i . n,oA .s 1 ,. wa ..,., -
43 f.7e. s . ,i_e t SMALL tett namCtts (tat OLAutto 0...ac..u.0.... 0 es.903 gn
^
ACTUAL ^
}.640 .*
e f',, *
, ,,, . . . . c. "* * " ".6 " m8> " "*0 l.448 4.230 . , f* ,
3.160 3.300 g . *
- p . .* * . 4.230
. . 3.148 3e030 , .p*..* . 3,200 m e.w ,un.es 3,350 s,m ne as u..o..n.n.w.w e s a.m,a
.
- 3.610 1.040 1.430
,.8.., == w e
'*****".".*iv.,cs.-
er en e 3.350 1,000 d 9.i n.r v.
' l 340 . p
- assa sTs. s.us
- Ieel8 410 .*.** ad /es6 pet 3.333 .
m ewee s : es.epos 340
,. 0- eaa, etmees, nas. te n
, g9, CVm RA -. O l Jan "*Fts l m e l App
. mat Juw '
JUL Cua ta n.. *AUC stP OCT *>cv Ott 'l veens e...u n ,u .n
. .ctsas goa.,en Je.
,,, , w 93* 607 I dJ m m m .e. a w ,e ,
U . n .= s . +. . fi m (241 f rA E )I (f .')
*Ao JJ 344 A P4 (eaf) 632T ftf J ed.
S.S. ManCttl =
l9A?E DA7101 CU a B& 71 0 & 710 0.. .. 0.... 0.. .. 0 cum R&tt PAtt0 - -
. ...i.....i ....i.....i...........i....
1.0000 1.1000 . 4.....i........................... . 1.0000 1.6000 . . 1.1ose i *~ 1.1000 . . 1.4888 1.4000 . . 1.lete l.3000 .
- 1.4008 1.2000 . . 1.leep i 4.1000 . . 1.lete 1.0000 . . 1.1988
(
*g m.
- 0.0000 8.0000
. - . l.8888
. . 9.seet 8.1000 . . 0.000L
< 1 0.4000 8.18e#
1 '
" EFF pe . ......................................................................... . ' ' '
. 0.60e8 Jhm 'Ftt hat apt Iff 98
'nat Jun JUL *4pc stP Oct OtC f fo es.* e v inne #,49 p. e ).
' N OV 'l =*ett s.7,# 3..e? 3.asr f ,.49p I
icw.e u ve.e e n aseio 2.d4o .f . z fi J, w d.# Te t . = e# 1.d k. F.64 3 J. 319 7. YH J e ds ..
i i e
m r ,
ri
, .7 :
r -. -
*- : - i g g1 n p 3 ,r 7 r- , .
C f (
6 STowE 6 UERSTES EwCPC. C0er. - wMP2 g i
lose +0gwAMIC PEDCrpf COMPLETE PLAN rp0CRE55 UPDATE - AUGUST 19, 1984 -I i
1984 $4epEn otpiris 19e4 EXPEwpED (ACTUAL) 1984 ExPEpoto (ErrEcrivEp _ ,
1' owr 6 wEs4TES EwCpc 1984 PtAw A.p.m. w/A Vase (-l C.R.R.
spCat vap+(-l 1,721,723 VAmet-i 1,820,611 vAmet-i .
I nowTw DEC 1983 ;INCat 1,721,723 nn neue ID-st Et arwP f D- Et (E/D1 FB ECwp (p-ri (r/D) g antaa. net at#11 at acwe ene?n sc.an '
. rs --.m.i es,see e.4e 76.633 86.633 es,474 (9,7983 s.1278 w/A w/A w/A CuoeEni 1.43 1.83 w/A 65,00s 1.e3 e.4e 76,633 86.633 e6,424 (9,7911 1.127e w/A w/A .
JAwvARY CUM 1984 1.43 1.e649 w/A N/A w/A
- fil66.891 CUM TOTAL 12,54 1.781.723 42.94 e.4e 1.798.)S6 86,611_ l.9)$.8)5 (136.6791 2.57 91,see I.es e.64 337,706 26,7e6 352,109 (34,4e3) 1.2923 w/A w/A n/A ,t CummEw? w/A w/A e rispUARY CUM 1994 3.65 151,see 4.44 1.e3 194,339 43,339 2)e,53a (44,1953 1.2274 w/h 1.872.723 45.75 1.e3 1.916 111 43.339_ 2.e67.145 (151.8 e 31 t.0700 w/A w/A . w/A
- f1911.961 run TOTAL 44.71 99,299 16.se? 133,119 (33,9891 1.34te w/A w/A N/A CummENT 1.99 83,2e9 2.37 e.30 i
MARCp CUM 19e4 5.59 234,20e 7.05 1,42 293,548 59,348 371.653 (7s le53 1.2661 w/A w/A w/A
- f1316.361 CUM TOTAL 46.75 1.955.923 48.12 1.42 2.e15.271 59.34e 2,7ee.264 (184,9938 1.e918 w/A w/A w/A ,
CUpptwT 1.05 77,659 2.06 1.98 119,649 41,981 143,896 (23,366) 1.1953 w/A w/A w/A 'l APRIL CUM 1984 7.45 311.059 9.86 2.42 413,les 181,329 534,659 (101,471) 1.2456 w/A N/A w/A *
* (1956.361 CUM TOTAL 48.55 2.933.5e2 58.17 2.42 2.134.911 191.329 2.343.279 (2es.359) 1.e976 w/A w/A w/A ,
CuppEwT 1.9e 79,573 4.72 2.e2 197,841 110,26e 176,817 21,524 8.8937 w/A w/A N/A ,
e nAv CUM 19e4 9.34 391,432 2s.5e 11.15 e58,553 467,121 691,476 167,e77 e. esse w/A w/A w/A f,
- f11a?_e91 run TOTAL Ss 45 2.111.151 11.jl 11.15 2 319.276 __111.121 2.521&E11 6e.199 c.9767 w/A w/A w/A CUppENT 1.52 63,692 3.57 2.85 149,558 e5,866 139,939 9,628 e.9356 p/A w/A w/A 455,124 1,098,111 552.987 331,496 176,7e5 9.9247 w/A w/A w/A I J UwE CUM 1984 18.07 24.e7 13.29
- f 118 7_111 run TOTat 41_97 2.176.e47 as_13 11.2e 2.729.814 552.987 2.619.317 69.517 f.9744 w/A w/A w/A CUppCNT 1.41 59,179 3.24 1,82 135,549 76,379 152,352 (16,883) 1.124e w/A w/A w/A JULT CU3 19e4 12.20 $14,383 27.31 15.83 1,163,66e 629,357 903,759 159,482 e.86e2 w/A w/A w/A .
