Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20096C9121984-08-0606 August 1984 Requests Extension to 841215 for Response to Generic Ltr 84-15 Re Diesel Generator Reliability.Extension Requested Due to Manpower Constraints,Time Needed to Collect,Verify & Analyze Data & Time Required to Formulate Future Actions Project stage: Other ML20101N6601984-12-28028 December 1984 Forwards Response to 840702 Generic Ltr 84-15 Re Reduction in Number of Cold Fast Starts Surveillance Tests for Diesel Generators & Diesel Generator Reliability Data Project stage: Other ML20101S5361985-01-28028 January 1985 Forwards Revised Pages to 841228 Response to Generic Ltr 84-15 Re Diesel Generator Reliability Data.Revised List of Failures & Causes of Failures for Each Diesel Generator for Last 20 & 100 Demands Encl Project stage: Other ML20101R8571985-01-31031 January 1985 Informs That Diesel Generator Reliability Info Submitted in in Response to Generic Ltr 84-15 Precludes Separate Response to Generic Ltr 83-41 Re Fast Cold Starts of Diesel Generators Project stage: Other ML20134A1321985-10-25025 October 1985 Advises of Review of Tech Specs & Intent to Prepare Application for Amend in Response to Generic Ltr 84-15 Re Diesel Generator Reliability.Schedule Discussed W/Nrc Project Manager on 851008 Project stage: Request ML20140F8511986-03-21021 March 1986 Proposed Tech Spec Sections 2 & 3 Incorporating Surveillance Requirements for Solid Radwaste.Discussion,Justification & Significant Hazards Consideration Encl Project stage: Other ML20140F8391986-03-21021 March 1986 Application for Amend to License DPR-40,changing Sections 2 & 3 of Tech Specs to Incorporate Surveillance Requirements for Solid Radwaste Project stage: Request ML20140F8161986-03-28028 March 1986 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-40,changing Sections 2 & 3 of Tech Specs to Incorporate Surveillance Requirements for Solid Radwaste.Certificate of Svc Encl. Fee Paid Project stage: Request ML20205M3801986-04-0909 April 1986 Application for Amend to License DPR-40,revising Tech Specs Re Surveillance Requirements for Emergency Diesel Generator Project stage: Request ML20205M3641986-04-0909 April 1986 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-40,revising Tech Specs,Re Surveillance Requirements for Emergency Diesel Generators Project stage: Request ML20207S1161987-03-13013 March 1987 Forwards Response to Questions Raised on 860321 Application for Amend to License DPR-40 Re Testing of Emergency Diesel Generators to Complete Generic Ltr 84-15 Actions Project stage: Request ML20216D0571987-06-22022 June 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Re Deletion of Requirement to Start Diesel Engine Project stage: Other ML20216D0271987-06-22022 June 1987 Update to 860321 Application for Amend to License DPR-40, Incorporating Discussion,Justification & Significant Hazards Considerations Re Deletion of Requirement to Start Diesel Engine Project stage: Request ML20235G8961987-09-24024 September 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 111 to License DPR-40 Project stage: Approval ML20235G8881987-09-24024 September 1987 Amend 111 to License DPR-40,incorporating Revised Surveillance Requirements for Diesel Generators Into Tech Specs,Per Generic Ltr 84-15, Proposed Staff Actions to Improve & Maintain Diesel Generator Reliability Project stage: Other ML20235G8721987-09-24024 September 1987 Forwards Amend 111 to License DPR-40 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Incorporates Revised Surveillance Requirements for Diesel Generators Into Tech Specs,Per Generic Ltr 84-15, Proposed Staff Actions..., Per Util 860328 Request Project stage: Approval 1986-03-21
[Table View] |
Proposed Tech Spec Sections 2 & 3 Incorporating Surveillance Requirements for Solid Radwaste.Discussion,Justification & Significant Hazards Consideration EnclML20140F851 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Fort Calhoun |
---|
Issue date: |
03/21/1986 |
---|
From: |
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20140F820 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
TAC-55860, NUDOCS 8604010194 |
