ML20080C560
| ML20080C560 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 10/05/1983 |
| From: | Rutman J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080C249 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-83-609 92HF-1ZZ01, 92HF-1ZZ01-R00, 92HF-1ZZ1, 92HF-1ZZ1-R, DN-1821B-0959B, DN-1821B-959B, NUDOCS 8402080136 | |
| Download: ML20080C560 (31) | |
Text
. _. - - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ - . -
J_.
TEST RESULTS REPORT Q ".
I
' '_ w
/
PROCEDURE NO. 92HF-1ZZOI PROCEDURE TITLE PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION REVISION AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF TESTING 00 DATE 05/05/83_
00 DATE 05/05/83 REVISION AT COMPLETION OF TESTING ,
43 DATE 07/01/83 LATEST TEST CHANGE NOTICE NO.
DATES OF TEST PERFORMANCE 05/16/83 through 07/01/83 l PAGE 1 OF 17 Review and Approval of Test Results fe ~. P i------ DAT5 /c Y2 l PREPARED BY:
/p 2.- . DATE /8 I. "
TECHNICAL REVIEW:
/A DATE /O -T-[$ l GROUP SUPERVISOR REVIEW-(/ ' DATE TEST WORKING GROUP MEETING NUMBER:
DATE PLANT REVIEW BOARD MEETING NUMBER:
DATE QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW:
(Required for Test Results Reports not reviewed by TWG) -
DATE STARTUP MANAGER APPROVAL:
l t p
l l
Ty -52g-8402000136 831116 PDR FOIA DN-1821B/0959B GARDE 83-609 PDR
--.,,'. . . - - . - . - _ _ . ~ - . . . ~ . . _ . . _ _ . . - _ . - - _ . - , - . _ - - _ _ . - - . . . - . - - -
I i
.."
- Tact Resulto Repsrt
, * '6 '92HF-1ZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 i Page 2 of 17 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of the Precore Instrumentation Correlation Test was to verify that similar plant instruments agre,ed within specific tolerances, and to collect a historical record of plant parameters
- during the Precore Hot Functional Test Program. In particular, its objectives were
(1) To verify that the outputs from the Plant Protection System, Core Protection Calculators, Process Instruments and the Plant Monitoring System are in agreement.
j (2) To verify that the narrow and wide range process instruments accuracy and operation by comparing similar channels of instruments.
(3) To monitor the Control Room and Remote Shutdown panel instrumentation during integrated plant operation.
(4) To provide a permanent record of plant parameters during Ptecore Hot Functional Testing.
The scope of the Precore Instrumentation Correlation Test was to ensure that the Plant Instrumentation met the following Acceptance
- Criteria:
(1) The differences in the outputs between the Plant Monitoring System, Plant Protection System, Core Protection Calculators, and Plant Process Instrumentation shall agree within the specified tolerances based on instruments accuracies (SFAR/CESSAR, Sections 14.2.12.2.2 and 14.2.12.2.7).
2.0 COMPLEMENTARY TEST f (1) Preoperational Test None l (2) Post Core Hot Functional Tests 73HF-1ZZO2, Post Core Instrumentation Correlation Test (3) Power Ascension Tests None r
---e ew_ . - - ,__
T;st Reculto Repsrt 92HF-1ZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 3 of 17 3.0 TEST DESCRIPTION The Instrumentation Correlation Test was conducted at eight different temperature and pressure test plateaus during the Precore Hot Functional Test Program. Specifically, these plateaus were:
(1) Ambient conditions (Appendix A)
(2) 260*F and 350 psia (Appendix B)
(3) 360*F and 460 psia (Appendix C)
(4) 460*F and 1100 psia (Appendix D)
(5) 505"F and 1550 psia (Appendix E)
(6) 520*F and 1750 psia (Appendix F)
(7) 545'F and 1950 psia (Appendix G)
(8) 565'F and 2250 psia (Appendix H & I)
At the final test plateau, instrumentation correlations were conducted twice, once at the beginning (Appendix H) and once at the end (Appendix I). In addition, in the time period between, plant parameters were recorded daily per Appendix J to provide data on instrumentacion performance and historical record of plant conditions.
Each time the instrumentation was correlated, data was gathered from the. Main Control Room Panels, Remote Shutdown Panels, Core Protection Calculators, Plant Protection System and Plant Monitoring System. The technique was to record the data for a particular comparison as simultaneously as possible. In cases where parameter indications were varying, due to signal fluctuation, a time average approach was employed. The test subdivided the instruments being correlated into the following groups: t .
(1) Channel to Recorder (2) Channel to Channel and Plant Monitoring System (3) Channel to Core Protection Calculators (4) Channel to Plant Protection System (5) Channel to Plant Monitoring System
! (6) Channel to Remote Shutdown Panel l (7) Plant Monitoring System to Core Protection Calculators The instrumentation comparisons performed consisted of two distinct i types. They were denoted as " difference" and " channel difference".
Their definitions are:
(1) Difference - Refers to a comparison between a Process Indicator reading to an associated Process Recorder, Remote Shutdown Panel Indicator, Core Protection Calculator, Plant Protection System or Plant Monitoring Computer reading.
(2) Channel Difference - Refers to the maximum difference between any number of Process Instruments which monitor the same parameter.
[
1
. . Tsst Ruults Report 92HF-1ZZ01 l
- Revision 00 TLN 43 I
. Page 4 of 17 These comparisons were then checked against the allowable tolerance. If the value derived was within this tolerance it was acceptable, otherwise a TER was written, corrective action taken (if possible) and the instrument rete,sted at the next' test plateau. Farthermore, if the problem persisted at the next test plateau, it was documented by the same open TER or a new TEk was written.
At the cocpletion of Data Collection and Review, a list of l
deficient instruments was compiled. These inst:ruments were then
" yellow stickered" by Operations to prevent their use to satisfy Acceptance Criteria by any other Hot Functional Test Procedure.
Furthermore, prior to continuing to the next test plateau, concurrence of the Shift Supervisor, Test Director and Hot Functional Test Group Lead Startup Engineer were obtained to ensure that adequate instruments were available to support this escalation.
i 4.0 TEST EVENTS 4.1 PRETEST INSTRUMENTATION WALKDOWN Prior to conducting the test, a walkdown of the instruments to be i correlated was conducted. It was done as a joint effort between the HFT and I&C Startup groups and both had to agree on the problem encountered. 'Ihe check included, but was not limited to:
'(1) Instruments monitoring similar parameters not in agreement (2) Unreasonable values (3) Instruments spiking or pegged up/down scale (4) Zero reference problems
(
(5) Instrum'ents not installed l
(6) Instruments not or poorly labeled j
(7) Recorders not having power on, no paper, not inking, etc.
The walkdown found 58 groups of instrument problems which equated l to approximately 20 percent of those used for this test. These problems were then forwarded to Startup I&C for resolution. In l addition, the walkdown also found procedural problems. To eliminate them, two TCN's, TCN 1 and TCN 2, were written.
! 4.2 PREREQUISITE AND INITIAL CONDITION The procedure Prerequisites and Initial Conditions were then reviewed for compliance prior to signing these steps. This review revealed that they were adequately met, but that the exact
' wording employed was overly restrictive. As such three TCN's
! (TCN 3, TCN 4, and TCN 5) were written to add "To the extent necessary" to steps 4.2, 4.7 and 5.1, and to delete parts of step 4.4. Thus at the start of Section 8.0, five TCN's were written l
I to cortect procedure problems encountered.
l
. _ _ . - - - . _ _- =- . . _ _.
- T20t Recults Report 92HF-12Z01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 5 of 17 4.3 TEST PROCEDURE CONDUCT The test procedure was started on May 16, 1983 and continued through the Precore Hot Functional Test program until completion on July 1,1983. In all 121 TER's written, 73 of which were resolved / retested and 48 were lef t open due principally to equipment problems. Furthermore, 43 TCN's were written of which 30 were non scope and 13 were scope intent. Of the scope intent TCN's, three were rewrites of earlier ones not submitted within the five working day requirements of 90AC-0ZZO2.
In general the Instrument Correlations (Appendices A through I) and the Test Data Records (Appendix J) were performed without significant problems experienced.. The test method for each Appendix followed the steps below:
(1) Plant conditions were verified to be stable within allowed tolerance at the Test Conditions.
(2) Data collection and verification of Acceptance Critcria was done in accordance with the applicable Appendix for that test plateau.
(3) TER's and TCN's were written as necessary to document failures of Acceptance Criteria and to correct procedure problems encountered.
(4) TER's generated from previous test plateaus were retested.
(5) Upon completion of Data Collection, a review was conducted to ensure that the required data had been collected, TER's and TCN's were properly entered, and that all "N/A's" were explained in Test Log.
(6) TER's written were forwarded to Startup I&C for resolution.
(7) Based on the resolution furnished on the TER's, TCN's were written as necessary.
An overview of major events that occurred during the conduct of each Appendix is shown in Table 1.0.