11142.111 cm Toynt 53.33. 2.2 36 J26 6AJ1 _11.U_ A ti M BJ _123233L __2J1Mit 53,els e.9815 w/A w/A w/A I CUppt#7 1.77 73,973 4.02 3.e6 292.e94 128,121 188.938 13.156 e.9349 w/A w/A w/A 500,276 32.13 1,345,754 757.470 1,172,696 173,eSe e.8714 w/A w/A I e AUGUST CUM 1984 14.e4 le.se w/A ~ w/A w/A
- finalait run TOTAL 55.15 2.193 ,331 13.21 18.30_ _ L E 61.112 ._757J7e 3.ff M f1 ,_jG 171- f.9704 w/A .
CUppENT 1.36 57,899 strTEMete CUM 1904 15.41 645,375 ,
._1.Jif,39a a con TOTat s&_s2 i CupptwT 1.27 53,979
}
OCToeta CUM 1994 16.6e 690,445 CW1 TOTAL 57.75 .2,429.111 CUpptwT 1.5e 66,173 g e povEneEm CUM 1984 le.26 764,6te CUM TOTAL 59.36 2.JJ1 ,341
' CUppEwT 1.19 46,e63 j CECEneta CUM 19e4 19.36 sie,6el ;
CCN TOTAL 6e 46 2.512_4e4 i spede!25-D * *
- ' 4 CUMULATIVE ADJUSTMENTS
- woTE: (1) 66.09 Comulative Percent Complete based on 1,721,723 Total Earned *
(ISO 4 CUM 6 TOTAL CUM) Olrect Manheurs thru Owcember 1983, calculated agalnot a base of 2,573,919 Total Estloate Direct Manheurs, se shown in January.
n4v (DCwr) -
- 247,524 MHp5 Thle Cumulattwe rescent Complete wllt adjwet per wete (23 below.
(23 1984 Oynamic Planned and Actual Percent complete will be calcolet-ed using the respective current month MOO 1 Estloate se follower 15JAmed MOD I - 2.573,919 MM !$JULei MOO I
- 4,998,453 MM 19rEpe4 MOD I
- 3,e27,917 MM *19AUC04 nGO e - 4,100,261 nw
- i leMAp04 HOO I- 3,e27,917 MN 16SEPe4 MOO 1 - As identlfled 15APnet MOD 1* 3,927,917 MN 140CTe4 MOD 1 - As identitled l i
- 2enavec Moo I - 4,ess,les au towove4 noo 1
- Ao ideatirled i 172Uwee noo I - 4. sos 453 nu 16orce4 noo 1 - As ideattried e
j
~ ~
i '
{ { [ ~~ } ( l ] { 'l f , $ e
* *S- Seto - et e
.NEC FTMDFNANCE DATA memtp51 8994 I .---.----------------------------__--------------------------------------------------------------~~----------- 8 8
3 I
I CUNLsLATIVE t
I CUEEENT FintDO I I
I e t
8
, t ----------------==_ 8
-=
=-
--t- -
8 3 8 8 2 I 3 8 4 8 5 8 6 8 7 8 9 8 t------_---*----------l---------- ----------l--
8 8 8 80 4 88 8 12 %
=--t ---8-- --_t- t-- -t 8.-------l--------g i I 1/8/93 i Curreat i Sc hedu t e 8 Actual I Earned ISchedule E*udget 1Schedute8 Actual 8 Earned 8ScheduleI Dudget t 3 I Est6= ate f NOO I I E DCI8S D I (ACWPD 8 iDCWPA t----------t----------l----------l----------I- --
--S----- -l-IVar 8 ance ! Var 8 anc e 8 4BCWS) I tACNPD 3 8 thCHP 5 4 var 8 ance IVar 8 anc e *
--l---- ---l--------l--------I- -
-l--------3------ -t i I t t I l I 1 I i CIEECTS 38.197.664 34,800.268 8 N/A t t i I I 33.D68.3a*6 83,067.477 8 N/A N/A I t t i t t t 66.173 i 4
B399.939 12(s2.094 I N/A 8 B3.156 I 4 8 3 t----------g----------t. -------- - _
---l----------t----------t--
3 8
=8---=
t 8 I a I
-_t--------l-~~-----l--------l--------l----. .s 8 I I 4 8 3 3 s
! CSSif4tps 13.273.332 24.692.49e i N/A t 8
83.572.245 13.504.4e8 8 N/A 8 667.76493 N/A t 92.399 3 67.786 I N/A 9424.68298 3 3 8 I I I I I t e a a t------------------l----------l----------l---------~!----- -l---------S---------l---- 8--------l-t ! ! 8 8 t 1
-------8--------I 1 1 1 I 80t At t e . 4 7se. 796 19.99es.759 I N/A 26.573.558 16.578,959 8 2 8 i N/A I (1.59338 N/A 1 2 3 8 8 t 3298.336 8269.880 I N/A stil,52692
!..........!......... 3..........t.........
3 5 ! .
I t 8 I t 3......... 3..........
i .........!.........I........t........t........t........I........t
! t
- I I 1 CONULATIVE : Cump(NT PERIDO 8
I 3 8
8 g E-lit ! I t
I I I I
8 8 8 3 I I I I 1 I t- I l i SDudgettActuall I I 8 kev 8 ODudgett 4 8
! Estimate! Estimates % IPtanned I Actual I pod9 et i Actual 8 untt 8 INOtCATORS untt I nate ICurr ent i Unit 8 Actual I Emened 8 IBeant a t yI ! Nanhour4 s t Cneel t heant 8 t y lpuant 4 t v t itCMPS 8 (ACWP9 I Rate t Rate Imatto IOneant a t yl Rate I 4ACWPD I spCurt I l 8 I I I I I I I I 8 I 8--------- I a
----*--------l--- ---t------l--------l--------3--- -l--- I------! -t I --l--------l-- -l -t--------t 3 I I I I t t 3 I t I l s I C. D. PIPING t ! 8 8 I ! I I I
I 8 I I I I S&htt-60989 8 79.237 3533.698 856.70 t N/A ! 46,693 8302.594 8235.784 86.498 85.049 89.779 8 t t tr i I t 8 3 I I I t 7.996 87.268 8 34.058 3 58.065 0 t 8 8 8 I t t t t I I I i 8 8 3 6 8 8 I I a t--------------t--------l--------l------t--------l--------8--------8-- -t------g -=t------ --------l------S--------8--------!
