ML20138F588
| ML20138F588 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1996 |
| From: | ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138F593 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9705060010 | |
| Download: ML20138F588 (116) | |
Text
MMMMMMMMM__.m.8MG
.u-w.
b Y?
$ A M8 @ s b @ $ F @m w% % s M b
E u&b&& d W' M' @ % W M $rMMMl
%MMr e s w m$ WM w $n $ e$ g%s @ k e$ & n wNw DN&W WW a
s Wk n
o
~
h w,@&Q4 nMyw%.m ?dd@hn9w%a We % mM4 Md W 4W a n a s,4v@ W W M wifeM & @@m,M 4-m,m nn#
w sM nn9 ' +4 W e l
pw q
%w dWi&+ w M W W % % w:W M NM F
WSW:anQt um&a W
%x w
wef m~w
- v
&n a wa+ w m e w w a s _a m e w m m s n.
e aem my u ALRADIOLOGICADENVIRONMENTARYOP
- ~1 nn.
a-w n MANNO Q@@
,gp_en_n m _,wsqu _e M.=a~ _w w _-O _ pup _wa~mye w
- 4 p u AQ>wspy wa
~C. i f ; ce p'. mfx y,ab.m 9my a@gsy 4@amlew MMv,,' e". \\ c
, a,qu, ny e. m or %%w%" f^
yb,cL,.a 4
p p
.4 m W u+ ~fu w l g vg.,phv.;
gs du pww w
+ a g.W 3 M ' y.%pv Q+:m. w % g n op g w'ny Qq?w a
n
- w'.f s
dm.,
- & y:y n ~: n h
QOyWQ&;W%, *%, Qg%L W,s nn w
. n% $\\ mmWW=
.1;:k 'y'4 Jl}.:W Mn: V W:
c g h%, c,
4"W.jf Q-
%% }Qy),
n q
- M u}y JPjW sp t
LdSp$$;NSM$Wh M KMl9 M%$ W i % y') N@W
' T@Q A
Y M
%$fGh@s%
$f M%
M$$t MQMhQF %% g;'?TWr%,, L M -l :w& y%n$, $..D, M
%MUh MM f$
6.n n w;.y r ;: L +, w. e
, 59 M;p:f:m :
a
%y
.m 7 ;, s..,.-e n
n a
< f ::&n' 4 n w u w w,p v :u r g' ge w y%.p;Q' ' %:v,s3m a %w%;p:Ry;g%m+26.%mpw:k n
a(s p.
my me wg t
w n.
W;$
+
eir..,,m, % 'wy';/ww nm.m Q 4, s.e,W,',
9 U
W
~
v rgt < a9G tyy.Wm p vw
~
<c t
n' a4 -
e3.y-
< ' og ',y,, e,;;%.
Wa q p)# wi M
4 W-i pn uyg/WQQR s+
h _ llp!p b d:;, ' a $ '. - 4@b..,
Mg fW%:m%p&n&r,N
. &q c. > s.g ffM Q W I y g
'y' s
Mb y
,r*
y?
%' n%' E...
pfyMmk n n.s g:n p q ; :9.;;,,'O 4
i
7%Q; y;qw
' Vg j 'h.
gj; Wi9
~
/
pf 4
w, kw
+
W u 3 J g ;p lA&&ac&hM"&u@hNM hs
+~m s
<v wmmy n W)lg:Nk&f:m. kh k
Qk u,;
+
hh f %k,AgWl.
u hema m v u&WlW &&u& n ~
s :a w :s w w[;N;v&n$
w 1 wlw%M k pw mu pm Mi C
- 4 Y N%+:DWp
- 5:V W~
$3
- & w s+ w %pe %x c W.
- ,flm pybhN:n.m%%ggugp/hk;':
e
,:,u Q<%: r 1 m,,NNe w ". s.> kc A
&q s>
-1 pwwx p
. yy ; y kkh Nhy Nh NN Ja.p p?
n yn n
kNh R $ Q g W M M [ M M d Q @d ukN a) 1 l y M $ ? *[k;b D N NhCOkiO h IM;b M :,,
M < tkMb
^
M
% Q E W ?:
y
?",1, t i M u&M
, e m
w n g w n;gh m a _a s.
x so sh h m~;r.:2s.n gs w ~nn vm w
.n oxy ge w
, n.
. n.
e
, y. d fY
$$N s
c isC u4 Q
4 ep-
~u ~m,.
's~t;,,'
$m"gDN '%g M
3 m. y' j.e m nr.
s i; k:,
e
{p, af J gg j f, l 3 3,
?N 44 l j [ygg]
' ( A J.'
.y m
WOOO r
3 s 4 s
PDR ADOCK 0500 s
{,yy eg '
.g q
.+
y s#@Nd@ J,.aM... 'h.W
' ' ' 'i 6,.
4 9; "i
F' '
i~
n
,# k+
, r*
- A y
4'M Q' _
A' e
eA e.i-m g.~,,
4 t..,
ONh%WYb'fNhMN$'N'.'WN'M %% MAN W ' ' ' "1 d+
I
't U
i8
~
' ^~ '
b-
~-
4 Q
B-
~
k
-*m4 4
--a A
4 N
4.
+
,(
9 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE-UNITS 1 AND 2 9
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 1596
}
I
- t P
4 p.
a 4
i b
9705060010 970430 PDR ADOCK 0S000313 PDR_
p SAW - _
k
{
[
Summary I
The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report presents data obtained
(-
through analyses of environmental samples collected for Arkansas Nuclear One's (ANO's)
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the period January 1,1996, through December 31,1996. This report fulfills the requirements of ANO Unit 1 Technical Specification 6.12.2.5 and Unit 2 Technical Specification 6.9.4.
During 1996, as in previous years, ANO detected radionuclides attributable to plant operations at the discharge location. ANO personnel routinely monitor results from tids area in order to note any trends. Their review of results from this area indicates the following:
Tritium levels in the surface water media were similar to the historic average and were well below reporting requirements.
Manganese-54, Cobalt-58, Cobalt-60, Cesium-134 and Cesium-137 levels in the sediment media are not demonstrating any increase in comparison to previous years. Review indicates that 1996 levels are less than those of previous years.
Cesium-137 levels in the fish media are not demonstrating any increase in comparison to previous years. In addition, all results were well below the required lower limit of detection as identified in the technical specification.
Tritium, attributable to plant operations, was detected at a new intake surface water control location. The initial sample collection point was relocated to a different area of the service water bay for protection during winter conditions. Prior to relocation, the sampler collected water unaffected by plant operations. However, after relocation, the sampler collected water affected by the plant's oily water separator discharge, thereby resulting in the collection of tritium contaminated water. This problem was eliminated by again relocating the sampler unit to an area unaffected by plant operations.
f I
L
l l
)
l Cesium-137, attributable to fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing, was detected at the Rylee and Steuber Dairies. However, the levels detected were similar to previously detected measurements.
l Section 2.0 of this repcrt discusses these results in more dctail.
Radiolocical Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)
Radiation an:l radioactivity are monitored around ANO within a 22-mile radius.
The REMP was established about two years before the station became operational in 1974.
This program provides data on background radiation and radioactivity which is normally present in the area. ANO has continued to monitor the environment by samplinF air, milk, water, food products, vegetation, sediment and fish, as well as mcasuring radiation directly.
Samples are collected fiom both indicator and control locations. Indicator locaticus are within approximately five miles of the site, and are expected to show any increases or buildup of radioactivity that might occur due to station operation. Control locations are I
further from the station and are expected to indicate the presence of only naturally occurring radioactivity. The results obtained from indicator locations are compared with control locations and with concentrations present in the environment before the station became operational. This allows for assessment of any impact the operation of ANO might have had on the surrounding environment.
In 1996, radiologierl environmental samples were collected and analyzed for radioactivity. Radionuclide concentrations measured at indicator locations were compared l
to control locations, as well as to concentrations in previous years. ANO personnel assessed plant operations using this data and concluded t!'at no significant impact occurred on the l
emirons surrounding the plant. Radiation levels in the environment were undetectable in many cases, and at or near previous low levels in all other cases.
l Ilarmful E(Tects or Irreversible Damare No harmful effects or evidence ofirreversible damage were detected by ANO's REMP. Therefore, no analysis or planned course of acticn to alleviate problems were necessary, ii
y-Reporting Levels No reporting levels for radioactivity concentration in environmental samples,
[
as outlined in ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specification Tables 4.30-3 and 3.12-3, respectively, when averaged over any calendar quarter, were equaled or exceeded due to ANO effluents during 1996. Therefore, no Radiological Monitoring Special Reposts were required.
_ Radioactivity Not Attril'utable to ANO Radioactivity attributable to other sources was detected by the ANO REMP in 1977,1978 and 1981 following nuclear weapons testing. The most recent incident occurred in May 1986 when the radioactive release due to reactor core degradation at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant was detected.
Comparison to Federal and State Programs
[
Data from the ANO REMP was compared to federal and state monitoring programs as results became available. The federal monitoring program used for companson was the b
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD) Direct Radiation Manitoring Network. The state program is conducted by the Arkansas Department of Health (ADH).
The latest available quarterly results from the NRC TLD Network have been compared to those from ANO's program. This comparison consisted of the following:
NRC and ANO results for 0 - 2 mile range TLDs.
NRC and ANO results for 2 - 5 mile range TLDs.
NRC and ANO results for >5 mile range TLDs.
NRC and ANO results for co located TLDs.
The results c,f this comparison indicate that quarterly doses recorded by both programs are in agreement. In addition, both programs have shown no change in TLD results Och could be attributed to ANO operation.
Radiological monitoring by the ADH entails similar runpling requirements to the ANO REMP. In many cases air samples and TLDs are cellocated, while sample media L
I, l
iii r
l l
(
such as food products, water, milk and fish are shared or split. Comparison of the 1996'results from ADH and ANO collocated air sample and TLD locations show that the programs are in
[
agreement and have produced similar results. The only commr,n location where radioactivity attributable to ANO has been detected by both programs is the ANO discharge. Discharge water, sedhnent and fish results were above background levels due to ANO effluents..
Sampline Deviations During 1996, the following sampling deviations occurred:
Two first quarter (Stations 135 & 139) TLDs were missing in the field due to vandalism and one second quarter (Station 135) TLD was damaged due to water. TLD losses of this type are characteristic of other TLD programs.
The 1996 TLD recovery rate was 98% (173 of 176), which is comparable with other TLD programs. These losses were isolated instances which did not recur during the year. The TLDs were replaced by ANO personnel once discovered.
Air sample Stations 7 and 3 had mechanical failures, during the weeks of March 5 -12,1996, and December 17 - 23,1996, respectively. In addition, air sample Station 3 had an electrical outage that occurred during the January 9 - 16,1997, sampling period. These deviations were isolated instances which did not recur during the year and were corrected by ANO personnel once discovered.
All other samples were within program parameters.
Sample. Station Relocation
[
No sample stations were relocated during 1996 due to unavailability of samples.
Unavailable Results Analytical contractor resuhs were received in adequate time for inclusion in this report. No missing results were identified.
[
T I
iv
)
I
~
{
Attachments Attachment I contains results of air, milk, water, food products, vegetation, sediment, fish and TLD samples collected in 1996. TLDs were analyzed by the ANO Dosimetry Department.
The remaining samples were analyzed by Entergy Services, Inc. (ESI) and the River Bend Station (RBS) environmental laboratory. Attachment I also contains 'RBS' participation in the interlaboratory comparison program during 1996. Attachment II contains statistical analyses performed on air and TLD results and the equations that were utilized. Attachment III contains dose calculations performed for sediment using a generalized equation from Regulatory Guide 1.109, " Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases ofReactor Efiluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I."
[
I I
V
.a I
[
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.Pagg
\\
l Summary.........
i List of Tables....................
vii l
List of Figurea.........................
viii List of Attachments...
ix Section Tonic 1.0 Introduction...
1-i 1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Purpcsc and Design Criteria................
1-1 1.2 Dose Pathways Associated with ANO.........
1-1 1.3 Pathways Monitored...
1-2 1.4 Program Description.......
1-2 1.5 Analytical Methods.
18 2.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 2-i 2.1 Air Particulate and Radiciodine Sample Results..
2-1 2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Sample Results..
22 2.3 Milk Sample Results..
2-5 1
2.4 Water Sample Results...............
2-5 2.5 1
Vegetation and Food Product Sample Results..............
2-9
.2.6
. Sediment Results.
2-9 2.7 Fish Sample Results.........
2-11 2.8 Annual Land Use Census Results......
2-13 i
2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results...
2-16 3.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary....
3-i l
3.I 1996 Program Results Summary.
3-1 I
l l
l i
)
vi H
LIST OF TABLES Table No.
Title g
1-1 Sample Stations................
1-12 2-1 1996 Lrmd Use Census...
2-14 3-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary..............
32 l
l l
1 1
I I
s I
i i
1 l
1 i
i I
L sii r
~
n f
LIST OF FIGURES Finure No.
Title Page 1-1 Expo sure Pathways.....................................................
1-25
[,
1-2 Sample Collection Sites...........................................
1-26 2-1 TLD Radiation Do se....................................................
2-4 2-2 Discharge Tritium Concentrations.............
2-8 2-3 Discharge Sedhnent.............
2-10 2-4 Discharge Fish......................................................
2-12
[
i 1
i
[
j l
1 i
l I
i i
i I
[
[
l i
I V111 i
a 1
)
l 4
I l-l LIST OF ATTACHMENTS f
Attachment Title Pan I
1996 Radiological Environmental
/
.[
Monitoring Report..............................................
I-i II Statistical Analyses............................................
IIi III Sediment Dose Calculations.....
III.i I
l i
i iX f
(
p
)
x::r::n n 1
(
SECTION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
I i
t l-i r
-=
. n-
.---=
1.1 Radiological Environmen?al Monitorine Program Purpose $nd Design Crjjeria The radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) was establi'i ed to ensure that plant operating controls properly function to mininnr.e any associated radiation endangerment to human health cr the environment. The gurpose of the 1
REMP is:
f to measure radiation levels and their variations in enviromnental media in the area surrounding the plant, I
to detennine average levels of radiation and radiosctive material e
in various environmental media, to evaluate environmental sarnpliag procedures, equipment and e
techniques, and to detect effects, if any, of ANO operation on the environmental e
radiation levels and corcentrations.
The.ie.sgn critpria for the REMP are:
l to anclyze important pathways for anticipated types and quantities of radionuclides released into the enviror-ent, to consider the possibility of a buildup oflong-lived radionuclides e
in the environment and physical and biological accumulations that may contribute to human exposures, to consider the potential radiation exposure to plant and animal life e
in the environment surounding ANO, and to correlate levels of radiation and radioactivity in the environment with radioactive releases from station operation.
1.2 Dose Pathways Associated with ANO Figure 1-1 shows potential exposure pathways that could occur as a result of a nuclear power plant. However, the mcst significant environmental dose pathways from a nuclear power station are direct dose from gaseous l
l-1 4
l t
[
effluent and thyroid dose due to the ingestion ofmilk. ANO operations are expected to have little, if any, impact by these pathways due to the absence of milking animals within the vicinity of the site and the very low levels of radiation released.
1.3 Pathways Monitored The airborne, waterborne, ingestion and direct radiation pathways are monitored as required by ANO Technical Specifications. The REMP indudes the sampling program required to meet the above intent This program is supplemented with additional sampling in order to provide a comprehensive 1
and we;l-balanced program. Sample locations used to monitor exposure pathways
~
are described in Table 1-1 and shown in Figure 1-2. Section 2.0 of this report provides a discussion of 1996 sampling results. Section 3.0 provides a summary ofresults for monitored exposure pathways.
1.4 Program Description 1.4.1 Air Particulate and Radiciodine ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specification Tables 4.30-1 and d
2.12-1, respectively, require five air sampler locations for measurement of radioactivity in the airborne exposure pathway. ANO used six continuous air samplers to provide gross beta, gamma and radiciodine activity l
measurements. Four of the air samplers were used as indicators (Stctions j
i l
1,2,3 and 4) with tne remaining two utilized as controls (Stations 6 and 7).
[
These air samplers were placed at distances from 0.4 to 19.3 miles (Table i
1-1 and Figure 1-2).
The air samplers were placed approximately one meter above the ground in weatherproof houses. A 47-millimeter glass fiber filter was instelled in the intake line by the vacuum pump with a charcoal cartridge located directly downstream. Flows were adjusted to 30 i 3 liters per minute. Filters and l-2
=,j
=
s l
(
cartridges were changed weekly and analy::ed for gross bets radionuclides and radiciodine activity, respectively. In addition, the filters were composited quvterly and analyzed for gamma radionuclides.
l 1.4.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry ANO Unit 1 and Unit 2 Tecimical Specification Tables 4.30-1 and l
3.12-1 respectively, require forty TLD locations for measurement of d!reet radiation doses. ANO measured ambient radiation in the environment surrounding the plant with 44 TLDs (two lithium borate and calcium sulfate, elerw.us) to provide a quantitative measurement of the area radiation le,els.
ANO personnel placed these environmental TLDs at distances from 0.4 to 21.8 miles (Table 1-1 and Figure 12).
Each dosimeter was sealed in a plastic protective holder and suspended above the ground. The dosimeters were collected and analyzed quarterly. The TLD locations may be summaired as follows:
I1 stations in the 0 - 2 mile range, 15 stationsin the 2 - 5 mile range, and e
18 stations in the >5 mile range.
1.4.3 Drinking Water, Surface Water and Groundwater l
ANO Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Tables 4.30-1 and 3.12-1, respectively, require one drinking water, two surface water and two groundwater locations for the measurement of radioacthity by the waterborne exposure pathway.
Il Drinkine water was sampled monthly from an indicator location (intake to Russellville City Water System from Illinois Bayou) at a distance of 5.3 miles (Table 1-1 and Figure 1-2). Water was collected in two one-l gallon labeled containers and one 250 milliliter (ml) labeled glass container.
TJpon return from the field, the one-gallon samples were acidified with l
l l
1-3
hydrochloric acid and analyzed for gross beta radionuclides, Iodine-131 and gamma radionuclides. The 250 ml glass container was composited
[
quarteriy and analyzed for tritium. ANO personnel also collected backup samples (two one-gallon containers and one 250 ml gl ass container) which remained on-site as a precautionary measure to replace samples lost during shipment or to verify analytical resu!!s.
Surface water was sampled monthly from two locations, an indicator location (discharge) and a control location (intake) at distances from 0.1 - 0.9
{
miles (Table 1-1 and Figure 1-2). Samples collected for gamma radionuclide analysis were composited with an automatic sampler that collected a preset I
volume at set intervals (~ 2 gallons per week). Weekly, a one-gallon sample from each location was acidified with hydrochloric acid and placed in an appropriately labeled composite carboy. At the end of the month, a one-gallon l
(
sample from each composite carboy was placed in a labeled container and then analyzed for gamma radionuclides. Samples co!!ected for tritium analysis s
were composited with an automatic sampler that collected a preset volume at set intervals (~ 100 mis per week)into a glass collection device. At the end of the quarter,250 ml of sample from each location was placed in a labeled glass contairer and then analyzed for tritium. ANO personnel also collected backup samples at each location (one-gallon container and one 250 ml glass container) l
.l which remained on-site as a precautioaary measure to replace samples lost l
during shipment or to verify analytical results.
In addition, through August 1996, monthly grab surface water samples from the discharge and Piney Creek locations were collected by the ADH and split with ANO. These samples were analyzed monthly for gamma radionuclides and tritium.
Groundwater was sampled quarterly from two locations, the C. Stewart Residence (indicator) and Ouita Lake Recreation Area (control),
b l
1-4
~
I
~
at distances from 0.9 to 3.8 miles (Table 1-1 and Figure 1-2). Water was collected from each location in two one-gallon labeled containers and one 250 ml labeled glass container. Upon return from the field, the one-gallon samples were acidified with hydrachloric acid and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. The 250 ml sample was analyzed for tritium. ANO personnel also collected backup samples at each location (two one-gallon containers and one 250 ml glass container) which remained on-site as a precautionary measure to replace samples lost dming shipment or to verify analytical results.
1.4.4 Sediment ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Specification Tables 4.30-1 and 3.12-1, respectively, require two sediment locations for measurement of radioactivity by the wnterbome exposure pathway. Contract personnel collected sediment semiannualiy from three locations, an indicator (discharge) and two control locations (intake and Piney Creek), at distances from 0.1 to 5.9 miles (Table 1-1 and Figure 1-2). A minimum of 1.5 liters of sample was collected with a dredge from the top layer ofsediment at each location. After foreign objects were discarded, the samples were transferred to labeled containers and then analyzed for gamma radionuclMes.
1.4.5 Milk ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specification Tables 4.30-1 and 3.12 1, respectively, require four milk locations for measurement of radioactivity b
by the ingestion exposure pathway. ANO and ADH personnel collected milk monthly fiom four locations at distances from 5.1 to 10.8 miles (Table 1-1 and Figure 1-2). Since no indicator locations exist within five miles of ANO, four
(
locations were utilized as controls (Arkansas Tech, Steuber, Rylee and Ragsdale).
Milk was collected from each location in two on> gallon labeled containers.
Samples were preserved with formaldehyde and then analyzed for Iodine-131 and r(,
1-5
+
{
l gamma radionuclider. When available, ANO personnel also collected backup samples at each location (two one-gallon containers), which remained on-site as a precautionary measure to replace samples lost during stdpment or to verify analytical results.
1,4.6 Vegetation and Food Products ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specification Tables 4,30-1 and 3.12-1, respectively, requhe three fbod product locations and one vegetation location for measurement of radioactivity by the ingestion f
exposure pathway. ANO personnel collected, when available, from o
two vegetation indicator locations (Flatwood Road and Intake Canal) and three food product indicator locations (Cochran, Rye and Shivers) at distances of 0.5 to 2.6 miles (Table 1-1 and Figure 1-2).
