ML20095C169

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Deposition of Jn Scarbrough & D Ethridge on 840801 in Glen Rose,Tx.Pp 74,500-74,521
ML20095C169
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 08/01/1984
From: Ethridge D, Scarbrough J
BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.), TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20095C073 List:
References
OL-2, NUDOCS 8408220403
Download: ML20095C169 (27)
v • d • e


Text

74,500

  • l .

1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 2

N: ge r er 3 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING' BOARD 4

'84 AGO 20 PS:10 3 _________________

In the matter of:  :

[Cc b Na N I:

6  : BRANCH TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC  :

7 COMPANY, et al.  : Docket Nos. 50-4450b__{~

8 (Comanche Peak Steam Electric 50-446 O L-[

Station, Units 1 and 2)  :

10 Rocm 46 11 Glen Rose Motor Inn Glen Rose, Texas 12 ,

August 1, 1984 13 ,

14. Deposition of: JAMES N. SCARBROUGH & DAVID ETHRIDCE 15 called for examination by counsel for Applicants, 18 taken before Margaret Schneider, Court Reporter, 17 beginning at 10:20 a.m., pursuant to agreement.

18 -

19 20 t

21 22 23 24 0

t j

74,501 6

1 APPEARANCES:

2 For the Applicants, Texas Utilities Electric Company, et al:

3 McNEILL WATKINS, ESQUIRE 4 Bishop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds

'1200 Seventeenth Street, Northwest 5 Washington, D. C. 20036 6 For the Deponents, James N. Scarbrough and David Eldon Ethridge, Personally: ,

7 R. JEFFREY COPPOCK, ESQUIRE 8 Vinson'& Elkins First City' Tower 9 Houston, Texas 77002 10 * *

  • 11 12 .

13 ,

14 15' 16 17 18 19 20

. 21 22' 23 24 25

74,502 c

s I IEEE5 2 DEPOSITION OF: DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS 3 James N. Scarbrough 74,504 -- -- --

and 4 David Eldon Ethridge 5

6 7

8 9

10 II E$EIEIT_g 12 NUMBER FOR IDENTIFICATION 13 Ethridge Exhibit No. 1 74,519 14 Ethridge Exhibit No. 2 74,520 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 9

24 25

74,503 1

PgggEEQIEgg 2 10:20 a.m.

3 MR. WATKINS: Good morning.

4 .My name is McNeill Watkins, counsel for 1

5 Applicant-in these proceedings. j i

6 This is the deposition of a panel consisting 7

of Mr. Scarbrough and Mr. Ethridge. The testimony of 8 Mr. Scarbrough and Mr. Ethridge will be part of an offer 8

of proof which Applicants will make to the Board in this 10 proceeding. Because it is an offer of pr'cof, the deposition 11 will consist solely of direct examination of Mr. Scarbrough 12 and Mr. Ethridge by Applicants.

13 Off the record.

14 (Discussion off the record.)

15 MR. WATKINS: On the record.

16 Would counsel like to identify himself, 17 I please?

18 MR. COPPOCK: Yes. My name is Jeff Coppock.

19 I am associated with the law firm of Vinson & Elkins in 20 Houston. I'm here today representing Mr. Scarbrough and 21 Mr. Ethridge, both panel members, who are Brown & Root 22 employees.

23 I'd like to rote that both pr.nel memebers 24 are appearing here voluntarily and are not under subpoena.

25 ,

//

74,504 1 Whereupon, 2 JAMES N. SCARBROUGH 3 and 4 DAVID.ELDON ETHRIDGE 5 the deponents, having first been simultaneously duly sworn, 6 were examined and testified upon their oath as follows:

7 DIRECT EXAMINATION 8 BY MR. WATKINS:

9 Q. Mr. Scarbrough, would you state your full 10 name, please?

11 BY WITNESS SCARBROUGH:

12 A. James Neal Scarbrough. -

13 Q. By whnm are.you employed?

14 A. Brown & Root at Comanche Peak Steam Electric 15 Station.

16 What'is your current job title?

Q.