! I 1 8 I I 3 ! 3 I 3 I e 8 0.D. 04ANGE RS 8 8 8 8 8 I I I I I I 8 8 8 1 3 8 7t*33 9 i 82.981 1519.276 848.59 i WIA I 1 EA
- 1 2
%.45% 3285.539 8233.313 139.58 842.77 18.693 3 Ad* I 45. 9^ t 29.482 8 29.864 5 3 3 5 8 8 8 8 8 I I 8 8 1 1 t .-
E 8 8 8 I I I I i i 1
- 3---- ---------t------.-g ---.--- ------S--------l------.-g-_----
I t
-g-----_--t------g-----.g -----8---.....!..----S--------t-------.3 i i 2 8 3 1 1 2 8 t t ICAT 2S3 seAmr.rn t s a 8 4 I t t I t 9 8 .
t t t 3 1 8 I (#9839 2 7 .898 2 S I 56.sonn 1889. n4 5 N/A 8 EA 9 6.229 33;n,9n6 8038.936 122.32 822.32 38.'..* t 954 !?6.62 8 25.49H I 25.?se *
- 8 2 2 8 ! t ! I g ! t I t ! ! 1 I I I t t t..<-- .. .
I i 8 I i I 4 * *
- _ _ - - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ -__ _ _ _ - _ _ . ._m _ __ +- -= :%
481:8 mlLt Pelet evCLtas g?Atlee . 9:19 1 gegegggg.,
8 tC Feeft (CC;92ts . att I:DICAt!9)
Act94L satt entl0 1904 OWIWtitt 1:8tALLAfl0m
~
tullac ACwti AuD Datt BAtt0 7teF00mamCt swtc.sht left SMALL 6081 PIPt lLfl 0....
PLamWED ACtWAL - 0..* * = 0* * *. 0 'l6. 612 Lt
. 16.440 .*
$1.930 . ,. p .. .e *. 16.640 47.300
- 11.920 42.400
.**# ....* **
- 41.200 I
31.140 33.040 .
. p**,.#. .
. 42.400 31.740 24.329 . ..*,p .**, . ,,,,
- 33,84e 33.400 . mew e.,.,.,n.m.u,s i me s . 20.32s 10.000 . "... .aa, es, .s n n. .e* . 23.40s m
14.ll* e. m ru avm se m .v u,w n ..u .
- 10.000 9.449 .
O'b M se. o M*HO
. 14.16e 4.720
- eselsa al.selI
- 9.448
- t. _es enerew,
_ ts. Le't tit.ati
- e sTIS i e Cum Lt ' '
Cum tr JAul* rte mas Apa ' mat Jun JUL 'Av:
strlOCT 'w0v Ott 'l weete
.. ...u...,,,, e .,..u .
am a s ., ., r a s. < . > . , . . , ..a,>... A., .. . u n cv. 6 e.. i n J ls ' i a. 'rJ ****
. ** ...e '>aa5
- r <A O 96
. . s i . .c .... o se ..c (.t.)(<,3,*) <*.t> io_e.6) o. nu 5.a 9 i
5.8. PIPt . .
ttatt 8Atl01 CU s A At t R At ! 0 0.....D.... 0 *.*
- 0 CVm_eAtt entt0 - -
' 1.4330 1.1000 .
. ..................... ................................................... . 1. gest 1.4000 . . 1.1048
".. 1.llet . . 1.4000 1.4000 . . 1.500 1.3004 . . 1.40s,0 1.20s0 . . 1.3es*
8.1000 * . 1.288e
" 1.0000 . - 1.1988 8.9000 . . 1.0080 0.0900 . . 0.9098
.. 8.1000 . d. A . . . g * . 0.88e8 0.6000 ACT 89
...........................'h .............. y ........................... .
e.1000 s.4e00 JAu A CT s t Eneen save usee
'FillMAa Att l' mat JUW JUL . 'Aug stP oct 'sev DEC 'l weets o.ese s . oc e l g , < se e.iss e e set s ete ..yte csg m ues.e u e u ,,e i.ite d. ,s , i 4. As ,
- t. 4,3 i t.. s. s . 7 7 o .,, t o Oc Sou(L poet mAm*tes (tAs PLAust0 0.... 0.... 0....
ActWAL -
0 't.300 EA 0.480 .*
1.100 . * * , .o *. 0,49e 1.400 . . f.180 4.380 . # ,.** p . . 1.000
, l.600 * . 6.3ee 4.900 . ***,. # *... . l.A88 4.yg0 . .-
e 4.9,89, e.u.nu..m...e. .. .uer e.e.i s 3.138 2,000
'0'*...,.. "
** e m on ne m 4 ,
3,les 2.100 *
. ...' a .... r .'."s u**v"m*"
p a..a m . e. m v*.".
'**n*
- 2. tee *m u 2.I
1.440, , ...,....*....* acent m n essac e. e :
s.es esu
. 1.488
" 9 3, , no. emetame n u ai
. tes CVm SA . p JAN 'FIS PLA R APS ' mat Jgu CVm t4 JUL 'AUC 8tt CCT ' 'p0v Ott 'l weets
_ eu.. an oe.e i n i17 eo. 29s **E asL
.cv tas ta o.*tr el+ etL *. e+ A30 6 e.. in .tr 6t ato 7 ?* ?** .5 h:. aJ. t a to .
.. s s e e e. s l cor e>6 499 Acw t ** t) (k ee) tom , teet> 4
, 3.3. manctes teatt I Att0) cut DAtt 84tle O.... 0.... 0=... 0 Cym sAtt aAtto - -
i.e90. . ... g. ......
1.1000 .
* ................................................... . i.0000 1.4089 .
9,
. 3.1988
==
1.1000 . '
. 1.4809 1.4000 . . 1.1008
, 1.3000 . . 1.4009 1.2080 . . 1.1980 1.1989 . . 1.20se
_ l.0000 . "
. 1.1006 9.9900 . D****="*****'.# . 1.0089 l
[
- 8.0080 . ~ . 0.9007 I 8.1999 . . 0.1988 I 9.1000 i 0.4000 ACT as . ......................................................................... . .
0.4090 l
l Jam orts mas APs .
- mat Act et JUN JOL *AUC 8tp OCT 's0v Ott 'l weete (cm e e s.s u s e u e s e o.s3, t.sse s.sto o.s.J *
- s. * *2e a lg t
** [._ avi e u,s uvie o. e u f 93, J.ao, e.a ') I s. Fan d 887 0 #64, d.AA/ o,9e t I '
. Oltt E848 P0let avCLlas 8t At10) . U:lt I ortsetti.C
. 8:tt r0908 ACCOW;ts . 8tt ICDICatoes ACTVAL satt SATIO 1904 CWArtitt ir st&LL A.f l om (W88tG ACwPl AND aAft 84730 PtarcamauCC 8vtC*84% lef!
