Letter Sequence Approval |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20135H8071985-04-12012 April 1985 Procedure CP.104 Re Transient Occurrence That Leaves RCS Being Cooled by HPI Cooling Project stage: Other ML20135H8001985-04-12012 April 1985 Procedure CP.102 Re Normal Cooldown Project stage: Other ML20127D9261985-05-10010 May 1985 Requests Fee Re 850412 Application for Permanent Exemption from Installation of Reactor Vessel Head Vent Project stage: Approval ML20135H8091985-05-29029 May 1985 Rev 1 to Procedure CP.105 Re Transient Termination Following Occurrence That May Require Pressurizer Recovery Solid Plant Cooldown w/once-through Steam Generator Removing Heat & RCS Subcooled Project stage: Other ML20135H8031985-05-29029 May 1985 Rev 1 to Procedure CP.103 Re Transient Termination Following Occurrence That Leaves RCS Saturated w/once-through Steam Generators Removing Heat Project stage: Other ML20135H7971985-05-29029 May 1985 Rev 1 to Procedure E.07 Re Operator Action Project stage: Other ML20126K2251985-06-17017 June 1985 Submits Fee for 850412 Exemption Request Re Vessel Head Vents (10CFR50.44(c)(3)iii),per 850510 Request Project stage: Other ML20135H8121985-08-12012 August 1985 Rev 33 to Procedure B.4 Re Plant Shutdown & Cooldown Project stage: Other ML20135H7931985-09-19019 September 1985 Forwards Operating Procedures,Per Miner Request,To Aid in NRC Review of 850412 Request for Permanent Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.44(c) Re Installation of Reactor Vessel Head Vent Project stage: Request ML20138K6991985-12-11011 December 1985 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re Util 850412 Application for Exemption from 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Requirements Re Installation of Reactor Vessel Head Vent Project stage: Approval ML20138K6751985-12-11011 December 1985 Forwards Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact,Re Util 850412 Application for Exemption from 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Requirements.Notice Forwarded for Fr Publication Project stage: Approval ML20137B5421985-12-24024 December 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting 850412 Exemption Request from Reactor Vessel Head Vent Requirement of 10CFR50.44(c)(3) (III) Project stage: Approval ML20137B5311985-12-24024 December 1985 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Re Installation of Reactor Vessel Head Vent & Other Sys Required to Maintain Adequate Core Cooling If Accumulation of Noncondensible Gases Causes Loss of Function of Sys Project stage: Approval ML20137B5151985-12-24024 December 1985 Forwards Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.44(c)(3) (Iii),Re Installation of Reactor Vessel Head Vent Based on Verification That Noncondensible Gas Bubble Can Be Safely Removed Via Hot Leg High Point Vents,Per 850412 Request Project stage: Approval 1985-05-10
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:GRANTS OF EXEMPTION FROM & EXTENSION TO NRC REQUIREME
MONTHYEARML20058D6481993-11-19019 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR140.11(a)(4) to Extent That Primary Financial Protection in Stated Amount Shall Be Maintained ML20057D1891993-09-27027 September 1993 Exemption from Training rule,10CFR50.120 Requirements to Establish,Implement & Maintain Training Program,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Categories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120.Exemption Effective 931122 ML20029B6701991-02-22022 February 1991 Exemption from 10CFR50-54(q) Requirements Re Offsite Emergency Preparedness That Provides Reactor Shutdown & Changes Long Term Defueled Condition ML20043A5841990-05-16016 May 1990 Exemption from 10CFR55 Requirements for Simulation Facility or Use of Simulation Facility to Grant or Maintain Operator Licenses at Facility.Exemption Granted Based on Defueled Condition of Plant & Continued Plant Closure ML20034B9821990-04-26026 April 1990 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,To Allow Facility to Discontinue Performance of Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing While in Defueled lay-up Condition ML20034B9351990-04-26026 April 1990 Exemption from 10CFR50.71,extending Submittal of Amend 7 to Updated SAR Until 900622.Action Based on Cessation of Power Operations on 890607 & Completion of Reactor Defueling on 891208 ML20246B1001989-06-28028 June 1989 Grants Exemption from 10CFR20,App A,Footnote d-2(c) Requirements to Allow Use of Radioiodine Protection Factor of 50 for MSA GMR-I Canisters at Plant ML20248E9091989-03-29029 March 1989 Exemption from 10CFR50,App J Requirements to Permit one-time Extension for Certain Local Leak Rate Tests to Cycle 8 Refueling Outage & Changes to