17 A. I'm a paint general foreman.

18 Q. How long have you been a paint general foreman:

19 A. About five months.

20 Q. What was your title prior to the time that 21 you became a paint general foreman?

22 A. I was a paint foreman.

23 Q. Did you know a QC paint inspector named 24 Robert Hamilton when he worked at Comanche Peak? ,

'd A. Yes.

74,505 1 Q. Did you know a QC inspector named Joe Krolak 2 when he worked at Comanche ?eak?

3 A. Yes.

4 Q. Did you know a QC paint inspector named 5 Sherman Shelton when he worked at Comanche Peak?

6 A. Yes.

7 Q. Do you remember the day that these three 8 gentlemen were terminated?

9 A. Yes.

10 Q. Do you recall the month and year that they 11 were terminated?

12 A. Yeah.

13 Q. And what was the month and year?

14 A. It was March of 82.

15 To the best of your recollection?

Q.

16 A. Yeah.

17 Were you at that time a paint foreman?

Q.

18 A. Yes, I was.

19 g, please describe your duties as a paint foreman.

20 A. I'm responsible for scheduling work for 21 my crew and their productivity and safety is my responsi-U bility.

23 Where was your crew working in March of Q.

24 1982?

3 A. In Reactor 2.

74,506 1 Q. At what area?

2 A. Elevation 1000 on the rotating platform 3 rail.

4 Q. Is that the rotating access platform rail?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. Was David Ethridge a member of your crew 7 at that time?

8 A. Yes, he was.

9 Q. Mr. Ethridge, would you state your full 10 name, please?

11 BY WITNESS ETHRIDGE:

12 A. David Eldon Ethridge. ,

13 Q. By whom are,you employed?

14 A. Brown & Root.

15 Where are you employed?

Q.

16 A. Comanche Peak, i

17 Q. What is your current job tihle?

~

18 A. Protective coatings inspector.

19 What level of inspector are you?

Q.

M A. Level one.

21 Q. How long have you been a protective coati.7gs M QC inspector?

23 A. Since October of '83.

24 Q. Prior to that time were you employed at 25 Comanche Peak?

H 74,507 1 A. Yes, sir.

2 Q. And what was your job?

3 A. Spray painter.

4 Q. How long.were you a spray painter?

5 A. Since October of '79.

6 Q. In March of 1982, were you working in 7 Mr. Scarbrough's crew?

8 A. Yes, sir.

9 Q. How many craftsmen were in that crew?-

10 A. Approximately 10 to 12.

11 Do you remember Robert Hamilton at the time Q.

12 that he worked at Comanche Peak?

13 A. Yes, sir. .

14 Was he a QC inspector?

Q.

15 A. Yes, sir. -

16 Do you remember a QC inspector named Q.

17 Joe Krolak at the time he worked at Comanche Peak?

18 l A. Yes.

19 Do you recall a QC inspector named Sherman Q.

  1. Shelton at the time that he worked at Comanche Peak?

i 21 A. Yes.

U Q. Do you remember the day that these three 23 gentlemen were terminated?

24 A. Yes, I do.

M Where were you working on the day that they Q.

74,508 I were terminated?

2 A. Reactor Building No. 2, rotating access 3 platform rail.

4 Q. Mr. Scarbrough, would you describe the 5 rotating access platform rail, please?

6 BY WITNESS SCARBROUGH:

7 A. It is a series of steel girders that go 8 all the way around the inside of the reactor building 9 that the top crane in the reactor building rotates around 10 on.

11 Q. How wide is the rail?

12 A. I would say it is between 16 to 20 inches 13 wide. .

14 Q. How far from the liner plate is the rail?

15 A. It varies. Probably between four and five 16 feet.

17 Q. How far above the nearest floor elevation 18 is the rail located?

19 A. The nearest floor is elevation 905. It M is about 95 feet.

21 Now, you testified earlier that in March Q.

22 of 1982 your crew was working on the rail. Were they working D on the liner plate?