CAT 363 L.8.
NAmCtes qtAl PLamut0 0.....c.....o.....o of.650 84 ActWAL - -
- 1.430 .* * . 1.629 letti . p . * , . .o . 6.986 6.358 .
.o ***.. . 4.358 1.111 S 116 5,006
. l.000 4.445 .
- 8 88I 8
3.010 . m= ****u e
**.. m w ,, e, e
- 3*I18 3.115 . 74'A*;'*g"*
- 3.111 2.148 .
mammv. niem
- I*S8' P
g, gen . - rueus m. 3. son . l.981 g*3tg . ac m A evt o.oes . 1,3te vanisse ss e es 431 . n o. esecte,i S.,e e
- 63%
- e. -- 0 cum LA CVm t4 JAu 'Ftt RAB APS ' mat JgslJUL *AUClStr OCT 'mov Ott 'l weets
- 6 * . . e es .., m . 6 4. ?os 4,34 <. A6 19e 4,96 4 36 7es
- ka 6 38- f' 1 0
.c t..s pe. ., m elf A ,9 i 7 7 t, e99 a t 7as 7,! t r .' !t
. . . . s e .n o . .. . ca,o p. t , .@ m3 3E ed6 frF vi9 i
. Cat 363 Lan . .
IRATE RAtl0) Cy a R A f t 8 A ? ! 0 0-.. . .c.. . . 0. ..'. .o cum BAtt 9Atle _
i 1.303g . ......................................................................... . 1.000s 1.1800 . . 1.1999 I
1.4000 . . 1.6004 1 left . . 1.5000 1.4998 . . 1.4000
. 1.3098 . . 1.3899 1,2800 . . 1.2000 1.1006 . . 1. lese 1.0808 .
. . 1.0000 9.9000 . . 9.9000
, 0.8000 . . a.3000 0.1000 . . 8.1000 9.4000 . ......................................................................... . 0.4000
, ACT BB ' ' '
ACT 99 l Jan ' rte maalApa emAt j Jgu Jgt : *Auc stP oct 'o0V Ott ' 'l weeks Icose e., sete maese ) ,, w f. coo f, W , f,e ,.aas if.sae p. W ,.W Q [cD.eu v e v o mo v e na v s e t ,. epo r,gpc r. co p i r. g f,g l p, pg , A g f, w N/A l
.e . .
p' lan.:rt. RA. A,. . mat l 2. avt . Ave it, oet i . .w , Ole .i .ee.s 4
,. ! i i i
f i I i m/A
~ . . 1 l
- e. . .
L : :
. . j I,A.
l
- 28. o. A,. . mat av. ,vt .Av. it, .et . Ole i ee..
, , ' i i I i i
_ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ ._ _ __m _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . . . _ ._
{~] [ / [ '. [ l 5 l 5
[ ' *
)
JOHWSON COWTWOL5, SwC. - wMP2
- 1984 *DTNAMIC PEpCEw? COMPLETE PLAN PADCRESS UPDATE - AUGUST 19, 19e4 JOum50m CONTROLS, twC 1984 PLaw 1994 EAnwED DSSECTS 1994 EXPENDED (ACTUAL) 1984 EEPEwOED (EFFECTIVE)
MONTH OEC 1983 . )mCal 144,074 gwCal V Ame (.) 144,874 V AR * (-) 172,051 VAR *(-) 4.P.R. w/A VAR *(-) C.S.A.
* (5 weetel (1125,50% Al f 2) 41 SCWS Ci t ?l IC-Al Of PCWP 10-91 El ACWP fD-El IE/DI FI ECWP IO-FI IF/OI CUAREw? 2.63 14,099 1.62 II.el) e,644 (5,356) 84,903 63,437)
JAwUARY CUM 5984 2.63 14 e99 ti.elp 8.629s W/A w/A w/A 1.62 e,644 45,356) 14,981 (5,437) 8.429s w/A (1)25.504 CUM TOTAL 29.68 15e 074 152,78e (5,356) le6,132 w/A N/A 20.67 '_jl.el) (13,414) 1.2EEe w/A w/A CumpEwT 4.32 2 , l!ll (1.6es 14,583 t e,4 9 7) 26,50s w/A e PEspUAar CUM 19e4 37,999 (12.e 7 7) 1.0327 w/A w/A w/A 6.95 4.34 (2.6e) 23,847 (13,e53) 49.661 (17,5145 a (1924.524 CUM TOTAL 34.se 101,074 1.7566 w/A w/A w/A 31.40, 2.6e) 167,221 (31.e53) 282,712 (45,498) 8.272e w/A w/A w/A CUmREwT 3.94 21,ess 2.5e 63 1),76e (7,2403 24,576 MA>CM CUM 1984 18.09 Se, Gee (3e 0163 1.1960 w/A w/A w/A 6.93 (3.96) 36,987 (28,893) 65,237 (20,33e) 1.7676
* (1924.521 cum TOTAL 37.94 202,074 33.99 (1.96) les,981 (21,893) w/A w/A w/A 237,20e (36,3071 1.3118 w/A w/A CUppfRY-~ 4.37 23,ess 2.9e (1.33T 15,e96 (7.184) 26,394 (10.498) 1.6604 W/A CPalL CUM 1994 85.21 m/A W/A w/A
' * (1124.524 81,e99 9.91 (5.29) 52,093 (20,197) 98,631 (30,e20) 1.7353 m/A w/A CUM TOTAL 42.26 225,974 36.97 196,877 w/A CompEw7 (5.29{ (2e,197) 263,6e2 (66,005) 1.339) w/A w/A w/A 6.3I 34,ess 5.14 (1.24I 27,367 (6.6))) 35,sel (4,514) 1.3111 m/A N/A 4 MAY CJM 1994 21.59 115,099 15.e5 (6.54) es,17e (34,e3e) 127,512 (47,342) 1.5905 w/A (1927.eSt COM TOTAL 4e.64 259,874 42.le m/A w/A W/A CumpENT (6.54) 224,244 (34,e3ep 299,563 (75,319) 1.3359 w/A w/A N/A 5.5e 29,799 4.21 (1.37) 22,413 (1,2973 32,74e tie,127) 1.46et w/A JUwE CDM 1994 27.17 144,799 19.26 (7.91) 182,583 (42,117) 169,251 w/A w/A (57,66e) 1.5622 m/A w/A (17 77.eSt CUM TOTAL. 54.22 20s,774 46.31 w/A CUmpEWT (7.91) 246,657 (42,1171 132,382 .(05.645L 1.3472 w/A w/A w/A 5.69 38,394 4.24 (1.443 22,6s7 (7,693) 39,537 (16,73el 1.74ee i
I JULY CUM 1994 32.86 175,999 23.58 (9.35) 125,19e (49,810) 199,768 w/A W/A w/A