At the fi al test plateau (565'F and 2250 psia), Appendix J was conducted daily except for two suspensions caused by RTD thernovell leakage problems which required a plant cooldown for repairs. Specifically:
(1) From 06/17/83 to 06/21/83 the plant was at reduced temperature and pressure during an unscheduled cooldown caused by leakage on RCA-TE-122CA thermowell.
' Tsot Resulto Report
- 92HF-12Z01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 6 of 17 4
(2) From 06/24/83 to 06/25/83 the plant was at reduced temperature and pressure during an unscheduled cooldown
- caused by leakage on RCC-TE-112CC thernovell.
Testing resumed upon return to this test plateau and continued until terminated by the controlling HFT procedure.
All TER's generated were logged into a tracking system to ensure that the status of each could be maintained. This list is shown in Table 2.0. If equipment failure or deficiencies were observed, SFR's were written and NCR/DCP's were generated as appropriate. Even though a large number of TER's remained open at completion of testing, only a relatively few number of problems other than re-calibration were found.
The technique used to resolve TER's, was to obtain Startup I&C resolution and then retest at the next rrocedure test plateau.
However, during testing from 460 to 545't, TER resolution prior to test conduct was not completely possible, due to the rapid succession of testing. TER resolution was again conducted after reaching 565'F and 2250 psia test plateau, which resulted in clearing many of these TER's generated over these test plateaus.
To ensure that process instruments which failed their correlation requirements were not used by other HFT procedures for satisfying Acceptance Criteria, yellow stickers were employed per Operation Instruction 9, Rev. 1. Their status was reviewed periodically and after completion of each appendix of this procedure. The statuc of the " yellow stickers" which were put in place as part of this test is shown in Table 3.0. After Precore Hot Functional Testing was completed, these stickers were then turned over to Operations per APS Hemo 03-019-419.
In summary, the procedure ran in a smooth fashion. No The outstanding problems were experienced in test conduct.
accuracy tolerances were achievable for instrumentation in calibration, except for Primary DP flow signals which required averaging due to the high degree of fluctuation.
4.4 TER RETESTING PACKAGES In general, TER'S generated at one test plateau were retested at the next test plateau. However, in certain cases due to the extent of the problem obse.ved and/or to resolve as many TER's as
' possible, two retest packages were generated to retest selected TER's. Specifically, they covered the following instruments:
.- . . _ = - _ . - . = _ _ _ _ . __ . _ . _ .. . - - . . - . - _ . . _. . .
. ?
' ' Tsot Rasulto Rep:rt 92RF-1ZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 7 of 17 4
(1) Retest Package 1 - Due to the extent of steam generator level problems experienced during test conduct, the level transmitter condensate pots on Steam Generator .2 were modified per DCP 1SJ-SB-0Z1 (See Figure 1.0). The intent uns to verify this fix on Steam Generator 2 prior to implementing it on Steam Generator 1. Retesting was done at all test plateaus, except " ambient conditions" to prove the modification. All level indicators passed retest except SGB LI 1124B which had a level transmitter problem previously documented per SFR 1SB080 and NCR ISJ2011. This level transmitter was replaced per Work Order 14839 and retested satisfactorily per Retest Package 2.
i.
(2) Retest Package 2 - This was done to verify the comparison on Steam Generator Level Indicator SGB LI 1124B to remaining channels, Steam Generator Level Indicator SGA LI 1123A to Remote Shutdown panel, Letdown Pressure Control Indicator CHN PI 201 to Plant Monitoring System and Remote Shutdown panel, and safety injection tank narrow range pressure between indicators SIN PI 312 to SIN PI 313 and SIN PI 342 to SIN PI 343. All retesting that was performed passed successfully. Retesting on the safety injection pressure was not possible since during this time period the SIT's were not pressurized above 450 psig.
In all, the following TER's were retested and passed to the extent necessary to close them (TER 7, 18, 21, 22, 27, 30, 52, 55, 59, 68, 80, 81 and 82).
4.5 INSTRUMENT TAGGING During the first run of Appendix J, Startup Q/A had concerns about the process instrument number, relative to the tag number utilized on the indicators / recorders. The problem was isolated to dual purpose instruments which had one tag number assigned.
Initially, the Test Director elected to write TCN's 24 through 26 to correct the problem. However, due to the large number of changes, it was decided to delete the reference to tag number by -
l l
TCN 27 and document Q/A's concern in an SFR.
i At the completion of the test program, four SFR's were written to address various tagging concerns encountered and to satisfy committment made to Q/A. They were:
i (1) SFR-1SI236 To document concerns on dual purpose indicators having only one tag number.
(2) SFR-1RC140 To ensure that recorders / indicators not having tags attached will be corrected.
l
Tact Results Report
- 92HF-1ZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43
- Page 8 of 17 (3) SFR-1RC139 To correct tagging inconsistencies on RCS wide range cold leg temperature indicators and recorders.
(4) SFR-1SB134 To address concerns about similar tagging numbers being used on the wide and narrow range RCS hot leg temperature indicators and recorders.
4.6 PLANT 3ETTERMENT During testing, the level indication ranges used on the steam .
generators, pressurizer, safety injection tanks and refueling water tank was found to be confusing. This was due to the narrow and wide range indicators both having a range of 0 to 100 percent. Since the instruments currently are in compliance with plant design, SFR ISB135 was written as a proposed Plant Betterment.
4.7 TWC COMMENTS ON PROCEDURES TCN'S .
During the course of test performance, all original TCN's generated were forwarded to TWG. All comments received were reviewed and changes made as appropriate. On the scope intent TCN's, meetings were conducted on June 8, 9 and 16,1983 for approval.' Of these 2,11,14,17, 23, 33 and 34 were dicapproved and 20, 21, 22, 29, 30 and 32 were approved. An overview of changes incorporated on procedure TCN's are discussed below:
TCN TYPE CHANGE / STATUS 2 Scope Rejected by TWG du'e to TCN not received I
within five working days per 90AC-0ZZ18.
Change resubmitted as TCN 32.
l 8 Non-Scope Interim approval not obtained prior to entry. Obtained Shift Supervisor's signature and added Note to TCN.
9 Non-Scope Interim approval not obtained prior to entry. Obtained Shift Supervisor's signature and added Note to TCN.
f l 10 Non-Scope Reason was re-written to clarify purpose for incorporating changes.
l l
I
Tact Re:ults Rep:rt
- ' 92HF-1ZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 9 of 17 TCN TYPE CHANGE / STATUS 11 Scope Rejected by TWG due to TCN not received within five working days per 90AC-0ZZ18.
Change resubmitted as TCN 33.
14 Scope Rejected by TWG due to TCN not received within five working days per 90AC-OZZ18.
Change resubmitted as TCN 34.
15 Non-Scope Interim approval not obtained prior to entry. Obtained Shift Supervisor's signature and added Note to TCN.
4 17 Scope Rejected by TWG. Their position was to use an open TER.
19 Non-Scope Added " procedure error" above reason stated.
20 Scope The performance frequency of Appendix J Lhanged from "approximately every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />" to "once daily" per TWG request.
21 Scope Appendix J performance log was made an
" exhibit" to allow multiple copies to be used as necessary per TWG request.
22 Scope Added "plus or minus" sign to Acceptance Criteria per TWG request.
23 Scope Rejected by TWG. Their position was to use an open TER.
30 Scope Proposed changes in Appendix I were deleted per TWG request.
32 Scope Reason for TCN expanded by using an attached page.
33 Scope Deleted by author based on TWG comments of TCN 11. Their position was to use an open TER.
34 Scope Deleted by author based on TWG comeents of TCN 14. Their position was to use an open TER.
37 Non-Scope Changed reason to " change scale indication, procedure error".
- . - , . . .~ , , . - . , - , , , - , - . . -- , ., - - - - , , , , , , - , - . - , ., , . - - , , , _ _ - - . , - , - , , , . - - . - . < -...,, --. . . - - - - - . , -
Tsot Recults Report 92HF-lZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 10 of 17 5.0 TEST RESULTS During the Precore Hot Functional Test Program, the Instrumentation Correlation Test identified, corrected, and documented numerous instrument problems which were encoun'tered. Furthermore, it provided:
(1) An efficient method for correcting instrumentation problems, since I&C Personnel could perform work under open TER's.
(2) Verification that similar instruments correlated within their allowed tolerance as required per the procedures Acceptance Criteria. All exceptions were documented by TER's and resolved to extent possible in the HFT time frame.
(3) A monitoring program on the Control Room and Remote Shutdown panel instruments. If any instrument problem was encountered it was " yellow stickered" to prevent their use by other HFT procedures for Acceptance Criteria.
(4) A permanent record of plant parameters. This was accomplished by recording data at each major test plateau and daily while at the 565'F and 2250 psia test plateau.
