ML20132C334

Informs That Appeal Meeting to Discuss Util Proposed Appeal of Auxiliary Sys Branch Position Re Determination of Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Sys Design Capability Not Needed.Licensee Should Be Directed to Address Issue

ML20132C334
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	08/01/1984
From:	Rubenstein L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Novak T NRC
Shared Package
ML19283C868	List: IA-85-926, Forwards Rept of 840726-27 in-progress Audit Re Detailed Control Room Design Review (Dcrdr).Dcrdr Proceeding Satisfactorily.Concern Expressed Re Differences Between Unit 1 & 2 Control Rooms & Role of Human Factors Specialist ML20132B767 ML20132B791 ML20132C010 ML20132C076 ML20132C105 ML20132C131 ML20132C209 ML20132C245 ML20132C247 ML20132C253 ML20132C285 ML20132C290 ML20132C295 ML20132C301 ML20132C310 ML20132C323 ML20132C334 ML20132C338 ML20132C344 ML20132C365 ML20132C379 ML20132C383 ML20132C389 ML20132C394 ML20132C421 ML20132C427 ML20132C433 ML20132C442 ML20132C453 ML20132C459 ML20132C464 ML20132C468 ML20132C474 ML20132C479 ML20132C484 ML20132C487 ML20132C493 ML20132C499 ML20132C512 ML20132C518 ML20132C536 ML20132C542 ML20132C559 ML20132C569 ML20132C575 ML20132C633 ML20133M691 ML20133P834
References
FOIA-84-926 NUDOCS 8408080003
Download: ML20132C334 (1)

Text

. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

8(paa 'o g \

o UNITED STATES

-l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

\...../

wAssinciou, o. c. rosss AUG 11984 NOTE T0:

Thomas M. Novak FROM:

L. S. Rubenstein

SUBJECT:

POSITION ON SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT LO Recently members of the Auxiliary Systems Branch (ASB) met with G eorge Knighton regarding (fuel pool heat load). determination of the spentcapability fuel pool co on is "backfitting" Beaver. I understand Valley 2 the applicant'saposition by requiring to be that ASB calculation capability discharges assuming the spent fuel pool is full of successive ueling annual re requires aatotal of 1088 fuel assemblies c(alculation based on 1-1/3 cores.) but the SRP (Secti of handling the total decay heat from a fullapable spent fuel p No other licensee cooling system compliance.with our long standing n

n uel pool not believe Beaver Valley 2 will be found to be position is met and the licensee does the necessary calculationsr unacceptable on

. j On issue.this basis, we see no reason to set up an appeals meeting to di The licensee should again be directed scuss this available to discuss this further as necessary.to address this issue. We are i

- 9

.S benstein 1 cc: 0. Parr G. Knighton J. Wenniel R. Anand

Contact:

J. Wermiel X29462 4

3; n

I'

( f(f. / \