ML20128Q438

Discusses Untimely Transmittal of Commission Paper on DOE Advisory Panel on Alternative Means of Financing & Managing Radwaste Facilities.Paper Represents More Positive Position by Panel than Was Previously Discussed

ML20128Q438
Person / Time
Issue date:	11/14/1984
From:	Jennifer Davis NRC
To:	Browning R NRC
Shared Package
ML19292E725	List: IA-85-170, Requests Response to Listed Questions Re Definition of Person in Paragrah 140.3(g) of NRC Regulation & Liability Coverage for High Level Waste Activities ML20127C018 ML20127C022 ML20127C338 ML20127C379 ML20127C418 ML20127C423 ML20128Q244 ML20128Q256 ML20128Q291 ML20128Q327 ML20128Q360 ML20128Q397 ML20128Q402 ML20128Q420 ML20128Q438 ML20128Q444 ML20128Q454 ML20128Q459 ML20128Q472 ML20128Q482 ML20128Q497 ML20128Q513 ML20128Q530 ML20128Q541 ML20128Q544 ML20129B806
References
FOIA-85-170 NUDOCS 8507130432
Download: ML20128Q438 (1)

Text

a nco

/  %' g UNITED STATES

. ! 'i o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

(, $ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 8 November 14, 1984

\.v+...o NOTE T0: R. E. Browning FROM: John G. Davis

SUBJECT:

COMMISSION PAPER ON PROGRESS OF AMFM PANEL The paper as received by me is untimely. It looks forward to a meeting on 11/13-14. It was received by me on 11/14. Hence, by the time the paper gets to the Commission the 11/13-14 meeting will have transpired and the information in the paper will be dated.

i .

In general the time of the paper represents a more positive position by the Panel that I would have anticipated from discussions I have had. An example of this tone appears on the second (unnumbered) page of the report ". . .

the Panel plans to recommend . . .." I had thought the Panel (as a body, not individuals) was more tentative than the Commission paper suggests.

Also, on the second page of the paper " improvements" are discussed. Did the Panel characterize these as " improvements" or " changes."

Lets discuss promptly.

q l &

JohfG. Davis

Enclosure:

As stated cc: D. B. Mausshardt 0507130432 850517 PDR FOIA EYE 85-170 PDR

.