ML20141J242
| ML20141J242 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/12/1995 |
| From: | Bangart R NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP) |
| To: | Morrison D NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20007J296 | List:
|
| References | |
| FRN-62FR4120, RULE-PR-20, RULE-PR-35 AE41-2-046, AE41-2-46, NUDOCS 9708150195 | |
| Download: ML20141J242 (1) | |
Text
. _ _._ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - - _ -.
& k.
~
.p.mm pyg-q)- p
,d" UNITED STATES g
i.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
cc: Morris
/
e
%s f
wAsusuorow, o.c. soimoooi Glenn g
o June 12, 1995 Schneider McGuire file dm HEMORANDUM TO:
David L. Morrison Director Office of Nuclear, Regulatory Research FROM:
xicri'afo L. Ba~ngart, Director Office of State Programs I2 M4
[v 84 [
SUBJECT:
7 0FFICE REVIEW AND CONCURRENCE: DRAFT FINAL RU FOR THE RELEASE OF INDIVIOUALS ADMINISTERED RADIO MATERIALS This is in response to your May 31, 1995 memorandum on the subject document We have reviewed the draft final rule as it applies to the Agreement States through compatibility requirements.
staff and Stewart Schneider, RES on Wednesday Jur;e 7,1995, the scop in 10 CFR Part 20.1002 Agreement States.
was revised to a Division III item of compatibility for
. dated May 3,1995), we concur in the rule. Based on this revision and o
Attachment:
As stated 9708150195 970007
$ 62N4120 PDR encf61'Ecs\\d 09 ts_
)
J f
\\
UNITED STATES j
,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. m1 8
i
%,.....,o May 3, 1995 HEMORANDUM 10:
Bill M. Morris, Director Division of Regulatory Applications, RES FROM:
Richard L. Bangart, Director Office of State Programs
[([g gf b
.4.
~ 1.7 4
SUBJECT:
TECHNICAL REVIEW:
DRAFT FINAL RULE - CRITERIA FOR THE RELEASE OF PATIENTS ADMINISTERED RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS This is in response to your April 12, 1995 memorandum on the subject document.
-We have reviewed the draft final rule as it applies to the Agreement States through compatibility requirements. Attached are several suggested changes relating to staff's interaction with the Agreement States.
,We have no objection to proceeding with this rulemaking effort.
If you have any questions, please contact me or Lloyd Bolling of my staff.
Attachment:
As stated M E3 v \\ \\ lp
i l '.
?< -.
,(
Suggested Changes - Final _ Rule _0n' Patient Release Criteria
,1.
Page 24,LMiscellaneous_ comments on the Rule i-the suggest the Tesponse to-the 'first. statement be revised as. follows:
Response: The NRC does-not agree. NRC conducts an assessment of each. proposed requirement or~ rule to determine what level of compatibility.will be assigned to the rule. These case-by-case assessments are based, for the most part, on protecting public health and safety.
2.
Page, 34, IV. Coordination with NRC Agreement States =
Wefsuggest_thel paragraph be revised as follows:
The staff-discussed the status of this-rulemaking effort at two public meetings; the Agreement State Managers Workshop held on July 12-14,-1994 and atlthe All_ Agreement States Meeting held on October 24-25, 1994. The Agreement States 1 expressed no objections tofthe approach in this rule.-
-3; Page-39,-VIII. Issues of_ Compatibility for Agreement States
~10 CFR 20.1002 Scope.
Office-of-State Programs Internal Procedure B.7 entitled,
" Criteria _for Compatibility Determinations", states.that
" Scope" tin;10 CFR Part:20 is a Division III: item of-1 compatibility.
Therefore, the wording regarding 20.1002
- scope" should be designated as'a' Division -III matter of ~
4 compatibility,rather than-Division-II.- Division-III rules-I would-be appropriate for Agreement StatesL to adopt, but do.
not require any degree of' uniformity between NRC and. State-
' rules.
O y
4