The data collection process was performed smoothly with the instrument correlation requiring approximately 9.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> and the test data records requiring approximately 4.1 hours1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> to collect the data. In general the instruments either correlated well within tolerance or were way out due to equipment or calibration problems. Some difficulties were experienced on the primary side differential pressures resulting from signal variation. These indications were time averaged but Steam Generator DP instruments consistently failed to correlate.
In all, the test procedure generated 121 TER's of which 73 were resolved / retested and 48 were left open due primarily to equipment
' problems. Furthermore, only a small number of equipment problems were present at the completion of Precore Hot Functional Testing.
The large number of TER's lef t open resulted in multiple TER's against the same problem.
The following instruments or groups of instruments had problems which were not resolved at the end of Precore Hot Functional Testing.
{
l l
l l
l i
t
~
Test Results Report 92HF-lZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 11 of 17 (1) Steam Generator Levels During the Initial Heatup to Hot Standby, steam generator -
level indications did not correl' ate to each other within their allowed tolerance. The following documents were written to describe and remedy the problem:
SFR: ISB086, ISB091, ISB098, ISB099 NCR: ISJZO38 I DCP: ISJSB021 NOIE: See Figure 1.0 for a visual overview of the problem and resolution.
The DCP was implemented on Steam Generator 2 to permit verification of this design change during Precore Hot Functional Testing. All level indicators on Steam Generator 2 were ratested and passsd the correlation requirement.
Modification of Steam Generator 1 level indications will be done after Precore Hot Functional Testing is completed.
In addition two steam generator level transmitters also had a problem, they were SGD LI 1113D and SGB LI 1124B. Their status is:
SGD LI lil3D - Problem documente/ w r SFR ISB079 and NCR 1SJ2012.
SGB LI 1124B - Problem documented per SFR ISB080 and NCR ISJ2011. Corrected per Work Order 14839 and retested satisfactory.
l Currently there are 17 TER's still open against Steam .
Generator 1. They are, TER 04, TER 12, TER 13, TER 17, TER 29, TER 35, TER 37, TER 38, TER 39, TER 54, TER 66, TER 83, TER 88, TER 98, TER 100, TER 102, TER 119.
(2) RTD Cold Leg Failures i
The RTD's used for monitoring cold leg temperatures had a l
higher than expected failure rate during the test program.
Specifically, five RTD's failed of which two later developed i
l leaks in the thermowell, resulting in two separate plant cooldowns to repair the leaks. The affected RTD's are listed I below:
w -
p +t gi. .'y. .---y-- -'
+
Test Results Report 92HF-lZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 12 of 17 FAILURE PUMP LEAK LOCATION DATE SFR NCR
' RTD DATE RCA-TE-122CA 05/28/82 RCP5A 06/17/83 ISB101 ISJ2250 RCC-TE-112 CC 06/02/82 RCP 1A 06/21/83 ISB103 ISJ2123 RCA-TE-111Y 06/02/82 RCP 1A (1) ISF073 ISJ2257 RCA-TE-112 CA 06/05/82 RCP 1A (1) ISB107 ISJ2172 RCA-TE-ll5 06/14/82 RCP 1B (1) 1RC129 ISJ2473 NOTE (1): These RTD thermowells were capped to prevent leakage problems.
Since there is a RTD thermowell location / design or RCP problem resulting in these failures, numerous SFR's and NCR's have been written to document and correct this problem.
Specifically beyond those listed above:
SFR: 1RC109, IRCll7, IRC119 NCR: ISM 2185, ISJ2201 Currently there are 12 TER's still open against these RTD's.
They are, TER 42, TER 45, TER 57, TER 63, TER 69. TER 73, TER 77, TER 86, TER 91, TER 94, TER 104 and TER 111.
(3) Steam Generator Primary Differential Pressure The steam generator differential pressure indicators consistently failed to correlate with each other and of ten failed to correlate during comparisons to the Plant Monitoring System and Plant Protection System. The problem was attribut'ed to:
l o The ITT Barton Electronic Transmitters were found to be experiencing drif t over short time periods (days). This problem is documented per SFR 1SB119. Later resubmitted as i
SFR ISB147 on CE request for additional data.
l o The oscillation in the differential pressure signal was on l
l the order of 2 to 5 times the allowed tolerance. This problem is documented per SFR ISB112.
The signal oscillation problem was also experienced on the core and reactor coolant pump differential pressure signals.
In cases where signal variations were experienced, obtaining the average reading was performed. This resulted in the core and reactor coolant pump differential pressure indicators generally close to their tolerance, but no failures were recorded. However, on the steam generator differential g
pressure this approach helped, but failure to correlate was l
experienced.
- Tast Reculto Report
' 92HF-12Z01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 13 of 17
' Currently there are 12 TER's open against the steam generator differential pressures. They are, TER 15, TER 16 TER 24, TER 32, TER 33, TER 47, TER 76, TER 101, TER 106, TER 117, TER 118 and TER 120.
(4) Safety Injection Tank 1 Pressurd' ;
The Safety Injection Tank narrow range pressures on SIT 1 did not meet the correlation requirement during the initial heatup l to hot conditions. Recalibration was performed at 565'F and 2250 psia and channel comparison per Appendix J did pass, however, full correlation retest was not possible due to the SIT being depressurized mid way into this plateau.
Currently there are 4 TER's still open against these pressures (i.e., SIN PI 312 and SIB PI 313). They are, TER 36, TER 49, !
(5) Wrong Scales The following indicators / recorders had the wrong scales still present at the completion of Precore Hot Functional Testing.
Instrument SFR CTA LR 35 1RM019 CHN LI 210 1CK353 CHN TI 224 1CH267 HCN TI 57 13C066 SGA PI 1013A-1 ISB071 SGB PI 1013B-1 ISB071 SGA PI 1023A-1 ISB071 SGB PI 10238-1 ISB071 i
NOTE: SFR 1SB082 and NCR SJ2212 were also written against all l
these scale problems as part of the instrumentation
' walkdown.
l Verific1 tion of correlation requirements was done using l correction factors during test conduct. As such there are no '
open TER's. Problem will be resolved without retest per I
l SFR/NCR resolution, f
(6) Safety Injection Tank Wide Range Levels The safety injection tank wide range level indicators were out-of-service during Precore Hot Functional Testing. The ITT Barton Transmitter required modification from a dry leg to a wet leg transmitter. Problem documented per SFR ISI190 and NCR ISJ2116. Currently TER 10 is open against these indications.
i
'" fact Resulto Repsrt 92HF-1ZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 14 of 17
- (7) Computer Containment Sump Levels, RDL19 and RDL20 Computer points RDL19 and RDL20 were out-of-service for Precore Hot Functional Testing. The level probes were not installed. Problem documented per SFR 1RD085 and FMR 71230.
Currently TER 11 is open against these points.
(8) Plant Protection System Bistable Select Switch It was observed during test conduct that the Bistable Select switch (SG101 and SC102) did not always make a good contact thus giving an erroneous reading. The problem was documented per SFR ISBill and NCR ISJ2269, which recommends that it be l
cleaned or . replaced. Currently there are no open TER's against this problem, since retesting at the next test plateau always passed.
(9) Reactor Coolant Pump 1A Speed (Alternate)
During the final instrumentation correlation, the computer
, pump speed indication (RCS 155) was found to be zero.
Investigation revealed that the sensor field cable was damaged. The problem was documented per SFR ISB120 and is currently pending Combustion Engineering resolution whether to fix or replace. Work Order 16273 was written to accomplish repair [ replacement. Currently TER 114 is open.
In addition, throughout the test, the refueling water tank level indications on CHA LI 203A, CHB LI 203B, CHC LI 203C and CHD LI 203D were off-scale high. As such, comparisons could not be done and "N/A's" were entered and explained in the Test Log. Therefore, confirmation of these levels correlating within tolerances were not 1
achieved. '- .
6.0 CONCLUSION
S
- The results of the test demonstrated that.the Process Instruments, Plant Protection System, Core Protection Calculator and Plant Monitoring System met their correlation requirements with only a few equipment problems causing test exceptions to remain open.
Therefore, this procedure adequately fulfills the intent of The problems
- SFAR/CESSAR sections 14.2.12.2.2 and 14.2.12.2.7.
encountered have been of a nature that would be expected during the startup of a first-of-a-kind unit of this size. They have been appropriately documented in SFR's, NCR's and DCP's and the resolutions obtained give adequate assurance that they will be corrected. As such, based on a review of the test results and
- problem resolutions, it is felt that Unit 1 instrumentation covered by this test, will support escalation to the next test phase.
1
- No te : The conclusions reached are still pending CE response to SFR ISall2 and SFR ISBil9 (Resubmitted as SFR ISB147).
Tast Results Raport 92HF-1ZZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 15 of 17 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1 Additional Testing Retesting of the procedure open TER's should be done per the guidance furnished in Table 4.0. If they are not resolved or retested prior to fuel loading, retesting can be done per 73HF-12ZO2, Post Core Instrumentation Correlation Test.