Surveillance Period for Local Leak Rate Tests of DHR Suction Piping ML20155D5601988-10-0303 October 1988 Exemption from Property Insurance Rule (10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i)) Until Rulemaking Finalized But No Later than 890401 ML20207E6721988-08-0404 August 1988 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.71,extending Date for Submittal of Amend 6 of Updated SAR ML20206F8801986-05-19019 May 1986 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Subsection Iii.L Re Capability to Achieve Cold Shutdown in 72 H. Alternative Shutdown Capability Should Be Able to Achieve Cold Shutdown Conditions in 205 H ML20137B5311985-12-24024 December 1985 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Re Installation of Reactor Vessel Head Vent & Other Sys Required to Maintain Adequate Core Cooling If Accumulation of Noncondensible Gases Causes Loss of Function of Sys ML20024D6651983-07-25025 July 1983 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii) Re Reactor Vessel Head Vent.Installation of Addl Vent in Reactor Vessel Head Not Necessary to Prevent Loss of Natural Circulation 1993-09-27
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20149E4541994-05-13013 May 1994 Licensee First Set of Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents to Eco.* W/Certificate of Svc. Related Correspondence ML20058P3701993-12-16016 December 1993 Memorandum & Order (Telcon 931209).* Smud Unopposed Motion Granted.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931217 ML20058P4161993-12-15015 December 1993 Licensee Petition for Review of Second Prehearing Conference Order & Motion for Directed Certification.* Advises That Commission Accept Review & Grant Directed Certification of Board Rulings.W/Certificate of Svc ML20058E0471993-11-30030 November 1993 Second Prehearing Conference Order (Proposed Contentions; Summary Disposition).* Environmental & Resources Conservation Organization Bases 1,5,11,13,2 & 14 Accepted for Litigation.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931201 ML20058E0361993-11-30030 November 1993 Transcript Corrections (Second Prehearing conference,930921- 22).* Board Adopts Listed Corrections.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 931201 ML20058D6481993-11-19019 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR140.11(a)(4) to Extent That Primary Financial Protection in Stated Amount Shall Be Maintained ML20058E0151993-11-14014 November 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Exemptions in Accident Insurance for Nuclear Power Plants Prematurely Shut Down ML20057G2181993-10-14014 October 1993 Proposed Transcript Corrections.* Submits Listed Transcript Corrections for 930921 & 22 Prehearing Conference. W/Certificate of Svc ML20058M8951993-10-0505 October 1993 Order (Proposed Transcript Corrections).* Util Submitted Proposed Transcript Corrections for 930921-22 Prehearing Conference.Other Parties May Submit Proposed Corrections by 931015.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931005 ML20058M8581993-10-0101 October 1993 Licensee Motion to Correct Transcript of Prehearing Conference.* Requests That Licensing Board Direct Correction of Prehearing Conference Trancript in Manner Described Above.Certification of Svc& Svc List Encl ML20057D1021993-09-27027 September 1993 Eco Answer in Opposition to Smud Motion for Summary Disposition of Eco Original Loop Contention.* Urges Board Either to Deny Motion or to Defer Consideration of Smud Motion to Conclusion of Proceeding.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057D0861993-09-27027 September 1993 NRC Staff Response in Support of Licensee Motion for Summary Disposition of Eco Original Loop Contention.* Summary Disposition Should Be Granted.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20057D1891993-09-27027 September 1993 Exemption from Training rule,10CFR50.120 Requirements to Establish,Implement & Maintain Training Program,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Categories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120.Exemption Effective 931122 ML20057D1351993-09-27027 September 1993 Eco Concise Statement of Material Facts as to Which There Exists Genuine Issue to Be Heard.* Eco Original LOOP Contention Continues to Present Justifiable & Matl Issues Requiring Denial of Smud Motion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20057D0451993-09-24024 September 1993 Notice of Hearing.* Notifies That Hearing Will Be Conducted in Matter of Proposed Decommissioning of Plant.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930924 ML20057D0441993-09-23023 September 1993 Notice of Appearance.* Notice Given That Undersigned Attorney Enters Appearance in Listed Matter & Listed Info Provided.