ML20136G231
| ML20136G231 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/19/1985 |
| From: | Olmstead W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19310G510 | List:
|
| References | |
| FRN-48FR36358, RULE-PR-2 AB78-1-040, AB78-1-40, NUDOCS 8508050086 | |
| Download: ML20136G231 (2) | |
Text
l Q*
mv.a.
?DL UNITED STATES i
[
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'L Aj WASHINGTON, D. C,20555
/
JUL 1 s 1985 MEMORANDUM F0f: Samuel J. Chilk
~
Secretary of the Comission FROM:
William J. Olmstead Director and Chief Counsel Regulations Division Office of the Executive Legal Director
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF COMMENT PERIOD FOR PROPOSED RULE - 10 CFR PART 2. ADJUDICATIONS; SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING CONFLICTS CONCERNING THE DISCLOSURE OR NONDISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION. 50 FR 21072, MAY 22, 1985.
COMMENT PERIOD EXPIRES JULY 22, 1985.
The staff has received the attached letter from Harmon, Weiss & Jordan on behalf of the Union of Concerned Scientists requesting a 30 day extension of the comment period in this rulemaking proceeding. On July 18, 1985, the staff received a telephone request for an extension from Juanita Ellis, President, Citizens Association for Sound Energy (CASE),1426 South Polk, Dallas, Texas, 75224. The staff knows of no reason for urgency in this matter and therefore recomends that the requested extension be granted. A Federal Register notice extending the comment period to August 23, 1985, is attached for your signature and transmittal to the Federal Register for publication.
William J. 01 tead Director and Chief Counsel Regulations Division Office of the Executive Legal Director
Enclosures:
1.
Letter dated July 17, 1985 from Diane Curran, Harmon, Weiss &
Jordan, to Jane Mapes, Office of the Executive Legal Director, NRC 2.
Federal Register notice extending comment period as<o2a5N M @ g
s dUlI91985 MEMORANbudFOR: Samuel J. Chilk Secretary of the Commission FROM:
William J. Olmstead
~
Director and Chief Counsel Regulations Di~ vision Office of the Executive Legal Director
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF COMMENT PERIOD FOR PROPOSED RULE - 10.CFR PART 2, ADJUDICATIONS; SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING CONFLICTS CONCERNING THE DISCLOSURE OR NONDISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION. 50 FR 21072, MAY 22, 1985.
COMMENT PERIOD EXPIRES JULY 22, 1985.
The staff has received the attached letter from Harmon, Weiss & Jordan on behalf of the Union of Concerned Scientists requesting a 30 day extension of the comment period in this rulemaking proceeding. On July 18, 1985, the staff received a telephone request for an extension from Juanita Ellis, President, Citizens Association for Sound Energy (CASE),1426 South Polk, Dallas, Texas, 75224. The staff knows of no reason for urgency in this matter and therefore recommends that the requested extension be granted. A Federal Register notice extending the comment period to August 23, 1985, is attached for your signature and transmittal to the Federal Register for publication.
William J. Olmstead Director and Chief Counsel Regulations Division Office of the Executive Legal Director
Enclosures:
1.
Letter dated July 17, 1985 from Diane Curran, Harmon, Weiss &
Jordan, to Jane Mapes, Office of the Executive Legal Director, NRC 2.
Federal Register notice extending comment period 0FC :0 ELD
- RPB M
. :0 ELD
:pg.
- -(
NAME G Map' s.
D lips
- WT stead
:------------:------------: k----------:------------:------------:------------:-----------
DATE :7/18/85
- 7//f/85
- 7//i/85
g
$CCr/l/**N
^' '
IAt. *o e A*, NyrJ M o *-
7/g//c HARMON, WEISS & JORDAN 2004 S STREET.N.W.
SUITE 430 WASHINoToN, D.G. soooo eAll McGREEvY HkhMON TELEPHONE ELLvN n. weiss HAND DELIVERED taOz: sas.ssoO
$,'I['c'u$saw"^.""
July 17, 1985
~
s DEAN R. TOUSLEY '
Jane Mapes, Esq.
Office of Executive Legal' Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Ms. Mapes:
On behalf of the Union of Concerned Scientists, I request a thirty day extension of time for filing comments on the Commissiori's proposed rule entitled " Adjudications; Special Procedures for Resolving Conflicts Concerning the Disclosure or Nondisclosure.of Information," 50 Fed. Reg. 21072 (May 22, 1985).