Download: ML20140F851 (9) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20195B4441999-05-26026 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating pressure-temp Curves, Predicted Radiation Induced NDTT Shift Curve & LTOP Limits to FCS Unit 1 RCS pressure-temp Limits Rept ML20205J7671999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Min Required RCS Flow Rate & Changing SRs for RCS Flow Rate LIC-99-0001, Proposed Tech Specs Relocating Three cycle-specific Parameter Limits from FCS TS to COLR1999-01-29029 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating Three cycle-specific Parameter Limits from FCS TS to COLR ML20151U3871998-09-0404 September 1998 Revised Bases of TS Sections 1.3(8),2.0.1(2),2.1.6,2.3,2.4, 2.13,2.15,3.1 & 3.6 ML20217B8241998-03-18018 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Alternate Shutdown Panel & Associated Auxiliary Feedwater Panel ML20217B8611998-03-18018 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 5.2 & 5.11.2,changing Title of Shift Supervisor to Shift Manager ML20217P2041998-03-0303 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 2.6 & Basis by Replacing Refs to TS 3.5(4) W/Refs to TS 5.19 ML20199L8951998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Relocation of pressure-temp Curves,Predicted Radiation Induced NDTT Shift Curve & LTOP Limits to FCS Unit 1 RCS PT Limits Rept ML20199L7291998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Section 3.E Re License Term ML20202B0931998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.5 Re Steam & Feedwater Sys ML20203G4311997-12-11011 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding New LCO to TS 2.15 Pertaining to Inoperable ESF Logic Subsystem ML20199K1391997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.19 Re Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program ML20217G4601997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising TS Surveillance 3.9, Auxiliary Feedwater Sys, to Clarify What Flow Paths Are Required to Be Tested & Delete Specific Discharge Pressure ML20196J0851997-07-25025 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Option B of 10CFR50,App J & Allowing Frequency of Conducting ILRT & Local Leak Rate Testing to Be Based on Component Performance ML20137Y1801997-04-17017 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes to License DPR-40 ML20137H4941997-03-26026 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Addl Restrictions on Operation of MSSVs ML20138L4361997-02-20020 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls LIC-96-0183, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & Table of Contents1996-11-20020 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & Table of Contents ML20129E5161996-10-24024 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 4.3.2,regarding Reactor Core & Control to Allow Use of Either Zircaloy or ZIRLO Cladding Proposed Additional Reference to Westinghouse Topical Report, WCAP-12610-P-A, Vantage + Fuel Assembly Rept ML20129C2621996-10-22022 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & 5.9.5 Re Core Operating Limits Rept LIC-96-0125, Proposed Tech Specs Revising Paragraph 2.B(2) of License to Allow Use of Source Matl as Reactor Fuel.Ts 4.3.2 Revision Would Include Depleted U in Describing Reactor Core1996-08-23023 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Paragraph 2.B(2) of License to Allow Use of Source Matl as Reactor Fuel.Ts 4.3.2 Revision Would Include Depleted U in Describing Reactor Core ML20115G0041996-07-15015 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 4.3.2 Re Reactor Core & Control ML20112D3211996-05-31031 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re LCO for Trisodium Phosphate & Increasing Min Required Amount of Trisodium Phosphate Contained in Containment Sump Mesh Baskets ML20117H6981996-05-20020 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Surveillance Test Requirements Found in TS 3-1,Tables 3-1,3-2,3-3 & 3-3A ML20117H5931996-05-17017 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Operability Requirements for Shock Suppressors (Snubbers) to USAR & or Plant Procedures & Incorporating Snubber Exam & Testing Requirements Into TS 3.3 ML20097C3081996-02-0101 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Increase in Initial Nominal U-235 Enrichment Limit of Fuel Assemblies That May Be Stored in Spent Fuel Pool LIC-96-0008, Proposed Tech Specs Placing Sirw Tank Low Level Channels in Bypass Rather than Tripped Condition1996-01-22022 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Placing Sirw Tank Low Level Channels in Bypass Rather than Tripped Condition ML20094N8631995-11-16016 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding LCO & Surveillance Test for Safety Related Inverters & Deleting Nonsafety Related Instrument Buses ML20092G0771995-09-0606 September 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 2.7,extending Allowed Outage Time from 7 Days Per Month to 7 Days W/ Addl Once Per Cycle 10 Day Allowed Outage Time ML20087E0281995-08-0404 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Minimum Operable Containment Radiation