ML20082D990
| ML20082D990 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 05/26/1988 |
| From: | ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20081E364 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-90-570 73AC-OZZ29, NUDOCS 9107300227 | |
| Download: ML20082D990 (51) | |
Text
_. _ _ _. _. _. _.. _ _ _ _ _. _
~}
M,;.
'i PALO VERDE NUCLEA.R GENERATING g ccome
(,
STATION MA'NUAL 73Ac-ozz29 REVISIOff ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 1 of 48 s
3 AUTHOR Gary Valdrep'
.+
REVISED BY
- Gary Valdrep EXT.
3528 TECH. REVIEVER dihi DATE d
PRG/TRRG REVIEW Y ~~
DATE M
-FINAL APPROVAL
/~
$/
k'd//)
y 7
i i
' EFFECTIVE DATE (DDC only)
DN-0676C/0111C ASSIGNED COPY NUMBER (DDC only) nucco etwn un 9107300227 910603
, _,,, p' (
) 'l
\\'I
' i:
u PDR F01 A '
PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING
@cEcune
{,
1 STA~ 'ON NlANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 2 of 51 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NUMBER 1.0 PURPOSE 1
3
2.0 REFERENCES
3 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS S
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 11 5.0 INSTRUCTIONS 17 5.1 General 5.2 EER Initiation 17 5.3 EER Resolution 19 5.3;1 EER Validation 20 g
5.3.2 Priority 20
(
5.3.3 EER Transfer 20 5.3.4 Interim Resolution 22 5.3.5 EER Disposition 22 5.3.6 Field Disposition 24 5.4 Approval / Closure 32 33 APPENDICES Appendix A - EER Form 37 Appendix B - Priority Codes 41 Appendix C - Equipment Qualification Guideline 42 Appendix D - Table for Component Identification Code 43 Appendix E - Design Basis Definition 44 Appendix F - EER Completion Guide 46 I.
s mme mo nev e n au
u.
m PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING g Cewas e
STATION MANUAL 73Ac-0ZZ29 REVISION -
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 3 of 51 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 This procedure provides a means for:
1.1.1 Requesting technical clarification and/or an evaluation from Engineering Evaluation Department, Systems Department.
or the Operations Computer i
1.1.2 Addressing Potential Nonconformances found within the plant.
1.1.3 Requesting a root cause evaluation for component or equipment failures.
1.1.4 Addressing evaluations of part and/or material substitution on non quality related systems, components and structures.
1.1.5 Addressing conditionally released warehouse parts discrepancies which cannot be resolved by the Warehouse Deficiency Notice.
f
2.0 REFERENCES
.(:
2.1 Implementing References 2.1.1 RRM01.04, Record / Document Turnover Control 2.1.2 PS03.06, Control of Safeguard Information 2.1.3 79AC-9ZZ07,10CFR50.59 Review and Evaluation 2.1.4 MS02.02, Surplus, Salvage and Scrap 2.1.5 QA03.04 Quality Assurance Trend A..alysis 2.1.6 30AC-92201, Work Control 2.1.7 73AC-9ZZ31, Technical Input and Review Checklist 2.1.8 ES03.02, Quality Classification of Structures, Systems and Components 2.1.9 EEDG.42, Root Cause Determinatin:.
3 g
PV216 000 REv 8 82 584 A
~~~~~
a PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING f/gctouRe
{
STATION MA' NUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 4 of 51 I
2.2 Developmental References 2.2.1 ANSI-N 18.7-1976, Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational phase of Nuclear Power Plants.
2.2.2 NRC Generic Letter 86-15 2.2.3 Technical Specificat40:is'Section 6.5 2.2.4 79AC-92Z08, Post Trip Review Reporting Rev. 4 2.2.5 ES01.03, PVNGS Failure Data Trending Procedure Rev.
0 2.2.6 40AC-9ZZO2, Csuduct of Shif t Operations Rev. 8 2.2.7 70AC-0ZZ01, Procedure Writer's llandbook Rev. 8 2.2.8 ANSI-N 45.2.11-1974, QA Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Pls
[~
2.2.9
(
Ops QA Criterion Manual-Nonconforming Materials, Parts or Components
- 2. '. 10 ANSI N45.2.10-1973, QA Terms and Definitions 2.2,11 73AC-9ZZ05, Temporary Modification Control Rev. 4 2.2.12 ES06.08, Review of Conditions Adverse to Quality for 10CFR21 Rev. O.
-2.2.13 ES06.07, Non-Routino Reporting Rev. 0 2.2.14 LCTS:
036316 036324 i
l 036888 l
l W716 EO RCY f Q M4A w_
M PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING 7CEWRE
(
STATION MANUAL 73AC-ozz29 REVIN N ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 5 of 51 3.0 DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS' 3.1 DefLnitions 3.1.1 Design Changes --free-BELOW 3.1.1.1 Plant Modification - A planned change to the Form, Fit, or Function of any c,omponent or system for PVNGS and as required by Technical Specifications 6.5.2.3, requires Plant Manager approval.
It is implemented by one of the following:
A.
Design Change Package, (DCP) - A change which involves the addition, deletion, or functional design modification of any component, system or structure, where the design basis is changed. The DCP also may be used to make design changes when design basis is not changed. Design Changes are initiated through the Plant Change-Request (PCR) program and include
(.
but are not limited to, the following:
(
Replacement of components or parts with items whose design characteristics are not engineering equivalents Tf~eQD(mot;nieep the form, fit and I function) of the original items.
Changes to environmental and seismic qualification requirem'ents, or changes to stress, thermal, hydraulic, or radi7ation analyses of structures, systems or components.
Changes to drawings due to discrepancies found between the drawings and the facility as constructed.
Changes in the purpose and/or application of a structure, system or component which modify the parameters under which it was intended to perform its function, even though such changes require no physical work.
B.
Site Modification - A plant change requ' iring limited engineering and planning, which does not change the design basis without prior Engineering approval, and which is also small and noncomplex, having a total installed cost of less than $100,000 per unit.
- - ~
M PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING Tceoune
(
STATION MANUAL 73AC-ozz29 i
REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST Page 6 of 51 Engineering Eval'uated Modifications - A change that C,
does modify the functional operation of any component, system, or structure and does require an engineering evaluation to verify that the change will-not change the design bases of the facility. Changes in this category are initiated through an identified Nonconforming Condition (EER/NC) or an EER documenting a design deviation (for non quality-related equipment).
l
...,, -. g g, 3 This type of disposit-lon shall only be utilized toy
-/
evaluate Nonconformance Conditions for Quality
' Ac e,f. /),r.d'~
Related, (QR), or design deviations for Non-Quality din /V Related, (NQR) found in installed equipment, and I
shall not be used to 1pitiate design changes, via the EER process.
This disposition also can only be used for changes-which do not affect any As-built drawings or Inservice procedures (OP's, ST's, TP's, etc),
If the plant change does require a change to the above documents it shall be performed as a Site
'{
Mod.
3.1.1.2 Design Equivalent Channe - A change that does not modify the functional operation of any component, system or structure, and docs-not modify the form, fit or function of any component or equipment.
Changes in this category are initiated through the EER, MEE, CCE, or ECE, and include the replacement, equivalency evaluation and procurement process'for spara parts and components.
Examples of a Design Equivalent Change-are:
~
h 4
l e
l PV216 mD HEV 4 U H8A 1
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING f/o ccoune
(,
STATION MANUAL 73AC-ozz29 R
REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 7 of 51 NOTE The form, fit, or function cannot be af fected for the change to be cor.iidered a Design Equivalent Change.
Setpoint changes within the range specified in the design document Gasket material type changes Lubrication
'in ation Material substitutions Equipment upgrade Part number to be installed is different than that specified in the design document Replacement of one type of scaling material with an acceptable substitute New part has replaced the old design Like for like component replacement Vendor has provided new design which is intended as an equivalent replacement for previous design
(-
_1_Ph 3.1.2 Fcrmi ysical characteristics i
As specified in the Design Basis, only critical characteristics (not physical appearance), as identified in the specifications / requirements (design basis).
For Example:
Effects on the selsraic calculations due to changes in thd weight of the component 3.1.3 Fit:
Interface characteristics Adaptability to related equipment Interconnection, in the assembly of parts / pieces Conformance with surroundings
]-
Ability to insert or adjust as specified by the existing design
3.1.4 Function
Performance characteristics Does not alter the action or output as detailed in the design basis Action for which the component is Required output of the device intended to perform Ability of the system to perform or create the desired ou'put k
n e*V2'6 00 P(V t'82 54 4 A
\\
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING flgccount
{
STATION MANUAL 73Ac-ozz29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 8 of 51 Ng If in doubt if thu plant change constitutes a derign change, consult with your supervisor or manager.
3.1.5 Accept-As-Is - A disposition which may be imposed for a Nonconformance Condition or Design Deviation when it
!=
established that the discropancy will result la no adverse conditions and that the item under consideration will continue to meet all engineering functional requirements even though the item does not conform to the original Design Requirement including performance, maintainability, fit, and safety.
The component, system, structure must still be verified to meet the original design basis.
NOTE The difference between a repair and an
(
Accept-As-Is disposition is that Repair
(
specifies that a change can be made and Accept-As-Is authorines a change already known to exist.
In all cases, both allow deviation from the Design Requirement and must verify that the original design basis is maintained.
3.1.6 Repair - The process of restoring a Nonconformance Condition or Design Deviation to a'cond'ition such that of an item to function reliably and safety dethe capability unimpaired, even though that item may not conform to the original Design requirement.