UCS requests the additional time in order to develop an alternative proposal that would protect the NRC's interest in conducting confidential investigations of safety problems witho'ut "
violating the public's < right to a hearing..on ' issues thaitiare
.. material.to. licensing ~ deciWoni...- Thi developitent-*tfeS* ' -- ":"- " ' '. " -
"~'
proposal has been more' time-consuming ~ than originally expected, since it' involves research into the disclo.su're requirements of the Freedom of Information Act=hdTis htWitzumnwrgy swC nm x
policy on disclosures, and'the experiences of intervenors with NRC investigations of allegations by confidential informants.
I would appreciate it if you would inform me by telephone regarding your determination on this request.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, p
h LO
~
Diane Curran
~
.~
_~ ~
- cc Office of the Secretary Docketing and Service of
. -, m o.n.2, 3 ys-y J
n t
~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~
~
Adjudications; Special Procedures for Resolving Conflicts Concerning the Disclosure or Nondisclosure of Information AGENCY:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION:
Proposed rule: Extension of comment period.
SUMMARY
- On May 22, 1985 (50 FR 21072), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission published proposed amendments to its rules of practice to provide special procedures for resolving conflicts concerning the disclosure or nondisclosure of information relating to an NRC investigation or inspection not yet concluded or.which would reveal the identity of a confidential informant and deemed relevant and material to an adjudication. The notice provided a 60-day period for public comment expiring on July 22, 1985. Two interested parties have requested a thirty day extension of time. Based on the significance of the issues involved and other factors, the NRC has decided to extend the comment period to August 23, 1985.
DATE: The extended comment period expires August 23, 1985. Connents received after that date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance
-of consideration cannot be given except as to comments received on or before that date.
7.
t ADDRESS S:' Submit written coments to the Secretary of the Comission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention:
Docketing and Service BFanch. Comments may also be delivered to Room 1121, 1717 H
~
. Street, NW., Washington, D.C. between 8:15 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Copies of coments received may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20555.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane R. Mapes, Senior Regulations Attorney, Regulations Division, Office of the Executive Legal Director, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C. 20555; Telephone:
(301)492-8695.
Dated at Washington, D.C., this day of July,1985.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission SE.I T Milk Secretary of u.i Commission
~.~.3
., )
anosong autgl_R+ _
(50 PA-J/d 7,z) 20**h.O T
OI HAnMow, WEISS & JORDAN 2001 S STREET, N.W.
SulTE 430 P,7y WASHINGTON, D.C. aoooo 4
oAst MeoaEEvy NAaMON (7f,,,,,.,
TELEPHONC
- ILYi AIs$ jo*a*eAN. iii HAND DhY.rI'SjE.)WD, caOaisas.ss00 DIANE CURRAN July 17, 1Qg-
,],
DEAN R. TOUSLEY Jane Mapes, Esq..
Office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Lear Ms. Mapes:
On behalf of the Union of Concerned Scientists, I request a thirty day extension of time for filing comments on the Commission's proposed rule entitled " Adjudications; Special Procedures for Resolving Conflicts Concerning the Disclosure or Nondisclosure of Information," 50 Fed. Re g. 2107 2 (May 22, 1985).
UCS requests the additional time in order to develop an alternative proposal that would protect the NRC's interest in conducting confidential investigations of safety problems without violating the public's right to a hearing on issues that are material to licensing decisions.
The developnent of UCS' proposal has been more time-consuming than originally expected, since it involves research into the disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act and the Atomic Energy Act, NRC policy on disclosures, and the experiences of intervenors with NRC investigations of allegations by confidential informants.
I would appreciate it if you would inform me by telephone regarding your determination on this request.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, g
Q LO Diane Curran cc:
Office of the Secretary Docketing and Service k,
_ 5;ygF dbb y }..)_
.r j.
' )
y Ye850717 21072 pyg
REGULATuRY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIOS)
ACCESSION 146R:8507230393 DUC.DATE: 85/07/17 NUTARIZED: Nd DOCKET"#
~
FACIL:
AUTH.NAME,
AUTH0R AFFILIATION CURRAN,0.
Harmon, Weiss & Jordan CURRAN,0 Union of Concerneu Scientists RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MAPES,J.