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057C0851993-09-22022 September 1993 Transcript of 930922 Hearing in Bethesda,Md Re Facility.Pp 387-579 ML20057B9611993-09-21021 September 1993 Transcript of 930921 Hearing in Bethesda,Md.Pp 181-386 ML20057B0091993-09-10010 September 1993 Memorandum & Order CLI-93-19.* Informs That Further Questions of Board Re Effect of Commission Holding in Issues Concerning CLI-93-3 & CLI-93-12 Should Be Certified to NRC, Per 10CFR2.718(i).W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930910 ML20057B0101993-09-0707 September 1993 Licensee Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue to Be Heard (Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Original Loop Contention).* Advises That Contention No Longer Matl Issue.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057B0051993-09-0707 September 1993 Licensee Motion for Summary Disposition of Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Original Loop Contention.* Advises That Contention Presents No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact to Be Heard & Should Be Dismissed ML20057A1721993-08-31031 August 1993 Notice of Prehearing Conference.* Notifies of 930921 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Proposed Decommissioning of Plant.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930901 ML20046C5241993-08-0202 August 1993 NRC Staff Response to Eco Contentions on Staff Ea,Finding of No Significant Impact & Se.* W/Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20045G9611993-07-12012 July 1993 Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Contentions on Staff Environ Assessment Findings of No Significant Impact & Safety Evaluation.* Urges ASLB to Admit Foregoing Contention Per 10CFR2.714(b)(2).W/Certificate of Svc ML20044F8041993-05-26026 May 1993 Memorandum & Order CLI-93-12.* Util Motion for Reconsideration of CLI-93-03 Denied.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 930526 ML20045D1871993-05-10010 May 1993 Erratum.* Informs That Correct Ref for Footnote 34 on Page 22 of Commission Memoranudm & order,CLI-93-03,dtd 930303 Is 57 Fed Reg 20,718 (920514).W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930610 ML20035G3321993-04-21021 April 1993 NRC Staff Response to Eco Contention Re Loss of Offsite Power.* Advises That Eco Contention & Bases Must Be Rejected in Entirety.W/Certificate of Svc ML20035F5841993-04-13013 April 1993 Licensee Response to Eco Proposed Loop Contentions.* Util Opposes Eco Proposed Contentions on LOOP Because Contentions Vague & Confusing & Lack Factual & Legal Bases.W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20035E0031993-04-12012 April 1993 NRC Staff Response to Eco Contentions Re Funding of Decommissioning.* All Bases Eco Decommissioning Funding Contention & Contention Should Be Rejected.W/Certificate of Svc ML20035B5391993-03-26026 March 1993 NRC Staff Support of Licensee Motion for Reconsideration.* Decommissioning Funding Plan Cannot Be Deemed Adequate Until Listed Issues Resolved.W/Certificate of Svc ML20035B5711993-03-26026 March 1993 Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Answer in Opposition to Licensee Motion for Reconsideration.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20035B5441993-03-22022 March 1993 Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Contention on Licensee Proposed Decommissioning Funding Plan.* Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Contends That Licensee Decommissioning Plan Inadequate.W/Certificate of Svc ML20034H8441993-03-12012 March 1993 NRC Staff Opposition to Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Petition for Reconsideration.* Staff Opposes Petition W/Respect to Reconsideration of Paragraph 2.W/ Certificate of Svc ML20034H7991993-03-12012 March 1993 Order.* Orders That Any Response to Smud Petition,From Either NRC or Environ & Resources Conservation Organization, Shall Be Filed by 930326.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930312 ML20034H8661993-03-10010 March 1993 Licensee Motion for Reconsideration.* Licensee Requests Commission Reconsider Grant of Discretionary Intervention to Environmental & Resources Conservation Organization. W/Certificate of Svc ML20034G7151993-03-0909 March 1993 Licensee Response to Eco Petition for Reconsideration.* Eco 930305 Petition Should Be Denied in Toto.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20034G6841993-03-0505 March 1993 Environmental & Resources Conservation Organization Petition for Reconsideration.* Urges Commission to Reconsider & Amend 930303 Decommissioning Order.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D4951993-01-28028 January 1993 Notice of Appointment of Adjudicatory Employee.