* (74,578) 1.5957 w/A w/A w/A (1727.85% COM TOTAL 59.91 319,974 5s.56 _(9.35) 269,264 (49, ele) 371,019 (182,555) 1.3ee9 CURREwT 37,ets 4.51 (13,730i w/A w/A w/4 7.10 (2.50) 24.eCl 51,968 (27,e9e) 2.1594 w/A hfA w/A 4 AUGUST CUM 4904 39.95 212,e99 28.e2 (11.93) 149,252 (63,54e) 251,728 (1e2,476) 1.6866 (1727.85% CUM TOTAL 67.50 w/A w/A N/A 356,074 55.07 (11.93) 293,326 (6),54s1 423,779 (130,453) 1.4447 w/A
- w/A w/A CuesEWT 5.26 20,096 SEPTEneEm CUM 1984 45.21 249,999 COM TOTAL 72.26 384,074 CuppEwT 5.26 2e,899 OCToeEn CUM 1984 50.47 260,000 CUM TOTAL 77.52 412,974
; cuwWERY~~ 6.66 35,5ss 4
- wovEMaEn CUM 19e4 57.13 384,399 7 CUM TOTAI. 84.le 440,374 CURREwT 5.2I Jo,ess DECEM Ea Cun 19e4 62.39 332,399 (2) ( 3) Cun TOTAL 89.44 476.374 i
9 LUMULATIVE ADJU$TMENTS: ene<iT7Frde I
- woTEt (1) 25.58 Cw=wlettwe Percent Complete based on 144,974 Total Earned (1984 CUM & TOTAL CUM) Direct Manhevrs thre December les), calculated egelnet a base of AUC - wowE TO DATE 563,324 Total Estimate Oirect Manhoves, as ahewn in January.
This Cumulative Percent Complete will adjust per wete (2) below.
(2) 1984 Oynamic Planned and Actual Percent Complete will be calculat-ed using the respective current month MOD 1 Estimate as follows:
15J4pe4 Moo 1 - 563,324 MM 15JUtse M00 1 - 532,614 Mw 39FE884 MOO I = $87,546 Mw *19AUGs4 MOD 3
- 532,614 Ma leMApte MOD I
- Se7,541 Mw 165Ersa M00 1 . As identitled i
15Armee MOO I
- 507,546 MM 140CT94 MOO I - As identitled l'
2eMA,e4 Moo i - 532,6ei Ma iewo. 4 M i - As I.en iene.
37JUwee Mon I = $32,6e3 MN 860ECe4 MOO I . As identitled
I
- b I I I I ' '
Il ' C r .
/
J01GNSON CONIRULS I994 CERFORMANCE DATA AUGUST I994 I I I t t t
! CONikACT TO DAtE I CUAEENT FERIDO t I I I I I 4 I . ........-...... ..__...... .........-..----.---..___- -----..-- -8.---- = - =-.-
-.......-I 8 8 8 8 2 8 3 1 4 8 5 3 6 8 7 8 9 8 9 8 80 t it I 82 3 1 2.-..------$--.--...--!------.-+.8.--- -
-3.--.------l.-------.3---------t -t--------8-- -t-- -.t..-----.s i 8 3/8/03 ! Current I Schedut er I ActumI 4 Earneat ISchedute 1 twdget ISchedule8 Actuat ! Ear ned iScheetut e 3 Pudget t I ! Est8 mete I MOD I I 4 9CW's 9 8 4 ACwp 8 4DCWP) 8 Var 4ance tVar4 mace I EDCNSI I 4ACWP) t t DCtr1 IVer i anC e t Var e anC e i 1.--....---t.-..------t.------...t.-.------8...-----..I.--.------I.-----.--l---.= -I--..----B.-----.-t==-- -B-.--..-.t.--.----t I i ! I I I I i 8 8 I f I I I CIRECTS I 469.670 2 532.&te 3 N/A ! 423.779 8 293.326 I N/A 20334.45333 N/A 3 58.960 8 24.062 8 N/A 3827.9999
! ! I I I I I I I t t I 8 3
,..- ......t....- ..- I .... -- -g g.___.. .__f. _...____3._= --.t _
.$.____. -g...... _3_ ....._I_...._..t__......g i 3 I I ! I I I I I I I I 2 CISTRIPS I **.995 8 29.664 8 N/A I 32.066 8 2o.872 8 N/A t #38.99408 N/A 3 4.447 8 9&S I N/A 3 43.54238 8 3 2
- I I I I I t ! I $ t t..... ....t.._-......t......- ..t....--....t.....- -B.........-t-...... .t. __
=t--_."----I.-__._..t....-. 8- -
=B-__._ ..I 3 I I I I I I I t t 8 8 8 8 TOTAL t 593.665 ! 542.279 8 N/A 8 435.845 8 313.499 8 N/A 94542.34798 N/A 8 54,4n7 3 24.967 8 N/A 9438.440pt t t I i 8 8 8 8 8 9 I 8 8 3 3..........t......... 8..........I..........t.... ....t... . t . . .t...... B....... 8 ......t. 8. ..t.. ... 8 g i 8 i e g
i CONTRACT TO DATE I CURALNT PintDO 9 8
y 8 8 I 8
g.........- __
= - = _
_ =- =_=== =8. ---- ------ - -t t 44R$$ 0 3 8 3 3 0 9 8 8 8 8 8 I t i I I 8 8 0 I 3DudgettActual8 8 thudgett t I
! t[V IEstteatetEstimatet % IP8 maned i Actual 8 Dudget I Actual I thtt I that I stat e ICurrenti telt i Acteat I trarned 3 IDuan t a t y t ttenhour e t Comet S Dumat 8 t y t Oumet i t y t 89 Cwt I ( ACw t Rate ! Rate 3Ratto 8 Oty 6 teat e e G ACw t I s pCw t t 8 INetCATORS 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8.-...-----..---l.---..-.I.......1-..---8.-...--.3-.--..-.0-.......t.---.---t------B-.----B..-...t.-...-.t...--.3-------.t.--.----t I t t 8 8 I I I t i ! i 8 8 i t f f I 8 I I $ $ 3 8 t ICU 6 SS TuetNG I I I i 1 (*398.*3949 !?3+e.2(we 3 235.