High Signal Channels ML20086D5341995-06-27027 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reformation & Clarification of TS Re Chemical & Vol Control Sys ML20091G3601995-06-26026 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Low Pressure SI Pump ML20086D3851995-06-26026 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Audit Frequencies for Plant QA Program ML20084G7751995-05-31031 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting Amend to Provide Addl Restrictions on Operation of CCW Sys Heat Exchangers ML20083C0091995-05-0808 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Proposed Revs Per GL 93-05 to Specs 2.3,3.1,3.2,3.3 & 3.6 ML20087G9691995-04-0707 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relocation of Axial Power Distribution Figure for License DPR-40 ML20082J0851995-04-0707 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes to License DPR-40 ML20080S0291995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Administrative Revs to TS 5.5 & 5.8,per GL 93-07 & Revs Unrelated to GL 93-07 to TS 2.5, 2.8,2.11,3.2 & 3.10 ML20078P8251995-02-10010 February 1995 Proposed Tech Specs 2.10 to Relocate Requirements for Incore Instrumentation Sys ML20077S1691995-01-0909 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Deletion of Requirements for Toxic Gas Monitoring Sys ML20078G8981994-11-11011 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 5.2 & 5.5,reflecting Administrative Changes ML20024J3921994-10-0707 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SRs in TS 3.6(3)a for Eight Raw Water Backup Valves to Containment Cooling Coils,Deleting SRs in TS 3.2,Table 3-5,item 6 for 58 Raw Water Valves & Revising Basis of TS 2.4 to Reflect Changes ML20069H9261994-06-0606 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Changes to Credit Leak Before Break Methodology to Resolve USI A-2, Asymmetrical Blowdown Loads on Rcps ML20069D8451994-05-25025 May 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting one-time Schedular Exemption from 10CFR50.36a(2) ML20062N4211993-12-28028 December 1993 Proposed TS Tables 3-1 & 3-2 Re Min Frequencies for Checks, Calibrs & Testing of RPS & Min Frequencies for Checks, Calibrs & Testing of ESFs & Instrumentation & Controls, Respectively LIC-93-0228, Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Changes to Leak Before Break Methodology to Resolve Unresolved Safety Issue A-2, Asymmetrical Blowdown Loads on Reactor Primary Coolant Sys1993-08-20020 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Changes to Leak Before Break Methodology to Resolve Unresolved Safety Issue A-2, Asymmetrical Blowdown Loads on Reactor Primary Coolant Sys ML20045H1791993-07-12012 July 1993 Proposed TS 2.14,Table 2-1,Item 6.b Re ESF Sys Initiation, Degraded Voltage Setting Limits LIC-93-0159, Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Administrative Changes1993-06-17017 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Administrative Changes ML20128E5341993-02-0808 February 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Section 5.9.4 Re Radioactive Effluent Release Rept.Draft Chemistry Manual Procedure Encl ML20128C0461993-02-0101 February 1993 Proposed TS Figures 2-1A & 2-1B Re pressure-temp Limits for Heatup & Cooldown,Respectively 1999-05-26
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20195B4441999-05-26026 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating pressure-temp Curves, Predicted Radiation Induced NDTT Shift Curve & LTOP Limits to FCS Unit 1 RCS pressure-temp Limits Rept ML20205J7671999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Min Required RCS Flow Rate & Changing SRs for RCS Flow Rate LIC-99-0001, Proposed Tech Specs Relocating Three cycle-specific Parameter Limits from FCS TS to COLR1999-01-29029 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating Three cycle-specific Parameter Limits from FCS TS to COLR LIC-98-0141, SG Eddy Current Test Rept for 1998 Refueling Outage. with1998-10-27027 October 1998 SG Eddy Current Test Rept for 1998 Refueling Outage. with ML20151U3871998-09-0404 September 1998 Revised Bases of TS Sections 1.3(8),2.0.1(2),2.1.6,2.3,2.4, 2.13,2.15,3.1 & 3.6 ML20217B8611998-03-18018 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 5.2 & 5.11.2,changing Title of Shift Supervisor to Shift Manager ML20217B8241998-03-18018 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Alternate Shutdown Panel & Associated Auxiliary Feedwater Panel ML20217P2041998-03-0303 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS 2.6 & Basis by Replacing Refs to TS 3.5(4) W/Refs to TS 5.19 ML20199L7291998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Deleting