7.2 Test Techniques The procedure ran in a smooth fashion with no problems ;
experienced other than minor typo's and changes documented by various TCN's written. As such,. prior to performing the test again, they should be incorporated as appropriate, specifically:
(1) The Prerequisites and Initial Conditions given in steps 4.2, 4.4, 4.7 and 5.1 were overly restrictive and need to be rewritten to include "to the extent necessary to support this test" (TCN's 3, 4 and 5).
(2) The computer points for Containment Sump Level and Reactor Cavity Level have to be converted to inches prior to comparison to their respective process instruments (TCN 6).
(5) The process instruments which fail to meet the correlation requirements need *. de " yellow stickered" out to assist in assuring that they are not used by other HFT procedures for satisfying their Acceptance Critarions (TCN 10).
(4) The frequency of performing Test Data Record ( Appendix J) of "eight hours" was to often and needs to be changed to "once ,
daily". Furthermore, provision for running this appendix numerous times should be incorporated (TCN's 20 and 21).
' (5) The Reactor Coolant System temperatures on indicators RCA TI ll2HA and RCA TI 122HA should not be compared to those on recorders RCA TR 112 and RCA TR 122. The indications monitor narrow range, whereas the recorders monitor wide range temperatures (TCN 22).
!' (6) The procedure should specify " Process Instrument Number" versus " Process Instrument Tag Number". The latter requires the procedure to duplicate exactly what is stated on the b Instrument Tag (TCN 27).
l-(7) The CEDM Normal ACU Outlet temperatures and pressures should not be compared since they monitor different trains (TCN 29).
1.
l
_ . . - - -_ _~ . _ _ . _ . _ - - . . _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ . _-__ _. . _ - _ _ . -
~ .
Test Results Report 92HF-12Z01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 16 of 17 l
(8) The following comparisons should be deleted from the procedure (TCN 32): .
I o Reactor Coolant Pump speeds On pumps not in service.
I o Safety Injection Tanks narrow range pressure indications on the first three test plateaus. They are not on scale.
[
o Pressurizer Restrictive Range Pressure Recorder i~ (RCA PR 103). It has been removed from Control Room panel i per DCP ISJRM092.
l o Condensate Storage Tank level indicator (CTN LI 13A). It has been removed from Control Room panel per DCP ISJRM056.
(9) The collection of data per Appendix J is required at the
- - 565'F, 2250 psia test plateau. As such if a plant equipment
' problem results in cooling down the plant for repair, its conduct can be suspended until return to this test plateau (TCN 39).
(10) The procedure typo's encountered should be corrected (TCN's 1, 7, 8, 9, 15, 16, 19, 28, 31, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41 and 4?). ,
4 In addition the following recommendations would be helpful in clearing up areas of confusion noted during testing:
(1) The Acceptance Criterions stated in each Appendix used a + A tolerance. It would be clearer if the + sign were deleted ,
and ths procedure " difference" and " channel difference" comparisons were defined as absolute values.
3 (2) The method of doing a " difference" and " channel difference" ,
comparison should be expanded in more detail, specifically, l'
d an example should be provided in the procedure.
! 7.3 Further Use of Test This test procedure was specifically written for Precore Hot Functional Testing, and as such, it only compares those instruments which are on scale during this test phase. however, it can be used as a bases for developing the following:
(1) Post Core Instrumentation Correlation Test (2) Process Instrumentati'n Surveillance Test
,, e-p, - - , , , +- ,- .,3, ,,-w- . ,, r.,,g._ _,.,-,_,,3--,w,,,.,-, ,,-w. ,,.,m_.w,--, ,y m,,,, , , ,, ,,,,,n-,~, . - - , - . , , , - , . , . , . , , , , , ,r---
- Tact Resulto R2 port
' 92HF-lzZ01 Revision 00 TCN 43 Page 17 of 17 7.4 Acceptance of Test Results*
The PSE recommends approval of these test results by the Reviewing Organization based on: ,
(1) All Acceptance Criterions were met except those noted by open TER's.
(2) The open TER's have been adequately documented by SFR's, NCR's and DCP's as appropritate to ensure that the problems addressed will be corrected.
(3) The open TER's will be retested per 73HF-lzz02, Post Core Instrumentation Correlation Test, if not resolved / retested prior to fuel loading.
nu Ie- - . J&ks~ re-s-53 Q4n M. Putnam APS Principal Startup Engineer, Level III
- Note: The acceptance of test results are still pending CE response to SFR ISBil2 and SFR ISB119 (Resubmitted as SFR ISB147).
8.0 ATTACHED TABLES AND FIGURES (1) Table 1.0 - Precore Instrumentation Correlation Test Summary (2) Table 2.0 - Precore Instrumentation Correlation Test TER History (3) Table 3.0 - Precore Instrumentation Correlation Test " Yellow Sticker" History (4) Table 4.0 - Precore Instrumentation Correlation Test Open -
TER's Retest Metrix (5) Figure 1.0 - Steam Generator Level Transmitters Condensate Pot Problem / Resolution.
~
PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST SLHMARY COLLECTION PER50RMANCE PROCEDURE START STOP TgST TER'S TCN'S TER'S COMPARIS0d TIME RATE STEP /APPX DATE DATE DIRECTOR WRITTEN VRITTEN RETESTED DONE (HOURS) (MIN / COMP) 8.1.2/A 05/16/83 05/17/83 J. M. Putnam 1 - 22 6 - 14 rone 284 12.03 2.54 05:0 0420 ;
8.2.2/3 05/24/83 05/25/83 J. M. Putnam 23 - 28 15 - 17 1.2.3.5.6 276 10.00 2.17 1000 0141 8.14.19.20 ,
8.3.2/C 05/27/83 05/27/83 J. M. Putnam 29 - 30 None 25.26.28 276 7.75 1.68 1040 1930 8.4.2/D 05/28/83 05/29/83 J. S. King 31 - 40 None 9 300 11.90 2.20 1700 0400 T. C. Crizzard 8.5.2/E 05/29/83 05/30/83 T. C. CrizzarJ 41 - 48 18 34.40 344 5.80 1.01 1800 0310 H
- h 8.6.2/F 05/30/83 05/30/83 J. S. King a
7 1325 2210 T. C. Grizzard 49 - 61 19 44.46 344 10.75 1.88
," 8.7.2/G 05/31/83 05/31/83 J. H. Tode ,
o 0210 0700 T. C. Crizzard 62 - 72 None 53.56 344 4.83 0.84 8.8.2/N 06/02/83 06/02/83 J. M. Putnam 73 - 83 None 41.43.48.50 344 13.65 ., 2.38 i 0830 2220 T. C. Crizzard 58.60.61.62 64.65.70.71 8.8.5/J 06/04/83 06/29/83 J. S. King 84 - 113 20 - 41 84.85.87.89 5644 70.82 0.75 i
0135 175(, J. R. Todd 90.92.93.95 J. M. Putnam 96.97.99.103 W. A. Wheelis 109 W. Asbury 8.8.8/1 06/30/83 06/30/83 J. M. Putnam 114 - 120 42 - 43 72.74 344 4.67 0.81 0730 1730 ,
i NOTE: Five TCN's (TCN 1 through TCN 5) were written' prior to starting Section 8.0 of procedure.
NOTE: Appendix J was performed daily during testing at the $55'r und 2250 psia Test Plateau. In total it was done 17 times. ,
NOTE: The TER Retent Status at comnletion nF rew!rw wag 73 TrR resolved /cetested.
This can be broken down to 47 retested per proce( sre. 13 reteeted Per TEll rctest packar.e and 13 did not require ratesting
--, e v -w
1
- i if PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST TER HISTORY , ,
i SFR STATUS DOC 12fENT L'RITTE** RETEST STATUS FROCEDURE RESOI.UT'ON WRITTEN ANSWERED SFR NCA DCP AMPLETED CO'CIEM TER f TER DESCRIPTION STEP /APPR 1RITTIN DONE N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Page 47
' 8.1.2/A Yes Yes No 1- Fressuriser Level Recorder Of f-Scale 14w I
4 Pressuriser Pressure RR, RCA-F1-105 failed to correlate Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Fame 49 l 8.1.2/A Yes j 2 with RCA-F1-103. RCA-F1-104 and RCA-F1-106 Steam Generator Pressure Recorder SGA-PR-1013A/1023A No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Page 47 found to have wrcng reuse scale 8.1.2/A Yes Yes 3 LT 111W l 5tese Generatore WR Level Indicator failed to correlate 8.1.2/A Yes No Yes Yes 153079 ISJ2012 N/A No Failed
- 4 (i.e. SCA-L1-1113A. 11135, 1113C & 1113D)
Containment Pressure wide range recorder had wrong ,
No N/A II/A N/A N/A Yes Fase 47 8.1.2/A Yes Yes r j 5 ranse scale Fage 47 !