The preferred source of food products was fruits, flowering vegetables and tubular vegetables. The preferred source of non food products was any vegetation with relatively broad leaves on which airborne radioactive particulate material might be deposited. Normally, when available, a one-gallon food product and c two-gallon vegetation sample were collected. The samples were then analyzed for gamma
.. i radionuclides and Iodine-131.
1.4.7 Fish ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specification Tables 4.30-1 and 3.12-1, respectively, require two fish locations for measurement of radioactivity by the ingestion exposure pathway. Fish were collected semiannually by a contractor from two locations, an indicator (discharge) and a control (intake), at distances from 0.1 to 0.9 miles (see Table 1-1 and Figure 1-2). In addition, the ADH collected and split samples with ANO at the discharge and intake location.
l l
L
A sufficient amount was cellected from each location to provide a minimum of1000 grams (wet weight) of eviscerated fish sample. The samples were then analyzed for gamma radionuclides.
1.4.8 Land Use Census i
ANO personnel conducted an annual land use census, as required i
1 by ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specifications 4.30.2 and 3/4.12.2,
)
i respectively. The purpose of the census was to identify changes in uses of land within five miles of ANO which would require modifications to the REMP or Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The most important criteria during the census were to determine location in each sector of the 3
cearest:
- Residence e Animal milked for human consumption e Garden ofgreater than 50 m2 (500 ft ) producing broadleafvegetation*.
2 The method used for conducting the land use census was as follows:
ANO personnel conducteo door-to door field surveys in each e
meteorological sector out to five mihs in order to locate the nearest resident, milk animal and garden *,
Consultation with local agricultural authorities was used in e
instances when personal contact could not be made.
As a result of these surveys, the following information was obtained in each meteorological sector:
- Nearest permanent residence
- Nearest garden and approximate size *
- Nearest milking aniraal.
l ANO personnel identified locations on the map, measured e
distances to ANO and recorded results.
ANO personnel compared the results to previous census results.
t ANO personnel chose not to perform a garden census in 1996, widch is allowed by Unit 1 Technical Specification 4.30.2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification 3/4.12.2, in lieu of broadleaf vegetation sampling in the highest "D/Q" meteorological sector (Sector 13).
1-7
I 1.5 Annivtical Methods 1.5.1 Sample Preparation Water samples were acidified by field personnel with hydrochloric l
acid when collected. Tritium samples were not acidified and were stored in glass bottles under refrigeration until the analysis could be completed.
Air filters were handled with care to avoid disturbing any deposition on the air particulate filter. Air filters were normally received in plastic petri dish containers that aided in transporting heavy dust loaded filters.
Milk samples were usually refrigerated until analyzed. Milk samples analyzed for Iodine-131 had formaldehyde added to inhibit bacterial growth and retard spoilage, and to avoid binding of the iodine that may occur with smaller levels offormaldehyde.
Soil and sediment samples were dried, pulverized, and sieved before analysis. To ensure a homogeneous sample, thorough mixing was performed.
Perishable samples were preserved by refrigeration or freezing.
Vegetation and other samples may require drying, pulverizing or ashing l
before or after analysis for long-term storage.
1.5.2 Gross Beta Analysis of Air Samples Air filters were counted in a low-background alpha-beta counter until the required LLDs shown in ANO's ' Unit 1 Technied Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved, and at least 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after collection to allow for the decay of short-lived materials such as radon and thoron.
1.5.3 Gross Beta Analysis of Water Samples This analysis measures overall beta radionuclides in water samples without identifying the specific radioisotopes present. An aliquot of sample, usually 100 milliliter (ml), was evaporated in a beaker. The residue was then l
l l
l-S i
I transferred and dried in a 47-millimeter stainless steel planchet. The planchets were counted in a low-background alpha-beta counting system until the required LLDs shown in ANO's Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved. Calculation of the activity includes a self-absorption correction factor for counter efficiency based on weight ofresidue on each planchet.
1.5.4 Tritium Analysis of Water Samples Six ml of water was added to twelve ml ofliquid scintillation cocktail in a twenty mi vial. The sample was counted in a liquid scintillation spectrometer until the required LLDs shown in ANO's Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved.
1.5.5 Iodine-131 Analysis Four liters or more of the sample were mixed with a stable iodine carrier solution, and then stirred with an anion exchange resin to remove iodine from the sample. The resin was then transferred to a 250 ml micro-marinelli beaker and counted in a shielded intrinsic Gennanium detector coupled to a computer-based data acquisition system, which performs a pulse height r.nalysis, until the required LLDs shown in ANO's Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved.
f A computer software program defined peaks by certain changes in the slope of the spectrum. The program also compared the energy of each peak with a library ofpeaks for radionuclide identification and then performed a calculation using appropriate fractional gamma ray abundance, halflife, detector efliciency and net counts in the peak region 1.5.6 Gamma Analysis of Milk and Water Samples A 3.7-liter marinelli beaker was filled with a representative aliquot of the sample. The sample was then counted in a shielded intrinsic Germanium detector as described in Section 1.5.5, until the required LLDs shown in ANO's 1-9
i Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification l
Table 3.12-2 were achieved.
1.5.7 Gamma Analysis of Vegetation, Food Products and Fish Samples l
A maximum quantity of undried vegetation or food product sample was placed into a tared 1-liter marinelli and weighed. The sample was then coumed in a shielded intrinsic Germanium detector as described in Section 1.5.5, until the required LLDs shown in ANO's Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved.
jII As much as possible (up to the total sample) of the edible portion of a fish sample was placed into a tared 0.5-liter marinelli or a lab-tech petri dish, depending on fish quantity, and weighed. The sample was then counted in a shielded intrinsic Germanium detector as described in Section 1.5.5, until the required LLDs shownin ANO's Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved.
1.5.8 Gamma Analysis of Soils and Sediments Soils and sedimefits were dried at a low temperature, placed into a l
tared 1.0-liter marineili beaker and weighed. The sample was then counted in a shielded intrinsic Germanium detector as described in Section 1.5.5, until l
the required LLDs shov.a in ANO's Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved.
l 1.5.9 Gamma Analysis of Charcoal Cartridges Charcoal cartridges were counted separately by positioning each cartridge on the face of the detector in a converted 0.5 liter marinelli used as a holder. The sample was then counted in a shielded intrinsic Germanium detector as described in Section 1.5.5, until the required LLDs shown in ANO's Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical 1
Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved.
I 1
l l-10
1.5.10 Gamma Analysis of Air Particulate Filters The thirteen (13) air particulate filters, contained in plastic petri dish for a quarterly composite for each field station, were stacked one on top of another. The samples were then counted in a shielded intrinsic Germanium detector as described in Section 1.5.5, until the required LLDs shown in ANO's f
1 Unit 1 Technical Specification Table 4.30-2 and Unit 2 Technical Specification Table 3.12-2 were achieved.
1.5.11 Therraoluminescent Dosimetry Readings I
l Environmental radiation doses were measured using TLDs that contained two lithium borate and two calcium sulfate elements. Approximately forty-eight hours prior to installation, the TLDs were annealed. After cooling, the TLDs were mounted in appropriate labeled blue clamshell type hangers and double-sealed in a whirl-pak, or similar protective covering. Upon return from the field, TLDs were read in a Panasonic UD-710A TLD Reader.
I I
l-11
l TABLE 1-1 Sample Stations Samole Station Number: 1 Approximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 88'- 0.6 nules
(.
S_agiple Twes: 1) Airborne radioiodines a
- 2) Airbome particulates
- 3) Direct radiation
(
Samole Station Location:
The sampic station is near the metcorology tower approximarcly 0.6 miles cast of ANO.
{
Samole Station Number: 2 Aporoximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 235' - 0.4 miles Samole Types: 1) Airborne radioiodines
- 2) Airborneparticulates
- 3) Direct radiation Samole Station Location:
E traveling from ANO, THEN go approximately 0.2 ndles west toward Gate 4. Turn left and go approximately 0.1 miles. Turn right and ge approximately 0.1 milea The sample stationis on the right at the former AP&Llodgelocation.
E traveling south on Flatwood Road, THEN go approximately 0.25 miles from sample station 109. Veer left at fork in road and go approximately 0.2 miles. Turn right and go approximately 0.1 miles. Turn right and go approximately 0.1 miles. The sample station is on the right at the former AP&L lodge location.
SamDIe Station Number: 3 Aporoximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 0* - 0.6 miles Sample Types: 1) Airborne radioiodines
- 2) Airborneparticulates
- 3) Direct radiation
- 4) Groundwater (alternate)
Sample Station Locatign:
E traveling west on Highway 333, THEN go approximately 0.35 miles from Gate 2 at ANO. Turn left onto gravel road and go approximately 0.05 miles. The sample station is on the left.
E traveling east on Highway 333, THEN go approximately 0.9 miles fromjunction of Highway 333 and Flatwood Road. Turn right onto gravel road and go approximately 0.i~ iles. The sample station is on the left.
i 1
1 s
1-12
TABLE 1-1 Samole Stations Sample Station Numben 4
[
Anoroxingts Direction and Distance from Plant: 180* - 0.7 miles
(
Sample Tvoes-1) Airborne radiciodines
- 2) Airborneparticulates
- 3) Direct radiation f
Samole Station Location:
Go approximately 0.25 miles south from bridge over intake canal. Turn right onto gravel road.
Proceed approximately 0.1 miles west of May Cemetery entrance The sample station is on the
{
IcA approximately 50 feet south of the road.
~
Sample Station Numben 5 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 298'- 8.2 miles Samole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation ja!nole Station Location:
While traveling on Highway 64, tum onto Cherry Street in Knoxville, AR and go approximately 0.7 miles. Turn lea onto Highway 64 South and go approximately 0.2 miles. The sample station is on the right.
Sample Station Numben 6 Anoroximate Direction and Dicta = from Plant: lil' - 7.0 miles Sample Tvoes
- 1) Airborne radioiodines
- 2) Airborne particulates
- 3) Direct radiation Samole Station Location:
Go to the AP&L local office which is located off Highway 7T in Russellville, AR (305 South Knoxville Avenue). The sample station is in the southeast corner of the back lot.
Sample Station Numben 7 Anoroximate Direction and Dia'a= from Plant: 209'- 19.3 miles Sg.oleTvoes
- 1) Airborne radioiodines m
- 2) Airborne particulates
- 3) Direct radiation Samole Station Location:
Turn west at junction of Highway 7 and Highway 27 in Dardanelle, AR. Proceed tojunction of Highway 27 and Highway 10 in Danville, AR. Turn right onto Highway 10 and proceed a short distance to the AP&L supply yard, which is on the right adjacent to an AP&L substation. The sample station is in the southwest corner of the supply yard.
Samole Station Numben 8 A_.gp_rp_ximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 180* - 0.1 miles Sample Tynes: 1) Surface water (composite)
- 2) Shoreline sediment
- 3) Fish Sample Station Location: Plant discharge canal 1-13
TABLE 1-1
(
Sample Stations Samole Statlan Numben 10 ADDroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 958 - 0.9 miles Sample Tvoes: 1) Surface water (composite)
- 2) Shoreline sediment
- 3) Fish Sample Station Location:
Surface water (composite) is collected at plant intake structure Shoreline sediment and fish are collected at plant inlet canal.
Samole Station Numben 13 Approximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 271* - 0.5 miles Sample Tve- - 1)Eloadicaf vegetation Sampi.g.St-Location:
'[
LF travr
.outh on Flatwood Road,
'IIIEN. approximately 0.2 miles from sample station 109. The sample station is on the lea.
5 jF traveling west from ANO toward Gate 4, THEN go approximately 0.4 miles and turn right onto Flatwood Road. Go a short distance (approximately 30 yards). The sample station is on the right.
Samole Station Numben 14 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 708 - 5.3 miles Sample Tvoes: 1) Drinking water Sample Station Location:
From junction of Highway 7 and Water Works Road, go approximately 0.8 miles west on Water Works Road. The sample station is on the IcA at the intake to the Russellville city water system from theIllinois Bayou.
Samole Station Numben 16 Approximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 290* - 5.9 miles Sample Tvoes: 1) Shoreline sediment Sample Station Location:
Fromjunction of Highway 64 and Highway 359 (Flat Rock Piney Bay Recreational Area turnoff),
go approximately 0.7 miles west on Highway 64. The sample station is at the Piney Creek area on Lake Dardanelle.
Sample Station Numben 19 Anoroximatg_ Direction and Distance from Plant: 95* - 5.1 miles Sampic Types
- 1) Milk Sju.Lnple Station location:
Turn from Highway 7 onto Harrell Drive in Russellville, AR and go approximately 0.1 niiles.
Turn right and go approximately 0.25 miles. The sample station is on the lea at the Arkansas Tech Dairy.
1-14
l i
TABLE 1-1 I
h Samnie Stations Sample Station Numben 32 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 132' - 0.9 miles i
SampleTvoes
- 1) Groundwater Samole Station I wian-From bridge over intake canal, go south approximately 0.25 miles. Turn left and go approximately 0.25 miles. Turn left on Bunker Hill Lane and go approximately 0.05 miles. The sample station is on the right at CliAon Stewart's Resident.
Sample Station Numben 33 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 94* - 3.8 miles Sample Types
- 1) Groundwater Samole Station Locaticn:
Fromjunction of Highway 64 and Highway 326 (Dike Road), go approximately 0.3 miles cast on Dike Road. The sample station is on the lea at the Ouita Lake Recreation Area on the Illinois Bayou.
Samole Station Numben 36 Approximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 140* - 0.05 miles
$3EHle Types
- 1) Pond water l
- 2) Pond sediment Samole Station Location:
The sample station is at the Wastewater Holding Pond on the ANO site east of the discharge canal.
Sample Station Numben 37 Anoroximate Direction and Did== from Plant: 0'- 7.5 miles Samole Tynes: 1) Milk Samole Station Location:
E traveling north on Highway 333, THEN 0 approximately 3.5 miles fromjunction of Highway 333 and Mill Creek Road on Highway 3
- 333. Turn left and go approximately 0.1 miles. The sample station is on the left at the lawrence Steuber Dairy.
E traveling fromjunction of Highway 7 and Highway 333, UiFH go approxinutely 6.0 miles west on Highway 333. Turn right and go approximately 0.1 mile.
.(
The sample station is on the left at the Lawrence Steuber Dairy.
Sample Station Numben 38
{
Anoroximate Direction and Didaae from Plant: 314' - 2.4 miles Samole Tynes: 1) Food products (alternate)
Sample Station Imcation:
From westjunction of Highway 64 and Highway 333 in London, AR, go approximately 0.4 miles west on Highway 64. Turn right at Hornet Estate and go approximately 0.1 miles. Turn left and go approximately 0.1 miles. The sample station is on the left at Ronnie Jones' residence.
1-15
TABLE 1-1 Sample Stations
(
Sample Statioa Numben 40 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 119'- 2.2 miles Sample Tvoes: 1) Food products Samole Station Location:
Fromjunction on Highway 64 and Highway 326 (Marina Road), go approximately 2.0 miles on Marina Road. The sample station is on the ich at Horace Hollis' r:sidencejust prior to curve.
Sample Station Numben 45 Aporoximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 90* - 0.9 miles
{
Samole Tvoes: 1) Broadleaf vegetation Sample Station Location:
The san 4!c station is located near mouth ofintake canal.
(
Samole Station Numben 48 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 316'- 2.2 miles Sample Tvoes
- 1) Food products Sample Station Location:
R. J. Cochran residence, No. 26 Hwy 64 London West, directly North (across from) London Volunteer Fire Dept.
Samnie Station Numben 49 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 338'- 9.0 miles Samole Tvoes: 1) Milk
[
Samole Station Location:
IF traveling from London, THEN take Hwy. 333 N. to Augsburg community. Turn lea (west) at the Augsburg Church.
{
Travel west on County Road 81 for 3.2 miles. Rylec Dairy on right (north) side of County Road 81.
1
(
Sample Station Numben 50 l
\\
Aporoximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 47* - 10.8 miles Samole Tynes: 1) Milk Sample Station Location:
Take state Highway 7 north to Dover. Turn right (east) on state Highway 27. Go approximately 1.6 miles. Dairy is located on lea (north) side of state Highway 27.
Samole Station Numben 51 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 48'- 2.6 miles Samole Tvoes
- 1) Food Products Sample Station Location:
Turn north off Highway 64 W. onto Mill Creek Road. Go approximately 0.8 miles. Turn right on Pleasant View Road. Go approximately 0.4 miles. The sample station is at A. C. Rylee's residence (white house on lea).
L 1-16
l TABLE 1 1
(
Sample Stations
{
Egmole Station Numign 108 engrpxima,t.; Direction and Distance from Plant: 30l* - 0.9 miles SampleTvoes: 1) Direct radiatioa
- 2) Food product.s Sampig_ Station location:
JE traveling from Highway 333, THEN turn south onto Flatwood Road and go approximately 0.4 railes. The sample station is on thesight.
IE traveling north on Flatwood Road, THEN go approximately 0.4 miles from sample station 109. The sample station is on the left.
fa.m_.g!c Station Num).s 109 Aporoximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 285*. 0.5 miles Samole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation SamDie Station location:
IE traveling south on Flatwood Road, THEN go approximately 0.4 mik.s from sample station 108. Sample station 109 is on a utility pole on the left across from thejunction of Flatwood Road and Round Mountain Road just before panment ends.
IE traveling west from ANO toward Gate 4, THEN go approximately 0.4 miles and turn right onto Flatwood Road. Go approximately 0.2 miles.
Tbc sample station is on a utility pole on the right across from thejunction of Flatwood Road and Round Mountain Roadjust after pavement begins.
$.a.m_2It318.t_ ion Number: 110 Aporoximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 138'. 0.8 miles
[
Sample Troes: 1) Direct radiation Y
Sample Station Location:
From bridge over intake canal, go south approximately 0.25 miles. Turn left and go approximately
[
0.25 miles. Turn right on Bunker Hill Lane. The sample station is on the first utility pole on the left Simple Ration Numbs 111 Approximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 121*. 2.2 miles l
Sample Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation l
Sample Station Location:
From junction of Highway 64 and Highway 326 (Marina Road), go approximately 2.1 miles on l
Manina Road. The sample station is on a utility pole on the left just prior to curve.
i 1
Sample Station Number: 112 1
L Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 74*. 2.6 miles Samole Types: 1) Direct radiation Sample Station Location:
(
Go to thejunction of Highway 64 and the I 40 exit which is approximately 1.3 miles cast of sample station 113. Sample station 112 is on a utility pole on the northeast corner of thejunction.
1-17 l
l
{-
i TABLE 1-1 Sample Stations Samsle Station Numben 113 Ar'oroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 52'- 1.5 miles Samole Tygg: 1) Direct radiation Samole Staljstn Location:
Go to the eastjunction ofHighway 333 and Highway 64. The sample station is on a utility pole on the southwest corner of thejunction.
Samnie Station Mahen 114 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 31 - 1.3 m'.les Samplc Tyocs
- 1) Direct radiatica Samole Station Location:
E traveling west on Highway 64, 13EN go approximately 0.6 miles west of the eastjunction of Highway 64 and Highway 333.
The sampl3 station is on a utility pole on the right.
E traveling mst on Highway 64, THEN go appronmawly 1.1 miles from sample station 115. Sample station 114 is on a utility pole on the left.
Samnie Station Nugjtsg: 115 Aporoximate Dimetion and Distance from Plant: 344'- 1.4 miles Sample Troes: 1) Direct radiation -
Sa._gte Station Location:
l 1
I E traveling west on Highway 64, THEN go approximately 1.1 miles west of sampic station 114. Sample Station 115 is ort a utility pole on the right.
E traveling east on Highway 64,
,T,JEN go apprcximately 0.8 miles from the westjunction of Highway 64 and Highway 333 in I.andon, AR. The sample station is on a utility pole on the left.
S mnie Station NMn 116 '
Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 320* - 1.8 miles Samnl.g_T.ygg: 1) Direct radiation Samole Station Iocation:
Go one block south of the westjunction of Highway 333 and Highway 64 in London, AR.-
The san;ple station is on a utility pole north of the railroad tracks.
Samnie Statlon Number: 117 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 30$* - 17.2 miles -
Sample Tynes: 1) Diiect radiation Sample Station Location:
E traveling west on I-40, THEN take Exit SE at Clarksville, AR. Turn right onto Rogers Street. Atjunction of Rogers Street and Highway 64, turn left and proceed west to first stop light. Turn left onto Cravens Street, ne sample station is on a utility pole on the right between the county courthouse and the post office.
E traveling west on Highway 64, THEN go to first stop light past junction of Rogers Street zad Highw3y 64. Turn left onto Cravens Street. The sample station is on a utility pole on the right between the county courthouse and the post office, f
/
l-18
[
TABLE 1-1
[
Samole Stations Samcle Station Nggdtgr: 118 Anoroximatq Direction and Distance from Plant: 294* - 5.6 miles l
fdgnole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Samole Station Location:
i E traveling east on Highway 64, I
THEN go approximately 0.3 miles from bridge which goes across Pincy. The sample station is on
' a utility pole on tbc lea.
~i Etraveling west on Highway 64, THEN go approximately 0.4 miles past Flat Rock Piney Bay Recreational Area turnofT. The
{
sample station is on a utility pole on the right.
Samole Station Numben 119 l
Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 309* - 4.3 miles I
[
Samole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation I
Sample Station Location:
Turn nst from Highway 333 onto Will Baker Road, which intersects Highway 333 approximately 1.4 miles north of the I-40 Overpass near London, AR. Go approximately 2.0 miles. The sample station is on a utility pole on the leAjust prior to pavement ending.
i Samole Station Numben 120 Aggrgximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 336* - 4.2 miles Entng!plyngs: 1) Direct radiation Samole Station Location:
EtravelingfromI-40OverpassinIondon, AR, THEN go north on Highway 333 approximately 2.4 miles. The sample station is on a utility pole on tie right near Martin Chapel.
