ML20095C127
| ML20095C127 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 08/15/1984 |
| From: | Wilterding D, Wilterding D, Zwahr J BROWN & ROOT, INC. (SUBS. OF HALLIBURTON CO.), TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20095C073 | List: |
| References | |
| OL-2, NUDOCS 8408220388 | |
| Download: ML20095C127 (29) | |
Text
-
_ - - . _ _ - m __ _
. - , 1 ~.
7, , .
1 UNITED STATES 0F AMERICA
( cm NUCLEAR ~ REGULATORY COMMISSION .
(._.)
a
.' .2 BEFORE-Ti!E ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING B ggr Q,;OARD fww 3' IN THE MATTER OF: )-
)
4 . TEXAS. UTILITIES ELECTHIC ' PS:07
) DOCK 18$ $
- 4 4 5 DL' 5 0 - 4 4 ,4 0 .L- h u-x 7;-
51 ) '
(COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ) $0C5CfhC "
6 - ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS )
l'AND 2) )
7:
_. 8 .PREFILED TESTIMONY OF JAMES EDWARD ZWAHR 9 -and- -
DANIEL THOMAS WILTERDING
. 10- AUGUST 15,-1984
?. ^11 12 x
/~'; . 13
%./
- 14
+
.,, 15 PREFILED TESTIMONY'OF JAMES EDWARD ZWAHR and Ll 6 . ~ DANIEL THOMAS WILTERDING, taken on the_15th day of-17-August, .1984, in the above-styled and numbered cause,=
' + .
,.18. at, Glen Hose Motor Inn located at Highway 67 & FM s-
- r 19 Road 2 0 1 ,- in the City of Glen Rose, County _of
- 20. Somerville and-State of Texas, before Janet E .'
~
21 Schaffer,-_a Certified Shorthand Reporter,in and for
.-22 'the State - of Texas.
- 2 3 -
~24 es ' 8408220388 840820
- 25
, e E A }
= F ft M ft R A R ' C @ ft R TRftff@f8WFtfMS
, . . , .. . . , . . . , - . _-, - -- -- - - - - ~ . . - ~ . --- -
^
3 '
. . , -a -
2'
'. x; .. . .
s-- .
.p
- r. q,.
~
.~
.c 1 ' APPEARANCES:
~ '
'2 BISHOP,~LIBERMAN, COOK, PURCELL & REYNOLDS (Attorneys . at Law -
t'.
3 11200 Seventeenth Street, N.W.
i Wa s h i ng t o n', D.C.- 20036 4- . s BY ::;,McNe illf. Wa tki ns II ,1 Esq.
51 . ..
APPEARING FOR. APPLICANTS
, - ' 6)
> o. ,
- .:7, e i
r 8 8 r,
- 9.
.r k'
.# s ,
r e- -
~
, e..
.... 10
'll
. "12 -
.o- ;>
!- 13 -
- _ '14'
- i. n ,
- ' 1 LIS.
- 4. .,
16-17.
.e . ';
~
j-' :- 18 .
19 t
[:. ,. - 20.1
.21 ,
l 1 I2 2 -~ ,
3__
. ,z s .
7 f
24 .-
2 5 ' 7,:
.. 4 1..
s ,
l* - -
'(%' j .a .tr
~
- ' .. ,_. . " , ,_ . ". . _ . . . . . - - . . _ . _ . . . - -F E D E R A L ., C O U R. T ,R E P O R T E R S ~ __-, , . _ . . . _ . _ , . _ . _ _ _,
. .- s. p - [. . .
3
- x. .
^ %
y, 8.. ,
^<
l' I N D .E X
, v f'%' d . *y
.2 WITNESSES: JAMEStEDWARD ZWAHR and
' DANIEL Til O M A S WILTERDING
'31
,. 7 Examination.-by,Mr.-Watkins Page 4
.4 -
, 5 , .
. DEPOSITION EXHIBITS PAGE
~~6 -
. Exhib'it Number 1, Repair Process
- ; 7 -Sheet written by Mr. Zwahr, dated 1/16/84 7 8- Exhibit Number 2, RT request ,
9 ,
u .
,f 9: ,
Exhibit; Number 3, Weld Data Card-for
, l'ield Weld 40C -
9 10 ,
s; - %
'[ 12,
~
' ^
?w I3
,5Q.
~
. . 14 o -
s y'g
. s.
e.
16- '
~
w o 17
=
' ~
18'
- I p F g
- 19. . ,
7 . .
- 201 c
N . . _,
^
21 ,
,' e .; 22' .
. ss. -
j=,-i - 23 l ,
i s
g4
- l 1 J, ] --
'.L L . 25 ,
f-A l'-
k
, l' S- ._. l , _ _
_ ,_ FEDERAL. COURT._ REP,OR,TER_S,i _,_,_.__ _ ,_
7 ,
.)
4 ..
~
L 4
,- _ ',, 1
. \
,f 1' , ' JAMES EDWARD.ZWAHR
( ;~y .
q / (,/ . _.22 2-and '
.c q ,
3 , DANIEL;-THOMAS WILTERDING, l
4- the!w'itnesses hereinbefore-named, being first~ duly .
15 ca'itioned land sworn'.'to" testify the truth, the whole >
.m . _ ,
J6 . truth and:nothing-but the truth, testified on their p i '7 onths as follows:
i 8' 3 MR. WATKINS: My name;is McNeill
- 9. Watkins, withothe law firm of. Bishop, Liberman, _ Cook, 10 , 'Purcell: &.Reynolds.* We are counsel for Applicants
~
11 infthis licensing proceeding. .
M .
This is'the prefiled direct' testimonyof 7 ; .12 -
13' ' James Zwahr and Dan Wilterding. Applicants-will g:{[ } . ,
- , 14' present(their testimony as a.paneli 'M r . Zwahr and'
~
15 .Mr.J Wilterding'are-appearinglas witne sses
}
16 ; voluntarily; 'they have not been subpoenaed by any
- 17? party.
~
~ 18 lMR.- WATKINS : Mr. Zwahr, will you
- 19 ' state your full-name, please.
4 4
,/ 20 MR. ZWAHR: James Edward Zwahr.
E- ' 21' MR. WATKINS: Where-are you employed?
