ML20126H460
| ML20126H460 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/26/1984 |
| From: | Thompson R NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Minogue R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20126H305 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-210 NUDOCS 8506180351 | |
| Download: ML20126H460 (2) | |
Text
- *O %
.) e' %
g** % ty UNITED ST ATES , ,-
. , . ?*, NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISslON I - # '!i S WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 Nh.h s, . .s . f
..* NOV 2 61984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research FROM: Ronald D. Thompson, Chief Operations Support Branch Division of Contracts Office of Administration
SUBJECT:
UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL FROM ENSA, INC., ENTITLED " STUDY SURVEY OF RADI0 ISOTOPES RE-CONCENTRATION WITHIN NEW YORK STATE SANITARY SEWAGE SYSTEMS AND LANDFILLS TECHNICAL PROPOSAL",
DOC NUMBER 85-005 The subject proposal is forwarded for your reviek apd consideration. Please note that we have placed a cover sheet on the propesal so that the manner of handling unsolicited proposals is compatible with the provisions of FAR, Part 15.509.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation and Manual Chapter 5102 require that rejection letters to offerors in connection with their proposal submissions be informative to the maximum practical extent. Accordingly, to the degree possible, technical reasons are to be given in a program office's rejection of'an unsolicited proposal. Such reasons could include for example, technical flaws in approach or assumption made, inadequately experienced personnel to conduct the proposed effort, the technical approach could lead to biased results, or the proposed work does not meet the NRC's needs or is non-applicable as regards its mission.
Further, where applicable, evaluation of unsolicited proposals should include statements that: the proposed work duplicates current efforts or the proposed ,
or similar work is intended to be procured under competitive solicitation in the future.
Rejection letters to offerors will be coordinated by our Operations Support Branch and the appropriate office performing the evaluation. Concurrence will be reflected by signature on the white file copy.
The evaluator of this proposal should keep in mind that the proposal should meet the following criteria (FAR 15.506-2):
- 1. Does the proposal contain unique, innovative, or meritorious methods, approaches, or ideas which originated with or are assembled by the offeror? ~
8506180351 850417 My i PDR FOIA WELDONB5-210 PDR .
~
.s Ncy 2 C IW-
- 2. Does the proposal have overall scientific, technical, or socioeconomic merits?
- 3. Will the proposed effort make a potential contribution to the agency's mission at this time?
- 4. Does the proposer have capabilities, related experience, facilities, or techniques, or unique combinations thereof, which are considered to be integral factors for the achieving of the proposed objectives? ,
- 5. Are the qualifications, capabilities, and the experience of the principal investigator, team leader, or key personnel considered to be critical in achieving the objectives of the proposal?
If the proposal is for on-going research, please pay particular attention to the period of performance proposed, its reasonableness, and where the proposal is reviewed favorably, the extent of the NRC's commitment to that period of performance.
Should the proposal receive a favorable techqical evaluation and you recormend that a contract be awarded for this work, your justification for noncompetitive procurement should clearly state why your requirement for their services cannot be procured on a competitive basis.
Should you recommend that this work not be funded, please return all copies of the proposal to me with your decision. They will then be destroyed or returned to the proposer.
We have advised ENSA, Inc. that we will let them know of our decision within -
90 working days. Accordingly, I would appreciate your prompt review consistent with that schedule. In response, please refer to the above DOC Number.
Should you have any questions, please contact Shirley Crampton at 49-24275.
i evd naTdD.b. 1k T mpson3{f'.hief Op'erations Support! ranch Division of Contracts Office of Administration
Attachment:
Unsolicited Proposal from ENSA, Inc.
+
cc w/ attachment:
Paul Lohaus, Region I y ___- - y __,y