The component, system, structure must still be verified to meet the original design basis.
3.1.7 Rework - The process by which a Nonconformance Condition or
~ design requirementDesign Deviation is made to conform to a pri
{
by rematching, reassembling,4cr-imposing -l other corrective measuresTT7,(This type;dcposition must T include a reference to the' initiating Work.. Document...(WR)) [
This Disposition may b2 utill' ed 'for; Des ~f gi
~
z l,
Design Requirements are maintained'.
i 3.1.8
' eject / Scrap - Disposition that determines an item to no longer meet PVNGS requirements and is to be removed from service and scrapped or salvaged in accordance with MS02.02 Surplus, Salvage and Scrap.
W24 ED P(v 4 O 584 A
PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GiENERATING Tccouse STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 9 of 51 3.l 9 Information Only - Disposition used when supplying i
inforcation to the initiator and does not require any f action to resolve a condition. "ThTs"-Dis' osition:may-bei urther
' utilized when authorizing Design. Margin 41]ei@ Design'ixce p
the.tDesign?Rpquirement)::to' bvfeduced-QheniN02orie~ctJN s
that.,the; change meets-the minimumtDasig u o
t 3
en t~.
3.1.10 Invalid - Disposition given to an~EER which has been determined to be unnecessary because either the condition already boon addressed by another EER or the conditica ca as be resolved by an EER.
3.1.11 EER Coordinator - Assigned individual (s) in Engineering Evaluations Department responsible for EER administrative activities in accordance with this procedure or the Duty STA on backshifts.
3.1.12 Field Disposition - Verbal disposition allowing work to continue when an existing condition hinders or restrains unit
(
operation or priority work, and requires fina1 approyal prior to the closure.of.the Vork. Package" 4
2 equipment being. declared operable.(pr the associated' C
3.1.13 Nonconformance Condition - A deficiency in characteristi documentation, or procedure * (see 3.1.15) which rendera th c,
quality of an ftem, part or component unacceptabic or e
indeterminate (applies only to Quality related components) 3 This excludes items that 'are found to be defective during o due to maintenance and/or which are not put into servic until the de'ficiency is corrected.
e
-3.1.14 Non-Quality related component such thatDesign De a
meets the design requirement.
the part.no longer defective due to maintenance and/or which are not puThis service until the deficiency is-corrected.
u 2n 3.1.15 Procedure * (see 3.1.13) - Method utilized to perform quality related_ task.
a the written procedures butThis does not_specifically apply to complete a task.
to the process utilized to 3.1.16 Design Documents - Design output Loop, Elementary, Single Line, drawings such as P& ids, Logic, etc. describing the" current Design of the Plant.
%6 000 REV iM $8 4 A N
.. ~
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
[lgccoune-
{l STATION MANUAL 73AC-0zz29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 10 of 51 3.1.17 Design Basis - Information which identifies the specific functions to be performed by a structure, system, or component of a facility, and the specific values or rances of values chosen for controlling parameters as reference bounds j
used for establishing design requirements,'(SEE APP."E)."
i These values may be:
s 1) restraints for achieving functional goals, or 2) requirements derived from analysis of the offects of a postulated accident for which a structure, system, or component must meet its functional goals.
3)
Interface requirements with othe'r systems or components *
(i.e., floor loading, stress, siesmic, electri6al" loads)7 3.1.18 Design Requirement - Minimum Design Values (such as wall thickness, flow rate, pressure rating) determined by Design Basis Analysis and calculations, or as required by Code
/
Requirements.
3.1.19 As-Built Drawings - Drawings describing the current
-(
configuration of the Unit.
physical They are generated from Class I Key Drawings and are usually prefixed (01),
reficct unitized uniqueness.
(02), (03) to are those drawings maintained in the Unit Control Rooms.In general A 3.1.20 Evaluator - The individual who dispositions the EER.
may be the System Engineer, the STA or the person to whom the This EER has been transferred.
3.1.21 Temporary Modification - A temporary alteration controlled in accordance with 73AC-9ZZ05, made to plant equipment that does not conform with drawings and design documents for equipment described in the FSAR.
3.1.22 Inservice Procedure - A procedure utiliced to cocra-e or test the installed equipment, 3.1.23 Interim Resolution - A partial or temporary disposition allowing rework, troubleshooting, or repair to be data required to complete the evaluation. accomplished or to May also be used to provide instruction to the Evaluator on reco,mmended method of resolution.
3.1.24 Operability - As defined in the. Technical Specifications (Sect. 1.18).
required by the Technical Specifications. Applies only to those system I
N116 T O PEV4 W H4A
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
[8CEDURE 0
STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 11 of 51 3.1.25 _ Database change - The revision of an operating parameter (setpoint, alarm description, etc) that results in the modification of a stored constant used by the computer to accomplish specific functions.
construction, etc.).
(e.g. alarm actuation, display 3.2 Abbreviations 3.2.1 SE - System Engineer or the duty STA 3.2.2 QS & E - Quality Systems and Engineering 3.2.3 EED - Engineering Evaluation Department 3.2.4 EER/RCF - EER used specifically for a Root Cause of Failure Determination 3.2.5 TSCCR - Tech Spec Component Condition Record, used by the Unit Control Room to track and document inoperable equipment.
3.2.6
.( -
WDN - Warehouse Deficiency Notice, used to document and resolve discrepancies in the receipt of spare parts.
3.2.7 EER/NC - This type of EER is an EER used to evaluate a potential nonconformance condition and is issued by any plant employeo upon identification of an existing potential nonconforming condition in installed equipment.
3.2.8 OCS - Operations Computer Systems Department.
3.2.9 MEE - Material Engineering Evaluation, document used by Material Control to evaluate material control issues.
9 3.2.10 CCE - Component Classification Evaluation, document used to determino quality class.
3.2.11 ECE - Equipment Change Evaluation, document used to evaluate 1
equipment or technical quality requirements.
4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1 Initiator is responsible to:
4.1.1 Address technical questions or concerns by generating an EER request when the concern cannot be resolved by the normal
( _
work control process, or by research/ review of readily available plant documents.
W24 030 ptv 4 0 M4 A
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING PROCEDURE C
STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 12 of 51 4.1.2 Report potential Nonconformance Conditions identified in the plant with the EER.
4.1.3 Request a root cause evaluation for component or equipment failures identified by the Failure Data Trending Program, a significant Plant Event, or a Tech.
Spec. component failure that required a TSCCR to be generated, (to be initiated by STA or System Engineer only).
4.1.4 Expeditiously submit to the EER Coordinator EER/NCs and other EERs in which the condition affects Nuclear Safety and/or Qut.11ty Related equipment Operability issues.
4.1.5 Complete the EER form through the Suggested Resolution section.
4.1.6 Obtain supervisor approval.
4.1.7 Obtain component type from Appendix D for entry onto EER form.
4.1.8 Identify if the EER is being written for a RCF or to identify a Potential Nonconformance Condition.
4.1.9 Inspect / verify the problem condition exists in the field.
4.1.10 Include references of all applicabic documentation relating to the problem, (e.g. work order, TSCCR, WDN, etc.).
The associated documentation should be attached to the submitted EER.
_ NOTE The STA should only be used on backshif ts or weekends where the EER must be initiated or resolved prior to the next working day.
4.1.11 Contact the S.E. or STA prior to EER initiation.
4.1.12 Obtain Dept. Manager approval for all EER's documenting unauthori::ed deviations from approved plant documents.
includes such things as missed hold points in work ord This missed procedure steps in surveillance procedure.
ers or 4.2 Initiator's immediate supervisor is responsible for:
4.2.1 Verifying the validity of the EER and that the situation through review of existing plantcannot be resolved by the normal w documents.
l PvP6 000 PEV 8 82 14 4 A
_ _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING@ccoune.
+
STATION MANUAL 73Ac-ozz29 REVISION-ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 13 of 51 4.2.2 Concurrence with the problem as stated and with the suggested resolution.
4.2.3 Verifying appropriate need date or plant condition restraint (if included).
4.2.4
-Insuring that the Initiator's section of the EER form is properly and completely filled out.
4.2.5 Verify proper references are included.
t 4.3 " Initiators Manager is responsible to:"
NOTE *;
This approval is to provide for increased?
awareness of the' situation by the affected Manager. J 4.3.1 Prior; to approval the HaMagE.~should, determine 'if any r
, (
T-immediate corr'ective acton_should be'taken as a result condition or if another method of resolution (vice an EE canbeutilized.y
-4.4 System Engineer is responsible to:
4.4.1 Answer the questions in the Resolution section of the EER form to determine if a Nonconformance Condition or operability issue exists 4.4.2 Notify his immediate supervisor when a Nonconformance Condition exists which could affect operability.
4.4.3 Determine Priority, Type of Disposition, and Units /Depts affected.by the Disposition.
4.4.4 Provide interim resolution for Potential Nonconformance Conditions when the EER is to be transferred to another gr for disposition.
oup 4.4.5 Transfer EERs to other groups better suited to address the issue as approved by his supervisor.
4.4.6 Invalidate any EER initiated which is a duplicate, has been previously answered), an open EER already exists (question if the EER cannot resolve the situation as stated.
, or
(
shall be provided for the Invalidation, and should include A reason any associated EER numbers, r
PV216 000 REV 8 62 544 A
.-vec
-r
---s e
-a w sm ;
--r*-4 m -
~-5 r.ya p.ym i
=my y
9 g-yy--
vr
-m
-y W
i
. '. =
=
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING [8 cewne
{
STATION MANUAL 0
73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING-EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 14 of 51 4.4.7_
Authoriae continuation of work by giving a verbal disposition, (field dispositions only).