Uffice of tne Executive Legal Director
SUBJECT:
Requests 30-day extension for filing comments on prooosed rule 10CFR2, " Adjudications;Special Proceoures.for Resolving Conflicts re Disclosure or Nondisclosure of Info," to allow for UCS development of alternative proposal.
/
0
/
DISTRIBUTION CODE: OS10D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR __ ENCL __
SIZE __________
TITLE: Public Comment on Proposed Rule (PR)-10CFR NOTES:
RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES IU CODE /NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE /NARE LTTR ENCL INTERNAL: ADM/DRR/RP6 1
1 EL0/SAIP 1
1 GC 1
NMSS/FC 1
1 DA 1
HEG FILE 1
1 RES DIR 1
RES/DAE/CSHR 1
1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 01 1
1 l
l l
h(ENCL 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REaOIRED: LTTR
Y A'ece w ol by nc x ma PDL q*'
,>. < o n 7)g,,
HARMON, WEISS Oc JORDAN 2001 S STREET. N.W.
SulTE 430 WASIIINGToN, D.G. soooo Gall McGREEVY HARMON TELEPHONE ELLvN R. wEise.
HAND DELIVERED (202: 3a83500
- Iuc^c"U R R July 17, 1985
" ^ " " '
N DEAN R. TOUSLEY Jane Mapes, Esq.
Office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Ms. Mapes:
On behalf of the Union of Concerned Scientists, I request a thirty day extension of time for filing comments on the Commission's proposed rule entitled " Adjudications; Special Procedures for Resolving Conflicts Concerning the Disclosure or Nondisclosure of.Information," 5 0 Fed. Re g. 21072 (May 22, 1985).
UCS requests the additional time in order to develop an alternative proposal that would protect the NRC'.s interest in conductint3 confidential investigationsfof safety pioblems'w._ithou'tl violating the public'.s right~to a hearing on issues that.are
,~
_._ _. material; to J.icensincf. decisions - Ths-deve-lognent of'-UCS ' ~
' ' ' ' " " ~ ~ " " -
T proposal has been more time-consuming than originally ext ect,ed, since..it involves research into the disclosurd requiremer ts of i
.._. the..li.eedom of Tn fnrma tion-Act and the Atomic Energy Ac't. NRC~
'~~
policy on disclo'sures,. and the experiences of intervenors with NRC investigations of allegations'by confidential informants.
I would appreciate it if you would inform me by telephone regarding your determination on this request.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, g
h LO Diane Curran
...., ~
cc:
Offics of the Secretiry Docketing and Service
MD aggg g l0$Nf
&[
~ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OgEfED 10 CFR Part 2.
15 JLP. 23 P5:25 Adjudications; Special Procedures for Resolving Conflicts Concerning the Disclosure or Nondisclosure of Information 0FFICE 0: SECRt:,
00CKETING & SEhiu BRANCH AGENCY:
Nuclear Regulatory Comission.
ACTION:
Proposed rule: Extension of coment period.
SUMMARY
- On May 22,1985 (50 FR 21072), the Nuclear Regulatory Comission published proposed amendments to its rules of practice to provide special procedures for resolving conflicts concerning the disclosure or nondisclosure of information relating to an NRC investigation or inspection not yet concluded or which would reveal the identity of a confidential infonnant and deemed relevant and material to an adjudication. The notice provided a 60-day period for public coment expiring on July 22, 1985. Two interested parties have requested a thirty day extension of time. Based on the significance of the issues involved and other factors, the NRC has decided to extend the coment period to August 23, 1985.
DATE: The extended coment period expires August 23, 1985. Coments received after that date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but assurance of consideration cannot be given except as to coments received on or before that date.
h(90k l'
~QW as u (!M(,
d d /
o' 8507g3 21072 py 1
V^
s l
=
v ;
' ADDRESSES:
Submit written comments to the Secretary of the Comission, U.S.
- Nuclear Regulatory CorIsnission, Washington, D.C. 20555, Attention: Docketing and Service Branch. Coments may also be delivered to Room 1121, 1717 H Street, NW..' Washington, D.C. between 8:15 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Copies of comments received may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20555.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane R. Mapes, Senior Regulations Attorney, Regulations Division, Office of the Executive Legal Director, U.S.- Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C. 20555; Telephone:
(301) 492-8695.
