ML20054A835
| ML20054A835 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Catawba |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1981 |
| From: | NRC - SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW |
| To: | NRC - SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19310G156 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-81-392 NUDOCS 8204160188 | |
| Download: ML20054A835 (5) | |
Text
... -...
O MINUTES - SALP MEETING 81-04 MARCH 31,1981 The SALP Board convened at 9:15 e.m. on March 31, 1981.
D. G. Eisenhut chaired this meeting in place of N. C. Moseley, the Board's Chairman.
Attendees are listed in Enclosure 2.
1.
D. G. Eisenhut informed the Board that:
a.
Project Managers (PM) write-ups would not be available for the River Bend and Shearon Harris facilities since they did not have assigned PMs; and b.
No additional PM input would be available for the Zimmer facility other than a statement that the PM concurs with the Region III report.
In this regard, Enclosure 3 provides a listing of PMs' input required by April 8,1981 for the forthcoming April 24 and 28,1981 SALP meetings.
2.
R. H. Wessman briefed the SALP Board on the facility data packages.
Facility packages reviewed by the SALP Board and conclusions reached are as follows:
a.
Catawba 1, 2 (Regional Evaluation:
September 1979 - August 1980)
With the consideration of the additional information requested in the March 31 SALP meeting, the Board approved Region II's Action Plan and concurred that Catawba 1, 2 is tentatively considered " average" and is a candidate for poor ranking.
b.
Callaway 1, 2 (Regional Evaluation:
July 1,1979 - June 30,1980)
The SALP Board approved Region III's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Callaway 1, 2 is tentatively considered " average."
c.
Zimmer (Regional Evaluation:
October 1979 - September 1980)
The SALP Board approved Region III's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Zimmer is tentatively considered " average" and is a candidate for a poor ranking.
d.
Shearon Harris 1-4 (Regional Evaluation:
September 1979 - August 1980)
The SALP Board. approved Region II's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Shearon Harris 1-4 is tentatively considered " average."
e.
River Bend 1 (Regional Evaluation:
September 1979 - August 1980)
The SALP Board approved Region IV's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that River Bend 1 is tentatively considered " average."
8204160188 811103 PDR FOIA UDELL81-392 PDR
. f.
Commanche Peak (Regional Evaluation:
August 1979 - July 1980)
The SALP Board approved Region IV's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Commanche Peak is tentatively considered " average."
g.
Clinton 1 (Regional Evaluation:
July 1979 - June 1980)
The SALP Board approved Region III's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Clinton 1 is tentatively considered " average."
h.
Monticello (Regional Evaluation:
October 1979 - September 1980)
The SALP Board approved Region III's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Monticello is tentatively considered " average."
i.
Prairie Island 1, 2 (Regional Evaluation:
September 1979 - August 1980)
The SALP Board approved Region III's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Prairie Island is tentatively considered " average" and is a candidate for a good ranking, j.
Crystal River (Regional Evaluation:
May 1979 - April 30,1980)
The SALP Board approved Region II's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Crystal River is tentatively considered " average" and is a candidate for a poor ranking.
k.
Farley,1, 2 (Regional Evaluation:
April 1979 - April 1980)
The SALP Board approved Region II's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Farley 1, 2 is tentatively considered " average" and is a candidate for a good ranking.
1.
Robinson 2 (Regional Evaluation:
April 1979 - May 1980)
The SALP Board approvea Region II's Action Plan.
All Board members concurred that Robinson 2 is tentatively.onsidered " average."
--.--r-w..
. 3.
During this meeting, the following items were discussed:
a.
Upcoming Regional SALPs o Nine Mile Point 1, 2 Region I - April 1, 1981 o Salem Region I - April 6,1981 (2nd round) o Beaver Valley Region I - April 13,1981 (2nd round)
Note:
anyone planning to attend meeting (s) should confirm dates with SALP Staff.
b.
April SALP Meetings Agendas o On April 24, 1981, will cover non-TVA facilities.
o On April 28, 1981, TVA facilities will be considered, as well as others selected by the SALP Staff.
c.
PMs' Inputs It was recommended by the Board that the PMs' write"ups clearly indicate how long the PM was assigned to the facility under evaluation.
d.
Appendix "A" of Regional Evaluation Reports It was recommended by the Board that this Appendix "A" contain the nane of plant under evaluation.
ATTENDEES - SALP MEETING OF MARCH 31, 1981 l
D. G. Eisenhut, NRR J. M. Taylor, IE J. H. Sniezek, IE R. H. Wessman, IE R. A. Purple, NRR C. A. Heit, NRR C. Michelson, AEOD i-t l
l t
l
Enciosure 3
- e:
5 3
Project Manager submittals required for previously reviewed packages:
i.
I Quad Cities 1, 2 Dresden 1, 2, 3 lb,..
c.
McGuire 1, 2 Cherokee 1, 2, 3 LaSalle 1, 2 Byron 1, 2 T....
r Braidwood 1, 2 Project Manager submittals required for April 1981 SALP Meeting (need by April 8 to allow processing and distribution):
Rancho Seco Bellefonte 1, 2
~Nine Mile Point 1 Yellow Creek 1, 2 Nine Mile Point 2 Big Rock PaloVerde 1, 2, 3 Palisades Waterford 3
-Midland 1, 2
' Browns Ferry 1, 2, 3 Susquehanna Sequoyah 1, 2 Hope Creek 1, 2
-Phipps Bend 1, 2 Limerick 1, 2 Watts Bar 1, 2 Seabrook 1, 2 Hartsville,1, 2, 3, 4 g
e g S 7 Q-g j