4.4.8 Concur on all EERs which have been dispositioned by an Evaluator other than the SE.
If the System Engineer does not concur with the Resolution, he should contact the Evaluator to resolve the issue.
4.4.9 Initiating proper plant work documents (W.R.) to impicment all resolations, individuals other than the system Engineer. including those d 4.4.10 Complete the Action Acceptanca sheet for Non-Conformance Conditions, Dispoeltioned as Rework,' Repair,"or Scrap.7 4.4.11 Obtain approval signatures as required.
4.4.12 Determine distribution of all completed EERs.
4.4.13 If an EER supersedes another EER, indicate-this in the Type E
of Disposition section of the EER, including the superseded EER number.
4.4.14 Transmit the Action Acceptance (with a copy of the EER), to the appropriate Implementing.Managon'.
Required only for Non-Conforming Condition 2 scrap."
dispositioned ' a' repair,~ rework; 4
4,5 EER Coordinator is responsible tol 4.5.1 Ensure administrative compliance to this procedure.
4.5.2 Assign EER numbers.
4.5.3 Maintain EER files and the EER Tracking System, 4.5.4 Transmit EER copies to appropriate departments.
4.5.5 Replace lost EER's.
-4.5.6 Closcout EER's.
4.5.7 Evaluations Manager. Generate trending reports as specified by 4.5.8 Make changes or corrections as necessary which are not of a technical nature.
Pv216 0:0 MV 8'82 544 A
~ ~ ~
PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING
[nctouse C
STATION NiANUAL 73AC-Ozz29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 15 of 51 4.5.9 Update the EER log to indicate that an EER supersedes another EER.
Also indicate that an EER has been superseded.
4.5.10 Insure all Telcon Approvals get countersigned prior to EER closcout.
4.56 Evaluator's Supervisor or designeo is responsibic for:
1 4.6.1 Reviewing and approving all EER dispositions.
This constitutes approval of the administrative and technical content of the EER.
4.6.2 Verifying adequacy of the 50.59 review.
4.6.3 Ensuring appropriate cross-discipline review as required.
4.6.4 Ensuring that the disposition addresses the problem statement, that the disposition is the appropriate action for the identified problem, and that other alternative actions have been considered.
(
4.6.5 Ensure Interim Resolution is utilized appropriaticy.
4.7 Evaluator is responsible for:
4.7.1 Providing a disposition including all supporting documentation needed to support the resolution when requested by formal transferal of the EER to that department.
4.7.2 Provide the disposition to EERs as assigned.
4.7.-3 Obtain cross-discipline review as appropriate for any EER in which the identified deficiency or disposition involves multiple discipline type issues or involves interfacing systems, outside the evaluators normal responsibilities.
4.7.4 Return the completed EER to the EER coordinator upon completion.
4.8 EED/0CS Supervisor or designee is responsible.for:
4.8.1
' Notification of the 'EED/0CS Manager of a Nonconforming '
Condition which could affect component operability:
4.A.2 Notification of the appropriate Shif t Supervisor upon closure of an EER/NC previously determined to affect component operability.
PN2te % D HEV4 4 M4A
_h
1 PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING [nceount STATION MANUAL 73AC-Ozz29 REVISION -
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 16 of 51 4.8.3 Approval of all EERs transferred to another' Dept.
4.8.4 Verifying prior to transfer that all appropriate documentation is attached.
4.9 Evaluator's Manager or Designee is responsible for:
4.9.1 Approving all " Repair" dr " Accept-As-Is" EER dispositions The approval is utilized to review and identify any potential design changes.
This review should include a review of the permanency of the modification and for any required changes to design drawings.
In the case of EER/NCs, this review authorizes the change to be routed to the Plant Manager for approval.
4.10 QS&E is responsible for:
4.10.1 Reviewing and trending EERs as per QA03.04, Quality Assurance Trend Analysis.
4.10.2
.C Reviewing EER/NCs for Quality requirements upon closecut.
4.11 Shift Supervisor / Assistant Shift Supervisor is responsible for:
4.11.1 ^ Declaring theJystem " Inoperable" and issuing a TSCC
'itihas been ' determined (by operations) th
~
~
shall 'be~ 'fifdicated '6Ti"th'd'TSCCR 'f6rm.'"
4.11.2 ' Insuring the' required Tech.~ Spec." Actions ~ror the i
~
~
'ei[u'ipment 'a6*dompleted."
a e 4.11.3 Revising or., clearing the associated TSCCR when~ notified by' the EED/0CS discipline ~ssperVisor of the ~associ'ated EER/NC closure; 4.12 Action' Acceptance Form for required actions e
a written response.
completed and the specific work documents to be utilize e
implement the required action.
4.13 Reviewer - Individual responsible for perf: cming the cross-discipline review as identified by the System Engineer Pv216 COD PtV 8.82 $44 A i
t --
. _ _ _. - _ -, - _ - -.._,. - - - - ~
~ - - -. -, -
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
["g CEDURE
{
STATION rdANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Pat,e 17 of 51 4.14 EED/0CS Maneger l
4.14;l I's' rc~sponsibic for:
Approval of all the EER/RCFs to insure a proper evaluation has been performed, that the proper conclusions have been obtained, corrective action docu.ments have been generated, as well as other responsibilities specified for this position.
4.14.2 Notification to the appropriate Plant Manager when it is-determined by Engineering that,a, specific *conditionfcould 2
affcct the bperability'of a system or component".
4.15 Compliance is responsible for:
4.15.1 Reviewing EERs marked as a potentially non-conforming condition for Potential Reportable Occurrences, (PR0s), per ES06.07.
4.15.2 Reviewing EERS marked as a potentially non-conforming condition for 10CFR21 Reportability per ES06.08.
5.0 INSTRUCTIONS 5.1 General NOTE Prior to submittal of the EER the SE/STA shall be contacted to verbally verify an EER condition exists and an EER is needed.
5.1.1 An EER may be initiated by any ANPP/APS personnel or any individual of an on-site contract organization, with the exception of EERs initiated for a Root Cause. The EEP/RCFs shall be generated by the duty STA or SE due to
- t. TL6R,
Plant E*/ent, the Failure Data Trending program, by management direction, or as determined by the System Engineer or STA.
5.1.2 Block by block instructions for filling out the EER form are contained in Appendix F.
5.1.3 All areas of the EER Form not utilized should be marked N/A.
5.1.4 Information classified as Safeguards Information sball be L
handled per PS03.06, Control of Safeguard Information.
PV214000 PEV 6 62 Nie A
_ _ ~ - - - -
~ - ~ ~
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
[R CEDURE
{
STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 18 of 51 5.1.5 EER numbers are issued 'in the format of:
YR-SY-XXX l
l l
Yearly Sequential No.
l l
System Designator l_
Year of Initiation 5.1.6 An EER is not an authorlzed plant work document and shall not by itself direct specific work activities.
5.1.7 EERs (or Engineering) do not determine Tech Spec Operability.
This responsibility rests with the Unit Shift Supervisor.
The EED/OCS Discipline Supervisor shall notify the EED/0CS Manager who shall notify the Plant Manager of any nonconforming condition which could effect system or component operability. The Engineering staff may assist the Unit Operations staff in making the operability determination.
NOTE Outstanding operability issues should be brought to the appropriate level of Management for resolution, with final determination by the Plant Manager.
5.1.8 EER Coordinator may make changes or corrections which are not technical in nature and do not require a technical assessment
=
e L
P G 6 E D PEV 8.42 M4A
~
PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING pcE0une
{
STATION MANUAL 73AC-ozz29 REVISION -
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 19 of 51 5.2 EER Initiation 5.2.1 Initiator shall:
NOTE Appendix F contains block by block Instructions for filling out the EER form, (Appendix A).
5.2.1.1 Contact the System Eng./STA prior to generation of the EER.
NOTET The STA should only be used on the m backshift'or weekends when the EER must be -initiated or resolved prior ~ to"the, next working' day. 7
(
Concisely describe all engineering related concerns, 5.2.1.2 Potential Nonconformance Conditions, and Root Cause requests by completing the appropriate blocks in the INITIATION portion of the EER Form, (Appendix A), with the following restriction:
EERs initiated for a Root Cause Determination shall only be initiated by an SE or the duty STA.
If a need for a root cause. evaluation is perceived, contact the Duty STA or System Engineer.
5;2.1.3 If a response is needed in a specific time period, or the EER Resolution restrains a work activity, modo entry, or document closure the need requirement and the reason for the requested need date should be included in the Suggested Resolution /Needs Assment block on the EER form.
5.2.1.4 If the EER was generated due to a deficiency found during' work, the appropriate WO number shall be entered in the reference documents section.
Any related design documents should be entered as well.
5.2.1.5 Provide a Suggested Resolution to the deficiency.
5.2.1.6 Obtain supervisor's signature /date in the INITIATION portion of the EER Form to signify the validity of the EER.
I W716 EO REV 4 Q M4A l
1
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
[ROCEWRE
(
STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 20 of 51 5.2.1.7 EERs which may adversely affect Quality related equipment, (Potential Nonconformance Condition issues),
shall be expeditiously submitted to the EER Coordinator.
5.2.1.8 Indicate if a potential Nonconformance Condition exists.
5.2.1.9 If a potential Nonconformance Condition is identified, the requirement which may not be met, should be identified.