Yes Yes 153082 ISJ2212 N/A Yes i 8.1.2/A Yes Yes 6 RWT Level recorder has wrong range scale j
N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes y
! Letdown Pressure Controller OtN-F1-210 failed to 8.1.2/A Yes Yes No 7' correlate with CNF-201 I l 153082 ISJ2212 N/A Yes Page 62 1 8.1.2/A Yes Yes Yes Yes f S RMWT Level Indicator has wrong range scale .
H N/A Yes Page 121 No M/A N/A N/A h Control Room and Remote Shutdown Steam Generator UK . '
8.1.2/A Yes Yes H 9. Indicator SCA-L1-1113A and SCA-1113A-1 did not correlate ,
SIT WR Level Indications SIB-L1-311, SIB-L1-321, SIB-L1-331 8.1.2/A Yes 151190 ISJ2116 N/A No 005 J Yes No Yes f 10 & S15-L1-341 failed correlation test No 005
!O Computer Point RDL19 and RDL2O Jailes to correlate 8.1.2/A Yes No Yes Yes 1RD085 N/A N/A i 11 with Indicator RDN-L1-410 36 m SG WR 1Avel Recorder SCN-LR-1111. 1112, 1121 & 1122 Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 No Froblee j
! 8.1.2/A Yes No 12 failed to correlate with each other and the FMS 5G LvL f Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 No Froblem SG WR Level Indicatore f ailed to correlate with each 8.1.2/A Yes No Yes l
13 other (SCA-L1-1113A & SGA-L1-11135) and the PHS Page 70 The Letdown Hz tube outlet Temperature indicator on the Yes ICM267 N/A N/A Yes i
8.1.2/A Yes Yes Yes 14 Remote Shutdown Facel (CHN-T1-224) has wrong range scale 155112 D gSgggg (3) (3) y, ,b en SG #2 Differential Pressure Indicator RCC-FDL-125C failed 8.1.2/A Yes No Yes y, 15 Low 155112 $g pp l
Yes No 155119 (3) (3) No Froblem SG #2 Differential Pressure Indicator RCA-FDI-125A. RCC-FDI 8.1.2/A Yes No 125C & RCD-FDI-125D failed correlation SG LVL 16 No SG fl Level Indicators 5GA-L1-1114A, 5GB-L1-1114s, 550-L1- 8.1.2/A No Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Froblem Yes l
i 17 1114C and SCD-L1-1114D failed to correlate IER SG #2 Level Indicators SCA-L1-1124A, SGB-L1-11245. SGC-L1- Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes gegeog 8.1.2/A Yes Yes Yes 18 1124C and SCD-L1-1124D f ailed to correlate Yes Fase 55 N/A N/A N/A N/A RWT Level Indicator CHA-L1-200 f ailed to correlate with 8.1.2/A Yes Yes No 19 FMS RWT Level Indicator CMA-L1-200 and CHB-L1-210 failed to Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Pase 55 8.1.2/A Yes
,20 ' correlate Nots (1): The steam generator level problem was documented by four SFR's. !
i They were 153086. 155096. 153098 and 153099.
Note (2): The need for a DCP on the failed RTD's are still under evaluation. !
depending on whether they were caused by the RCP Problems experienced.
MM- f1h Nf" mi PCP aw11 tine resciut f an nf set.s 1sg182 and 155!!9
~
i I PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST TER HISTORY .
i PROCEDURE RrS01,UT : Opt SPR STATUS DOCUMENT WRITTEN RETEST STATUS TER f TER DESCRIPTION STEP /APPK !JRITTEN DONE WRITTEN ANSWERED SPR NCR DCP :OMPLETED COMENT TER SG WR Level Indicators SGA-LI-1123A and SGA-L1-11235 is11ed Yes Retest to correlate on Panel 806 8.1.2/A Yes Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes 21 ILR l SG #2 WR Level Indications SGA-L1-1123A. SGB-L1-11238. SGC- Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes Retest 22 LI-1123C and SGD-L1-1123D failed to correlate 8.1.2/A Yes Yes
- .Ne t PMS Point CML-2035 indicate negative off-scale where the Yes remaining PMS points were off-scale high 8.2.2/8 Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Rettuiret l 23 ISS!!2 SG DP SG #1 Dif ferential Pressure Indications RCA-FDI-115A. RCB- No 153119 0) (3) No Problee i 24 PD1-1158. RCC-FDI-115C & RCD-FDI-115D failed to correlate 8.2.2/3 Yes No Yes PPS Point D-14. Steam Generator #1 Differential Pressure Yes 158111 ISJ2269 N/A Yes Page 85 f' 25 off-scale low. Should have indicated approminately 40 PSID 8.2.2/B Yes Yes Yes Containment Pressure Indicator NCB-PI-3528 failed to N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Page 77 26 correlate with FMS 8.2.2/8 Yes Yes No TER I Letdown Pressure Controller CHN-PI-201 failed to correlate N/A N/A Yes -L
)g 37 with Remote Shutdown Panel CNN-Ft-201-1. 8.2.2/5 Yes Yes No N/A N/A Reteet
)h M 38 ReR. Hz to changing line D/P Indicator CHN-PDI-240 failed to correlate with FMS 8.2.2/8 Yes Yes Ito N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Pace R9 SG LVL SG #1 WR Level Indicator SCA-LI-1113A failed to correlate Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 No Problem 29 : with remaining similar channels 8.3.2/C Yes No
- f IER iC SG #2 WR Level Indicator SGA-L1-1123A and SGB-LI-11~35 8.3.2/C Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS3021 Yes Retest j
n 30 failed to correlate with each other
'O .
Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Require <
j 31 RCA-F1-102A and RCA-PR-102A failed to correlate 8.4.2/D Yes SG DP i O* 32 SG fl 151f ferential Pressure Indicator RCA-PDI-115A and PPS Point A-14 failed to correlate 8.4.2/D Yes No Yes No ISB112 158119 UI 3) No Problee 158112 SG DP !
j ' SG #2 Differential Pressure Indicators RCA-FDI-125A and UI
- U) 8.4.2/D Yes No Yes No ISB119 . No Problem j 33 RCD-PDI-125D failed tc correlate to their PMS Points PagesaJ5 i Computer Points RCP-102A, NCP-351A. NCP-3525. 518-333 & N/A Yes 136 & 140 8.4.2/D Yes Yes No N/A - N/A N/A 1 34 S18-343 not available
) '
SG LvL i SG #1 WR I4 vel Indicator failed to correlate with the PNS 8.4.2/D Yes No Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS5021 No Problee ,
35 PMS. Indicator was SCA-LI-1113A. PMS Point was SGL-1113A gg ;
SIT NR Pressure Indicators for S1T 1 & SIT 2 (i.e. SIN-PI- No N/A N/A N/A N/A No Retested 312. 51G-F1-313. 51M-PI-322 & SIB-PI-323) f ail to correlate 8.4.2/D Yes Yes
]
36
- Sc LvL
} SG #1 NR Level Indicators SGA-LI-1114A. SGB-LI-11145 SGC- Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS9021 No Problem
- 37 LI-1114C and SGD-LI-1114D failed to correlate 8.4.2/D Yes No Sc tyL I SG #1 NR Level Recorder (SCN-LR-1111 & SGN-LR-1112) & (SGM- Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 No Problem LR-1121 & SGN-LR-1122) failed to correlate 8.4.2/D Yes No
) 38 sc LvL f SG #1 & 2 indicators SGA-L1-1123A & SGA-7.1-1113A failed Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 No Protlee 39 to correlate with PMS Points 8.4.2/D Yes No j
4 Sif NR Pressures on SIT #4 f ailed to correlate. They were Yes Page 140 8.3.2/D Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A 7
60 SIN-PI-342 and SIA-PI-343 I Note (1): The steam generator level problem was documented by fore SPR's.
i They were 158086, 158096. 1S5098 and 155099.
$ 1 Note (2): The need for a DCP on the failed RTD's are still under evaluation.
depending on whether they were caused by the RCP problems ewPertenced.
...m. .~.+,.ev- . s e e . . ...n. p . . g m , e pr, gut g y m.t gggggg
}
1 PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST TER HISTORY 4
i SFR STATUS DOCUMEXT WRITTEN RETEST STATUS PROCEDURE RESOLUT'ON DONE WRITTEN ANSWERED SFR NCR DCP .OMPLETED COMMENT
- YtR f TER DESCR1FTION STEP /AFFX WR17EN 1
i RCB-F1-1018 f ailed to correlate with CFC B-9. They appear N/A N/A N/A Yes Page 229 8.5.2/E Yes Yes No N/A l 41 to have a transmitter failed "
RCA-TI-122CA pegged high during correlation to CPC A-6 8.5.2/E Yes No Yes Yes 158101 ISJ2250 (2) No r led 42 Pressurizer Pressure Indicator. MR. RCA-F1-101A RCB-F1- 8.5.2/E Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Page 234 j 43 1015. RCC-F1-101C & RCD-F1-1014 Failed Correlation.