E traveling fromjunction ofMill Creek Road and Highway 333, THEN go approximately 1.0 mile south on Highway 333. The sample station is on a utility pole on theleA near Martin Chapel.
{
Samole Station Numben 121 Approximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 349' - 4.6 miles i
Sample Types: 1) Direct radiation Sample Station Location:
E traveling from I-40 Overpass in London, AR, I
THEN go north on Highway 333 approximately 3.4 miles to Mill Creek Road. Turn right onto i
Mill Creek Road and go approximately 0.7 miles. The sample station is on a utility pole on the right.
E traveling northwest on Mill Creek Road, 11JEN go approximately 0.4 miles past East Poirt Baptist Church and Cemetery. The sample station is on a utility pole on the lea.
[
L l-19
l j
. r.:
=
TABLE 1-1 Sample Station _s, Samole Station Numben 122 Aggroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 18* - 3.3 miles Samole Tynes: 1) Direct radiation Samsle Station 14 cation:
E traveling north fromjunction of Highway 64 and Mill Creek Road, THEN go approxunately 2.5 miles. The sample station is on a utility pole on the right.
E traveling southeast on Mill Creek Road, T_IEN go approximately 1.9 miles from East Point Baptist Church. The sample station is on
. a utility pole on the left.
Sample Station Numben 123 ADoro.cimate Directionand Distance from Plant: 46* - 3.5 miles Samole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Samole Station 14 cation:
Turn north from Pleasant View Road onto Ball Hill Road and go approximately 0.8 miles.
The sample station is on a utility pole on the left.
SM StW+ Numben 124 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 60* - 3.2 miles Sample Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Sample Station Location:
E traveling fromjunction ofHighway 64 and Mill Creek Road, THEN go north on Mill Creek Road approximately 0.7 miles. Turn right onto Pleasant View Road and go approxima:ely 1.3 miles. The sample station is on the tight on a utility pole which is across from a siren and below a transmission line.
E traveling west from junction ofliighway 7 and Pleasant View Road, THEN go approximately 3.1 miles. The sample station is on the left on a utility pole which is across from a siren and below a transmission line.
Samnie Station Numben 125 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 46'- 9.1 miles Sample Tvoes: 1)Distet radiation Samole Station Location:
While traveling north on Highway 7, turn left onto Water Street in Dover, AR. Go one block and turn left onto South Elizabeth Street. Go one block and turn right onto College Street. The sample station is on a utility pole at the southeast corner of the red brick school building, which f
is located on top ofhill.
Sample Station Number: 126 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 81* - 5.5 mile.s Sample Tvocs: 1) Direct radiation Sample Station Location:
The sample station is located on the west side of Highway 7 directly across from Shiloh Road, which is approximately 1.3 miles north of thejunction of Highway 7 and Dike Road.
l 1-20
{
-l I
TABLE 1-1 Sample Stations Samaic Stalhtsfumber:127 Anoroximate Directi,gn_and Distance: 102* - 5.6 miles p
Samole Tm: 1) Direct radiation
(-
Samole Station Location:
The sample station is located on the Arkansas Tech Campus on West 0 Street on a security light pole in front of Bryan Hall, which is the first building on the left when traveling from North Arkansas on West 0 Street.
Samole Station Number: 128 ADDroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 113* - 8.6 miles Sample Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Samole Station Location:
The sample station is on a utility pole inside the security feixe near the Russelhille Airport Office. The airport is located off of East 16th Street and is well marked by airport signs.
Samole Station Number: 129 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 118* - 7.3 miles Samole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Samole Station Location:
Tbc sample station is on a utility pole north of the Russellville High School sign, which is in front of the high school on cast side of Highway 7T.
Samnie Statlan Number: 130
(
Acoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 245* - 4.6 miles Samole Tvtes: 1) Direct radiation Spinole Station Location:
Atjunction of Highway 7 and Highway 22 in Dardanelle, AR, take liighway 22 toward Delaware, AR. Go approximately 0.4 miles west ofDelaware Recreation Area turnoff. The sample station is on a utility pole on the right in Delaware, AR near Shirley's Beauty Salon.
Samnie Station Number: 131 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Play: 244* - 2.4 miles Samole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Samole Station Location:
Turn north from Highway 22 onto Highway 393 at Delaware Recreation Area turnosand go approxunately 2.9 miles. The sample station is located past the boat ramp on an oak tree near crosstic steps in northeast quadrant of circle drive.
133ple Station Number: 132 Anoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 267* - 5.8 nrdles Egmole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Samole Station 14 cation:
Turn north from Highway 22 onto Highway 393 at Delaware Recreation Area turnoff and go f
approximately 0.9 miles. Turn left onto dirt road and go approximately 2.3 miles. The sample station is on a utility pole on the right.
I l-21
l NARA.enW TABLE 1-1 Samole Stations Samnie Station Number: 133 Anoroxingte Direction and Distance from Plut: 233' - 3.7 miles
{
SampleTypes: 1) Direct radiation i
SARID.e Station location:
l E traveling west on Highway 22, THEN 0 approximately 2.0 nWes from sample station 134. Sample station 133 is on the 3
{
south side of the Highway 22 causeway attached to the first NO PARKING ANY TIME sign west of the bridge.
E traveling east on Highway 22 from Delaware, AR, THEN go approximately 0.8 miles from Delaware Recreation Area turnoff. Tb sample station is on the south side of tbc Highway 22 causeway attached to the first NO PARKING ANYTIME sign west of the bridge, f
Samole Station Number: 134 Acoroximate Direction and Dicrance from Plant: 200* - 2.8 miles Samole Tygg3: 1) Direct radiation
~
{
Samole Station Location:
E traveling west onHighway 22,
'lHEN go approximately 0.8 miles from sample station 135. Semple station 134 is on a utility pole on the right at Mociangbird Lane.
E traveling cast on Highway 22, THEN go approximately 2.0 miles from sample station 133. Sample station 134 is on a utility pole on the leR at Mockingbird Lane.
Samaic Station Number: 135 Anoroxingte Direction and Distw* from Plant: 188* - 3.2 miles SainJ}t_yggg: 1) Direct radiation T
Samole Station Location:
E traveling west on Highway 22,
[
THEN go approximately 1.7 miles from sample station 136. Sample station 135 is on a L
utility pole on the right.
E taveling east on Highway 22, M go approximately 0.8 miles from sample station 134. Sample station 135 is on a l
f utility pole on the left -
- Samnie Station Number: 136 Anoroximate Dittetion and Distance from Plant: 168* - 4.3 miles Sample Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Sample Station location:
E traveling west on Highway 22,
'! HEN go approximately 3.7 miles from junction of Highway 22 and Highway 7. The samph f
station is on the right on the first utility pole west of the Little Hays Creek Bridge.
E traveling east on Highway 22, THEN go approximately 1.7 miles from sampic station 131 Sample station 136 is on the left on the first utility pole west of the Little Hays Creek Bridge.
1-22 i
_m_______
_ _ _ _ - - _ - - - _. _ ~
-~__
II M """.M MMM.M_
TABLE 1-1 Samole Stations j
Samole Station Numben 137 Aggroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 150* - 8.4 miles Sample Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Salggic St tig_nLocation:
Atjunction ofHighway 7 and Highway 28 in Dardanelle, AR, go approximately 0.2 miles on Highway 28. The sample station is on a speed limit sign on the right in front of the Morns R. Moore Ankansas National Guard Armory.
I Samole Station Numben 138 Aggpximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 193* - 5.8 miles Sample Tvgg: 1) Direct radiation Samplc Stali.2n LocWgjl:
Atjunction ofHighway 22 and Highway 155 (Mt. Nebo Road)in Dardanelle, AR, turn 4
p west and go to top ofmountain. Veer right at stop sign and proceed toward Sunset Point.
}
The sample station is down a dirt road on the right which is approximately '0.1 miles southeast of Sunset Point. The sample station is on the left side of the dirt road on a utility J
pole near a TV tower.
Sanmie Station Numben 139
.Acoroxir.iate Direction and Distance from Plant: 178'- 19.2 miles Samole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Sample Station Location:
Take Highway 7 South through Dardanelle, AR to Ola, AR. Turn left at junction of Highway 7 and Highway 10 West in Ola, AR and go approximately 1/2 block. The sample station is on a utility pole on the left in front of the U. S. Post Office.
Samnie Station Numben 140 l
Anoroximate Dirxtion and Distance fr.g.m P.lagt: 151* - 21.8 miles
. Sample Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Stmolc Station Location:
Proceed through Ola, AR and take Highway 10 East to Casa, AR, which i' in Perry County.
Turn right at the Perry-Casa High School. The sample station is on a utihty pole at th:
southwest corner of the school.
' Samnie Station Numben 141
' Acoroximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 125'- 3.8 miles Sp. mole Tvoes: 1) Direct radiation Sample Staton Location:
While traveling southwest on Highway 326 (Manna Road), go appror.inately 2.4 miles from sampic station 111. Sample station 141 is on the right on a utility pole, which is approximately
[
50 yards cast of a transmission line. (The sample station is approximately 0.35 miles west of I
thejunction of Hilltop Drive and Marina Road.)
Samole Station Numben 142 Approximaggpirection and Distance from Plant: 129'- 5.1 miles Samole Tvoes: 1)Dirxt radiation Sample Station Location:
j The sample station is on a utility pole at the junction of Skyline Drive and Nordin Lane in Russen ille, AR, near a peach orchard.
v l-23 I
l l
TABLE 1-1 Samyle Stations j
Sample Station Number: 143 i
Approximate Direction and Distance from Plant: 106'- 17 5 miles Sample Troes: 1) Direct radiation Sample Station Location:
If traveling cast on Highway 64 to Atkins, AR, THEN turn left atjunction of Highway 64 and North Church Street. Proceed north. The sample station is on a utility pole on the left in front of Atkins High School near stop sign at corner of North Church Street and Northeast 3rd Street.
Ill traveling east on Interstate 40,
[
THEN take Exit 94 at Atkins, AR. Tura left onto North Church Street and proceed south.
The sample station is on a utility pole on the right in front of Atkins liigh School near stop t
sign at comer of North Church Street and Northeast 3rd Sr.reet.
(
Sample Station Number: 144 Apprp,sm._aJe Direction and Distance from Plant: 313' - 12.7 miles Sample ~1%es: 1) Direct radiation
{
Sample Station Location:
While traveling on Highway 64, turn south onto Cumberland Street in Lamar, AR, and go approximately 0.7 miles. Veer left at stop sign. The sample station is on a uti!ity pole across the one way fire lane in front ofIxnar Elementary School.
(
[
{
1-24
FIGURE 1-1 J
Exposure Pathways I
s.
[
EFF.UENT5 L10Ut0.
CFFLUEN15 i
l Y
W
~ %
w, 5 ~ ~ W~
1 Irra[fatfon y
.N.
,c Transport of Fuel and Waste Irradiation l
ggef*
C, i'I c,
U"$,,,,
O
\\,,,. j X
w.
s.
f-5Wir*i"
,p Qggg
\\
0*
43RR.h e R :
%g $
5 s
1
- /
'W
/ f**""iin'"kt i
g..
e s==*
m v_e Inges tf on p *": *6 j
- ~'~
~
~~~
{.
]
l-25
/
--m___
,c---
d$#illi!hNM!1.d#[i
"/Il$O')
'll
~
t u;ddl sMWd&g4 4 t~~.)L i
.1 1 lL' i
4 d.jf? br- /
S 7
. g,'d
,. I M:
ir i
y li s %w,,_ l
/ f75
- 4..2e.QfLa 1 Wl iji:iht: 'i i
/
3rb Nl7A; a
c a
i r.
6 @! b i2 1 M N7 f U
_. h ; W 3@2ME
[
r-I, b-
- i
{ j 4
n Q
&qk&,k fh ?k A Q f bdM
~ w a
a 3 wm Edh @E#f#['
[!U"Yi(Y
(
did
= bask h?WR W4EZMk
,L Wsb 8, i M' M 7p % v; 4 2 Q$ k (Jk
.4 g w w
N AtOb-NN E ?: 'i N
A i
cl L!&Af RW hf
!,il %
Lj o /",
u s r
w _%e e G =Pbtir i3
- - A L
'74 41 U W
- Ui;;h- :.: 4,
1 G&
9Mas p(p" e
'J 3b wADtTW.,
~'
pr/y
?{
L, g
g y
.4 i
.m 4
4-o
$~/
f, Q~
q g
'/A4 0
k i
"Y i
W9;ng Q j.$.fj@ik;hy@ y'T/\\[va / t Tgj7)je 6n pa,-
!qigii,
)
sT.i j3 4
a o! i d g o
lli,ili;!I!!Mhlill!!ih,!! Llijn!ll!!!!!ill!!!Id Qifd.i' i
QMhh Wggg'
, ;11llli.IlWHtHIH iH44WMW !! > :1 r -
- ;; 48 d
.p
]
1 1
j
+
'[
SECTION 2.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (INTERPRETATIONS AND TRENDS OF RESULTS) l wees
.=
t 2,1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results
.,A Since ganuna radionuclides were not detected in the air particulate composites and Iodine-131 was not detected in the radiciodine cartridges during 1996, u has been the case in previous years, the airborne exposure pathway has been unaffected by the operation of ANO.
A Gross beta air particulate results for 1996 were similar to those background levels obtained in previous years of the operational REMP and well below preoperational levels as seen below. Results are reported 3
as annual average pCi/m.
Year Indicators Controls 1973 0.047 0.047 I
1974 0.139 0.135 1993 0.012 0.013 1994 0.015 0.016 1995 0.014 0.016 1996 0.016 0.017 Gross beta results for 1996 ranged fron10.005 - 0.0330 pCi/m with a mean 3
3 of 0.016 pCi/m for indicator locations as compared to controllocations which l
ranged from 0.00897 - 0.0328 pCi/m with a mean of 0.017 pCi/m3 3
The standard "t" test was used to compare avera3;e gross beta l
concentrations from the indicator locations to the control. The test result indicates concentrations at indicator sample locations 1 and 2 to be statistically identical to the controllocation, and indicator sample locations 3 and 4 to be f
statistically lower than the control. Although a minor difference exists in the l
i results for sample stations 3 and 4, background fluctuations and geographical location are contributing factors to be ccmsidered. Results of this analysis are summarized in Attachment II.
i
[.
i 2-1
~
2.2 Thermo!9minescent Dosimetry Sample Results Gamma radiation dose in 1996 was similar to that obtained in previous operational years and well below preoperational results as seen below. Results are reported as annual average millirem / quarter. In 1994, calculated doses were based on deep working dose (1000 mg/cm ) For previous years, calculated doses 2
2 were based on lens of eye dose (300 mg/cm ) which yielded higher values.
Year Indicators f_ontrols 1973 20.8 24.3 1974 24.0 29.3 1993 26.9 26.6 1994 15.7 15.7 1995 16.9 16.8 1996 15.6 15.5 Quarterly doses recorded by TLDs during 1996 were as follows:
0 - 2 miles, mean of 16.4 mrem and range of 13.0 - 20.0 mrem 2 - 5 miles, mean of 14.7 mrem and range of 11.0 - 20.0 mrem
+
>5 miles, mean of15.5 nuem and range of11.0 - 19.0 mrem.
e These results indicate that the ambient radiation levels remained at or near background in 1996 and have been unaffected by the operation of ANO.
In addition, the standard "t' test was used to compare average radiation doses from the 0 - 2 and 2 - 5 mile area TLDa to the >5 mile area TLDs. The result from this test indicates radiation doses at the 0 - 2 mile range to be statistically higher than the >5 mile range. However, radiation doses at the 2 - 5 mile range were statistically lower as compared to the >5 mile range.
Although differences exist, background fluctuations and geographical location are contributing factors to be considered. Results of this analysis are summarized in Attachment II.
(
1 i
2-2 V
\\
J 1
I Radiation doses shown in Figure 2-1 further emphasize that ambient i
radiation levels have remained at or near background levels. This figure shows 1987 through 1996 annual quarterly average results for indicator 4
locations compared to controls.
I I
I l
l 4
s 4
i I
l
-i
^
4 i
4 2-3
y i
i Figure 2-1 TLD Radiation Dose 1987-1996 TLD Flesults indicators Versus Controls Annuct Average mR/Otr 50
~
,s
,=
s yg E-
_g, e
j u mlrdcators:'
~ NControls J~:
40
. ~.
35
= '
30
...~
a.-
25 -
20 -
15 -
.-t 10-5-
~
0
' i -
i
'r s'
i i
c i'
i 1987 1988 1969 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
- 1995 1996 I
- Dose based on deep working dose (1000 mgkm ). Previous doses based on lens of eye (300 mg/cm ),
2 2
2-4
_-._____J
I 1
2.3 Milk Sample Results Milk samples were collected monthly from four control locations in 1996 and analyzed for Iodine-131 and gamma radionuclides. Iodine-131 was below detectable limits in all controllocations. Cesium-137 was detected once at the Steuber Dairy at a concentration of 2.0 pCi/l and the Rylee Dairy at a concentration of 12.0 pCi/1. Listed below is a comparison of 19% results as compared to the preoperational and operational years.
Results are reported in pCi/l units.
Radionuclide 1996 1987-1995 Preoperational Iodine-111
<LLD 0.3 2.7 Cesium-137 7.0 4.1
<LLD Other Gammas
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD The twel of Cesium-137 detected in the control location samples is indicative of concentrations attributed to past atmospheric weapons testing.
Since there are no dairies within five miles of the ANO site and the control locations do not indicate any unusual concentrations ofradioisotopes, it is concluded ANO's operation had no impact on this pathway in 1996, as has been the case in previous years.
2.4 Water Sample 'Resu,ltst Analytical results for 1996 drinking water, surface water and groundwater samples were similar to those reported in previous years.
{
Drinklnr water samples were collected monthly from one location and analyzed for gross beta radionuclides, Iodine-131 and gamma radionuclides.
In addition, a composite was analyzed quarterly for tritinm. Tritium, gamma radionuclides and Iodine-131 were below detectable limits, which is ccmsistent with preoperational data. Gross beta concentrations ranged from 2.5 - 4.8 pCi/l with a mean of 3.45 pCi/1, which are consistent with preoperational and operationallevels. Listed belowis a comparison of1996 results to preoperational and operational years. Results are reported in pCi/l units.
i 2-5
1 v
Radionuclide 1996 1987 - 1995 Preoperationaj, Gross Beta 3.45 3.6 6.5 Iodine-131
<LLD 0.3
<LLD Gammas
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD Tritium
<LLD 580.0 165.0 Based on this comparison, the operation ofANO had no impact on this pathway during 1996.
Surface water samples were collected monthly and analyzed for gamma radionuclides and a composite was analyzed quarterly for tritium. In addition, even though this practice was discontinued after August 1996, the ADH and ANO split monthly grab samples from the discharge canal and Piney Creek locations. These samples were analyzed monthly for gamma radionuclides and tritium. Listed below is a comparison of 1996 results from indicator locations as compared to the preoperatiomt and operational yeart. Results are reported in pCi'l units and do not include ADH split samples. Results of ADH samples are summarized in Table 3-1.
Isotope 1996 1987-1995 Preoperational Cobalt-58
<LLD 7.5
<LLD Cesium-137
<LLD
<LLD 17.8 Other Gammas
<LLD
<LLD
<LLD Tritium 916.3 666.2 200.0 Based on this compadson,1996 levels are similar to historic values; therefore, the operation ofANO had little or no impact on this pathway. Figure 2-2, which presents 1996 tntium concentrations in compadson to previous years, further emphasizes the above conclusion.
Groundwater samples were collected quarterly fmm two locations and analyzed for ganuna radionuclides and tritium. As in preoperational and previous operational years, gamma radionuclides remained undetectable, e
t 2-6
f r
Ahhough tritium was not detected at the indicator location, it was detected once at the control location at a concentration of 130.0 pCi/1. This concentration is well below the required LLD value and is below previous levels detected in the preoperational and operational years. Therefore, concentrations continue to be at, or near, background levels.
l I
o i
)
2-7
5 Figure 2-2 5
Discharge Tritium Concentrations 1987-1996 Tritium Results Discharge Surface Water Annual Average pCb1 1600-1400 1200 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 2-8
2.5 Venetstion and Food Product Sample Vegetation and food pioduct samples were collected when
{
available from five locations in 1996 and analyzed for Iodine-131 and gamma radionuclides. The 1996 levels remained undetectable, as has been the case since 1989. Overall, concentrations continue to remain at or near background levels, and continue to be well below the preoperational Iodine-131 average levels of 60.0 pCi/kg, Cesium-134 average levels of 70.9 pCi/kg and Cesium-137 average levels of 349.5 pCi/kg, as measured from the indicator locations.
2.6 Sediment Sample Results Sediment samples were collected semiannually from three locations in 1996 and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. As in previous years, radionuclides attributable to ANO were detected in the discharge sediment.
However. Figure 2-3 shows that 1996 levels are similar to those of previous operational years.
Since reporting levels for radionuclides in sediment have not been established, an evaluation of potential dose to the public from this media was performed as shown in Attachment III. The annual maximum dose from all radionuclides to the skin and total body was < 0.01 millirem. Design objectives a
given in 10CFR50, Appendix 1 for liquid effluents are annual doses ofs 3 millirem total body and s 10 millirem any organ. The values of< 0.01 millirem for the skin and total body are well within the design objective criteria. Therefore, the level of radionuclides detected in 1996 had no significant impact on the l
environment or public.
I i
2-9
~
=
Figure 2-3 Discharue Sediment 1987 - 1996 Gamma Radionuclide Results Discharge Sediment j
Annual Average pCi/kg 3000 l: m1996 Operational Average
- 1967-1995 Operational Average.. l
^
2500 2000
~
1500 1000 -
500 -
0
'-T--"'-
--'i.