5.2.1.10 Ottain Dept.~MgrlJapp'ov~n17fo'r EER's dohu5eit'ing'"
~
r 2
unauthorized deviations ' from' a'pproied plant 'docubents.
(i.e., work" orders,' surveillance testsT" set;)-
5.2.2 EER Coordinatur Shall:
5.2.2.1 Ensure the INITIATION portion is completed correctly, and if not, notify the EER Initiator of any deficier.cy.
5.2.2.2 If no apparent deficiencio-exist, assign a number to the EER and enter it in the EER No, block.
5.2.2.3 Enter the EER into the EER log and tracking system.
5.2.2.4 Transmit a copy of the EER to the initiator, QS&E, and Compliance.
5.2.2.5 Transmit the original EER to the appropriate SE for resolution.
~
5.2.2.6 J1 ace a copy of the EER in the EER Coordinator files.
5.3 EER Resolution System Engineer shall:
5.3.1 Determine if the EER is Valid.
5.3.1.1 If the EER is Valid continue with the resolution (step'".
~
5.3.2)T 5.3.1.2 If Invalid the EER should be marked as such and a brief reason for the Invalidation noted in the disposition block.
Invalid EER's do not require supervisor approval and should be sent directly to the EER coordinator.
5.3.2 Immediate Action / Priority - The SE shall, upon receipt of the
(
EER, determine the EER pricrity.
(Utilir.e Appendix B ar.d the specified need date, if included.)
h@6 T,O PEv 6 L2 M4A o
s PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
["o ceone 4
STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 21 of 51 5.3.2.1 Enter this information into the Priority block.
5.3.2.2 Provide this information to the EER Coordinato that the EER Tracking System can be updated.
5.3.2.3 EER Coordinator upon receiving the Priority information shall enter the information into the Tracking System.
5.3.2.4 The SE shall address the first three questions in the Resolution section on the EER form, to determine if a Nonconformance Condition exists or if the condition affects the operability of the-component or system.
- 1. If the first two questions are YES, a nonconformance condition has been identified.
NOTE If a potential Non-Conforming condition is determined not to exist (i.e. marked NO) justification for that determination shall be included in the resolution section.
5.3.2.5 If insufficient documentation or information exists to determine operability the 3rd question should be left blank until such information can be obtained.
5.3.2.6
.If,an operability determination cannot be made the evaluation should address the operability issue.
during the evaluation a condition which affects If should be notified immediately. operability is discov
=
affew!s--component operability _(YES to the thirdIf the deficiency questio.1, the appropriate _EED Supervisor should be notified.
5.3.2.7 The EED/0CS discipline nupervisor, is responsible for notification of the EED/0CS Manager of any EER/NC which could component operability.
5.3.2.8 The EED/0CS Manager shall notify the Plant Efanager when affect system or component operability.any non-c Pv216 0C0 Rtv 4:82 544 A
_ _ __ m e'
G PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING PROCEDURE o
i STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVAhUATION REQUEST 7
Page 22 of 51 5.3.3 EER Transfer 5.3.3.1 For EERs which address Equipment Qualification concerns, (see Appendix C for determination); transfer the EER to the Enginecring Department. -
5.3.3.2 If the SE determines an EER can best be resolved by another organization, he should transfer the EER to that organization.
to receive the EER should be contacted. Prior to transfer 5.3.3.2.1 Indicating the organization to which the EER is to be transferred in the Transfer block.
5.3.3.2.2 Obtaining the signature /date of his immediate supervisor or designee in the transfer block for approval of the transfer.
5.3.3.2.3 Forwarding the EER to the EER Coordinator for formal transfer to the organization indicated.
(
5.3.3.2.4 For returning the EER back to System Engineer, the EER shall be transferred via the EER Coordinator, 5.3.3.3-EER Coordinator shall:
5.3.3.3.1 Make a new copy of the EER for the files, and transmit the original EER by transmittal to the organization indicated.
~
5.3.3.3.2 Make a copy of the returned EER for the EER files when the EER is returned, and transmit the original EER back to the SE.
5.3.3.4 SE shall:
5.3.3.4.1. Sign for concurrence in the Approval block on EERs which have been transferred to and dispositioned by an '
Evaluator other than the SE.
):
Pv716 000 REY 4 82 ' Sid A
~
...r
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING[f CEWRE STATION MANUAL
[
73AC-u m a REVISION ~
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7~
Page 23 of 51 5.3.3.4.2 Complete the Resolution per Sec. 5.3.4, if he is acting as the Evaluator.
'N6TE;'
Interim Resolution may be' utilized-to"obtain or provide;informgtion only'andl.shallynot-be utilized as the' Disposition. authorizing equipment to be declared operable.
5.3.4 Interim Resolution - The SE may provide an interim resolution as appropriate in the following cases:
NOTE If multiple interim resolutions are required they should be documented on the EER continuation sheet and annotated as such.
5.3.4.1
- (I Conditions which require Engineering input for further troubleshooting to adequately understand the situation or when evaluating or testing prior to final-Disposition.
-5.3.4.2 To obtain information or data to aid in the EER Resolution.
5.3.4.3 Clarify or recommending any actions to be addressed in the Disposition by the Evaluator.
5.3.4.4 Providing instructions or a temporary Resolution to allow continued operation of non quality related equipment prior to final disposition.
5.3.4.5 All Interim Dispositions require disposition hv the System Engineer and opproval by the lead. supcivisor prior to implementation.
i e
Pv216 000 My e 82 Sa4 A
.-.m..-
. m.._
-Q f
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING gccoune
{
STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 24 of 51 5.3.5 EER Disposition NOTE-Dispositions addressing Temporary Shielding calculations shall be dispositioned as "Information Only" an require a 10CFR50.59 per 79AC-92Z07, 10CFR50.59 Review and Evaluation.
5.3.5.1 General Evaluation Resolution Process:
The following general steps should be utilized by the Evaluator to insure a systematic evaluation of the reported situation.
f Review reported condition Review suggested resolution Evaluate the situation Determine the conclusions Identify solution NOTE All Repair or Accept-as-is Dispositions Require completion of the Technical Input and Review Checklist per 73AC-9ZZ31.
5.3.5.1.1 The Disposition of the EER should include the following as applicable:
Evaluation of situation Recommended solution Justification for conclusions Supporting calculations Corrective Actions Recommendations Implementing Documents Evaluation method utilized if RCF performed 5.3.5.1.2 Indicate in the Unit Affected block the units affected by the EER disposition.
5.3.5.1.3 Indicate in the Organization block any organizations that are affected by the EER disposition, (i.e., any dept.
that has an action or needs the information).
W24 02 REV4 M M4A
~
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
[aceouns STATION MANUAL-73AC-0zz29 REVISION' ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 25 of 51 5.3.5.1.4 Complete and attach a 10CFR50.59 Review and Evaluatio dispositioned EERs.per 79AC-92207 for all " Accept-As-Is NOTE Cross-discipline review shall be performed anytime the condition involves interfacing systems or involves multiple discipline-type issues.
5.3.5.1.5 Determine if any cross-discipline reviews are required.
be specified in _ the disposition section.Any cross If no Block should be checked h'O. cross-discipline reviews a 5.3.5.1.6 Cross-Discipline reviews should normally be conducted informally with the SE hand carrying the EER to the cross-discipline reviewer.
5.3.5.1.7 All cross-discipline ruviews shall be documented by signature of the reviewer on the EER form in the space provided.
5.3.5.1.8 Perform the Technical Input _and Review Checklist per 73AC-9ZZ31 for EERs dispositioned as " Repair" or
" Accept - As -Is ".
5.3.5.1.9 Prior to disposition, the Evaluator should contact th group responsible for impicmenting the recommended e
1 corrective action prior to EER closure.
5.3.5.1.10 Dispositions authorizing changes to the As B il be dispositioned as Information Only or R u t additional work is required.
In this case, verified to be maintained.the Design. Requirement shall be The disposition shall Requirement is maintained. include an evaluation doc t
The actual Design Requirement shall be included in the evaluation PV276 000 Pty as Sa4 A
--,m*
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING "" ceoune o
- STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION -
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 26 of 51 5.3.5.2 EER/RCF Disposition NOTE This type of EER will be identified by a "Yes" response to the root cause question in the Special EER consideration section.
NOTE 0ther than the analysis process involved in the evaluation of the EER/RCF, thtre's no difference from a normal EER in the routing or disposition requirements.
5.3.5.2.1 All root cause evaluations should be performed by the appropriate System Engineer.
5.3.5.2.2
(
The actual root cause determination process and various methods which may be utilized can be found in EEDG-42, the Engineering Evaluations Department Guideline governing root cause determination.
If a specific type of evaluation cis utilized it should be included in the disposition.
5.3.5.2.3 EER/RCFs' should be dispositioned as " Info Only" if a procedural, operational or programmatic type change is
/ "'"
' recommended; if the concluded cause or fix has alread vu been implemented; or-if no recommendations are being
,fp igs made.
1-t
/
f 5.3.5.2.4 EER/RCFs sj2culf be dispositioned as " Info Only" and document initiated shall be referenced.any applicab
\\_
t 5,3.5.2.5 All EER/RCFs resolutions require Dept. Manager or designee approval for closure.
5.3.5.2.6 EERs generated for RCF determination are not considered as Non-Conformance EERs.
For all EER/RCP the Non-Conformance Block shall be marked N/A Pv24 000 Pty Sa82 *Le A
. ~. -, _ _.