- 3s e 85n.80 t N/A st34,nen taly.R97 1837.827 3n.979 83.372 II.333 4 6.637 St.f4>) I 28.3&S 8 7.373 8 8
8 GLFS I I ! ! I I I I 3 3 8 8 8 8 I I I ! l ! ! I t ! I I I I t I
t..__.........--8........g-.......t......t..-.....t. .... 3-._.....t....... 8..... B...__.8... ..t.......t..- 8.-......I.....-..t t t 1 1 1 8 8 I I S S I I t
3 8 8 8 0 SECISMIC SFCfS. 1 I I 1 1 i i 0
! (
- ye.,s t
,, *. . 88 7,st... t *,4. 9fe I N/A I 2.987 I 75.7780 8849.442 176.e=e 3 5n.9", I I . 9&s e 288 126.em) 8 86.889 ! *
,,4e4 :
! e t s.e I t -
I t 1 i i t t t t t ! .
3 0 t
! I I ! I $ 3 1 3 3 t
!..-.... - - . . . . . .......-.__--................--...--.........--.....-......-.3-.-......-.----._---.-.-.---*
n ,
~
sist altt 8'Olst tvCLthe stAtttre . Lsit i es t e t t y).e JOIz80s C0s?90L8 leC. e att feelCatial (CtWat patt title p (W81pC ACwft 1998 QUA*titt lastaLLatles 1
AND SAtt BAtle PtertenAmCE JCI.Sht lef!
I lustavatet s tweli.f. ILF) PLaunt0 e.... 0.... 0.....g *181,3g9 Lp hCTWAL ^ -
) f 111.380 . *
) 101.125 . 4 * . 119.148 31.15e . **,p **,. . 181.131 87.975 . . 91.159 4
14.344 . .*,..**,. . 07.91%
g- 68.421 . . ft fte f i
; 54.6le . g *. * # .. w 48.431, 3g.g3 I
. a3.I?3 3g Iee
*.a.... # m..an.,.em.n se
. .se .e.s an.nie,n.es.
seser,. en m e .
. 4g,p11 p
***'.*.***i..'-..
a * * . . a ** . . a * *
+
39.325 . - n. n.1 m . . )9,)ee '
L f., . rw .us yn. ii. m . 19.333
- 1,3,333 99g . ...gr *.. aave*6 ort e t.t s e ele.stte
. i
} g,_ m vanaarsr ne ee en c a isi sai
. 1,9.150
* .ptg
- m CVm LF 9 J&W Cum LP
'Ftt MA? hPt
- mat Jgu l Jyg *Agg $tt OCT , '80V Ott 'l weett
.. . ~ . . e. e. . .. , n ,w ..a . n.a
) .es. 6 e. .... r. he# 9 a.**.
8.9,o
,, ,o - ,,.e.,-,m ,. .e, . ,m .. m
; _........... i+(e n L.a.,m pesx.J e
, 'd87 sw u ss ;
,, 4 9, .. 7m m _ i i
.,a en ru ne; I lul?R. TV0lpC - -
18 Af t Batten CU R rat t BA?! 0 0. . .. 0.... 0.. .a .0 cum 8Att R ATIO ^ -
' 1.3433 .
........4.wq. .................. .y.I..............=**...=......
l.1ple .
s
. 1. 4 H O c l.6000 +
's #.." 1.1008 '
f.
1.leeg . ', .
*
- 1. 4 H e 3.4093 . _
- 1.18e8 l l N 3.4004 1.3333 . s
, i 1.IetI . . 1.3088 1.lege . 'd......o......C . 1.2e09 (
1.0000 . . 1.1998 1 p.90g3 . . 1.0000 i
l 8.0088 . . 9.9000
(' 0.1990 . . 0.9889 8.1000 g.4gi8 i
ACT sa * . 0.4e40 l g
j jam 'Ft3 man j Art Aca se
\ les...a u n m.n o emat JyulJgg leagC str CCT
'uCV l CEC 'l ***tt I s. s t e J. e.o .. ?n s ! e. d. ,. , ' s' I te* w 's.. wu wn*i'.at' d . . ve t. J e r i ,. *n .. s u r.7,,
,..a6 ef .fo s.vn i '
i f. .af i, . a r i i i Stl8mit tvet
! 8Wpretts Ital PLaputD 0.....o....
httVAL ^
0.....o *3.034 IA 3.964 .
- i l 3.001 . ..e . . 1.86%
i . '
4 2.lle .
p..',s*** .
1.891 3.lle 4
t* 2.29.5
,,....p.** . 3.
1.185 . . .295 1.S30 . 3.10 1.111 .
... a ...* a.n=.6 ...
er emnu
, m . 1.13,5
' 1. elf . ***.#* ~
. == wser .
*"""n . 1,331
. ill . ... n. n.-.. . 1.028 lle .
ru m.mu ses evi, m. a.ne . ill glg . aroun6 e 4.*64 . lit
- g. onesasse.vt ee sese' .
* '" 31%
n F CTse SA M ,,. g l
Jan l 'FEB RA8 APB Jgu Jgt cvm 24 l' mat *AgC stP DCT 'u2V Ott 't weets
, ~ . . ,,, .., .., ,,, ; m !
*et. 6 esaet en sal Ada ,e
,,, w ,,, ,a ,a n.,,a
.fd I ## 64 Red' . A er 1 , *
- n .w a . . Ja za (20 cc.131 <f,,L) i o g ,3 r p,3 Tr,m i 1
y slmC TVlt 8Pt -
j teatt sAtle Cve satt BAtle o.....o.....o.....o a.
l.steg cum _thit SAtle - _
!, . .. 1..... % ..
1.1999 . 'C6..,,..................._......_........................... . 1. teep 1
1.4004 . . 1.tese j *-
I 1.1H8 . . 1.te88 1.4004 . . l.%000
)
1.3000 . . I.eees 3.3000 . . 1.1888 j I{
- l.1999 l.0004 1.1898 1.180' t
8.9000 . . l.Gett t
- 0. 0 t De . . 0.9999 1 0.1999 . . 0.808e 0.8960 8.1009 i
=
ACT be 0.4000 Jhs Af tt
'Ftt R&B APs omht Jyu Jgg eggg gap ect oppy agc og ,,'t ,te
(
teente t.*s n no a.e 4 s. vat 1.vtf 7 449 L a st E. L u r. sy, l fee un.e 6..e eene Lad ,.se, a. 30
. 9st i.e.J 1.aM 2. . f s .. aN z.m i t== I
- 4
IN1' (NAL CORRESPCNDENCE '
. ~ <,..m si ei ou h.suMOHAWK V HlAGAR A
! Fmou W florrison oistoct Nine Mile
- Point Unit #2 to Distribution oArt August 31, 1984 nLtcoot susJact NMP2 Project Controls Organization '
An integrated Mr. Charlson endNMPC/SWEC myself. TheProject Coni,rols Organi'ratic has been approved by Project Controls Organiza ion has the overall g
responsibility to implement the Projects Controls Program, l-This organization is directed by Mr. Bob Gibson, Project Controls r, Manager.
