ML20053E625
| ML20053E625 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Saint Lucie |
| Issue date: | 01/25/1982 |
| From: | Stohr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Grimes B NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20049J052 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-82-195, REF-SSINS-0940 NUDOCS 8206090085 | |
| Download: ML20053E625 (2) | |
Text
' ~. ',
.e..
.4
..,. ~.
Up
- g"**g UNITED STATES
.. p 4
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
REGION ll
(
101 MARIETTA ST. M.W EUITE 3100 ATL.ANTA, GEORGI A 30303 N...q JAN 2 51982 3
SSINS 0940 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Emergency Preparedness, Office of Inspection and Enfort:ement FROM:
J. Philip Stohr, Director, Division of Emergency Prepandness and Operational Support, RII StBJECT:
ST. LUCIE - EMERGENCY PLANNING Transmitted herewito for your information and action as appropriate' is a copy of a memrandum from the State Liaison Officer, RII to the undersigned, dated.
January 22, 1982 Please note that this itemorandum discusses several major concerns relative to emergency planning at the State and local level and with the interface of these entities with FP&L's St. Lucie facility.
d We are particularly concemed with the status of the St. Lucie County resolution, dated April 3.1981, and the City of Port St. Lucie resolution dated May 4,1981.
NRC was petitioned (Harold Centon and Chainnan Ahearne, respectively) regarding
(~
each of these resolutions and was requested to take action or require FP&L to take action to resolve the issues contained therein.
We are not aware of any x' -
NRC HQ action on these two petitions.
Another area of some lingering concern is that the early ~ warning and notificatfor system in the vicinity of St. Lucie may be incapable of full implementation by 7
February 1,1982.
The County of St. Lucie and the State were at an irrpasse in this regard.
FP&L apparently negotiated with the State to provide a sum of $200/
siren / year for maintenance.
St. Lucie County for some time now was not willing k
to accept the system on these terms and feels that these monies will not t
adequately cover insurance, naintenance, vandalism and replacement.
We have
@}y discussed this issue with FP&L on January 4,1982, and were advised that FP&L was scheduled to meet with the St. Lucie County Commissioners on January 11-12, 1982 to discuss a revised three party contract (including the State, the County and FP&L) dealing with the early waming system.
Subsequent to these neetings, 1
FP&L advised NRC on January 12. 1982, that the St. Lucie County Comissioners had. approved the content and they were expected to sign off on it during the week of January 18.
Although no problems are anticipated in Dade County for the early warning and notification system for Turkey Point, please note that it is FP&L's desire to have the contract read identical for both sites.
Hence, there possibly could be an administrative deley until the Dade County Comissioners meet and fonnally approve the content.
There is also some concem as to whether FP&L will complete the mquired systems check of these systems by Februa.y 1,19s A major full field exercise is scheduled for February 10-13, 1982, involving
(
the State of Florida, local governments and the FP&L St'. Lucie facility.
As of this date, the State still does not have a plan which carries the endorsem3nt of FEMA IV or the Regional Assistance Connittee.
Several versions of the Florida plan were reviewed during the past eighteen calendar months and the most recent review bv the RAC occurred on December '15-16,1981.
e 8206090085 820511 PDR FOIA REYNOLDB2-199 WC9
c.
Brian K. Grimes JAN 2 51882
[
FEM IV. advised Governor Graham on Ibcerrber 29, 1981, that the Florida plan still does not meet the guidance providad for in NVREG-0654/ FEM-REP-1.
The Regional State Liaison Officer and the Chairman of RAC IV net with State officials on January 8,1982, to discuss these concerns and other matters related to their cmergency prepamdness program.
The state was receptive to these corments and agreed to make the necessary revisions.
In sumnary, there are still a nu:rber of open issues relative to emergency planning mgarding the St. Lucie facility.
Consequently, it is-not co@letely clear what position or actions the local governments will pursue inmediately before or during the conduct of the upco:ning full field exercise.
There are indications, however, that relationship anong the State, local governrients and FP&L has recently improved.
We will continue to follow these areas closely.
Please advise this office of any NRC HQ actions, either planned or cocipleted.
to resolve these issues.
em
.t J.
hili Stohr Inclosure:
As Stated O
9
(
i h
..