22 MR. ZWAHR: Comanche Peak project at d2 3 ' , -Glen Rose.
124 NR. WATKINS: By whom are you employed?-
.,_T(
u j: . .
- _ 25 ,
MR. ZWAHR: Brown & Root.
u-- FE@ ERA 1 @@@RH BGP@@HERS.
-- _ - - ~ - . ..- .- - . . . . - . . ___m-._ -
, .~ .
5
-1 . ,
- 1. ,-
MR. WATKINS What's your title?
TN , .-
~. : . y
? 3 technician five.
- 4- MR. WATKINS: How long have-you been a ,
5' weld' tech five at Comanche Peak? .
c , .
_' MR. 2WAHR: Two and-a-half years.
l[6
'7:
MR. WATKIhS: What department"do you -
- 8 ' work in?
6
~ '
l9- MR. ZWAHR: ,' Welding engineering.
10 ~. M R . WATKINS: Would you briefly 1: [ describe'your duties as a, weld tech five?;
31 s ,
- 12. . MR. 2WAHR:' My duties specifically"are ,
L.
13 to writeLrepair; process sheet's and.the accompanying
, ? l '4 W F M L._, .also. ,
- 15. ..M R . .. WATKINS: Wha t-' is a WFML? ,
11 6- -
MR. ZWAHRa~ < Weld fillNr material log. -
w . .. , ; ,
17- WATKINS . .Is a. repair process if C
'MR. - v
'Y. .'18- sheet: commonly referredJto1by its., acronym,-RPS? '
19-
, [ _[ ' -
MR. ZWAHR: That i 's f correct.'
. ~20- MR.-WATKINS:. Mr.'Wilterding, will you
> : 21. . state your, full name,-please.
s ,
' 22 e. >
MR.-WILTERDING : Danielt Thomas
? 2 3.; Wilterding'.
j < /_Y 24 ,
lMR. WATKINS:..
Where are youLemployed?3 ,
t V. ~~
~ ~
L, 3 25. MR. WILTERDING: : Comanche Peak.-
l .; u ,' ,
7,. .' ,
.n / ;. L -
' ~
' ^~
1 2- -
FEDTtBAfL R@f0 IMP PdTtP@R7?l%2P> -
E 1
_~ _
6-
. 1
,_ MR.-WATKINS: By whom?
i .. >
Us '2:
- MR. WILTERDING: Brown & Root.
. 3. MR. WATKINS: What is your position at
~
.4 -:. Coma nche : Pea k ?
5 ^
f MR. WILTERDING: Welding engineering, 6 weld tech four.
7- MR. WATKINS: How long have you been a 48 weld--tech'four at Comanche Peak? .
9 MR. WILTERDING: Approximately three 4
10 years. ,
11 . MR. WATKINS:. What department do you
-'- 12 fwork_in?
13 ' MR. WILTERDING: 'Wel' ding engineering'.
' }-
14 ,
NR. WATKINS: Would'you briefly 15 . describe your duties.as a weld t e c h '.f o p r ?
- x1 16 MR. WILTERDING: I prepare and[ review 17 ASME'and non-ASM5' piping documentation. i
. 18 MR. WATKINS: Mr. Zwahr, what's the
. 1. .
- 19 ' purpose of.a-repair process _ sheet?
~
[
,20- MR. ZWAUR To set forth thensteps and
'21 guidelines for the~ craft to follow in making a
~
J 22' repair, and also: to document-that repair.
t
[ 123 MR.'WATKINS: _How many RPS's dolyou ys 24' prepare daily at this time? -
t \
o (f
- 25 MR. ZWAHR
- At this time, I.probably t
c.
l ^ _
~. - - __ ,- -
~
7 4
-1 . prepare;1ess than' a dozen'a day.
. ,13 ' .
. (_) 2 MR.. WATKINS: In January 1984 how many 3; RPS's per day were you preparing?
4 MR. ZWAHR: Probably- 15 to 20.
- 5. MRi WAT' KINS: Mr..Zwahr, I show you
^
6 this one-page document that's been identified-as
> :8 7: Zwahr Exhibit 1. .Does your cignature appear 'on that 8 document?
- 9 MR. ZWAHR: Yes, sir,.it,does.
10 MR. WATKINS: Would you describe that 11' document, please?
12' '
MR. ZWAHR: This-is a repair process, p
-13 sheet that I wroteLon January 16,-1984.
d(~4 ~
14 M . WATKINS's To.what weld does that 15 repair.. process' sheet refer? .
16 MR. ZWAHR: lit'appliesLto Field Weld pj Qi.
'17 40C.
n- . .
18 -
.MR.
WATKINS What parts of the RPS. .
19 ,did you prepare?: '
20 e M R . 'Z W A H R :'- I preparedLall_the
" ~
l21 directions, the steps, the" defect'and' descriptions.:
- + -
22 The signatures and dates under " inspection results" Ji ' 23< 'are not mine. ,
7 ., ,_
2'4 > MR. WATKINS: Mr. Wilterding, would
- \ v , ,
j;25 .you:reviewLZwahr ExhibitL.1 and t e ll' ' me if your, -
, _-- s m - -
^
1- -
- z. F E D E R A I/ :C O U R T ..R E P O R T E R S .
', : ' a;,;; ' <~.
8 t
-1 -signature appears on tha t ?- _
y ~g . .
l u/ MR. WILTERDING: Yes, it does.
3 MR. WhTKINS: Where'does it appear?
k 4- MR.~ WILTERDING: Adjacent to the word
- - 5' - '" r e v i e w. " - 4 1 6 MR. WATKINS: Does Ithat indicate that
'7: :you reviewed this RPS?
a' 8 MR. WILTERDING - Yes, it does.
9' MR. WATKINS ,
Mr. Zwahr, why-did you -
10~ prepare this RPS?
11 M R'. ZWAHR:- An RT reject'would have
'12 initiatedithis RPS.
~
13 MR. WATKINS: What does RT stand for?
,{v)
- > '14 MR. ZW AllR : Radiography test.
15- MR. WATKINS: And was it a written.
16 report?
17~ MR. ZWAHR: Yes, it was.
~
'18 MR. WATKINS: I show you a document 19 'that's been' identified as Zwahr Exhibit 2 and~ask.if' 20 youfcan identify it?.
