ML20141K814

Responds to 850617 Request for Reconsideration of Fee Categories Assigned to License SNM-1872.Fee Categories Assigned Correctly.Fee Remains Due & Payable

ML20141K814
Person / Time
Site:	07002930
Issue date:	07/29/1985
From:	Gerard Jackson NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Stewart R FIVE FOUR THREE CO., INC.
Shared Package
ML20141J561	List: ML20141J555 ML20141J595 ML20141J637 ML20141J659 ML20141K814 ML20141K834 ML20141K845 ML20141K859 ML20141K906 ML20141K936 ML20141K951 ML20141K978 ML20141K983 ML20141K998 ML20141L016 ML20141L026 ML20141L044 ML20141L847 ML20141L872 ML20141L896 ML20141L920 ML20141M246 ML20141M264 ML20141M286 ML20141M301 ML20141M341 ML20141M398 ML20141M417 ML20141M432
References
NUDOCS 8602270396
Download: ML20141K814 (1)

Text

,

DISTRIBUTION:

Pending Fee File Weekly Reading File Materials Reading File JUL 2 0 lb The Five Four Three Co. , Inc.

ATTil: Mr. Robert F. Stewart President Route 8 Box 228 Horgantown, uest Virginia 26505

Dear Mr. Stewart:

This refers to your June 17, 1985 letter requesting a reconsideration of the fee categories assigned to Materials License SNM-1872.

The fee categories assigned to a license are based on the types of materials and their authorized uses. Although your letters stated that the authoriza-tion for services other than leak testing was requested for use in the event of accident or. emergency conditions only and is not a regular service to your customers, the review effort required to authorize these services is essen-tially the saae as for other service licenses. For this reason, licenses which authorize the use of byproduct material for service to other licensees are subject to the fees specified in fee Category 3N, and the authorized use of special nuclear material for service is subject to the fees specified in x

fee. Category 1K.

You ' mentioned that the plutonium sources are no longer leak tested even though this authorization remains on the license. Please note, however, that fee Category 1K applies not only to the leak testing of the plutonium sources, but also to the Pu-238 sources authorized in Item 6. A. , which are used in the ser-vicing of the sources as authorized by Item 9A.

We apologize for the incorrect information you were given in December 1984 concerning the amount regt;1 red for renewal. However, in order to consistently apply the regulations in 10 CFR 170 and in fairness to other licensees who hold similar licenses and pay the specified fees, we find the fee categories currently assigned to License SNM-1872 to be correct. Therefore, the $1,280 fee requested in our June 12, 1985 letter remains due and payable.

If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please let us know.

Sincerely, 9ti2indsigrc:tgy Gle;!alxhan Glenda Jackson License Fee Management Branch

% 2{g g 851203 Office of Administration SNM-1972 PDR

" "

• LFMB:ADM k

.u = > Mackson:ref .+. .

.71.3.]/85.. . .

nac ronu n s oo-soi nacu ono OFFICIAL RECORD COPY