* W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930129 ML20127D5091992-09-11011 September 1992 Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Brief in Support of Appeal from LBP-92-23.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127D4711992-09-0808 September 1992 Notice of Appeal.* Gives Notice of Appeal from Order of Board (Served 910821),denying Environ & Resources Conservation Organization Petition for Intervention & Request for Hearings & Termination of Proceedings ML20141M5981992-08-20020 August 1992 Prehearing Conference Order (Terminating Proceeding).* Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Prior Hearing of Petitioner, ,denied & Proceeding Terminated. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 920821 ML20141M5881992-08-17017 August 1992 NRC Staff Response in Support of Licensee Motions to Strike Improper Argument in Environmental & Resources Conservation Organization (Eco) Filings.* Further Argument by Eco Unauthorized.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20029B5991991-03-0404 March 1991 Environ Conservation Organization Reply to 910215 Order.* ASLB Should Limit Any Rulings Based on Current State of Record to Rulings Which Presume That Petitioner & Members Have Standing Under Atomic Energy Act.W/Certificate of Svc ML20029B6701991-02-22022 February 1991 Exemption from 10CFR50-54(q) Requirements Re Offsite Emergency Preparedness That Provides Reactor Shutdown & Changes Long Term Defueled Condition ML20024F8321990-12-0505 December 1990 NRC Staff Response in Opposition to Petition to Intervene Filed by Environmental Conservation Organization on Proposed License Amend.Petition Should Be Denied Based on Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc ML20024F8311990-11-30030 November 1990 Licensee Answer to Environ Conservation Organization Petition.* Organization Seeks to Litigate Issues That Are Beyond NRC Jurisdiction & Scope of Proposed License Amend. Petition Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20024F8301990-11-26026 November 1990 Order.* Motion for Extension of Time for 1 Wk to Respond to Environ Conservation Organization Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing,Granted.Util Response Due on 901130.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 901127 ML20024F9081990-11-16016 November 1990 Licensee Motion for Extension of Time.* Extension of Time of 1 Wk Beyond 901123 Deadline Requested,Based on Length of Petition/Request & Intervening Two Holidays.W/Certificate of Svc ML20024F9051990-11-0808 November 1990 Environ Conservation Organization Comment on Proposed NSHC & Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Prior Hearing.* Other Remedies Sought Should Be Granted.Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20058G9051990-10-23023 October 1990 Comment on Fr Notice Page 41280 to 41282 Re Smud Possession Only License Amend.Believes Termination of Plant OL Prior to End of Authorized Operating Term Will Have Significant Impact on Environ Sources Needed to Generate Power 1994-05-13
[Table view] |
Text
,
7590-01 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of
)
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY
)
DISTRICT
)
Docket No. 50-312 (Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating
)
Station)
)
EXEMPTION I.
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (the licensee) is the holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR-54 which authorizes the operation of the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station (the facility) at steady-state power levels not in excess of 2772 megawatts thermal. The license provides, among other things, that it is subject to all rules, regulations and Orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Connission (the Commission) now or hereafter in effect.
The facility is a pressurized water reactor (PWR) located at the i
licensee's site in Sacramento County, California.
II.
]
On December 2,1981, the Commission published a revised Section 10 CFR 50.44, " Standards for Combustible Gas Control System in Light-Water-Cooled j
Power Reactors" (46 FR 58484). Section10CFR50.44(c)(3)(iii)ofthe regulation requires:
"To provide improved operational capability to maintain adequate core cooling following an accident, by the end of the first scheduled outage beginning after July 1,1982, and of sufficient duration to permit required modifications, each light-water nuclear power reactor shall be provided with high point vents for the reactor coolant system, for the 8601150550 851224 DR ADOCM O 2
7590-01 1 reactor vessel head, and for other systems required to maintain adequate core cooling if the accumulation of noncondensible gases would cause the loss of function of these systems."
