ML20053E623

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Updated Info Re Status of Prompt Notification Sys for Facilities.Util Expects to Meet 820201 Deadline
ML20053E623
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Browns Ferry
Issue date: 01/21/1982
From: Stohr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Grimes B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20049J052 List:
References
FOIA-82-195, REF-SSINS-9199 NUDOCS 8206090082
Download: ML20053E623 (3)


Text

_ _ _

' p >>* ** %r s

z UNITED STATES 1

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

  • 78 S

If HEGION 11 i #

e th) *AAHlf I l A S1, N W., SulTE UfW)

ATLANTA, CEORGIA 30303

(

J A N 21 1982 SSINS 9199 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Brian K. Grimes, Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness, IE FROM:

J. Philip Stohr, Director, Division of Emergency Preparedness and Operational Support, RII M G 'l. 'bl-

SUBJECT:

UPDATED INFORMATION ON STATUS OF PROMPT NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (PNS)

As we had discussed, enclosed is a completed data sheet for TVA's Browns Ferry plant pursuant to the memo from R. C. DeYoung to Regional Administrators, " Decision on Enforcement Actions on Prompt Notification

{

l Syscems".

This background information is provided even though TVA states, as of January 20, they expect to meet.the February 1,1982 deadline.

We j

have informed TVA of the nature of the operability test we expect by February 1,1982.

j Y

J.

ilip Stohr

~

Enclosure:

As Stated agg6gosa saasti REYNOLD82-195 PDR

o 9

INFORMTION SHEET (Facilities Expected to Miss February 1,1982 Data)

(.

Subject:

Promot. Public Alert' and Notification Systems

n. Background 1.

Facility: & ^ ' '

i, 2.

Size:

3.

EP2 Site l

B.

Alert _ System Data and Curmnt Status 1.

lype of alert systeet:

"::- " e r d.'

I' 4 -

5 M'o$t c 5 ( W h r W A hkd6

.,, r.,. w>

.s.r.

2.

Dates design study initiated and completed:

h % *d l f.13v ' f 2,2

" n

!<*!ri.

~p

  • ; c.

.fI

?% f :,.. '. '".s 'T If. A i

~

  1. $ Y NTI

~

f 3.

Dat$ equipment orce M :

(

j & lic,

.a i -. ~.'i - !5.z~.<, D. o i

'N

-, :), ;;E 3 ~ C $. E '/t) : k '

. ::.c, :

' kount of e 4

=6f.;.'; : ' quipment on hand:, ; i. J

%i *j. i *==.k :W r ' ] gY',,b h^' ' "i

,da;;

s. i

.s a-

. r n-r.

~'

,sn.C. 5- ~, s

. 2.

r.

'
- H.:

.5.. n 5-

. :-:.4y;p r c? ?Apr?'2--

5.

Date installation of equipr6ent began:

2.w.No v 6/

6.

Dsta installation of equipment completed:

/

A,/4 7.

Fraction of ' system installed:

7j:.,_,

~

.;20 P s S2.

o:

8.

y>, t... ;. kr n. + / -Date of initial alerting systep,, test:r=ivis f x =

',.(.

~,

e 9.

Results of initial ale-ttag syste.1 test and scheduling for fixing ceficiencies s'/. 't.-

i

,JCI Date of alert and notification test (evaluated by FD%)

.t J. ;- -

W.' Resul ts of alb 2nc o-i'ha-ic" :ast and senecule for fixing

(

ceficiencies 'by FE.41}

t' f f, r.,

____---a

2-1 12.

7 poosed comoensap*ory, measures until alert system initial test

. h e.- 4;.:'. e y r.- ; e s

'y..,

n.

gm y..

c C. f.eisr w :st..,.i s. j..:.y.,y...

.! ~,.

.-3

.e...

Factors bearing off enforcement in addition to items B.2-8 and_12 _ebove

' Ii b d i o :

1.

Equipz!nt. Vendor problems 'i h r.

'N' rs:-u /: ~,'.;! r.L.,.n :.v -. b i;. 2.' 5.

.,,.,.- a..

.v - i ? Ja,.;;

~I N'av. E be /a-fe,,u debvn t.

fa s doe, 5.& r. ' :.

' 't' ' -

?

s.-

r s

I j* tA 8 0.l e.4,1 t';n f e wj -

  • -l 9

f 8

/

~e 2.

Local design aoproval problems

' ^ './ " '+r~,,;,;. %.,

.-l

. s.. -', -

?e l

..1.. c.,-r

,; v t.,.

*E Ai li.

. m n 41-i:, i,

?.: - ' 'ip.2 --fa e $ r 4 7.

1 1

3.

Right of way problems 4'

p r-y:ri:-f b nIY h ** '

WY

~'.Y

  • g t

r

%'.;t 1* Y s.

4.

FCC* frequency (1 Scanse) pmblems

' ' I 0.' " ' " ' t' a

.- a 4

f.s j

/.11.s

.u..; l,p.y

,.....,,,. ~/f,,'v: pi li c u c o 0

.,,,: -.i~.,..:, ~c. ;

4

f r.;

_j

..j.,.

- r,

y :. r c 6_

as<

, v r : s.~ i

~,: pp i.:

,s~

I 5.

Adverse weather 5 '* M r 0/[A c r hu

~ b/#

6.

Licensee written coconunications to.1RC on factors above r

J j!j,n ~f rf s j

~s o

G

- -