Section 3.E Re License Term ML20199L8951998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Relocation of pressure-temp Curves,Predicted Radiation Induced NDTT Shift Curve & LTOP Limits to FCS Unit 1 RCS PT Limits Rept ML20202B0931998-01-30030 January 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.5 Re Steam & Feedwater Sys ML20203G4311997-12-11011 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding New LCO to TS 2.15 Pertaining to Inoperable ESF Logic Subsystem ML20199K1391997-11-21021 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.19 Re Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program ML20217G4601997-10-0303 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising TS Surveillance 3.9, Auxiliary Feedwater Sys, to Clarify What Flow Paths Are Required to Be Tested & Delete Specific Discharge Pressure ML20211N7591997-10-0202 October 1997 Rev 0 to Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1 Operating Instruction, OI-ES-3, Engineered Safeguard Controls Normal Mode 1,2 & 3 Alignment Check ML20211N7521997-09-21021 September 1997 Rev 2 to Fort Calhoun Operations Dept Policy & Directive OPD-6-04, Annunciator Marking ML20211N7471997-09-12012 September 1997 Rev 2 to Fort Calhoun Operations Dept Policy & Directive OPD-6-08, Plastic Label Usage ML20211N7661997-08-25025 August 1997 Rev 4 to Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1 Annunciator Response Procedure ARP-1, APR-1 Annunciator Response Procedure ML20211N7411997-08-24024 August 1997 Rev 0 to Fort Calhoun Operations Dept Policy & Directive OPD-5-14, Test Monitor Program ML20196J0851997-07-25025 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Option B of 10CFR50,App J & Allowing Frequency of Conducting ILRT & Local Leak Rate Testing to Be Based on Component Performance ML20137Y1801997-04-17017 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes to License DPR-40 ML20137H4941997-03-26026 March 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Addl Restrictions on Operation of MSSVs ML20138L4361997-02-20020 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls ML20134J6841997-01-20020 January 1997 Rev 5,Change a to Security Training & Qualification Program LIC-96-0183, Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & Table of Contents1996-11-20020 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & Table of Contents ML20129E5161996-10-24024 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 4.3.2,regarding Reactor Core & Control to Allow Use of Either Zircaloy or ZIRLO Cladding Proposed Additional Reference to Westinghouse Topical Report, WCAP-12610-P-A, Vantage + Fuel Assembly Rept ML20129C2621996-10-22022 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 5.0 Re Administrative Controls & 5.9.5 Re Core Operating Limits Rept LIC-96-0125, Proposed Tech Specs Revising Paragraph 2.B(2) of License to Allow Use of Source Matl as Reactor Fuel.Ts 4.3.2 Revision Would Include Depleted U in Describing Reactor Core1996-08-23023 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Paragraph 2.B(2) of License to Allow Use of Source Matl as Reactor Fuel.Ts 4.3.2 Revision Would Include Depleted U in Describing Reactor Core ML20115G0041996-07-15015 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 4.3.2 Re Reactor Core & Control ML20112D3211996-05-31031 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re LCO for Trisodium Phosphate & Increasing Min Required Amount of Trisodium Phosphate Contained in Containment Sump Mesh Baskets ML20117H6981996-05-20020 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Surveillance Test Requirements Found in TS 3-1,Tables 3-1,3-2,3-3 & 3-3A ML20117H5931996-05-17017 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Operability Requirements for Shock Suppressors (Snubbers) to USAR & or Plant Procedures & Incorporating Snubber Exam & Testing Requirements Into TS 3.3 ML20129C5351996-03-0101 March 1996 Rev 0 to Incore Instrumentation Operability Requirements ML20097C3081996-02-0101 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Increase in Initial Nominal U-235 Enrichment Limit of Fuel Assemblies That May Be Stored in Spent Fuel Pool LIC-96-0008, Proposed Tech Specs Placing Sirw Tank Low Level Channels in Bypass Rather than Tripped Condition1996-01-22022 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Placing Sirw Tank Low Level Channels in Bypass Rather than Tripped Condition ML20108A7161995-12-19019 December 1995 Rev 7 to CH-ODCM-0001, ODCM, Incorporating TS Amend 171 for Section 3.1 Update/Reflect Changing Environ ML20094N8631995-11-16016 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding LCO & Surveillance Test for Safety Related Inverters & Deleting Nonsafety Related Instrument Buses ML20092G0771995-09-0606 September 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 2.7,extending Allowed Outage Time from 7 Days Per Month to 7 Days W/ Addl Once Per Cycle 10 Day Allowed Outage Time ML20091P4011995-09-0101 September 1995 Rev 3 to Fort Calhoun Station ISI Program Plan Third Ten-Yr Interval 1993-2003 ML20087E0281995-08-0404 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Minimum Operable Containment Radiation High Signal Channels ML20086D5341995-06-27027 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reformation & Clarification of TS Re Chemical & Vol Control Sys ML20091G3601995-06-26026 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Allowed Outage Time for an Inoperable Low Pressure SI Pump ML20086D3851995-06-26026 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Audit Frequencies for Plant QA Program ML20085M0081995-06-15015 June 1995 Rev 2 to ISI Program Plan for 1993-2003 Interval ML20084G7751995-05-31031 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting Amend to Provide Addl Restrictions on Operation of CCW Sys Heat Exchangers ML20083C0091995-05-0808 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Proposed Revs Per GL 93-05 to Specs 2.3,3.1,3.2,3.3 & 3.6 ML20087G9691995-04-0707 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Relocation of Axial Power Distribution Figure for License DPR-40 ML20082J0851995-04-0707 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Changes to License DPR-40 ML20108A7121995-03-15015 March 1995 Rev 6 to CH-ODCM-0001, ODCM, Incorporating New TS Amend 164 ML20080S0291995-03-0101 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Administrative Revs to TS 5.5 & 5.8,per GL 93-07 & Revs Unrelated to GL 93-07 to TS 2.5, 2.8,2.11,3.2 & 3.10 1999-05-26
[Table view] |
Text
'
'. 2.0 - LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION 2.4 Containment Cooling (Continued)
During power aperation one of the components listed above (in addition to one raw water pump) may be inoperable. If the inoper-able component is not restored to operability within seven days, the reactor shall be placed in a hot shutdown condition within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
If the inoperable component is not restored to operability within an additional 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />, the reactor shall be placed in a cold shutdown condition within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
(2) Modification of Minimum Requirements During power operation, the mir.imum requirements may be modi-fied to allow a total of two of the components listed in a. and
- b. to be inoperable at any one time (in addition to one raw water pump). Only two raw water pumps may be out of service. l If the operability of both components is not restored within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, the reactor shall be placed in a hot shutdown condition within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. If the operability of both components is not restored within an additional 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />, the reactor shall be placed in a cold shutdown condition within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Any valves, interlocks and piping directly associated with one of the above components and required'to function during acci-dent conditions shall be deemed to be part of that component and shall meet the same requirements as for that component.
Any valve, interlock or piping associated with the containment cooling system which is not included in the above paragraph and which is required to function during accident conditions may be inoperable for a period of no more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. If operation is not restored within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, the reactor shall be placed in a hot shutdown condition within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
Basis The requirements of Section 2.3, Emergency Core Cooling System, apply to the specifications above with respect to the operability of the 2-25 ATTACHMENT A Amendment No. 49 40go g [5000205 P n
___- p--- . s
TABLE 3-2 (continued) ~
F MINIMUM FREOUENCIES FOR CHECKS, CALIBRATIONS AFD TESTING OF
@ ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES, INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS 3 &
9 Surveillance
" Channel Description Function Freauency Surveillance Method
- 5
- 6. (continued) b. Calibrate R b.. Exposure to known external l E radiation source.