24 A. Yes.

M Q. Were they preparing the liner plate for

. :* 74,509 1- coatings and applying coatings to the liner plate?

.' 2 A. Yes.

3 'Q. How long had your crew been working on or

4. about the rotating access platform rail?

5- A. I believe we had been up there about a-month.

6 Q. Did your crew use scaffolding in connection 7 with its work?

-8 ~ A. Yes, we had to use scaffolding. You can't 9 reach the liner plate without scaffolding.

10 Q. In other words, a painter cannot paint the

-11 -liner plate simply by standing on the rail.

12 A. No. -

13 Q. Was the scaffolding located between the 14 rail and the wall of the liner?

15 A. Yes.

16 Q. And your crew could not have worked without L17 '

, the scaffolding; is that your testimony?

18 A. No. That's right.

l  ;

1 19 Q. Mr. Ethridge, on the morning of the day  !

Nl  !

Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Krolak and Mr. Shelton were terminated, 21  : what was your job activity?

l 22  ;

BY WITNESS ETHRIDGE:

23 A. I was preparing a section of the liner and 24 steel substraight for coatings, primer application.

25 In relation to the rail itself, could you Q.

74,510 1- describe the location of that area?

2 A. We were up right at the rail level or a 3 little bit below it.

4 Q. Were you working on scaffolding?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. Could you have worked on the liner I'. ate 7 without scaffolding?

8 A. No, sir.

9 Q. Did you finish the job activity that.you 10 have described that morning?

.11 A. Yes.

12 Q. Did you request a QC inspection of that 13 work? ,

i 14 A. Yes.

15 i Q

_ .- How did you request the inspection?

s 16 'A. Through the foreman.

17 , Q. Is that Mr. Scarbrough?  :

I 18 A. Yes.

/

19 .Q. Mr. Scarbrough, do you recall Mr.-Ethridge

! i

~1 20 1 requesting an' inspection that morning?

l s J21 BY. WITNESS SCARBROUGH:

2: A. I don't. remember exactly who it was. I t --

23 remember someone telling -- one of my crew members telling 24 me that'they had some liner plate ready for primer.

25 Q. And what did you do as a result?

1

{,

+

. . 74,511 1 A. I phoned the QC field shack, told them what

'2 I'hsd.

'3 Q. Did you identify the area that needed 4 inspection as located on.the rotating access platform rail?

5 A. Yes, I did.

6 Q. Did you; follow-normal procedure that morning 7 -in requesting the inspection?

8 A. 'Yes.

9 Q. And was that procedure to telephone the 10 lQC inspectors?

11 A. It was.

12 Do you remember who you talked to?

Q.

13 A. No, I don't.

14 Q. Did a QC inspector show up for the inspection 15 that morning?

16 A. No, sir.

17 How long did you wait?

Q.

18 A. Well, we waited all day, really. I waited 19 about an hour before I got in touch with my boss, 20- Jim Brackin, and let him know that we weren't getting QC i

.21 coverage.

22 Where were you while you were waiting for Q.

M the QC inspector?

24 A. I was in the area.

M Were you on the rotating access platform Q.

. 74,512 1 rail itself?

2 A. Not at all times.

3 Q. Part of the time you were?

4 A. Yes, part of the time I was.

5 Q. Mr. Scarbrough, would you describe the 6 physical access to the rotating access platform rail?

7 A. It is a series of ladders going up the liner.

8 Q. Is there only one ladder that actually goes 9 to the rail itself?

,j 10 A. There's only one means of access to it.

f 11 There's only one series of ladders.