.0 i
Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Ag-110M Cs-134 Cs-137 2-10 l
}
2.7 Fish Sarante Results Fish samples were collected semiannually from two locations and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. In 1996, Cesium-134 was undetectable in indicator and control locations. However, Cesium-137 was detected at i
ANO's indicator sample location at a concentration of 14.7 pCi/kg. During the preoperational monitoring period, gamma radionuclides were not detected,
' No reporting levels as outlined in ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Technical f
Specification Tables 4.30-3 and 3.12-3 respectively, were equaled or exceeded when averaged over any calendar quarter. Also, as shown in Figure 2-4, all detectable activities over previous years were well below the rcquired LLD specified in the technical specifications.
In addition, atmospheric fallout from nuclear weapons testing during the preoperational years and the most recent incident, the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident in 1986, could be contributing to these levels since Cesium-137 has been detected in the control location over previous preoperational and operational years. However, overall the operation of ANO had no significant radiologicalimpact upon the environment or public by this pathway.
1
(
f
(
2-11
s Figure 2-4 Discharue Fish 1987 - 1996 Gamma Radionuclide Results Discharge Fish Annual Average pCi/kg 200 175 150 (Cesium-137 Tech Spec Required LLD)1 2
125
~
(Cesium-134 Tech Sp_ec P quired LLD)
~
100 j
l Cesium-134 l l Cesium-137 l A
50 Q'
e 25 mr
0
.~
>=
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 2-12
I l
2.8 Land Use Census Resuhs ANO did not modify the REMP, even though some changes occurred f
from 1995 to 1996. These changes involved the following:
W. Henderson replaced S. Lynn as the r earest residence in Sector 1 e
B. Williams replaced J. Kelly as the nearest residence ir. Sector 9.
s W. D. Hale replaced Stiles as the nearest residence in Sector 15.
Bryan Irby no longer has an individual milk animal. However, Mr. Irby has not participated in ANO's sampling program in previous years.
j Jerry Pierce has an individual milk animal (goat). However, e
Mr. Pierce declined to participate in ANO's sampling program.
In addition, the land use census identified no location which yielded a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than those currently calculated.
ANO personnel chose not to perform a garden census in 1996, which is allowed by ANO Unit One Technical Specification 4.30.2 and Unit Two Technical Specification 3/4.12.2, in lieu of broadleaf vegetation sampling in the l
meteorological sector (Sector 13) with the highest "D/Q". Results of the 1996 land use census are presented in Table 2-1.
1
(
2-13 I
I
(
TABLE 2-1
{
1996 Land Use Census (September 9 - 10,1996)
MILK-PRODUCING ANIMALS WITHIN FIVE (5) MILES
(
Milk-Producing ammals are divided into two categories defined as:
[
- 1. Class A Dairies:
Dairies in which milk is intended for human consumption as Grade A milk.
[
- 2. Individual Milk Animals:
Family ammals in which the milk is intended 1
for home use.
{
CLASS A DAIRIES None INDIVIDUAL MILK ANIMALS Jerry Pierce
- 55 degrees -3.1 miles MILK-PRODUCING ANIMALS OUTSIDE FIVE MILES -(CURRENTLY SAMPLED)
CLASS A DAIRIES Dairy Azimuth - Distan.g,e Arkansas Tech Dairy 95 degrees - 5.1 miles Steuber Dairy 0 degrees - 7.5 miles
[
Rylee Dairy 338 degrees - 9.0 miles Ragsdale Dairy
- 47 degrecs - 10.8 miles INDIVIDUAL MILK-PRODUCING ANIMALS i
[
Nonc j
?
- ;Chinged since 1995 Land Use' Census.
r 2-14 W
1 i
TABLE 2-1 1996 Land Use Census (September 9 - 10,1996)
NEAREST RESIDENCE WITIIIN FIVE MILES Sector Residence Location Distance (miles,}
l W.Henderson
- S.R.333 0.7 2
Snider 8893 Hwy 64 1.2 3
G. Murray Gum Lane 0.9 4
Knight Knight Lane 0.7 5
O. Bibler Bibler Lane 0.9 6
R. Lambert Scott Lane 0.8 7
Douglas 237 Bunker Hill Lane 0.8 8
M. A. Wood Wood Lane 0.8 9
B. Williams
- May Road 1.0 10 McClurley May Road 0.8 11 Bob Northup 1269 River Oaks 3.2 12 G. Sides Flatwood Road 0.7 13 J. Nichols Fla: wood Road 1.0 14 Young 110 Round Mt. Lane 0.7 i
15 W. D. Hale
- S.R.333 0.8 R
16 Roshto 85 Bennett Circle 0.8 l
7
,a,n.. d.smcej995 ce--,,,g7py, m,m,,y7gyg n,ewgyp+m.wsschudumsum m
e-,.
aCh P
ge nsus.1 a M Ju m s us 1.m.a a m,E h m a, L w a u m.. pnwweg9mgay i
2.,,
~
(
2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results RBS' environmental laboatory analyzed interlaboratory comparison samples
(
for ANO to fulfill the requirements of ANO Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specifications 4.30.3 and 3/4.12.3, respectively. Attachment I,1996 Radiological Environmental b
Monitoring Report, contains these results. Based on a review of the results, RBS achieved a 97% (95 of 98 analyses) acceptance on intercomparison sample analyses. For additional detail on the three unacceptable analysis results, refer to Table 11.0 of Attachment I.
[
[
[
[
1 l
r 2-16 1
l
(
SECTION 3.0 I
j RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
i 1
3-i
l' 3.1 1996 Program Results Summary Table 3-1, which includes all sampling locations and samples split with
[
the ADH, summarizes the 1996 REMP results. ANO personnel did not use values reported as less than the lower limit of detection (<LLD) when determining ranges and means for indicator and control locations.
(
(
{
i
[
fL I
E 3-1 L
o useus summu mumme suan
-- gueur w TAELE 3-1 Radiological Environment-1 Monitorine Pmeram Summ rv Name of Facility ANO - Units I and 2 Docket No. 50-313 and 50-368 l
Location of Facilsty Pope. Arkansas Reporting Period January-December 19%
(County, State)
EM !IeTypet STypeabamibers d.J LID d -
X:IndicatorI4catiossF MImcation with Highes(Annual Mean W ?;ContrOllocationsi O Neasberof M b
hjjIJElts)jNY [ofI$NM*b
$g:YIwr
& W;ei&/-
1 -% ' - J 59s
^- 7$[){N[Rsnge]f. :
MesdF)NC' Mi% ~f$$gt25y2$dN{[h $[Meam{FICf#
Jeq DrM*E-U1Sg ?m -
fiEen.
J
'4e WMEN MWY* VM i$ NRanhj
^
'jj Noarodtini[
NE(h[; :
R-ERisultif ?
k[h D
[Qjf ' _fd !N[9 ' _ ~ d.
r,# ' '~h[-
h [N$[ N 4-:t d[? r ^ N
' q@Q Tjy,gj @dl _gy $ ~ =
r$j;;jMesa(FMybU i
~ ~ '
m
~ " -
g ~;} g Q,jis 5 9 Jgg5f - W
= ~ ugadp[
Air Particulates GB 318 0.01 0.016( 211 !212 )
Station 1 0.017 ( $3 / 53 )
0.017( 105/106 )
0 3
(pCl/m )
[ 0.005 - 0.0330J
( 88*,0.6 mi )
[ 0.006 - 0.0330 ]
[ 0.00897 - 0.0328 ]
Station 2 0.017( 53 /53 )
( 235',0.4 mi )
[ 0.00911 - 0.0300 ]
GS 24 Cs-134 0,03
<LLD N/A N/A
< Lip 0
Cs-137 0.01
<11D N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Airborne lodine 1-131 318 0.07
<11D N/A N/A
<LLD 0
3 (pCi/m )
8 - 2 Mile TIDs Ganana 44 (f) 16.4 ( 44 /44 )
Station 109 18.3 (4 /4 )
N/A 0
( mR/Qtr )
[l3.0 -20.0 ]
( 285*,0.5 mi )
[17.0 -20.0 ]
2 - 5 Mile TIDs Gamma 57 (f) 14.7 ( 57 / $7 )
Station I12 17.5 ( 4 /4 )
N/A 0
( mR/Qtr)
[ l1.0 - 20P ]
( 74',2.6 mi )
[16.0-I8.0 ]
>5 Mile TLDs Gamma 71 (f)
N/A N/A N/A 15.5 ( 71 / 71 )
0
( mR/Qtr)
[ t 1.0 - 19.0 ]
12
~
~.~
?
TA:LE 3-I Radiolorical Environssental Monitorine Proarrie Summanry Naaie of Facility ANO - Units 1 and 2 Docket No. 50-313 and 50-368 Location of Facility Pope. Arkansas ReportingPeriod January-Decesiber1996 (County, State) l y$[t$$ts)$piMlM,m$ype KNemeberM Sample Ty NET b
MIJR qyy pg 3,gge,,,,y,e,g.,,3gy gg;catten"withHighest AmmentinM97 @ControlIAtseises$ ?% NeusherefjN
. k[
afMalNO.::f$$$I$$$$$.. 5 ;n$j=M. h$$$ $%:M -
fp W C N ~'- =*
1w%n$.$.~ F%.d M M W % M,*- w+6.~$.NNI$.*.$idi
$,dw.
y$$ M i.d.-,?&QReage].$.n$.
@n!((Neestatimes,.$,1 M,,. nSi q2W m
- n' ce.um$~hte/.s n-wn 1%
y-WLN i? C+FPW g;um@maJm:seg' dR;;. W;in l24g(Range]EEJM n
.a
- @:w:, Masalts jm
??
u c
Wmm: g
>% swa rms-sa e Megg. {~ $y..3; 5;6mes:w;fy:i y..-- e s,.
-em gf
- 3db.:rggi:
s d3Mg=_:: t r3@gy.
m M.sg gy'm;~.:tv.
gg psfc,sdnpx 7
E_q 2
- w. %5:m -
e.g 3,p. q.:g:%gg m%-
7 - i
_r e c h' maa- -~Q..cf.g;.;.--
.m u.
wQ.g...
s
.x(-.)
.pr x
nr.;r.;.Awxx.x 5 :q.
- f t,
s- _ ig; i %1 msw.e n~p m I: -,
e e,
qwa r
'..v :. _
3 4
vm y W2% tion.c w : w : n + 4x; w
.m
- .it
".#M1 Range 1%w g@n Niwe3WR 51 SWE C:W-m,
.w:
mu Drfsking Weter GB 13 4
3.45 ( 10/13 )
Station 14 3.45 ( 10 /13 )
N/A 0
( pCill)
[ 2.5 - 4.8 }
( 70*,5.3 mi)
[ 2.5 - 4.8 ]
1-131 13 1.0
<f.in N/A N/A N/A 0
H-3 4
1000
<11D N/A N/A N/A 0
GS 13 Mn-54 15
< LID N/A N/A N/A 0
Fe-59 30
< LID N/A N/A N/A 0
Co 58 15
<I1D N/A N/A N/A 0
Co40 15
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
l Zn-65 30
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
Zr-95 15
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
N' -95 15
<tLD N/A N/A N/A 0
o Cs 134 10
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
Cs 137 18
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
Ba-140 15
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
La-140 15
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
t 1
3-3
U w
umus usum ungen um m
m-w TA:LE 3-1 Ra Iblorical Emironment-1 Monitorine Pmcram Summary Name of Facility ANO - Units 1 and 2 Docket No. 50-313 and 50-368 Location of Facility Pere. Arkansas Reporting Period Januniv-December 1996 (County, State)
IR$SempleTyt..eE:'_.
- T
~
b
>pLype&J~umbern iJ3LLD. -- -@A.=Q Ji@ Indicatar Imca. tion 3E IIacatien~siiliHighest AnnualM.+eani 5 Coatn4.n'(ocemes,$,
WNdieb,erofQ L
ww m
- -e
-n u m.
v
.=c
$sn;jfUnits)(N, agg!@> r#
m.wm K
9Qf of Analyses "fG[ts
- a
,s c
Mesa ( F. ) *n4 "~
MUMAN ^y 4jth ';;pv R..w.=csM
=r
, ~
~
-a
- 3 Meam E).Ca=n.
?Nantuutiser.,:
MP 1 wh. ~
SN
, Y. w ~ s ~ k.ri:
Nh 4
$NbhdI. E,.[ /$mn
[4.:.ssfC " Y; ?
NM, ij Ra$,.ge][
MnNb
[h 5[R5'"8*l9%3."-IURS.r,uit,.i'$,
^
w W. W,h U b [ gun L
NN
]N 3ss I NINY@i [
,~
.. __ I tA 3.N l $.,-
% :k%m _
yW pg;m et w.
]Mgpqyyl34 2-,
f enag)y ( QQ
[OM y M
g mp-Wym -t am;w
- gm,%d 2 Mg Rangel
CVx:
< xa '
- Surface Water 11-3 8
(g) 916.3 { 4 /4 )
Station 8 916.3 ( 4 /4 )
912.0 ( 3 /4 )
0 (pCill)
[ 628.0 - 1240.0 J
( 180',0.1 mi )
[ 628.0 - 1240.0 }
[ 236.0 - 1558.0 ]
GS 24 Mn-54 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Fe-59 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co-58 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<tLD 0
Co.60 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Zn-65 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
l Z:-95 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
l Nb-95 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
1 Cs-134 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-137 18
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD C
Da-140 15 (LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
La-140 15
<tLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
ADII Split H-3 14 (g) 600.2 ( 6 / 7 )
Station 8 600.2 ( 6 / 7 )
174.2 ( 2 / 7 )
O Surface Water
[ 210.0 -1950.0 )
( l80*,0.1 mi )
[210.0 -1950.0 }
[127.0 -221.0 ]
( pC1/l)
GS 16 Mn-54 15
<tLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Fe-59 30
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co.58 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<llD 0
C>60 15
<llD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Zn-65 30
<llD N/A N/A
< LID 0
Zr-95 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Nb-95 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
i Cs-134 15
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Cs-137 18
<LLD N/A N/A
<llD 0
Ba-140 15
<LLD N/A N/A
< LIB 0
La-140 15
<11D N/A N/A
< LID 0
3-4
1 rw
.m rm 1~
m m
m-"
TACLE 3-1 Radiolorient Environmental Monitorier Prueram Summary Nanne of Facility ANO -Units I and 2 Docket No. 50-313 and 50-368 Incation of Facility Pope. Arkansas Reporting Period January - December 1996 (County, State)
- (Seample Tyl eji? MTy 1 Number 3: mJLID M!n inIndicstorlecationsb.
i E$n.pe. EofM. M..,y,..m*$ I
' *E Centrol Locationsi'i fjiNumberof2f
. IscationwithHighest"AnnietMesa%'l
- NNjF)*8 m.d.1.1mhi,f?f5
~
I 3Mife. 3W-M.M....N.. F} CN -
M. r49.. M. ~ u EIMm.-=. D Y. # h. MI '.
., -.. ~,
Nh.dii $,h wp 1-7ffasis 4lf..
n.
~ - =
, $bRp d[@ [f*Vy 7 gp g, ?{[Rangdjff' WOW -MM e * ?
~
r y[ Range]M;,.
1.Resi t f
- =. ji::$%1.- p; #Ei ts#W'w-i ' "- W M!ijdLVM: u n ~". w% ? "" @
- 4Wa;,sA *.
- a % niin (F );C A "
n, " ~~~? W*
~ 3 %, 2i
-"TM a
J
- K;;g.
g"rms >:
x
.;.n M +.
ups =_ _ -
w
, % WwrgC~yg.
v m
-rwe
,p
~;
.....a.
~ ~ i We%b 3
4 Imcati_e_s_
O * [ Range l t -
m
- +~4 Croundwater H-3 8
1000
<I1D N/A N/A 130.0 ( l /4 )
0-( pCl/I)
[NA}
GS 8
Mn-54 15
<1lD N/A N/A
<11D 0
Fe-59 30
<11D N/A N/A
<11D 0
Co-58 15
<11D N/A N/A
<11D 0
Co-60 15
<11D N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Zn-65 30
<I1D N/A N/A
<I1D 0
Zr-95 15
<I1D N/A N/A
<I1D 0
Nb-95 15
<11D N/A N/A
<11D 0
Cs-134 10
<1lD N/A N/A
<I1D 0
Cs-137 18
<11D N/A N/A
<11D 0
Ba-140 15
<I1D N/A N/A
<I1D 0
La-140 15
<11D N/A N/A
<1lD 0
MI!k 1-131 53 1.0 N/A N/A N/A
< 11D 0
(pCl/l)
GS 53 l
Cs-134 15 N/A N/A N/A
<11D 0
Cs-137 18 N/A N/A N/A 7.0 ( 2 / $3 )
0
[ 2.0 - 12.0 ]
Ba-140 15 N/A N/A N/A
<11D 0
La-140 15 N/A N/A N/A
<11D 0
1 3-5
,- m m
W em m
TACLE11 '
Radiebrical Enviroamental Moeitorier Premram Summerr Name af Facility ANO - Units I and 2 Docket No.20-313 med 56-368 I.mcation of Facility Pope, Arkasses ReportingPeriod Jammarv-December 1996 (Ceesty, State) l Wiiu@le%)$i?[IINNMAN 2MNESN INE$idIIIeYIMNN$$
@ SWnManted $sMTIJDAMM isEIhTacoaler4N
$liscatisewieltQ
@ME$iN[ihnyggAmmuniMseilypF4 FICettetIAtseenshk $UlembernffitNM Si!9[1[lAIsI5 M " d[2$$$Id N$
[M M YN$$$
-+w?hhkNbge%gw38 k-$gsmym$bb fbkhd E$p5 NhE[ yaw $k;%,
hh$$$$1bNNS$
N hNM M d i$$N,fk.hf$
W x sg,m weMe~na--(Ffem% m$mM.kkbNE
- %gs stun n
c c ?@ss, ayu:w p www<fe-em
-~ni pmmsp x; ISTQe %.,%1.'awgm-Me#p,j.TME$g@w:.
+,n.
pm,5'^g =:
Emnmii1M n ; +;g n
= mpdi w 2.s.,wg%,= gYWI?, :,-
axn g=
t g
mg i
n e9iS G
%:._ m%$.,<w w wm~
w --
M ww#fs7!!gn@s%gw:=: ;a%rw,._ggg., y%s z
a a
umm wA
- M.mw.9tfT -
yA Eh w%r' ' "4:,,tjLP- '"e m er Y+ v:=t W
v %n d' g *ene#, p@g m a
mm NQ
~ n
- www W
ww.j,.c::
- w c.eger py e
a ma:.
. -. _ m Vgetaties I-131 7
60
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
( PCLig ).
GS 7
Cs I34 60
<IJ D N/A N/A N/A 0
Cs-137 80
<tLD N/A N/A N/A 0
Feed Product 1 131 12 60
<LLD N/A N/A N/A 0
(pCIAg)
GS 12 Cs-134 60
<ILD N/A N/A N/A 0
Cs-137 80
<!JD N/A N/A N/A 0
Fish GS 8
( pcl/kg)
Mn-54 130
<f J n N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Fe-59 260
<LLD N/A N/A
< LID 0
Co-58 130
<LLD N/A N/A
<LLD 0
Co-60 130
<LLD N/A N/A
<f1D 0
Zn-65 260
<IJ n N/A N/A
<11D 0
Cs-134 130
<LLD N/A N/A
<IJD 0
Cs-137 150 14.7 ( l/4 )
Statior 8 14.7 ( l /4 )
6,42( 2 /4 )
0
[N/A )
( 180*,0.1 mi )
[N/A]
[ 3.83 - 9.0 ]
3-6 n
J
Radioloeical ENronmental Monitorira Prorram Summary Nanne of Facility ANO - Units 1 and 2 Docket No. 50-313 and 50-368 Location of Facility Pooe. Arkansas Reporting Period Jamsary - Deceinber 1996 (County, State)
[ Type l Nihin E n T %Iil l D h s/ M I?l$ k $ N % N j $ $$ $
h y 8 3 5 @ [ p $ $ 2iE @I N N
$ N I y bs$ssepleTypej$
i "InsEcsterIAcelleaQ4 JgIMwil4
-Aiemeal MessR5M NM3CentrolImenes m "yf Egigammberg SIE 5
h@jth0tsf$[N W W *M INS $dMiM$
YS I
Mani je3rd$ ($$gfigijggsQg
$$fN$55NIk M32hN ODMhy$$%bP NNNk]F@I$NNd3Eh E
DMN% NNYRaligi] k MS?2ENWM5jiv DiMMesn~(F)I OS ENI NNN
$h%RAugejhk IIEMENSM2@EN$O5$bbf$$n
$$51$S 55$ [$b db@id Min Mifj$#n@
$5!&M dib!MM%
E$dTM ~" $$MM5N' diMWn T6 flicatise#dlfhnF Din $fRhiid1 4;
$ M ADH Split Fish GS 2
( PCi/kg)
Mn-54 130
<ILD N/A N/A
<I1D 0
Fe-59 260
<ILD N/A N/A
<I1D 0
Co-58 130
<I1D N/A N/A
<1lD 0
Co40 130
<llD N/A N/A
<I1D 0
Zn45 260
<ILD N/A N/A
<11D 0
Cs-134 130
<llD N/A N/A
<11D 0
Cs.137 15')
<I1DJ N/A N/A
<llD 0
i Bottens Sedissent GS 6
(p w )
Mn-54 (f) 27.0 ( l/2 )
Station 8 27.0(l/2 )
<11D 0
[ N/A }
( l80*,0.1 mi )
[N/A 1 Co-58 (f) 126.0 ( l / 2 )
Station 8 126.0 ( l /2 )
<ILD 0
[N/A]
( l80',0.1 mi)
[N/A }
Co40 (f) 185.0 ( 2 / 2 )
Station 8 185.0 ( 2 / 2 )
<I1D 0
[ l84.0 - 186.0 )
( lgo*,0.1 mi)
[ !F4.0 - 186.0 }
Ag-110m (f)
<11D N/A
<11D
<llD 0
Cs-134 150 60.0 ( l/2)
Station 8 60.0( l /2)
<I1D 0
[N/A ]
( 180*,0.1 mi)
[ N/A ]
Cs.137 180 1026.0 (2 /2 )
Station g 1026.0 ( 2 /2 )
340.0 ( 2 / 4 )
0
[ 932.0 - 1120.0 ]
( l 80*,0.1 mi )
[ 932.0 - 1120,0 )
[ 311.0 - 369.0 }
4 1
l N GB = Gross betsi I-131 = lidine-131i II-3 ETritium; GS = Gassana scan.?.