L Fressuriser Pressure Indicator. MR. RCA-F1-199A. RCB-F1-199 Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Fmpe 168 44 RCC-F1-199C and RCD-F1-1990 Failed Correlation. 8.5.2/E Yes f RID 8.5.2/E Yes Yes Yes Yes 15901 ISJ2250 (2) No ralled .
, 45 RCA-71-122CA pegged high during correlation to FMS '
IER 4
SC f2 WR Level Indicator failed to correlate sith FPS (i.e. 0.5.2/E Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 15J53021 Yes Retest
) 46 SCB-L1-11238 to FPS Foint ID B-8) 15B112 SC DF SC fl & #2 Differential Pressure Indicators RCA-FDI-115A 15B119
(} (} No Froblem J
8.5.2/E Yes No yes No 47 and RCA-FDI-125A failed to correlate to FPS Reference Temperature on RCM-TIC-100 failed to correlate N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Pa'se 252 8.5.2/E- Yes Yes No y 48 to the FMS Not
- fD SIT #1 Pressure. NR. Indicators SIN-F1-312 & SIB-F1-313 8.6.2/F Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A No Retested l9 49 failed to correlate
!* SIT f2 Fressure. NR Indicators SIN-F1-322 & SIB-F1-323 8.6.2/F Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Page 206 O So failed to correlate i
M o 51 Comparison of RCM-TI-1111 to RG8-TR-111K were both of f scale low 8.6.2/F Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Pape 231 IER Ih SC f 2 WR Level Indicators SCA-L1-1123A and SCO-L1-1123B 8.6.2/F Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS8021 Yes Retest lg M
52 failed to correlate Page; 206 SIT f4 Pressure. MR. Indicators SIN-F1-342 and SIM-F1-343 8.6.2/F Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes i 53 failed to correlate SC LyL l SC fl NR Level Indicators SCA-L1-1114A. SCB-LI-11145. SCC- 8.6.2/F Yes No Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 15J58021 No Froblem j 54 LI-1114C. & SC-LI-1114D f ailed to correlate. Also #2 NR Ind. IER i SC #2 NR & WR Indicator / Recorders on Panel 806 failed'to 8.6.2/F Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes Retest I 55 correlate SCN-LR-1121/1122 & SCA-L1-1123A/11238 RCS Pressure Recorder RCN-FR-100Y and FMS Foint RCF-100Y Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Pace 208 did not correlate 8.6.2/F Yes i 56 i
RCA-TI-122CA failed low during Indicator to PHS Yes No Yes Yes 158101 ISJ2250 (2)* No railed f>. 6.2 / F
{ 57 Comparison i RCS Fressure. NR. Indicators RCC-F1-101C and RCD-F1-1010 8.6.2/F Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Fare 234 58 failed to correlate 158082 ISJ2212 TER i SC #1 & #2 Fressures Indicator in the Control Roon sei Yes Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes Reteet RSF did not correlate. Also SG WR Levels 8.6.2/F Yes 59 e f Reference Temperature on RCN-TR-100 failed to correlate N/A Yes Fmpe 252 i .
R.6.2/F Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A l 60 to the PMS Note (1): Yhe steam generator level problem was documented by four SFR's.
l
- They were 15B086, 159096. ISB098 and 155099.
Noto (2): The need for a DCP on the failed RTD's are still under evaluation. !
depending on whether they were caused by the RCP problems esperienced.
l f If m (3): 'tCR .*nd DCP nwtit1rR re w1gri m of SFRes IFRft2 ind 15B119 i
. ~_ - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._
a 1
l PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST TER HISTORY ,
- i 3
SFR STATUS DOCUMENT WRITTEN RETEST STATUS !
FROCEDURE RESot.UTION TER DESCRIPTION SFR NCR DCP .;0MPLETED CLXCtEN f TER f STEP /AFFX WRITTEN DONE WRITTEN ANSWERED l Comparison of RCN-T1-11l1X to RCT-111X (FHS) were both- Yes Page 251 8.6.2/F Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A'.
61 off-scale low d -
RCS Fressure. MR. Indicator RCS-F1-1018 failed to No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes rage 229 62 correlate with CFC Point B-9 8.7.2/C Yes Yes
' RID RCS Temperature Indicator RCA-T1-122CA and CFC Foint ISJ2250 (2) No Failed ID A-6 of f-scale high 8.7.2/C Yes No Yes Yes 158101 63 j
RCS Temperature RON-T1-111X. RCN-TR-111X. RCN-TI-1211 and Page 231 8.7.2/C Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes ,
64 RCN-TR-121X failed low /not in correlation RCS Pressure Indicators RC5-F1-1015 and RCC-F1-101C did Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Page 234 i
- 65 not correlate 8.7.2/C Yes SG LVL !
SG #1 & #2 NR & WR indicators SGA-L1-1123A - D, SGA-L1- Froblem i 1
8.7.2/C Yes No Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS8021 No 1 66 Il14A - D and SCA-L1-1124A - D fall correlation i Ecit i
SET Pressure. NR on 51T f2 did not correlate. In particular N/A No Retested .[
8.7.2/C Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A
- 67 SIN-F1-312 & S15-F1-313 Itn -[
H SG #2 NR & WR Indicators / Recorders on Fanel 806 failed to 8.7.2/C Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) 15J2038 ISJSB021 Yes Retest !
correlate SGN-LR-1121/1122 & SCA-L1-112,3A/11238 4
C 68 gyp
[ RCS Tempereture Indicator RCA-TI-122CA and FNS Fotnt Yes 155101 ISJ2250 (2) No railed RCT-122CA of f scale high 8.7.2/C Yes No Yes 4
69:
U Steam Generator pressures SGA-F1-1013A - D and SGA-F1-1023/ ISJ2269 Yes Page 243 8.7.2/C Yes No Yes Yes 158111 N/A ;
C) 70 thru D failed to correlate to FFS m RCS Temperature Indicator RCA-T1-1111 and RCT 1111 are of f- Yes Page 251 8.7.2/C Yes Yes No N/A N/A. N/A' N/A
@ 71 scale low
, Fase 290
- M RSP Indicators SGA-FI-1013A-1/1023A-1. SCA-HIC-179A and 8.7.2/C Yes. Yes Yes Yes 153082 ISJ22?2 N/A Yes 292
- g 72 RCA-TI-112NA does not correlate with Control Room RCS Paperature Indicator RCA-T1-112CC of f-scale high gap y 8.8.2/N Yes No Yes Yes 155103 ISJ2123 (2) No Failed [
j* 73 during comparison to RCC-TI-112CA j
SG Fressure Indicator SCA F1-1023A failed low during Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Fase 269 74 comparison to ramaining three channels 8.8.2/N Yes got .
! SC Fressure Indicator SGA-F1-10238 failed to correlats to 8.8.2/N Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Required i 75 FFS Fotnt ID B-12 sG OF 15R112 SC Differential Pressure Indicator RCC-FDI-115C failed to Yes No 158119 I3) I3) No Froblem i 76 correlate with PPS Foint ID C-14 8.8.2/N Yes No RID
} RCS Tes erature Indicator RCA-11-111Y and computer point Yes Yes ISF073 ISJ2257 (2)* No Failed ,
i 77 RCT-111 were both off scale during comparison 8.8.2/N Yes No Not l S1T #1 Fressure. MR. Indicators SIN-F1-312 and S18-F1-313 8.8.2/N "Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A No Retested [
- 78 failed to correlate Not !
Sit #4 Pressure. NR. Indicators SIN-F1-342 and SIN-F1-343 No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Required l 79 failed to correlate 8.8.2/N Yes Yes I 7
TER l
SC #2 WR Level Indicator SCA-L1-1123A and SCS-L1-11235 8.8.2/N Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) 15J2038 ISJS8021 Yes Retest 80 fail to correlate (Fanel 306)
- 1 Note (1): The steam generator level problem was documented by four SFR's.
j
' They were 158086. 158096. 15B098 and 15R099.
I ,
l Note (2): The need for a DCP on the failed RTD's are still under evaluation. !
i depending on whether they were caused by the RCP problems esperienced.
} +
N- . (1n nra .,c-i ter .mit to, rewl e san -f srn., Iml? an.1 15 119 :
l - - - -- _. _ _ . . _
~
PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST TER HISTORT .