12 Q. Okay. Were you within sight of that ladder 13 during the time that you waited for a QC inspection that 14 morning?

15 A. I was.

16 Q. Mr. Ethridge, where were you wnile you 17 awaited the --

18 Mr. Ethridge, did you await the QC inspection 19 at your work area?

20 BY WITNESS ETHRIDGE:

21 A. Yes, sir.

M Q. How long did you wait?

M A. I'd say.several hours.

24 Q. What did you finally do?

25 A. We moved to another area.

74,513 1 Q. During the period that you waited, did you 2 observe the means of access, the ladder to the rotating 3 access platform rail?

4 A. Yes, sir.

5 Q. During the period that you waited for QC 6 inspection, did you observe Mr. Krolak climb the ladder 7 to take a idok at the rotating access platform rail?

8 A. No, sir.

9 Q. Did you see Mr. Hamilton climb the ladder 10 to observe the rotating access platform rail?

11 A. No.

12 Q. Mr. Scarbrough, during the period that you 13 awaited the QC inspection e did you observe Mr. Krolak 14 climbing the ladder to inspect the rail?

15 BY WITNESS SCARBROUGH:

16 A. No.

17 Q. Did you observe Mr. Hamilton climbing the 18 ladder to inspect the rail?

19 A. No.

N Q. Would you have seen -- Mr.Scarbrough, would 1

21 you have seen either Mr. Krolak or Mr. Hamilton had they 22 climbed the rail?

M A. Yes, I would have.

2' How can you be sure?

O.

25 A. I was waiting on an inspection to be done, I

1 l

. . 74,514 1- and I was looking for the inspectors.

2 Q. Did you have your eye on the ladder at all l

3 times?

4 A. No, I didn't, not at all times.

5 Q. Is it pcssible that Mr. Krolak could have 6 sneaked up the ladder without your seeing him and sneak 7 back down again?

8 A. No, he couldn't. It is 95 foot of climb 9 straight up, and for a man that's not in perfect shape 10- that's a pretty good climb, and he would stop and rest 11 .cn one of the landincs. It would probably take just about 12 anyone five minutes t.o make the climb.

  • 13 I would have looked and seen had they gone 14 up.

15 Q. Mr. Ethridge, would you have noticed 16 Mr. Hamilton or Mr. Krolak had they climbed the ladder?

17 BY WITNESS ETHRIDGE:

18 A. Yes, sir.

19 Q. Why would you have seen them?

20 ' A-. I was looking for an inspector, waiting i

21 on them, and it is part of my job to make sure that'I was 22 there available.

23 Mr. Scarbrough, prior to the events on the Q.

24 day that you have just described, do you recall Mr. Krclak 25 performing inspections en the rotating access platform rail?

74,515 1 BY MR. SCARBROUGH:

2 A. Yes, I do.

3 Q. Prior to that day, do you recall Mr. Shelton 4 being on the rotating access platform rail?

5 A. Yes.

6 Q. 'fou observed him personally?

7 A. Yes, I did.

8 Q. Mr. Ethridge, prior to the day we've been 9 discussing, did you observe Mr. Krola): on the rotating 10 access platform rail?

11 BY WITNESS ETHRIDGE:

12 A. Yes.

13 Q. Was Mr. Krolak performing inspections?

14 A. Yes.

15 Q. Did Mr. Krolak inspect work that you had 16 performed as a craf tsman?

17 A. Yes.

18 g. prior to that day, did you observe Mr. Shelton 19 on the rotating access platform rail?

M ,

A. Yes.

21 Q. Was he performing an inspection?

M A. Yes.

D Q. Was Mr.,Shelton inspecting work that you 24 had performed as a painter?

25 A. Yes.

I

.=.

74,516 t- Q. Mr. Scarbrough, would you describe the safety 2 features for persons working on the rotating access platform 3 rail?