, TT J.
. ii.f.
'TTE 9 7 DC '
- ~7 b f LLD =I Required lower itselr af detecties based on Arkansas N=rtear OmE Unit 1 imod Unit 2 Technicat.$picificasion Tablis 4.30-2 and 3.'12
~
.C p Mesa and 'rnage based spea detectable mecasuressents 'oely/ Fraction of detectable messerram*=ts at specified locations is ledicated la parentheses (F)d f E-d -!; Imcations are @ (1) by mame and (2) degrees' relative to reactor site.1._
.f[
T _.1 ~ ju,.J 7;f y'^
~l-NNeu-asetime results are these which exceed ten tienes' the control station valued If no centrol'staties value is available, the result is considered non-rnestine >
~
6 If it exceeds de.a tienes the preeperational vahme for the location.
.7_..
~
~
~'I
~
~
~
I]ILD is_ met' defined _in ANO Unit 1~and Unit'2 TechnicalSpecification Tables.7. _ _......
~
P E 5 LLD met definM la ANO Tarh=ar=1 Specificaties Tables, therefore,====ned 2000 based on Regulatory Guide 4.8. 4..-
^
^
3-7
[
{
(
d i
ATTACHMENT I 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report i
J
.[
[
[
[
[
{
{
r l-i
~
l i
(
]
Table of Contents t
Page Summary ofMonitoring Results 1
I Air Particulate and Radiciodine 3
Milk...............................
16 Drinking Water 20 Surface Water......
22 Groundwater.
27 Fish........
29 Sediment..............
31 Vegetation 32 Food Products.
34 Thermcluminescent Dosimeters..
37 I
Interlaboratory Comparison...
40 l
l l
1 l
L a
8'*
e 1
I 11 l'
Summary of Monitoring Results
_ Radionuclides Detected The following radionuclides were detected during this reporting period:
Cesium-137 in the Rylee and Sauber Dairies milk.
Tritium in the Ouita Lake groundweer.
Tritium in the intake surface water.
Tritium m the discharge bay surface water.
Cesium-137 in the intake fish and sediment.
Cesium-137 in the discharge nsh.
e Manganese-54, Cobalt-58, Cobalt-60, Cesium-134 and Cesium-137 in the discharge sediment.
Sampic Deviations The following air sample locations had cauipment malfunctions during this reponing period.
b, cation Sample Period Run Time (bre Comment Station #3 01/09/96 - 01/16/96 96.0 Electrical outage Station #3 12/17/96 - 12/23/96 NA Mechanical failure Station #7 03/05/96 - 03/12/96 144.0 Mechanical failure Two first quarter TLDs (Stations 135 & 139) were missing in the field due to vandalism, one second quarter TLD (Station 135) was damaged due to water, and one fourth quarter TLD (Station 136) result was skewed and not representative of the historical average during the reporting period.
Page1
(
Summary of Monitoring Results
{
,R, equiredpwer Limit of DetectionJLLD) Values All LLDs for this reporting period were within the acceptable limits required by the technical specifications.
Analytical Lai orstory Services t
Entergy's nuclear sites discontinued utilizing the laboratory services ofEntergy Serv;ces, Incorporated located in Little Rock, Arkansas, and began using River Bend Station's environmental laboratory located at St. Francisville, Louisiana on May 1,1996.
(
{
(
(
{
{
[
=.J c
k Page 2
Table 1.1 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Radiciodine Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exchange Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radioicdine Cartridge) 5 Units: pCi/m Location: 01, Met Tower (Indicator) 1 Particulate Radiciodine f_ Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131 l
Recuired LLD +
0.01 0.07 9600382 9600382 12/26/95 01/02/96 0.010 i 0.002
<0.046 l
(
9600390 9600390 01/02/96 01/09/96 0.027 i 0.002
<0.027 9601232 9601232 01/09/96 01/16/96 0.013 i 0.002
<0.032 9601808 9601808 01/16/96 01/23/96 0.014 i 0.002
<0.021
'1 9602298 9602298 01/23/96 01/30/96 0.008 i 0.002
<0.016 9602698 9602698 01/30/96 02/06/96 0.006 i 0.002
<0.015 1
9603373 9603373 02/06/96 02/13/96 0.013 i 0.002
<0.034 9603584 9603584 02/13/96 02/20/96 0.017 i 0.002
<0.026 9604288 9604288 02/20/96 02/27/96 0.014 0.002
<0.021 l
9604704 9604704 02/27/96 03/05/96 0.019 i 0.002
<0.034 8
9605349 9605349 03/05/96 03/12/96 0.010 i 0.002
<0.056 9605578 9605578 03/12/96 03/19/96 0.012 i 0.002
<0.029 9605737 9605737 03/19/96 03/26/96 0.006 i 0.002
<0.015 9606176 9606176 03/26/96 04/02/96 0.014 0.002
<0.034 9606704 9606704 04/02/96 04/09/96 0.015 i 0.002
<0.021 1
9607022 9607022 04/09/96 04/16/96 0.022 i 0.002
<0.019 9607487 9607487 04/16/96 04/23/96 0.014 i 0.002
<0.024 I
I 960049 960042 04/23/96 04/30/96 0.0149 0.00197
<0.0277 960109 960102 04/30/96 05/07/96 0.00996 i 0.00195
<0.0288 960163 960156 05/07/96 05/14/96 0.0135 i 0.00211
<0.0346 960205 960205 05/14/96 05/21/96 0.0203 i 0.00226
<0.0317 960246 960246 05/21/96 05/28/96 0.0164 i 0.00213
<0.0313 g
960290 960290 05/28/96 06/04/96 0.0198 i 0.00221
<0.0211 3
960352
)
960352 06/04/96 06/11/96 0.0150 0.00215
<0.0358 960406 960406 06/11/96 j 06/18/96 0.0169 i 0.00227
<0.0509 950449 960449 l 06/18/96 [ 06/25/96 0.0164 i 0.00205
<0.0404 1
1 1
Page 3
q Table 1.1 Sample Type: Air Part cuhte and Radioiodine i
Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exchange Analysis. Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radioiodine Cartridge)
Units: pCi/m' Location: 01., Met Tower (Indicator)
Particulate Radioiodine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross. Beta 1-131 Reauired LLD 0.01 0.07 960475 960475 06/25/96 07/02/96 0.0137 i 0.00217
<0.0326 960513 960513 07/02/96 07/09/96 0.0221 i 0.00228
<0.0248 960570 960570 07/09/96 07/16/96 0.0109 i 0.00196
<0.0234 M0618 960618 07/16/96 07/23/96 0.00887 i 0.00186
<0.0404 960676 960676 07/23/96 07/30/96 0.0150 i 0.00214
<0.0285 960719 960719 07/30/96 08/06/96 0.0198 i 0.00224
<0.0390 960762 960762 08/06/96 08/13/96 0.0177 0.00218
<0.0384 960804 950804 08/13/96 08/20/96 0.0330 i 0.00267
<0.0267 960836 960836 08/20/96 08/27/96 0.0314 i 0.00260
<0.0231 960867 960867 08/27/96 09/03/96 0.0311 i 0.00258
<0.0323 960906 960906 09/03/96 09/10/96 0.0288 i 0.00252
<0.0298 960938 960938 09/10/96 09/17/96 0.0241 i 0.00228
<0.0307 960965 960965 09/17/96 09/24/96 0.0186 i 0.00222
<0.0341 961005 951005 09/24/96 10/01/96 0.0220 0.00235
<0.0255 961062 961062 10/01/96 10/08/96 0.0205 i 0.00220
<0.0209 961104 961104 10/08/96 10/15/96 0.0277 i 0.00244
<0.0216 961128 961128 10/15/96 10/22/96 0.0179 i 0.00225
<0.0214 961176 961176 10/22/96 10/29/96 0.0103 1 0.00189
<0.0230
(
961213 961213 10/29/96 11/05/96 0.0152 0.00215
<0.0352 961248 961248 11/05/96 11/12/96 0.0170 i 0.00205
<0.0197 961284 961284 11/12/96 11/19/96 0 0194 i 0.00208
<0.0266
%1325 961325 11/19/96 11/26/96 0.0161 i 0.00201
<0.030-2 961360 961360 11/26/96 12/03/96 0.0229 i 0.00229
<0.0262 961388 961388 12/03/96 12/10/96 0.0146 t 0.00213
<0.0189 961421 961421 12/10/96 12/17/96 0.0185
- 0.00213
<0.0189
%1464 961464 12/17/ %
12/23/96 0.0139 t 0.00237
<0.0413 1
970012 970012 12/23/96 12/31/96 0.0184 i 0.00203
<0.0196
}
Page5
)
Table 1.2 l
Sample Type: Air Particulate and Radioiodine B
Collecticn: Continuous with Weekly Exc!mnge Analysis: G; ass Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radiciodine Cartridge)
Units: pCi/m' Location: 02, Southwest of Site Undicator)
~
Particulate Radioiodine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131 Reanired LLD
-)
0.01 0.07 I
9600383 9600383 12/26/95 01/02/96 0.012 i 0.002
<0.046 9600391 9600391 01/02/96 01/09/96 0.023 0.002
<0.027 9601233 9601233 01/09/96 01/16/96 0.016.i 0.002
<0.032 9601809 9601809 01/16/96 01/23/96 0.014 i 0.002
<0.021 g
9602299 9602299 01/23/96 01/30/96 0.013 i 0.002
<0.016 I
9602699 9602699 01/30/96 02/06/96 0.016 i 0.002
<0.015 9603' 74 9603374 02/06/96 02/13/96 0.010 -1 0.002
<0.0.i4 3
1 9603585 9603585 02/13/96 02/20/96 0.010 0.002
<0.026 960C89 9604289 02/20/96 02/27/96 0.016 i 0.002
<0.021 9604705 9604705 02/27/96 03/05/96 0.010 0.002
<0.034 l
9605350 9605350 03/05/96 03/12/96 0.015 i 0.002
<0.056 9605579 9605579 03/12/96 03/19/96 0.013 i 0.002
<0.029 9605733 9605738 03/19/96 03/26/96 0.017 i 0.002
<0.015 I
9606177 9606177 03/26/96 04/02/96 0.011 i 0.002
<0.034 9606705 9606705 04/02/96 04/09/96 0.020 i 0.002
<0.021 9607023 9607023 04/09/96 04/16/96 0.018 i 0.002
<0.019 9607488 9607488 04/16/96 04/23/96 0.016 i 0.002
<0.024 960050 960043 04/23/96 04/30/96 0.0126 i 0.00189
<0.0183 l
960110 960103 04/30/96 05/07/96 0.0175 i 0.00221
<0.0276 960164 960157 05/07/96 05/14/96 0.0147 0.00216
<0.0311 960206 960206 05/14/96 05/21/96 0.0199 1 0.00224
<0.0320 960247 960247 05/21/96 05/28/96 0.0135 i 0.00202
<0.0332
{
960291 960291 05/28/96 06/04/96 0.0160 i 0.00207
<0.0131 I
960353 960353 06/04/96 06/11/96 0.0152 i 0.00216
<0.0409 960407 960407 06/11/96 06/18/96 0.0130 t 0.00199
<0.0481 l
960450 960450 06/18/96 06/25/96 0.0138
- 0.00200
<0.0409 l
I
~
~
l l
]
Page5
Table 1.2 Sunple Type. Air Particulate and Radiciodine Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exchange Analysis: Gross Eda (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radiciodine Cartridge)
Units: pCi/m' Location: 02, Southwert of Site (Indicator)
Particulate Radioiodine Lab Nurnber Lab Nurnber Start Date End Date,,
Gross Beta I-131 1
Reauired LLD ->
0.01 0-.07 960476 960476 06/25/96 07/02/96 0.0198 i 0.00235
<0.0403 960514 960514 07/02/96 07/09/96 0.0215 i 0.00225
<0.0189 960571 960571 07/09/96 07/16/96 0.0121 0.00201
<0.0294 l
960619 9606:9 07/16/96 07/23/96 0.0112 i 0.00196
<0.0290 960677 960677 07/23/96 07/30/96 0.0118 i 0.00197
<0.0537
.I 960720 960720 07/30/96 08/06/96 0.0211 i 0.00228
<0.0670 960763 960763 08/06/96 08/13/96 0.0226 i 0.00235
<0.0434 960805 960805 08/13/96 08/20/90 0.0293 0.00256
<0.0411 960837 960837 08/20/96 08/27/96 0.0300 i 0.00255
<0.0672 960868 960868 08/27/96 09/03/96 0.0297 i 0.00253
<0.0573 960907 960907 09/03/96 09/10/96 0.0273 0.00247
<0.0321 f
960939 960939 09/10/96 09/17/96 0.0279 i 0.00240
<0.0261 960966 960966 09/17/96 09/24/96 0.0206 i 0.00230
<0.0345 961006 961006 09/24/96 10/01/96 0.0205 i 0.00232
<0.0225 I
961063 961063 10/01/96 10/08/96 0.0236 i 0.00220
<0.0185 961105 961105 10/08/96 10/15/96 0.0208 1 0.00221
<0.0230 i
961129 961129 10/15/96 10/22/96 0.0181 1 0.00228
<0.0216 961177 961177 10/22/96 10/29/96 0.0101 i 0.00188
<0.0249 961214 961214 10/29/96 11/05/96 0.0175 i 0.00221
<0.0379 961249 961249 11/05/96 11/12/96 0.00930 - 0.00176
<0.0239 i
961285 961285 11/12/96 11/19/96 0.0176 i 0.00219
<0.0292 961326 961326 11/19/96 11/26/96 0.0149 i 0.00194
<0.0308 961361 961361 11/26/96 12/03/96 0.0143 1 0.00199
<0.0203 961389 961389 12/03/96 12/10/96 '
O.0140 - 0.00210
<0.0226 961422 961422 12/10/96 12/17/96 0.0227 i 0.00228
<0.0220 "
961465 961465 12/17/96 12/23/96 0.00911 0.00238
<0.0429 970033 970013 12/23/96 12/31/96 0.0157 0.00204
<0.0120 l
i t,
~
~l l
Table 1.3 Sample Type: Air Paniculatn and Radioiodine l
Colixtion: Continuous with Weekly Exchange I
Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radioicxline Cartridge)
Units: pCi/m' I
Location: 03, North of Site (Indicator)
Paniculate Radio'iodit e
'~
Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131 Reanired LLD 4 0.01 0.07 9600384 9600384 12/26/95 01/02/96 0.008 0.002
<0.046 9600392 9600392 01/02/96 01/09/96 0.022 i 0 002
<0.027 9601234 9601234 01/12/96 01/16/96
- 0.017 0.002
<0.032 I
9601810 9601810 01/16/96 01/23/96 0.017 i 0.002
<0.021 9602300 9602300 01/23/96 01/30/96 0.007 i 0.002
<0.016 l
9602700 9602700 01/30/96 02/06/96 0.015 i 0.002
<0.015 I
9603375 9603375 02/06/96 02/13/96 0.008 i 0.002
<0.034 9603586 9603586 02/13/96 02/20/96 0.018 0.002
<0.026 I
9604.290 9604290 02/20/96 02/27/96 0.009 i 0.002
<0.021 9604706 9604706 02/27/96 03/05/96 0.018 i 0.002
<0.034 9603351 9605351 03/05/96 03/12/96 0.011 1 0.002
<0.056 f
9605580 9605580 03/12/96 03/19/96 0.009 i 0.002
<0.029 9605739 9605739 03/19/96 03/26/96 0.006 i 0.002
<0.015 9606178 9606173 03/26/96 04/02/96 0.015 i 0.002
<0.034 9606706 9606706 04/02/96 04/09/96 0.010 0.002
<0.021
]
9607024 9607024 04/09/96 04/16/96 0.017 i 0.002
<0.019 l
9607489 9607489 04/16/96 04/23/96 0 013 i 0.002
<0.024 960051 960044 04/23/96 04/30/96 0.0126 i 0.00190
<0.0455 960111 960104 04/30/96 05/07/96 0.0158 i 0.00215
<0.0402 l
960165 960158 05/07/96 05/14/96 0.0151 i 0.00217
<0.0320 960207 960207 05/14/96 05/21/96 0.0166 0.00213
<0.0284 960248 960248 05/21/96 05/28/96 0.0151 d. 0.00208
<0.0392 960292 960292 05/28/96 06/04/96 0.0151 i 0.00204
<0.0262 960354 960354 06/04/96 06/11/96 0.0170 0.00222
<0.0360 960408 960408 06/11/96 06/18/96 0.00711 0.00179
<0.0433 960451 960451 06/18/96 06/25/96 0.00980 0.00187
<0.0572
- See Sample Deviatiors on Page 1 of this repost.
Page 7
Table 1.3 Sarnple Type: Air Particulate and Radiciodine i
Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exchange
(
Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radiciodine Cartridge)
Units: pCi/rn*
Location: 03, North of Site (Indicater)
Particulate Radioindine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131 Recuired LLD i>
0.01 0.07 l
960477 960477 06/25/96 07/02/96 0.0218 i 0.00238
<0.0320 960515 960515 07/02/96 07/09/96 0.0260 0.00241
<0.0335 960572 960572 07/09/96 07/16/96 0.0139 0.00208
<0.0462 960620 960620 07/16/96 07/23/96 0.0115 1 0.00197
<0.0237
% 0678 960678 07/23/96 07/30/96 0.00951 1 0.00187
<0.0318 960721 960721 07/30/96 08/06/96 0.0199 i 0.00224
<0.0274 960764 960764 08/06/96 08/13/ %
0.0142 0.00204
<0.0292 960806 960806 08/13/96 08/20/96 0.0189 1 0.00223
<0.0431 960838 960838 0'8/20/96 08/27/96 0.0190 1 0.00220
<0.0503 960869 960869 08/27/96 09/03/96 0.0306 i 0.00256
<0.0366 960908 960908 09/03/96 09/10/96 0.0225 i 0.00232
<0.0328 960940 960940 09/10/96 09/17/96 0.0233 1 0.00226
<0.0242 960967 960968 09/17/96 09/24/96 0.0162 0.00213
<0.0245 961007 961007 09/24/96 10/01/96 0.0189.i 0.00214
<0.0220 961064 961064 10/01/96 10/08/96 0.0231 - 0.00214
<0.0216 961106 961106 10/08/96 10/15/96 0.0267 i 0.00241
<0.0182 961130 961130 10/15/96 10/22/96 0.0165 1 0.00223
<0.0216
%1178 961178 10/22/96 10/29/96 0.0119 0.00195
<0.0195
~961215 961215 10/29/96 11/05/96 0.0120 i 0.00200
<0.0339 961250 961250 11/05/96 11/12/96 0.0183 i 0.00211
<0.0219,
961286 961286 11/12/96 11/19/96 0.0143 0.00197
<0.0287 961327 961327 11/19/96 11/26/96 0.0185 1 0.00210
<0.0332 961362 961362 11/26/96 12/03/96 0.0111 i 0.00186
<0.0323
'961390 961390 12/03/96 12/10/96 0.0208 i 0.00234
<0.0274 961423 961423 12/10/96 12/17/96 0.0156 2 0.00203
<0.0224 961466"
% 1466 12/17/96 12/23/96
<0.00278
<0.0404 970014 970014 12/23/96 12/31/96 0.0133 0.00185
<0.0205
- See Sainple Deviations on Page 1 of this report.