1
- c. Test M c. Remote operated integral i
radiation check source used to verify instrumentation, one channel at a time, and isolation 1
lockout relay functional check.
- 7. Manual Safety Injection a. Test R a. Manual initiation.
Initiation F
- 8. Manual Containment a. Test R a. Manual Initiation.
Isolation Initiation
- 9. Manual Initiation Con- a. Test R a. Manual switch opera-tainment Spray tion; pumps and valves tested i
separately.
- 10. Automatic Load a. Test Q a. Proper operation will be veri-l Sequencers fled during safety feature
' acutation test of Item 3(a) above.
1-q 11. Diesel Start See Tech Spec 3.7 for these tests.
1
TABLE 3-2 (continued)' -
MINIMUM FREQUENCIES FOR CHECKS. CALIBRATIONS AND' TESTING OF ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES. INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS Surveillance Channel Description Function Frecuency ' Surveillance Method I
- 12. Diesel Fuel Transfer a. Test M a. Pump run to refill day tank.-
Pump
- 13. SIRW Tank Low Level a. Check S a. . Verify level indication between Signal independent channels.
- b. Test / M b. A test pressure simulating the tank level is applied to each w tank bubbler, one at a time.
.L C'
- c. Calibration R c. Known level signal applied to sensors and STLS logic verified.
- 14. Safety Injection Tank a. Check S a. Verify that level and pressure indications are between indepen-dent high and low alarms for level and pressure.
E
3.0- SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3.7 Emergency Power System Periodic Tests Applicability Applies to periodic testing and surveillance requirements of the emergency power system.
Objective To vertfy that the emergency power system will respond promptly and properly when required.
Specifications The following tests and surveillance shall be performed subject to the following:
A. A maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25% of the surveillance interval unless otherwise specified, and B. A total maximum combined interval time for any 3 consecutive surveillance functions not to exceed 3.25 times the specified interval.
(1) Diesel Generators
- a. Each diesel engine shall be started at least once per 31 days on a staggered basis. The test .shall verify that:
- 1. The diesel starts from ambient condition and accel-erates to rated speed and voltage in less than or equal to I 10 seconds.* The signal initiated to start this test shall be varied from one test to another to verify manual and auto start circuits.
ii. With the diesel running'at rated speed and voltage, the generator shall be synchronized with the 4.16 KV bus and the diesel breaker manually closed from the electrical control board. The generator shall be loaded to nominal nameplate rating and run for a minimum of 15 minutes.
After this 15 minutes, a continuation of the run shall be accomplished for a total run of at least 60 minutes before being off-loaded and the diesel breaker tripped.
- b. The diesel auto start initiating circuits shall be tested prior to each start up if not done during the previous week.
'The diesel generator start (10 seconds) from ambient conditions shall be performed at least once per 184 days in these surveillance tests. All other engine starts for the purpose of this surveillance testing may be preceded by an engine prelube period and/or other warmup procedures recom-mended by the manufacturer so that mechanical stress and wear on the diesel engine is minimized.
Amendment No. 41 3-58 el
. 3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3.7 Emergency Power System Periodic Tests (continued)
(1) Diesel Generators (continued)
- c. Tests shall be conducted during each refueling outage to demonstrated the satisfactory overall automatic operation of each diesel system. This test shall be initiated by the simulated simultaneous loss of 4.16 KV supplies to bus lA3 (IA4) and a simulated auto start signal. Proper operation will be verified by observation of (1) de-energization of bus 1A3 (IA4) and load shedding from bus (both 4160 V and 480 V), (2) diesel automatic start, energization of bus lA3 (IA4), automatic sequence start of emergency load and opera-tion for > 5 minutes while its generator is loaded with the emergency loads. Manual control of diesel generators and breakers shall also be verified during refueling shutdowns.