PALO VERDE NUCLE.AR GENERATING
["o Ccwns STATION NIANUAL 73Ac-ozz29 REVISION _
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 27 of 51 5.3.5.3 Disposition of EER/Nes NOTE For a Nonconformance Condition to exist, the associated part must be quality related and it has been verified that the deficiencylis such that the part does not conform to the specified design requirements.
5.3.5.3.1 The System Engineer should initially review the problem description and any suggested resolution if
- provided, If the EER is marked as-a potential-Nonconformance Condition, the System Engineer shall determine if a Nonconforming Condition exists.
NOTE A Deficiency is considered a Non-f(,
Conformance Only when the component-is In-Service with the deficiency or will be put in service with the condition present.
5.3.5.3.1.1 An actual Nonconformance has been identified when the first two questions under the Resolution section are answered YES.
5.3.5.3.1.2 It is the respon'sibility of the System Engineer to determine the proper resolution of the Nonconformance Condition.
5.3.5.3.2 The SE should provido an Interim Resolution for EER/NCs prior -to transferring it to another group for-disposition, or if a significant delay in the disposition will occur when the system or component will remain in service.
t 1
i
~,...
L
-p
,e------,
y u-
-,e py-
PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING en etwne
{
STATION MANUAL 73AC-ozz29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 28 of 51 NOTE l
If $dufflElent 'information or documentation'to properly evalua'te
^
the 'conditilbn'," justification for ~
continued operation is not
~
required.- How
- 'ittshould be docum~ent'e'd I n ' eve r,
i thd7rit'srim "Resolut ion Sectioii"thE -Eisuf'ficlint"svidencd ' -
eicists~to cFaluate th6" impact on"?
~
~
quality o'r'o'perabilityr"
~
5.3.5.3.3 When sys tems c r_com..........
s ponents,,will. remain in service wit
~~'
' denkified j,lexisting Lnoniconforming hori~diti5ns,theT.h i
justification.for., continued use of the component shall address' tihe fb11owing..
a) The Nonconforming itrm or equipment is capable of-
"s'upportin b) The item'g"0'pofability'a' T defined lit T5ch Speci,
' s'NoiiEonform' aitdUodditiddiill not 2ffect
~
~
(
'OpeTabilli"y'Wi!Dn'ii6Hiilirued use and -
'c)A"r e,p]ot3sNonconformanceconditiondoesnot 1
resent, in effect, a change in the PVNGS design basis as described in the design basis documents.
5.3.3.3.4 For EER's addressing existing Nonconformanc.e Conditions the Disposition shall include justification that:
a) The Nonconferming item or equipment is c,9able of supporting Operability as defined in Tech Specs, b) The item's Nonconformance condition will not affect Operability while in continued use and, c) The item's Nonconformance condition does not represent, in effect, a change in the PVNGS design basis as described in the design basis documents.
5.3.5.3.5 For EER/NCs dispositioned as " Rework" or " Scrap"; the evaluator shall:
4
/"' ~,
- 1. Provide a final resolution
- 2. Initiate the applicable change document, (if any),
\\
N required to accomplish the resolution, (e.g. Vork Request).
- 3. Complete the EER Action Acceptance section Appendix A page 4 for Rework or Scrap Dispositions. -
- 4. Enter the date required and Work Request number, (if applicable) on Page 4 of the EER Form.
- 5. Obtain supervisor approval and forward to the EER Coordinator.
2'8(CD PEV882 $84 A g _
__-___-_-_--------,_______._.-._m-
- - ~ ~ - - ' - - - ' - -
--~
PALO VERDE NWIb emNERATING
["o ctocati
(
STAWH MNtJAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 29 of 51 NOTE The original Action Acceptance Form should be routed directly to the Implementing Manager.
5.3.5.3.6 Evutuator shalllreturn the completed EER/NC package to the EER Coordinator.
5.3.5.4 Disposition of EER/NC with " Repair or Accept as is" Dispositions.
5.3.5.4.1 If the disposition of an EER/NC is Repair or Accept-as-is the Evaluator shall:
1.
Complete the EER disposition which shall contain the evaluation of the Nonconformance Condition, impact of Nonconformance on continued operation and justification for allowing the Nonconformance Cond. ion in the plant.
2.
Complete the EER Action Acceptance Section for all Rcpair Dispositions.
E9IE The Action Acceptance Section shall be utill cd for all non-conforming conditions dispositioned as Rework, Repair or Scrap.
3.
Complete the Technical Impact and Review Checklist per 73AC-92Z31 for the Design Change being accepted by the EER/NC.
4.
Complete a 100FR50.59 review and evaluoulon in accordance with 79AC-9ZZO7.
5.
Obtain supervisor and manager approval for the EER/NC.
6.
Obtain the Technical Specification 6.5.2.3 (Plant Manager) approval for the plant.
7.
Forward to EER Coordinator for cloucout per Section 5.4.2.
5.3.5.4.2 The System Engineer shall insure that a copy of the EER/NC and the original Action Acceptance Form
(
is
(
routed to the applicable (eg Unit Work Control Manager). implementing organization, W2 '6 7sO M V 8.82 M4A
!'==~
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
{
STATION MANUAL 73AC-0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVA1.UATION REQUEST 7
Page 30 of 51 5.3.5.4.3 Upon receipt of the EER/NC packar.o tha impicmenting organization shall:
1.
Initiate the document that will be used to impicment the required action.
2.
Include the documant number and brief description of work on Action Acceptance form.
(include when action will be coopicted, if known.)
3.
Transmit the completed EER Action Acceptance page to the EER Coordinator.
5.3.5.4.4 The EER Ccsordinator retains the original with the remainder of the original EER/NC.
5.3.5.5 Resolution of Non-Quality Related EERs addressing Design Deviations.
NOTE
'(\\
This type of disposition can only be used to authorize Design Deviations as found in installed equipment and shall not be used to initiate a Design Change.
5.3.5.5.1 The requirements for evaluating Design Deviations on non quality related components are the same as they are for quality-related equipment.
5.3.5.5.2 For " Accept-As-1s" or " Repair" dispositions, see Section 5.3.5.4 with the exception that the Action Acceptance is not requi 2d.
5.3.5.5.3 For " Rework" or " Scrap" dispositions, see Section 5.3.5.3.3 with the exception that the Action acceptance is not required.
9 Pvii4 E:D HIV 8 82 50 4 A
--^
e PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
@CEDUf3E
~
{
STATION MANUAL 73AC 0ZZ29 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 31 of $1 5.3.5.6 Resolution of Material Substitution rrRs NOTE This evaluation should consider the design requirements, process liquid environment, internal pressure, stress, and function of' the material change.
[Loln Material substitutions, both rnetallic and non-metallic, (e.g., changing from carbon steel to stainicas steel) may require cross-discipline review by the EED-Technical Engr Section.
5.3.5.6.1 If the EER is initiated to evaluate a change of material other than that specified in design documents the evaluator shall:
(
j,0
- 1. Complete the EER disposition evaluating the material substitution ensuring that neither form, f, pf/, pa or fit nor function are affected (i.e., no Design i
Chaage is identified).
j*
gC'; 6
- 2. Complete the Technical Input and Review Checklist por '/3AC-9ZZ31 for the material substitution.
$, ~
- 3. Obtain supervisor or designee and manager or designee approval..
- 4. Forward to EER Coordinator for closcout per Section 5.4.2.
5.3.5.7 Utilization of EERs for Process Computer, (PMS, ERFDADS, etc.), Database changes.
. NOTE i
I l
A computer database is not considered a Design Document.
5.3.5.7.1 An EER should be used in the following cases:
5.3.5.7.1.1 Evaluating changes to the database to restore consistency with the plant design documents (ICDL', Inst. Index, SPDS Tech. Reqs.).
PV356 tEO My e 82 $44 A
.+. -,
o+n
--.4-i---
---ew
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
"" ctounc
{
STATION MANUAL o
73AC ozz29 RLVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 32 of 51 5.3.5.7.1.2 Evaluating changes to the database which are not within the scope of the design documents. (i.e.,
minor changes in the databann not specified in the design documents).
5.3.5.7.2 Implementat ion of these EER resolutions may requirn both a VR to change the actual software and a pCO/pCR to reflect the change in the database listing.
5.3.5.7.3 Any changes to the process computer design documents requires the ur.c of the design ch ngo processes (DCp, Site Mod).
5.3,5.7.4 If a design change is being implemented, No EER lu required.
The database is updated based on the ugmcifications in the design change package.
5.3.5.7.5 EEks are not the performance of testtequired for database changes required in procedures.
C 5.3.6 E1cid Disposition NOTE If fic1d disposition is required, the System Engineer shall bn contacted prior to generation of the EER.
If an EER is determined to be required, it should be complet.ed by the Initiattar and either anotated as to verbal disposition or forearded to the System Engineer for disposition.
5.3.6.1 Upon receiving not ification f rom the EER condition, the SE shall daterminefinld of a possiblo if an EER condition does exist and if a field disposition is required (sco Step 3.1.8).
5.3.6.2 SE may provido a verbal disposition to the Work Organization on any EER when t hu met following conditions are
- 1) problem Description and any verbal disposition (not necessarily the final disposition) shall be documented in the Initiation and Resolution areas and the EER issued a number prior to the responsible individual leaving the pVNGS site.
Notmally, the field resolution should be documented in the Interim Resolution block unless a final disposition is necessary.
Pyle 000 atV 4 6J See A
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING@ ""'
STATION MANUAL 73Ac -oEE:']
REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 33 of 51 i
If Netbal disposition is given per Telecon the perr.on requnt. ting the disposition shall document resolution on the EER form and anotate it Telecon the Apptoval.