Dated at Washington, D.C., this "2b day of July,1985.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission L
b*G h
Samuel C Chilk Secretary of the Comission i
kN i
e 4
ML 7
.g 30446 Fed;r:I Register / Vol. 50. No.144 / Friday. July 26,1985 /. Proposed Rules (1) The accuracy of the information (2) Where the grantee finds that the unit is NUCLEAR REGULATORY submitted as to number of units assisted, the so located that it needs an environmental cost of assistance.and the type of recipients; assessment, the grantee will advise FmHA COMMISSION
'I '
4.
(2)The accomplishment of quarterly ebhctives and the accuracy of the grantee's under i 1M4.673(a)(3) of this subpart, and
~.... -~~
schrdule-assist FmHA in preparing an environmental) 10 CFR Part 2 (3) The grantee's performance in assessment. The property to receive HPG implementing environmental and historic assistance will be handled similar to a Adjudications; Special Procedures for prese ation processes of i 1944 673 of this Section 502 loan. even though the financing Resolving Confilets Concerning the will be from the HPG grantee.The grantee Disclosure or Nondisclosure of I
(4) Th'e type of assistance provided. if may be requinddf funha she infonnation is nersury. to the grantee to help accomplish needed, to prepare and submit an FmHA Information; Extension of Comment i
Ltie objectives; and Form 1944-20 for the property, with the PMod
)
(5) Any recommendations for modifying or grantee being the " applicant". FmHA will A otasCv: Nuclear Regulatory cmending the statement of activities to reflect then prepare the appropriate assessment grantee activities.
outhned in Subpart G of Part 1940 of this Commission.
C. The State Office will work closely with chapter, working with the gsntee to develop Acnow: Proposed rule: Extension of the District Office and the grantee to assure alternative actions as appropriate.
cdequate HpC performance. The State Office (3) Upon completion of the FmHA comment period.
sh uld assist the District Office. as assessment, the grantee will be advised of cppropriate. in resolving any problems or appropriate action to comply with'the results summan: On May 22.1985 (50 FR t: Ling adsantage of favorable funding or of the assessment. A copy of FmHA's 21072). the Nuclear Regulatory program opportunities.The State Office will reviIw the reports. comments. and assessment will be given to the grantee for Commission published proposed recimmendations forwarded by the District filing in the recipients file. FmHA will amendments to its rules of practice to Office within fifteen calendar days of receipt.
maintain a copy of the review and related (1)If the reports indicate satisfactory correspondence in the HPG file in the provide special procedures for resolving i
progress. the State Office will forward a copy 8"Y;Ci"8 g'C'-
conflicts concerning the disclosure or 13 the National Office with all review M /'" dim 8 U nlA8"*""If8"d nondisclosure ofinformation relating to comments or suggestions and return the Nodi &ing Statements o/Actwities.
an NRC investigation or inspection not yet concluded or which would reveal the criginal to the Distnct Office and the A. If request for a grant extension is Distnet Office with a copy of the comments approved under i 1944 684 of this subpart, the identity of a confidentialinformant and rem:ining copy to the grantee through the State Director will authorize the District deemed relevant and material to an c.t recommendations (21If the reports indicate unsatisfactory Director to amend the ending date of the adjudication.The notice provided a 60-l progress. the State Director will recommend Grant Agreement and revise the budget,if day period for public comment expiring appropriate action to resolve the indicated necessary, on behalf of the Government.
on July 22.1985.Two mterested parties problem (sl. In accordance with li 1944.683 B. If grantee requests any modifications to have requested a thirty day extension of end 1944.688 and the Grant Agreement. the the Statement of Activities for the HPG time. Based on the significance of the P'"d program under i 1944 684 of this subpart. the issues involved and other factors the c t rmi a e e gr n w ere t re ss of grantee will subreit the modified Statement of NRC has decided to extend the comment the project is unsatisfactory. The State Activities, and HPG budget if appropriate.
period to August 23.1985.
Director wil! notify the grantee in writing-together with any information necessary to
~
through the District Director of a decision to justify its requests. Such requests will be DATE:The extended comment period suspend or terminate the grant. providing the submitted to the State Director through the expires August 23.1985. Comments grantee with the reasons for such action.
FmHA servicing office which will review and received after that date will be possible corrective measures the grantee may recommend approvalifit concurs with the considered ifit is practical to do so, but t-kt. and the effective date of the action.
modifications-FmHA will also advise the grantee ofits C. F hibit B to this subpart shall be assurance of consideration cannot be rppeal rights under Subpart B of Part 1900 of executed upon approval of an extension of given except as to comments received this chapter.