Page 8
-8'
Table l'.4 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Radiciodine Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exclunge Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and lodine-131 (Radiciodine Cartridge)
Units: pCi/m' Location: 04, May Cemetery (Indicator)
Particulate Radiciodine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131
.R gyired LLD
=)
0.01 0.07 f
9600385 9600385 12/26/95 01/02/96 0.005 i 0.002
<0.046 9600393 9600393 01/02/96 01/09/96 0.018 i 0.002
<0.027 9601235 9601235 01/09/96 01/16/96 0.005 i 0.002
<0.032 9601811 9601811 01/16/96 01/23/96 0.014 i 0.002
<0.021 9602301 9602301 01/23/96 01/30/96 0.005 i 0.002
<0.016 9602701 9602701 01/30/96 02/06/96 0.011 i 0 002
<0.015 9603376 9603376 02/06/96 02/13/96 0.008 0.002
<0.034 9603587 9603587 02/13/96 02/20/96 0.015 0.002
<0.026
)
9604291 9604291 02/20/96 02/27/96 0.008 i 0.002
<0.021 9604707 9604707 02/27/96 03/05/96 0.014 i 0.002
<0.034 9605352 9605352 03/05/96 03/12/96 0.009 1 0.002
<0.056 9605581 9605581 03/12/96 03/19/96 0.010 0.002
<0.029 9605740 9605740 03/19/96 03/26/96 0.010 0.002
<0.015 9606179 9606179 03/26/96 04/02/96 0.013 i 0.002
<0.034 9606707 9606707 04/02/96 04/09/96 0.012 i 0.002
<0.021 9607025 9607025 04/09/96 04/16/96 0.017 i 0.002
<0.019 9607490 9607490 04/16/96 04/23/96 0.010 i 0.002
<0.024 960052 960045 04/23/96 04/30/96 0.0139 i 0.00193
<0.0355 960112 960105 04/30/96 05/07/96 0.0160 i 0.00218
<0.0239 960166 960159 05/07/96 05/14/96 0.00914 i 0.00194
<0.0355 960208 960208 05/14/96 05/21/96 0.0193 i 0.00222
<0.0317 960249 960249 05/21/96 05/28/96 0.0132 i 0.00202
<0.0306 960293 960293 05/28/96 06/04/96 0.0160 i 0.00207
<0.0263 960355 960355 06/04/96 06/11/96 0.0112 0.00200
<0.0344 960409 960409 06/11/96 06/18/96 0.0148 i 0.00206
<0.0330 960452 960432 06/18/96 06/25/96 0.0122 1 0.00197
<0.0547
Table 1.4 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Radiciodine Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exchange Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radiciodine Cartridge)
Units: pCi/m' Location: 04, May Cemetery (Indicator)
~
Particulate Radioiodine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131 Reanired LLD
-4 0.01 0.07 960478 960478 06/25/96 07/02/96 0.0187 i 0.00228
<0.0326 960S16 960516 07/02/96 07/09/96 0.0150 1 0.00204
<0.0396 960573 960573 07/09/96 07/16/96 0.0151 i 0.00212
<0.0329 960621 960621 07/16/96 07/23/96 0.00851 1 0.00185
<0.0486 960679 960679 07/23/96 07/30/96 0.0131 i 0.00201
<0.0315 960722 960722 07/30/96 08/06/96 0.0178 0.00212
<0.0484 960765 960765 08/06/96 08/13/96 0.0216 i 0.00231
<0.0307 960807 960807 08/13/96 08/20/96 0.0150 0.00208
<0.0429 960839 960839 08/20/96 08/27/96 0.0252 i 0.00240
<0.0622 960870 960870 08/27/96 09/03/96 0.0261 1 0.00242
<0.0622 960909 960909 09/03/96 09/10/96 0.0286 i 0.00251
<0.0393 960941 960941 09/10/96 09/17/96 0.0190 i 0.00211
<0.0300 960968 960967 09/17/96 09/24/96 0.0207 i 0.00229
<0.0286 961008 961008 09/24/96 10/01/96 0.0193 i 0.00226
<0.0148 961065 961065 10/01/96 10/08/96 0.0250 i 0.00227
<0.0184 961107 961107 10/08/96 10/15/96 0.0229 i 0.00221
<0.0252 961131 961131 10/15/96 10/22/96 0.00901 i 0.00195
<0.0204 j
961179 961179 10/22/96 10/29/96 0.00648 i 0.00173
<0.0226 I
961216 961216 10/29/96 11/05/96 0.0112 i 0.00197
<0.0372 961251 961251 11/05/96 11/12/96 0.0136 i 0.00194
<0.0193 961287 961287 11/12/96 11/19/96 0.0115 i 0.00189
<0.0296 961328 961328 11/19/96 11/26/96 0.00992 i 0.00176
<0.0322 961363 961363 11/26/96 12/03/96 0.0174 i 0.00210
<0.0270
{
961391 961391 12/03/96 12/10/96 0.0180 0.00224
<0.0238 961424 961424 12/10/96 12/17/96 0.0205 1 0.00220
<0.0214
% 1467 961467 12/17/96 12/23/96 0.00737 i 0.00203
<0.0473 970015 970015 12/23/96 12/31/96 0.0123 i 0.00178
<0.0191
=
1
]
Page 10 J
Table 1.5 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Radiciodine Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exchange Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radioiodine Cartridge)
Units: pCi/m' Location: 06, Local Office (Control)
Particulate Radiciodine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131 Beauired LLD
-)
0.01 0.07 9600386 9600386 12/27/95 01/02/96 0.009 i 0.002
<0.046
{
9600394 9600394 01/02/96 01/09/96 0.025 i 0.002
<0.027 9601236 9601236 01/09/96 01/16/96 0.013 i 0.002
<0.032 9601812 9601812 01/16/96 01/23/96 0.015 i 0.002
<0.021
{
9602302 9602302 01/23/96 01/30/96 0.012 i 0.002
<0.016 9602702 9602702 01/30/96 02/06/96 0.012 0.002
<0.015 9603377 9603377 02/06/96 02/13/96 0.013 i 0.002
<0.034 9603588 9603588 02/13/96 02/20/96 0.017 i 0.002
<0.026 9604202 9604292 02/20/96 02/27/96 0.012 i 0.002
<0.021 9604708 9604708 02/27/96 03/05/96 0.016 i 0.002
<0.034 9605353 9605353 03/05/96 03/12/96 0.012 1 0.002
<0.056 9605582 9605582 03/12/96 03/19/96 0.009 i 0.002
<0.029 9605741 9605741 03/19/96 03/26/96 0.011 t 0.002
<0.015 9606180 9606180 03/26/96 04/02/96 0.011 i 0.002
<0.034 9606708 9606708 04/02/96 04/09/96 0.017 i 0.002
<0.021 9607026 9607026 04/09/96 04/16/96 0_019 i 0.002
<0.019 9607491 9607491 04/16/96 04/23/96 0.013 -i 0.002
<0,024 960053 960046 04/23/96 04/30/96 0.0152 i 0.00200
<0.0310 960113 960106 04/30/96 05/07/96 0.0137 i 0.00208
<0.0241 960167 960160 05/07/96 05/14/96 0.0121 1 0.00200
<0.0374 960209 960209 05/14/96 05/21/96 0.0143 i 0.00207
<0.0297 960250 960250 05/21/96 05/28/96 0.0155 i 0.00210
<0.0460 960294 960294 05/28/96 06/04/96 0.0151 i 0.00206
<0.0249 960356 960356 06/04/96 06/11/96 0.0157 i 0.00216
<0.0423 960410 960410 06/11/96 06/18/96 0.0149 0.00204
<0.0505 960453 960453 06/18/96 06/25/96 0.0151 i 0.00215
<0.0317 i
-. - =.
Page 11
Table 1.5 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Radioiodine Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exchange Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radiciodine Cartridge)
Units: pCi/m' Location: 06, Local Omce (Control) l Particulate Radiciodine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End.Date Gross Beta I-131
)
Reauired LLD
-)
0.01 OE 960479 960479 06/25/96 07/02/96 0.0179 i 0.00198
<0.0328 960517 950517 07/02/96 07/09/96 0.0270 i 0.00247
<0.0339 960574 960574 07/09/96 07/16/96 0.0156 0.00216
<0.0322 960622 960622 07/16/96 07/23/96 0.0125 0.00202
<0.0262 960680 960680 07/23/96 07/30/96 0.0172.i 0.00214
<0.0194 960723 960723 07/30/96 08/06/96 0.0205 0.00225
<0.0470 960766 960766 08/06/96 08/13/96 0.0208 i 0.00228
<0.0227 960808 960808 08/13/96 08/20/96 0.0328 i 0.00268
<0.0280 960840 960840 08/20/96 08/27/96 0.0257 i 0.00242
<0.0447 960871 960871 08/27/96 09/03/96 0.0290 i 0.00251
<0.0459 960910 960910 09/03/96 09/10/96 0.0269 0.00243
<0.0302 960942 960942 09/10/96 09/17/96 0.0273 i 0.00242
<0.0294 960969 960969 09/17/96 09/24/96 0.0192 i 0.00222
<0.0330 961009 961009 09/24/96 10/01/96 0 0217 i 0.00236
<0.0245 961066 961066 10/01/96 10/08/96 0.0228 i 0.00222
<0.0218 961108 961108 10/08/96 10/15/96 0.0164 0.00243 (0.0197 961132 961132 10/15/96 10/22/96 0.0131 i 0.00212
<0.0218 961180 961180 10/22/96 10/29/96 0.0117 0.00194
<0.0236 961217 961217 10/29/96 11/05/96 0.0153 i 0.00211
<0.0383 961252 961252 11/05/96 11/12/96 0 0153 i 0.00203
<0.0234 961288 961288 11/12/96 11/19/96 0.0159 i 0.00205
<0.0357 961329 961329 11/19/96 11/26/96 0.0172 i 0.00204
<0.0323 961364 961364 11/26/96 12/03/96 0.0175 0.00210
<0.0343 961392 961392 12/03/96 12/10/96 0.0189 i 0.00231
<0.0219 961425 961425 12/10/96 12/17/96 0.0217 0.00225
<0.0247
%I468 961468 12/17/96 12/23/96 0.0160 i 0.00241
<0.0360 970016 970016 12/23/96 12/31/96 0.0188 i 0.00204
<0.0192 Js Page 12
Table 1.6 Sampic Type: Air Particulate and Radioiodine Collection: Continuous with Weekly Exchange Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodire-131 (Radioiodine Cartridge)
[
Units: pCi/m' Location: 07, Danville (Control)
Particulate Radiciodine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131 Reauired LLD +
0.01 0.07 9600387 9600387 12/26/95 01/02/96 0.017 0.002
<0.046 9600395
% 00395 01/02/96 01/09/96 0.022 i 0.002
<0.027 9601237 9601237 01/09/96 01/16/96 0.016 i 0.002
<0.032 9601813 9601813 01/16/96 01/23/96 0.016 i 0.002
<0.021 9602303 9602303 01/23/96 01/30/96 0.017 0.002
<0.016 9602703
% 02703 01/30/96 02/06/96 0.012 i 0.002
<0.015 9603378
% 03378 02/06/96 02/13/96 0.017 0.002
<0.034 9603589 9603589 02/13/96 02/20/96 0.016 1 0.002
<0.026 9604293 9604293 02/20/96 02/27/96 0.018 i 0.002
<0.021
% 04709 9604709 02/27/96 03/05/96 0.015 i 0.002
<0.034
% 05354 9605354 03/05/96 03/12/96
- 0.015 i 0.002
<0.056 9605583
% 05583 03/12/96 03/19/ %
0.009 i 0.002
<0.029
% 05742 9605742 03/19/96 03/26/96 0.015 0.002
<0.015 9606181 9606181 03/26/96 04/02/96 0.012 i 0.002
<0.034 9606709 9606709 04/02/96 04/09/96 0.023 i 0.002
<0.021 f
9607027 9607027 04/09/96 04/16/96 0.014 i 0.002
<0.019 9607492 9607492 04/16/96 04/23/96 0.012 1 0.002
<0.024 960054 960047 04/23/96 04/30/96 0.0173 i 0.00143
<0.0364 960113 960107 04/30/ %
05/07/96 0.0185 i 0.00226
<0.0361 960168 960161 05/07/96 05/14/ %
0.0130 i 0.00205
<0.0241
%0210
% 0210 05/14/96 05/21/96 0.0203 i 0.00227
<0.0293 960251 960251 05/21/96 05/28/96 0.0125 i 0.00197
<0.0310 960295 960295 05/28/96 06/04/96 0.0194 i 0.00228
<0.0348 960357
%0357 06/04/96 06/11/96 0.0183 i 0.00223
<0.0392 960411 960411 06/11/96 06/18/06 0.0218 t 0.00226
<0.0355 960454 960454 06/18/96 06/25/96 0.0187 i 0.00216
<0.0556
=
- See Sample Deviations on Page 1 of this report.
Page 13
Table 1.6 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Radiciodine Collection: Continuous with Weekly Ex. change I
Analysis: Gross Beta (Particulate) and Iodine-131 (Radioiodine Cartridge)
' Units: pCi/m' I
Location: 07, Danville (Control)
I Particulate Radiciodine Lab Number Lab Number Start Date End Date Gross Beta I-131 I
Reauired LLD +
0.01 0.07 960480 960480 06/25/96 07/02/96 0.0231 1 0.00241
<0.0446 960518 960518 07/02/96 07/09/96 0.00966 i 0.00184
<0.0379 960575 960575 07/09/96 07/16/96 0.0103 i 0.00247
<0.0566 I
960623 960623 07/16/96 07/23/96 0.0114 i 0.00197
<0.0398 960681 960681 07/23/96 07/30/96 0.0156 i 0.00207
<0.0543 960724 960724 07/30/96 08/06/96 0.0177 i 0.00216
<0.0490 I
960767 960767 08/06/96 08/13/96 0.0205 0.00229
<0.0358 960809 960809 08/13/96 08/20/96 0.0253 i 0.00242
<0.0396 960841 960841 08/20/96 08/27/96 0.0244 i 0.00240
<0.0686 960872 960872 08/27/96 09/03/96 0.0244 i 0.00236
<0.0486 960911 960911 09/03/96 09/10/96 0.0246 i 0.00238
<0.0339 960943 960943 09/10/96 09/17/96 0.0250 i 0.00235
<0.0299 I
960970 960970 09/17/96 09/24/96 0.0185 i 0.00219
<0.0290 961010 961010 09/24/96 10/01/96 0.0177 i 0.00223
<0.0214 I
961067 961067 10/01/96 10/08/96 0.0234 i 0.00220
<0.0207 961109 961109 10/08/96 10/15/96 0.0262 i 0.00247
<0.0239 961133 961133 10/15/96 10/22/96 0.0169 i 0.00230
<0.0210 961181 961181 10/22/96 10/29/96 0.00897 i 0.00183
<0.0181 961218 961218 10/29/96 11/05/96 0.0150 i 0.00208
<0.0268 961253 961253 11/05/96 11/12/96 0.0151 i 0.00203
<0.0280 961289 961289 11/12/96 11/19/96 0.0183 i 0.00213
<0.0295 961330 961330 11/19/96 11/26/96 0.0157 i 0.00200
<0.0371 I
961365 961365 11/26/96 12/03/96 0.0184 i 0.00213
<0.0270 961393 961393 12/03/96 12/10/96 0.0191 i 0.00231
<0.0260 961426 961426 12/10/96 12/17/96 0.0245 0.00233
<0.0209 I
961469 961469 12/17/96 12/23/96 0.0147 0.00231
<0.0414 970017 970017 12/23/96 12/31/96 0.0239 i 0.00215
<0.0212 I
I
[
J Table 1.7 SampleType: AirParticulate Collection: Quarterly Composites of Weekly Samples Analysis: Gamma Units: pCi/m' I
Location Lab Number Start Date End Date Cs-134 Cs-137 Reauired LLD
=)
0.01 0.01 01, Met Tower (Indicator) 9607632 12/26/95 03/26/96
<0.0011
<0.0012 01, Met Tower (Indicator) 960646 03/26/96 06/25/96
<0.007
<0.008 01, Met Tower (Indicator) 9601025 06/25/96 09/24/96
<0.0014
<0.0024 01, Met Tower (Indicator) 970091 09/24/96 12/31/96
<0.0014
<0.0020 02, Southwest of Site (Indicator) 9607633 12/26/95 03/26/96
<0.0008
<0.0009 02, Southwest of Site (Indicator) 960647 03/26/96 06/25/96
<0.006
<0.004 02, Southwest of Site (Indicator) 9601026 06/25/96 09/24/96
<0.0017
<0.0016 i
02, Southwest of Site (Indicator) 970092 09/24/96 12/31/96
<0.0013
<0.0011 03, North of Site (Indicator) 9607634 12/26/95 03/26/96
<0.0009
<0.0010 03, North of Site (Indicator) 960648 03/26/96 06/25/96
<0.006
<0.007 03, North of Site (Indicator) 9601027 06/25/96 09/24/96
<0.0024
<0.009 03, North of Site (Indicator) 970093 09/24/96 12/31/96
<0.0019
<0.0021 04, May Cemetery (Indicator) 9607635 12/26/95 03/26/96
<0.0008
<0.0006 04,May Cemetery (Indicator) 960649 03/26/96 06/25/96
<0.004
<0.004 04, May Cemetery (Indicator) 9601028 06/25/96 09/24/96
<0.0013
<0.0014 04, May Cemetery (Indicator) 970094 09/24/96 12/31/96
<0.0017
<0.0020 06, Local Omce (Control) 9607636 12/27/95 03/26/96
<0.0012
<0.0012 06, Local OfTice (Control) 960650 03/?6/96 06/25/96
<0.006
<0.008 06, Local Office (Control) 9601029 06/2.5/96 09/24/96
<0.0024
<0.0019 06, Local Omce (Control) 970095 09/24/96 12/31/96
<0.0013
<0.0014 l
07, Danville (Control) 9607637 12/26/96 03/26/96
<0.0008
<0.0010 07, Danville (Control) 960651 03/26/96 06/25/96
<0.004
<0.002 07, Danville (Control)-
9601030 06/25/96 09/24/96
<0.0024
<0.0022 07, Danville (Control) 970096 09/24/96 12/31/96
<0.0013
<0.0016 Page 15
Table 2.1 Sample Type: Milk (ADH Split)
Collection: MonthlyGrab Analysis: Iodine-131 and Gamma Units: pCi/l Location: 19, Arkansas Tech (Control)
1.0 15 18 15 15 9600264 01/09/96
<0.8
<2
<3
<10
<2 9602542 02/06/96
<0.6
<3
<3
<10
<3 9604519 03/05/96
<0.7
<3
<3
<13
<4 9606373 04/02/96
<0.9
<4
<4
<13
<4 960064 04/30/96
<0.99
<3.86
<4.92
<14.0
<5.23 y
960234 05/28/96
<0.83
<4.94
<5.20
<13.6
<4.92 j
960436 06/25/96
<0.83
<2.97
<3.81
<13.5
<3.65 3
960436 **
06/25/96
<0.83
<3.64
<4.21
<14.4
<5.88 960625 07/23/96
<0.88
<3.21
<4.04
<13.2
<4.23 I
960802 08/20/96
<0.84
<3.73
<3.76
<14.9
<3.49 960935 09/17/96
<0.90
<3.33
<4.18
< 14.9
<5.11
[
961102 10/15/96
<0.83
<4.04
<5.13
<14.9
<5.79 I
961244 11/12/96
<0.90
<3.61
<4.88
<14.8
<5.30 961386 12/10/96
<0.80
<4.01
<5.07
<14.7
<6.32 I
I I
i Arkansas Department of Health cotlects and splits sample with ANO.
- Duplicate analysis.
Page 16
l Table 2.2 SampicType: Milk 4
Collection: MonthlyGrab Analysis: Iodine-131 and Gamma
(
Units: pCi/l
(
Location: 37, Steuber Dairy (Control)
Lab Number Collection Date I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Required LLD +
J,e y,
18_
15 J,5 9600131 01/03/96
<0.8
<2
<3
<ll
<3 9602483 02/05/96
<0.6
<2
<3
<l3
<3
[
9604425 02/28/96
<0.6
<4
<3
<12
<2 9605867 03/27/96
<0.9
<4
<3
<13
<4 9607652 04/25/96
<0.9
<3 2
1
<15
<4 960214 05/23/96
<0.84
<4.51
<4.67
<13.5
<4.95 960396 06/19/96
<0.86
<3.55
<4.87
<14.5
<5.53 960591 07/22/96
<0.86
<3.85
<5.03
<! 4.5
<6.01 960761 08/14/96
<0.86
<3.72
<5.15
<14.9
<5.88 960899 09/11/96
<0.90
<3.67
<4.26
<!4.9
<5.26
(
961074 10/09/96
<0. 90
<2.76
<3.17
<l4.6 '
<5.02 961204 11/07/96
<0.82
<3.24
<3.56
<14.0
<4.3 8 961352 12/04/96
<0.82
<4.16
<4.27
<14.9
<5.67 Page 17
I Table 2.3 l
SampleType: Milk l
Collection: Monthly Grab Analysis: lodine-131 and Gamma Units: pCi/l I
Location: 49, Rylee Dairy (Control)
I Lab Number Collection Date I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 i
Required LLD +
LO g
g g
g 9600132 01/03/96
<0.7
<4 12 i 5
<13
<4 9602484 02/06/96
<0.6
<3
<3
<10
<2 9604425 02/28/96
<0.7
<3
<3
<ll
<3 9605868 03/27/96
<0.9
<4
<4
<l2
- <4 9607653 04/26/96
<0.8
<4
<3
<13
<3 960235 05/28/96
<0.86
<159
<4.87
<14.1
<5.37 1
960397 06/20/96
<0.83
<3.16
<3.87
<!3.9
<4.24 960593 07/22/96
<0.87
<3.31
<4.57
<l4.4
<4.25 l
96077) 08/15/96
<0.85
<3.01
<3.59
<13.9
<6.15 960905 09/12/96
<0.79
<3.60
<4.3 9
<14.8
<5.81 961075 10/10/96
<0.80
<3.07
<4.42
<l4.6
<6.96 I
961205 11/07/96
<0. 87
<3.59
<4.12
<l4.6
<4.42 961353 12/04/96
<0.83
<3.79
<4.57
<l4.7
<5.82 I
I L
Page 18
Table 2.4 Sample Type: Milk (ADH Split)
Collection: Mcmthly Grab Analysis: Iodine-131 and Gamma Units: pCi/l Location: 50, Ragsdale Dairy (Control)
1.0 15 18 15 15 9600265 01/09/96
<0.8
<3
<3
<9
<3 9602543 02/06/96
<0.6
<2
<3
<13
<3 9604520 03/05/96
<0. 8
<3
<3
<9
<3 9606374 04/02/96
<0.7
<3
<3
<12
<3 960063 04/30/96
<0.99
<3.23
<4.34
<14.9
<5.96 960236 05/28/96
<0.87
<3.44
<4.36
<13.5
<4.21 960437 06/25/96
<0.82
<3.36
<4.11
<13.6
<3.81 960626 07/23/96
<0.87
<3.67
<4.65
<14.9
<4.70 960803 08/20/96
<0.83
<3.10
<3.46
<13.4
<4.30 960936 09/17/96
<0.S8
<3.82
<4.63
<l4.9
<4.61 961103 10/15/96
<0.86
<4.24
<4.78
<14.8
<4.39 961245 11/12/96
<0.80
<3.73
<3.88
<l4.9
<5.45 961387 12/10/96
<0.87
<4.22
<5.13
<14.1
<6.22 l
l L
^
Page 19
Table 3.1 Sample Type: Drinlang Water Collection: Monthly Grab Analysis: Gross Beta, Iodine-131 and Gamma Units: pCi/l Location: 14, City of Russellville (Indicator)
Lsb Number CoIIcetion Date Grus Beta I-131 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 R wuired LLD. ->
M M
M.