- d. Each diesel generator shall be given a thorough inspection at least annually following the manufacturer's recommenda-tions for this class of standby service. The above tests will be considered satisfactory if all applicable equipment operates as designed. This will include calibration of mon-itoring instrumentation.
- e. The fuel. oil transfer pumps shall be verified to be '
operable each month.
(2) Station Batteries
- a. Every month the voltage of each cell (to the nearest 0.01 volt), the specific gravity, and temperature of a pj' pt )
cell .in each battery shall be measured and recordedW(2 I
- b. Every three months the specific gravity of each cell, the temperature reading of every fifth cell, and the amount of water added shall be measured and recorded. During the first refueling outage and every third refueling outage thereafter the batteries shall be subjected to a rated load discharge test.
- c. At monthly intervals the third battery charger, which is capable of being connected to either of the two D.C. distri-bution buses, shall be paralleled in turn to each D.C. bus.
In-each case, load shall be transferred to this reserve battery charger by switching out the normal charger. The reserve charger shall be run on load for 30 minutes on each bus and the system shall finally be returned to normal.
- d. During refueling shutdowns the correct function of all D.C.
emergency transfer switches shall be demonstrated by manual transfer of normal D.C. supply breakers at the 125 volt D.C. distribution panels.
Amendment No. 24 3-59 ti
-3.0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3.7 Emergency Power System Pariodic Tests (Continued)
(3) Energency Lighting The correct functioning of the emergency lighting system shall be verified at least once each year.
~
(4) 13.8 Kv Transmission Line The 13.8 Kv transmission line will be energized and loaded to minimum shutdown requirements at each refueling outage following installation.
Basis The emergency power system provides power requirements for the engineered safety features in the event of a DBA. Each of the two diesel generators is capable of supplying minimum required safety feature equipment from independent buses. This redundancy is a factor in establishing testing intervals. The monthly tests speci-fied will demonstrate operability and load capacity of each diesel generator. These tests are conducted to meet the objectives of NRC Generic Letter 84-15 regarding the issue of reductions in cold fast starts. For this reason, the test verifying a 10 second start will be conducted from ambient conditions once per 184 days for each diesel. Other monthly tests will allow for manufacturer recommended warmup to reduce the mechanical stress and wear on the diesel engines. The fuel supply and various controls are contin-uously monitored and alarmed for off-normal conditions. At approximately yearly intervals (during refueling shutdowns) automa-tic starting on loss of off-site power and automatic load shedding, diesel connection, and loading will be ver_ified. At the same inter-vals, capability will be verified for manual emergency control of I these functions from the diesel and switch-gear rooms.
Considering system redundancy, the specified testing intervals for the station batteries should be adequate to detect and correct any malfunction before it can result in system malfunction. Batteries will deteriorate with time, but precipitous failure is extremely unlikely. The surveillance specified is that which has been demon-strated over the years to provide an indication of a cell becoming unserviceable long before it fails.
References (1) USAR, Section 8.3.4 (2) USAR, Section 8.4.2 Amendment No. 24 3-60 ti
'. - DISCUSSION, JUSTIFICATION, AND SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATIONS The NRC's Generic Letter 84-15, dated July 2, 1984, provided staff ob-jectives with respect to the emergency diesel generators at nuclear power facilities. The first. attachment to this letter addressed a staff objec-tive of reducing the number of cold fast start surveillance tests for diesel generators which were deemed as resulting in premature diesel en-gine degradation. The Generic Letter requested a description of the current surveillance testing program, and a description of intended actions to reduce cold fast starts.
OPPD's response directly applicable to this i. tem of the Generic Letter was provided in our letter LIC-84-413, dated December 28, 1984. In this l_et-ter, we described our cold fast start surveillance testing program, and stated that we would conduct a review of the Technical Specifications and surveillance testing in order to determine if any unnecessary testing could be eliminated. In a letter to the NRC (LIC-85-362) dated October 25, 1985, OPPD stated that our review indicated that certain changes to the Technical Specifications would be in order. We further noted that we expected to submit those changes in the form of an Application for Amend-ment approximately 30 days after full power operation following the 1985 refueling and maintenance outage. Accordingly, the proposed changes to
-the Technical Specifications are intended to meet that objective.