NOTE
{
If Final Disposition of the EER is required (i.e. System must be placed into operation) the rasolution shall be documented in the disposition section and all required approval signaturen obtained.
- 2) Final resolution shall be completed prior to the k'ork Package being closed.
- 3) Any per telecon EER disposition shall be considered ricld Dispositioned.
- 4) All Telecon Approvals shall be anotated as follows and require counter signature prior to final closcout for all Telecon Approvals.
John Don for Mr.
' Signature" System Engineer Ipr i n t e d "
5,4 Approval /ulosure N0'IT.
EER/NCs cannot be closed by the EER Coordinator until documentation is received. (Action Acceptance Sheet page 4 of EER Form) indicating action acknowledgment.
5.4.1 Evaluator shall:
5.4.1.1 Signify completica of the EER dating the Ev:1unt::r/iiate block. resolution by signing and 5.4.1.2 Obtain the signature /date of his superviser or designe in the Supervisor /Datc block to indicato his a o
the dinoosition por S'ep 4.5.
pproval of 5.4.1.3 Obtain in the Evaluator's Mgr/ Data bleck the tignatur and date of the Eval tst or'r Mano.i;er or his designee to e
indicate his approval for all ";,icept As-Is"
" Repair" Dispositions.
, and
1
)
I i
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING flgctount
\\
C STATION MANUAL 73Ac-ozz29 RtVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 34 of $1 5.4.1.4 Transmit the EER to the EER Coordinator for final processing and closure.
5.4.1.5 If the Evaluator is someone other than the System Engineer, the EER shall be routed to the System Engineer via the EER Coordinator for concurrence.
5.4.1.6 If the Evaluator was the System Engineer, the System Engineer concurrence block should be marked N/A or signed and the EER routed to the EER Coordinator for final processing and closure.
5.4.2 The System Engineer shall:
5.4.2.1 Follow Section 5.4.1 for all dispositions in which the System Engineer was the Evaluator.
NOTE This type of interim disposition will
(
allow work to cornmence, or the fabrication of parts, et;., to enhance the work process.
5.4.2.2 If preliminary or interim instructions, (e.g., for troubleshooting or testing), are required prior to final dispositions, these instructions should be provided in the Interim Resolution and the appropriate System Engineer signature and Lead or Supervisor is obtained (See Sect. 5.3.4) 5.4.2.3 For all EERs in which thn System Engineer was not thn Evaluator, the System Engineer shall review and concur with the disposition prior to final closure.
5.4.2.4 Insure that all documents required to be impicment the resolution are referenced in theinitiated to Disposition Section.
5,4.2.5 Obtain approptidto Dept.
EER/RCFs.
Manager approval for all L
Pv24 ODD N(v482 684 A
-h-
%.A
>w
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING f/;ctount
{
STATION MANUAL 73AC ozz29 RtvisioN ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 35 of 51 NOTE Any department who has an action or needs the information should be identified in the EER Disposition Section.
5.4.2.6 Identify the departments af fected by the disposition on the EER form.
5.4.2.7 If an EER supersedes another EER(s), this should be anotated in the Disposition section and indicated in the Type of Disposition section including the number of the superseded EER(s).
NgrE A copy of the EE. will be sent to the Manager of each ideniffled department.
5.4.2.8 After System Engineer concurrence, the EER should be routed to the E'{ Coordinator for final closure.
5.4.3 EER Coordinator shall close the EER by:
5.4.3.1 Ensuring the EER has complied with the administrative provisions of this procedure and signifying by signing and dating the EER Coordinator /Date block.
5.4.3.2 Updating the EER log and EER Tracking System.
5.4.3.3 Update the EER log to indicate that an EER has been superseded, d that an EER supersedes another EER, 5.4.3.4 Transmitting copics of closed EERs to:
- 1. Initiator
- 2. System Engineer
- 3. Engineering
- 4. QS&E (by transmittal) i
- 5. Nuc1 car Safety and Licensing (dispositions that contain 10CFR50.59 Review and Evaluations)
- 6. Managers of the A,artments indicated by the System Engineer on Page 2 of the LER forta PV14 (CD Pt V i 12 584 A
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING[Rcrount o
STATION MANUAL 73AC-ozz:9 RLvisioN ENGINEERI!'O EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 36 of $1 5.4.3.5 Maintaining the original EER with attachments for a minimum of 30 dayn and then transmitting by transmittal Docutnent Control.to DDC-PV for final retention per RM01.04 5.4.3.6 Non intent changes or additional documentation may be added to a closed EER as maintains the original EER provided:long as the EER Coordinato 5.4.3.6.1 Disciplino Supervisor and EER Coordinator supervision initials and dates the changes or additional documents 5.4.3.7 Maintaining a copy of the closed LER with attachments for reference until it is firmly established the original EER has been archived properly.
5.4.3.8 Verify receipt of the Action Acceptanco Form from the Irnplementing Manager prior to EER closure.
'5.4.3.9 Report on all outstanding Action Acceptanco 5.5 Lost EERs 5.3.1 EERs lost shall be replaced by the EER coordinator by:
1)
Making a copy of thn file copy EER, and 2)
Identifying it with a red "Use as Original" notation, t
e L
Pv24 ODD MtV 4 a; See A
)
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATINGl$C'""'
(
STATION MANUAL mm3 73Ac-o m 9 Page 1 of 4 ntv1SioN ENGINEERING EVA1.UATION REQUEST 7
Pago 37 of 51 i
f ENGINEENNO WAI,UMON11EQUEW(
N8" AWPt*
P All; INitiAlfip $1Cil0N bis; witil :
tyvittithi 1 Au huMetM:
ifNIPMLh! lISte r !a0N2 Luty*ptatet t yt't; delfl AIDN ;
LM1:
kll( ALNLt DOCUHANit'.
41 Ai* ~
Me t t PrD /5-M00/Pf P/ve /v0 000 '
~ ~ ~
libllM LitJifdtit OR 61 A 00tel ACitDiset tl Al f f 9 00_NsgAp _rr-
-L aa j.
EOQI C Aubi k!CVWiDP vis O N0 0 int 191tbBYt PQ1tN16At 74ptvCQtd ORMAN((
~
11 &
4, it O t$cca
- pertmN.
~
IdchM 0tschiPilord:
vts O noDieO (t's rat we.itv"2t Atis wor <tur:
~
A"#~
~
1
~ ~ ~ '
0Ntv)
~~
s i
buCM61LD f(t&OLUll0N / id(&E ASSOHlNt; i
lu x fHtN (t40#44ktt<0 (vM u M LN ta k.' WALD 10 4 iM%t 1HW LONDillDN VCRP C;*1 Rot PRottSS.
Ahie C AteN01 tit NAt<btiD py Itg huxtt AL ~
INI TI A IOR 'S
$UP(RVISOR '
F4tf A10k$1 i
_ ___ B A t t.._. _.,_ _ M A N A f.I N :.__
s tS IHL All!C1&D Cut w'ot4NT QUAdly ktLitLD F$YSil M I NGINil W'S WIS0lllll0N,___ _ p a t t ___,
I R
het$ THIS (ilKitNCY 00COMit4l A tc40td04 MAN.CE 00f4D6luft ?
gg
~
1 answer enha if untwen 4Seve ;s mas 6ed "Yf S t
MUdl(NCY AllLLI lit OPik ABILlY Cf itt (OtV'Ohlfst 04 SYSitti ?
N00 a/A O
~
~~~
Yt$
l APPINDDr A Of 73AC 02/79li(V.1 g
L PvM 000 Rty a fJ 644A
,~..L-.22-_.,,_,_.
....,., - = _ - _
.,-n_----r.-n~,,-..:n,-.,
-. ~.. -...
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
[l$ " "'
STATION MANUAL 3ppggnix 3 73Ac 0ZZ29 Page 2 of 4 REVISION ENGINEERING EVAI,UATION REQUEST 7
Page 38 of 51
[.
ENGINEElllNG INALUATION REQUEttr PA e : Dr _
- AN,,.
ElDDLullHN SICil0N PR0411Vi
- iY$11 M l NGINil W"I kl Mit tillHN irWT )
SY%1LM LNotalR $ INitRF1 Rt 50 Lull 0N:
5VbitM thoddtk/D Alt; t,UP(MOR /p A t[ ;
i k A NM I W Al __
DtPIi NDivipVAL.
D Alii
~
L t *D bN burt WVnou
~
A>PROV Al /D A TI' :
DisPositK;N:
IYAlllA10R'S SICIl0N
- (
CRD55 DP53PLtd RtyltvRIQuiktD7 Ovt$ ONO M"'"""'"
"'*6 5 SN RtP AR
~
M Af TRIAL $UO5fif Uit0N M' kI 8 ?
g*
ACCEPT AS is '
RC1T CAUSt Of f ALVRt
~
~
L
$[VORK Unit t
~
INV AL O
~
htJECT/ SCRAP
[ suPERCitbs (tR NUMota
[ uni 13 Unit 2 Il F(ORMAT10N ONLY (E[p [ii$ E Iiitc M U UddiEN-N/A VNII{ID 3
[ CUT AGl MAN ACtMINT
~
~
OP(R Alt 0NS R AD PR01. A CHtM CtNTR AL MAIN 1tNANCt MAstitNANCr
$[CURif f VCRK CONTROL R ADV A57t SUPPORT.