4 I
' RETEST STATUS FROCEDURE REsof.UT10N SFR STATUS DOCUMENT WRITTEN TER f TER DESCRIPTION s1EP/AFFX JRITTEN DONE WRITTEN ANSWERED SFR I;CR DCP _0MPLETED Com ENT j
tER SG #2 NR Level Recorders on Fanel 806 failed to correlate Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes Retest 81 (i.e. SCN-LR-1121/1122). 8.8.2/N Yes Yes ,
TER I SC #2 WR Level Indicator SCA-L1-1123A failed to correlate Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes metest v with the reesining three channels. 8.8.2/N Yes Yes i
82 SG #1 & #2 NR Level Indicators failed to correlate. They at
- w LvL j 8.8.2/H Yes No Yes Yes (1) ISJ2034 ISJSbC21 No Froblem t i 83 SCA-LI-1114A - D and SCA-LI-1124A - D Chem. Spray Tank Level Indicatore SIB-Lt-348 and 51A-LI-349 N/A N/A 8.8.5/J Yes Yes llo N/A N/A fes Fase 2968 84 failed to correlate
] RCF 28 D/F Pegged high during comparison of RCN-FDI-122 j 8,8,3/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Fame 3024
- 85 to RCN-FDI-123 (i.e. RCN-FDI-122 Pegged high)
ItID l
RCS Temperature RCN-T1-111Y Fegged off-sente high. 8.8.5/J Yes No Yes Yes ISF073 ISJ2257 (2) No ratted l 86 Pages 30ag
! SG #2 WR Level Indicator SGA-L1-1123A failed to correlste Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes and 312M
! 87 with the remaining three channets 8.8.5/J Yes Yes Yes SG LvL lY sc #1 and #2 NR Level Indicators f ailed to correlate. They Froblee [
4.8.5/J Yes No Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 15J50021 No j U" g 88 are SCA-LI-1114A - 11140 and SCA-Lt-1124A - D ,
89 SG #2 NR Level recorders on Fanel 906 failed to correlate Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS3021 Yes Page 312?
- y 89 specifically
- SCN-LR-1121 and SGN-LR-1122 8.8.5/J Yes Yes Yes SG #2 UR Level Indicators on the RSP Failed to correlate. Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS3021 Yes Fare 3171 !
3U 90 Specifically: SGA-LI-1123A-1 and SCB-LI-11238-1 8.8.5/J Yes Yes Yes Rr0 l8 91 RCS Temperature Indicator RCA-T1-112CC off scale high during comparison to RCC-TI-112CA 8.8.5/J Yes No Yes Yes 158103 ISJ2123 (2) No Failed l
! y l ft Chen Spray Tank Level Indicators SIS-LI-348 and SI A-L1-349 Yes 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N'/A Fase 2961 o', 92 failed correlation -
" RCF 23 D/F plegged high during comparison of RCN-FDI-122 rage 302t g
- to RCN-FDI-123 (i.e. RCN-FDI-122 PeRaed high) 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes [
93
- RID i RCS Temperature Indicator RCA-TI-112CC of f-scale high Failed during comparison to RCC-TI-112CA 8.8.5 /J Yes No Yes Yes 155103 ISJ2123 (2) Eo !
9 94 l SG f 2 WR Level Indicator SGA-L1-11234 failed to correlate Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 Yes Page 3095 i 95 with remaining three channels 8.8.5/J Yes Yes SG #2 WR Level Indicators on Panel 306 (SCA-LI-1123A and Yes (1) ISJ2038 15J53021 Yes Page 3121 96 SCA-Lt-11238) fatted to correlate 8.8.5/J Yes Yrs Yes SG #2 WR Level Indicators on RSF (SCA-L1-1123A-1 and 8.8.5/J Yes Yes Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS9021 Yes Fase 317:
97 SCB-LI-11235-1) failed to correlate SC LYL SG #1 WR Level Indicators on RSP (SCA-LI-1113A-1 and Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 No Froblee 98 SCB-LI-11138-1) fatted to correlate 8.8.5/J Yes No Yes ,
4 l RCS Temperature Indicator RCB-TI-112C8 of f-scale Jew 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A' II/A N/A N/A Yes Pare 30h a 99 during comparison to RCD-TI-112CD
. SG Lvt 5 SC f t WR Level Indicator SCA-L1-1113A f ailed to corre!1ste Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJS3021 No Froblem 100 with remainina three channels 8.8.5/J Yes No Yes j
Note (1): The steam generater AcVet proDies was documented by four SFR's.
l They were 158086. 158096. 158098 and 158099. t Note (2): The need for a DCP on the failed RTD's are still under evaluation.
depending on whether they were caused by the RCP problems esperienced.
4 Marc (1): FR cc.f Nf' writ tine, remolitt f on af SrR.* 15ft112 and 15s119
- , .= - .-, .-. .- - - . - . ,,
. . _ . . m.--. _ _ __ .-_ _ . . ._
,I
)
1 .
l * !
- PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST TER HISTORY -
$ i y
l PROCEDURE Resol.UT :ON SPR STATUS DOCUMENT WRITTEN RETEST STATUS ,
! TER i TER DESCRIPTION STEP /APPX WRITTEN WRITTEN SFR DONE ANSWERED NCR DCP XIMPLETED COMMENT
[
SG #1 Ditferential Pressure Indicators RCB-FDI-1155 and 155112 g3) SC DP i 101 RCC-FDI-115C failed to correlate with remaining channels 8.8.5/J Yes No Yes No 15801119 (3) No '
rroblee f SG fl WR Level Indicators on Panel 806 (SGA-L1-1113A and Sc LYL
! 102 SCA-L1-11138 failed to correlate 8.P.5/J Yes No Yes Yes (1) ISJ2038 ISJSB021 No Problee v j Chem. Spray Tank Level Indicators stb-Lt-348 and SIA-LI-349 8.8.5/J 103 i failed to correlate Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Pare 2961 '
RCS Temperature Indicator RCA-TI-112CA off-scale high RTO ,
j 104 during comparison to to RCC-TI-112CC 8.8.5/J Yes No Yes Yes 155107 ISJ2171 (2) No Problem i l 'RCS TeePerature Indicator RCB-T1-112CB off-scale low '
got i 105 durbs comparison to RCD-TI-122CD 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yan Resufred
} SC #2 Differential Pressure Indicator RCB-PDt-1255 failed 158112 SC DP f l 106 to correlate with remaining three channels 8.8.5/J Yes No Yes No 1SB119 I3I I3) No Problem :
! RCS Pressuriser Level Recorders RCA-LI-110X-1 and RCB-L1 Xot j 107 110Y-1 failed to correlate S.E 5/3 Yes Yea Ma M/A N/A N/A M/A Y,a sl.au f r.A i RCS Pressurizer Level Recorder 110X, failed to correlate gag jj 108 between channels X & Y 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Reewired j$ RCS Pressure, NR, Indicators failed to correlate. Specif1- .
t
' fs 109 callyr RCA-Pt-10lA. RCB-PI-1015. RCC-PI-101C & RCD-Pi-101D 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A M/A Yes Pne 107 i to RCS Pressurizer Level Recorder 110X, failed to correlate Not O
110 between channels K & Y 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Required RCS Wide Range Temperature Indicator RCA-TI-115 and RTD
}Q 111 RCA-TR-115 off-scale low 8.8.5/J Yes No Yes Yes IRC129 ISJ2473 (2) No railed 1
y RCS Marrow range cold leg temperature indicator , , Not
, r, 112 RCD-TI-112CD off-scale low 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A fes Required I Not i l8 113 RCSMarrowranfecoldle!ghtemperature PCB-TI-122CB o f-scale h indicator 8.8.5/J Yes Yes No N/A N/A M/A N/A Yes Required
i 114 to CPC. RCP 1A rpeed on TC/ CMC read aero 8*S*S/I Yes No Yes Yes 159120 N/A N/A No Probles RCS Temperature RCA-TI-122RA failed to correlate
- Not i 115 with recorder RCA-TR-122AA 8.8.8/1 Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Required Comparison of RHWT Level Indication to computer Not i 116 failed to correlate within allowed tolerance 8.8.8/1 Yes Yes No N/A N/A N/A N/A Yes Required SG (1 Differential Pressure Indicators RCA-FDI-115A - D ISB112 SG DP 117 failed to correlate with each other and PHS 8.8.8/1 Yes No Yes No 158119 (3) I3I ' No Problee j i SG #2 Differential Pressure Indicators RCB-PD1-125B and 158112 SC DP l 118 RCD-PDI-125D failed to correlate with the PMS 8.8.8/I Yes No Yes No 158119 I3I I3I No Problem
]
! SC #1 NR Level indicators SCA-LI-1114A - D failed to SG LYL i 119 correlate with each other 8.8.8/I Yes No Yes Yes (1) 15.12018 ISJSB021 No Problem
! SG #1 & #2 Dif ferential Pres *ures Indicators RCD-FDI-115D, 155112 SG DP '
120 RCA-PDI-125A & RCD-PDI-1250 failed to correlate with PMS 8.8.8/I Yes No Yes No ISBil9 I3) II No Problem Note (1): The steam generator level Prob 1cm was documented by four SFR's.
i They were 158086, 155096, 158098 and ISR099.