Mr. Gibson is assisted by Mr. Yatish Goyal, Mr. Wes Boyea, Mr. Csr1 Debratz, Mr. Joe Jones and other support staff. The attached organization chart and program description depicts the responsibilities of this support organization.
Any questions you may have regarding Project Controls should be directed to Mr. Gibson of my staff.
I l
* ^
g W. Morrison Project Director WM/RG/bb
, Attachment t
i xt: Project File (1549D)
Distribution:
)
J. P. Ptak i
J. H. Jones J. Kappas it.C )
A. P. Saleno - -
Y. Cc Goyal- e J. T. Niezabytowski F. Mr $heldon '
R. J. Cohen C. E. Crocker "
J. P. Thomas M. J. Ray
- -- - u R.- Y,aggar~ L. Brown "
J. Yought CD, Beckham R. Burke C. R. Kolarz W. Boyea
- i J. L. Anderson C. D. Terry L D. Quarne J. Carter "
, J. B. Hadden C. Dobratz "
L .
. .s, w
one H
up.
4--,
I L
- r-NMP2 PRNECT CONTROLS ORGANIZATION
- i. -
I. Functional Responsibilitiej The Project Controls Organization has the overall responsibility to 1
implement the Project Controls Program and in turn it supports the ovuall project objective of completing Nine Mile Point Unit 2 on schedule and at 4
the lowest possible cost with utmost attention to quality and safety.
The scope of the program consists of:
- Work Identification and Structure Resource Estimating Schedule Planning and Control Information Reporting Managerial Action The Major objectives of the Project Controls Program are as follows:
l ' ~
Provide a system to optimize productivity during bulk construction and testing phases of the project.
Provide information organized to support AREA management methods during project construction and SYSTEM mankoment methods during test--with efficient transfer of work content across the construction and testing boundary.
Provide an information system suited to Milettene Management techniques.
Ensure QA/QC hold points are well defined in the project to remove I any potential for schedule dynamics to affect quality. l Achieve a work completion profile wherein a maximum of only 5% of construction work remains 13 weeks prior to scheduled turnover of any system for testing.
Through control of detail and timely progress update, ensure that E cost and schedule progress is reported accurately for any or all
. portions ofuthe-project and at all-hierarchical-levels of the project.
The responsibilities for implementation of the Project Control Program are t,.
classified and identified in the following major functional areau A. Planning and Scheduling - Through the utilization of network plans, provides scheduling status information and
- reconnendations for schedule recovery at various levels of cetail to the Project.
B.
[ Budgets & Cost Control - Through the utilization of a responsibility u
matrix, provides information~to management that will allow for early i detection of cost problems, a management structare to correct the !
problem and a reporting mechanism to meuure the 1!tqcess of the l
[ actions taker..
i
, . . . C. Cost Assurance - Provides a method to ensure that Project decisions are prudently analyzed, evaluated, and documpted to demonstrate l ..
prudent mar,igement action, and to continuously apprise ranagement of
- the afrect or these decisions.
)
~
l l
F
- _ ._, y. _ . - -___m . _ _ _ - -
b
!!. Organization Structure ,
" " A. The NMP2 Project Controls Organization is staffed' with full time #
personnel under the direction of the Project Controls Manager who has the assigned responsibility, authority, and accountabi3 tty for the functions described berein.
f
[ 8. The Project Controls Manager derives authority from and is reportable both administrative 1y and functionally.to the NMP2 Project Director.
4 t
t I
e f 8 I
- t i
4 i
m amme e one r
l 1
J
/
F I M e ** m e ...
J
,L -
l I
- a i
i 5s, i . l ooo e
l i
w
-" ' ' ~
g j {] [] g T f
'} l] [~
~
- s
'- -l-
~
, .'1
~.
~] .] '
PR 2XC tlA C2f AOL S FR 1 '
t see cass0m towCe ,
ASSI$fANI (OWIMOLS IMNACFR , f PROM CY i s 9
, . A , 4, 0. . ..f e, w ~
W uAo CE Ns SCt[p. LEAD -
CLERK /CTPIST lCLFRIUf PISI LEAD COST as we(s esTCS '
CARL 00enAf2 mAaru FC?**
i CMI W5 Sort A
~ w e u ' s k RTt.t. COW 400s l N
I L l p-m g _
, 7 _
,
- 3ttr Deviseacr lCENiRAL PL AN , ) L- -t N c.r.4 Aft [ sA SPEC lAi EfEO syggg.VP fggg l Et,o OrNIFAL
< -Ci trto ,
shg;/3,- A RtPoNrs _
, , g,g y
"'L"'n~'* ! ~= f -
. ^< .L .0a,'f,#,s,C, aml- ~ f x .i.. ; - .0, c A:C so.O I men nCatuilt i 3 I s etsC t,
~l N
- j OAff tt0fM(RWftl (2NO $Nlr f t g_
' ~
CA F"
,,00s FTA W 'ff has SAUR3 DATE etAmatffT Sres A:ffluc -l .' tutsr ACs sweeCl 01Amt f** 88 GEL 8 ""Of 3*I"8 n C Ang(La 00r nc Me eCrt omryC s er,cC a entt mA=sm PR itt AM I REACIOR pavr nfre* sin rt t f Coura ERCare CON I AI NITIs t SUILDINC furfCP '
J8"" IIIII""" turfCP DAdr FEACet CHRIS J458N$N8 M4RE esFLgrR ELr A33 futFC tr ADB fatFCI SM BMf05 PA' 00tr ettut AOUuGS r0 PiCet0WI "$;04 8Af1A URL50s
") OI E **"
j ' s OsI wL f 4 SARS FR W N AICHA10 CouGA3 FA?!I Acts OrSt tometfI ILEC) 44fft tuffCp Ifm r0RM9 h f MIN AU DILL CRCINCR SFC Sur tsum$as atCHA13 te04f0W g 9444D CJT fiEC3 l *# I, ,III" af N 9t*C4 g
NDe tufM CilpCICHOCs DAf t0 PA1RISS gg y 8,f rL L f E[Q1 Saw07 alue SABA JE lacs (M'
SAff SAffAMU48 IOMT LICAIIA AAJ DIAFAfl4 '
AMOB M81LfR Pl riWOOO MOWE4 [
feeOCD ful0Cl trMOCS ## "'IN E' I SR[af f1C*"C450W 4iC4 rA42iEA l
SAAf ang st ACawtil -l l I
' 89 .