TR AINF40 CtN1R Al, R AD PR01tC1 TON R AD PROT [Cil0N Pt ANT Stb & CONikDL M Af tRI AL CON 1ROL
, CHtMISTRY (NO#d tRido f
OPER All0NS C0t1Pufl4 L
($ALU Alt,N/DAf t :
Al'I'WUVAt $t tijuy LV ALVAIDR'$ %UPikV60N/D A1L a tvALVAlp4 5 MAN Ay4Nipatt ;
i U$llM if4Gildik $ C0rd UkklNC(;
IlCH, tf'tC,6 $ ? 3 api $0V AL(DAlti tiR (Dowgigt Algg(p A}[ tct93gQ7 APPENDIX A DF 70 AC-0?l29 tiV 7
-.- ~ ---
Pv24 000 Rtv 8 62 564 A m
~. _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i 1
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING
n ctount NO.
{
STATION MANUAL APPENDIX A 73AC-0ZZ29 Page 3 or 4 HEVISION
-ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 39 of 51 ENGINEERING INALUATION REQUE!TT ANPP 00NilNUA110N l'AGl P A 0HLit1/ buvot b li p ki bau t ivN / re t t k auti kg snu i spNip aseos s i agN ;
b 6
APP (fCIX A Of 73AC 97229 R[y 7 L
t PY796 000 p(v s O sad a s
..,,.g,,#.
wen NE"8T**'"
__,_,_,,,,,,-a=~=v-#*-'"" " " ' " ' " ' ' '
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ ~. _ _ _
\\
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING en croune
"~
g STATION MANUAL (4 or 4 A
7 xc ozz29 REVISION.
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 40 or 51 Uf4G WA1.UATIOff itEguterI 7-P Act 4 (r ANPP I1R ACIl0N ACCEPIANct Ac t 4ONS ELQUWID 10 Ott AM idoNGoterokgAnct ;SYSl[N I NCINI f R'S SICil0N i
i i
6
'(
6 AIL REQUALD:
' v0AM i<t Qut E l
- 1
)
IMI'l t Mf NilNG URGANilAll0N'S StCil0N NRK 00Cletttit$ 04 ACTIONS Cot 1PLLilk CR 10 i
i
+
l, f
i l
t1Pttrit N1 reg cac ANig 4: 3gy g g4434ggg f pg,g ;
APPINDIM A 0F 73 AC 0?l29 Rty 7 e
L Pyl4 000 hty a u $as A I
C" L
PAL') /EilDE NUCLUXt GENERATING
[l;crount
{
STATtON $1ANUAL
-i - - -
73AC-0Z::29 Page 1 of I l
nty,3,gy ENGlW ERING EVALUATION REQUEST
_,-d 7 Page 41 of $1 I
PRIORITY LODES l
s CODr.
[gt(giry Al h.x Required to assure the continued health and sa f ety of the public.
1 A2 Vork Required to assure the continued health and safety of personnel working at s'.NGS.
B1 Work required by regulatory or management mandate E^
Vork required to assure commercial operation or continued operation of each PVNGS unit or to increase station output.
B3 Vork required to reduce outage durations.
B4 Work required to precludo escalation to a higher priority or work which is mandated with a flexible schedule.
C1 Work with economic justification resulting in payback within one (1) year.
C ?.
Work with economic just j fication resulting in payback with 2 1/2 years.
k L
Pv?4 000 PiW8 42 See A L--
i PALO VEF.DE NUCLE,AR GENERATING
@ctoune STATION MANUAL 73Ac-0Zz:9 Page 1 of 1 REVISION -
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 42 of 51 i
EER EQUIPMCNT QUALIFICATION GUIDELINE PRIMARY QUESTIONS:
1.
Is the EER in question addressing Quality Related Equipment or component (s)?
YES NO !
2.
Qualification List?Is the equipmen _t or comp _onent(s) in questi (FSAR 3.2.1)
,YES NO If either Question 1 or 2 is "NO", an equipment qualification c been identified, and the EER is not required to be transferred t oncern has not o Engineering.
for further evaluation.If both Questions 1 and 2 are "YES", Questions 3 th i
e answered SECONDARY QUESTIONS
'(
3.
replacement component?Does the EER propose a change in the c YES NO 4.
Does the EER identify an increase in the severity of the enviro to which the component is exposed?
nment YES NO 5.
Does the EER address a possible chango to the orientation or seismic condition of the component.in question.
, mounting YES No 6.
IEes the EER sddress a possible extension to the shelf lif i
component as noted in the Equipment Qualification List?
e of a YES NO If a "YES" response is indicated for any of the Questions 3 thru 6 que= tion is considered to be addrensing an Equipment Qualifict tion c
, the EER Jn shall be transmitted to Engineering for resolution, unless there i oncern and evidence that the question has boca previously resolved and is so s documented the EER Resolution or if a verbal-agreement with Enginee i stated in If so, a copy of EER should be sent to Engineering, r ng has taken placo.
EER is not required to be transferred to Deer Valle an equipment qualification concern has not been identifiedif all Questions
,-and the L
PV24 000 Riv 4 &2 $44 A
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING((ctount STATION MANUAL Appn 9}x 9 73AC-ozz:9 Page i cf 1 ntvisioN ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 43 of 51 1
4 TABLE FOR USE IN IDENTITYING COMPONENT TYPES COMPONENT ID DESCRIPTION ACCUM AIRDRY Accumulators ANNUNC Air /Cas Dryers BATTRY Annunciator Modules BLOVER Batteries and Chargars CRTDER Blowers CONROD Circuit closures / Interrupters /hd switch Control Rods CRDRVE DEMINX Control rod drivo mechanism ELECON Domineralizers ENGINE Electrical Connectorn FILTER Internal Combustion Engines FIREXX Filter / Strainer FUELXX Misc. ;' ire Protection Equipment UENERA Any type of fuci
(-
HEATER Generators / Inverter INSTRO Electrical lleaters IBISSV Instrumentation and Centrols ICNTRL Instru - Bistabic/ Switch 1GNITE Inscru - Controllers INDREC Aux. Beiler Inuiter INTCPM Instru - Indicators / Recorders IPWSUP Instru - Integrator /Compu - Mod ISODEV Instru*- Electronic Power Supply IXMITR instru - Isolat ion Device MECFUN Instru - Transmitter / Element MOTORX Mechanical Functional Unit PENETR Motors PIPEXX Containment Penetrations PUMPXX Pipes and Fittings RECOMB Pumps RELAYX llydrogen Recombiner SOFTVR Control Relay SPAREX Computer Software SUPORT Spare Patts STRUCT Structural Support TRANSF Building or Structure TURBIN Transformer VALVEX Steam Turbine VAIN 0P General Valve Category VESSEL Valve Operator Type of container Pd216 (CD At V 6 82 $8 4 A 1 ________-.-- - --- l 2-- ~ ---
- ~ ~ ~
PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING P" CE*RE NO.
STATION MANUAL API,ENDIX E 73Ac-ozz29 page i of 2 REVISION E!!GINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 44 of 31 i
Design _ Basin The following are those documents which constitute the design basis:
' Design baseline analyses and calculationn 1
Seismic llydraulic Thermal Stress
- Transient Flooding Diesel generator loading sequereing analyses Cable raceway routing and loading analyses Breaker coordination Environmental and seismic qualification Radioactive release analyacs System interactions Radwaste system design basis calculations
(
AIARA considerations ASME code design reports Fire hazards analysis D.C. auxiliary power systems loading Safety-related A.C. auxiliary power systems loading Floor loading (static)
Elcetrical load studies Voltage drops and short circuit calculationa Protective relay coordination curves and setpoints Pipe break analyses (high energy line break)
Internally generated missile analyses
- Indus'try codes and standards Applicable Licensing commitments affecting design Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR)
Technical Specifications PYD6 &C Rif lM M4A W-
=_
PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING enoct unc NO-STATION MANUAL APPENDIX E 73Ac-ozz29 Page 2 of 2 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Pago 45 of 31 l
D g yn Basis (Cont)
'NRC Bulletins, Generic Letters
' Regulatory Guides
\\
'Special Studies and Reports liydromotorological studies (calculations which support, probably maximurn Environmental reporthurricano, probabic maximum flended, off site Fire protection report Reports of geological studies and scismic hazards Evaluations conducted for the NRC (DERs.
LERs, etc.)