The proposed changes to the Technical Specifications are as follows:
Technical Specification 2.4, Limiting Condition for Operation of the Containment Cooling System, part (2), Modification of Minimum Require-ments. The existing Technical Specification allows during power operation, The minimum requirements to be modified to allow a total of two of the components listed in a. and b. to be inoperable at any one time (in addi- '
tion to one raw water pump) provided that the emergency diesel generator connected to the other engineered safeguards 4.16 KV bus (IA4 or IA3) is started to demonstrate operability. The proposed Technical Specification removes the requirement that the emergency diesel be started. This partic-ular requirement imposes the stresses associated with cold fast starts on the diesel engines. Further, the requirement is not consistent with the Standard Technical specifications. Therefore, this start requirement has been removed from Technical Specification 2.4(2).
Technical Specification 3.1, Instrumentation and Control, applies to the checks, calibration, and testing of the RPS, ESF, and miscellaneous plant instrumentation and controls. Item 11 of Table 3-2, of the Specification addresses test requirements for the diesel generators. These requirements i are spelled out in far greater detail in Specification 3.7. Therefore, l the Item 11 of Table 3-2 has been modified to refei ence Technical Specifi-cation 3.7. This will climinate redundant roouirements and clarify the j specifics of the diesel tests actually requirid.
l The requirement for a manual start found in item lla is essentially l
redundant to that found in Technical Specification 3.7(1)a.
i ATTACHMENT B tt
, ATTACHMENT B (Continued)
The requirement to start the diesel in Table 3-2, Item 11b, has been removed. The text required by Table 3-2, Item 3b will verify that the proper start signals are received. Thus the intent ~of this Technical Specification can be met by verifying a start signal is present without actually starting the diesel. The change will reduce the number of diesel starts required by the Technical Specifications.
The existing requirement of Table 3-2, Item 11c to test the diesel during the refueling shutdowns is redundant to the test noted in 3.7(1)c and is therefore deleted.
The requirements of Table 3-2, Item Ild to test the diesel auto start initiating circuits prior to startup if not done during the previous week have been moved to Section 3.7(1)b. ~Thus provides for the~ diesel generator testing requirements to be located within one specification.
Technical Specification 3.7(1) has been modified to allow for the dicsel '
start (10 seconds) from ambient conditions to be performed at least once per 184 days. The other engine starts in this specification will be allowed to be preceded by an engine prelube period and/or other warmup procedures recommended by the manufacturer so that mechanical stress and wear on the engine is minimized.
Technical Specification 3.7(1)(e) has been removed from the Technical Spec-ifications. This specification refers to design consideration and not a surveillance requirements. The design basis considerations are found in USAR Section 8.4.1.2.
A note has been added to the Basis section of 3.7 to specify that Generic Letter 84-15 recommendations to reduce cold fast starts have been incorpor-ated into these Technical Specifications. I Justification This change to the Technical Specifications is proposed in response to the NRC recommendations of Generic Letter 84-15. This change will reduce the number of unnecessary cold fast starts of the emergency diesel generators.
These changes will bring applicable portions of the Fort Calhoun Station Technical Specifications into conformance with the recommended changes noted in the Attachment to Enclosure 1 of Generic Letter 84-15.
Significant Hazards Considerations The proposed changes to the Technical Specifications have been reviewed relative to the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90. This review resulted in the ,
following conclusions:
The proposed changes will not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment previously evaluated in the Safety Analysis Report. These changes are intended to reduce degradation of the emergency diesel generators caused by cold fast starts. Thus, the probability of malfunction of equipment can be considered to have been lessened, d
. ATTACHMENT B (Continued)
The changes will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated. The proposed changes do not change the normal operating mode of any existing system, but only alter the testing mode. i The proposed changes will not involve a significant reduction'in a margin of safety. The changes are intended to provide a less severe method of testing of the diesel generators, thus decreasing the likelihood of de-gradation and wear. Thus, the proposed changes could be viewed as increasing a margin of safety.
en