ML20064E307

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Draft Proposal Outlining Programs Under Development Addressing Concerns Expressed in NRC 810408 Immediate Action Ltr & 810410 Enforcement Conference.Review of Proposal Requested Prior to NRC Visit in June 1981.W/o Encl
ML20064E307
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Zimmer
Issue date: 05/18/1981
From: Borgmann E
CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20064E073 List:
References
FOIA-82-206 NUDOCS 8301050304
Download: ML20064E307 (1)


Text

- A4 pe .79. .~. rw y

,N g , ' - + ..;

THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY crj C CINCINN AT1, OHIO 452ot Mayb8,1981 E. A. S ORG M AW ,

steseon vict passiotNT hEIMCR.R ST!.7F 3IR I I?&TSI U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 3/D fPAo 799 Roosevelt Road 'O Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 flu VOUPT Attention: Mr. J. G. Keppler ,

-' - N/

Director -

E?lo File

' I b

RE: WM. H. ZIMMER NUCLEAR POWER STATION -

UNIT 1 - DOCKET NO. 50-358 Gentlemen:

It was disappointing to learn of the postponement of your May 18, 1981 visit planned to further our discussions on the programs CG&E is developing to address the concerns expressed in your April 8, 1981 Immediate Action Letter and April 10, 1981 Enforcement Conference.

As suggested by your Mr. R. F. Warnick, when he notified our Mr. W. D. Waymire on May 13 of the change in plans, enclosed are five (5) copies of CG&E's draft proposal outlining our programs in their current state of development. It is understood that this submittal will be reviewed by your staff prior to your visit here the first week in June,1981.

Please don't hesitate to contact us regarding any questions on this matter that may arise prior to that time.

Very truly yours, THE CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY s --

E. A. BORGMANN EAB: dew inclosure cc: W. H. Dickhoner

! F. T. Daniels ,-

~ N l ) 19 9 8301050304 821116 PDR FOIA "

DEVINE82-206 PDR

a. .ca n:,

W RFu)

Nam.e

~

EI;c National Enarb of Eoiler anh Urcssure liessel 3nsperfo'rif"'

S F. HARRISON. Esecutive Director oF MUSTEES

i. a'oc . s.s CoLuusu Moa 29 U s A Paon. 614 888 4320 J J e,JFFy

. o w may. i,. v<. ca. t. 2 25 7 si.i. w.m...i.

a. .euona c-*~ , , , , , , , , , , ,

a et egoseg..y,vic.c

, ,, 7%

M 1919 62 d 19Bilp no.m. . .. e..... i.,.

6 M Waltems

~

. QNIVERSARy,pj si.ie of O,egon

- p.. en.

o a cau,un s.,,, is .. iii.ao.,

December 9, 1981 Cincinnati Cas & Electric Company Attn: Mr. Earl A. Borgmann, Senior Vice President 139 East 4th Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

SUBJECT:

Investigation Conducted on December 8, 1981 by Mr. Donald Milan, Chief Inspector of State of Ohio and Mr. Richard E. Jagger; National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors Zimmer Nuclear Power Plant; Moscow, Ohio

REFERENCE:

Improperly Shimmed Pullman Power Radiographs Conformation Program Socket Weld Nonconformances Improprieties Regarding Nonconformances Lack of ANI Inspections Documentation Deficiencies

Dear Mr. Borgmann:

The subject investigation was held at the request of the S;; ate of Ohio to review the referenced problems, to determine the status of items under continuing investigation, and to see if further areas or items should be subjected to future examination.

The following additional people were contacted during this meeting:

Mr. Robert Arthur; Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Mr. Harlan R. Sager; Q. A. Manager, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Mr. Rick Leiber, Level III, NES Mr. Lowell Burton, ANI, Hartford Steam Boiler

.~

Mr. John Watkins, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Mr. David Howard, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company

_ 7

}

hf-f-DIh0N

Page (2)

Mr. Borgmann December 9, 1981

- ACTION TAKEN TO DATE -

d 1. In response to our recommendation a review was being made of all Pullman Power radiographs, due to questions raised by NRC and by this investigation team.

2. We audited the review program by checking the re-review log, and by spot checking final radiography packages to see that they had both the original and re-review "RT" reader sheets.
3. The status of the review as taken from the computer on this date is as follows:

TOTAL RADIOGRAPHS l Accept as is 2219 Cannot Interpret 78 To be Reshot 426 Sensitivity Level I 298 Sensitivity Level 2 10401 Froperly Shimmed & Accepted 4354 Sensitivity Level 4 2247 No Sensitivity 122 Total Views Reviewed 17419 The corrective action being taken to date on the radiography sensitivity problem was in compliance with our previous recommendations.

However this must remain as an open item and none of the radiographs l can be accepted until the proper control comparison radiographs have been taken and evtluated.

New Its as

1. A review of drawing ISK-D01-M427-1-DO Revisions 1, 2, 7,, 4, 5 and 6 disclosed discrepancies and unaccountability of ac:eptance for socket welds B1 and B2.

.~

The welds which had originally been stamped accepted by Q. C.

on revision (1) were later cut-out. Acceptance of the replacement I welds could not be verified, and it appeared that a brejkdown had occurred in the documentation of identification and inspection portions of the Quality Assurance program. j l

1 l

. . a e

Page (3)

Mr. Borgmann December 9, 1981 5

_ 2. Evidence was obtained wherein items which were nonconiormances

. as defined by the Kaiser Quality Assurance Manual were Japroperly 7 listed on " Surveillance Reports" in lieu of issuance of non-conformance reports as required.

3. A review of numerous weld histories disclosed the fact that the Q. C. Inspection " Transfer Acceptance Stamps" were being used improperly. Kaiser Q. A. Procedure 15 paragraph 3.1.3 provides for use of such a stamp only when satisfactory documentation has been provided. Contrary to the requirement a search of the files failed to show that appropriate documentation had been provided.

Hence many of the welds which had been stamped acceptable under this proviso must be classified as questionable until the documentation is complete.

4. Procedures were not being followed which would assure compliance with NCA-4134.3(c) of Section III, Div.1 ASME for the review, approval, release of documents necessitated by revisions.
5. The obliteration of entries by Q. C. Inspectors on nonconformance reports is an apparent violation of ASME Section III Division Code requirements. Paragraphs NCA-4134.10 and NCA-4134.15.

The improper removal of hold tags, and failure of Kaiser Quality Control to assign NR numbers and enter the nonconformance into the nonconformance system, when NR reports were submitted is also an apparent violation of the aforementioned paragraphs. It was further determined that Kaiser reports numbered CN-5476, CN-5477, and CN-5479 were improperly voided, and copies of these reports were deleted from the NR system in difference to ASNE Code requirements and the Kaiser Q. A. Nhnual.

6. Information was provided which disclosed the requirements of Section III, Div.1 ASME Code paragraph NCA-4134.1 were not being followed.

Persons performing Quality Assurance program inspections were not-being provided the required freedom and authority to initiate quality control functions.

7. Contrary to ASME Section III, Div. 1 paragraph NCA-4134.15 and

.- Kaiser Procedure QACMIG-4 nonconformance reports were being improperly voided without proper evidence for voiding, (NR-E-2237) incorrectly

!* dispositioned(NR-E-2596),voidedbyimproperpersonne((CN-5479),

and voided with inadequate justification (NR-E-2466). 7arious nonconformance reports which had been issued NR numbers had not been filed or retained in the Site Documentation Center as required.

8. The requirements of ASME Code Section III 1971 Edition Article NB-3661.5(b) were not being adhered to as required. Further Articles NA-4130(a), NA-4320, NA-4510, NA-4442.1, NB-4122, NA-4451, NB-4230, and NB-36 61.5(b) which require inspection for fit-up and welding were not performed properly. It was determined that several

Page (4)

Mr. Borgmann December 9, 1981

~

_ different methods of verifying " pull back" en socket weld,s were

- employed, some of which would prevent verification and inspection

. as required by Article NB-3661.5(b).

! ~

9. It appears that a serious breakdown in both the Kaiser and Cincinnati Gas and Electric Quality Assurance Programs has occurred.

j 10. In tesqimony taken from the Authorized Nuclear Inspector Mr. Lowell Burton of the Hartford Steam Bciler Inspection and Insurance Company during the course of this investigative visit, typ apparent attempts of intimidation had been made.

11. A review of the Authorized Inspectors logs on site showed that for approximately 90% of the time period under which this plant was under construction, only one ANI had been assigned. The plant is now 97% complete. It is impossible for one AEI to inspect to ASME requirements under normal situations, and to assume one ANI can maintain proper inspection monitoring when the Quality Assurance Program is not functioning properly is ludicrous.

One ANI in a nuclear plant under construction can only give 4

cosmetic and token type inspection service. If the ASME third party inspection philosophy is to be meaningful, we must have proper and adequate inspection by ANI. If five or six inspectors are needed on site to achieve this level of confidence, then we should insist on that number. It is believed many of the aforementioned deficiencies, errors, and omissions could have been prevented if there had been more Authorized Nuclear Inspectors on site.

Conclusions In order to verify that we have complied with the ASME Code requirements a National Board investigation is necessary and should be initiated at an early date. -

The number of Authorized Nuclear Inspectors on site should be increased immediately from one to four, with an understanding that more would be provided i if,it was demonstrated they could be utilized.

Q Respectfully, /~

f,M

~

<' fff%

  • Richard E. Jag er l

' Assistant Director of Inspections REJ/dd cc: D. J. Mcdonald, NB S. F. Harrison, NB D. Milan, Chief Inspector of OH l V. Stello..NRC-Washington DC j

K. Ward, NRC-Glen Ellyn, IL R. Arthur H. R. Sager, J. Watkins, D. Howard-Cincinnati Gas & Electric R. Leiber, NES J. G. Keppler, Director; Region III-NRC-Glen Ellyn, IL R. F. Warnicka/NRC-Glen Ellyn, IL

.s s e ,.

y fTb5-l NCNCCSTOR:iUCI RI? ORT ESSII' *~ U. f\[

C G & c-  !;0. O -d'4" ,J2__,-Y/-6'?AGI -[ 07 / I.s NCN-ESII';7Ill.

l r .. ?sg./!ns:./ 2. >sg./ Ins:./Nane or 3. P.O./ Con . 4. Supplier / Con::ac:c: Nane:

I:p. No. F.ev.  ::ac: No.

9;__m lC5lNO.n S _- UY,k "dbc 707o M I K / B iO 5 7 0 t_

6. nspector 7. Date B.5pec.& ?.ev.No, Code, 5:d. c: Au t.o::.: >
5. ::.s r e :::.:n/ -

A.S.M.I

?Lan No.

R H ARW I- 30-82 H-2n4 9. C Yes E No ij,@j_-@fj

" : . Oes:3ip:ics of Non Confor=2nce/

111. Oisposi:ien 11.:1spesi: ion :ns::uction/

hs-ificatien And Cause:

('isy cen:i:ue en at :h.sh:.) (May centinue on att:h. sh:.)

u. < _ ., a - ~ sal l

.- l l l

. ~ .- ..

~ - ,,

l 5-t3 Ucos) ~

9&A e. , , . w.n  ? ?. ' ?!e': Gl' D C'd CG&E Eng. Dispesi:ioning NR Ja:e C0&E :.-Winitiator A' Date 13.:.:=ediate Correc:ive Action Needed: 14 Is any Oesip Docs:ies:

(May continue en A::ch. Sh:.) Revision Req'd?

' Yes C No y k

/ .Q . id o-O Consultan: A/.s l' Ge' O l Date: h)* Sy: Oate:

3y: r--

15. Correc:ive action to be taken to preven: recurrence: Ni
.j a !

(May con:inue on A::ch. sh:.) oi i g aa '

ceDl

. aJ O J J

l ,

l ce u.a =

> r*

G_

O OO

.a

  • Z .

=

d" Da:e:

Esti=a:ed! Cenpletion Date: Sy:

l sT -

15. A. ::cals:  :

s  ;;&E NE;/ 5&L DA .J. ne e s WM8L LATE  ;;;&E Q.E. LATE i

17. Reverk/ repair is cc=plete and acceptatie: 18. Closed cu::

~ 061 1_s t e::i; OA! C0&E Engineer CA E C0&E XR Coc; :.na::: Datel A::s:.vnen: 7.2 18; na.n1 - - - --

.._ .. ~. . - - -

e em _ e e .

  • h me o _

~~

s

. d.

s ,-

  • s., ,, .

' C-fMV V @C $ -l_1-5-$-1 P t.G E NO.bNCNCONFCRMANCE}5PCRT

/ '-

O!SPOSITION / COPJ.IC'.'I ACIish:

' DESCalPTION / CrJSI:

L a c A-ri o w : C ,e svve,1- E LE.v Sb i' l Arrow 5 0 - o 4 5 *-

U dA c.c EPTA;E L E Covoi scMS: .

2: o u. e c man - AstI 5 D I.I '7 2 l PARA 3.2.1- St_cc Coworno.a O = rait - \^/ci.OS

.Q-r @Efiro Iou Ncc n EMS 1 QS vb 10 7 cuo 1 OS -ro 104 EYH 1817 fE L. A d.

(Sts Arr ncuso See,t.a L Reco s aem se,- - 19 - O A -06 */.

Po rt o . (, 4. 2. 01 - Ovez un P.

Comoi-r,ou Dera u_ : wm.os a-r 8 sam C o u wec.-n ou s 105 i

i ro 10 7 saxa i s ir Ov eszca r .

f5cc Ortacw so Se=rca Sacer) .  ;

-9 . . . 1 '

Reooiedmeaur- A.w/5 D l.1 ~7 2 -

Pedb o. 4. + - A ec Srni x es f.

D s:ra i t_ . a <2c_

i b o ooi fl o N 4 C

,JG? I < ES EVt57- O'M wr il 6056 M cEct ODTnccMT iO

\ A/ ELO S Of GGM (c ro tu sc-nb M C O

T

r N o .

Q) se p NO.1 gNg'Of40RMANCE,

~2 - F ' '.:L A d._ _

REPORT PAGE O OF Na '

DISPOSITION / cs!J.IC IVI ACIlG.N:

DESCR!PilON / CA!!SE:

ID5 T5 1D7 C td O I QS rc iC+

.m 0 war .a m N Y -,- A C r -- - 1

~

s _

ke U .126 m ENT - l9 -O A -O'o"[

i Po e A . 6 '+ ? 2 - Lc u c= Fos , w l

(o rvOrn ed Demit- iAlcLos or .

re, Scom - C o o a e c-n soc i os l

iD7 o ra O 1 C>S Tb I D 4- E W i6 n-t i

LACK or- fos e od .

f BEE MMCMG b(ETC4 $HEEr) I kEO ct RE me.JT- 14-QA-06R/i

~

var.a. (o.A.d.~]-\A e.o Pebpse.G. .

I t

i  !

l  !

l bDuOinoo Dernic: \n/a.os ar Em Couveer,eus i oc ro I

)D 7 000 105 -rd 104- ' i ETH I G tT- C.D*Jv DCIrY '

/Sce Prtracuco seeru saarr) 1 fr a u. c e mear- 1 6'I - 0 9 - O V h 1 '

Faea. to . e. g . G - O uoeec.ar.

. I 2l CAvoi-noo Dmt - \Aletos or f  ;

bAm CD N MEC nod 105 m iet  :

E w i B in- O ru DeccoT .

BEE O NCM S < t:.T t p Sw i

- 1

  • I

. I N CH C.CNE.O R M ANCE,R EPORT ,,

  • A Q :=

bDQd NO. i P " d b[-' 2 _. PAGE " CF f DESCRIFilCN / CAUSE: lCISPOSITION / CD?.?.IC!LI ACI 4:

ho, eg%a . ,a -o o -ov/. I 4 f%tc. s . + ;? l - C e ac.cs i  !

_.(- dC rr: w Dw pi t : 5[/E LO S or !?:=c.m [.sra% c ne.M '05 l I ro \ D A- Ev.&*7sv C.2acKG n

Ro M u.O c Faem -n+4c rop I

o9 -r+2 v GCTic n;_ r" ro -r M I

G E - 637t?nur C OR W-e CNO Ff2bm TM BOTTb'm O F -T dE \/G2'nc41.

I

~

Y2." r~ O WG 2 6 - GMTT2.u k.57 l

Cc)2M M .

(Ses h acuso seu se .) i AWS D1.l ~J2 FARA. 3. 7 2.+

EQ ui R 6 MENT : l1 C S - C7 #/4

.=n s.So.si

- 4RA,ct,g n _r o-.

,m~n v . ,,, - s c - a . .m, ~ . u m s.

i i

[ ou O rn bd be i at t_:

kE- EMT120 Afr I

bG WR  !=~V++ e 8 iT (st4c ic C cw we Uprec awa I ~A

' i l

2E- GhnttA x.rr C d c ruEEs .

EE O 1T46 C .-ET) bdc m A bha r - . ,

~

e O

i O O *

  • M e . . M e. W g e e e , _

O**

e e o e

T I M

+

c l

~

1 d{ T

! g%

I 'sQ I e

o ,I e

=

s' 4d ,

,s i:

I i* g M t

- .- 5 -

5 .; m i 3 EE E E 7t 5 e

c= y n

~ 3 <

%f 2 o

. . k 7 0

an 'J > 7 I 9 h E si I h

$sc w so as 99 c 2s vs

' ** c . o. a 'S Gaz . ot a s 4a od c

'~

"o E8 a E

u o N

o-S s

2 J

O td:

c O D _ ycEu*Of dvou g

">e#d o v)U ew a V

  • ee o2 - "2 EU o m 55 d ?*E.q q{ c - aw 2vd?#

Ojd- g

" ". W " E C O C _J $ r w

. vt -

IE

~= 5

$R b 5

. .eg *a C 3t3 5C G l2 E .a + n o ~r En y - a mm . 83

" " ~

4 = . z. 2, >s

.M Ed Oc D d' yd 3N oV s '

". G a 5 m e

o oa D J VJ u

- 5 c= b io o

-4 w w uJ u.s '

E .

3 x C Q u

\t a %y -

E \a

~ S E ~

'NW & N< N<

s ~ < 8 2 2 l ~ ' " -5  !

3se i s y c e '

  • Q O e

'4- T C (

m aV '

S o

  • rm

.w w

M~ . R E g m o W rs Ne < t- "

S i- 1::

i - E.- . . d -

! E h S $ E --

5 '

ii 5 s G g. e

a. g g v' AnA M #1

! -T S -

M,? 1 19-QA-06 l

s' ' L ._._7 -R I

\ 2 -J94-3.i- Gb'b- 9 .

. 9 .

i *

  • FORM 6.2-2 4 \s ,

1 l 1

.' $, ( !gil

. Wii. H. ZlHilER POWER STATION llNIT I -

CINClHNATL CAS & El.ECTRIC Co.

, q_ Q c4 .

,t ....

. - QtfALITY C0!!PIRMATION - SAFETY CLASS 1 STRUCTilRAL STEEL. WEl.D$ _ INSPECTInff ItEPORTN. ..

,O ':k s. 6 % c. R/O

,' 1,-

BLOG. ORYWELL S AL DWC. H0. 5-3'1'i c. a/Az SERI AL HO. 5 63C.f.DW o+5-

  • y.a-f- l os vo lo7 Oct. G (s.4s -

,s,t

  • El.EV . 56I. REAM NO. i o g to s o+ Ocr. 6 Ts-9s SHEET f 0F << , . ,

INSPECTOR 6 & b DATE OF INSPECTION I-29-SR

. / '

VISUAL thSPECTION - SKETCH SHEET i  !

. i 10 4 105

,, > . - . 3

1 } I n$ ,hc Y//////// / /l V / / / /, f ' '

s ,s < .

oy / \ -  ; / .

  • O- ', @ NEAR SIDE h

/

HEAR SIDE h

/

/ / i

)- ,

FAR S10E -

FAR SIDE h

. / , .

, /

l / .' '

/

.- r s/ s s /// //n , , , , y , , ,. ,

I._

Y@ - @mi s

t.

/

- xs'. wI , ,,

1 .-

,J,,%,'

. s \ \\N XX X X X \ \ \ u \ \ \\ mu m m m i m m imx x x i m x u x m

. . m m- .  ;

I , k__,__W_______________________________________________U,,m,__j ' ,, 5 -

s

':. . .. '%@ t. n o xisic. NoRTu _._ @/h l

(

n.A. EnciHeEn e . ,-. oAre , -- TASx C00nniHiToa %DAAS, OAT: - 6 en. '.

. . :b - J

, , () - d' J ~ <.*- {, ,:' - b 1

G Q - L.- l _: a.

'. .i b

~

WM. H. ZIMMER POWER STATION UNIT - 1 CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

00ALITY CONFI?.MATION - SAFETY CLASS 1 STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDS - INSFECT40N REPORT BLDG. 01IY W GLt_ S&L DWG. NO. 5-399c

.i- G 3 ul A/O

e/n SERIAL NO. S/, bcow o+5 ELEY." M EG ' ' BEAM NO.i N 2 'e s S S ,fHEET F- 0F /.

INSFECTOR [ d d '/I. d ,7 DATE OF INSPECTION 1 _ p q _ g _1 VISUAL INS?iCTICN - SMETCH SHEET l

WELD WELD C3MDITION WELD CC'iDITION REMARKS NO. SIZE LENGTH LENGTH CETAIL LOCATION Sun c. l5 %~ W l12i l Le,- Moe.2c e s_

7  %." K" I g- lLowse %,2 crevn t_ I Ovcetap 7  %" Ve"X XCo 8" L owcre lhe ,2 ceu 9 %: YiX XCD ?.' veevesc .

h_ Steircs ? K' X." B" L c,m ne me ,2 oo u 8 'Ai X." 8" we-n e ne 8 '/.c Y+" 8" ro g %,2 e u,.m '

Loc.c oc ra,s,od 7 '/ic XJ 8" venc,e n o Peociu- B  %" Xi 8' (couvu) w nc,c A m m m,m,)

s SLAG 3  %' E 8- Venn em.

4-  %~ I" 8' The N on , zem..

I l A rz c % w s 3 %J W 8- L omere. po,e ,2 o-t.

I II %I V4 11 3' rne u wom I2  %; I" iT It m  % , u ,e m .

' c rza ce ) %c )" iy veemcoc. (n, _,.m p 3 l .l 1  %~ Xa" 13' Vecm % /ac amoa i .'

! We %r,te 3 'AJ K B' veement l 'M M:

(or sm ahura i \T  %-e . (na ' '

l __ .

Q.A. TASK \ )/ A ENGINEER A < . ~ . % DATE ; .e s. fl

  • COORDINATOR ,

o J _U., DATE 2re/A2.,

1 ... .. _ .- ---.. . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

l . *. '

i 0 ~ $ k bm"l. '*?.'.'!- 5 s e

~

?.% f ~ ' ~

l0 -

'l ( l .

WM. H. ZIW.ER PCWER STATION UtilT - 1 l

' CINCIHriATI GAS & ELECTRIC CD. .

OUALITY C0f1FIRMATION - SAFETY CLASS 1 STRUCTURAL STEEL WELDS - INSPECTION R

~

BLDG. .ORYWELL S&L DWG. NO. I"IN f $#$a .

i SERIAL NO. S635r.pwo*5 ELEY.,SbP BEAMNO.lEh2l$2$$7((.',YhHEET

  • OF 4

! ItiSPECTOR .424./- / /.d.d,,

- DATE OF INSPECTION )_pq_g2 l

VISUAL ItJSPECTIO?l - SKETCH SHEET l

CD'1DIT! Oil WELD WELD CCtJDITIO!! WELD

' REMARKS

.10. SIZE LE.';GTH LINGTH DETAIL LOCATICil Law cc F mn 3 E I '/ i l8- vmur 4 %J K" B" Lemm Ho e. 2eum e .

+ 7/4 P' 8' Tbg  % . z e ~ m t..

Uwoemn- I  %;' A' X7M 6" @m ou 1

e t

i ufNEER # ___ , DATE s. --n RDINATOR h DATEt/ib2.

m .

d'

[ <{ . -

1 FORH 6.2-1 l '

Wil. II. ZltetER POWER STATION UNIT 1 g CINCINNATI CAS & EI.ECTRIC CO.

03' QUALITY CONFiltitAT10N - SAFETY Ct. ASS I STRUCTURAL. STEEI RE-ENTRANT CORNERS - INSPECTION RF20RT.i, Bl.DC. O R'/ W E ti_ .5-c 3bC R/o S&l. DWC. NO. 5.-381() C e /tiz l SERIAL NO.QG3kqpwo4S 10 5 To 10 ~7 O ct. 6 -188 El.Ev. __5(o I

  • REAM NO.I 05 rn Ioi O ct. G. ,-488 SHEET f 0F _ d;
  • INSPECTOR 2 M DATE OF INSPECTION I-29-02!

-f -

VISUAI. INSPECTION OF RE-ENTRANT CORNERS i

RE-ENTRANT CORNER I.D. ACCEPT REJECT

> REHARKS

  • g?h 6cm 105,o 107 Acceer 7A

~' ' '

4 S5

  • b I

EAm 105 To 104- YA RE.TECT RE -ErdTRAuf (oRNOE HAS 4 CRACsC ~THQT E CENOS T FRovi THE CoRuct To vuE Wstlicau Cl ie WELD. (top AtJO SenTs a

i ... ..

!.....}

i Q.A. ENGINEER M J' m e DATE _ ;t- e

  • c. TASK C00RI)INATOR 1 6

_ DATE J p

b d 0 -

u.

y 0

- 5 v \,

e

- a 5 d D w N

. = a = . =

= m T  :

h

- - \e .

i

= '

T -

i.a:

E i xs d

s w = 3

v. m n -

= ~

w

  • Z

. . E -

n on m a

~

aa m E t

Y ,, r

= V

= i y 0

? Q 3c d * ,

u .

z s .=. .u.

d N3 V d 44 $ -3 d 'N

= -

=

=

~

?!

~ rg E l

VJ u)b = = o .

=  : S Q u a CU

< a d M.c c Iq $

$ 4 a m* C0 w 2. O

- Y. = m o J =

J , =

e g

E .*.

~ -$  ? 0. 0 x- .. $ n 5 d F c 'n p y

= = a

= y d j y

= = =* O .G -

x C i 4 p

-- . P  ?-

  • L

= < m .:  : m 2

g .=.

s - 4

. b .c O ~

a

= .:

~

9 n .:

_ E 2

= .

> V s. h t C y (

O C \, ~.

A \ -

M

\h J / D

  • 8 Q- b - _

=

= Q  % -

- 5

N, I, t

\' \ t

=

% s 6

L* i, n- ..

p i .,

rv

-- 9 -

G N

..Q- ..

$ - s s i -

~ -

>. J N -

a E. .- 4 o

W = \ _N

6

=

= .: * ..

.~

= --R .- -

-. 4

~

- =-

= - '

. a. .no.m-. ,. . # 2 C , -----.] 19-QA-07

. 7' W Rev. 1

., .. , j .= _ ,o

. . -e * .r

. .. , ,