' ~
fAuff 940CE :
Ofs 5ff.rtil13ss <
Ctets tf R II* .aggargr vissirussi row rRoi. "' "' L L g
- i re er. ore sullotNo l5 rCCc/w$ss m_
s-I a Ciasis seernLr NAvs Ceinasirtral a:n ensotr !. '
eun-re str 40s
*= rec afAar Jona ls Cr0RCANAS l AmC RflN AIMtfCy MAGES l GrHOCD l g 4Cte3C3 'l!43 8 l
.n = r r .r r na, ,
4048 OUROCHfe SALE CHA'rER Sr0ff totsvA
- simCD ft4CD 't KCe j,y pg 9413 wlC' sots moetRI u11sc cA30Lfs eAltre fif f B ft1CS sigrt
}
'Ur rtA1$HALi
, gg
.A,.. .WA> ,
rurarl eUnOsr= 3
i .; ! i :
3 -- q' g~3 NJKCI CONILOL$ '
M47t.cr2 SOS WISSON filfFC9 ASSISfANI PROECT
_ 0088fROL5 NANAcfR varasw C0rs sweets g
y a FUlfCTIOIIS INCLUDE.NILESTOIIE.
L^" AREA SYSTEMS.COtt100lIY SCHED. LEAD CLERK / TYPIST CLFRK/ffPISI LFAD COST ROLL-WS & IWL A SCHEDULES.
Cast 00enafz unnte reAff eferRTLt C0ue00W utt 90frA t
i I I LE AD ARE A I SPECIAi SctlED Mkdh rifiD '
PL AssNER & REPORTS SIARI-UP CfMIRAL COSf COSi StABNC IJC88
, csCatesem wort tasetasees Roe stoneet Puti astwo JOHW 90wr ran:c sato are neuturar st uCe OAtt norteEAWitt (2mo snarre SPECI AL SCHED I Ct r ue noe KA m str sesevaariac J0MM sAURo ewust act swerC DIANC MICAntttt 00m le0 W A 80[I PL41E SONALLI AN0f sP(NO my furfCl emerCD REACTOR pavr neras
- C itrar i BUILDINC '8ted? jo,,, 3,gtina, nn rtticuta crerw ' '
Coenas Jassassa naar isrttra OAV 20CrRs 439 (**FC trAD) sJsaw w04 ton terFCI PA' r0tt
, tel%4 Wits 0W KIRL ROUnOS
( C ( l I 'I "IIII" C0s443 PA'8 8 Rots Or81 r0 SHAUC990(sse 188 i f reir 004C0A A1 l JOH1 fM1900 RAW
' SEC sur empusu 7' passo Cav tiuC L * ',Q,5 W
, utu naru gwa g,e strLL CAtt 4W sM4IN
- rars ,0,8 g e4CectAv sagor atec pasav Jrmusses ggg,g,$$gg trueCl --
808f LIC4ffA a4J ftAWAIN AVN PtIL L r a l
'NFOCD FiWOOD nodre tvC 41s% 08 PROECT C IROLS Acra trHOCS esca rantsta
...< , .OC. HANAdROFPROKCIS (OL 3 AS,
, 4 -.
-l MC PROMCf DIRECTOR PCCC/MSSS
'O ' . " ' " ,"rC t r '*" ' *S
=cm at A= nn s so..
",",R","' NNP2 PR0JECI CONTR0LS Cs 't!st ORGANIZATION
('rra sr0r g: iva "I",'
, [ """ o, adl ACARA F10 HAWK POWER si C r uotva saitre CORPORATlON r=0m NINF HILF POINT UNI' sJ l1A'F CICt f S ' /H. 19H4 1
e .e e * , .
u ___ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ - - - . - - _ _ - - - _ - - _ - - - - - --
r-INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM A. yo, Q 12187 l SUBJECT CONTROL OF WORXFORCE DATE Octcoer 1, 1984 FROM JGKappas/lWBrown:dj7 TO JPClemmens CC RCO'Donnell '
RWHenn RBaker CWStuart
~ LJMartiniano JECarter JSPistana WWalker SDaelhousen DGodard t
The overall control of the construction workforce on the project has been poor and needs improvement. The most common and offensive items are; early quits, late starts and loafing on the job.
The non-manual Supervisor has prime responsibility for the direct control of the work. Due to the problems that we have been exper3cncing,jthe followine non-manual Supervisor accountability and progressive dis- J '.ine program will be adopted.
I. Construction Supervisor accountability progressive
' discipline steps to be taken when non-manual Supervisor has not demonstrated control of the workforce.
; 1st offense t
Supervisor will be given a written warning. (Warning to be placed in' Supervisor's personnel file) 2nd offense l' Supervisor will be suspended for a period of two L weeks without pay.
3rd offense
~
Supervisor is to be terminated for cause.
II.
i.. Disciplinary action will be handled by SWEC discipline department head for force account Supervisors and by Contractors for contractor supervisor.s.
- III. Area managers will identify problem areas to SWEC Discipline !}eads for both force account and contractor l , personnel.
l l IV. SWEC discipline department heads 'will be responsible
,, for reporting problem areas to contractors for action
- - - - , v , - , - - - . - ,--
I
- l. IOM JGK l
i The objective of this program is to demonstrate control of the work force and to insure that the non-manual Supervisor is held accountable for this responsibility. We hope that disciplinary action will not be necessary to accomplish our i' objeetive.
Attached is a suggested progressive discipline form for your review and use.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss this program, please feel free to contact myself or L.W. Brown.
i r
, e
{ /
I J.G. Kappas
, General Supt. of Construction 4
f e
O L
I L
M une U
I l
L 1 l
l' ;
I F
m
~
.' INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM a m e. M M i2187 SUBJECT NOTICE OF DISCIPl.INARY ACTION - DATE IACK OF ENFORCEMENT OF JOB WORK RULES. FROM TO cc Central rites !
LWBrown !
i..
, You are hereby Warned l
Suspended virhout pay for a two veck period '
conumencing and ending .
r for the lack of control of the work force you are responsible for.
NOTE: Any further action beyond suspension will subject you to termination.
Remarks:
9 l
l t
l l
b Date k
L.
b .
u==
_ ., . . _ . ._. . _ . - . , . . . . . - , - . . -.}}