IR 05000528/2007007
| ML20137C399 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/1985 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20137C388 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-354-85-27, NUDOCS 8508220253 | |
| Download: ML20137C399 (2) | |
Text
.
.
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Public Service Electric & Gas Company Docket No. 50-354 80 Park Plaza - 17C License No. CPPR-120 Newark, New Jersey 07101 As a result of the inspection conducted on May 28 - July 7, 1985, and in accor-dance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (10 CFR 2, Appendix C), the following violation was identified:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B requires that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with documented procedures. The below listed are examples of failure to follow procedures for implementing preopera-
~
tional tests:
A.
Preoperational test Procedure (PTP) EE-1, Revision 0, Torus Water Cleanup System, prerequisite 3.1 requires (1) review of reference document revisions (2) pen and ink up-date of revision numbers, and (3) review of up-dated documents to determine necessary procedure changes.
Contrary to the above, about June 4,1985, PTP EE-1, prerequisite 3.1 was performed inadequately, in that the FSAR amendment reference was not updated and reviewed. As a result the test procedure contained nonconservative stroke time criteria for two containment isolation valves.
B.
PTP PG-1, Revision 0, Class 1E 480VAC Unit Substations, Prerequisite 3.1.3 requires verification that all test packages (TPRs) have been reviewed by the Startup Group.
Startup Administrative Procedure 24, Revision 6, Preoperational Test Procedures, Format, and Instructions states that if a prerequisite cannot be met a test exception will be instituted.
Contrary to the above, on March 11, 1985, Prerequisite 3.1.3 of PG-1 was performed improperly, in that TPR-PGC-153 had neither received the required results review nor been noted as a test exception.
C.
Startup Administrative Procedure 24 (SAP-24), Revision 6, Section 7.5.3.2 requires a Change Notice, with QA and Preoperational Review Committee (PORC) approval prior to testing, for procedure modifica-tions that change acceptance criteria.
Section 7.5.3.1 requires for On-The-Spot Changes (OTS), clear marking of the Master Test Copy of the procedure with the procedure step changes and an OTS reference notation.
8508220253 850813 Contrary to the above:
gDR ADOCK 05000354 PDR 1.
On March 26, 1985, acceptance criteria of PTP PG-1, Revision u, were changed via OTS without QA and PORC approval.
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY IR HC 85-27 - 0002. _.
.
.-
.
. Appendix A
2.
On March 26, 1985, Part 3 of OTS-1 to Preoperational Test Proce-dure PG-1, Revision 0, was not properly implemented, in that the affected test steps in the procedure Master Test Copy were not changed, nor was reference made to the OTS.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Public Service Electric & Gas Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of the letter which transmitted this Notice, a written statement or ex-planation in reply, including: (1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when-full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending this re-sponse time.
l l
l
!'
l OFFICIAL RECORD COPY IR HC 85-27 - 0003.0.0 08/13/85 l
,
_.
. _ - - _ _ _.
,
- _ -.
.. - _ _.
-.
.---
.. _ _..
- -.
--_--