ML20141J242
| ML20141J242 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/12/1995 |
| From: | Bangart R NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP) |
| To: | Morrison D NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20007J296 | List:
|
| References | |
| FRN-62FR4120, RULE-PR-20, RULE-PR-35 AE41-2-046, AE41-2-46, NUDOCS 9708150195 | |
| Download: ML20141J242 (1) | |
Text
. _ _ ._ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - _ - .
~
& k.
.p.mm pyg-q)- p
,d"
$ UNITED STATES g
e i.
t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION cc: Morris /
wAsusuorow, o.c. soimoooi
%s g of _
Glenn
- ,... June 12, 1995 Schneider McGuire
, file dm HEMORANDUM TO:
David L. Morrison Director Office of Nuclear, Regulatory Research .
FROM:
- xicri'afo L. Ba~ngart, Director Office of State Programs I2 M4 [v 7 84 [
SUBJECT:
0FFICE REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE: DRAFT FINAL RUL FOR THE RELEASE OF INDIVIOUALS ADMINISTERED RADIO MATERIALS This is in response to your May 31, 1995 memorandum on the subject document .
We throughhave compatibilityreviewed the draft final rule as it applies to the Agreement States requirements.
staff and in 10 CFR PartStewart 20.1002 Schneider, RES on Wednesday Jur;e 7,1995, the scop Agreement States. was revised to a Division III item of compatibility for
. dated May 3,1995), we concur in the rule. Based on this revision and ou
Attachment:
As stated 9708150195 970007
$ 62N4120 PDR encf61'Ecs\d 09 ts_
)
J f \ UNITED STATES j *
,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
$ $ WASHINGTON, D.C. m1 8 May 3, 1995
' i
%,.....,o - !
HEMORANDUM 10: Bill M. Morris, Director Division of Regulatory Applications, RES FROM: Richard L. Bangart, Director '
[([g gf b Office of State Programs 4 .4. ~ 1.7
SUBJECT:
TECHNICAL REVIEW: DRAFT FINAL RULE - CRITERIA FOR THE RELEASE OF PATIENTS ADMINISTERED RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS This is in response to your April 12, 1995 memorandum on the subject document.
-We have reviewed the draft final rule as it applies to the Agreement States through compatibility requirements. Attached are several suggested changes relating to staff's interaction with the Agreement States. .
,We have no objection to proceeding with this rulemaking effort.
If you have any questions, please contact me or Lloyd Bolling of my staff.
Attachment:
As stated
- M E3 v \ \ lp
i l '.
?< - .
,( , . .
< Suggested Changes - Final _ Rule _0n' Patient Release Criteria
,1. Page 24,LMiscellaneous_ comments on the Rule i- the suggest the Tesponse to-the 'first. statement be revised as. follows:
Response: The NRC does-not agree. NRC conducts an assessment of each. proposed requirement or~ rule to determine what level of compatibility.will be assigned to the rule. These case-by-case -
assessments are based, for the most part, on protecting public health and safety.
- 2. Page, 34, IV. Coordination with NRC Agreement States =
Wefsuggest_thel paragraph be revised as follows:
The staff-discussed the status of this-rulemaking effort at two public meetings; the Agreement State Managers Workshop held on July 12-14,-1994 and atlthe All_ Agreement States Meeting held on October 24-25, 1994. The Agreement States 1 expressed no objections tofthe approach in this rule.-
-3; Page-39,-VIII. Issues of_ Compatibility for Agreement States
~10 CFR 20.1002 Scope.
Office-of-State Programs Internal Procedure B.7 entitled,
" Criteria _for Compatibility Determinations", states.that *
" Scope" tin;10 CFR Part:20 is a Division III: item of-compatibility. Therefore, the wording regarding 20.1002 1
- scope" should be designated as'a' Division -III matter of ~ 4 compatibility,rather than-Division-II.- Division-III rules- I would-be appropriate for Agreement StatesL to adopt, but do.
not require any degree of' uniformity between NRC and. State-
' rules.
O y
4