M M
M M
M M
M 18 15 15 9600787 01/11/96
<2.8
<0.9
<2
<4
<2
<2
<4
<3
<2
<2
<2
<ll
<3 I
9602725 02/08/96
<2.5
<0 9
<2
<3
<2
<2
<5
<5
<2
<2
<2
<10
<3 9605183 03/07/96 4.8 i 1.9
<l.0
<2
<3
<3
<2
<5
<5
<3
<3
<2
<13
<4 4
% 96183 04/02/96 2.5 i 1.7
<0.7
<2
<5
<2
<3
<5
<4
<2
<2
<3
<10
<3 960060 05MI/96 2.94 i 1.59
<0.88
<3.09
<7.10
<3.20
<2.87
<8.23
<5.77
<4.23
<3.10
<3.99
<l2.6
<3.26 960258 05/31/96 2.95 i 1.59
<0.90
<3.26
<6.72
<2.75
<3.34
<7.93
<3.51
<4.76
<3.42
<3.92
<12.4
<6.30 960448 06/28/96 3.36 i 1.62
<0.7)
<2.98
<7.63
<3.47
<4.03
<5.90
<6.62
<3.64
<3.60
<2.98
<!3.5
<3.68
% 0636 07/25/96 4.46 i 2.16
<0.85
<3.57
<6.72
<3.34
<2.65
<8.39
<4.97
<4.25
<3.95
<3.93
<14.2
<6.08 960799 08/20/96 3.57 i 2.19
<0.88
<2.32
<7.27
<2.39
<3.39
<7.%
<5.06
<4.03
<2.78
<3.02
<l l.6
<6.16 960937 09/19/9e 3.43 i 2.13
<0.88
<3.19
<7.37
<3.20
<3.53
<7.16
<6.08
<4.76
<3.54
<2.75
<12.4
<4.64 961101 10/16/96 2.96 i 2.14
<G.86
<3.13
<5.52
<3.21
<3.68
<8.73
<3.43
<3.62
<3.71
<2.97
<l2.6
<5.16
% 1241 11/12/96
<3.04
<0.88
<3.44
<4.42
<2.76
<2.98
<7.21
<5.38
<3.43
<3.30
<3.00, <12.9
<5.10
% 1385 12/10/96 3.49 2.15
<0.83
<3.33
<6.56
<2.79
<3.71
<6.25
<5.68
<3.08
<3.30
<3.30
<10.7
<4.03 Page 20
i Table 3.2 Sample Type: Drinking Water 1
Collection: Quarterly Composite of Monthly Samples Analysis: Tritium Units: pCi/l Location: 14, City of Russellville (Indicator)
Lrb Number Start Date End Date H-3 Reauired LLp, =>
2000 9606517 01/11/96 03/07/96
<250 960642 04/02/96 06/28/96
<250 960937 07/25/96 09/19/96
<256 961385 10/16/96 12/10/96
<251
(
(
[
r Page 21
~
m Table 4.1 SampleType: SurfaceWater Collectirm-MonthlyComposite Analysis: Gam:9a Units: pCi/l Locahon: 08, Discharge Bay (Indicator)
Lab Number Start Date End Date Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nh.95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-146 La-140 FeeniW LLD ->
M 30 15 15 30 15 15 15 15 18 15 M
9602330 12/31/95 01/31/96
<2
<4
<2
<2
<4
<4
<2
<4
<2
<2
<l3
<4 l
9604470 01/31/96 02/29/96
<3
<6
<3
<3
<6
<5
<3
<4
<3
<3
<l5
<4 9605998 02/29/96 03GI/96 3
<2
<2
<2
<2
<4
<4
<2
<2
<2
<2
<7
<2 I
960061 03/31/96 04G0/96
<2.85
<5.91
<2.77
<2.94
<5.08
<5.13
<2.84
<5.10
<3.06
<3.02
<l4.9
<4.97 l
960267 04!30/96 05/31/96
<2.90
<6.62
<2.29
<3.45
<7.64
<4.11
<3.05
<3.96
<2.83
<3.90
<l3.4
<3.19 060462 05/31/96 46/30/96
<4.11, <8.77
<3.54
<3.89
<6.26
<5.70
<2.58
<4.21
<3.25
<3.77
<l2.0
<3.76 960683 06/30/96 07/31/96 i <3.32
<7.89
<2.39
<2.54
<7.67
<6.64
<3.78
<4.13
<3.42
<3.52
<l 1.8
<2.41 960843 07/31/96 08/31/96
<3.15
<6.77
<3.43
<3.11
<7.78
<6.07
<3.21
<4.92
<3.34
<4.64
<14.5
<6.61 960989 08/31/96 09/30/96
<3.85
<7.06
<3.70
<3.10
<9.58
<6.23
<3.25
<4.47
<3.12
<3.79
<14.4
<3.83 l
% 1189 09/30/96 10G1/96
<3.55
<6.56
<2.97
<3.65
<6.49
<6.04
<3.71
<5.42
<3.11
<3.21
<14.9
<4.82 l
961332 10/31/96 11/30/96
<2.64
<5.71
<3.05
<2.89
<5.83
<6.22
<3.20
<3.75
<3.05
<3.77
<13.5
<4.58 970019 11/30/96 12/31/96
<3.91
<6.10
<3.13
<4.09
<8.64
<6.07
<3.66
<4.28
<3.15
<3.08
<13.9
<5.24 Page 22
~l
+
m o
~ m w
Table 4.2 SampleType: SurfaceWater Collectkm MonthlyComposite Analysis: Gamma Units: pCi/l Location: 10, Intake Canal (Control)
Lab Number Start Date End Date Mn.54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co40 Zm-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Reenired LIS, ->
.M M
M
[5, M
M M
M M
18 g
5 15 15 9602331 12G1/95 0181/96
<2
<5
<2
<2
<5
<3
<2
<3
<2
<2
<ll
<3 9504471 01/31/96 02/29/96
<2
<4
<2
<2
<4
<3
<2
<3
<2
<2
<10
<3 9605999 02/29/96 03/31/96
<2
<3
<2
<2
<5
<5
<2
<2
<2
<3
<8
<3 I
960062 03/31/96 04/30/96
<3.46
<6.89
<3.61
<2.98
<6.07
<5.24
<3.32
<5.13
<3.45
<3.59
< t 4.5
<4.14 960268 04/30/96 05/31/96
<3.76
<6.54
<3.00
<4.56
<8.49
<7.40
<3.80
<4.92
<3.75
<4.21
<14.2
<4.68 960453 05S1/96 06SO/96
<4.61
<6.54
<333
<3.22
<5.69
<7.08
<3.54
<4.27
<3.22
<3.02
<13.0
<5.89 960684 06G0/96 07G1/96
<3.75
<7.44
<3.96
<4.44
<7.74
<5.88
<4.37
<430
<3.68
<4.44
<14.2
<4.80 l
960844 07/31/96 08G1/96
<2.99
<6.90
<2.63
<3.42
<5.50
<5.68
<3.87
<4.20
<2.92
<3.18
<14.2
<638 960990 08S 1/96 0980/96
<3.01
<5.87
<3.16
<4.38
<5.03
<6.59
<330
<3S8
<2.83
<3.51
<13.8
<5.53 1
l 961188 0980/96 10/31/96
<3.19
<6.54
<3.73
<3.60 l <6.58
<5.77
<3.28
<5.16
<3.15
<3.50
<l4.9
<5.59 961333 1081/96 11/30/96
<3.12
<5.42
<3.11
<2.57. <8.54
<6.06
<3.59
<5.00
<3.20
<3.41
<13.1
<5.14 970020-11/30/96 12/31/96
<2.86
<6.68
<3.03
<3.13
<7.03
<536
<3.56
<4.49
<238
<3.01
<13.4
<4.83 i
Page 23
~-
Table 4.3 Sample Type: Surface Water Collection: Quarterly Composite of Monthly Samples Analysis: Tritium Units: pCi/l Location Lab Number Begin Date End Dste II-3 Reauired LLD ->
2000 08, Discharge Bay (Indicator) 9606000 12/31/95 03/31/96 1240 i 160 08, Discharge Bay (Indicator) 960462 03/31/96 06/30/96 628 i 128 1
08, Discherge Bay (Indicator) 960991 05/30/96 09/30/96 693 i 118 08, Discharge Bay (Indicator) 970023 09/30/96 12/31/96 1104 i 123 10, Intake Canal (Control) 9606001 12/31/95 03/31/96
<250 10, Intake Canal (Control) 960463 03/31/96 06/30/96 236 i 109 10, Intake Canal (Control) 960992 06/30/96 09/30/96 942 i 141 10, Intake Canal (Control) 970024 09/30/96 12/31/96 1558 i 129 l
Page 24
x c-
~
w Table 4.4 Sampic Type: Surface Water (ADH Split)
Collectum. Monthly Grab Analysis: Tritiura and Gamma Units: pCi/l Location: 08. Discharge Bay (Indicator)
- Lab Numeber Conection Date H4 Ma-54 Fe 59 Co-58 Co 68 Zm-65 Zr-95 Mb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-144 Reesired LLD ->
2000 15, 30 15 15 30 15 15 15 15 18
~ 15 15 9600976 01/16/96
<270
<2
<4
<2
<2
<4
<3
<2
<1
<2
<2
<9
<3 I
9602 % 7 0?/13/96 210 1 160
<2
<4
<2
- <2
<4
<3
<2
<2
<2
<2
<9
<3 960512R 03/12/96 310 t 15e
<i
<3
<2
<2
<3
<2
<2
<2
<i
<2
<7
<2-9606868 04/11/96 1950 1 150
<2
<4
<2
<2
<5
<4
<2
<2
<2
<2
<10
<3 960180 05/14/96
<2.83
<8.40
<3.43
<3.91
<6.70
<4.62
<3,90
<5 21
<3.13
<3.72
<l3.3
<6 98 960359 06/11/96 303 1 109
<3.71
<6.76
<3.14
<3.14
<7.04
<5.%
<3.90
<3.91
<3.32
<3.32
<11.8 -
<6.56 960578 07/18/96 219 i 108
<3.39
<4.19
<2.74
<2.46
<7.77
<6.50
<3.20
<3.38
<2.53
<3.94
<l2.7
<3.76 960846 08/2736 618 i 115
' <2.35 -
<6.32
<2. 80
<3.01
<6.00
<6.08
<3.60
<5.84
<2.55
<2.30
<14.9
<3.67 Arkansas Department of Health colletts and splits sample with ANO.
- Analysis not performed; isowever, sample est rgired by technical specifications.
PaEc25
~
w w-m m
m-m ww Table 4.5 Sample Type: Surface Water (ADH Split)
Collectiorr MonthlyGrab Analysis: Tritium and Ganutn Units: pCill t
Location: 16, Piney Creek (Control)
- i Lab Number Collection Date H-3 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 ZaM5 Zr-95 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Rmuired LLD C 2000 g
M M
M g
g H
M g
18 g
g 9600977 01/16/96
<270
<3
<5
<3
<3
<6
<5
<3
<3
<3
<3
<14
<3 9602968 02/13/96
<270
<2
<3
<2
<2
<5
<5
<2
<2
<3
<3
<9
<3 9605129 03/12/96
<250
<2
<5
<2
<2
<6
<5
<3
<3
<2
<3
<13
<3 9606869 04/11/96
<220
<3
<6
<3
<3
<6
<5
<3
<3
<3
<3
<13
<4 960181 05/14/96
<3.93
<9.20
<3.37
<3.41
<9.84
<6.08
<3.93
<5.45
<3.75
<3.64
<l4.8
<6.45 960360 06/11/96 221 i 108
<3.23
<3.23
<3.48
<2.97
<7.52
<4.F
<3.68
<3.88
<3.34
<3.70
<i3.5
<5.94 960577 07/18/96
<250
<3.78
<6.39
<2.60
<2.65
<4.87
<5.86
<3.24
<4.31
<3.47
<4.01
<12.9
<5.36 960845 08/27/96 127 i 107
<2.69
<5.59
<2.94
<2.96
<5.78
<!.33
<3.40
<6.32
<2.57
<3.51
<14.2
<6.15 I
1 Arkansas Department of Health collects and splits sampic with ANO.
" Analysis not performed; however, sample not required by technical specifications.
Page 26 y
4 Table 5.1 SampleType: Groundwater Collectier QuarterlyGrab Analysis: Tritium and Gamma Units: pCill Location: 32, Stewatt Residence (Indicator)
=_
1 Lab Number Collection Date H-3 Mc-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co4e Zm45 Zr-95 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Receited LLD ->
2000 15 30 15 15 30 15 15 15 15 18 35 15 9004648 03/05/96
<250
<2
<3
<2
<2
<4
<4
<2
<3
<2
<2
<9 i
<2 960273 06/03/96
<251
<3.18
<6.29
<3.27
<3.09
<7.27
<534
<3.82
<3.90
<3.40
<3.55
<l2.1
<4.94 960800 08/20/96
<256
<4.54
<9.20
<3 42
<3.%
<l1.5
<7.71
<3.67
<5.17
<4.34
<3.71
<14.6
<4.30
% 1242 11/12/96
<251
<3.00
<4.88
<3.56
<4.48
<8.32
<7.21
<3.41
<4.17
<3.12
<3.49
<! 3.8
<3.06 I
i I
1 I
Page 27 i
f LL
+__
D
~
y Table 3.2 SampleType: Groundwater e
Collection: Quarterly Grab Analysis: Tritium and Gamma Units: pCi/l Location: 33, Ouita Recreation Area (Control) 1 IAb Number CoHertion Date H-3 Ma-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co40 Zn45 Zr-95 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 Ls-140 Reiswl LLD ->
2000 g
30 15 15 30 16 15 15 18 18 15 15 l
9604649 03/05/96
<250
<2
<3
<2
<2
<4
<3
<2
<3
<2
<2
<9
<2 960274 06/03/96
<252
<3.40
<6.09
<2.67
<3.99
<7.80
<6.29
<3.99
<4.84
<3.23
<3.99
<13.8
<5.14 960801 08/20/96'
<255
<3.17
<6.38
<3.35
<2.86
<5.84
<5.68
<3.39
<4.65
<2.94
<3.32
<14.2, <6.39 961243 11/12/96 130 i 108
<3.29
<6.82
<2.48
<2.70
<7.19
<6.11
<3.50
<3.94
<2.97
<3.31
<l2.2
<3.64 1
Page 28
'1 T-t r-sums imme ammu m
mww Table 6.1 Sample Type: Fish Collection: Senuannually Analysis: Ganuna Units: pCi/kg I
Ination Lab Number Celicction Date Sample Type Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 i
Reevired LLD 230 260 130 l
130 260 134 150 08, Dischsrye (Indicator) 9606084 03/15/96 Catfish
<5
<9
<6
<5
<12
<6
<6 08, Discharge (Indicator) 9606085 03/15/96 Game Fish
<7
<l4
<8
<8
<18
<7 08, Discherye (Indicator)
% 1076 09/16/96 Catfich
<3.24
<26.6
<9.19
<8.50
<22.2
<5.76
<8.49 08, Discharge (Indicator) 961077 09/16/%
Game Fish
<4.27
<!9.4
<5.85
<5.09
<l3 4
<5.05 14.'/ i i
1.9 10, Intake (Control) 9606082 03/15/96 Catfish
<7
<l4
<S
<7
<19
<8
<8 10, Intake (Control) 9606083 03/15/96 Game Fish '
<6
<10
<6
<S
<12
<6 9i5 10, Intake (Controi) 961078 09/16/96 Catfish
<l1.5
<44.2
<12.8
<6.90
<25.9
<10.8
<l4.5 10, Intake (Control)
%1079 09/16/96 Game Fish
<5.67
<23.5
<7.72
<5.92
<l5.8
<4.78 3.83 i 1.8 l'
I Page 29
~
____-___-___f
w m-n Table 6.2 Sample Type: Fish (ADII Split)
- Collection-As Requestexi Analysis: Gamma Units: pCi/kg Iacation Lab Number Collection Date W -54 Fe-59 Co-53 Ce40 Zn45 C9-134 Cs-137 Required LLD +
130 260 130 130 260 130 150 l
08, Discharge (Indicator) 960183 05/09/96
<12.2
<37.8
<l3.1
<21.4
<37.1
<11.6
<21.2 10, Intake (Control) 960182 05/09/96
<18.0
<37.2
<.19.3
<17.8
<46.7
<l 5.7
<21.3 i
- Arkansas Department of Health collects and splits sample with ANO.
Page 30
a S
Table 7.1 SampicType: Sedunent Collection Semiannually Analysis: Gamna i
Units: pCi/kg l
Location Lab Number Collection Date Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Required LLD ->
NA NA NA 150 180 08, Discharge (Indicator) 9606030 03/13/96 27 8
i 126 i 12 184 i 9 60 5
932 i 40 08, Discharge (Indicator) 961081 09/19/96
<54.4
<60.6 186 1 30.4
<56.4 1120 i 86 l 10, Intake (Contro!)
% 06079 03/13/96
-06
<45
<33
<43 369 i 23 10, Intake (Control) 961082 09/19/96
<42.4
<40.5
<45.6
<37.6 311 i 40 16, Piney Creek (Control)
% 06081 03/13/96
<24
<29
<22
<30
<23 16, Piney Creek (Control) 961080 09/19/96
<35.7
<4b.3
<36.4
<30.8
<34.3 I
I i
i Page 31
^
I l
Table 8.1 SampleType: Vegetation Collection: AtTimeofHarvest Analysis: Gamma
.)
Units: pCUkg Location: 13, Flatwood Rosd (Indicator)
Lab Number Collection Date I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Reauired LLD -)
.60 60 80 4
960374 06/14/96
<40.6
<38.9
<31.6 960579 07/17/96
<42.1
<24.0
<3 7.7 960726 08/09/96
<37.2
<3 0.3
<32.5
{
l l
- 3 L
Page 32
Table 8.2 Sample Type: Vegetation Collection: AtTimeofHarvest Analysis: Ganuna Units: pCi/kg Location: 45, Ir take Cenal (Indicator)
Lab Number Collection Date I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Reauired LLD, -)
g 60 g
960375 06/14/96
<34.8
<28.6
<33.5 960580 07/17/96
<42.1
<24.0
<37.7 960727 08/09/96
<59.0
<43.4
<55.1 970021 12/13/96
<53.6
<45.7
<43.9
(
[
4 l
l lUN l
1 Page 33
al Table 9.1 Sample Type: Food Products Collection: At Time ofHarvest Analysis: Gamina and Iodine-131 Units: pCi/kg Location: 48, Cochran Residence (Indicator)
Lab Namber Collection Date Sample Type I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 l
Required LLD '+
60 60 80 960445 06/27/96 Beans
<22.3
<17.1
<7.38 960446 06/27/96 Potatoes
<?L9
<18.7
<19.0 960447 06/27/96 Cucumbers
'28.9
<14.7
<l 6.8
(
960461 07/01/96 Tomatoes
<l5.4
< l 4.1
<20.8 I
IJ b
Page 34
Table 9.2 Sa:nple Type: Food Products Collection: AtTimeofHarvest Analysis: Gamma and Iodine-131 Units: pCi/kg Location: 51, Rye Residence (Indicator)
Lab Number Collection Date_
Sample Type I-131 Cs-134 Cs-13_,7_
Reauired LJ2 -)
60 60
,$_0 f
960605 07/22/96 Tomatoes
<14.8
<14.1
<15.9 960606 07/22/96 Potatoes
<26.3
<13.9
<29.2 960607 07/22/96 Okra
<31.9
<25.3
<34.5 960608 07/22/96 Cucumbers
<53.8
<49.9
<43.7
(
l l
t l
r s
Page 35
l 1
Table 9.3 Sample Type: Food Products Collectiore AtTimeofHarvert Analysis: Ganuna and Iodine-131 Units: pCi/kg Location: 108, Shivers Residence (Indicator)
Lab Number Collection Date Sample Type I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Re,_q,uired LLI! +
g go 80 960547 07/12/96 Tomatoes
<28.1
<15.9
<17.5 960548 07/12/96 Squash
< ! 8.8
<14.4
<17.2 960549 07/12/96 Potatoes
<43.5
<26.1
<29.1 960550 07/12/96 Cabbage
<43.6
<25.3
<28.1 L
4 e
i 6^-
1 i
s Table 10.1 Sample Type: 'Ihermoluminescent Dosimeters Collection-Quanerly Analysis: DirectDose Units: mrem /Qtr Location: 0- 2 MILE TLDs (Indicators) ggjiM fiA1st Qtr/96MLE2nd Qtr$6% gr3rdQtt46W 2ldWi41 i4thQtr16 gAnnualMean 46g hmWdfu@WHsW $un@am.4$1
@adawam Nd4WP RWsafgag s@maan r
km ma auwse an 1
16.0 16.0 19.0 18.0 l
17.3 l
2 16.0 17.0 19.0 18.0 l
17.5 l
3 14.0 14.0 16.0
_17.0 l
15.3 l
4_
13.0 14.0 17.0 16.0 l
15.0 l
108 15.0 16.0 18.0 17 0 l
16.5 l
109
- 18.0 17.0 20.0 18.0 l
18 3 l
110 15.0 15.0 18.0 17.0 l
16.3 l
113 14.0 15.0 17.0 16.0 l
15.5 l
114 15.0 15.0 18.0 17.0 l
16.3 l
115 14.0 15.0 19.0 17.0 l
16.3 l
116 14.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 16.3 k ElWi!!Mn zgpupi@ih$1MgMS
@imlMll@fBW%g$%
Wgh!Mii$nt jpMG%mp W
i t
Aqs. sun
% uaeg pa mu MwWiM g higanny Min M ngkg h M NNif y';[j M M O 33 Mold $y$$ ( 3 $ f[ Q /,Q %
,'E
~
j 5
r 4
d M M & M M d G E M ai n }jd p![b f
F@C 6nwith shnualhl hsstainnualtnsar e M b*u di e
ep%
fsdLgis$g$$sM2 d
br Page 37
Table 10.2 Sample Type: Thermohuninescent Dosimeters Collection: Quarterly
. Analysis: Direct Dose Units: mrem /Qtr Location: 2 - 5 MILE TLDs (Indicators)
.M
- WStationm tist Qtr?960 M2nd Qtrl96W n3rd Qtry6M M4thQtrl96M 1AnnualMeany6$
~4
%gu,mm%@, : &w(mrom)ma e
w w)gMn w j' x ~ ya
~ mx pyw(mm;um,. ns(mre U W(mrom if:n
$w Ng e mrom m mtem p ga m
m.