4 BY WITNESS SCARBROUGH:

5 A. Yes. Everyone of them that worked at that 6 elevation wears a safety belt and a lanyard with a safety 7 belt. Going all the way around the reactor is a steel 15 - cable that's attached to the liner plate by about a three-9 foot support. It stands out about arm's height and is

, 10 within. arm's length-of anyone standing on the rail, and 11 they attach their lanyard to that cable.

12 Q. To hook onto the rail, does a person have

--13 to lean over? ,

14 A. No.

15 Q. Mr. Ethridge, during the time that you worked to on the rotating access platform rail, did you ever observe 17 oil-or greasc on the rail?

18 BY WITNESS ETHRIDGE:

19 A. .Yes, on occasion.

lE Q. How frequently would you say?

! 21 A. Very occasionally.

Et Q. What did you do when you saw oil or grease El on:the rail? ,

24 A. We'd clean it up.

I 26 Q. Why did you clean it up?

74,517 1 A. Safety reasons. We had to work up there.

2 .So it was to our benefit to clean anything up.

3 Q. You wanted it to be as safe as possible?

4 A. Yes.

5 Q. Did you have any particular responsibilities 6 regarding safety at that time?

7 A. Yes. I was a member of the craft safety 8 committee. I was responsible for safety related items.

9 Q. As part of your duties as a member of the 10 safety committee, did you urge those in your crew and the 11 paint department generally to make sure that there was 12 no oil, grease, or foreign matters on the rail for people 13 working there? ,

14 A. Yes, sir.

15 Q. And did you instruct them that if they saw 16 such foreign matter they were to clean it up immediately?

17 A. Yes, sir.

18 Q. On the morning that you have described on 19 the day that Mr. Shelton, Mr. Hamilton and Mr. Krolak were 20 terminated, do you recall seeing oil or grease on the rail?

21 A. No, sir.

22 Q. Mr. Scarbrough, did you instruct members M of your crew that they,were to keep the rail clean at all 24 times?

2 //

74,518 1 BY WITNESS SCARSROUGH:

2 A. Yes, I did.

3 Q. Why was that?

4 A. For their safety. That was my responsibility 5 for them to have a safe work area.

6 Q. .Mr. Ethridge, I'm going to hand you a document 7 and ask you if you can identify it.

8 BY WITNESS ETHRIDGE:

9 A. Yes, sir. It is the inspection report used 10 in protective coatings.

11 -Q. . What was the item inspected in that 12 inspection?

13 A. Liner plate,.

14 Q. What reactor building was the inspection 15 performed in?

16 A. Reactor Building No. 2.

17 Q. At what elevation was the inspection 18 performed?

19 A. Elevation 998 to 1001.

20 Who signed that inspection report?

'Q.

21 A. Joe Krolak.

22 Q. And what is the date on that inspection 2 report?

24 A. March 1st, '82.

26 Mr. Ethridge, in your judgment as a craft Q.

I

, 1 74,519 1 . painter who worked on the rotating access platform rail 2 and with your experience as a QC inspector familiar with 3 inspection reports for protective coatings, is it your 4' judgment that in order to perform that inspection 5 Mr. Krolak would have to traverse, have to walk on the 6 rotating access platform rail?

7 A. Yes, sir, definitely.

8 MR. WATKINS: I'd like the reporter to mark 9 this two-page document for identification as Ethridge 1, 10 if you would bind that in the transcript, please.

11 (The document referred to was 12 marked Ethridge Exhibit No. 1 13 for identification.)

14 BY MR. WATKINS:

15 Q. Mr. Ethridge, I show you a second document 16 and ask you if you can identify it.

17 A. Yes, sir. It is also an inspection report 18 used in protective coatings.

19 Q. What was the item being inspected?

20 A. Liner plate.

21 Q. What reactor building?

Z! A. No. 2.

%I Q. At what elevation in the reactor building?

24 .A. Elevation 999 to 1001-6.

25 Q. Whose signature appears on that inspection

74,520 I report?