By letter dated July 2, 1982, the licensee requested an exemption from the requirement of 10 CFR 50.44(c)(3)(iii) to install a reactor vessel head vent. The basis for the request was a proposed alternate technique for venting noncondensible gases from the reactor vessel head. The alternate technique involved the use of high point vents at the top of the hot leg U-bends as a means to vent noncondensible gases from the reactor vessel.
On July 25, 1983, the Commission issued an interim exemption to defer the implementation date for installation of a reactor vessel head vent until December 31, 1985. At that time, the Commission was unable to conclude that noncondensible gases could be safely vented by the hot leg high point vents alone. The primary reason for the Commission's conclusion was the lack of 4
integral system test data which would demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed venting procedure. The interim exemption was granted in order to allow the licensee to perform the necessary integral system testing.
On April 12, 1985, the licensee provided the results of testing performed in the Once-Through Integral System (OTIS) test facility which was performed to demonstrate that a reactor vessel head vent is not necessary to (nsure adequate core cooling in the presence of significant quantities of noncondensible gases. Based upon these test results, the licensee requested a permanent exemption from the requirement to install a reactor vessel head vent.
7590-01 III.
The OTIS facility is an experimental test facility at Babcock & Wilcox's (B&W's) Alliance Research Center in Alliance, Ohio. The OTIS facility was designed to evaluate the thermal / hydraulic conditions in the reactor coolant system and steam generator of a raised-loop B&W reactor, during the natural circulation phases of a small-break Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA). The OTIS facility is a portion of the Integral Systems Test Program sponsored by the Commission, EPRI, B&W Owners Group and B&W.
The Commission has reviewed the OTIS test results and the licensee's proposed procedures and found that:
The hot leg vent can be used to remove noncondensible gases from the reactor vessel head during a plant cooldown and depressurization without interrupting natural circulation.
Even if noncondensible gases in the reactor vessel head expanded into the hot leg U-bend and interrupted natural circulation, feed-and-bleed cooling can be used to assure core cooling.
In addition, opening of the het leg vent will also allow the restoration of natural circulation.
Venting procedures have been developed to limit gas expansion rates from the reactor vessel head in order to ensure that natural circulation is continuously maintained during a plant cooldown.
Procedures would specify initiation of feed-and-bleed cooling of the core, should natural circulation become interrupted, while' attempting to recover natural circulation by leaving the hot leg vents open.
~
7590-01 4-The reactor vessel head gas bubble which would remain following plant cooldown to actuation of the decay heat removal system will not interfere with core cooling. The licensee has developed various means to remove this gas bubble in the long term.
The OTIS tests were performed in a manner which assures that the results bound the expected Rancho Seco plant performance.
Based on the above discussion, we conclude that an exemption to 10 CFR ~
50.44(c)(3)(iii) can be granted. Details of the review may be found in the Commission's related Safety Evaluation dated December 24, 1985, which is available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 1717 H Streat, N.W., Washington, D.C., and at the Sacramento City-County Library, 828 I Street, Sacramento, California.
IV.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50.12, an exemption is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and is otherwise in the public interest and hereby grants an exemption with' respect to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.44(c)(3)(iii), as follows:
The licensee is not required to install a reactor vessel head vent at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station.
b s
y e
w
-g egm
one y
u y
-e y
9 m
~
7590-01
' i 4
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, for the reasons stated in the Environmental 4
Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on December 17, 1985, 50 FR 51492, the Commission has determined that the issuance of the exemption will have no significant impact on the environment.
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
FOR THE EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Fran Schroeder, De uty Director i
Division of PWR Licensing-B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 24th day of December 1985.
I i
S P
h 4
4
--wwy
--w.
~,-, m w
s.
-m-c.
w, 3
-~.-