21 -
MR. ZWAHR: This is a request.for RT
-22 for Field Weld 40C on piping 1sometric' drawing 12 3' AF-1-SB-007. It is stamped "rc'ected."
j This is the
,_ 24 , document that triggered my preparation of thefRPS.
V 25 MR. WATKINS: 'When you received this a-'
I i
1 paper, what documents did you gather in order to 2 prepare the RPS?
t 3 MR. Z W AllR : I gathered the weld data 4 card applicable to Field Weld 40C and the isometric 5 drawing that shows the system.
6 MR. WATKINS: I show you a document 7 that has been marked for identification as Zwahr 8 Exhibit 3, and ask if you can identify it?
9 MR. ZWAHR: Yes, sir. That's the weld 10 data card for Field Weld 40C.
11 MR. WATKINS: And if you could compare 12 Exhibit I and see if the RPS refers to the same weld.
- , 1,3 MR. Z W A ll R
- Yes, sir, it does.
14 MR. WATKINS: You testified that in 15 order to prepare the RPS you gathered the' weld data 16 card. How could you be sure you had the weld data 17 card in front of you when you prepared the RPS?
18 MR. ZWAHR: Because I wrote the RPS on 19 the back of the weld data card, which has the RPS
, 20 form on it.
21 MR. WATKINS: Is this a preprinted 22 form?
MR. ZWAHR: Yes, it is.
- 24 MR. WATKINS: And so_the record is 25 clear, the weld-data card is printed on the one side l
i -
\
FEREBAR @@MRT REPORTERS
p_p ,
vy -.
.c
' 10 f y[
,g ,1 >
17 ,
.a nd the-RPS.is on the other?
N '[ '
.i
-( / ,. -2 -
MR. ZWAHR: That's.. correct.
2 M R . :. W A T K I N S : Now, at the time that
+ you received _these documents was'part of the weld
- 5
- data' card already filled-out?
E
~
, 6' MR. ZWAHR: Yes,,thatDis correct.
, 7; MR. WATKINS:
But the RPS was blank?
~8 f MR.'ZWAHR: That's right.
1,V -
Ni 9 MR. WATKINS: What kind'of repair did 10; you specify in the RPS?
11- M R .- ZWAHR: I specified an in-process 12 repair cyc1'e one.
f'V A/ ;
.13 MR. WATKINS: What is an in-process 14 repair?
15 MR. ZWAHR: That's a. repair that is r 16 done before the final ND 's.have been signed off..
19- 'MR. ZWAllR : By having the wcid data 20 card in front of me, I could see that step five and i 21 step six, the final NDE hold points for VT and PT
_22 were blank and not been signed off by Oc.
23 MR.1WATKINS: In the lefthand column j, 24 of the RPS, where it says " Operation Number," there i A._)
L 25 appear a series of steps designated by a number four l
s L RUE
c.-
i 5, 11 w" p s
. s
, , it and then A,-B, C, D, and other letters; is that n'.2 T
2-w
' correct?
3 p. _
MR. ZWAHR: That's true.
- s. x
' MR. WATKINh; 5What does the use of the l
g N
5- number four-signify in connection'with this weld-6 .da).a card?
.7 MR.' ZWAHR : Four indicates that our 8' ~next operational step on returning to the weld data
[' k9 'cadd issgoing.to be five, which I indicated is my
. 10 final step on'thelRPS,' " return to step number five" 11- on the weld data card.
, [12 , MR.,WATKINS: And for.the record,_that
~.. .
s r13 is.=just above.your' signature'at the bottom of:-RPS?
t (w] ~ .
4 14 MR. ZWAHR: Yes.
' - . s .
'> 15. MR. WATKINS: . Mr. Zwahr,-is there.'any
..< s:.
c
. :' 16 way-that'you would :ha've written." return;to step five"
?
11 7 of the ::yeld data cardzhad. stepsfive'on the weld data x , , ,
S 18 d card.-on'the-other side of the RPS already been
, . g ;
?
t.' g, _
~
Y
'19 s i g n e sd ?,',,' ,
74 ,
k20 'MR. ZWAHR- There-is'no way that I fe
~og --
y 21 \b would have written that.hPS that way if' step five y_I ;, .
7 :.~ . w
' f 22J . h a d :. b ee n s i g n e'd ' o f f .
~
I
-MR. WATKINS:. Let me ask-youLa.
7{ 23> _ . # ,
<[ - [24 ? h y p o t.h e t i c a l .' If,"when you reviewed the weld data y
% t g._ .u . s . .
-s
~
- 25. ' car ( in connection-with this repair, step;five or i
m K, ; _ ..."
Tt . ,
w i t .1
.% -4 #-
F
(
l a
- ~A
~^
- e
~
s f
4!'- . d._
+ ' -ppfgrg' g . gg
. . -, - . -- 4
.-y ,
y' ' .? .. ,
12- -'
,n .
0
,t %:' ,
tt <p r ' ,1 : . six:had..already been, signed, would . yo u ' ha ve<- ,.
e ,. . , _
ijf , s :2 ' d e s iglia ted . thi s - a no the r kind,sf repair? T 3 MR. ZWAHR: Yes, sir, I would have.
~
4- (It-wouldLhave no[ longer been an.in-process repair., ,
5' MK. WATKINS: What kind of repair
,. ~
~
4 - - 6. Would~it have been?
7 y MR.; Zh AllR : It would~:.have b e'e n a major .
'8 weld repair, repair cycle one.
=9 MR. WATKINS: In that hypothetical .
~
10 case, would you'have included Oc hold points i n o
+ 11; connection with the repair? ,
12 MR. ZWAHR: Yes, sir, I would. .
l'~i- 13 -
MR. WATKINS- Mr. Zwahr, are- -
A/ ~
14 in-process. repairs procedurally defined?
r 71 5 MR. ZWAHR: .Yes, they are. Inprocess 16 weld ~ repairs are defined by construction procedurc
. 17 CP-CPM 6.9D, section 3.19.1.
18, MR. WATKINS: Mr. Zwahr, I shew you'a 19 one-page document that has been marked as Zwahr 20 Exhibit 4 and ask you to identify.it.
21 MR.,2WAHR: This is a copy of section 22 3 . 1 9 . 1 -~o f CP-CPM 6.9D, which defines inprocess weld 23 repairs.
,j_
'24 MR. WATKINS: Was Exhibit 4 the L/ 25 revision of this procedure that was in effect when ,
_" _- _ FERRBAR C@MMW MR&@MWRBM
\ '
l-13 p . ,_
- f. . . . i
~
you p r epa r ed. .th e RPS for-'Fie,1d Weld 40C7 N. r ,
,M 2..
MR. ZWAHR: Yes,,it was.
o ,
3' MR. WATKINS: Mr. Zwahr, is the
. g e
s .~4 -
preparation.of an RPS-governed by procedure?- ,
.y ;
[
N. , ' - .
5' -
MR. ZWAllR : Yes.
Section 3.3 of a
!f 16 CP-CPM 6.9G provides the procedure for preparing
. .,4 1 \
k ,
- 7 ' Repair Process' Sheets. \
p ,
u T-(
- 8,. MR.'WATKINS: Please identify Zwahr
'4 L.
, /
E9 Exhibit 5,'which 'c o n s i s t s of four pages.
,~ ., t .
10'l '. # MR. ZWAHR: This ,.is a copy of section
., .m s s I ll: f ,
- y ,
n 1.l i- ,
3.3'of C P-C PM . ;6. 9G .
u
?
f ..
t" '= I f"
' ~
W 12'.1 ,
, MIN WATKINS : Was this revision i n V E ,13 effect-when.you prepared toe _RPSt for Field Weld 40C7
~ {'~j.
~
n ~
,_ r T. , ^14 - -
p MR. ZWAllR : Ye s ,' t. si t was.
^(..
.15 _. QjMR. WATKINS: Mr. Wilterding, you_have
<n .
.. . .~
j ,
-16 .tes ti fied 'tha t you _ 're v iewed _- the RPS. .
When you o '
, +
- - ~
,w
- y , ', , . , , _s .
.revi,ewed theiRPS,.did.you also .' review 17 "g
~ .
- 4 the weld, data
+
- . e , .
c .
o18 , scard th a t? wa rd a s s o c i a te d' (wi t h , i t ? .1 aqp: ^ (,
a - 1\. 3 . /, . . . , ,.
~
- < j. . 7 fgg,.WILTERDING:1 u, ' 19 4' , Yes,.I.did.
s /
3 ,ff ' -
l 3
- f r , '.. )
< 20 -
_- MR.;WATKINS:
-What. things:did you.-look j
- y p-s . . ;
q .. ,
' Nfor e wh~en, reviewing [the'RPE"and'the associatedLweld t, c 21' m-
, g w tNi M. '
2 ' -
' ~
"p .
22.. data, card? I
- W x . ,,
,.. 4 23 MR. 'WILTERDING:' I checked to'make
. .. . ' ,~ , 4 -
," i . -
< 2 4' suresthat'the f i n a l; . N D E had not ~been signed off.- I-
/ j ;- . r
'y .s . . .
~
250 o ch e'c k e d; to see that the ,
applicable information from l
). '4 * '
s
'f e .T. _
r gy~ s.y
,f.. *g %' x.
' , u $.=
g-
.[
W ,
r
- vo ,
v'
l:s - -- 7 ; J- '
, o
- .J,.. ...,-(
,4
,x3 ,
- l' ithe frontlof the.-weld 1 data card was transferred to
. .L 4 2' .the :back , .tha t e. in f o rma ti on from the RT reject ~,
1 5 ' 3:
referring,to the defect, was properly transcribed on j.4 .the repair process sheet, and that the hold points
[>
Si were'. correct.
6 M R'. WATKINS: .Mr..Wilterding, is it
- s 4 . w. . 7 clear tol.you > tha t had step;five or step six, the 4 8 ' final'VT or final PT in connection with the weld 9 data card,-already been signed,'that that would have 10 ~made'a difference in your review? -
l11 MR.-WILTERDING: It would have made_a 3 12 world-of difference.
[3 13 MR. WATKINS: And is'that.something U- ,
14 J for which you specifically looked when you reviewed
^
15 the weld data card'and RPS?
16 MR. WILTERDING: That is correct.
117- MR. WATKINS: Mr. Wilterding, do you 18 :know a QC inspector named Jack Stanford?
- 19' ,
MR. WILTERDING: I cannot put the name 20 with a face.
- .21 MR. WATKINS: Mr. Zwahr, do you know a
- 22 OC-inspector named Jack Stanford?
'2 3 ' MR.-ZWAHR: No, I don't. .
. 24. MR. . WATKINS: Mr. Wilterding, have you
-,C .
'25 1 ever discussed thisLRPS or the weld data card with l
L / 9MMMMBR C@ MBT REBORTERS
__. .~ , - - - .- -
~
35
- l- - any QC inspector? j
. (3 '
MR. WIfTERDING:
(J 2 I have not.
3 MR. WATKINS: Mr. Zwahr, have you
'. .k
.,4 discussed this RPS or this weld data card with any t- !
- 5. QC inspector? i
/
t' '6 -
NR. ZWAllR : No, sir, I have not.
7' MR..WATKINS: Mr. Wilterding, do you a
8
~
<9 .with"any~ person'in the QA/QC organization at any 10 time? .
._ 11
, MR. WILTERDING: I do not.
- ^
-1 2 MR. WATKINS: Mr. Zwahr, do.you
~
- (j 13: remember.having'any conversations with anyone in the
. q,- s
. 14 QA/QC' organization'regarding this RPS or its
~
' ' 1_
15 '
_ associated, weld data card after it.was prepared?
>g .
I
_ y V- -16 ,
MR. ZW AllR : No, sir, I do not.
_3
~"
. 217' MR. WATKINS: Does that conclude-your
~ 18 ' testimony, gentlemen? - ^
. .. 19 MR. ZWAllR : Yes, it does'.
r ,
20
~
~ -
MR. WILTERDI,NG: .Yes.
- 2-211 - *
~ "' ^
22' r '.
b
't A g
-W. . . -
.24 j
, s.x g <
.+,
a - ,9 3
~ n,,
. , .* f '*$._ ,
3 "4 3 S., .
= ,.
-- .. _ ; . . ~ . .- - . , ,
a
- t. +
9, g 9
- - i 1(,
, s. .
' 1. . { I J
,O "
-?' 2 \'s f
a . :,
3 ii 4- I, JAMES E.';ZWAHR, have read th foregoing -
m %
f
- ~5 deposition and hereby affix-my signature that same.
6 is~true'and correct, except:as noted herein.
.7
- 8-
.9 JAMES'E. ZWAHR 10 '
~ J11
-12. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to'before me this the
-Q ^
b' 13 day of _
,-1984.
' 14,
- - 15 -
16 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS 17 18 19 My commission expires:
e 20 v-4 21 22 l 23 l' O l.
24
! 25
~
1
^ " "' ~~
5 j l,
= DALLAS,1 TEXAS
~
, Y .,
.j
- p. . a T
4 . ,
17
- s ,
[ ; a 1 ' STATE OF : TEXAS ) ;
~~ 2 COUNTY OP DALLAS ) l
- ; g 33
^
[t '4 LI,-Janet E. Schaffer, RPR, Certified I t^ Shorthand Reporter in and for.the State of Texas, p ;
do hereby. certify that there came before me on'the
.: h 15th' day o'f August, _
A. D., 1984, .a t the Glen Rose ,
F: *8' ' Motor Inn, Glen-Rose, Texas, the following' named
- c. . - .. ..
. person, to-Wits JAMES E. . ZWAHR, who- was by me duly:
s9 .
'10 ~ ' tsworn to testify-the: truth and nothing but the.
- 7 11 >' truth of his knowledgejtouching and concerning the 12 matters in. controversy in.this causes and that he
- () -
m
'13 wast.thereupon, examined upon'his oath.and his w , .
u Nf 114 -
examination reduced to writings same to be'-sworn 15 -
- to andisubscribed by said. witness-ibefore any
. , .+ , ,
.J'~ 16 '. Notary Public.
- - m .w ,
17 g y ,
I further certify.Lthat I am neither attorneyr
~
a' , -: 18 .
3 nu <
. m . .
y 19 o r.: counsel for, nor related to-or employed.by, any kW , ~
.. L -..
$20 :offthe; parties;to the'~ action'in,which this ,
f' - '21 deposition-is taken, and further that I.amlnot -
a v .
L, s22 relative or'. employee of-any1 attorney or counsel' w
.a . .: . .. .. .
/ employed by.the parties hereto,sor financially
- . .? .. l-
, a 123 i, 4 JQ; 1 24 . intierested inithe action. -
v, ..
b < , '#*
h,_f -
25 , .
_,_^ ' '_
+ v , .
' ^ - P - ,
_f ,
r
- . q, ,
L
- i. ,_
^ ~ ' . _ .
+'
-E. a . DALLAS,-TEXAS: ,
. J'4l L- , , .
.x,
..:w ,
w , : -- <
- .j . 1 3g .
g+;
g
' tj-i ,
, _'l . In-witness whereof, I- have - he reunto' set' my 4 a-
- .Q .- , .
1 .
' J2C , hand'and affixed my-seal this~ 15thYday of August,-
~
U- 3 'A.D.,n1984. - .
~
e :4 +
5 License Expires r ,
.,, ;6 ' December 31,-1985
- CSR~No. 1453
~
1
-c ;7 JANET.E.-SCHAFFER, RPR,=CSR
^
=
4 IN AND FOR THE STATE.OF TEXAS-
"8 1226 Commerce, Suite *411
' Dallas, Texas 75202
< 9- -(214) 742-3035 .,
~
.l0 1 .
P 11 ~
12 n, . )
13 _
s- s a
v 14 ,
15; 16 _
-17
~
,18
- 19 20
., 21 .
s 41 23 r3 24 25 -
L 1 I
1
+
^ ~
~~ ~ ~~ ~ "
T'CEPORTERS
'FEDERAU'COUh'\"YAR DALLASi T a.
19 e g-. n [-
3 .
3 \.
3
~ I, DANIEL,T. WILTERDING, have read the foregoing 3
l.. . .
5 deposition and hereby affix my signature that same 3, -
16 Jia true and correct, except as noted herein.
\
.J i t
8 ,
4 9 DANIEL T. WILTERDING.
a
.t
- 10 ,
f<<' -
, 11 t
\
.Ev)-
12 SUBSCRIBED-AND' SWORN:to before meLthis the >
1 _t
~13 1 day of '
,s19h4.- g 4
14 ~
'. i.
16 NOTARY-PUBLIC IN AND FOR THS ~
STATE OF TEXAS' 17 ,
- l' 4 18 -
<\ ,"'
i \
- 19 ,.My commission ~ expires:: A' '
M,
- \ .
-20
'(
=b ,
- s. '
e ,-
I ' . 22
- s.
~.2 3 -
-t'
!' 24 .
, r , :-
-:(') . .gg
~.
- i; PBDBRAECOURT-RRPORTERS
~
> 6 t' ; DALLAS,' TEXAS- .
~
F V ,
5 y ,
S e y.'
-1 STATE. OF.
.- ' TEXAS ) -
y* .- .
= ^ -
.);
' yy. * . -2 -COUNTYLOP. DALLAS yn -
~
- 3 . -
, u
.4 I,. Janet'E.'ichafferi.RPR, Certified
" . e 5 ! Shorthand Reporter inland for the State of Texas, ,
6 '[do hereby certify that therefcame'before me on'the I 7 -15th day of August, A. D., 1984, at-the Glen Rose
, '8 Motor Inn, Glen Rose, Texas, the'following named d
-9 ' person, to-wit DANIEL T. WILTERDING, who wasnby g,
10 me duly: sworn to-testify the truth and nothing but-
~
11 1 the truth of his knowledge touching and concerning-
.12 the.' matters in' controversy.in.this1cause; and that~
13 he-wasfthereupon examined uponfhis oath and his e
p'x>
14 examinat' ion reduced _to writing; sane to be sworn 15 to and: subscribed by said witness before any 16 Notary'Public.
17 1
^
18 ,I further certify that I am neither attorney 19 or counsel for, nor related to or employed by, any *
=20 of the parties to the action in which this 21 deposition is taken, and further~that I am not a
- 22 relative or employee of any attorney or counsel m 1 23 employed by the parties-hereto, or financially 24 interested in the action.
Th 4 25 V
FEDERAL-COURT-REPORTERS D A L LA S ,' TEXAS Ls - a
~
g.g
'l In witness whereof, I have. hereunto set my 2 biand.and affixed'my~ seal'this 15th day of August,
,h- ,
+
- 3 ~A.D., 1984..
l 4 5 '
License Expires:
6 -
December 31, 1985 ,
CSR No. 1453 7 JANET.E. SCHAFFER, RPR, CSR IN AND'FOR.THE' STATE OF TEXAS' 8 1226 Commerce, Suite 411 Dallas, Texas. 75202 2 (214) 742-3035-10 11 12 13 -
')
f
- ~ -14
- 15
- 16 -
t o; 17 +
~
18 i.,
-19 r,
,, u <
b ,
20
~
- .(
e 21 22
- s 123 ,
24 +-
' 7-m,- , 25 8 ); - -
}. '
F-BDERAL-COURT-REPORTERS t
DALLAS,' TEXAS .
o _ :'
L, w .i. % r.s ., a.s) e .~ i Change affects syste::t t' urn:, ,,__ j .
'over ind clearsneo cust be obtai-nsd from the Startup EE? AIR EECCEIS SHEET WCCOrniingScrial No.//f-/-f No. @lh I!ald No./2z'/. </d(f, Engineer prior to' starting '
work. .e
// de/8dT .8df6 g .rg g g g 7 g pfg gjg'ig[ / DESCRIPTION OF CEFECT (SKETCH) ,, .- , , .
q'-bl4 'B :f6ffd/Mb!/H/ 7A//3
. . - . . . n , , - ,;
1 =. 53/ 42&'o' bi2WY. ,S/0AE . .. . e,Lm, ya%-
fg' -1//CDT <l-6i 6 ~ Eaf/Z~d lB' %'JE
$L6 'Ooge t< ~-cm y' W[verYh A i
s.c INSTALLATION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURES REFERENCED IN CPM 6.11 !
! @L1 POINTS =$= IM5P-GiiGN R sVLis (5IGN AND DATE) 7 OPER. OPERATION WT QC, ANL CCM,. or -
! NO. =U
- t.! VEL
- ~
/44tdEtDA14d6A LEf/7/L : I 4/7 lfJ99' 0 07 lX AN1 AA , < ra i-n..ui
_fA\$l/'AD lX AM KA l 2 t: %//t-n-N l
}f W7//7BGI'/M 'X l NA l NA l lSzs R D N H & % pt.1C
> dD GML:4TEElmirs X NA NA l%w C e %-u.s l 0 4E BLEW -
X NA NA \.
l sn~ t P,A% t-16-s4 z- l,'- x- + l
_4 f /FfnE4r X XA NA -
l Sc' iwi% HWI -
%464tdEU):%2:2% NC AM A%
'd// l6raDUVA'D .f4 K4 K4l -
. JI FM4L vr -
lx .NA NA l l St. %d t- asil \ ~~~
0 )
lfEZZ/FN m_JTEPW.5 VfLEDl' 1 l 1ffEf:Q2., -%?ADAlk/PA l l \
- ~
~~i (Enstd?/R swi>Z L -
w,.h-d l \ l - -
i l X/ l l I I I I
. i + 11 HAT l t 'It .Y l
~
l i 1 l l
~
I I l l l 1 -
l l I -
1 I I l I I l ll h I i j i
i
.4fdd - 'A'7/fy : .
' ANT GaH mn
- DEPOSITION
. . VE OC r, i n- n ,. .em - u 1 m.i, . . == im n. .. EXHIBli L 2 ant /
.U.-:* T.' u".". T x:e. .= =. m ,. l i
s2071 -
n ..
/
A F~ c. c.
~
Date Joint Welded O Quality Assura0Ce Final
. FIL TO; 4
helding En'g'iMerih - hformation On l
~
n REGUEST FOR RT- .
~
- OATE
~
FLAGGED BY @ DATE REQUESTED BY..
t PRIORITY
//07 JGd
~
DRAWING ISO bO7 UNEOb'8 DOI'd WELD &- b (Rl
~
"REVIOUS RT LOG NUMBER IF A REPAIR i o _(IN.) JOINT DESIGN:
PlP DIAMETER WALL THICKNESS * *-
(LN.) OPEN BUTT h f
MATERIAL TYPE 8 INSERT O BACKING RING O 4
PIPING SYSTEM CLASS -
WELD PROCEDURE //O/O WELDER'S SYMBOL (S) [oCT*
-m b
LEAcor- AFK AMS - '
p . .
s.
g' _,
STA3E OF MANUFACTURING
[ .
1 INFORMATION ONLY (Al REPAIR INTERMEDIATE COMPLETED ROOT 0' _ DEPOSITION AREA (S! / ' EXHIBIT
[ SWAya
- 2. RT BEFORE STRESS I
f -
tl J> ~
- 3. ROOT f _
l J. REPAIR -
AREA (S)
$.' FINAL LOCATION Oh7 ' NN.
BY DATE /" /8 ~
LOG NUMBER: ACCEPTED d
)~ RbECTED 4-L - S. - e A &-8
- d: jf,.),-l- y_-f, p , c,...L 4 4 ~ ,,9y w , n 7Z,15 , g , n,
W N QUZRED ,
4,
, , dhvige Effects cyste::1 turn-
. .aSTANON TO BE IN *
. F {hJ S
C 6
@ L tu eer prior to~, , starting WELO CATA CARD - Orawing No. $bl-$8-CQ7 R j
' l DEPOSITION l '~. - . .-
'4eid No.- F7Qd6G I N'" s~ *. *' -
j "k;JQ EXHIBIT - -
- u. .
//00D 7/ O CLASS /ACC. STD.
M, TG-(-om ,ao%3 non _gjp , Am E i:i
// d/ o /O M, f1 CPM 6.9 POSNE.0 MEAT Dil!XTMW
]~
$5 MTEA' L/!-d('r.* r2 pr 7 -7J to HTi /Jb TINE NA Hrs.. *~~~' E P. "~NA 'F PC i ItT o'-n to FCI w.7, to P i /Hr.
~
Pi / / HEATING RATE NA NA
~
, y 73 SPECIFICATION WP37DM 6.9D dd. UT 9l QI-QAP/REV VT/11.1-26 PT 10.2-1 MT/10.2-2 RT/10.2-3 .
[ *Ar(5) M.ii.5. CALIS. QC WELD FILLER MATE.i!AL REQUIRED
' 4' CUE DATE GC VERLF. \ t MC t /HWr/ tvau-Sm i.uitu/+vIhGoi Cl.AS5 E >% .7.
3 ATE: ! 4 f IFILL CLASS Chp? '
l l CLAS5 C >ciEr _few/ t-r3 '
i CLASS -
.. NIES:, (1 Applicaole QC/ANI nola points.snalI ca incicatec Oy enecx::.arx 7 .
j (2 ANI inspection points indicated b) (X). : .c _ ._
' (3 Denote Satisfactory inseection by an "S"; Unsatisfac'.ory'_inseections by a "UN
~
l%
pS g .} .
, .; ;, . . ,. fR000GTION RELEASE.,, ,.
g, ,
, CPER. OPERATION MOLO POINTS CCN SAT. INSPECTION RESULTS (5IGN AND OATE)
.Q_ UNSAT. LE'/EL
.I Verifv cut i NA W ,
Y SW/?/-2-N . --
( 2 CTeaniiness NA / JLY, ()ds NdfR/ l-3-94 Z
~2 3 iitu? NA /
k // $ ? N i v h M o d
. i. ,i
.1c jf 57 /r /n /a., .
1l .
4 Prthest KA l' A lt', x /k1]sV/Ji/is/90- w -
. 5 Final VT NA / g)( ,,h&g h ) t h/ WN 27
$$N b W ]l9 W
- - . G. Ed f/h /JA \ AK t L Ve5ny)$hdNuv I-3-04 Y l N$ $ hA-ty 4A dl.', a /JA N Ak*> $ 1 b % b A /A>/91 .1% l
- 4 % ) f]W'A;8Gdi:u/SM l'
&i%
' ~ 5)l1 M 0 W D n n v 4 nord tu errer N thuu
?
ttle A
- O963 0/' !/ '
uEiU' N //ix/d OC !$D W hfant & $ as $628)&
t .
A;;roval stag in e.sca signatures secuenes.shall' becyc.j affixed en y) th' li6e hueciately heleg)jie i ~l2>38 V S l
s p.N /y. r C43 t-3-e
- . - - . - . .. p t., - ,n , :,. . , s . . ,,s. s ., ., . y,, ,- ,,
PROCEDURE EFFECT1VE EROWN & ROOT, INC. NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES
/
J JOB 35-1195 JAN y g ,
CP-CPM 6.9D 6 35 of 58 _.
3.19.1 In Process Weld Repairs Q
In process repairs shall be defined as those discovered prior to final code required NDE.
All major weld defects discovered before final inspection shall be evaluated by the PWE who may generate an RPS operational sequence at his discretion.
NOTE: Through wall repairs or those where 1/8 inch or less metal remains shall require an RPS. )
The removal of starts and stops and slag, etc. may be routinely ground out during the welding process. No .
documentation is required.
When weld _ defects are discovered before final inspection '
(In process), and operational steps are not defined by the PWE, the following operational steps may be used to affect reworking:
- - Grind as required to remove defects within the guidelines of this procedure.
Perform information PT or MI
- Reweld utilizing original welding procedure
- Grind and fair deposited area into the surrounding metal surface
- Reinspect utilizing the original NDE method and acceptance criteria for information unless defined otherwise by the PWE.
3.19.2 Weld Metal Repairs 3.19.2.1 Maior Defects
. BOP,Q The following defects discovered during or after final code required NDE shall be classified as " Major Repairs":
- 1. All cracks and/or linear defects identified during the final inspection of a weld joint.
- 2. Cracks, that are repaired and then reappear after the repair.
O DEPOSITION f EXHIBIT
) 2nLv 4 N N
n
_,e.. ..-- . .
. .: w
.w_ . . _ _ ~ _ ~ . __w m _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ _ , _ _ . _ _ .
J BROWN & ROOT, INC. PROCEDURE ISSUE
_1 CPSES NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE JOB 35-1195 g~ ~ '
CP-CPM 6.9G 5 3/1/83 9 of' 19 '
NOTE 7: Required holdpoint and inspection point operations shall be performed by the group defined on the WDC .
I or RPS in the order dhown from left to right (i.e...
I if an operational sequence requires WT and QC holdpoints, the WT inspection shall occur before QC inspection)..
NOTE 8: Delta ferrite checks shall be performed as required
' by Appendix 6.9D.
NOTE 9: Line, ~ drawing no. , weld no.(s), and fabrication code and class entires shall be made on WDCs and MWDCs, as applicable.
NOTE 10: Upon acceptable completion of the WDC(s), the individual reviewing the above entries shall denote
" Review" immediately below the last operational sequence and sign and date in the "WE" column.
For B0P WDC's a line may be skipped.
3.2.1 Pre-established Repair Sequence (0'ptional - In Process)_
3
- 1. A pre-established repair sequence may be added at the direction of the PWE below final NDE. Signoffs for .
review shall be made below such sequence. Normally the pre-established sequence will contain the following operations:
3 DEPOSITION '
EXHIBIT
- a. Excavate defect.
l
$ld2b't 5 j b. Perform Info PT.
nimummmmmmmmmmem
)'
- c. Evaluate excavation and attach a sketch to the WDC and return to Welding Engineering.
- 2. In the event that this pre-established repair sequence J is not used, all steps may be marked N/A by the PWE in i the " Inspection Results" column.
t -
3.2.2 The WDC shall reflect the revision and ICN's which are current at the time welding is started. Revision changes which occur after welding has started, but prior to completion of the item, will be documented on the WFML.
3.3 REPAIR PROCESS SHEET i
i Welds requiring rewelding which were rejected after final r.
inspection, all " major" repairs, and all base metal repairs J requiring welding shall be documented on the RPS, Figure CP-CPM 6.9G Rev. 5 DCN 2 8/1/83 Sheet 2d
- _ - _ _ - . _ - , _ _- -_ _ - - ,_ n . ----
t.;
d PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE y= BROWN & ROOT, INC.
NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE
,f {h l . CPSES Ik .
3 S /83- MdM fw ,
- JOB 35-1195 . , , .
(or continuation sheet). The RPS is normally 6.9G-4 j reproduced on the back of the WDC. Specific requirements 1
by classification of repairs are given in Appendix 6.9D.