2 A. Sherman Shelton.

3 Q. What is the date of that inspection report?

4 A.* February.25th of '82.

5 Q. Mr. Ethridge, in your judgment as a craft 6 painter who worked on the rotating access platform rail 7 and with your experience as a QC inspector who utilizes 8 inspection reports such as that one, is it your judgment 9 that to perform that inspection Mr. Shelton would have to had to climb to the rotating access platform rail and 11 traverse th'e rail?

12 A. Yes, sir. ,

13 Q. Mr. Scarbro, ugh, would you repeat the 14 elevation of the rotating access platform rail?

15 BY WITNESS SCARBROUGH:

16 A. Exactly, it is 1000 and 6 inches.

17 And you have testified that the next floor Q.

18 level down is elevation 905; is that correct?

19 A. That's correct.

20 MR. WATKINS: Mr. Coppock, I will ask the 21 reporter to mark this document for identification as 22 Ethridge 2, if you would bind that into the transcript, 23 please. ,

24 (The document referred to was U marked Ethridge Exhibit No. 2 for identification.)

74,521

, 1 Mr. Coppock, do you have any additional 2 questions?

3 MR. COPPOCK: No, I do not.

4 MR. WATKINS: That concludes the testimony 5 of Mr. Scarbrough and Mr. Ethridge.

6 Thank you, gentlemen.

7 (Whereupon, at 10:42 a.m., the deposit on

.8 was concluded.)

9 ***

10 --

11 12 ,

-13 14 15 16 17 18 I

19 i M

21 22 23 24 25

CERTIFICATE OF PROCEEDINGS ,

i This is to certify that the attached proceedings before the  !

2 i NRC~ COMMISSION 3

In the matter of: TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al 4' (Scarbrough & Ethridge) j Date of Proceeding: August 1, 1984 l 5 i I Place of Proceeding: Glen Rose, Texas t 6i j were held as herein appears, and that this is the original  ;

7

  • transcript for the file of the Commission. ,

8 i 9

Margaret K. Schneider 10 Official Reporter - Typed 11 e

l __ el FA 13- Off'ic44 fR'eporter - Signature i4 .

15 16 17 18 1 19 20 21 ,

22 23  !

l 24 i

~

25 I

TAYLOE ASSOCIATES REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL REPORTERS NORFOLK, VIRGINIA

p yg_,,97s ] ARMS c0MANCHE FEAK STEAM ELE':TR$ 0( M N se / w Z U-Qg p g,99 y '

RE.7." ~

/

INSPECT 10N nm. v :ss4GNanca t WWT[TV 7tw cascnipr:en 'cunricancA P lsv w/

  1. ,.aucruntV99f /on/J7 M .# M PROTECTIVE COATINGS 2 frYe/1 F A476 v ocm .so:

srsc..sc. arv. au o.c. ccc. a arv. a cw. anca w. o. pum cajm c:wn AS-31 s [ s 01-QP-11.4-5.Rev.I t //d// /g9/ /dR3 ,

NSP' oN vf NSPT C IN (CTION NS oN [

.MSP. At3UI.73 i

!MMCT!oM CoMPLETIo , ALL APPUCASLK lTEMS sATISFACTCRY ,f / ((

O iNsencTioM comal:Tro, uNsArisrAcTeaT irrus untro a:Lew f "*' "

[

lNSPECTION ATTRIBUTES / -

$ l caTt "

., PRIMER REPAIRS / '2 k 5 r?l

1. l For reoair of sacs and runs over 5.5 mils DFT_ nerfnm b l l l I I l OFT of Primer Coat in areas whf eh have been sanded or l l screened oer para. 3.2.1. (For multiole items indicate I

!! l I l Min. Spot, Max. Spot and Average DFT with corresponding l l l  !

l' OP & 10 No's for each item in " Remarks". ) ll l  !