(31 A copy of the unsatisfactory report and the grant period. or significant change in on or before that date.
'f the m;morandum returning it will be
. either the project budget cr the approved ADDRFSSES: Submit written comments I;rwarded to the National Office together HpG processes contained in the Statement of to the Secretary of the Commission. U.S.
Activities.
with the State Director's decision. comments-Nuclear Regulatory Commission, c nd recommendations. as appropriate.
D. lf an extension or modification is not Washington. D.C.20555. Attention:
VI. Ens imnmento/ Process After Cront approved. the State Director will notify the appheant in writing of the decision and Docketing and Service Branch.
l Approiot,
advise the applicant of the appeal procedures Comments may also be delivered to A. Applicants will provide environmental under Subpart B of Part 1900.
ggg g
information on the area to be served by the E. Additional grants to the HPG recipient Washington, D.C. between 8.15 a.m. and HPG program on Form FmHA 1940-20 as part cf the their preapplication. In addition.
will be considered and processed 500 p.m. Copies of comments received i
applic:nts willinclude in their Statement of competitively. similar to en initial grant as may be examined at the NRC Public Activities their process for assessing whether provided in i 1944.686 of this subpart. Upon Document Room 1717 H Street. NW.,
en individual property requires an approval. a new grant agreement will be Washington. D.C. 20555.
essessment because it is tocated in a required and the grant will be coded as an floodplain or wetland or is eligible for or init al grant on Form FmHA 1940-1.
FOft FURTHEft INFOftMAT10M C0sf7ACT:
hsted en the National Register of Historic gF 7g 7g Jane R. Mapes. Senior Regulations PincIs.
2.7a Attorney. Regulations Division. Office of B. Grantees are responsible for making an Da ted. March 19.1985.
the Executive legal Director. U.S.
I initial environmental review of each unit to Nuclear Regulatory Cormnission.
I DMght O. Calhoun.
Washington, D.C. 20555; Telephone:
5 1 W ere the is n wetland or floodplain ACli88A880 Clot' Ad*Ini8'N'Of f"
(301)492-8695.
I h
c ro te n so D
1 48 d 7-2545; 815 aml Dated at Washington. D C this 23rd da> of docum:nt in the recipient's fue.
unusso cooe seisarr.c July.1965.
.6 a
Sem Fedtral Register / Val 506 No.144 / Friday, Jul5 2aL 1985 / Psoposeal Rules For the Nudear Regulatory Cornmission.
Regulaimos held on bly 1.'1ess.h Las independence Aweare.SW, Samuel [ Chilk.
Vegas. Nevada.Mr. Thomas A. Hine.
Weshingfee D.C. Ze50s. AB seaumenes Area Manager. Boulder City Aaea must be a aded: Docket No. aa6dM.
Surerary of the Camersssn.
Office.Waatem AreaFanser Comments army he inspectedimiammma
[FR Doc. as-17sta Filed 7-25-ak eies aml Administration, reed alet4er dated jenly 916 weekdays.ezarpt Fedasal baisdmys, i
1,1985, addre 3 sed io Mr. Jack, betwenn a:30 a.m. and 5:00 p au ha - '
,u a coag ri w Stonehocker. Colorado River addition,the FAA is -meseg sa -.
Cammission af Nevada, fnxa Westaca.
infoumataan decleet of cr==anta fia lbe
=
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY granting a ss day delay in the pubhc Office of the RegionalCounsel 4 Abed-7k Western Area Power Adminiesration process on the proposed General FAA. Northwest Mountain Retpos. Wens R@+= The delay was gransed kr PaciDe Hsghway Saath. Cassee. Semede.
10 CFR Part 904 order to resolve the coacaras expresand Washington 35188.Connaenas k the by Mr. Stonehockar onbehalf of the information docket may be MT - e d hs Delay in Comment Period on P oposed parties inwmIved.
the Office of the Regional Counsel General Regulations for the Charges
!!is Western's intent to constder all weekdays, except Federal holidays.
I' I*
recommendations made by the parties between T.36 a.m. and 4:9Er p.ar.
Bo r an P
involved for the formulation of the poa runtwen oaonasAttom contact:
AGENev: Western Area Power proposed GeneralRegulatinna.IT Richard Nelson, Regulations Branch.