9 Pyt4 0nD Ntv 4 A2 See A 99*
~ ^ ~
e PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING(("""'
C STATION WIANUAL y,PEmnx r m e-ozz:9 Paac 1 of 6 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Pare 46 of 51 ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUE!rr
*'0' AMPP IWillA TOI? StCil0N
~"
l lQUVMLN1 bl%CRIV $0tC tilltAICR LXI:
kliL klNCl DUCUMLit t5 :
$1A-MPII
- ID/$ MOD /PrP/VR/VO DOC
)
bV51LM LNGINLLN 04 6i A GONI ACILD:
$PtrtAl f f p rON9f Df pail 0N l
RD01 Caubt MousRED7 vts NoO *<itiAt D av:
0tatt<DDtvtNTO1seca*$_
T -
F'ROULlM DELCRP1 WN:
, Yi$
it0 O'<caO (vts - toa ouAttiv Rtt AiiD c0MPONt,4r: or
~
. v>
(
SUGGE SI10 k($0 Lull 0N' NIIDS AS$tSM[NT:
fv ORK CONTROL proct $$. Hit (R EfrJir4ttRr.G (V ALU AlION G R1GVALD 10 haiOLVL IH V
b CCFADtituf4 AND C Awat bt HAtdttD UV IH
~~
I INITl A TOR 'S S L'Pf RVISCR : __
._..__ _.__.__ D a t t. ___ _.,___ M A N Ar,I RPvtT ATOR$ *$
x 31HL AlI(CI(D Cor1 Pot 4NT QUALilY kit A1LD$YSit M I NGINII W'S Rt Sul flil0N
_ pair R
PCI$ IHIS OffIClif4CY OUCUMLHI A NJHLOfdLAMAhCL C0fiDil 0N y
~
answer ed; if gueshen above is enar6,4 *YtS*
4 7 --
'CULD1His Ptfit.itt.CY AFitCi 1HL Cf(R AOLlY Of tht COMtvdt l vts O No O
'</A O i 04 SY$itt7 f Yt$.1HE $Y$1(M[NGfit(R'$ $UPIRVISOR $ Hall NOTtrY THE Aff
~
fCf(D UNIT'S tse LR AT10NS SHf f SUPfRVISOR Pv?4 000 pty 4 W Sea A
_ _ _ _ _ _-~ _
O' O
PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING flg cm>nt STATION MANUAL ppgggx y 73AC-0ZZ29 Page 2 of 6 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 47 of 51 t
9 ENGINEEIUNG EVALUATION REQUEST rw aw ANPP Rt501bil0N St CTION Pk10Ri!Y:
SYSil M i Nr.1NIi R'S kl SOL UIION fccTT 1 g
SYSitM U4G24tLR'S INTERIM RESOLVION: (IF NONColdORMANCE C0:
~
4D41ON(xiSTS, AL50 COMPLt![ Pact g)
Sib 1LM thor 4LLR/D Alt ;
i surtuysson/p A tt :
DLPT; ikAhSiiWAL f4DivlDU AL :
D Alt :
(t aD ou svethviscg APPROVAL /D A TE :
DGPO51140N; (YALtlA10WS SICT1 N
~
CAosspnclPLr4 Rtvity REQUIRED P 0 vtS ONo
'" S " "
pgpAg g_
MA1(RIAL SUustifUTION 9
8?
ACCCPT AS is Root C AUSC or T ALURI 2-klYORK INVALD UNIT I 3_
[ RtJECT/ SCRAP (SUPERCitD UNIT 2 NUM0lR bir51YAYK3 CI Y1@hYtYdUiE
~-
- 0RM A TION CNLY UNIT 3 M 85 W
~
)
N/A
[OPERATONS
~ OUT AGt M AN AGEMENT
~'"
MAINitNANCC CENTR AL MAINTIN ANCE R R AD PROT, & CHEM
~
~
StCURt1Y VORK CONTROL R ADVASIL buPPORT TR AIN#40
~
R AD PR0f tCT40N CtNTR AL R AD PR0f tcil0N
[ CHEMTSTRY Pt ANT $1D A CONTROL MATIRIAL CONTROL l
[ OPfR ATONS COMPUT(R I_j __talNo (NGNf i
tvAt u A TOR /D Alt Al'I'40 VAL SICilDN (v ALU A10R '$ 5Urf avs50R/D Af t :
tv ALV Aloit 5 M AN Autw/oAtt :
SYS11M LNGtd(R S C0teCukktf Cf :@
ILCM. SPEC,65 2 J ANA0 VAL /D tiI {
4 A
G lk C00kDtv AIOR/p Alt (CLOLvw():
G.
L PYD6 (CD Rtv 4W S44 A 7-w in wr.----
-my w
y y-.y--3 9,,r-psg.-yry-,9m---,
pn 3,+m,y py--yy.nwg-.,.w,,..-yyv.
.y
,mr w
e mea
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING 1
PROCEDURE No
{
STATION MANUAL APPENDIX F 73AC-ozz29 Page 3 of 6 REVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATICN REQUEST 7
Page 48 of 51 i
EER COMPLETION GUIDE Specific Section Resp. Individual 1.
EER Number -(YR)-(System)-(Seq. No.)I 5.1.5 EER Coordinator 2.
Date-Month / Day / Year Initator 3.
System - Two Digit System Designator Initiator 4.
Unit - Affected Unit (s) 1,2,3 or All ator 5.
EQIl Complete Equipment Number as listed in SIMS Initator 6.
Type - NPRDS Component Type (sco Appendix D)
Initiator
(
7.
Equipment Description - Brief description of the component or Initiator part being addressed B.
Initiator - Name of Initiator Initiator 9.
Ext. - Initiator's phone extension Initiator 10.
STA - Initiator's mail station In.itiator 11.
Department - Initiator's Department Initiator 12.
Ref. Documents - Any related document 5.2.1.4 associated with the equipment of the Initiator problem.
Includes - Plant Design Documents, Vendor Drawing, Tech Manuals, P.O.(/, In Progress Work Order (), PCR, PCP, etc.
13.
S.E. Contacted - Name of the S.E.
5.1.1 or ST contacted prior to completion Initator of the EER.
L Pv24 000 Div 912 14 4 A
._ ~
PALO VERDE NUCLE;AR GENERATING
["[ctwne
{
STATION MANUAL ENDIX F 73AC-0ZZ29 Page 4 of 6 RcVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQl'EST 7
Page 49 of 51 EER COMPLETION GUIDE (CONT)
Spacific Section hjp d i_dividual 14 Root Cause Req. - Identifies the 5.2.1.2 reason for the EER to perform a STA/SE Only Koot Cause Analysis of the failed component.
If an RCP is believed to be reqtired, the SE/STA should be contacted, otherwise the block should be marked NO.
15.
RCF Initiated by - The proper block 5.2.1.2 should be marked to indicate what STA/SE Only caused the RCF to be generated.
Any related documents should be provided.
If by TSCCR, Indicate the number in the space provided.
16.
Potentin! Ncnconformanco Condition -
3.1.10 Initiator Used to indicate if a Potenttal Non-5.2.1.7 conforn.ance Condition has been 5.2.1.8 identified in a quality related compoicnt.
17.
ProbIcto Description - Conciso descrip-5.2.1.2 Initiator tion of the Engineering concern.
Should include resolution need dato if known.
18.
Suggested Resolution - Any known or 5.2.1.3 itt).lator recommended r.olutions to the identi;itd concern.
5.2.1.5 19.
Initiator'n Supervisor Review - Review 4.2 to determinn validity of the EER prior Initiator's Supv.
to submittal to EER Coordinator.
20.
Determination of Quality Class 5.3.2.4 necessary to determine if a Non-Sy.teni l
}S' conformance condition exists.
PWP6 OtD $4) 3 42 544 4 c-
=
w n-
,4
(
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATINGf/[ctount STATION MANUAL pyg 9xx y 73Ac-oE229 Page 5 of 6 RtVISION ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 50 of 51 g_R COMPI.ET10N GUIDE (CONTl Specific Section
_R e n n. Individual _
21.
Nonconforming Condition Deter-mination - Only required if first 5.3.2.4 System Eng, question has been answered yES.
22.
Operability Determination - Pre-liminary evaluation of the effort 5.3.2.'4 System Eng.
of the concern as its relates to Tech Spec Operability.
23.
S.E. Interim Resolution - Allows a documented resolution prior to 5.3.4 System Eng, final closure. Hay also be used to give guidance to Evaluator.
24 Priority - EER work priority, determined from Appendix B.
5.3.2 System Eng, 25.
Transfer Block - Used to indicate the Individual and Dept, 5.3.3 to whom System Eng.
the EER is being transferred.
26.
Supervisor Approval - Rnquired
~
to allow transfer of the EER 4.7.3 S.E. Supervisor to another Department, 27.
Sys. Eng. - Signature of the S.E.
for Authorizing Interim Res.
5.3.4 System Eng.
or for requesting Transfer.
28.
Disposition - Evaluators Resolution of the reported 5.3.5 Evaluator
-condition.
29.
Cross Disciplino. Review - Ur.ed 1
to document 5.3.5.1.5 Evaluator all cross-discipline reviews (by Signature).
30.
Type of Disposition - Used to annotate the type of EER disposition.
5.3.5 Evaluator
,,..s m......
- - - ~
,o PALO VERDE NUCLE,AR GENERATING "" ctouns (j
(_
STATION MANUAL o
73Ac-ozz29 Pace 6 of 6 HEVISION.
ENGINEERING EVALUATION REQUEST 7
Page 51 of 51 APPENDIX !' (CONT)
EER COMP!J. TION CUIDE
? Specific Section Number cf any Previous EER Respu lndividual_
31.
which has been superseded 5.4.2.6 by the resolution.
System Eng.
32.
Units affected by the Disposition 5.3.4 Evaluator 33.
Organizations Affected - Those i
Depts who need the EER for 5.4.2.5 System Eng.
implementation or information.
34 Evaluators Signature /date - Signed upon completion of the EER.
5.4.1.1 Evaluator 35.
Evaluators Supervisors Approval -
Required for all EER Dispositions 5.4.1.2 Eval. Supervisor 36.
Eval. Managers Approval - required for repair of accept-as-is dispositions 5.4.1.3 Eval. Manager 37.
S.E. 's concurrance of the resolution If it was performed by another
,5.3.3.4.1 System Eng.
ludividual.
Hay be N/A'd if S.E.
5.4.2.3 was the Evaluator.
- 38.. Plant Manager approval if the change is considered a Plant 5.3.5.4.1 Plant Manager Modification.
39.
EER coordinator - Used to document final closure of the EER.
5.4.3 EER coordinator O
P44 000 A(V 8 A2 $84 A
,_vw-----
"'