d RECORD: Minimum Soot Test: ll I l I Maximum Soot Test: l l

! Average DFT: -

Il l l

2. I Abrasive acceotable per para. 3.2.2.a. Id I i
3. Separators installed, drained, and drains left dI l i i partially open. l l l l  ;
4. I Air supply free of contamination. / l l  !
5. Blasted surface and orofile- [l l  !
a. Blasted surface and surroundino areas cleaned ner / l l I para. 3.2.2.c. l i l I
b. Surface free of foreion matter inr1 crease & oil. 1/ I 1 I I c. Sharo (non-enundma) oroinctinne removed. l l I ld. Anchor pattern depth 1.0 mil. minimum. /l i 4  !

le. Surface licht 1v abraded Der oara. 3.2.3. /3 I $  !

l f. Surface wiped clean per pa'ra. 3.2.3 or 3.2.4 VI I T l l l (Repairs Only). I j l $ j l 6. I Unioue Number stamoed on oiec'e(s). Record Unioue YN I N i l _ Number (s) in " Remarks" below.

I l M

7. Ambient conditions checked car oara_ i3.3.2 orier to / l l l primer application and record below:' l 4 l lDATE:S/-71 TIME: /'80 gr2, WETBULBTEMP:[h'* I N I I ORY BULB TEMP:Mh' $5.MNATIVE HUMIDITY://

I d l OEW POINT: //A

  • SURFACE TEMP: W* ll O  !
8. '

Substrate surface free of contaminants and less than /l l I l 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> elapsed since blasting. l 'll XHIBIT '

] __-- ._l.___.______... (Continued on Next Sheet) Mf _

f, , _

l l l COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION gg,gp.g g,4,5, g,,,

j .

. INSPECTION REPORT Sheett of 4 ,

! (SUPPLEMENTAL) ,

! i

~ "

'E ii INSPECTION ATTRieuTES w 3 e 2 5 mAnsu

.e i' 9. Tran. filter or senaratar innta11.d na, naen 3.3.4.  %

10. Air supply free of contamination. W .

l

11. Qualfication of ann 11entar. (List Aeolicators:) V  !

j E)JALE l t

! 12. Verify Mixing Operations per para. 3.2.2.h. /

{ 13. Coating Material Product Identification: C2// /44L 1/

j a. Base Lot No.: /1. g 7 1 3 / N PART A: v/A. V l l b. Filler Lot No.: / 7 i gr / p>L, V i c. Thinner Lot No. : //(3 / 9 d pg,,,, V

d. Time Mixed: / / 1 4 /rL V i
e. Shelf Life Not Exceeded /
14. Pressure pot agitated.  % ,

15 . Pot life not exceeded. /'

16. Hose less than 75 feet.  %

l .

{

i i .  !

! i i I

! MNS (swes, specs.tT O&tE, 0 O NO IR M 2. BL W 7 l cw una Plars SysnQim.L '

ell kssaut on sg yr. ,

l l

, hfi. J J d i g

1.R. CLOSED Q k lsimAws/

oc mapseton

~~

m

.- .- =.. . . .. ,,3 agTr;4p n,3

~"

STEAM EL.jMDE%ED

". R IC ST "

6 CON ANCHE FEAX ,.

'"/'y 000 . $ $0b INSPECT 10N . jac g y g rtM etsCAlpf;CN DCEpTmCAUGh'fC. [5157EM / STM GE31GMarCN PROTECTIVE CDATINGS 1 Li veK ri47-6

,118#.1 (yCTVME.srs- fempsh)  ;

REE G.a CCC. & 4(V. & GNANGl 4Q MEMbME GM UT CCulp Q EN T, NQ.

3PE L MG.

AS-31 s MEV./e QI.QP.11.4 5. Rev. 6  ? /B9/. /49/, SMd . N .5.3 o a iamo=, aegurio- ceria gr ipos c cr,~4,,J cIn<g , g Je4P. AESUL.73 .

l hMShtCTloN COMPLETED , Au. APauCASLK ITEMS SATLSFACroRv h spp.) yffh [

O inseverion cometarro unsarisractoAv irtus untro attow -

e. I oc l INSPECTION ATTPISUTES /

,, PRIMER REPAIRS / ,2 5 $gayg ?l

1. For reoair of saas and runs over 5.5 mdis DFT omrfann N I l I I l 0FT of Primer coat in arsae which have been sanded or  !

I screened per oara. 3.2.1. (For multiole items indicate I! l  !

Min. Spot, Max. Spot and Average DFT with corresponding l l l l OP & 10 No's for each item in " Remarks" 1 ll l  !

I I I RECORD: Minimum Soot Test:

Maximum Spot Test: '

l I Average DFT: lI l l i

2. l Abrasive acceptable per para. 3.2.2.a. Mi l I i
3. Separators installed, drained, an'd drains left /f l l  !

I partially open. lI l i 4 I Air supply free of contamination. lv l l  !

5. Blasted surface and orofile! SO3 '

/I '

a. Blasted surface and surroundine areas cleaned nor # L para. 3.2.2.c. I J l ;; IXHIElT ,
b. Surface free of foreien matter inel crease & oil. ld I, '

g l

lc. Sharo (nnn.rnuna.a) oroinctinne removed. Id [' g.g,g' gg I d. Anchor pattern depth 1.0 mil, minimum. VI -

I e. Surface lichtiv abraded Der cara. 3.2.3. Id l .-=  !

l f. Surface wiped clean per para 3.2.3 or 3.2.4  !'A l l Y (Repairs Only). l,l l 1 3 I l

6. I Unique Number stamped on aiece(s1. Record Unioue M l 'S i Number (s)'in " Remarks" below. L l $ l
7. Ambient conditions checked oar oara i3.3.2 orier to VI ' l E I l primer apolication and record below:' l l  ! I I DATE:.2/.6/g.1 TIME: 3',0c P WET BULB TEMP: 64# S  !

l DRY BUl.8 TEMP: 4[8 RELATIVE HUMIDITY: #3fo i Id  !

DEW POINT: 4/f ' SURFACE TEMP: %7 lI l4 l

8. Substrate surface free of contaminants and less than lVl' 'I l M I l 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> elapsed since blasting. I i I IContinued on__Nemt 57eet) I l !  ! I

i

CDMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION g[ gp.11,4,g, p,y,k

! INSPECTION REPORT Sheetgoff

'(SUPPLD8 ENTAL) l i

f 'E ,,

INSPECTION ATTRisuTES g

.I abrue 4

i 9. Tran filter or monaratne installed nar am-m 3.3.4. /

10. Air supply free of contamination. V l 11. Qualfication of annlientar. (List Acolicators:) /

{ K. NumAd/r_s ,

v l j 12. Verify Mixina noerations per para. 3.2.2.h. V f l 13. Coating Material Product Identification: dZ_// /  !

a. Base Lot No.: /L.3 /J 3 A PART A: #

i b. Filler Lot No.: 1JJ5 6/ /FI v '

  • c. Thinner Lot No.:1)(3)qd fyr , y -
6. Time Mixed: 2:*- T :_ );26 % w M .gadr> s -

l e. Shelf Life Not Exceeded v j 14. Pressure pot agitated. v l 15 . Pot life not exemedad. v j 16. Hose less than 75 feet. v i

i .

1 REMAnKs comes, specs sve. pfg, ppfgg 'Sp.3 gay /,7r4y.

f lFA. Mr.137 *- ly 3 ' EM ff /fI */" ,

An.

lfA. l+9*- IS4" El.I. 999 '- Io05' I 509

-- DlIORMkil0N O D -

pps a -3 ia q s:u g. 3

\

@ AB .V W $$

YJ' W 47* M

  • 37)1 ,

i is g, R, CLQ3gg lMM//

/ I SieleAWPS 1

M OC 18sSPECTOR g i

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20095C169&oldid=2785370"