Administration. DOE.
necessary. Western will pubnsh revised Transport Standards Staff. ANM-120.
proposed General Regulations in the Aircraft Certifica tion Division. FAA.
ccTioN: Notice of a Delay in
-a Federal Register and hold a second NorthwestMountain Region 17900 r
Period on Proposed General Regulations comment forum on the proposed Pacific Highway South. CA590th Seattle.
for the Charges for the Sale of Power General Regulatbns.
Washington eBTes; telephoney206} 431-From the Boulder Canyon Project.
2121.
Ismeed at Gelden. Celesado,h412. taat suert.sutwTAmy inwosasAtenes suWMA8tY:The Boulder City Area Offn:e wiinem u.C3.g.et, of the Western Area Power C"""'' W Administration (Western) published the N ' # " N " "*"I laterested persona are invued to proposed " General Regulations for the participate in this proposed rulemaicas
- """S*E** "
Charges for the Sale of Power frma the by subeGting such written data, news.
Boulder Canyon Project." 20 CFR Part 104 (proposed General Regulations)in DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION or arg=ents as they may desire.
Comraants relating to the envicanmental.
the Federal Register (50 FR 20732) on Federal Avlation Aed,J.h a,7 energy, or economic impact thaa naight May 17.1985. Interested parties wer, resall from ad pting the propeaala invited to submit comments concerning FR PW M m contained in Notice No. atAH5GFR the proposed General Reguistions to the Boulder City Area Office of Western on
[ Docket No. 24594. No#ce has. a6-tml 15038; Aprillik 1985) are invided.
Substantive comments shoadd be or before July 15,1965.
improved Fla,TMity Standards for accompanied by cost estimates.
On July 1.1965. In response to a Materlats Used in the interiors of Commenters aboald identify the request lay the current and proposed Transport Category AJrplane Cabina regulatory docket or motice n=b: and Boulder Canyon Project allottees.
submit commefds. in du plice4e. to the Western announced a 90-day delay in AGENCY: Federal Aviation Rules Docket address above. All the public process on the proposed Adrainistranon (FAA). DOT.
comments received on or before the General Regulations. As a result of the ACTION: Not. ice of proposed rulemaking closing date for commenta will be
- 90. day delay in the pubhc process, the (NPRM) reopening of comment period.
considered by the Admuuetrator before deadline for comments concerning the taking action on this %d proposed General Regulations has been suuuany:This notice aansances the rulemaking. The proposals anrtaned in r
extended.
reopening of the comment period for Notim No. as-10 mray be chanquulin Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) light of comments recerved. All OAtts: All comments concerning the No. 85-10. which invites comments comments will be svuilable in the Rules proposed General Regulations should be relative to amending Parts 25 and 1 1 of Dockmt far examination by interestad submitted on or before October 1.1945.
the Federal Aviation Regulatama tFAR)
A atss-All written comments to upgrade the fire safety standards for persons.both before and after the closf ag date for comsnents. A poport l
coni:erning the proposed General cabin interio-materials in tmnsport summaming each substancise pubhc l
Regulations should be sent to: Mr.
category airplanes.This reoperring fe contact with FAA penonoel concernmg Thomas A liine. Area Manager. Boulder necessary to afford allinterested partier this relemahng will be filed in die l
City Area Office. Western Aree Power an opportunity to present their views en docket. Commenters wishing the FAA to Admirustration. P.O. Box 200 Boulder the proposed ruhakmg.
acknowledge receipt of their comments City. NV secos.
Darts: Comments nest be weeiwd en must submit with those comments a self.
suret.rsstwTAny ssFORMATlees:On june or before SeptemM.1945.
addressed. stamped postcard en wMch 27.1985, Western seceived a letter from the Colorado RJver Comrmasion on Acosass:Comraents on this proposal the b!!owing steeement la svede:
Nevada on behaN of the BoulderCanyon may be meiled in dupi.icate to: Federal
" Comments to Decket No, assos." The Project renewalcontractors and Aviation Administration.rm, of the postcard will be dete/ time stamped end proposed Uprating Program allottees.
Chief Cour.sel. Attentson: Rafes Dochet returned to the counmeWer.
requesting a goaley deley in the pmWic
( ACC-206). Docket No.24594.aso g
I l
process on the proposed General Independence Avenue 5W.
Regulations. At the public comment We shington. D.C. 20591: or delivered in Any person may obtain a copy of forum on the proposed General duplicate to: Room 916,800 Notice No. 85-10 by sub.mitting a request i
W