Section 3. Before defining each repair operation sequence,
?-
the repair type shall be defined (i.e. Base Metal Repair, In-Process Repair, Cosmetic Repair, . Major Weld Repair).
The' applicable repair operations shall be established and approved before proceeding with the repair work. ,
j NOTE 1: For socket,' component supports, and pipe butt welds 1 using the MWDCs and WDCs, the first repair sequence
[ may be defined for each weld before initial issuance .
of the card. Should the repair not be required, the
~
-i
- t appropriate ~s ignoff areas are marked N/A by the cognizant QC Inspector or WT and initialed and v.u .
dated..
. %.;;.':; w ., ,
'~0 ,
,2 ,;
~. ~
s : .f
'1,. 3 x . . _ , ,
The repair.~ work Land the inspection' holdpoints on'^ '4
.- < .' . NOTE 2:
. Q ,7 - . . :<: ,, - the RPS'must be totally' completed (signed) by the r ~-1/
.[
-- QC Inspector. When the repair is complete and the T RPS is signed, work may continue to the next; 4
- i
. sequential step on the front of the WDC or MWDC.
4 i 1. The rejectable operation identified on the front'of the ~ -
! WDC is marked "U" for unsatisfactory and' signed and dated by the QC Inspector before continuing to the RPS operational repair sequence.
- ! 2. - Each major welded repair (excluding in-process welds)
!.d. shall be numbered consecutively as R-l', R-2, etc. This shall be . stated next to the repair type before the Lk first operational step. Operation designations shall lh
'g be " operation number" of the rejectable operation on the
.D front of the WDC suffixed by an A, B, C, etc. In-process welds will be sequentially number IP-1 IP-2, etc.
i'p if _
f
~[ 3. Should an ' operational step ' result' in a rejectable a
condition that cannot be considered an in-process repair,
,, then one shall be added to the repair number and this shall be affixed prior to the next operational sequence,
, i.e.:
j 1
4 .9-5J 1 !
~ #
'NM [,, ,,. ,,
,g -
v wp ~. .~ :,. ..r. .-
ws... . . / . u ,. w.u. w . .__a. . , _ . . . ,_
PROCEDURE EFFECTIVE BROWN & ROOT, INC. NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE CPSES
,h, JOB 3'5-1195~
~
i j
R-1 Major Weld Repair i 7A Grind defect i 7B PT excavation 7C Fill per WPS 88023 7D Grind for NDE inter-pretation
! 7E Perfonn final RT "U" 7F Remove Purge Dam N/A I R-2 Majoi- Weld Repair .
! 7A Grind defect f
7B PT excavation 7C Fill per WPS 88023 1
- 4. In a given operational sequence, steps that are not to be used may be marked "N/A" in the Inspection Results section by ,the PWE.. . ,
, 5.- Upon canpletion .of a given operational' sequence, work .
.shall proceed to the next succeeding step on the front
.)
of the WDC 1.e., Step 70 is the last operational step l
which includes signoff for required final NDE. -. .
On the Weld Data Card, Step 8 is the next step after signoff of the required NDE, as required by the last step on the RPS.
3.3.1 Required Approvals l
j Base metal repair - ANI, WE, G&H
'i j; Approval signatures and dates shall be affixed in the appropriate column of the RPS directly below the last i
operation step defined. On l'dDC's, sequences for several
- - welds may be defined before affixing of approval signatures at the end of the last operation defined.
, NOTE: A repair cycle shall be defined as operations on i a weld after a rejectable code-required final NDE
< that results in either an acceptable or rejectable additional code-required final NDE.
l
. . - - , . . . . m '
1 --
- m
- n m n .*m: .~ ~ w : =m . : y . c > . - .r. : . a. . .. . a,=-;,
- s. . . , .. ~ x . ,.
3 t
- t. i BROWN &RdOT,INC.- PROCEDURE ISSUE I d . CPSES:.
4 JOB 35-1195,
'. NUMBER REVISION DATE PAGE' '
.[
,O
' Q!' "'~ ' "
.s c.
CP-CPM 6.9G 5 "1 ^3/D83' 12 of 19' 1
i e ~
The repair number on applicable RPS's shall be advanced only under these circumstances unless -
determined otherwise by the PWE.
- g 3.3.2 Repair Process Sheet Initiation ,
y .
[ The Repair Process Sheet shall be completed and verified as
- follows for repairs to ASME items:
- 1. The WDC Serial No! (where applicable), drawing no., and
~i weld no, shall be entered at the top right corner. For 5
J component support applications, both the component
.L support drawing number and the applicable piping isometric
+ drawing number shall be provided. For base metal defects, .
(I the spool number shall be entered. .
8
~ ^~
3.3.3 l - Weld Metal Repairs' : < - -
4 W ; p~ - -
' a: s ' ,q g y . a ~A : wk . ~ , . ., .
.D ; . - IL Required,ap.provals? insp'ections and !oldpoints shall> @@
t/ '
j p, 1
", + ;m D;ggm?Jm e be established as' delineated in Table 6.9G-2, required M' ' '
F lu ^~i._ , examination, QC holdpoints, and approvals required for '
repairs to ASME Section III, Subsection NB, NC, ND. -
For Subsection NF, see Table 6.9G-3, Note 6, page 3 of '3.
, c ,
b 2. The Repair Process Sheet shall descrd be the defects,
-p including sketches or attachments (i.e., overlays) in order to adequately locate the defect (s) at a later date.
.j completed, verify that in addition to the weld repair
as required by Table 6.9Gl. If a delta ferrite check l , j;.
, is required, verify that " Delta Ferrite Check" has been i entered.-
!i 4. The repair cycle (the number of repairs to this weld) shall be noted. Requirements for more than two repairs t _.
- f are given in Appendix 6.90.
l 5. If all items on the RPS have been acceptably completed,
,-4 the originator shall denote " Final Acceptance" on the <
line inmediately below the last entry and sign and date
- j. in the appropriate column. The applicable documentation shall then be transferred to QA for QA/ review /ANI review /
, j l 3 ,
approval, as required.
1 m
i l d.)
, , . m, . .. . , _ . . ,_....~ _ m _
.. .. . wm ,
~CP-CFM 6.9G Rev. 5 DCN 82'., ~
8/1/83 Sheet 3'of 8-l