M-yp%ew.. ew
@hu%ws, 9
gp%e;amjup w
n y
My sQwmA:x. MQ e6 y wa nw hw is w
aws a 4 w
wwa wet 111 12.0 13.0
' 15.0 15.0 l
14.0 l
112
- 16.0 17.0 18.0 18.0 l
17.5 l
{
119 14.0 14.0 18.0 16.0 l
15.7 l
120 14.0 14.0 15.0 15.0 l
14.7 l
121 15.0 15.0 17 0 16.0 l
18.0 l
122 13.0 14.0 16.0 15.0 l
14.7 l
~
123 12.0 13.0 15.0 15.0 l
14.0 l
124 14.0 16.0 20.0 18.0 l
17.2 l
130 13.0 14.0 16.0 16.0 l
15.0 l
131 12.0 13.0 15.0 14.0 l
13.7 l
133 11.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 l
11'.9 l
134 14.0 14.0 16.0 16.0 l
15.2 l
135 17.0 16.0 l
16.5 l
136 14.0 15.0 17.0 l
15.6 l
141 12.0 12.0 13.0 13.0 12.7
" eqpm gJ., phgy~a gu%y an a
wep wwpo > m.s bfyh.new a y my,
g pg gy
,.w y g.3A M
, s. E13.3 ns w13.9 %gg W16.0M W15.p43g
,a% @EAN 6@i#$M%
w#19;$$$M MPl MM@h$Ti@@f 4% a q
9; W2Wp Mw mnkmygr ag!$W annwnnmm.m'mmmmpmmwxwnnmmm.
%.;mp mypm
,t<
, mmmm ww o n o
p;$ Location with annual hig!wstin6ualNOnMQW% (f ds%$3GsmECM@j, MN h
mgTLD mi,ssisem w(%gz g.gga gp;ig.,gWwgggg$gggg,3fy yaMhW %
% g% & W Je f'MN Ms9wwpm MpWWs w WNf ng in Held see Sample Deviations on Page forthisiepoi1 j
fd@w@aaQmaww@vewnu@MgMghggM#
g4 gegM yMyQ Wn grabam 6%(see Sample Deviations on PageIbrthis re gy ygm ggTLD damagedin field, pa Q9 MW MMg gResultnotrepresentative of historic a,.g.waygne,lu,e not,sedNs #a.
ggg gMg y4p g
g of thifrehrefore va
- v. era.gQ u
W
- - - e
.h h y w wm - w =.g
.s M C M n i E M a & p & d m %n n q& &md v) g &. m M, W i @w,. m pex(see Sample Deviation.-s.on PagsT.m dWM M;;,7MM m
+ port s i
+mn n
ucW 4s
.. wss uma m
E h
s Jd g
l 1
Page 38
Table 10.3
)
Sample Type: Thermolumir.: scent Dosimeters Collection: Quarterly Analysis: Direct Dose Units: mrem /Qtr Location: >5 AHLiE TLDs (Controls)
$$ sStation$g lyist Qtr'96?s jf2nd Qtr46
[w+.Mh4 j}P y ($le M ) &
A3rd Qtr'96n
[$4thQtr46i -(ArmualMean'982 A($je$)ll@E 4+(MN$f$!
h
- 4. imrh M /$(stM)+7$,
$ sg4>
?
J wafr e dh%aat;w.AJ4m L
e wh esi smenaba#n war,bm w amn,em ve
. d3, a una M nn hnur s am&
m 5
16.0 16.0 19.0 10.0 l
17.3 l
6 15.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 l
16.0 l
7 13.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 l
15.5 l
117 13.0 13.0 15.0 14.0 l
13.8 l
118 14.0 15.0 17.0 15.0 l
15.3 l
T25 12.0 12.0 15.0 14.0 l
13.3 l
126 13.0 15.0 17.0 16.0 l
15.3 l
127 16.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 l
16.3 l
128 16.0 16.0 18.0 18.0 l
17.0 l
129 15.0 15.0 18.0 19.0 l
16.8 l
132 14.0 15.0 17.0 16.0 l
15.5 l
137 15.0 17.0 19.0 18.0 l
17.3 l
138 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 l
13.5 l
139 W
11.0 16.0 15.0 l
14.0 l
140 15.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 l
16.0 l
142 13.0 14.0 16.0 15.0 l
14.5 l
143 15.0 15.0 17.0 17.0 l
16.0 l
144 14.0 14.0 17.0 17.0 15.5 e,
t
- ]
[
{
e
@.n AN,M @ MON ME n.aw.-4K14.5Ns M16.8 :m,wwM,hijetits r;;16ga?
d w
& mc 6,M&
, um 7-m.-
i ye
~> a s,
^
5 b
~
t d R R a 9laS!a P P S M P M @d e m# $ a h a & c e @
l W
MPM%. s uadsuwasmaaahama umJ i
Page 39
Table 11.0 Sampic Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Frequency: Varies Analysis: Varies Sample Type Study Date Analysis Known' RBS RBS RBS (units)
Value
- Value N-Dev b N-Range c Air Filter E0800-125 09/26/96 Beta 57.0 17.3 56.97
-0.01 0.230 (pCi/ filter)
E0884-125 12/12/96 Beta 87.6 i 17.3 89.07 0.25 0.071 Charcoal Cartridge E0640125 3/12/96 I-131 66.0 i 11.4 63.03
-0.78 0,161 (pCi/ cartridge)
E0699-125 6/19/96 I-131 84.0 14.5 81.17
-0.58 0,162 E0801-125 9/26/96 I-131 60.0 i 10.4 59.77
-0.07 0,305 E0885-125 12/12/96 I-131 79.7 i 13.8 82.37 0.58 0.14i ater E0637-125 3/12/96 Beta 98.0 17.3 110.13 2.10 1.394 (pCi/1)
E0638-125 3/12/96 H-3 2982 i 621.1 2600.0
-1.85 0.212 E0639-125 3/12/96 Cr-51 322 i 27.9 295.67
-2.83 2.018 Mn-54 31.0 8.7 31.87 0.30 0.721 Co-58 48.0 i 8.7 46.17
-0.64 0.295 Fe-59 83.0 i 8.7 86.97 1.37 2.871 Co40 76.0 i 8.7 78.47 0.85 0.343 Zn-65 97.0 t 16.8 94.43
-0.46 0'.079 I-131 36.0 i 10.4 34.53
-0.42 0.620 Cs-134 58.0 t 8.7 51.67
-2.19 0.272 Cs-137 64.0 i 8.7 60.27
-1.29 0.874 Ce-141 88.0 i 8.7 82.77
-1.81 0.721 E0696-125 6/19/96 Beta 174-i 45.2 193.0 1.26 0.521 E0697-125 6/19/96 H-3 4915 i 851.3 4521.33
-1.39 0.111
Table 11.0 Sample Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Frequency: Varies Analysis: Varies Sample Type Study Date Analysis Known RBS RBS RBS (units)
Value
- Value N-Dev b N-Rangec Water E0698-125 6/19/96 Cr-51 995 i 86.2 932.0
-2.19 0.427 (pCi/1)
Mn-54 530 45.9 528.33
-0.11 0.223 Co-58 164 i 14.2 156.33
-1.62 1.008 Fe-59 137'1 11.9 129.0
-2.02 1.207 Co-60 148. 12.8 149.67 0.39 0.639 Zn-65 102 17.7 95.83
-1.05 0.208 I-131 20.0 i 10.4 23.3 0.95 2.461 Cs-134 294 i 25.5 263.67
-3.57' O.241 Cs-137 724 62.7 706.67 0.83 0.359 Cc-141 379 i 32.8 345.67
-3.05*
0.779 E0769-125 6/19/96 Cr-51 995 i 86.2 938.0
-1.98 0.404 (duplicate)
Mn-54 530 45.9 543.67 0.89 0.201 Co 58 164 i 14.2 161.67
-0.49 0.504 Fe-59 137 i 11.9 148.0 2.78 0.517 Co-60 148 i 12.8 154.33 1.48 0.718 Zn-65 102 i 17.7 103.33 0.23 0.290 1-131 20.0 i 10.4 21.63 0.47 0.098 Cs-134 294 i 25.5 262.0
-3.77' O.522 Cs-137 724 i 62.7 729.33 0.26 0.082 Ce-141 379 i 32.8 361.33
-1.61 0.249 E0800-125 9/26/96 B:ta 57.0 i 17.3 56.97
-0.01 0.230 Page 41
Table 11.0 Sample Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Frequenev: Varies Analysir. Varies Sample Type Study Date Analysis Known RBS RBS RBS (units)
Value
- Value N Dev b N-Rangec I
Water E0798-125 9/26/96 Cr-51 646 i 55.9 641.33
-0.25 0.731 (pCill)
Mn-54 239 i 20.7 251.67 1.84 0.297 Ca-58 174 t 15.1 175.67 0.33 0.611 Fe-59 50.0 t 8.7 47.43
-0.89 0.721 Co-60 151 i 13.1 161.67 0.15 0.548 Zn-6$
93.0 i 16.1 103.43 1.94 0.55) 1-131 50.0 10.4 53.27 0.94 1.319 Cs-134 295 i 25.5 309.33 1.68 0.200 Cs-137 225 i 19.5 233.67 1.33 0 26)
Ce-141 423 i 36.6 417.33
-0.46 0 25i E0802-125 9/26/96 Cr-51 646 i 55.9 644.67
-0.07 09I4 (duplicate)
Mn-54 239 1 20.7 251.67 1.84 0 148 Co-58 174 i 15.1 174.33 0.07 0.44)
Fe 59 50.0 i 8.7 48.90
-0.38 02I)
Co-60 151 i 13.1 157.67 1.53 0 31)
I Zn-65 93.0 i 16.1 101.30 1.55 0 769 I-131 50.0 i 10.4 43.67
-1.83 0.788 Cs-134 295 1 25.5 305.33 1.21 0.200 Cs-137 225 i 19.5 231.33 0.98 0.053 Ce-141 423 i 36.6 416.67
-0.52 0.391 Aph -
l
[
t i
Table 11.0 Sample Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Frequency: Varies Analysis: Varies Sample Type Study Date Analysis Known RBS RBS RBS t
(units)
Value
- Value N Dev b N-Range c Water E0882-125 12/12/96 Cr-51 209 i 18.1 187.33
-3.59' 1.272 MI/I)
Mn-54 202 1 17.5 211.67 l'66 0.351 Co-58 119 i 10.3 113.33
-1.65 0.199 Fe-59 48.0 t 8.7 48.00 0.00 0.685 Co-60 108 i 9.4 109.33 0.43 0.875 Zn-65 91.0 i 15.8 87.5
-0.67 0.448 I-131 39.0 10.4 36.07
-0.85 0.807 Cs-134 172 i 14.9 170.67
-0.27 0.137 Cs-137 191 i 16.5 189.33
-0.30 0.371 Cc-141 272 i 23.6 265.33
-0.85 0.608 E0886-125 12/12/96 Cr-51 209 i 36.2 205.67
-0.55 2.035 (duplicate)
Mn-54 202 i 17.5 217.67 2.69 0.468 Co-58 119 i 10.3 119.33 0.10 0.397 Fe-59 48.01 8.7 58.57 3.66' 1.524 Co-60 108 9.4 113.67 1.82 0.547 Zn-65 91.0 i 15.8 100.10 1.73 0.227 I-131
't9.0 i 10.4 32.37
-1.91 0.847 Cs-134 172 i 14.9 175.00 0.60 0.343 Cs 137 191 16.5 194.33 0.60 0.618 Cc-141 272 i 23.6 271.33
-0.08 0.261 r
(
Page 43
Table 11.0 Sample Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Frequency: Varies Analysis: Varies i
Sample Type Study Date Analysis Known RBS RBS RBS (units)
Value
- Value N-Dev b N-Range c Sediment E0799-125 9/26/96 Cr-51 608 52.7 575.67
-1.84 0.350 (pCi/each)
Mn-54 225.6 i 19.5 231.33 0.88 0.367 Co-58 163 i 14.1 161.67
-0.28 0.507 Fe-59 46.0 8.7 41.00
-1.73 1.170 Co-60 142 i 12.3 148.33 1.54 1.664 Zn-65 88.0 i 15.2 89.50 0.30 0.638 Cs-134 277 i 24 266.67
-1.29 0.512 Cs-137 430 i 37.2 397.67
-2.60 0.467 Ce-141 398 i 34.5 396.33
-0.15 0.178 E0883-125 12/12/96 Cr-51 756 i 65.5 729.00
-1.24 2.578 s
Mn-54 728 i 63.0 751.33 1.11 0.097 Co-58 430 i 37.2 407.00
-1.85 0.549 Fe-59 174 i 15.1 176.00 0.40 2.512 Co-60 389 33.7 390.67 0.15 0.334 Zn-65 327 i 56.6 345.00 0.95 0.434 Cs-134 620 1 53.7 588.00
-1.79 0.076 Cs-137 873 i 75.6 S30.00
-1.71 0.149 Ce-141 979 1 84.8 960.33
-0.66 0.338 (9 The '.'ksown" values'are listed.with a range reflecting control (3' sigma) limiti
"" The nonniligd deviation from the "known'? value is computed l from the Jdeviation
~
and the standard error of the mean;; *2.000 is'the warning limit :
and *3.000 is the controllimitt (4 : The normalized range'is computed from the mean range, the controllimit, and J jthe
. standard error of the range;} +2.000 is the warning limit and +3.000 is the control
}
r limit.'
)
- Statistical calculations performed using inethods given in EPA-600/4-80-044 5 (4. The results reported were out of the controllimits; refer to the' discussion on
~'
, i program exceptions..
Page 44
PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 1.
E0698-125 (6/19/96) Gamma in Water and E0769-125 duplicate (6/19/96) Cs-134 I
Cs-134 results in 6/19/96 m in water sample E0698-125 and duplicate gamma in j
water sample E0769-125 were outside the control limits as defmed in note "b"in the data table. Review of the previous three years of cross-check data indicated that a low bias for Cs-134 existed due to cascade (coincidence) sumnung effects.
l A summing correction factor was calculated and applied to the Cs-134 ields in the 3
software nuclide library for water. Re-analysis of the spectrum data with corrected yields produced results within the warning limits. Cs-134 results for 9/26/96 and 12/12/96 gamma in water studies uere within the warning limits as dermed in note "b"in the data table.
2.
E0698-125 (6/19/96) Gamma in Water Ce-141 The Cc-141 result for the 6/19/96 gamma in water sample E0698-125 was slightly f
outside (-3.05) the control limit. Review of the three analysis results did not indicate an outlier, The Cc-141 result of the duplicate 6/19/96 gamma in water sample E0769-125 was within controllimits.
No reason was detern6ned for the outer-control limit result of Cc-141 in the second quarter study.
Results for Ce-141 in all other gamrna in water studies for 1996 were within the waming limits. No corrective actions were taken due to the single out of control limit result for Ce-141 in the second quarter study.
3.
E0882-125 (12/12/96) Gamma in Water Cr-51 The Cr-51 result for the 12/12/96 gamma in water sample E0882-125 was outside (-3.59) the control limit. Review of the three results used for the average indicated an outlier result caused the low average.
The percent coefficients of variation calculation will be used in the future as a criteria to determine the presence of an outlier. Outlier results will be discarded, using just two results, or the sample will be analyzed a fourth time if possible.
h Page 45
... ~. _.. _ - _. _. _ _. - _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _... _.. _.
I
]
i PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS f
4.
E0886125 (12/1206) Gamma in Water (Duplicate) Fe-59 i
1 l
The Fe-59 result for the 12/12/96 gamma in water sample E0886-125 was outside j
(+3.66) the control limit. Review of the three results used for the average indicated j
an outher result caused the high average.
j'
. determine the presence of an outlier. Outlier results will be discarded, using just two The percent coefficients of vanation calculation will be used in the future as a criteria to j
results, or the sample will be analyzed a fourth time, if possible.
]
Impact Statement k
I j
There is no impact on past data indicated by these intedaboratory comparison program exceptions.
Enviro.unental samples are analyzed and reported with a 95% mahe level that the analytical l
i
. result with its associated error encompasses the "true" value. As seen below,95% of the cross-l check results are within the acceptable control limits of the three normalized deviation.
]
Normalized Deviation Control Limits Percent i
0-1 53 l-2 34
+
2-3 8
>3 5
i j
i i
i i
i i
i i
1 l'
i 4
1 1
1 1
1 i
I I
Page 46 I
i
=
3 ATTACHMENT ll Statistical Analyses 4
I
4 4
i Statistical Analyses 1
4 Calculation of the mean, standard deviation and "t" values are as follows:
Mean:
X=
Xi/ n
)
{
where:
.X
= Mean of sample results l
j Xi Sum ofindividual results
=
I n
= Number of samples Standard Deviation T (#~#)
=
I n-1
]
where:
Sd
= Standard deviation I
X
= Individualsampleresult X,
= Mean of sample results I
= Number ofsamples n
"t"' Value (X -7)
=
I(n, - 1)s ' + (n, - 1)s,2 r3 3
_ _ + -.
)
n, + n, - 2 y n, n,
where: t Calculated "t" value
=
x Mean of first data r,et
=
i m
)
y
= Mean ofsecond data set n
= Number of variables in first data set x
Standard deviation offirst data set j
sx
=
ny
= Number of variables in second data set sy
= Standard deviation of second data set l
)
I 1
i 3
A 3
i 4
i 4
1 l
1 11-1 i
Statistical Analvge,.s.
Calculated "t" values were compared to tabular "t" values obtained from the e
CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 26th Edition (1981) to test the hypothesis that the true mean of the fiist populationis equal to the true mean of the second popu!ation. For purposes of this report, the "t" test was only performed for air samples end TLDs, due to the large sample population size involved.
Samples types other than those presented below were not statistically analyzed due I
to the small population sample sizes.
Air Samples y gpParandeterpBGg$
h MStation IQ gStation 2P W Station'34 yStatisade MStationl7::
d
.h bd h
Gross Beta Mean 17.1 (17) 17.0 (17) 15.6 (16) 14.3 (14) 17.6 (58) 3 (10E-3 pCi/m )
Gross Beta Standard Deviation 6.2 5.4 5.4 5.6 4.6 3
(10E-3 pCi/m )
l Number in Sample 53 53 52 53 53 Calculated "t" Value 0.472 0.616 2.045 3.333 N/A
)
to Comparison with Control Station ( 7 )
Tabular "t" Value 1.984 1.984 1.984 1.984 N/A at 95% Confidence
( t,0.025, n )
i
~
Statistical Conclusion Identical Identical Lower Lower N/A i
I f
l II-2
{
)
Statistical Analyses TLDs
$#'h,,g/gyf.;9)jy% >W[.[,o h :N 'sM.,.mF,arameterphy;gm+g Afjfg4a N., (0.2iMiless 'l f;- AJ2F.,5 Miles?.JiP S / g> >;5 Miles lJh..'^,
4
~
d om m
< m
' is'b,,p,]m~,&r girh:
,g yst "Wj;N
.m.
,~.m
':iiL ',L... )#V ' W f
win i
J2 o
r dit /~ dis W'Ma' W'd'M-h[4_hf !$T;I;;!h[jl[NNh.,Y{.Qff',ty]
D
~ Q,[ > 1 p1
,7 7[g j;,;d 7
{>.' j;6];%!N #,'(!
', 4 i-j
- 4 i 7
Mean 16.4 14.7 15.5 r
( mrem /Qtr )
1 Standard Deviation 1.7 1.9 1.8
( mrem /Qtr )
Number in Sample 44 57 71 Calculated "t" Value to 2.663 2.439 N/A Comparison with Stations Located >5 Miles Tabular "t" Value at 1.982 1.980 N/A 95% Confidence
( t,0.025, n )
\\
Statistical Conclusion Higher Lower N/A i
)
II-3 i
l l
i k
ATTACHMENT lli 1
Sediment Dose Calculations
\\
III-i
$_ediment Dose Calculations Dose calculation for the discharge sediment was performed using generalized equation found in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Appendix A as follows:
I R = (40) x (C) x (U) x (D) x (W) where:
R = Annual dose to skin or total body in mrem / year; 40 = Area-mass conversion factor given in Appendix A ofRegulatory Guide 1.109 in Kg/m2, C = 1996 maximum radionuclide concentration in pCi/kg; U = Maximum exposure time given in Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (67 hours7.75463e-4 days <br />0.0186 hours <br />1.107804e-4 weeks <br />2.54935e-5 months <br /> for teenager);
D = Extemal dose conversion factor for standing on contaminated ground given in Table E-6 of 2
Regulatory Guide 1.109 in mrem /hr per pCi/m, and W = Shore-width factor (01) given in Table A-2 of Regulatory Guide 1.109.
(Dose from Sedhnent in M'illiremA' ear) l
&ni
,MaManan yyg$jg; L[
%@$ inn]-
. onv&sionFa tog; [yy(Totalg';4 ;C6nversionfactor.
@$Totalpp!E MNk[d51$s.
Id M$$$$@D$ $
~
!SNysj$s[lg!NNN0![ DIN SkEi$seg W60il%df BAMNue f
Mdfkfi G MM$$$$$h i MEN $dNk Mn-54 27 6.80 E-09 4.92 E-05 5.80 E-09 4.20 E-05 Co-58 126 8.20 E-09 2.77 E-04 7.00 E-09 236 E-04 Co-60 186 2.00 E-08 9.97 E-04 1.70 E-08 S.47 E-04 Cs-134 60 1.40 E-08 2.25 E-04 1.20 E-08 1.93 E-04 Cs 137 1120 4.90 E49 1.47 E-03 4.20 E-09 1.26 E-03
~
l l.
IU-l
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _