ML20054A858
| ML20054A858 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/02/1981 |
| From: | NRC - SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW |
| To: | NRC - SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19310G156 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-81-392 NUDOCS 8204160208 | |
| Download: ML20054A858 (6) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
MINUTES - SALP MEETING 81-07 I
June 2,1981 The SALP Review Group convened at 9:30 a.m. on June 2,1981 for meeting 81-07 in the Air Rights Building Conference Room 5033.
Attendees were:
N. C. Moseley, IE R. A. Purple, NRR C. Michelson, AE0D J. H. Sniezek, IE R. H. Wessman, IE 1.
R. H. Wessman briefed the SALP Review Group on facility reviews.
Conclusions reached are as follcws:
a.
Midl and.
Regional actions approved.
All Review Group members concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " poor."
b.
Marble Hill.
Regional actions approved.
Moseley, Purple and Michelson concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " poor."
Sniezek abstained as: (1) facility construction was halted pursuant to an NRC Stop Work Order d/uring most of the evaluation period; (2) SALP Board recommendations were not provided to the Review Group; and (3) there was insufficient basis for a vote on facility performance.
c.
Kewaunee.
Regional actions approved.
All Review Group members concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " average."
d.
Davis-Besse.
Regional actions approved.
Moseley, Purple and Michelsen concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " average-candidate for poor."
Sniezek considers this facility to tentatively be " poor."
e.
Point Beach.
Regional actions approved.
All Review Group members concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " good."
f.
Duane Arnold.
Regional actions approved.
Moseley, Purple and Sniezek concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " average."
Michelson considers this facility to tentatively be " average-candidate for poor."
g.
FitzPatrick.
Regional actions approved.
Sniezek, Purple and Michelson concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " poor."
Moseley considers this facility to tentatively be " average-candidate for poor."
h.
Indian Point Unit 2.
Regional actions approved.
All Review Grcup members concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " average-candidate for poor."
i.
Indian Point Unit 3.
Regional actions approved.
All Review Group members
\\<
concurred that this facility was tentatively considered to be " average."
UDELL81 -392 PDR
16 m 2.
The Review Group re-examined those facilities previously considered as
" average-candidate for good."
Big Rock Point was rated " average."
The following facilities were rated "above average:"
Vermont Yankee Fort Calhoun Millstone Cooper Farley Oconee Prairie Island 3.
Comments on NRC Manual Chapter 0516 were discussed.
sassman will provide a re-draft of the definitions for Review Grvup approval on an expedited basis.
Various other changes were incorporated into the Manual Chapter, based on Review Group comments.
A revision will be issued for regional office use and for agency review and conments.
4.
The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, June 9,1981 at 9:30 a.m.
in H. C. Moseley's office in the Air Rights Building, Room 5301.
The agenda will be:
(a) facility reviews.
(b) re-examine facilities tentatively considered as " average-candidate for poor." (The attached " score sheet" lists these facilities).
(c) review draft 2 of the final report.
O b
p Operating Reactors Avg-Candidate Above Average Average for Poor Poor Rsgion I Yankee Rowe Ginna Calvert Cliffs Peach Bottom Vermont Yankee Main Yankee Indian Point 2 Salem Millstone 1, 2 Haddam neck Beaver Valley i Indian Point 3 Oyster Creek Pilgrim FitzPatrick Region II Oconee North Anna Crystal River 3 Surry Farley
- McGuire 1 Browns Ferry Brunswick Robinson Hatch Sequoyah 1 Turkey Point St. Lucie 1 Region III Prairie Island Zion Lacrosse Palisades Point Beach Quad Cities DC Cook Dresden Davis-Besse Monticello Big Rock Point Newaunee Duane Arnold i
V
- Evaluated with operating reactors
O e
Operating Reactors (Continued)
Avg-Candidate Above Average Average for Poor Poor Region IV Cooper Ft. St. Vrain Arkansas Fort Calhoun mjan San Onofre 1 Region V Rancho Seco Totals:
9 19 11 9
i i
\\
Construction Reactors Avg-Candidate Avg-Candidate Good for Good Average for Poor Poor agion I Hope Creek Seabrook Limerick egion II Shearon Harris Summer McGuire 2 Catawba Grand Gulf Watts Bar Cherokee Sequoyah 2 Yellow Creek Phipps Bend Hartsville Bellefonte Vogtle l
Zimmer Midland
)gionIII Perry Fermi Marble Hill-LaSalle Braidwood Bryon Callaway Clinton o
kM
Construction Reactors
,m (Continued)
Avg-Candidate Avg-Candidate Good for Good Averaoe for Poor Poor Egion IV Wolf Creek River Ben'd Commanche Peak Waterford 3 egion V WNP-3/5 WNP-1/4 WNP-2 San Onofre 2, 3 Palo Verde
>tals 0
0 27 5
3 O
I
--