I j Note (2): The need for a DCP on the failed RTD's are still under ev.11uation.
i depending on whether they were cauwd by the RCP probicas exPerlenced.
l Note (1): NCR an l IMP wif t t nn resolut lan of 'tT'R.g ISRll2 and 15B119 I L
- d
_ T e N r S E i
_ U toqu T
A Ne T
S N R D
T E S T E E s T L e E P T R M O
P A
/
C N D
N E
T T A I R /
R C N W N T
N E
M A U R /
C F N Y O S D
R O D T E S R A I E /
H W S N N
R S U
A E T T A N E
T S S T T T /
N S R I E F S
R W
T N
O E s I N e T O Y N D A O L I T
E U, N R s o E l
R S T e O E T T C R I
R W
N F I C R P 1 I U P T D E /
A 6 A C P 8 T OE N R T P S E
M U
R T d n
S a N
I T
'0
_ E 2 R 5t
( e
_ O n C 6. a r
E 8 e R l P no ot i
_ t e
_ cd ei ss l
_ gu t
i no t e
. rr ae t
s w
)
ru oa f e N - t O sa I nl T oP P i I t t R i s C d e S nT E o D ca i
A l s E aP T i t0 i5 n7 I1 f
1 R 2 E 1 T
mfHG y.O ^ ODr.ba
- t t
, l S 1 '
fI1 ,f, ! 4 1 9 i
PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST " YELLOW STICKER" HISTORY ,
PROCEDURE APPENDIX INSTRUMENT '
NUMBER REASOM FOR " YELLOW STICKER" A B C D E F C H J I SIB LI 311 Out-of-service for PreCore HFT T T T T T T T T T T SIB LI 321 Out-of-service for Precore HFT T T T T T T T T T T l
SIA L1 331 Out-of-service for PreCore HTT T T T T T T T T T T
! l SIA L1 341 Out-of-service for PreCore HFT T T T T T T T T T T SCN Ld 1111 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requireme$ts T T T T T T T T T T SCN LR 1112 Fatted Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T T l
SCN LR 1121 Failed Instrumes.tation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T/R SCN LR 1122 ' Failed Instrumentstion Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T/R g
8
& SCA LI 1113A Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T e
w SCB L1 11138 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T b SCC LI 1113C Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T SCD LI 1113D Out-of-service for PreCore HFT T T T T T T T T' T T SCA L1 1114A Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T T SCB LI 11148 Failed Instrumentatica Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T T SCC LI 1114C Failed Irrtrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T T SCD L1 11L43 Ts11ed Instrumentation Correlation Requirtmenta T T T T T T T T T T SCA LI 1123A Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T/R SCB Li 11238 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T/R l
\
SCC L1 1123C Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T
, SCD LI 1123D Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T Hote: T = Tellow stickered after completion of this test due to stated reason i
R = Removed af ter successful retest per Appendix J and/or TER retest
PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST " YELLOW STICKER" HISTORY .
i l
l PROCEDURE APPENDIX DSTRUMENT NUMBER REASON FOR "WELLOW STICKER" A B C D E F C N J g SCA LI 1124A Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T/R i
i SCB L1 11245 Failed Instrumentation Correlatloa Requirementa T T T T T T T T T/R i
i SCC LI 1124C Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T/R SCD L1 1124D Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T/R RCA PD1 115A Tailed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T I
} RCB PD1 115B Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T 4
iH Failed Instrumentation correlation Requirements T T T T T T T T T
- m IfCC PD1 115C tr RCD PD1 115D - Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T .T Iu g RCA PDI 125A Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T
- g RCB PD1 1258 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T i0 T T T T lk RCC PD1 125C Out-of-service for PreCore HFT T T T T T T RCD PDI 125D Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T CMA LI 200 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T
]
l CHB L1 201 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T
! CHN T1 223 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T j CHN T1 224 drongranRescale T T T T T T T T T T 4
SCA PR 1013A L'rong range scale T I
SCA PR 1023A Wrong range scale T I
RCA PI 105 FAlled Instrumentation Correlatio a Requirements T
- l. -
1 j RCN LR 110X Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T l
1 Note T = Yellow stickered af ter completion of this test due to stated reason l
R = Removed af ter successful retest per Appendix J and/or TER retest i
i 1 ,
i PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST " YELLOW STICKER" HISTORY ,
i PROCEDURE APPENDIX INSTRUMENT J
i 1
NUMOER REASON FOR " YELLOW STICKER" A %__C D E F C H t HCA PR 35)A Wrong range scale T I CTA LR 35 Wrong range scale T T T T T T -T T T' T I -
Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirement T -T T T T T T T T T CHN PI 201 I
Wrong Range scale T T T T T T T T T -T
', CHN L1 210 , _
! , e T
- j. HC8 Pi 3528 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements
'alled Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T' T
- SIN P1 342 i
Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T i
- [ SIN FI 343 0'
T T 7 RCN PR 100Y Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements
~
T 7
!F
~o CCA T1 122CA Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements 1 T T T ,
T g RCA Pt 199A Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements ic .
T T T T T SIN P1 312 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements
~
t v SIN PI 313 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T' T T Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T SIN P1 322 a
Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T i SIN FI 323 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T RCN TI 111X Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T RCN TR 111X Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T/R RC8 FI 1018 ,
1 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T l RCC PI 101C Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T/R RCD P1 101D Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T
! RCA Tt 112CC i
Notes T = Tellow stickered af ter completion of this test due to stated reason R = Removed after successful retest per Appendix J and/or TER retest l
4
= ,-.
4 PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST " YELLOW STICKER" HISTORY i
1 PROCEDURE APPE!! DIX INSTRUMENT NUMBER REASON FOR "TELLOW STICKER" A B C D E F C M J t a
Wrong Range scale T T T T T SCA F1 1013A-1 Wrong Range Scale T T T' T T SC8 FI 10138-3 Wrong Range Scale T T T T T SCA F1 1023A-1 Wrong Range Scale T T T T T SC8 FI 10238-1 1 l l
Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T y SCA LZ 1113A-1 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T T T/R
] SCA LI 1123A-1 t Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T T
! RC8 TI 122C8 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements T .T RCD TI 112CD-g 1 ie T 1 RCA TI 112CA Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements l U" g
i* T T' RCA TI 115 Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements i p
!O ECA TR 115 Failed Instrumentation correlation Requirements T T
- ^ ~
i O T T j] RCA TI 111Y Failed Instrumentation Correlation Requirements
- v?.
D.
iV 1
I 1
1 Note: T = Yellow stickered af ter completion of this test due to stated reason R = Removed af ter successful retest per Appendix J and/or TER rettet I
I
e 4
PRECORE INSTRUMENTATION CORRELATION TEST OPEN TER's RETEST MATRIX RCS TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE TEST PLATEAUS AMBIENT 260 Deg. F. 360 Deg. F. 460 Deg. F. 505 Deg. F. 520 Deg. F. 545 Deg. F. 565 Deg. F.
PARAMETERS COMPARISONS CONDITIONS 350 Psia 460 Psfa 1150 Psia 15y Pela 1720 Des. F. 1950 Psia 2250 Palm SC #1 Levels Channel to Channel TER 4,12 TER 12.17 TER 12.17 TER 12.35 TER 29,54 TER 83,88
?ER 17.38 TER 66 Channel to PMS TER 13,17 TER 29 TER 37,38 4
Channel to RPS TER 98.100 TER 39 TER 102.119 RCS Cold Leg '
Temps. (failed) Channel to PMS ,
TER 42,45 TER 42,57 TER 63,69 TER 73,77 Channel to CPC SC #1 and #2 Channel to Channel TER 15,16 TER 24 TER 24 TER 24,32 TER 47 Primary DP's TER 76.101 Channel to PMS TER 33 TER 106,117 Channel to PPS TER 118,120 j SIT 1 NR Pressures Channel to Channel TER 36 TER 36 TER 49 TER 67 TER 78 h
=
Channel to PMS h SIT's Mt Levels
.# Containment Sump Channel to PMS TER 11 TER 11 TER 11 TER 11 TER 11 TER 11 TER 11 TER 11 O Levels RCP 1A Speed PMS to PMS . TER 114 PMS to CPC i .
NOTE: Retesting at the exact test plateaus noted above is not uendatory, provided suitable alternative test plateaus are available and they give adequate assurances of verifying the instrument correlation requirements.
NOTE: RCP 1A speed can be retasted at any test plateau provided this pump is in service. Pump speed is not a function of reactor coolant system temperature
, and pressure.
NOTEt Containment sump levels need only be retested once at any of the above test conditions since they are not function of reactor coolant system temperature and pressure.
STEAM GENERATOR LEVEL TRANSMITTER CONDENSATE POT PROBLEM / RESOLUTION AS BUILT AS MODIFIED STEMt CENERATOR 1
. CDEDENSATE FOT STEEL CENERATOR STEAM CENERATOR REIERENCE LEG m -- _
q ~ ~ 1" FIPE 3
(d 7 \ CONDENSATE FOT O TRANSMITTER REFERENCE LEG STEAM CEXERATOR g RETERENCE LEG STEAM *
[ l STEAM 3/4" FIFE TRANSMITTER RF.FERENCE LLC h~mw- -
WAff.R WATER D D
% % % :.~
Note (1): This design allowd water to hullJisp in the reference let between the steen generator anel condensate Fot.
6 e
9 e
6 I' -
. -